by Jimmie Moglia for The Saker Blog
That all the world is a stage and all men and women merely players is a familiar and generally accepted proposition. But many, prompted by curiosity and helped by new information previously unknown or uneasily available, would like to know more about the play they are the unwitting players thereof.
Which transforms the frame of mind of the curious into that of a historian. In turn, this exposes him to the immediate problem of interpretation. Interpretation of the historical facts themselves, often accompanied by a likely change of his worldview, following the discovery of new facts. For historians themselves can modify their views, when forced by the train of circumstances.
Here is an example. Friedrich Meinecke was an eminent German historian, with an unusually long life span, during which a series of revolutionary and extraordinary changes affected the fortunes of Germany. His books reflect four different Meinecke(s), each the spokesman of different times, and each speaking through one of his major works.
In his first, “World Citizenship and the Nation State,” published in 1907, Meinecke sees the embodiment of German national ideals in Bismarck’s Reich. And like many 19th and 20th century thinkers, he identifies nationalism with the highest form of universalism.
Here is dramatic evidence of the revolution of the times. In the parlance of current Western European & American elites, nationalism, rather than a higher form of universalism, is labeled as ‘fascism’ or ‘racism’. And since the characterization is ludicrous, a new word has been coined, ‘populism’, to demean and disgrace the idea.
In his second book, “The Idea of the Raison d’Etat,” (published in 1925), Meinecke speaks with the divided and bewildered mind of an observer of the Weimar Republic – where the world of politics has become an arena of unresolved conflict between the reason-of-state and morality. Morality, of itself, seems external to politics, but in the last resort it affects the life and security of any state. For morality is written in the human heart, even of those who hold it in contempt.
To frame the issues in today’s terms, since the end, in the 1950s, of the “Legion of Decency” act in American Cinema,” Hollywood’s productions have set the standard, planted the roots and sowed the of seeds of shame and iniquity, in just about all domains of collective and personal behavior.
In the Weimar Republic, as we know, it was the state of universal degradation, promoted, inculcated and imposed upon Germany after her defeat in WW1, that prompted the birth and growth of National Socialism.
In his “Development of Historicism” (published in 1936), Meinecke laments the idea of a certain view of history, which seems to recognize that whatever is, is right.
In our days, examples of this ‘historicism’ are many, from the totally unbelievable official explanation of 9/11, to the physical destruction of the Middle East, the ongoing farce in Ukraine, the grotesque Russophobia, the idea that Western European and North-American states can exist without borders, and so on.
Finally, in 1946, after seeing his country defeated and leveled to the ground, he published “The German Catastrophe,” where he exposes the belief that history is at the mercy of blind and inexorable forces.
That the times we live-in weigh on our thoughts and judgment is as obvious as saying that a great cause of the night is lack of the sun. Nevertheless, our individual evolving point of view also influences the selection of the facts needed to produce an acceptable explanation of causes and effects, or of causes and defects as the case may be.
That is, the historian and the facts of history are necessary to one another. For a historian without his facts is futile; and facts without a historian are dead and meaningless.
Finally – and I hope the strenuous reader will forgive the long preamble, though I hope there is method in the meandering – not all facts are historical. History begins when the historian selects certain facts and declares them endowed with historical value.
But the distinction between historical and unhistorical facts is not rigid or constant. Any fact may become historical, once its relevance and significance is recognized. If so, that fact generates its own historical wave, whose effects may be felt after a long time and with enormous power, unimaginable when the fact occurred.
In nature an analogy is the tsunami, where, at the point of origin, the waves are only about 3 feet high. But travelling at incredible speed across incredible distances, they finally release their apocalyptic energy on touching land.
As someone ‘curious about history’ and not a professional historian, I experienced a change of outlook on historical events when the United States declared war on Iraq and destroyed it. For I knew the country well and I could personally attest that all that was said about Iraq by the organs of mass persuasion, was false. And while accepting the inherent murkiness of politics, I could not reconcile myself to the idea that the two Bushes, one of whom is dead, could be some of the lyingest knaves in Christendom.
As it is universally accepted, the US destroyed Iraq to satisfy Israel’s ambitions. And given that curiosity is the mother of explanation, I took up the doubtful challenge of locating the original historical fact, the trigger and the source of the wave-of-time, which eventually led to the Iraqi Armageddon and beyond.
In this and similar instances, opinion reigns supreme. Other ‘curious about history’ may choose another episode or fact, and with good reason. But sometimes, lesser-known events, singularly representative of the reality and culture of an era, can offer a perspective different from the conventional and usual narratives.
In the instance, I pinpoint the source of the topic wave-of-time in Napoleon’s emancipation of the Jews in France, following the French Revolution.
Actually, already in 1791, in the midst of the Revolution, the National Assembly had granted Jews full citizenship. It was hoped that, by so doing, Jews would stop acting like a separate nation within France. But soon there were complaints that the Jews were stuck in their old ways, particularly in Alsace and Lorraine, where their majority lived. Their ‘old ways’ referred to usury, or, as we would say today ‘financial engineering’, or ‘banking shenanigans’.
The situation remained fluid and uncertain till Napoleon, converted from a servant of the Republic into an Emperor, convened, in 1807, what he called the Great Sanhedrin, to resolve the controversial issues arisen from the emancipation. The Great Sanhedrin refers to the governing body of the Jewish community, notably during the Roman Empire.
To a council of 71 Jewish leaders and rabbis, Napoleon posed 12 questions about their laws and customs. Some questions were amusing – for example, were Jews allowed to have more than one wife? The main issue, however, was whether Jews born in France, and now treated by law as citizens, would regard France as their country. They answered that there was nothing inherent in their religion preventing the full integration of the Jewish community into French life. This was enough to confirm their full recognition and emancipation, along with an obligation to take up French names.
Perhaps Napoleon ignored that if a rose by any other name would smell as sweet, a Shylock, by any other name would still call for his pound of flesh.
In fact, there was immediate widespread opposition to the move, in French-ruled Europe and in France itself. Even one of Napoleon’s famous generals, Francois Christophe de Kellerman, whose name is inscribed in the Arc de Triomphe, recommended strongly that the Jews be prohibited from dealing in commerce.
With easy hindsight, Napoleon, like all who like to anticipate futurity and exalt possibility to certainty, might or should have avoided this adventure, so linked to chance. For, in this and other similar instances, disappointment must always be proportionate to the breath of the original hopes.
The pressure became so intense that soon Napoleon restricted the terms of emancipation, via the so-called “Infamous Decree” of 1808. The decree annulled, reduced or postponed all debts with Jews, and imposed a ten-year ban on any kind of Jewish money-lending activity.
As an aside, the official public face of a notable politician or ruler, often conflicts with his private persona, as seen in his diaries or confidential papers. In a letter to his brother Jérome Napoleon, dated 6 March 1808, Napoleon writes, “I have undertaken to reform the Jews, but I have not endeavored to draw more of them into my realm. Far from that, I have avoided doing anything which could show any esteem for the most despicable of mankind.”
“Give me ten thousand eyes, and I will fill them with prophetic tears” – said Cassandra predicting the fall of Troy. The most Cassandra-like admonition given to Napoleon came from his uncle, Cardinal Fesh, who told him, “Sire, by giving the Jews equality as Catholics, you wish for the end of the world to come.”
But the onrush of events, including Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo, inaugurated a new era. When an atheistic ideology, molded in the Age of Enlightenment, and strengthened by the impact of the French Revolution, took hold and spread at large throughout Europe.
For the 19th century saw an upsurge of anti-clerical movements and ideologies in the Western world. This is not a wholesale defense of organized religion. Nevertheless, religion also acts as a bulwark of the moral law. And irrespective of specific customs or ceremonies, religion – without disrespect – is metaphysics for the people, an intelligible intimation of eternity, an unthreatening glimpse of the infinity, a psychological safeguard from the despair of mortality.
In this context, it is not accidental that the rebirth of Russia, earlier ravaged, debased and plundered by the dissolvers of the Soviet Union, has seen the resurgence of her religion, which was dormant but never died.
Compare this with America, with her enforced and compulsive secularization, the banning of religion in schools and the prohibition of public display of religious symbols.
But I digress. Let’s return to the subject at hand. After 1815, Jewish supremacy, especially in the banking field, asserted itself in Europe, spearheaded by the ubiquitous House of the Rothschilds. In the second part of the century, England even had a Jewish Prime Minister, Disraeli.
During that time, with a pronouncement that today seems impossible, the Vatican declared that any country that abolishes the Christian religion will be run by Jews.
It’s worth transcribing an extract from a 1890 issue of “Civilta’ Cattolica,” the key media organ of the Jesuits and the Vatican,
“The XIXth century will end, in Europe, leaving her in the throngs of a very sad issue, of which the XXth century will feel consequences so calamitous, as to induce her (Europe) to drastically deal with it. We refer to the improperly-called “Semitic Question,” that more accurately should be called “Judaic Question” – which is connected via an intimate link, to the economic, moral, political and religious conditions of Europe.
How fervid at present and how much this question perturbs the major nations, is manifest by the common cry against the invasion by Jews in all spheres of public and social life; by the leagues formed to slow its advance in France, Austria, Germany, Italy, Russia, Rumania and elsewhere. By the calls for action in various Parliaments – by the large number of newspaper articles, books and pamphlets that are constantly printed, all showing the need to stem the growth of this plague, and to combat it, showing evidence of its very pernicious consequences….
Naively, some try to show that the ”Judaic Question” is the result of a (Christian) hatred of the (Judaic) religion or sect. Mosaism (read ‘religion inspired by Moses) in itself could not be an argument for hatred…. for it was the antecedent of Christianity… But for centuries Judaism has turned its back on Mosaism, exchanging it with the Talmud, quintessence of that pharisaism, many times blasted by Christ…. And although Talmudism is an integral element of the Jewish question, we cannot say that (Talmudism) is all that relevant to it (Judaic question). For in Talmudism the Christian nations detest not so much the theological part, almost reduced to insignificance, but the moral one, that contradicts the elementary principles of natural ethics…. “
Incidentally, and as another aside, it is customary to describe the roots of European culture as “Judeo-Christian.” Many contend that a better description would be the “Greek-Christian” tradition, as certain important tenets of Christianity are actually derived from Plato. For example, he suggested that a trinity of forces shapes the cosmos and he struggled with the idea of a Being, purely incorporeal, executing a perfect model of the universe and molding with his hand what was but a rude chaos of random forces.
As an explanation, or at least a theory, Plato considered the divine nature of the universe under three modifications. There was indeed a first cause, the Reason or Logos, the soul of the universe, along with three subdivisions.
Readers may recall the beginning of St. John’s Gospel, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” where ‘word’ is an imperfect and narrow translation of the Greek ‘logos.’ For one of the meanings of ‘logos’ is indeed ‘word’, but not with sense that we usually attribute to it. A better translation could possibly be, “In the beginning was the Reason of the Universe.”
Plato conceived of 3 original principles, incorporated in the Logos, different, but linked to each other by a mysterious generation.
The important point is that the mystical and mysterious concept of the Trinity is the Christian rendering of Plato’s idea. The Trinity may still remain mysterious, but at least the mind can understand a Father, a Son, and a Holy Spirit, better than Plato’s more symbolic rendering.
Back to the main subject. During the early XXth century three events, distinct but important affected the wave-of-time begun with Napoleon.
One was the establishment of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in 1913 – at first in America but now practically extended and enforced worldwide.
In fairness to its founders and all subsequent members, it should really have been called the ‘Jewish Anti Defamation League.’ Though by astutely avoiding the qualifying adjective, ‘ADL’ suggests impartiality, thus evading suspicion among the majority of the gentiles, who rarely or superficially follow the details of political events and institutions.
The actual purpose of the now ubiquitous and wealthy ADL was and is to aggressively prevent any criticism of Zionism and Israel, by crushing the critics, destroying their career, often depriving them of a livelihood and even removing them from the Congress or the Senate.
Observers may have noticed that when the Prime Minister of Israel addresses a US joint session of Senate and Congress, he routinely receives a record number of standing ovations. And, after an ovation, no one wants to be the first to sit down – presumably but also probably – for fear of being suspected of weaker Pro-Zionist sentiments.
Readers familiar with the Communist world will easily detect the stunning similarities between the new-speak of Communist Eastern Europe and ADL’s new-speak and thought-crime – in America but also in Europe and the English-speaking world at large.
As an example, in December 2018, the owner of a pleasant yet unostentatious house in the Italian provincial city of Aosta, installed a metal gate at the end of his driveway. The gate carried a decorative wrought-iron winged eagle, reminiscent of a National Socialist emblem, though without a swastika or other disturbing symbols.
But it was enough for a rabbi in Turin, 100 km away (and presumably a member of a local ADL chapter), to have a judge issue a search warrant and dispatch the Italian police to execute it against the shocked, bewildered and disbelieving house-dweller.
The police carried a thorough search of the premises, removed his computer, various personal effects and books from his library. In the end all the ‘incriminating’ evidence they found – besides the eagle on the gate – consisted of some books about the history of WW2.
Curiously, the event leading to the founding of the ADL had nothing to do with defamation and all to do with the sexual assault and murder of Mary Phagan, a 13-year old girl in Atlanta, Georgia. Mary worked for the National Pencil Company, and in May 1913 went to her place of work to collect her $1.20 earnings from the company superintendent Leo Frank. She was never seen again. Her body was later found in the basement of the company, mutilated, bruised and with her undergarments torn off. She had been strangled and Frank was the most likely suspect.
At the trial, Frank pleaded innocent and declared himself a victim of hate. But after a thorough investigation, Frank was found guilty. That is when Adolf Kraus, president of the Jewish-American order of B’nai B’rith founded the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. Its charter reads:
“The immediate object of the league is to stop, by appeals to reason and conscience and, if necessary, by appeals to law, the defamation of the Jewish people. Its ultimate purpose is to secure justice and fair treatment to all citizens alike and to put an end forever to unjust and unfair discrimination and ridicule of any sect or body of citizens.”
Sometime later the outgoing governor of Georgia commuted the sentence from death by hanging to life imprisonment. But the leaders of the town were enraged by what they rated a corruption of justice. They dragged Frank from the courthouse and hanged him.
Ever since, Leo Frank is viewed by the ADL as a kind of patron saint; a man whose death serves as a reminder of the depths of depravity to which men can sink when in the grip of xenophobic hatred.
Today, as universally acknowledged, the ADL is the lay arm of the Zionist inquisition and a patently obvious instrument for censorship and the abolition of free speech.
The second momentous event I referred to was the publishing of the so-called Scofield Reference Bible. Which is a Bible annotated by Cyrus Scofield, a man of questionable background though an able manipulator of souls and money.
Scofield and his Bible are responsible for the birth and expansion of Christian Zionism. If there was ever a contradiction in terms, Christian Zionism is one. It created a class of unpaid and obedient political eunuchs at the service of the Zionist state.
Specific and central to Christian Zionist belief is Skofield’s comment on Genesis 12:3 (the words in Italics are the comment). ‘I will bless them that bless thee.’ In fulfillment closely related to the next clause, ‘And curse him that curseth thee.’ Wonderfully fulfilled in the history of the dispersion. It has invariably fared ill with the people who have persecuted the Jew—well with those who have protected him. The future will still more remarkably prove this principle.”
Though a struggling born-again preacher, Scofield became a member of the exclusive New York ‘s Lotus Club, where he was befriended by the Wall Street lawyer Samuel Untermeyer. Untermeyer was instrumental in having Scofield’s annotated bible published.
In Scofield’s biography, written by Joseph Canfield, we read that Scofield’s theology was “most helpful in getting Fundamentalist Christians to back the international interest in one of Untermeyer’s projects—the Zionist Movement.”
Israel holds the Christian Zionists in utter contempt. The Talmud considers Christ a heretic boiling in excrement for eternity, and his mother a whore. Jehovah allows goys to exist so as to be like donkeys in the service of the chosen people.
But according to Fundamentalist preaching, at some unspecified time in the future, there will be what they call a ‘rapture,’ during which the Messiah will return to earth and all Jews will convert to Christianity.
If Fundamentalism were played on a stage it would be condemned as improbable fiction. Even Greek-Roman paganism contains more truth than Fundamentalism and its absurd ‘dispensations,’ as they define their ranting.
For the extravagance of the Grecian mythology proclaimed clearly that the inquirer, instead of being scandalized or satisfied with the literal sense, should diligently explore the occult wisdom, which had been disguised, by the prudence of antiquity, under the mask of myth and the display of follies practiced by the quizzical dynasty of the Olympian Gods.
The Fundamentalists are a large congregation. Israel supplies their leaders with money, endowments and private planes, while feeding and securing their lavish lifestyle.
The third event, whose momentousness and importance is gradually being recognized, was Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi’s launching of the plan for the creation of the European Union, with extraordinary, new and revolutionary characteristics.
He was the son of the Austrian Ambassador to Japan, Heinrich Coudenhove-Kalergi, who was also a great friend of Theodore Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism.
In the 1920s Heinrich’s son, Richard Kalergi, published a few books, the most important of which is “Praktischer Idealismus,” never, as far as I know, printed in English. The book is important because what Kalergi prophesied, promoted and predicted about the fate of Europe is occurring under our own eyes.
Kalergi envisioned a unified Europe, invaded by Africans, who would miscegenate with Europeans, creating a new negroid population, similar in appearance to the characters depicted on the inside walls of Egyptians pyramids and tombs. Ruling over them would be a class of “the best of the Jews” some of whom would intermarry with the best of the European nobility.
In his autobiography Kalergi states that when his book was printed, it came to the attention of the Jewish banker Schiff, who along with the American Jewish banker Warburg generously financed him to carry out his plan. From then on Kalergi would undertake a massive lobbying operation, which – temporarily halted during WW2 – was restarted immediately afterwards.
An Italian history professor, Matteo Simonetti, has published a very interesting book, titled “Kalergi, La Prossima Scomparsa Degli Europei” (Kalergi, The Forthcoming Disappearance of the Europeans) – available at Amazon. In his book, Prof. Simonetti included the most critical pages of Praktischer Idealismus translated from the German. What transpires is even worse than the disappearance of the Europeans.
I quote directly from the translation. At pages 21-22-23 of Praktischer Idealismus we find that “the future race, negroid-caucasian will be composed by people without character, without scruples, weak in their will, without respect (for one another) and untrustworthy. The new race will replace the multiplicity of people with a multiplicity of individuals.”
As for the ruling Jews, Kalergi describes them as “close in blood”, whose “strength of character and sharpness of spirit” predestines them to become “the race of (the new) Europe’s spiritual leaders,“ the “carriers of the nobility of spirit,”…. endowed of superior intelligence, a race of lords (Herrenrasse)… the chosen people (pages 28, 33, 49-51 in the original German book).
But it gets worse. The only free marital union will apply to “the most noble of men and women.” Inferior men and women will mate with their societal equivalent. The “erotic style” of the lower classes will be casual mating. Only the upper classes will enjoy the free formation of families.
The new cultivated nobility of the future will emerge from the divine laws of erotic eugenics. “It is here, in social eugenism, where the new nobility will achieve its historical mission of excellence” (pages 55-57).
The new miscegenated race of the lower classes will live in “factory-cities,” where the factory will be the new “cathedral of work”, the center and object of devotion of the new race of miscegenated goys (page 110).
As for the elimination of genders, Kalergi hints at the formation of a Brave-New-World society. “Today men of both sexes (sic) command political and economic power. The emancipation of woman is but the triumph of the feminine man over the real feminine woman. With the emancipation, the feminine sex is mobilized for a technical war and regimented into the army of labor.” (page 119)
As for democracy, Kalergi says it is an instrument to be discarded, as soon as the new Jewish nobility will be established and in charge. (page 36).
In summary, there we have it – the predicted apocalyptic end of the tsunami – helped and driven by the ADL (at work to criminalize free speech), the fundamentalists (a docile army of spiritual eunuchs in the service of Israel), and the Kalergi Plan (a Europe of Negroids ruled over by Jews).
As universally acknowledged, Jewish elites and politicians are at the forefront of the push for illegal immigration and the abolition of borders, worldwide.
And the Left, deprived of its reference class, the proletariat, has made of the migrants a sort of fig leaf to prove that they still side with the weak. Indeed, migrants are the new proletariat, because their identity (or consciousness thereof) is not here, but elsewhere. But the original inhabitants of the poorer districts of Europe and elsewhere have the right not to be uprooted from their customs by a culturally heterogeneous immigration. The migrants do not reside in London’s Chelsea, New York’s Upper East Side or the posh districts of other cities. Nor they steal the jobs of bank managers and corporate directors.
The chosen elites have decided that people are ugly, dirty, bad and xenophobic because they do not want to accept migrants by the millions. But it is the people who bear the weight of immigration and the loss of manual work.
During the latter years of neo-liberalism and turbo-capitalism, the cultural devaluation of labor has been possible thanks to the reserve army made up of migrants. It is logical that the chosen elites favor immigration. It frees them from relocating in the cesspits of despair, by bringing cesspits and despair to the ugly and xenophobic locals, along with the prospect of a Kalergi-type future.
We cannot know precisely how far the wave-of-time, traced back to Napoleon, has travelled towards its end. For the laws of probability, true in general, fail in the details. But given the essentially unchallenged progress of the wave, I doubt whether the collective consciousness of the European peoples will wake up and prompt them to react effectively in self-defense.
Until historically recently, the Catholic Church provided protection. It preached and prohibited violence against the chosen people, but expected them not to corrupt the culture of the host nation. And she gave them the option of conversion. By converting to Christianity, all true or pretended forms of discrimination would be instantly removed.
But the Catholic Church has lost power and unity. In recent Catholic pronouncements, it is even stated that Jews no longer need to convert to be “saved.” And in current religious ceremonies the brethren are invited to “pray for our elder brothers in the Abrahamic religion.”
Therefore, given that time comes stealing by night and day, I must reluctantly observe that the very shortness of time and the failure of hope will tinge with a deeper shade of brown the evening of our current historical times, and the last act of the play performed on the current historical stage.
“The main issue, however, was whether Jews born in France, and now treated by law as citizens, would regard France as their country. They answered that there was nothing inherent in their religion preventing the full integration of the Jewish community into French life”.
Am I alone in seeing that as a bold evasion of the question? The answer said that “there was nothing inherent in their religion preventing full integration”.
This is as if someone asked a person whether he promised to abide by the law, and he replied that there was nothing to prevent him doing so.
Nothing would illustrate better the real stand of the Jews in France, than the foundation in France in 1860 of the ‘Alliance Israélite Universelle’, by Adolphe Crémieux.
“Isaac-Jacob Adolphe Crémieux (30 April 1796 – 10 February 1880) was a French lawyer and politician who served as Minister of Justice under the Second Republic (1848) and Government of National Defense (1870–1871). He was a staunch defender of the rights of the Jews of France…
Crémieux did much to better the condition of the Jews. In 1827, he advocated the repeal of the ‘More judaico’, legislation stigmatizing the Jews left over from pre-revolutionary France. He founded the ‘Alliance Israelite Universelle’* in Paris in 1860, becoming its president four years later. In 1866 Crémieux traveled to Saint Petersburg to successfully defend Jews of Saratov who had been accused in a case of blood libel…
While in the government of the national defence, he secured full citizenship for the Jews in French-ruled Algeria, through the Crémieux Decree (décret no 136 du 24 octobre 1870). The decree allowed for native Jews to become French citizens while Muslim Arabs and Berbers were excluded and remained under the second-class ‘indigenous’ status outlined in the Code de l’Indigénat. This set the scene for deteriorating relations between the Muslim and Jewish communities, and later proved fateful in the Algerian War of Independence, after which the vast majority of Algerian Jews emigrated to France…
Initiated freemason in 1818, at “Bienfait Anonyme” Grand Orient de France lodge in Nîmes, he joined “Aide-toi , le Ciel taidera” lodge in Paris during 1830. In 1866 he joined Suprême Conseil de France and became 33rd degree and Great Commander in 1868. During his masonic career, he encouraged republicans and monarchists to work together…
*The Alliance israélite universelle (Hebrew: כל ישראל חברים) is a Paris-based international Jewish organization founded in 1860 by the French statesman Adolphe Crémieux to safeguard the human rights of Jews around the world. The organization promotes the ideals of Jewish self-defense and self-sufficiency through education and professional development. It is noted for establishing French-language schools for Jewish children throughout the Mediterranean in the 19th and early 20th century.
The motto of the organization is the Jewish rabbinic injunction Kol yisrael arevim ze laze (כל ישראל ערבים זה לזה), translated into French as Tous les israélites sont solidaires les uns des autres (“All Jews bear responsibility for one another”).
At his discourse at the inauguration of the Alliance (founded with the generous contribution of the Rothschilds) Cremieux announced the aims of the organization:
“« L’Union que nous désirons fonder ne sera pas une Union française, anglaise, irlandaise ou allemande, mais une Union juive universelle. […] Dispersés parmi les autres nations, qui depuis un temps immémorial furent hostiles à nos droits et à nos intérêts, nous désirons premièrement être et rester immuablement Juifs. Notre nationalité, c’est la religion de nos pères, et nous ne reconnaissons aucune autre nationalité…”
[The Union we wish to found will not be a French, English, Irish or German Union, but a universal Jewish Union … Dispersed among other nations, which from time immemorial have been hostile to our rights and our rights. interests, we first desire to be and remain immutably Jewish. Our nationality is the religion of our fathers, and we do not recognize any other nationality].
This is astonishing. The French government was obviously and already in the hands of the International finance. Otherwise, this organisation could have never been licensed by a sovereign state.
came across this quote which is completely new to me: Author I believe is an Elizabeth Dilling
Woodrow Wilson was their tool. The banking system is like the circulatory and nervous system of society rolled into one. Its goal is to expand its credit monopoly into a monopoly over everything including thought.This is Communism. Society has no future unless “debt” is disowned.
A mind bending article which brings many pieces of puzzle together for me.
Ps: watch your back Jimmie!
Your essays are rays of light and hope in this dark time, Mr. Moglia. Mods, is there a place to view Mr. Moglia’s essays for this site over the years? (Just wondering and tnx in advance)
Some good history here. It is imperative to become educated in the history of the Jews. Another good resource is Douglas Reed’s “The Controversy of Zion.”
@ certain important tenets of Christianity are actually derived from Plato… the mystical and mysterious concept of the Trinity is the Christian rendering of Plato’s idea.
Actually, Plato’s idea was an ‘antitypos’ (a symbolic foreshadowing) of the Trinity (like the three men appeared at Abraham’s tent next to the Oaks of Mamre near Hebron, in the Old Testament).
Trinity was fully revealed at the Theophany (hey, it was just yesterday).
Christianity (i.e. the Church) is not ‘derived’ from ‘Judaism’, or ‘Hellenism’, or from a combination of both, wrapped in simple terms for the feeble minded.
‘Christianity’ ‘derives’ from the Crucified and Resurrected Christ “unto the Jews a scandal, and unto the Gentiles foolishness”, who will become allies in their fight against the Church. The ‘Catholic Church’ capitulated to both. First by ‘rationalizing’ the Trinitarian message (filioque) and then by proclaiming that the Jews do not need the Christ.
Anon,
Actually, Hellenes from the prehistoric days (6000BC and before) believed in one and only creator. The Mythical Gods including Olympic Gods were actually real people who were Pelazgoi=proto-Hellenes). Most of them born in Thessaly. Interestingly enough they ended up on the mount of Olympus to escape the great Flood Cataclysm when the ice started to melt in Northern and Central Europe. The God creator created the Original Pelazgo who then gave birth to the Olympic Gods and the Hellens. If you pay attention to Pre-History=>Mythology you will see that none of the said Olympic Gods had a power to create. They could only procreate with their brethren Hellens and created demigods. So, to make story short Platon continued on the earlier history writings.
Contrary to popular belief Aigiptos (Egipt) was always part of the Hellenic world including Plato’s days.
look at this map https://www.ancient.eu/Hellenic_World/
@ Anonymous
The dialogue is ostensibly between Parmenides and Socrates when he was young (as reported by a third party). Note: the topic the dialogue begins with is the concept of One (which is not what we have when we are children beginning to learn arithmetic).
It is conducted—until nearly the end but not beyond—conceptually and as ontologically real. The conclusion articulated by “Parmenides” speaking ontologically not just of a pragmatic tool or convention = “if one is not [ergo ontology, not just a system of merely pragmatic artifice] let us then say this and also that as it seems, whether one is or is not, it and the others are and are not and both appear and do not appear all things in all ways, both in relation to themselves and in relation to each other. And the young Socrates answers: “Most true”.
My interpretation is that: 1) conceptually {dianoetically) ‘one’ exists; [and here at this ‘moment’, as Hegel might say] we have a one which is a duple, and a triple:
(1) ‘manys’ exist, (2) ‘difference’ is real, (3) {exists} <thus I am not Existence but I exist (“paticipationally”–or again—2) sameness, difference and existence exist but not absolutely “clearly and distinctly—as Descartes would wish it (not conceptually) but from the vantage point of noesis=noetic insight.
And an application on this site and for a goodly number concerned: that is a conclusion and reason concerning for my not converting to Orthodox Christianity. Despite my sins and sins of some of the hierarchy. (After all evil ones often seek positions of power…and sometimes we let them.get and maintain them.)
Post Script: I read much history in college. And re the Council of Florence what I have read is that the Orthodox delegation agreed with the Filioque explication but — upon their return that their superiors—(i.e. political-secular superiors) remanded (on non-theological grounds) the agreement reached in Florence. Other views ???
Wow. The editor edited this to the point I am not clearly understanding the present foreshortened version of what I actually wrote. Suffice it so say: Plato makes a not-meytaphoric case for Trinitarianism in his Parmenides dialogue.
I approved this comment with no modification about 1 hour ago and history also show no modification … please re-post original … mod
@other views
Yes, the real one.
The Orthodox delegation at Florence did not agree with the filioque. There were the ‘political-secular’ superiors (i.e. the Emperor) who agreed and enforced it. It was not at the pressure of the ‘political-secular’ superiors that the opponents of the Robber Council diktat rejected it in whole (especially the main ‘non-theological’ point – the Pope as head of the Church) when returning to Constatinople, but at the pressure of the Orthodox consciousness of the Church, represented by St. Mark of Ephesus. They actually repented for caving in to the pressures of the Emperor and the blandishments of the Pope.
The Eastern Patriarchates and the Church of Russia also rejected the Robber Council.
“As someone ‘curious about history’ and not a professional historian, I experienced a change of outlook on historical events when the United States declared war on Iraq and destroyed it.”
My own “Jimmie Moglia moment of conversion” came later, when the EU$A declared war on Serbia and destroyed it. By now there must be quite a few people who realize that “some of the most lying knaves in Christendom” are leading us “to Armageddon and beyond”.
Some people were awake much earlier. I remember watching on TV and it passed me by: the mass-murdering Belgian regime’s assassination of Patrice Lumumba in their Belgian colony, known to the world as “The Heart of Darkness”. All I noticed was my wife looking at the screen and saying about the man whom the EU$A had chosen to replace Lumumba, “What a hard cruel face”. What do we little people know? But someone knew and wrote in those years:
“They buried Lumumba
In an unmarked grave.
But he needs no marker––
For air is his grave.
Sun is his grave,
Moon is, stars are,
Space is his grave.
My heart’s his grave,
And it’s marked there.
Tomorrow will mark it everywhere.”
Langston Hughes, 1961
Quote Tweet Zach Carter @zachjcarter
“Today marks 58 years since Patrice Lumumba was assassinated. CIA director Allen Dulles called the military coup against Lumumba “an urgent and prime objective,” handing over the Congo to a U.S.-[Belgian]-backed dictator.”
At the present time I would say that “an urgent and prime objective” of the present Western Capitalist CIA is to close down Freedom of Information on the World Wide Web, to wipe out sites like this one, because that is where We Little People learn what lies at “The Heart of Darkness” — the truth about the capitalist City of London and the darkness behind “the shining Thames” which Joseph Conrad either did not know or dared not make explicit.
Ironic that the westerners being repulsed by the demons of papism, swept the house clean of the diabolical latins, and now finding the house left vacant the jewish kabbal have set-up shop— and the latter state is worse than the first.
”During the latter years of neo-liberalism and turbo-capitalism, the cultural devaluation of labor has been possible thanks to the reserve army made up of migrants. It is logical that the chosen elites favor immigration. It frees them from relocating in the cesspits of despair, by bringing cesspits and despair to the ugly and xenophobic locals, along with the prospect of a Kalergi-type future.”
The Western labour aristocracy and middle classes correctly perceive their erstwhile benefactors as grossly cheating on them. Our dear ’locals’ were, for the most part, happily parroting neoliberalism’s soundbites — bogus individualism, freedom of choice, zionazi misculture, etc. — deeply convinced of their exceptionalism and indispensability, not even having to procreate, mind you. So when imperialism continues to launch endless wars abroad on ’ugly locals’ to settle the demographic problem in the West, thus achieving the devaluation of labour here, we’re supposed to believe in Coudenhove-Kalergi as the culprit? Did he also envisage/plot that other supreme assault on the indispensable, exceptional Master Race, to wit relocating the West’s manufacturing base? It’s quite telling that immigration and deindustrialization are damned forever while perpetual wars of aggression go unnoticed.
Grow a spine, for crying out loud.
Interesting article, if somewhat misleading. In the article “Jews” are mentioned, when in fact the name “Khazars” should be used. The original Jews were a small ethnic group, and most lived in Palestine during Roman times. When the Roman Empire collapsed, the Palestinian Jews were assimilated with local populations, with the result that Palestinians today have more Jewish blood in the veins than “Jews” who live in Israel.
In the 8th century a Turkish pagan tribe known as Khazars converted to the Hebrew faith, becoming “Jews” overnight. Benjamin Freedman, in his famous speech in 1961 in Texas, admits to this fact. The Khazars created a temporary kingdom, which was crushed by a combined Russian-Persian military assault, after which the Khazars went westwards. Their chief prize was Britain, a perfect island fortress for their future imperial ambitions. Their chance came in 1066, when Duke William of Normandy quarrelled with King Harold of England over the English crown. The Khazars from Rouen stepped in, financing a “Norman” invasion of England. Duke William assembled a mercenary army of 10.000 men and built a fleet for the invasion. Historians never explained how a duke managed to find the money to fight a king. After the invasion, the Khazars became tax collectors in England, amassing a fortune. This fact is also ignored by historians.
We now arrive to the 13th century, when the English King Edward Ist, known as Longshanks, was fighting both the Scots and the French, and in dire need of money. The Khazars again step in, offering money and demanding total submission from Edward. The enraged Edward sent them to the Tower of London, where he had them executed, while the entire Khazar population of England was expelled. The consequences of this act for world history would be tremendous, leading to the present situation that we have.
The Khazars were planning revenge on England. Their chance came in the 17th century, when they used their agent Oliver Cromwell to provoke a civil war. Cromwell was financed by Khazar bankers from Holland. Cromwell wins and the English king is executed, a pactice that was to be repeated, namely internal subversion and execution of the leading political figure. The Khazars return to England.
Once the Khazars returned to England, they placed the English aristocracy under their financial control. The present City of London is an independent banking country, under the control of the Rothschilds and outside the jurisdiction of the British Parliament, something few people know.
In 1776 the Rothschilds provoke the American “revolution”. Their agent is George Washington and his free masons, who were given the status of “revolutionaries” and not private agents. France is dragged into the war, so it could be financially ruined, an easy task, as the French aristocracy payed no taxes. Washington wins. We now have emigration of immigrants back to England, as the same did not want to become “Americans”. A contemporary of the day stated that there was not a single village or town in England which did not see a return of emmigrants, which was logical, as conservative historians estimate that Washington was backed by a mere 7 % of so called “Americans”. The Rotschilds needed the newly created US, not only to be their private colony for domestic plundering and waging foreign wars, but also as a precedent, where geography was used to create future artificial nations, like the American “nation”, which for some reason speaks English.
In 1789 the Rothschilds finance the French “revolution”, using French free masons. The French king is executed, just like the English king was. French finances pass from royal control to the control of private bankers. The Rotschilds later on finance the revolutions of 1830, 1848, and the Russian “revolution” of 1917, using free masons Lenin and Trotsky. The Russian Tsar and his entire family are butchered.
In 1812 Napoleon invades Russia. He is financed by the Rothschilds. He fails. The Rothschilds permit the 1871 unification of Germany, as Germany was decreed to take over from France when it came to fighting Russia. Germany, a peasant agricultural country, is in 29 years transformed into an industrial giant. The Kaiser in 1914 invades Russia. He fails. The Russian “revolution” in 1917 is financed by Anglo-American bankers. It too fails. Lenin in 1924 is replaced by Stalin, while Trotsky subsequently gets assassinated. Stalins arrival in Russia sees, as a consequence, the arrival on the political scene of Germany of an obscure second rate “artist” by the name of Adolf Hitler. Before Hitler assumes power in 1933, the Wall Street bankers in 1931 create the Bank of International Settlement in Basel, Switzerland, right next to the German border. The Bank finances Hitler, who in 1941 invades the Soviet Union (Russia). He too fails, ostensibly committing suicide in 1945. Historians never mention the fact that Hitlers bunker had four escape tunnels, while in Argentina and Japan it’s common knowledge that he escaped. As for the US, it twice militarily intervened in Europe, in 1917, after the bankers financed the “revolution” in Russia, and in 1941, when Stalin moved more than one million men from Manchuria to Moscow, and when it became apparent that Hitler would be defeated. Germany was not intended to lead Europe, only to fight Russia, the reason why it was permitted to unite in 1871.
In 1948 NATO took over from Hitler as far as aggression against Russia is concerned. It was subsequently joined by the EU, a civilian component of NATO. Both strive to move against the East and Russia. The 2014 coup d etat against Yanukovich in Kiev was a joint EU/NATO operation. NATO grabs Kiev and Putin reunites Crimea with Russia, leading to the present situation of conflict between Moscow and Washington, backed by London and partially by the EU.
What do we have now ? The world debt stands at more than 244 trillion dollars, and analysts are expecting a world wide crash of finances. Both NATO and the EU are looking into dissolution. The internal situation in the US is none too rosy, with quite a number of secessionist movements. This is all a result of Khazarian interventions in European politics, which led to interventions in other parts of the world. In trying to destroy Russia and China, the Khazars have in fact created conditions for their rise, the last thing they expected.
B.F.
Thanks for your comment .
The Thirteenth Tribe (The Khazar Empire and its heritage) book by Arthur Koestler (Hungarian Jew) should be mentioned . Book is published in 1976. This book provoked angry response in Israel and elsewhere .Author answered that his intent was to make antisemitism disappear by disproving its racial basis. Fascinating book .
@ demodok
Mr. B.F. clearly stated :
” in 8th century turkish pagan tribe known as khasars converted to hebrew faith “.
” becoming jews overnight ” .
Facts mentioned 8th century , jews are already old 30 or more centuries ,
and comes turkish tribe , convert , like , Infiltrate , yes infiltrate , into jews.
Do you think it can be accepted as 13th tribe ? Do you think that if someone converted can be accepted as jew tribe ?
Of course there were interests , on both tribes. Much gold changed hands.
But it is not important.
It was not vaĺidated by God Himself.
Jews are His tribe , His ” choosen ” ones ,
and there can not be accepted some turkish tribe , as jew.
Men can accept it.
But God do not accept such ” deals between men “.
Some very specific jews of jewish tribe are marked by genetic stamp by God .
No convertion interests God.
He placed his own stamp. On His choosen tribe.
He even calls jews stronger , ” you are my priest tribe. ” All men in tribe as priests. !
Heavy burded to carry. Much rules and orders to follow.
Those who do not follow rules , suffer. And jews sufferd long time.
Those rules are not for other tribes. More relaxed rules for others.
He marked jews with his own genetic stamp. He stamped their genes.
BTW , Did not hitlers nazi germans follow that Gods mark ,
by their own marking jews with yellow sign ,
david star , jews were ordered to display !
_ book 13th tribe by A Koestler ,…
_ ” provoked angry response in israel ” …
Of course israel angry responsed.
Because they perfectly knew khasars are not jew tribe , nor 13th , nor any other… they are infiltrated , masked ,turks , as always were.
Isrsael knew that to be member of tribe you have to have blood line of ancesstors.
Not merchants agreement , paid by gold. We have converted , we are jews now !
Point of book is to cover fact that serbs are those 13th tribe.
And jews know that very well , and do not complain about it . about facts.
( As i could remember it was written in bilble , prophet isaiah 55;5 : _ and there will be tribe you did not know about , and will be united ,” ,
something , for now i can not remember precise words …. )
There are simiarities between jews and serbs , i think not existant in other tribes…
Like name : JEW. : SRB , three words ,
Like present number population
jew in israel , abt 6 milions , nuber of
srb in srbija , abt 6 milions,
Number of years spent as slaves ,
jews , 430 years under pharaos ,
Srb , 430 years under turk ottomans
Those facts were of most importance to be hidden , forgotten , until nowdays ,
so srbs could not understand its own real value , its real position in Gods plans.
As srbs are also marked by God , genes imprinted ,
They are called ” heavenly ” ones. As jews are called ” choosen ” ones .
Only two tribes with such specific attributes. Gods similarity of markings ?
Serb people has mark of good angel upon itself. Maybe merciful angel ?
So , when nato bombed serbia , in 1999 , they called operation ” merciful angel “.
Unknowingly they displayed Gods mark. God has its ways to show his signs.
As hitler forced jews to wear jellow mark , david star.
So , God sign is also displayed even in those marks similarities.
@B.F.
_ ” misleading ” _ ” jews are meñtioned “…
I think i wrote coulpe of lines in some post somewhere here ,
mentioning confusion made by use of one word having two meanings.
And that confusion is intentional , not accidental, like we do not know…
I mentioned word CIA , that in fact has two contents , CIA_A , and CIA_B.
One is controlable , cia_a , other is uncontrolable , underground , cia_b.
Same could be applied to word jew.
But if we say jew_a , and jew_b , it would be clearer.
Jew_a : jews , jew_b : khasars.
But nowdays we talk about jews ,only ,
so confusion continues….
Also there is different example. Two words having one same content.
Like , anti_communism and communism.
Communism was invented by UK and USA , and they paid for that invention,
and someone thinks that UK and USA are anti_communists ?
Inventor and Anti_Inventor at same time ?
How inventor of something can be agianst that what he invented ?
Same person communist , and also anti_communist !? Strange , is not it ?
But people have to be left confused ,
less will they understand.
Better slaves.
that one is easy, its called hegelian dialectic, thesis, antithesis, syntesys.
something akin to action, reaction, consequences, where PTB invert the order, and start with the desired consequences, and then implent actions and reactions to achieve the desired effect.
All the story about the ‘Khazars’ is meant to confuse things and shift attention from the real thing.
The Jews from Holland who financed Cromwell were Sephardi Jews from Spain and Portugal, where they were living since Roman times and expelled in 1492. No ‘Khazars’ whatsoever.
Jews in the Roman Empire were alighting originally from Judaea, of course, but they were a large population dispersed all over the Empire and enjoying, under the Roman Emperors, large privileges, which were increasingly eroded once the Empire became Christian. They conducted an intense activity of proselytizing in competition with the Christians. A large population of Jews lived continuously in Babylonia (the Mizrahi Jews) who certainly were instrumental in the conversion of the Khazars.
The ‘fascinating’ theories of Koestler are speculations with little ground. They fail to explain why the Jews from Poland and Ukraine, the supposed descendants of the ‘Khazars’, speak Yiddish, a German dialect, if not coming, as all documentation shows unequivocally, from Germany.
A well known fact is that Jews, wherever they settled, have been engaged in financial operations.
Agree! Those expelled from Portugal and Spain moved to the rich cities of the Netherlands (which then included current Belgium and a bit of northern France) when they were rich enough to afford the long move. Others found possibilities to safely settle in places much closer to Spain and Portugal, like for instance Peyrehorade in southern France where jews were not prosecuted and became an influential part of the population.
Yes, some words in Yiddish come from Germany, from the German dialects spoken in the Eastern part of Germany to be exact. And Eastern Germany back then stretched across the coast of Poland into the Baltic states, even Russia’s Kaliningrad region was previously German. Germans constituted the elite in those regions, so the new immigrants relentlessly hobnobbed with them as is their modus operandi and some Eastern German dialects made their way into Yiddish, as well as some Eastern German spermatozoa.
Apparently Yiddish is devoid of words from the German dialects spoken in the Western part of Germany. This suggests that Yiddish originated in the Eastern part of Europe, not the Western part, so the Yiddish speakers are of Eastern European origin.
Germany consisted of several Germanic states before they were united into Germany in 1871.
There are not ‘some words in Yiddish [that] come from Germany’. The ‘Yidish Taitsh’ (“Jewish German”) as a whole is a German dialect with some Hebrew, Aramaic, Slavic, Romance words.
“The earliest surviving references date from the 12th century and call the language לשון־אַשכּנז (loshn-ashknaz, “language of Ashkenaz”) or טײַטש (taytsh), a variant of tiutsch, the contemporary name for Middle High German…
Ashkenaz/Eretz Ashkenaz always designated ‘Germany’ especially Rheineland and the term Ashkenazi came to refer to both the Jews of medieval Germany and France.
The ‘Khazars’ are not the origin of Eastern Jewry, although they might have merged with the immigrants from Germany. Some Jews living in cities of Lithuania, were speaking “Russiany”.
Not to split hairs completely, but here is a link which says Yiddish is Not a Dialect of German, but is Germanic in origin. Similarly English is Not a dialect of German, but is Germanic in origin. However, while English is most definitely West, Yiddish is borderline East.
http://yiddish.biz/blog/yiddish%20is%20not%20german.htm
in the graph Yiddish is placed at the Eastern most end of the Western Germanic language spectrum, English is at the Western most end. Yiddish has no links to Ingvaeonic (North Sea Germanic), Yiddish has no links to Istvaeonic (Weser-Rhine Germanic), Yiddish does however have links to Irminonic (Elbe Germanic).
Eastern Germanic is extinct and not well documented, though the graph perhaps tries too hard to place Yiddish in the Elbe Germanic category of the Western Germanic languages, it definitely does place Yiddish as being East of modern German, and east of Germany is Eastern European. So however you look at it, Yiddish is East.
its a bit (lot) more complicated than that.
summary: spain kicked them from the kingdom of granada (the others before where just killed) in 1492.
most of them fleed to portugal, who accepted them (portugal is special because its connected to the vatican, hungary, armenia, england , templars since its inception)
the poeruguese king wanted to marry with spain to join the crowns, and the condition was to expel the jews. so as usual in portugal, he said ok, but then allowed anyone to convert in 1497.
Only the ones not willing to convert went to holland, the rest converted and can be traced by family name (tree name) to conversion.
many converts kept their traditions and practices, and one of portuguese dishes today, “alheira”, is a sausage made from birds, invented by fake converts to give the illusion of eating pig, while eating bird.
converts kept judaic traditions, and many old manor houses still have secret rooms with menorahs and other hidden traces to judaism.
The articles by Mr. Moglia are always very instructive, this one in particular.
Epina39
Plato went to Africa (Egypt) where, among many things, he learned about the law of three(Trinity) and the law of seven. Regarded by the ancients both in Egypt and India as the two fundamental laws of world creation. The esteemed master Jesus Christ, said “Love your neighbor as you love yourself”. Some other Jew is alleged to have said “do unto another as you want done to you”. The cheater said “I can run very fast, the ground said I am endless “. Call a thief to catch a thief so says the English. I look into Syria today and my heart cries out, “what has the world come to ?”. Where are the good people of the world gone?. Its high time we stat acting like human beings and realize your pain is my pain, your joy is my security, your child is a gift to humanity. We do not choose where nor what we are born as. Perhaps the “Yellow Jackets” offer hope that the reckoning has begun
Whilst there is (and never was) any doubt whatsoever that Egypt had a profound and formative influence on Hellenic philosophy (which Plato repeatedly alludes to in his ‘Dialogues’) there is no proof that Plato himself actually studied in Egypt. We would have found at least an allusion in his autobiography (The VIIth Letter).
Certainly, Plato was strongly ‘influenced’ by the ‘mathematical’ philosophy of Pythagoras, or rather of his School (which was an expression of a universal ‘Perennial philosophy/Wisdom/Sophia’ – not ‘African’, to be sure -, common to the Ancient World, irrespective of its ‘whiteness’ or ‘blackness’) which Plato certainly attended in Sicily.
Pythagoras indeed was in Egypt, as were other Hellen philosophers (Thales), at a time when Hellen-Egyptian relations were the order of the day.
There is not by chance that, in the so-called ‘Late Antiquity’, the ‘Greek’ creation in Egypt, Alexandria, became that famed center of learning which, unfortunately, generated also that bastardized ‘philosophy’ known as ‘Neoplatonism’, which was an attempt of the Roman Emperors to sponsor an ‘alternative’ to Christianity (which had a stellar success in subverting Christianity up to our days), and the cluster of anti-Christians heresies known variously as ‘Arianism’, ‘Nestorianism’, ‘Monophysitism’ (revamped as ‘Myaphisitism’), which all deny the Incarnation and the divinity of Christ- Judaism by various names).
Gibbon’s take on history, “The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empires”, the ‘Masonic – Anglo – Zio’ history of the Roman Empire (which, unfortunately, continues to shape ‘Western’ mentality in relation to Christianity) should be discarded. Actually, it must be discarded, if we want to make any sense of what happened since Incarnation. Gibbon was an agent (perhaps, just perhaps, unwitting – he was a high ranking Mason and a Member of Parliament at that – but lavishly rewarded, although, or because, he was already a very wealthy man) of (risum teneat amici!) the Bank of England! I do not propose to burn his ‘History’ (that it actually deserves for the conscious blasphemies it proffers). No, keep it as a witness to the ‘turning off the lights’ that the “Enlightenment” brought upon a still Christian Europe in preparation of the genocidal orgy of the ‘French Revolution’. I cannot describe it but as ‘fake history’ and a justification for the ensuing Christian persecutions in the name of ‘Reason’. Gibbon was, as his ‘enlightened’ by the Masonic light fellows across the Channel, an admirer of Islam (which aligned him with the British ‘Empire’s’ support of the Ottoman Empire against Christian Russia).
Sorry, as much as I hate to do this, it’s the other way around. Egypt from it’s beginnings was part of Hellenic world. Even it’s name is Αιγυπτος (Epypt) https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%91%CE%AF%CE%B3%CF%85%CF%80%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%82 from Ειγάων πελαγος ( Aegean Sea https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%91%CE%B9%CE%B3%CE%B1%CE%AF%CE%BF_%CE%A0%CE%AD%CE%BB%CE%B1%CE%B3%CE%BF%CF%82)
Check this map of Byzantium:
http://users.sch.gr/ipap/Ellinikos Politismos/xartes/byzantio324.htm
So, whenever whoever talks about any Hellen going to Egypt, it’s like going to another home.
If you search internet carefully you will see that all cities along the Nile were actually Hellenic (from Egypt’s humble beginnings).
As for Masonry it’s another story, and I chose not to discuss it here in public.
Sorry the last link above does not work, this one should work:
http://users.sch.gr/ipap/Ellinikos Politismos/xartes/byzantio324.htm
And, the map is called Byzantium to 324AD, I could not find older maps.
I am guessing the space “Ellinikos Politismos” causes the problem. But if you have problems put this in your search window (copy everything below, this says: The map of Byzantine Empire before 324AD):
Χάρτης της βυζαντινής αυτοκρατορίας το 324 μ.Χ
I am back and this might come as a shock Removed – no attacking others. Mod.
This prof explains that philosophy was born in Ellas (Hellas) was born 48,863 years ago. But you must learn Hellenic language first:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwygHbMSgiM
He quotes Διογένης Λαέρτιος (Laertios).
Milestone article !
That is how this text could be titled !
Mr. Moglia clerarly defines future of mankind. New path.
Since capitalism is closing its dead end path. End of path.
Like feudalism before. Like slavery before.
And Masters of World are preparing new era of mankind to appear.
There are two equations present , as Mr. Moglia explained :
1 / People who will lead this new path : jews
2 / People who will contain travellers on path
: new men :
migrants + rest of old world.
And other equations to be added later , as Masters of World bring them up in use ,
3 / organization of new society , role of familly , role of religion , role of work…
role of some new ” money ” ,
4 / name of new era of mankind,
and so on…
That is why this text may be considered milestone text.
Regards to Mr . Moglia !
Dear Mr. Moglia,
I find your article very instructive, particularly the terrifying lines concerning Count Kalergi. It is undeniable that the Jewish finance effectively controls the FED, Wall Street, The City, as well as the main world hedge funds and corporations. However, let me dissent with some of your ideas, which I find contradictory and weakly-built.
First you align with well-known conspiracy theorists, specially with those coming from the far right christian reaction. And the problem here is that, as a confirmed anti-communist, (someone mentioned Elisabeth Dilling in the comments) you not only reject any attempt to build a documented scientific approach of the matter (preferring a fictional totally literary narrative) but also omit and silence some fundamental issues such as the role of christianity itself and its utter historical failure.
You can keep trying to pour down the Jewish all the trash produced by history. Didn’t they kill your God? This is not new, for this idea has been and still is the christian motto for 2019 years now. Your anti-Jewish anti-freemason paranoia conformed the grounds of the Spanish fascist “crusade” led by the very Roman catholic blood thirsty General Franco and his British mentors (a.k.a Sir Winston Churchill). Instead, try to figure out how the Jewish people must have felt being chased by the Inquisition and expelled from their centuries-old homes in Spain and elsewhere. The moorish were too. Then Spain discovered and conquered America, committing one of the most despicable genocides times have seen, totally obliterating both the Aztec civilisation and the Inca civilisation. Was it the fault of the Jewish too? What about the Saint Barthelemy massacre in France and the subsequent persecutions Protestants had to endure for centuries? Was it surprising that both Protestants and Jewish determined to ally in order not to be crushed by the Roman Catholic gut-ripping witch-burning hordes?
Because for minorities, when it comes to deal with Rome, there is only an option, surrender and convert. The very name of that organisation “Catholic”, means “universal”, and that is precisely what Rome has always been about. Because, make no mistake, behind the Pope, there is still an emperor ruling. The “globus cruciger”, also known as the “orb and cross”, is the symbol which best represents the catholic intentions for the planet. Those who think that catholicism has something to do with spirituality are nothing but fools.
What about a little of christian self-criticism? Is that possible? I hope so. Jewish communities were sparse across the Middle East, Europe and the Mediterranean, long before the destruction of the temple by Roman Emperor Titus, just as many other communities such as the Phoenicians or the Greeks. Remember that, at that time, Palestine and the Jewish were an irrelevant part of the empire, a part of the Syrian province. What made that people special was their fierce monoteism which opposed and resisted both polyteism and Roman imperial cult and determined the still on-going diaspora. Needless to say that the christians, were later equally masacred for denying to kneel down the emperor as a God.
There are and there have been many other diasporas. No need to list them here. The current world-dominating elite is the result of the alliance of two persecuted religions by the Roman imperial power (today struggling to take back over its lost imperial hegemony, called by some “christianity”)
@ Yoni
_ ” finance effectivelly controls fed …
Yes , those mentioned are game players , but pecking order may be different..
Like : the City controls jews finance , fed , wall street…. Boss is on top.
_ … terriffying lines concerning Count Kalergi ,_” …
His book is known , printed decades ago , nothing new. This is masters of earth manifesto , displaying their plans , future actions , that already were completed
, or are in progress.
Actions by the book. Line by line . Page by page . Rearanging world
There was also well known book , displaying plans of Masters of World.
Written by Adolf Hitler , known as ” mein kampf ” . Many knew about this book.
_ ” confirmed anti-communist _”….
Who is anti- communist ?
If we come from fact that communism was created , invented , produced , and its creation paid by UK of England , and USA state of Wall street , does it mean he is anti_uk and anti_usa ?
Since uk and usa are creators of communism , so they are world communists ?
_ ” docummented scientiffic aproach ” …
What if scientiffic approach in history,
means quite lot of invented , falsified papers , written and left to confuse those ” scientists ” reading those papers , 50 , 100 years after.
And leading to incorrect conclusions.
Those real facts , are top secret files , and will always be left top secret files.
Those declassified , are those left to confuse historians. To recreate false history.
_ ” did not they kill your God _ ”
Jews killed Isus Christos , KING.
He was 42nd King of Jews , in line of jewish kings.
Like 42nd president of usa. And usa also had several killed POTUS(es).
And He was not first , nor last king to be killed by people. Jews had their reasons.
He was also Son of God , with assigned duties to complete , by His Father , God.
So what men did is irrevevant compared with God’s plan of actions. His plan.
BTW , Isus Christos was Essen , one special group rather away from ordinary jew.
_ ” ( jews ) _ ” being chased by inquisition ” …
Being chased , tortured , killed , is another , ” in familly event ” ,
between God and jews ,
His ” choosen ” tribe. So jews knew they were coosen ones. God told them so.
Tribe with very special duties , tasks , and also accompanying set of sufferings done. God told them : i will spread you throughot world , you will suffer , but after two thousand years , i will make you a state , make you a nation. And jews knew it.
And patiently waited that day. In the meantime , many sufferings.
This words are from someone , like , ortodox chistian ,
painting frame of jew role, but jews of cousre know it better.
I also tried to understand your opinions and your words as another religion frame.
I hope seemingly different opinions would melt into one , true , truth.
”And while accepting the inherent murkiness of politics, I could not reconcile myself to the idea that the two Bushes, one of whom is dead, could be some of the lyingest knaves in Christendom.”
Still not to be confused with Rev. Satan himself, however. As Rafael Correa in Ecuador pointed out, basically as a polite objection to Hugo Chávez, ”Equating Bush with the Devil is offending the latter. The Devil is evil but intelligent”.
Absolutely correct that the Devil is evil but intelligent, as the next quote demonstrates admirably:
”But the Catholic Church has lost power and unity. In recent Catholic pronouncements, it is even stated that Jews no longer need to convert to be ’saved’.”
That shouldn’t pose any noticeable problems to Catholicism as practised in Poland. There, whatever the Vatican puts forward is a divine message as long as it’s
a) not outright incompatible with Russophobia.
b) is seconded by Anglo-American consent. This, by inference, means 100% Zionist approval; hence no conversions needed for God’s Chosen People.
QED.
Thank you Jimmie, great contribution!
“Plato conceived of 3 original principles, incorporated in the Logos, different, but linked to each other by a mysterious generation.”
Jimmie, could you give a reference? I am not familiar with this aspect of Plato, nor could I find it by a web search. What I did find was a reference to 3 Principles of Plotinus (the Neo-Platonist) from WikiPedia:
“Plōtinos; 204/5 – 270) …. In his philosophy… there are three principles: the One (to en), the Intellect (nous), and the Soul (psyche).[1] He is of the Platonic tradition …we must call the One a sheer potentiality (dynamis) or without which nothing could exist. … Plotinus compared the One to “light”, the Divine Nous (Νοῦς, Primal will towards Good) to the “Sun”, and lastly the Soul (Ψυχή) to the “Moon” whose light is merely a “derivative conglomeration of light from the ‘Sun'”. The Primal Light (to en) could exist without any celestial body.”
I can see how the Plotinus trinity could have become transformed into the Christian Trinity: The indefinable generative principle (the One) resembles the intangible Holy Spirit or Logos; the shaping driving intellect (Nous) resembles God the Father creator of the visible universe; and the sympathetic soul (Psyche) resembles the sympathetic bhuman side of God, the Christ.
PS Plotinus’ idea that there was Light before there was the Sun and the Moon is anticipated in the first chapter of Genesis. It used to cause 19th century rationalists some amusement (e.g, Dostoievsky’s character Smerdyakov in The Idiot). But this concept is the cornerstone of 20th century cosmology: the Big Bang was our incredible Universe beginning as a flash of Light.
Chapter XXI (second volume of Gibbon’s “Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire,” (Denton Edition). In turn Gibbon also refers to other various writers on the same subject. And to some disciples of Plato, who held that his trinitariarian cosmological theory “could not be perfectly understood till after an assiduous study of thirty years.”
Jimmie, thank you for the ref to Gibbon’s Decline and Fall. As I suspected, the notion is one of Gibbons’s Falls. See note 1111 in that chapter, by the Rev.H.H.Milman. The trinity notion is Neo-Platonism.
This may seem like nitpicking pedantry in relation to your article which is about Christendom’s relation to the Jews; but it is important to Christianity’s relation to Greek philosophy. Christian monotheism comes from Parmenides, Xenophanes and Plato rather than from Jehovah. The idea of redemption through suffering is already in Sophocles (Oedipus at Colona, and at least one other play). The Logos, as you say, is pure Plato.
And what is the Christ then? Does he have any role in ‘Christianity’ if Christianity sprung like Athens fully armed from the heads of the Greek philosophers?
Several Jay Dyer’s lectures on Platonism; Christianity and Neoplatonism; Defense of Metaphysics & Traditional Philosophy; Plato, Crystals & Dimensions; Platonism, Hermeticism, Demons & Paganism, and other delightful topics.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=jay+dyer+platonism
“Until historically recently, the Catholic Church provided protection. It preached and prohibited violence against the chosen people, but expected them not to corrupt the culture of the host nation. And she gave them the option of conversion. By converting to Christianity, all true or pretended forms of discrimination would be instantly removed”.
But the Catholic Church has lost power and unity. In recent Catholic pronouncements, it is even stated that Jews no longer need to convert to be “saved.” And in current religious ceremonies the brethren are invited to “pray for our elder brothers in the Abrahamic religion.”
Such deserve the words,
Keep watch over yourselves and all the flock of which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers. Be shepherds of the church of God,[a] which he bought with his own blood. I know that after I leave, savage wolves will come in among you and will not spare the flock. Even from your own number men will arise and distort the truth in order to draw away disciples after them. So be on your guard! Remember that for three years I never stopped warning each of you night and day with tears. Acts
I take off my hat for this article, Jimmie Moglia ! This is a must read article for everyone who comes here on this blog, it perfectly shows all the nuances of the most acute problems our civilization is facing today. Very interesting reading, an eye opener.
As I have said before, speaking as a spiritual Marxist, Nietzche had it wrong, God is not dead, theology is dead. Scholastic theology, a remnant of the middle as has been dead centuries ago at least since the renaissance and the birth of the scientific method.One does not need a definitive theology be spiritual, as true spirituality comes from the hearts and minds of humankind. There is nothing wrong with intuitive speculation about God and spiritual matters, but such speculation is not science, and will never contain the full Truth about God. I personally find much inspiration from esoteric Christianity, nondual gnosticism, Eastern teachers like the Buddha, Kabir, Yogananda, Ramana Maharshi, Ramakrishna, Vivekananda, krishnamurti and many others. I see the teachings of the Christ in Orthodoxy to be closest to the universal spiritual teachings of the East. True spirituality does not claim to be a science, nor does it contradict science. Marx’s criticism of religion was primarily about organized religion and how organized religion tended to support the capitalist plantation system of greed. Marx however, never denied the inner potential spirituality of humanity.
‘Spiritual Marxism’ is an oxymoron. ‘Esoteric’ Christianity is the old heresy (or rather heresies) of Gnosticism.
The meaning of ‘religio’ is ‘cultum deorum’, “the proper performance of rites in veneration of the gods”. Religion is always ‘organized’.
Theology is dead, therefore one can be a spiritual Marxist as many Marxist indeed are. There is no contradiction in that a Marxist can be spiritual, atheist or agnostic. Jesus the Christ was no capitalist, he was a socialist/ communist. Jesus was no advocate of the capitalist plantation. As for Marx, he was the greatest critic of capitalism after Jesus.
Jesus was neither capitalist, nor socialist, or communist. His Good News was not about this world. Marx and his toadies were the greatest critics of Jesus the Christ. Their ‘spirituality’ is not that of the Holy Spirit, but of the Evil Spirit, the Father of Lies.
If Jesus was an historical figure, than going by his statements and actions in the Gospels, he undoubtedly a socialist/communist and not a capitalist. Whatever Marx’s own spiritual beliefs or lack of is besides the point, his contribution is scientific socialism, objective dialectical historical materialism. Can spirituality survive historical materialism? Marxists have to think and decide this for themselves.
Surely Jesus was a historical figure, but his statements show him biased in favor of capitalism. See the parable of the talants. He praised the good servant who invested the money entrusted to him by his master and made a profit, whereas he condemns the ‘wicked and lazy’ one who did not, take his money a give it to the one who made a profit!
He enjoined those who wanted to follow him to SELL their riches and bring the money in.
Marxist do not criticize personal property, as long as it is not parasitical on the working class. However, Marxists do criticize the so-called private property owned by large multinational corporations that have created the international plantation system of greed. Is this capitalism also a teaching of Jesus, the one who threw the money changers (financers) from the temple? I think not.
Zalamander;
You are so right. The fantasy that Marx was against real Christianity is so verifiably false. It stems from a superficial misunderstanding of what Marx was all about. To start with he is on record as dedicating his life to the cause of Christ. Read his “Reflections of a Young Man on a choice of Career.” He actually admitted to his family that he regarded himself as a Christian. As did Engels. All of this can be found in the wonderful book entitled Marx Against The Marxists by Jose Miranda. Marx told his own family quote “we can forgive Christianity many things because it taught us how to love.” That is about as Christian a statement as one could ever hope to find.
Marx gave a speech in London wherein he openly stated “for our part we do not mistake the presence of that shrewd spirit that marks (embraces) all these (political-economic) contradictions.” The “shrewd spirit” is what Hegel called Reason. An educated Christian would have to call that the divine movement inside history. The whole thing about Marx being a materialist atheist is more of a cultural collapse than a fair reading of Marx’s intent. Marx in his attitude to religion was really attempting to criticize false religious ideology in favor of authentic spiritual self awareness. For cultural reasons this has been obscured. Bottom line is Marx was working for the Christ force. Denial of this betrays a superficial and inadequate understanding of Socialism. This is all verifiable. The unrecognized Christian emancipatory force inside Marxism is the real reason it has had such a powerful influence upon the world. Don’t expect the Chinese or Iranians to be confused about this.
Marx wrote his ‘Reflections… ‘ as an essay when he was a pupil at the Trier Gymnasium and fulfilling the Gymnasium’s religious graduation requirements, when he was 17 years old. One had to get his marks, right?
Once at University, Marx quickly converted to militant atheism, shifted his major to philosophy, and joined the Doktorklub of young (or Left) Hegelians, of which he soon became a leader and general secretary. He started to write poems in praise of Satan! Things that, apparently, irked his own father (by no means a Christian, although recently baptized), along with the tendency of Karl to live (lavishly) on other people’s money (he lived on a pension provided by Engels, the capitalist who himself lived as a wealthy rentier). The ‘proletarian communist ‘who always insisted that his wife Jenny imprint “nee von Westphalen” on her calling card.
His true feelings and thinking are expressed, once and for all, in the Communist Manifesto:
Question 22. Do Communists reject existing religions?Answer: All religions which have existed hitherto were expressions of historical stages of development of individual peoples or groups of peoples. But communism is that stage of historical development which makes all existing religions superfluous and supersedes them.
Communism superseds all religions, according to Marx, in that it is the real fulfillment of the aspirations of all religions. This is the only reason Marx invested himself in it. This is verifiable when one examines the substance of Marx’s definition of communism. In his 1844 Manuscripts Marx’s definition is quite precise. “Communism is the transcendence of human self-estrangement.” That is the highest possible realization of authentic religious aspiration. All we have to do is remove the German philosophical double negative and Marx’s definition of communism reveals itself to be Communism is human self realization. If one reads Marx’s description of social relations in communism it can be seen to be an almost poetic description of how spiritually enlightened people would see each other and relate. The atheistic dimension of Marx is better read as an assertive advocacy of the primacy of human self consciousness. Any true religion would tell you that the God that is sought is to be found within one’ self. Marx, being a German romantic philosopher was actually doing early pioneering work to further the German philosophical discovery of the Inner Self. His atheistic materialism can be more accurately interpreted as a compensatory advocacy of what we would call today grounded holism. Marx did not have the term holism available, as the word had yet to appear in the English lexicon. So he used his own term “new materialism” which he did not clearly define. It is revealing that people who say Marx was an atheist materialist picture him being a typical bourgeois atheist materialist. However in his writing he specifically condemned the very materialism that so many people falsely believe he held to. His poetics regarding Satan are widely misunderstood. He was calling forth the powers of the world (world dragon) that have been cast off by patriarchal religion. One cannot understand Marx at all if one tries to interpret his approach to spiritual matters from the perspective of traditional patriarchal religion. Unfortunately very few people know how to avoid that pitfall.
Thank you Snow Leopard for helping explain the complexities of Marx. In philosophy, the only real metaphysisical question is “why does the universe exist?” This is the unanswered philosophical question. Marx himself said “The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point however is to change it.” Another way of putting it is “why does existence exist?” Even science has not answered this existential metaphysical question. In spiritual language we can say however, “God is existance, existance is God.” The universal consciousness or God is pure existance.
Marx despised the ‘bourgeois materialism’ but had a little weakness for many of its trappings: smoking, wine drinking, love of heavily spiced foods.
He despised so much money that he was spending Engels money like water (£400-£500 a year, when the upper tenth of Englishmen in that period were earning an average income of only £72 a year).
He did not do too much to realizing its ‘transcendence’ in his own life, while recommending it to others. Isn’t that the definition of the Pharisee?
A brilliantly written, thought-provoking article. I had no idea that France, during the revolution, was the first country to emancipate its jews. Also didn’t know about Napoleon’s relationship with the jews. Thanks for a very informative read!
Always a pleasure to find Jimmie Moglia’s articles here. This one is no exception, despite the bleak picture it paints of the world we live in. It’s like reading the words of a scholar and a prophet.
Thank you.
A great article, thank you.
I have one objection, though. The true Jews are the Orthodox Christians. Those who followed Christ and found salvation, Theosis, and life eternal.
John 8:44
You are writing about those whom Christ called the Children of Satan, the children of the father of lies and the first murderer of people. He came to save the mankind from them. He gave people spiritual armor to defeat them.
Don’t encourage them. It’s a misnomer to use ‘Jews’ for members of the Rabbinical Talmudic cult formed in Poland sometime in 11th century. They recruited locals and slaves, since they were engaged in slave trade in Europe and the New World of the Americas. That’s why genetically they are identical to the Eastern Europeans with admixture of African haplogroup. They are fully dedicated to Satanism. We easily recognize them as those who demand wars, sanctions, demand to starve nations, to bomb, to kill their leaders and priests, to destroy churches. The list of their crimes is long. But, they wouldn’t be able to accomplish all what they have accomplished without willing participation of the Europeans.
International law treats them as another religion, when they are an extremist cult. In Russia, several Talmudic priests were arrested and recognized by court as extremists, and deported. They all were citizens of Israel.
We, Orthodox Christians are the real Jews, and Israel is our promised land.
BTW, here is a fresh example of activities of an extremist Talmudic sect Black Hebrew Israelites.
Their method of hours long provocative abusive behavior towards their target, after that they publicize a minute of footage and use their online bots and followers to “condemn” innocent victims of their attack.
This is a sort of hell’s fury that Russians, Iranians, Syrians face every day. Not a peep in support from those Europeans.
—
More Fake News Exposed As Media Lies About Catholic Kids, Native American Debacle
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-20/more-fake-news-exposed-media-lies-about-catholic-kids-native-american-debacle
‘Journalists’ who uncritically accepted Nathan Phillips’ story got this completely wrong…
“Partial video footage of students from a Catholic high school allegedly harassing a Native American veteran after the anti-abortion March for Life rally in Washington, D.C., on Saturday quickly went viral, provoking widespread condemnation of the kids on social media. Various media figures and Twitter users called for them to be doxed, shamed, or otherwise punished, and school administrators said they would consider expulsion.
But the rest of the video – nearly two hours of additional footage showing what happened before and after the encounter – adds important context that strongly contradicts the media’s narrative.
Here is a video clearly showing that Nathan Phillips approached the students. On the basis of the evidence we now have, I believe that people who issued categorical and one-sided condemnations of the students should retract and apologize. pic.twitter.com/GxmXcMuQgC
— Matthew Schmitz (@matthewschmitz) January 20, 2019
Far from engaging in racially motivated harassment, the group of mostly white, MAGA-hat-wearing male teenagers remained relatively calm and restrained despite being subjected to incessant racist, homophobic, and bigoted verbal abuse by members of the bizarre religious sect Black Hebrew Israelites, who were lurking nearby. The BHI has existed since the late 19th century, and is best describes as a black nationalist cult movement; its members believe they are descendants of the ancient Israelites, and often express condemnation of white people, Christians, and gays. DC-area Black Hebrews are known to spout particularly vile bigotry.
Phillips enters the picture around the 1:12 mark, but if you skip to that part, you miss an hour of the Black Hebrew Israelites hurling obscenities at the students. They call them crackers, faggots, and pedophiles. At the 1:20 mark (which comes after the Phillips incident) they call one of the few black students the n-word and tell him that his friends are going to murder him and steal his organs. At the 1:25 mark, they complain that “you give faggots rights,” which prompted booing from the students. Throughout the video they threaten the kids with violence, and attempt to goad them into attacking first. The students resisted these taunts admirably: They laughed at the hecklers, and they perform a few of their school’s sports cheers.”
” We, Orthodox Christians are the real Jews, and Israel is our promised land.” ( ?! )
The Church is the Israel of God (Galatians 6:16) and New Jerusalem refers to the Church, to all the saints in heaven, and to heaven itself.
http://orthochristian.com/93181.html
Something wrong with your argumentation. Read what He said to the Jews.
“In the beginning was the Reason of the Universe.”
Yes, a much better translation. Except
– reason doesn’t cut it, as the laws of Existence are far beyond reason and un-reason, and more importantly
– there was no beginning, as Existence always ‘is’, without beginning, without end.
A better translation of ἀρχή is ‘principle’. In principio erat Verbum.
“ἀρχή – properly, from the beginning (temporal sense), i.e. “the initial (starting) point”; (figuratively) what comes first and therefore is chief (foremost), i.e. has the priority because ahead of the rest (“preeminent”).
‘Being’ has no temporal beginning, but is the origin of ‘Existence’.
The more the planet gets away from the sun, the more it becomes darker and cold.Same as people.Or religions. The more they get away from God…From this point of view,the Talmud is beyond planet Pluto and out of the solar system.No wonder there is no Life there nor Truth.
And still,in the worst and last moments of our history on this planet ( However, when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on the earth?” ) there will be 144 000 Jews converting to Christianity , coming back Home after centuries.
Jimmie, yet another great article.
Let me repeat, I am not here to undermine Christianity as I consider myself an Orthodox, as Jimmie says thanks to the internet I never stop searching for interesting information even it undermines our established dogmas.
This fellow, who is an actual doctor in NY, Emmanuil Lambrakis presents some challenging subjects. This one is about history of Christianity, Emperor Megas Konstantinos and the Testament (not old, which he calls figment of imagination). He says that there have been three oldest Bibles (Testaments) found, and he shows the book written by German researcher who located them. The oldest Bible named “Sinai” (named from the place where it was found), and the second oldest was found in Egypt are locked up in some museum in London. The third one is locked up in Vatican. Couple of videos, sorry but they are in Greek and are titled
Χριστιανισμός και Ελληνισμός (Christianity and Hellenism):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jeqw90sj6L8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nn5C4GvwcT8
He says that the oldest one is the shortest in context. Some text was added to later versions to be significantly changed in the current versions.
These three ‘oldest Bibles’ (Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus, Codex Alexandrinus) are the most corrupt texts of the Christian Scriptures and they are not above suspicion of forgery (at least for the Codex Sinaiticus – the ‘Sinai Bible’ – ). In any case they are falsifications of the Scriptures made by heretical sects.
They have been used by the so-called Critical School to undermine the authority the Scriptures used in the Orthodox Church, “The Byzantine text-type (also called Majority Text, Traditional Text, Ecclesiastical Text, Constantinopolitan Text, Antiocheian Text, or Syrian Text”).
All modern ‘Bible’ translations are based on the corrupt texts of these three codices. Exception is the King’s James Bible, but only for the New Testament translated from the Majority text. The Old Testament is translated from the Masoretic text.
Mr Moglia
Very enlightning for me. Thanks.
Havre a slight problème with “pray for our elder brothers in the Abrahamic relegion”‘; I just don’ t see the problème. Abraham us our ancester in believing in God and it’s only the Jewish leadership through Time that distanced itself from God and paid the conséquences,.not listening to théir prophets. Rejecting Christ is another matter altogether.
Harfang67
The historical point is that, until the Vatican II Council, (as mentioned in “Quo Vadis Vatican”,) the prayer was (in Latin) “Oremus pro perfidis Judaeis”, meaning “let us pray for the Jews without faith.” (so that they may convert). That prayer was substituted by the one cited.
The significance of the change in prayers relates to the change in policies and attitudes by the governance of the Church.
Of course “il n’y a pas de problème” in praying for anyone.
The prayer up to 1956:
“Oremus ET pro perfidis Judæis: ut Deus et Dominus noster auferat velamen de cordibus eorum; ut et ipsi agnoscant Jesum Christum, Dominum nostrum.
(Non respondetur Amen, nec dicitur Oremus, aut Flectamus genua, aut Levate, sed statim dicitur:)
Omnipotens sempiterne Deus, qui etiam judaicam perfidiam a tua misericordia non repellis: exaudi preces nostras, quas pro illius populi obcæcatione deferimus; ut, agnita veritatis tuæ luce, quæ Christus est, a suis tenebris eruantur. Per eundem Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum Filium tuum, qui tecum vivit et regnat in unitate Spiritus Sancti, Deus: per omnia sæcula sæculorum. Amen.”
“Let us pray ALSO for the faithless Jews: that Almighty God may remove the veil from
their hearts so that they too may acknowledge Jesus Christ our Lord.
(‘Amen’ is not responded, nor is said‘ Let us pray’, or ‘Let us kneel’, or ‘Arise’, but immediately is said:)
Almighty and eternal God, who dost not exclude from thy mercy even Jewish faithlessness: hear our prayers, which we offer for the blindness of that people; that acknowledging the light of thy Truth, which is Christ, they may be delivered from their
darkness. Through the same our Lord Jesus Christ, who liveth and reigneth with thee in
the unity of the Holy Spirit, God, for ever and ever. Amen.”
In 1959 the word ‘perfidis’ was removed. ‘Amen’, kneeling and ‘let us pray’ are prescribed after “Let us pray for the Jewish people, the first to hear the word of God, that they may continue to grow in the love of his name and in faithfulness to his covenant… Almighty and eternal God, long ago you gave your promise to Abraham and his posterity. Listen to your Church as we pray that the people you first made your own may arrive at the fullness of redemption. We ask this through Christ our Lord. Amen”.
Great article–Jordon Peterson wouldn’t get pass round one with this writer. My quick response–yes we can track the history–we can see the regional expulsions, read the warning historical commentaries, and watch on Utube as they sniper-murder unarmed Palestinian civilians–we yet we still can’t believe the purported barbarity and malevolence–it would for this tribe of people to actually subordinate the planet to their exclusive benefit.
I invite you to read this excellent short historical account of the rampages of mongol mass-murderer Genghis Khan: http://tomatobubble.com/id852.html
He was a savage brute who murdered, raped and destroyed millions–destroyed entire cities–was the devil incarnate–and would have eventually overtaken Europe if not for a family feud. Ninety-five percent of today’s Jewry are of Mongo/Turk descent from the Caucasus Mountain regions of Eastern Europe: It’s in the blood–this what we’re dealing with–these are Not the Semitic peoples of Abraham’s lineage.
“The chosen elites have decided that people are ugly, dirty, bad and xenophobic because they do not want to accept migrants by the millions. But it is the people who bear the weight of immigration and the loss of manual work.
During the latter years of neo-liberalism and turbo-capitalism, the cultural devaluation of labor has been possible thanks to the reserve army made up of migrants. It is logical that the chosen elites favor immigration. It frees them from relocating in the cesspits of despair, by bringing cesspits and despair to the ugly and xenophobic locals, along with the prospect of a Kalergi-type future.”
This essay is very interesting in light of a piece that I just read, by Patrick Cockburn, about the Brexit situation in Britain. That is, Cockburn—whose writing I generally like, in particular when he is writing about the situ in the ME–is very disappointing in this current piece (On the Brink of Brexit: the Only Thing Most People Outside Westminster Know About Brexit is That It’s a Mess, http://www.counterpunch.org/2019/01/22/on-the-brink-of-brexit-the-only-thing-most-people-outside-westminster-know-about-brexit-is-that-its-a-mess/).
Cockburn’s general attitude is: the “unqualified” (true working class and working poor) are maingly the people who voted for Brexit, and they don’t really understand an;ything. Cockburn relates their views not to understand them, but just to reject them an ill-informed. He quotes a source who complains: ““I think people who live in Dover feel cross and unheard,” she says. “There is this sort of anger and apathy going together and even if I try to have more fact-based conversations [about immigration and Brexit] I don’t connect with them because they are so cross.” This source assumes that she knows more facts about Brexit than those who have to live with the results of membership in the EU.
Cockburn and his sources in Dover have no respect nor grasp of the realities of living with unwanted immigrant groups. Cockburn reports, cluelessly:
“There is another aspect to the immigration issue in Dover revolving around the Slovakian Roma, who often do not speak English. Even those most sympathetic to them say they are peculiarly hard to communicate with. White parents express anger that scarce school resources are spent on teaching Slovakian Roma children to speak English.
“Hall says: “The lies that were told on the Leave side during the referendum make it very easy for people to feel – when they see their town being left to rot – that we need to spend the money on ourselves.” She believes lack of education makes it easy for newspapers or politicians to persuade people that immigrants come to UK solely to live on benefits, take the jobs of local people, and get free treatment from the NHS.”
Actually, that is why a lot of immigrants come to the UK. And the locals are the ones who see and feel the results, and have to live with Roma who don’t speak English, and who are peculiarly difficiult to communicate with, and who may also be a nuisance on the streets (if my experiences with Travelers in Ireland in the seventies are anything to go by).
The disdain that Cockburn inadvertently (I believe) expressed for those who voted for Brexit is quite startling, as is the smug certainty that he, Cockburn is right, and those he is reporting on are wrong and ill-informed. In other words, this is not a neutral reportage, but a condemnation of those he writes about, and their views, and their life situations, and their reasons for their views in order to bolster the rightness of his own position by default—but without actually citing any evidence that his position actually is right (that Brexit will be a disaster, and the UK had better Remain). Which is just as blinkered as the way he presents the Brexit voters’. He never once acknowledges that these people actually do understand their own interests, and they are not the same as Patrick Cockburn’s. Instead, those with actually different interests are presented as ignorant and pathetic. Even the Syrian refugees are described as “pathetic.” Very strange choice of word. And I find it somewhat unethical for cockburn to use his writing ability to make a mockery of other people’s views and economic interests and needs.
I would love to hear Jimmy’s take on this article by Cockburn. Or anyone’s. I found it so striking that Jimmy seems to be talking about virtually identical phenomena as Cockburn (I had just read the Cockburn article minutes before reading this one), but from the other side of the mirror.
Katherine
Hi Katherine,
There are a whole lot of Cockburns all over the place, not only in the UK but many in France and the rest of the EU as well, all with their own perspective, exagerations and often blunt lies.
But sometimes we experience a fresh wind and some truly objective information. Please enjoy this video by Franois Asselineau, the leader of the French political party Union Populaire Republicaine and candidate at the latest presidential elections: https://www.upr.fr/actualite/le-rejet-du-projet-daccord-sur-le-brexit-analyse-de-francois-asselineau/
Enjoy!
Jacques
I love these articles that open up such vistas of time and space to infinite spiritual horizons which have No End.of Complexity, Contentiousness, ….and Convoluted Controversy.
One is tempted to say, “What a G D Mess!” but one pauses, realizing that Civilization, great art and literature…music….and .language itself was most inspired by IT (Spirit) as a way of retaining it and not sinking into the emptiness of existentialism and the mere animal biological rhythms of meaningless life…..followed by a Death Having Learned Nothing of Permanent Value…in terms of truth
Yet, I cannot grasp at any single organized religion without knowing a great deal more about all this Holy or Unholy Human Religious Mess….and realize that even if I read everything cited here as references….the confusion and controversy would most likely compound much more….in all likelihood settling nothing that I don’t already know:
Namely that:
1) There is something foul, unholy, seemingly, in the roots of all of this, that the better parts clearly survived a long time……but particularly in my time on earth among the Zionists (not all Jews!) ADL gangsters, just about ALL of the Fundamentalist Literalists of ALL religions (smacks of slavery to me, mind control, not freedom to “ascend” higher in any way…)…..and so forth.
2) I am certain that there is a Truth….and part of it might be in parts of that mess alluded to above…but most probably ALL IS NOT…and never could be! What there is …is humans (or Demons….lol) trying to gain and exert AUTHORITY over other humans. And I don’t care how many books were written to justify this earthly authority. It is hard for anyone but a child to accept ANY of it…..unless the intent is to cynically partake in the earthly power of The Authorities….who today, in the west, at the highest levels…are Satanists and Luciferians particularly within Talmudic Judaism and “Roman” Catholicism.
3) And so I find myself here more than anywhere else on the internet saying to myself that the Truth —for me…..is that imperfect Russia…in my time…or the Last Third of My Time is more admirable in its world wide influence and example and internal behavior …after a horrendous crisis…than “The West”…..now getting its turn at Utter Degradation…lol. And yet, I ask, “How did THAT come about?” in terms of :
Anti-Authoritarian Premise # A: IMHO the First Rome Stunk (general parasitical imperial rule throughout the mediterranean world….steady conquest and looting and demographic collapse….engineering for dominance…but no scientific or even artistic advances…for many dreary centuries….ditto the Second One.well not SO bad lol…….and SO: how could a Third One…calling up the “Authority” of the Paradigmatic Empire…Rome…..be anticipated with hopeful eagerness???
I don’t know!
Meanwhile, what a mess!!
Despite all these religions and the positive things they have contributed to building human Civilization it looks like they were unable to stave off the Old Religion of Organized Evil and Human Sacrifice…infiltrating nearly all of them….and probably creating a fair number of them…..until perhaps…..things get so bad…that The Good must manifest in hundreds of millions of souls….(very soon!) …or simply be eliminated in this little corner of the Universe…..by the Universe itself.
Last question for the many religious scholars here:
Is there any documented truth you can cite supportive of the assertion that the Luciferian-Masonic (not Judaic in terms of representing anything postive thereof….in creating the NAZI movement and then its flip side…Zionism…) House of Rothschild extended a very large, desperately needed LOAN to the Vatican in 1832 …and used the priestly celibacy weakness of its Popes, Bishops and Priests to blackmail and own them all, in short order, especially through increasingly rampant pedophilia…or rather sexual abuse of humans too young and of the wrong sex to become pregnant?
This is a common theme currently in the self -proclaimed Anti-New World Order Alt-Media.
Or perhaps the (Collapse fleeing escaped Roman) Venetians did something similar, centuries earlier??
Beautifully written. Such a pleasure to read. Thank you!