Not the whole truth because US joint action with Turkey, Saudi and Israel over past decade is ignored. But as much as she can say as a presidential candidate.
She’s too sane and rational to be taken seriously by the American power structure or its propagandized citizens. We always get more of the reflexive warmongering in response to any contrived crisis on the international stage. Expect it again here, sooner or later.
“… infantile fairy tale belief of who was behind 9/11 …”
To tell the full truth: Putin too has been publicly saying exactly the same – even though he too fully well knew it to be a naive fairy tale!
Perhaps, their “reason” for going along with the “official” bogus narrative is diplomatic, to avoid getting embroiled in an extra dispute, not conducive to achieving their more important objectives. Incidentally, apparently not the approach of Iran, who generally seem to favour truth in diplomacy.
Officially declaring the true identity behind both 9/11 and the war in Syria is a no-no in DC, it would result in the end of her career.
I think Tulsi is quite aware of that.
It would have even more impact with ventilating her meaning about the occupation of 1/3 of Syria by US forces, stealing their oil.
It strikes me that there is quite some misinformation about the situation around Idlib. At least I’m a bit cautious. I’ve even read comments with ‘what Putin should do’. I’m pretty convinced that Putin has far more and better intel than we have, and acts as such.
What Tulsi Gabbard FAILS to mention are the current { on going } actions by the US Government to continue with the destabilization of Syria { for the benefit of Israel and the MIC } as well as Trump’s delight in his publicly acknowledged stealing Syria’s oil resources. A couple of those so called : “preemptive” wars ……for no reason other than the US Government’s desire to steal things that do not belong to the USA…….but can be excused by Lame arguements ; such as “Weapons of Mass Destruction”….or “Human Rights” …are a case in point. When Tulsi Gabbard seriously begins to question the four billion dollars gifted annually to : “Talmudic Israel” ….as as result of the influence of those Dual Israeli citizens in the US Senate and Congress…… then she will have the respect of thoughtful, patriotic Americans. Right now….She is simply trying to make a few {cheap} Brownie points without any real repercussions to her political aspirations.
Anymore deviating from the party line, and it would be political suicide for Tulsi ghabbar Singh. She’s just another run of the mill pseudo left candidate. Lets be honest.
The US won’t get involved bcs they r bankrupt. Oh, and btw, didn’t the combined West try to kill Erdogan a few years ago. But somehow they gonna fight for him today? Clearly critical thinking is démodé. Emotional responses are all that’s important in this age. So, how are you feeling today?
What nonsense she speaks. She’s just another apologist for the empire. Tulsi ghabbar singh calling this Er-Dog-An’s war is a fraud! This is a US war in Syria at the behest of Israel.
So many here whining she didn’t say this or say that or she shoulda done this. She made her point and didn’t muddy it up with stuff that could detract from that point. Sure she could have mentioned the US role in this tragedy but then she would have been attacked by the warmongers as an America hater and stooge of Assad and Russia. Most Americans have been so indoctrinated with the bunk that the world would fall apart if it wasn’t for the US and it’s role as the only force for good on the planet and that the world would descend into chaos without the US the truth would have fallen on deaf ears and discredit her and her message in the eyes of most Americans.
if snedly arkus actually listened to ; and understood Tulsi Gabbard what she was saying ; he would understand that ” There was no point to “her” point”. Complaining about a Turkish Hotel thief by the name of Erdogan….in the Same hotel that the American Hotel thief Trump was also breaking into rooms is a pointless exercise. The core issue here ; centers on the violation of Syria’s sovreignity by all uninvited invaders.
Gabbard is sometimes superficial (because naive, or for a broader following?), but as the most outspoken critic of lies used to justify regime change wars, she is the most ignored candidate.
Not to minimize the criticism of her deficiencies, she IS confronting the warfare state.
What is the point? Tulsi has no hope of making a dent, or nary a blemish for that matter. The repeated postings of her vids on here result in the usual back-and-forth bantering of those for Tulsi, and those against. The supporters, though far less zealous than the Trumpettes were, still reek of the odious perfume of willful self delusion— why not support her, since there’s nothing else, and nothing more to lose? Her detractors point to the holes in the narrative, mirroring the adage: half of the truth is all of the lie.
The point is simply, to my mind, that the narrative is purely distracting, and a redirect from the rebellion shout of outrage that must ensue when thinking souls recognize the meaningless and empty political charades perpetrating as reality. And to call the bluff means not to fawn over a Tulsi type, but to reevaluate, life, the universe, and everything.
I am sick of this kardashian-level of gossiping. Who said what? Jeffrey/Pompeo say they will support Erdogan, Tulsi says dont, what will Sanders say etc.
WHO THE F CARES!
The US is bankrupt. Repeat after me:
THE US IS BANKRUPT.
One more time:
THE US IS BANKRUPT.
That is the only point that matters. The US won’t support nothing, even as we speak they are packing their bags leaving Afghanistan becauseeeee?
Yes, because they are BANKRUPT.
In fact, a major point of contention in the “Peace” deal with the Taliban is whether America will or will not be allowed to retain a terrorist-sponsoring… I mean anti-terror contingent of troops in Afghanistan.
The Americans want to keep some troops in Afghanistan.
RATM, this kind of incoherent shouting all in caps does not serve a purpose excepting to make you feel better. You absolutely need to bring some support to your statements otherwise it is just someone else shouting on the internet.
I refer you to mod rule 1
“1) Absolutely no use of CAPITAL LETTERS (as this is considered SCREAMING). Abbreviations (DPRK, USA, UN, BBC, etc.) are, of course, allowed.”
It would be a good idea for most of the new posters to familiarize themselves with the moderation policy. /moderation-policy/
Bankruptcy includes a reset of the monetary system. Pensions, debts are thus forgone or not paid as agreed to. We are deep in debt yes, technically bankrupt, a greater than your average country’s citizens are physically bankrupt, but the country is not physically bankrupt until the citizens refuse to be taxed beyond the breaking point, this still appears to have some running room.
This physical bankruptcy has not occurred, so you are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts.
No sovereign country can ever go bankrupt in its own currency, but the US dollar exchange rate with other currencies and relative to the price of gold, can be adversely affected by uncontrolled military spending, while its domestic infrastructure and social services are degenerating. The same situation caused the demise of all previous empires as outlined by historian Paul Kennedy in “The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers” published in 1987.
tulsi’s statements come conveniently after the self-styled sultan of the muslim world, Erdogan, raised the plight of muslims in the recent delhi riots.
Similar riots happened when modi was in power in the indian province of gujrat. Modi is a life-long member of indian right-wing group, the RSS which seeks to replace the secular character of indian constitution with a hindu one and covert india into a hindu nation.
Tulsi is known to be close to indian origin hindus in USA who are affiliated to the RSS and has their backing.
The Sultan got a tongue lashing from the only Presidential Candidate in this field qualified to be CiC 4 days before his Summons to Moscow where he will get another tongue lashing from Vladimir Putin for breaking his agreement to disarm HIS Terrorists In Idlib.
Almost all the comments before mine show a complete lack of understanding anything about her.
I completely agree with you. Tulsi is not just the only presidential candidate speaking sanity rather than the usual warmongering propaganda (and that includes Bernie), she is the only politician on the entire national scene doing so (at least since Rep. Rohrabacher was defeated at the polls). No, she doesn’t have a chance of winning, but there is no reason to believe she is insincere. Maybe, unlike all the others, she still has a conscience she must answer to. Who else has a message other than raving that every problem in the world is Russia’s fault and it is the obligation of the glorious USA to stop them “there” (pick the country) rather than here? Answer: Absolutely no one.
Here we go. The agenda becomes clear. All this crap about “the sultan,” as if a democratically elected leader is somehow preferable. And now Erdogan is “at war with Russia.” Give me a break! If you don’t get what CFR Gabbard is up to, you are part of the problem.
Didn’t Mrs. Assad meet with this woman? Any updates on Mrs. Assad’s health?
Tulsi agreed to meet with Assad when she was asked while on her trip to Syria to meet with the Opposition. This CFR BS is nonsense. She was invited by DNC members because they knew they had a Hot Potato to deal with and thought they could co-opt he. They didn’t know Tulsi is not co-optable. All you naysayers don’t have a clue. Are there any other CFR members who went to Syria to talk to the Christians being slaughtered by the terrorists?
All those who think Tulsi is a joke, stupid, a Deep State Operator, etc, etc, need to look at her legislative proposals on her website that nobody in Congress would sign on to or bring to the floor for a vote.
Rewriting history, Tusli Gabbard fails to mention the construction of the attack on Syria in which they created the armies of conquest composed of ISIL from al Qaeda in Iraq, that went on to produce local al Qaeda groups in Syria led by mercenary fighters into the country through Turkey. So while Turkey is an accomplish in this, and a convenient NATO partner, the doctrine of the Obama administration was “leading from behind” is totally true.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton carried out the political foundation by creating a “government in exile” which also seem to have faded out of the “history books”. At first based on the old Muslim Brotherhood hostility with the Syrian Government and exiled, it was based in Turkey. Later the state department made a larger foundation based on arab support which is evident by the Doha Conference at Brookings Institution led by Sec. of State Hillary Clinton in which she called for and created the basis for a future syrian government involving the ISIL and al Qaeda group to take part in the government and as such commanding the government , so as to create a basis for partition of Syria according to their and Israels interest particularily these mercenaries simply follow orders, and would give away the Golan Heights to Israel, and create etnically divided Syria to control its economy by corporations of the empires syndicate. US is still supporting Turkey in Syria and that is a main factor in there continued assault, still the mercenaries are US proxies. Excluding perhaps ISIL that created a rift while they established the islamic state, ISIL groups are still supporting Israel in the Golan Heights. Others have been replaced or rebranded by US bases such as al-Tanf in eastern Syria.
Very well said. The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. No decent loyal American could disagree with Major Gabbard.
Not the whole truth because US joint action with Turkey, Saudi and Israel over past decade is ignored. But as much as she can say as a presidential candidate.
She’s too sane and rational to be taken seriously by the American power structure or its propagandized citizens. We always get more of the reflexive warmongering in response to any contrived crisis on the international stage. Expect it again here, sooner or later.
Mostly very sane indeed yes…BUT, once again Gabbard reveals her infantile fairy tale belief of who was behind 9/11 at the 30-second mark…I quote…
“I and thousands of Americans enlisted after the al-Qaeda attack on 9/11”
“… infantile fairy tale belief of who was behind 9/11 …”
To tell the full truth: Putin too has been publicly saying exactly the same – even though he too fully well knew it to be a naive fairy tale!
Perhaps, their “reason” for going along with the “official” bogus narrative is diplomatic, to avoid getting embroiled in an extra dispute, not conducive to achieving their more important objectives. Incidentally, apparently not the approach of Iran, who generally seem to favour truth in diplomacy.
Officially declaring the true identity behind both 9/11 and the war in Syria is a no-no in DC, it would result in the end of her career.
I think Tulsi is quite aware of that.
It would have even more impact with ventilating her meaning about the occupation of 1/3 of Syria by US forces, stealing their oil.
It strikes me that there is quite some misinformation about the situation around Idlib. At least I’m a bit cautious. I’ve even read comments with ‘what Putin should do’. I’m pretty convinced that Putin has far more and better intel than we have, and acts as such.
Cheers, Rob
“… there is quite some misinformation about the situation around Idlib …”
Quite so. See “Turkish And Russian Propaganda On Collision Course”, https://southfront.org/turkish-and-russian-propaganda-on-collision-course/
What Tulsi Gabbard FAILS to mention are the current { on going } actions by the US Government to continue with the destabilization of Syria { for the benefit of Israel and the MIC } as well as Trump’s delight in his publicly acknowledged stealing Syria’s oil resources. A couple of those so called : “preemptive” wars ……for no reason other than the US Government’s desire to steal things that do not belong to the USA…….but can be excused by Lame arguements ; such as “Weapons of Mass Destruction”….or “Human Rights” …are a case in point. When Tulsi Gabbard seriously begins to question the four billion dollars gifted annually to : “Talmudic Israel” ….as as result of the influence of those Dual Israeli citizens in the US Senate and Congress…… then she will have the respect of thoughtful, patriotic Americans. Right now….She is simply trying to make a few {cheap} Brownie points without any real repercussions to her political aspirations.
Anymore deviating from the party line, and it would be political suicide for Tulsi ghabbar Singh. She’s just another run of the mill pseudo left candidate. Lets be honest.
The US won’t get involved bcs they r bankrupt. Oh, and btw, didn’t the combined West try to kill Erdogan a few years ago. But somehow they gonna fight for him today? Clearly critical thinking is démodé. Emotional responses are all that’s important in this age. So, how are you feeling today?
Two aspects of her statement which are important:
1. She has links into elements of the US military who are not automatically “friends of Zion”
2. She demands that Bernie make a statement on what is going on.
What nonsense she speaks. She’s just another apologist for the empire. Tulsi ghabbar singh calling this Er-Dog-An’s war is a fraud! This is a US war in Syria at the behest of Israel.
So many here whining she didn’t say this or say that or she shoulda done this. She made her point and didn’t muddy it up with stuff that could detract from that point. Sure she could have mentioned the US role in this tragedy but then she would have been attacked by the warmongers as an America hater and stooge of Assad and Russia. Most Americans have been so indoctrinated with the bunk that the world would fall apart if it wasn’t for the US and it’s role as the only force for good on the planet and that the world would descend into chaos without the US the truth would have fallen on deaf ears and discredit her and her message in the eyes of most Americans.
if snedly arkus actually listened to ; and understood Tulsi Gabbard what she was saying ; he would understand that ” There was no point to “her” point”. Complaining about a Turkish Hotel thief by the name of Erdogan….in the Same hotel that the American Hotel thief Trump was also breaking into rooms is a pointless exercise. The core issue here ; centers on the violation of Syria’s sovreignity by all uninvited invaders.
I have to say,
I like her.
More fake dissent from the self-styled Land of the Free.
Yawn.
Gabbard is sometimes superficial (because naive, or for a broader following?), but as the most outspoken critic of lies used to justify regime change wars, she is the most ignored candidate.
Not to minimize the criticism of her deficiencies, she IS confronting the warfare state.
What is the point? Tulsi has no hope of making a dent, or nary a blemish for that matter. The repeated postings of her vids on here result in the usual back-and-forth bantering of those for Tulsi, and those against. The supporters, though far less zealous than the Trumpettes were, still reek of the odious perfume of willful self delusion— why not support her, since there’s nothing else, and nothing more to lose? Her detractors point to the holes in the narrative, mirroring the adage: half of the truth is all of the lie.
The point is simply, to my mind, that the narrative is purely distracting, and a redirect from the rebellion shout of outrage that must ensue when thinking souls recognize the meaningless and empty political charades perpetrating as reality. And to call the bluff means not to fawn over a Tulsi type, but to reevaluate, life, the universe, and everything.
I am sick of this kardashian-level of gossiping. Who said what? Jeffrey/Pompeo say they will support Erdogan, Tulsi says dont, what will Sanders say etc.
WHO THE F CARES!
The US is bankrupt. Repeat after me:
THE US IS BANKRUPT.
One more time:
THE US IS BANKRUPT.
That is the only point that matters. The US won’t support nothing, even as we speak they are packing their bags leaving Afghanistan becauseeeee?
Yes, because they are BANKRUPT.
The USA is not leaving Afghanistan.
In fact, a major point of contention in the “Peace” deal with the Taliban is whether America will or will not be allowed to retain a terrorist-sponsoring… I mean anti-terror contingent of troops in Afghanistan.
The Americans want to keep some troops in Afghanistan.
“packing their bags leaving Afghanistan”
Or because they need the people to murder somewhere else
RATM, this kind of incoherent shouting all in caps does not serve a purpose excepting to make you feel better. You absolutely need to bring some support to your statements otherwise it is just someone else shouting on the internet.
I refer you to mod rule 1
“1) Absolutely no use of CAPITAL LETTERS (as this is considered SCREAMING). Abbreviations (DPRK, USA, UN, BBC, etc.) are, of course, allowed.”
It would be a good idea for most of the new posters to familiarize themselves with the moderation policy.
/moderation-policy/
Bankruptcy includes a reset of the monetary system. Pensions, debts are thus forgone or not paid as agreed to. We are deep in debt yes, technically bankrupt, a greater than your average country’s citizens are physically bankrupt, but the country is not physically bankrupt until the citizens refuse to be taxed beyond the breaking point, this still appears to have some running room.
This physical bankruptcy has not occurred, so you are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts.
No sovereign country can ever go bankrupt in its own currency, but the US dollar exchange rate with other currencies and relative to the price of gold, can be adversely affected by uncontrolled military spending, while its domestic infrastructure and social services are degenerating. The same situation caused the demise of all previous empires as outlined by historian Paul Kennedy in “The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers” published in 1987.
tulsi’s statements come conveniently after the self-styled sultan of the muslim world, Erdogan, raised the plight of muslims in the recent delhi riots.
https://www.trtworld.com/video/social-videos/erdogan-denounces-massacres-committed-against-muslims-in-india/5e5810b56c3540001591d27a
Similar riots happened when modi was in power in the indian province of gujrat. Modi is a life-long member of indian right-wing group, the RSS which seeks to replace the secular character of indian constitution with a hindu one and covert india into a hindu nation.
Tulsi is known to be close to indian origin hindus in USA who are affiliated to the RSS and has their backing.
https://theintercept.com/2019/01/05/tulsi-gabbard-2020-hindu-nationalist-modi/
The Sultan got a tongue lashing from the only Presidential Candidate in this field qualified to be CiC 4 days before his Summons to Moscow where he will get another tongue lashing from Vladimir Putin for breaking his agreement to disarm HIS Terrorists In Idlib.
Almost all the comments before mine show a complete lack of understanding anything about her.
I completely agree with you. Tulsi is not just the only presidential candidate speaking sanity rather than the usual warmongering propaganda (and that includes Bernie), she is the only politician on the entire national scene doing so (at least since Rep. Rohrabacher was defeated at the polls). No, she doesn’t have a chance of winning, but there is no reason to believe she is insincere. Maybe, unlike all the others, she still has a conscience she must answer to. Who else has a message other than raving that every problem in the world is Russia’s fault and it is the obligation of the glorious USA to stop them “there” (pick the country) rather than here? Answer: Absolutely no one.
Here we go. The agenda becomes clear. All this crap about “the sultan,” as if a democratically elected leader is somehow preferable. And now Erdogan is “at war with Russia.” Give me a break! If you don’t get what CFR Gabbard is up to, you are part of the problem.
Didn’t Mrs. Assad meet with this woman? Any updates on Mrs. Assad’s health?
Tulsi agreed to meet with Assad when she was asked while on her trip to Syria to meet with the Opposition. This CFR BS is nonsense. She was invited by DNC members because they knew they had a Hot Potato to deal with and thought they could co-opt he. They didn’t know Tulsi is not co-optable. All you naysayers don’t have a clue. Are there any other CFR members who went to Syria to talk to the Christians being slaughtered by the terrorists?
All those who think Tulsi is a joke, stupid, a Deep State Operator, etc, etc, need to look at her legislative proposals on her website that nobody in Congress would sign on to or bring to the floor for a vote.
https://www.tulsi2020.com/issues
Rewriting history, Tusli Gabbard fails to mention the construction of the attack on Syria in which they created the armies of conquest composed of ISIL from al Qaeda in Iraq, that went on to produce local al Qaeda groups in Syria led by mercenary fighters into the country through Turkey. So while Turkey is an accomplish in this, and a convenient NATO partner, the doctrine of the Obama administration was “leading from behind” is totally true.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton carried out the political foundation by creating a “government in exile” which also seem to have faded out of the “history books”. At first based on the old Muslim Brotherhood hostility with the Syrian Government and exiled, it was based in Turkey. Later the state department made a larger foundation based on arab support which is evident by the Doha Conference at Brookings Institution led by Sec. of State Hillary Clinton in which she called for and created the basis for a future syrian government involving the ISIL and al Qaeda group to take part in the government and as such commanding the government , so as to create a basis for partition of Syria according to their and Israels interest particularily these mercenaries simply follow orders, and would give away the Golan Heights to Israel, and create etnically divided Syria to control its economy by corporations of the empires syndicate. US is still supporting Turkey in Syria and that is a main factor in there continued assault, still the mercenaries are US proxies. Excluding perhaps ISIL that created a rift while they established the islamic state, ISIL groups are still supporting Israel in the Golan Heights. Others have been replaced or rebranded by US bases such as al-Tanf in eastern Syria.
Tulsi does talk about this – just not here in this post.