By Godfree Roberts selected from his extensive weekly newsletter : Here Comes China
Editorial Comments
Now that the excitement of all the major Heads of Countries virtually speaking at the UNGA is over, we can come to initial conclusions. The theme of this gathering was to investigate the UN itself, and to position it to be a better global gathering place where internal relations can be discussed, problems solved and the work of multi-polarity between nations can continue. President Putin gave a serious statesman speech without any fireworks, stating why the UN is important and calmly outlining the conditions in our world today, which actions should take priority and what the Russian focus is in the medium and long terms. His gift to the UN and staff is a free SputnikV Vaccine. Chairman Xi did the same and also came bearing gifts, putting some money where their mouth’s are in essence. Here is the transcript and this quote stands out: (Note my bolded sentence).
“Since the start of this year, we, the 1.4 billion Chinese, undaunted by the strike of COVID-19, and with the government and the people united as one, have made all-out efforts to control the virus and speedily restore life and economy to normalcy. We have every confidence to achieve our goals within the set time frame, that is, to finish the building of a moderately prosperous society in all respects, lift out of poverty all rural residents living below the current poverty line, and meet ten years ahead of schedule the poverty eradication target set out in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
China is the largest developing country in the world, a country that is committed to peaceful, open, cooperative and common development. We will never seek hegemony, expansion, or sphere of influence. We have no intention to fight either a Cold War or a hot war with any country. We will continue to narrow differences and resolve disputes with others through dialogue and negotiation. We do not seek to develop only ourselves or engage in a zero-sum game. We will not pursue development behind closed doors. Rather, we aim to foster, over time, a new development paradigm with domestic circulation as the mainstay and domestic and international circulations reinforcing each other. This will create more space for China’s economic development and add impetus to global economic recovery and growth.
China will continue to work as a builder of global peace, a contributor to global development and a defender of international order. To support the UN in playing its central role in international affairs, I hereby announce the following steps to be taken by China:
— China will provide another US$50 million to the UN COVID-19 Global Humanitarian Response Plan.
— China will provide US$50 million to the China-FAO South-South Cooperation Trust Fund (Phase III).
— China will extend the Peace and Development Trust Fund between the UN and China by five years after it expires in 2025.
— China will set up a UN Global Geospatial Knowledge and Innovation Center and an International Research Center of Big Data for Sustainable Development Goals to facilitate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”
So why is it that the Chinese government seemingly fails to convince the western public that China is not their enemy? Alternatively stated, why is it that the western countries are successful in portraying China as their enemy? The answer is non-complicated at a first look.
At present, 90% of Americans learn about China through Western media, so it’s hard for the Chinese Government to convince Americans of anything.
American media are even more tightly controlled than Chinese media and far less trustworthy, says the American Press Institute, “Just six percent of Americans say they have a lot of confidence in the media, putting the news industry about equal to Congress and well below the public’s view of other institutions”.
Americans don’t trust what their media tell them, but they don’t have other sources of information, either.
Joey Yu says: (February 22) —”The average American also has never left the United States. Never seen another country unless it’s through the media, and what the media shows them is probably outdated.” • And nearly all Western media has the constant anti-Chinese political refrain which has brainwashed many even highly educated American and British professionals. I have given up trying to correct such people because I would lose their friendship if I continue to do that. But that brainwashing rankles.
First we had President Trump’s speech at the UNGA, which can only be categorized as a blistering and outright attack on China, well outside of the theme set for this meeting, while pretending to be the ‘Peaceful Nation’. The Chinese commentary was immediate and devastating. I pulled these few comments describing President Trump’s speech out of just one of the Chinese commentaries:
Discriminatory, did the US President come to the UN for a quarrel, vulgar, full of loopholes, fooling only the American public, undisguised attempt at a new cold war, a destroyer, a creator of tensions, a hysterical attack that violated the diplomatic etiquette a top leader is supposed to have, pays no heed to diplomacy, they believe power is everything, they want the agenda of the international community to serve US politics, and the UN General Assembly be turned into Trump’s presidential campaign, the US has performed so poorly in handling domestic affairs that reforms could barely be advanced, it has to pass the buck to digest the domestic anger.
And then finally: “This is the sign of stagnation and the decline of a major power. It’s hoped the US government will not go further in this direction, which will only end up deceiving itself.”
With that as a backdrop, this selection from Godfree’s Here Comes China Newsletter focuses on
- vaccines,
- how the ‘scary social credit system’ actually works,
- a purported whistle blower,
- Pakistan and Belt and Road
- Chinese foreign investment.
While in the western countries there is a concerted effort against vaccines, and a tremendous amount of backlash from citizens against vaccines for Covid-19 (and I don’t blame them at all given who is developing these for the western world), in China the situation is completely different:
China will not need a sweeping coronavirus vaccination programme because the pathogen is effectively under control in the country – at least for now. Gao Fu, director of the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CCDC), said that large-scale vaccination would only be needed if there was a major outbreak, like the one in Wuhan in February. “This is an issue of balancing risk and return”.[MORE]
We’ve seen endless propaganda with visions of brutal control of the citizens via the so-called Social Credit System in China. Let’s take a look at how it really works.
The chairman of China’s embattled HNA Group Co. Ltd. was restricted from excessive spending on travel, golf and other activities by a court as debt woes continue rattling the once high-flying conglomerate. A district court in Xi’an, northwest China’s Shaanxi province, issued orders to limit spending by HNA and its 67-year-old co-founder and Chairman Chen Feng, a court document database showed Wednesday. As the legal representative of HNA, Chen will be restricted from taking flights, buying train tickets that are pricier than economy class, accommodations in luxury hotels, spending on entertainment such as golf and leisure trips, buying property and nonessential vehicles, and investing in high-yield wealth management products, according to the orders. The Xi’an court said it issued the orders in a debt dispute filed against HNA in August. [MORE]
It seems absolutely fine to me that if someone mismanaged his large business and lived a luxury life, that he should be brought back to a normal lifestyle while fixing his business.
We`ve all heard of the Chinese Virologist that is being trotted out on most western mainstream media, saying that China developed the Covid-19 virus in a lab and she was told to stay silent. Yet, I bet very few have seen the Chinese commentary on this:
Chinese defector’s shocking virus claim: Dr Li, a formerly a specialist at Hong Kong’s School of Public Health, said her supervisor first asked her to investigate a new “SARS-like” virus in Wuhan – but that her efforts were later stifled. She said she reported back that cases appeared to be rising exponentially but was told to “keep silent and be careful”. “’We will get in trouble and we’ll be disappeared’,” her supervisor reportedly said. Dr Li travelled to the US in late April before speaking out, saying she had to leave Hong Kong because she “knows how [China] treat whistleblowers”. [MORE]
A press release from the University of Hong Kong (HKU) denied her claim and stated that: “Dr Yan never conducted any research on human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus at HKU during December 2019 and January 2020. We further observe that what she might have emphasised in the reported interview has no scientific basis but resembles hearsay.” The director of HKU’s School of Public Health, Keiji Fukuda, said in an internal memo to staff that none of the researchers named by Yan were involved in any cover-up or “secret research”.[MORE]
Pakistan and China signed the Development Agreement for the first China Pakistan Economic Corridor’s (CPEC) Rashakai Special Economic Zone (SEZ) Monday. Chairman Atif R. Bokhari said sufficient headway has been made on this front and the zones are now gearing up for business. “Pakistan’s proximity with China will allow these SEZs to foster economic interdependence for mutual economic advantage,” he added. [MORE]
In Pakistan, the Belt and Road project is everywhere. A dinner at the Islamabad Club quickly turns into a reminiscence of different visits to China. After a lecture in Lahore, a group of young men from Baluchistan want to know if China’s monumental economic initiative will develop their region — or cause it to lose its identity. The acronym for the corridor linking China and Pakistan, CPEC, can be heard in hotel lobbies and restaurants; it stands out for those who cannot understand Urdu. There are young people who have come of age since the beginning of the initiative and for whom it constitutes the only possible horizon for professional advancement. Earlier this year, I spent three weeks traveling in Pakistan, the crown jewel of the Belt and Road project, the country where the initiative first took root and therefore the most plausible candidate for the place where its future can be surmised and understood.
So central is the Belt and Road to Pakistani politics that it should not be thought of as a specific enterprise. Rather, it provides the overarching framework for every economic policy and project. In short, the initiative is something that should feel very familiar to policymakers in Brussels and other European capitals.
In my discussions with economic authorities and think tanks, it quickly became obvious that the main debate in Pakistan today is about the best way to adapt policy decisions and reforms to the Belt and Road framework. The Belt and Road can thus be compared to the European Union and the role it played for countries in Central and Eastern Europe after the 2004 and 2007 enlargements. Which decisions should these countries make in order to better occupy their place within the given political and economic order?
That many in the West still think of the Belt and Road purely in terms of infrastructure is something I find deeply perplexing. In the project’s inaugural speech that Chinese President Xi Jinping delivered in Astana in 2013, infrastructure was no more than one of the five pillars of the Belt and Road — and very obviously not more than an ancillary one. The real action was clearly elsewhere.
At the time of Xi was giving his speech in Astana, it was common to hear from different officials and intellectuals in Beijing that the Belt and Road was meant to be completed in 2049, around the time of the first centennial of the new China. Last year, while living in Beijing, I started hearing that the temporal horizon was even longer. Many spoke openly of a 100-year project. This is not the time-scale of an infrastructure plan. The Marshall Plan was concluded in just a few years. Interestingly, in Pakistan this idea — that the Belt and Road is a project of economic and technological development, culminating in a new global political and economic order — is clearly understood. By Bruno Maçães, a former Europe minister for Portugal, is a senior adviser at Flint Global in London and the author most recently of “History Has Begun: The Birth of a New America” (Hurst, 2020). The paperback edition of his “Belt and Road: a Chinese World Order” will be published this month. [MORE]
Over 80% of the World’s Nations received Chinese Foreign Investment in 2019. China’s outbound foreign direct investment totalled USD$136.91 billion, for a YoY decline of 4.3%. The investment sum nonetheless made China the world’s second biggest source of foreign direct investment after Japan ($226.65 billion). As of the end of 2019 China’s total foreign direct investments were $2.2 trillion, third behind the United States ($7.7 trillion) and the Netherlands ($2.6 trillion). China’s outbound foreign direct investment comprised 10.4% of the global total in 2019 – the fourth consecutive year that this figure was above 10%. China’s total foreign direct investments were 6.4% of the total, on par with 2018. 80% of China’s foreign direct investments in 2019 were in the services sector, with key areas including leasing and commercial services, wholesale and retail, finance, information communications/ software, real estate, and transit/ warehousing. [MORE]
Selections and editorial comments by Amarynth. (Go Get that newsletter – it is again packed with detail).
The Chinese Virologist is connected to Steve Bannon. https://asamnews.com/2020/09/15/former-trump-adviser-steve-bannon-manufactures-phony-study-that-china-created-covid-19-in-a-lab/
Where have we seen this game before?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony
Any citizen of any country has a duty to fact check when the propaganda outlets kick into high drive.
China cannot produce a vaccine because they have no way to test the effectiveness of a vaccine since the epidemic is frozen in their country. The only way they could develop a vaccine internally would be to have concentration camps of Uighurs, give 30,000 of them vaccines and then infect them with the virus or partner with a country that has an increasing case load.
In the U.S. we will have no problem testing 3 and now 4 candidate vaccines in stage 3 testing at the same time. No problem. Not that I think this is anything to brag about.
Christian J. Chuba what you are saying is actually erroneous.
4 world’s covid vaccines in final trials are from China. China has been administering experimental coronavirus vaccines to groups facing high infection risks such as medical workers since July under an ’emergency use’ programme
Below is a summary of its efforts to develop vaccines.
Two of the candidates are from China National Biotec Group (CNBG), a unit of state-owned pharmaceutical giant China National Pharmaceutical Group (Sinopharm).
Sinovac Biotech is developing the third candidate called CoronaVac, while CanSino Biologics is working with state military research unit Academy of Military Medical Sciences on Ad5-nCoV.
Who is partnering with China for trials?
Argentina, Peru, Morocco, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates have allowed CNBG to run Phase 3 trials. It’s not immediately clear if the company’s two vaccine candidates will be tested in those countries.
Indonesia and Brazil are helping with Phase 3 trials of Sinovac’s CoronaVac, while Bangladesh aims to run a late stage clinical trial for the experimental vaccine.
Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Russia have agreed to conduct Phase 3 trials of CanSino’s candidate, while Mexico has signed an early agreement with the Chinese firm for a late-stage trial.
How experimental covid-19 vaccines are used in China?
China has been administering experimental coronavirus vaccines to groups facing high infection risks such as medical workers since July under an “emergency use” programme.
Authorities could consider modestly expanding the emergency use programme to try to prevent outbreaks during the autumn and winter.
China has not specified how many people have been vaccinated or which product has been given.
Before the official launch of the programme in July, China’s military approved the use of CanSino’s vaccine, in June, while state media reported in June that employees at state-owned firms travelling overseas were allowed to take one of the two candidate vaccines being developed by CNBG.
A large warning banner should encircle this clown’s comment.
It is total claptrap.
Ignorance and misinformation in the circumstance of Pandemic and INFOwar against China demand that the Vineyard provide more than an open space for comments. It demands warnings when such stupidity is foisted on the threads.
Larchmonter445 says: “A large warning banner should encircle this clown’s comment.”
You probably should mention the name of specific commenter (Removed,do not dox fellow posters,MOD) to avoid confusion. Casual readers may mistaken who you refer to (since you are reply to amarynth).
Sorry d dan … we have some crossed lines here. I would say, least said, soonest mended. Larchmonter directed his comment to me, because we share the frustration of these kinds of comments, and we both know it :-)
They are testing in Brazil.
thank you. “china will not need a sweeping corona vaccination program.” i hope this translate into other countries as well after they have it under control of course.
The author asks the following;
”So why is it that the Chinese government seemingly fails to convince the western public that China is not their enemy? Alternatively stated, why is it that the western countries are successful in portraying China as their enemy? ”
Let me give you my perspective on that.
I am from Holland aka the Netherlands and get 98% of my information from non mainstream media and I still think the Chinese Government is my enemy. Just as the EU and Dutch government is my enemy, just as I think the US government is my enemy and I could go on but you get the idea. The only government I am not sure about if it is my enemy is the Russian government now but I am sure they will become so eventually.
The reason why is simple and can be summarised this way, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely! Positions in power are sought after by power hungry psychopaths and sociopaths mostly. Very few good people can stand up to them. Ron Paul is the most famous one to me and I consider him a hero.
The results of that? See the mess we have in this highly centralised, totally corrupted government and corporate system called the world. Xi and his government the humanitarian? Dont make me laugh. Same goes for mr. Trump, mr Rutte (”my Prime Minister”), miss Ursula whatever from the EU and the puppet ”string pulling” masters above them. They do not care at all about humanity. They oppress their people, spy on them, keep them dumbed down, torture them and so on. They care even less about foreign people. They hate peace, love, harmony and so on. They love to hate, devide us, rule (power is a goal in itself, not a means to achieve positive things), exploit us and kill us and profit from it.
If you say that governments, giga corporations and their puppet masters are waging a spiritual war agains humanity all over the globe (minus Russia atm) I will agree fully.
The very sad thing is that you can ignore politics but politics will not ignore you. So I still have to follow it and be the grain of sand in the big wheels of the political world that are turning.
Has it ever been different? As far as I know not. Has it ever been this depraved though? I think only a few times.
If only there was a way to detect 100% objectively the sociopaths and psychopaths in our societies and euthanese them before they can ever do any serious harm. We know the harm they are doing now. That would defenately make things better for humanity. Would most of Chinese government be on that list, sure, just as most in the EU, Dutch government, American government and all governments and giga corporations on this planet.
Take a look at the Neurenberg trials, if you keep the standards they had there back then (only on the Germans) for the whole world, it would be a great start to clean up this mess. We have 150 seats in our parliament. Out of them I think 3 are decent and 1 is great.
We as voters really tried hard to change the system here in Holland. On the 6th of may 2002, 9 days before elections the one we, as the people, rallied around and was threatening to get an absolute or near absolute majority in the elections after well over a decade of hard work to unite the country was executed via gun shot wounds to the head fired at point blank. Of course the lone gun man story happend according to officialdom. Just like Kennedy tons of things point the other way. His executioner walks free for years now.
That broke the spirit of the country. Now with tons of (il)legal immigration this has been made it nearly impossible to recreate the vision we had back then. To be clear, an (near) absolute majority in Hollands political landscape is unheard of. We were so close to kill what we call the ”cartel of political parties” but they survived and still rule with an iron vist. J
See, just as the Chinese government does. So that is why I consider governments all over the world my enemy. They want to rule me, extort me, spy on me, decide for me, micro manage me and worst of all, killl my spirit. In case of foreign governments even worse. Same goes for the corporations.
Sorry for the rant but had to get if off my chest.
Regards,
Hugo
But you do understand what we are talking about here? Just one of the things that governments do to engender the mistrust from the ordinary citizen. In this case there is the western countries (USA particularly) that is being propagandized and lied to, specifically to hate another people with a view to either sell a war to them (trade war in this case or even worse). It is one of those things governments do to engender the mistrust – they call it nationalism or patriotism. I don’t want to go to war because I mistrust one government more than another. Countries and governments do that. We should not. You may not like the Chinese, that is not the issue. We cannot again be lied into a war in our world.
First of all, let me be clear, I like almost all Chinese people I met in Holland and when I was on Holliday. I am only talking about their government. Big difference to me.
I like to think that I understand what we are talking about. It is a vicious circle. One or more empires around the world rule it. The smaller countries at best get to chose what empire rules them. We are emerging from an unipolar world. Russia and China had the option a) be forever ruled by the US Empire or b) become an empire and become like the US now eventually. For the small(er) countries, yay, maybe a tad less if becomes unipolar.
But that is not a good solution, just no war and muddle on. You got to strike the root by not allowing everything centralised. We do not need much centralisation as normal human persons (unlike the sociopaths and psychopaths)
All that is needed is an return to our God given rights. Yes, what that means differs all over the world. But in most religions (Zionism and Wahhabism are a rare and relatively recent exemption to the rule I think) seek peace and voluntary exchange of value, idea(l)s and human cooperation.
The so called dark ages in Europe were not that dark actually. They held onto much of them decentralised values of what I talked about above. Why were that not bad? From Egypt times via Roman times and all the way to now we read about European history minus the dark ages. Why is that. Mmm no major wars, no major centralised powers and so on maybe? It is not a glorious period to research as an historian thus and hence history is scatchy from that time. (I am not a historian to be clear, just like to read stuff about it).
It is an interesting period to research a bit since decentralised model of society we have not lived under since a long, long time. I dont call the time period of from when to when the dark ages lasted since definitions differ.
Dont be fooled though, that was not a bad time in Europe. The 100 year war with Spain was for example! And so much history about that told. Makes one think no?
Hugo says: “First of all, let me be clear, I like almost all Chinese people I met in Holland and when I was on Holliday. I am only talking about their government. Big difference to me.”
Then you should at least respect their (Chinese people’s) view about THEIR own government. Most Chinese support their government and believe their government is doing good things for their people, and their country is heading into the right direction.
What did Chinese government do to YOU that you regard it as your enemy? Furthermore, Chinese government and Chinese people have been constantly under attacked (militarily or otherwise) by your government and the western governments for the last 150 years. Please give them some slacks, and leave them alone, instead of calling them your “enemy”, would you?
The ‘Dark Ages’. It was not intellectually dark, ignorant or otherwise. It was litterally dark all across the northern hemisphere. The darkness began around the year 600 when a volcano(s) in Indonesia exploded (krakatoa perhaps). It’s documented in Chinese history (sulfer rain that lasted for weeks killing all it touched). The dust and ash blocked out the sun for hundreds of years destroying food supplies for animal and human alike. The second big blow was around 900ad, extending the ‘dark ages for another 400 years, leaving Europe’s Feudal Fifedoms fighting over scraps for hundreds of years. No big land wars buts lots of fighting over food supplies.
The reason for the ‘dark ages’ was recently looked at by tree archeologists examining tree rings from wood structures that still stand all across Europe. The tree rings tell the atmospheric history of the time period. Trust a tree to tell truth………..no a politician!
Otherwise Hugo, I hear you on the distrust of all perfidious governments, yours, mine, and theirs, and fully agree with the pastoral model of socitey that we need to return to.
Cheers, M
Hugo, you mistakenly believe that by its very nature government is ‘bad’ – but that means in a world of unequal relationships between customers and corporations – who is going to defend you against corporate abuse?
Workers trade unions?
Church organizations?
International organizations like the UN or Amnesty International?
Your argument is usually used in support of Libertarianism (which is what got us into this mess in the first place – less taxation & smaller government) but abolishing governments will only lead to corporations having even more power over us wage slaves / debt slaves – who are the vast majority of humanity
The trick is *not to allow a billionaire class to insert themselves *above political authority ie democracy – as the US, UK and most of Europe have done – which is something that the Chinese will *never allow
So its a bit of a paradox that a country thats a one party state (China) is actually *more democratic than so-called liberal democracies (like the US & UK)
You might have heard the joke that goes: ‘In the US you can change the party – but you *cant change the policy. In China you cant change the party – but you *can change the policy!’
Regards