What Does Nazism Mean? | The Vineyard of the Saker

by Batiushka for the Saker Blog

You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred, they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values of religion (to which few members of other civilizations were converted), but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do.

Samuel Phillips Huntingdon, The Clash of Civilizations, Chapter Two

President Zelensky of the Ukraine is by race a Jew, as indeed was President Poroshenko before him. Why then does the Russian Federal government call its special operation in the Ukraine ‘Denazification’? It seems contradictory to most Western minds, where the word ‘Nazi’ relates narrowly only to the anti-Jewish genocide of Third Reich (Reich = Empire) Germany. In other words what is the Russian, and for that matter non-Western, understanding of Nazism?

First of all, for Russians, as for many others, Nazism is the creed which in the Second World War organised above all the Slav Holocaust (over 30 million dead), far outmatching the Jewish Holocaust (nearly 6 million dead), as well as the genocide of other minorities at that time. Nazism is the programme to invade, kill, rape, plunder and enslave. This is exactly what the Nazis did in the Soviet Union after 1941. Invade others’ territories, kill the men, rape the women (and then kill them – one German soldier in two was a rapist and murderer in the USSR), plunder art and culture, and make slave workers of anyone left, taking them off to slave factories and camps in Germany, where they toiled until they died as serfs of the Third Reich.

However, the Nazis, shut out from colonization in the rest of the world, only did in Central and Eastern Europe, especially in Russia, what other Western European peoples did in their colonies, as we shall see below. In other words, what is meant by ‘Nazism’ is not at all specific to what Germans did during the Second World War. In this wider sense, which is what the Russian Federal government has in mind today, Nazism is what may be called ‘Western Supremacism’, the idea that Non-Western races are ‘Untermenschen’, subhumans. Therefore, like ‘niggers’, ‘savages’, ‘monkeys’, ‘nips’, ‘gooks’, the Russians too can be ‘cancelled’.

This mentality has its roots far back in the Barbarianism which destroyed the Western part of the Roman Empire in the fourth and fifth centuries AD. At first it seemed as though the Barbarians would be Christianised, especially on the outer edges of Western Europe, in Ireland, England, the Iberian Peninsula and Italy. But in the central geographical core, controlled by the Franks, the temptation among the barbarians of restoring the pagan Roman Empire was too strong.

This renewed and justified Barbarianism can be seen in the First ‘Reich’ (Empire), founded under the Germanic prince, Karl the Tall, also known as Charlemagne (747-814). Already before he founded this Reich in 800 and appointed himself ‘Emperor’, his Frankish forces under Roland had invaded the Basque Country and were defeated by the still free Basques at Roncevalles in 778 (one of the founding myths of Western Barbarianism) and again in 782 at the massacre of 4,500 Saxons at Verden. As a result, this genocidal barbarian was then called ‘The Great’ and ‘The Father of Europe’ and was ‘beatified’ by Roman Catholicism, which new Frankish religion, come from the Babylon of Rome, Charlemagne in effect founded, substituting it for the old Orthodox Christianity, come from Jerusalem.

Although Charlemagne and his Reich soon collapsed, it was the beginning of the end. After him the Western barbarians began to reject Christianity. (See, The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Power and Deviance in Western Europe, 950-1250 by R. I. Moore, 1987). Indeed, by the 11^th century, the barbarians under their new Norman shock troops, the SS of the time, began to massacre and oppress the native Greeks in the south of Italy and then the Muslims in the Iberian Peninsula and a little later the native Christian Mozarabs. As part of the same process, in 1066 the Norman SS invaded England and conquered that country, massacring the natives, imposing slavery (‘feudalism’) and Roman Catholicism. Many of the English took refuge in Constantinople and in the south of Russia.

The Western barbarians had found a justification for their barbarianism, there was no need to try and become Christians, they could carry on as before, only under the new names of ‘Catholics’, or in modern language, ‘Globalists’. After all, the barbarians were already saved, as now they belonged to an infallible organisation, whose leader held the keys to Paradise for them and which would justify any sort of pillage and murder.

After 1066 there soon followed the invasion, massacre and plunder of Wales and Scotland and the imposition of feudal enslavement and the new ‘Church’ there. In 1096 the same Western barbarians massacred the Jews in the Rhineland, on their way to massacre the ‘Greeks’ (= the Christians) and the Muslims in their genocidal campaign they called ‘The First Crusade’. In the second half of the 12^th century, these barbarians, who nowadays would be called Nazis, continued their massacres (‘crusades’) in the Near and Middle East and between 1169 and 1172 also invaded Ireland. In 1204 they massacred in and plundered the Christian Capital, New Rome, which they called Constantinople.

In the early 13^th century the barbarians to the north, called ‘The Teutonic Knights’, began their invasions, killings, rapings and plunderings of the Russian Lands. (See, Guy Mettan, Russia-the West, a Thousand-Year War, Geneva 2015, in French). However, this was only the beginning. At the end of the 15^th century there came the Italian Nazi, Columbus. In the space of 400 years, his primitive barbarian followers massacred perhaps 100 million people, whom they called the ‘Indians’, that is, the native peoples of the Caribbean (the Spanish, the British, the French and the Dutch), South America, (the Spanish and the Portuguese), Central America (the Spanish) and North America (the British, the French and the Spanish). They stole the vast American territories of two continents and their natural resources, and raped, plundered and enslaved on ‘reservations’.

However, within the same space of time they did the same in much of Africa (the slave trade, the Boer War), Asia, India, (See, the ‘India Mutiny’ (1), the salt hedge, the Bengal famine), and in Australasia massacring the Aborigenes, the Maori, as well as Micronesians and Polynesians. What the Nazis did in the Slav Holocaust (30 million dead) in Eastern Europe, the other Europeans had already been doing among the native peoples in the rest of the world, apart from in the Americas and Australasia, the British in India, China and Africa, the Portuguese in Angola and Mozambique, the Dutch in what is now Indonesia, the French in Central and North-West Africa and South-East Asia, the Belgians in the Congo, the Germans in South-West Africa and later the Italians in Ethiopia. All of this was in the name of ‘civilisation, freedom and democracy’. Why not even plant your flag on the Moon and claim that?

This Western Barbarianism used to call itself ‘the free world’ (it was not actually meant ironically…), but nowadays terms itself ‘the international community’ (= mafia). It is the same group of countries, totalling perhaps a billion zombified serfs, whose leaders have given themselves the divine right to sit at the top of the global pyramid of banana republics and racketeer and exploit the rest under the excuse of ‘Globalism’, that is their personal global control. Today they call their doctrine Secularism; in Russia it is called Nazism; elsewhere it is simply called ruthless exploitation.

Today, as a result of what is happening in the Ukraine, there is only one question: Are we going straight to the end of the world as a result of the global corruption of this elite of leaders, or will the end be delayed because the world is about to be cleansed of this Nazi elite?

Note:

1. See how the Nazis always camouflage their massacres and wars with different names:

English Christians = the Anglo-Saxons

Christians = The Greeks

The Genocide of Native Peoples and the Theft of Their Lands = The Discovery of the New World

The Franco-British Invasion of Russia = The Crimean War

The First Indian War of Liberation = The India Mutiny

The British Genocide of the Chinese = The Opium Wars

The Genocide of Dutch Settlers = The Boer War

The Great European War = World War I

The Euro-American War = World War II

Batiushka is an Orthodox priest

petergrfstrm on March 30, 2022 · at 6:28 am EST/EDT

There are some distinct features about the ‘usual’ nazism as compared with western supremacism.
It was a sect/cult. And it didnt emerge without substantial help from a foreign power center.
It turned out that Richard Wagner came to be an important inspirer. But in his youth he was recruited to the networks belonging to young Europe, Britains machinery for raising opposition against Britains rivals both on the continent and in the Americas.
Could perhaps be compared with the Open University and similar globalist instruments.
And later Wagner obtained a book written by one of the authors in Lord Palmerstons circle.
It concerned a struggle between jews and gentiles where the gentile hero was defeated.
That came to be a lifelong theme for Wagner.

Wagner belongs to the romantic era. From one perspective he was an innovator of the combination of art music and the spiritual

But romanticism refers to our emotional side. Something which is a great help when the aim is to launch an irrational cult with the purpose of pitting groups against each other.

Edward Gibbons, who earlier had studied the rise and fall of the Roman empire instructed the British oligarchy to use the roman method of supporting various religious sects for imperial purposes.

Now why would the British want to pit Germans and Jews against each other?

There was already antisemitism but that is useful when you attempt to strengthen it and also works as a cover for more ambitious efforts to encourage it.

So what was it all about?
It was about controlling the banking networks. Banking is most profitable when one nations currency plays the role of an effective reserve currency.

But if the bankers are allowed to be truly international that advantage is at risk if there is real competition.
So for the favoured nation it is best if one can limit the opportunities of rival nations for having equal access to fair financial practises.

Where the development of a rival nations economy may be partly obstructed.

This meant that Britain would want to isolate the bankers but without making it too obvious that it was all about the financial priviledges.

Thus encouraging ‘good ol’ antisemitism was a workable metod.

It may be related that the same author returned later when the prussian Jews were emancipated and published a novel which may be seen as providing a logical approach for the creation of a (gentile) master race.

Bismarck was a threat to Britains aims since he did collaborate with the financiers,
But the prince of Wales, Edward, got Bismarck out of the way in 1890.

Unfortunately for Russia and Germany the Tsar and the Kaiser were Edwards younger cousins and were too guillible. Edward even bragged about how easy it was to manipulate people on the continent

Houston Steward Chamberlain(HSC) eventually presented his interpretation of Wagners views to a wider audience and Houston also established himself in the Wagnerian Bayreut circle, married into the Wagner family.

Both the Kaiser and the nazis were significantly influenced by HSC and Hitlers letters to HSC were left on his desk until 1945 when they suddenly disappeared. Simultaneously compromising documents about Edward VIII’s nazi-connections were grabbed by the British.
(If Hitler had defeated the USSR, Britain would have changed guards a bit with Edward as the nazi king, something Edward had promised Hitler and suddenly Rudolf Hess could have been unleashed. The letters to HSC would then have been of value for Britain.

Depending on how the US-Japanese fighting turned out, Britain might well have been able to encourage Hitler to take on the US with the same bait as in the east. )

But at that time the nazis had become key to the geopolitical great game of playing Germany and Russia. And the above mentioned motive less important,
Before WWI however the motive of controlling the bankers was the only acutely strong motive for Britain to encourage antisemitism in Germany as I see it.
Once the bankers had been coopted some time between 1907 and 1913 the bankers were onboard and had no safe way to turn back. And they certainly came to be involved in supporting all warrying sides.
But before that pivotal time there was a chance that Germany would have been left to trade under conditions of peace and without any unfair restrictions on what the financiers were allowed to invest in.
Thus in my view it isnt Germany which should be blamed as much as Britain, the mastermind of everything that happened, world wars nazism and communism.

And in my view the bolshevik jews were simply doing Britains dirty job.

Britains clever calculating aristocracy wanted to impose communism on Russia and Britain wanted the nazis to notice the jews as bait for Britains wanted war.

98 Comments

scarnoc on March 29, 2022 · at 8:57 pm EST/EDT

Thank you for sharing your thoughts, Father. I think it would be good if you or other knowledgeable people could compile a list of scholarly works that explain history from the position you take in your argument. I am an Orthodox Christian in the USA, and I know it would be useful for my mind and spirit to read such things. I will find and read

The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Power and Deviance in Western Europe, 950-1250 by R. I. Moore, 1987

and

Guy Mettan, Russia-the West, a Thousand-Year War, Geneva 2015 (I can read French tolerably well)

Perhaps a list of titles in English, German, French, Spanish, Italian and Portuguese would serve for those of us in the west who want to broaden our mode of thought.
- Suk on March 29, 2022 · at 9:33 pm EST/EDT
  
  friends, I didn’t want to post here on the blog anymore.
  I saw that humanity is lost. The west is tiring me. But let’s study Macron, let’s observe Macron. What Macron is playing is a psychopath, a big fool. He is working for Satan married to an old woman. Who likes a masculine woman is not a man. Masculine energy likes feminine energy. That’s the problem with the west. Macron is lost and is betraying Putin. He wants to be close to Putin but he is betraying Putin. He may have had a good upbringing but he’s missing the point in the equation. The equation can be wrong if the point is in the wrong place. Macron is wrong, he somehow works for Satan. I ask that the world be cleansed of this evil elite!!!
  - FiveGunsWest on March 29, 2022 · at 10:39 pm EST/EDT
    
    How dare you piss off now. None of us want to post anymore but we must. Don’t give up when the end is in sight.
  - Lumi on March 30, 2022 · at 5:24 pm EST/EDT
    
    Macron is gay and Brigitte is a transvestite. See Natacha Rey and Xavier Poussard.
Vladimir on March 29, 2022 · at 9:04 pm EST/EDT

Father this is good to see!

They have been at this for a long time, since they fell from Christian Faith. And even in Russia their agents worked, during the Time of Troubles and the Raskol, and ever after.

“Babylon ” is where the source of Western evil is
- Cid on March 30, 2022 · at 5:55 am EST/EDT
  
  In this article there is some mixed things that are fake.
  Call Columbus a NAZI is absurd, as well as compare the Spanish possessions in South America with the other European powers possessions around the world.
  
  Spanish did not ethnically clean South America, there is no difference in they conquest in comparación with the Russian conquest of Siberia.
  
  Both mixed with locals and both integrate them into their kingdoms.
  
  Put Spain in the same level than England, France or Germany is believing the British propaganda about Spain, that is a direct ancestor of British propaganda against Rusia or Rusophobia.
  
  Also compare Catholic with Protestants is silly. Catholics are far from perfect but the nazis ideology always originated under Protestant countries, they justified ethnically cleaning, something that Catholic Church never did.
  Indeed Catholic Church became worst when it fall under the Protestant influence in this Vatican concilio II.
  
  Please be more serious in analysis and don’t fall under British and Anglo Saxon propaganda. Not all European countries are the same, and the ones like Spain, Portugal or Italy are totally under control of the Protestant powers nowadays.
  - yorg on March 30, 2022 · at 8:05 am EST/EDT
    
    Agree !
    I would add : Jew is not a race, as the author states, but a religion !
    - Srbalj on March 30, 2022 · at 11:30 am EST/EDT
      
      “Spanish did not ethnically clean South America, there is no difference in they conquest in comparación with the Russian conquest of Siberia.”
      
      Yes, indeed, this is why today, in the Carribean islands for example, there are no indigenous “Indians” left to be found, those islands are completely populated by the descendants of African slaves. The Spanish massacred the entire indigenous populations of the Carribean islands, they left no one alive. In South & Central America the Spanish & Poreguese committed the largest known genocide in human history, over the course of 200 years murdering up to 100 million indigenous people. By contrast in Siberia the Russians massacred exactly no one. The indigenous peoples are still there, ethnic Russians have not even settled much of Siberia. So the author of the piece is correct & your comment is a typical apologia for European, in this case Spanish racial genocide.
      - Orisha19 on March 30, 2022 · at 10:42 pm EST/EDT
        
        Yes indeed, the Catholic Church and the Spanish along with the Portuguese got the blessing of the Pope in 1494, by way of the Treaty of Torsedillas.
        
        This opened the door for genocide of Indigenous people in the “New World” and the ensuing slave trade from Africa which lasted three centuries. So the Spanish and Portuguese must take full responsibility for the origin of genocide of Indigenous people and the slave trade.
    - Arkos on March 30, 2022 · at 10:37 pm EST/EDT
      
      It’s not a religion, as most Jews are atheists.
      
      Judaism is not a religion in the sense in which most non-Jews understand the term. It’s basically a blueprint for group success, and it’s been fantastically successful, needless to say.
  - Charles Lamb on March 30, 2022 · at 11:32 am EST/EDT
    
    No Cid, sorry but you are letting your nationalism colour your worldview here.
    
    Fascism was the foundation of Nazism, it originated in Italy. Were these Italian ideologues protestant ?.
    (no they were Catholic).
    
    The 1st Crusade and the Catharsis, ( a horrific genocide before Protestantism even existed).
    Charlemagne was also before the Protestant church existed.
    
    There may be correlations between Fascism/Nazism and Christianity. Just as there are correlations between Takfarism & Isis/Al Quaeda. People have and probably will continue to do terrible things in the name of ‘God’.
    If you ‘other’ people (because they are ‘heathens’ for example) its the equivalent of claiming that they are less. It is the same principle that Nazism is based upon.
    
    However no truly spiritual Christian or Muslim of ANY denomination could or should ever condone such a thing.
    
    Look up some information about Operation Paperclip & the Vatican ratlines in 1945/46. You may be a little bit surprised.
    
    The Spanish Conquistadors were greedy violent mercenaries out to enrich themselves just like all colonialists, yes there was some ethnic integration, but it was ultimately conquest at the point of a sword just the same as all of the other colonial powers listed above. And even now most of these countries are still dominated politically by wealthy white people of European descent. ( Bolivia and Venezuala perhaps being an exception. It was colonialism (which the author equates, I think correctly with Nazism) then and the legacy is still playing out now.
    
    As an Anglo myself I abhore aspects my own cultures history & the systems that it has evolved to effectively enslave people (and of course more current activities) but I own it.
  - Explico on March 30, 2022 · at 2:01 pm EST/EDT
    
    You ignore centuries of Roman Catholic slaughter and oppression. I will admit they’ve done an excellent job hiding most of their atrocities from the common histories, but their hands are bloody. And the literal Nazi party originated in the mostly Catholic southern German states, not the mostly Protestant northern states.
    
    Spanish conquistadors were ruthless and wiped out millions. The Aztecs definitely had it coming, no one is weeping for their loss, but that is one of many peoples wiped out. And the modern rulers of almost every Latin American country are the descendants of the aristocratic Spaniards, not the descendants of the natives. The owners of the media, manufacturing, banking, and most government leaders pride themselves on the pure blood.
    
    I don’t agree with every part of this article, but much of it is a very uncomfortable truth. But we must face the truth and accept the pain or we can never be free.
    
    And Jews are a race & a religion. If you say something bad about a Jew, it is called “anti-Semitism” which is explicitly a race term, not religious.
Durruti on March 29, 2022 · at 9:16 pm EST/EDT

“You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred, they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.”
Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Solzhenitsyn was a fine writer, but his History and his numbers are all wrong.

The Bolshevik (Communist Revolution) was a lawful result of the decline of the Russian Government and their corruption, and repeated military defeats and wastes of millions of young Russian soldiers’ lives. They were Defeated in 1905, against Japan (and the lost of most of their Navy), and they continued their tragedy with incompetently led armies in WW I, with the loss of some 4 million soldiers.

Additionally, WW I was an imperialist war fought between Empires, and often for land of other nations they had no right to. It is not my intent to rain on the Saker’s parade on his fine website, or to single out Solzhenitsyn, for
sloppy history and numbers. And Mr. Batiushka is only one of dozens of ‘Historians’ -who have got it back asswards.

Trotsky, Stalin, Lenin-(who the best of them), were the inheritors of the decline of a Nation. To some degree, they rescued and set it on the right path. Djugashvili, and his Government killed no 60 million Russians, not 30, not even 10 million. Russia’s population in 1914, was 120 million. Subtract 60 million, and explain their victory over the Nazi Germans. I offer to run this down in greater detail, (if Mr. Raevski will print it).

The Bolsheviks, some of uncertain origin, paved the way for Vladimir Putin, and his government’s revival, and their being able to Rise, Shooting, blowing to pieces, avenging the Imperialist Zio-Nazis, (just as they did one time before-when they fought all the way to Berlin).

God Bless Russia!

God Bless the United States!

It will all come out good. The Russians are shooting. The Russians are rescuing, not only Russians, but all Europe and the World. Freedom is not Free! It must be paid for! The Russians are paying it. We Americans are in great debt, and owe more than we know.

Dr. Peter J. Antonsen – nom de guerre, Durruti

*Yes, I am an Anarchist, and the Bolsheviks did us great harm. But Anarchists must tell the truth – all of it.
- scarnoc on March 29, 2022 · at 10:57 pm EST/EDT
  
  I do not think Solzhenitsyn is always reliable. When he writes ‘They hated Christians’ he is telling a truth written in blood. I believe you are correct that the demographic decline under the Bolsheviks is hugely overstated by Solzhenitsyn. Still, Father’s contention that the present Nazi threat is an heir to a Teutonic anti-Christian hyper-violent ideology interests me very much, particularly if one sites that ideology in a materialist critique.
  - Robert Lindsay on March 30, 2022 · at 3:22 am EST/EDT
    
    lt’s all nonsense. Solzhenitsyn was a royalist and a fascist supporter. He was a traitor in WW2 and he was properly sentenced as such! This is the lie that “Bolsheviks killed 60 million Christians.” Pretty much a Nazi antisemitic lie. The antisemitism? Bolsheviks = Jews. In other words, JEWS killed 60 million Russian Christians.
    
    Bolsheviks were not all Jews and early on, most Jews were not even Bolsheviks. They later supported them but so did the vast majority of Soviet workers and peasants. Anyway, the Bolsheviks didn’t like any religion and they went after Judaism and Islam as much as they went after Christianity. And 2.5 million Soviets were killed in the Stalin period, not 60 million.
    - Tarrasik on March 30, 2022 · at 4:53 am EST/EDT
      
      Nonsense.
      
      Solzhenitsyn correctly accused Jews of being hostile foreign conquerors of Russia. That’s why he included photos in the Gulag Archipelago of the Jewish Gulag managers.
      
      Putin stated in no uncertain terms that over 80% of the early Bolshevik government was JEWISH. Look it up, his speech is still on Youtube.
      
      Stalin was a Georgian Jew. His last name ends with ‘shvili’ which is absolutely typical of the Georgian Jewish population. It’s almost as indicative of Jewish heritage as Stein in the US. He was surrounded by Jews. Even his doctors were Jews.
      
      Anybody who believes that the Jewish Bolsheviks would ever allow a gentile to take over their operation and purge them is simply delusional. Jewish organizations do not allow non-Jews to hold any real power. Occasionally they’ll post a gentile as ‘window dressing’ to deflect suspicion.
      
      Yuri Schlezkine’s book The Jewish Century, says that as late as the mid 1930s, nine of the twelve intelligence/security directorates were headed by Jews. How is that possible, considering Jews were only 2% of the Russian population?
      
      No, the Bolsheviks did not go after Jews like they went after Christians.
      
      Goebbels had some very interesting things to say about Jewish control of the USSR.
      
      “There can be no doubt that Jews are the founders of Bolshevism and that it is they who represent it. The old leading class in Russia has been so completely eliminated that no other leadership group was left but the Jews. Every conflict within Bolshevism is therefore more or less a family conflict among Jews. The recent executions in Moscow, i.e. the shooting of Jews by Jews, can only be understood on motives of thirst for power and determination to destroy all opponents. The belief that Jews are always at perfect harmony with one another is a widespread error. They live in unity only when they form a minority that is kept in control and menaced by a large national majority. In present-day Russia this is not the case any more. If Jews have attained power —as they exclusively have done in Russia —the old Jewish rivalries begin again, which had been kept in abeyance by the danger threatening their race.” – Bolshevism in Theory and Practice
      - Durruti on March 30, 2022 · at 8:50 am EST/EDT
        
        “Goebbels had some very interesting things to say about Jewish control of the USSR.”
        
        That’s it. Quote Goebbels.
        
        You might try Biden, Obomber, Casino Trump, Bill & Killery Clinton, Zelenski, & Mussolini, while you’re at it!
    - yorg on March 30, 2022 · at 11:47 am EST/EDT
      
      Agree. This Bolsheviks = Jews is nonsense, 60 million russians ( that’s half of the population !) killed by Stalin, preposterous.
      Even the americans couldn’t cope with Solzhenitsyn , he was an embarrassement and a bore and was put aside rather quickly as to not discredit anti-soviet propaganda with his delirious assertions.
    - Deplorable Commissar on March 30, 2022 · at 10:23 pm EST/EDT
      
      ” Bolsheviks were not all Jews and early on, most Jews were not even Bolsheviks. They later supported them but so did the vast majority of Soviet workers and peasants. ”
      
      Is Putin a liar then ? The Bolsheviks were led mainly by Jewish foreigners.
      
      ” Russian President Vladimir Putin said that at least 80 percent of the members of the first Soviet government were Jewish.
      
      “I thought about something just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish,” Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center. ” “
- Arek on March 30, 2022 · at 4:28 am EST/EDT
  
  The truth is brutally acute: since roughly 1870 the world fate has been shaped by Ashkenazi Jews who embraced power in the West. Period. Who were Trotsky, Stalin, Lenin or more broadly the Bolsheviks? Who triggered WW1, WW2, set fire to Levant and meddled in global politics through individuals like Elliot, Kissinger, Brzezinski or Soros? Who has been on eternal crusade to reconquer the land of ancient Khazaria, their original motherland? (by the way please check out who invaded them at the time and expelled). Westerners use to say “All roads lead to Rome”, Non-Westerners version should rather sound “All roads lead to Khazaria”. The rest is a narrative aimed at achieving desired effect depending on the subject of the essay and assumed thesis.
  - Arek on March 30, 2022 · at 5:33 pm EST/EDT
    
    I concur that that City of London (“COL”) has been calling global shots at least since 1600 (East India Company). However, it is her overseas offshoots (by consent or by force, it does not matter) in the US that has been a chief perpetrator of all major global dramas since ca. 1870. Without the Wall Street money and MIC potential, the COL would have been only a poor cousin of her historical might. The former and the latter has been controlled by women and men in question.
- Pedro Pousada on March 30, 2022 · at 4:33 am EST/EDT
  
  Dr. Peter
  You will be glad to know, being an anarchist yourself as I see by your alias, that The Portuguese Communist Party was foubded by anarchists and remained (and still is) loyal to the great human achievements of the USSR. It’s true: Modern Russia exists because of the USSR that saved the world from nazism. Never in the wildest dreams the tsarist economic system or a liberal democracy would have managed to overcome and surpass the manpower and the machine power of nazi-fascist barbarism. The USSR. still an Egypt in the Steppes in the mid twenties and an industrial power by 1941, did it!!
  Being an atheist I just say
  May the peoples of Russia be blessed by the friendship of the peoples of the United States of America and vice versa.
  May the peoples of the world be blessed by the friendship and solidarity of the peoples of the world.
  Best
- Suker on March 30, 2022 · at 9:26 am EST/EDT
  
  “Russia’s population in 1914, was 120 million. Subtract 60 million, and explain their victory over the Nazi Germans”
  
  Why don’t you try to explain how 120M can only grow to 140 million in a hundred years if all was hunky dory in Russia? I thought they were benevolent dictators looking after the poor, your darlings of last century…Surely, they needed people but somehow population didn’t catch up despite all that “peace and abundance”.
- John Neal Spangler on March 30, 2022 · at 7:09 pm EST/EDT
  
  How many did the Bolsheviks kill in the Revolution/Civil War? Are there any good books? The American ones are all liars and exaggerate the deaths.
vientito on March 29, 2022 · at 9:24 pm EST/EDT

To be fair the west is not the only one who has committed atrocities as such. Everyone has done their fair share of crude violence against their adversary at some point in history given a set of inducive conditions. The west just happened to occupy a domineering position in a period during which they exploited the world on a larger scale. We all have that animal instinct lurking beneath – only some of us who are strong enough to resist and not to cross the line into the abyss. Nazism is a dark force among all of us. It just needs the right condition to rear its ugly head.
Fred on March 29, 2022 · at 9:43 pm EST/EDT

Who confronted the Bolsheviks again? I missed that part.
sidoonio terralheiro on March 29, 2022 · at 9:49 pm EST/EDT

Check the lineage of Hitler and you find out he was a jew so nazi
Zelensky says he is a jew so he can’t be a nazi
- Stuart Estrine on March 29, 2022 · at 11:45 pm EST/EDT
  
  Hitler was a Jew ? Such absurd assertions do nothing to further important discussions such as these. Get some help.
  - TB on March 30, 2022 · at 4:26 am EST/EDT
    
    1/4 Jew he allegedly was. There is research on the subject.
Philip H Gattey on March 29, 2022 · at 10:00 pm EST/EDT

Nazi creed and practice differ.
What they do , always, and lust for, is the death of the soul in its victims before physical death..
Humiliation is too mild a word.
They seek elimination of the springs of grace that make one human. Dehumanizers. It is far better to die and die early than take what comes in the camps they erect. Normals die, the weak in spirit live longer but what a cost.
Do not be a coward around Nazis.
WTFUD on March 29, 2022 · at 10:00 pm EST/EDT

In the 1880’s Cecil Rhodes referred to the indigenous peoples of South Africa and Zimbabwe as ‘barbarians’, just after mowing down 5000 spear carrying natives in a single afternoon with just 5 Maxim Machine Guns. His gay lover said Cecil seen the elimination of an inferior race as a sport, a natural occurrence.

With groups of para-military (Nazis) he proceeded to genocide the southern African continent en masse, confiscating hundreds of millions of hectares of fertile land.

Germany’s genocide of 10’s of thousands of Namibians has yet to be reconciled. Someone asked if Russia/Soviet countries received reparations from Germany. The Namibians (the barbarians) lost 80% of their tribe. The Tribe got paid!

De Beers & Rothschild, British Crown and various European and North American Banks and businesses held interests in the slaughter.

Wouldn’t be surprised if vested interests in the UK & Hitler took their script from Cecil Rhodes as 2 World Wars followed within 50 years.
vera on March 29, 2022 · at 10:13 pm EST/EDT

If all ruthless exploiters are nazis, doesn’t the term lose most of its meaning?

For example, were the Mongols swooping down over Asian steppes Nazis? Were the Russians colonizing Siberian tribes Nazis? Were the Muslims taking over Christians kingdoms of North Africa Nazis? Were the Turks Nazis for conquering Constantinople? Were the Aztecs Nazis?

I appreciate the new angle. But it may be a bit… too acute. It leaves me confused.
- Greg on March 29, 2022 · at 11:44 pm EST/EDT
  
  The essence of this categorisation is the invader/oppressor’s deeply held conviction that their victims are sub-human. This visceral belief drives utterly brutal programs of subjugation, exploitation and eradication.
  
  History’s list of conquerers and empires demonstrates a general support for ethnic diversity within their realms. The objective of empire was predominantly receiving the vassal’s timely payment of due tribute. The Nazi character pivots upon the active implementation of genocide as a core tenet. This entails a quasi-religious fervour toward the creation of social utopia via variously harnessing and eliminating human pools of perceived genetic deficit.
  - Rodolfo on March 30, 2022 · at 4:03 am EST/EDT
    
    Kind of like what the Kabbalists like Schwab, Gates, Soros are doing to America with open borders and the millions of middle eastern peoples streaming into Europe. White genocide is the flavor of the month. Jesuits like Fauci are the flip side of the same coin. They also control the media to propagandize the sheeple.
    - Greg on March 30, 2022 · at 5:15 am EST/EDT
      
      Except it seems that the new globalists have ascended to a new order of perceived supremacy. Genetic selection remains a mechanism for the trolls and tools that implement specific parts of their program. These new ubermensch base their recognition of fundamental merit vs need for extinguishment upon demonstrably accumulated power.
- Gab on March 30, 2022 · at 5:03 am EST/EDT
  
  “If all ruthless exploiters are nazis, doesn’t the term lose most of its meaning?”
  
  Of course it does. But apparently the majority here is not interested in theoretical consistency, as long as the “analysis” fit their prejudices. Truth is, this article is very badly written, and it won’t pass even the most superficial academic scrutiny.
  
  Unfortunately, all I can see is people with their own personal enemies, whoever they are, waiting nothing but the occasion to call them “nazis” or “fascsts”. What a childish behaviour.
- gvillewill on March 30, 2022 · at 5:20 am EST/EDT
  
  Thank you. I don’t know what to think about this site sometimes.
  On the one hand you get some good Geo-political analysis.
  And then you get articles like this that read more like delusional bitterness.
  - Greg on March 30, 2022 · at 9:59 am EST/EDT
    
    Perhaps when you’ve lived within a culture in recovery from a genocidal event being madly wrought upon it by a very distinct character of evil you’ll have the comprehension necessary to adjudicate usefully upon that culture’s intimate insights rather than simply dismissing what you have no understanding of as ‘delusional bitterness’.
Bob on March 29, 2022 · at 10:26 pm EST/EDT

“President Zelensky of the Ukraine is by race a Jew, as indeed was President Poroshenko before him.”
I’m sorry, there is no Jewish race. There is no Jewish gene. Jewish is a religion. There are many different people of different nationalities/ethnic groups that practice Judaism.. Shlomo Sand points this out in his brilliant book, “The Invention of the Jewish People”.
- Lynda Burstein Brayer on March 30, 2022 · at 2:19 am EST/EDT
  
  Jews constitute a tribe based on lineage -blood. The rabbinical definition of a Jew is one born of a Jewish mother. It sounds like a tautology but the rabbis keep lists. Being a Jew has nothing to do with belief. The Jewish religion is not monotheistic but rather henotheistic. They have their own special god. Rabbinical Judaism is devoted to defining the borders between Jews and non-Jews. Judaism is ritual praxis to keep the Jew uncontaminated and pure from contact with the Impure Gentile whose status as a being is equivalent to that of an animal because the Gentile has no soul.
  Only Jews have souls.
Akram abu Abs on March 29, 2022 · at 10:52 pm EST/EDT

The Final Prophet said: He who practices ‘Asabiyah is not of our Ummah (community) and defined it as any group being unjust towards another.
Essentially, prejudiced activities violating the rights of Others!
All other terms fall short of ‘Asabiyah…
Doom Sternz on March 29, 2022 · at 11:39 pm EST/EDT

Nazism and Fascism is a distinction without a difference, what George Galloway would describe as two cheeks of the same arse. It was Benito Mussolini who coined the phrase and what he meant was large corporate (oligarchy) control of Government.

It is my opinion that long cycle global economic dynamics (eg Kondratieff cycles) if left to long are responsible for creating an environment where massive individual wealth leads to corruption. If this corruption is not checked then Oligarchs are created. If these Oligarchs are not checked then this leads to endemic institutionalised corruption of society in general.

Once society in general is corrupted then the Oligarchs take control all levers of power, and creates Fascism. Fascist governments go to war over profit. Its that simple.
- Gab on March 30, 2022 · at 5:13 am EST/EDT
  
  You’re wrong. They differ very much. Your brief reconstruction of what leads to fascism just does not fit very well how fascism took place in Italy at the time (where it was invented). It’s not “that simple” at all. Seeing fascism as a bunch of oligarchs taking power is just a brutal simplification that does not explain anything and neglects all the other important factors at the time.
ZZZ01 on March 30, 2022 · at 12:20 am EST/EDT

Unless someone posted this already, came across another twist to the Snake Island Story :)
https://twitter.com/DefenceU/status/1508814043213139980
Mad Serbian on March 30, 2022 · at 12:27 am EST/EDT

A very well written post briefly documenting the true origins of Nazism and I’d just add that Charlemagne and his descendants had great success pacifying the pagan Western Slavs from 900 – 1200 AD, with great support from fellow baptised Slavic neighbours the Czechs, Moravians and Poles who continue their servitude to the Germanic peoples and their false god too this day!.

The ideology, mythology and mysticism has adapted throughout the centuries but what has remained constant was the demonic quest for expansion Eastward and equally into the South (a precursor to Lebensraum) with main obstacle being Orthodox worshiping Slavs and having subdued much of the West, their only really remained one true obstacle to expansion coming from Russians and Serbs who they see as tiny Russians.
Paul Sponeck on March 30, 2022 · at 12:30 am EST/EDT

Mr Batiushka forgets that the Bolsheviks enabled Soviet Russia to withstand the Nazi invasion of the USSR in 1941. Stalin’s rapid industrialization of the Russian economy and building-up a modern military-industrial complex assisted in Russia’s survival as a sovereign state. These facts should never be ignored despite the rather oppressive nature of the Soviet regime.
- Sledgehammer on March 30, 2022 · at 3:52 am EST/EDT
  
  The tsars were also industrializing. Under them Russia was the world’s breadbasket. The soviets destroyed Russian agriculture with collectivization. All Soviet industry was appropriated from Russian capitalists. Even the Soviet space program was actually launched by the tsars. Russians were already testing rockets before Werner von Braun. Tsarist Russia had world leading aerospace(Sikorsky), chemical (Mendeleev), medical (Pavlov), mathematical and whatsoever other minds. Stalin’s military industrial complex was built by tsarist officers like tukhachevsky. The rapid industrialization of Russia was already underway since after the Crimean war. Hence the trans Siberian railroad and world leading oil production in Baku. Now, it’s a typical mistake to hypothesize the future by altering past events. The Bolsheviks did not”enable Russia to withstand Nazi attack. The Bolsheviks killed all the best tsarist military and spiritual leaders including said tukhachevsky who invented blitzkrieg before the Germans. The Bolsheviks collaborated with both Weimar and Nazi germany.see treaty of Rapallo. The German military also trained secretly in the ussr due to Versailles treaty restrictions on rearmament. Finally, its not clear whether Hitler would have invaded or come to power at all if the whites had won the Russian civil war. So its premature to credit the Bolsheviks with defeating an antisemitic and anticommunist fascist beast that might not have come into being had the selfsame Bolshevik jews not caused so much consternation in Russia and Europe. Russia defeated Nazism DESPITE the Bolsheviks, not thanks to them.
  - Sadam79 on March 30, 2022 · at 4:24 am EST/EDT
    
    судя по твоему ответу – ты дебил
    
    1- в Российской империи каждый год был голод в кокой нибудь губернии. а каждые 2-3 года был крупный голод касающийся несколько губерний
    2-все продовольствие идущее за границу производилось на крупных латифундиях
    3-все крестьяне коренной России жили в сельских общинах
    4-Тухачевский провоевал 3 месяца в чине прапорщика и попал в плен. никакого военного опыта у него не было. в Гражданскую войну он был комиссаром
    5- “блицкриг” придумали немцы сами, НО ссылались на опыт Буденого
    ну и так далее
    - Carol on March 30, 2022 · at 6:06 am EST/EDT
      
      Translation from Russian to English:
      
      1- In the Russian Empire every year there was a famine in some province. and every 2-3 years there was a major famine affecting several provinces
      2-all food going abroad was produced on large latifundia (farms?)
      3-all peasants of indigenous Russia lived in rural communities
      4-Tukhachevsky fought for 3 months in the rank of ensign and was captured. he had no military experience. in the Civil War he was commissar
      5- “Blitzkrieg” was invented by the Germans themselves, BUT they referred to the experience of Budeny and so on.
      - Sadam79 on March 31, 2022 · at 12:25 am EST/EDT
        
        пишу с телефона поэтому без перевода
        
        ЛАТИФУНДИЯ – аналог современого агро предприятия какого нибудь агро холдинга.
        В СССР это называлось совхозом
        
        MOD translation:
        I am writing from my phone so no translation.
        
        LATIFUNDIA is an analogue of a modern agro-enterprise of some kind of agro-holding.
        In the USSR it was called a state farm
RedMe on March 30, 2022 · at 1:21 am EST/EDT

Nazism = Fascism = Corporate Control of Government = Violent anti-communism.

Nazi Germany rose from the ashes of WW1 because German capitalists/industrialists were wetting their pants in fear of the 1917 Russian communist revolution spreading across the world, and were willing to support any ideology whose main target was Communism, no matter how violent and crazy.

Nazism is not about anti-semitism. That is is just a distraction. Nazism is about anti-communism, and infused with nationalism to distract the workers from putting their personal needs ahead of the “national” (ownership class) needs.

With the above in mind, it is quite clear how many countries neighboring Russia has strong Nazi tradition going back to the 1920s. For example, Poland, Ukraine and the Baltic states. Much collaboration with the German Nazis ensued during WW2, and the nazism still lives on, as we see in Ukraine right now.
Mvd on March 30, 2022 · at 1:24 am EST/EDT

Just started reading the two babylons by alexander hislop, wich delves into the origins of the foundations of the RCC and many other religious myths. And this piece fits very well into that «history» humanity was hijacked to slavery under false dogmas right from the very start, and after the great flood the semiramis /nimrod deification and the replacement salvation worship of the holy triades and heavenly mother, the hosts of heaven. It all interweaves with the worlds mythologies and the tower of babel was its cradle. To this day the masonic brethren uses these «sacred mysteries» to influence and rule people. Under the guise of «enlightenment» and «freedom» this is not a battle against men only, but principalities of darkness, the b’ne a elohim who came before and made humanity their slaves. Even though their world empire was drowned and washed away(giving rise to the myth of altlantis) some small fragments remained wich mesmerized men over the ages. That along with the occult practices wich made them able to communicate with certain interdimensional entities is the basis for most of what is called World Religions today. Imho
Thanks for an interesting read.
Mvd
- L on March 30, 2022 · at 6:07 am EST/EDT
  
  @ Mvd,
  
  Thanks. This and what I understand regarding the Khazarians adds up to there being a caste with a powerful program of spiritual warfare and spiritual / physical / economic slavery and deception. Vampiric.
  
  Maybe their time is ending. I have read their longstanding dark arts are being broken so their power base is failing.
Stand Easy on March 30, 2022 · at 1:26 am EST/EDT

Thank you for this excellent article Batiushka.

In this wider sense, which is what the Russian Federal government has in mind today, Nazism is what may be called ‘Western Supremacism’, the idea that Non-Western races are ‘Untermenschen’, subhumans. Therefore, like ‘niggers’, ‘savages’, ‘monkeys’, ‘nips’, ‘gooks’, the Russians too can be ‘cancelled’.

I’m not Russian but I think, for obvious reasons, the term ‘Nazi’ (or ‘Fascist’) strikes a very raw nerve amongst Russians. Now, there are some, perhaps those more academically inclined, who would insist that we be precise in our use of term ‘Nazi’ and thus also to take into account the NSDAP’s other policies — socio-economic and gender policies, for instance — before using the term as a label; others prefer that we limit the term to mean extreme anti-semitism — a historical untruth but meant to serve the ‘Holocaust’ narrative — only recently unsuccesfully deployed by Zelensky in the Israeli parliament, of all places.

But I believe you are correct in using it as a descriptor of a particular creed in your interpretation of the Russian government’s conception of the term ‘Nazi’. With regard to the Ukraine, this creed is not only manifested in outward signs of obeisance to the Nazis of wartime Germany but also increasingly obvious in their attitude towards the ‘Other.’ The effect of the creed on the West as manifested in their reaction to what Russia is doing needs no further elaboration.

Your mention of Belgium brings to mind a withering satire regarding the atrocities committed by Leopold II in his private property, the Congo Free State, penned by Mark Twain. Leopold took it upon himself to seize a land 30 times the size of his kingdom in order, of course, to ‘civilise’ the peoples in it.

https://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/i2l/kingleopold.pdf

As an aside, in a forum hosted by George Galloway (at least I think it was) a guest was bewildered as to why no African country participated in anti-Russia sanctions. A UK-born African answered simply, ‘because the Russians and the Chinese have never colonised us.’
Acarnanian on March 30, 2022 · at 2:01 am EST/EDT

Having recently read Saker’s narration of how Ukrainian ethnogenesis is due to papal designs of destroying orthodox Russia and subjugating it to papal authority, I was reminded of what Saint Kosmas had repeatedly said. He had said “you have to curse the pope for he will be the cause”. If (God forbid!) the Ukrainian hatred toward Orthodox Christianity and the Russians in particular, created by the popes and rejuvenated by the Empire of lies, leads to a general conflagration, then maybe we now are in the position to grasp what St. Kosmas meant.
St Kosmas’ prophecies are well documented and known since the beginning of the 19th century.
Saint Kosmas was a Greek monk and priest from Aetolia known as “Father Kosmas the Aetolian” who was killed (beheaded) by the Turks in 1779. (The Turks were persuaded to kill him by the Jews who hated Saint Kosmas).
Saint Kosmas, to whom God had bestowed the gift of prophecy, had prophesied that Greeks would fight the Turks in Asia Minor, that the Greeks would be forced back to the “Six Mile” (in popular language the river Evros known also as the Maritsa river was called the “Six Mile” river or maybe Saint Kosmas referred to the 6 or 12 miles of national waters) and that then a major war (World War III?) would erupt leading among other things to 1/3 of the Turks converting to Christianity, 1/3 of the Turks being killed and 1/3 of the Turks being pushed further back eastwards. Then, according to the prophecy, Constantinople (nowadays known as Istanbul) will revert to Greek hands. His prophecy runs as follows: “The Turks will go away, but will come back again and will arrive up to the Hexamilia (6-miles location). Finally you will drive them out into the “Red Apple tree”. From the Turks the 1/3 will be killed, the other third will be baptized, and only 1/3 will go to the Red Apple Tree.” The “Red Apple Tree” is a location which the imagination of enslaved Greeks put into the depths of Asia.
Saint Kosmas had also prophesied among other things and events the automobile (“You’ll see in the plain a car without horses running faster than a hare.”), the telephone (“time will come when people will talk from a distant place to another, as if they were in adjoining rooms, for example from the City (Constantinople) to Russia.”), the telecommunication satellites orbiting Earth (“the time will come when the devil will make rounds with his pumpkin.”), the air strikes against civilians and the underground air shelters people would go into in order to save their lives (“You will see people flying in the sky as blackbirds and throwing fire to the world. Those who will live will run into graves and shout: get out you dead so that we, the living, get in”) and the age of computers (“the time will come when the mute and dumb objects will manage the world.”).
He had also prophesied that Epirus would be liberated from the Turkish yoke in 1912. When in a village in the region of Epirus, then part of the Ottoman Empire, the villagers asked him when they would be liberated; he answered that “the desired [i.e. their liberation] will come when two Paschal celebrations come together.” Indeed in 1912, the year the first Balkan war that led to Epirus’ liberation broke out, the Annunciation and Easter celebrations coincided, i.e. the orthodox Greek Easter according to the Julian calendar then in force in Greece fell on the 25th of March, i.e. on the Annunciation Day on which Greeks also commemorate their 1821 national uprising against the Turkish occupation.
Remarkable also is Saint Kosmas’ prediction that “They will throw to you much money; (Then) they will ask you to take it back, but will not.” Verbal tradition has it that the Saint hinted at a major war (World War III?) preventing the return of the money.
Recently a prominent Greek man of letters surprised the author of these lines when he made known to him what a venerable old Turk had told his father who was then (sometime between 1920 and 1922) a soldier in the Greek army fighting the Turks in Asia Minor. The venerable old Turk had said at a time the Greek army was still advancing: “Now you Greeks will not be victorious. You will be driven back. Next time you will be victorious though.”
Anyway, the future is unknown to us mere mortals. People may do their best or their worst but God’s plan ultimately gets accomplished.
C3 on March 30, 2022 · at 2:23 am EST/EDT

And the Mongol invasions of Russia were but a footnote? How did they slip through the cracks in this historical picture of Russia? How did they fit in to the over all picture? Did they liberate while they completely annihilated much of the working classes and purged anyone they thought useless (such as farmers as they were nomadic herdsman). Were they all Nazis too?
David Kirk on March 30, 2022 · at 2:39 am EST/EDT

The Normans did not impose slavery in England in 1066 – it was already there, as it was in most societies at the time. It was in fact King William I (1066-1089) who banned the slave trade in England and began freeing slaves, such that slavery ceased altogether in about 50 years.
igor on March 30, 2022 · at 2:42 am EST/EDT

author did not mention crusades of those nazis against czech kingdom in 14th and 15th century, against the comunities in bohenia, which went away from RC dogma.
Per Terram on March 30, 2022 · at 2:56 am EST/EDT

You van always rely upon Eva Bartlett to show the truth …

https://youtu.be/7eGGPI7jo6E
Konstantinos on March 30, 2022 · at 3:13 am EST/EDT

Fact: Russia helping people thriw off the yoke of foreign evial empires:

https://russianembassyza.mid.ru/home/-/asset_publisher/Ot1afwuqKVmN/content/memory-of-russian-volunteers-who-had-participated-in-the-anglo-boer-war-honoured-in-midrand?redirect=/&inheritRedirect=true

Then 75 years later, same region, a new fight, against an oppressir who was once themselves oppressed!

https://englishrussia.com/2017/08/28/soviet-officers-fighting-war-in-angola/

Sadly, so many of my friends and relatives were sent to fight these same Russians. I have mixed feelings over this: I totally support modern Russia, but I cannot turn my back on my family so easily.
X3mhunt on March 30, 2022 · at 3:25 am EST/EDT

Very short version,

Seems like Khazaria is not mentioned here, crushed by Rurik in the late 800s, thereafter the Khazars was disbursed all over Europe. Fast forward, creation of the FED in 1913, by whom? I think you all know the answer to that.

The rest is history, FED 1913, WWI 1914, Russian revolution 1917, Spanish flu 1918 until around 1923/1924, The Great Depression 1929, WWII 1939, after that the bigges power grab in history. Controlled by whom? Are we really asking such questions today?

Vladimir Putin Speech 13.06.2013: 85% Of The 1917 Soviet Government Was Made Up By Rothschild Zionist Khazars!
Brianborou on March 30, 2022 · at 4:02 am EST/EDT

The article has many good points but let’s not forget that barbarism is not constricted to the West. For example, the Arab invasion of North Africa, Persia, the Indian sub continent nor the expansion of the Muscovy empire into Siberia.
Otto Kern on March 30, 2022 · at 4:03 am EST/EDT

Possibly it is actually necessary to stress this part of Western “civilization” because many countries – partly friends of Russia – are at war with the West and as a German I’m ashamed of the primitive and brutal cultural warfare against the Russian culture.

But: in hoc signo vinces Russia! (maybe also in signo of Cross or of hammer and sickle).
Vince on March 30, 2022 · at 4:14 am EST/EDT

Isn’t this a case of seeing history through a very particular lens? There is about as much objectivity or context here as one would find in a western MSM outlet on the Ukraine crisis. For example, I have read other articles that describe islamic incursions into Christendom, most latterly reaching as westward as Vienna. So, this seems too extreme to me, to take seriously, although obviously things like imposition of feudalism in England is certainly true and does not need any further context.
Batiushka on March 30, 2022 · at 4:29 am EST/EDT

Some of the comments here seem to have missed the point. Yes, peoples have always invaded others’ territories and killed and plundered, for example, the Mongols in Russia, Persia, India, African tribes who sold members of other African tribes to white slavers etc. Similarly, the enslavement of a small minority existed in England before 1066, but after it 95% were enslaved by Norman feudal serfdom. However, what we are talking about by Western Supremacism or Nazism is not the temporary, historical cruelty of one tribe to another, we are talking about the systematic and institutional enslavement of others globally, over a period of more than 1,000 years by Western ‘Civilization’. That is what Samuel Huntingdon referred to in the quotation from his best-known book. This is what we mean by Feudalism and Nazism.
Secondly, some historical corrections. Of course, Solzhenitsyn was not perfect and he did initially naively fall into the extreme right-wing (Nazi), anti-Russian CIA trap when he was expelled from the USSR – something for which he later repented as a patriot.
It was not Stalin who won the Great Fatherland War, it was the peoples of the Soviet Union, the majority of them Slavs, by who won that War through their incredible sacrifices. Had the leaders of the Soviet Union been competent, there would have been far fewer Soviet losses between 1941 and 1945. In 1941, the Fascists arrived at the gates of Moscow within a few months and there were millions of losses. In the German-Austro-Hungarian attacks on the Russian Empire between 1914 and 1917, the Russian Imperial Army suffered losses of not millions but 670,000 (far fewer than on the Western Front in the same period and facing twice as many enemy) and the enemy got little further than Lithuania and Galicia after two and a half years. Indeed, in early 1917 Imperial Russia was on the brink of victory before it was betrayed by the West and its own utterly corrupt aristocrats, generals and politicians.
Gab on March 30, 2022 · at 4:54 am EST/EDT

Please someone help me understand why I always feel out of place when I read this kind of imaginative historical reconstructions. It seems to me that history is always trated like a multi-author book where every new writer can twist the story as he pleases, by the means of theoretical inconsistency, ultra-simplifications, and some lies too (or delusional beliefs, I don’t know).

Let’s see just some examples:
– Broadening the definition of Nazism to make it fit whatever theory (plunderers=nazis). Totally inconsistent. So the Mongols were Nazi too. Wow.
– Nazism=Fascism: completely FALSE.
– 6 million Jews? Utterly ridiculous, this is pure proaganda.
– 30 million? A purely invented number.
– Normans as the cause of slavery for England? A vulgar simplification, simply not true.
– Catholics=Globalists: just a poor argument.
– Columbus=”Italian Nazi”: you just don’t know what you’re talking about, stretching definitions just to fit your personal view.
– “All of this was in the name of ‘civilisation, freedom and democracy’”? You are projecting stupid US mantra upon others who never claimed that.
…and these are only a few because listing all of them would be a waste of time.

Father, I hope your spiritual and metaphysical reasoning is way better than your expertise in history, because this article was an unprecise, imaginative, inconsistent theoretical mess.

Next time, just say “I don’t like globalists and nazis”. It’ll be more than enough, thank you.
- Sam on March 30, 2022 · at 6:01 am EST/EDT
  
  Why do I feel you are a de-Z campaigner?
  - Gab on March 30, 2022 · at 7:23 am EST/EDT
    
    I don’t know, maybe because of your prejudices. I’m supporting Russia in this war.
    - Sam on March 30, 2022 · at 8:12 am EST/EDT
      
      getting petty … hs
      O yea now I see you were not criticizing the priest for rewriting history you directly attacked him for something you are bitter about… Are you a nazi collaborator?
      - X3mhunt on March 30, 2022 · at 9:57 am EST/EDT
        
        I strongly believe there are 2 sides of this NAZI story. One being Germany, in part, being against the insanity that took place during the USSR under Khazarian leadership, and one happening right now, against the same Khazars who are funding the new generation of Nazism in Ukraine.
        
        In the 1930s, who created the so called NAZIs, and what is the abbreviation supposed to be short for?
        Could it be what was suggested by Eustace Mullins?
        
        Gab on March 31, 2022 · at 10:15 am EST/EDT
        
        @ X3mhunt: that word is not an abbreviation, it was coined by some jewish journalist as a derogatory term. No national-socialist has ever called himself that way.
        
        @ Sam: I was criticizing the author for his theoretical inconsistency and historical inaccuracy. Fake numbers are fake numbers. Don’t you like it? Not my problem. About me, I’m an independent thinker and collaborator of noone.
- Greg on March 30, 2022 · at 9:49 am EST/EDT
  
  “Let’s see just some examples (of biased fabrication):
  – Broadening the definition of Nazism to make it fit whatever theory (plunderers=nazis). Totally inconsistent. So the Mongols were Nazi too. Wow.”
  
  Except the author didn’t say anything like that. It seems that you are reading constructs that pull triggers in your head and not what’s actually written on the page. Similarly your effervescence over the numbers allegedly killed wreaks of undue and unknowable literalism. Indeed various numbers float about on these fatalities. No-one knows the actual truth, including you. As such you can’t credibly denounce anyone else’s figures as incorrect. Your demand for literalism within such unknowable realms distracts you toward entirely missing the author’s point, which, suffice to say, is that a hell of lot died and many, many more of them Russians than Jews.
  
  The point you are missing within this posited essence of Nazism is its base character of fervent racial superiority; a belief so darkly demented that it destroys human empathy and licences the absolute dispossession of the victims’ culture, humanity and soul. The Mongols didn’t act that way. Neither did the Romans. They simply, albeit often brutally, demanded fealty and tribute. The Crusaders and their ensuing lines escalated conquest to a totalitarian level of metaphysical destruction.
  - Sam on March 30, 2022 · at 1:31 pm EST/EDT
    
    Thanks for the reply am not much of a smartwit but totally condemning the author without constructive deduction reeks of smear campaign that was my point about Gab
bonbon on March 30, 2022 · at 5:16 am EST/EDT

The letter Z is cancelled –
Paul Joseph Watson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qON-LmkIdAI

denaZification sure hit a nerve!

Fines and imprisonment in Germany and France! Ukraine wants the whole world to de-Z !
Sam on March 30, 2022 · at 5:56 am EST/EDT

Dear Father Batiushka,

This is a concise but quite interesting exposition for this blog I appreciate your style of writing with the references given for further investigation.

So their own meted out genocide would be whitewashed and be demanding political correctness from the Russians for use of the word “denazification” who gave them the moral high ground in the first place.
Nikita on March 30, 2022 · at 5:57 am EST/EDT

You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians, wrote Solzhenitsyn, but they were of course and that is the whole point, as a great light has a very dark shadow, and the Bolsheviks were Russians who became utterly corrupt.
This was not a phenomena that arose in a declining environment, but took off from the ground of the tremendous forces of the revolution that were tilted and usurped by the forces of Bolshevism, which are the same as Nazism.
It is a westernized expression of the east to maintain that Russia is incapable of spiritual corruption.
This is a complex and highly controversial subject, much of it remaining under the blanket of censorship……
petergrfstrm on March 30, 2022 · at 6:28 am EST/EDT

There are some distinct features about the ‘usual’ nazism as compared with western supremacism.
It was a sect/cult. And it didnt emerge without substantial help from a foreign power center.
It turned out that Richard Wagner came to be an important inspirer. But in his youth he was recruited to the networks belonging to young Europe, Britains machinery for raising opposition against Britains rivals both on the continent and in the Americas.
Could perhaps be compared with the Open University and similar globalist instruments.
And later Wagner obtained a book written by one of the authors in Lord Palmerstons circle.
It concerned a struggle between jews and gentiles where the gentile hero was defeated.
That came to be a lifelong theme for Wagner.

Wagner belongs to the romantic era. From one perspective he was an innovator of the combination of art music and the spiritual

But romanticism refers to our emotional side. Something which is a great help when the aim is to launch an irrational cult with the purpose of pitting groups against each other.

Edward Gibbons, who earlier had studied the rise and fall of the Roman empire instructed the British oligarchy to use the roman method of supporting various religious sects for imperial purposes.

Now why would the British want to pit Germans and Jews against each other?

There was already antisemitism but that is useful when you attempt to strengthen it and also works as a cover for more ambitious efforts to encourage it.

So what was it all about?
It was about controlling the banking networks. Banking is most profitable when one nations currency plays the role of an effective reserve currency.

But if the bankers are allowed to be truly international that advantage is at risk if there is real competition.
So for the favoured nation it is best if one can limit the opportunities of rival nations for having equal access to fair financial practises.

Where the development of a rival nations economy may be partly obstructed.

This meant that Britain would want to isolate the bankers but without making it too obvious that it was all about the financial priviledges.

Thus encouraging ‘good ol’ antisemitism was a workable metod.

It may be related that the same author returned later when the prussian Jews were emancipated and published a novel which may be seen as providing a logical approach for the creation of a (gentile) master race.

Bismarck was a threat to Britains aims since he did collaborate with the financiers,
But the prince of Wales, Edward, got Bismarck out of the way in 1890.

Unfortunately for Russia and Germany the Tsar and the Kaiser were Edwards younger cousins and were too guillible. Edward even bragged about how easy it was to manipulate people on the continent

Houston Steward Chamberlain(HSC) eventually presented his interpretation of Wagners views to a wider audience and Houston also established himself in the Wagnerian Bayreut circle, married into the Wagner family.

Both the Kaiser and the nazis were significantly influenced by HSC and Hitlers letters to HSC were left on his desk until 1945 when they suddenly disappeared. Simultaneously compromising documents about Edward VIII’s nazi-connections were grabbed by the British.
(If Hitler had defeated the USSR, Britain would have changed guards a bit with Edward as the nazi king, something Edward had promised Hitler and suddenly Rudolf Hess could have been unleashed. The letters to HSC would then have been of value for Britain.

Depending on how the US-Japanese fighting turned out, Britain might well have been able to encourage Hitler to take on the US with the same bait as in the east. )

But at that time the nazis had become key to the geopolitical great game of playing Germany and Russia. And the above mentioned motive less important,
Before WWI however the motive of controlling the bankers was the only acutely strong motive for Britain to encourage antisemitism in Germany as I see it.
Once the bankers had been coopted some time between 1907 and 1913 the bankers were onboard and had no safe way to turn back. And they certainly came to be involved in supporting all warrying sides.
But before that pivotal time there was a chance that Germany would have been left to trade under conditions of peace and without any unfair restrictions on what the financiers were allowed to invest in.
Thus in my view it isnt Germany which should be blamed as much as Britain, the mastermind of everything that happened, world wars nazism and communism.

And in my view the bolshevik jews were simply doing Britains dirty job.

Britains clever calculating aristocracy wanted to impose communism on Russia and Britain wanted the nazis to notice the jews as bait for Britains wanted war.
- bonbon on March 30, 2022 · at 8:07 am EST/EDT
  
  There is a better analysis here, from a poet, where all philosophers fail :
  Religion and philosophy in Germany : a fragment : Heine, Heinrich, 1797-1856 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
  
  https://archive.org/details/religionandphilo00heinuoft
  
  Heinrich Heine, imo the finest German Poet, exiled to Paris in opposition to Young Germany, Jewish himself, looked back at then recent at Paris 1789, and declared what Germany would do would make Robespierre et al look like amateurs. That in 1834, 100 years before!
  
  The reason?
  Immanuel Kant, the omni-pulverizer as he named him.
  
  “What a strange contrast did this man’s outward life
  present to his destructive, world-annihilating thoughts!
  In sooth, had the citizens of Konigsberg had the least
  presentiment of the full significance of his ideas, they
  would have felt a far more awful dread at the presence of
  this man than at the sight of an executioner, who can but
  kill the body. But the worthy folk saw in him nothing
  more than a Professor of Philosophy, and as he passed
  at his customary hour, they greeted him in a friendly
  manner and set their watches by him. ”
  
  Immanuel Kant founded the Romantic Movement, and we see the result with Nazi’s – omni-pulverizers, world-annihilating not merely the body, but the world of ideas.
  Many today still set their watches by this pervasive anti-philosopher.
  
  As for the Jewish state project, first from Prime Minister Disraeli, Venetian and Jewish himself, in 1855, the reason Britain pushed this was to totally eradicate classical culture in Germany – that culture was cherished and cultivated by the Jewish community there. I surmise Heinrich Heine’s razor sharp classical reasoning prompted this. Hitler’s first act in Paris was to destroy the grave of Heinrich Heine.
  
  Could it be Zelensky knows his Nazi’s are Romantic, and thinks that is a laughing matter?
- sean the leprechaun on March 30, 2022 · at 9:14 am EST/EDT
  
  Peter, I always enjoy reading someone who fully, and I mean fully, understands the root of the evil and where the lair is. All roads of racist hate, bigotry, and sectarianism lead to London.
  
  Cheers M
Mr_Mayhem on March 30, 2022 · at 7:29 am EST/EDT

“The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values of religion (to which few members of other civilizations were converted), but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. ”

That quote from Samuel Huntington is typical British Imperial thinking, which overlooks the achilles’ heel of Empire. Empire erodes the cultural and economic fabric necessary for the promotion of genius that the military depends on for its technological advantage. It could be said that the right ideas being applied in practice is what made the west win the world, right from the start. For example, Benjamin Franklyn was not running his revolutions only via politics, but was an active man of letters and inventor, and was in correspondence with a network of leading anti-empire intellectuals, and was aware of the significance of Leibniz, as a superior foundation for science, as opposed to Newton’s Royal Society formalism, which specialized in masking the art of forming scientific hypothesis.

So, to group western as one blob, when it was a idea battleground between the American System, and the British Empire Imperial system, is a fallacy of composition. The members of the Empire Club like some of the Huntington, do not acknowledge any countercurrent to their framework, when indeed that was the essential element for understanding the US success.

The West was a success despite Empire and later the British, not because of it. At its core was the principles of renaissance, classical education, mastering timeless principles, essentially a political economic system capable of producing young geniuses. Where as empire sees geniuses as a threat unless they are captured and neutered within the system, free thinking in general has always been a threat to Political power systems based upon circular logic.
bonbon on March 30, 2022 · at 8:13 am EST/EDT

Missing is a proper discussion of the Roman Empire – the Ishtar of Babylon. The eastern Rome, Venice, displays perfectly clearly with the stolen corpse of Catholic San Marco with Babylonian Wings.

Then note Viking Runes on the lions at the Doge Palace. There is the key to the first terrorists, the Vikings. In other words Viking barbarism run by billionaires, Venice.

These barbaric berserkers were dispatched by Venice, commanded by someone from Baghdad, to destroy Charlemagne’s Empire. They quickly found Christian Augustinian Scotland and Ireland to be Charlemagne’s (Alcuin, his advisor educated at Kells University) source of strength, which they assaulted. These Vikings of Jutland, Saxons, were then targeted, and ater became Normans, who continued their game.
Here we have the model for all terrorism to today.
Nazi-specific always sound like Vikings, looking mystically north.
Curiously the Bolsheviks had an ideology, Third Rome, well into the Soviet times of the Cold War. That is precisely their root – Venice.
Jean de Peyrelongue on March 30, 2022 · at 8:23 am EST/EDT

I do not like this paper. All the numbers are false. Among the people from the USSR, how many were killed by the germans and how many by Stalin’s policy ? Nazisme is today a convenient tool to through at the head of an ennemy. The Ukraine case is special. The Galicie since the end of World war one has been given fisrt to Poland and then the USSR took it when they share Poland with Germany in 1939. This has never been done with the galicien people’s agreement and the have been fighting first Poland then the Bolscheviks. True during the second world war they were pro Germany and they have taken revenge against the Jews seen as traitor to Galicie. Today they are still hating Russia and they are not manageable, that is the problem.
Katharina on March 30, 2022 · at 8:45 am EST/EDT

I think in the West these days the word ‘Nazi’ has come down to nothing but a slur. In Germany, for example, a political party like AfD (roughly the equivalent of 1980s conservatives) are slammed as being the worst kind of Nazis, whereas the butchers in Ukraine are seen as good guys, their actual Nazi insignia and nationalist crap deliberately ignored. The German interior minister screeches about their ‘battle against the right aka Nazis’, but all that is meant with that is a battle against dissent. You’re a Nazi if you disagree with the government, criticize any of their measures or find fault with anything they do, but you’re not a Nazi if you run around with a swastika and bash some Russian heads in. However, if you think that the Nazis doing such things are Nazis while the Nazis in the government think they aren’t, you’re a Nazi yourself. The teutonic logic in this is a bit hard to understand, but in Germany at least, the word ‘Nazi’ has become totally meaningless. Therefore, a word like ‘denazification’ is rather incomprehensible.

As a side note – right now you’re probably a Nazi for displaying the letter ‘Z’ somewhere, and it might get you three years in jail. As a comparison, two migrants raped a 14-ys-old girl and got 18 months on probation. Those who protest the lenient sentence are Nazis, of course. Come to think of it, being called a Nazi in Germany is probably a compliment, but when they call you one of the good guys, you might want to reconsider your ethics.
bonbon on March 30, 2022 · at 8:53 am EST/EDT

Barbarism is from the Greek – those who speak bar-bar, that is uneducated. Then referring to Scythians north of Greece.
Greek civilization from which the Eastern Orthodox Church at Mount Athos Abby comes, has luckily been preserved, lost, rediscovered over 2000 years.

As Putin himself said, “Prometheus was chained to a rock at Sochi”, by his brother Titans for the unforgivable crime of giving Logos, fire, to mere mortals. The Titans of today would torture forever any Promethean they could get their paws on.

Russia now defends actually Western, Greek civilization against barbarians, but also Titans.
David B. Hungerford on March 30, 2022 · at 9:18 am EST/EDT

This guy has a religious worldview, i.e. , he is concerned with the next world. Applied to this world, the results are simply ludicrous. Spare us.
Andrea Catalano on March 30, 2022 · at 9:33 am EST/EDT

German intelligence installed communism in Russia.
Rootman on March 30, 2022 · at 9:49 am EST/EDT

An (eventual) request for a much deeper, scholarly level debate about this subject. Level: college or university course… By a panel with for example, historians, theologians and experts about geopolitics. Of course by open minded experts of Russia and the west, but preferably also some from China, Latin America and developing countries.

Of course extremely hard to organize, but eventually to be expanded into a serious Master or even PhD degree!
- bonbon on March 30, 2022 · at 10:35 am EST/EDT
  
  Already done – many have done their PhD on Immanuel Kant – Hannah Arendt for example, the mistress of Martin Heidegger – Hitler’s ghostwriter. Heidegger also revered across transatlantic Uni’s.
  Kant is revered, the founder of Romanticism, which with Romantic Nazi’s we see is no laughing matter!
  See Heinrich Heine info above…
Batiushka2 on March 30, 2022 · at 10:47 am EST/EDT

With respect for the author, I’m not buying the demonization of the post-800 A.D. West and the retro-fitting of its historic internecine conflicts into a prepackaged narrative a la Romanides. It’s tempting to see all cultural conflicts of the world as black and white, and all the black hats of recent millennia as The Same Team. But truth is sacrificed in the mad rush to point fingers. Crusaders, for example, were not Nazis but Crusaders–different goals, different ideology, different faith. Christopher Columbus was not a Nazi, nor was he a Crusader. Being a slave and being a prisoner are equated in this article, but though similar, these are distinct woes. And what is not mentioned is that Western “baddies” have stiff competition in the Eastern baddies about whom the article is silent. I think it undermines the urgency of Russia’s de-Nazification efforts, to define a “Nazi” as “anyone who ever did bad things from Cain onward, who happens to be Western.” I am an Orthodox priest.
Opport Knocks on March 30, 2022 · at 11:23 am EST/EDT

“President Zelensky of the Ukraine is by race a Jew, as indeed was President Poroshenko before him.”

Judaism is not a “race” it is an ethno-cultural construct based on an ancient religion. There are huge variations within it, not unlike Christianity. Neither of these men showed any signs of being religiously observant. Both showed signs of craving more power and money, by doing the bidding of others. Hardly a trait unique to those who identify as Jewish people.

Similarly “Nazism” is a unique flavour of Fascism in Germany from 1933-44, and we would all be better off if the word were confined to that context. Ukrafascists would be a better term for the Azov and other similar groups.
a on March 30, 2022 · at 1:07 pm EST/EDT

I have an interesting story about Nazis and finding out I was married to the granddaughter of one of the worst of them.

I was born in NZ but raised in England by Greek Cypriots and my NZ Scots mother. By the age of 21 I was back in NZ and engaged to a German girl. Not long after that her parents admitted that her paternal grandfather was in the SS, but that he just had an office job in Berlin and after surrender the locals pleaded on his behalf that he was a good guy not involved in crimes etc.

I felt sorry for my wife because she moved to NZ at the age of five as was teased for being German etc. She said kids would walk behind her goosestepping and doing the Nazi salute etc. She hid being German and anglicized her name. I initially had sympathy for the father too, because he was in Berlin during the war and had serious digestive health issues that he insisted were due to malnutrition. He said he never saw fruit until he was seven years old. I believed it at first, but now very much doubt it.

However as the years past I began to learn more. The first alarm bell was when we were planning a holiday. I wanted to visit all the famous cities and sites around the Mediterranean. She refused to go to Jerusalem. She said “those people are dirty”. Then her younger brother robbed a video shop with a Luger pistol from WWII. It was on the TV news and they did a long segment about it and youth sentencing. The pistol belonged to the father. The police found a basement full of Nazi paraphernalia and books the father had kept. The son had got a large Nazi tattoo on his back that he copied from one of those books and met his wife while on a trip to the Y2K Nazi convention in Germany. The father ran a small group called Christian Apologists. I thought it was about religion because he went to church every week, but I now know better. The mother by the way was all heart and saw no wrong in anybody, which in hindsight is actually a fault.

So who was this SS officer? Otto Rasch. The commander of Einzatzgruppen C at Babyr Yar. It was true he was a pencil pusher in Berlin during the war, but what was not disclosed to me was where he was before that. I am not sure about the story of locals vouching for him, but I now know he died awaiting trial at Nuremberg. It now appears the father and son thought very highly of him. I will not go into detail about about the father and the three daughters. The mother left him over it when she found out, but strangely returned to him a year later and nobody ever pressed charges. A sick guy and I think poisoned by Nazism.

My ex wife once rolled around on the floor wailing in despair “I hate being German” when she saw something on TV about what the SS had done. She had been shielded from it by her family. Then she got heavily into the US style born again Christian thing where they speak in tongues et cetera and it became impossible to stay with her, because she was insisting the children we were trying to have would be raised that way, plus lots of other factors. She is now working for a US company teaching at a school for rich kids in China (she is a clinical child psychologist and a teacher).
Uwe on March 30, 2022 · at 3:53 pm EST/EDT

Umm, that is a bit far fetched. For example: Normandy had pretty much the same founding fathers as Russia, the Vikings. And they did the same everywhere, conquer, subdue and colonize. Nazism is a left wing ideology not unlike communism, just on a national scale. On the other hand, imperialism and racism are independent from those ideologies and even from any confession.
Lumi on March 30, 2022 · at 5:20 pm EST/EDT

So “nazism” can be traced all the way back to Charlemagne, who never existed, by the way.

And “nazism” means invasion and aggression and oppression.

But I am going to ask why not trace it back further to the Roman Empire which invaded peaceful Barbarian lands, or rather yet to the Greeks, who besieged peaceful Troy?

The word “nazism” doesn’t make any sense.

There is National Socialism, and its version 2.0 is alive and well in a certain country in the Far East, which officially is still communist, and that country is not aggressive, but extremely successful, and that is due to the intelligence and diligence of its people, and to the cybernetic ruleset and mindset adopted by its leaders, which is national socialism.

What does it mean when the Kremlin talks about the denazification of the Ukraine? The answer is simple. It means the de-Azi-fication, the removal of Azi control, of Anglozionist control, personified by Victoria Nuland.

The thugs in the Azov & Aidar and whatnot bataillons are only the useful idiots and not the masterminds of the Anti-Russia that has been built by the Azi planners and schemers.
Really? on March 30, 2022 · at 8:07 pm EST/EDT

This little video might clear up some details I’m reading here in the comments section….

It is …at least…a good starting point …

A good little history lesson ….

What has worked for me over the years is to quote things that Jewish people have to say ….it takes my thoughts and opinions out of the equation. This way I can formulate my own opinions based on what they have had to say….

That seems reasonable to me …no?

Check it out …

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=58CaLup5dE8
John Neal Spangler on March 30, 2022 · at 8:11 pm EST/EDT

How many did the Bolsheviks kill in the Revolution/Civil War? Are there any good books? The American ones are all liars and exaggerate the deaths.
John Neal Spangler on March 30, 2022 · at 8:21 pm EST/EDT

Too broad a definition. In USA Nazi has been degraded to mean a fanatic. Surfnazis, Feminazis, anti-smokingnazis, and the Soup Nazi from the TV show Seinfeld. The Ukrainian version is so close to the WW2 German original in their sadism, brutality, death worship and mystic irrationality of a “pure race”., I call the whole Azov-Right Sector crew Nazis.
Geoffrey on July 15, 2022 · at 4:18 am EST/EDT

it doesn’t make sense because, for example Alexander the great conquered Sirius’s empire far before Carlus magnus…

besides, there is evidence swastika sign were common during imperial roma period – read Doughine about it

and what about Attila ? Or Gengis Khan ? and what about the incas, those emperors who from Cuzco were ruling millions, most of them kept into quasi-slavery ?

suggesting an ideological filiation between foedalism, capitalism and nazism is interesting, though.

Geoffrey, communist from Belgium (birth place of Clovis, Charles Martel and Charlemagne)
Annwn on July 28, 2022 · at 4:30 am EST/EDT

In Hebrew, Germany is called “Achkenaz”. A German is an Ashkenazi. In “Achkenazi”, there is the word “Nazi”. What is “Ach” and this “K”? “Asch” is fire. “K”, indicates the container, the similarity. The biblical word that says “Ashkenaz” warns that fire will be in the structure when the Nazi arises. This indication takes on its full significance when we remember that Hitler ruled the Third Reich. “Reich” is “Rosch”, “Resh” or “Rais”, that is to say “Head”.
The accession of Hitler thus consecrated an evolutionary intelligence of first significance for a man of knowledge.
NB: Each of the great moments in history, when the world changes shape, is marked by a trial and always, strangely enough, by a rigged trial, where the immolation of the condemned person expiates the indignity of the judges and the executioners. The Passion of Christ is the eternal archetype, as it will be later, to a lesser extent, for the Templars, Joan of Arc, Marie-Antoinette, etc., Nuremberg…
The clearer and clearer the vision of the past, the more the present becomes clear.
Continued: https://livresdefemmeslivresdeverites.blogspot.com/2017/07/delisraelismeaujudaisme.html