Why France?

Why France? How about: France’s vote to recognize Palestine.
All kinds of games being played, it’s mostly background noise for the sheeple (USA #1!!).
Let’s see if there’s a play for the Golan Heights, and a general expansion of ‘greater Israhell’. These folks are patient. However, I have the sense that they perceive that time is running out for subtlety. If the Dollar is rejected the fifty billion that bibi just extorted from DC will be about enough to buy a cup of coffee.
In general, as long as chaos reigns and brother kills brother, few will perceive the zio’s global machinations.

Because the French people (well, Paris French) don’t have guns? There will be another really huge wave of gun buying in the US again. And ammo. Americans know the gooberment can kick their ass any day of the week and twice on Sundays with the army, navy, air force, and marines (or Obama’s drones, if you will) but people don’t expect the gubmint to kick their door in at 3:00 a.m. They expect ISIS to kick their door in at 3:00 a.m. Americans are really smart.

Well, it seems to go elucidating the true objectives of the last “event” in Paris.

They say now in the Sexta TV (Spanish TV) that the role in combating ISIS is now led by France along with the US and its allied.

Let´s see.
The Russians were demonstrating not only be effective in their bombing on ISIS but making it clear the aforementioned “coalition” and its real intentions in Syria and with respect to ISIS. Russia was winning the media war, with almost all political analysts, including those against Al Assad, agreeing that its performance was nothing short of providential.

On the other hand, Hollande was already a political corpse and Obama virtually too. And these two gentlemen are in electoral campaign. Well, now Hollande already has “his war” with which to wash his deteriorating image ( remember Thatcher and “her war” of the Falklands at the lowest point of her popularity ) and leverage to damage, if possible more, Al Assad and, in passing, the Syrians, because we have seen that the French, when bomb, do not go around with nonsense and so gives them a damn to damage water-related and electricity infrastructures, as well as schools or hospitals.

Therfore, with the G20 summit in perspective and more than likely advance by the Russians of their intention to make public the list of sponsors of ISIS there, we have that with this new attack in Paris, ISIS sponsors have step overnight to take the place of Russia as chief whip of that “entity” and at the same time have made their way to “defend its interests in Syria” without UN mandate nor Syrian government permission.

Then, there is the fact that on television, at least Spanish TV, the word “Kalashnikov”, related to the jihadist perpetrators of the attack, is repeated continuously, and even when some analyst clarified that the biggest illegal arms traffic is originated in Belgium and that guns handled by ISIS are most probably of American origin stolen in Iraq, for the lady who is in the kitchen and hear the television while doing her work without paying much attention the message is clear: “jihadists carried Russian arms.” I am hearing this all the time since yesterday. And today, coincidentally, the Spanish woman whose husband died in the Bataclan hall, and who saved her life, has written a letter to the media telling her story and stressing that “she will never forget the sound of the “Kalashnikovs”.” Well, I do not know if the word “Kalashnikov” is exactly said in her letter or not, but if not, you have already the program conductors to “translate”.
I do not know, but seems to me too insistently.

Well, all that, but, if you need even more, here you have Hollande´s urgency to the French Assembly on the need to change the French Consititución and exponentially increase the security / intelligence apparatus, that are already on the table…..One wonders for what…. certainly not to prevent ISIS attacks nor to capture the perpetrators, as has been amply demonstrated. But, then? Yes…. dear French citizen…. to control you better. French Republic and its old and epic rights and liberties….way too much for “big money” and its bussiness coming with TTIP….
Yesterday I also read that the UK is going to increase its number of spies in more than a thousand….

if this is not already “1984”, God to come and see it.

Perhaps the following might be a starting point for the author’s question (Why France?).

(1) Your political class are completely sold out to non-French interests, Or at a minimum, they are not looking out for the interests of the French people, but the interests of their paymasters in European/transnational banks, Banking families and their monopoly over French media, French Multinational corporations, the hydrocarbon mafia (Total + Saudis & Qataris) and the parochial interests of the various ethnic and/or religious sects/ideologies that dominate the aforementioned entities – that’s reason number 1.

(2) Cultivation of Salafists, by the French State and the elite, within the Muslim minority for both domestic policy shaping (i.e. dividing & distracting the population) and for destabilizing former colonies. -if you’re going to incubate terrorists and use them for State policies, then they will have opportunity to act within France as well as abroad. Reason #2.

(3) The Owners of France (Banks, Oil Sector stakeholders, the owners of French media, Brussels/EU etc) and their hirelings in the incumbent sold-out political class are not serious about dealing with terrorism: They want their cake and eat it to: Supporting and using terrorists as instruments of state policy while pretending to champion secular values and other nonsense rhetoric

4)Since France is not ruled by people who identify with the French people, the average French person can be sacrificed for the various parochial goals of the those that rule the country (this seems to be a French tradition).

5)The French electorate are no longer smart enough to look out for their best interests: they want their cake and eat it too. They want the keep their fake liberal values, social subsidies, the illusory promises and perceived security of the illusory EU gravy-train. They don’t want to make the compromise of short-term sacrifice for longterm gain both socially and economically. They don’t want to give up the narcissistic and self-destructive liberalism of the West (with it’s built-in demographic suicide pill) and accept the common-sense of a more natural common-sense and conservative social structure (meaning traditional family values, children, hard-work, respect for men – not just respect for women, a healthy sense of ethos, autonomy, respect for all religions – instead of contempt for all religions). They are not willing to say yes to their long term national interest if it means to say no to the EU and accepting a tougher leaner but more independent state.

The rest of the immediate-term reasons are:
– They were the most permissive in allowing “French” Salafists to travel to Syria: – The French State organs, arm and support Salafist terrorists in Syria and Africa and allow them easy access to travel to and from France – if you use terrorists and extremist for hurting others, it’s inevitable that those coddled terrorists, who have easy access to your country, will have the opportunity to do harm when given the order.

– The French Ruling class were the loudest and uncompromising of the “Assad must go” crowd of fanatical idiots: – The hijacked French govt were the most vociferous in their attacks on the Syrian govt,

– Hollande’s govt was the most radical out of the West in overtly, not covertly, supplying weapons to Syrian terrorists.

– The French State continues to cultivate the worst kinds of Salafists in their muslim population doing nothing practical to stamp them out. Instead they shut up those advocating serious steps by labeling them extreme Right or extreme Left while indulging in humiliating and useless steps like banning a harmless garment like the hijab.

Here are some further speculations regarding why terror attacks may serve a purpose in France:

– to strip away the further liberties of their population under the guise of security,
– to keep the nationalist National Front from gaining power,
– to make a last ditched effort to become relevant in the mid east with the French government attempts to unseat Assad having failed so badly and French influence having become totally marginalized: to achieve this via a fake war effort involving backing from EU/NATO.,

OT… Some music for these troubled times.

Here is Father Foty Mochalov with his “golden Voice”

https://02varvara.wordpress.com/2015/11/14/14-november-2015-heres-some-more-from-fr-foty-mochalov-of-the-golden-voice/

And here singing in English from Lion King – Circle Of Life – Иеромонах Фотий (Мочалов).

https://vk.com/video-94644184_171483275

The article should have a by line. “Kakaouskia”

Are the days of the Fifth Republic coming to an end in France? I would say,there is a strong possibility they are.Where are the French today? In the past the French were a difficult people to govern.Their didn’t put up with tyranny easily.Many governments fell over the slightest problem.Today,they are slowly (maybe quicker now) creating a police state in France.And so far the people aren’t even protesting that.What past French government could have survived two terrorist attacks of the horror that France has had just this year.Attacks directly linked to the actions of the French government itself.The French people almost brought (and have at times) their governments down for far less.And yet not a sign of protests today.So why is that? I suspect several “culprits” are to blame.France isn’t the France of my youth anymore.The France of today is multicultural,not an age old multiculturalism of native peoples in a land.But a new multiculturalism of immigrants from distant lands.And that has weakened solidarity among the French public.Notice that even in the latest attacks many of the restaurants and bars attacked in Paris weren’t French.And the concert was a multicultural audience listening to a US band.The elites know that a weakened national unity makes it easier to control the public and have pushed immigration in Europe for that purpose.France “used” to be independent,but today has become a “province” of the EU.And the global elites dominate it.Whether some of them or born in France or not.They serve globalist interests,not French ones.The question I feel we will see in the next days is whether anything of the old France is left to be saved.Or has it totally died.And the new France become nothing to worry about saving.

Saker

Regarding the reports of the French airforce bombing targets in Raqqa, I assume that if reports are true, then this would be second phase of the geopolitical war in Syria and that the Empire is now planning to divide Northern Syria by giving land to the Kurds and thus establishing a pipeline path from Qatar, through Iraq and Northern Syria and then through to Turkey?

What is your assessment on this hypothesis? And how would the Russians respond given that they have not yet installed the S-400s (public statement was issued to confirm this) to completely seal off Syria’s airspace.

Here is a rough and dirty translation of Thierry Meyssan’s recent article in French (Novemeber 16). It is definitely worth the read. Bolding and italics are mine.

The French Republic as Hostage

by Thierry Meyssan

The war extending into Paris is incomprehensible to the French who know little about the covert activities of their government in the Arab world, its unnatural alliances with Gulf dictatorships and its active involvement in international terrorism. This policy has never been discussed in Parliament nor in the mainstream media which rarely dares show interest.

For five years the French have heard about distant wars without understanding the cause. The press informed them of the commitment of their army in Libya, but not of the presence of French troops deployed to the Levant. My articles about it are widely read but perceived as oriental quirks. Despite my personal history, it is fashionable to qualify them as “extremist” or “conspiratorial” and it is noted that my articles are reproduced by websites of all persuasions, including the genuinely extreme and conspiratorial. Yet nobody finds anything wrong with what I write. Nobody listened to my warnings about alliances that France had concluded.

Suddenly, the truth ignored has surfaced.

France was attacked on the night of Friday, November 13, 2015 by several commandos who killed at least 130 people in five different places in Paris. A state of emergency was declared for 12 days on the entire territory of France and can be renewed by Parliament at any time.

There is no direct link with the Charlie Hebdo affair.

The French press interprets this as an act of war by linking it to the attack on Charlie Hebdo, although the specifics are completely different. In January, [the attacks] were meant to kill specific people, whereas this time it was a coordinated attack against large numbers of random people.

We now know that (1) Charlie Hebdo’s editor had just received a “gift” of 200,000 euros from the Near East to continue his anti-Muslim campaign; (2) the killers were linked to the French intelligence services; (3) the origin of their weapons is considered an official defense secret. I have already shown that this attack was not an Islamist operation (4), had been an immediate state recovery and that recovery had met a hostile response in the population the Republic (5) — an idea that was brilliantly developed a few months later by the demographer Emmanuel Todd.

If we go back to the war that has now spread to Paris, it is a surprise in Western Europe. We can compare it with the Madrid bombings of 2004. In Spain, there was no gunman or bomber, but 10 bombs in four separate locations. The scene that just took place in France is the daily lot of many populations across the “broader Middle East” since 2001. And we find similar events beyond, like the three days of attacks in six separate locations in Mumbai in 2008.

Although the attackers were Muslims and some shouted “Allahu Akbar!” while killing passersby, there is no connection between these attacks, Islam and the so-called “clash of civilizations.” Thus, these commandos were instructed to kill randomly, without first inquiring as to the religion of their victims.

Identically, it is absurd to evoke the message [of vengeance] by Daesh against France -even though there is no doubt about its involvement in the attack. If the terrorist organization wanted “vengeance” is in Moscow they would hit.

France has been a terrorist state since at least 2011

Reading these events is difficult because behind all non-state actors are the states who sponsor them. In the 70s Venezuelan Carlos the Jackal had begun with a conviction to serve the Palestinian cause and the Revolution with discreet support from the USSR. In the 80s, the example of Carlos was taken by mercenaries working for the highest bidder, as with “Abu Nidal” who carried out attacks as well on behalf of Libya and Syria against Israel. Today there is a nebula of terrorism and covert action involving many States.

In principle, States still deny their involvement in terrorist groups. However, the French Foreign Minister, Laurent Fabius, said in December 2012, at the conference of “Friends of Syria” in Marrakech, that Al-Nusa, the Syrian branch of al Qaeda, “in fact is they do a good job.”

Given their role, Mr. Fabius knew he would not be prosecuted for his support of a listed terrorist organization by the United Nations Security Council, but he did place his country at serious risk plunging it into the cauldron of terrorism.

In reality, France has been directly involved alongside Al Qaeda since at least 2011. At the time, the United Kingdom and France had joined the US proposed “Arab Spring” plan. The purpose was to overthrow secular Arab regimes and replace them with dictatorships of the Muslim Brotherhood. While London and Paris fully discovered this operation while already underway in Tunisia and Egypt, they had previously been asked for support against Libya and Syria. In Libya they organized, with the assistance of the Italian Special Forces, massacres in Benghazi and helped of Al Qaeda to take control of various arsenals. I can attest that in August 2011, when I was protected by Khamis al-Gaddafi while NATO assaulted the capital, at the Rixos hotel where we were was besieged by a unit of Al Qaeda known as The Tripoli Brigade, commanded by Mahdi al-Harati to the cry of “Allah Akbar!” and surrounded by French officers in the mission. The same situation occurred with Mahdi al-Harati and its chief Abdelhakim Belhaj, the founder of the so-called Free Syrian Army, in reality an Al Qaeda group carrying the flag of French colonization.

In Syria, the presence of French officers framing armed groups for perpetrating crimes against humanity is widely attested.

France has subsequently played an extremely complex and dangerous game. In January 2013, one month after Laurent Fabius publicaly supported Al Qaeda in Syria, France embarked on an operation in Mali against the same al Qaeda, causing the first backlash against its undercover agents in Syria.

You have never heard of this because although France has democratic institutions, its current policy in the Arab world has never been discussed publicly. At best it is simply a violation of Article 35 of the Constitution by going to war against Libya and against Syria after only a few hours of superficial parliamentary debate, without a vote. French parliamentarians have waived their control of the executive mandate on foreign policy, thinking that it is a reserved domain of the president, without consequences to everyday life. Everyone can see the effect today on peace and security, one of the four fundamental “Human Rights and the Citizen” of 1789 constitution (Article 2). The worst is to come.

In early 2014, when the Liberal US hawks were developing their Islamic Emirate transformation plan in Iraq and the sham that became Daesh, France and Turkey supplied ammunition to al Qaeda to combat the EIS -this point is evidenced by a document presented to the Security Council July 14, 2014. However, France subsequently joined the secret operation and participated in the anti-Daesh International Coalition, each of which is now known that contrary to its name it does not bombarded Daesh but largua him arms for a year. This evolved after the signing of the 5 + 1 Agreement with Iran. The United States returned suddenly to the field against the terrorist organization and rejected in Hasaka (Syria). But it was not until mid-October 2015, a month ago, that France began to fight Daesh. Not to stop its massacres, but to conquer a part of the territory it occupies in Syria and Iraq and install a new colonial state which would be called “Kurdistan” although its Kurdish population there is still a minority.

In this perspective, France sent its aircraft carrier -which is not yet on Zone- to support the Marxist-Leninist party of the Kurdish YPG-but what does this policy reference when planning to create a [Kurdish] colonial state? – against his former ally Daesh.

We are now witnessing the second backlash. Not from al Qaeda in Syria, but from Daesh in France, on instructions of unmentionable allies of France.

Who runs Daesh?

Daesh is an artificial creation. It is the instrument of policy for several states and multinationals.

Its main financial resources are oil, Afghan drugs -including the French who have still not grasped the implications for their solvent, and Levantine antiquities. Everyone agrees that the stolen oil passes freely through Turkey before being sold in Western Europe. Given the volumes, there is no possible doubt on the support of the Turkish state to Daesh.

Three weeks ago a Syrian Arab Army spokesman revealed 3 planes respectively chartered by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates had smuggled Daesh fighters out of Syria and the transported them to Yemen. Again, there is no doubt about the links between these three states and Daesh in violation of relevant Security Council resolutions.

I have explained at length, since the first conference in Geneva in June 2012, a faction within the US state apparatus was conducting its own policy against that of the White House. Initially, this plot was directed by the CIA director and co-founder of Daesh in 2007 (father of “The Surge’), General David Petraeus, until his arrest, handcuffed the day after the reelection of Barack Obama. Then it was the turn of the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was unable to complete her term during the presidential transition period due to an unfortunate “accident.” Finally, the fight [for Daesh] was pursued by Ambassador Jeffrey Feltman from UN offices and General John Allen head of the alleged anti-Desh Coalition. The group, part of the US “deep state,” which has continued to oppose the 5 + 1 agreement with Iran and to fight the Syrian Arab Republic, has supporters within the administration of Obama. Above all, it can count on the help of multinational companies, whose budgets are larger than those of the States, and can fund their covert operations. This is the case of the Exxon-Mobil (the true owner of Qatar), the KKR investment funds, and private army Academi (formerly Blackwater).

It is on behalf of these States and the multinationals that France became a mercenary country.

The French have been blackmailed

On November 11, 2015, the Prime Minister, Manuel Valls, assured us that France was committed [to the fight] against terrorism.

On November 12, the National Observatory of delinquency and criminal responses – attached to the Ministry of Interior published a report stating that terrorism had become the second French concern after unemployment.

The morning of 13 November, the Interior Minister, Bernard Cazeneuve, presented a plan in Nanterre including twenty measures against arms trafficking. Perhaps it should be added the announcement of the restoration of identity checks at borders, even if this decision can be explained by the fear of demonstrations during the Cop21.

Clearly, the government expected the worst, implying that it was negotiating with those who attacked it. France has made commitments that it has not kept and is definitely being blackmailed by the masters she has betrayed.

An exercise simulating attacks was conducted on the morning of the attack on hospital emergency services, under the control of the Ministries of Interior and Defense. A coincidence previously noted in the attacks of September 11, 2001 in New York and Washington, those of 11 March 2004 in Madrid, and those of 7 July 2005 in London.

Provisional Conclusion

Successive French governments have forged alliances with states whose values ​​are opposite to those of the Republic. They have gradually committed to assisting secret wars on their behalf, then retreated. President Hollande, his chief of personal staff General Benoit Puga, his Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius and his predecessor Alain Juppé are now the subject of blackmail which they can not escape without revealing they misled the country, possibly exposing them to [proceedings] in the High Court of Justice.

On 28 September, on the UN podium, President Putin addressed the United States and France and exclaimed: “I would ask those responsible for this situation: Do you know what you have done?” But I fear that this issue will remain unresolved, because these people have not given up their policy based on exaggerated self confidence and a belief in their exceptionalism and impunity.” Neither the Americans nor the French would have listened anyway. It is now too late.

OT, but related – RT reports the Russian investigators have identified a terrorist attack as the cause of the Sinai plane crash, as traces of (probably homemade) explosives have been found in the wreckage:

https://www.rt.com/news/322393-russian-plane-crash-terrorist-attack/

Contrast the speed of this investigation with MH-17…

gonna repost all this, rather than just link

If France is at war, “It’s because of the criminal incoherence of French foreign policy, … plunging Syria into chaos”

Syrian rebels. Picture is from the Le Monde article linked in text below: “We can’t let up on our support to the rebels..who share the democratic spirit.”

Guillaume BOREL
In Arrêt sur Info, November 15, 2015

Translated from French by Tom Winter, November 15, 2015
The unprecedented wave of attacks that struck Paris last night, and which left, on first accounting, at least 127 dead, is the direct consequence of the foreign policy conducted by France in Syria, a policy less concerned over the salafist terrorism than it is about the destruction of the country and the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad.
If several authors of the carnage in the Bataclan concert hall were saying, according to witnesses: “It’s Holland’s fault , it is the fault of your President, he did not have to intervene in Syria,” we must consider what was the reality of French politicy in this country since the conflict began in 2011.
The French Republic, as president François Hollande revealed in the interview with journalist Xavier Panon, has been supplying weapons to the Syrian rebels since 2012. Through channels of the DGSE, 20mm cannons, machine guns, rocket launchers, and anti-tank missiles were delivered to the “moderate” rebels, in violation of the arms embargo put in place by the European Union in the summer of 2011.
An advisor in the Elysée recalled, according to Panon:
“Yes indeed, we are furnishing what they need, but within the limits of our means and in accordance with our evaluation of the situation. Under cover, you can’t act except on a small scale, with limited means, limited objectives.”
France has also put special forces on the ground aimed at the training and operational support of the combattants.
In March 2012, 13 French officers got captured by the Syrian Army when the Islamic Caliphate was relaunched in the Baba Amr quarter at Homs by the Al-Farsouq brigade and the Al-Waleed brigade, which would soon leave the FSA to join ranks with the Islamic State.
President Hollande, quoted in Le Monde confided in August 2014:
“We can’t let up on our support that we have been granting these rebels who are the only ones sharing the democratic spirit.”
Since the Syrian president Bashar al-Assad has declared more than once, that there aren’t any “moderate” rebels, one might inquire as to the actual nature of the rebel groups sustained and armed by the French state since 2012.

The Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius declared on this subject that the Al-Nosra front (Syrian branch of Al-Qaida), “was doing a good job.” On the other hand, Syrian relatives of people killed by Syrian rebels entered suit at the tribunal of Paris against Fabius, seeking symbolic reparations for the “personal failings committed by the minister of foreign affairs Laurent Fabius”
And the US Defense Intelligence Agency in a 2012 report had already determined that the help for “moderate” rebels actually benefitted the Islamic State: According to the former agency director, General Flynn, the indirect help of the US and the western coalition to the Islamic State was “an intentional decision.” In an earlier article on the troubled role of the western coalition in Iraq and Syria, I laid out the factually different elements that demonstrated the support and operational cooperation of Turkey, the US, and Israel with different jihadist groups [Western sponsors of the Islamic State].
These different elements show clearly enough that the western coalition, France included, has conducted a policy of support for various jihadist groups in their goal of overturning president Bashar al-Assad, under the pretense of that fiction of bringing help to the mythical “moderate” rebels.
The recent Russian intervention put a spotlight on the true nature of the pretend rebel groups when it brought about a chain of complaints and protestations from the western capitals that the strikes were hurting rebels supported by the West [(!) — Tr.] However, the groups hit by Russian aircraft belong to the Army of Conquest — a collection including the Al-Nosra Front (Syrian branch of Al Qaeda) and such Islamist groups as Ahrar al-Sham.
Unfortunately, it is unlikely that the support of the French executive to jihadist groups in Syria will get exposed in the light of this unprecedented wave of attacks, which nevertheless constitutes its logical and predictable conclusion. The chaos Syria has been reduced to, and the proliferation of jihadist groups are indeed the direct result of the French foreign policy in the Middle East.
Whereas when the earlier attacks in January the executive posited the internet as favoring “autoradicalization” of terrorists, and presented them in falsifying fashion as “lone wolves,” scapegoats for the lapses and incompetence of French Intel and Security services, and introduced devises for mass surveillance of citizens, this policy was mainly aimed at individual freedoms, and has shown its futility today. It is however unlikely that the heads of security services, including the interior minister Bernard Cazeneuve – who have failed yet again – will be held accountable.

The government and the political class are hiding once again behind emotion and an insistence on “national unity.” For all that, the some ones who today declare a state of emergency and the reestablishment of control of the borders were barely just a few weeks back committing our participation in the welcoming of Syrian immigrants, in the name of humanitarian principles, and this despite the reservations of EUROJUST [agency for European judicial coordination], which affirmed that the influx included close connections with terror organizations in Syria.
“It is an alarming situation because we see plainly that the smuggling is destined to finance terrorism and that the migration is often being used for the infiltration of members of the Islamic State.”
If, as president François Hollande says, France is “at war” today, then France essentially owes it to the incompetences of the executive and to the criminal incoherence of French foreign policy that has sustained and armed the jihadists who are plunging Syria into chaos …
Guillaume Borel | 14 novembre 2015″

Yes, why France? and besides, how are we sure this comes from Daesh?
Apparently some witnesses described the attackers as calm, professionally looking and effective white men speaking perfect french. I do not know if those reports are true, but if it is so, it just reminds me of the killings of the “killers of Brabant”, a group of calm, professionnal, acting like military people, who between 82 and 85 attaked about a dozen of supermarkets (always the same brand) in Belgium. They were not going after money: they were coming for killing. They used automatic weapons and killed everyone in sight, men, women, children. They disappeared after a cop who was there for shopping opened fire on their car (always the same type of car, a VW Golf GTI stolen shortly before). To make it short, the remains of the body of one of the men were found around 15 years later buried in the woods. He was an ex-gendarme connected to the far right, and swiss historian Daniele Ganser states in his book “the secret armies of NATO” that this was one of the black ops of NATO (the “Stay Behind” network, a parallel organization created illegally without the states knowledge except for a handful of leaders in each country of Europ) to the effect of consolidating the politic power against the people of Europ. Such operations were effected in almost all the countries of Europ. In Belgium it had the effect of massively reinforcing the security apparatus. In Italy it was built around former fascists, in Germany around former Nazis, in France there seem to have connections with the OAS (Organization of Secret Army) which tried repeatedly to murder General De Gaulle.
Well: that is just a passing thought, but it seems that the investigation has been led with lightning speed (thanks to the good old passport found on the crime scene again), and that everyone is hot for going bombing Syria now, which is just what NATO needs now, isn’t it?

One last remark, technical this one. We have no details on the number of casualties at Stade France.
Sounds like takfiris screwed up there, while this was supposed to be their biggest hit.
Media are not developping, but there’s something for digging in here. The planing and execution seemeed flawless everywehere else exept at stade de france which could have been the biggest and most spectacular one since it was aired on TV.
Also it’s a stadium with security (not flawless by the way) but i doubt some djihadi dude withe explosives canc ome in with a belt full of explosives. Now the questions:
Why didn’t they hit when people were queing in (and Holland not yet inside the stadium) for maximal damage and why didn’t they hit right at the end or slightly before (assuming Germany would win) same thing for maximum damage?
Holland had his stupid G.W Bush kind of moment/alibi but terrotists screwed up -from their perspecive), Ideas???

@Peter J.Antonsen

You r the one doing the mis-direction and obfuscation here, Mr.

HAMLET
Words, words, words.
LORD POLONIUS
What is the matter, my lord?
HAMLET
Between who?
LORD POLONIUS
I mean, the matter that you read, my lord.
———————
It is a matter of the courage for trust, love born from the trust, and the annihilation of confidence.
It is a matter of Mother Russia and the West; she will not survive without Europe. . .

Why France? because Hollande is the weakest of all the weak non-US NATO leaders, with one of the largest none-US military footprints in Syria? Because he will be easiest to lean on to “do more” in NATO proxy war with Russia?

Sweden blames israel for paris attack:
http://www.weaselzippers.us/240189-swedens-fm-blames-israel-for-paris-terror-attacks/

Whats her name the ugly woman who is the head of IMF is French, aint he I mean she? And she was all gung-ho LAST WEEK about the Chinese currency being accepted by the IMF by th end of 2016, OH WOW, look, a terrorist attack in France! Whatta coiincidence indeed! USA does have untll the 4nd of 2016 then the dolla’ is kaput! Come on, it’s all abut protecying the dolla’!