By Saker´s Johnny-on-the-spot in Belgrade for The Saker Blog
Would Rudolf Steiner be a Vučić troll?
I doubt it. But it was good of Zoran to take time off his busy schedule to comment on my reporting from Belgrade. I am sorry that my dispatches fall short of Australian journalistic standards. Serbian political language is probably more robust than anything that Zoran experienced down under. I suspect that returning to Serbia must have been quite a culture shock. I cannot imagine that in Australia it would occur to anyone to refer to the Queen and her dysfunctional family in the robust terms that I routinely employ with reference to Vučić. There are, nevertheless, equally piquant descriptors that could be applied to some of the British royals who have been in the news lately. Some of the same attributes would also fit Vučić quite nicely.
Zoran is upset by the epithets that I use. There is visual evidence that Vučić is keenly aware of the disrepute in which he is generally held and of the trashy nicknames that, long before me, the Serbian people pinned on him:
He does not seem to be bothered by it, or at least he puts up a brave front and pretends not to be. If Vučić says he is OK with it, why should it perturb Zoran so much?
My descriptions of Vučić as a “tyrant” and “psychopath” are not complimentary but more relevantly I would suggest that they are accurate, just as it would be completely accurate, for example, to describe Prince Andrew as a pervert. In Black’s Law Dictionary, the term “tyrant” is defined thus: “The chief magistrate of the state, whether legitimate or otherwise, who violates the constitution to act arbitrarily contrary to justice”. The Cambridge dictionary defines “tyrant” as “a ruler who has unlimited power over other people, and uses it unfairly and cruelly,” a definition that is essentially identical. This is a precise description of Serbia’s form of government under Vučić. As President, formally he has limited and largely ceremonial powers, not unlike the President of Switzerland or the Queen of England (and Australia). However, it is he in fact who makes all important decisions in the country and micro-manages everything, as every person in Serbia who is not on cannabis is perfectly aware. To judge whether he perceives himself within the constitutional framework, watch his own ludicrous boasting of the things he has supposedly done which, whether actually done or not, constitutionally do not pertain at all to the office of the President:
More seriously, as everyone living in Serbia knows, major government institutions are empty shells, ministers, judges, and other officials are his puppets and party appointees, they sit at his pleasure, and do not make independent decisions. Arbitrary, personal rule is the salient feature of Serbia’s political system under Vučić. I submit that saying so publicly, far from being an insult or in bad taste, is simply a true statement within the legal and political definition of the term “tyrant,” as I use it. Nobody in Serbia today would seriously challenge that, not even trolls, in private at least.
As for my other uncomplimentary description of Vučić, that he is a “psychopath,” the impression that Vučić has serious mental health issues is widespread in Serbia. But I do not make that assertion lightly. As a layman, I defer to the diagnosis put forward by a competent professional, Prof. Mila Alečković, who has a doctorate in clinical psychology from the Sorbonne and has taught and practiced in France for many years. In her considered professional judgment, without reference to what the common people might be whispering in the cafes, Alexander Vučić is in fact a psychopathic personality. Take a watch at what Prof. Alečković has to say on the subject:
The utility of Prof. Alečković’s exceedingly well-argued presentation is that even in layman’s terms it provides reasonable grounds to conclude that both of the descriptions of Vučić that Zoran objects to, not just that of “psychopath,” but based on the visual evidence that she provides also “tyrant,” are accurate. If so, that is very bad news indeed for the country that such an individual happens to be running.
It is a pity that other than regard for good journalistic practices, not much else seems to have rubbed off on Zoran in Australia. One of the things he might have learned there is to support the right of citizens to present their grievances and to voice their views publicly without getting their heads smashed. Minimizing the number of protesters and denigrating their concerns is a rather disingenuous strategy of avoidance to express human solidarity, even with those whose views we may not share. I wonder how Zoran would have reacted in Germany in 1942 if told of the students who were members of the White Rose Society and of what they had done. Would he have dismissed them as insignificant because they were just a handful? In retrospect, who does he think was morally superior and ultimately victorious in that controversy, the outnumbered students or the regime they were protesting against?
He should give the matter some deep thought for his own sake now that he is back in Serbia, as he observes the dominant trends. It is always useful to repeat Pastor Bonhoeffer’s admonition concerning the fate of the fence-sitter who refuses to speak up when morally he ought to. After silently watching those he wanted nothing to do with being taken away, when his turn comes will anyone be left to stand up in his defense?
I sympathise with commentators who are so defensive about their country that they confuse it with the ruling regime, though it is bringing ruin upon the country they cherish. Saint Paul speaks in the Gospel of that sort of phenomenon as “zeal not according to reason.” But no government should ever enjoy the immunity from criticism to which one’s country is properly entitled.
I left the country in 1992 and cannot claim to have any insight into what is going on below the surface in Serbia. In addition, I find Mr Vucic quite abhorrent person. For those who do not understand Serbian, in his speeches (videos) Vucic states… I work on those new railways, schools, hospitals roads, investment etc….In other words, without him, nothing will happen in Serbia. Every sentence starts with “I… I… I…. made it possible, did it”, etc. As a qualified lawyer in both the former Yugoslavia and England, I agree with the author that Mr Vicic acts outside the scope of his constitutional parameters. In that respect, I agree with the author. After all, as far as I remember he was briefly an information minister in Milosevic’s government – good practical experience. My main objection to Mr Vucic’s politic is his commitment to the EU (globalist) project. But I digress. The article is grotesquely one-sided. There are a plethora of videos of “peaceful” demonstrators using not so peaceful means of expressing their anger. In addition, the number of “peaceful” protestors arrested were holders of foreign passports – the UK, Ukraine and probably some others. Please note that they were not persons with dual citizenship. Let’s not forget that Srdja Popovic never sleeps. Bottom line, the article is Grotesquely One-Sided.
“In addition, the number of “peaceful” protestors arrested were holders of foreign passports – the UK, Ukraine and probably some others.” – This is a news to me. Weren’t those arrested actually russian spies as traitor said? Have you ever asked yourself who is in charge on serbian secret police? MI6. Do you know who has offices in serbian military headquarter? NATO. Do you know who controls serbian SAJ (special anti-terrorist unit)? US ambassador himself. Ask yourself why no one cannot remove Spasoje Vulević from his position as a commander of SAJ.
In case you do not believe this, no one also believed that general Perišić was CIA spy either …
Stekicar
“In addition, the number of “peaceful” protestors arrested were holders of foreign passports – the UK, Ukraine and probably some others.” – This is a news to me”. Indeed. It’s impossible for you not to know this. It’s common knowledge, posted by newspapers and TV stations. As for your question that those arrested were actually “Russian spies”, my answer to you is that they were not “Russian spies”, a little bit of disinformation which liberals in Serbia posted for public consumption, thinking it would work. It did not.
Even assuming that the most violent protesters were not thugs hired by the regime to infiltrate and discredit the protests, which many believe to be true, these protests were pretty tame compared to protests in other countries. Take France, for example, a country with a ‘culture’ of often violent protests, when most of Paris looking like a warzone afterward, or Greece, also known for riots and violent protests.
We are dealing in Serbia with a neurotic government, which deems it necessary to lash back at even the slightest criticism. For a man with such absolute power as Vucic, he gives off the impression of an insecure neurotic.
Has anyone stopped to think why this is so?
“…commentators who are so defensive about their country that they confuse it with the ruling regime”
No Stephen, it’s the other way around. Some of us are defensive about the “ruling regime” because we think that it is the best available option for our country at this point in time.
Z
Well spoken. Vućić and his regime are indeed the best solution for the country at this time. As for Johnny-on-the-spot, more infantile nonsense from him. For example:
He states that Zoran’s return to Serbia “…must have been quite a culture shock”. Indeed. In what way ? What is the difference between Belgrade and Canberra/Sidney for example, except the language spoken ?
As for President Vućić’s mental health, he states “the impression that Vučić has serious mental health issues is widespread in Serbia”. Absolute nonsense. This is a simple fabrication, invented by the author. I have yet to hear anybody state this.
And of course, the “protesters” could not have been left out. Johnny has stated “Minimizing the number of protesters and denigrating their concerns is a rather disingenuous strategy of avoidance to express human solidarity, even with those whose views we may not share”. Indeed. I live in Belgrade, and nobody has “minimized” the number of protesters. One more time Johnny: There were no demonstrations in Belgrade, nor “protesters”, only football hooligans hired by liberals and Western controlled NGO’s, who tried to grab the Parliament building. As I have written before, the hooligans were initially joined by teenagers who, after a few days, backed off, realizing they were played and used as stooges. The moment the teenagers backed off, the riot stopped, as the football hooligans did not have the numbers to carry on.
And finally, I am again asking Mr. Johnny-on-the-spot why the population of Belgrade did not join the “protesters”. When will I get an answer ?
@B.F.
”As for President Vućić’s mental health, he states “the impression that Vučić has serious mental health issues is widespread in Serbia”. Absolute nonsense. This is a simple fabrication, invented by the author. I have yet to hear anybody state this.”
How interesting, You live in the capital, Belgrade, and You never heard, read let alone thought that the above-mentioned person is a narcissistic, schizophrenic, psychopathic, or anything alike.
Well, being so, let me provide You a little help.
I assume that Mr. Predrag Popović will not resent me for quoting parts of his text “Why is Vučić not in a madhouse?” Everyone knows that Vučić is seriously ill, it can be seen that he is bloated and crazy, but… ”, last October: https://www.srbijadanas.net/zasto-vucic-nije-u-ludnici-svi-znaju-da- je-vucic-tesko-bolestan-vidi-se-da-je-naduven-i-lud-ali /
Since he has been in politics, and especially during the last seven years of his rule, Vučić has left countless traces of the crime. There is even more evidence of his mental illness. Most of his statements and actions can be interpreted in parallel through the Criminal Code and the F Diagnosis Codebook. On the list of hundreds of mental illnesses, which are defined as deviations of spirit and consciousness, it is difficult to find one that does not describe Vučić.
– Suppose that the association of psychiatrists and psychologists agrees that the president encourages and causes social devastation, due to easily provable public statements, which do not contain facts, but his personal assessments, inappropriate insults and hostile messages sent to dissidents. As they substantiate their opinion with examples from the president’s daily speeches, a group of these experts can make their findings public. Such a document has no professional basis because it is based on generally known symptoms, which cannot represent a diagnosis. In psychiatry and psychology, it is placed in direct contact with the client-patient after studious observation, medical and psychological tests and team decision-making – claims Dr. Dragica Stanojlović, a retired psychologist.
Stanojlović points out that Vučić was the same before, he just didn’t have the opportunity to show the whole range of pathological features of his disjointed personality.
– He is egocentric, narcissistic, with an insurmountable need to always be in the center of attention. He is in a changeable mood, without empathy. He is prone to theatrical behavior and dramatization. He does not tolerate criticism or a different opinion. He deeply suppresses unpleasant situations or emotions, so that they cannot penetrate into his reality, which is modeled by imaginations and fantasies. He has a transcendent experience of his own being – said Dr. Stanojlović.
Psychologist Žarko Trebješanin also described Vučić as an autistic narcissist, who does not see reality because he is closed in on himself and surrounded by swindlers and halflings.
– Vučić is arrogant, he goes from extreme to extreme, he is prone to extremes. He was an extreme nationalist, now he is a great European. All this speaks of great instability. If You look at Koraks’ caricatures, you see him from those nine screens and it is clear to you that he sees only himself everywhere and that he is a great narcissist, like all despots, who have a fantastic desire for power – claims Trebješanin.
What kind of political life is that if you can’t have normal, minimally fair elections. We live in a special kind of ruin, worthy of serious psychological observation. Orwell is seriously shaken by the reality in Serbia. Our political genre, a buffoon made up of comedy, drama, tragedy, and thriller, has surpassed the possibilities of even a Hollywood blockbuster – says Trebješanin.
Zoran Radovanović, a retired university professor, points out that it is not ethical to go public with a diagnosis, but also that Vučić’s condition is known.
– You don’t need to be a psychiatrist, or even a general practitioner, in order to come to the conclusion that Vučić is egocentric and malignantly narcissistic, based on non-obligatory media monitoring. One lawyer, otherwise a university professor, describes Vučić as a blackmailed man, which is commonplace, having in mind the circumstances under which he was brought and the obligations he accepted. Psychiatrists add to that, seeing in him a person “as if” which, in a free translation into Serbian could be said: a servant person – claims prof. dr Radovanović …
A few days ago, the Alliance for Serbia called on Aleksandar Vučić to “urgently undergo a medical examination by a professional medical team.”
– The citizens of Serbia are already accustomed to Vučić violating the Constitution in performing his duties as president, destroying the country’s international reputation, damaging its interests, usurping the functions of prosecutors, judges, prime ministers, ministers, presidents of municipalities, football coaches. A special problem is Vučić’s behavior in everyday public appearances, which raises the question of his health condition. In almost every one of his performances, serious disorders are manifested, from borderline personality disorders to paranoid syndromes. His growing propensity to embody the role of messiah and father of the nation, the frequent mention of his own death, the emphasis on clairvoyant abilities, unrelated sentences, sudden mood swings, and worrying self-observation from the future are just some of the reasons to provide Serbian citizens with unequivocal evidence. that Aleksandar Vučić is mentally able to do his job – it is stated in the announcement of the Alliance for Serbia.
Радо Мир
So, President Vučić is “narcissistic, schizophrenic, psychopathic”. Indeed. It would appear that the population of Belgrade, two million people, just love that their President is “narcissistic, schizophrenic, psychopathic”, proof of this being found in the fact that the population did not join the “protesters”. Fancy that.
I do not mingle with what’s left of the liberals, and therefore I do not hear any of their infantile nonsense.
Back in 2000 the West used the liberals to overthrow President Milošević. In what must have been record time, the liberals became immensely unpopular, as the population saw that they got nothing but a bunch of parasites to lead the country. Where is Boris Tadić and his Democratic (Liberal) Party now ? I don’t see him. What we have now are the remnants of the liberals, and even back in 2000 their number was not absolute. And what are the liberals doing now ? Listening to their Western masters, who are using the same methods against President Vučić that they used against President Putin, accusing both of “not being” patriotic enough, this being the height of cynicism, psychological tricks based on inversion of facts.
The “demonstrations” we had in front of the Serbian Parliament was an attempt at a color revolution, a coup d’etat, the Western centers of power either thinking or hoping that their psychological tactics would work and that a “patriotic” movement would be created overnight and used to overthrow President Vučić. Nothing of the sort happened. The “demonstrations” were led by football hooligans, hired by liberals and Western NGO’s, and initially backed by teenagers. The population of Belgrade did not join this riot, called “demonstrations”, as it understood what was going on. When the teenagers grasped that they were being used as stooges, they backed off, leaving the “field” to the football hooligans. After that the “demonstrations” collapsed. The situation now is perfectly normal. The country is still being led by President Vučić. The last time I saw him he looked perfectly sane and normal to me. However, I don’t think this can be said about the leaders of the liberals.
We know your song Johnny . It is song of Sirens of Western Democracy .
And we know where it leads Johnny Guitar.
I don’t get the Vucic supporters. He is about to implement the traitorous Brussels Agreement which violates our constitution, yet we, the patriots who call him out for it are accused of being the “fifth column”. Go figure.
Every man wants to believe. I want to believe. Even, Fox Mulder from X-files wants to believe. What I have found out is that everyone wants to believe especially in lies because lies sound so nice. If you rattle someone’s cage with blatant truth you become his enemy. For example, I tell you vučić is traitor. You ask me do you have a proof. I give you the proof, not one but 10. You do not care about proof but you call me Đilas’ puppet. I tell you I never voted for Đilas but you voted for him. You tell me: well that was different, I believed that he will do something good. It is really hard to discuss anything with someone who voted on 1000 euros promise for Tadić and his party. God is my witness how many times I felt bad because I was right …
Stekicar
“What I have found out is that everyone wants to believe especially in lies because lies sound so nice”.
Is that so ? You better start making amendment’s to the company you keep. I can assure you that not everybody want’s to believe in lies. As for stating that President Vučić is a “traitor”, you are kindly requested to terminate the promulgation of this piece of liberal disinformation. Thank you.
If you do not want to believe in lies, can you answer these questions:
1. What is the purpose of Brussel agreement meetings vučić attends to?
2. Do we have a border with customs on Serbia-“Kosovo” border?
3. Does serbian judges in Kosovo rule based on Serbian law?
4. Do you know what is international area code for Kosovo? Who gave it to them?
5. Who let Kosovo incorporate Gazivode electro plant into Kosovo electro system?
6. Do you know that Kosovo electro system is part of Albania electro system?
7. Are Kosovo passports recognized by Serbia?
If you truthfully answer all the question, I will believe you do not want to be lied to. Otherwise …
“As for stating that President Vučić is a “traitor”” – Show me where I called vučić a traitor. I never said that vučić is traitor. I always used word traitor when I was proving treason but I never referred explicitly that vučić is traitor. Why vučić’s name first came to your mind when I was talking about traitor?
“He is about to implement the traitorous Brussels Agreement …” blah-blah-blah….after 8 years of repeating the same, it became boring…
p.s. btw, he signed that document which was created and agreed with EU by your lot, CIA payed prostitutes, with Đilas, another CIA prostitute..
Every year that there are meetings to implement this agreement. You obviously don’t have clue about how this works, do you?
All you have are insults ad hominems.
Ps are you going to go crying now to Saker *behind all our backs* because you can’t win an argument in the comments sections?
Take a look at these two videos:
First one shows how Putin addressed russians on Covid-19 lockdown:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBOSexNTSVA
Second one shows how vučić addressed serbians on Covid-19 lockdown:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohYIND7-g5E
Mute the sound on both videos and look at face and body expressions of both presidents.
Then listen again video where Prof. Mila Alečković talks about vučić’s mental state.
Mila Alečković was a member of Dveri, quasi-patriotic movement, turned into quasi-patriotic political party, with strong ties to USA Embassy, and CIA owned opposition.
Any proof for this “fact”?
“Mila Alečković was a member of Dveri, quasi-patriotic movement, …” What did I say about when facts were presented? You ask me do you have a proof. I give you the proof, not one but 10. You do not care about proof but you call me Đilas’ puppet. In this case, Dr Alečković is Dveri’s puppet …
@ Johnny-on-the-spot
I listened to the entire interview with Professor Dr. Mila Alečković. Truly remarkable. Thank you for posting it.
Johnny-on-the-spot:
You have wrote several articles, about Serbia, or rather about Vucic….
Could you please write your views about Kosovo, and Srebrenica. Where do you stand about those questions?
Enough of empty accusations, it is easy to do, “show me the money” or in other words show us what you stand for..?
Thank you.
If I am not mistaken, Jonny has written extensively on Srebrenica.
Check out
https://srebrenica-genocide.blogspot.com/2008/10/stephen-karganovic-stefan-karganovic.html
Sorry, I sent the wrong link
http://us.srebrenica-project.org/
I didn’t bother search for this on Google, but DuckDuckGo was no better. It did not appear in any searches I did. I found it on Yandex immediately.
I’m sure that on both questions of Kosovo and Srebrenica, Johnny can present views that would be deemed “correct” or at least palatable. But that is not really the issue. The issue is (or should be) what are his proposed solutions and would those “solutions” be applicable in the real world that we live in right now.
This article would be published in Blic, Danas, CNN1, and other western media outlets in Serbia in an instant…
Just curious, wat’s going on with Cyrillic in Serbia, is it no longer fashionable / dominant or was it always the case that transliteration was common?
They use both, Cyrillic is official. if you walk around Belgrade, I’d say it’s about 50/50. I believe Latinica was standard in the SFRJ and generally easier with the internet. However, even as a native English speaker, I’d say Serbian Cyrillic is easier to read than croatian latinica.
Come on Joca, this whole article undermines your credibility.
**OMG,** a sociopathic politician?? Well, I never.
This is Serbian discourse, maybe general southern European discourse: Histrionic bravado, every discussion immediately reduced to a kurac measuring contest. Hopeless.
My question is: what makes the political situation in Serbia unique in Central and Eastern Europe? That it has not capitulated entirely to the Davos overlords like the Visegrad 4 or the Eastern Balkans? Romania and Bulgaria have pretty much constant anti-government protests. Croatia isn’t any better run than Serbia. Serbs can thank their lucky stars that they’re not Ukrainians. The Baltics have had their economies raped and pillaged, with the population in decline. Greece has also been economically monkeyraped, Belarus is next. In any EU country, state institutions are ’empty shells’, the European commission calls the shots.
So if this is part of a broader trend, the fetishistic rape and slaughter of eastern Europe by the Davos set to perpetuate their own suprematism, kind of like Zoran alluded to, what is the viable alternative? How is a tiny country of 7 million people, same as New York City or Hong Kong, supposed to buck the trend and oppose the greatest concentration of economic might ever seen? No one I know here in Serbia has the slightest clue.
The course of history is determined not by ideals, but by those with the means to pursue their perceived interests. I don’t hear people asking what the ideal Serbian society would look like or how to make it, let alone the more realistic question, how to mediate between the powerful vested interests involved to achieve the best possible outcome. All Johnny’s bravado, wailing, and gnashing of teeth is worth nothing. How about for the next article you calmly answer that question in detail.
The Saker might disagree with me, but I think Valam Shalamov’s Kolyma Tales is more effective than Solzenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago because the former just calmly states the facts of what he experienced and leaves it to the readers to form their own emotional reaction. Solzenitsyn is a bit of a diva.
Our best and perhaps only hope is that the Davos crowd (a.k.a. The Empire) implodes due to its internal contradictions, with a little help from the strong winds blowing from the east. In the meantime, our task should be to locally strengthen our country as much as possible, and globally to stay out of the way of the big players or, as doctors would say, “do no harm”.
True to that. I agree.
I find the argument that ‘it’s like that all over East and South Europe so stop complaining’ rather amusing.
Appeasement to the hilt. Like saying the Nazis are already all over Europe, so let’s accept them too.
Anyways, I am not worried. All obedient sheep listening to government orders will self-harm and deterioate their own health due to wearing masks and inhaling CO2.
Maybe Bill Gates is right. Lowering world population, stupid ppl self-eliminating themselves from the gene pool.
I do not want to lecture Serbians, but at this moment they do not have alternative for Vucic.
And maybe I am wrong, but I believe that he is good President
He won last elections and he is not dictator and tyrant.
Precisely because we have no alternative to Vucic, as you say, it is the informed citizenry who’s duty it is to monitor him and call him out when necessary.
How do you think our country resisted for so long?
If it wasn’t for us, our politicians would have sold us out ages ago (with the flag-waving sycophants cheering on!)
I do not want to lecture anti-Serbs, but you should stop watching Pink TV. It helps to be in right state of mind.
I am not anti-Serb but Vucic won last elections.
Or maybe you claim that elections were fixed.
TV Pink …I do not watch it
I have been (rather superficially) following the articles written about my country (Serbia) and the debates regarding Vuchich and his personality and policies. Since I returned to Serbia from the United States in 1995, and as I have matured and considered the geopolitical options of Serbia, I have come to the conclusion that the actions and personalities of our politicians are completely irrelevant: they have been chosen by the global elites to rule as their local administrators and possessing a personality is not a requirement.
Whether it is the political position (the Serbian Progressive Party) or the opposition (the various flavors of “liberal” or “patriotic” parties) that are taken into consideration during these debates, no one ever seems to look for any ethics or what are the underlying moral principles of these groups, or whether they even have them. People divide themselves into opposing parties, similar to soccer fans, and duke it out, trying to ascertain who has the “moral high ground.” Of course, the only thing that each side considers to be morally correct is a position which has themselves as its ontological and epistemological starting point, i.e. a position which is by its very nature solipsistic and not conducive to any sort of dialogue.
Is there any point in discussing the Serbian political scene? Yes, there is, with the condition that we talk about the real moral values that we actually live by and not about some abstract concepts à la “democracy, human rights and freedom.” Only we approach the dialogue as living and breathing bearers of moral law will we be able to resolve these irksome political and social issues and resurrect Serbia.
“a ruler who has unlimited power over other people, and uses it unfairly and cruelly,”
That applies to all western leaders in the New Normal
It is a most insipid definition, hardly suitable to tyrants such as Vlad the Impaler. However, it could be applied to Vladimir Putin, who ‘unfairly’ deprived the Russian oligarchs of their assets and ‘unfairly’ forced them to pay taxes. Taxes after all are just for little people, so it was ‘unfair’ to apply it ‘wealth creators’.
This news article shows in what kind of mind state are SNS party lunatics:
http://www.nspm.rs/hronika/milos-vucevic-nisam-siguran-ni-kada-bismo-dobili-neku-dobru-ponudu-za-kim-da-bismo-mi-srbi-hteli-da-je-prihvatimo.html
In short, SNS party member, mayor of city of Novi Sad, said the following: “I am not sure, even if we, Serbs, get some good offer for Kosovo that it will be accepted”. Good offer for Kosovo? What is a good offer for Kosovo?
Thief steels car from you and then you hope, if he is willing to sell it back, you get a good offer to buy the car back?!? What kind of mind can think like this?
I can assure you Johny, all cannabis users…we are perfectly aware of general situation.
So was dr Steiner, imo one of the greatest souls around here. Born in Donji Kraljevac among Hungary, Slovenia, Hrckolandija..
So Remember dr Steiner as a giant of humanity as was Nikola Tesla..they gave a lot and took nada.
Lep pozdrav!
Johny on the spot in Belgrade – long writing with repetition of factual blindness! First of all I never said that protest gathering was “insignificant” – I simply corrected Your statement -it was not Belgrade but crowd – small one!
It seems that You know not only psychological profile of Vucic but also mine – I am “upset”, You know what I experienced down under and what I did not experienced, “I do not object…” You became so personal!
It is great to know from Your article that You actually study Vucic and then with Your findings You explains his deeds. I don’t bother if Vucic is a psychopath (with all respect for Prof. Aleckovic) wht mtters to me are his deeds. Instead of cowboy black and white I prefer quote from Zoran Cirjakovic “I like all shades of grey!” Instead of running from sympathy to antipathy, facts are what matters!
Behind a nickname You courageously throw “ He should give the matter some deep thought for his own sake now that he is back in Serbia,”! You are either fully completed idiot or You are threatening me! Regardlessly, what worries me is that Saker and all readers of this “article” did not see it! Saker?
Hello Zoran,
4. try: _ It’s understandable that you’re worried if the blog author’s perfidious language doesn’t worry anyone. The lack of comments has an explanation…
Let me put it this way & I’m curious if this comment will be posted:
It was good of Johnny to take the time to respond to your blog. Johnny regrets that his reports do not meet journalistic standards and notes that the Serbian political language is more robust than in Down Under. (Nobody there would describe the queen as a pedophile, homosexual, tyrant, etc.). But he appreciates the Cambridge dictionary.
Johnny is angry because you don’t use insults (after all, this is part of a decent Serbian culture, quite the opposite of the Australian one). He would like to see solidarity, even from those who don’t share his view (including the sandwich eaters). Johnny establishes _ for whatever reason _ the conditions in Serbia 2020 in connection with Nazi Germany 1942. This is allowed HERE. WOW!
There is a term in the German language which I appreciate very much: | Streitkultur | which is untranslatable but means the culture of dispute. It is a mystery to me how someone in the year 2020 has no feeling for a culture of dispute, insults, defames and censors everyone who disagrees with him. We know this reaction, which always claims the sovereignty of interpretation, in other constellations.
Even if it’s hard, don’t get angry. I did not comment in your post because I do not have that much time, but I agree with your assessment.
I see, that all pro-vučić or we-have-no-other-option-so-let-lunatic-rule-instead supporters did not reply to any questions/facts about treasonous acts done by lunatic. Ignore this unpleasant true and lets hope no one notice it – that is their way of loving the truth (or lie?). B.F. especially. Zidar at least admitted that something is wrong on territory called Serbia.
Anyway, this video shows top 10 lies vučić said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wB0hsz0sxxY
In short:
10. Ikarbus (serbian company) will start making buses based on Mercedes license. – This never happened.
9. vučić: Putin never came to Serbia before vučić came to power. Video shows Putin and then serbian president Tadić during Putin’s visit to Serbia.
8. vučić states that Sinisa Mali (ex DS party member – now SNS party member) will never be a mayor od city of Belgrade. vučić selected Sinisa Mali to be a mayor of the city.
7. vučić never came for TV duel with any opposition member although he said that he will come to TV duel.
… Etc, etc. …
2. vučić: Germany did not bombard Serbia in 1999. – This was also news to me …
1. vučić: pensions will never be reduced. – Pensions were reduced by 10% with exception to those who had less than 25k dinars (approx. $240).
What kind of person in sound state of mind would say one thing and do totally opposite?