Wimminz – celebrating skank ho's everywhere

Sounds like misandrist hell? Sounds like something off a raayyyyype awareness thing on campus?

(disclaimer, I am going to be using the word WOMEN a lot as opposed to wimminz)

Maybe so, but it is actually the home / welcome page message of more than one local-ish swingers club… Now… I want you to think about that for a moment.

Girls make the rules. No means no.

This follows on nicely from the previous post, it’s a jungle out there, which also dealt with the whole swinging scene, because again the reality on the ground is never quite so simple or monolithic.

Jane49 is on the back burner, bo peep and her sheep style, jane50 just had a huge fight with her best long term girlfriend because jane50 blew her friends mind by telling her she knew I was fucking other wimminz but there was nothing she could do about that and how dare she diss her man (me) for screwing around, and jane51 just left after a night of raunch and is now asking me to arrange a threesome with her and another wimminz, any wimminz, of my choice.

As y’all know, I am in my fifties and don’t have a pot to piss in, but plenty of free time, and janes 49/50/51 are all within one year of 32.

Girls make the rules. No means no.

Well, apparently not if you are one of the janes.

So we are left with a contradiction, what I experience directly, and what some commercial venture swinging clubs use as their “brand message”…. so we can get some bullet points;

• I was doing this shit before these individual commercial ventures opened.
• I trust I will be doing this shit long after these individual commercial ventures close, though that is of course purely conjecture and wishful thinking.
• Both they and I and the janes can all be considered subsets of the greater whole
• THEY ARE COMMERCIAL VENTURES.

I think it is fair to say that the capitalised final bullet point is the one that carries the weight, if you are trying to monetise something “Girls make the rules” is a good policy.

Men make the rules. No means no.

Stands to reason, a new competitor swinging club opened by me with that branding on the front / home page of the website means it is going to bomb commercially, because as we have already discussed, the men in these “couples” are all niggerz, not men.

Note also it is always “GIRLS make the rules” not “WOMEN make the rules“, and so technically the opposite is “BOYS make the rules” not “MEN make the rules“… it’s another part of the bait and switch, it is girls, not women, who make the rules, and men, not boys, who follow the rules as laid out by the women.

These 4 words above are very important human language is nothing less than the communication and programming language of our species.

We have four possible permutations;

1. GIRLS make the rules, MEN obey them.
2. GIRLS make the rules, BOYS obey them.
3. WOMEN make the rules, MEN obey them.
4. WOMEN make the rules, BOYS obey them.

In just the same way we can say a=2 and b=3, so if a+b=c then c=5, we can and do do the same kind of math, or value judgement, with language, which proves it is a programming language for humans.

So lets look at the four possible permutations one by one.. in reverse order

4/
WOMEN trumps BOYS, women always have power over boys, women are mothers to boys, it’s not just a fairly obvious statement like water runs downhill, it implicitly accepts that there is a power differential and the women have the upper hand, which is not the message that is politically correct or acceptable.

3/WOMEN trump MEN, all red pill men know this is the reality on the ground legally, in theory the two should be equals, so again this is not a politically correct or acceptable message or phraseology for our programming language.

2/
GIRLS trump BOYS, again, all red pill men know this, so this is just the same as #3 but dealing with the younger, non-adult section of society, again it is not a politically correct or acceptable message.

The three above in programming terms all have SYNTAX errors, the individual items are fine if arranged in one with with one set of inter-relationships, but are not fine arranged in another way with another set of inter-relationships, even though in both cases the individual items are identical in every way.

1/GIRLS / MEN, our programming language is replete with examples of this being valid syntax, the older stronger male as protector of the younger weaker fairer maiden, etc etc etc ad infinitum… This is both a politically correct and socially acceptable syntax.

The only people this shit doesn’t work on is you and me brother, and we are not the target audience of a commercial venue catering to males who support women and then pay for admission to a venue where said women can fuck other guys, in front of the guy who is putting a roof over her head.

We have, literally, broken our programming when we took the red pill, now, what was perfectly acceptable code for most of our lives throws up regular syntax errors, we see the commercial cuckolding described above (syntax / sin tax… geddit? geddit?… oh never mind..) as a fatal exception, parameters out of bounds, divide by zero error, does not motherfucking compute.

We are as welcome in their programming environment as Stuxnet / Slammer is inside a large corporate IT department

Our prisons, our law enforcement systems and our secret family court systems are in fact nothing more than the anti-malware systems put into place to prevent our take on syntax and language from spreading, the rich irony is of course that our take on syntax and language used to be the same as theirs, until they recorded a false positive when scanning us and made us into the thing they fear and hate.

We already have DIRECT EQUIVALENTS to malicious software in law, in fact we had direct equivalents back in the days of steam… first it was just defamation and slander, but now it is actual “hate speech”.

Use of non approved human (programming) language can and will result in incarceration.

As Kevin Mitnick will tell you, everything he did in the 80’s and 90’s is doable today.

Now imagine him doing that today, those EXACT SAME ACTS, imagine how he would be treated and branded.

Now imagine he was not a US citizen.

Now imagine he is a foreign national raghead terr’rist.

Girls make the rules.

It is a line of code with approved syntax in our human programming language.