Wimminz – celebrating skank ho's everywhere

January 6, 2013

“Girls make the rules. No means no”

Filed under: Wimminz — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — wimminz @ 2:15 pm

Sounds like misandrist hell? Sounds like something off a raayyyyype awareness thing on campus?

(disclaimer, I am going to be using the word WOMEN a lot as opposed to wimminz)

Maybe so, but it is actually the home / welcome page message of more than one local-ish swingers club… Now… I want you to think about that for a moment.

Girls make the rules. No means no.

This follows on nicely from the previous post, it’s a jungle out there, which also dealt with the whole swinging scene, because again the reality on the ground is never quite so simple or monolithic.

Jane49 is on the back burner, bo peep and her sheep style, jane50 just had a huge fight with her best long term girlfriend because jane50 blew her friends mind by telling her she knew I was fucking other wimminz but there was nothing she could do about that and how dare she diss her man (me) for screwing around, and jane51 just left after a night of raunch and is now asking me to arrange a threesome with her and another wimminz, any wimminz, of my choice.

As y’all know, I am in my fifties and don’t have a pot to piss in, but plenty of free time, and janes 49/50/51 are all within one year of 32.

Girls make the rules. No means no.

Well, apparently not if you are one of the janes.

So we are left with a contradiction, what I experience directly, and what some commercial venture swinging clubs use as their “brand message”…. so we can get some bullet points;

  • I was doing this shit before these individual commercial ventures opened.
  • I trust I will be doing this shit long after these individual commercial ventures close, though that is of course purely conjecture and wishful thinking.
  • Both they and I and the janes can all be considered subsets of the greater whole
  • THEY ARE COMMERCIAL VENTURES.

I think it is fair to say that the capitalised final bullet point is the one that carries the weight, if you are trying to monetise something “Girls make the rules” is a good policy.

Men make the rules. No means no.

Stands to reason, a new competitor swinging club opened by me with that branding on the front / home page of the website means it is going to bomb commercially, because as we have already discussed, the men in these “couples” are all niggerz, not men.

Note also it is always “GIRLS make the rules” not “WOMEN make the rules“, and so technically the opposite is “BOYS make the rules” not “MEN make the rules“… it’s another part of the bait and switch, it is girls, not women, who make the rules, and men, not boys, who follow the rules as laid out by the women.

These 4 words above are very important human language is nothing less than the communication and programming language of our species.

We have four possible permutations;

  1. GIRLS make the rules, MEN obey them.
  2. GIRLS make the rules, BOYS obey them.
  3. WOMEN make the rules, MEN obey them.
  4. WOMEN make the rules, BOYS obey them.

In just the same way we can say a=2 and b=3, so if a+b=c then c=5, we can and do do the same kind of math, or value judgement, with language, which proves it is a programming language for humans.

So lets look at the four possible permutations one by one.. in reverse order

4/
WOMEN trumps BOYS, women always have power over boys, women are mothers to boys, it’s not just a fairly obvious statement like water runs downhill, it implicitly accepts that there is a power differential and the women have the upper hand, which is not the message that is politically correct or acceptable.

3/WOMEN trump MEN, all red pill men know this is the reality on the ground legally, in theory the two should be equals, so again this is not a politically correct or acceptable message or phraseology for our programming language.

2/
GIRLS trump BOYS, again, all red pill men know this, so this is just the same as #3 but dealing with the younger, non-adult section of society, again it is not a politically correct or acceptable message.

The three above in programming terms all have SYNTAX errors, the individual items are fine if arranged in one with with one set of inter-relationships, but are not fine arranged in another way with another set of inter-relationships, even though in both cases the individual items are identical in every way.

1/GIRLS / MEN, our programming language is replete with examples of this being valid syntax, the older stronger male as protector of the younger weaker fairer maiden, etc etc etc ad infinitum… This is both a politically correct and socially acceptable syntax.

The only people this shit doesn’t work on is you and me brother, and we are not the target audience of a commercial venue catering to males who support women and then pay for admission to a venue where said women can fuck other guys, in front of the guy who is putting a roof over her head.

We have, literally, broken our programming when we took the red pill, now, what was perfectly acceptable code for most of our lives throws up regular syntax errors, we see the commercial cuckolding described above (syntax / sin tax… geddit? geddit?… oh never mind..) as a fatal exception, parameters out of bounds, divide by zero error, does not motherfucking compute.

We are as welcome in their programming environment as Stuxnet / Slammer is inside a large corporate IT department

Our prisons, our law enforcement systems and our secret family court systems are in fact nothing more than the anti-malware systems put into place to prevent our take on syntax and language from spreading, the rich irony is of course that our take on syntax and language used to be the same as theirs, until they recorded a false positive when scanning us and made us into the thing they fear and hate.

We already have DIRECT EQUIVALENTS to malicious software in law, in fact we had direct equivalents back in the days of steam… first it was just defamation and slander, but now it is actual “hate speech”.

Use of non approved human (programming) language can and will result in incarceration.

As Kevin Mitnick will tell you, everything he did in the 80’s and 90’s is doable today.

Now imagine him doing that today, those EXACT SAME ACTS, imagine how he would be treated and branded.

Now imagine he was not a US citizen.

Now imagine he is a foreign national raghead terr’rist.

Girls make the rules.

It is a line of code with approved syntax in our human programming language.

February 12, 2012

Up, and down, up, and down…

Filed under: Wimminz — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — wimminz @ 1:52 pm

…it’s a song from 1999 that for some reason got stuck in my head last week, so instead of conversation, such as “Oh yes” or “and what did you say” or “so how was that new bar you were going to” I end up wiggling my eyebrows at them and saying “Up, and down….Up, and down….”

mental health, it is an issue… lol, we have met the enemy, and he is us, our enemy is the enemy within, the white knight niggerz mangina that is bred into us all, programmed by the very language we speak, and I do not mean the feminazi MSM dialogue, I mean the language of English itself.

It’s only when you learn OTHER languages that you start to make connections about English as a language, and a language is of necessity a programming language, it is the language we use to communicate and describe the world around us.

Sometimes language is also like an aquarium, the view from outside looking in is different from the view inside looking out, and sometimes you have to venture out of your own aquarium to find a language capable of expressing that which you wish to describe.

There are probably few actual English words left in English, and those that survive have been changed, all the rest is imported from abroad… just as it is flatly impossible to separate out the influences of the Roman conquest 2,000 years ago and the Norman conquest 1,000 years ago (and the Viking raids etc) and arrive at a true English culture.

So only a non Spaniard can go to Spain, and point to three words;

  1. Casa – House
  2. Casado – Married
  3. Casadoras – Handcuffs

….and smirk, to be met by utterly blank looks on the faces of the Spaniards themselves, as though you just pointed out “the” / “there” / “theremins” … because by definition being a native English speaker I will not be able to come up with three English words that do this, or spot them when pointed out to me.

So thought processes end up in a rut, in a closed loop, much like the Vengaboys – Up and down song that started all this off, a mindless little tune and lyric that gets stuck in your head, and you end up talking crap to people, crap that is perfectly in context from your perspective, but from theirs makes them look at you as if you were slightly mad.

What’s that you say? All wimminz are filthy lying whores?

Bzzzzt, does not compute, you end up sounding like a candidate for the nice men in white coats, because just as the Spanish word for foreigner and the Spanish word for stranger are essentially the same thing, estrangero, the English word for someone who has truly swallowed the red pill and gone all the way down the rabbit hole, and the English word for someone who is a menace to society are essentially the same thing.

Every man who has stood in a secret family court and / or been falsely accused of  rape knows EXACTLY what I mean, they are using words that sound exactly like the words you grew up with, except they now have radically different meanings.

Down the rabbit hole where NOT buying your girlfriend a diamond ring for valentine’s day does NOT constitute a pre-meditated act of domestic violence and oppression and control.

So yesterday I am on PoF and this skank ho tells me the reason she split from her ex, was they weren’t getting on, and so one day she slapped him, and he put her in the hospital for three days… so I ask her, what did you learn from this, and get the predicted response, don’t be around violent men, and I point out to her a better lesson might be don’t bite off more than you can chew, after all, she instigated the violence. What did she expect???

It is only when I quite correctly pointed out that (due to other things and inconsistencies said in chat) that she is a liar and a hypocrite that she started to go all cold on me, me siding with the guy who allegedly put her in hospital for three days did not turn her off.

These brain draining parasites in the secret family courts, wimminz movements and so on all inhabit a world where no woman ever gets a throbbing dripping wet cunt at the thought and practice of a man giving her exactly the kind or pre-arranged and discussed and agreed to rough sex that she desires, the whole idea of kinky sex from a bit of slap and tickle all the way up to BDSM simply does not fucking exist, because in a real world where a man does not rape or beat or abuse, there can be no evidence (use the search facility on this blog and look up “locard“) of these things.

Evidence of sex is not evidence of rape, accusations of abuse not backed up by any medical notes or photographs of bruises is not evidence of beatings, failing to do or provide certain things for a woman who nonetheless chooses to stick around for several years is not evidence of abuse.

Yet should you have any further doubts upon this matter, should you question whether control of the definitions of the programming language is the one thing they all actually care about, all you have to do is to dare to question any of the definitions of this language, as I did…. consensual slap and tickle and consensual rough sex BDSM is not fucking rape and abuse.

When you point out the that “enormous” sex implements, note the use of the word implement and not toy, which in reality means anything larger than 1″ diameter and 6″ length, were bought by the psycho skank ho in question who is accusing you of being the abusing rapist, reality and the subject will shift to the next item on the agenda, and sooner of later there will be one you cannot answer, because in your world and your language a response is meaningless, and the question itself nonsensical, yet in their world every response you can possibly make can and will, as the caution says, be used in evidence AGAINST you… nothing is ever used FOR you, but then, they never say it will be in caution….

When the psycho skank ho’s lawyers allege that the woman who decided to walk down the road to your house two or three times a week for ten years, to have sex, to have children by you, to be taken shopping by you, to have Christmas lunch with you, to use you as unpaid taxi and 24/7 multiskilled DIY man on call, was in fact nothing more than the woman you have been raping and abusing for ten years, and this is just one of many reasons why you should never be allowed anywhere near your own children ever again…. what do you have to say to that, Mr Afor?

You might as well wiggle your eyebrows, smile, bob your head from side to side bop to the beat and say “Up, and down…. up, and down”

Related articles

%d bloggers like this: