I am not sure if it was, or was not, ever thus.

I am sure that each time you sell something to the public, the next sale comes easier, so whether or not it has always been with us, it is certain that it is with us today more than ever before.

This “thing” of which I speak is the Rule of One, which is the practice of taking an extreme statistical anomaly, and making policy out of it.

We heard all about “Megan’s Law” in the US, and the efforts made to introduce a UK, equivalent, now we have a new effort all because one women met one man on an internet dating site and got battered to death, so now they want a law allowing all wimminz to in effect do a free police search on all men contact them on a dating site.

“9/11” was a statistical outlier, but arguably it changed the face of US society and personal liberty more than anything else.

Here in the UK we had decades of background constant IRA terrorism, with the odd “spectacular” thrown in every Christmas, and yet we just got on with life and all the railway stations had rubbish bins on the platforms, 9/11 happens thousands of miles away and suddenly all the rubbish bins are removed from our railway stations, and they have never come back.

One asshole hacks into the FBI and suddenly all of us face new restrictions in our on-line freedoms.

Now, here is the thing, yesterday I wrote about Incompetence and Neglect, and there is a correlation between the rise in Incompetence and Neglect, and the rise in the Rule of One.

Let’s take the McCann’s, a couple who abandoned their toddler age children alone in a holiday flat in a foreign country to go for meals and drinkies a hundred yards away at a restaurant… what could possibly go wrong?

Top of the list would be the kids get immolated in a house fire, or one of them strangles on a pyjama cord, or one of them chokes to death on their own vomit… further down the list comes the kids being abducted.

Either way it is incompetence and negligence as a parent, criminal incompetence and negligence, right?

No, it is instead a launchpad for a whole new career as a talking head (which also neatly avoids all the awkward questions about forensics found in the McCann’s car that raised more questions than they answered) for yet another campaign for yet another Rule of One.

Everyone everywhere has to suffer the consequences of more laws and less liberties so that Mrs McCann can continue to avoid culpability for her own negligence and incompetence, and can continue her lucrative career as a talking head and professional victim who has “lost their child”

I have been denied contact with my kids until they are 18, because the secret family courts fear I might fuck them up mentally or fuck them up the ass literally, despite there being no allegations of any abuse of any kind against the kids themselves, just a False Rape Accusation against mature adult female, etc etc… all because some psycho somewhere presumably did fuck his own kids in the ass.

The Rule of One studiously ignores the very real harm caused to children (latest figures show 1.6 million children in the UK alone who never see their fathers thanks to skank ho mummy aided by the secret family courts) in losing both a father and the entire paternal extended family, very real harm that is both profound and irreparable, while concentrating on putative harm than daddy might do, just in case, best to be safe, for the sake of the children.

This is “future crime” and nothing less, no appeal.

Not only are the putative aggressors in these imaginary future crimes punished, but the putative victims themselves, the bloody children, are punished by being excluded from all contact with half of their genetic lineage.

The Rule of One, funnily enough, never applies when statistical outlier cases at the opposite end of the spectrum crop up, as they inevitably do from time to time.

You have a Baby P and all of a sudden “lessons will be learned” and of course nothing ever happens, and woe betide any father such a me who raises the spectre of Baby P in his own custody battle, if you had not already lost the case (see my article about Religious Fervour) then at that point you have because you just lit the blue touch paper and all concerned individually go into Cover Your Ass mode, this is not a conspiracy (see my article about Conspiracy or Not) because they are all just collectively and individually covering their own asses.

One guy goes on a rampage with firearms in Hungerford, and suddenly all the rules concerning firearm ownership are changed, everyone who did not go on a rampage in Hungerford has their liberties curtailed by the state, and more apparatchiks are employed by the state.

Does this stop misuse of firearms? Not so’s you would notice, Derrick Bird was another recently, so everyone else had their liberties curtailed, but the outliers, who by very definition do not fit any of your fucking rules, carry on as normal and statistically speaking the chance of some nut going on the rampage with a firearm is as great as ever.

Statistically speaking the chances of earning a cushy living as a talking head on the subject or a state apparatchik involved in gun control have never been better.

Statistically speaking the chances of rolling back individual personal liberties and responsibilities to say circa 1955 levels have never been worse.

Statistically speaking the chances of the next statistical outlier being able to perform their misdeeds without hindrance or anyone catching up with them until long after the deed(s) is/have been done are at best unchanged and at worst probably vastly improved.

In 1980 any and every child within eyesight of me could have walked up to me and asked for help, and gotten it, now I do not want to know, I will literally turn my back and walk away no matter what I see, why should I give a fuck, when I have been told in no uncertain terms by the state that the very children I care about the most, my own fucking flesh and blood, are off limits to me, to such an extent that even if I see one of my own kids in the street being abused and I intervene I WILL be in court facing imprisonment for breaching a court order to have zero contact of any kind until they are 18.

I am a fucking walking zero crime area, not just in the sense that I genuinely do not commit crime, but that any crime that may occur within my field of vision and hearing will not be acknowledged by my concious mind.

Nor am I going to lift a finger to aid or help anyone in need, if you are stuck upside down in a wrecked car that has slid off the road you’d better pray that I am not the first person to wander past…. or you’d better be able to reach your wallet, and fortunate enough to have plenty of cash in it, and smart enough to wave the cash at me BEFORE you ask me for help or to phone the emergency services.

Think I am joking? Think again.

Think I am the only one? Think again.

One of the reasons society is coming apart at the seams is that human beings instinctively know when it is in their best interests to emulate the three monkeys, see fuck all, hear fuck all, say fuck all.

The biggest earthquake in modern human history followed by a 60 foot wall of water hit a Japanese nuclear power reactor plant, and the bottom line is it survived basically intact, the best possible advert for nuclear safety, and yet the Rule of One ensures that it is compared to Chernobyl and Three Mile Island and half of Europe bans nuclear power generation.

We simply have no medium (10 years plus) to longer term alternatives to nuclear power generation if we intend to keep the lights burning, and yet the Rule of One carries the day.

Man Made Global Warming is another case in point, one statistical trend was found which supports it, and everything else has been made to fit, now CERN, which is publicly funded by these same talking heads remember, has released scientific data that shows an AMAZING correlation between cosmic ray bombardment (muons etc) and global climate right back to the last ice age, but has banned its scientists from discussing this in public.

The Rule of One is essentially symptomatic of a sick society, which has utterly lost all sense of direction and purpose, a fearful society, which will clutch at straws, any straws, however far fetched, as long as they can be seen to be doing something, anything.

And God help you if you question the efficacy of any of it.

Related articles

• Real Risk Assesment (wimminz.wordpress.com)
• Damned lies and statistics (wimminz.wordpress.com)
• Ivory towers of ignorance. (wimminz.wordpress.com)

Religion. It is not necessarily a belief in “God”, it is more true and accurate to say that it is a belief system, the subject or object of that belief is immaterial, as it is the belief system that lies at the heart of it.

Science is the exact opposite, science is about not believing anything at all, unless you can prove it, repeatedly, on demand, with no variation.

You cannot be both religious and scientific, you can kid yourself all you like, but you either apply the scientific method to everything, or you do not… and yet the fact is many people will define themselves as being both religious and scientific, or rational, because put simply most people do not understand either science or belief, both are hidden mysteries of the subconscious mind.

To give a sanitised and redacted example, I have been to secret family court, and I nearly ended up in open criminal court, after a False Rape Accusation made as in integral part of a child custody battle.

One of the several serious allegations made involved physical evidence, this physical evidence was subjected to very extensive scientific scrutiny, specifically Edmond Locard‘s forensic science, and the results of that very extensive scientific scrutiny, was that I was the one person on the planet who had been thoroughly and extensively tested as to whether I had ever had any kind of contact with said physical evidence, and found to have had none.

That leaves several billion people on the planet who have not been tested, including the person who told the police exactly what they would find and where to find it, e.g. the psycho skank ho ex.

Despite the fact that I am the only person on the planet whom it has been proven scientifically cannot possibly have had any contact of any kind with said evidence, the judge in secret family court decided that said evidence was inextricably associated with me, and was proof that all the other allegations made against me were also true, case closed, you are a sexual and psychological and physical danger to your own children, so you shall not have any contact whatsoever with them until they are 18 and adults, at which point they can make up their own minds, next please…

Now, I did see gross negligence and incompetence (which I shall write about shortly) exhibited by the judge in secret family court, but I did not see any conspiracy (which I have written about) so what exactly is going on?

Why and how is the judge in the secret family court behaving like the Red Queen and believing six impossible things before breakfast, and finding of fact?

Religious belief is the answer.

To a logical and scientific mind, since I am the only person on the planet totally excluded from having any connection or contact with said physical evidence, it must be someone else, and the logical place to begin that search for someone else is with my accuser, who told police what they would find and where they would find it, and whom according to Locard’s Principle, would inevitably have traces of said connection.

Should (I am being scientific here… lol, it might not have been her who planted the “evidence” and called police in order to win a child custody battle she would otherwise have drawn at very best) my lying psycho skank ho ex be connected with said evidence, then we have what I said on day one, a deliberate and premeditated campaign to Pervert the Course of Justice in order to win a child custody battle, and to frame an innocent man for a serious crime to boot.

Back in the real world as soon as the misandric rape squad police determined that the said physical evidence had no connection whatsoever to me, and more so could not scientifically or physically possibly have ever been handled or possessed or used in any way, shape or form, by me, instead of performing the same expensive and time consuming tests on my psycho skank ho ex, they destroyed said physical evidence.

So, in the real world, a scientific judge should have said “Mr Bastard, you have been proven to have no connection whatsoever with exhibit X, Mrs Bastard, exhibit X has been destroyed by Police, and so we cannot prove whether you did or did not plant it as evidence on Mr Bastard, and so you cannot be charged for that, however, Mr Bastard’s testimony and statement upon arrest is entirely consistent with the scientific factual record, and Mrs Bastard’s testimony and allegations before this court is entirely inconsistent with the scientific factual record… ”

A scientific judge would then be forced to conclude that the remainder of the allegations, all of which are he said / she said in nature, must be found as unproven against Mr Bastard, because the scientific forensic evidence specifically exculpates Mr Bastard, and proves Mrs Bastard’s testimony as regards to that allegation, and the allegation itself, as false.

A religious judge (again, religion as in belief systems, not belief in God) who believes that the wimminz be oppressed and the men are all patriarchal bastards, will not be free to take that view, because that view starts a chain reaction, and the judge’s own internal belief systems are always, without exception, held in higher regard than any mere externalities.

A religious judge must preserve their own internal belief systems first and foremost, so the man is evil and did it all, and he can never see his kids again, what a good days work that was saving poor innocent wimminz and kidz from another evil man…. and the judge will actually believe this to be true.

Just as Christians will believe that Jesus lived and died, and then rose from the dead… and he did this for all of us, individually, born thousands of years later.

Clarke said that any sufficiently advanced technology was indistinguishable from magic, certainly the laptop this is being typed on and the files it contain would have been nothing less than magic a mere century ago right here in England, much less 2,000 years go in the desert.

Scientifically speaking the most probable hypothesis for Jesus, assuming he actually existed and was not merely fictional, is that he was a humanoid alien visitor, certainly any space-faring technology capable of travel between star systems in non geological time would be sufficiently advanced to perform all the so called miracles ascribed to Jesus and God.

This would of course mean that both the devout and the scientific would be beating at path to NASA, the former to get closer to God, the latter to determine if he exists.

Now, the fact is that the idea of selling the scientific method to the secret family court judge who considered me a sexual, psychological and physical danger to my own children, is EXACTLY as difficult and equivalent a task as convincing a bishop or cardinal in the church that Jesus was really a grey, or perhaps green, or borg, but certainly alien, and THAT my friends is why the system cannot be changed, it can only be starved to death.

Related articles

• Locard – the daddy (wimminz.wordpress.com)
• Real Risk Assesment (wimminz.wordpress.com)

As is repeatedly pointed out at the excellent False Rape Society (link on the right) blog time and again, rape is unique in the legal lexicon because it is outwardly identical to an act that we all do and derive great pleasure from hundreds of times per year.

The current definition (because the definition is a moving target) of rape is the putative rapist (e.g. the man.. sic) must believe in his head that the woman (cos men never get raped… sic) does not want sex… if the man genuinely believes she does, EVEN IF SHE DOESN’T, it isn’t rape.

If she doesn’t want sex she says or indicates “No” and at that point no jury will believe that the man genuinely believed etc.

The problem is, a whole load of shit that isn’t rape has latterly been included in the definition of rape, and this has been done deliberately because those who are deliberately shifting this definition know that you can grab any man off the street, show him a piece of paper with the word “rape” written on it, and what is going through his head is a scene of physical violence, a women dragged into the bushes by force, a knife shoved into her throat, piercing the skin, threats made to be quiet or die, and a violent rape ensues… that is what your average man in the street will think.

This is rape.

As the picture says, you can expect a bit of it, in the sense that you can expect a bit of murder.

Speaking as someone who has been falsely accused of rape in the UK, I have to tell you something.

Yes, the Police automatically believe the woman who makes the accusation, no matter how nuts it seems. Yes, the Police look for evidence to convict you, not for evidence to determine what actually happened. Yes, the Police have essentially an unlimited budget for sex crime, since they are such a hot topic politically, so expect thorough forensic examination of all your computers, all your paper records, all your bedding and clothing, all your DNA and biometric data, and expect your life since birth to be put under the microscope, and examined for things than can be used to convict you.

The thing I have to tell you is this. Speaking as someone who has been through this, as much as I hate the bastards for their attitude and approach, I have to admit one thing, I cannot conceive of any way in which their attempt to find evidence against me, while studiously ignoring the ever increasing mountain of exculpatory evidence, (like your accuser losing track of how many different rape accusations she has made, I shit you not…) could have been more thorough.

I am speaking as a man who has gone through it, and I simply cannot imagine any way in which a genuine rapist could slip through this investigation.

I simply do not find it even remotely credible.

Ocean’s Eleven (the film) could not plan a perfect rape that would beat the investigation I went through, and this is a hypothetical scenario where the crime is planned in minute detail to ridiculous levels with ridiculous amounts of technology and insider knowledge AND AN INSIDER, in advance.

If you rape someone in the UK, even if it is a historical allegation and the semen is long gone, there is still enough evidence there to charge you and convict you.

And all these bastards are gung-ho to nail you, because this is their job, it is what they specialise in and are paid to do 24/7, and having been through it let me tell you, they are all misandrist women or manginas. Follow the fucking money.

These fucking idiots genuinely believe, partly because they are paid to do so, partly because they drank the kool-aid, that rape is fucking rampant, more common than automobile accidents and all forms of cancer combined, and of course it is their well paid job to continue to believe it… follow the fucking money.

Combine this with a society where False Rape Accusers are only ever prosecuted in the most egregious cases where they are dumb enough to admit to making a false accusation, and a society where the coffers of Legal Aid are (since 2011) only opened when a woman screams Domestic Violence and / or Rape, in her bid to seize both the assets and children of a partnership / marriage and have the man ejected and kept away by the Gestapo, and you can see that with all the inevitability of gaming a system, while genuine Rape, as a man imagines it to be, does indeed happen, a bit, in our society, the vast majority of reported rapes are complete and utter bullshit.

My friends over at the False Rape Society are scrupulously and scientifically correct when they say that due to the nature of he said / she said, behind closed doors, and the fact that sex and rape are basically the same act, it is impossible to know how many rape accusations are false.

They are scrupulously correct, but they do not factor in the CSI like power of a Police rape squad forensic investigative department, when you factor that in, the picture shifts more than somewhat.

The reality is that Mr statistically average male is FAR more likely to be the victim of a False Rape Accusation, than Mrs statistically average female is to be the victim of an actual rape.

So, let’s look at what rape actually is.

Rape is assault, with some sex thrown in.

A violent rape at knife-point, the picture all men have when you say the word “rape”, is actually a lot less traumatic for the victim than a violent beating at knife-point, this is self evident, you are unable to get up and walk away and into the Police station after a violent beating.

To suggest that wimminz having a penis forcibly shoved inside them causes such special female only deep psychological horrors that it outweighs being beaten to the point you think you are going to die is complete and utter fucking bullshit, thinking you are going to die leaves indelible mental scars, fucking indelible.

Speaking as a False Rape Accused, I can tell you, I’d rather be raped in the ass every fucking day than see what my own False Rape Accusation did, and is doing as an ongoing process, to my friends and family and children, no matter how much it hurts physically and degrades me mentally, I would prefer it to seeing all these innocents suffer because of the fallout of the False Rape Accusation made by my ex for no purpose other than to get all my shit and my kids. that hurts more.

So where does all this rape shit come from, since men as a whole*** naturally picture rape as a violent and horrible crime, quite alien to their makeup?

(*** excepting exceptional circumstances such as warfare, where people return to less civilised, more animalistic behaviour, and even so, it is still a small minority, likely to be shot by their comrades on the spot if discovered)

It comes from the fucking wimminz of course, who all have fantasies about being raped, I should know, two of my current skank ho’s have sent me text messages begging me to tie them up and abuse them and make them feel pain and rape them in all their holes… they DO NOT FUCKING WELL WANT ME TO BE A CARING AND CONSIDERATE LOVER.

I shit you not.

I’ll tell you something else, I tell all these skank ho’s, without exception, that I have been Falsely Accused of Rape, it doesn’t drive them away, it turns the bitches on, and they all say, without exception, “No way you are a fucking rapist.”

I reply “I could be, how would you know?” and they answer, “No, no fucking way, you like women too much to hurt them.” which is 100% true and spot on… I’m a lover, not a fighter.

So, you dig down a little deeper, and push, and ask them, how come you know I’m not a rapist, but you have all these rape fantasies, and there is all this rape hysteria?

As I have said elsewhere, these skank ho’s are not trailer park trash, they are very successful and intelligent women, many of them 6’s and 7’s, and you know what answer they all give?

They are ashamed of their desires.

They are not afraid of me, or of my Evil Penis (great blog) nope, not in the least.

They are afraid of their own cunt, and what it drives them to desire and do.

They don’t actually want the violent rape that men think of when they hear the word rape, they want the submissive, ceding all control over their cunt, fantasy rape from a man who they are NOT afraid of.

But they are too ashamed to admit it, even amongst themselves, and too afraid of letting their cunt have control, so they are stuck between a rock and a hard place intellectually and emotionally.

Nota Bene; these are the skank ho’s, the wimminz in general, such as those who exclusively form the staff of Police sexual assault squads and social services and family lawyers and so on, are living a lie, they are not open to themselves like the skank ho’s, which is why me, my lawyer, and my female rape squad policeperson were sat in the police station watching a video of my False Rape Accusing ex deep throating me, a video dated after her historical rape accusation, a video that we all sat and watched all the way though, while the misandrist female rape squad policeperson is licking her lips and hating me because I have a shit eating grin, I know what the fuck is going on, so does my lawyer, with his eyebrow raised 1 millimetre.

The wimminz KNOW that the vast majority of rape accusations are false.

They just don’t say a damn thing about that in public, and subscribe to the rape epidemic in public, because they live in fear of doing or saying anything else, because they know for a fact all the other wimminz will instantly attack them, but not with false allegation, but with true allegation that they cannot defend against, that they are all living in fear of being ruled by their cunts, and living in frustration and having to fight their cunts for control, and all dream of a man who they can hand cunt control over to.

“face” is everything to wimminz.

Wimminz would rather be violently gang raped every day for a month, than lose face with the wimminz sistahood.

So, back to the beginning, the truth about rape.

Rape does happen, a bit.

The rest of it is all projection by the wimminz, a bit like the story of the emperor who had no clothes.

“Rape culture” does not actually exist, from a man’s perspective.

“Rape fantasy culture” is endemic and hard wired into the wimminz at cunt and hormone level.

Fuck it, the truth is I can’t even rape a woman in fantasy sex play when she is begging for it and offering me the world to do it, that little male voice sitting on my shoulder that associates rape with violence keeps getting in the way, and NO MAN OUT THERE doesn’t get what I am saying… so I have to substitute another, non violent fantasy, like a porn movie, easy excuse to film everything, to allow me to perform, and allow the skank to have her rape fantasy.

In real life I probably have more chance of flying by flapping my arms, than being able to commit a rape.

If you think real, male understanding and description of, violent rape is the worst thing you can do to a woman, I have news for you brother…

The worst thing you can do to a woman is cause her to view herself as having lost face with the other wimminz.

Admitting desiring anything salacious is the best way for a woman to lose face… if a woman says “I like fucking donkeys” all the wimminz will attack her and distance themselves from her, if she says “he made me fuck a donkey and I hated it (even though I had an orgasm or ten)” then all the wimminz will rally around to hate the accused man in question.

THIS is the reason sites like the False Rape Society (link on the right) are either treated with hate filled venom, or studiously utterly ignored, by the wimminz.

THIS is the reason the whole subject of False Rape Accusations is either venomously attacked, or studiously ignored, by the wimminz.

THIS is the reason that for example other subjects such as female orgasm during childbirth are so very taboo… just like rape.