Wimminz – celebrating skank ho's everywhere

February 27, 2013

Enough do


Been a bit too busy with work and life to update here recently, but none of that stops me from observing the world.

One of the things I want to touch on today is “Enough do“, for example as in “why do spammers send out all this crap, surely no-one is dumb enough to buy it!!

The answer is of course “Enough do (to make it worthwhile)

This is a cool little thing that you can apply across the board, why do guys just ignore my profile and send me horrible cut and pasted “wanna fuk?” messages, surely no wimminz can go for this!!!

Enough do, to make it worthwhile.

Why do guys ask me if I want to spend 30 minuted getting fucked by their alsatian / GSD? Sure no wimminz can go for this!!!

Enough do, to make it worthwhile.

And right there is an interesting and valuable bit of knowledge, the only sound you hear is those complaining “why do they do?“, but you never hear a peep from anyone else, but the “why do they do?” are the canary in the coal-mine, and their actions tell us that the thing we never hear about is ALWAYS present.

If it is always present, then “Enough do” to make it worthwhile.

God knows, I have banged on enough about “My wife won’t take it up the ass” to which the answer is “Not from you, at least…

So the same rules apply here

Pick a random wimminz, does it occur to you that she will kneel for Rover, probably not, and if you asked her about her sexual tastes and even if she was liberated and honest you’d get an answer like “no pee poo or pain” and a pause and “and of course it goes without saying, no kids or animals” (if it goes without saying, why did you need to say it?)

All of which you might buy, at face value.

But there is the old “Enough do” to make it worthwhile, which means there are people out there, constantly, asking if they do, so now we are down to statistics, there is an x% chance that she has been asked to do this thing, and there is a y% chance that she has done that thing, and all we can say with confidence is two statements.

  1. Because of “Enough do”, we can be extremely confident that both x and y are above zero
  2. Because the rest of the data is unknown / hidden / denied / etc, we have no idea what the actual value of x and y are.

It’s a variation on Schroedinger’s cat….

In this variation you have to open the house door to find out if the wimminz is humping Rover, but if you open the front door, they are no going to be / are going to stop humping.

We could ask the spammers, the guys asking the wimminz if they want to fuck the GSD, but just as the wimminz will understate the case and nobody ever fell for a spamvert, these guys will overstate the case and claim they are wildly successful, the truth, well, that lies somewhere in between.

All you need to remember is ENOUGH DO.

—————————————————————————————–

“Enough do” is a bit like NAWALT, it implies that enough don’t, but if you look intelligently at what we have been discussing, you will see there is no data on that whatsoever.

What colour is that house over there on the hill?

This side is white.

We simply have no data on the other side.

We simply have no data beyond “Enough do” to do any kind or sorting on wimminz into two categories, those that might, and those that won’t, so unless you can split “all wimminz” into two groups, those that are not like that, and those that are, you have to accept that any individual wimminz might, which means you have to treat wimminz as AWALT.

this is a fundamental issue, you cannot take macro global facts and apply them at an individual level, they not only cease to be valid, they cease to be true.

If there are sufficient numbers of wimminz around that a “wanna fuk my GSD?” generates an “enough do” response to continue to ask the question, this is a shotgun strategy, some pellets are going to hit someone in the crowd.

trying to pick the ones who have never been hit in the past, haven’t been hit now, and who will never be hit in the future… well, what are next week’s lottery jackpot numbers.

AWALT

Enough do.

January 1, 2012

Debt, Contract and the Golden Rule.


Fred owes 5k to Bank A for a car loan.

Fred owes 175k to Bank B for a home loan / mortgage.

Fred owes 2k to Bank C for his overdraft / plastic.

The car loan from Bank A was made at an interest rate of 9.5%, the home loan from Bank B was made at a rate of 4.25%, the overdraft/plastic from Bank C is 13.95%

Three separate loans, three separate legal contracts, three separate incredibly powerful potential opponents.

Fred, or Freda, has goldfish memory, he cannot remember ordinary vehicle purchase loans running at 33% APR… I can.

Fred, or Freda, also suffers from massive ignorance, if Bank A sells Fred’s debt to Bank C, then Fred can forget all about any arrangements or contracts he had with Bank A, they all expired, the only thing left is the debt.

Bank C can say to Fred “Pay us in full, NOW!” or they can say “Everything is staying the same, except we are charging you 25% APR interest on your outstanding balance, not the 9.5% you were paying.

Fred or Freda cannot stop Bank A selling his debt / contract to Bank C, if Fred / Freda doesn’t like it the only real option is to pay off the debt in full, and yes, there will be an extra “arrangement fee” to do that.

Fred or Freda cannot enforce the terms of a contract between Fred(a) and Bank A, upon Bank C, as they are not named in it, Bank C bought the debt from Bank A, Fred(a) wasn’t part of that deal legally either.

Once Bank C hold’s Fred(a)’s debt, then that debt is the only thing that has survived the transition from Bank A to Bank C.

Bank B now notes that Fred(a)’s financial situation has changed, eg loan payments have just gone through the roof, making the outstanding mortgage more risky, and more risky loans = higher interest rates, so Bank B increases the minimum monthly payments Fred must make.

In the “last” recession I had a friend, he had a great business, it employed 12 people, cash flow was good, order books were full for nearly 18 months, he was doing great, naturally enough he used Bank provided finance to make everything simpler and easier and smoother, but see above, cash flow was great, order books were full for the next year plus, all 12 staff were working and making him a profit, he was making all his payments on time and had cash deposits as well.

The Bank called him in, sat him down, and called in ALL his loans, which closed his business, put 12 men out of work and left his customers on the order books having to find a new contractor etc etc

The Bank manager told him, unofficially, plain as day, “Fred, we (the Bank) did not call all your loans in because you could NOT pay, but because you COULD pay… we need the money…

This, like a certain bank offering me a vehicle loan at 33% APR are not mythical fairy stories, this shit happened in my lifetime not ten miles from where I sit right now.

The fact is people today not only lack clue #1 about the true nature of debt, they also lack clue #1 about the true nature of Contract Law, and they lack clue #1 about the Golden Rule, he who has all the gold makes all the rules…

Fred(a) vs Banks A/B/C in various Courts, arguing that Fred borrowed the money for the car from Bank A, and that should be that, is an unequal battle, a non starter, it is going to do nothing except pound Fred(a) even harder into the ground.

Those of us who are not Fred(a), those of us who always understood that percentage interest on loans is an Exponential Function mathematically speaking, those of us who always understood that the Bank has more lawyers than I have hairs on my head, those of us who always understood that a loan from a bank for a car was a contract, and just as I can sell the car at some future point the Bank can sell my debt at some future point, those of us who always understood that THE LOAN HAS YET TO BE WRITTEN THAT DOES NOT CONTAIN A PROVISION ALLOWING THE BANK TO DEMAND IMMEDIATE AND FULL SETTLEMENT FORTHWITH, are those of us who relatively speaking owe sweet fuck all today, view what the rest of us are doing as some sort of cross between boarding a train that is already involved in a slo-mo train wreck, and jacking yourself up with the latest wonder drug which is nothing more than rat poison with a label stuck on it saying “Wonder drug” and obscuring the rat poison label… barely…

Indentured Servitude is an evil thing, and yet it appears that all those who have the gold have to do is offer the screaming masses a iphone and a large screen TV and a new model Ford on easy easy terms, and Fred and Freda will willingly take the first steps on the short and slippery path to Indentured Servitude.

 

%d bloggers like this: