[this column was written for the Unz Review]
Israeli Prime Minister made it to Kiev today, where he was greeted by the (pseudo) “traditional” Ukronazi slogan “Glory to the Ukraine! Glory to the heroes!”. For somebody like me who dislikes Zionism and Nazism just about the same, it was a sweet irony to see an Israeli Prime Minister officially traveling to the Nazi-occupied Ukraine to commemorate the massacre of Jews at Babii Iar greeted by the very same slogan which the Jews murdered at Babii Iar heard from their Banderite executioners while they were being shot.
STOP!
Do you already hear the choir of voices protesting: how can anyone expecting to be taken seriously write a paragraph about the civil war in the Ukraine with all the following words: Ukronazi, Zionism, Nazism, Nazi-occupied, Jews and Banderite?
That is a very good question.
But I have a better one!
How can anyone expecting to be taken seriously write a paragraph about the civil war in the Ukraine WITHOUT all the following words: Ukronazi, Zionism, Nazism, Nazi-occupied, Jews and Banderite?
Let’s begin with the first question. The obvious implied criticism behind the first question, is very simple and it assumes that there is a profound and inherent contradiction between everything Nazi and Jews/Zionism. Speaking about a “Nazi Jew” or a “Nazi Zionist” is just as nonsensical as speaking about dry water or and diamonds raining from the sky!
Except that both dry water and diamonds raining from the sky do exist in real nature, so let’s not jump to conclusions too fast and see which contradictions are real, and which ones are only apparent.
I won’t even go into the (deliciously controversial) topic of the historical fact of the collaboration of the German National Socialists with various Zionist organizations which, rather naively, thought that a nationalist like Hitler would understand their own nationalism and help them to emigrate to Palestine. But this goes even further than that as Hannah Arendt said, in her superb book “Eichmann in Jerusalem” (see excerpt here or, even better, read the full book (for free!): various Jewish organizations continued to work with/(for?) the Nazis well into the so-called “Holocaust”.
[Sidebar: to be honest, I don’t think that we, safely sitting in the comfort of our homes, should be too quick to condemn these Jewish organizations. Yes, of course, many of them were “naive” (and I am being polite here), but others must have realized that European Jews are in a great deal of danger and must be evacuated at any cost and if the only way to achieve such an evacuation was to deal with the Nazis, then so be it! This is no different than offering a bribe to a jail guard to obtain some kind of favor. Thus I think that Jewish organizations which today categorically deny having collaborated with the Nazis are mistaken on not one, but two grounds: first, the truth is coming out and it is impossible to suppress it and, second, there is nothing shameful in swallowing your disgust to save a person. Except that for the racially deluded minds of modern Zionists, such an admission would take the air out of their silly notion of racial superiority. Hence the categorically crimethink nature of speaking about this]
No, what I want to suggest here is very different: in our 21st century, most of the 20th century terminology has lost its meaning. What is a liberal (no, not Hillary!)? What is a Communist (no, not Obama!)? What is a Christian (no, not the Pope!)? What is a democrat (no, not Kamala Harris!)? What is a patriot (no, most definitely not Trump!)? What is a tyrannical dictator (nope, not Putin!)?
You think that I am being facetious here?
Then explain to me how a rabidly Takfiri regime like the one in Saudi Arabia can get help from Zionist Israel? Or how the “democratic West” gave its full support to Takfiris in Chechnia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Libya and Syria? How is it that during the so-called “Global War on Terror”, (which was supposed to be officially waged against al-Qaeda and its various local subsidiaries, in retaliation for 9/11) the various Takfiri groups only got stronger? Yet what we really see is that the US provides training, financing, coordination and even close air support for pretty much every al-Qaeda type out there?
There are two phenomena which explain this gradual dissolution of meanings into meaningless and insipid categories: first, the correct meaning of many terms has been covered by a thick layer of ideological imperatives and, second, most 21st century politicians couldn’t care less what any word really means. All they care about is framing the discussion in a way which makes it easy for them to obfuscate their numerous crimes.
The truth about the Ukraine is very simple: yes, there are bona-fide Nazis in the Ukraine and, yes, they have a lot of influence due to their quasi monopoly on violence and total collapse of the state. True, these hardcore Ukronazi freaks are a rather small minority, but one which is well organized, well funded and fully prepared to use violence.
“Jewbanderite“
There are also a lot of Zionists in the Ukraine. And while these folks silently hate each other, they hate (and fear!) Russia much, much more; just like mobsters can fight each other, but can unite against any common threat (such as, say, an honest police chief).
Oh, and yes, there are also plenty of very influential Jews in the Ukraine (Kolomoiskii and Zelenskii being the two best known ones right now) and they have the full backing of the AngloZionist Empire and all of the Zionists interests in the West. And I think that most folks fully understand that. The real reason behind all the protests about me using terms such as “Ukronazi” stems from a very different cause.
The problem is that you get a lot of ruffled feathers when you suggest that the USA, which is supposed to be some kind of “land of the free and the home of the brave” aka “the indispensable nation” is found in bed with the self same folks who the US propaganda machine paints as arch-villains: Nazis, of course, but also Takfiris. As for the Zionists, it would be wrong to say that the US of A is “in bed” with them. No, it’s even worse: the much-maligned and ridiculed term of ZOG (as in “Zionist Occupation Government”) is much more accurate, but it offends those who rather think of themselves as “rulers of the world” than the voiceless serfs of a regime of foreign occupation!
US Americans love to thump their chests while mantrically chanting some nonsense along the lines of “USA is number 1!” and they get really mad when they are told that “the party is over” which I did in this article in which I wrote:
Both US Americans and Europeans will, for the very first time in their history, have to behave like civilized people, which means that their traditional “model of development” (ransacking the entire planet and robbing everybody blind) will have to be replaced by one in which these US Americans and Europeans will have to work like everybody else to accumulate riches
And, just by coincidence, Paul Craig Roberts recently wrote an article entitled “American Capitalism Is Based On Plunder” in which he explained that US foreign policy is basically driven by a plunder imperative and that if that imperative cannot be realized abroad, it will be implemented at home (I wonder if he will be accused of being anti-American or even of “Communism”? It is quite striking to see a paleo-conservative like Paul Craig Roberts basically paraphrasing Lenin and his statement that “imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism” (a historical truism which the western propaganda system is doing its best to bury, obfuscate, ridicule and the like).
Writing things like these typically result in a barrage of ad hominems which, by itself, is quite telling (usually the same 2-3 folks, some probably remunerated for their efforts) There is a Russian saying that “the hat of the head of the thief is burning” (see here for an explanation of this rather weird expression) and this is exactly what is happening here: the folks protesting the loudest are always the ones who are most unwilling to stop the planetary plunder, messianic arrogance and imperial hubris in which they were raised. It is not only their livelihoods which are threatened by such talk, but even their very identity. Hence the very real and very high level of rage they feel.
Finally, there are all the Nazi sympathizers who absolutely hate Jews and for whom any notion of Nazi and Zionist collaboration are just as much a case of crimethink as it is for Zionist Jews to admit that they have collaborated with bona fide Nazis many times in the past.
However, if we set aside silly ideological shackles, we can immediately observe that the kind of ideology of racial superiority which the Nazis are known for can also be found in the Judaic (religious) and Zionist (secular) ideologies. In fact, both National-Socialism and Zionism are just two amongst many more types of European nationalisms which have their root in 19th century ideological categories.
Let’s try a different approach: what do Ukie “dobrobats”, al-Qaeda forces in Syria, KLA units in Kosovo and Israeli settlers in Palestine have in common? Correct! They are all first and foremost *thugs* who all prey on the weak and defenseless. In other words, they are the perfect tool to force civilians to surrender and accept some kind of foreign rule. That foreign rule is, in each case, the one of the AngloZionist Empire, of course. This, in turn, means that their official ideologies are almost irrelevant, because in reality they are all servants of the Empire (whether they understand it or not).
Conclusion one: it’s all a big lie!
Yes, it is a big lie. All of it. And this is how we end up with an Israeli Prime Minister who, by any criteria, is not only a Fascist, but also a Nazi as long as we make it clear that his brand of Nazism is a Jewish one, not a Germanic one. And it’s not just Bibi Netanyahu who does not mind dealing with Ukronazis, so the the the Chief Rabbi of Ukraine (see here for details). As for the said Ukronazis, they are now trying hard to deny that Bandara and his gang massacred Jews during WWII. As for Zelenskii, he is most definitely not a Nazi, but he has already caved in to the Ukronazi ideology (i.e. a form of Nazism which substitutes myths about “ancient Ukrs” to the more traditional Germanic myths about the Aryan-Germanic “race”). Then there is Kolomoiskii who is simply a typical Jewish mobster who has no personal ideology whatsoever and who has no love for the bona fide Ukronazis, but who is being very careful about how to purge them from power lest they beat him yet again. And above them all, we have the leaders of the Empire who use ideological categories as slurs but who don’t give a damn who they back as long as it is against Russia.
Against this background it is worth asking a simple question: do these words even matter? Do they still have any kind of meaning?
Conclusion two: yes, words do still matter!
I believe that they do, very much so! This is precisely why the legacy corporate ziomedia and those brainwashed by it freak out when they see expressions such as “AngloZionist”,“Ukronazi” or even the rather demure “Israel Lobby”. When somebody comes up with a powerful and correct descriptor, say like “ZOG” – the propaganda machine immediately kicks into high gear to shoot down in flames whatever author and article dared to use it. In fact, there are at least two types of wannabe word censors which typically show up:
TYPE ONE: the real McCoy. These are the sincere folks (whether of the Nazi or Zionist persuasion) who are truly outraged and offended that such “hallowed” words as Nazi/Zionist (pick one) can be combined with “abominations” such as Nazi/Zionist (pick the other one). These are all the Third Reich nostalgics, the defenders of a “White Christian West” and all the rest of them neo-Nazis.
TYPE TWO: the paid trolls. These are the folks whose task it is to obfuscate the real issues, to bury them under tons of vapid ideological nonsense; the best way to do that is to misdirect any discussion away from the original topic and sidetrack it into either a barrage of ad hominems or ideological clichés.
Seriously, what we are witnessing today is a new age of censorship in which government and corporations work hand in hand to crush (ban, censor, demonetize, algorithmically purge and otherwise silence) all those who challenge the official ideology and its many narratives. It would be naïve to the extreme to assume that the so-called “alternative media” and blogosphere have been spared such an effort at silencing ideological heresies.
Next time these self-appointed enforcers of the politically correct doxa come out, try this experiment: when you read their comments, don’t just look at what they write, but also try to guess why they write what they write and then mentally place a T1 or T2 sign next to their comments and you will soon see that they follow a careful pattern :-)
The Saker
Like all Western political movements since the French Revolution, the National Socialist Party of Germany was a Jewish Mafia project. By default.
With the French Revolution the Jewish Mafia had reached complete financial supremacy, and full-spectrum hegemony in all of Europe. Henceforth no other segment of society had the financial clout to form and develop
new social, cultural, religious, scientific, educational, political movements with the potential to significantly influence the destiny of the world.
Do you really think that the most famous financial backers of Naziism and Hitler like Krupp, Thiessen, IG Farben were goys? Think again. These mega corporation were Jewish Mafia assets like all other mega corporations. By default.
This also explains Project Paperclip. The thousands of criminal Nazis smuggled out of Germany to continue their dirty work in the US branch of the Jewish Mafia were all Jews and cryptos. All the Mafia assets were required to do is to change their costumes from ‘Evil Nazi’ to ‘American Dream’. Because ‘All the world’s a stage’, as the Jewish Mafia’s motto goes…
If you, by default, could back up your allegations with some facts, they would be easier to assess.
I often think that these ‘The Jews control EVERYTHING’ theorists may be Zionazis subtly boasting of their Machiavellian genius (and the concomitant inferiority of the goyim, everywhere)while laying down a sort of straw man of ‘antisemitism’. Numerous Zionazi sites quite openly boast of ‘the tribe’s’ ineffable genius and incomparable talents, but if a goy dare mimic that bombast, in accusatory and antagonistic manner, he, she or it will be immediately denounced as an ‘antisemite’. It is SUCH a racket.
On this, I think you are “over the target” Mulga and that _smr perfectly illustrates Saker’s point…..perhaps without realizing it!
Namely that Nominalism (the confusing of labels with the reality, the essence of the situation) is THE most effective and commonplace technique of Deception and Mind Control…as passionate human beings with very little time hastily read the label on the outside of bottles……………and either buy the poison……..or reject healthful things based on thier own haste, superficiality and passions ungoverned by Reason.
As though Zionist Jews and National Socialist Germans (or Ukrainains….or Americans) are not all enslaved by the same mental illness….and end up Loving Their Chains (and fanatically identifying with those chains of victimization!) in almost identical fashion.
Then they all promote this enslavement as either “inevitable”…..or “invincible”…painting all resistance and thinking any other way….not only their messed up way…….. as “futile”.
_smr (in this comment, at least) reminds me of Miles Mathis. LOL.
As though there were no Jews that don’t understand this dynamic extremely well….and aren’t 100 more free of it than these two pessimists!
The fact that such Jews exist despite circumstances far more difficult than these two (probably) ever faced……………..ought to give pause to such cultural pessimists and their promotion of a corrupted, hopeless world view!
“Both US Americans and Europeans will, for the very first time in their history, have to behave like civilized people, which means that their traditional “model of development” (ransacking the entire planet and robbing everybody blind) ”
Pretty weird, didn’t the mongols occupy Europe for hundreds of years? Didn’t the moors occupy Europe for hundreds of years? Did not arab muslim slavers enslave millions of Europeans? Did not the Ottoman empire occupy Europe for years? If anything, is not Europe that behaves civilized while the entire world tries to ransack Europe? Pretty hard to “blame whitey” when whites now are minority in London and most other capitalist in the western world that they founded hundreds sometimes thousands of years ago.
“Why have the white British left London”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21511904https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21511904
The imperial and colonial records of Portugal, Spain, France, Germany, Belgium and the UK in the world outside Europe put anything inflicted on Europe in the shade. By orders of magnitude in genocide, destruction, exploitation and savagery. And the greatest suffering in Europe was inflicted by Europeans on one another.
Ulrich von Kafkanien
Both Napoleon and Hitler were proxy fighters, fighting for banker interests. Both assembled the largest armies they could, to be used solely against Russia. Who payed for all of this ? Historians are shy to explain this. Napoleon was financed by the Rothschild’s, while Hitler was financed by both the Rothschild’s and Wall Street, with Wall Street in 1931 opening the Bank of International Settlement in Basel, right next to the German border. That Bank poured money into Germany. That Wall Street also opened industries in Germany after World War One is common knowledge. Why ? Perhaps to prepare Germany for war with Russia ?
After World War Two, a heap of Nazis, including scientists and engineers, were brought over to the US in operation ‘Paperclip’, the most famous being Werner von Braun (no, I don’t think they were crypto Jews). The other celebrity was SS General Heinrich Mueller, chief of the Gestapo, who ended in Washington as Truman’s personal spy chief. He was never tried by the Nuremberg Tribunal for war crimes. Why not ?
Napoleon and Hitler, as proxy fighters, failed in their attempts to conquer Russia. That role after World War Two was given to NATO, backed by imported Nazis from Germany. Who controls NATO ? The bankers perhaps, backed by corporations ?
As for Ukraine, as soon as Yanukovich was overthrown in 2014, Zionists started appearing in the country, looking for real estate to buy, no doubt trying to reincarnate the Khazarian Kingdom which existed briefly in southern Ukraine and Russia, where they came from Asia.
Ukraine has been forced to plant GMO seeds on it’s fertile soil. Why ? Maybe because GMO food causes infertility and cancer, a well known fact. Do we here have some attempts at population reduction ? Putin, by the way, banned GMO in Russia.
I well remember feeling alarmed when I read of this brazen development on the internet back in ‘13/14.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/05/biden-ukrainian-gas-company
Of course, it’s not just gas that is being monopolised by private interests.
We are all Palestinians
You are making some critical mistakes in your post. First is the convenient but rather flawed comparison between Hitler and Napoleon that’s popular in the West these days. While there are some obvious parallels between the two (both were in control large portions of continental Europe, both were considered invincible at their peak) however, there are fundamental differences which cannot be ignored just to fit these two men into whatever purpose suits us at a given moment. Napoleon and Hitler were different personalities, had different goals, and lived in different times. Yes, they were both outsiders who gained power through their ability (Napoleon as a prodigy general, Hitler as a demagogue and rabble-rouser) in a very turbulent time of their country’s history. Nevertheless, Hitler was a fanatical personality driven by an ideology based on struggle (I consider struggle to be a central aspect of Fascism/Nazism and their worldview), whereas Napoleon was an opportunistic glory seeker, pragmatic, but not ultimately devoid of any real values. And let’s not forget another fact: Napoleon’s France was under constant siege by hostile aristocratic, conservative European monarchies which saw in him an existential threat, Hitler on the other hand, was a gambler in his foreign policy who employed bully tactics to coerce and scare enemies into submission by the threat of force, or using real force whenever he thought he could get away with it.
Most importantly, their goals differed: Hitler’s war on Russia was a brutal conquest fueled ultimately by the desire for conquest and plunder justified by a racial suprematic ideology, Napoleon’s campaign against Russia was not anything similar. Napoleon had in fact preferred to come to terms with Russia as Britain was his chief enemy, but then, as during WWII, the British establishment found in Russia the most useful tool to break up and mortally weaken any attempt at continental hegemony. France under Napoleon and until the rise of Germany was still a country with most potential to achieve continental hegemony, and it’s not accidental that France and the UK remained in hostile relations until shortly before the unification of Germany.
If we look at things from a mainly geostrategic and geopolitical point of view and forget about ideologies, which are always convenient tools to mask more prosaic goals, we will see that France under Napoleon and Germany under Hitler were in a similar position (despite the aforementioned fundamental differences between Hitler and Napoleon personally and their goals – personalities and their goals are, after all, determined by geostrategic constants). Both countries made a gamble to achieve continental hegemony and break the status quo, these goals were not wrong or immoral per se. France and Germany were both preeminent European countries with the power to rally other European countries behind themselves in either economic or political union or the combination of both. But in looking at the map of Europe we see the UK and Russia both as countries on the edge of Europe, one on the Western, and the other on the Eastern one, one a striking example of a thalassocracy and the other a typical example of a tellurocracy and both of which are clearly a part of Europe, but possess an identity different from the continental European one. In the XIX century, the Russian Empire was the guardian of conservative order in Europe “the hegemon of reaction” as it was sometimes referred to. No matter how opposed the UK had been to Russian interests (‘The Great Game’) the always pragmatical (to the point of cynicism) Britons saw in Russia a convenient tool to block the rise a continental power in Europe which had been the pillar of British geopolitical strategy since the XVIII century. It
Again, it is no coincidence the UK and Russia were allies three times and defeated three attempts at a continental hegemony, one by France and two by Germany. These attempts posed a serious threat to Russia (an existential threat in the case of Hitler’s Germany) but in essence, the interests of continental Europe and whatever country achieves the preeminent status in Europe and Russia are not inimical. Russia has enjoyed good relations historically with the continent, even the powers such as Austria Hungary and Bismarck’s Germany (Bismarck took great care to maintain friendly relations with Russia for as long as he could). It should come as no surprise the biggest fear of the Anglo-American elites is Moscow-Berlin cooperation or worse for them, an alliance, because it would greatly diminish the impact of their control over the world’s seas, shipping, and trade (a cornerstone of their power) and effectively kick them out of the Eurasian landmass, which contains the largest portion of the world’s wealth, resources, and population. Such a union would have the potential for spectacular economic and technological growth and if we consider it would be easily connected with China and the rest of East Asia, the opportunities are truly spectacular. All that the Anglo-Americans could do is to watch it from their ships, impotently while their wealth and the ability to stir up trouble all over Eurasia vanishes forever.
It becomes obvious why has Britain, then her Imperial successor the US invested such huge amount of resources, diplomatic and intelligence work into keeping the continent divided and most importantly, facilitating hatred between Germany and Russia (there is indeed a kind of a civilizational animosity between Germanic peoples and Slaves, most likely due to their competition for land and wealth in central and eastern Europe). Wall Street and the City of London were indeed providing financial backing to Hitler’s Germany, but let’s not forget they have cards to play within Russia itself.
For the end, an interesting historical fact that it was Churchill who proposed, after the end of WWII, that Germany is broken up in separate states and deindustrialized, while Stalin often emphasized the USSR would not exact revenge on the German people or destroy Germany as a country.
As NATO’s first Secretary-General famously said the goal of the US presence in Europe in the post-WWII period was to: “keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.”
The strategy has not changed to this day.
Mairon
I don’t think I made any critical mistakes. You wrote plenty but did not say too much, like the true motive for Napoleons invasion of Russia. The Rothschild’s used Napoleon for war against Russia, covering his expenses. In 1941 when Hitler invaded the Soviet Union (Russia), the US stayed neutral, France was under German occupation, while Britain was on it’s island, having no troops on the Continent, watching developments.
To the Anglo-American bankers the biggest headache was the rise of Euro-Asia, namely a Russian-German economic and political alliance. The biggest army Napoleon ever raised was the one against Russia. Who payed for it ? The biggest army Hitler ever concentrated was the one against the Soviet Union (Russia). Who payed for all of that ? The Anglo-Americans permitted the unification of Germany in 1871, as Germany was being set up for war with Russia. When Bismarck advocated an economic alliance with Russia and China, he was removed from Office. Napoleon failed. Hitler failed. Finally, NATO’s first Secretary-General said it all: “to keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.” Yes, keep the Germans down and prevent them forming an alliance with Russia. When Eisenhauer was NATO commander before becoming President, he confirmed the US would never permit a German alliance with Russia. What has Trump been doing, threatening sanctions against all of those who participated in the building of the Nord Stream – 2 gas pipeline. The policies of Anglo-American bankers has not changed. However, times do change.
“The Rothschild’s used Napoleon for war against Russia, covering his expenses.”
As I said, Napoleon’s career cannot be quite dismissed a Rothschild plot to destroy Russia. Napoleon’s goal was not to destroy Russia, like Hitler, but to bring it to his camp. Isn’t it a bit ironic that Napoleon has been demonized most intensely by the British as a villain and a tyrant? We should by no means fall into the trap of thinking the Anglo-Americans could not or would not use Russia as a weapon against European continental powers. They did and they would do it again. It is simply a matter of geopolitics and not some kind of intrinsic hatred of the Anglo-Americans towards Russia. Napoleon failed to do away with Britain. It is Britain which financed all the Coalition wars against him and Russia helped them weaken him.
EVERYTHING is a ‘Rothschilds’ plot’. The Rothschilds, nasty, hereditary, parasites as they are, must laugh into their champagne as they read it. The parasitic financier elites are a little more various than just one family.
Dear smr,
If you removed the two words ‘By default’ your comment would be far more accurate. When Hitler sent Adolf Eichmann and his mate to Palestine to study the scenario of permitting German Jews to migrate to Palestine, that was not a ‘National Socialist’ agenda, but a Zionist agenda , approved by the Rothschild family, as the Zionists believed that the German Jew was the best suited for assimilation in Palestine.
And to demonstrate this, Jewish refugees from Germany were not permitted to disembark in America as per the HMT Dunera case and those Jews were eventually dumped in Sydney where they were interned as POW’s at Hay.
Of course as colonialists Australians are not permitted to remember the friendship between The King of England (Edward) and Hitler, and that Lord Rothschild’s problems were resolved when somebody introduced Mrs Simpson to Edward, after all Edward was more a man for the people rather than a man of the banks, something the Queen’s mother, Elizabeth never forgave Edward for.
Of course few people remember that once the French Revolution was won, France immediately declared war on ‘All Monarchies’ and few people comprehend as to why Napoleon decided to march on Moscow, but Moscow controlled ‘The Pale’, and the Jews therein frequently assassinated Russian Czars and other leaders, but please forget that I even mentioned that.
And of course there was the ‘miracle’ of Dunkirk, but let’s forget about St Valery, but the truth was that Hitler still believed that Britain would join Germany in smashing Russia, but that was impossible once Hitler betrayed the British banks and used bartering as a trade system thus depriving the British Banker of their fees.
And before the French Revolution there was the ‘Glorious Revolution’ in England when William of Orange with his wife Mary ousted Mary’s Father James who was evicted from the monarchy for his discarding of a ring!!! Something only a Jew could invent, and of course nothing to do whatsoever as James belief that the Presbyterian religion was false as it recognised usury, one of the major tenets of John Calvin
And after Billy Boyo defeated James at the Battle of the Boyne in 1690, lo and behold, Montagu and Co created the Bank of England in1693 whose first Governor was the Scottish pirate William Patterson who was replaced three years later by the Jew Isaac Newton.
What a truly vile photo, made my stomach do a little somersault. Much appreciate your analysis on this, and I have no problem at all using the terms like Anglo Zionist Empire, or Occupied Palestine or Fascist to describe this situation.
In answer to your questions, why does Takfiri Saudi Arabia get help from Zionist Israel, plus other examples, for me its about Imperialism. Its about Power, Control, and Pure Greedlust. It all boils right down to $$$$ in my opinion.
I actually don’t see any irony at all in this photo, as vile as it is. These people are part of the Anglo Zionist Empire. They stick together. They have similar agenda’s.
What appears on this site, you’ll never see anything even remotely close in any mainstream ‘media’. Not even in the same universe. Thanks…
Gezzah Potts: “‘In answer to your questions, why does Takfiri Saudi Arabia get help from Zionist Israel, ….”
….they are part of the same organization: KSA is an Anglo Zio Capitalist oil company masquerading as an Arab kingdom (Lawrence of Arabia) and Israel is _the_ AZC prestige project in Palestine (Letter to Dear Lord Rothschild).
‘In answer to your questions, why does Takfiri Saudi Arabia get help from Zionist Israel, ….”
Dr. NG Maroudas, have you any idea why Russia is supporting the Takfiri’s via their TOS-1A MLRS sales to Saudi?
My answer. Easy Money. They’re not gonna use it and the world might be a calmer/safer place because of it.
Dr NG Maroudas: appreciate the clarification. I suppose the most basic thing is they are all functionaries of the Anglo Zionist Empire. Was rushing my original comment, however, the fact is this evil has caused such death and destruction in a whole host of countries in all parts of the planet.
“it assumes that there is a profound and inherent contradiction between everything Nazi and Jews/Zionism.”
Zionism, like nazism, is a manifestation of mental disability. A mentally defective mind. Like other fanatically bigoted supremacist povs. Such as ran the pindo slavocracy, and similar in apartheid south africa. These are all variations of diseased/seriously defective minds.
Zionism is for the Jews as Nazism was for the Germans. Every group is capable of throwing up xenophobic, racist, supremacist groups, particularly when driven by ancient religious hatreds, like those of Talmudic Judaism. Zionist tendencies early on included the open fascism of Jabotinsky, the sewer that leads directly to Bibi.
Tell me Mulga, just how many of the Nationalist Socialist Party were German Jews; I just wonder and somebody has mentioned to me that even Goebbels was Jewish. Of course Eichmann was only considered half-Jewish which is why Hitler sent him to Palestine, and why the Zionists kidnapped him and brought him back to Israel for trial.
Ahh, but never mind as perhaps you may not have heard of the Nazi of Nanking, John Rabe who worked so hard to protect Chinese civilians from the Japanese army and worked with 15 other American and European missionaries and businessmen to create a 6.5 square kilometre sector near the centre of Nanking and “marked it off with white flags and Red Cross banners and declared it an International Safety Zone” (Page 59 Readers Digest October 1998)
Jews and ‘part Jews’ (Hitler believed that ‘Jew’ was a racial category, not a religious or communal one)served in the Nazi regime and in the armed forces right through the Nazi period, I believe. They were, apparently, slated for later consideration of some sort of negative kind, but what, I’m not sure. The Nazis really wanted to expel the Jews, to begin, and the German Zionists co-operated with them, a fact that the Zionazis today demand be suppressed, on pain of being declared an ‘antisemite’ like Ken Livingstone. But then, as Livingstone garbled, things turned murderous, particularly in the East after Operation Barbarossa began. But I’ve never had the stomach to read any comprehensive studies of the genocides in the East, so my knowledge is very patchy.
Important discourse. Personally I am also very pleased to see that The Saker recommends Eichmann in Jerusalem by Hannah Arendt.
Well, that must be a superb (relatively honest) book then [seems to me SS-Obersturmbannführer Eichmann was just an ordinary, ignorant servant of the Empire, but one who talked too much and started to ask the wrong questions], but she must’ve written (propagated) a lot of not so superb things (CIA propaganda?) as well [such as “The Origins of Totalitarianism” maybe?], otherwise CIA-Wikipedia wouldn’t describe her as “one of the most important political philosophers of the twentieth century.” I wonder what _smr’s opinion on her is.
Actually, Hannah Arendt is indeed one of the most important philosophers and most remarkable women of the last century. As a German Jew she enjoyed a top education in the humanities and the great German and European humanist philosophers that created the period of the enlightenment and our still imperfect forms of democracy. She was educated at three well known German liberal universities in the mid 1920’s. She was a humanist and even the Holocaust did not make her depart from her core principles. In fact, it made her research how such abhorrent human behavior is manifested. Her “Banality of Evil”, which I read in the mid 70’s in a philosophy course, was an eye opener in that it showed me that evil comes in many forms and can even be disguised as normality. There was nothing striking about Eichmann, except the evil within him.
America is on a collision course with history for the very same reasons. The mainstream of America has come to accept the evil perpetrated by the regime, especially since 2001, as normal. Think of it this way, babies born in 2001 are now 18 years old. They are adults, able to vote and able to enter military service. They grew up with war from the first time their level of awareness allowed them to recognize war as such. Imperial War is now a normality for an entire generation. This is a truly frightening circumstance considering the present state of affairs in the realms of finance (debt and dollar hegemony), economic (the limits to growth) and environmental (the many impacts of climate change). When these factors begin shaking the foundation of the US, how easy will it be for the true evil, hiding behind the banality of normalcy, to exploit this generation that has learned to accept war as normal for a “final” war?
Arendt coined the term ‘banality of Evil’ after meeting our former PM, John Howard.
Well Mulga, she got that one spot on.
Arendt was fiercely attacked by some Jews after the publication of Eichmann in Jerusalem. Understandable, only two decades after the Nazi Judeocide. A book to be read after the survivors are all dead.
I saw one of the leading Zionazi thugs from the US Congress the other day, arguing, first, that American Jews are a very varied lot, with some supporting the Democrats, some the Republicans, some neither, etc, so Trump’s assertion that Democratic Jews were traitors to Israel (or whatever he said)was nonsense. Fair enough, but then he started raving that it was ‘antisemitic’, because it suggested that Jews had ‘dual loyalties’.
This, of course, is imbecile garbage, because Trump was speaking of loyalty, or not, to Israel, not the USA. But, as we know from the filthy campaign against UK Labour, the Zionazis will twisted anything, turn it inside out and upend it, to find ‘proof’ of ‘antisemitism’, and once the charge is thus fabricated, the entire Rightwing media and political sewer will repeat the accusation ad nauseam, and this is a case where the accusation itself is enough to bring instant sentence and execution. Indeed, in these cases, the very vilest form of ‘antisemitism’ is to defend yourself, a sure sign that you are a dire Jew-hater, through and through.
And, of course, the Zionazi boss’s observation that Jews, like all groups, are a varied lot, does not extend to ‘loyalty’. All US Jews, naturally, are 100% loyal to the USA only, no matter how many houses they have in Israel or the Occupied Palestinian Territories, how much money invested there, how many relatives living there or buried there, or how much time they spend there themselves. This is a typical piece of Zionazi gibberish, that defies the commonsense that some Jews are loyal to the USA, some to Israel and the USA, and some, like Pollard say, loyal overwhelmingly, if not entirely, to Israel. How could it be otherwise? English living in the USA have no trouble being loyal to both countries, to different degrees at different times, so why not Jews and other nationalities? Yet this sordid garbage is gospel, and the charge of implying ‘dual loyalty’ for ANY Jew, EVER, is a typically fallacious and banal sign of ‘antisemitism’. Zionazi rule, first and foremost, sends the parasitised elites raving mad.
Remember that Adolf Eichman visited Palestine (including Jerusalem) in the mid 1930ies and made comments of enthusiastic support for the Zionists’ progjects.
As far as I remember Dimitrov gave the following explanation of Fascism: Fascism is the open terrorist Dictatorship of the most aggressiv, the most chauvinist part of Finance Capital.
Thats it! It doesn’t matter your Jew, Ukrainian, German or Brasilian, nor you Hindu, Zionist or Christian. It’s all down to money or, if you want, those few on the top(of capitalist society) against us many at the bottom.
It’s a very old cult, exposed in the temple, when they bought the first set of nails for the cross. The guy on the cross called it Mammon.
Soldat82
In fact Fascism is the merger of private capital with the state, the state thus being placed under the control of private bankers. Now, to which countries can this fact be applied ?
Bibi handed Zelensky his orders. One item was the pension money for 450,000 Ukies who have migrated to Israel. Bibi wants Kiev to start paying the owed pensions. It’s many hundreds of millions of dollars.
Ukraine lost some of its best educated and trained technologies people, and now has to pay for them to stay in Israel.
Larchmonter445
I don’t know how many fled to Israel, but by December of 2017 some 4.4 million fled to Russia, including scientists and engineers. I am afraid that Ukraine is doomed.
Many of them also routed that way to come to US (early ’90’s there was an almost free for all immigration to US via that route). I may go to say, some of them also immigrated to Israel with shady documentation.
And then a bit later, there was Australia’s F.M., Alexander Downer in Israel, offering free migration to Australia, and he may have even mentioned the rag to riches story of Rabbi ‘Aussie’ Joe Gutnick as the Jews of New York knew him, or as ‘Diamond’ Joe Gutnick, as the rest of the world know him.
Now what is Alexander doing back in the news again?
“No, what I want to suggest here is very different: in our 21st century, most of the 20th century terminology has lost its meaning. What is a liberal (no, not Hillary!)? What is a Communist (no, not Obama!)? What is a Christian (no, not the Pope!)? What is a democrat (no, not Kamala Harris!)? What is a patriot (no, most definitely not Trump!)? What is a tyrannical dictator (nope, not Putin!)?
You think that I am being facetious here?
Then explain to me how a rabidly Takfiri regime like the one in Saudi Arabia can get help from Zionist Israel? Or how the “democratic West” gave its full support to Takfiris in Chechnia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Libya and Syria? How is it that during the so-called “Global War on Terror”, (which was supposed to be officially waged against al-Qaeda and its various local subsidiaries, in retaliation for 9/11) the various Takfiri groups only got stronger? Yet what we really see is that the US provides training, financing, coordination and even close air support for pretty much every al-Qaeda type out there?
There are two phenomena which explain this gradual dissolution of meanings into meaningless and insipid categories: first, the correct meaning of many terms has been covered by a thick layer of ideological imperatives and, second, most 21st century politicians couldn’t care less what any word really means. All they care about is framing the discussion in a way which makes it easy for them to obfuscate their numerous crimes.”
Rules-Based International Order!
Western Democratic Values!
Human Rights!
Democracy!
Freedom!
…
Meaningless Propaganda Slogans Regurgitated by the Sheeple!
In Hong Kong, the Ukro military has arranged the showing in 40 different locations of a Ukie propaganda film on their color revolution:
Winter on Fire – Ukraine’s Fight for Freedom’ shown in 40 places in Hong Kong tonight
Brought to Hong Kong by Ukroboronprom (UOP) (Ukrainian: Укроборонпром, Ukrainian Defense Industry) is an association of multi-product enterprises (conglomerate or concern) in various sectors of the defense industry of Ukraine.
Bibi to Volodymyr:
— My dear little Ukro plaything, what do you want as compensation for overseeing Jewish settlement and apartheid colonialism established in what is nominally your country?
Volodymyr to Bibi:
— I am all yours, no need for bribes. Just say something nasty about Russia, and I’m fine.
Ergo: No anti-semitism here. The Ukros know who can be slandered and who cannot.
Wasn’t it lovely how Bibi’s charming wife threw away the bread proffered by the Ukrainian goyim at the airport. The contempt is rarely so unhidden.
And the very convincing piece of Zio-information to the effect that ”Obviously Sara had no intention of disrespecting Ukraine. This is total nonsense.”. One can imagine the hissy fits if Putin had made ’thumbs down’.
As Groucho said-‘Who are you going to believe? Me, or your lying eyes’. Frau Nuttyyahoo had to be restrained on the flight to Ukraine from attacking the pilots are they neglected to announce her arrival on the plane. Priceless!
It would have been more befitting if the hapless ‘Ukronazis’ had offered matzos.
Bibi visiting his homeland: Khazarstan.
Man, the word ‘nazi’ is right on the end of their chosen name. Ashkenazi. Ashke-nazi. This, of course, being the ‘sect’ that was forced to convert from their pagan (and very evil) religion to Judaeism, at sword point no less.
Cross reference all of the public figures that claim this sect with current conflict zones. Specifically, battlefield tactics and strategies. Scorched earth policies, concentration camps, massive numbers of hostages, human shield tactics, inflicting the highest possible number of casualties (preferably by fire) on friend and foe alike. Not to mention a rather blatant policy of bizarrely hateful racism. Then just follow the money.
They are nazis. Nazis are they. Two sides of the same coin. That is my observation of the physically visible reflection of their presence.
the holocaust (hollow cause of course) means burnt offering that is the ASH part of Ashkenazi. A hollowcause nazi is the correct term I think for a Khazar.
If one is careful to observe recent events from within the “Land of the Bankrupt, Home of the Terrified” then one will easily recognize that the Empire is, in fact, plundering its own citizens, starting with the weakest and poorest, and gradually working its way up. Read John W. Whitehead’s August 28, 2019 article, “The American Gulag: Brick by Brick, Our Prison Walls Get More Oppressive by the Day” You can find this article on rutherford dot org
“It is quite striking to see a paleo-conservative like Paul Craig Roberts basically paraphrasing Lenin and his statement that “imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism” (a historical truism which the western propaganda system is doing its best to bury, obfuscate, ridicule and the like).”
Well capitalism is heavily foucused on material acquisition. “How can i expand my lot, and how can i take his things and bring it into my possession.” Since all material is made up of actual material and natural resources are sprinkled throughout the world, Its natural to think the big capitalists will go around the world trying to steal the resources that are deposited in various parts of the world. Of course only after they soaked everything out of their own population/region. Since the capitalsitic system is not built on any moral or ethical principal, the only thing holding back the hyper capitalist is his own imagination and obviously his own mortality. In this type of system even moral and ethics and religion are bent in whatever which way benfits the elite/super capitalists(think western evangelical Zionism) . Its esentially a system that’s built purely to rob all those who are unfortunate enough to be robbed. Physically , mentally and most importantly spiritually. A system truly built on oppression.
I agree with you saker. The whole “wave the flag” mentality makes it impossible for the people stuck in this type of system to ever really honestly study the implications of this system. Obviosly because the super capitalists already bought the newspaper and media, and the last thing they would tell the people is “this system in which we benfit from, is the problem.” So it becomes really hard for the people to pin point the problem, and those who do feel helpless in changing anything.
” In fact, both National-Socialism and Zionism are just two amongst many more types of European nationalisms which have their root in 19th century ideological categories.”
Yes nationalism as a creed had its rise in Europe after Napoleon. I think specifically in Germany. I guess the people needed something to feel good about after Napoleon romped through Europe. Which not shockingly was also the home of the zionist movement. Zionisim itself was incubated in post Napoleon Europe. Nationalism is a pseudo-religion which the West created to fill an ideological vacuum.
On this site their was an interview posted by Sean Stone of president Putin. In it he mentioned how he hated nationalism, or something to that effect. A very wise stance by pres Putin. Since i mentioned capitalism above, the subject of nationalism and its negative effects are even less talked about.
Thanks for the enjoyable read Saker.
*sorry the interview of Putin was done by Oliver Stone not Sean stone. Sean is Oliver’s son.
Stepan Bandera – the unfaithful son of the Jewish people – Excerpts
“And often the one who you never suspect is a Jew”
E.M. Remarque
Stefan Bandera – baptized Jew, Uniate. Greek Catholic from the village of Ugryniv Stary near Kalush, born during the Austro-Hungarian rule in Galicia.
Father: Adrian Bandera – Greek Catholic from the bourgeois family of Moishe and Rosalia (Beletskaya nee,
by nationality – Polish Jewess) Bander. Rose is a typical Ukrainian name, is it?
Mother: Miroslava Glodzinskaya – Polish Jewess, these Jews are also called GALAHIC, that is, by mother.
And the explanation of the origin of his last name is simple. Modern Ukronazists translate it as a “banner”
but in Yiddish means “hangout”. And this is not a Slavic surname or Ukrainian.
And the portrait of Stefan Bander himself leaves no doubt in his genetic Jewry: with the growth of 159 centimeters and with the Asian faces, there is no question:
Stepan Bandera’s direct descendant, his grandson and full namesake Stepan said that “in childhood I
often went to the Toronto synagogue”.
Indirect evidence of the Jewish origin of S. Bandera is the attempts of the Security Service of Ukraine to
find evidence of the involvement of the OUN in repressions against Jews and even the presence of Jews
in the UPA leadership. As you know, the OUN and the UPA conducted ethnic cleansing not only against
Jews, but also against Poles, Hungarians, Slovaks, other national minorities, and even Ukrainians who
did not cooperate with Bandera. But for some reason, the SBU eagles were preoccupied with the relations
of the Jews and the UPA.
Bandera’s deputy – Yaroslav Semenovich (Shmulevich) Stetsko, again, a baptized Jewish Uniate, and his
(Bandera’s) wife and associate – Ganna-Evgenia Iosifovna, who took the party nickname “Yaroslav”, re-
turned to Ukraine in 1992, where she led the Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists and showered with hon-
ors country Mom. According to the nationalist tradition, she ended her filthy life in Munich, as did Bandera himself. It is interesting – even Golda Meir, the legendary Prime Minister of Israel, surpasses in terms of
Semitic appearance.
And another important associate of Bandera in the “struggle” is the Jew Dr. Lev Rebet, editor of the
Ukrainian Independence, one of the leaders of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists Abroad (OUN).
Finally, Shukhevych Roman Ioskovich is a “combat general.” The head of the Yad Vashem memorial com-
plex in Jerusalem, Yosef (Tomi) Lapid, pointed out the deep and intense connection between the Nightin-
gale battalion led by Roman Shukhevych and the German authorities, as well as the participation of the Nightingale battalion under the command of Shukhevych in the pogrom in Lviv in July 1941, which claimed
the lives of approximately 4,000 Jews. Lapid relied on documents in the archive regarding the Nightingale battalion and Roman Shukhevych. Copies of these documents were handed over to the Ukrainian delega-
tion when Yushchenko arrived in Israel in a yarmulk for support in pushing through the idea of the
Ukrainian genocide.
All these people carried out persecution of Jews, called the Bolsheviks Jews and sought to create for their
own kind a separate state in Galicia.
Principle: The thug runs and shouts “Catch the thug!” or thief – “Hold the thief!”. Many Banderists were in
the German concentration camp as Jews in accordance with German anti-Semitic policies, and not
because of “Ukrainian patriotism,” as the orange Ukrainian authorities tried to imagine.
Bandera was a great demagogue, careerist, fanatic and gangster who neglected all the principles of human morality to achieve his goal, always ready to commit any crimes.
(Google translation)
Source:
http://ru-an.info/%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8/%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%BD-%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0-%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9-%D1%81%D1%8B%D0%BD-%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0/
I’ve been writing for some time about the huge importance of words, their effect on our thinking, our perceptions and thus actions, and how they are used to manipulate minds.
The best early studies – for anyone interested in this – were done by a man called Lee Benjamin Whorf and his mentor, back in the 1933’s. Mr. Whorf, who was an insurance fire risk assessor was also a brilliant linguist. From his studies of Native Nations languages, compared to English, he could see how a word framed a perception. He illuminated this by talking of his investigation of why workers were tossing around barrels drained of an inert liquid but which contained vapour which was highly explosive and incendiary: they described the barrels as “empty” – thus not conceptualising reality.
In Spanish [I live in a Spanish speaking country], the reflexive verb form [which in English we do not use,] which refers to the actions we perform ourselves on ourselves i.e. to shower, the verb is “showerme”. However, they also use this for inanimate objects – leading to much confusion among new students, for whom “I burned the soup” translates as “the soup burned itself”. Our teacher explained – to my “we take responsibility” as “Oh well. In Spanish we dont take any responsibility” which brought a huge laugh, as this attitude among the natives is a well recorded source of frustration and bewilderment. It does lead to problems. Did the word usage come from a state of mind, or the reverse. I propose the latter.
This is why those who say “European Russia” or even worse “Eurasia” dont realise the damage they are doing. This has also been exemplified by Professor Immerwahr in his “The Hidden Empire” – nicely explained in an interview with Abby Martin in The Empire Files. He points out that the name “America” was hardly used at all until 1898 and Roosevelt started to push it extensively. Why? “Because it is more capacious [i.e. open to multiple uses and interpretations] than the others like “Republic of States” or “Unified States”. It was wanted to incorporate the invaded and annexed Pacific Islands America was building an empire with.
Well, Eurasia does the same. Anyone who studies this sort of thing, especially maps, can see that Eurasia is rapidly being used more and more in the AngloEuro Empire to mean Russia, thus blotting the concept of the nation out.
Other damaging word usages have been exchanging the lovely word “gay” to mean a lighthearted, singing and dancing joyousness, for men who want to sexual things to other men [and we have no other word for the emotion in the English language]:
Free Market – for a full elucidation see the excellent work by Michael Hudson called “J is for Junk Economics” :
“elite” meaning the best, most talented, committed, devoted and able of a group, now mean the most vile and vicious;
and, perhaps worst of all, the sick phrase “cultural cleansing” where to clean was remove contamination, dirt, and disfigurement, in order to make an improved, clean, noninfectious, valuable thing, now used to disguise the horror of genocide.
And worst of all, basically good people use these terms. People who mean well, are aware of the disaster the Empire is and the worse to come, aware of the intrinsic good of those opposed including Russias leaders – and yet they too use these words. That’s how powerful they are. People think they are good words or phrases, and have no idea how – whenever you use a word, you take it’s concept to mind, in less than a split second – for the average reader “sees” about 3-5 words a second, and without considered thought absorb the twisted meaning, leading to confusion, wrong perceptions, thus wrong thinking.
I’ve written more about it in a single topic here:
https://themungbean2019.blogspot.com/2019/08/the-russia-europe-paradox.html
The more The Saker and others can get this fact across to broaden the realisation of the damage, and get people to wake up to what they are doing to themselves when they dont examine every word usage, the better. The better we can think for ourselves and learn to fight back from the unseen mind manipuation war being waged against the rest of the world – and all of us.
Grandson of Ukrainian fascist reckons with a legacy of Nazi collaboration
Steve Bandera’s grandfather Stepan led a movement whose followers killed tens
of thousands of Jews and Poles
By SAM SOKOL
August 31, 2019
https://www.timesofisrael.com/grandson-of-ukrainian-fascist-reckons-with-a-legacy-of-nazi-collaboration/
Slava Ukraine !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcDayP1qDJQ
It is very funny. I miss the black sheep.
The Khazars are grimly directing a European holocaust.
Through expanding Aspartame (highly damaging) to all of the available drinks recently.
Using Europes spare room for mass immigration of third world people while israel uses forced birth control on African immigrants:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/eliseknutsen/2013/01/28/israel-foribly-injected-african-immigrant-women-with-birth-control/
Antisemism:
‘: hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group’
The Khazars are hostile to indiginous europeans as a religious, ethnic, or racial group.
They constantly accuse white people of being loyal to other whites before their country but to accuse a Jew of it and it anisemism??
The ruling Ashkenazi Jewish elite in Israel used that long-term contraceptive ploy, and much worse, on non-Ashkenazi Jews from the Middle East, North Africa, Yemen and Ethiopia. They are such luverly people.
Your article is well written. Yet, National Socialism within the Third Reich occurred at a particular time in history, with unique contributing factors. Taking the term ‘Nazi’ (a western derogatory term) out of context, and applying it to Ukraine is inaccurate; and undercuts your thesis regarding the obfuscation of political terminology in our time. The consideration of historical context is imperative when one attempts to draw parallels between different times periods and events.