By Zamir Awan for the Saker Blog
China achieved miraculous progress during the last four decades, which were never seen in humankind’s known history. There must be many reasons for its rapid developments, but its foreign policy was one of the significant reasons. In simple words, China opted for a reconciliation policy and avoided any confrontation with any other nation or country. It helped China to focus only on developments and achieved the desired results.
State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi expressed outlooks of Chinese foreign policy and answered questions about the country’s foreign policy and external relations at a virtual press conference on Sunday during the fourth session of the 13th National People’s Congress, China’s top legislature. Some of the highlights are given below:-
Pandemic
Through innovative “cloud diplomacy,” President Xi Jinping has championed solidarity in the world’s fight against COVID-19 and pointed the way forward for the international community to jointly fight the virus.
China will continue working with other countries in ongoing efforts to defeat the COVID-19 pandemic ultimately. Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, China has carried out its most extensive emergency humanitarian action, contributing to the world’s anti-coronavirus efforts.
On China-Russia relations
In the face of the once-in-a-century pandemic, China and Russia have stood shoulder to shoulder and worked closely to combat “both the coronavirus and the political virus.”
China and Russia should be each other’s strategic support, development opportunity, and global partner. It is both an experience gained from history and an imperative under the current circumstances.
On CPC leadership
Facts have proved that the Communist Party of China’s leadership is the most prominent political advantage of Chinese diplomacy. Leadership will offer fundamental support for China’s diplomatic agenda to secure more victories.
Wang said that China’s diplomacy is people-oriented diplomacy led by the CPC, and the Party set the direction for China’s diplomatic agenda. The original inspiration and mission of the CPC – to seek happiness for the Chinese people and rejuvenation for the Chinese nation — determine China’s diplomacy’s responsibility.
On China-Africa relations
Helping African countries contain the COVID-19 pandemic and bringing their economies back on track is the top priority of the China-Africa cooperation. China will always support developing countries. China has started to provide COVID-19 vaccines to 35 African countries and the African Union Commission already.
On ‘patriots administering Hong Kong’
Hong Kong is a particular administrative region of China. One cannot talk about loving Hong Kong without loving its motherland, adding that love for the country and Hong Kong is entirely consistent. Hong Kong enjoyed no democracy during colonial rule. Since its return to the homeland 24 years ago, no one is more concerned about Hong Kong’s democratic development and wishes Hong Kong to remain prosperous and stable than the central government, he said.
On China-US relations
It is logical for China and the US, two countries with different social systems, to have differences and disagreements. “What matters most is to manage them effectively through candid communication to prevent strategic miscalculation and avoid conflict and confrontation.”
China hopes the US can remove its unreasonable restriction on bilateral cooperation as soon as possible and refrain from artificially creating new ones. China is willing to work with the US and set China-US relations on a new path of healthy and steady development.
On Taiwan question
The two sides of the Taiwan Strait must be and will surely be reunified, which is the trend of history and the entire Chinese nation’s collective will, Wang said, adding the one-China principle is the political foundation of the China-US relationship. It is considered a red line and should not be crossed. There is no room for compromise or concession from the Chinese government on the Taiwan question.
“We would hope to see a clear departure from the previous administration’s (Trump Administration) dangerous practice of ‘pushing the red line’ and ‘playing with fire, and we hope that the Taiwan question will be handled prudently and properly,” Wang said.
China stresses the UN’s core status
The UN is not a club for big or rich countries. All countries enjoy equal sovereignty, and no country is in a position to dictate international affairs, Wang said. He also urged efforts to enhance the representativeness and voice of developing countries in the UN to better reflect the common aspiration of most countries.
China, EU not systemic rivals
The China-Europe relationship is equal and open and not targeting any third party or is controlled by anyone else. China never intends to divide relations between Europe and the United States, Wang said, adding that the country is glad to see the European Union uphold multilateralism and remain devoted to coordination and cooperation among major countries.
China opposes ‘vaccine nationalism.’
China opposes “vaccine nationalism,” rejects any “vaccine divide” or any attempt to politicize vaccine cooperation. More than 60 countries have authorized the use of Chinese vaccines. China has provided COVID-19 vaccine aid free of charge to 69 developing countries urgently need while exporting vaccines to 43 countries.
On China-Arab relations
China will work with Arab states in solidarity, pursue expected progress, and prepare for a China-Arab States Summit.
In the past year, relations between China and the Arab States have continued to progress amid various challenges, Wang said, adding their joint fight against the COVID-19 pandemic has set an excellent example for international cooperation.
On multilateralism
Building small circles in the name of multilateralism is, in fact, “group politics,” multilateralism with one’s own interests taking precedence, is still unilateral thinking, and “selective multilateralism” is not the right choice.
Genuine multilateralism means openness and inclusiveness instead of closeness and exclusion. It means equal-footed consultation instead of supremacy over others.
China’s WTO accession
The past two decades had taught China four crucial lessons: China will stay committed to the fundamental policy of opening-up, remain committed to the principle of win-win cooperation, remain committed to the right direction of economic globalization, and we must stay committed to the central role of the WTO.
“China has injected energy into economic globalization and facilitated the optimization of global industry chains and resources,” he said.
On China-Japan relations
China and Japan should remain focused without being distracted by any single event to make the bilateral relations more mature and stable. China and Japan should support each other in hosting the upcoming Olympic Games this year and next year. China hopes the Japanese society would truly embrace an objective and rational perception of China to solidify public support for long-term progress in China-Japan relations.
‘Xinjiang genocide’ claim a thorough lie
The so-called claim of genocide in Northwest China’s Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region is preposterous, a rumor fabricated with ulterior motives and a complete lie.
Some western politicians chose to believe in the lies cooked up by a few instead of listening to the voice of 25 million Xinjiang residents of various ethnic groups, Wang said, adding that they chose to dance with the clumsy dramas by a few anti-China forces instead of acknowledging the progress in Xinjiang.
On China-ASEAN relations
Wang said that China stands ready to develop an even closer community with a shared future with ASEAN as the two sides celebrate the 30th anniversary of establishing bilateral dialogue relations this year.
China will continue to prioritize efforts to meet vaccine demand from ASEAN and further consolidate beneficial cooperation and see that China’s new development paradigm is better to align with the ASEAN Comprehensive Recovery Framework, he said.
On the Belt and Road Initiative
China’s commitment to supporting the Belt and Road Initiative has not changed, and the country will continue to work with stakeholders to advance high-quality Belt and Road cooperation, Wang Yi said.
COVID-19 may have changed the world, but the need for Belt and Road cooperation has not subsided, he said.
“As we pursue a new development paradigm, we will explore better pathways for Belt and Road cooperation and offer greater opportunities to BRI partners,” he added.
In the new development stage
China will create a better business environment, pursue opening-up at a higher level, and work with various countries to accelerate an open world economy, Wang Yi said.
China is like an express train with the greater driving force and load capacity accelerating towards a new goal in the further development stage, he said.
On China-India relations
China stands in a firm position to solve border disputes through dialogue and consultations and, at the same time, is determined to safeguard its own sovereign interests, Wang Yi said.
Border issues are not the whole of the China-India relationship, Wang said, noting that what happened again proves that initiating confrontation will not solve the problem and that returning to peaceful negation is the right way forward.
On climate change
Even though China and the US, and the European Union are in different development stages and face other challenges, they share the same mission in coping with climate change.
Wang urged enhanced communication and coordination between the three sides. They play a leading role in the international community, adding that China welcomes the US’s return to the Paris Agreement and expects that the US will shoulder its responsibility and make its due contribution.
On Iran nuclear issue
China hopes the United States will show sincerity on the Iran nuclear issue, take actions as quickly as possible, including removing unjustified unilateral sanctions and lifting the “long-arm jurisdiction” on third-party entities and individuals, Wang Yi said.
At the same time, he said, Iran should resume compliance with the Iran nuclear deal and shoulder its responsibility of nuclear non-proliferation, Wang said.
On the South China Sea
The only intention of some Western countries, including the United States, is to stir up troubles in the South China Sea in the name of so-called free navigation and undermine peace in the South China Sea and disturb regional stability, Wang said.
He called on China and ASEAN countries to continue to remove distractions and press ahead with Code of Conduct consultations, and continue with the full and effective implementation of the Declaration on Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea.
On Myanmar tensions
Relevant parties in Myanmar should maintain calm and exercise restraint, address their differences through dialogue and consultation within the constitutional and legal framework, and continue to advance the democratic transition.
“The immediate priority is to prevent further bloodshed and conflict, and ease and cool down the situation as soon as possible,” Wang said.
On China and Latin America
China is providing COVID-19 vaccines to 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. “China and Latin American and Caribbean countries have stood alongside and supported each other in COVID-19 response and economic recovery,” he said. “Our cooperation best illustrates the saying, that ‘a bosom friend afar brings a distant land near.”
On objective coverage of China
China hopes to see and welcome more journalists in Edgar Snow’s mold in this new era among foreign journalists.
Wang Yi said he hopes that foreign journalists will not apply any filter to their camera, whether beautiful or gloomy, when reporting on China.
“Truthful, objective, and fair stories will always appeal to people and can stand the scrutiny of history,” he said. “However the world changes, the media should stand by their professional ethics.”
Author: Prof. Engr. Zamir Ahmed Awan, Sinologist (ex-Diplomat), Editor, Analyst, Non-Resident Fellow of CCG (Center for China and Globalization), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan. (E-mail: awanzamir@yahoo.com).
Dear Professor
السلام علیکم
How can we dispel the fake news about the Uyghur genocide in East Turkestan/Xianjiang? It seems many notable Muslim personalities are always taking about this. Especially in western countries. It confuses the Muslims in the West. It is being pushed quite heavily whilst little talk about the Kashmiris. I hope the Muslims of Pakistan are not falling for this fake news.
From the Island of the Anti Christ.
Thank you for your concerns. I used to travel to Xinjiang in 1980s and I was impressed the developments, natural beauty, and Chinese government friendly policies toward Muslims.
The problem started in 2009, when Muslims launched insurgence and killed few hundreds Chinese. I have not been to Xinjiang since long, and can not comment anything with authority or absolutely.
But understand very well, that the West has been using media as a tool against China. In the same manner, BBC reported regarding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and US led allied forces destroyed Iraq completely and then confessed that non of weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq, British PM apologised for fake news by BBC. The same truck was used against Libya. West spread the use of Chemical weapons in Syria and attacked, but could not prove their claim. In a matter of fact, West is using media to build a narrative then attack.
If the West is sincere with Muslims, then why keep criminal silence on killing of Muslims in Palestine, in India, especially in Kashmir.
I believe, all of Western propaganda regarding Xinjiang is to pressurised China. Allah knows better. We should pray to Allah for the protection of Muslims around the globe. Muslims has suffered a lot. It is time for Muslims to awaken and stand up for their due rights.
this is reason no #1 why Muslims are disliked worldwide:
“We should pray to Allah for the protection of Muslims around the globe. ”
you only care about other Muslims, not humans in general.
how about this:
“We should pray to Allah for the protection of humans around the globe. “
I am really sorry, but let me say right now that Muslims are not disliked worldwide. I like the ones that I know, very much, thank you. If you’ve forgotten, the topic here is Muslim Genocide, and from the perspective I find the comment absolutely appropriate. But your comment is completely inappropriate. Not only have you forgotten the context, but you make a statement which is just not true.
Solipsism is not uniquely Muslim. It’s the way all of humanity has operated at all times. Actions are the only measure to judge anyone. On this front, almost none of us can deliver.
I think this is not the main problem, check how he refers to his unknown new nation that hosted him? ”From the Island of the Anti Christ.”
This guy is a (Mod: ad hominem attack deleted).
@Leo
I think you are making a misjudgment here. In case M resides in the US, the reference to that country as ’the island of the Anti-Christ’ is a most apt expression. The US does look like a Satanist stronghold in every sense of the word, from top to bottom. And M’s invocation of the concept Anti-Christ implies that Christ should be appalled, all the ’Christianity’ of the US notwithstanding.
Now, there is actually no hint at where M resides. But the point I made about Anti-Christ still holds.
@ Leo as well.
The reason I mention the Anti-Christ is to impress upon people that we are living in the age of the Anti-Christ. He is the main actor from behind the curtain on world affairs at least since the beginning of Modernity.
I specifically use ‘from the Island of the Anti Christ’ instead of the more usual name to highlight, at least to Muslims, a hadith mentioning where the Anti-Christ commenced his mission from. Just as a remembrance.
It is an island, 40 nights journey from the Arabian peninsula [by sea], that excels in espionage and was Christian. It is an island that ruled the world as well. [I think these are enough clues].
No it is not the USA as it is not an island and it takes longer the forty nights. Though I think the Christ [may God be pleased with him and his Virgin Mother] would be appalled at the USA.
This island is deceiving Muslims into supporting this fake narrative of a Uyghur ‘genocide’. What this island does is find trustworthy Muslims, who successfully defend Muslims and Islam from liberalism, feminism, secularism etc etc, to promote this fake narrative. It may be that even these trustworthy Muslims actually buy into this or it may be even more sinister than I fear.
Are you SERIOUSLY trying to imply, the US is anything BUT the nation of the anti Christ? Anything except Sodom and Gomorrah?
Well a lot of research has been done by some good alternative researchers. Most of the propaganda comes from one source, a German, Adrian Zenz. This is similar to a Bellingcat type operation.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/china-uighur-genocide-behind-us-government-propaganda/276085/
https://thegrayzone.com/2019/12/21/china-detaining-millions-uyghurs-problems-claims-us-ngo-researcher/
Seemingly from today’s Here Comes China newsletter, China is going to take him to court.
On behalf of Xinjiang people whose livelihoods he has threatened, China sued German researcher, Adrian Zenz, for apologies and financial compensation. China disputes his report saying hundreds of thousands of laborers from ethnic minority groups in Xinjiang were “being forced to pick cotton by hand”. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3124736/human-rights-china-beijing-endorses-legal-action-against
As far as the Muslim population is concerned, somewhere in the Here Comes China Sitreps on the blog there is a list of all Muslim countries that have visited and declared that everything is not as the propaganda makes it out to be and there is freedom of religion and the Muslims are not being suppressed or genocided. From memory, 50 mainly Muslim countries visited. China has also done a number of debunks of this socalled genocide.
I am sure there are work camps and re-education camps, and I would not like to be in one of those. But what is the alternative if one has a completely terrorist group with no skills or human values to deal with? China decided not to shoot them, but to re-educate, give them skills and give them jobs.
What do you mean “How can we dispel?” RT, Press TV, China daily, Fars News, and so on are doing it every day….
I understand what you say but despite this many Muslims in the island of the AntiChrist are falling key
prey to this propaganda. I think it’s because of notable Muslim personalities who have taken up the cause of the Uyghur ‘genocide’.
Death to Al Jazeera. God, there has never been bigger munafiqs that deserve to be cursed by God than those particularly honorless presstitutes
Also, just to add my two cents, this is how I’ve convinced many of my family members and neighbors that the West’s “China bad” narrative is a bad one. The hui Muslims do not face any discrimination neither do they “replace the word Allah in the Quran with Xi Jinping” or any other kind of CIA non sense. As a matter of fact, the Chinese counterpart of the Muslim Brotherhood, the Yihwani (sinicised version of Ikhwani) has always been sponsored by the CCP itself ever since Deng. Plus they have been certified by Azhar to be non heretic.
Also here is another interesting fact, the Uighurs, or Sinkiang region as it was known in the 1930s were some of the first to turn communist and be backed by the Soviets and the apostate Ataturkists. This is during a time that the kmt was mostly in control with help from its warlord allies, one of which, Ma Bufang envisioned a Sharia state allied with the central govt. The same people who fought him then n the name of communism and racism ( mao back then was pretty irrelevant and had a full head of hair) are now apparently want Shariah law themselves.
And this is said by the same people who lied about Vietnamese ships attacking first, Iraqi soldiers tearing babies frm incubators, and having nukes, Gaddafi changing the Quran to I clue his name, Assad gassing his own people etc etc.
In 1971 David Rockefeller convened a meeting in New York with 300 of CEOs of the top corporations of the US. Following this Henry Kissinger went to China to pave the way for Nixon’s detente with the Chinese. The meeting Rockefeller had with the CEOs was to discuss the potential of investment and technology transfer to China. Since then their has been a deliberate strategy to deindustrialise the US and a number of its vassal states. The question is why would an Uber group of capitalists be willing to invest in an ideological enemy sworn to destroy. Moreover, this is not the first time that Western capitalists financed a communist country. For example, the Bolsheviks were financed by them and the 5 year plans were designed by them, the country was electrified by them, there major factories and oil industry was developed by them. The technology transfer persisted throughout the history of the USSR as described in great detail by Professor Antony C Sutton’s books. So history has repeated itself but to what purpose!!
The major reason behind China’s rapid economic expansion is that its central bank is owned by the Chinese government that enables it to create its internal domestic currency the yuan without incurring interest bearing debt to private banks. Government taxes are also not necessary to provide funding for infrastructure building, education to university level, for hospitals, healthcare and public housing.
The Chinese people are now well educated and possess the energy and enterprise to forge ahead economically and surpass the US and Europe with ease.
“why would an Uber group of capitalists be willing to invest in an ideological enemy sworn to destroy.”
Please do a mental exercise to create a global financial empire. How would one go about accomplishing such a dream? What will be the key strategic construct, power elements of that empire? One would want a hierarchical structure where each layer is dependent on others and no building block independent. The most important layer and the building block will be FINANCE, control the money/debt and one controls the value of everything. This top control block is the “Ring of Power.”
If the International Financial Oligarchy (Capital owners), orders the capitalist lackeys, they will follow. Those who don’t, their company’s valuation will drop and they will be fired or driven out of business. It has used this control mechanism to capture the control of money, resources and distribution (through military bases, gatekeepers).
China’s advantage is that it has seen all the ploys of this global financial empire and prepared itself to be sovereign. It is being helped by Russia and other resource rich nations who have seen reality and evil. China and Russia stand when united and fall when divided. They’re the final frontier before the financial oligarchy achieves its dream. However, it seems like Empire’s control structure is failing and falling apart.
All governance structure ideologies are meaningless as all “isms” have a central bank and are centrally planned economies. To understand a nation’s control structure follow its CENTRAL & private BANKING structure. Any analysis without monetary sphere, is flawed. The top layer (nations) of this empire pursue monetary imperialism in Africa, Asia, Middle East, Latin America and Eastern Europe. What enslaves a nation most, debt or monetary imperialism? China is offering a way out from monetary imperialism through its debt diplomacy. One need to be smart and careful before pursuing debt.
Care to address why Russia isn’t following similarly re central bank?
if you follow history, you would know that boris yeltsin came to power by destroying the ussr. from which he has russia becoming the successor nation. but in order to get the legitimacy as a recognised leader to the world, yeltsin sold out his people by allowing other provinces/states to become new states to allowing the americans to write the new russian federation’s constitution.
so what do you think those nasty americans did? they re-made the new russian federation’s system to be like their’s, hence your answer. furthermore, the russian central bank’s governors are predominantely (you guessed it) pro-american so the majority of their policies goes against the need of the country.
as a sidebar, i believed the saker here had written about it some time last year about russia finally putting their seal in their currency, which they can’t before. where even putin admitted he can’t do anything until a certain time has come. why? cos the constitution forbids it, till then. can’t remember the link, but maybe some of our readers can direct you to this article by the saker there…
Russia seem to be operating within confines of the established financial structure of 1990s, maybe to maintain internal stability or pursue an evolutionary path. Hopefully, it will learn from China’s success to build a better economy. China and Russia need to combine their respective strengths in hardware and software to define the next generation platforms in multiple sectors, particularly the next generation operating system for devices.
STRATEGIC CONSTRUCT
Ones a financial system of a nation is established it is very difficult to change it without destabilizing the internal power structure which can lead to instability or revolution or assassination of the leader. The international financial oligarchy (IFC) has worked diligently to capture the financial, monetary and economic systems of each of its private colonies (so called countries or suzerainties) after every revolution. IFC ensures that funds and assets are directed to its cronies, who become kleptocrats controlling banks, political parties, media and the key economic sectors.
RUSSIA
Russia’s central bank, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia) system was established in 1990. Unfortunately, it seems like IFC had very well captured the key individuals in Russia who became its future oligarchs. These oligarchs seem to have operated within the boundaries defined by IFC. After Vladimir Putin came to power certain limits were put on oligarchs but the overall financial structure hasn’t changed much. Maybe to maintain its internal stability Russia has been on a path of incremental change or it is conservative. It appears that Russia would take care of IFC first before making revolutionary changes for it to be a great nation.
CHINA
Its People’s Bank of China (PBOC), was established in 1948 and after 1990s its leadership has achieved remarkable success in managing the public-private partnerships and ensuring state control over finance and resource allocation. If China would have been destabilized in 1990s its financial system would have been identical to Russia. It is a great success story for nations to learn from. Now IFC is using all its colonies to capture China.
CHANGE
Whenever leaders within a nation have challenged the financial structure established by IFC for betterment of their people, in most cases they have been assassinated. In the United States, they were Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley, Huey Long, John Kennedy…
Is there a nation that has changed its financial system without a revolution?
I can see you have never heard of the Hegelian dialectic thesis +antithesis = synthesis. Professors Carol Quigley, Antony C Sutton and Guido Preparata wrote numerous books describing in detail this strategy. Since not only did the Uber Capitalists finance the Bolsheviks, kick start the Chinese industrial progress but also the National Socialists besides of course being out and out capitalists. But the clue is in the fact that these Uber capitalists believe in State monopolies. These Uber Capitalists don’t believe in nationhood, they strive for a New World Order and that is not just to applicable to the US Uber Capitalists!
Oh yes, have a look at who the real owners of the Chinese biological laboratory in Wuhan is. Why GlaxoSmithKline and it’s is controlled by the Uber Capitalists!
Please define “Uber Capitalists” and name a few from the US. What are the core common characteristics of Uber Capitalists in our world? They’re globalists and many know that.
William Thompson a director of the New York Fed and agent for J.P. Morgan was sent on a mission to Russia in 1917. Kissinger to China? How about the National Socialists? What is different this time?
IFC wants state and global monopolies as it is easy to control them through the financial network. They would like all to use the money created as debt and the payment network, as long as they control it. Quigley did talk about central banks. What are the missing elements from Sutton’s work? Interesting times.
Let’s see the Rockefeller’s, the Schiffs, the Rothschilds agents and the agents of the The City of London, this includes J.P Morgan. The common characteristics are exactly what Sutton and Quigley defined they have no allegiance to nation states.
Moreover, they, along with Lionel Curtis, Lord Milner etc, who along with others instigated the First World War as outlined in the book Hidden History, have the common agenda of a New World Order. Thompson if you recall was sent as part of the “ humanitarian cause “ of the Red Cross which had many more lawyers and bankers than doctors. In addition, he came bearing gifts of millions of dollars.
Kissinger was/ is an emissary of the Rockefeller’s who are part of the Uber Capitalists.
The National Socialists received huge amounts of cash plus technology transfer from Prescott Bush, ITT, Standard Oil, Ford, General Motors and 4,500,000 pounds in gold bullion from the Bank of England left in the care of the BOE by the Czechoslovakian Government before the National Socialists invaded the country who gave it to the Nazis.
The Bank of International Settlements was set up by the Uber Capitalists to ensure the Bank of the Central Bankers could play both sides in the conflict of WW2 and indeed have done ever since. The model for this was the Rothschilds who financed both sides in the Napoleonic wars. Notice that Sutton provided proof both about the financing of the Bolsheviks and also the National Socialists by Wall Street. If you read his, Quigley and also Preparata’s books, you can see that a common thread is letting the state do the work, which is precisely what monopolies are about.
The “ interesting times” is just one more piece in the Uber Capitalists, or as Sutton called them, Transnational Financiers strategy of a New World Order!
Brianborou, thanks for your detailed response. I really appreciate it. You and I are on the same page with regards to the past. Let’s focus on the present to predict plausible future scenarios.
China, Russia, Iran, Syria, Venezuela… are on the same side and one can define this group as “Non-$” or RESISTANCE, as they have been sanctioned and they’re leading de-dollarization. China and Russia don’t want to be NWO vassals? Also, in the Quad group, Japan expressed its opposition to being a junior partner. Germany is hedging. Will China & Russia succeed?
Emily Goldman, Deputy Director for Interagency Coordination in the Office of Communication at the US Central Command, had published findings in her book which clearly identified Russia & China as a major challenge to USA’s global hegemony. Paraphrasing from her book about Russia: persistent financial crisis confronted the tsarist government following the Crimean war… It had lacked a coherent strategy to invest in its industries, commerce, and development of its markets… Another factor recommended to exploit was Russian media, which in the past had reinforced factional divisions among elites… Finance & media, are the two main factors identified by the security analyst team with regards to what has contributed to Russia’s repeated falls. They recommend that these factors be exploited again to challenge Russia.
When it comes to finance, Russia has repeatedly made mistakes. China has done better in this arena. Also, China has maintained internal unity by limiting external media.
Here is a good book: https://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=11751
At the moment the Transnational Financiers, as Sutton called them, are still going full steam ahead with their plans of pursuing the Hegelian dialect. Have a good read of this it will help you to put into perspective what is really going on in China
https://patriotssoapbox.com/politics/the-grand-strategy-kissinger-rockefeller-scheme-to-transfer-wealth-industry-to-china/
Oh yes, let’s look at one small example of how the Transnational Financiers operate in China
The Chinese biological laboratory in Wuhan is owned by GlaxoSmithKline.
Who, by chance owns Pfizer.
Which, by chance is managed by Black Rock Finances.
Who by chance, manages the finances of the Open Foundation Company ( SOROS FOUNDATION)!
Which by chance, serves the French AXA.
Coincidentally owns the German company Winterhur!
Accidentally bought by the German company Allianz
Which, incidentally, has Vanguard as a shareholder.
Which is shareholder of Black Rock.
Which controls the central banks and manages about ONE THIRD of the global investment capital.
Which, incidentally, is a major shareholder of MICROSOFT.
The property of BILL GATES, who happens to a shareholder of PFIZER ( which sells the miracle VACCINE) and is a major sponsor of the WHO !!
I give up really. This is a piece of propaganda first drawn up by a Spanish person and sent around – this was last year some time. And now, it has been redone by someone, and heavily promoted through all the alt sites as accurate.
Well, the first sentence is even just wrong. The Wuhan Institute of Virology doesn’t belong to any pharmaceutical company as it’s part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), which at the same time is run by the Chinese government.
These level 4 biosafety labs all belong to governments. Now go and research all the US biolabs (if you can find them) scattered all over the world.
So you have evidence?
US technology transfers to China
https://fas.org/nuke/guide/china/doctrine/dmrr_chinatech.htm
2019 -nCov Pandemic Event 201 by Bill Gates and John Hopkins et al
Among the people attending were George Gao, Director of the Chinese Centre for Disease Control Prevention.
https://virutron.com/2019-ncov-is-pandemic-event-201-by-bill-gates-and-johns-hopkins-et-al/
Brianborou, the frame of information you shared is narrow and it doesn’t connects all the dots, leading to a MONO viewpoint. One doesn’t really understand something well unless they understand it more than one way. On connecting various dots (multiple perspectives) one gets a better understanding compared to Sutton’s mono viewpoint as stated in the article you shared.
The primary driving force of most global developments over the last century has been IFC’s plan to bring all captured countries together under its control structure at an accelerated pace. It would prefer to transfer technology and know how to accomplish this goal rather than let a nation develop its technologies, capabilities and capacities at its pace. Also, it wants to increase DEBT of each nation so it has a better control over them. This is its biggest leverage. When it transfers a technology it is reducing future competition, as that nation is not developing its design and development capabilities and making it dependent on the supplier. In the long term that nation becomes dependent and not a threat. One can see this leverage used by Google against Huawei through its Android OS and apps. Arm, Qualcomm, … have followed the licensing business model. In addition, Wall Street benefits significantly by financing other nations developments.
Let’s look at this from a business angle. A business wants to increase revenue, profits and market power. In the case of an underdeveloped country, they don’t have money to purchase multinationals fully developed product, so the options are to license the technology or ignore that market for a multinational. Since the core of IFC is in the City (London) and Wall Street, they have worked diligently to reduce long term threats by willingness to sacrifice short term as they felt confident in developing newer designs. So transferring technologies to Soviet Union was a pragmatic decision to protect the long term challenge to the core of the Empire. Most corporations are just business divisions of the Mega Corporation called Wall Street.
Whenever any article talks about “human rights” and presents an altruistic angle, it is a PROPAGANDA. Nations that debt enslave their populace, don’t believe in human rights and don’t have the right to talk about them. One can only lead by examples. Hypocrisy leads to zero credibility.
Let’s look at the period from 1950 to 1970. Europe recovered well after the WWII and got going strong by 1970. In 1960s, the US saw Europe as a business competitor in consumer and some arenas. It appears IFC planned to accommodate the new competition by letting Europe focus on the high end and the United States on the low and medium end of the global markets. There was to be overlap in some arenas. To prepare for the low and middle ends, it needed to drive the cost lower. It couldn’t cut the cost in the US and so sought low cost countries. It tried in 1950s in Korea and 1960s in Vietnam. It didn’t succeed because of competition from the communist bloc who didn’t want to fall apart. The United States had cash flow problem in 1971, leading to its DEFAULT by breaking the Bretton Wood agreement and devaluing the dollar.
Henry Kissinger is just a globalists high management for a faction of IFC and worked with David Rockefeller. How would one describe Kissinger’s challenge of 1971 to protect the City & Wall Street? IFC decided to neutralize the communist bloc by offering China a development deal. It would transfer manufacturing to China at its pace to lower the production cost. China saw this as an opportunity to accelerate its development and worked with the IFC team. Kissinger is a very shrewd and resourceful planner who doesn’t care about workers or military. He is like most people at the top who work to PROTECT and increase their power. One can learn about various players who are attendees at the Bilderberg meetings.
“The American consumer,” saw lower prices in the technology arena. Remember, the financial sector doesn’t like deflation compared to inflation. Microsoft moved its production to Asia, lowered PC costs and won the market share. Apple that had its manufacturing in the US finally had to move its manufacturing too. Apple’s products were expensive, resulting in a lower market share.
IFC has followed an interesting fractal to CAPTURE nations like Japan, South Korea,… It first enables their development, creates debt and then attacks their currency and markets. IFC and its top layers in the US, UK, Europe,… know what they’re doing and complicit in crimes against humanity. They want to capture and control technologies, resources (natural & human), money, energy, military, media… to maintain their DOMINANCE. They use their network of Central Banks (Fed, BOE, ECB, BOJ, Swiss…) to attack a nation financially. What is the current hierarchical layer of the Financial Empire?
IFC had captured Russia in 1990s and was hoping to capture global resources through war on terrorism in the Middle East, Africa and thereby dominate Japan, Germany, Europe and China. It was hoping China would float its currency and thereby captured, and controlled through resources. Vladimir Putin & Russia have been a game changer. China saw what happened during 2008 Olympics torch relay and how the Empire wanted to keep it in its low tiers. China and Russia have seen reality and what future awaits them as vassals. They have decided to be sovereign and own their destiny.
All decisions made by the United States were in its interest to maintain the top position in the global hierarchy at tremendous cost to Americans. What do Americans want? What are their core values? The most important question, what are they doing? Focus on the future.
If you read all of Sutton books, Quigleys books, Preparata’s books and books from G.Edward Griffin, Gary Allen, Eustace Mullins and others, you would notice a common denominator. Namely, the hand of the Transnational Financiers which as Sutton has written about stretches back well before WW1. Moreover, you would have also noticed that they use a similar tactic in order to bring out a change which the population would not accept in normal circumstances. For example, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 which prior to this they had deliberately orchestrated a financial crisis in order for the public to demand a solution which the Transnational Financiers had the ready solution. The term Federal Reserve is a misnomer because the only thing Federal about is it’s name since it’s owned by a number of private banks which are owned by Transnational Financiers. Let’s look at the Bank of International Settlements based in Switzerland , the Central Bankers Bank, which originally was born out of the ashes of WW1 again another orchestrated crisis to bring about a Hegelian dialect. The BOIS was used by the Allies and the axis powers with board members from both sides even during WW2 which was and still is used to launder money from illicit sources in the Nazis case gold and money they had stolen from conquered peoples.
Moreover, the Transnational Financiers have orchestrated crisis after crisis right up to the present day. If you watch the documentary Princes of the Yen documentary by Professor Richard Werner, it demonstrates very precisely how they initiated a financial in Post War Japan in the 1980s in order to transform Japanese society for the benefit of a small group of people. I also recommend watching The Spiders Web concerning the nefarious activities of the City of London who are part and parcel of the same Transnational Financiers. Again, the same Transnational Financiers, this time using the Rockefeller’s poured vast sums of finance, and continue to do so right up to the present time, plus enormous technology transfers.
On one level the Chinese play out the game of being an adversary of the US, however, on a higher level they are intertwined. For example, as I pointed out at 2019 -nCov is Pandemic Event 201 by Bill Gates and John Hopkins, et al there were 2 high ranking Chinese government officials there one of whom was George Gao, Director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control Prevention. And Voila 2 years later the World has the “ pandemic “. Just to reiterate, the Transnational Financiers owe no allegiance to a nation state because they don’t believe in nation states and openly stated that. Their goal is a NWO. Time to understand what is really happening and has been planned for a very very long time !
Suggest you read and look at this to see how the Rockefeller’s, part of the Transnational Financiers, poured finance into China and initiated the technology transfer which enabled China to become the Wirtschaftwunder of the Far East
This is how the Rockefeller’s, who are part of the Transnational Financiers, enabled China to become the Wirtschaftwunder of the Far East.
https://patriotssoapbox.com/politics/the-grand-strategy-kissinger-rockefeller-scheme-to-transfer-wealth-industry-to-china/
Here is a documentary by Professor Richard Jordan ( Princes of the Yen) which explains how and why the Transnational Financiers used the Central Bank of Japan to create a crisis in Post WW2 Japan to enable a solution which changed Japan. The Hegelian Dialect in action.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5-IZZxyb1GI
Did you hear this, Russians and Chinese: The successes which you claim and take pride in are in fact not yours at all. It was the Western ’elites’ who saved your a•••s, and you should repent and pay back accordingly. With beloved Anthony C. Sutton 19 years dead, consider his most faithful Western readership due for reimbursement, LOL.
On a more serious note: The beauty of the calm and ideological tranquility of the formulations of the Chinese Foreign Minister is that they are spoken/written from a position of incontestable strength and confidence. The contrast to Western apeshit passing for ”analysis”, ”research”, and ”leadership” these days really speaks for itself. Moreover, on the subject of the West’s ’elites’ once again: this has not been lost upon them. Today, the MSM are essentially what remains at their disposal. Forums such as this one pose a danger to the extent they undermine the reputation of Western propaganda, rendering the rotting ”leadership” here increasingly exposed and reviled. Leadership quality is utterly and absolutely crucial. Wang Yi proves the point superbly. Respect.
Well put. That you define the differences so succintly is beyond conjecture.
Hmm, it seems cognitive dissonance is now in play, If you have evidence/ proof that Ford did not build the production plant at Nizhny Novogorod, Armand Hammer had the first American Oil Concession in the USSR. Perhaps, you have evidence proof that the Soviets didn’t use the Americans Principles of Scientific Management and high authorities used Walter Polakov an American follower of Henry L. Gnatt, a liaison with American scientific -management experts and to prepare production charts for the entire First Five -Year Plan.
Moreover, you have proof/ evidence that the West did not provide loans, finance to the USSR through out itshistory, plus technology transfer. Now, if you have any proof, evidence which contradicts Sutton’s methodological and meticulously documented books, I would be most interested to see it !
And your point is what, exactly? To me, this is just a — rather quixotic — flavour of Western victimology where Big Business is, somehow, being ”disloyal” to its lesser Western subjects; intellectuals included. As a consolation, for all the treasonous ”technological transfer” in the 1930s, the US didn’t lose its productive capacity, neither its very strong budget surpluses. And the Soviets were not quite as backward technologically as alleged in Western propaganda; had this been the case, the US would have turned the USSR into a US colony outright.
Now, much more than in the 1930s, blaming the rot and decay of the West on corporate greed definitely makes sense, showing the utter incompetence and ineptitude of the West’s ruling corporatocracy and intellectuals alike. Anthony C. Suttons is lucky that he didn’t live to see the ongoing collapse of the Empire, at home and abroad. To his avid readers such as yourself, I am curious about one thing: Does he mention George Soros? If so, does he pass any verdict on him?
“ And your point is what exactly “. I have already that crystalline clear. A Hegelian dialect thesis + antithesis = synthesis. These Uber Capitalists orchestrated WW1, WW2 they helped to ensure the Bolshevik coup plus the maintaining of the USSR, the National Socialists and the creation of the UN, the Breton Woods agreement, the IMF, WB, the WHO all towards a NWO. Soros is a frontman as is Gates for them.
Look at the elegance of this line. “China and Russia have stood shoulder to shoulder and worked closely to combat both the coronavirus and the “political virus”. – State Councilor
真实，客观，到位的分析👍
Mod: Translation: Real, objective, and in-place analysis
They once claimed the Chinese were perfuming forced sterilisation on Tibetan women, the lie never lasted since any one can figure it out, there were never solid evidence for once, and the fact trying to claim 1.2 billion Han are going to be threatened by mere 4-5 million Tibetan is a bit long stretch.