By Ivan Ilyin, from Книга раздумий (The Book of Rumination)
translation by Edvin Buday
You do not wear glasses? What a shame! In the opposite case, I would have told you a little something about glasses. After all, it is thanks to them that I have learned something in life, something that possibly might not be without any use for others as well.
When I was a child I did not wear glasses. At that time, to me there only seemed to exist “another’s glasses” that I looked through with such eagerness and curiosity. But this always ended in disenchantment: everything immediately became strangely vague, so sharply skewed, wrong, deceptive; or, on the contrary, all objects became comically small, as if they had been moved away like toys, pedantically did everything their own way. I secretly thought: “So that’s how he sees the world! No, my world is better”. “Stop it, you’ll ruin your eyes!” — a stern voice often sounded. But I myself was happy to return to my own “worldview” and already knew that another’s glasses did little to help.
The years went by without glasses: I had no desire to turn to another’s (they were unsuitable) and for the time being I had no need of my own. I was possessed of a youthful confidence that told me, that I “saw everything correctly, like it is in reality”… Who could want anything more? And I lived like this in the naïve complacency of a creature that suspects nothing.
Then the great war broke out, and it put a pair of Zeiss field binoculars in my hands. Suddenly, my horizon significantly widened. Having the ability to see so far, so clearly, and so crisply was tremendous. And every time when I put my field binoculars away, I felt that my vision just narrowed, and that I would immediately become part of that very same group of “dwarves” who because of their weak vision saw objects myopically and also didn’t register many things at all. From that point onward, I made two decisions: to not overrate my normal vision and to cherish it in any way I could.
In the heavy and chaotic post-war days, I had lost all my illusions. I knew that I suffered from bad eyesight and could not go without glasses. And when a famous ophthalmologist chose the glasses I needed and I put them on for the first time, I was surprised at how I had earlier marched through life with my “visionary” conceit. From that point forward, I worry not only about my eyes, but about my glasses, too, and I take special care to guard them from the dirt and dust that settles on them from God knows where. There is still something else that I am indebted to the experience of wearing glasses for…
Above all else, I do not trust another person’s glasses at all: I want to see everything myself, that is, through my own glasses. Thus, they have taught me a propensity for independence, and consequently, the formation of character. It is true that it is said, that “independent men” are “insufferable and quarrelsome”. However, it is not necessary to become a “know-it-all” in one’s field or to fall into aggressive pertinacity; all that is needed is to sink into the depths of one’s own “self”, because in those depths true and creative conviction is formed.
Hereafter, glasses became a permanent warning against complacency and arrogance. We are all forced to get used to the idea that we see little and poorly; that our normal eye does not grasp many of the things which is important, and, possibly, the most important as well: that we have good reason to always think about the limits of our own mental capacities. There is nothing easier than crossing these boundaries; nothing is as vital as the gradual broadening of these limits. Our spiritual vision is limited; it can always lead us to illusions and disenchantment. And how is it at all possible for us to find true “spiritual glasses”, glasses that could help and save us?..
Is humanity not near-sighted? Does it not stumble around by touch? Does it not register its own movement blindly after the bright progress of spiritual vision? Has it not surrendered to pitiful bragging about is good eyesight? From time to time we clean our glasses by removing dirt and incrustation from them. But who of us thinks to check and improve our “spiritual glasses”, widen and deepen our spiritual vision? Who knows the ways and methods of this improvement? How are we to arrive at the last truth of spiritual vision which the philosophers call “evidence”, which means the transcendence of temporal-subjective “vision” and the acquisition of completed, true “understanding”?
How many men wear the glasses of others that they accidentally found outside and through which they see everything in a twisted and skewed way! But they cannot correctly clean and wear even these glasses… And those glasses then become their fate.
Some supplemental input:
Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone else’s opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation.
– Oscar Wilde
Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts
– Richard Feynman
Men are born ignorant, not stupid. They are made stupid by education
– Bertrand Russell
Education is a system of imposed ignorance
– Noam Chomsky
Strange as it seems, one meets independent thinking today only in the few people who have not been to school much
-Rudolf Steiner
They could be made to accept the most flagrant violations of reality, because they never fully grasped the enormity of what was demanded of them, and were not sufficiently interested in public events to notice what was happening
– George Orwell, 1984
We are accustomed to use our eyes only with the memory of what other people before us have thought about the object we are looking at.
— Guy de Maupassan
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.
– Krishnamurti
‘The real hopeless victims of mental illness are to be found among those who appear to be most normal. Many of them are normal because they are so well adjusted to our mode of existence, because their human voice has been silenced so early in their lives, that they do not even struggle or suffer or develop symptoms as the neurotic does.” They are normal not in what may be called the absolute sense of the word; they are normal only in relation to a profoundly abnormal society. Their perfect adjustment to that abnormal society is a measure of their mental sickness.These millions of abnormally normal people, living without fuss in a society to which, if they were fully human beings, they ought not to be adjusted.’
– Aldous Huxley – Brave New World Revisited
I long ago came to the conclusion that no Mozart will appear amongst us because any child thus disposed is very quickly diagnosed, treated and side-lined by the ‘authorities’ into special schools.
Not so long ago my blood boiled at our local shopping mall, which was undergoing refurbishment in preparation for the Commonwealth Games:
“we have created a new vision for you”
Expressing my opinion on this resulted in blank stares of bewilderment.
I was the problem.
May I add this quote from Olive Schreiner: “when I am most real, to you I am mad.”
And so it goes
Here in arse-tralia, I know exactly that feeling. Any thoughtful comment or critcism of the status quo results in bewildered, blank and/or fearful looks and the sudden desire to be elsewhere. Olive Schreiner’s: “when I am most real, to you I am mad” seems to be how I am precieved by the sheeple (and the authorities, no doubt).
I knew someone, in the same end of the world, who at a meeting where the management was introducing the slogans called ‘vision’ and ‘mission statements’ as means of skyrocketing the productivity and staff commitment, made a joke which costed him eventually his employment. The ‘consultant’ was explaining that the vision and mission statement must be formulated in such a way that ‘even the toilet cleaner can understand it’. The person in question mumbled ‘because he might be a PHD’. He couldn’t forget the horrified looks of the staff who was listening religiously to the blabber. As he was an immigrant escaped from the socialist paradise, he explained to his colleagues: “We came from your future”. Shortly after his contract was terminated, for other reasons. of course.
Because she might be a PhD indeed. A lot of toilets are PhDs.
“The ‘consultant’ was explaining that the vision and mission statement must be formulated in such a way that ‘even the toilet cleaner can understand it’. The person in question mumbled ‘because he might be a PHD’.”
What a gem, and also:
“We came from your future”, what a painfull gem of vision of an eastener
among the ‘winners of the cold war’.
Anonymus, take a name and stay please
dear babushka,
I’m fully embracing your soft rant.
Living in the country my late ideal had become true, but different than I had thought.
Your ‘not so long ago’ was my ‘don’t ask them, it’s hopeless’
They are ‘creating for you ‘every crap you don’t need’ as long as the buck
comes over.
Buck’s world is hell.
All this is ‘mad talking’
Nice to have you
Thank you mundanomaniac. I have been “against the grain” all my life. Like so many Europeans in our age group, I wanted to understand the causes of war, with a view to never having another: no more suffering.
So that has been, and continues to be, my life path. I’ve had to come to an acceptance of the fact that, like the poor, suffering is always with us. That is the human condition.
I was in my early thirties when I first read Jung’s Memories Dreams and Reflections. That was the very first time I found myself in a book: like a mirror.
Years later I found my spiritual director at the CG Jung Society. It just so happened he was also an ex-priest.
His genius was getting me to work with my own dreams. And now I’m here in this sacred community- what an unexpected blessing. Yes, dreams do come true, but rarely in ways we expect, or hope for.
God loves to play Surprise
Some of my favorite quotes are listed in your message.
THE POLITICS OF OBEDIENCE: the discourse of voluntary servitude by Etienne de La Boetie.
Krishnamurti is a huge influence for me in regards to never lose presence of mind in the face of authority.
Right now, I’m mostly in search of advice and ideas of how to avoid an “educational” matrix system without losing my kids.
I was typing my message in response to ChaosNavigator then something happened; computer glitched, half of the message disappeared and it got posted improperly. Sorry about that. Basically, I meant to say that breaking out of Matrix is an endeavor that goes back in time all the way to ancient Rome (perhaps even Egypt). In fact, I read somewhere that even the whole idea of grain based diets was invented in Egypt as a form of food that was designed exclusively for the slaves. It appears that grains tend to impair cognitive factions in humans. Add to this traditional schooling ( not to be confused with education) plus pharmaceuticals and one might get into a 360 degree slave coverage for life.
@Krishnamurti
I wonder if ever Christ had any influence on your search. Probably not, He asked for obedience.
He led by example of obedience to God. He did not coerce or sanction. We are free to follow the example of Christ. We are made in the spiritual image of God, to commune.
Jesus was a rebel. It is my personal believe that a lot of stuff in the bible was doctored by the “rulers” to facilitate their agenda. We’re given free will and some Orthodox monks are used to be known for not backing away from certain battles.
“… how to avoid an “educational” matrix system without losing my kids.”
Perhaps look into Montessori education?
my answer would be
break free of any foreign matrix like I did:
create your own astrology within the ‘matrix’
of our ancestors gods of eternity
you are gods yourselves
Ps. 82
I think psychopathy is a learned trait – the army is doing it every day to the recruits – those who don’t adapt – go crazy – depression PTDS (or whatever it is)
Did you know that the army uses pigs – live pigs – restricted – and the recruits have to slice them as they’re running by – it started in Brazil with dogs tied to fencing – quarter tied – each leg tied to a fence so the dog was spread eagled – the ‘Freedom Fighters’ of Brazil – a few years ago – whenever – were trained to slice the dogs and they ran by –
It must be CIA training-
Now the military – the US military uses this method with pigs – its widely known and accurately photographed by undercover animal rights people –
This is trained psychopathy.
True.
But unfortunately it goes in all civil areas also. US psychophatic language is “desensitize” the Russians to US Military Navy outside Crimea´s coast.
In MSM we have the same “desensitize” the public to lies and fraud stories. “Desensitze” the ME arabs to wars and chaos. “Desensitize” children to bombs and murders, etc.
Thanks for these quotes, they nourish my Soul – which often feels lonely in this strange world.
Pardon the pedantism, but we don’t have a soul, we are soul. Otherwise, who would be making the statement, “I have a soul”? How do we define the difference between mind and soul? Soul acts out of love, while the mind is interested in its own passions.
Yes, Dimitar! Thanks for that post! To expand that a bit. We are a soul first and then the physical brain creates it’s belief about itself, which is our ego. We can easily learn to “witness” or “observe” our internal dialogue which is the ego talking to itself. The witnessing soul easily recognizes the self-deceptions and rationalizations of the ego. All the problems in the world are caused by humans identifying with the self-talk and craziness of their ego, rather than identifying with the observer of the ego where wisdom is found . The ego is always fear based and always finding ways to compensate for it’s many, often hidden fears.
A good case can be made that the “witness” is the “Father Within” (us all), and that which connects us all. Sub-atomic physics proves we are all connected at the subatomic particle level. Some physicists are now brave enough to say it looks like “consciousness” might be in subatomic particles.
The best and clearest teaching about this is in Eckhart Tolle’s “The Power Of Now”. The best to you!
Very interesting, Barry, thank you so much. Yes, the distinction between soul and mind is a hugely important step which we all must one day make, because that decision results in the beginning of spiritual freedom. I know the word spiritual is vague, and overused, but to me means living in a way known only to yourself. That is following one’s inner dictates. This presupposes of course, that those inner dictates are in harmony with the universal law; Soul exists because God loves it. In my opinion the best contemporary writings defining the nature of Soul are by Harold Klemp, and can be found at http://www.eckankar.org. A few titles I can recommend are “The Sound of Soul”, “Past Lives, Dreams and Soul Travel” and “Child in the Wilderness”. In Spirit, D.
Thanks Dimitar! My take on the “soul” is that it’s the “witness” or “observer” we can use to monitor our ego. Not so common “Common Sense” is found in the quiet/silent “observer” mode. It seems to have a sense of caring/love in it’s silent guidance. “Be still and know I am God” and “God, the Father, is within”? If we are paying attention to it, which is a spiritual practice, you “know” things spontaneously about the situation at hand, without knowing how you know. “Knowingness”! It’s not knowing by the accumulation of data or experience. It’s not knowing data. You simply and spontaneously know to do the right thing at the moment. Unfortunately, the ego usually interferes with it’s own viewpoint as self-talk. It’s really hard to trust what comes spontaneously prior to thought or conditioning. But we’ve all had experiences of doing something excellently, spontaneously, without any thought, and then wondering how or why we did that, or how we knew what to do.
Modern sports use the terms “in the zone”. Zen Buddhists practice “Zen No-Mind”. It’s about being immersed in the moment without the mind’s thoughts interfering. There are many people doing amazing things who don’t realize they are Zen masters. A concert pianist for example, is totally focused on the instrument and music, in a state of Zen No-mind. If the ego-mind starts to interfere with thought, mistakes start to happen.
I have different thoughts at different times about whether of not souls reincarnate into subsequent bodies or whether at death we simply return to a universal “soul soup”. But that’s another very long subject. Nice to have this chat with you.
Just a brief observation on your final point, Barry. To me its self-evident that life continues beyond death of the physical body, for a number of reasons. Have you heard the sleep state being referred to as “the little death”? First of all, its a state of being where the consciousness is freed from the constraints of the physical body, and is able to explore realms beyond our external world. Further, the dream state is a setting where we are able to receive guidance or instruction re: the connection between our inner and outer lives. It remains with us to decide whether our experience was “real” or not.
Have you heard the saying, “God created Soul, then destroyed the mould”? To me this is an indication that the Deity values Soul’s individuality. I cant see why IT would go to the trouble of “creating Soul” if at the end of a mere lifetime, we simply end up dissipating into the cosmic soup again. My personal belief stems from encountering a loved one in the dream state after their physical death, and the awareness of the reality of that meeting. However, I cant “prove” it, I simply know that my experience was real. There’s a difference between belief and knowing. We can’t prove what we may know, however, we can demonstrate it. Best.
My point of view at your last question is given in the concept of the
Hun-soul. It’s a spiritual ‘person’ to be nourished while in time.
Like a corral reef the Hun might be persistent
carrying coming futurous souls in the waters of the uncoscious spirit
in an other dimension of time
Barry,
on Eckhart Tolle’s books, I bought them about 20 years ago and have read them often. Now I open them at random from time to time and read a bit without trying to think too deeply. I don’t strain to understand, I just sit a while. Sometimes some kind of insight comes to me in the following days – sometimes not – just a calming feeling – which is good enough.
A sceptic would say I’m stretching to find some meaning. Anyway, that’s been my experience with Tolle’s books over the years.
I once sat at dinner, next to a senior lecturer in education at a catholic university, a woman frustrated in those moment with all sorts of problems: health, kids, computer etc., who scoffed at me when I dared raise the subject of soul.
“I don’t believe in soul!!!!”
That silenced me.
None so deaf/blind as will not hear/see
Babuška, how careless we human beings are. Your comment reminded me of William Blake’s poem, “The Fly”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fly_(poem)
The Fly
Little Fly, Thy summer’s play, My thoughtless hand Has brush’d away.
Am not I, A fly like thee? Or art not thou A man like me?
For I dance And drink and sing; Till some blind hand Shall brush my wing.
If thought is life And strength and breath; And the want Of thought is death;
Than am I A happy fly, If I live Or if I die.
All grist for Soul’s mill.
Thank You Dimitar, for your lovely, resonating response: seeing the holy in the ordinary
For you, dear Babuška, and for all true lovers;
“Even in hell, if you are with me,
I would not want to leave.
And if I find myself in heaven
without you, those wide fields will
be confining to my breathing-heart.”
Rumi, “Soul Fury”, translations by Coleman Barks.
With a tear and a smile, Thank You Dimitar
The old perception of the mind isn’t passion, but cooling
the passions of the soul.
(cf. Carl Jung, Psychology and Alchemy)
Love, love, this thank you very much from someone who is nearsighted lol!!!!! and here’s a couple more quotes:
“This life’s dim Windows of the Soul distorts the heavens from pole to pole and leads you to believe a lie when when you see with, and not thro, the eye.” William Blake
“Worthy endeavor with an interested motive nearly always results in the exact opposite of what was intended. Thus, education aimed at producing literates for industry produces illiterates for anarchy. The more motorways the more accidents, the more psychiatrists the more lunacy, hypochondria burgeons with the health service, and delinquency with remedial prisons.” Malcolm Muggeridge
“That the depravity of man is at once the most empirical verifiable reality and at the same time the most intellectual resistant fact.” Malcom Muggeridge
“O ye gods, grant us what is good whether we pray for it or not, but keep evil from us even though we pray for it.” Plato
Wonderful analogy : from wearing others glasses to the spiritual blindness. In the past, much more people had their own well defined vision about the world, society they lived in. It seems a paradox but in the Eastern socialist countries this was a reality, somehow the people have been better informed, the thirst for knowledge was much greater, the libraries were always full with people of all ages, from very young to very old. People have developed a sense being capable to read between the lines, being capable to make a difference between a lie and the truth. All these “senses” – or glasses as Ivan Ilyin said – today are less and less palpable in the world. Something has happened, something has changed as we know and witness every day in the news and in our private contacts on the street. Is this the new scream : ” can somebody help please, I want my glasses instead of cheese ” ?
Ioan, I would like to expand on what you said. Our perceived knowledge is an imposed point of view. This imposition actually goes back about 1600 years. I will not quote any one, except the fact which confirms what the author said about glasses. Until mid 1980’s I happily believed that Jews were ethnicity, because this is what I was told at school from the days of preschool. Then one day my boss hired a young Jewish engineer, during one of the project discussions in my office I blabbed something about Jewish nation. This comment made him very irate and to make the story short this day I stopped believing in the story of Jews being a national thing. This was the day I put on my “Jewishness glasses”. The problem is, that whenever you look around this old thing is being pushed down our minds and it happens every day. I could go on and on about other things that were pushed down out throats, or minds to be more correct. All we need to do is put some visors on in order to break away from old visions.
The concept of a “point of view” is even more powerful as a metaphor than the one of “glasses” here. It can better distinguish between what is subjective, what is inter-subjective, and what is objective.
What one person sees, for example when standing at a vantage point on one side of a valley, is quite different from what another sees standing on the other side of the valley. For one to see the other’s point of view requires, as the saying goes, to “walk a mile in their shoes”. Yet, there is commonality among subjective points of view. A group of people, for example standing together at a vantage point, do not have exactly the same point of view, but their points of view have a lot in common. Depending on their interests, the differences may be more or less irrelevant. Their point of view is inter-subjective in reality, but they may persuade themselves – if they have a consensus Theory of Truth, for example – that their inter-subjectivity is an objectivity. Whereas we can see straight away from the metaphor that this cannot be the case. We can also see what the a priori requirements are for an objective point of view – being in the possession/knowledge/awareness of all the possible subjective truths on a matter. I leave it to readers to expand the metaphor further still to cover the notion of Absolute (ie “Eternal”) Truth.
The 360 vantage points in the circle of truth are to me the natural
answer to any question.
The reduction to twelve batches, our fathers have invented as zodiac, does
a great deal in order to make the cleaning easier.
I think the vision is significantly improving amongst a growing minority of people with increasing access to an exploding variety of vision-aiding apparati.
For example, you have this community, and many others like it, spread over most of the globe. We may not see the same things all the time (LOL) but the chances of the focus improving with time are immensely greater than in the past century. And the individual and collective process can be much, much quicker, if the will and the perseverance is there!
Which is an individual choice, opportunity….and responsibility that will be dealt with in every conceivable variety of ways and degrees of discernment that may seem chaotic. However I find it immensely encouraging!
What tends to discourage participants in this exciting process is the determination of the majority of persons that they know……to avoid it (seeing better….or AT ALL….) like the plague! That may change dramatically after a generation or two (it could!) but for now, don’t worry about it!
The important thing is the speed and quality of the awakenment and the improvement in the aggregate capacity to not only focus with increased sharpness of vision………….but to simultaneously increase the width of the personal, and societal peripheral vision.
Meanwhile, consider this: Film is an extremely powerful propagandistic tool that can brainwash and stupify with incredible powers of persuasion to distort reality and manipulate emotions and the subconscious. However the semi-underground film THEY LIVE carries the analogy/metahphor…..( of the Golden Age of Ophthalmology the Russian author’s article can make us attracted to the idea of …..) forward in the consciousness of an awakening person, quite powerfully and well:
In this 7 minute scene in Downtown LA, I surmise…:
https://youtu.be/Ntns8Xp3-rA
I can’t locate the entire movie online right now, in the time available. But I have before. It’s worth finding if you have the time.
The fight scene, where the hero tries to open the eyes of his co-worker, who resists by punching the hero in the face….before finally being subdued and donning another pair of the sunglasses.offered…… is a metaphor for the challenges of organizing your fellow human being, your friends, neighbors (or especially your extended family, whose idea of you was FIXED in time, long ago, most probably…..) that has to make you laugh: The power and number of the punches portrayed would kill any normal person 20 times over! LOL
I think the movie is something like 30 years old.
But here’s the part that is most prescient: The hero dons his glasses and looks up at a billboard advertising CNN. The glasses screen out the fancy advertising color graphics and leave in the black and white billboard rectangle only the following 12 characters/letters:
CNN = FAKE NEWS
I believe I saw a version online dubbed into Russian.
That’s a very interesting clip(film) when man thinks it was made in 1988, as some kind of prophecy for what will happen beginning one year later till our days. Are we already reached the extreme limits or the “goodies” will be yet to come, that’s the question. Good to see though, there were people who were not zombies, at least there is a chance to change the outcome.
A yogi teacher of mine once said that spiritual vision is in the purview of the purified emotional wisdom of the heart.
Clear Hearing lies then with ability to recognize your own thought patterns which interfere. ( western psychologist would call them your neurosis) and the Buddhists would call it “mindfulness”.)
if the two can even be separated in functional reality at all.
Yes! Eckhart Tolle’s “The Power Of Now” is the best and clearest explanation I’ve read in years of reading and practicing various spiritual “paths”. Very easily we can all learn to “witness” or “observe” our internal dialogue (self-talk). That internal dialogue is our own ego talking to itself. That which can witness or observe the ego is the awareness that exists prior to the ego. The ego is created by the brain and is it’s story of itself. That awareness we all have can recognize the ego’s rationalizations and “crazyness”. Tollle says, and I now agree, that all the problems in the world are caused by humans identifying with their ego’s self-talk and thoughts, rather than identifying with the observer of the ego. A case can be made that the “observer” or “witness” is the “Father Within” (us all), and a case can also be made that we all share that knowingness and wisdom. Observing my internal dialogue is now my primary spiritual practice. It’s easy to do and I fail a hundred or more times a day to identify with my “witness” and focus instead on my internal dialogue as “me”. Humans are in a trance and the focus of that trance is their ego’s self-talk (internal dialogue). Some people are so out of touch, and so entranced by their own self-talk, they don’t even know they talk to themselves mentally. The idea is to use our mind as needed, rather to let our ego/mind to use us. My ego, your ego, and everyone’s ego want to believe that it is the God of it’s reality. We have billions of crazy human ego’s who believe they are sane, creating misery, death, and destruction on the planet. The best to you!