This article was written for the Unz Review: http://www.unz.com/tsaker/how-russia-is-preparing-for-wwiii/
I have recently posted a piece in which I tried to debunk a few popular myths about modern warfare. Judging by many comments which I received in response to this post, I have to say that the myths in question are still alive and well and that I clearly failed to convince many readers. What I propose to do today, is to look at what Russia is really doing in response to the growing threat from the West. But first, I have to set the context or, more accurately, re-set the context in which Russia is operating. Let’s begin by looking at the AngloZionist policies towards Russia.
The West’s actions:
First on this list is, obviously, the conquest by NATO of all of Eastern Europe. I speak of conquest because that is exactly what it is, but a conquest achieved according to the rules of 21st century warfare which I define as “80% informational, 15% economic and 5% military”. Yes, I know, the good folks of Eastern Europe were just dreaming of being subjugated by the US/NATO/EU/etc – but so what? Anyone who has read Sun Tzu will immediately recognize that this deep desire to be ‘incorporated’ into the AngloZionist “Borg” is nothing else but the result of a crushed self-identity, a deep-seated inferiority complex and, thus, a surrender which did not even have to be induced by military means. At the end of the day, it makes no difference what the locals thought they were achieving – they are now subjects of the Empire and their countries more or less irrelevant colonies in the fringe of the AngloZionist Empire. As always, the local comprador elite is now bubbling with pride at being, or so they think, accepted as equals by their new masters (think Poroshenko, Tusk or Grybauskaite) which gives them the courage to bark at Moscow from behind the NATO fence. Good for them.
Second is the now total colonization of Western Europe into the Empire. While NATO moved to the East, the US also took much deeper control of Western Europe which is now administered for the Empire by what the former Mayor of London once called the “great supine protoplasmic invertebrate jellies” – faceless bureaucrats à la François Hollande or Angela Merkel.
Third, the Empire has given its total support to semi-demonic creatures ranging from al-Khattab to Nadezhda Savchenko. The West’s policy is crystal clear and simple to the extreme: if it is anti-Russian we back it. This policy is best exemplified with a Putin and Russia demonization campaign which is, in my opinion, far worse and much more hysterical than anything during the Cold War.
Fourth, the West has made a number of highly disturbing military moves including the deployment of the first elements of an anti-missile system in Eastern Europe, the dispatching of various forms of rapid reaction forces, the deployment of a few armored units, etc. NATO now has forward deployed command posts which can be used to support the engagement of a rapid reaction force.
What does all this add up to?
Right now, nothing much, really. Yes, the NATO move right up to the Russian borders is highly provocative, but primarily in political terms. In purely military terms, not only is this a very bad idea (see cliché #6 here), but the size of the actual forces deployed is, in reality, tiny: the ABM system currently deployed can, at best, hope to intercept a few missiles (10-20 depending on your assumptions) as for the conventional forces they are of the battalion size (more or less 600 soldiers plus support). So right now there is categorically no real military threat to Russia.
So why are the Russians so clearly upset?
Because the current US/NATO moves might well be just the first steps of a much larger effort which, given enough time, might begin presenting a very real danger for Russia.
Furthermore, the kind of rhetoric coming out of the West now is not only militaristic and russophobic, it is often outright messianic. The last time around the West had a flare up of its 1000 year old chronic “messianic syndrome” condition Russia lost 20 (to 30) million people. So the Russians can be forgiven if they are paying a great deal of attention to what the AngloZionist propaganda actually says about them.
The Russians are most dismayed at the re-colonization of western Europe. Long gone are the days when people like Charles de Gaulle, Helmut Schmidt or François Mitterrand, were in charge of Europe’s future. For all their very real faults, these men were at least real patriots and not just US colonial administrators. The ‘loss’ of Western Europe is far more concerning for the Russians than the fact that ex-Soviet colonies in Eastern Europe are now under US colonial administration. Why?
Look at this from the Russian point of view.
The Russians all see that the US power is on the decline and that the dollar will, sooner or later, gradually or suddenly, lose its role as the main reserve and exchange currency on the planet (this process has already begun). Simply put – unless the US finds a way to dramatically change the current international dynamic the AngloZionist Empire will collapse. The Russians believe that what the Americans are doing is, at best, to use tensions with Russia to revive a dormant Cold War v2 and, at worst, to actually start a real shooting war in Europe.
So a declining Empire with a vital need for a major crisis, a spineless Western Europe unable to stand up for its own interest, a subservient Eastern Europe just begging to turn into a massive battlefield between East and West, and a messianic, rabidly russophobic rhetoric as the background for an increase in military deployments on the Russian border. Is anybody really surprised that the Russians are taking all this very, very serious even if right now the military threat is basically non-existent?
The Russian reaction
So let us now examine the Russian reaction to Empire’s stance.
First, the Russians want to make darn sure that the Americans do not give in into the illusion that a full-scale war in Europe would be like WWII which saw the US homeland only suffer a few, tiny, almost symbolic, attacks by the enemy. Since a full scale war in Europe would threaten the very existence of the Russian state and nation, the Russians are now taking measures to make darn sure that, should that happen, the US would pay an immense price for such an attack.
Second, the Russians are now evidently assuming that a conventional threat from the West might materialize in the foreseeable future. They are therefore taking the measures needed to counter that conventional threat.
Third, since the USA appears to be dead set into deploying an anti-ballistic missile system not only in Europe, but also in the Far East, the Russians are taking the measures to both defeat and bypass this system.
The Russian effort is a vast and a complex one, and it covers almost every aspect of Russian force planing, but there are four examples which, I think, best illustrate the Russian determination not to allow a 22 June 1941 to happen again:
- The re-creation of the First Guards Tank Army (in progress)
- The deployment of the Iskander-M operational-tactical missile system (done)
- The deployment of the Sarmat ICBM (in progress)
- The deployment of the Status-6 strategic torpedo (in progress)
The re-creation of the First Guards Tank Army
It is hard to believe, but the fact is that between 1991 and 2016 Russia did not have a single large formation (division size and bigger) in its Western Military District. A few brigades, regiments and battalions which nominally were called an “Army”. To put it simply – Russia clearly did not believe that there was a conventional military threat from the West and therefore she did not even bother deploying any kind of meaningful military force to defend from such a non-existing threat. By the way, that fact should also tell you everything you need to know about Russian plans to invade the Ukraine, Poland or the Baltics: this is utter nonsense. This has now dramatically changed.
Russia has officially announced that the First Guards Tank Army (a formation with a prestigious and very symbolic history). This Guards Tank Army will now include the 4th “Kantemirov” Guards Tank Division, the 2nd “Taman” Guards Motorized Rifle Division, the 6th Tank Brigade, the 27th Guards Motor Rifle Brigade Sevastopol and many support units. This Army’s HQ will be located in the Odinstovo suburb of Moscow. Currently the Army is equipped with T-72B3 and T-80 main battle tanks, but they will be replaced by the brand new and revolutionary T-14 Armata tank while the current infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers will be replaced by the new APC and IFV. In the air, these armored units will be protected and supported by Mi-28 and Ka-52 attack helicopters. Make no mistake, this will be a very large force, exactly the kind of force needed so smash through an attacking enemy forces (by the way, the 1TGA was present at the Kursk battle). I am pretty sure that by the time the 1TGA is fully organized it will become the most powerful armored formation anywhere between the Atlantic and the Urals (especially in qualitative terms). If the current tensions continue or even worsen, the Russians could even augment the 1TGA to a type of 21st century “Shock Army” with increased mobility and specializing in breaking deep into the enemy’s defenses.
The deployment of the Iskander-M operational-tactical missile system
The new Iskander-M operational tactical missile system is a formidable weapon by any standard. While technically it is a short-range tactical missile (under 1000km range, the Iskander-M has an official range of 500km), it can also fire the R-500 missile has the capability of striking at an intermediate/operational range (over 1000km, the R-500 has a range of 2000km). It is extremely accurate, it has advanced anti-ABM capabilities, it flies at hypersonic speeds and is practically undetectable on the ground (see here for more details). This will be the missile tasked with destroying all the units and equipment the US and NATO have forward-deployed in Eastern Europe and, if needed, clear the way for the 1TGA.
The deployment of the Sarmat ICBM
Neither the 1TGA nor the Iskander-M missile will threaten the US homeland in any way. Russia thus needed some kind of weapon which would truly strike fear into the Pentagon and White House in the way the famous RS-36 Voevoda (aka SS-18 “Satan” in US classification) did during the Cold War. The SS-18, the most powerful ICBM ever developed, was scary enough. The RS-28 “Sarmat” (SS-X-30 by NATO classification) brings the terror to a totally new level.
The Sarmat is nothing short of amazing. It will be capable of carrying 10-15 MIRVed warheads which will be delivered in a so-called “depressed” (suborbital) trajectory and which will remain maneuverable at hypersonic speeds. The missile will not have to use the typical trajectory over the North Pole but will be capable of reaching any target anywhere on the planet from any trajectory. All these elements combined will make the Sarmat itself and its warheads completely impossible to intercept.
The Sarmat will also be capable of delivering conventional Iu-71 hypersonic warheads capable of a “kinetic strike” which could be used to strike a fortified enemy target in a non-nuclear conflict. This will be made possible by the amazing accuracy of the Sarmat’s warheads which, courtesy of a recent Russian leak, we now know have a CEP of 10 meters (see screen capture)
The Sarmat’s silos will be protected by a unique “active protection measures” which will include 100 guns capable of firing a “metallic cloud” of forty thousand 30mm “bullets” to an altitude of up to 6km. The Russians are also planning to protect the Sarmat with their new S-500 air defense systems. Finally, the Sarmat’s preparation to start time will be under 60 seconds thanks a a highly automated launch system. What this all means is that the Sarmat missile will be invulnerable in its silo, during it’s flight and on re-entry in the lower parts of the atmosphere.
It is interesting to note that while the USA has made a great deal of noise around its planned Prompt Global Strike system, the Russians have already begun deploying their own version of this concept.
The deployment of the Status-6 strategic torpedo
Do you remember the carefully staged “leak” in November of last year when the Russians ‘inadvertently’ showed a super dooper secret strategic torpedo on prime time news? Here is this (in)famous slide:
What is shown here is an “autonomous underwater vehicle” which has advanced navigational capabilities but which can also be remote controlled and steered from a specialized command module. This vehicle can dive as deep as 1000m, at a speed up to 185km/h and it has a range of up to 10’000km. It is delivered by specially configured submarines.
The Status-6 system can be used to target aircraft carrier battle groups, US navy bases (especially SSBN bases) and, in its most frighting configuration, it can be used to deliver high-radioactivity cobalt bombs capable of laying waste to huge expanses of land. The Status-6 delivery system would be a new version of the T-15 torpedo which would be 24m long, 1,5m wide weigh 40 tons and capable of delivering a 100 megaton warhead which would make it twice as powerful as the most powerful nuclear device ever detonated, the Soviet Czar-bomb (57 megatons). Hiroshima was only 15 kilotons.
Keep in mind that most of the USA’s cities and industrial centers are all along the coastline which makes them extremely vulnerable to torpedo based attacks (be it Sakharov’s proposed “Tsunami bomb” or the Status-6 system). And, just as in the case of the Iskander-M or the Sarmat ICBM, the depth and speed of the Status-6 torpedo would make it basically invulnerable to incerception.
Evaluation:
There is really nothing new in all of the above, and US military commanders have always known that. All the US anti-ballistic missile systems have always been primarily a financial scam, from Reagan’s “Star Wars” to Obama’s “anti-Iranian ABM”. For one thing, any ABM system is susceptible to ‘local saturation’: if you have X number ABM missile protecting a Y long space against an X number of missiles, all that you need to do is to saturate only one sector of the Y space with *a lot* of real and fake missiles by firing them all together through one small sector of the Y space the ABM missile system is protecting. And there are plenty of other measures the Russians could take. They could put just one single SLBM capable submarine in Lake Baikal making it basically invulnerable. There is already some discussion of that idea in Russia. Another very good option would be to re-activate the Soviet BzhRK rail-mobile ICBM. Good luck finding them in the immense Russian train network. In fact, the Russians have plenty of cheap and effective measure. Want me to list one more?
Sure!
Take the Kalibr cruise-missile recently seen in the war in Syria. Did you know that it can be shot from a typical commerical container, like the ones you will find on trucks, trains or ships? Check out this excellent video which explains this:
Just remember that the Kalibr has a range of anywhere between 50km to 4000km and that it can carry a nuclear warhead. How hard would it be for Russia to deploy these cruise missiles right off the US coast in regular container ships? Or just keep a few containers in Cuba or Venezuela? This is a system which is so undetectable that the Russians could deploy it off the coast of Australia to hit the NSA station in Alice Springs if they wanted, an nobody would even see it coming.
The reality is that the notion that the US could trigger a war against Russia (or China for that matter) and not suffer the consequences on the US mainland is absolutely ridiculous. And yet, when I hear all the crazy talk by western politicians and generals I get the impression that they are forgetting about this undeniable fact. Frankly, even the current threats against Russia have a ‘half-backed’ feel to them: a battalion here, another one there, a few missiles here, a few more there. It is like the rulers of the Empire don’t realize that it is a very, very bad idea to constantly poke a bear when all you are carrying with you is a pocket-knife. Sometimes the reaction of western politicians remind me of the thugs who try to rob a gas station with a plastic or empty gun and who are absolutely stunned with they get gunned down by the owner or the cops. This kind of thuggery is nothing more than a form of “suicide by cop” which never ends well for the one trying to get away with it.
So sometimes things have to be said directly and unambiguously: western politicians better not believe in their own imperial hubris. So far, all their threats have achieved is that the Russians have responded with a many but futile verbal protests and a full-scale program to prepare Russia for WWIII.
As I have written many times, Russians are very afraid of war and they will go out of their way to avoid it. But they are also ready for war. This is a uniquely Russian cultural feature which the West has misread an innumerable number of time over the past 1000 years or so. Over and over again have the Europeans attacked Russia only to find themselves into a fight they would never have imagined, even in their worst nightmares. This is why the Russians like to say that “Russia never starts wars, she only ends them”.
There is a profound cultural chasm between how the West views warfare and how the Russians do. In the West, warfare is, really, “the continuation of politics by other means”. For Russians, it is a ruthless struggle for survival. Just look at generals in the West: they are polished and well mannered managers much more similar to corporate executives than with, say, Mafia bosses. Take a look at Russian generals (for example, watch the Victory Day parade in Moscow). In comparison to their western colleagues they look almost brutish, because first and foremost they are ruthless and calculating killers. I don’t mean that in a negative way – they often are individually very honorable and even kind men, and like every good commander, they care for their men and love their country. But the business they are in in not the continuation of politics by other means, the business they are in is survival. At all cost.
You cannot judge a military or, for that matter, a nation, by how it behaves when it triumphs, when it is on the offensive pursing a defeated enemy. All armies look good when they are winning. You can really judge of the nature of a military, or a nation, at its darkest hour, when things are horrible and the situation worse than catastrophic. That was the case in 1995 when the Eltsin regime ordered a totally unprepared, demoralized, poorly trained, poorly fed, poorly equipped and completely disorganized Russian military (well, a few hastily assembled units) to take Grozny from the Chechens. It was hell on earth. Here is some footage of General Lev Rokhlin in a hastily organized command post in a basement inside Grozy. He is as exhausted, dirty and exposed as any of his soldiers. Just look at his face and look at the faces of the men around him. This is what the Russian army looks like when it is in the depth of hell, betrayed by the traitors sitting in the Kremlin and abandoned by most if the Russian people (who, I am sorry to remind here, mostly were only were dreaming of McDonalds and Michael Jackson in 1995).
Can you imagine, say, General Wesley Clark or David Petraeus fighting like these men did?
Check out this video of General Shamanov reading the riot act to a local Chechen politician (no translation need):
Shamanov nowadays is the Commander in Chief of the Airborne Forces (see photo) whose size Putin quietly doubled to 72’000, something I mentioned in the past as highly relevant, especially in comparison with the rather tepid force level increases announced by NATO (see “EU suidice by reality denial”). To get a feel for what modern Russian airborne forces are like, check out this article.
It is not my intention here to glorify nuclear war or the Russian Armed Forces. The reason for this, and many other, articles is to try to raise the alarm about what I see is happening nowadays. Western leaders are drunk on their own imperial hubris, nations which in the past were considered as minor stains on a map now feel emboldened to constantly provoke a nuclear superpower, Americans are being lied to and promised that some magical high tech will protect them from war while the Russians are seriously gearing up for WWIII because they have come to the conclusion that the only way to prevent that war is to make absolutely and unequivocally clear to the AngloZionists that they will never survive a war with Russia, even if every single Russian is killed.
I remember the Cold War well. I was part of it. And I remember that the vast majority of us, on both sides, realized that a war between Russia and the West must be avoided at all costs. Now I am horrified when I read articles by senior officials seriously discussing such a possibility.
Just read this article, please: What would a war between the EU and Russia look like? Here is what this guy writes:
To the poetically inclined, the Russian military looks more like a gigantic pirate crew, than a regular army. The ones who rule are the ones with the sharpest cutlass and biggest mouth, typically some scurvy infested mateis who rely on the support of their mates to make any unpopular “officer” walk the plank… Or, more apt, they resemble the members of the cossack horde, run by the brashier warriors… While these troops can be very brave, at times, they are not effective in the field against a well regulated and trained modern military machine. Given this, it is improbably, ney, impossible for ordinary Russian troops to conduct operations of major consequence at more than platoon level against any disciplined armies, especially the US, British, German, or French.
This kind of writing really scares me. Not because of the imbecilic and racist stupidity of it, but because it largely goes unchallenged in the mainstream media. Not only that, there are plenty such articles written elsewhere (see here, here or here). Of course, the authors of that kind of “analyses” make their money precisely the kind of manic cheer-leading for the western forces, but that is exactly the mindset which got Napoleon and Hitler in trouble and which ended with Russian forces stationed in Paris and Berlin. Compare that kind of jingoistic and, frankly, irresponsible nonsense with what a real military commander, Montgomery, had to say on this topic:
The next war on land will be very different from the last one, in that we shall have to fight it in a different way. In reaching a decision on that matter, we must first be clear about certain rules of war. Rule 1, on page I of the book of war, is: “Do not march on Moscow”. Various people have tried it, Napoleon and Hitler, and it is no good. That is the first rule.
So who do you trust? Professional cheerleaders or professional soldiers? Do you really believe that Obama (or Hillary), Merkel and Hollande will do better than Napoleon or Hitler?
If the AngloZionist ‘deep state’ is really delusional enough to trigger a war with Russia, in Europe or elsewhere, the narcissistic and hedonistic West, drunk on its own propaganda and hubris, will discover a level of violence and warfare it cannot even imagine and if that only affected those responsible for these reckless and suicidal policies it would be great. But the problem is, of course, that many millions of us, simple, regular people, will suffer and die as a consequence of our collective failure to prevent that outcome. I hope and pray that my repeated warnings will at least contribute to what I hope is a growing realization that this folly has to be immediately stopped and that sanity must return to politics.
The Saker
Hello, I wonder if the writer could discuss this issue from the point of view of the buffer, East European countries. If he could go back in history and see what always happened in this region for the last 1-2000 years. Would he evaluate the issue differently? Thanks,
WW3 will happen, unfortunately. It’s not a question of ‘if’, but rather ‘when’ and ‘how’ bad it will be/get.
Why? The reason you may ask? Simple. Anglo-Zionism (I hate to say this but it’s really just ‘Zionism’, and more specifically Talmudic Judaism) is driven by a Satanic greed. It has been for thousands of years; behind every upheaval and or catastrophe/ calamity humankind has had to endure throughout World history.
End of discussion, really.
It’s much simpler actually, read about “Russian analyst says to nuke Yellowstone”
Greetings from Poland!
When I was in the US military, we would be briefed with Secret Mission Assessment seminars. In those meetings we were told time and again that the Soviet Union was the worlds leading producer of concrete, and they did not export any of it. We were told that for every factory above ground, there was a mirror complex deep under ground, complete with support facilities for workers and their families. Lo and behold! I ran into this article a few years ago: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2336721/Sweatshop-city-260-migrant-workers-complete-canteen-cinema-casino-Moscow-street.html
This was June of 2013. Were the Russians refurbishing those long abandoned deep underground facilities? I hope so. Make no mistake, the leadership of the West is down right satanic. The goal here (among other things) is to obliterate Orthodoxy and the Christian faith (look at what they did in Kosovo and Iraq: putting Iraq under Shariah law caused the largest Christian diaspora since the Armenian Genocide).
I pray for Mr Putin, and the leaders of the Russian Federation. I pray also that the hand of God may be against The US, rather than our brothers in Russia. We are Altantis, decadent and blind with godless hubris. We are consumed with murderous depravity, and know we deserve death, but will not turn to Christ for life and repentance, but cast our bloody shadow on the world. God help us all and restrain the madness of our rulers. Peace and God’s grace to you Mother Russia.
Most tragically, Russia has not asked for this — When can anybody even remember when in the last 100 years Russia simply outright declared war on other nations — Russia has always simply defended herself against global powers always at her throat to destroy her. To my mind, the most maligned nation on the planet, has always been Russia — also, arguably the nation which suffered the worst, the greatest human loss at the hands of those ever trying to possess her. Yet, Russia has always rallied and always will. As Vladimir Putin said, Russia would have to cease to exist, before she will ever give up.
This piece filled me with terrible sorrow, that supposedly western civilised Man, continues contemplating death and destruction of others in order to rule the planet. If Russia had to blast the whole planet away in defense of her country and people, she would be justified and rather that we all cease to exist, than be enslaved by what is nothing less than the Evils of Satan.
Comprehensive military analysis. Though this war will probably be decided within the financial systems.
Bravo. Hubris, arrogance are mind and heart blinders. Humans…believe they are very special and deserves very special privileges…we are partially animals no matter we speak alone to ourselves and calling it “thinking”…We have a said. “only the one is carrying the sac knows what is inside it” Russia have immensely suffered because evolution retarding AZ forces have criminally imposed violence, war on them…rail gun 500 km reach?, f-35?, the unstable new ship? failed hyper-sonic gliders?, do I ear somebody laughing? Suffering teach lessons beyond comprehension to the ones living comfortably and also temper the soul. Arrogant people knows not so boring they are so only opportunistic, lazy ones, as all criminals are, endure such twisted souls. So I share the gilt by being mentally indifferent. My opinion, just that.
There is a point that needs to be stressed: the USA is not the helmsman of the Empire, at the top of the pyramid there is Israel, who uses the USA as thier long military arm. Today RT reported that Israel’s defense chief prefers Syria to be taken over by ISIS and other terrorists than to see Syria-Iran-Hezbollah-RUssia win, because their military capabilities are far superior to those of the rag-tag desert bandits. In other words, Israel is afraid, so scared that they need to have world domination by the USA to feel safe. They are the cancer of the Middle East, no US politician dares to stand up to them.
The Crown of the Judaic Imperium (hq the sq mi The City in London) its empire state: Israel and great ZOG are certainly in the mood for confrontation with Russia.
The nations they own as assets of their Money Trust (human resources, land and wealth) are growing aware, nationalistic and restive. They are rejecting the Masonic social order which has been imposed on them since The Revolution of the Judaic Imperium (inaugurated 1789). The corporate infrastructure of their Money Trust has been largely off-shored from their ZOG national assets, but the whole cartel has been structured around the debt based currencies of the ZOGs with the US dollar being the reserve currency.
The War for Greater Israel (which they have been prosecuting since 9/11) was one of their Knight’s moves on the Grand Chessboard. They regime changed a lot of nations mandated for regime change as stated by General Wesley Clark, but they stalled in Syria because of the Russian intervention. They invaded Iraq on the basis of lies, they bathed in the blood of Libya, they are still destroying Afghanistan – and so it goes.
But ‘them good old boyz’ in charge of the ordo ab chao in Syria are drinking their own Kool Aid now.
On the other side of the Judaic Revolution – Russia recovered from Sovietization. It looks to me like The Crown imposed a different model on Russia with the Bolshevik Revolution. The Apex of the Party would be the same group of Jews who own the global Money Trust, but instead of the central bank owning the nation as an asset, the Party and its state monopoly socialism were one and the same. The central bank was an apparatus of the state, not the other way around as in the West.
So when Putin threw out the (((oligarchs))) – namely the Jew Overlords, the central bank remained where it was as the financial apparatus of the Russian state.
So, it looks to me like Russia owns the Bank of Russia and issues its own currency based upon its own Russian productivity and the all that Russia is able to do with the vast wealth of the Russian Motherland.
This is diametrically opposite the situation in the West where a central bank that is a mere subsidiary of The Crown’s Money Trust owns the nation as an asset (a ZOG) and issues the currency as debt to their cartel.
The Crown of the Judaic Imperium is for world domination. Its world paradigm will never be multi-polar. Its solidarity and sovereignty is money – namely usury. The very idea of a Russian Christian ethno-state makes it cough up its collective furball.
This is why The Jew Overlords will drive its ZOGs to aggress upon Russia. They can not help themselves. These are the forces of anti-Christ and rational arguments and considerations do not sway them. They just have to have it all and they can’t live with themselves if they do not.
As a Christian ethnostate, Russia might have been the helping hand and model to the ZOG populations wanting to divest themselves of Jew ownership, just as Russia divested itself of Jew political control and de-Sovietized. If the ZOG populations were not post Christian seculars and modernists this could have played very differently.
A strong Roman Catholic Church would have weeded out its ecclesial masons in the hierarchy and consecrated Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary as our Lady asked at Fatima in 1917. The entire Church would have taken to heart what the pre-Conciliar popes decreed: that this event was the Signum Magnum of the Apocalypse chapter 12. And Russia, only Russia, would have been the focus of all the prayers, penances, First Saturday devotions required to win the graces necessary for the consecration to take place. Russia would have led the way to resurgent Christendoms both East and West and the former ZOGs would have modeled themselves on Russia that nation uniquely desired by the Blessed Virgin Mother of God. That was Plan A.
Plan B was rather darker. In her final prophetic interview of Dec 1957, Sr Lucia, the final surviving seer of Fatima saw that 1960 was at hand and the consecration was not done. Indeed, the promised chastisement from Heaven (if the consecration was not done) was imminent – a chastisement that would begin with the Great Apostasy. It would fall upon the Church of the Western Patriarchate. It would begin, as Cardinal Ciappi stated “at the top” and the organised forces of antiChrist would capture the hierarchy. Good luck with the mandate of heaven then. “Rome would lose the faith” our Lady infallibly stated “and become the seat of the Anti-Christ” – at La Salette.
So here we are at the time of all times and end of all ends.
The Crown of the Judaic Imperium will not back down on this, Saker. The entire Fatima Apostolate knows it. There is no doubt that the Russian leaders who steered Russia through the recovery from Sovietisation know it.
Of course, everything that humanly speaking can done must be done to avert the ZOG aggression upon Russia that will demand the Russian response. But forces much greater than ‘humanly speaking’ are at play.
Looked at from the perspective of the union of the Sacred and Immaculate Hearts: is it not better to die offerring one’s sufferrings in expiation of the sins that have prompted Divine chastisement in the war that comes than for the Judaic Imperium to succeed in its goal of world dominion and survive to live in the certainty that no new age will or can yet be. If Russia were to fail to respond effectively to the ZOG aggression, the victory of the Judaic Supremacy will be final. Their Pax Judaica and world empire will be hell on earth – worse than what was imposed upon Russia in the Bolshevik Revolution and the sovietisation following from that Revolution.
Even with the war that threatens – beyond all hope – Russia will yet be consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. This is one of the certainties. And there will come through Russia, uniquely Russia, an age of peace in the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Our Lady has foretold this. The Western Patriarchate believes it from the teaching of the pre-Conciliar popes – it is of the faith. The Roman Catholic Church once believed it and events are now in motion that will ensure they believe it again.
Amazing telling. What I always wonder is that if this war against russia is only by ZOG then why are the West/US directly involved? I believe there are many scenarios:
1. There has always been revenge from ZOG against Russia first via Bolsheviks then oligarchs in the 90s and now direct military threat. I believe they want to re-establish a Jewish Kahzar state that was taken over by Russia around 11th century.
2. The alliance between West-ZOG is finally to allow the destruction of Russia and re-establish Kahzar for the Jews just like israel that way there will not be the so called anti-Semitism in the West.
3. The obvious reason, the need to get rid of Russia so that West-ZOG will remain dominant on the world
Personally a nuclear slugfest means total planetary devistation and destruction. No matter how psychopathic you are as a leader this is a scenario you do not want. All nations know that with exponential population growth and with industrial and technical advances much of the world population is surplus to economic needs. Unchecked population growth means that there will be rising tensions between nuclear states for remaining resources particularly non renewable resources. That spells nuclear confrontation. With superstates aware of this danger and the consequences perhaps deals have already been made for a choreographed war to reduce current populations to manageable levels through, war, starvation and disease. Although parts of the planet will be damaged for an extended time, the planetary elites will continue to thrive and control the planet. See Audrey Thomasson’s the Acpocalypse equation. This is the scenario that appears most rational IMHO.
You are all deluded. There will never be WWIII between Russia or east allies and The West. It’s just simply impossible.
Enjoyed every bit of your article post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.
Very emotional writing. Fact is, USA/EU break down just from a virus. One nuke Is enough in D/F/UK and Europe dies without internet and electricity (& sewage & water)
The ruling clowns/ NATO generals are better at LGBT, not war
Sometimes I long for it to go and be over with. Stupid politicians playing stupid games for stupid reasons. The money we spend to kill each other. Imagine the good that money could’ve accomplished. We could solve so many problems, alleviate so much suffering, but nope. We gotta buy bigger and better bang. The better to kill you with my dear.
I have cancer, and prob not a long time left on this rock. I am glad I’ll be leaving it soon. You lot can rot.