President al-Assad to Denmark’s TV 2: Moderate opposition is a myth… We won’t accept that terrorists will take control of any part of Syria
Damascus, SANA – President Bashar al-Assad affirmed that the United States doesn’t have the will to reach any agreement about Syria, and that Syria knew in advance that the US agreement with Russia will not succeed because the main part of that agreement is to attack al-Nusra which is an American card in Syria.
In an interview given to Denmark’s TV 2 channel, President al-Assad said that “moderate opposition” is a myth, and that reaching a political solution requires fighting terrorism, asserting that it’s not acceptable that terrorists will take control of any part of Syria.
Following is the full text of the interview:
Question 1: So, Mr. President, let us begin with the current situation in Aleppo. The last few weeks, terrifying pictures have come out from Aleppo. I mean, we see the residents of the rebel-held eastern part of Aleppo in a very dire situation. They seem exhausted, they seem terrified, the situation is very violent. What is the strategy behind launching such fierce attack from the Syrian and Russian armies at the moment?
President Assad: Actually, we didn’t launch an attack, because the Syrian Army has continued its drive toward liberating every part of Syria including Aleppo or eastern Aleppo from the terrorists, but there was a ceasefire for one week in order to give the treaty, or the agreement, let’s say, between the Russians and the Americans a way to be implemented, and it didn’t work. When that week ended, we continued our drive as army to liberate eastern Aleppo from the terrorists. But actually, when you want to talk about the dire situation in eastern Aleppo, it’s not because of the government; it’s because of the terrorists. They’ve been in that area for years now, but we only heard about that “dire situation” in the media recently, in the Western media, because the situation of the terrorists is very bad. This is the only reason. While if you want to talk about the situation there, we never prevented any medical supply or food supply or any other thing from entering east Aleppo. There’s no embargo, if that’s what you mean, there’s no embargo, and our role as a government is to encircle the terrorists in order to liberate every part of the city.
Question 2: But what I also mean, we see pictures of children being killed, children at hospitals, we see pictures of demolished hospitals. Who’s targeting those hospitals?
President Assad: Let me tell you something about those pictures of children; of course, in every war, there are victims, there are innocent victims, and that’s why every war is a bad war, but if you look at those pictures that they’ve been promoted as pictures in the Western media, they only singled out a few pictures of children that suit their political agenda, just to accuse the Syrian government, while – you’ve been here now for two days – and they’ve been daily shelling from the eastern part of Aleppo toward the rest of the city, and there was wholesale killing and destruction of the other part of the city and tens of victims and tens of wounded people from Aleppo that the Western corporations didn’t talk about them. The Western officials didn’t issue a single statement regarding those children and women and elderly and innocents in general. So, this is part of the propaganda and demonization of the government in Syria. That doesn’t mean when you have war, again, that you don’t have victims, but the Syrian government has opened the door for the militants in the eastern part of Aleppo to leave safely with guarantees, and for the people of that area to go back to their houses.
Question 3: But residents in the area, eyewitnesses, international aid organizations, all saying that the hospitals have been targeted, and when I look at the pictures, I see hospitals, I see the beds inside the hospitals, and to me it really looks like it is demolished, it has been targeted, so who’s targeting the hospitals?
President Assad: I don’t have the answer to which hospital are you talking about, because we don’t have any facts about it, we only have allegations, so answering allegations shouldn’t be only through-
Question 4: But pictures are facts.
President Assad: Pictures cannot tell you the story, even videos, everything could be manipulated these days. I wouldn’t say that there are no such attacks on any building, but as a government, we don’t have a policy to destroy hospitals or schools or any such facility for a simple reason: first of all, morally, the second reason is that if we do so, we are offering the militants the incubator, the social incubator that they’ve been looking for, it’s going to be a gift, something we wouldn’t do because it’s against our interests. It’s like shooting ourselves in the foot. If there’s such an attack from the army, it could be by mistake, but we don’t have any information that thing has happened. All what we have is allegations and only in the Western media, not from Syria.
Question 5: So, if the Syrian Army didn’t attack hospitals, or maybe they did by mistake, you say, are you sure it’s not the Russian air force who are targeting hospitals?
President Assad: The question that you should ask when you have a crime: who is the beneficiary of that crime? What would they get, I mean for the Russians or the Syrians, if they attack a school or if they attack hospital? What would they get if they attack a hospital? Nothing, they wouldn’t get anything. I mean, even if you want to talk about the terrorists, most of their hospitals for the militants would be in the basement in ordinary buildings. So, attacking a hospital intentionally by the army is based on shaky logic, let’s say.
Question 6: Do you then agree that whoever attacks hospitals, they are guilty of war crimes?
President Assad: Of course, by international law, it is. I mean, hospitals have immunity. Any other facility for any inhabited area – inhabited by civilians, not by militants – has immunity, and any government shouldn’t do it, of course, I agree with you.
Question 7: Mr. President, you have kids yourself, and I’m sure you’re also watching television, you also watch these pictures of children at the hospitals, children being buried in the rubble. How does it affect you when you look at these pictures of Syrian children?
President Assad: Of course, I have children, I have the same feelings of any father and mother who would care a lot about their children, and how would they feel if they lose a member of their family. And by the way, we lost members of our families during the conflict because of the terrorist attacks. But when you look at those killed children, you think why? Why the terrorists did so? Why did Qatar and Saudi Arabia and Turkey commit those crimes? And I wonder why would the Western countries, mainly the USA and its allies in Europe, have supported those terrorists who’ve been committing crimes in Syria? That’s the first thing I thought about. Of course, as President, the second thing that I would think about is how can I protect the Syrian people and the Syrian children, and how can I protect the innocent from having the same fate in any coming day.
Question 8: So, you are blaming the rebels in the eastern part of Aleppo of being behind the attacks on the children of Aleppo?
President Assad: You can take your camera to Aleppo, to the other part of Aleppo which is under the control of the government, which is – I mean, when you see the fact, it’s more credible than what I’m going to say – but you can see how many civilians have been killed during the last two months in Aleppo. Hundreds of civilians have been killed by the rebels. The question is why didn’t we hear about them in the Western media? That’s my question. Again, I wouldn’t say that you don’t having civilians going as victims, but when it’s shelled by mortars by the rebels intentionally, we have to talk about this crime as well.
Question 9: At the moment, there’s a seven-year-old girl, her name is Bana al-Abed, from Aleppo. She’s Tweeting about her life in the eastern part of Aleppo. She’s talking about the massive bombardment. She’s very scared, every time she wakes up and realizes, fortunately, she’s still alive. Do you trust her as an eyewitness?
President Assad: You cannot build your political position or stand, let’s say, according to a video promoted by the terrorists or their supporters. It’s a game now, a game of propaganda, it’s a game of media. You can see anything, and you can be sympathetic with every picture and every video you see. But our mission as a government is to deal with the reality. You have terrorists in Syria, they are supported by foreign powers and foreign countries, and we have to defend our country. In some areas, the terrorists use the civilians as a human shield, but we have to do our job to liberate them, we cannot say “we won’t do anything because the terrorists are holding those hostages.” It’s our mission. Again, we are going to the same point; you always have mistakes that are committed by anyone, but this is not policy, and you always have innocent victims of that war.
Question 10: What kind of mistakes did the Syrian Army do?
President Assad: Any individual mistakes.
Question 11: Have you any examples of mistakes?
President Assad: I mean, you have institutions, I mean anyone could be punished if he commits a mistake, that would happen in any war, in every army, this is common sense.
Question 12: You have encouraged the civilians in the eastern part of Aleppo, and also actually the rebels, to leave the place. You wanted to create a humanitarian corridor. Can you guarantee the safety of those civilians and the rebels if they leave the rebel-held part of the city?
President Assad: Exactly, that’s what we announced a few days ago, and we announced it two months ago, because we wanted the civilians to leave away from the terrorists. Yeah.
Question 13: And how are you going to protect them?
President Assad: They are allowed to leave. It happened many times, in many different areas in Syria. We allowed the terrorists to leave that area in order to protect the civilians. We don’t need any more blood-letting and blood-shedding. This is one of the ways or the methods we’ve been using in order to protect the civilians. Of course, if they don’t obey, we tell the civilians that we’re going to attack that area, so they can move away from it. But the best way is to allow the terrorists to leave, and the civilians will be safe, then you can if you want to follow or chase the terrorists, you can chase them somewhere else where there’s no civilians.
Question 14: Do you understand if people around the world who are watching these terrifying pictures coming out of the eastern part of Aleppo, if they maybe think that you are denying facts? That you also have some kind of responsibility for the victims, for the bombing of the hospitals, for the bombing of the civilian infrastructure? Do you understand that some people, they may think you are denying facts?
President Assad: Look, if we’ve been faced by lies since the beginning of the war on Syria, accepting those lies as reality doesn’t make me credible. I wouldn’t be credible if I say “oh, yeah, you’re right.” That’s why I said there’s a difference between accepting that this is a policy, or accepting that they always have mistakes. I didn’t deny any mistake to be committed by any individual. I said there’s always mistakes. There are always mistakes committed in any war. So, I’m very realistic. But to say that this is our aim as a government, we give the order to destroy hospitals or schools or to kill civilians, this is against our interests. I mean, if you want to put the morals aside, we wouldn’t do it because this is against us, so how can those people, that would say that we are only denying facts, convince anyone that we are working against our interests?
This is first. Second, if we are killing people, Syrian people, and destroying hospitals and committing all these atrocities, and we’ve been faced by all the great powers and the petrodollars in the world, how can I be President after nearly six years of the beginning of the war? I’m not Superman, if I don’t have support, I wouldn’t be here, and because I have the support, and because we defend the Syrian people, we have the support as President or as a government. This is how to refute all these claims. I mean, at the end, the reality is telling.
Question 15: So, there’s a fierce battle going on in Aleppo right now. What will be the Syrian army and the Russian army’s next move to retake the eastern rebel-held part of Aleppo?
President Assad: To continue the fight with the rebels till they leave Aleppo. They have to. There’s no other option. We won’t accept that terrorists will take control of any part of Syria, not only Aleppo. This is our mission, and this is our goal, and this is our next step.
Question 16: So, this intense way of warfare that we see right will continue, that’s what you’re saying?
President Assad: No, if you have any other option like the reconciliations in other areas, that’s the best option, not the war, and that’s why we announced – we gave many amnesties to hundreds, and maybe thousands, not hundreds, thousands of militants, in order to save blood, and it worked. That’s why we said we give them guarantee, whether they want to have reconciliation and to have the amnesty, or to leave with their armaments outside the city of Aleppo completely, to leave the city safe, and for the people to go back to their normal life.
Question 17: The United States, they stopped all bilateral talks with Russia about any kind of peace agreement, and the Russians they said that they actually regret this. Do you regret it as well?
President Assad: We regret it, but we knew in advance that it wouldn’t work, because the agreement, it’s not only about the talks between the two great powers, it’s not about what they’re going to sign or agree upon; it’s about the will, and we already knew, we had already known that the Americans didn’t have the will to reach any agreement, because the main part of that agreement is to attack al-Nusra which is, according to the American list and to the United Nations list, is a terrorist group, but in the Syrian conflict, it’s an American card. Without al-Nusra, the Americans cannot have any real, let’s say, concrete and effective card in the Syrian arena. That’s why we regret it, but we already knew that it wouldn’t happen.
Question 18: But isn’t it very difficult for the United States to separate the so-called “moderate rebels” and some of the more radical ones? This is very difficult, when you are attacking the moderate rebels all the time.
President Assad: You are right, do you know why you are right? Do you know the unicorn, the animal that’s like a horse, has a long horn? It’s a myth. And the moderate opposition is a myth. That’s why you cannot separate something that doesn’t exist from something that exists. All of them have the same grassroots, the same grassroots that used to be called “free Syrian army” four years ago, five years ago, then it became al-Nusra, then it became ISIS. So, the same grassroots move from group to another group. That’s why they cannot separate it. And they don’t want.. if this is reality, not a myth, they don’t want, but they cannot, because it doesn’t exist.
Question 19: But why did you ask them to do it if it’s not possible?
President Assad: Because they insisted that there is a moderate opposition, and the Russian told them “ok, if there is a moderate opposition, please separate those moderates from the extremists,” and it didn’t work, because they don’t exist, that’s why.
Question 20: What do you think will be the consequences of the US suspension of the bilateral talks? I mean, until now, the Syrian and Russian armies, they have avoided direct clashes with the US army. Do you think that there’s an increased risk of direct attacks between you and your allies and the US army?
President Assad: Many people are talking about the escalation, if the agreement didn’t work or if it’s not implemented. But actually that escalation has been happening for a while now. I mean, before that agreement, let’s say, failed, the Americans attacked our forces in Deir Ezzor, and everybody knows that only one group existed in Deir Ezzor, which is ISIS, and ISIS came and took the place of the Syrian Army and they threaten the city, which is called Deir Ezzor, because of the American attacks. So, talking about escalation, it’s already happening. Talking about direct confrontation, since World War II, that never happened, I mean, it was very close to happening during the Cuban missile crisis, in 1962 I think. Now the situation is different, because in the United States you don’t have superior statecraft. When you don’t have superior statecraft, you should expect anything, and you should always expect the worse. I’m sure that Russia is doing its best not to reach that point, but do the Americans – or, let’s say, the “hawks” part or the group within the administration – do their best to avoid that confrontation, or the opposite, do their best to have this confrontation with Russia? That’s what worries us.
Question 21: And talking about the incident in Deir Ezzor on September 17. It was British, Australian, US, and Danish fighter jets who allegedly attacked the Syrian Army. Denmark, like the other countries, they said it was a mistake. Do you accept that explanation?
President Assad: We accept the explanation, but that doesn’t mean we accept that error, doesn’t mean we justify it. To say a mistake, maybe you have the wrong information, especially as you are fulfilling an American mission; I’m sure not the Danish, not the British, decided which target they should attack. I’m sure the Americans said “this is our target, and this is where ISIS is.” Of course, they deceive the others, and tell them “we’re going to attack ISIS.” Maybe that’s the truth. But is it acceptable for the Danish people that your army is fulfilling military missions of other countries without verifying the target and knowing where is it heading? Do you take a bus without knowing where the bus is going to? You don’t. So, it’s not acceptable. Maybe it’s a mistake, that’s true, but the mistake is not acceptable.
Question 22: So do you think that, indirectly, Denmark, they were helping ISIS?
President Assad: In reality, they helped ISIS because of this attack, because they killed tens of Syrian soldiers who are defending the city of Deir Ezzor from being under the control of ISIS, and now ISIS took the place, took the hills that overlook the city, so they could be able someday to take control of Deir Ezzor because of that attack.
Question 23: And you think that the US, they did that on purpose, and Denmark, they helped them without knowing?
President Assad: I don’t know about Denmark; I don’t know if it’s without knowing. Maybe. The only reason that makes me believe so is because the Europeans implement and fulfill what the Americans want in every field without asking and without discussing, to be frank, so it could be one of the reasons. But for the Americans, a hundred percent, they did it intentionally, because ISIS gathered their militants in the same place before the attack, and when the attack started, it took about one hour, and in the next hour ISIS attacked and took control of those hills. How could ISIS knew about this raid before it happened? Of course, this is not the only indication for us that the United States is supporting ISIS, the attack on Palmyra, when they occupied and took control of Palmyra under the supervision of the Americans, the smuggling of oil, the extraction of oil from oil fields in Syria in the desert in the middle of the day. This is a strong indication that the United States has been supporting ISIS in order to use ISIS.
Question 24: Until now, the Danish government they have followed US policy towards Syria. They even said that they were willing to engage in a military operation against the Syrian Army. What do you think about the Danish policy towards Syria?
President Assad: First of all, the intervention in Syria, as part of the international coalition which is actually an American coalition, this is against the international law, this is against the sovereignty of Syria because this is not in coordination with the Syrian government, while the Russian came to Syria after taking the permission of the Syrians; actually after having an invitation from the Syrian government to support us in our fight against the terror. So this is against the sovereignty, this is against the international law and this is against any moralized policy anywhere in the world. It’s illegal.
The other aspect of that policy is the embargo. As part of the European Union, they made embargo on the Syrian population; tens of millions of Syrians, they are not allowed to reach the basic needs of their life. For example, you cannot buy now pumps for the water, they cannot buy medical equipment to diagnose somebody who has a cancer who would die because he cannot afford these materials. The embargo prevents the Syrian companies, airlines companies, from having spare parts for their airplanes in order to prevent those airplanes from crashing in the air and killing the passengers. This is the policy of the European Union, and Denmark is part of that policy.
Question 25: But what else should they do? I mean, they are very much against what’s going on in Syria right now. They have been supporting the opposition. Maybe they don’t want to be involved in a direct war with the Syrian Army. So what else to do?
President Assad: For the government?
Journalist: Yes.
President Assad: The question is would you as a Danish citizen accept me as a foreigner to support opposition in your country with money and to tell them “go and kill, and that’s how you achieve your political goals?” If there is opposition, what is the definition of opposition? Could you accept an opposition in your country that belongs to other countries? Or should it be a Danish opposition that belongs to Danish people. They cannot tell which opposition to support in any other country. This is an intervention in internal matters. This is against the sovereignty, against the international law. They don’t have the right to support anyone in Syria against anyone. It’s not their business. We are a sovereign country; we are independent. We have the right to tackle our problems. So, they’re not in a position to support anyone, whether right or wrong.
Question 26: Do you see Denmark as an enemy of Syria?
President Assad: No, they are not. They are not an enemy. There is a big difference between the Danish people, like most of the European people, they were friends to Syria, but it’s about the policy of the government. It’s about whole Europe now being absent from the political map at least since 2003 after the invasion of Iraq, just because they had to follow the Americans, and they don’t dare to take their independent, let’s say, path in politics. We differentiate precisely between the government and the people of Denmark, and the same for other countries.
Question 27: If it could speed up the negotiations for a peaceful future in Syria, if you left office and may be another one from the Syrian administration took over, why wouldn’t you do that?
President Assad: To leave, you mean?
Journalist: Yes.
President Assad: That depends on the Syrian people. It’s not my decision. And if you don’t have the support of the Syrian people, you have to leave right away, because without their support, you cannot achieve anything, you cannot produce anything, you are going to fail. So that’s simply the reason, especially during the war you have to lead the ship to the shore; you don’t run away because there is a war, unless the Syrian people want you to leave. If I’m the problem, again, or the other point, let’s say, or the other side of the story, if I’m the reason of the war, I would leave. But it’s not about me; I am just used as a nominal reason. It’s much bigger than that; it’s about Syria, it’s about the government, it’s about the independence, it is about the war on the regional level, it is about the war between the great powers. Syria is just the headline and the President is the main headline.
Question 28: So you don’t think that you are one of the reasons for the war?
President Assad: No, I am not a reason for the war, because if I am a reason, the war should have started in 2000, since I became President, not 2011 when the money started pouring from Qatar and when the United States took the decision that they want topple governments and presidents because they do not suit them.
Question 29: But don’t you think you are the reason that the war escalated?
President Assad: Because of me?
Journalist: Yes.
President Assad: So, the terrorists according to what you are saying, terrorists are not responsible, they are very peaceful people. The money of Qatar and Saudi Arabia and Turkey are something legal and natural, let’s say, and the agenda of the United States fulfilled the needs of the Syrian people, which is not realistic.
Question 30: Mr. President, you have said many times that you will continue the fight until you have recaptured the whole country, is that still your approach to this process?
President Assad: No, it’s not my approach; it’s my mission according to the constitution. It’s the mission of the army according to the constitution; it’s the mission of the state’s institutions according to the constitution. It’s not an option, it’s not a personal opinion, and it’s not my plan. My mission is to defend the civilians. My mission is to fight terrorists. My mission is to take control of every part of my country. You don’t take part of your country as a state. You don’t say “it is enough for me have half of the country” or so.
Question 31: So you think that you are defending the civilians?
President Assad: Definitely.
Question 32: I mean more than hundreds of thousands of civilians have been killed; some people say 250 thousands; some people say 300 thousands. Do you think that you are defending the civilians in Syria?
President Assad: The majority of those that you are talking about, the victims, are supporters of the government, not the opposite. Another part which is unbiased, in the middle, it doesn’t belong to the government or to the other. So the majority are supporters. So, of course, I am defending the civilians. Again, otherwise if I’m not, If I’m killing the civilians, as the propaganda would promote for four years, I wouldn’t be here as President. I cannot withstand for nearly six years.
Question 33: Last question, Mr. President: Do you believe in a diplomatic political solution, or do you, deep inside your heart, know that this is going to be a military solution, and that is really what you want?
President Assad: Neither, neither, because when you have a problem you have a solution, you don’t have a kind of solution, but the problem itself will tell you how many aspects of that problems you have. For example, if I believe in political solution but you have terrorism, you cannot have a political solution because you have chaos. If you have chaos, this is the antithesis to anything natural, including the political process. So, you need first to fight terrorists in order to reach political solution. So, in reality, you have to follow both paths; the military and the diplomatic or the political, because they are related to each other. So, it’s not about my belief; it’s not what I believe; it’s what the requirement of this conflict to be solved. So you don’t define it. The whole circumstances define it. For example, regarding the terrorists, it’s not only about military solution; it’s about the adjacent countries and the Western countries stop supporting the terrorists. If they stop supporting them, the military aspect of that solution will be marginalized; it won’t be important because they will be weak. You will give a chance to more political initiatives in that regard. If they support them more, actually what is going to happen is the opposite; the political solution or path will be marginalized. So, it’s not about what I believe in. I wish we can solve everything politically, I wish, that’s what I think is suitable, but it’s not about what I wish, it’s about the facts on the ground.
Journalist: Thank you very much, Mr. President.
President Assad: Thank you for coming.
I don’t know many “monsters” or “dictators” that seem to open themselves up to such a regular stream of accusations from a somewhat skeptical if not openly hostile interviewer.
There was an Irish interviewer a month or so back, same exact thing.
How many Castros or Husseins would have put up with that?
He is a British trained eye surgeon who was taught surgery in the National Health Service (free state provided hospitals by UK government if you don’t know about UK healthcare).
He is not some brain dead Danish reporter or traitorous deserting US diplomat or arrogant US war hawk!
Assad is the bee’s knees when it comes to something no EU or US government representative has: sound moral stature.
In comparison Obama and May are second hand car sales people.
Yes, Assad is a very credible and ‘normal’ sounding guy. I think he is answering all the questions well, and honestly. But he did make one glaring faux-pas.
He said that Europe lost its way, and integrity, or something to that effect, by supporting the war in iraq in 2003. Actually, because of the Russian veto, the US and UK tried to bend the UN rules to make it a majority vote among the 15 security council members (5 permanent, 10 rotating). Instrumental in hitting the politically magic number, was……. SYRIA, who were a rotating UNSC member at the time.
Yes, Syria allowed its arm to be twisted, if i remember correctly, and supported the US invasion of Iraq. Basically, no better than those Europeans. Actually, France and Germany did NOT support.
I remember at the time, thinking about Syria, ‘What a stupid decision; you think it will spare you the same fate, but the USA honours no promise, and you will be next.’
Never, ever, trust the USA.
I would add also, that though to his credit, Assad made this point, I don’t think he emphasized it enough. What ‘Motive’ would Syria or Russia have for bombing hospitals?
He identified a now very old but still seemingly effective Western meme, that of using a humanitarian pretext to conduct the mass-bombing and regime change that it wanted to do in the first place.
First come the atrocities, which are always gruesome in detail, and absolutely contrary to the interests of the accused. For somebody like Assad, Gadaffi, Milosevic, Hussein, and so on, to perform an act of limited or no strategic battlefield value, that will absolutely turn the world against them, and in spite of knowing that their actions are being stringently scrutinised, and will assuredly invite NATO attack and regime change, is stupidity that we can safely assume none of them were guilty of. These things are almost certainly set ups in every case. The Canadian Commander Lewis Mackenzie in Bosnia, accused the muslims of bombing their own people, to provide the USA with footage that it could use to re-direct public and political opinion.
Likewise the alleged Chemical attack in Syria, and the hospital bombings there. It is the usual meme; it is pushed into our faces on the MSM so that we support the Empire to unleash its aerial Armada. The accused would only have performed the alleged act, if they were insane or totally stupid. But if the act is that heinous, and they did not do it, and this pattern of behaviour repeats in every NATO adversary, then why is it so hard for the public to see that the monster hides within NATO itself?
Once a Western sponsored insurgency starts in country x, y or z, it follows a very well rehearsed modus operandi. It is obvious in the extreme, and yet sickeningly effective time after time.
The only comfort I can find in it, is that public opinion must still be important, else TPTB need not bother with the manipulation thereof. It is a question of how to awaken public consciousness.
I hope the Danish people get to see that interview in full, and then make their own judgements about who is good and who is bad in this situation.
Poor deluded interviewer. The real answer to all those questions of course would be: go find a real journalist. Someone who checks all those allegations. Poor, empty, talking head.
And that’s a great man he was talking to. I hope he knows that. The more I read or hear Assad’s words, the greater is my respect for his mind and his character.
The funny thing is no western journalist will ask questions that are merely half as tough, but full
of facts to the Israeli PM….
I feel very deeply that I want to slap that interviewer in the face with a small office building. Repeatedly.
I cannot believe how these “journalists” can be so ignorant of the truth. How did they become so incompetant. Have they forgetten the basic rules of “check your facts/sources”.
I feel such anger towards them. Such a rage boils inside my heart when I see questions like this.
I think it is time for “western civilisation to die”. We haved stooped too low
Syrian, Russian actions beg for war crimes investigation – Kerry
Published time: 7 Oct, 2016 14:26
Edited time: 7 Oct, 2016 19:03
https://www.rt.com/usa/361939-kerry-russia-war-crimes/
“Washington has intensified saber-rattling rhetoric towards Russia, with US Secretary of State John Kerry calling for a war crimes probe of Moscow’s anti-terrorist operation in Syria.
Trends
Syria unrest
“Russia and the regime owe the world more than an explanation about why they keep hitting hospitals, medical facilities, children, women,” Kerry said after meeting with the French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault on Friday. “These are acts that beg for an appropriate investigation of war crimes.” Kerry called the actions of the Syrian military and the Russian air force “beyond accidental” and “a targeted strategy to terrorize civilians.”
Kerry prefaced his remarks about “war crimes” by claiming that the Syrian forces hit “another hospital” in Aleppo overnight, killing 20 people and wounding 100. There has been no confirmation of the attack, whether from government or rebel sources.”
It really is time for Lavrov to say enough now…….this is getting very sick indeed, no UNSC resolution is ever possible to try usa coalition and moderate rebels so called and their sponsors for war crimes and breaking every international rule.
So even Putin met the French Foreign Minister yesterday I believe, he is scheming with partner in crime kerry-UNSC due to meet 5pm today New York time????
I wonder what will happen…………………………
yup the skulduggery continues by France
Russian ambassador to the UN Vitaly Churkin© EPA/JASON SZENES
READ ALSO
France to put draft resolution on Aleppo at UN SC voting on Saturday
UNITED NATIONS, October 7. /TASS/. Russia cannot admit endorsement of the French-authored draft resolution on Aleppo in its current form, the Russian ambassador to the UN, Vitaly Churkin told reporters on Friday.
The diplomat assumed that the real objective of the document was to make Russia use its right to veto even though the French diplomats assured him initially they did not have any such intentions.
“I don’t see how we could possibly admit adoption of that resolution,” he said.
More:
http://tass.com/politics/905003?_ga=1.74685915.813553340.1472135887
so Russia, are you really really happy the way treated you over the mistral for example-one wonders. Because to me it showed you would give in………………
although , or consequently does this statement carry any weight
MOSCOW, October 7. /TASS/. John Kerry’s statement on the necessity of a probe into Russia’s operation in Syria is obviously meant to divert attention from Washington breaching the Syrian ceasefire deal, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Friday.
She said Kerry’s words can be explained by Washington’s non-fulfilment of its liabilities under the agreement on ceasefire in Syria.
“The American side was simply unable to fulfil the ceasefire agreement. They told us themselves that they have no levers of influence on the opposition,” she said in an interview with the Dozhd television channel.
More:
http://tass.com/politics/905002
MOSCOW, October 7. /TASS/. The Russian Federation has fulfilled all commitments on Syria to the United States, while trying to meet its Western partners halfway, whereas the US-controlled opposition used the ceasefire regime to rearm, Russian Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov said Friday.
“I want to note that the Russian Federation fulfilled the commitments it undertook in full, while meeting our partners halfway,” Antonov said.
“At the same time, the opposition controlled by the United States used the cessation of fire only for regrouping, replenishment of supplies of ammunition, armaments and materiel,” he said.
“Restoring the combat efficiency, the militants again started attacks on the positions of the government troops,” Antonov said. “In such conditions, the unilateral observation of the regime of cessation of hostilities by the government troops is impossible and senseless.”
About 13,000 civilians and 3,500 servicemen of Syria’s government army were killed in a period from late February and September 1 in violations of the regime of cessation of hostilities, Antonov added:
“In a period from February 27 to September 1, 2016, a total of 2,031 ceasefire violations by ‘moderate’ opposition groups were reported in Syria. As a result, a total of 3,532 servicement of the Syrian army and 12,800 civilians were killed. As many as 8,949 servicemen and 25,642 civilians were wounded.”
Aleppo crisis
READ ALSO
Russia ready to let Jabhat al-Nusra leave Aleppo for saving the city — Lavrov
Deliveries of humanitarian aid to Syria’s Aleppo last month were frustrated due to US military’s failure to push back armed opposition from Castello Road, Anatoly Antonov noted.
“Syrian troops withdrew from Castello Road twice on September 15 and 16,” the deputy defense minister said. “However, the United States failed to organize the withdrawal of the armed opposition from the Castello Road and Syrian troops returned to the positions they held.”
“The security for UN humanitarian convoys was not eventually provided and the delivery of the humanitarian aid to citizens of Aleppo was frustrated,” he added.
US and its inability to influence opposition
READ ALSO
Diplomat: Russian-US tension stems from failure to separate Syria terrorists, opposition
The Amman-based analytical group has proved the United States’ inability to exert any influence on the Syrian opposition, Anatoly Antonov has stated.
He reminded that following the launch of the first ceasefire regime on February 27, 2016, a hotline between Russia’s air base at Hmeimim and the US analytical group in Amman, Jordan, was established. “However, from July 28, 2016, this communications channel was stopped by the United States’ unilateral decision and the group was subsequently dissolved. Obviously, one of the reasons was that over the period of its work, receiving regular requests from Russia to the United States on exerting influence on ceasefire violators, the group demonstrated that the Americans had no levers of influence on the opposition.”
“US representatives have failed to talk the ‘moderate’ opposition into dropping unacceptable ultimatums which has brought the political process into a dead end,” Antonov said.
At the same time, he stressed that officers of the Russian center for reconciliation of the warring parties in Syria have managed to persuade the elder of 742 populated localities in that country to join the reconciliation process. “As many as 69 armed groups of the ‘moderate opposition’ have declared their commitment of the regime of cessation of hostilities. More to it, work on a draft of Syria’s new constitution has been launched with Russia’s participation,” he said.
More:
http://tass.com/politics/904964?_ga=1.80525662.813553340.1472135887
The current French government?
A shiver looking for a spine to run up.
crosstalk tonight
re who are the white helmets…………..111111111111111111111111111111111
According to the Russian Foreign Ministry, the decision to deploy S-300 anti-air missile system in Syria came after receiving leaked data on US intentions to bomb Syrian airbases.
“The S-300 appeared there [in Syria] after experts close to the American establishment had started leaking information…that the US could hit Syrian airfields with cruise missiles,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said in an interview with Russia’s Dozhd TV chennel. The Russian Defense Ministry said on Tuesday that a battery of S-300 air defense systems had been delivered to Syria to protect the naval base at Tartus, as well as Russia warships deployed off the Syrian coast. Earlier, Zakharova critized US Secretary of State John Kerry’s statements on launching an investigation into “war crimes of the Russian Federation.” © SPUTNIK/ DMITRIY VINOGRADOV Definition of Insanity: US & Europe Preparing Sanctions Against Russia for Fighting Terrorism in Syria “This is propaganda,”
Read more: https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20161007/1046118409/syria-s-300-deployment.html
Sick and tired of those so called Western journalist who don’t know the basic rules of their own work.
Unbiased research, unbiased research…….
They should be made to write it until their fingers are stumps.
“they only singled out a few pictures of children that suit their political agenda, just to accuse the Syrian government, while – you’ve been here now for two days – and they’ve been daily shelling from the eastern part of Aleppo toward the rest of the city, and there was wholesale killing and destruction of the other part of the city and tens of victims and tens of wounded people from Aleppo that the Western corporations didn’t talk about them. The Western officials didn’t issue a single statement regarding those children and women and elderly and innocents in general”
Sarajevo redux.
This must be put on all social media. US has been EU allowed and supported to become a Fourth Reich by copying the Third Reich slavishly from a British solution decided by the British Parliament of 1814!
More than three hundred years ago. WW11 was an US war decided waged before Europe ever had time to recover from WW1, which was declared the worst war the world have ever engaged in: ‘the war to end all wars!’ A war that would clearly have taken much more than 100 years to recover from, was simply repeated less than a generation after WW1. WW11 was won by the country, Russia, the US was sure would be defeated by the German Third Reich which was US funded throughout WW11.
Germany was to then give part of a defeated Russia to the US in exchange for the US ‘loaned’ German world war11 funds. Implicitly the weak and facillating German Foreign minister, Merkel, fell into the US trap sprung by it’s supported 9/11 removal of all laws. In 2001.Now being 2016 with over half of Europe become US vassal states having blindly followed US run, EU trusted, Merkel. Because Europe did not demand, using Russia as it’s brother in arms, it’s 100 years of peace to recover from WW1! Merkel from the US divided East Germany. From end of WW11 to now, the US has relentlessly demonised Russia based on the British demonisation of Russland in 1814! UK always in complicit relationship to USA. See Blair and Bush11. See the British lords, the Scotts lords relationship to USA from the beginning.A place to only exploit. Ruthlessly.
Only Europe can stop the USA, and must do so in order to survive itself in any form at all.
Why Everything You Hear About Aleppo Is Wrong –
What’s really going on in Aleppo? Are Assad and Putin exterminating the population for sport? Is it a war against US-backed “moderates”? That is what the mainstream media would have us believe. We speak with Vanessa Beeley, a journalist who just returned from Aleppo for the real story.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8mA0h7dCKI&feature=youtu.be
Very well spoken, President Assad.
As for the zio-gay propagandist asking the biased questions, there is a place beside a certain lord ha ha for that war criminal.
The questions are not that biased, because being confronted with the meaningless accusations Assad gets a possibility to falsify and reject them and thereby break the globalists narrative.
He came, he saw a picture, and immediately knew that ‘Assad must GO’. Giggle, giggle.
I wonder if the CIAda handed him the questions to be asked?
The interviewer was more interested in his stupid questions than finding out what is actually happening in Syria
Journalism like this does not deserve respect. They have become instruments of oppressive U.S. govt.
wow, I think this is by far Assad’s best interview!
Battles for Aleppo | October 8th 2016
Militants shell Government Controlled Districts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XLKagolnJ0