Question for COVID-dissidents and anti-vaxxers

The hand behind the curtain likes to remain unseen. This is why 9-11 was a mistake, created by the ‘usual suspects’, as it reveals a scene performed against the laws of physics. Steel framed buildings do not collapse at free fall speed, through their central core, without the use of military grade explosives.

The positive aspect of the Covid virus then maybe that it also reveals the ‘usual suspects’. I suspect the virus was designed as a bio-weapon and yet it is little more than a serious flu, treatable by good health habits and Ivermectin, etc. However, the suspects have gone full crazy on the pandemic hysteria and now it is revealed to be a PR farce.

Once the people realise they have been deceived, the court cases will be as numerous as the leaves upon the trees, and once the sanctum of deception is breached, then all sorts of investigations will begin, such as a forensic examination of our monetary system. What fools create their greatest treasure, the nation’s monetary system, as debt, the money for slaves?

My hope then is the suspects have overreached with Covid, and now they will begin to pay the price!

I’ve had ally vaccines so to say that I’m am anti-vaxer would assume incorrect, because I won’t take the vaccine. World leaders are incapable to know all and is why there are professionals in place. Speaking as an American, we have Fauci. I will be more than happy to prove your theory incorrect but would take a lot of reading as I can provide theories, evidence, and show you the publication material of said evidence. The issue is this goes back quite a bit and there’s so much to show. I do believe this is a depopulation scheme. I believe there are pawns, everyone has a price, and you should follow the money trail. Do you think AIDS was created in Africa or in a secure military facility in the US? What about Lukemia? Do you believe that Fauci funded the Wuhan virus that was man-made? How far does the arms of the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation reach – Are WHO and CDC their puppets? Are they eugenicists? How far do the hands of big Pharma reach? Are they on the board of every MSM news outlet in America? And lastly how much did the Elite make during the covid lock downs? $5 Trillion? If you don’t believe any of this, then nothing I say to you will convince you otherwise whether I provide evidence or not. And the fact of the matter is the world is not unicorns and fairy dust. There are evil people in this world. There are people would would combine a SARS virus with HIV ribbon to create a new super coronavirus so that the vaccine,that was already patented, could be used to depopulate and track the world population, using the 5G network, from the nanoparicles introduced in the vaccine, reporting to the cloud that is already patented. And by the way, these patents are owned by Bill Gates or one of his foundations that he sponsors. Now can you prove me wrong? Only one requirement. You cannot use the propagated entertainment of MSM. The information must come from specialist who have no ties to big pharma, a govt entity, big tech, or any of the Bill and Gates foundations or sponsored foundations. It must come from those who truly back science and have the people’s interest at heart. And one other thing to mention.

P.S. – Tell me a time in history when the truth tried to silence a lie, and not a lie silence the truth? I look forward to your response.

P.S.S. – Those that speak out against the jab, what do they have to gain? What is there ultimate goal? What are they sacrificing?

Those that silence anticovid Vax, what is their goal? What do they have to gain? What are they sacrificing? Why are they taking away our 1st ammendment right of freedom of speech?

Lastly look at the research results of ivermectin and HCQ W/Zinc. These items are already FDA approved. So why are they blowing up the hcq labs, killing the founders of HCQ, and telling people not to take it because it doesn’t work? And why did Fauci tell his friends and family members to take it..(found in his emails that were released thru the Freedom of Information Act).

ARE YOU READY TO KNOW THE TRUTH? ARE YOU READY TO UNPLUG FROM THE PROPAGANDA MACHINE? IM @TALLFIN7 ON MOST SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS THAT STILL ALLOW OUR 1ST AMMENDMENT RIGHT!

If you could only read the censor scientists like Dr, Michael Yeadon, Dr Michael Levitt, Dr Geert Vanden Bossche, Dr Kaufman, Dr Sam Bailey, Dr Peter Gotzsche, Dr Mark Honigsbaun, Dr Marc Siegel,Dr Torsten Engelbretch,Dr Klaus Kohnlein, Dr Stefano Scoglio, Dr Sunetra Gupta,Dr jay bhattacharya,Dr Jon Ioannidis, Dr Martin Kuldorff, Dr Sucharit Bhakdi, Luc Mongtanier and many others you would have at least some scoope of the level of high tech censorship and smearing campaign going arround the globe.

Are you suggesting that such articles as this ‘No Jab for Me – And Here Are 35 Reasons Why
By Dr. Gary G. Kohls
Global Research, May 05, 2021
Theme: Media Disinformation, Science and Medicine

“Fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. The CDC’s entire vaccination propaganda campaign rests on their claim that side effects from vaccinations are exceedingly rare, but according to the blatantly pro-over-vaccination,
Big Pharma-funded CDC, in 2016 alone, VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) received 59,117 vaccine adverse event reports. Among those reports were 432 vaccine-related deaths, 1,091 permanent vaccine-related disabilities, 4,132 vaccine-related hospitalizations, and10,274 vaccine-related emergency room visits. What if these numbers actually represent less than 1% of the total as this report asserts? You multiply those numbers by 100.” – William Christenson
***
“The FDA receives 45% of its annual budget from the pharmaceutical industry.
“The World Health Organization (WHO) gets roughly half its budget from private sources, including Pharma and its allied foundations.
“And the CDC, frankly, is a vaccine company; it owns 56 vaccine patents and buys and distributes $4.6 billion in vaccines annually through the Vaccines for Children program, which is over 40% of its total budget.
“The HHS (US Health and Human Services) partners with vaccine makers to develop, approve, recommend, and pass mandates for new products and then shares profits from vaccine sales.
“HHS employees can personally collect up to $150,000 annually in royalties for products they work on.
“For example, key HHS officials collect money on every sale of Merck’s controversial HPV vaccine Gardasil, which also yields tens of millions annually for the agency in patent royalties.” — Robert F. Kennedy, Jr
***
Statements in these sites (this and this) are substantiated with facts that will stand in a court of law. Informed Consent requires a flow of information. Click on the hyperlinked sections to direct you to primary sources such as CDC, WHO, FDA documents.
***
Did you know?
1. The FDA did not approve Moderna or Pfizer mRNA gene therapeutics they dubbed “vaccines”. It simply authorized them. Fauci confirms. “In the US, the FDA in its ambiguous statement provided a so-called Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, namely “to permit the emergency use of the unapproved product, … for active immunization…” (see here)
see below:

19 doctors warned the world of the dangers. AstraZeneca is being dropped by 24 countries.
Johnson & Johnson, a Viral Vector(1) ” injection” that was given Emergency Use Authorization on Feb. 27, 2021, was halted by several states due to the formation of blood clots. The CDC had confirmed. But distribution resumed after a 10 day pause.
The CDC also confirms(2) the Pfizer & Moderna jabs are the deadliest of all “vaccines”, also in a bar chart. 5 prominent doctors discuss how the Covid jab is a bioweapon.
2. The clinical trials will be completed in 2023, there are 12 vaccine companies ramping up their marketing, and you are the guinea pig.
3. The FDA & CDC have not revealed to the public over 20 adverse effects, including Death, related to Covid19 injections, which were discussed in an October 2020 meeting. 3,544 deaths from Covid19 injections are reported by the National Vaccine Information Center as at 4/23/2021, and one-third of the deaths occurred within 48 hours.
For clarification purposes in this article, Covid19, given that the virus has not been isolated, is regarded as an influenza variant, given the symptoms exhibited by patients. And, yes, people can die of influenza or the common cold. In fact, lungs of influenza patients can be more damaged than those of Covid patients.
Some will argue that SARS-CoV-2 was developed in a Gain-of-Function lab. That is moot. The primary consideration is whether an experimental injection is warranted for a disease with a 99.9% survival rate.
I am for tried, true and tested (safe) vaccines. I am NOT for experimental gene therapeutics backed by disastrous animal studies, used on humans for the first time in history.
4. The mRNA jab delivers a synthetic, inorganic molecule (medical device) that programs your cells to synthesize pathogens in the form of the spike protein that your immune system will constantly have to fight off for the rest of your life, according to experts such as Molecular Biologist & Immunologist, Professor Dolores Cahill. She explains. Fauci confirms. Dr. Lee Merritt reconfirms.
Others call it Information Therapy that hacks the software of life, according to Moderna’s [Mode RNA] chief scientist. You essentially become a GMO. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny mapped eight mechanisms that can result in death by a Covid jab.
5. The mRNA jab does not prevent you from contracting Covid19 or from transmitting it. Dr. Steve Hotze elaborates. Fauci confirms. The CDC graph underscores that reality, proving these injections are ineffective and injection passports are totally useless.
87 million Americans have been subjected to injections as at 4/20/21, of which 7,157 have contracted Covid after beingvaccinated, resulting in 88 deaths. Also, an imperfect “vaccination” can enhance the transmission of highly virulent pathogens, according to this NCGI article. A study on mice concludes that the spike protein from a “vaccination” can cause lung damage.
Did you also know?
6. The CDC inflated the death rate for Covid19 – that was not isolated – by instructing medical practitioners in its March 24, 2020 directive to ascribe the cause of death as Covid19 for all deaths, irrespective if patients were tested positive for Covid19 or if they had other comorbidities, so as to ramp up the fear, and doctors have publicly stated they are being pressured to mark Covid19 on death certificates. Here is a list:
• Dr. Dan Erickson
• Dr. Scott Jensen
• Infectious Disease Director Kris Ehresmann
This missstep by the CDC contravenes Federal Regulations, according to IPAK. Each Federal agency is required to submit a formal change proposal to the Federal Register before enacting their proposed changes. A 60-day public comment and peer-review process ensues before the changes can be made.
The fact is that 60,000 Americans have been dying weekly, consistently, before and after the covid scare – more data – while deaths by influenza and other diseases have plummeted.
7. The CDC later admitted that 94% of deaths had underlying conditions. That means that of the 527,000 deaths attributed to the influenza variant masked as SARS-CoV-2 only 6% were actually caused directly by Covid19, or 31,620. That brings the true case fatality rate to 0.12% out of the 27 million cases.
8. The survival rate for Covid19 is, therefore, roughly 99.9%. When using the state population as the denominator, the death rate is even lower, ranging from 36 to 247 deaths per 100,000. As at March 19, 2021, even with the doctored numbers and faulty tests, the CDC arrived at the following survival rates:
• Ages 0-17 99.998%
• Ages 18-49 99.95%
• Ages 50-64 99.4%
• Ages 65+ 91%
9. The CDC lumped pneumonia, influenza, and Covid19 into a new epidemic it called PIC in order to inflate Covid19 deaths.
The CDC stats for week of July 3, 2020 confirm that pneumonia and influenza combine with Covid to inflate the death rate. The Feb. 5, 2021 report does the same. The obfuscation is underscored in the search results page, where only “(P&I)” is mentioned, but PIC graphs appear upon clicking the links. Deaths by influenza have dropped from 61,000 in 2018 to 22,000 in 2020, while medical malpractice is the third leading cause of deaths in the US.
10. Hospitals are paid $13,000 for every Covid19 admission, and $39,000 for every patient that is put on a ventilator, on average. More proof doctors and nurses have orders to place on ventilators patients who tested negative, effectively killing them.
Are you aware that…
11. The PCR tests do not detect SARS-CoV-2 particles, but particles from any number of viruses you might have contracted in the past, and that a lawsuit for crimes against humanity is being launched by a German attorney for this fraud. Even Fauci admits PCR tests don’t work. The WHO backs him up.
Important Statements on Impacts of Vaccination by Prominent Scientists, Scholars and Authors
In this CDC document, testing guidelines state that false negatives and positives are possible – page 39. The PCR test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens – page 40.
But most importantly, on page 42, SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated in the first instance: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA“.
Neither the CDC can provide samples of SARS-CoV-2, nor can Stanford and Cornell labs, and in a CNN interview Fauci said he was not getting tested and there is no need to test asymptomatic people. He reiterates that asymptomatic people have never been the driving force of a pandemic. Again, the WHO backs him up.
12. There are class action lawsuits in the works, naming Anthony Fauci as defendant, amongst others. Here’s a partial list:
• a lawsuit against the CDC was filed for illegally withholding information under FOIA
• the WHO has a lawsuit brought against it by German lawyer, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, for crimes against humanity. Here is an update
• nurses are suing a hospital CEO for Fabricated’ COVID-19 Tests
• California teachers are suing for being pressured to get an experimental vaccine, the press release
• the Government of Norway is facing a crimes against humanity lawsuit
• the UK Government will be facing a lawsuit for crimes against humanity
• Israelis are launching a crimes against humanity lawsuit against their own Government
• the Government of British Columbia is being sued by the Canadian Society for the Advancement of Science in Public Policy
• the Canadian Government is facing a legal battle from the best Constitutional attorney, Rocco Galati, who wants to seeBill Gates jailed
• Florida is suing the Federal Government and the CDC
• doctors plead guilty to biotest fraud
• Human Rights attorney, Leigh Dundas, is going after California for trying to vaccinate children without parental consent. And just like that she forced Orange County to back down from vaccine passports
• a British law firm is fighting against ‘No Jab, No Pay, No Job’
• Canadian Police Officers are taking the Ontario Government to Court
• New Zealand is facing a legal challenge on the admissibility of injections
And we’re just getting warmed up. If Israeli citizens have brought their government to the International Criminal Court for Crimes Against Humanity, alleging they are being coerced into taking an inadequately tested, experimental COVID injection by Pfizer, in contravention of the Nuremberg Code, then the citizens of any state (West Virginia comes to mind where young people are bribed with $100 to take the jab) have that same right and obligation.
13. Therapeutics and prophylactics for coronaviruses, like Hydroxychloroquine, have been approved in the WHO, CDC and NIH websites.
But, suddenly in 2020 they were banned. Why? Because, according to FDA rules only when there are no alternative therapeutics, can untested vaccines be cleared for Emergency Use Authorization. In 2020, the Canadian company, Apotex, was giving HCQ away. Even after the American Journal of Medicine approved the use of HCQ for Outpatients, HCQ is nowhere to be found in the US. Now, doctors are pleading that Ivermectin be used as a safe therapeutic.
Doctors in India and the UK speak out. Costa Rica uses HCQ extensively, while Novartis donates it to Mexico. In India doctors are prescribing Ziverdo kits.
14. Front Line Doctors who try to explain the benefits of proven therapeutics are being silenced, and some have had their license suspended. A concise summary by Dr. Simone Gold, who is also an attorney and founder of America’s Front Line Doctors, is a must watch.
As well, the British Medical Journal has broken rank and is citing corruption and suppression of science. The World Doctors Alliance joins the resistance. In Australia, the Covid Medical Network represents senior medical professionals doing battle.
15. Fauci and the CDC have flip-flopped on masks, contaminated surfaces, asymptomatic spread, testing, and have only recently acknowledged that herd immunity is achieved when antibodies are spread by those who beat the disease (the 99.9%), but still recommend social distancing, only now from 6 feet to 3 feet, resulting in this lockdown map.
Speaking of herd immunity, the WHO changed its June 7, 2020 definition from:
“Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection” to:
“Herd immunity, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it” in Nov. 13, 2020.
But it again reversed its position in Dec. 2020, with this inane statement:
“Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as ‘antibodies’, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease, but – crucially – vaccines work without making us sick. Vaccinated people are protected from getting the disease in question and passing on the pathogen, breaking any chains of transmission”(4).
And they keep moving the goal posts. Pfizer trials warned men to stay away from pregnant women… but now the CDC is pushing pregnant women to take an experimental biological agent without a second thought.
The CDC has played dumb about the high 37 to 40 cycle thresholds used for COVID PCR testing yielding 85-90% false positives. But, now, it readily accepts the lower threshold of 28 cycles for post-vaccine testing.
… and that
16. Injuries and deaths by mRNA jabs keep rising. VAERS reports 12,619 serious injuries as at 4/23/21. In the first quarter of 2021 there has been a 6000% increase in deaths by injections from the same period a year ago. Graphically, the jab looks more like a stiff upper cut, to quote attorney Rocco Galati. And that’s if, according to a Harvard Study, only 1% of vaccine related deaths are being reported.
17. The CDC at one time recommended DDT for in home use, and used the same fear tactics to sell vaccines for H1N1.
18. Documents prove that the media was to be the key player in creating the hype leading up to the promotion of vaccines, that a VACCINATE WITH CONFIDENCE paper by the CDC exists, along with its British equivalent, and that lifting lockdowns – on condition of vaccination – is used as a carrot to get people to accept the jab.
19. Politicians are caught on camera talking about the theater of wearing masks, and the NCBI, a division of the NIH, published a paper on the complete ineffectiveness of masks. Even the CDC warns of the dangers of masks, as do these studies on Mask Induced Exhaustion Syndrome MIES.
20. The CDC owns the patent for the coronavirus that is transmitted to humans; also, a patent for a System & Method to test for Covid19 filed in 2015, corroborated here, and Covid19 test kits were being shipped around the world in 2018.
… or that
21. The Covid19 INJECTION was developed in just a few hours.
22. Vaccine companies cannot be sued for injuries.
23. Bill Gates, who invested $10 Billion into vaccines, boasts of how he injects kids with genetically modified organisms.
24. Bill Gates is on record pushing for vaccine passports. Parenthetically, various domain names for “vaccinepassport” were filed in 2016 by an entity in Milan, Italy, and that there are people who cannot take vaccines because of medical contraindications. A vaccine passport would discriminate against these people as they attempt to go about their lives, in violation of The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Section 12101)..
25. Bill Gates is on record pushing for vaccines to lower the world population by 10% to 15%, and a call has been made for his arrest and trial at the International Criminal Court
Finally, did you know?
26. Covid variant injections are to be marketed without safety trials, Fauci confirmed it, and that antibodies/antigens to SARS-CoV-2 are found in saliva, making the use of masks counterproductive in achieving herd immunity.
27. The CDC, that props itself up with statements like:
“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is the agency Americans trust with their lives. As a global leader in public health, CDC is the nation’s premier health promotion, prevention, and preparedness agency. Whether we are protecting the American people from public health threats, researching emerging diseases, or mobilizing public health programs with our domestic and international partners, we rely on our employees to make a real difference in the health and well-being of people here and around the world.”
buys and resells injections at a markup, about $4.6 Billion worth every year, and owns over 20 vaccine patents – according to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and is listed on Dun & Bradstreet. Fauci personally owns 1000 patents.
28. The consent forms in hospitals disguise vaccines as “biogenics”, and blood brokers have paid up to $1,000 for blood samples of recovered Covid19 people.
29. It’s against the Nuremberg code to force vaccinations on a person, and informed consent overrides public policy. Federal law prohibits employers and others from using vaccines under EUA as a condition of employment. A Nevada attorney is ready to do the battle. Each state has its own unique provisions for refusing a vaccine on medical, religious or philosophical grounds.
30. Donald Trump glories in the fact that he pushed Warp Speed and urges his supporters to take the jab, while Biden gloats that he ordered 100 million doses. Same dung – different odor
… or that
31. Time, again and again the WHO has discouraged the wearing of masks by healthy individuals, let alone children.
32. Several “simulations” of a pandemic were held in:
• May 2018 Clade X by Johns Hopkins University
• September 2019. The WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (in another supposed simulation) included as one of its progress indicators the release of two lethal pathogens by September 2020. See pg 39
• 2018. Bill Gates’ INSTITUTE FOR DISEASE MODELING released a video modeling a pandemic starting at Wuhan, China
• October 2019. Bill Gates, sponsored a Global Pandemic Exercise Event 201, video. Fauci, of course, sits in the Leadership Council of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which has contributed over $3.5 million to Fauci’s NIH,
33. The Pfizer, Moderna and J&J jabs were developed using fetal cell lines, that is, cells grown in labs originally obtained from aborted fetuses decades ago. The argument used by pro-vaxers is that these are not the original cells, but descendants or duplicates of the originals. The medical term varies depending on the aborted fetus’ number and organ . You have a right to decline any vaccine that was developed with or contains fetal cell lines, based on your religious or philosophical beliefs.
34. Lockdowns have had no effect on the death rate. Here’s another report. And here we can see how Covid won’t breach Michigan’s southern border.
35. On March 2020, the British Government discussed tactics it would use to ensure citizens complied with the loss of their rights and freedoms and these have included –
• Using media to increase the sense of personal threat
• Using media to increase the sense of responsibility to others
• Using and promoting social approval for desired behaviors
• Using social disapproval for those who do not comply
Here is the document, and the woman the NHS hired to fiddle with the death numbers. Not to be outdone, Trudeau boasts how much he pays the media to sell his propaganda that presciently reported in April, 2021 a 4th wave, while the German Minister of Interior pressured epidemologists to create the fear that would necessitate lockdowns.
So your employer backs you into a corner. Get the jab or quit. What do you do?
Here’s what I would do:
1. Demand that the ‘jab or quit’ proposition be put in writing.
2. Explain that irrespective of whether it’s a government or a corporation, any entity that makes experimental vaccinations a condition of employment – or of doing business – engages in the practice of forced vaccinations, which is in violation of the Nuremberg code, especially experimental vaccinations that are still undergoing clinical trials scheduled to end in 2023.
3. I would pull out my card ask the questions in it, leave the card with instructions to relay answers to me in writing
4. I would inform the employer that lawyers are filing crimes against humanity lawsuits, and that I would be consulting an attorney
This is just what I would do. I’m not giving anyone legal advice.
Find attorneys in your state:
• America’s Front Line Doctors Attorney Intake Form
• Justia
• Avvo
*
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Dr Kohls practiced holistic mental health care in Duluth for the last decade of his family practice career prior to his retirement in 2008, primarily helping patients who had become addicted to cocktails of psychiatric drugs to safely go through the complex withdrawal process. His column often deals with various unappreciated health issues, including those caused by Big Pharma’s over-drugging, Big Vaccine’s over-vaccinating, Big Medicine’s over-screening, over-diagnosing and over-treating agendas and Big Food’s malnourishing food industry. Those four sociopathic entities can combine to even more adversely affect the physical, mental, spiritual and economic health of the recipients of the vaccines, drugs, medical treatments and the eaters of the tasty and ubiquitous “Franken Foods” – particularly when they are consumed in combinations, doses and potencies that have never been tested for safety or long-term effectiveness.’ has no factual basis? Thank you for receiving this comment.

If you really want an answer to this question, you can start here: https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/

Then go here: https://nomorefakenews.com/

Read this: https://jech.bmj.com/content/57/12/927

Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYcq1WAPojg

I would say 2 but would express it in a different way.

Politics is a theatre. Putin, Xi, Khamenei, Maduro, Arce, Morales and Diaz-Canel all know they are on that same political world stage. Actors and theatre companies all have different players and different motivations.

But no matter the competition between each other, no actor is going to stand up in the theatre while watching someone else’s show and say , “You are not really the character you are playing! This is all made up and all a lie.” Likewise magicians, no matter how competitive with each other do not share the secrets of each others magic tricks.

The reason is simple, to do so would not gain oneself a bigger audience, it would just appear ridiculous and cause everyone to feel uncomfortable and go home.

Politicians protect their ‘craft’ just like actors do. They need an audience and they need a stage.

Vaccines have been a big theme in the Covid production and so of course all of the politicians will go along. They may not be working together, but they are not going to be left out of the show.

Of more interest is the fact that you and VT have turned to name calling people wary of taking an untested vaccine in a worldwide rollout, with the rate of iatrogenic disease already so high.

In my experience (working in family conflict) name calling is a sure sign that someone fears telling the truth.

You swear the virus is not a bioweapon and VT swears that it is, but both of your websites quite uncharacteristically call anyone questioning vaccines safety derogatory names.

So what could the possible reasons be for your fear?

1. You and have a vested interest in promoting vaccines.

2. You are being threatened.

3. You have lost your ability—on this one subject—to think critically and consider all facts.

4. You know something that you do not feel safe to disclose that truly makes you fear the world is in danger if people do not choose to accept getting vaccinated.

As both you and VT have taken this same position the odds against 3 being the answer seem very high.

With VT I would say the answer to most readers with critical thinking skills looks like 1, as there are many comments in that direction on their website.

In your case it would appear to be 2 or 4.

If so there are two further scenarios, namely…

If the answer is 2

1. The threat to you is genuine
2. The threat to you is a bluff

iI the answer is 4

1. The threat to humanity is genuine
2. The threat to humanity is a bluff

The fact you used murder in your headline leads me to believe this is most likely a matter of life or death.

(I don’t expect you to answer) but if the answer is 2 only you can decide if the threat is real or a bluff. If you decide it is real please look after yourself and your family. Maybe find an excuse to stop writing for awhile.

If the answer is 4 or a combination of 2 and 4 I hope there is a way that you can figure out to safely allow the truth to come out so more people can help deal with the threat.

Perhaps you and VT descending to such blatant defensiveness on this subject is a clue for your more emotionally intelligent readers and you are hoping we will see through what you are being forced to say. All I know is that to see folk as tough and street wise as you and the writers at VT all as scared as you appear when talking about the safety of vaccines makes me (and probably others) very worried about what it is that you know and fear saying.

Perhaps it’s time we all leave the theatre of politics and go home and start securing the foundations of defence in our communities and homes?

There are many levels of reality as there are many levels of understanding. As one dive deep at a particular subject you go from simplicity and external apperances to a deeper and ever more complex level of intricate phenomena. The same goes for understanding. Some are willing to follow the most symphatetic leader, be it political or religious. Some others follow their gut feeling, others the herd, the authority or even a formal logic process. Science contrary to all these approches follows a method. A hard working process of observation, testing and reproduction of a phenomena to validate or discart a statement or belive regardles of what result, be it intuitive or counterintuitive. Science always welcome open debate and is always against censorship. Science understands the fragility of “truth”. A true scientist would never claim to be the holder of the absolute truth. As Sagan once said: The only sacred truth is that there is no sacred truth. Science more than a body of knowledge is a way of thinking. This way of thinking has been disregarded in the western educational system after the neoliberal wave and sure is the root cause of western debacle. As the soviet educational system prevailed in Rusia, she rose from the ashes of destruction after the USSR collapse.
Good leaders, honest leaders and fiable leaders are always important, but most important is to have citizens versed in science way of thinking and critical thinking. We should all know that a formal logic conjecture is misleading and that all man are falable. At analysing the behaviour of leaders (not aligned to the empire) I would say that every one may have more than one explanation. Politics and strategy are totally different animals. May be those leaders that have come to agree with the oppresors, recognize that this issue could be use as a political and geostrategic weapon of mass destruction.
Perhaps, they follow one of art of war recomendations: Never fight a war that you cannot win. Perhaps they await for the critical mass of free thinkers to rise, or perhaps they all have been decieved.
In science vote or majority do not count.
All scientific consensus is temporal and more often than not influenced by the political agenda of the epoch.

(the only thing I am sure of is that it was not a leaked bio-weapon)

Why don’t you say that on Unz?

I’m reluctant to wade too deeply into this, but I will say that it’s certainly possible to acknowledge that Covid-19 is a very real public health crisis while being skeptical of the narrative that’s being promoted around it (specifically how much of a long-term threat it really constitutes) and the lockdown/ experimental vaccination response to it. If the Russian vaccine, which is more like a conventional vaccine (I’m actually very pro-vax for standard, properly-tested vaccines), were available in the US, I would probably take that one. I’m hoping that like most coronaviruses, Covid will slowly mutate into more contagious but much less lethal and suffering-causing variants as time goes on.

I don’t need a medical degree to understand that Anthony Fauci is a congenital liar. Simple common sense tells me that it is stupid to wear a mask outdoors or in your own car. Viruses have been around since humans and animals showed up and herd immunity works or we would have been extinct long ago.
I claim the same rights as the pro abortion crowd…..it’s my body my choice.
And finally I have enough sales experience to see the abundance in B grade propaganda and outright statistical fraud with the numbers and the abuse of the PCR test to drive a fraudulent narrative.

Saker, when I was working at a tuberculosis research unit in the early 1990s, some no-nonsense inspector visited the unit. As a researcher I assured him that I was abiding by the hygienic rules as required; I did not, though, inform him of accidents that had happened — sometimes noticing them retrospectively, only — when the volume of bacterial suspensions had decreased (indicating leakage). An accident-prone procedure was the mechanical disruption of gram quantities of live “pathogenic” Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the infectious agent of the white plague.
I may have been spreading the pathogen, since my 3 year old daughter had turned tuberculin-positive — since the 1950s a rather rare event in the industrialised world. Still, myself, my daughter and my colleagues have never succumbed to tuberculosis. (My three-year-old was offered preventive medication, which I dismissed, since the girl was of excellent strength — and to date still is). Back to the inspector, whom I did not hid my scepticism concerning the official infectious disease narrative. He, thankfully, spared me any educational chagrin, but explained:
“We need to appear whiter than white”,
a demand with which I could only agree. And this is where we all are at, including “the best political leaders on the planet”.

References on my institutional research work you find here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=garbe%20t&sort=date&ac=yes

Exhaustive information on “AIDS” and related issues you find here: http://www.duesberg.com/papers/index.html

A book on the natural philosophy of nutrition (in german): https://www.lehmanns.de/shop/naturwissenschaften/54801229-9783752914771-naturphilosophie-der-ernaehrung

A book debunking “Syphilis”: SYPHILIS: Is it a Mischievous Myth or a Malignant Monster
By Herbert M. Shelton
Published 1962 by Health Research, Mokelumne Hill, California
(This book first appeared at the Soil and Health Library, an important source of books on holistic agriculture, holistic health, self-sufficient living, and personal development)
INTRODUCTION TO THE SECOND EDITION
Introduction
Chapter 1. The Beginning of a Myth
Chapter 2. The Myth Becomes a Lie
Chapter 3. A Pathological Mocking Bird
Chapter 4. The Myth Becomes a Nightmare
Chapter 5. The Nightmare Becomes a Mania
Chapter 6. Tests That Do Not Test
Chapter 7. What Causes “Syphilis”?
Chapter 8. Diagnosing a Protean Monster
Chapter 9. The Beginning of Quackery
Chapter 10. New Evils for Old
Chapter 11. The Artificial Fever Cure
Chapter 12. What Is “Syphilis”?
Chapter 13. Regular Abuse of the “Syphilitic”
Chapter 14. The Hygienic Care of the “Syphilitic”
Addendum
The Medical View
“As a danger to the public health, as a peril to the family, and as a menace to the vitality, health, and physical progress of the race, the venereal diseases are justly regarded as the greatest of modern plagues.”—Milton J. Rosenau, M. D.
The Rational View
“The present medical opinion of venereal diseases is an infinitely greater curse to the world than will be all the diseases of mankind when they are understood and treated properly.” —J. H. Tilden, M.D.
Dedication
To the human race, in the sincere hope that the truths it contains may serve to emancipate mankind from the frightful slavery to the siphilis myth and the still more frightful treatment accorded so-called syphilitics, this little book is lovingly dedicated, by H. M. SHELTON
INTRODUCTION TO THE SECOND EDITION
Much water has flowed under the bridge since the first edition of this book came from the press. The practice of medicine soon thereafter entered upon a period of discovery of spectacular, sensational and miraculous near panaceas. Indeed, with the “fever cure” and snake venom therapy, both of which promised to be near cure-alls, they had already entered this period at the time the first edition of this book was published. There followed in rapid succession the sulfa drugs, frozen sleep, penicillin and the other antibiotics, ACTH and Cortisone, and a few minor seven day wonders. The practice of medicine not only became increasingly spectacular, but it also became more and more commercialized until, today, the physician is nothing more than a peddler of doubtful goods, hawking his wares in the market place. He has not abandoned the pretense that medicine is a science and he is a scientist; he has not surrendered his claim that he is a public benefactor and he still strikes an altruistic pose, but all of this has worn so thin that it has become transparent to almost everybody.
Through the years I have repeatedly emphasized the fact that cures may come and cures may go but the curing goes on forever. Although the profession has never met my challenge to provide us with acceptable evidence that there is now or ever has been in any part of the world in any age of the world a single case of a disease called “syphilis”, they have continued to cure this fiction and to seek for newer and more effective cures. Shortly after this book was first published, sensational cures for “syphilis” came thick and fast. We had a five-day cure and a one-day cure both announced with all the fanfare of a returning triumphant Army. These cures amounted to new techniques of administering the older drugs, especially the arsenicals, and in giving them in larger doses. Their vogue was short lived, as, with the discovery that one dose of penicillin will cure syphilis, there was no longer any need to resort to the older failures. Although the older drugs have not been completely abandoned, penicillin is now the ranking cure for “syphilis”.
It took the medical profession nearly four hundred years to erect the present superstructure of fallacy about a disease they call “syphilis” and it takes but one dose of the wonder drug penicillin to consign it to the oblivion in which it rested before the medical practitioners of the sixteenth century conjured it into existence. A remarkable poison that destroys a “disease” that had defied all the older drugs of the profession for nearly four hundred years and yet fails to provide such spectacular results in its destruction of other and less formidable “diseases”! But “medicine” was always noted for its paradoxes.
Let us take the paradox that “syphilis” not only imitates every other known disease, so that no man, in the absence of reliable serologic tests, can possibly diagnose the “disease” from its symptoms and pathology alone (a fact that makes it difficult to understand how physicians of the past ever discovered that there is such a disease), but also imitates health: — Becker, a leading medical authority in this field, says that “countless numbers of persons have been infected with syphilis all their lives without knowing it. Many persons infected with the disease for years die from other causes without ever having known they were syphilitic . . . ” “If all syphilitic individuals could be lined up, the reader would be surprised to see what a healthy-looking group they actually were and also how many of his or her friends were among them”.
If it is possible to have the disease for so long a time and never know that you are sick, but appear and feel so healthy that both you and your friends as well as your physician think you are healthy, it would seem that the “disease” is not as serious as we have been led to believe. This is in line with my contention in the body of this book that’,” the real evils of “syphilis” are the drugs with which the patients are poisoned. I think that so long as the profession can be made to believe that one dose of penicillin will cure “syphilis”, the patients will suffer far less than under the older methods of treatment and the results may finally lead physicians to realize that for nearly four hundred years they have been fighting a phantom of their own creation and producing, with their poisons, the very symptoms they were assigning to the “disease”. Penicillin may force them to realize that “syphilis” is a myth.
The war came and it was re-discovered that there is a marked similarity, if not a genuine identity, between the so-called first stage of “syphilis” and smallpox vaccination. It was discovered that smallpox vaccination will give a positive Wasserman reaction—the so-called false positive. The question will not down: How do they know it is a false positive? What is a “false positive”? How is a “false positive” to be distinguished from a true positive? How do they know that the forcible infection of a man or woman with cow-pox pus is not identical with the infection that gives rise to a chancre? The resulting sores in each case are so nearly identical at every stage of their evolution that they cannot be differentiated.
No man lives who knows the real meaning of a positive serologic reaction. He cannot say, with finality, that it does or does not mean “syphilis”. No man lives who knows the meaning of a negative serologic reaction. When a patient gives a negative reaction, he knows no more about the condition of the patient than when a positive reaction is returned. Although the original Wassermann test is no longer used, more than eighty-five other serologic tests having been devised and used since Wassermann’s original was devised, not one of them is a reliable test and the meaning of the serologic reaction with each test is not known.. John H. Stokes, M. D., a leading medical syphilologist, says in an article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Dec. 5, . 1951:
“The past five years, the era of the Wassermann barbecue and the wholesale application of serologic tests to large groups of the well, have now shown the positive test, no matter by what methods or how rigorously performed, to have a margin of nonspecificity of disturbing proportions. The presence of syphilitic reagin in normal persons; its rise and fall under drugs, diseases and unexplored factors; the uncertainty as to its whereabouts, mode of generation and actual nature; its absence in undoubted syphilis with characteristic manifestations; the anxious attempts to define by such methods as verification tests, so-called; by quantitative procedure; by spirochetal antigens, including even the Relter strain, whose superior specificity approaches the ludicrous when men of the experience and caliber of Kolmer suspect it at being Treponema macrodentium, a mouth spirocheie, and not treponema pallidum at all; all these considerations and many more have given the thoughtful observer a real case of serojitters. . . . ”
Can any of my readers think it just for the state to require of young men and women planning marriage to stake their chances of marriage upon the outcome of a test that is as doubtful as Stokes’ statements indicate the various serologic tests prove to be? Have not the lawmakers gotten ahead of the advance of science in their haste to saddle the people with this farcial test? Is it not time that all such laws be repealed in the interest of public health and sanity?
Let us take a further look at this statement of Stokes. He tells us that:
1. “Syphilitic reagin” is present in normal persons.
2. “Syphilitic reagin” is absent in “undoubted syphilis with characteristic manifestations”.
The question now arises: What is “syphilitic reagin”? If it is present in health, is it really “syphilitic”? If it is absent in “undoubted syphilis”, what is its real relation to “syphilis”? Why does it accompany health and fail to accompany “syphilis”? What is it that gives a positive reaction and what is its meaning? What provides a negative reaction and what is its meaning? Is there any such thing as “syphilitic reagin”?
Stokes says that there is “uncertainty about” its “actual nature”, its “mode of generation”, and its “whereabouts”. More than this, he indicates that the best men in the profession, men with vast experience and of high caliber, are not always able to distinguish between the spirochete that is the supposed cause of “syphilis” and a spirochete that is regarded as absolutely harmless. A bacteriologic diagnosis of “syphilis” becomes, therefore, as difficult and uncertain as a serologic diagnosis, But the confusion and uncertainty is worse than this indicates. Stokes says that the “syphilitic reagin” “rises and falls under drugs”, it “rises and falls under. . . . disease” and it “rises and falls under. . . .unexplored factors”.
So great was the uncertainty that an international Evaluation Committee was established to evaluate the serologic findings and to assay the reliability of the different serologic tests. This Committee worked and met and, like the mountain that labored and brought forth a mouse, came forth with a report of findings that left matters about where they were. No committee of men, however great, can make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear—they cannot transmute a fallacy into truth; a fraud into a genuine product. It has long been obvious that the serologic tests are thoroughly unreliable.
How; then, is “syphilis”, to be diagnosed? What is “undoubted syphilis”? What are the “characteristic symptoms,” of a disease that imitates every disease in the nosology? If anything from cold sores to cancer, from pimples to heart disease; from a skin rash to insanity can be diagnosed as “syphilis”, what are its “characteristic symptoms”? Who can tell when a patient has “syphilis” and when he does not have it?
Hans Zinnser, M.D. , one of the professions’ outstanding authorities on bacteriology, immunology and serology, says that “by proper titration of the reagents, your boots can be given a positive Wassermann reaction”. It should be obvious, even to the least informed of my readers, that when boots give a positive Wassermann reaction, the trouble is with the test, not with the boots. No wonder Parran wrote in his Shadow on the Land that;
“After thirty years of using serodiagnostic tests, they are still purely empirical. We do not know that a negative test in a person who has had syphilis does not mean that the disease is cured. We are not sure that a persistently positive test means that organisms ‘ persist. We think it does, but positive blood tests for other diseases—typhoid and diphtheria for example—persist after the living organisms have been killed off. There, is no way to determine accurately the time when the syphilis organism has been exterminated from the body”. Zinnser would probably remind him that by their tests, they cannot tell when the last “syphilitic” organism has been destroyed in the boot.
A few years ago Walter Winchell told of a prospective groom who received a notice that his blood was “positive”. This meant that he would be denied a license to marry. He was now a branded man. He committed suicide. Several days after his suicide the laboratory forwarded a corrected “negative” report with an apology for the error it had made. Those who are always in such a rush to force the passing views and practices of the medical profession upon the people by law should ponder well this case and other cases like it. While few of them led to suicide, they prohibited healthy men and women from marrying. They might also ask what these young people do when they are denied the right to marry. I have not heard of any great rush of these young people into convents and monasteries. It is certain that most of them do not become celibates or sublimate their sexual drives in poetry and painting.
The great uncertainty of the tests led to the practice of making “verification tests”, or “check tests”. Two tests, each of them of a slightly different character, are made from the same blood sample. But as neither test, singly, is reliable, their use together does not increase their reliability. Let me recount a case of a young woman in my own practice, who underwent a series of serologic tests prior to the time when she was married. The first laboratory used the Kolmer test and employed as a check, the Kahn test. The Kolmer was positive, the Kahn negative. She went to a second laboratory. This time the Kolmer was negative, the Kahn positive. At a third laboratory, both tests were negative. All of this testing with its confusing results took place within a single week.
So much for her tests; what of the woman herself? She was a young and beautiful woman, with a beautiful figure, except that she was slightly overweight. She had a clear skin, a peaches and cream complexion, bright sparkling eyes, good teeth, abundant vigor, and no history of any so-called “syphilitic infection”. She was a clean, wholesome young woman who had been in excellent health for years and she remained in good health thereafter.
Let me recite another case. This time in a married woman whose behavior was not exemplary. Her husband was a sailor and was away from home much of the time. A sore developed on her lip and refused to heal. After a time, she went to a physician. He suspected “syphilis”. A test was made and it proved positive. She was supposed to have received the “infection” from some of her male friends with whom she indulged in promiscuous kissing. She refused medical treatment, but came to the HEALTH SCHOOL instead. A fast of three weeks resulted in the healing of the sore. She had no other symptoms of ill health. A week after her fast was broken, the city of San Antonio announced that it had made arrangements with the laboratories of the city to make serologic tests for “syphilis” during the week for a dollar. She wanted to have a test made. I advised against it, saying that she had not been eating long enough to affect the test. I had found, since the first edition of this book was published, that a fast has little or no effect upon the test, but that two or three weeks of proper feeding will reverse it. The test was made against my advice. It was positive. Three weeks later another test was made; it was negative. Five years afterwards I saw the woman again—there had been in this time, no recurrence of any symptoms of any nature.
Charles W. Barnett, M.D., Stanford University Professor of Internal medicine, was director of the Stanford Medical School’s “syphilis” clinic for twenty years. Speaking before the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association of Life Insurance Examiners of America, in the Ambassador Hotel, Los Angeles, Calif., October 23, 1952, Barnett told the assembled physicians that nearly half the people who were once diagnosed as “syphilitic” don’t have the disease and never did have it. He told them that the “widely-used Wassermann test has been proved highly inaccurate”. He added that “the new TIP (trepinoma pallidum immobilization) test, which is specific for syphilis, shows that at least 40 per cent of the patients with a positive Wassermann are entirely free of the disease”.
Think on this statement for a minute. The old tests were unreliable. Patients were treated for long periods with poisonous drugs for a “disease” they did not have because tests that were, even then, known to be unreliable, showed that they did have it. Why could not the physicians who treated these patients determine that they did not have “syphilis”? Why did they rely upon the test? Why did they accept the positive reactions of the test as diagnostic? Because no one can diagnose “syphilis” from its symptoms. Only the men of nearly four hundred years ago, when the disease was first described, possessed sufficient diagnostic ability to diagnose the disease from its symptoms. Present-day physicians either never had such ability, as they admit, or they lost it.
His statement means that untold thousands have been treated for a disease they did not have as a result of a positive Wassermann. It means that thousands of mothers have been treated for syphilis who did not have it; that great numbers of young people have been denied a marriage license when a positive test, that was thoroughly unreliable, was returned. It means that our law makers in passing, the compulsory test laws of mothers and people who applied for a marriage license acted hastily and unwisely under the influence of the frenzy and panic that had been created by the syphilophobic minds of the Rockefeller-financed agent designed to sell more drugs manufactured by Rockefeller. It should reveal to everybody the folly of forcing medical measures upon the people by law.
But suppose we assume that the physicians who first described a disease to which the name syphilis has been given also lacked diagnostic ability to differentiate “syphilis” from the four hundred other diseases that it can imitate. Suppose they could not tell “syphilis” by its symptoms from other disease. Suppose, also, that they had no reliable test, and we know they did not have such” a test. How, then, did the existence of a disease called “syphilis” come to be recognized? “If the physicians of the time of Columbus could not detect “syphilis”. and if modern ideas concerning the disease are correct, they certainly could not do so, how did they manage to create, this protean monster and saddle us with it?
The fact is, as I have pointed out in the text of this book, the original “syphilis” and what is called “syphilis” today are not the same symptom-complex at all. Originally an acute disease in which patients often died within twenty-four hours, it is now a chronic disease that may persist throughout a long and useful life, the “victim” dying of an automobile accident at eighty or beyond. The evolution of the “syphilis” myth forms one of the most amazing stories in all medical history, a history which is replete with myths, such as the myths of rabies, the wolf disease, influenza, chronic appendicitis and the myths of cures and immunizers.
Inasmuch as “syphilis” cannot be diagnosed from its symptoms alone and none of the older tests are reliable, how was it ever determined that there is such a disease as “syphilis”? If there is not a sure way of discovering “syphilis”, except by a strictly accurate test, how can it be known that the test discloses “syphilis”? The disease called “syphilis” was created in the days when there were no blood tests of any kind and when far less was known of pathology than is known today. It was, in other words, conjured into existence in the days of grossest ignorance. What warrant is there for continuing to believe that such a disease exists? The point I want the reader to get firmly in mind is this: Today, after nearly four hundred years of intensive farming of the idea that there is a disease called “syphilis”, the best physician living cannot diagnose the disease without the aid of a serologic test; physicians of the past, who had no such tests and were equally unable to diagnose the disease, created the disease for us. They drew it out of their imagination—what they did not produce with their heroic drugging. Because it is a complex tissue of fallacy, no physician has ever dared to accept my challenge to prove that the disease exists.
Barnett went further in his talk and stated that, despite the development of the useful new diagnostic test and the “successful” use of penicillin, the world is far from the complete wiping out of “syphilis”. He asserted that “no disease has ever been eradicated by treatment. Immunization and preventative measures are the only ways which have thus, far been successful”. He does not seem to have named the “diseases” that have been “wiped out” by these means, but he did say that, despite years, of research, no “Immunization” against “syphilis” has ever been developed.
Finally, he told the insurance examiners that “latent syphilis”, which “produces no symptoms”, is not sufficiently dangerous to be regarded as a life insurance risk. This “latent syphilis” is the type that imitates health. It was created by the Wassermann test. This is to say, a test was made of an apparently healthy man who had not and did not subsequently develop any symptoms that they would regard as evidence of syphilis, but the test was positive. The explanation was that he had “latent syphilis”. It is part of the tissue of fallacy that Is “syphilis” and that makes a nightmare of the life of syphiomaniacal physicians and their syphilophobic patients.
Herbert M. Shelton,
San Antonio, Texas.
August 10, 1962.

INTRODUCTION
Today we are faced with a new crusade, the knights of which promise us everything short of the millineum itself, if we will but adopt their program and supply them with the billions of dollars needed to put it into effect and carry it on. Yes, they have launched a crusade, a crusade motivated by the highest ideals and the purest altruism, but they do ask for money and, long-time jobs at good salaries. It is amazing how much altruism a man is capable of when he sees an opportunity to reap a golden harvest out of it.
They ask us for billions of dollars and for autocratic authority over us. They ask us to pay them well to make us do what they, in their infallible wisdom, want us to do. Give us your purse and your life, they demand, and let us spend the one and control the other as we decide best.
The anti-venereal campaign is presented to the public as a defense measure. “Gonorrhea and syphilis constitute a menace to national defense” and the anti-venereal fight now proposed would be “a distinct measure of national preparedness.”
Indeed the ghouls who fathered this crusade have not missed a single appeal to the public, and our legislators. Their members have been present at every legislative hearing on bills providing for appropriation of millions of public funds to be put into, the empty purses of a dying profession, reminding us of the biblical statement that, “where the carcass is there will the buzzards be gathered together.”
With the plea that it will cost us less money to hire these men to free us forever from venereal disease than to go on as we are, they seek to get their hands into the public purse and to gain a firmer hold on the lives of the people. Indeed they have already attained a measure of success.
Several cities have established and maintain, at the tax payers expense, clinics for the detection and treatment of veneral disease. Several stales have passed laws providing for compulsory testing and compulsory treating of certain groups. The Federal government has appropriated a huge sum of money to finance a long-term fight against “syphilis.”
Many industrial organizations have been induced to require a Wassermann test of all their employees and to require out reporting to the police. This makes it difficult for the medical profession to hound their victims. He complains about the difficulties that have been met in the effort to “establish the same control as prevailed in Europe.” He especially likes the European method which he thus describes: “If a patient fails to appear for treatment, a government agency is notified and the missing syphilitic is located no matter to what part of the country he may have gone.” He also approves of Denmark’s laws which require treatment of “all infected persons” and which “under certain conditions” force “infectious patients” with “syphilis” to enter hospitals. He finds in the people of Denmark “respect for and obedience to authority.”
It cannot have escaped the notice of discriminating readers that this anti-venereal campaign was launched and is carried on by those who expect to reap financial rewards from the discovery and treatment of venereal disease. The doctors are clamoring loudest for the appropriation of millions of dollars and the creation of legal powers to enable them to “wipe out” the venereal diseases. That they have help from other sources, some interested, others disinterested and well-meaning, though misguided, goes without saying.
Becker says that “the people of the United States again are syphilis conscious,” while Parran speaks of a “curt popular mandate to stamp out syphilis.” Of course no such popular mandate has ever been given and the “syphilis consciousness” of Americans was created by a flood of propaganda, largely financed by the hoarded loot of buccaneer, Rockefeller. A group of scare-mongers, whose scaremongering almost equals that employed in 1916-17 to get us into war, is responsible for any mass fear of “syphilis” that exists.
These men who expect to profit from the search for and treatment of “syphilis” have deliberately lied to the public about the prevalence and evils of “syphilis,” in what de Kruif describes as “a fight that will be pretty rough on its victims.” The statistics they issue are false and unreliable, but effective in creating mass fear, therefore useful. De Kruif says that doctors and “health experts” don’t know how much “syphilis” there is, and that “all statistics are guesses, nothing more.” They tell us there are a half-million new cases of “syphilis” each year. The figure is a mere guess and is placed high for effectiveness in producing fear and panic. Those of us who went through the propaganda that got us into war know the power of lies to create mass hysteria and cause the people to give up both their money and their liberties. Doctors who traffic in Hell’s Commerce run the same kind of lie-factory the Allies did.
Statistics are made up of diagnoses and are subject to the whims, caprices, hobbies, prejudices, misconceptions, mistakes and studied deceptions of the doctors making the diagnoses. There is nothing reliable in these.
In Chicago, efforts were made to get a “popular mandate to wipe out syphilis.” After a strenuous campaign the matter was brought to a vote and the alleged results were published. The truth about this historic ballot on the blood test has never been published. Somebody is lying about the outcome of the ballot.
None-the-less the Chicago campaign of ballyhoo led by Wenger and that ill-famed tool of the candy companies, Bundesen, gave the doctors of Chicago a real taste of prosperity. Then Wenger, the leader of it all, had to give up because his own heart went bad — it is not reported whether from “syphilis,” or from tobacco or alcohol. He is only fifty-two but the great medical scientist, who would save others, but cannot save himself, is out for the count.
They suspect that “chronic carriers” may be a factor in “the spread of syphilis.” Here is ground for the creation of more Typhoid Marys, and the life-long persecution of healthy men and women. “Soon,” says Dr. Alsaker, “it will be proven that there are but two classes of people so far as the doctor is concerned; namely, one class that carries germs and is well, and another that carries germs and is sick. Soon one class will be in the hospitals and the other in quarantine.”
Becker tells of an “enthusiastic public health nurse of a Chicago Welfare clinic” who “keeps the number (of untested expectant mothers) in her field of work at a minimum by making periodic back door calls to ascertain what women are pregnant, so that the women may be taken to the clinic for the blood test.” He seems to favor this snooping and spying and there can be no doubt that the adoption of the medical program would usher in another era of snooping such as we had during the prohibition period.
He also recommends the use of “scouts” to seek out “syphilitic” patients and to induce those “who have allowed their treatment to lapse to return to the clinic.” He says the “medical social worker is indispensable to the management of syphilis clinics,” because they are “well trained in follow-up work” and do not “possess the physicians scruples against seeking out” patients. “The code of medical ethics forbids solicitation of patients, and some doctors maintain that a follow-up of any patient, syphilitic or otherwise, is a violation of the code,” hence the need of “scouts” camouflaged as “social workers.” He would also use the “social workers” as salesmen to sell the treatment to the “syphilitic.”
Becker wants laws passed “requiring physicians and midwives to take a blood test on every pregnant woman at her first visit.” “Every pregnancy means that a Wassermann test is necessary,” says Dr. Parran. He also says: “Certainly one place where there should be complete agreement as to the need for universal Wassermann tests, is in connection with applicants for marriage licenses.” He adds, “Twenty-eight states now forbid marriage when either man or woman is infected with a venereal disease.” He neglects to tell what people do after they are forbidden marriage. We seem not to have learned from the bootleg era — 1920-1933 — that prohibitions foster the bootlegging spirit. In an appeal for such a law in New York, Elsie Bond stated that New York state was “being flooded by diseased people who can’t comply with Connecticut regulations.” She wants every state in the Union to pass a law such as that in Connecticut. She too failed to say what those will do who are refused the right to marry upon the strength of a positive Wassermann, when there is no longer a free state for them to go to. The Connecticut experience shows that they will marry — legally or otherwise.
Morris Fishbein, the great mouthpiece of the American Medical Association, issued a propaganda book under the title, Syphilis, the Next Great Plague to Go. He, like Becker and others, attempts to impress his readers with the “fact” that one out of every ten Americans have “syphilis” and need medical care. This callous, conscienceless, irresponsible promoter of medical interests says: “every woman who has ever had syphilis should have extensive anti-syphilitic treatment throughout every pregnancy. This should be done whether or not her blood reaction during the pregnancy is positive or negative or whether her infection is recent or has existed for a long time.
“It has been found that the treatment for syphilis during pregnancy is not harmful to the mother.”
Depending on these unreliable tests is” going to result in many pregnant women being treated for a disease they do not have and in many young people being denied marriage license when there is really no reason why they should not be allowed to marry. Doctors and Medical journals admit this, but the campaign goes on.
Dr. Parran seems to place chief reliance in Wassermann tests. Becker says that the “requirements of certain states that prospective husbands and wives have blood tests before marriage is not quite sufficient, since a single negative blood test, as explained in an earlier chapter, does not always mean freedom from syphilis”. If one test is not reliable, will any number of repetitions of the test increase its reliability? A positive reaction is no more dependable than a negative one.
They are after the child also and want to test all the children of the country. Parran insists that if a married person comes with “syphilis” the marital partner must also be examined. If “late syphilis” is found, not only the marital partner, but the children must also be examined.
Other means of coercion are advocated. For instance, Parran wants life insurance companies to require a Wassermann test of every applicant for a policy, for “self-protection.” He does not say in what manner the test will prevent “infection” subsequent to the test.
They also want employers of labor to require tests of their employees. “After all,” says Becker, “it is merely good business for a company to refuse to employ new employees known to be infected with syphilis.” Parran and all other crusaders approve of this form of coercion. Business “for its own sake” says Parran, “must look for syphilis among its employees.” By claiming that the “syphilitic” under treatment is safe, they hope to both prevent loss of jobs and to provide another means of coercing men and women who might, otherwise, reject their treatment. Palm wants every company to adopt and publicize a policy that a worker’s job will not be jeopardized by reason of a venereal infection, provided the disease is treated by a legitimate physician.” By “legitimate physician” he means an allopath. Thus the medical racket slowly unfolds itself — patronize us, or lose your job.
The reader may be curious about the reason for all this effort to enslave the people of America. Why do they seek the passage of laws to compel everybody to submit to the will of the medical profession? Why do they seek the establishment of a dictatorship of the medicos?
Power is always used to enrich those who wield it. Power always masks itself with a pretense of altruism. All tyranny is for the public good. All of this cry for compulsory treatment is motivated by a desire to control the public in the interest of a sordid profession. Let us look at a little of their own testimony.
Parran says: “Carl Warner recently given honorable mention by the Pulitzer Award Committee for his graphic series of articles on venereal diseases in the New York Daily News,” sent “a surge of new patients to the physicians and clinics.” Private physicians in Chicago reported that the campaign there brought them seventeen per cent more cases of “early syphilis.”
Discussing the practice-building effect of the “sex” movies that are used as part of their devilish program, Parran says, “Certainly it works; at least in the beginning. The health officer of Oklahoma told me last week that in a small town in his state he had shown a moving picture depicting the dangers of syphilis. Shortly afterward he checked up with the 11 doctors of the town to see if they had any new patients as a result of the showing. They reported from 4 to 10 apiece.” Here is a man in the pay of the public, employing public time and money to drum up trade for the medical profession, and going back later to check up on the effectiveness of his advertising campaign. It is “unethical” for doctors to advertise only when they, themselves, have to pay for the advertising.
Parran, who is Surgeon General of the U. S. Public Health ” Service, says he is “willing to go all the way to work out an American (sic) method with the whole American Medical profession.” He means an “American Method” of compelling free men and women to patronize an obsolescent medical system. Decker insists that “the practitioner of medicine must not be left out of any program” of venereal control. He asks for legislative action to compel “syphilitics” to patronize the medical profession if “appeals” fail to maintain regularity of attendance for treatment. He says: “There just is no remedy available for self-treatment of syphilis. The patient must go to a physician, a clinic or a hospital.” He means, to an allopathic physician, clinic or hospital.
Besides compulsory treatment these men want to “obtain public funds which assure adequate treatment for all infected persons.” They want to dip their hands into the public treasury. They want to tax all the people to support a dying profession. Becker, who wants more public money, is very guarded in promising results. Certain cities have already requested WPA funds to cany on an anti-“syphilitic” campaign.
Of all the schools of medicine or “healing” in America, only one, the self-styled scientific school, that is the “old” or allopathic school — miscalled “orthodox medicine” — is back of these compulsory medical laws. This school of “medicine” (school of poisoning, blistering, serum-squirting, electrocuting, baking and carving) is married to the state and seeks to have all of its superstitions, dogmas and mistakes fastened upon the whole populace by law. The doctors of this school organized as the American Medical Association, “fight physicians of other medical schools with a ferocious savagery and vindicativeness rarely seen outside the jungle,” as Bruce Calvert says in The Open Road, May, 1938. He adds, “They are pressing at every point and in every state for legislation preventing the other doctors from the free exercise of their chosen profession.”
Approximately half the population of America patronizes these other schools of healing, and do not patronize the Allopathic school. The present anti-“syphilis” drive is intended to compel all to patronize this school and to prevent them from receiving the care they desire. As Mr. Calvert has it: “Only one school of doctors, the strongest medico-religious church, will profit by giving the Wassermanns and Salvarsan treatments. *** Whether you like it or not you will be compelled to take the tests and swallow the holy water (medicines) of the one particular medical church in power. *** All others are taboo, spurius, anathema, expergatorious, spurlos versenkt! — he might have added, verboten!
They want the Emperor to issue a decree that “no one shall get well of syphilis who has not felt the divine touch of King Allopathy.” They want the laws of Nature and those of the land altered to favor medical bigotry and absolutism. In all such sumtuary enactments as the pre-natal and premarital laws requiring tests and treatment, there is seen the entering wedge of a union of medicine and state, for our salvation, of course, that will prove to be much more dangerous than the state religion against which we have so long struggled and only recently rid ourselves of.
We should not think for a minute that they intend to stop with venereal diseases. Indeed they have already in-dictated that they are going to wage war on cancer, tuberculosis, rheumatism, and other diseases. The shibboleth here is the same as with syphilis—it costs the public less money to cure these diseases in their early stages than to support their victims after they have been made into helpless invalids. They are going to save the tax payers money by giving themselves fat jobs.
Already a campaign has been launched against rheumatism, which is held responsible for much heart trouble and helpless invalidism. Rheumatism is claimed to be due to germs which find entrance into the body through the sinuses, tonsils, gall bladder, appendix, ovaries and seminal vesicles.
Invalids cost the tax-payer money. Rheumatism causes invalidism. Prevent rheumatism and you save the tax-payer money. How prevent rheumatism? Easy! cut out the tonsils, remove the gall bladder, excise the appendix, extirpate the ovaries, chisel out the sinuses, and take out the seminal vesicles. Suppose the people don’t respond to the appeal of the surgeons to have themselves dismembered; what then? The answer is, “legislative action that will enable us to force people to submit to examinations and operations.”
Where can this program logically stop? If we recognize the validity of the principal of state medicine and compulsory treatment, to save our money, as state religion saved our souls, there is no logical stopping place short of the universalization of the program. Thus, if they have their way, we are to have salvation forced upon us. We are to be placed under the autocratic control of one small group and their unstable and everchanging theories and damaging practices are to be forced upon all.
More than once in the world’s history infant dragons have been mistaken for harmless lizards. If the American people don’t awake and defend their liberties they will wake up some morning and find themselves the victims of a Medical Inquisition that will make the Spanish Inquisition look like a Sunday School picnic.
Chapter I. THE BEGINNING OF A MYTH
Suddenly, out of a blue sky, “syphilis” sprang upon Europeans in the early years of the Sixteenth century or the closing years of the Fifteenth and swept over the world slaying thousands. “Scientists” have greatly puzzled their feeble gray matter to account for the origin of this terrible plague. Most of them are now content to place the responsibility for the disease upon the Indians who met Columbus when he discovered Haiti. Indeed Becker says that only a few die-hards have failed to accept this hypothesis. He says it was introduced into Spain in 1493 when Columbus and his sailors returned. At least “there is an abundance of historical and biographical writing to show that Spanish physicians recognized the disease that year and that they appreciated that the malady was one entirely new to them. They called this newly encountered ailment the disease of Espanola (now Haiti), after the island upon which the great navigator’s sailors became infected.”
Both Becker and Parran tell us that there is evidence that Columbus, himself, was infected. Parran says “Kemble points out that in the early months of 1494, during Columbus second voyage, he began having attacks of fever, possibly the febrile secondary stage of syphilis. During the third voyage in 1498 he developed a ‘severe attack of gout.’ Since Columbus was an abstemious man; it does not seem probable that he suffered from the gout of the intemperate, especially since the inflammation was widespread and not confined to one or two of the smaller joints, as gout usually is. (He does not say, “as gout always is.” Author). During this voyage, also, the first evidence of mental disorder appeared. He began to hear voices and to regard himself as ‘ambassador of God’ *** In spite of his disabilities Columbus made a last voyage and returned in 1504 so ill that he had to be carried ashore with his whole body dropsical from the chest downward, like that which is caused by injury to the valves of the heart, his limbs paralyzed and his brain affected — all symptoms of late, fatal syphilis.”
Doctors are better at making long-range diagnoses than in diagnosing living patients who are before them and whom they have just examined. However, I trust I will not be charged with desecrating the sacred temple of medicine if I point out that “attacks of fever” may and do occasionally develop in those who are not in the “febrile secondary stage of syphilis,” that “hearing voices” and thinking oneself “ambassador of God” belongs to all religions and is older than recorded history; that the dropsy, paralysis and brain affection that are so confidently said to have been the effects of syphilis, may have been, and most likely were, due to ship dropsy (malnutritional edema) which was so common among sailors in those days.
According to the myth we are here discussing, the Spanish sailors passed the disease on to the whores of Spain, who, in turn passed it on to the Spanish soldiers. Some of these soldiers were hired out as mercenaries to Naples (Italy) and others to Charles VIII of France. Charles invaded Naples the next year and “syphilis” became epidemic among his soldiers. Despite his military successes, his soldiers became panic stricken and “fled out of Italy,” “not fearful of their human enemies but craven creatures before that mysterious plague that laid so many of them low.”
Becker says, “the initial epidemic of syphilis dates definitely from the return of Charles’ warriors to their respective countries. This exodus from Italy, combined with the loose morals of the times, resulted in the unusually rapid spread of the disease to France, Germany, and Switzerland that year; to Holland and Greece the following year; to England and Scotland within two years; and to Hungary and Russia within four years.” European sailors carried the infection to Africa and Asia so that “the disease was recognized in India in 1498, in Southern China in 1505, and in Japan in 1569.” Patriotism leads men to do strange things. No country desires to accept the blame for the origin and spread of this “new plague,” and each country blamed the other for it. The French called it the Neapolitan disease because they “met it” in Naples; the Italians called it the French or Spanish Disease; the English “caught” it from the French and, hence, called it the French Pox, the Turks called it the “disease of the Franks” (christians), and the Spaniards called it the disease of Espanola; Morbus Gallicus, or French sickness, was its accepted title for a century or more.
In 1530, an Italian physician, wrote a poem about a shepherd boy named Syphilus who was afflicted with Morbus Gallicus because he had insulted Apollo. The name Syphilis, as Parran puts it, “was acceptable, says Abraham, because it was a new word casting no aspersions upon any nations.”
Paracelsus called the “new” disease, “French Gonorrhea,” and gave its origin, “the coition of a leprous Frenchman with an impudent whore who had venereal bubos.” More than five hundred names had been applied to the “disease” up to the time it was agreed to call it “syphilis.”
What was this strange new disease that spread over Europe like a wild fire, laid men low in a few days and routed victorious armies, and that is said to have “attacked its victims with a violence unknown today?” The “disease”‘ is said to have been “as contagious as smallpox” and to have “spread both through venereal contact and through the ordinary processes of living which, even among the noble, would seem by our standards astoundingly intimate and distressingly filthy.”
The patient had high fever, delirium, violent headaches and pains in the bones, horrible sores, and bone ulcers. We are told that “death was not uncommon during the secondary stage.” Dr. Becker says it was “often so severe as to cause death.”
Now, there is not a physician living who ever saw a case of so-called “syphilis” that even remotely resembled the above description. They simply do not describe the same disease today when they describe “syphilis.” To account for the difference they tell us, to use the words of Parran, that “new diseases always are devastating. An infection in a virgin soil is more severe than among peoples who have suffered with it for generations and built up a partial immunity.” However he is not sure whether the early severity of the disease was due to “the lack of resistance” of Europeans, or “to the exceptional virulence of the early strain of syphilis.” Becker tells us that its severity died down after fifty years, so that although at the beginning “Europeans were attacked in a more serious manner; they became very ill and often died in the early stages of the malady,” “this virtually never happens at the present time.” He adds that “it has been more and more inactive up to the present time, which is a fact of importance. It is now possible to contract the disease and have it for years with no visible manifestations.”
There is not a physician living who could prove that Morbus Gallicus (or the great pox) of the Sixteenth Century is the father of what is now called “syphilis.” Nor can they be sure what Morbus Gallicus was. The reader should know that the physicians of that day had almost no knowledge of human anatomy, still less of physiology, little knowledge of pathology, and that diagnosis was very crude, differential diagnosis almost unknown. The National Encyclopedia says that “smallpox, or variola, in ancient writings, is confused with other skin eruptions, such as measles, syphilis, (great pox), and chickenpox.” It was over a hundred and fifty years after the great outbreak of Morbus Gallicus, when Thomas Sydenham, the English Hippocrates, who practiced medicine in London from 1663 to 1689, first differentiated measles from smallpox. He is also credited with having been the first to describe scarlatina. Into the epidemic of Morbus Gallicus of that day there were thrown all the feverish and eruptive disorders the sensuous and filthy, vermin infested near-men-and-women who inhabited the continental pig stye and universal whore-house that was the Europe of that day, were afflicted with; just as colds, pneumonia, typhoid fever, sleeping sickness, menengitis, tubercular flare-ups, and other troubles were called influenza in 1918-19.
Becker says, “There is some dispute as to whether the plague which attacked the soldiers was syphilis alone or a combination of syphilis with some other malady.” Parran says, “Even if it were true that Columbus’ crew had returned in 1493 with the infection, it is denied that the disease could have spread with such rapidity as to have devastated Charles’ army at Naples in 1495. The almost universal reports of its spread are attributed to the fact that those years showed an extreme epidemic prevalence and because of a confused terminology among the current pests, pestilences, and contagions, there might well have been on epidemic of many diseases. Plague and typhus, for example, were known to be prevalent in Europe of that day; they followed the armies then as they do now.”
He further says; “Significance also is attached to the coincidence of the outbreak of alleged syphilis over Europe with the abolition of the Order of St. Lazarus and the scattering of the inmates of the 19,000 leper houses. Leprosy and syphilis continued to be assimilated in popular prejudice during a long period.” He speaks of “the origin of syphilis and its history, which gradually emerges from ‘ambiguity and rumor.'”
No physician can separate fact from fancy in this cloud of mystery, rumor and doubt. But of one thing we may be sure (this will be proven in a subsequent chapter); the physicians of that day could not possibly have told whether a patient did or did not have “syphilis.” They lacked all knowledge of the necessary tests and examinations. What they did was to build a myth that has assumed for us the appearance of reality.

Chapter 2. THE MYTH BECOMES A LIE
Although patriotism prevented each European country from accepting responsibility for Morbus Gallicus, and hatred of their neighbors caused them to blame the disease upon neighboring countries, they all finally agreed to credit the Americans with having originated the disease. As Dr. Wm. S. Sadler says, “syphilis” is one of “America’s contributions to civilization” Bloch, Becker, and most syphilographers of the present take this view. Sir Wm. Osier says in his Principles and Practice of Medicine: “The balance of evidence, according to the best syphilographers, is in favor of the American origin.”
Palm says in Death Rides With Venus, that, “the first recorded patient treated for syphilis belongs to Pinzon, Columbus’ pilot. He stated that he contracted the disease in Haiti from a native woman.” Becker tells us Columbus’ sailors became infected in Haiti, then Espanola. This is more of the myth. It is not known what Pinzon suffered with and we are sure he did not know and could not have known that he contracted the disease from a native woman. It was not then known how the disease was contracted.
No disease resembling the “syphilis” of today and certainly no disease resembling Morbus Gallicus was found among the Indians of America. Becker says “proof of the fact that the Indians of the new world were the source of syphilis which was spread in Europe after the return of Columbus’ sailors is found *** in the historical writings of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.” What Becker omits to say is that these writers could not have known this to be a fact. The absence of dark field tests, Wassermann tests, etc., made the whole thing impossible.
Becker attempts to account for the failure to find “syphilis” among the Indians by saying: “The Indians from whom the disease was contracted had only slight manifestations of infection because they had had the disease for a long time, but the Europeans were attacked in a more serious manner; *** bear in mind that the Indians may have been subjected to the disease for thousands of years, and that, even now, white men have been subjected to it for less than 450 years.” If Becker’s theory is correct, the “slight manifestations of infection” seen among the Indians were much less marked than what is seen today among whites. At any rate the Europeans found nothing in the Indians that resembled Morbus Gallicus, and attributed the disease to the Indians not alone for patriotic, but for commercial reasons, as well. Parran says: “The insistence upon the New World origin of the disease during the early half of the sixteenth century is ascribed to a commercial motive — the effort to sell large quantities of guaiacum, or the ‘holy wood’ of the West Indies, as a cure for the syphilis; the argument in this case being that ‘Divine Providence mercifully provides the antidote or remedy for a disease so inflicted, at the place where the disease originates or among people who were thus afflicted.'”
However, the syphilographers are not to be stumped by such a small thing as the absence of “syphilis” in living Indians. They can’t find evidence that the Indians had “early syphilis” or that they had the “tertiary stages;” but they have discovered that Indians who have been dead five hundred or a thousand years had the disease.
Parran says: “In support of the American origin of syphilis, paleopathologists — those who study disease in human remains of the past — point to the definite evidences of it in skulls and long bones disinterred from Indian burial . places of clearly pre-Columbian periods in the Western hemisphere. These are numerous and from areas as widely separated as New Mexico, Tennessee, Ohio, Peru and Argentina.” Becker says that “syphilis of the bones leaves unmistakable evidence of its ravages in the skeletal remains of its victims.”
He tells us that proof of the American origin of “syphilis” is found “in ancient human remains discovered in many and widely separated regions in North, South, and Central America. *** Bones of men dead thousands of years have been found with marks of syphilis on them in Peru, Columbia, New Mexico, Colorado, and other regions of the Western world — proof of the existence of the disease in the Americas in pre-Columbian times.”
To the writer it seems that better evidence would be proof that the Indians of Columbian times had the disease and that they also had the “tertiary stages,” or “late syphilis.” In the absence of such proof we can only hope that the paleopathologists are better diagnosticians than are physicians. We trust they can tell better, by looking over the shin bone of a man dead a thousand years or more, what he died of, than the physician today can tell what his patient has after he makes all his tests and examinations.
Unless immunity to “syphilis” is hereditary, there is no reason why the Indian was not as much affected by “syphilitic infection” as whites. Unless the Indian’s immunity was much greater than that of present day whites, symptoms of “late syphilis” — paresis, tabes, heart disease, aneurisms, blindness, deafness, etc. — should have been quite common among the Indians who lacked all of modern medicine’s effective weapons with which to combat infection. Pre-natal “syphilis” and still-births should have been very common. Is there a syphilographer in the whole world who will assert that these conditions existed among the American Indians? The fact is, the syphilographer is attempting to trace to the Indian a disease of the very existence of which he is not sure. He is attempting to find an origin for an epidemic that he knows very little of and of the very nature of which he is entirely ignorant.
Let us go on with our paleontological studies of “syphilis.” One of the contributors to Prof. Morrow’s voluminous work on venereal diseases, speculating upon the existence of “syphilis” in ancient times, says: “Should not the bones of a prehistoric race, where no efficient treatment interposed a barrier against the encroachment of the disease, exhibit in an intense degree if such disease had prevailed when our race yet survived, the osseous lesions of syphilis? It is almost true that the reverse is the rule.”
Becker says, “In the old world — in Egypt, Asia Minor, India, and throughout Europe — never has an ancient tomb produced human remains that show evidence of syphilis. There is an abundance of material of this kind for study, yet no one has found any scientific proof of the existence of syphilis in the Eastern hemisphere before 1493.” Parran says: “In the Eastern hemisphere relatively few bones have been found that are even suspicious. None of the specimens is unquestionably syphilitic. *** Elliott Smith, who has examined the remains of something like 30,000 bodies of ancient Egyptians and Nubians, representing every period of Egyptian history for the last 60 centuries, and from every part of that country, says it can be stated confidently that ‘no trace whatever even suggesting syphilitic injuries to bones or teeth was revealed in Egypt before Modern times.'” Again, “so far as scientists are able to judge, syphilis was unknown to primitive Africa.”
The Medical Journal and Record, (New York), March 4, 1925, says editorially (page 32): “The historian of medicine, puzzled to account for the absence of traces of syphilis from the disinterred bodies of ancient Egyptians, and indeed from the whole of the Old World previous to the very end of the fifteenth century, seeks from the study of the evolution of disease and the changes which it undoubtedly undergoes in consequence of the external conditions, an explanation of the disappearance of leprosy and the contemporaneous rise of syphilis.”
Perhaps this reference to leprosy gives us a clue to the origin of “syphilis,” since the two words so often find themselves associated in medical speculations about “syphilis.” It has already been pointed out that “leprosy and syphilis continued to be assimilated in popular prejudice during a long period.” In his poem, “Syphilus sive Morbus Gallicus,” Fracastorius applied the term Morbus Gallicus to leprosy and scabies (itch), as described in the earlier Latin poems, as well as to many other forms of skin disease with which Europeans of the period were afflicted.
For ages the term leprosy, was applied to a wide variety of skin diseases and was not supposed to be the name of a specific disease, as now. Indeed the conception of specific diseases is a relatively modern conception. In like manner, the term syphilis is today applied to a broad group of pathological conditions.
Let us turn our attention for the moment to the contentions of those whom Dr. Becker calls “die-hards,” that is, those who reject the hypothesis of the American origin of “syphilis.” J. Parrot, late Professor of the Faculty of Medicine, Paris, claimed the existence of venereal disease, including syphilis, as far back as the “stone age.” Parran says, “By Sudoff in Europe and Holcomb in America, among others, the American origin of syphilis has been bitterly attacked.” He says: “In general, it is the contention of those who deny the American origin of syphilis, that the disease had long existed in Europe but in “a milder form, not differentiated from other plagues; that because of the drifting from nation to nation of armies made up of mercenaries of every nation, because of loosening of moral restraints, the unbelievable sexual laxness, and the crowded, verminous living conditions, the end of the fifteenth century constituted an ideal period for the spread of all known contagions, including syphilis; particularly those deriving from poverty, filth, and debauchery. Rather than the emergence of syphilis as a new disease, it is believed that the 1490’s marked a sudden virulence of the existing syphilitic strain.
Parran, though regarding the matter of origin as merely of academic interest, seems to favor its American origin. He says: “no reference to syphilis, as now known, is contained in medical literature of the pre-Columbian period either in Europe or in Asia. Certain ambiguous references to loathsome skin sores and ulcerated bones are believed to mean leprosy, then much more prevalent than in Europe of today.”
Others disagree with this and tell us that the Ebers papyrus, which treats of medicine at the time of Rameses II, contains descriptions that are those of “constitutional syphilis.” Palm says, “Arab physicians of the early thirteenth century described a disease which corresponds to it, and are credited with being the first to use mercury in treating it.” Certain references in the Bible are supposed to be to “syphilis,” notably the description of leprosy in Leviticus 13 and 15. King David’s cry, “my bones are filled with a loathsome disease *** because of my foolishness,” is thought also to refer to “syphilis.”
In 2637 B. C. Emperor Hoang-ty of China, ordered all medical documents in his empire collected and compiled into books for the benefit of his people. In 1863 Captain Darby, with the aid of some Chinese friends, translated these manuscripts. It is stated that a full description of a disease, the symptoms of which correspond with “syphilis,” is found therein, together with a statement that mercury is a specific for the disease.
There are those who affirm the existence of “syphilis” in the old World in ancient times and those who deny that it existed before the return of Columbus and his sailors in 1492. No doctor would deny the existence of conditions resembling the two stages of so-called “early syphilis” in ancient times. They base their denial of its existence in pre-Columbian times upon the alleged non-existence of its so called “late” or “tertiary” stages.
However, it is certain that many of the conditions called “late syphilis” did exist in Ancient and Medieval Europe and Asia. For instance, locomotor ataxia was known to the ancients. So was epilepsy, and all forms of madness. Blindness, deafness, still-births, heart failures, etc. were known to the Ancients.
We are assured that Henry VIII, Louis

I think being cautious, waiting to see if those others around you, who are taking the vaccine may have any side effects is not wrong. At the end of the day it comes down to trust, do you trust your medical experts and do you trust your government. After all haven’t our economies world wide been severely compromised, haven’t our savings vanished as we struggle to cope with this. At the same time we see the wealthier get wealthier. Some scepticism is acceptable. Am I not behaving in a scientific way to wait to see the results of this rushed vaccine experiment.
I think your website is very informative and insightful.

Although none of the manufacturers of these experimental drugs use the word vaccine in their SEC filings to describe their products, they do use the words experimental gene therapy. Get over the idea you are getting “vaccinated.” No, you are getting experimented on. Big difference if you can see it.

So, then, are these medical experiment companies “anti-vaxxers” too because they are not injecting you with a vaccine?

When the “cure,” experimental genetic modification injections, aka “covid vaccines,” injures and kills more people than does the “disease” by far, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out, which obviously goes to show the dismal level of medical competence of world political leaders, that something is bassackwards.

Right now, we are at the viral immune escape stage, hence the variants, which only are caused by these mass double injections. Maybe when their citizens begin dying by the thousands, the coming ADE stage, will it dawn on these political leaders, hmm, something’s amiss. So, what gave it away, Watson? One thing is guaranteed for sure. Not one of these political leaders will take full responsibility for their lethal mistakes. Then, they will blame the medical people.

“Personally, it is my choice to trust the best political leaders on the planet, especially when their conclusions are supported by the best (both in quality and honesty!) scientific community on the planet.” Then answer one simple question, the manufacturers don’t call these jabs vaccines. If we truly want to be honest call them what they are, experimental genetic modification injections. Real vaccines do not need EUAs. Stop using the word vaccines. To call them that is a LIE. We aren’t “anti-vaxxers,” we are anti-Big pharma true believers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGXpt9TrF3E Better a live conspiracy theorist than a dead true believer.

Oh one last thing, God is the author of truth, not lies. If you got both (why two needed, btw?) your jabs, let’s see who’s still breathing 18-24 months from now. That will settle the question.

P.S. Are you still flying around in Iceland?

I’m grateful to Saker for providing a venue for this important conversation. I would like to take advantage of the opportunity to share something that may be of interest.

Back when I was blogging a lifetime ago, I had a few posts about the role vaccinations would play as the elite would do what they can to protect their income streams. (This blog has long been defunct: I don’t track the traffic to it, most of the posts have been memory holed (but a few seem to have survived), so sharing this isn’t for any self-aggrandizement. I merely want to demonstrate that what’s happening now has been in the works for a long time.)

With you indulgence I would like to share some excerpts from a post from 2005: Let the Culling Commence.

The danger signs are spread all around us yet scarcely register in the standard economic models. Nature is the greatest obstacle of all to the future of the free-market system and cannot be treated as an adversary. The message must be protect or perish.
— — —
Giant corporations, wealthy communities and rich individuals, whatever their assets cannot escape the consequences of ecological degradation. Yet even they seem powerless to halt the process. They illustrate the paradox of beneficiaries unable to protect the system that benefits them, a paradox we shall encounter frequently in this Report.
— — —
The bedrock of free-market theory and practice, need we remind the Commissioning Parties, is not altruism or self-sacrifice but immediate self-interest and profit. It would thus be astonishing to find this market rife with statistically significant unselfish behaviour. This holds true even when it can be shown that some policies and individual actions are much more likely to protect the system than others; to allow it to pass on, as it were, its genes. Market players care only about themselves, today, not about transmitting their individual or collective inheritance.
— — —
We know for sure that hundreds of millions of individually justifiable decisions to have children will lead to the presence of a higher population than the planet can ultimately support. We also know with mathematical certainty that excessive populations in individual countries will result in increased pressure on land and other resources, the reduction of output per capita and therefore a drop in the standard of living.
— — —
Today’s rulers seem to have lost sight completely of the fundamental duty to maintain population stability, and, rather than lying to their citizens for their own good, they seem more often to be lying to themselves. Whether from cowardice or from ignorance, they pretend that the market can, by itself, bring happiness, riches and well-being to all, even in the face of staggering growth in the numbers of people pursuing these rewards.
— — —
Since profit is the goal and the motor of the system, corporations must be free to pursue it. The corporation belongs to those who have invested in its stock, its shareholders. Whatever moralists may say, it does not belong to its employees, to its suppliers or to the town, city or country in which it happens to be located. This is doubtless as it should be, but one cannot have one’s cake and eat it. The workforce, suppliers, local community and country will have to accept sacrifices.
— — —
Income transfers from the relatively rich to the absolutely poor would necessarily be accompanied by transfers of power; the West would have to relinquish not just its wealth but its authority. It would thereby seal the fate of the liberal system and ensure its certain demise. The entire exercise would be revealed as self-defeating.
— — —
The Commissioning Parties have instructed us to be straightforward and explicit. They will have drawn for themselves the unmistakable conclusions of our analysis: we cannot both sustain the liberal, free-market system and simultaneously continue to tolerate the presence of superfluous billions.
The only way to guarantee the happiness and well-being of the vast majority is for the total population of the earth to be proportionally smaller. This choice may appear stark but it is dictated at once by reason and by compassion. If we wish to preserve the liberal system — the very premise of our assignment — there is no alternative. All else is illusion and wishful thinking.
As Machiavelli pointed out to the Medici long ago, the choice is to remain Prince and to do whatever is necessary to that end, or to cease to be Prince. We have no doubt that the Commissioning Parties will choose to remain, as it were, Prince. The great question thus becomes, ‘What is necessary to that end?’

If twenty-first century capitalism cannot continue to function optimally — if at all — under foreseeable future demographic conditions, then those conditions must be altered.
— — —
To reach the target of 4 billion in 2020, world population must be reduced on average by 100 million people a year for two decades. Nine-tenths or more of the reduction should take place in the less developed countries. Effort must be brought to bear both on mortality increase and fertility decrease in proportions which will vary according to time and chance.

This is the theoretical background provided by Susan George’s remarkable The Lugano Report.

With that as the background, I then cite what were then current news articles and policiy discussions. Here are some more excerpts from the post:

Toronto Star: Bird flu a ‘global threat’ — EU ministers [Oct 18 2005]

European Union foreign ministers Tuesday declared the spread of avian flu from Asia to Europe a global threat, as the Swiss manufacturer of the only available anti-flu drug announced it was building a new U.S. plant to increase production amid fears of a major flu outbreak.

— — —

From The Wilderness: A Career In Microbiology Can Be Harmful To Your Health [Feb 14 2002]

According to the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), after declaring a “public health emergency”, and without consulting with public health authorities, law enforcement, the legislature or courts, a state governor using MEHPA, or anyone he/she decides to empower, can among many things:

– Require any individual to be vaccinated. Refusal constitutes a crime and will result in quarantine. [em. mine]

– Require any individual to undergo specific medical treatment. Refusal constitutes a crime and will result in quarantine. [em. mine]

– Seize any property, including real estate, food, medicine, fuel or clothing, an official thinks necessary to handle the emergency.
…
The research the microbiologists were doing could have developed methods of treating diseases like anthrax and smallpox without conventional antibiotics or vaccines. Pharmaceutical contracts to deal with these diseases will total hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars. If epidemics could be treated in non-traditional ways, MEHPA might not be necessary. Considering the government’s actions nullifying many civil liberties since last September, MEHPA seems to be a law looking for an excuse to be enacted. Maybe the microbiologists were in the way of some peoples’ or business’ agendas.

We also know that DNA sequencing research can be used to develop pathogens that target specific genetically related groups. One company, DynCorp, handles data processing for many federal agencies, including the CDC, the Department of Agriculture, several branches of the Department of Justice, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the NIH. On Nov. 12 DynCorp announced that its subsidiary, DynPort Vaccine, had been awarded a $322 million contract to develop, produce, test, and store FDA licensed vaccines for use by the Defense Department. It would be incredibly easy for DynCorp to hide information pertaining to the exact make-up, safety, efficacy and purpose of the drugs and vaccines the US government has contracted for.

— — —

Scientific American: If Smallpox Strikes Portland… [March 2005]

After we began developing EpiSims in 2000, smallpox was among the first diseases we chose to model because government officials charged with bioterrorism planning and response were faced with several questions and sometimes conflicting recommendations. In the event that smallpox was released into a U.S. population, would mass vaccination be necessary to prevent an epidemic? Or would targeting only exposed individuals and their contacts for vaccination be enough? How effective is mass quarantine? How feasible are any of these options with the existing numbers of health workers, police and other responders?
…
Of course, appropriate public health responses will always depend on the disease, the types of interventions available and the setting. For example, we have simulated the intentional release of an inhalable form of plague in the city of Chicago to evaluate the costs and effects of different responses. In those simulations we found that contact tracing, school closures and city closures each incurred economic losses of billions of dollars but did not afford many health benefits over voluntary mass use of rapidly available antibiotics at a much lower economic cost.

— — —

The White House: President Holds Press Conference [Oct 5 2005]

Q Mr. President, you’ve been thinking a lot about pandemic flu and the risks in the United States if that should occur. I was wondering, Secretary Leavitt has said that first responders in the states and local governments are not prepared for something like that. To what extent are you concerned about that after Katrina and Rita? And is that one of the reasons you’re interested in the idea of using defense assets to respond to something as broad and long-lasting as a flu might be?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes. Thank you for the question. I am concerned about avian flu. I am concerned about what an avian flu outbreak could mean for the United States and the world. I am — I have thought through the scenarios of what an avian flu outbreak could mean. I tried to get a better handle on what the decision-making process would be by reading Mr. Barry’s book on the influenza outbreak in 1918. I would recommend it.

The policy decisions for a President in dealing with an avian flu outbreak are difficult. One example: If we had an outbreak somewhere in the United States, do we not then quarantine that part of the country, and how do you then enforce a quarantine? When — it’s one thing to shut down airplanes; it’s another thing to prevent people from coming in to get exposed to the avian flu. And who best to be able to effect a quarantine? One option is the use of a military that’s able to plan and move.

— — —

House Committe on Veterans’ Affairs: Testimony…Regarding Lessons Learned from the Gulf War [Jan 24 2002]

Given the AVIP’s abysmal track record, all of us should be deeply concerned about the Joint Vaccine Acquisition Program (JVAP), the $322 million cost-plus biowarfare vaccine program initiated in 1998 by the Pentagon’s Joint Program Office for Biological Defense.

The JVAP calls for the Dynport Corporation to develop at least three, and possibly as many 12, additional biological warfare vaccines over the next decade. What happens when you give a human being a dozen or more BW vaccines? Nobody knows. Not DoD, NIH, CDC, the World Health Organization or any other medical or scientific body.

Will these vaccines actually work against a real threat? Again, nobody knows; no challenge or efficacy studies have been conducted in animals, so far as VVA is aware. This means that the JVAP is a giant biowarfare defense gamble; it assumes that our enemies will field weapons that our vaccines will defeat. As with so many other things, the Gulf War experience is instructive here.

— — —

Dr Leonard Horowitz: Avian Flu Fright – Politically-Timed For Global ‘Iatrogenocide’ [Oct 11 2005]

…A growing body of scientific evidence strongly suggests vaccines are largely responsible for increasing cases of autism and other learning disabilities, chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, Lupus, MS, ALS, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, hay fever, allergies, chronic draining ear infections, type 1 autoimmune diabetes, and many, many more pandemics. These chronic ailments are said to require long-term medical care for the patients, management causing toxic side effects resulting in America’s leading killer–iatrogenic disease. That is, vaccines and other pharmaceutical industry inventions are literally killing or disabling millions with little effort on the part of government officials and their drug industry cohorts to arrest this scourge.

For all we know, governments are ordering an avian flu vaccine that will precisely deliver this pandemic to the world to affect population control.

— — —

The White House: President Details Project BioShield

3. New FDA Emergency Use Authorization for Promising Medical Countermeasures Under Development. Some of the most promising treatments for a terrorist agent may still be under formal FDA review when an attack occurs. The President proposed an emergency use authorization to permit the effective use of such treatments in an emergency, if alternative treatments are not available. This will improve access to a potentially beneficial treatment in an emergency situation, when it is most likely to save lives, even if it has not yet been proven to be suitable for routine general use or has not completed the formal process for full FDA licensure.

— — —

National Vaccine Information Center: Briefing Paper- Homeland Security and Vaccine Compensation

On November 13, 2002, the Homeland Security Bill was passed by the House of Representatives and sent to the Senate. Originally intended to set up a new Department of Homeland Security, the 484-page bill also provided for the biggest reorganization in government since 1947. The last four sections of the bill, (1714-1717) shielded the pharmaceutical industry from lawsuits for injuries caused by FDA-approved vaccines, [em. mine] such as mercury containing pediatric vaccines associated with the development of autism.

Section 304 of the bill [ie: Homeland Security Act] removed from the states their historic control over public health laws, including vaccination laws, and handed it over to federal health officials. This section allows the Secretary of DHHS to issue a “declaration” after concluding that “an actual or potential bioterrorist incident” or “other potential public health emergency” warrants the administration of “a substance or substances” to “individuals during the effective period of the declaration.” The law provides for no exemptions to vaccination or medication and is expected to override state public health and vaccine laws which currently provide medical and/or religious exemptions to vaccination for school entry. This federal law also does not preclude the use of the U.S. military to enforce the administration of vaccines or other “substances” to individuals as ordered by the Secretary of DHHS.

— — —

The Evening Standard: Roche sees £1bn Tamiflu sales [Oct 18 2005]

Sales of pharmaceutical giant Roche’s Tamiflu bird flu treatment could reach £1bn in the next two years as governments frantically stockpile it as a precaution against the disease.

The Swiss-based company’s own Tamiflu sales forecast earlier this year – long before avian flu threatened Europe – was £385m.

Analysts now believe the frantic international stockpiling of recent weeks could send Roche profits off the dial. Its shares are already trading close to an all-time high at 188 Swiss francs.

‘The profit potential is enormous,’ one analyst said. ‘A billion pounds is not unlikely over a prolonged period. They don’t disclose production capacity or profit margin, but one assumes something in the order of 27%…’

There’s much more, but I’ll stop there. The point of this article and what’s happening now… well, that should be obvious I think.

As if by providence I came across this interview with Franciscan hermit Alexis Bugnolo from Rome. I think this interview goes someway to answering the Sakers question, but doubt if he will accept Bugnolo’s point of view.

Bugnolo is an Italian-American with a degree in anthropology and besides being a monk, is also an historian, journalist and aspiring politician. He has shown great courage in resisting tyranny.

The interview is by the Polish writer Konrad Stachnio and they discuss many topics including: the geopolitical world order, the state of Russia, the state of Poland, the state of Italy, the masonic societies, the state of the catholic church, the idea that Russia might want to convert to catholicism (a strange idea), the purpose of the vaccine, what it means to be human and many other topics.

(The title is just clickbait, as this is a very minor part of the interview)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/crtfI7AuCX2V/

Saker is simply a Chinese-Russian spy or useful fool with the mission to damage all countries outside such an environment, so he wants our total vaccination to eliminate us more easily.

I had detected him before but now he has surpassed all the barbarism a person is capable of, he is simply a savage, he is vomitous.

I will never come back to this site.

What knowledge do all these world leaders have of molecular biology? What do these people know about crisper technology? They use “scientist” that practice more politics and buddy systems than bench science. If a whole group of medical researchers and molecular biologist at UCLA come out against the current response to this disease the rhetoric truly becomes questionable.(Al these people are ether fired or discredited, why would they do that to themselves.?) I am a molecular cell biologist with 16 years formal training and 38 years bench research so I guess I could make an educated evaluation of what is happening. Just saying.

Es ist offensichtlich,
dass du ‘Covid-Experten’ sein willst,
in der Hoffnung,
deiner Leserschaft imponieren zu können.
Das ist tragisch.
Bilde Dich.
Lies.
Benutze deinen Verstand.
Gott wird dir dabei nicht helfen.
Das musst du schon selber tun.
Kannst du das?

https://www.thomaskubo.de/das-pcr-desaster.html

i’m a covid dissident and antivaxxer, and i’ve been taking in the saker blog for about 4 or 5 years now. so i guess i’m eligible.

1st question

Putin, Xi, Khamenei, Maduro, Arce (and Morales!) and Diaz-Canel:
1. are all less well informed that we (COVID-dissidents/anti-vaxxers) are.
2. all know the truth, but they are all lying.
3. are all working with the Great-Replacers and “chippers” from Davos, with the Bohemian grovers, with Bill Gates and CFR, etc. etc. etc. They all want to create a single world government, kill a few billion people and usher in the Times of the Antichrist.
4. Don’t confuse me with facts, I got my opinion and, dammit, I am right!!!

Ans: i don’t know why i’d care. if putin had something to say about economics, politics or karate, i think he’d be authoritative. but if he talks about health, or who i should vote for in the next election, he’s out of his wheelhouse. as for your answer – i disagree. trust is never carte blanc.

was that it? just those questions? or you want comment on your editorial? sigh.

first para: i’ll trust putin et al if they trust me. personally and specifically. until then i’ll take them under advisement. putin used to be kgb. anybody who spent most of their life in that sort of thing comes out of it with a different relationship to the truth than other people.

second para:
“extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence“. this is nonsense. it’s nonsense because who gets to decide what’s extraordinary? if you ask me, any rational that results in locking down the healthy is an extraordinary argument, since it’s never been done before in all of history. but more generally, i see this phrase used more often to shut down discussion. i think the contrary is sherlock holmes. “Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”

third para: is this you asking to be insulted? i think you’re a great analyst about everything except covid. and sandy hook.

i don’t think i need to respond to the rest. i don’t look to you for any information about the scamdemic. it’s not your wheelhouse, and that’s ok.