A South Korean newspaper claims Russian investigators have found North Korea did not torpedo one of the South’s warships that sank in spring. The report says the vessel hit a mine.
Russia has not yet commented on the story.
The “Cheonan” sank off the Korean peninsula in March, with the loss of 46 sailors.
Earlier, a US-backed international investigation found Pyongyang responsible. However, Pavel Leshakov, the director of Korean studies at the Moscow State University, says the conclusion is “almost 100 per cent political.”
Watch full interview with Pavel Leshakov:
Russia sent its own team of investigators to the region last month.
North Korea has continuously denied any links to the incident.
The incident has made the tense situation on the divided peninsula even worse. But it could potentially develop to become even uglier, says investigative journalist Wayne Madsen.
“This is very critical, because if there is a smoking gun – this could have been a set-up, this was some sort of accident made look like hostile action or it was some sort of false flag attack, this could result in war against a nuclear armed-country, North Korea,” Madsen asserts.
Canadian foreign policy analyst Stephen Gowans says war in the region “could be possible, however we can also look at this as an on-going programme of the United States and South Korea to impose enormous military pressure on North Korea with the goal of seeing it collapse.”
Watch full interview with Stephen Gowans:
Pyotr Razvin from the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Foreign Ministry, believes despite the high tension, the chances of an actual war are limited.
“Both North and South Korea see the perspective of a war as mutually assured destruction. If a conflict were to erupt, the Korean peninsula would be economically devastated. Besides, neighbouring China has no interest in a war on its borders either, be it a nuclear or not.”
Watch the full interview with Dr. Jae-Jung Suh:
Dr. Jae-Jung Suh of the Korea Studies Program at Johns Hopkins University in Washington, DC argued that the report presented by the international investigation faulting North Korea may have errors.
Suh’s report casts doubt on North Korea’s guilt and the use of a torpedo, arguing that the evidence does not prove North Korea nor a torpedo were at fault.
“We do not argue that the North Koreans did not do it. What we are arguing is that the joint investigative group of the South Korean government has failed to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the North Korean torpedo hit the ship and sunk it,” said Suh.
He argued that the biggest inconsistency is the white power found on the ship by the investigative group; he argued that it did not result from an explosion. Lab experiments and analysis have replicated the chemical process, showing that the powder was rust from water exposure over time, aluminum hydroxide, not a result of the explosion.
Looks like the Russians are not interested in a little nuclear war at it’s Far East borders. Interesting to see if they will call the US bluff when the Yankees will come up with their false flag operation in the Middle East any time soon.
alibi
I’ve always thought that this incident was the US rattling the Korea sword at the uppity japs for having the temerity to try to move a Marine base in Okinawa.
Setting the final stages for the over 3 decades long covert war against Russia and China and the destruction of Russia via Islamic proxy, economic sabotage, war, organised crime, terrorism and separatism.
Setting the final stages for the over 3 decades long covert war against Russia and China and the destruction of Russia via Islamic proxy, economic sabotage, war, organised crime, terrorism and separatism.
Saker what do you think about the latest rocket attacks at Israel. The Jews say some of the rockets came from Egypt. Egypt denies it’s involvement. Could the rockets from Egypt be fired by the Jews’ order to give it a start?
alibi
@alibi: I honestly don’t know. It seems possible that the Egyptian cops might have missed something, but I have hard time believing that this was a serious rocket attack which could be used as a pretext for something. After all, Egypt under Mubarak is the Israel’s poodle and as long as Mubarak is in power their southern front is safe (even though the vast majority of Egyptians oppose Mubarak’s Vichy policy).
What do you think?
Cheers!
I don’t know. I think we can all agree on one thing – the Israelis want to strike at Iran no matter what. Giving that we can only speculate at what would be the Tonkin incident style pretext. Rocket attacks at Israel would look pretty promising since Israel might hope to get sympathies from the simple people of the world for once if they could reveal civilian casualties of the rocket attacks. It’s probable hard to organise strikes directly from Iran, which would be ideal for that. There were a few launches from Gaza just recently at least it was reported by the Israelis. I doubt that the Hamaz was really involved in the strikes, at least I think that Iran would not authorise any escalation now so I would think that if there were strikes from Gaza territory they might have been originated by the Israelis but found out and cut off by the Hamaz and since it’s easier for the Israelis to control and manipulate events in Egypt then in Gaza the Jews might have decided to use the Egypt territory to originate the Tonkin incident.
alibi
Alibi,
My guess is someone is trying to embarrass the puppet before his masters.
Hi Lysander, you mean embarrass Mubarack?
alibi