by Ollie Richardson for The Saker Blog
Buzzfeed, whose reputation can hardly be described as trustworthy, reported on May 29th that a genuine document – the British Army’s guide for spotting the “Extreme Right Wing” – has been leaked online. According to Buzzfeed, the MOD told the agency that “the document was produced in late 2017 after the arrest of four soldiers who were accused of being affiliated with the banned neo-Nazi terror group National Action”, and that “robust measures” were put in place so that people with so-called “extremist views” didn’t end up in the Armed Forces.
Let’s now examine this leaked document:
So, if to pick out a few examples from this chart, it follows from above that in order to be “perfect” and in the “center”, people must not:
“Claim that it is acceptable to abuse Jews or Muslims as Judaism or Islam are not ‘races’”
Yes, the British Army is indeed saying these words. The same army that, to cite a recent example, participated in the genocide of over 1 million Iraqis based on a “WMD” lie. In fact, the ICC even admits, in a 74-page report, that “the [prosecutor’s] office has reached the conclusion that there is a reasonable basis to believe that members of the UK armed forces committed war crimes within the jurisdiction of the court against persons in their custody”. We can even read that British soldiers were given a free hand to kill unarmed civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan:
“The British army operated rules of engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan that at times allowed soldiers to shoot unarmed civilians who were suspected of keeping them under surveillance…”
And of course, there is the Chilcot enquiry, which concluded, if to read between the lines, that the post-9/11 “attack” (let’s not beat around the bush: a foreign actor dragged the US army into the Middle East to take care of “threatening” neighbours) invasion of Iraq was completely illegal but no punishment will follow, since the whole neocon bloc would be thrown in jail.
The monarchy even sent its spawn to give the genocide a “patriotic” wrapper – Prince Harry, who likes to dress up in SS uniforms and set a “multicultural” example by referring to a compatriot as “our little Paki friend”.
“Describe themselves as ‘patriots’”
This one is really vague, since the definition of a “patriot”, according to the Oxford dictionary, is “a person who vigorously supports their country and is prepared to defend it against enemies or detractors”. Hmm, so how can one both be in the army and not be a “patriot”? Secondly, a British citizen whose coffin is draped with the Union Jack isn’t a “patriot”?
Thirdly, the war criminal David Cameron, after he said that fellow war criminal Winston Churchill was a “patriot”, isn’t a “patriot” himself? Tony Blair, who promoted “modern patriotism” in 2001 – on the eve of the Middle East invasion – isn’t a “patriot”? Apparently so…
“Use blatantly untruthful or incorrect references to immigrants, Judaism, or Islam”
What does “blatantly untruthful or incorrect references” mean? Let me guess, it is the “honest” government that decides the criteria? After all, “Operation Telic” launched by Blair was factually based on a fiction – that Iraq possessed WMDs – and driven by aggressive anti-Muslim media campaigns, as a result of which the army massacred scores of Muslims (not to mention the colonialist past of the government in London).
And how to explain the photo below showing the govermental “far-right” stooge Tommy Robinson posing with UK troops?
After all, even Facebook wasn’t able to help the self-proclaimed Zionist Tommy and keep his Facebook page alive, having closed it down earlier this year due to “dehumanizing language and calls for violence targeted at Muslims”.
Actually, when we really sit and analyse each square of that chart, referring to real life examples of the British Army’s actions both in the distant past and in the recent past, it’s as if the death squad of Elizabeth II (seen below greeting her puppet Adolf) is either describing itself as “extreme right-wing”, or that the “center/left/right” liberal paradigm is tearing at the seams after the “center” has too often shown itself to be yet another continuation of the policy of colonisation?
I would opt for the latter, since every decade that has passed since the British banking empire started to wrap its tentacles around the globe contains a plethora of examples of categorisation (where some categories are “bad” and others are “good”) being used to deliberately stratify society and pit the “plebs” – both natives and immigrants herded from colonies – against each other. And it is this initially liberal and later (after September 11th 2001 in America and July 7th 2005 in London) ultra-liberal matrix that keeps the Queen’s “United” plantation in business. Contrary to what British schools teach, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland did not consciously chose to be a part of the UK. And even those who have watched such Hollywood blockbusters as “Braveheart” sadly generally don’t show an interest in London’s track record with invading and annexing (real annexation, not the laughable definition attributed to Russia’s actions in Crimea after Washington’s 2014 coup in Kiev) sovereign territory. They don’t care about the testimonies of Irish people who witnessed British troops shoot people and use their skulls as an ashtray. And they most certainly don’t care about how Thatcher left most of Wales unemployed and used the money “saved” from privatisation to fund the Gulf War.
And what to think about the explanation of the origins of the chart – that “robust measures” were put in place to counter “neo-Nazi terror groups”? Well there is a slight problem: the British government participated in the “Banderisation” of Ukraine, injecting the legacy of Hitler’s Galician collaborators into the veins of the whole country (besides certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions, as well as Crimea, of course). The British Army, as Le Figaro found out when it travelled to the territories of Donbass occupied by Kiev, sends representatives from the Sandhurst Royal Military Academy to the USA-led Yavorov training ground in the Lvov region. What are Ukrainians taught? Well, besides brutal methods of exterminating their own people, they also learn about how to distinctively mark their territory.
The bottom of the Buzzfeed barrel is reflected in the words of an “Army spokesperson”…
“The values of our armed forces and the nation they serve are totally incompatible with extremist views. We have robust measures in place to ensure those exhibiting these views are not permitted to serve.”
…and an “MOD source”…
“The chart doesn’t suggest that all patriots are extremists, and the department was taking a comprehensive approach to tackling extremism through the UK government’s counter terrorism and extremism strategies”.
Ah yes, “counter-terrorism”! When Downing Street arms and funds terrorist organisations in order to carry out “regime change” abroad, and then lets a few “moderate rebels” slip through the net in order to justify the said invasion.
Let’s face it: Britain didn’t seem to care about Muslims or Islam during the Crusades, it didn’t seem to care when it occupied Palestine over 100 years ago and created the terrorist organisation known as “Israel” nearly 30 years later (coincidence?), and it certainty didn’t care during the “shock and awe” and “Assad must go” eras, so why would it suddenly care now?
Ask yourselves why in May 2019 Sky News entered takfiri-controlled Idlib without a problem and gave its friends from Al Qaeda (al-Nusra) free PR…
…and why the British-funded “White Helmets” terrorist organisation was present at the scene of a roadside bomb blast on May 26th 2019 in Idlib, which killed a high-ranking al-Nusra commander?
In the time it took you, the reader, to reach the bottom of this article, the British Army facilitated or even directly carried out an act of aggression against a Muslim country. If Westminster is so adamant on deploying the “extreme right-wing” category in order to whitewash itself, then it should at least wipe away the blood dripping from its Sykes-Picot fangs first.
There is a rock solid formula for burying these guys, and it lies in their pants.
We should all keep in mind that the British Army, being a major enforcement wing of the English ruling class, is a component of that ruling class itself. And it adheres to that with a religious dedication. An individual far wiser than I once described the English ruling class as a “Scorpion entity,” which is responsible for much of the misery in the world. A such it cherishes its capacity to be the “father of lies” in order to further its enthusiastic dedication to manipulating and controlling the minds of the multitude that it takes delight in despising. Shockingly, including its own common people. Proof of this is in abundance all around us. One has only to look at the hidden control of the BBC through its Secret intelligence Agencies. Those agencies being long regarded as the private property of that ruling group itself.
And then there is perhaps the most despicable of all their great crimes. The deliberate and quite un-necesary creation and prolongation of the First World War, purely for the purpose of not having to bother with changing their hidebound attachment to their own way of doing things in competitive response to the rise of Germany’s far more effective means of running an economy. They actually are so Scorpionic that they take delight in sacrificing the blood of their own kind in order to satisfy their own mania for absolute world mind domination.
Their disgusting slaughter of their own troops in the battles on the Somme anybody?
Now it appears they are finally having their own nature finally openly catching up with them. The condition of the Tory party now seems to be showing every sign of decaying quite rapidly into a condition of open public self mockery. Their time must be truly approaching its final ending. That is truly historic. However deliberate and prideful lying has been their chosen art form for a very long time. Let’s all keep that in mind when we try to figure out what they are really doing.
Snow, I rather think that the genocides in India (while ripping tens of trillions from the richest victim on Earth) were England’s greatest crimes. So much to choose from-the Atlantic slave trade, Imperial glory throughout Africa, the Opium Wars, the suppression of the Boxers, the devastation of Ireland etc, but the Holocausts of savagery in India in deliberately contrived famines from the late 18th century up to the last, Winnie Churchill’s Great Bengal Famine of the 40s that killed more people than were despatched in all the Nazi death-camps in toto. Then they were succeeded in the role of ‘Western Civilization’s Bringer of Death by their bastard off-spring, the US of A(nnihilation).
I recommend the book “Heligoland by George Drower.”The true story of German Bight and the Island that Britain betrayed…”
In Churchills own words: “Who the hell do the Germans think they are, to have the arrogance to challenge our supremacy on the High Seas…”
…and another incident forgotten in History…The Danes may be grateful for the British contribution to removing Germans from Denmark in 1945 but there were Danes on my various business trips there, who reminded me of the word “Copenhagenisation” – when Britain launched a pre-emptive attack on the Danish fleet, to prevent them from possibly making any mischief against British naval superiority…i think this was the first example in history of a “Pre-Emptive Attack” ??
…to which i replied that i was not sure, as a British citizen whether i should even talk to a Dane, as they were so evil in laying waste to Britain during the Viking Invasions…;oP
My Swiss grandfather was firmly on the German side during WW1 – he was sent to the Jura region to defend the area in case of attack. He observed with tales of horror, the explosions and gunfire from the battlefield around Nancy and Metz… Switzerland at the time was buzzing with contempt for the British…
However, on his deployment in the Jura in 1940, he was sent there as a Sapper and was involved in the preparations to blow up the whole mountain chain in case the Germans invaded…His home was a regional armory and he stated if his home was attacked, he would “make damned sure he took 10 Germans down with him…”
One of the sad things about losing my Grandad when i was aged 9, was that he left behind many unexplained mysteries > He was invited to Luxembourg in 1946 where a Monastery honoured him and gave him access to their cellars to pick out 50 of their best wines (Still have some of them at my home in London today)… Why was he honoured in this way? Why did he hate General Guisan as someone he could not trust? Why was my grandad “suddenly called away on some important business,” and then it turned out that Canaris had been visiting Berne in a “nightclub” where my mother was posted in the Swiss equivalent of GCHQ ? Why was he happy to employ a Berliner in his post-war business when all around him, his compatriots were still raging in fury against the Germans?
During Kohls tenure, the latter mentioned that a “German Resistance Cell” was asked to stand down – and Mitterrand then announced that a similar Group which existed in France was also disbanded.
These, alongside the Cell that my Grandad was in, were apparently Ultra-Patriots who were in charge of putting spine into the Resistance Movements across Europe and taking extreme measures if necessary, to defend their homelands…a sort of supra-NATO cell…
I wonder what my Grandfather would say about the CIA or British “Ministry of Defence” of today? a bunch of Ultra-Psychopaths or an Ultra-Patriotic Cell? The number of CIA and UK sponsored “Innoculation programs” that were unleashed on a now peaceful Europe post 1945 would i am convinced, never have been supported by my Grandad…
The greatest genocide in human history is totally unknown in the world. It happened between world war one and second world war, when the british facilitated the genocide of 9 000 000 iranians reducing the population form 20 million to only 11. Somebody wrote a book about it a few years back.
When I was a little boy my mother would tell me stories about the famine, that the british created, that killed so many of our people. For years I had nightmares about it. Those stories have followed me all my life and even as an old man, I still try to teach myself how to survive things like that.
But as if killing 9 000 000 people wasn´t enough, you can read in “All the shahs men”, that the british themselves declared, that they would not be able to create their moderne society without the plunder of iranian oil. They needed the money!
One day during the revolution of 79 I came home from a demonstration and when my father saw me, he said: “you don´t need to go to demonstrations, the british have already planned you grandchildrens future.” I can´t remember a single time, that he did not cry, when he heard the name Mossadegh!
We have millions upon millions of reasons for hating the british and the americans!
Minute by Minute, I think that I know how you father felt when Mossadegh was mentioned. Maybe I cry someday when Kekkonen, president of Finland 1956-1982, is mentioned. Totally evil British Empire is still alive and spreads her poison through globalization nowadays.
Maybe also Islam is her creation? Who knows? I have came to the conclusion that Islam is not a religion, it´s a political system that destroys all original national identities. Globalization uses also Islam here in Europe to achieve that target.
Mossadegh wasn´t a muslim. Right? Iran was a secular country during his time. But his “crime” was that he wanted to nationalize the oil of Iran, for the benefit of Iranians. Exactly the same scenario than in Venezuela.
What do you think? Is Irans original identity Islam? Has once so great Persia totally forgotten her history? Maybe your father cried because of that?
Prospeller, we have never forgotten our history. The arabs may try, but we all know, that we were the ones, that civilized them. We have a very long memory and we remember. We were even ruling the world, when the british still were jumping from treetop to treetop. Not even their orientalism can change that.
What ever Mossadegh became, he started as a british dupe and errandboy. He even came with suggestion to the british, with regards to how to crush rebellions against them in Iran. There are those, that start as revolutionaries and end up as traitors to their own people and ideals. And there are those, who start as traitors and end up becoming legends in their own right. Mossadegh was the latter.
Unlike Christianity where people are devided as a punshment from god, in islam the differences between different people from different parts of the world is said to be, in The Quran, a gift from God to mankind. A muslim can not be a racist. It goes against the religion.
Islam is the religion of the sword and the book. Anybody saying differently is a liar. But it is forbidden for us to start a war. We are only allowed to defend ourselves. That is also what our leaders in Iran have been saying for the last 40 years., but no wonde the western media and rulers have their own agendas. We are also obliged by our faith to help opperessed people, which is why we not only cut our relation with South African apartheid and israhell in the early days of the revolution, but have helped the palestinians and helped ANC, when a few people in the world even knew, what ANC was.
Islam has its own way of government too, it is true. We were the first people in history to create what is today known as the wellfare state, where people were treated equally. A freed slave would for instance recieve the same amount of money as a general under our Prophets rule. I doubt the world has ever seen a more just ruler in the history of mankind. Sadly the second khalif Omar destroyed the society, that our Prophet had built and began treating people with discrimination, and in the end he destroyed the fabric of our muslim society.
To understand any religion or ideology one has to at least know one three things: the ideologue, his book or the pesons, that are taught and personify the book and the ideology of its creator by him.
With regards to Islam Imam Ali said only a few years after the death of our Prophet, that Islam is like a beautiful skin jakket, that is wore inside out, ugly and unlike the beauty of the skin. People say, that our Prophet didn´t have any miracles or knowledge of the future. Nothing could be further from the truth. He was shown by Gabriel, what was going to happen to Islam and he told his followers about the thing he had been shown.
I am not a muslim because my father was a muslim. I always say, that I would be a muslim, even if I was from Mars and only heard about Imam Ali. There is a book written by a lebanese christian about Imam Ali called “The voice of human justice” by Dr. George Jordac. If you want to know the real Islam, you should read that book written by a christian.
Personally I am more interested in the nasty books written abuot Islam by western scholars. At the moment I am reading the ultimate muslim bashing book written by Tom Holland “In the shadow of the sword”
https://archive.org/details/TomHollandInTheShadowOfTheSwordepub
The last one I finished was this one:
https://www.amazon.com/First-Muslim-Story-Muhammad/dp/1594632308
which is written by a muslim hating jewish woman doing her best orwellian act with her reverse psycology on the muslims. Shamefully the idiot muslims invite her to speak for them and they even cheer her too! I douibt any of them has read the book!
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Lesley+Hazleton+&sp=mAEB
The childishness of the best of antimuslim western intellectuals!
Believe me when I tell you, that any muslim worth his or her spit can do a better job than these monkeys, who have spent years of their lives creating their dump!
With regards
British Complicity in the Iranian Holocaust
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWc8-P29wIc
Any chance you remember the book title?
Here is the book for you Texas
https://www.amazon.com/Great-Famine-Genocide-Iran-1917-1919/dp/076186167X
I doubt, that I will ever read it. It will be all too painful for me. It will destroy me. But people of the world need to know!
And thank you for the link Azorka.
With regards
Analyst, sounds like your Grandad was a Freemason?
Sigh… These PR slobs can’t even spell correctly: Islamofacism. Interestingly, what used to be a Western slur applied very frivolously to anti-imperialist movements throughout the Arab and Muslim world has become taboo as more and more people now see the elephant in the room: Wahhabism does merit the label ”Islamofascism” with all the ramifications this has for Western ideological credentials.
This word is a pr victory for the neocons and their ideologues. A meningless comparison considering the political and industrial state of the muslim world. A dehumanizing word created by the real fascist of the world, the purpose of which is only jingoistic, an oxymoron label considering the defenition of fascism by the father of the ideology Mussolini! If there is any fascism in this world, and there is, its centers are London, Bonn, Paris and washington, not their errandboys in the west asia! And those regurgitating it being it for sensationalism or ignorance are doing the bidding of real fascist of this world being it willingly or other wise.
But why, then, do these very same scum today issue warnings like ”Look out for individuals who use the term Islamofascism” ? And I do insist, mind you, that if there is one abomination to which this concept has some true significance, it is Wahhabism. Again, just listen to the specimen which Saker brought to our attention in October last year:
/saudi-writer-on-rt-syria-iraq-gulf-states-belong-to-saudi-arabia-english-subtitles/
Your link doesn´t work. Regardless wahhabism is a tool of the fascists not the other way around. Maybe it is a chicken and egg thing. These things are not a question of taste or opinion. The defenition of fascism is set by its creator. It has its own meaning. It is as Goebbels said it is. They repeat something and here you are repeating it for them. Wahhabism is not Islam. The highest religious institutions in the muslim world have denounced it as apostasy. Even Abdul Wahhabis father and brother declared him as an apostate. The father of Wahhabism is a jew named Ibn Taymiyyah. He was beaten by the people in the mosque where he preached for apostasy and put in jail, where he died in Damascus. His god is the god of Talmud and has nothing to do with The God of Islam. If you want to know how deep the jews infiltrated Islam, you only need to listen to the infamous wife of the Prophet aisha, who shouted many times at the people, calling for them to kill the old bearded jew as she called the 3. KALIF UTHMAN! The jews took control of the muslim world only 5 years after our Prophets death! I am not saying these things, because I am Shia, it is from the historical books of the Sunni!
Yemen is the irrefutable proof. Stop harping on about ideological concoctions by Euro-trash, past and present. Seriously, should Saudi Arabia be let off the hook because Mussolini, Hitler, Goebbels etc. etc. didn’t have violent Sunni reaction, oppression, warmongering, and lawlessness in mind?
And in case the link provided didn’t work, please take the time and effort to search the article.
Youtube says
“This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated”
It was a video embedded by TheSaker, sounds like Youtube has shut down the Saker!
What is the name of the video to look for it elsewhere?
“The defenition of fascism is set by its creator. It has its own meaning. It is as Goebbels said it is.”
No, it’s not.
Fascism is an italian word, created and invented in Italy, not in Germany.
After the war, that word has been used to describe the most various florilegium of dictatorships and authoritarianisms worldwide, thus perverting forever the original meaning.
But the truth is that FASCISMO is an italian word, born to indicate an italian (and italian only) phenomenon.
Those who use it in a broader sense are simply using it wrong.
Unfortunately, it appears there’s no way to educate conformist people that using the word “fascism” for every violent authoritarianism is simply wrong.
Apparently, it’s plenty of people all over the world willing to teach italians what “fascism” really means.
This discussion is bordering on the outright ludicrous. Not only is Saudi Arabia’s genocide in Yemen supposedly not a case of fascism; even more telling is that the West’s complicity in propping up Wahhabism is not addressed either. Typical academic way of dodging the issue in the West.
Well nuss, I am the first to accept defeat at the hand of a superior intellect like yours. I will not waste your time commenting you on this site. But I will suggest reading a book or two or give it time. Getting older brings about some perspective too. One learns, that it is not about winning every battle. Those that try, loose!
Gab, doing cut and paste is a waste of time. As I said Goebbels is famous for the repeating thing. That is the function of “.” before beginning a new sentence. I did read “mein kampf” years ago. Will you educate my, that Mussolini didn´t write that too! don´t be that cheap, I am sure, that you can do better than this.
Wahhabism more merits the description pseudo-Islamic fascism, or even Doenmehfascism in my opinion. Perhaps simply calling it, ‘radical, genocidal Evil’, might be best, if a little unwieldy.
Sorry Mulga but you are just spewing words and missed the point. One must ask, why these neocons and their mouthpieces invent words like that. You can be sure, that it is not accidental. They are creating negative imagery and associations out of the blue as a means to achieve something. Mind you that a few years back these same people created a small booklet for western medias asking them not to use specific words when talking about israhell, like the word “kill” and as everybody has heard it is now words like “shot dead”……..! Kinetic action anyone?
Yes, it’s all in the word. You can’t criticize the Apartheid Occupation of Palestine by it’s UN madated name in most countries, Germany, Canada (neonatzi colony) springs to mind. And the endless bills in the US to stop any criticizism of “The Shit Hole” is amazing. But, But, you can criticize the Shit Hole. Stop f’in call it by it’s mandated name. Why not play their game. Call the place THE APARTHEID OCCUPATION OF PALESTINE. How f’n hard is that. Get with the program. When someone mentions the Shit Hole’s name just say “oh, you mean the Apartheid Occupation Of Palestine.” I love the look on their faces. What are they going to say back, ‘oh, oh’ Palestinians bad’, counter with “yes, but, Palestinians don’t shoot cripples, babies and old ladies like the Occupying forces do, do they?”
What will the PTB do, pass bills saying it’s illegal to criticize The Apartheid Occupation of Palestine. Try passing that bill, at least it states the criticizim of what you can’t criticize in the name. Every time the “shit holes’ name is mentioned it is ligiticized, why give them that power, call a spade a spade damn it.
If every anti empire person who puts word to paper used the proper terminology, it’d be right out there in the open.
I started calling it the Apartheid Occupation over 15 years ago, at every opportunity I get, 15 years later (not taking credit, my ego ain’t that big) I see more and more writers using that teminology. It must be brought forward in front of the eyes of more people. Then, one day, with the ‘stroke’ of a pen, the name can be formaly recognized as, Palestine.
”And what to think about the explanation of the origins of the chart – that ’robust measures’ were put in place to counter ’neo-Nazi terror groups’ ? Well, there is a slight problem: the British government participated in the ’Banderisation’ of Ukraine /…/”
Very true. However, according to the funny Liberal Imperialist Weltanschau, Anglo and Nazi are mutually exclusive. Never mind that Nazi Germany did its utmost to successfully emulate Anglo-American imperialism at the expense of the Slavic peoples in general and the Russians in particular. Also never mind that Anglo-American Russophobia is as venomous and vitriolic as Nazi Germany’s. . Hitler is, hardly surprising, not being frowned upon for what Nazi Germany inflicted on the USSR.
Basically boils down to 3 commandments:
1. Thou shalt not criticise Zionism and Al-Qaeda/ ISIS ideology.
2. Thou shalt not protest any “diversity” within society (migrants, transgenders etc). Identity Politics is required to distract the working and middle classes, while the 1% continue unhindered accumulation of wealth and power.
3. Thou shalt not fail to report any possible “XRW” individuals. This will enhance the lack of solidarity and general feeling of mistrust within the working and middle classes, and will undermine any coordinated resistance against the 1%.
Dont forget that “thou shall butcher the language” as a means to your own ends.
Right on the money. Identity Politics etc are all ‘Divide and Rule’ tactics of the hereditary, parasite, Overlords. And the suckers fall for it EVERY time. Meanwhile, once surreptitiously, now screamingly in our face, the ecological Holocaust commences consuming everything.
If you want to stick your head down a morbid rabbit hole look at Dr. Guy McPherson’s work on near term human extinction at the website Nature Bats Last, we have far less time than than most think.
Yep-for years I hoped that McPherson was over-pessimistic, and, somehow, I underestimated the radical, omnicidal, Evil of the capitalists and the denialists. Not any more. Any sane estimation of our prospects, looking at the science without rose-tinted glasses, simply screams Near Term Human Extinction.
A Saint he ain’t?
A sage? Perhaps.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Guy_McPherson
I wouldn’t cross the street to micturate on ‘Rational wiki’ if it was on fire.
So, the Royal Army is on the lookout for Donald Trump!
@Anon (the one who said Her Majesty’s guard dogs have been sicked onto Trump). That’s not a joke. The Fake Left is an invention of Soros, who is Rothschild’s right hand man in the U$A. It embraces most of the Anglo Zio Capitalist Establishment. The Fake Ultra Right was an invention of the Fake Left to explain away the defeat of their Establishment candidate Killery Clinton lost to a bunch of AZC Outsiders namely, Donald Trump and his Deplorables, baked by Sheldon Adelson and Natan Yahoo. It may come as a surprise to hear The Yahoo described as an Outsider; but I remarked back in 2014 that Bibi’s Bombing of Gaza did not get nearly as much MSM sympathy as Obomba’s Bombing of Syria. I concluded 5 years ago there were two factions of the AZC trying to get their grimy greedy hands on all those lovely gas fields offshore of Gaza and Syria: the Rothschild Fake Left (Clinton, Obama, BLiar, Her Majesty’s Government and Her Majesty’s Armed forces including The Queen’s White Helmets) vs the shadowy Fake Right behind Trump, Adelson and The Yahoo. Neither faction have even the remotest connection with a traditional Socialist or Conservative ethos.
That’s true, Anonymous.
The Orange Menace Wrecking Ball is extremely dangerous to the Edifices of The Empire and they must absolutely limit his wild swings (and mostly misses…unfortunately….LOL) to Four Frightful Years, and get another “Loyalist” Colonial Compromised by Mossad directed (Jeffrey Epstein, anyone??) honey trap sex with a minor to bring Deplorableland back fully into the Empire Fold.
It is worrisome that not three years into his first term too many dumb American Deplorables are stirring again, in doubt and distrust of their “Most Trusted Ally” and are slowly, chaotically, haltingly, jerkily ….. getting a little less stupid about the British Ruling Class.
As much as his ultimate intentions……. (Israel is last. Q…..???) are in considerable doubt and the British Ruling Class and the Crown are after him with their minions all over the world….my calculations tell me that it were better to have a few more Edifices of Empire Control, especially in DC,,,,rocked to their foundations than to retire the Orange Wrecking Ball any earlier than after 8 years of chaotic, often confusing operation…considering the absolutely worshipful of Her Satanic Majesty supine spinelessness of the disgustingly anti-patriotic Anglophile Democrat Party and Rhino Republican alternatives.
The British Army and the “Extreme Right Wing”
A marriage made in gay heaven, zionazi-gay heaven nowadays. The latter by sacrosanct decree.
I don’t understand the problem about British people having been pro-Hitler in the past, or doing the roman salute like Elizabeth II. Uncle Adolf would have never create Israel in the place where it is now: he wanted (historically documented) to send the jews to fucking Madagascar. That would have been way smarter than Churchill’s post war idiocy. Plus, he sincerely never wanted war against Britain, which he somehow admired. Plus, at that times, NS wasn’t seen as it is today, having supporters in British politics, like Oswald Mosley. Using today’s anti-nazi propaganda to disqualify people for their benign reaction to national-socialism in the ’20s or ’30s isn’t fair. On the contrary, at the time it offered a better perspective to some countries than bolshevist collectivization or Uncle Shmuel’s imperialism and globalism.
I am italian and – oh yes – I would have preferred to win WWII together with the germans, rather than losing it and sell my country to the fucking USA.
PS. Sorry, this is just a general rant, not directed to the author of this article, which is well-written and the British authorities indeed deserve it.
“Uncle Adolf would have never create Israel in the place where it is now”
So why did he transfer Jews from Germany to UK-occupied Palestine in exchange for financial guarantees? Even Wikipedia admits it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement
Because at first (until 1939) they believed it would have been an easy way (=without violence and avoiding international media backfire) to get rid of the most influential part of the jewish community in Germany.
So, your point is spot-on; but that was before the war and, more important, before the plan of mass deportation took place. When things started to become huge (=managing all european jews), the necessity of a different strategy emerged.
Moreover, since Madagascar was a french colony, the germans could start to think at Madagascar as an option only after having defeated France and then by forcing France to give up that territory via diplomatic agreements.
This plan was never implemented for war reasons, mainly because Germany had to fight in 2 fronts, and for the same reasons it was eventually converted in something different (=deportation to the East + alleged systhematic mass-killing by means of gas chambers, as stated in that ridiculous farce called the Nurnberg trial).
(Thanks Ollie anyway, keep up the good work!)
Ollie, mentioning the Haavara Agreement is ‘antisemitic’. Didn’t you see the public lynching of Ken Livingstone for doing so?
I am ever so sorry! Glory to the Talmud!
“the govermental “far-right” stooge Tommy Robinson”
Firstly he isn’t far right, that is the accusation that the main stream media and government use to try and silence him. Secondly if he were a government stooge I doubt the government would have locked him up on fake charges and attempted to get him killed by putting him in a prison with a muslim majority.
Inaccurate reporting like this devalues what is otherwise a good article.
You’ll notice I put “far right” in quote marks…
Defending Robinson is to defend apartheid Israel, which he – according to his own confession – serves. He’s trash, simply.
Im suprised it is still called the British army. They hate Britain so much and its real inhabitants.