Jaro, the Chinese have a better carrier killer missile now.
DF-26, nuclear capable. Vastly superior range 3000-4000km, highly mobile system.
Could reach Guam. Would prevent US naval forces from operating any closer than 1000 miles from mainland.
The most interesting part of the article. I think, is a 5 minute video by Vladimir Bukovsky.
“Writer, lecturer and political dissident from the former USSR, Vladimir Bukovsky, delivers a blistering comparison of the European Union with the Soviet Union.”
The video is here: https://youtu.be/92Vjc_PeYtc
No doubt the pindo crate violated Chinese airspace “accidentally” the same way those Turkish aircraft violated Syrian air space when the shot down the Russian Su-24.
China is the one majorly powerful country whom zionazis/Israel have little influence in, America is their tool to cause problems for reticent victims.
US is asking for trouble. It will be really embarrassing to see a B-52 forced down by Chinese jets.
These weapons have an unholy history from the Vietnam War, which was very close to China when Nixon ran his bombing campaigns in the North. The Chinese see them as anti-Asian, racist weapons that devastated millions of Vietnamese.
Threatening the Chinese, arming the Taiwanese all in the same week, is clearly provocative.
And claiming the weather set the planes off course is so laughable. It is exactly the reason, erratic weather conditions in the Nansha Islands (Spratly) that China says they are building lighthouses and emergency airfields on the reefs turned to islands. So there is good cause for what the Chinese have done. The US got lost flying in the zone. Welcome to Fiery Reef, Johnson Reef and Subi Reef.
I think the Chinese must act decisively to these provocations as early as possible while it can still be a low-level incident rather than a major confrontation. Shooting down a plane is already fairly serious, but better than sinking a ship. The US must understand there are limits (‘red lines’) it can not cross or it will keep on escalating. The more serious such an incident is the more difficult for the US to back down and still ‘save face’.
China has called on the United States to respect the East Asian country’s principal “interests” and concerns, and refrain from what it terms as “shows of force” close to its islands in the South China Sea.
In a telephone conversation with his US counterpart John Kerry on Monday, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said that Washington needs to stop selling munitions to Taiwan and also put an end to its military patrols near the Spratly Islands, known as the Nansha Islands in Chinese.
“President Obama said every country has a right to self-defense”
This was stated by him with reference to the Russian SU-24 that was demonstrably not attacking Turkey, was never pointing at the Turkey mainland and allegedly strayed into that finger of Turkey that used tp belong to Syria before the French gave it away to Turkey. Strayed -allegedly- for all of 17 seconds and was shot down.
So why then, using this ‘every country’ Obama logic did China not shoot down the B-52? It is, after all, an Obama and USA sanctioned procedure.
Needed, Russian and Chinese warplanes to mistakenly violate, on an ongoing basis but at irregular intervals, the Empire’s airspace, specifically East and West of U.S. coasts… just in order to preserve intact every nation’s freedom of navigation.
Not to worry: every time, the Empire will understand the validity of the motive invoked by both Russia and China, then simply wave peacefully and friendly at their respective pilots.
The American determination to prevent a multipolar world is implacable.
Expect the provocations to increase in intensity.
OOPS SORRY, OUR BAD!
Didn’t the US also ”mistakenly” bombed and strafed that MSF hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan, in early October, even attacking staff as they fled?
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0SU27J20151105
And just this Friday, they again, from all reports ”mistakenly” bombed some Iraqi troops, killing several:
https://www.rt.com/news/326420-iraq-us-air-strike/
I wonder what would happen if China should mistakenly sink a US Aircraft Carrier with one of its DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile?
After making so much ”mistakes” itself, do you think the US would show empathy and understand that ”mistakes” can be made????
Just asking.
Jaro, the Chinese have a better carrier killer missile now.
DF-26, nuclear capable. Vastly superior range 3000-4000km, highly mobile system.
Could reach Guam. Would prevent US naval forces from operating any closer than 1000 miles from mainland.
http://sputniknews.com/asia/20151218/1031991437/china-missile-nuclear.html
http://www.janes.com/article/53994/df-26-irbm-may-have-asm-variant-china-reveals-at-3-september-parade
Hi
This is a bit off-topic but i just read an article on RT titled:
Is the EU the new USSR?
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/326577-eu-ussr-brussels-london/
The most interesting part of the article. I think, is a 5 minute video by Vladimir Bukovsky.
“Writer, lecturer and political dissident from the former USSR, Vladimir Bukovsky, delivers a blistering comparison of the European Union with the Soviet Union.”
The video is here: https://youtu.be/92Vjc_PeYtc
Very nice. Classic!
” Vladimir Bukovsky, delivers a blistering comparison of the European Union with the Soviet Union.”
https://youtu.be/92Vjc_PeYtc
No doubt the pindo crate violated Chinese airspace “accidentally” the same way those Turkish aircraft violated Syrian air space when the shot down the Russian Su-24.
China is the one majorly powerful country whom zionazis/Israel have little influence in, America is their tool to cause problems for reticent victims.
US is asking for trouble. It will be really embarrassing to see a B-52 forced down by Chinese jets.
These weapons have an unholy history from the Vietnam War, which was very close to China when Nixon ran his bombing campaigns in the North. The Chinese see them as anti-Asian, racist weapons that devastated millions of Vietnamese.
Threatening the Chinese, arming the Taiwanese all in the same week, is clearly provocative.
And claiming the weather set the planes off course is so laughable. It is exactly the reason, erratic weather conditions in the Nansha Islands (Spratly) that China says they are building lighthouses and emergency airfields on the reefs turned to islands. So there is good cause for what the Chinese have done. The US got lost flying in the zone. Welcome to Fiery Reef, Johnson Reef and Subi Reef.
Peter Koenig What a fabulous video…love your accent…thanks man !!
He is Swiss. Here is a very nice two hours interview with him, unfortunately in German.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnlkZXoiArU
” One also has to remember that more than 50% of the US GDP depends on the US military-industrial complex and its related services.” — Peter König
I think the Chinese must act decisively to these provocations as early as possible while it can still be a low-level incident rather than a major confrontation. Shooting down a plane is already fairly serious, but better than sinking a ship. The US must understand there are limits (‘red lines’) it can not cross or it will keep on escalating. The more serious such an incident is the more difficult for the US to back down and still ‘save face’.
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/12/21/442593/China-US-core-interests-Spratly-Islands-South-China-Sea
China has called on the United States to respect the East Asian country’s principal “interests” and concerns, and refrain from what it terms as “shows of force” close to its islands in the South China Sea.
In a telephone conversation with his US counterpart John Kerry on Monday, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said that Washington needs to stop selling munitions to Taiwan and also put an end to its military patrols near the Spratly Islands, known as the Nansha Islands in Chinese.
“President Obama said every country has a right to self-defense”
This was stated by him with reference to the Russian SU-24 that was demonstrably not attacking Turkey, was never pointing at the Turkey mainland and allegedly strayed into that finger of Turkey that used tp belong to Syria before the French gave it away to Turkey. Strayed -allegedly- for all of 17 seconds and was shot down.
So why then, using this ‘every country’ Obama logic did China not shoot down the B-52? It is, after all, an Obama and USA sanctioned procedure.
Needed, Russian and Chinese warplanes to mistakenly violate, on an ongoing basis but at irregular intervals, the Empire’s airspace, specifically East and West of U.S. coasts… just in order to preserve intact every nation’s freedom of navigation.
Not to worry: every time, the Empire will understand the validity of the motive invoked by both Russia and China, then simply wave peacefully and friendly at their respective pilots.
Nothing beats “l’entente cordiale”!
Correction: friendly = friendlily