@Anonymous: when a body is found the police establishes that a murder has been committed. They do not deny that a murder has been committed only because they do not know how. So your question is out of logical sequence. Second, the POINT of a new investigation is precisely to answer that question. And third, some rather excellent footwork has already been done on it:
Good thing somebody has been asking questions instead of simply idiotically swallowing the government cool aid which does not even have the beginning of an explanation about how these buildings came down:
The NIST report says the collapse was NOT due to damage from the other two towers. Also says not due to diesel fuel or Jet fuel, It was due to furniture fires. That’s their story. Read the thing and most of the alternative reasons for the collapse are not considered credible by the NIST report itself. I wonder if there was some very interesting discussions withing NIST itself, where their official story, which they were required to give, was accompanied by sufficient qualifications so as to make it absurd, thereby satisfying their mandate to white wash it, but their conscience is thrown this bone in that the internal inconsistencies make it clear to anybody searching for the truth, that the official explanation is absurd. Like the captured US airmen confessing to war crimes etc, but their eyes were morse coding TORTURE, to anybody that dared look. This is clearly (to me now) part of a false flag operation to launch the US into a generational war against Israelis enemies in the world. go to the NIST report. grep for Diesel in the executive summary. Look at the comments to the youtube piece. It’s really too bad they could not find somebody other than Ed Asner, because he is such a political person, this is not, should not be, some left wing issue.
@oldman:this is not, should not be, some left wing issue.
Totally true. And the good news is that Richard Gage is a Reagan Republican. As for Steven Jones, I don’t know that for a fact, but one look at the guy tells me that he is no leftist :-)
incontrovertible.
out of curiosity: what’s your hunch on how this ‘inside job’ was carried out?
how did it work, presuming that months of preparation were needed and that more than a handful of people would have been involved?
what’s a reasonable explanation?
@Anonymous: when a body is found the police establishes that a murder has been committed. They do not deny that a murder has been committed only because they do not know how. So your question is out of logical sequence. Second, the POINT of a new investigation is precisely to answer that question. And third, some rather excellent footwork has already been done on it:
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html
Good thing somebody has been asking questions instead of simply idiotically swallowing the government cool aid which does not even have the beginning of an explanation about how these buildings came down:
http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2010/09/why-am-i-not-hearing-endless-rumble-of.html
The NIST report says the collapse was NOT due to damage from the other two towers. Also says not due to diesel fuel or Jet fuel, It was due to furniture fires. That’s their story. Read the thing and most of the alternative reasons for the collapse are not considered credible by the NIST report itself. I wonder if there was some very interesting discussions withing NIST itself, where their official story, which they were required to give, was accompanied by sufficient qualifications
so as to make it absurd, thereby satisfying their mandate to white wash it, but their conscience is thrown this bone in that the internal inconsistencies make it clear to anybody searching for the truth, that the official explanation is absurd. Like the captured US airmen confessing to war crimes etc, but their eyes were morse coding TORTURE, to anybody that dared look. This is clearly (to me now) part of a false flag operation to launch the US into a generational war against Israelis enemies in the world.
go to the NIST report. grep for Diesel in the executive summary. Look at the comments to the youtube piece. It’s really too bad they could not find somebody other than Ed Asner, because he is such a political person, this is not, should not be, some left wing issue.
@oldman:this is not, should not be, some left wing issue.
Totally true. And the good news is that Richard Gage is a Reagan Republican. As for Steven Jones, I don’t know that for a fact, but one look at the guy tells me that he is no leftist :-)