Make no mistake, Kissinger – a top envoy for such shadowy globalist organizations as Bilderberg and an advocate of real politik – plays the long game. Long term world order is part of his calculus. Ultimately, Kissinger now suggests, Ukraine will remain a buffer or middle ground between U.S. interests in Europe (via NATO) and the traditional Russian sphere of influence.
RT reported on his lengthy statements, and their significance for the bungled effort in Ukraine:
Looks like Kissinger with the magic envelope delivering putin his latest marching orders.
Standoff in the Korean peninsula: It is totally awesome how you persist in getting better and better in your presentation. The visual graphics are emblazoned on my eyeballs and the sum up sentence ” war is a persistent risk under these circumstances” was a wonderfully effective understatement. Hmmm in the word “rhetoric ” the stress is on the initial syllable and not the second one. ( both American and British English)
North Korea is like a toddler pretending to be a Virginia Tech student. You either attack or you don’t, North Korea will never attack the South in a full scale, border length attack.
They simply lack the means to sustain a ‘war’ for more than a few days/weeks.
North Korea is a ChickasawChicken Hawk Chihuahua pretending to be a snarling German Shepherd. I’m totally not impressed.
It keeps the MIC going though, so some pockets are bulging in a satisfactory manner to some.
North Korea has an army of 3 million and reserves of 6 million.
There is every reason to believe that N.K. could take Seoul in hours.
The war would last months unless the US wanted to lose parts of Japan and nearly all of S.Korea. If the US used nukes to stop the N.Koreans, then it would ignite an ending unimaginable in devastation.
The fact of war history in Korea is that the Koreans will fight for years in the most bitter warfare.
The entire UN could not defeat the N.Koreans in 1950-53.
No one wants to test the present readiness of North Korea. It is madness to think they would merely sustain a blitz from the US and succumb.
They have somewhere between 6 and 10 nuclear devices (not weaponized yet, but explodable like they were tested in New Mexico before we turned ours into aerial bombs).
The US military might lose 10 thousand men in the South.
It is very cavalier to think the North Koreans are a paper tiger. Their rational neighbors, China and Russia take them very, very seriously.
The true weakness of the Koran military is at the very top. The Kim family and the elites in the military are the weak link. But once their machine starts fighting, no one on Earth can predict the outcome.
If you cannot decapitate the leadership, war is not an option.
I doubt your analysis. Fact is N.Korea has a large army, but poorly equipped and poorly fed! If it werent for their handful of nukes, S. Korea would have little problem handling them. The only reason N.Korea exists to this day was due to General MacArthur’s hubris. During the Korean war, the UN troops under MacArthur already won back practically everything in Korea, but he went crazy and think he is God and wanted to “march all the way to Peking”, that’s his down fall – Mao’s troops (including one of his sons died in the war), decided to spank them all the way down south, and then the border settled where it is now. From what I can gather, the PRC at the time warned MacArthur to not get close to the Yalu river and that would have been it, but the insane general decided to play King, and that’s where we are today.
You are right on MacArthur’s stupidity in ignoring China’s outrage.But I’m not so sure on your thinking on North Korea.They do lack real modern “state of the art” military equipment.But so did the North Vietnamese,and so do the people of Donbass.And the equipment they do have ,there is a lot of it.An army needs to have something to fight for as well.And a US and South Korean invasion would give the people a reason to fight.Also,and most importantly,the geo-politics hasn’t changed that much from those long ago days.China still would not want to see US troops on their border at the Yalu River.And Russia I doubt would want to see US troops a few miles from Vladivostok.So its likely the Chinese and the Russians would not let North Korea fall to NATO forces,no matter the cost.It would be an unacceptable security risk for them.In someways worse than Ukraine.For China it would be the same as NATO in Ukraine is for Russia.While for Russia it would endanger the entire Russian Far East.Then there is the nuclear issue.I really have little doubt that facing defeat the North Koreans wouldn’t use those bombs (just as all other nuclear countries would.Its wishful thinking for anyone to doubt that on any country).There is also one last issue,Japan.Would the US try to get the Japanese to join them in the war.And would Japan do so.If Japan did,there is also little hope that China would permit that.Japanese troops fighting Koreans near China.Would be totally “beyond the pale” for the Chinese.And assure WW3,with China (and probably Russia) entering the war on North Korea’s side.So like always,the Empire and their stooges are playing with fire.And may get burned if they continue with it.I don’t think Obamacare covers nuclear radiation burns.
The only way the Koreas can be unified is with two conditions. US forces kicked off the peninsula, and therefore, Korea moving distinctly into China’s orbit.
In an economic sense the Korea’s already are heavily integrated and enmeshed in China’s orbit.
Both the US & China (& Russia) know this, this is part of the reason the status quo endures. The US knows it ain’t going to get any better for US troops on the Korean peninsula than it is now so may as well not stir things up too much and lose this significant foothold on mainland North Eastern Asia.
South Korea is an Anglo American trojan horse nation in China. The South’s economic “enmeshment” in China is in actuality designed to penetrate China economically.
But ultimately, the South is beholden to America with over 20,000 American occupation troops on its soil; a regime head by Park Geun-hye (daughter of the America-backed South Korean dictator, Park Chung hee) who came to power through the machinations of the country’s National Intelligence Service (and thus the US CIA); and plans to join the USA’s TransPacific Partnership, an economic alliance that pointedly exlcudes and targets China.
Q; The fact of war history in Korea is that the Koreans will fight for years in the most bitter warfare.
R; So, what are the North Koreans waiting for? Just cross the border, with all that might, and go plunder the sh*t out of the South..
North Korea is overrated beyond believe. Where’s the evidence of NK’s nukes? There isn’t any. Detonating a mother-load of dynamite in an abandoned mine does not equal ‘possessing nukes.’
This whole ‘affair’ is like playing poker with a guy who thinks wearing shades will help him in bluffing his way to the top. Not in my book, no siree.
Whether the aforementioned is all fishy or not, you decide.
http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/ukraine-failed-attempt-to-break-russia-kissinger-warns-u-s-stop-backing-kiev-at-all-costs_08222015
Make no mistake, Kissinger – a top envoy for such shadowy globalist organizations as Bilderberg and an advocate of real politik – plays the long game. Long term world order is part of his calculus. Ultimately, Kissinger now suggests, Ukraine will remain a buffer or middle ground between U.S. interests in Europe (via NATO) and the traditional Russian sphere of influence.
RT reported on his lengthy statements, and their significance for the bungled effort in Ukraine:
Looks like Kissinger with the magic envelope delivering putin his latest marching orders.
“Looks like Kissinger with the magic envelope delivering putin his latest marching orders”
LOLWUT? What are you smoking bro?
Standoff in the Korean peninsula: It is totally awesome how you persist in getting better and better in your presentation. The visual graphics are emblazoned on my eyeballs and the sum up sentence ” war is a persistent risk under these circumstances” was a wonderfully effective understatement. Hmmm in the word “rhetoric ” the stress is on the initial syllable and not the second one. ( both American and British English)
North Korea is like a toddler pretending to be a Virginia Tech student. You either attack or you don’t, North Korea will never attack the South in a full scale, border length attack.
They simply lack the means to sustain a ‘war’ for more than a few days/weeks.
North Korea is a
ChickasawChicken HawkChihuahua pretending to be a snarling German Shepherd. I’m totally not impressed.It keeps the MIC going though, so some pockets are bulging in a satisfactory manner to some.
North Korea has an army of 3 million and reserves of 6 million.
There is every reason to believe that N.K. could take Seoul in hours.
The war would last months unless the US wanted to lose parts of Japan and nearly all of S.Korea. If the US used nukes to stop the N.Koreans, then it would ignite an ending unimaginable in devastation.
The fact of war history in Korea is that the Koreans will fight for years in the most bitter warfare.
The entire UN could not defeat the N.Koreans in 1950-53.
No one wants to test the present readiness of North Korea. It is madness to think they would merely sustain a blitz from the US and succumb.
They have somewhere between 6 and 10 nuclear devices (not weaponized yet, but explodable like they were tested in New Mexico before we turned ours into aerial bombs).
The US military might lose 10 thousand men in the South.
It is very cavalier to think the North Koreans are a paper tiger. Their rational neighbors, China and Russia take them very, very seriously.
The true weakness of the Koran military is at the very top. The Kim family and the elites in the military are the weak link. But once their machine starts fighting, no one on Earth can predict the outcome.
If you cannot decapitate the leadership, war is not an option.
I doubt your analysis. Fact is N.Korea has a large army, but poorly equipped and poorly fed! If it werent for their handful of nukes, S. Korea would have little problem handling them. The only reason N.Korea exists to this day was due to General MacArthur’s hubris. During the Korean war, the UN troops under MacArthur already won back practically everything in Korea, but he went crazy and think he is God and wanted to “march all the way to Peking”, that’s his down fall – Mao’s troops (including one of his sons died in the war), decided to spank them all the way down south, and then the border settled where it is now. From what I can gather, the PRC at the time warned MacArthur to not get close to the Yalu river and that would have been it, but the insane general decided to play King, and that’s where we are today.
You are right on MacArthur’s stupidity in ignoring China’s outrage.But I’m not so sure on your thinking on North Korea.They do lack real modern “state of the art” military equipment.But so did the North Vietnamese,and so do the people of Donbass.And the equipment they do have ,there is a lot of it.An army needs to have something to fight for as well.And a US and South Korean invasion would give the people a reason to fight.Also,and most importantly,the geo-politics hasn’t changed that much from those long ago days.China still would not want to see US troops on their border at the Yalu River.And Russia I doubt would want to see US troops a few miles from Vladivostok.So its likely the Chinese and the Russians would not let North Korea fall to NATO forces,no matter the cost.It would be an unacceptable security risk for them.In someways worse than Ukraine.For China it would be the same as NATO in Ukraine is for Russia.While for Russia it would endanger the entire Russian Far East.Then there is the nuclear issue.I really have little doubt that facing defeat the North Koreans wouldn’t use those bombs (just as all other nuclear countries would.Its wishful thinking for anyone to doubt that on any country).There is also one last issue,Japan.Would the US try to get the Japanese to join them in the war.And would Japan do so.If Japan did,there is also little hope that China would permit that.Japanese troops fighting Koreans near China.Would be totally “beyond the pale” for the Chinese.And assure WW3,with China (and probably Russia) entering the war on North Korea’s side.So like always,the Empire and their stooges are playing with fire.And may get burned if they continue with it.I don’t think Obamacare covers nuclear radiation burns.
The only way the Koreas can be unified is with two conditions. US forces kicked off the peninsula, and therefore, Korea moving distinctly into China’s orbit.
In an economic sense the Korea’s already are heavily integrated and enmeshed in China’s orbit.
Both the US & China (& Russia) know this, this is part of the reason the status quo endures. The US knows it ain’t going to get any better for US troops on the Korean peninsula than it is now so may as well not stir things up too much and lose this significant foothold on mainland North Eastern Asia.
South Korea is an Anglo American trojan horse nation in China. The South’s economic “enmeshment” in China is in actuality designed to penetrate China economically.
But ultimately, the South is beholden to America with over 20,000 American occupation troops on its soil; a regime head by Park Geun-hye (daughter of the America-backed South Korean dictator, Park Chung hee) who came to power through the machinations of the country’s National Intelligence Service (and thus the US CIA); and plans to join the USA’s TransPacific Partnership, an economic alliance that pointedly exlcudes and targets China.
@ red Ryder,
Q; The fact of war history in Korea is that the Koreans will fight for years in the most bitter warfare.
R; So, what are the North Koreans waiting for? Just cross the border, with all that might, and go plunder the sh*t out of the South..
North Korea is overrated beyond believe. Where’s the evidence of NK’s nukes? There isn’t any. Detonating a mother-load of dynamite in an abandoned mine does not equal ‘possessing nukes.’
This whole ‘affair’ is like playing poker with a guy who thinks wearing shades will help him in bluffing his way to the top. Not in my book, no siree.
Whether the aforementioned is all fishy or not, you decide.
daniel rich, sometimes I think you’re comments are witty and funny, but this stupid R and Q is tedious…can you speak normally ?
Hi South Front, another fabulous news broadcast…I sent it to about 7 or 8 people…I’m really proud of you South Front.