According to the Regnum news agency the Sevastopol City State Administration is threatening to break-away from the Ukraine and create a “Federal State of Ruthenia/Small-Russia”. Here is a rough and quick translation of the article:
The Chairman of the Sevastopol City State Administration Volodymyr Yatsuba appealed to citizens in connection with what is happening in the country, and especially in its western regions, the correspondent of IA REGNUM reports.
Yatsuba thanked citizens who had prevented a “Evromaidan” type of rally in Sevastopol. He also thanks the “Berkut” riot police, which, according to him, “coordinated everything to make sure everything remained clam”.
“Sevastopol will not surrender! If things become critical and we get information that they (the nationalists) are coming – I will make an address on the TV and ask the people to come defend our city. Together with the security forces we are in control of all the entrances into our city, its railway station and all the roads. Should something happen I will issue a alert on the local TV station”- said the official.
“All of our strength is in the fact that we are united. Our task is to be united and to all obey a single authority, because many provocateurs, they are prepared. People are afraid that the brown plague (Nazi) will come here. I beg eveybody to remain calm and to obey a single authority “- said Yatsuba.
He appealed to “all sensible people, men who can protect Sevastopol.” “My main task is to assemble on the people who are willing to participate in the defense of Sevastopol. There is no need to defend myself and my family. I grew up in this area, and I can defend myself if needed. I’m not asking you to defend any specific building, but I ask protect the entire city Sevastopol “- said the head of the administration.
In the meantime 12 local NGOs form the city Sevastopol have declared that they are considering the option of creating a “federal state Ruthenia” and that appeals to the local population explaining this are being prepared. These appeals will also be sent to the local councils south, east and centeral Ukraine.
“We have prepared appeals to regional, city and district councils of deputies southeast and center of Ukraine to establish a “Federated State Ruthenia” with a focus on Russia and we are also preparing an appeal to the people of Russia and the Russian authorities, the EU and the international community.
In connection with the real threat of a coup and violent overthrow of the government of the Ukraine, a meeting was held in the headquarters of Russian social and political organizations with representatives of the Russian youth, sports, Cossack, political and social organizations of city of Sevastopol. It was decided that in the case of a coup and and an overthrow of the government in Kiev, Sevastopol would use its right to self-determination and remove itself from the jurisdiction of the Ukraine”
Just to clarify. The possible future state these officials are thinking about would be called “Федеративное государство Малороссии” which Google translated as “Federated State Ruthenia” but which could also be translated as “Federated State of Small-Russia” (Malorossii). The terms “small” here is not to be understood as referring to size, but in the ancient Greek meaning of “small Greece” i.e., central Greece as opposed to the “greater” (peripheral) Greece. In other words, by planning to call their state “Federated State of Small-Russia” they are really saying that they aim to be recognized and seen as the historical core of the Russian nation which, of course, the Ukraine has been in the past. I just wanted to clarify this point because all too many people think that the term “small Russia” is somehow condescending or derogatory while in reality it is quite the opposite: it means “central” or “core”. As for the term “Ruthenia” it really can mean either ancient Rus’ or, more frequently, a region around modern Galicia. This is why translating “Malorossia” as “Ruthenia” when speaking of Sevastopol makes no sense at all.
As for the statement itself, it sure contains some very strong words. Whether the population of Sevastopol is truly that determined or not I cannot tell. My personal and highly subjective feeling is that two factors indicate that there might be more bark than bite here: first, the population of southern and eastern Ukraine has been amazingly passive since 1991 and, second, I still don’t see any credible political party or leader in the anti-nationalist camp. There are quite a few decent politicians in the anti-nationalist camp but no real leader-figure has emerged so far. As for the “Regions” party of Yanukovich, well, it is precisely that – the party of Yanukovich. Still, cataclysmic events often generate their own historical figures so I would not dismiss the possibility of a charismatic anti-nationalist figure appearing to lead the reaction to the nationalist revolution in Kiev and the northwestern Ukraine.
The Saker
And of course, why would Russia stand passive? Attempts to spread this to McFauls fools in Russia proper are most certainly under way as we speak, should this violent CC-revolution succeed.
Didn´t RT called you yet? You Sleboda and Mercouris would make a nice trio on this subject, with you being less pessimistic that is…
@Whazzo: And of course, why would Russia stand passive?
Indeed I honestly think that Crimea is a special case and even though Russia did recognize it as part of the Ukraine, this was done with a clear understanding that Russia did consider the Peninsula of national strategic importance. The Crimea and Sevastopol are truly Russian and if the Russian population more or less agreed with the separation of the Ukraine after 1991, there is no way that the nationalist neo-Nazis are going to impose their rule on the Crimea without the shit hitting the fan in a major way. Sevastopol is a “hero city” who suffered horrendously during WWII from the Nazis and there is no way the local population or the Kremlin are going to stand by while the heir of Stepan Bendera will impose their rule on the peninsula. If the nationalists are truly determined to seize control of the Crimea in a coup, the Black Sea Fleet will have no option but the take control of the Peninsula and should that happen, I think that they will do that in coordination with the rest of the Russian military. The operation will be presented as a “interposition” and “peacekpeeing/peace enforcement operation” but what it will do in reality is return Crimea to Russia.
Didn´t RT called you yet?
Actually, they did contact me. But I had to turn down their offer because I really want to keep my anonymity for a few more years. Besides, Sleboda and Mercouris are doing an fantastic job and then RT always has Pepe Escobar to complete the trio for some world-class analysis, so they don’t really need me anyway :-)
Cheers!
The Saker
Maybe I’m getting too imaginative. Does anyone else think that somehow these events will drastically intensify during the Sochi Olympics, especially in the scenario Saker describes where Russia becomes militarily involved? Wouldn’t that be just perfect for the provocateurs? Since all eyes would be on Sochi (not very far away, by the way), it would almost certainly stain, if not ruin the event. I would think this is viewed as a golden opportunity by the West. They must be soo thrilled about all of this! Perfect timing.
We all remember krazy Sakashvili !
Hello Saker,
Crimea, Odessa,have always been russian, so if there is a split up the logics would be to join Russia in a way or another.
Ruin Sotchi, may be! they tried with Georgia, as eveerbody was occupied with summer and the cup.But that would mean sophisticated people leading the offensive. I don”t see the three jackasses in such roles.
Many thanks Saker for this wonderful news!
Of course the situation will produce a leadership worthy of the task only if the population is supportive and ready for it. I only hope it’s the case!
O, what a reminder of my life in Bosnia before the hell broke loose. I get goose bumps following this development. We Serbs knew what we wanted and the international law was on our side. We struggled against all odds, and partially won at the end. Future is working in our favor as well. The scars left on our people, however, by the zionazi media from that war, are deep indeed, but the day of debunking that one of the most successful PR stunts in world history will come sooner than we could ever expect! And it’s all by the ziofasciosts undoing themselves. Per one truth they had to come with a thousand lies – just like they are doing now everywhere else where they spilled innocent blood for their evil-minded ends.
It made me sick every time they succeeded since then, again & again with no consequences at all.
O boy, how much more of innocent blood do they plan to spill before their sick ideology is euthanized?
So, I read somewhere that ~25% of the population in Ukraine is pro-Russian (SE), about the same percentage are these zio/neo-Nazis (NW), and the rest (~50%) is . . . what? Undecided?
I am wondering why Russia, learning from our experience, didn’t do enough to spread its influence via media / church / culture throughout this undecided camp in Ukraine by insisting on the highest level of autonomy for these regions? Hell, Serbia is still divided into Serbia proper, and two autonomous regions: Voivodina, and the zionazi druglords / organ & human traffickers / EU neonazi goons occupied Kosovo & Metohia which they recognize as a separate state.
I mean, these people in Ukraine have everything on their side. O, the slovenly slavs! Always wait for the worst to happen.
BTW, the name, Ukraine, roughly means land close to the border. We have a region in parts of Bosnia and Croatia called Krayina denoting the same thing.
I pray that situation develops further in this direction – regardless of the events in Kiev.
Thanks again Saker, this made my day!
Look, nato fasciosts are chapping Ukraine already:
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2014/01/28/transcarpathia-under-threat-of-imminent-invasion.html
Ziofasciost propaganda gearing up; ZIA’s rag puts out a lie and keeps it there until it starts believing in it (sorry for the spam, just couldn’t resist it:)):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/01/27/envious-of-ukraine-russians-are-circulating-this-satirical-map-of-russia/
@Sevastopol,
I think that Russia will never permit a defection of Crimea, for obvious reasons.
Speaking of Crimea (and Ukraine)it is perhaps worth remembering that it was at a certain (revolute)time in the past the object of Zionist wet dreams to create a Jewish state (or at least an Autonomous Soviet Republic). It did not cut much ice neither with Ukrainian nationalists, nor with Stalin.
I believe that the Jewish oligarchs nurture the same ambitions. It remains to be seen whether it will cut much ice with todays Banderovtsi.
WizOz
With regards to Russian Media and promoting Russia cause through media, unfortunately for Eastern Europe and that includes former USSR states, the narrative taught is that USSR was a Russian dominated entity. Those of us who know who the real Bolsheviks were and how they were financed know that this was not the case a Russian enterprise. The Bolsheviks though ingeniously though used Russia and her capital top administer their suffering on the East of Europe.
This is hard to break through. Many generations of programming to break through. Same with Finns and the Wars of aggression against them done by Stalin. 1st to let them know the only Russian on Stalin’s Inner Circle was Molotov and only under duress and that Stalin used troops form Caucasus against Finland because he knew the Russians would not be favourable to waring against their neighbours.
“This is hard to break through…”
If you have a wish to lose friends and evoke anger you can read “Icebreaker” by Orlov.
It seems there are certain explanations of history that make most people uneasy.
It can be freely downloaded as a pdf
T1
Hi Saker,
Ukraine fell into the background, it seems:). No doubt, attacks on many fronts.
I just read an analysis by some guy, Starikov, in Serbian. It is not available in English unfortunatley as of now.
The title translates roughly as: “Euromaidan”, One more Defeat
If you read it in Russian by any chance, what’s your take on it?
I liked it a lot, I do admit, but there is the issue of integrity and rellevance since I’ve never heard of that guy before.
Thanks in advance!