Absolute “Yes” to Peter Lavelles’ observation that “it’s amazing how fast this fell apart”.
That’s been my take as well. In fact, in many cases it can be said to have never held together at all. From it’s first launch I have followed the sceptical scathing comments of poster in UK newspapers. Whether many are followers of alternative Truth media we have no way of knowing, but that they from the first shouted that “Putin isn’t even mentioned, why the photos and implication of him?” was loud, clear, and made by the majority.
I just wonder – is this another sign that the Empire is beginning the long slow fall into it’s night? Netherlands voted “NO” to Ukraine; Austria wants to link it’s military with Russia, Germany’s businessmen want sanctions ended – among others. The countries whose popular votes were ignored in favour of whatever the EU apparatchiks wanted are celebrating with Netherlands; more referenda may be on the cards, and in the UK the most unexpected of consequences of this Panama slime bucket could be the loss of a major US puppet ally if Cameron is unseated.
The speed of it’s rejection coupled with the other factors has me daring to feel, finally, a little hopeful.
The demonstrations against Cameron in the UK. And even more so,the large demonstrations sweeping France now. Are leaving me feeling (slightly) hopeful. Possibly people are beginning to wake up in those countries. And while maybe not ready for a “European Spring” (yet). We may be seeing the early stages of it.
He suggests Soros fronts for the US government and I agree, only I would add that he works for a faction of said government, i.e. the ‘Anglos.’
Although it’s an oversimplification, zionists are at war with anglos, just as CIA is at war with the Pentagon. Everything is mixed up and connected. To add to confusion many seek to straddle both factions, covering their bets in an uncertain environment.
Many more fronts are likely to activate ahead of the US election on November 8.
I’m sure you know Cameron is married to a Rothschild. This is a big hint as to who is behind the Panama Papers (Anglos) and why Putin’s name was initially bandied about (distraction/acceptance by zionists) despite these reports having nothing to do with the Russian President.
On another level, this is a repeat of the attempted informal alliance between the Eisenhower administration and Kruschev’s Soviet Union, torpedoed, of course, by Rothschilds zionists. Their most successful cooperation (Russia-US) occurred during the Suez crisis in ’56, stymying UK, French and Israeli aggression. In 1960 the downing of a U2 spy plane and capture of Gary Powers destroyed prospects for Eisenhowers planned trip to Russia and peace plan to de-escalate or even end the Cold War. The military-industrial-complex was for obvious reasons ferociously opposed, presaging Eisenhower’s departing warning, repeated by Kennedy just before his own assasination.
The fight for the US Presidential power of appointment generally follows the line and dispositions discussed above, although I have seen next to no reporting on this in any media.
This is pax americanus versus pax universalis, the former allied to Russia. If you accept the frame I’ve outlined then Donald Trump is the best we can do, I’m afraid.
Cameron isn’t married to a Rothschild. He’s married into a very old aristocratic family, the Sheffields, who trace their lineage back to the 17th century King Charles the second, a Stuart. UK aristos might do business with Jews but are far too anti-Semitic to let them taint the bloodline. As a class our aristos fully supported Germany’s Jewish programme in the 1930’s.
I think that this is simply a desperate attempt to foment some general chaos and that Serbian Girl hit the nail on the head when she predicted a ramping-up of class war on another thread. The whole enterprise stinks of desperation though and serves as a classic act of misdirection to cover other nasty realities.
Domestic extremist, it is not the “Davos men” but the middle class that is the target of this class war.
A middle class that is impoverished, desperate and scared, cannot offer much resistance to those who would rule over them.
Your first link does not work, here is the correct link which discusses an old jewish joke unrelated to Cameron, his marriage or his wife’s ancestry then compares that to the Tory attitude to the EU:
As for your second link, you do know that ‘Downton Abbey’ is a fictional TV soap opera? Another piece of evidence cited is from a 19th century novel, by definition a piece of fiction. The rest is inference not evidence, of the same sloppy quality that links Putin to the Panama Papers.
I’m no fan of the sleazy Cameron but I hate misinformation masquerading as fact even more.
I did google the headline, that’s how I found the working link, which is still working. Your original link has an extraneous ‘/ntity’ added to it, presumably included from ‘Identity theft’, the following words in your post.
The content in the second article I addressed as entirely fictional–inference, not evidence– as laughably inept as trying to link Putin to the Panama Papers.
‘Sweetie’, I see how you operate, jumping to conclusions based on no evidence whatsoever, simply to defend the indefensible. I’m not impressed.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with “C I eh?”-s second link.
(1) Anyone can understand that the photo from “Downtown Abbey” is not there to “deceive” anyone (as you fear), but merely to illustrate the point of Makow’s article, by referring to a story from a widely popular TV show.
(2) The passage from the XIX century novel “Biarritz” was not submitted by Makow as any “evidence” (as you claim), not in the least, but only to use it as an eloquent vehicle to express a true fact.
(3) In humans, mitochondrial DNA is inherited exclusively from the mother (never from the father). Mitochondria, in turn, which are present in every single cell of the body except erythrocytes, are the power generators of the cells, creating more that 90% of energy needed by the body; almost “the life itself” if you will.
(4) Among Jews, Jewishness is determined strictly by Jewishness of the mother. And “(3)” above provides a biological underpinning of this. Thus, the tribe of the Jews is enlarged if a female member of it marries outside tribe, and is potentially enriched and improved by valuable DNA other than mitochondrial.
In this context, one can somewhat better understand the quote from the above novel (yes, only novel) – “Our race, chosen by God, cannot be corrupted by the introduction of a certain amount of impure blood, and by those marriages our daughters will secure alliances with Christian families of some influence and power” – when it speaks of Jewish daughters, and not sons.
Someone might refer to that process even more colourfully, as “body snatching”.
I don’t dispute any of what you say, and you, C I eh? and the author of the article are entitled to your opinions, however bizarre. I took issue with the fact that the article with the novel extract was presented by C I eh? as solid evidence that Cameron is married to a Rothschild–which is nonsense.
When you buy into that kind of blatant nonsense masquerading as evidence it makes every other claim dubious, as we have learned from the endless manipulations of the western MSM.
I am not familiar with the pedigree of Cameron’s spouse.
However, Cameron himself is partly of Jewish extraction, although not a Jew in a strict sense. It was only his paternal (!) grandmother, Enid Cameron, nee Levita, that came from that tribe. She joined the UK nobility by “snatching” the son of Lord Ewen (Cameron).
I don’t have a problem with Jews or with any other religious denomination. I am agnostic myself but find the variety of beliefs with which people sustain themselves interesting. My problem is with misinformation masquerading as fact.
If Cameron were married to a Jew I would find that to be irrelevant, that he has Jewish ancestry I find to be equally irrelevant. I took issue with the statement that he is married to a Rothschild which I know to be untrue.
The Spectator headline cited by C I eh? is pure clickbait that worked, just like the Guardian’s ghastly hazard-yellow pictures of Putin attached to the breaking Panama story.
‘Bait and switch’ is the first trick a conman learns.
Here is a link to an irrelevant woman, complete with handy ancestry notes for anyone who cares(!):
The well-researched analysis below has been posted on this site earlier. It is at clear variance with the allegation that the British aristocracy is somehow “anti-Semitic” (least out of fear that their already thoroughly impure mongrel bloodline could be “tainted” (!)), and it fully justifies Saker’s term “AngloZionism”.
A brilliant and accurate article from Thierry Meyssan that I have not seen before. I don’t think it proves a lack of anti-Semitism in the British aristocracy however. To this day in Britain aristocratic clubs and fee-paying schools operate quota systems to exclude all but a very small token number of Jewish members. Until a few years ago these places routinely excluded all Jewish members because they could get away with it.
I am grateful to the Saker for introducing me to the concept of Anglo-Zionism, which is not the same as anti-Semitism.
To bring this back to the topic, which isn’t anti-Semitism, I recommend this article by Dan Glazebrook, ‘Britain is the heart and soul of tax evasion’, it could equally be titled, like Meyssan’s, ‘Who is the Enemy?’:
Oh, and I agree with your ” their already thoroughly impure mongrel bloodline”.
Us Brits are a completely mongrel race having been thoroughly immigrated, overrun and intermarried by countless hordes since we all lived in caves, painted ourselves blue and ate our enemies.
My quip about tainting the bloodline was sarcasm.
Which reminds me of an old U.S. joke (from the pre-neocon times, of course).
A well-to-do Jew wanted to crown his business success by joining a prestigious all-WASP country club. However, his way of taking, his vocabulary, body language, manners, grooming, dressing, all gave away his ethnic persuasion – and so the admissions committee reject him on the spot.
Over months he persistently keeps trying and trying to get in, but each time he gets the boot…
Realizing eventually what the problem was, he decides to do something about it. He undertakes a year of serious systematic tutored training in manners and etiquette, hires a speech therapist, learns all kinds of vacuous WASP phrases, buys WASPish clothes, grooms himself their way, observes, imitates … etc., etc., etc…
Finally he is ready. He goes to the coveted country club admissions office, where he exhibits everything that he had learned. And the country club admissions people are truly impressed! They all enthusiastically want him in! And have just this very last question, a sheer formality to enter in their records. They ask him:
— Your ethnicity, Sir?
and he replies:
— Goyim, of course.
***
(Glossary: WASP = White Anglo-Saxon Protestant)
It’s not clear to me that Cameron is an “unintended” victim. To me it seems like a payback for Cameron’s “treachery” against the Hegemon – he is the first of the FiveEyes that disobeyed Washington’s orders not to join the AIIB. After he brazenly disobeyed this order, it led the way to many other Western countries to follow suit to join…..
I notice how Lavelle’s Crossfire is so different from the old US program Crossfire. The best shows are _not_ the ones with people screaming over each other. The best shows are like this one, with three intelligent people with different strengths, who give the viewer new vistas to look at an issue. I wish the show were 45 min. instead of 30, Lavelle is really getting into his stride.
^ Loved Mark (as I always do) and for once, we even managed to get a glimpse of his humorous [even if a sarcastic one] side here…
…also, I loved the way Peter is now respecting Mark and allowing him to make his point uninterrupted. If anything that’s a testament to Peter’s spotless moral code.
Absolute “Yes” to Peter Lavelles’ observation that “it’s amazing how fast this fell apart”.
That’s been my take as well. In fact, in many cases it can be said to have never held together at all. From it’s first launch I have followed the sceptical scathing comments of poster in UK newspapers. Whether many are followers of alternative Truth media we have no way of knowing, but that they from the first shouted that “Putin isn’t even mentioned, why the photos and implication of him?” was loud, clear, and made by the majority.
I just wonder – is this another sign that the Empire is beginning the long slow fall into it’s night? Netherlands voted “NO” to Ukraine; Austria wants to link it’s military with Russia, Germany’s businessmen want sanctions ended – among others. The countries whose popular votes were ignored in favour of whatever the EU apparatchiks wanted are celebrating with Netherlands; more referenda may be on the cards, and in the UK the most unexpected of consequences of this Panama slime bucket could be the loss of a major US puppet ally if Cameron is unseated.
The speed of it’s rejection coupled with the other factors has me daring to feel, finally, a little hopeful.
The demonstrations against Cameron in the UK. And even more so,the large demonstrations sweeping France now. Are leaving me feeling (slightly) hopeful. Possibly people are beginning to wake up in those countries. And while maybe not ready for a “European Spring” (yet). We may be seeing the early stages of it.
Did you see Scott’s last Ukraine report?
He suggests Soros fronts for the US government and I agree, only I would add that he works for a faction of said government, i.e. the ‘Anglos.’
Although it’s an oversimplification, zionists are at war with anglos, just as CIA is at war with the Pentagon. Everything is mixed up and connected. To add to confusion many seek to straddle both factions, covering their bets in an uncertain environment.
Many more fronts are likely to activate ahead of the US election on November 8.
I’m sure you know Cameron is married to a Rothschild. This is a big hint as to who is behind the Panama Papers (Anglos) and why Putin’s name was initially bandied about (distraction/acceptance by zionists) despite these reports having nothing to do with the Russian President.
On another level, this is a repeat of the attempted informal alliance between the Eisenhower administration and Kruschev’s Soviet Union, torpedoed, of course, by Rothschilds zionists. Their most successful cooperation (Russia-US) occurred during the Suez crisis in ’56, stymying UK, French and Israeli aggression. In 1960 the downing of a U2 spy plane and capture of Gary Powers destroyed prospects for Eisenhowers planned trip to Russia and peace plan to de-escalate or even end the Cold War. The military-industrial-complex was for obvious reasons ferociously opposed, presaging Eisenhower’s departing warning, repeated by Kennedy just before his own assasination.
The fight for the US Presidential power of appointment generally follows the line and dispositions discussed above, although I have seen next to no reporting on this in any media.
This is pax americanus versus pax universalis, the former allied to Russia. If you accept the frame I’ve outlined then Donald Trump is the best we can do, I’m afraid.
Methinx it is a “sacrifice move”.
You exchange a few officers for a queen, or some tactical or strategic advantage – if it works out for You.
We know who the ‘queen’ is – BTW, the queen has decided to release some documents herself recently. It’s on Fortruss.
When it gets to actual confiscation of assets, freezing of accounts, watch out: that’s when the poop hits the fan.
Cameron isn’t married to a Rothschild. He’s married into a very old aristocratic family, the Sheffields, who trace their lineage back to the 17th century King Charles the second, a Stuart. UK aristos might do business with Jews but are far too anti-Semitic to let them taint the bloodline. As a class our aristos fully supported Germany’s Jewish programme in the 1930’s.
I think that this is simply a desperate attempt to foment some general chaos and that Serbian Girl hit the nail on the head when she predicted a ramping-up of class war on another thread. The whole enterprise stinks of desperation though and serves as a classic act of misdirection to cover other nasty realities.
I assure you the last thing Davos Man (or the Davos Men) want to see is a class war.
That’s why you’ll see them trying to kick off a race war, religious war or any other kind of war first, while they keep going to the bank, natch.
Domestic extremist, it is not the “Davos men” but the middle class that is the target of this class war.
A middle class that is impoverished, desperate and scared, cannot offer much resistance to those who would rule over them.
David Cameron marries a Rothschild
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2013/01/david-cameron-marries-a-rothschild/ntity theft: Britain’s Jewish aristocracy
Identity theft: Britain’s Jewish aristocracy
http://henrymakow.com/englans_jewish_aristocracy_ii.html
Anglo + Zionist =
The most virulent and destructive empire in human history.
Your first link does not work, here is the correct link which discusses an old jewish joke unrelated to Cameron, his marriage or his wife’s ancestry then compares that to the Tory attitude to the EU:
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2013/01/david-cameron-marries-a-rothschild/
As for your second link, you do know that ‘Downton Abbey’ is a fictional TV soap opera? Another piece of evidence cited is from a 19th century novel, by definition a piece of fiction. The rest is inference not evidence, of the same sloppy quality that links Putin to the Panama Papers.
I’m no fan of the sleazy Cameron but I hate misinformation masquerading as fact even more.
Strange, the first link you ‘fixed’ is not available.
Google the headline.
Fast work work by GCHQ? Special directive to protect the PM, perhaps?
You have dismissed the second article based on the photo at top, without reference to the content of the article.
Nice try sweetie.
I did google the headline, that’s how I found the working link, which is still working. Your original link has an extraneous ‘/ntity’ added to it, presumably included from ‘Identity theft’, the following words in your post.
The content in the second article I addressed as entirely fictional–inference, not evidence– as laughably inept as trying to link Putin to the Panama Papers.
‘Sweetie’, I see how you operate, jumping to conclusions based on no evidence whatsoever, simply to defend the indefensible. I’m not impressed.
@ Helen
There is absolutely nothing wrong with “C I eh?”-s second link.
(1) Anyone can understand that the photo from “Downtown Abbey” is not there to “deceive” anyone (as you fear), but merely to illustrate the point of Makow’s article, by referring to a story from a widely popular TV show.
(2) The passage from the XIX century novel “Biarritz” was not submitted by Makow as any “evidence” (as you claim), not in the least, but only to use it as an eloquent vehicle to express a true fact.
(3) In humans, mitochondrial DNA is inherited exclusively from the mother (never from the father). Mitochondria, in turn, which are present in every single cell of the body except erythrocytes, are the power generators of the cells, creating more that 90% of energy needed by the body; almost “the life itself” if you will.
(4) Among Jews, Jewishness is determined strictly by Jewishness of the mother. And “(3)” above provides a biological underpinning of this. Thus, the tribe of the Jews is enlarged if a female member of it marries outside tribe, and is potentially enriched and improved by valuable DNA other than mitochondrial.
In this context, one can somewhat better understand the quote from the above novel (yes, only novel) – “Our race, chosen by God, cannot be corrupted by the introduction of a certain amount of impure blood, and by those marriages our daughters will secure alliances with Christian families of some influence and power” – when it speaks of Jewish daughters, and not sons.
Someone might refer to that process even more colourfully, as “body snatching”.
I don’t dispute any of what you say, and you, C I eh? and the author of the article are entitled to your opinions, however bizarre. I took issue with the fact that the article with the novel extract was presented by C I eh? as solid evidence that Cameron is married to a Rothschild–which is nonsense.
When you buy into that kind of blatant nonsense masquerading as evidence it makes every other claim dubious, as we have learned from the endless manipulations of the western MSM.
@ Helen
I am not familiar with the pedigree of Cameron’s spouse.
However, Cameron himself is partly of Jewish extraction, although not a Jew in a strict sense. It was only his paternal (!) grandmother, Enid Cameron, nee Levita, that came from that tribe. She joined the UK nobility by “snatching” the son of Lord Ewen (Cameron).
It is quite of interest to read the 2010 article at TotallyJewish.com titled “Cameron: ‘I will empower UK Jews'” http://www.totallyjewish.com/news/national/c-13853/cameron-i-will-empower-uk-jews/
Waldo,
I don’t have a problem with Jews or with any other religious denomination. I am agnostic myself but find the variety of beliefs with which people sustain themselves interesting. My problem is with misinformation masquerading as fact.
If Cameron were married to a Jew I would find that to be irrelevant, that he has Jewish ancestry I find to be equally irrelevant. I took issue with the statement that he is married to a Rothschild which I know to be untrue.
The Spectator headline cited by C I eh? is pure clickbait that worked, just like the Guardian’s ghastly hazard-yellow pictures of Putin attached to the breaking Panama story.
‘Bait and switch’ is the first trick a conman learns.
Here is a link to an irrelevant woman, complete with handy ancestry notes for anyone who cares(!):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samantha_Cameron
The well-researched analysis below has been posted on this site earlier. It is at clear variance with the allegation that the British aristocracy is somehow “anti-Semitic” (least out of fear that their already thoroughly impure mongrel bloodline could be “tainted” (!)), and it fully justifies Saker’s term “AngloZionism”.
Who is the Enemy?, by Thierry Meyssan http://www.voltairenet.org/article184973.html
Peter,
A brilliant and accurate article from Thierry Meyssan that I have not seen before. I don’t think it proves a lack of anti-Semitism in the British aristocracy however. To this day in Britain aristocratic clubs and fee-paying schools operate quota systems to exclude all but a very small token number of Jewish members. Until a few years ago these places routinely excluded all Jewish members because they could get away with it.
I am grateful to the Saker for introducing me to the concept of Anglo-Zionism, which is not the same as anti-Semitism.
To bring this back to the topic, which isn’t anti-Semitism, I recommend this article by Dan Glazebrook, ‘Britain is the heart and soul of tax evasion’, it could equally be titled, like Meyssan’s, ‘Who is the Enemy?’:
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/338961-cameron-tax-haven-uk-evasion/
It provides a good overview of the off-shore shenanigans and the greed and hypocrisy that drives it, a covert continuation of colonialism and empire.
Petar (not Peter)
Apologies to Petar for the spelling slips (twice!) above.
Peter,
Oh, and I agree with your ” their already thoroughly impure mongrel bloodline”.
Us Brits are a completely mongrel race having been thoroughly immigrated, overrun and intermarried by countless hordes since we all lived in caves, painted ourselves blue and ate our enemies.
My quip about tainting the bloodline was sarcasm.
@ Helen
Which reminds me of an old U.S. joke (from the pre-neocon times, of course).
A well-to-do Jew wanted to crown his business success by joining a prestigious all-WASP country club. However, his way of taking, his vocabulary, body language, manners, grooming, dressing, all gave away his ethnic persuasion – and so the admissions committee reject him on the spot.
Over months he persistently keeps trying and trying to get in, but each time he gets the boot…
Realizing eventually what the problem was, he decides to do something about it. He undertakes a year of serious systematic tutored training in manners and etiquette, hires a speech therapist, learns all kinds of vacuous WASP phrases, buys WASPish clothes, grooms himself their way, observes, imitates … etc., etc., etc…
Finally he is ready. He goes to the coveted country club admissions office, where he exhibits everything that he had learned. And the country club admissions people are truly impressed! They all enthusiastically want him in! And have just this very last question, a sheer formality to enter in their records. They ask him:
— Your ethnicity, Sir?
and he replies:
— Goyim, of course.
***
(Glossary: WASP = White Anglo-Saxon Protestant)
The whole story was just a marketing campaign. They borrowed from the ‘Pentagon Papers’ Meme and called it “Panama Papers”.
It’s like a follow on grade B movie. The blockbuster movie is “Frankenstein”, and the grade B is ‘Son of Frankenstein’.
Kind of like Bush’s triumphal landing on the Abraham Lincoln after the US invasion of Iraq was scripted like “The Triumph of the Will”.
New and improved Tide Detergent, since the old brand was getting tired.
So a ‘New and Improved’ Joe Friday, crime thriller. Ridiculous
It’s not clear to me that Cameron is an “unintended” victim. To me it seems like a payback for Cameron’s “treachery” against the Hegemon – he is the first of the FiveEyes that disobeyed Washington’s orders not to join the AIIB. After he brazenly disobeyed this order, it led the way to many other Western countries to follow suit to join…..
The beginning of the end of Western MSM:
Webby awards now has RT at 53% of the vote!!!!!
https://pv.webbyawards.com/2016/social/social-content-and-marketing/news-information?pre_open=332
Great to hear, Alan. I must go over and vote.
I notice how Lavelle’s Crossfire is so different from the old US program Crossfire. The best shows are _not_ the ones with people screaming over each other. The best shows are like this one, with three intelligent people with different strengths, who give the viewer new vistas to look at an issue. I wish the show were 45 min. instead of 30, Lavelle is really getting into his stride.
Latest CrossTalk:
Bullhorns Incorruptible
https://www.rt.com/shows/crosstalk/339151-panama-papers-eu-ukraine/
^ Loved Mark (as I always do) and for once, we even managed to get a glimpse of his humorous [even if a sarcastic one] side here…
…also, I loved the way Peter is now respecting Mark and allowing him to make his point uninterrupted. If anything that’s a testament to Peter’s spotless moral code.
-TL2Q