Day 6, a couple of quick points

I find the situation in Kharkov worrisome. Seems like the Ukies keep fighting and using civilians as human shields, but unfortunately a lot of civilians don’t seem to mind or even think this is a legitimate move (from talking to people, I am from Kharkov originally but lived my whole life in the West). 8 years of constant propaganda really drives people crazy and irrational.
I thought the city would surrender much faster.

Regarding Kiev I am hoping that the move behind Kiev / Odessa is just to block roads to prevent more western weapons from getting to the east. I keep hearing about how we ‘the U.S.’ can supply Ukraine so easily from Poland but without air cover, the only way they can get them to the army that matters is with east west roads.

Sure, you can pile up weapons in Lvov, or the extreme west Ukraine but as you mentioned, I doubt the Russians care about that. Ukraine’s best fighters are in the east. Also, you need roads, roads, roads to move any weapons that matter. You don’t need to man the entire line from north to south, just block the east / west roads.

———-
As I said before, I hope that there never is an attack on Kiev. If you wait long enough they will probably burn down their own buildings with all of those dumb Molotov cocktails but I hope ‘Z’ makes a deal before that happens.

Surrounding Kiev and not taking it may end up in a 1948 Berlin style airlift.

I would air drop pamphlets to the UKN forces outlining the new UKN and good it will be and many may surrender and go home. Perhaps even do some vodka drops too as friendly gesture.

What is concern is the conscription of UKN people being forced to fight when I suspect most would not.

From Col.C today:

Military expert Boris Rozhin especially for the Voenkor Kotenok@voenkorKotenok channel:
one.
Kyiv. There is no attack on the city itself yet. The RF Armed Forces are expanding their control zones around the city. The troops approached the settlement. Brovary. In the city itself – chaos, rampant Volkssturm. Destroyed hardware in the area of ​​the Kiev TV tower. Television disappeared in Ukraine.
2.
Kharkov. Fighting on the outskirts. The city is under fire, especially from the MLRS of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as the locals themselves say. Looting and chaos continues. Kharkiv is plunging into a state of humanitarian catastrophe.
3.
Mariupol. The city is completely surrounded. The boiler is ready, it remains to weld it. Most of the adjacent villages, incl. n.p. Shirokino and Sartana are released. Humanitarian corridors are open until March 2. Then comes the cleanup. It is also worth noting that Volnovakha was almost cleared out.
4.
Donetsk-Gorlovka-Dokuchaevsk-Yasinovataya and a number of other cities were subjected to heavy artillery shelling by the Armed Forces of Ukraine. There are civilians killed and wounded. There is no military meaning in these attacks. They have not yet approached Slavyansk and Kramatorsk.
five.
LPR. Starobelsk and a number of settlements were liberated. The Armed Forces of Ukraine are gradually pressing on in the area of ​​Severodonetsk and Rubizhne. Blocked Svatovo. Russian troops advancing from the border came to Izyum.
6.
Zaporozhye. Fighting is underway near Vasilievka, where the RF Armed Forces are breaking through an improvised fortified area of ​​the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which covers Zaporozhye.
7.
Kherson. In the morning, the cleansing began, which is still going on. The troops of the Russian Federation are already in the central regions of the city, incl. at the station. Detachment of the local Volkssturm was destroyed.
8.
Nikolaev. Instead of a direct assault, the RF Armed Forces cover the city. He’s already in a semicircle. The road Nikolaev – Krivoy Rog was cut.
nine.
Odessa. Contrary to the landing mania, there were no landings near Odessa or so far. In the city – signs of chaos and hysteria.
10.
Transnistria. Despite numerous stories that the Russian Armed Forces will attack Ukraine from Transnistria, practically nothing is happening in this direction.

From a post at Gab:

“So far Russia has been banned from FIFA, the International Ice Hockey Federation, and the International Tennis Federation, Adidas has stopped doing business with the Russian football federation, Apple has stopped doing business in Russia and banned RT from the Apple Store, Microsoft has delisted RT from Bing results and banned its app from the Microsoft store, Universal has stopped releasing movies in Russia, Russian users have to get rid of their Namecheap domain registrations, Facebook and Twitter are suppressing Russian content and Russian journalists, YouTube has banned RT across Europe, DirecTV have dropped RT, Roku has taken down RT’s channel, and Republican-controlled states are banning the sale of Russian vodka…”

Incredible. What a pathetic joke the nation my ancestors founded has become. I feel embarrassed. And how much suffering will come of all this – for Ukrainians, for Russians, for Americans. While the people behind it all will laugh and party.

“Canada has a fascist psychopath as prime minister and a [N]azi as deputy prime minister. They recently gave themselves extraordinary powers to crush peaceful dissidents,” Bernier said in a statement via Twitter.”
… From Sputnik “Canada’s Bernier Decries Trudeau as ‘Fascist Psychopath,’ Brands Freeland as ‘Nazi’”.

See also: “Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Shares—Then Deletes—Photo Holding Fascist Banner at Ukraine Protest” at RT. If you still can in your western dungheap. Her grandpa was a war criminal in service of germany, who canada was at war with. She is is the same thing regarding her israeloamerican owners. A war criminal and a traitor.

“The country’s emergency services said that five people were killed and five more were injured as a result of what they referred to as “shelling.” Earlier, Ukrainian minister of culture said that no TV employees were injured or killed in the blasts.” … Typical of israeloamerican propaganda. The source exposing this is Sputnik.

Russia declares war on the Straussians.

Russia is not waging war on the Ukrainian people, but on a small group of people within the US power that has transformed Ukraine without its knowledge, the Straussians. It formed half a century ago and has already committed an incredible amount of crimes in Latin America and the Middle East without the knowledge of the United States. This is their story.

At dawn on February 24, Russian forces entered Ukraine en masse. According to President Vladimir Putin, speaking on television at the time, this special operation was the beginning of his country’s response to “those who aspire to world domination” and who are advancing Nato’s infrastructure to his country’s doorstep. During this long speech, he summarized how NATO destroyed Yugoslavia without the authorization of the United Nations Security Council, even bombing Belgrade in 1999. Then he perused the destruction of the United States in the Middle East, in Iraq, Libya and Syria. Only after this lengthy presentation did he announce that he had sent his troops to Ukraine with the dual mission of destroying the Nato-linked armed forces and ending the Nato armed neo-Nazi groups.

Immediately all the member states of the Atlantic Alliance denounced the occupation of Ukraine as comparable to that of Czechoslovakia during the “Prague Spring” (1968). According to them, Vladimir Putin’s Russia had adopted the Soviet Union’s “Brezhnev doctrine”. Therefore, the free world must punish the resurrected “Evil Empire” with “devastating costs”.

The interpretation of the Atlantic Alliance is aimed above all at depriving Russia of its major argument: although Nato is not a confederation of equals, but a hierarchical federation under Anglo-Saxon command, Russia is doing the same. It refuses Ukraine the possibility of choosing its destiny, just as the Soviets refused it to the Czechoslovakians. It is true that Nato violates the principles of sovereignty and equality of states stipulated in the UN Charter, but it should not be dissolved, unless Russia is also dissolved.

Perhaps, but probably not.

President Putin’s speech was not directed against Ukraine, or even against the United States, but explicitly against “those who aspire to world domination”, i.e. against the “Straussians” in the US power structure. It was a real declaration of war against them.

On February 25, President Vladimir Putin called the Kiev leadership “a clique of drug addicts and neo-Nazis”. For the Atlantic media, these words were those of a mental patient.

During the night of February 25-26, President Volodymyr Zelensky sent a ceasefire proposal to Russia via the Chinese embassy in Kiev. The Kremlin immediately responded by setting out its conditions:
arrest of all Nazis (Dmitro Yarosh and the Azov Battalion, etc.)
removal of all street names and destruction of monuments glorifying Nazi collaborators during the Second World War (Stepan Bandera, etc.),
laying down of weapons.

The Atlantic press ignored this event, while the rest of the world, which knew about it, held its breath. The negotiation failed a few hours later after Washington intervened. Only then would Western public opinion be informed, but the Russian conditions would always be hidden from them.

What is President Putin talking about? Who is he fighting against? And what are the reasons that have made the Atlanticist press blind and mute?

A brief history of the Straussians

Let us stop for a moment to consider this group, the Straussians, about whom Westerners know little. They are individuals, all Jewish, but by no means representative of either American Jews or of Jewish communities worldwide. They were formed by the German philosopher Leo Strauss, who took refuge in the United States during the rise of Nazism and became a professor of philosophy at the University of Chicago. According to many accounts, he had formed a small group of faithful students to whom he gave oral instruction. There is no written record of this. He explained to them that the only way for the Jews not to fall victim to a new genocide was to form their own dictatorship. He called them Hoplites (the soldiers of Sparta) and sent them to disrupt the courts of his rivals. Finally, he taught them discretion and praised the “noble lie”. Although he died in 1973, his student fraternity continued.

The Straussians began forming a political group half a century ago, in 1972. They were all members of Democratic Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson’s staff, including Elliott Abrams, Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz. They worked closely with a group of Trotskyite journalists, also Jewish, who had met at the City College of New York and edited the magazine Commentary. Both groups were closely linked to the CIA, but also, thanks to Perle’s father-in-law Albert Wohlstetter (the US military strategist), to the Rand Corporation (the think tank of the military-industrial complex). Many of these young people intermarried until they formed a compact group of about 100 people.

Together they drafted and passed the “Jackson-Vanik Amendment” in the midst of the Watergate crisis (1974), which forced the Soviet Union to allow the emigration of its Jewish population to Israel under pain of economic sanctions. This was their founding act.

In 1976, Paul Wolfowitz [1] was one of the architects of the “Team B” charged by President Gerald Ford with assessing the Soviet threat [2]. He issued a delirious report accusing the Soviet Union of preparing to take over “global hegemony”. The Cold War changed its nature: it was no longer a question of isolating (containment) the USSR, it had to be stopped in order to save the “free world”.

The Straussians and the New York intellectuals, all of whom were on the left, put themselves at the service of the right-wing president Ronald Reagan. It is important to understand that these groups are neither truly left nor right wing. Some members have switched five times from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party and back again. What is important to them is to infiltrate power, whatever the ideology. Elliott Abrams became an assistant to the Secretary of State. He led an operation in Guatemala where he put a dictator in power and experimented with Israeli Mossad officers on how to create reserves for the Mayan Indians in order to eventually do the same thing in Israel with the Palestinian Arabs (the Mayan Resistance earned Rigoberta Menchú her Nobel Peace Prize). Then Elliott Abrams continued his exactions in El Salvador and finally in Nicaragua against the Sandinistas with the Iran-Contra affair. For their part, the New York intellectuals, now called “Neoconservatives”, created the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the U.S. Institute of Peace, a mechanism that organized many colored revolutions, starting with China with the attempted coup d’état of Prime Minister Zhao Ziyang and the subsequent repression in Tiananmen Square.

At the end of George H. Bush’s (the father’s) term of office, Paul Wolfowitz, then number 3 in the Defense Department, drew up a document [3] based on a strong idea: after the decomposition of the USSR, the United States had to prevent the emergence of new rivals, starting with the European Union. He concluded by advocating the possibility of taking unilateral action, i.e. to put an end to the concerted action of the United Nations. Wolfowitz was undoubtedly the designer of “Desert Storm”, the operation to destroy Iraq that allowed the United States to change the rules of the game and organize a unilateral world. It was during this time that Straussians valued the concepts of “regime change” and “democracy promotion.”

Gary Schmitt, Abram Shulsky and Paul Wolfowitz entered the US intelligence community through the Consortium for the Study of Intelligence’s Working Group on Intelligence Reform. They criticized the assumption that other governments think the same way as the US government [4]. Then they criticized the lack of political leadership in intelligence, leaving it to wander into
unimportant issues instead of focusing on the essential ones. Politicizing intelligence is what Wolfowitz had already done with the B-team and what he would do again in 2002 with the Office of Special Plans, inventing arguments for new wars against Iraq and Iran (Leo Strauss’ “noble lie”).

The Straussians were removed from power during Bill Clinton’s term. They then entered the Washington think tanks. In 1992, William Kristol and Robert Kagan (the husband of Victoria Nuland, widely quoted in the previous articles) published an article in Foreign Affairs deploring President Clinton’s timid foreign policy and calling for a renewal of “benevolent global hegemony” [5]. The following year they founded the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) at the American Enterprise Institute. Gary Schmitt, Abram Shulsky and Paul Wolfowitz were members. All of Leo Strauss’s non-Jewish admirers, including the Protestant Francis Fukuyama (the author of The End of History), immediately joined them.

In 1994, now an arms dealer, Richard Perle (a.k.a. “the Prince of Darkness”) became an advisor to the President and ex-Nazi Alija Izetbegović in Bosnia-Herzegovina. It was he who brought Osama Bin Laden and his Arab Legion (the forerunner of Al Qaeda) from Afghanistan to defend the country. Perle was even a member of the Bosnian delegation at the signing of the Dayton Accords in Paris.

In 1996, members of the PNAC (including Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser) wrote a study at the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS) for the new Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. This report [6] advocates the elimination of Yasser Arafat, the annexation of the Palestinian territories, a war against Iraq and the transfer of Palestinians there. It was inspired not only by the political theories of Leo Strauss, but also by those of his friend, Ze’ev Jabotinsky, the founder of “revisionist Zionism”, of whom Netanyahu’s father was the private secretary.

The PNAC raised funds for the candidacy of George W. Bush (the son) and published before his election its famous report “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”. It called for a Pearl Harbor-like catastrophe that would throw the American people into a war for global hegemony. These are exactly the words that PNAC Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld used on September 11, 2001.

Thanks to the 9/11 attacks, Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz installed Admiral Arthur Cebrowski in Donald Rumsfeld’s shadow. He played a role comparable to that of Albert Wohlstetter during the Cold War. He imposed the strategy of “endless war”: the US armed forces should not win any more wars, but start many of them and keep them going as long as possible. The aim would be to destroy all the political structures of the targeted states in order to ruin these populations and deprive them of any means of defending themselves against the US [7]; a strategy that has been implemented for twenty years in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen…

The alliance between the Strausians and the revisionist Zionists was sealed at a major conference in Jerusalem in 2003, which Israeli political figures from all sides unfortunately thought they should attend [8]. It is therefore not surprising that Victoria Nuland (Robert Kagan’s wife, then ambassador to NATO) intervened to declare a ceasefire in Lebanon in 2006, allowing the defeated Israeli army not to be pursued by Hezbollah.

Some individuals, such as Bernard Lewis, have worked with all three groups, the Straussians, the Neoconservatives and the Revisionist Zionists. A former British intelligence officer, he acquired both U.S. and Israeli citizenship, was an advisor to Benjamin Netanyahu and a member of the U.S. National Security Council. Lewis, who halfway through his career assured that Islam is incompatible with terrorism and that Arab terrorists are in fact Soviet agents, later changed his mind and assured with the same aplomb that the religion preaches terrorism. He invented the strategy of the “clash of civilizations” for the US National Security Council. The idea was to use cultural differences to mobilize Muslims against the Orthodox, a concept that was popularized by his assistant at the Council, Samuel Huntington, except that Huntington did not present it as a strategy, but as an inevitability that had to be countered. Huntington began his career as an advisor to the South African secret service during the aparteheid era, and later wrote a book, The Soldier and the State [9], arguing that the military (regular and mercenary) is a special caste, the only one capable of understanding national security needs.

After the destruction of Iraq, the Straussians were the subject of all sorts of controversies [10]. Everyone is surprised that such a small group, supported by neoconservative journalists, could have acquired such authority without having been the subject of a public debate. The U.S. Congress appointed an Iraq Study Group (the so-called “Baker-Hamilton Commission”) to evaluate its policy. It condemned, without naming it, the Rumsfeld/Cebrowski strategy and deplored the hundreds of thousands of deaths it had caused. But Rumsfeld resigned and the Pentagon inexorably pursued this strategy, which it had never officially adopted.

In the Obama administration, the Straussians found their way into Vice President Joe Biden’s cabinet. His National Security Advisor, Jacob Sullivan, played a central role in organizing the operations against Libya, Syria and Myanmar, while another of his advisors, Antony Blinken, focused on Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. It was he who led the negotiations with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei that resulted in the arrest and imprisonment of key members of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s team in exchange for the nuclear deal.

Regime change in Kiev in 2014 was organized by the Straussians. Vice President Biden is firmly committed to it. Victoria Nuland came to support the neo-Nazi elements of the Right Sector and to supervise the Israeli “Delta” commando [11] in Maidan Square. A telephone intercept reveals her wish to “fuck the European Union” (sic) in the tradition of the 1992 Wolfowitz report. But the leaders of the European Union do not understand and protest only weakly [12].

“Jake” Sullivan and Antony Blinken placed Vice President Biden’s son, Hunter, on the board of one of the major gas companies, Burisma Holdings, despite opposition from Secretary of State John Kerry. Hunter Biden is unfortunately just a junkie, he would serve as a front for a gigantic scam at the expense of the Ukrainian people. He would appoint, under the supervision of Amos Hochstein, several of his stoner friends to become other front men at the head of various companies and to plunder Ukrainian gas. These are the people that President Vladimir Putin called a “clique of drug addicts”.

Sullivan and Blinken relied on mafia godfather Ihor Kolomoysky, the country’s third largest fortune. Although he is Jewish, he financed the heavyweights of the Right Sector, a neo-Nazi organization that works for NATO and fought in Maidan Square during the “regime change”. Kolomoïsky took advantage of his connections to take power within the European Jewish community, but his co-religionists rebelled and ejected him from international associations. However, he managed to get the head of the Right Sector, Dmytro Yarosh, appointed deputy secretary of the Ukrainian National Security and Defence Council and to get himself appointed governor of the Dnipropetrovsk oblast. Both men would be quickly removed from any political function. It was their group that President Vladimir Putin called a “clique of neo-Nazis.”

In 2017, Antony Blinken founded WestExec Advisors, a consulting firm that brought together former senior Obama administration officials and many Straussians. The firm’s business is extremely low-key. It uses the political connections of its employees to make money; what anywhere else would be called corruption.

The Straussians are still the same as ever

Since Joe Biden returned to the White House, this time as President of the United States, the Straussians have been running the show. “Jake” Sullivan is National Security Advisor, while Antony Blinken is Secretary of State with Victoria Nuland at his side. As I have reported in previous articles, she went to Moscow in October 2021 and threatens to crush Russia’s economy if it ded not comply. This was the beginning of the current crisis.

Undersecretary of State Nuland resurrected Dmitro Yarosh and imposed him on President Zelinsky, a television actor protected by Ihor Kolomoysky. On November 2, 2021, he appointed him special advisor to the head of the army, General Valerii Zaluzhnyi. The latter, a true democrat, rebelled at first and finally accepted. When questioned by the press about this astonishing duo, he refused to answer and mentioned a question of national security. Yarosh gave his full support to the “white führer”, Colonel Andrey Biletsky, and his Azov Battalion. This copy of the SS Das Reich division has been staffed since the summer of 2021 by American mercenaries formerly from Blackwater [13].

Having identified the Straussians, we must admit that Russia’s ambition is understandable, even desirable. To rid the world of the Straussians would be to do justice to the million or more deaths they have caused and to save those they are about to kill. Whether this intervention in Ukraine is the right way remains to be seen.

In any case, if the responsibility for the current events lies with the Straussians, all those who let them act without flinching also have a responsibility. Starting with Germany and France, who signed the Minsk Agreements seven years ago and did nothing to ensure that they were implemented, and then with the fifty or so states that signed the OSCE declarations prohibiting the extension of Nato east of the Oder-Neisse line and did nothing. Only Israel, which has just got rid of the revisionist Zionists, has expressed a nuanced position on these events.

This is one of the lessons of this crisis: democratically governed peoples are responsible for the decisions taken for a long time by their leaders and maintained after alternations in power.

https://www.voltairenet.org/article215879.html

Zelensky’s Dirlewanger Brigade

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/zelensky-arm-prisoners-combat-experience-drop-hottest-spots-war-fight-ukraine-compensate-guilt/

Refer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirlewanger_Brigade

The Poles should rethink their position on this.

Man,

That State of the Union Address was off the charts. Made me think of the Stones song Dead Flowers.

‘Well, when you’re sitting back in your rose pink Cadillac
Making bets on Kentucky Derby Day
Ah, I’ll be in my basement room with a needle and a spoon
And another girl to take my pain away’

I drank Stoli on the rocks (not Russian made but close to the Russian border than Kentucky. Help make the lies go down easier LOL!

The ‘west’, in all honesty, is making itself look ridiculous.

Biden’s speech this evening was especially pathetic, I’m not sure if even one word of it was true.

Yes, the governments of all the US vassal states may well line up together, a cavalcade of idiots, blackmailed and leveraged to the hilt, but it’s very clear from their language, that all they are going to do is talk.

Cowards to the last, if anyone was in any doubt about the reliability of the US as an ally in the face of a serious adversary, let there be no doubt, you’re on your own.

Talk is cheap.

Ultimate irony: General Motors which as I understand it helped fund the Nazi Third Reich is announcing they will pull out of Russia. Same goes for many of these other companies which have announced cancellation of factories/business in Russia, yet were happily aiding Nazi’s in WW2. One can only shake one’s head.

Here’s another good comment from a blogger in Germany. I have been following him for many years and he has foreseen many things completely correctly. Unfortunately, he almost no longer posts lately. Today a new comment from him:

http://analitik.de

War continues

Published on February 26, 2022 by Analitik
Many people probably have the impression that something completely new is happening in the last months and especially in the last days. It is not so. The third world war continues. We are not seeing its beginning or its end right now, we are still in the middle of it. The change is that Russia has gone from the defensive to the offensive.

The war in Ukraine did not start three days ago. It has been going on there for eight years. Russians have been under artillery fire in Ukraine for eight years. A whole generation of Russian children has grown up in basements. Eight years Russia has been preparing to put an end to that.

Eight years of preparation for the Donbass? Of course not. The Donbass is inevitably only the beginning of a chain of escalation. Eight years ago, Russia was not strong enough militarily and economically to endure this chain of escalation cleanly to the end and emerge victorious (nuclear weapons are out of the picture, they cannot be used as a primary means for victories, but serve as a deterrent).

Now Russia is strong enough to scare Nazis and NATO away from its borders. In December 2021, Russia made its demands public, including: NATO must return to 1997 levels. For those who don’t realize what that means, check out the NATO expansions here. It means that all countries that joined NATO after 1990 must get out of it. That’s the way it is in war. You defeat others or others defeat you. And if you are defeated, you have to.

This demand seems harebrained? You know, when Putin addresses a problem publicly (just addresses it without promising anything), it means that he has already started working on a solution. When Putin gives an ultimatum, it means that he already has a plan to achieve the set goal against any resistance. You can think whatever you want of Putin, love him or hate him, but that’s how he works. He is extraordinarily diplomatic, never leaning further out on a limb than he can reach. When he states the goal so harshly – and it is harshly stated and Russia repeats it daily through all diplomatic and public channels – there is already a plan.

Putin has also publicly emphasized at least twice that Russia is acting and will continue to act strictly according to plan. All possible scenarios have been calculated and for each scenario Russia has a plan.

I don’t know what that plan is. I did not expect Putin to launch a major military operation in Ukraine. Since I did not anticipate his move, I am ill-advised to predict the next move.

The path is not clear, but the destination is: NATO must return to its 1997 borders. The Donbass and Ukraine are only a first step. What is clear is that Ukraine will return to the Russian orbit. It is also clear that Putin does not want the lands west of Ukraine. What is clear is that these lands must be militarily neutral. Militarily neutral lands between Russia and NATO. There will be no new Warsaw Pact.

Military operations can spread further west on the European continent (do not have to, but can) if the goal cannot be achieved otherwise.

There will be no bloodbaths like in the First or Second World War, even if the situation will develop according to the most critical of all scenarios. This can be seen, for example, now in Ukraine: neither Russia nor Ukraine have mobilized the population. There is one military destroying another military. The civilians are standing next to it, filming what is happening on their cell phones and uploading it immediately to the social networks. Surreal. For the civilian population in Europe, there is no direct danger from the current and upcoming military operations.

The political order in Europe and the world will change, of course. The West will unquestionably lose this war. The only open question is how much more damage the West will inflict on itself before it capitulates.

For you, reader, the biggest danger of this war is that you worry too much about it and watch and read too much news. If you cut yourself off from all news channels, you will hardly notice the war. You will see that everyone around you is on edge, but that’s it. You will continue to go to work, will have a lot of fun in your free time (because you won’t have to watch the news and consequently do something else), will go to sleep at night and be woken up by the alarm clock in the morning to go back to work.

For you, reader, this war will either be only in your head or not at all. And although it may sound unbelievable, you actually have a choice whether you participate in this war or not. Your choice has absolutely no influence on the outcome of the war, but it has the greatest influence on your well-being.

In fairness, the West will lose some of its standard of living. But you will be happy with it. Because the elites are already beating it into your head that it’s great if you don’t own a home, but rent a 2×3 m “Tiny House”. And that you’re a hero if you don’t eat meat and make do with beans. And that having your own car is also totally yesterday’s news and a rented electric scooter is much more awesome. By and large, you are already being taught that all middle-class dreams are totally ew and that you will be much happier and more modern with ascetic lifestyle (formerly called poverty).

Yesterday I saw on Twitter, get this, a demand for Zelensky to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. This being the same Zelensky who could have avoided the whole damned mess by following the Minsk II agreement and repudiation of NATO. Why then stop at the Nobel Peace Prize? Let’s give him the Nobel Prizes for literature, medicine, physics and chemistry, the Pulitzer Prize, the Magsaysay Award, and the local primary school poetry recitation competition one as well. He’s as deserving of them.

I’m amazed when I hear the US MSM breathlessly exclaim that the world is with us and Ukraine against Russia.

No country but the EU and the 5 Eyes are backing the West. Everyone else is waiting to see how the chips fall and hoping the Russians finally bring to a close the 500 years of European world domination.

This is for a lot of chips.

We know there is a big plan coming. Much like the Sarajevo Breadline massacre where News anchors just happened to be filming that day. Bombs were hidden under the stalls so legs could be filmed be blowing off. The shit media said it was Bosnian Serbs lobbing bombs from surrounding hills.

How hilarious would it be if Ukraine ended up being Russian ally – just like they turned Chechnya, while being the west’s “good guy” and pet member of EU, with all the funding that’s being directed there right now and all debts forgiven ?