ST. PETERSBURG, Russia, June 23 (Xinhua) — Russian President Vladimir Putin, in an hour-long exclusive interview with Xinhua President Cai Mingzhao ahead of his upcoming visit to China, elaborated his views on bilateral ties, China-Russia trade, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), and international cooperation, among other issues. The following is the full text of Xinhua’s exclusive interview with Putin:
Cai: Honorable President Putin, it is my great pleasure to have an exclusive interview with you here in your beautiful hometown St.Petersburg, ahead of your once-again visit to China. Please allow me to express our respect to you on behalf of Xinhua News Agency.
Putin: Thanks.
Cai: Thanks to the joint efforts made by Chinese President Xi Jinping and you, the China-Russia relationship is currently at its best in history. I believe that today’s interview will also be conducive to our bilateral relations. Shall we start the interview please?
Putin: Yes, please.
Cai: According to our calculation, President Xi had five meetings with you last year. And you are visiting China again very soon. The China-Russia comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination has been deepened thanks to the joint efforts made by President Xi and you.
This year marks the 15th anniversary of the signing of the Sino-Russian Good-Neighborly Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation, as well as 20th anniversary of the establishment of the China-Russia strategic partnership of coordination. What in your opinion are the highlights of China-Russia ties? What are their future prospects? What do you expect from this visit?
Putin: You said our bilateral relations are standing at a very high level, which is your comment on our bilateral ties. Here I want to remind Xinhua readers of two historical junctures:
Twenty years ago, we announced a new type of relations — a strategic partnership; 15 years ago we signed the Sino-Russian Good-Neighborly Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation. As a lot of work has been done since then, trust between Russia and China has reached an unprecedented level and laid a solid foundation for bilateral cooperation.
Since it is a level that probably has never been reached in our relationship in the past, it is very hard for our experts to define today’s common cause that binds our two countries together. In fact, it is not enough now to simply call it a strategic coordination. Therefore, we started to call it “a comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination.” The word “comprehensive” means that we are cooperating on almost all vital areas, and “strategic” demonstrates the prime importance we are attaching to our relationship.
You mentioned the coordination between President Xi and me. Indeed, the work between us, the work at our level, serves without doubt as an engine for the development of bilateral relations. We are currently discussing together some basic issues in our cooperative strategy. President Xi himself values a lot the development of Russia-China relations. He is a very good friend and reliable partner.
However, the smooth growth of Russia-China ties can not merely depend on our efforts. It calls for further improving the working mechanism between the governments of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China. The heads of government of our two countries meet on a regular basis. More than 20 sub-commissions and intergovernmental commissions have been set up — I believe there are 26 sub-commissions in fact. People in these commissions are working diligently and efficiently. Although the two countries are still far from being able to swiftly reach consensus on every complicated problem, we always share the common goal of pushing forward our cooperation no matter how complex the issues are. So we always find a solution.
The difficulties that the global economy is going through are widely known. They are also reflected in the coordination between the two countries. For instance, the trade volume between Russia and China has declined a bit. But we believe it is merely a temporary downtick resulting from the current market prices of certain commodities and differences in exchange rates.
Meanwhile, actions have been taken to solve the major problems. To optimize the bilateral trade structure, we have taken some substantial actions.
I may not remember correctly and may need to check up, over the past year, Russian export of mechanical and technical products to China has grown significantly, by 44 percent. This means a lot to us. We have been negotiating this with the Chinese partners for years. I want to thank our friends for making this a reality, which makes it possible for us to gradually realize our goals in the most important direction. This is our common goal, which we have consensus with. We are going forward together in the direction that we need to go.
Therefore, the most important task in bilateral relations is bringing diversities and higher quality to trade relations, particularly boosting cooperation in high-tech areas.
We are also working together in the fields of space projects and aviation, notably with a joint research on wide-body airplanes and heavy-weight helicopters. We are jointly seeking solutions to ecological problems and continue to launch giant programs in the field of energy, including nuclear energy.
Cai: Russia has a lot of strength in these sectors.
Putin: Indeed, yes. Rosatom (Russian state-owned nuclear corporation) has a remarkable orderbook. The two reactor units at Tianwan Nuclear Power Plant have been operating for eight years and have been recognized for their performance. We are building two more reactor units and I don’t think we will stop there. We should expand our cooperation, not just building more nuclear power plants in China but also broaden our technological collaboration in this respect.
China is now gradually strengthening its presence in our energy market. Not only it’s one of the main shareholders of the Yamal LNG plant, an important liquefied natural gas mega-project, but also China bought 10 percent of the shares of the Siberian-Ural Petrochemical and Gas Company, one of the top chemical shareholding companies in Russia. We welcome such investment by China, not only because of capital inflows but also because it helps deepen our partnership.
On the famous Moscow-Kazan high-speed railway line, we are seeing very good progress, and we are expecting a speed of up to 400 km per hour at some segments. We are closely following the work on the projects, and it may very well be only the beginning of our broad cooperation in infrastructure.
Our cooperation in culture is also of great value, including the Chinese Year and Russia Year, held alternately in our two countries, the Sino-Russian Youth Friendship Exchange Year, the Russian and Chinese Language Year, the Tourism Year, etc. Some of these were proposed by Russia while others were initiated by China. All of them have been very successful and will undoubtedly promote the mutual trust between our two peoples. The importance of these activities is no less than that of mega energy projects like the “Power of Siberia,” by which I am referring to the eastern gas pipe project between Russia and China that supplies China with 38 billion cubic meters of gas annually. Apart from this, we have also had steady progress in cooperation on international and military affairs and on military technologies.
We usually discuss all these cooperation when President Xi and I meet. You know, my upcoming visit had packed schedules, very packed actually. So I expect to have friendly meetings with President Xi on a broad range of topics, with mutual trust, as we have always had.
Cai: Thank you. You mentioned the growth of economic and trade cooperation, and a lot of the mega cooperation projects, which are very encouraging. You have said many times that we should align the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) with the Belt and Road Initiative proposed by China. China’s economic sector is following this closely. So specifically what do you suggest the two countries do in this respect? How can we leverage on the alignment of these development plans to promote the economic and trade cooperation between China and Russia?
Putin: What you’ve raised is an interesting topic. We know that President Xi Jinping put forward the Silk Road Economic Belt. We think that Xi’s proposal is very well-timed and appealing, and the initiative holds great potential as it aims to expand China’s cooperation with the world. China’s neighbors naturally come first in such cooperation, as the road, wherever it leads to eventually, first goes through the neighboring countries.
We are undertaking two negotiations: one is bilateral between Russia and China, and the other is between China and the EEU. Just recently, the five member countries of the EEU discussed relevant issues in Astana (the capital of Kazakhstan). We all agreed to develop our cooperation with China within the framework of the Silk Road Economic Belt initiative.
I have to be absolutely frank with you. Of course, we do have to take care of the interests of our producers. But we share the consensus that our fundamental approach to world economic development and our cooperation with China is to gradually eliminate the various barriers to our common cause of opening up. So I think what we can do at the first stage is to establish a free trade area.
We are realists. We are aware that it is impossible at the first stage to rule out exceptions and special cases, but we should be clear about where we want to go. Given that more and more countries in our region are enthusiastic about our cooperation, in order to achieve our aim, we shall try to create favorable conditions for what we call Eurasian cooperation, and we shall try to avoid establishing a closed economic and trade bloc.
Cai: Thank you. The 16th summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) is to be held in the Uzbek capital of Tashkent. Established 15 years ago, the SCO, with both China and Russia as founding member states, has played an important role in boosting regional security and development. What’s your anticipation for the upcoming summit? And what do you think of the SCO mechanism?
Putin: The SCO, at its early days, set itself pretty low-profile goals. I want to say those goals were both important and pragmatic, which were aimed at addressing various kinds of problems in cooperation along the borders. However, whether they are easy or not, those issues were still no more than cooperation along the borders. But we are aware that those issues would have stayed unsolved for decades without sincerity and could be easily solved with enough sincerity. Whether those issues could be solved or not depends on a country’s internal situation and how it conducts itself on the world stage, to a great extent.
It was based on their utmost sincerity that Russia, China and other SCO member states achieved all of the pre-set goals in this area. Obviously, it is advisable for us not to abandon this mechanism and to cherish our achievements as well as the current development level of the inter-relations among all the SCO member states. As a matter of fact, we have begun to solve other problems through the SCO mechanism, starting with cooperation in a number of fields. Such cooperation is not only political but also involves infrastructure construction. We have also begun to discuss issues concerning security and drug trafficking, among others.
I will not say that we have achieved many magical results or that we have carried out a series of exemplary operations. But I will say the SCO has become a popular and attractive organization in the region. Many countries around the world have expressed willingness to join it.
At the SCO Ufa Summit last year, we decided to initiate the procedure of admitting India and Pakistan into the bloc. At the Tashkent summit, we will implement the decision and hold discussions on other countries’ willingness to participate in the work of the organization.
The expansion of the SCO’s functions and the increase in its member numbers, particularly the inclusion of those important countries mentioned above, have made it an authoritative and popular international organization in the region and the world at large.
As the international situation is complex and diverse, some countries might differ from others in terms of stance and opinion over certain international issues. Although their inclusion into the SCO might not offer solution to their disagreements, we will make efforts in paving the way for the settlement of those issues. We are full of expectations for that.
Cai: Thank you. Today the world faces many grave challenges, including a sluggish global economic recovery, instability and volatility in some regions, rampant terrorist activities, and environmental problems such as climate change. As two influential and responsible major countries, China and Russia are important forces in maintaining world peace and stability, especially under such challenging international situations. So, what additional efforts do you think China and Russia should make to maintain world peace and improve global governance?
Putin: As you know, coordination between Russia and China on the global stage is itself a stabilizing factor in international affairs.
Let’s recall Chinese President Xi Jinping’s address at the ceremony marking the 70th anniversary of the establishment of the United Nations. Please recall his words. He advocated for all controversial issues to be resolved in accordance with international law and through peaceful means only. President Xi also said China stands ready to aid poor countries, and even put forward specific measures accordingly. He is one of the few national leaders who are dedicated to international poverty reduction. It is these positions, instead of just geographic proximity, that unite us in international affairs.
Apart from our cooperation within the framework of the SCO, we have been cooperating with each other within the BRICS framework as well. Actually, we jointly created the BRICS mechanism. We also have active cooperation with each other at the United Nations.
In retrospect, it was my country, the then Soviet Union, that tried its best to help the People’s Republic of China secure its permanent seat at the UN Security Council, a respectable place where we always think China should be. Until today, we have always been very happy that this happened, as our two countries, in the language of diplomacy, have the same or very similar viewpoints in international affairs. Such alignment of our stances is also substantiated at the technical level. We have maintained contact regularly, and carried out consultations on global and regional affairs. We see each other as close allies, so of course we always listen to each other, by this I mean we keep in mind each other’s interests.
I believe that during my visit to the People’s Republic of China, our cooperation will continue to follow this spirit.
Cai: Thank you Mr. President. We sincerely look forward to your visit to China and wish you enormous success. I would also like to tell you that during your visit, Xinhua News Agency and Tass News Agency will sign a new cooperative agreement.
Putin: You have been a great help on this front. Thank you. In today’s world, the work of news reporting is no less important than that of diplomats.
Pleasantries.
Thanx for the translation anyway.
Thanks for this good news. However, being from the US, I kept wanting to say: what about us?
I agree with almost all presented, but there are two areas that concern me, long term: nuclear power plants and China’s investments in Russia.
Regarding nuclear power, I’m assuming that the safety valves have greatly improved. Still, the type of nuclear energy today, with its waste products, is problem prone. I can’t tell fusion from fission, but I had the impression that one was safer than the other.
Regarding China’s investments in Russia, how is that going to affect Russia’s long term sovereignty?
My own general view is that of Putin’s idea of “nature-like technologies.” It’s a delicate balance, and dangerous if we get too techy. My more specific view is that the heart of nature is love, which I am more recently characterizing as the love army, over at Cafe Revolution of Love. When Russia finally succeeds in bringing my country to its senses, the love army can retire, and the love amory will fall naturally into place; if Chinese investors don’t get too greedy, and a nuclear plant doesn’t blow somewhere on the border, by accident or plan by our “western partners.” As these polite gentleman statesmen would say: thank you.
The only way America will be “brought to its senses” is how Nazi Germany or Imperial Japan were brought to theirs: to suffer a massive defeat in which the entire state apparatus is ended and even national borders fundamentally altered.
The American national character is based on rapacious capitalism and aggressive expansitionism from the first slaveowners like George Washington to the Manifest Destiny ideology of the 19th Century to the Cold Warriors of the 20th Century to US Full Spectrum Dominance of the 21st Century.
The track record of Americans throughout their long and bloodthirsty history gives lie to any fairy tales that America will voluntarily undergo any type of sincere change towards peaceful behavior.
No, it’s a bit more complicated than that. You’re falling into the same oversimplification that people fell into regarding Germans, earlier.
Most Americans are not bloodthirsty or super-aggressive. Most of them are cowardly and mind-controlled. If they got their heads out of their rectal cavities, and saw the light of day, they could rein in the neocons and even jail many of them. That’s the Great Work. Cranial/rectal separation. When it is accomplished Americans are grateful and no longer self-destructive.
Of course it’s easier to wish for a global thermonuclear exchange which would get many if not all of the visitors here killed, and simply write them off without ever trying to free their neighbors from mind control. But if any US residents or citizens agree with your approach, they are definitely under mind control and self loathing. Dennis and I agree on some things and disagree on others, but I wouldn’t put either of us in the self-loathing zombie camp.
SO let’s do the work. It’ll be easier if you pick a handle. Thanks. Goodnight.
The issue as I see it is that the US has been completely overtaken by the industrial militatary complex. They go and fight wars to contries that Americans have hardly an indea they existed before. Their military goes and “promote democracy and freedom” for unclear reasons leaving behind av path of destruction and chaos. This is good for the military industry because it will keep selling weapons both to “friends” and foes. The EU is following the same steps so the outcome may not be pleasant indeed.
True enough, Oscar, but why? Why, why, why? Why are the American people so mind controlled that they participate in this destruction?
The typical soldier in Iraq or Afghanistan has few prospects of rewarding, well paid employment,was raised on TV and lousy schools, and thinks they may get economic advantages (GI Bill, VA loan for a house) and they don’t know squat about anything going on in their own country let alone foreign lands, so they enlist, serve a tour or two and find out some reality the too hard way, and return with PTSD, effectively destroyed.
Or, The Pat Tilman Story. A tragic sucker. But what do you expect, coming from the pseudo world of professional sports? As local sportscaster (talk radio) used to proudly proclaim in oft-played recording here in So Cal: “I know 2 things: 1. I know sports, and 2) I know sports.”
Stop being proud of your ignorance, estupidos! As Tilman found out, it can kill you. Or the entire country. Or the entire world.
So, Why, why, why?
I intend to go very very deeply into that subject in 2-3 weeks, hopefully. It has to do with self-loathing and arrested development, parental abandonement, etc…..And it has been deliberately engineered by the global elites to deepen their control through enslaving minds and bodies, world-wide. It can be defeated. All for now.
Bro. No idea. I myself have American relatives and they do often not agree with the American policies but do not dare to raise their voices against, they are very afraid to be considered “non or anti American”. You mentioned “the global elites” I think you are on some kind of track, my relatives (in the US) would never dare to suggest the smallest disagreement (with the US-Israel policies) that could be considered anti Israel. To me it is difficult to understand this (never lived in the US). So I often wondered what is going on there?
What has been going on since the Spanish American War in particular is the long range, in depth targetting of a relatively rich area of the world well defended by two oceans to serve as a power base for bringing the entire world under domination and slavery for the benefit of a tiny few who have no loyalty to any nation.
Like British subjects in the 1770s and 1800, and then a bit less overtly in the 1900’s (especially after WWII) most Americans did not care much to investigate evil done by their governments, controlled by Wall St and London as long as they sensed they were better off than their counterparts in other places in the world. Corruption, cowardice, stupidity. That’s the extremely short version short.
Here’s a good video on the subject: https://youtu.be/U1Qt6a-vaNM
Others may suggest something better for the same period (WWI to present) or earlier periods.
When Russia finally succeeds in bringing the US to its senses, the clear implication is that the US has been terminally dissolved as a political entity just like the USSR (in the latter case, however, the trajectory was the exact opposite; from plain common sense to instant madness). The US, for its part, has never known any other modus vivendi but enslavement, genocide, imperialist war, and global plunder. The infatuation of the average Pindo with torture, slaughter, racism, and gun-toting is almost making a caricature out of the historic process of shaping national consciousness.
Nazi Germany was a dead serious attempt at emulating successful Anglo-American imperialism in raising living standards at home at the expense of subjugated and raped peoples abroad. If anything, the Nazis were particularly envious of the US for its striking social cohesion, based on White supremacy, “Manifest Destiny”, and hysterical flag-waving.
@ Mr. Nussiminen:
In this equation you forget how it came to that and which circumstances and which backgroundplayers brought Hitler-idiot to power.
Dictate of Versaille, poverty, mass-unemployment, Hyperinflation prepared the gound.
And then came zionist banks who funded Hitler and managed to bring him to power in 1933 via the Reichstags-burning, although under normal circumstances the Communists should have won – or otherwise the Zionist infiltraged so called “Social Democrats” would have stayed in power.
I say Zionists, I never say “The Jews”.
As you still don’t know the difference despite having posted here for eternities, read what I wrote on that subject repeatedly: /uman-ukraine-israeli-hasidim-attacked-journalists-police-fires-shots-threw-stones-glass-bottles/comment-page-1/#comment-251769
Unfortunately in your removed. no attacking other commenters. Mod. you overlook such aspects.
Benjamin H. Freedman 1961 speech
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8OmxI2AYV8
I do not back everything (in fact a lot not) of what he says, but this gives a clue.
Anyway to those open for and looking for clues.
Aber hallo, lieber Martin.
Meines Erachtens nach hat Der Führer nur die Deutsche Frauen und Kinder vor Massenvergewaltigung schützen gewollt. Zu jener Zeit gab es noch so gut wie keine Muslime in Deutschland und Westeuropa. Es war daher notwendig, andere Minderheiten für die Bedrohung verantwortlich zu machen.
You don’t even read the evidence and prefer to stubbornly maintain your false myths.
If you are seriously against so called Antisemitism, why are for for Arabs then? Clear contradiction.
2nd point: Arabs are themselves also Semites (you cannot know that, right).
Here are your hero’s fruits:
google images for: Gaza children
https://www.google.ru/search?q=gaza+children&biw=1280&bih=640&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwil_ufW2cHNAhWFvxQKHbuyCFgQ_AUIBigB
And once again for the 10 thousands’ time:
/uman-ukraine-israeli-hasidim-attacked-journalists-police-fires-shots-threw-stones-glass-bottles/comment-page-1/#comment-251769
Jews != Zionists!!!
jews against Zionism
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=jews+against+zionism
Jews Against Zionism And Rothschilds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awCOSRg-gks
Orthodox Jews protest against Zionism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IapWP8hq9Mc
Jews against Zionism -True Torah Jews
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOfmRyxdMKQ
New York City: 10,000+ Jews Against Israel (U.S. Media Blackout)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMQ9C6vni0w
“”””” Martin from Soviet East-Berlin on June 23, 2016 · at 1:47 pm UTC
Dear elsi, Jonathan and Carmel by the Sea,
sorry for the delay, but at the moment I’m too much involved in my unpaid software project work and at the same time too many discussion threads actually expect my response, so I rather didn’t respond anywhere.
And also here only in short: Yes, I have nothing against Jews because of racial motivation. In fact my first Ukrainian girlfriend in 2003 is jewish. Also remember how I repeatedly defended and promoted Sarah Wagenknecht as being the only good politician in all of nowaday’s so called “Germany”. Also I promoted videos that you find on yt when searching for “orthodox jews against zionism”.
Then again: I hate Jews like I hate Muslims like I have Christians like I hate all sects and all so callled “religions”. Just like I hate all fanatic people and just like I hate stupid german hooligans which I sometimes see in tramway or bus.
Not because of their skin-color, but because of the idiotic nonsense they are wasting their brains (?) with.
As for Tunesia: elsi, you yourself admit that there *is* the problem that I mentioned. Maybe not the location (Tunesia) was the reason, but your age and clothing at the time when you visited Tunesia. Of course if you are over 18 and clothe yourself like a mummified gray granny in black all-body-prisons then you have less problems. Is that because Musilms are showing bad behaviour only in Tunesia? Or may there be another reason? I also know other Arab countries and had similar experiences in Egypt when traveling with a european lady from Alexandria to Luxor in the 1990ties. At the time we had Coptian Christs as friends there. But the muslim men in the train behaved like dictators and one of them wanted to sleep on the seat behind us and he shouted like a maniac that we shall go away because he wanted to turn the seat so he can use “his” side as a bed. Fortunately this didn’t work for technical reasons because it was the first row of seats in the coach and there it was not physically possible to turn it around (unlike in all other rows).
This doesn’t mean that all Muslims are “bad”, in Romania of the 1980ties I experienced similar things. This also doesn’t mean that all white or all non muslim men are good (as seen with the barbaric child-murderer and women-beater last week).
But if you are in a muslim crowd things are almost garuanteed to turn badly.
Once again: *forbid*, *outlaw* and legally prohibit *religions*.
As Jonathan said in:
“”””” Jonathan on June 22, 2016 · at 7:23 pm UTC
What a pity that the days of a secular, socialist, anti-imperialist, nationalist pan-Arab state, as promoted during the time of Gamal Abdel Nasser seem to be so far in the past.”””””
We need a Leninist/Marxist Stalinist Soviet System worldwide.
Otherwise: This world’s days are numbered.
Оргия Праведников. Наша Родина – СССР
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwAXO7IzomU
Вся мощь СССР в одной песни
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op0_yIIjRcw
And yesterday I talked you a young Russian lady at the supermarket.
I experienced the same again as every time: She is from Russia and speaks Russian, English and German, comes from the Kaukasus.
I asked her why she quit Russia.
She said Russia is not a nice country, she is not proud of being a Russian and she prefers Capitalist Germany.
When I told her that it is my biggest dream and highest goal to be a Russian and to speak more fluently in Russian, she pointed her finger at her head and couldn’t believe it.
I responded harshly that she is a traitor.
But as said earlier: It is hopeless.
When I started to praise Communism she ran away.
Judging from her eyes she must have thought I’m not quite normal. Maybe I escaped from some ill-programmed time machine.
Ah, btw: The man working in the supermarket and cashing in the money is also a Russian, and the couple behind me were also a Russian lady (35) and her mate (45 to 50).
The Russian diaspora watches western liars-TV and enjoys the entire capitalist dirt.
The younger, the worse.
Don’t count on them!
“”””””
Meanwhile back at the ranch the crumbling of the West continues and they will try to take everyone with them:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/06/23/the-slow-crash-when-global-economies-are-run-by-banks/
rt –
The world needs a “modern, non-bloc collective security system,” said Putin. “Russia is open to discuss this crucial issue and has more than once shown its readiness for dialogue, but, just as it happened on the eve of World War Two, we do not see a positive reaction in response.”
So, if the United States and its European allies are decidedly reluctant to refashion a new international security arrangement, what does that mean?
The obvious conclusion is that the proponents of NATO are not primarily motivated by maintaining security through cooperation. NATO proponents are more interested in perpetuating Cold War ideological divisions in the world that revolve around a mentality of “us and them”.
Pleasantries !? On the contrary to understand a conversation one must understand the language, in this case the language of diplomacy. For example ‘ strategic’ means generally military and specifically nuclear …… Allies is again a term to be read in the context of above. Read it again .
The Chinese economic and political system are deplorable and no country should ever try to emulate them. Modern Chins offers no alternative to the so called “decadent” west, no matter how disgusting the western economic and political order has become…..
China has a dictatorial political regime that still describes itself as “communist”, but in reality has nothing in common with marxism, socialism , and communism. Party commisars are simultaneously billionaires who have profited by doing business with the West while they maintain tight control over population
Chinese economy is an oligarchic capitalist economy that caters to western multinational corporations (at the expense of Chinese consumers and workers). The so called Chinese economic miracle occured because western industry moved into China to take advantage of the low labour costs. It is not endogenous development. Millions of Chinese workers are exploited as slaves at sweatshops ….
And what about the values of Chinese people as opposed to the westerners ? China has a long history and traditions but is not immune to degeneracy. Globalist trash culture has taken inroads at China. The medium and upper class of China is far more consumerist and capitalistic than westerners. They have idolized western brands and spend huge amounts of money to buy every worthless crap that multinational corporations produce. They send their kids to expensive private colleges to show off . They really love gambling and spend thousands at casinos.
But China is important.
As a trade partner, they are willing to trade with anyone and everywhere as long as money are available. They don’t care for the political stance of the countries. On the other hand, US and EU would punish with sanctions any country that diverts from the “western” way of doing things. So China is somewhat valuable to any country that wants to resist NWO.
But that’s all. Anynone who thinks that China is an emerging world superpower is delusional.
China does not have the means to become a world power and offers no alternative. China is an active promoter of neoliberalism and more global trade . Chinese capitalism is not only supplementary and vital to the globalist economic system , but also is
far worse than western capitalism (even though there is convergence now as quality of life in western countries gradually becomes worse for the sake of economic globalization )
Unfortunately, the world is unipolar and the system of neoliberal globalization has taken over.
The myth about the “BRICS” collapsed . BRICS were countries with huge natural wealth and population but of limited sovereignty, immense poverty and third world economic development.
There was no multipolar world emerging
Only Russia differs somewhat because of the soviet legacy and the military superpower status even though Russian industry and geopolitical power were decimated in the 1990s and have not recovered
george c comment earlier.
This is the standard zionazi (for leftwing consumption) propaganda meme used to dissuade people from viewing actions from a target of zionazis in a positive light and discourge people from thinking there are alternatives to zpc/nwo fascism.
It’s a common propaganda ploy used by zionazis against Iran to demonise that country and by zionazis to demononise Russia.
A way to tell these zionazi-bots apart from genuine critics is to look at the content of their posts. Is it general bs of the sort vomitted regularly by the Jewish owned run “western” msm propaganda machine, or does the criticism embody detailed specifics, researchable, accurate documented factual data?
That is usually the main determinate, the more clever will attempt to sound more sympathetic and offer unsound advice as well.
Michel Chossudovsky “How the West Re-colonized China”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxFSvPUY_oc
Takis Fotopoulos, “BRICS and the myth of the multipolar world”
http://www.inclusivedemocracy.org/journal/vol10/vol10_no1-2_BRICS_and_the_myth_of_the_multipolar_world.html
I am not a “zio-nazi” and I do not endorse the current state of affairs in the world. Just because the globalist neoliberal system is barbaric, it does not mean that we should look up to China’s system as an alternative. China’s capitalist system is not only very bad but also it is integrated into the Globalist system.
There are other alternatives to the NWO dictatorship but the Chinese system is not one.
China is integrated into the NWO and its role was vital for the emergence of the NWO globalist economy. The de-industrialisation of the West happened because all these multinational corporations cooperated with the Chinese regime and relocated their operations in China to take advantage of the abundant and very cheap labour force.
During Mao, China’s economy was centrally planned state owned and based on soviet practices. Foreign trade was minimal and China was not integrated into the global economy.
Nowadays, China is a huge sweat shop for multinational corporations where hundreds of millions of Chinese people are exploited. The welfare system of the Maoist system has been dismantled. Social and income inequalities are staggering, working conditions are awful, political freedoms are
non-existent.
We should look for other alternatives. Unfortunately, there is no country today around the world that offers something different.
Totally agree.
george c
Essentially all your 2nd comment does is repeat what you wrote in the first, with the inclusion of a couple of links, of which the 2nd one argues for a strong Eurasian union to counter the zpc/nwo in the “west”.
I’m no more impressed with your general repitition of the zio-media “bad China” meme that I was the first time.
First the conditions in China are greatly exaggerated by the zio-media, you accept those exaggerations as “fact” and base your demonisation on these exaggerations.
2nd, your characterization of the Chinese establishment as an integrated part of, and subordinate to, the western oligarchy is factually false. The reality is of all the countries, China probably has the most independent control of themselves and their destiny. The western oligarchs may use Chinese industry to further their own enrichment and control at home,, but they have failed to gain control of China and remain, still, outsiders looking in and drooling. This is especially true of the zionazi oligarchy (the zpc).
While there in no multi-polar world yet, it is this Chinese independence of zpc control that will eventually bring a return to a multi-polar world.
Will a multi-polar world, brought about through an independent China usher in a new era of freedom, democracy and social justice? Unknown. Will the mono-polar mess run by the zpc and their fellow fascists that we have now ever bring these progressive changes? We’ve seen how its continiously gotten worse and more bee hived. It will only get worse under this freakshow and the chance of the zio-media zombified people under this zionazi dictatorship ever rising up is literally zero.
Inappropriate sentence removed — mod-hs.
I would kindly suggest you to get a Chinese visa and pay a visit to the country. I don’t mean to do sightseeing as a tourist but to talk to regular Chinese people. Only by then, you would know how absurd your nonsense is.
By the way, Chinese government always insists: so-called “China model” is NOT universal and every nation should find its own way to prosperity. On the other hand, Francis Fukuyama now has already dropped his famous “the End of History” claim exactly because of the success of “China model”.
If, as you claimed, China is controlled by any West political or financial power, why would the US even bother to try so hard to contain China?
World people have great confidence in the vision of the President Putin. We as human fallow great leaders, in our times Putin is the best.
Fantastic Interview.
Whilst everyone in the West is distracted by Brexit – the SCO and Pres. Putin’s visit to China were very successful. Onwards and upwards.
I find it staggering that the US has chosen to destroy these two vast nations joining in opening up the globe and to one another. That the efforts to get ready to destroy both lands is because they are joining in a multi-lateral, not a uni-lateral way!
These plans illustrate how disfunctional Western governments have become, frankly suicidal.