Rabbi Dov Lior, a senior authority on Jewish law in the Religious Zionism movement, asserted recently that a Jewish woman should never get pregnant using sperm donated by a non-Jewish man – even if it is the last option available.
According to Lior, a baby born through such an insemination will have the “negative genetic traits that characterize non-Jews.” Instead, he advised sterile couples to adopt.
Lior addressed the issue during a women’s health conference held recently at the Puah Institute, a fertility clinic. His conservative stance negated a ruling widely accepted by rabbis, which states that sperm donated by a non-Jew is preferable to that of an anonymous Jew, who might pose a genealogical risk.
“Sefer HaChinuch (a book of Jewish law) states that the character traits of the father pass on to the son,” he said in the lecture. “If the father in not Jewish, what character traits could he have? Traits of cruelty, of barbarism! These are not traits that characterize the people of Israel.”
Lior added identified Jews as merciful, shy and charitable – qualities that he claimed could be inherited. “A person born to Jewish parents, even if they weren’t raised on the Torah – there are things that are passed on (to him) in the blood, it’s genetic,” he explained. “If the father is a gentile, then the child is deprived of these things.
“I even read in books that sometimes the crime, the difficult traits, the bitterness – a child that comes from these traits, it’s no surprise that he won’t have the qualities that characterize the people of Israel,” he added.
‘Kids born to single moms become criminals’
Lior condemned artificial insemination and sperm donation in general, saying that they lead to waste of sperm, unclear genealogy and other Jewish law offenses. He warned against undergoing intrauterine insemination at hospitals, where the workers may mix sperm samples for one reason or another – a major halachic violation.
On the subject of women who freeze their eggs to use at a later date, the rabbi asserted that instead they should concentrate their efforts on getting married younger.
“Our public has been influenced by a part of the Western culture in which every woman, instead of becoming a mother, needs to get a Masters Degree,” he lamented. “The role of women – child rearing – is not less important than an academic degree.” Lior noted that there is nothing wrong with attaining a profession, but it should not be a priority.
Moreover, the rabbi spoke against single women getting pregnant.
“We can understand the desire of every woman to have a child, but according to our Torah it is impossible to address the demand of a certain woman when it can cause someone else suffering,” he said.
“If a child is born without a father, he cannot be 100% normal.” He stated that rabbinical literature defines these kids as “criminals and subjects of other negative phenomena.”
To be fair you could find equally toxic statements from Islamic extremists if you wanted to.
@Anonymous: really? ok, please share some links with the rest of us.
You are going to have a hard time since Islam teaches that there is one Islamic ‘Umma’ in which all races and ethnicities are united and equal. Islam being absolutely non-racist, to claim that Muslims would speak of “Muslim semen” as different or superior to “non-Muslim semen” is absurd.
But, please, don’t let me deter you from hunting for such quotes on the Internet and, should you find them, share them with us ;-)
“what character traits could he have? Traits of cruelty, of barbarism!”
I’d like to see what this guy defines as cruelty… or barbarism. How rich.
From Angry Arab
New TV in Beirut just aired an audio tape with mini-Hariri and his chief of intelligence, Wisam Hasan, and German Hariri investigator, Gerhard Lehmann, and…the FAMOUS FALSE WITNESS, MUHAMMAD ZUHAYR AS-SIDDIQ (the most famous of the false witness who has woven so many fabrications about who was responsible for the Hariri investigation and who has been aided by French intelligence and Dubai intelligence). The significance of the audio tape can’t be overstated: this will officially put the last nail in the coffin of the Hariri tribunal. Hariri has officially denied any knowledge of the “false witnesses” and in this meeting he seems to be receiving orders from Siddiq himself. Now we know why the Hariri camp has been fiercely opposing the demand by the opposition to refer the “false witness” matter to the Justice Council in Lebanon. Of course, the testimony of Saddiq was the only reason why the “four generals” were incarcerated. Now you see why I never bothered to take the Hariri tribunal seriously. It was a joke before it was formed by an Israeli/US decision. This is the biggest gift to Hizbullah for the new year. Expect a press conference by Nasrallah this week.. Any chance you could get the speech if and when Nasrallah makes it. thanks
@anonymous3:Any chance you could get the speech if and when Nasrallah makes it.
My understanding is that the speech is scheduled for Sunday evening Beirut time. I am confident that I should get a copy within a couple of days. If I do, I will most definitely publish it here.
@VINEYARDSAKER:
They don’t use racial terms but they do use ethno-religious terminology differentiating between Muslim and non-Muslim and a separate code of ethics.
Exhibit E – Islamic Guidelines for Individual and Social Reform
Islam’s egalitarian spirit is conditional on being Muslim.
That is why Islamic society has a history of slavery and sex trafficking and why insurrections are being waged against non-Muslims in every corner of the world in the Mid East, China, Russia, India, Philippines, Balkans, Thailand and Africa which military action and aggression being sanctioned by Muslim scholars.
http://www.network54.com/Forum/84302/thread/1082834921/Fetwa+of+Yusuf+al-Qardawi+about+Jihad+in+Chechnya
@Jack: are you Jewish? You parrot all the doubleplusgoodthinking anti-Islamic propaganda of the Israel lobby, you even use the same sources….
Seriously,
Seriously, you say that Islam differentiates between Muslims and non-Muslims. So?! Every single religion does that. What you probably meant to say is that Islam socially discriminates between Muslims and non-Muslims. And here you are correct. Even the “people of the book” (Christians and Jews) are given apartheid-like 2nd class status in Islamic societies. They are heavily discriminated against in the courts, and in their civil rights. Furthermore, they are heavily over-taxed. Historically speaking, the worst offenders were the Ottomans who also forcibly converted Christians to Islam, and who even kidnapped children for use a shock-troops in their military. As for the Wahabis and Co. their is no limit to their religious intolerance. This is all true.
HOWEVER….
However, with the exception of the Ottoman Empire, the 2nd class status of dhimmis in Arab/Muslim countries was at least one of GUARANTEED 2nd class, meaning that it would get worse than what that 2nd class entitled to. This is in sharp contrast of the policy of the Western Christendom in general, and the Papacy in particular whose entire 1000 year history could be summed up in a single slogan “conversion or genocide”. When the Croat Fascists declared that 1/3 of all Serbs should be converted, 1/3 expelled and 1/3 exterminated, they were following exactly the same policy as the so-called “Holy See” and ordered the Teutonic Knights to apply the Orthodox Christians in the East. Western Christendom has ALWAYS had a policy of “conversion or genocide” for not only all other religions, even for other CHRISTIAN religions. All of that, ad majorem Dei gloriam of course.
So if you want to make the ‘inventory’ of Islamic sins, then at least put it in context and compare it with the similar inventory of Western Christendom. You spoke of the Crusades. Have you ever read what the Crusaders did when they entered Jerusalem? Witnesses describe that there was blood ‘ankle-deep’ in the streets. You probably don’t even know what the Crusaders did in Byzantium, the 1000 year heir of the Roman Empire.
Barbaric Franks, the greatest of which (Charlemagne) could not even sign his name (!), pillaged plundered and murdered a 1000+ year old civilization just as they plundered the Arab Muslim civilization in Jerusalem. Make no mistake, modern Barbarians like the dumb and ignorant Yanks you see today in Iraq plundering this 5000 year old civilization are not aberrations, they are the DIRECT continuation of the equally barbaric Franks who epitomize the pompously misnamed Sacrum Romanum Imperium Nationis Germanicæ.
As for the book you quote as evidence, its nothing but a low level Wahabi brochure who says as much about Islam then some Southern Baptist of Evangelical Cult would say about Christianity. If you really want to understand Wahabism, then at least read Ibn Taymiyyah or Sayyid Qutb. And I mean read what they actually wrote, not what some camel herder thinks they wrote, or what AIPAC or MEMRI want you believe that they wrote. And once you are done with that, then CONTRAST what these guys stood for what what, say, a Shia Ayatollah Khomeini or a Sufi like Abul Hasan al-Shadhili wrote. And maybe then you will realize who stupid it is to lump of Muslims into one group.
(continued below)
(continued)
Frankly, it is obscene for a Westerner to dare to criticize Islam. Did you forget that the Franks did such a great job of destroying everything they could get their hands on that only the re-discovery of the ancient Greeks THROUGH ISLAM allowed the modern West to have a modicum of culture, however artificial, superficial and shallow. Had it not been for Islam the Western Europe would have remained a cultural wasteland forever.
It is hilarious to hear West Europeans claim that their cultural roots are in ancient Greece. What a total lie! Your roots are in the Frankish cultural wasteland and the modern Yankee Empire is really just another version of the Regnum Francorum (except that for the last couple of decades it got hijacked by Zionist Jews, just to make it even worse than it used to be!)
BYZANTIUM had its roots in Rome, which had its roots in ancient Greece. West Europeans destroyed both Rome and, eventually, the 2nd Rome – Byzantium. Islam, for all its faults, is a least a real civilization. Franks, whether modern or ancient, were always the ultimate anti-civilization.
Yes, there are Muslim terrorists out there. And yes, the Wahabis & Co. are crazy lunatics every bit as nasty as evil as the US propaganda says they are. But never forget that the West is far more of a terrorist Empire than all of the Jihadis in history put together, and the if Wahabism is a sick and demented ideology, it is a kindergarten prank compared to such products of Western ‘civilization’ as the Papacy, Marxism-Leninism, National-Socialism, or Capitalism.
So please, please, spare me your self-righteous bashing of Islam in particular with such vacuous accusations as, of all things, sex trafficking and slavery (like the West is not the Ueber-sex trafficker and Ueber slaveholder of the history of the planet).
When looking at the faults of Islam, whether imagined or real, Western folks should bow their heads in shame and shut the fuck up! Or, as Christ said it Himself:” And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye”
(conclusion)
and now, to end its disgraceful history, the Western Empire has done one of two things (pick your interpretation)
a) become a host for a Zionist parasite using it for its own racist and genocidal purposes.
or
b) formed an alliance with the racist and genocidal Zionists.
At least the Muslims are RESISTING both the Western Empire and the Zionists. Yeah, I know, most so-called “Islamic regimes” are really puppets for the West and Tel-Aviv, but at least the vast majority of Muslims out there have enough brains to reject the constant stream of Zionist propaganda which Westerners never seem to have enough of!
There is no Western Hezbollah or Western Nasrallah out there. Scratch this, this might be asking for too much. But there is not even a Western “Iran” or a Western “Ayatollah Khamenei”.
All you have is a Pope looking like Count Dracula who used to cover up pedophile priest seriously pondering the first official beatification of a CIA agent.
That, or a bunch of illiterate and dumb Protestant preachers thumping their Bibles while making millions of dollars from their equally dumb and illiterate flock.
No, Westerners have to right to criticize Islam, none whatsoever, because no matter what you accuse the Muslims of, a short look in the mirror will always show you a far more guilty (and unrepentant!) criminal.
The Saker
@Jack:
“That is why Islamic society has a history of slavery and sex trafficking and why insurrections are being waged against non-Muslims in every corner of the world in the Mid East, China, Russia, India, Philippines, Balkans, Thailand and Africa which military action and aggression being sanctioned by Muslim scholars.”
The usual neo-antisemitic sophistry peddled by Jack. First, he confuses “Muslim” with “Islamic”: two very different things. Muslims are like anyone else, good, bad and in-between. “Islamic” refers to that which is sanctioned by Islam, and that does not include “sex trafficking”. And the slave trade was a universal (and deplorable) practice, whose worst instantiation — chattel slavery — is a product of the European mind, in the name of Christianity. (Of course, Quakers and other later Christians led the abolitionist movement in the West as well).
According to the Prophet of Islam (S), the slave traders are a class upon whom the curse of God has descended.
Israeli gangs are at the heart of Euro-sex-trafficking today: Does that make Judaism evil?
As for insurrections, most places Jack mentioned are areas where Muslims have been traditionally independent and subject to relatively recent imperialist subjugation and/or repression.
And Muhammad bin Jamil Zino was an insignificant, paid Wahhabi, and Wahhabism itself is an aberrant virus which maintains relevance today only due to the corruption of Saudi oil money, their unfortunate control of the Muslim holy lands — a relatively recent phenomenon –, and the support of the US. Otherwise even Sunni Islam rejects Wahhabism.
Anyway, I don’t know why I even bother …
VINEYARDSAKER:
are you Jewish?
No.
In fact international Jewry support Islamic terrorism and genocide against Serbs and Russian and Orthodox Christianity.
The later leading Trotskyite Jewish Zionists Neocons run their entire western propaganda unit not to mention the Russian Jewish Israeli oligarchs and the Georgian Israeli Oligarch that conspired with western intelligence and Chechen terrorist/separatist regime to annex Russia’s South and gain control of the Caspian oil industry for British oil interests.
http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/American_Committee_for_Peace_in_Chechnya
And bring up Islam’s historical roots is meaningless I am talking about the here and now of contemporary political Islam and it is a fact that they work with western intelligence as an international mercenary unit some of which are on the direct payroll of private military contractors like MPRI or British intelligence linked Sakina Security Services until 2001 of training in camps inside the US.
During the 90’s billions of dollars came flooding in to Russia from Muslim countries and organisation trying to Islamise and train Russia’s Muslims which fortunately was squandered by local intermediaries.
http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&div=7999
you even use the same sources….
I would use Russia source but the criminal regime doesn’t release any information including the international sponsors of Chechen terrorism from 1991-2000 master terror list of 60 Islamic organisations involved in financing terrorism in Russia.
What mainstream news article and US court case material?
This is the same mass media that constantly tell us there is little or no foreign Islamic terrorist presence or network in Chechnya and the issue is just about “nationalism” and Putin wanting to control the Chechen oil (which I will admit is partially true but is more to do with Dagestan than Chechnya) despite the overwhelming evidence that every single major terrorist attack since the Embassy bombings in 98 has a clear and obvious Bosnian-Chechen connection.
Madrid train bombing was organised in the Panski Gorge.
If you want to make a credible issue then you should point out the fact that international Jewry leading by the Neocons support Islamic terrorist/separatists movements around the world when it suits US geo-political advantage except when it affects Israel and its sphere of influence.
@jack: you are hopeless, I am sorry to say. You write And bring up Islam’s historical roots is meaningless I am talking about the here and now of contemporary political Islam and it is a fact that they…..
First, you were just clearly told by anonymous that Islam/Islamic and Muslims are two different concepts. And yet you write “political Islam they”.
As for the refusal to consider what is happening today in the light of its historical context, that is EXACTLY what the NATO “Franks” told the Serbs: stop it with your endless historical references, we don’t care. we are only talking about today, about now”. Every time a Serb tried to educate the NATO Franks about history, every time they rejected it out of hand as irrelevant. You do the same.
Logically, since you are unwilling or unable to look into the history of Islam and the history of Muslims, you have absolutely no problem conflating it all into a single “Islamic/Muslims” category and, since history does not matter, neither do facts, right? So you can parrot anything the Zionists say, no matter how utterly absurd, and, as we say in Russian, “get out of the water dry”.
Jack, I am sad to say that you exemplify the attitude which says “don’t confuse me with facts, I already have made up my opinion”. With a typically Frankish aversion and disdain for history, you can only press on with an endless stream of finger-pointing and oversimplified generalizations (the “Islamic sex traffic” ‘argument’ being just one amongst many other examples). Let me put it simply: I don’t believe that you will convince anybody on this blog of anything other that you have no idea what you are talking about.
BTW, I am also coming to the inevitable conclusion that no matter what I would say to you, no matter what argument I would present, I would not even dent your total certainty that you know what you are talking about.
Your posts here began with an accusation about Hezbollah being a terrorist organization and ended with a general reference to an “Islamic/Muslim sex traffic”. I hate to break it to you like that, but you are really making yourself look ridiculous with this kind of nonsense. So make yourself a favor, stop your rather lame “Islamic/Muslim” bashing campaign, at least on this blog. Try maybe learning something or, if that is not an option, than at least go and preach somewhere where the audience would applaud. I just don’t see that happening around here.
My 2cts, of course, and if you find it productive to post anti-Islamic/Muslim invectives here, then I guess carry on and have a blast!!
Good nite!
The Saker
@jack: one more thing, I am just curious: how old are you?
Muslims are like anyone else, good, bad and in-between. “Islamic” refers to that which is sanctioned by Islam, and that does not include “sex trafficking”.
True but it is only Muslims that are receiving billions of dollars and part of a global network without that they would not be a threat.
What about harems?
The Ottoman Empire had a sex slave industry and today Russian, Ukrainian and Moldovan girls are trafficked to Mid East countries like Dubai.
At least the Muslims are RESISTING both the Western Empire and the Zionists.
No they don’t they are fighting for them.
Since 79 Muslims have fought in wars that expand US hegemony that conveniently help US and EU oil companies that bypass Russia and used as a pretext for foreign US military expansion.
@VINEYARDSAKER:
Jack, I am sad to say that you exemplify the attitude which says “don’t confuse me with facts,
But I have provided you with the facts above straight from the horse’s mouth with the written guidelines from the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, et al.
Your posts here began with an accusation about Hezbollah being a terrorist organization
They were are terrorist organisation when they were operating in Sarajevo against the Serbs training and helping the terrorist Izabegovich regime to conduit offensive terrorist operation against Serbs and non-Muslim civilians as well as attacking UN personal and false flag attacks against there own people. .
If they were simply a resistance organisation they would not be fighting in foreign conflicts which they have no business of being involved.
The simple fact is that in every corner of the world today Muslims are fighting non-Muslim whither it be Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Orthodox and Catholic Christians and atheists.
Even in Palestine Hamas a Muslim/Islamic organisation was promoted by Mossad to undermine Marxist aligned Palestinian nationalist movements the same can be said of the entire Mid East.
Muslims are adherents to the Islamic faith or I’m I wrong?
Here’s the dictionary definition:
Mus•lim /ˈmʌzlɪm, ˈmʊz-, ˈmʊs-/ Show Spelled
[muhz-lim, mooz-, moos-] Show IPA
adjective, noun, plural -lims, -lim.
–adjective
1. of or pertaining to the religion, law, or civilization of Islam.
–noun
2. an adherent of Islam.
3. Black Muslim.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/muslim
Israeli gangs are at the heart of Euro-sex-trafficking today: Does that make Judaism evil?
Yes it does if they have a history of it which Jews do and is sanctioned in the Talmud which it is.
And we are not facing an international Jewish terrorism threat presence in 50 countries.
The predominant sex trafficking gangs today are Muslim Kosovo Albanian gangs.
one more thing, I am just curious: how old are you?
Why?
@jack: Why?
Just to see if my guess that you are very young is correct. You very much remind me of myself as a teenager ;-)
=====
True but it is only Muslims that are receiving billions of dollars and part of a global network without that they would not be a threat.
=====
That’s ridiculous enough on the face to not require any rebuttal.
======
What about harems?
======
What does that have to do with anything? In any case, the “harem” was a part of the Byzantine culture of royalty and not invented by Muslims. Sure, Muslim emperors and kings — among others — adopted the lifestyle of the harem; the Chinese arguably took that lifestyle beyond anyone — the Forbidden City — so what’s your point?
The rest of your quips are just as ill-informed — among other falsehoods they are largely based on the treatment of Islam and Muslims as monolithic –, but this one
=======
And we are not facing an international Jewish terrorism threat presence in 50 countries.
=======
just made me laugh myself silly. Do you know anything about international Zionism? [eg, the fast evacuation of the Mossad outpost in Tunisia, but I suppose the Muslims who kicked Bin Ali out were terrorists too … In Trinidad — just a small island –, the police now wear a star-of-david emblem, and the Police Commissioner is not even a Trinidadian but a Canadian zionist]
Why, oh why, do I bother … ok, time to take another long break from this …
Jack o Jack… Why is that people always use negative examples to attack others… Heck, do you hear anyone saying the cocaine trading is a Christian thing because some countries in the Americas are in it? Ottoman philosophy was (and is) the Turkish-Islam synthesis. What most Arabic states have today is again synthesis such that the religion serves the national/racial identity and interests.
Is Islam was so bad how come Saladdin was recognized for his fairness and decency by the westerners?
Saladdin’s fairness, decency, and idealism costed the Kurdish nation a great deal but that’s a different story…
Zerkes
@anonymous 17:18:the “harem” was a part of the Byzantine culture of royalty
Uh? Where did you get that information?
Byzantium was strictly monogamous, so I don’t see how harems could exist there. Besides, is the word harem not a variation on the Arabic word haram which means “forbidden’?
As far as I know, only Judaism and Islam were polygamist, Christianity was always monogamist.
Am I missing something?
@Anonymous
Jack o Jack… Why is that people always use negative examples to attack others…
Because they behave in a very negative manner at a minimal tolerated by the Muslim community and at the most actively supportive.
We are not fighting a multi-billion dollar international Christian, Buddhist, Jew, etc terrorist threat spanning the globe we are facing an Islamic threat and Islamic terrorist groups.
My criticism is not limited to Muslim I also criticise Jews, the US and my own country far more frequently than I criticise Muslim but Muslims and Islamic insurgent movements are the tool of the NWO who since 79 and especially after the collapse of the USSR making it possible for US/NATO intervention and military presence in places which before seemed inaccessible especially US military presence in Central Asia.
I don’t think Byzantine endorsed harem sex slavery and kidnap women from foreign countries into an Empire wide industry.
@VINEYARDSAKER:
===
““harem” was a part of the Byzantine culture of royalty
Uh? Where did you get that information?
===
This is pretty well known amongst historians who study the era, not an “alternative” or controversial issue. Just research it a little bit :-)
But people often confuse polygamy with the harem; those are two very distinct things. The Ottomans integrated the Muslim culture of polygamy into the harem — and the word itself comes from turkish/arabic — but they did not invent the harem as a royal institution of segregating the family/women’s quarters; that was a Byzantine custom.
Even earlier, Muawiyah, the first Muslim king — and usurper of the rule of Ali — was the first to adopt aspects of the Byzantine (and Persian) harem culture. Anyway, the Ottomans did not keep “harems” themselves till after the conquest of Byzantium.
BTW: A study of Muawiyah the usurper is very insightful for the Muslim/Islamic distinction.
Saker,
In a day or two I will write up how muslims fucked up my country. Will that at least answer a few questions? I am not a Westerner. I belong to a nation which has had to endure at least 700+ years of muslim rule and conversions and rapes and pillaging. For example, one fucker, killed 100,000 Hindus in one day. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timur#Indian_campaign
please dont be a muslim apologist. Also please be reminded I am not talking about Jews or the Crusades or anything. Just reminding you that muslims are not so above the crusades in pillaging or plundering or killing others. I can provide you many many many many more details of our sufferings at the hands of muslims.
@Shashank:In a day or two I will write up how muslims fucked up my country
No problem. I look forward to hearing your point of view.
Please dont be a muslim apologist
Funny how many people cannot understand that I am not a ‘Muslim apologist’. All I care for are two things a) facts b) sound logic. Combined, they for the truth, which is what I care for.
that muslims are not so above the crusades
Here we would probably disagree. I do believe that the Papacy has a historical record which is infinitely worse than the one of Muslim nations.
I can provide you many many many many more details of our sufferings at the hands of muslims.
I have no doubt that you can and I hope that you will, if only for the some of the Muslim readers of this blog who seem to think that Muslims are always the victim.
But frankly, if you had read what I wrote about Muslims more carefully you would have seen that I am not AT ALL an apologist for Muslims or Islam. However, I do find the conflating of all Muslims into one group wrong, both factually and logically, and to speak of one “Islamic movement” or “Islamic world” out there which is somehow united in a nefarious plan to conquer or mistreat the rest of the world is plain nonsense.
I had to debunk some of the rather crude anti-Muslim propaganda posted here by other commentators and to do that, I compared the history of Islam favorably to the West European history. But that hardly makes me an apologist for Islam, I think. Have you ever read what I posted here about the Chechen insurgents, the Bosnian-Muslim leaders, about Saudi Arabia or about Kosovo? I guess not, because if you had you would never have thought of me as an apologist for Islam or the Muslim world.
I do, very openly, admit that I deeply admire Hezbollah and Hassan Nasrallah. And since I like to call myself a “Hezbollah groupie” or a “Nasrallah fanboy” I suppose that this means that I am an apologist for Hezbollah. ok. But I would note that I NEVER consciously lie about anything related to Hezbollah. The fact is that I happen to think that, in fact, Hezbollah are truly heroic people, in the deepest sense of the word. But, believe me, I am quite aware that Hezbollah is a quite unique phenomenon in the Muslim world.
I hope that this clarifies some of your misconceptions of where I come from.
Cheers!
The Saker