By Marwan Salamah for the Saker Blog
American nineteenth-century folklore tells of a young man asking his elders’ advice on what calling he should take up. The answer was a firm “Go West my son and grow!”, or to that effect. The gist of the advice was that the American West was at the time viewed as virgin, not yet settled and built up by the European immigrants. In fact, most of those who headed West did succeed, subject to exhibiting diligence, persistence, hard work, and some luck.
But today, in the twenty-first century, circumstances have changed. The West has matured, competition has increased, and returns have shrunk. Endless series of bubble booms and busts continue to occur and at ever shorter intervals. Classical economics concepts have gradually changed away from a real production economy to a paper economy which is considered by some to be fictitious, unreal, and unsustainable.
Today’s Western economy is dominated by the FIRE sectors (Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate) plus the military industry, all of which have usurped the bulk of the economy’s wealth and income, leaving far too little for the other sectors to survive let alone grow. The result is an alarming rise in extreme inequality with, it is claimed, the top 1% (or 10%) of the population owning the bulk of the wealth and income.
Other sectors have also grown, most prominent are those related to IT and services. But these are highly volatile and high-risk businesses and not all who enter them succeed or remain and prosper. Quite a few have turned into Zombie companies that absorb endless bouts of capital increases in the millions and even billions of Dollars but fail to show a profit.
The great western industry has all but disappeared. It has migrated to China, Asia, and elsewhere, as a result of an erroneous application of the famous economic edict of “maximizing profits”. It was applied exclusively to the short-term with total disregard to its negative long-term implications on both the companies themselves as well as the economy as a whole. The result, among other things, was the stripping of the West’s industrial capability, increasing its balance of trade deficit, creating endless supply chain bottlenecks, and increasing its vulnerability and reliance on the outside world.
Despite the negative description above, the US, so far, remains the biggest and strongest economy and the US Dollar remains the main trade currency, the main reserve currency held by the world’s central banks, and the number one safe haven currency. Also, we should by no means ignore the huge American agriculture capacity that has fed and continues to feed a substantial number of the world’s population.
But at the same, we cannot disregard the huge and important changes that are rapidly occurring elsewhere in the world, especially as most of these changes seem intent on competing directly, commercially and economically with the US and the West. Nor can we disregard the well-published data signaling a shrinkage in the West’s global market share and the gradual erosion of the US Dollar hegemony.
And once we add the increasingly belligerent geopolitical tug-of-war between the US and its allies against Russia, China, and part of the Global South, it quickly becomes apparent that the world is on the verge of a major historic and permanent split into two or more camps.
Regardless of who fares better in the coming split, it is clear that the economic development that began a few years ago in Russia, China, Eurasia, the Far East, and the Global South has been positive and impressive, and is likely to be more so if it continues – and all indications point to its continuity.
On this basis, it is logical to assume and expect a huge growth of business and investment opportunities in those changing countries (East and South), both quantitative and qualitative. Bear in mind that those markets are still more or less virgin in that they have not reached their market or financial peaks and have ample room for additional growth. The crown jewel here is that most of the available business and investment opportunities are in the “real” economy and not fictitious paper or pencil-pushing based. Many comprise opportunities in the industrial and agricultural fields and are thirsty for smart capital. The services, trading, and real estate sectors are similarly poised for development by those with proven know-how and expertise.
It is therefore not surprising to see Turkiye begin, a few years ago, to turn its attention Eastwards, especially after a decades-long frustrating wait for the glorious EU membership approval that never arrived.
But the true attention head-spinner is Iran’s resetting of its compass from West to East. After more than two millennia of looking West, Iran has at long last realized that its future lies in the East. Obviously, the US and West’s animosity, accompanied by an endless series of harsh sanctions, and the unlikelihood of a return to the nuclear agreement has not only tipped the Iranian scale away from the West but pushed it firmly eastwards where it sees a much brighter and mutually beneficial future.
As such, Iran began a couple of years ago with a mega multi-year investment agreement with China worth approx. $400 Mill to develop and upgrade its oil and industry sectors. It then joined several segments of the Belt & Road Initiative (the new Chinese Silk Road) as well as signed a joint venture agreement with India to develop Iran’s Arabian seaport of Chabahar as a main trade transit hub. In the process, it has significantly increased its trade with its northern, eastern, and southern neighbors and the trend appears continuing. On another front, it has recently jointly inaugurated the north-south route from Saint Petersburg through Azerbaijan and the Caspian Sea all the way to the Arabian sea and henceforth to India and Asia. This is claimed to be a very fast and economic route and is another potential competitor to the Suez Canal. And finally, only last week, it signed a batch of agreements with Russia, including one with giant Gazprom to develop its many gas fields.
On the international organizations’ side, Iran joined last year the Shanghai Cooperation Council (SCO), which is an important Asian economic and security cooperation organization. Turkey is a Dialogue Member and new applications are expected from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Egypt. Similar developments are in progress in other Asian and Global South international organizations.
It is clear that the chess board layout is rapidly changing, and opportunities are aplenty. There is no logical reason not to head East and South… remember the early bird is usually well rewarded.
******************
N.B. A BIOGRAPHICAL SUMMARY:
Marwan Salamah is a Kuwaiti economic consultant and publishes articles on his blog: marsalpost.com
He is also an amateur Chef (Middle Eastern, Chinese, and European cuisines), home gardener (Hydroponics & Aquaponics), Herbal enthusiast (Moringa, Oregano oil, etc.), and dabbles in oil painting and sketching.
The West moved to the East confident of a new white conquest, this time technological, but his plans went awry and now he is in serious trouble. And it cannot be solved by killing because the others are also very well armed.
As I read the article it just dawned on me whatever happened to the WTO (World Trade Organization)??? Oh yeah, I had totally forgotten the “collective West” are leading it. Meanwhile China and Russia are leading the rest of the world towards the East.
Nowadays the acronym for WTO should be West Towards Oblivion.
My understandig is that the West haven been beaten in it’s own game, want to change the rules of WHO. Until so happens the US obstructs the functioning of the organization and it is in effect in hibernation/defect.
@iR.47 The WTO is being held hostage, by the “collective West”, until then both China and Russia will continue leading the Global South, with or without the WTO.
That’s gotta be the best one liner of the day. Thanks for The laugh.
One thing even worse than the WTO is the WHO, what is it with these sinister 3 letter agencies. The agenda there clearly is world population reduction via their administration of big pharma nonsense. The common thread with these and many others is that they are captured or designed to be tools for the elites who control the NWO nonsense and who also control the US agenda, one and the same these days.
> … “remember the early bird is usually well rewarded.”
Ah yes, that famous ancient saying: “The early bird gets the worm”. Only problem is: what happens to the early worm? Gotta wonder, among all these earlys, who will be the bird, and who the worm?
In the time of “Go west, young man”, native Americans were clearly the worms. As so many now head East, there will surely be at least as many worms as birds. “New World Order” mutually beneficial, symbiotic relationships are likely to prove, like so many earlier utopian ideas, rather difficult to implement and maintain. Still worth a try, but nobody should expect an easy passage.
^^;;^^
Morcegão
“You Can Recognize A Pioneer By The Arrows In His Back.” :-)
You can recognize a gambler by the cards he shows.
I was taught “The early bird gets the slow worm”, which I thought redundant. But I guess it isn’t: the quick worm gets away and the late bird needs to be lucky.
“Today’s Western economy” … ref FIRE being prime.
This is not so. The description fits US and UK. It does not /yet/ fit the industrial economies of the EU like Germany, Northern, Italy most of France.
This is where Germany is a manufacturing monster while 4x the size US is barely keeping up mostly thanks to the MIC.
Trying to maintain a manufacturing monster status without a supply of good quality reasonably priced fuels is going to be very good trick, but good luck with that.
Germany at 1/3 of US value of manufactured goods. Overachieving but not exactly a world-beater. Manufacturing value added per capita: Germany $8400, Japan $8300, South Korea $7900, USA $7100
https://www.indexmundi.com/facts/indicators/NV.IND.MANF.CD/rankings
About modern manufacturing: I listened to a very illuminating lecture a few years ago by a Professor Goran Roos, who specialised in modern manufacturing. The forum was one sponsored by Caterpillar in Burnie, Tasmania, in an attempt to soften the blow that was them moving their underground machinery manufacturing operation to Thailand. He pointed out that modern manufacturers aimed to make more in spare parts and servicing for their products than from the initial product sale. With that fact in mind, when my dairy farm employers were looking to install a European manufactured robotic dairy I pointed out that they needed to fully understand this aspect and know the spares and servicing aspect of that investment. They have stuck with the herringbone shed, and I know of a number of farmers who have gone back to conventional systems after trying robotics because the cost issues, when combined with the logistical nightmare off being on call 24/7, are unacceptable.
In a resourcce constrained world the next wave of product innovation is going to involve delivering long term value in the form of products that are durable, easily and cheaply repairable and not reliant on highly specialised, proprietry equipment, techniques and specialist employees of a company that may or may not continue in existence long term. Germany, and the rest of the Europena modern manufacturing system is going to have a problem, and charging subscriptions to make your car seat heater work won’t help.
I just brought a “new pump for my small farm”. It was second hand, about 60 years old, and can be repaired by anyone with a lathe. It’s seals are still made of leather. The only place I have seen something similar for sale is Thailand, The man I brought it from said it uses a fraction of the electricity the new, multi-stage centrifugal pump uses, and I know from past experience that after ten years the manufacturers of those pumps stop supplying parts, forcing the purchase of a brand new pump.
Interesting times
I met Göran Roos socially in Paris many years ago.
Car manufacturers have always relied on buying their components at sub-cost prices from suppliers on the understanding that the supplier makes his money later from the spare parts. That is why there are a vast number of non-OE (Original Equipment) manufacturers of things like wheel bearing and starter motors.
I once saw an article that explained how the cost of a car would be a multiple of its price if it were assembled out of spare parts.
BMW making a subscription for things like the car seat heater is ridiculous. We are well past peak complexity IMHO.
There are some (not huge numbers yet,but many) Westerners that have given up on the West and moved to Russia. There are a lot of individual reasons each one would have for that. But it seems to me a common theme I hear about is their rejection of the new “Western/European values” that have abandoned God and Family.
For a while now I’ve followed on Youtube an Australian family that moved to Russia several years ago. They don’t really talk much about their reasons. But I gather that being religious and family orientated was a big factor with them. Their family (or maybe an extended family would be a better description) is a older couple with 3 grown children,one son-in-law,and 3 little children.They had a farm in Western Australia before making the move. And now are living in Novosibirsk in Asian Russia while looking to buy land for a new farm in the Altai region of Siberia.
They have a lot of videos on several Youtube channels (the different family members have their own channels) about their lives in Russia and cover a lot of life in Russia in general. Unlike the overall picture we get from most other reports they give a view of life there from a ground level view. And unlike many Western,and even many pro-Western 5th column Russian channels that dominate Youtube. Their channels are neutral non-political,and just show Russia as it really is for the common people. I’ve been very impressed with what a see from them.
Here are a few sample videos:
East into Siberia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxYhcTbAnIw
Russian veggie garden update
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PtSVzhiAa0
RUSSIAN TOOL STORE | What Can You Buy???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UReu3PDbOjU
RUSSIAN TRANSPORT | What Is It Like?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9cX-xPcItw
Holiday Season In RUSSIA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gvO4T_irj0
Beautiful river, stunning mountains what more could you want (Searching for our farm #4)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPvtugIgk7I&list=PL8GK6JJqCZOnDzJ4AsWZ91odSJMLh-lWD&index=9
Thanks for the links. Your point is a point I would make. The amorality and the demoralisation, the corruption of language and education, and the liberal lunatics.
Who cares about $10 million on your account if you are surrounded by mentally disabled people? Only people with personal disorders would do.
To Uncle Bob
The author appears to me to be asserting a defective analogy. As I understand the article, he is saying that it used to be the case in US that the new yet unsettled world was in the west, i.e., California. (The people who first used that expression were in the Boston area, New England.) Now, he says, it is in the east, RU, IR, IN, CH.
The misanalogy is that when it was said to go west, it was within a given country (that was still not settled), namely, the US. But when this author tells us now to go east, he uses the same starting point of reference (New England or eastern US seaboard) and the world is no longer primitive.
Nowadays, you first have to get passport and visa. You then have to take a plane. There are many impediments now that prevent one from just moving to another country. And there is the language problem and culture shock but set those aside for now.
Do you see my point? By way of example, a US citizen can go to Mexico and stay no longer than 6 months.
So please explain to me how one can transfer their small savings to, say, Moscow and then just get on a plane and make it your new home?
One may be able to get a tourist visa but one cant just stay there. So please explain. Thx
Political refugee perhaps?
“Go west!” was the famous advice given to a young Civil War veteran who wrote to Horace Greeley, editor of the nationally influential New York Tribune. His reply (though not in that familiar form) appeared in the July 19, 1865 issue. The west to which he referred is what we think of today as the Midwest, which was then sparsely settled. The far west was largely unexplored and still in the possession of its original stewards. After decades of obstructionism from southern congressmen, who wanted that land for cotton plantations, Congress was finally able to pass the Homestead Act in 1862, granting a square mile of some of the richest farmland on earth to anyone willing live on it and farm it. How that land was to be settled was perhaps the leading cause of the north-south conflict. The barons of the old south wanted it for their use only, while the voters overwhelmingly approved of barring all blacks slave or free from the new land. The extent and character of antislavery sentiment in antebellum America is quite exaggerated today!
Unhappily, in the corrupt Gilded Era that followed the Civil War, it has been estimated that better than 95% of the federal homesteading lands fell under the control of the northern robber barons who immediately replaced the slaveholder aristocrats as the dominant special interest lobby in Washington.
Correction, it was 160 acres. In the drier West where water was the limitation for cattle grazers, the big ranchers hired ‘homesteaders’ to claim land with water. Once assured of water, the big guys hired more homesteaders to claim land around until they had thousands of acres. Fun times.
One square mile was 640 acres. I thought the deal was “40 acres and a mule”.
I think “40 acres and a mule” was the allotment promised to freed slaves in the South.
I agree that the Go West/Go East image is kind of weak.
“Go West, young man,” was advice given to American citizens regarding territories of their own country, where individual effort promised to pay large rewards.
“Go East, young whoever” would seem to refer to entrepreneurs who can, with fancy financing and cross-border trading and investment networks, take advantage of potential for economic development in underdeveloped countries of Eurasia and the Global South.
Hmmm, I see a small problem here . . .
«the increasingly belligerent geopolitical tug-of-war between the US and its allies against Russia, China, and part of the Global South, it quickly becomes apparent that the world is on the verge of a major historic and permanent split into two or more camps.»
Quite transparently that is the plan of the USA oligarchs, and it is an intelligent and reasonable plan: if there is a single globalized market, then China may come to dominate it in the long term, but if the USA oligarchs can split it in two, take the bigger part, and “contain” China inside the smaller part, the USA oligarchs can continue to dominate most of the world for a much longer time.
The USA oligarchs have to act fairly fast, and indeed they are doing so, to get the bigger slice while they have to power to push the oligarchies of their vassal states commit to their sphere of influence; to prevent for example the UK oligarchs to sell-out to the highest bidder (the UK oligarchs had already started being quite close to the chinese oligarchs). The way they have chosen is the famous “sanctions”: their role is to force ambiguous oligarchies choose between USA “sanctions” or chinese and russian “sanctions”, and for most european and many developed asian countries being “sanctioned” by the USA is far worse than being “sanctioned” by the RF or PRC.
The model is clearly 1946-1991, with some differences: with the RF as the weaker junior adversary, and China as the stronger major adversary, rather than vice-versa, and with some third-world states as partially in-between, in part because they don’t matter. It worked pretty well for the USA oligarchs.
For Americans, Mr. Salamah’s direction East is still direction West. Across the Pacific to India and Asia. For Americans, to The West is the shortest way to “The East,” which is a descriptor coined in Europe for Europeans because of their geography. Columbus’ mission was to find a westward passage to what for Europe was and remains The East. Because of their geography, Americans look West to find India and Asia.
“Middle East” also is a descriptor relative to Europe, not to The Americas, who again, look West to find India and Asia. Americans have tried moving eastward to reach The East and that has always been an unhappy experience for everyone concerned. That is because Americans’ “going East” is, for them, a retrograde movement, an unhappy movement. Forward movement for Americans is “going West.” Still.
The fundamental divide in US foreign policy — I reference sane people, not the oligarchs who simply want to tear up all the nations so they can build an entirely new world order, one they own — is between those who think of India and Asia as East — that is, vectoring from The Americas across Europe and The Middle East — and those who think of them as West — that is, vectoring from The Americas across the Pacific and Indian Oceans. General MacArthur thought of India and Asia as West. General Marshall thought of India and Asia as East. Far more American officials today, and for decades, think of India and Asia as East than think of them as West. But this is one reason for those officials’ lack of respect among Americans, who see India and Asia as West because the underlying mentality of American civilization has always been and will always be westward-looking, just like the Magi, who came from The East to Jerusalem at their West.
Several geo-political commentators here and also the author treats West and East, as if they were just equal competitors for the same cake.
There is a serious difference: Perfidious Albion, LGBT culture, Financial Usury Economy, Water Boarding, Bioweapons, Head-chopper assets, Deliberate Culture destruction, which the other part still dont have and try to resists.
I did not pick up that the author here views East and West as competitors for the same cake. I take him observing — and I believe accurately — that a new cake is being baked “in The East” and that opportunity there beckons “cooks” and their suppliers and distributors.
You seem to want a fight for scarce whatevers (cake) that one set of nations deserves none of because of their badness and, presumably, another set of nations deserves all or at least most of because of their goodness.
That type of historiography goes in circles.
Rarely these days do I read an essay which is so clear, concise and spot on. Thank you. Yes, this piece reminds me of an old Steppenwolf song called: “The Monster”. How prophetic of John Kay to write a song over fifty years ago that mirrors the west {especially the USA} today. The FIRE elites mentioned above know the west has seen it’s best days, and are at present picking the last bit of meat from the bones, for they are truly vultures. They moved the bulk of their investments east twenty years ago. There is nothing REAL to invest in besides farm land in the US, that is why everything else is a casino. Then there is that other speculation: Cryptos. Is it just a coincidence that the words: Cry {because that is what people end up doing that “invest” in this scam} and: Crypt {the place where money goes to die}. Westerners don’t invest anymore, they speculate {gamble}. That is a mark of a system on it’s deathbed.
That 25 year Iran-China deal is worth $300 Billion, not millions. A typo, sir, I understand/believe you are aware of the correct sum.
Irán-Persia junto con China y la India conforman las tres grandes civilizaciones milenarias que han sobrevivido hasta nuestros días, por ello no tiene ningún complejo de inferioridad respecto a un Occidente recién llegado que apenas ha cumplido 500 años. Es Rusia la que desde siempre y hasta ayer mismo ha deseado ser aceptada en Europa como un miembro más, recibiendo continuos desprecios y rechazos. Esperemos que esta vez haya aprendido la lección definitivamente. Go east tovarish, mira al futuro y abraza a los pueblos más civilizados.
Translation. Mod:
Iran-Persia together with China and India make up the three great millenary civilizations that have survived to this day, so it has no inferiority complex with respect to a newly arrived West that has barely turned 500 years old. It is Russia that has always and until yesterday wished to be accepted in Europe as another member, receiving continuous contempt and rejection. Hopefully this time he has definitely learned his lesson. Go east tovarish, looks to the future and embraces the most civilized peoples
Despite what western propaganda says, Russia (geographically) is still a part of the Europe, ever was and forever will be. The core of the Russia’s nation is still Slavic and Christian and is much closer to European culture than to the Asians. Not that this would stop Russia from relations with Iran, India and China either way…
Europeans are just North Western Asians, their supremacist’s thinking can come to the logical conclusion that there is no geographical separation with the European peninsula and Asia, it’s all one full land mass and continent, therefore only six continents not seven. If Christian makes you a separate continent, then you might as well make Muslim Asia, Hindu Asia, Buddhist Asia, or Confucianist Asia separate continent, or split Africa in to two continent Muslim North and Sahara Sahel Africa, and Christian Animist Sub-Sahara Africa. Call Europe a region, peninsula, maybe like India a sub-continent, but not a real continent.
Thank you for the article.
But it raises an issue that I’m surprised no-one has touched on.
The advice to go west, now east and south, should be a reminder of the essential parasitism of the global economic structure. What happens when there’s nowhere else to go, when all corners of the earth are developed?
All awards and prizes for economics should be suspended until plans can be produced for a healthy no-growth economy.
I won’t hold my breath waiting for that day however, as I suspect that such an economy would be based on cooperation rather than competition, a concept beyond the understanding of the current clowns in charge.
Its not current, its always been that way since they roamed the open seas, its just been rolled over until now. Where you are right, the cliff is just around the corner for the speedy train, it was an interesting story, but its all over now.
I beg to differ Al, when I grew up in the 50s and 60s the masters of the universe were realists – they knew the limits of their power.
The current crop of clowns have been raised on free-market lies and US exceptionalism, they know nothing else, and so they actually believe the bullshit.
It was a tough world during the cold war, but it was never this messy. They lurch from crisis to crisis on a daily basis, and they create each crisis.
Their power of what limit? To extract easy oil on someone elses land and use it to bolster their limits. They were no more real than the taxes they levied on their citizens.
I agree about the compounding of problems since then, but the same system has been applied since the formation of the Fed, and what you are witnessing is the directional confusion of the western monetary system and who floats their inflationary crisis boat the least.
“What happens when there’s nowhere else to go,
when all corners of the earth are developed?”
The Human species wins the Darwin Award supermax!
We know how to avoid that.
“… economy would be based on cooperation rather than competition,
a concept beyond the understanding of the current clowns in charge.”
If you look outside of america and europe,
you will see a lot of places where clowns are not in charge.
Look to the not-clowns and learn.
Europeans are raiders. Chinese are traders.
Raiders believe in zero-sum games : Me win; you lose.
Me get all your toys and your woman and your daughter; you die.
Traders know both sides need to know they got a good deal.
This is why the Chinese keep singing, “Win! Win!”
I can remember, 60 years ago, when I first read about “Game Theory”. Look it up in wikipedia.
The paper started by exposing the games one should never play. The paper was very clear that the players can agree to change the parameters : the players can always change the outcome from “I win, you lose” to ” we share”. The paper again stated that if the other player refuses to negotiate, you should refuse to play.
It is always possible to negotiate : latin “nec otium” = “no nasty”.
I had a bit of a life change then. When I got back to reading math papers, “Game Theory” seemed to have collapsed to two games : “Zero Sum” and “Prisoners Dilemma”. Both of which are trivially avoided. Both of which are proclaimed to be unavoidable.
Bullies like to proclaim “Zero Sum” Games, at least particular configurations which happen to favour them, are inevitable. Prosecutors and priests prefer particular “Prisoners Dilemmae” which favour them.
When they proclaim, “There is no alterative!”, they are lying.
When they claim to be real stupid, they are lying.
Manufacturing value added per capita figures could be very misleading. They are high in countries where most of industrial production don’t have to compete hardly at all with foreign production. If priced of houses are high then technically construction industry can have very high value added even when houses are quite the same as built in other countries with much cheaper prices. We are talking about home market prices very different in let’s say USA and China or India.
China produce 52-54% of world’s aluminium and steel. In real competition China would wipe out most western construction industrial sector too. Not just e.g solar panels, mobiles, tablets etc.
Energy consumption figures are quite well telling where global economic activity is (numbers, million Mtoe) :
China 3,652
United States 2,123
India 927
Russia 811
Japan 400
Brazil 308
South Korea 298
Canada 289
Germany 286
Iran 274
France 235
Indonesia 226
Of course Canada and Russia have their colder climate factor (increasing it 40-60%).
China is consuming and producing now 80% more electricity than USA. Its construction volume is likely 10 times bigger than USA has.
Vraiment bien apprécié votre article Mr Salamah. Ça va certainement m’aider à planifier mes choix pour moi et ma famille.
Harfang67
“remember the early bird is usually well rewarded.” The second mouse gets the cheese!
Go West, go East, go North, or go South? If you like the geography of your current place, why leave? Why not stay and struggle to change that which is motivating you to leave in the first place.
Leaving is merely a form of escapism.
What you will find in your choice of places to escape to, will have it’s own issues as well. Rest assured.
I would have added PIGS, the Pride, Integrity and Guts Sector as one of the growing industries. The rich man’s gang, the police.