Shortly after the Stuxnet attack on the Iranian nuclear facilities made headlines, Barack Obama was announcing an update of the US cyber war policy. As far as I recall, he was threatening anyone who would dare to attack the US by electronic means with military retaliation: murder, bombing, nuking. It seems to me that this was evidence of an evildoer who mirrored his own criminal conduct on potential opponents.
Hillary Clinton did change neither the US cyber war policy nor the perception of the US regime as the land of Mordor. We shall not forget that the NSA’s business is to hack’em all. Accusing thrid parties of hacks into US servers and private computers seems a bad joke, given that these systems are/were probably owned by the NSA. I am still stunned how naive governments can be when generously funding secret services, believing these services won’t spy on them first. What else shall they do to secure steadily growing funds?
I also think that if Hillary Clinton gets elected, a shooting war against Russia will be likely. However, I am confident that Russia will be able to shove the US “with love to Russia”-hardware mostly down the throats of the attackers. Bon appétit.
I really don’t know how much clearer it can be. If Killary is elected the Worlds people need to prepare for massive wars. Probably ending in Nuclear War. The odds are more than 50% ,that is whats coming.
For this reason people should consider or look into moving to other parts of the world, or at least more remote areas, assuming they have the means to do this…
I would recommend South America. That is where I’m heading if it looks like war is certain. We’ll probably have a few months to see the clouds coming before the war.
Full on nuclear war means you live a little bit longer if you move. Radiation from bombs and many nuclear power station and nuclear storage ponds will flood the planet.
In Peter Dale Scott’s American Deep State he devotes a paragraph or two on how the presidents, even dodgy ones like W, have resisted the worst tendencies of the deep state. It is difficult to see how someone with brain health issues, someone whom Trump called “weak” will have the fortitude to prevent catastrophe. On the other hand, like Gollum in The Lord of the Rings her venality just might save us.
US politicians like Clinton calling for war on Russia, but the think tanks are calling for war on China.
What chance is there the US won’t start WWIII in the next year or two? No shortage of “threats” that need to be destroyed by military force.
Looking at comments under various guardian articles, the US has near total support for a war on China, but not for a war on Russia.
So I guess the coming war is most likely to start in the SCS.
Now, all that said, I am SURE, that nuclear conflict is on our way.
What you need, if You’re not within like 20 klicks from an epicenter is plenty of plastic sheeting, water and food for about a month, gasmask(s) with plenty of filters and some guns’n’ammo.
Tape! The glue of civilisations! Good tape and rope.
You set.
You come out in two weeks and there is plenty of sh!t laying around.
Smells abit, but hell, it starts to smell like food after a while.
Then, you build Hiroshima and do not let in anyone, who would destroy her.
Shortly after the Stuxnet attack on the Iranian nuclear facilities made headlines, Barack Obama was announcing an update of the US cyber war policy. As far as I recall, he was threatening anyone who would dare to attack the US by electronic means with military retaliation: murder, bombing, nuking. It seems to me that this was evidence of an evildoer who mirrored his own criminal conduct on potential opponents.
Hillary Clinton did change neither the US cyber war policy nor the perception of the US regime as the land of Mordor. We shall not forget that the NSA’s business is to hack’em all. Accusing thrid parties of hacks into US servers and private computers seems a bad joke, given that these systems are/were probably owned by the NSA. I am still stunned how naive governments can be when generously funding secret services, believing these services won’t spy on them first. What else shall they do to secure steadily growing funds?
I also think that if Hillary Clinton gets elected, a shooting war against Russia will be likely. However, I am confident that Russia will be able to shove the US “with love to Russia”-hardware mostly down the throats of the attackers. Bon appétit.
I really don’t know how much clearer it can be. If Killary is elected the Worlds people need to prepare for massive wars. Probably ending in Nuclear War. The odds are more than 50% ,that is whats coming.
For this reason people should consider or look into moving to other parts of the world, or at least more remote areas, assuming they have the means to do this…
I would recommend South America. That is where I’m heading if it looks like war is certain. We’ll probably have a few months to see the clouds coming before the war.
Full on nuclear war means you live a little bit longer if you move. Radiation from bombs and many nuclear power station and nuclear storage ponds will flood the planet.
Well according to eschatology (Christian or Muslim), you will have a better survival rate in Syria than in Europe or the US.
@ Anony
Also it is not about “living longer”, but also about the survival of your offspring assuming you have any.
Thinking similarly. Have you checked out any specific countries?
K
Argentina,Chile,Uruguay,Ecuador,might be some to look at.
No .This part of the world is full. Stay where you’re and change your government for the better.
In Peter Dale Scott’s American Deep State he devotes a paragraph or two on how the presidents, even dodgy ones like W, have resisted the worst tendencies of the deep state. It is difficult to see how someone with brain health issues, someone whom Trump called “weak” will have the fortitude to prevent catastrophe. On the other hand, like Gollum in The Lord of the Rings her venality just might save us.
US politicians like Clinton calling for war on Russia, but the think tanks are calling for war on China.
What chance is there the US won’t start WWIII in the next year or two? No shortage of “threats” that need to be destroyed by military force.
According to various prophecies, WW3 will not be “nuclear”.
( e.g. : http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/profecias/esp_profecia07c.htm )
Thank you for that very thought provoking link. I never heard of Mitar Tarabich before.
Looking at comments under various guardian articles, the US has near total support for a war on China, but not for a war on Russia.
So I guess the coming war is most likely to start in the SCS.
At this point let me make a kinda jest, but really:
http://www.angelfire.com/ca4/yourturf2/HiroshimaandDetroit.htm
Now, all that said, I am SURE, that nuclear conflict is on our way.
What you need, if You’re not within like 20 klicks from an epicenter is plenty of plastic sheeting, water and food for about a month, gasmask(s) with plenty of filters and some guns’n’ammo.
Tape! The glue of civilisations! Good tape and rope.
You set.
You come out in two weeks and there is plenty of sh!t laying around.
Smells abit, but hell, it starts to smell like food after a while.
Then, you build Hiroshima and do not let in anyone, who would destroy her.
Vote for the krookid one then?
Good p!an?
Whatcha say?