In the meantime, Google engages is some “oh so subtle” homo-propaganda

Canada’s response, lmao. http://www.buzzfeed.com/maycie/canadas-response-to-russias-russias-anti-lgbt-propaganda-law

Google has become a very tiresome propaganda outlet.

Consider: did Microsoft or Apple ever exploit their position to blanket the public with their owners politics?

Google, however, has turned its Doodles into a regular propaganda vehicle. They used to be a rarity, now every other day the company sends some message to its users.

I’m trying to imagine going into J.C. Penny in the 80’s and every other shopping trip encountering unavoidable signs proclaiming some political cause. I can’t imagine it.

Bezos is a big supporter of gay rights, but he hasn’t used Amazon.com in the same way.

Google seems to feel that since they’re the last remaining search engine, they can convert us all to their politics.

its not russia that is abusing gays with laws…its a US ally: QATAR thats doing so

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2013/10/08/peter-tatchell-fifa-has-no-option-but-to-cancel-qatar-world-cup-over-tests-to-detect-gays/

Qatar: 150 beatings with a stick, Uganda: life in prison, KSA Beheading, Emirates: chemical castration.

Propaganda in W Europe has gone over the top: a growing segment is getting very fed-up with the never ending attention about gays. People now want to root for their national heros.

Most people are not anti gay, but only a small fraction is willing to spend time and energy to fight for their cause. In Holland many TV hosts are openly gay (and a disproportionate percentage in government is jewish)

Gays almost have the same iconic status as jews

Salut Saker,

A bit off the subject, but I thought you and others on this blog might enjoy this excellent article on Dieudonné and his saga against the zio-crazy mafia!
http://www.maskofzion.com/2014/02/dont-laugh-its-anti-semitic.html
Thanks for the good work and all your great articles and analyses.
BTW, thanks also for this address you gave earlier :
http://www.romanity.org/htm/rom.03.en.franks_romans_feudalism_and_doctrine.01.htm
Excellent reading for anyone who wants to have a larger perspective on christianity.
From a dedicated reader.
RMJ

And then we have the clown and US stooge Bang Ka Boom holding a torch with gay-gloves, making inflammatory speeches in support of Sorosian peddled perversities to Russian children.They should have fired him from that mission on the spot for disrespect of the Russian host and interference in Russian internal affairs.

Who made him his redicolous gloves anyway? His Saudi Arabian partner?

@RMJ: salut l’ami!

BTW, thanks also for the link you gave earlier :
http://www.romanity.org/htm/rom.03.en.franks_romans_feudalism_and_doctrine.01.htm
Great reading to get a wider perspective on christianity.

Wow, I never thought anybody would appreciate – nevermind thank me – for this link. I think that the core thesis this article (that Franks never became Romans but that they exterminated Romans and then took on their name) is so totally unacceptable for a majority of the public in the West because of the huge implications it has. Think of it, that means that the roots of Western Civilization are not in Greece or even Rome, but in the Frankish Empire. All these grand statements about Ancient Greece being the cradle of European civilization is absolute bullshit. Next, the Latin Church is not Roman either. It is also Frankish. Amazing, no? And then the fact that the Roman civilization continued to exist for a full *thousand years* after the Fall of Rome is also ignored. That is for the political aspect.

From the Christian aspect there never was a schism between East and West, but one between the Frankish “north” and the Roman “south” and that nowadays the folks sitting in the Vatican are not heir of the Roman Empire and civilization, but of the Frankish Germanic Empire.

Blows your mind, don’t it?

No wonder most folks can’t handle this :-)

All this just to say that I am really happy that you found it interesting!

Cheers,

The Saker

Salut Saker,

Well, it was not an easy read, especially the parts dealing with the doctrinal aspects, but, yes, it does dramatically change the perspective on history. Always good to lose a few illusory concepts and gain a fresher look on things!
BTW, have you ever heard of a book called Vie et mort des Chrétiens d’orient, by Jean-Pierre Valognes (not his real name)? Just barely stated reading it. Of course he holds the traditional view on Greeks and Romans, but there’s seems to be lot’s of info in there. I just wonder if you had an opinion on it (a negative one would spare me a lot of reading… It’s thick!).

Thanks!

If I were Putin, I’d happily introduce a new Olympic sporting discipline to kill off most of the planet from sheer laughing: “Western monkey competition” in which the participants — exclusively Westerners — behave like Pu55y Riot with regard to their body apertures while at the same time reading some Corporate Media Horseshit aloud (VERY loudly). Putin greets the winner!

I think what is needed is not just information exposing what’s going on and more blogging, but concrete steps people can take within the Anglo-Ziosphere to start undermining the power of these forces. Why not organize coordinated operations to subvert them just as they subvert others? I find it somewhat pathetic that so many people talk about the problem so much but take so little action. Any suggestions?

@ChessMaster:I think what is needed is not just information exposing what’s going on and more blogging, but concrete steps people can take within the Anglo-Ziosphere to start undermining the power of these forces. Why not organize coordinated operations to subvert them just as they subvert others?

Because that is “their kind” of warfare whereas we need to fight “our kind” of warfare. As a (now former) military analyst I can tell you that one of the most important rules of warfare is to never accept the kind of warfare your enemy has chosen. Everybody is best at “something” and that “something” is most likely to be something your opponent is better at then you. So what you must do is play by a different set of rules. This is why there is no such thing as a “Hezbollah Air Force” or “Hezbollah tank battalion” – because that would be a dream come true for the Israelis. Likewise, when this moron Saddam attempted to fight the USA in a combined arms operation in the desert he literally made their dreams come true. What we need is a way to bring to life the worst nightmare for our imperial overlords, not make their dreams come true. Subversion, terrorism, violence – this is what they love. But use humor like Dieudonne and they go in a hysterical panic mode. Break their laws, no matter how stupid, and you just made their day. Be a law abiding citizen and they hate you. Crucially – accept a debate carefully framed by them and they win each time, CHANGE THE TERMS OF THE DEBATE and REFUSE TO PLAY BY THEIR RULES and they freak out. Does that make sense? Do you see what I mean? We will never “out-CIA the CIA” – so let them play their little subversion games. But all the might of the AngloZionist Empire is right now completely unable to deal with the Soral+Dieudonne phenomenon. Just like the entire Soviet Union could not defeat one man: Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Or the entire British Empire could not defeat Gandhi. And the Pharisees and the Sanhedrin could not prevail against Christ. Their weapon has always been violence, corruption and deception. Our power has always been “one man and the truth” which I believe really is one man + God. This is why Saint Seraphim of Sarov said “Save yourself, and thousands around you will be saved“.

To prevail against your enemies requires that you first stop acting like they do. Breaking their operational paradigm is the key to breaking free from them and, eventually, breaking their power.

I hope that my reply makes sense to you.

BTW – what is your chess rating?

Cheers!

The Saker

Emerald, look again at what VINEYARDSAKER wrote especially the quote from Saint Seraphim of Sarov who said “Save yourself, and thousands around you will be saved”.

Does that imply the need for leaders? You are your own leader, maybe that is what is more needed. Live a life as you would want it and not as the AngloZionists want. Another way to look at this is that “Change starts with ones self” or “to lead by example”.

To much we have relied on leadership and we are constantly let down by such people. They say the right things but they do not practise what they preach. It is time to turn our backs on said people and be our own leaders. Our future with combination of decentralised technological developments point to this path. Localised living in a networked world. Direct Democracy, community participation, de centralised crypto currency not born of debt and valued on terms of human worth not debt slavery. We are at the precipice of great change and we can forge a much better world. One where people are treated with respect and nature and environment as well.

Work for this and be inspired by the likes of Snowden, Assange, Satoshi, Gadaffi, Jesus, Ghandi and others that struggled for a better way via living their example. Were they all perfect, no but perfection is something to strive to even though, like infinity, it can never be obtained.

Justin.

A bit off-topic, but nice:
Russian Skieres Show Real Olympic Spirit
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2014/02/russian-skieres-show-real-olympic-spirit.html

Hi Saker:

I bookmarked the piece you referenced
Franks, Romans, Feudalism…..
I was talking with my hubby about it
and he said- search first reich and it was interesting what came up
even at wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reich

the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation, which lasted from the coronation of Otto I as a Holy Roman Emperor in 962 to 1806, when it was dissolved during the Napoleonic Wars;

related?

and yes I am reading the piece now, to my husband also
:)

Justin and Saker:

At my blog when talking about what we can do as individuals to jam up the machine…

I extol always the virtues of doing your own thing.
Being the change you want to see
and not ever relying on any leader
the moment there is a leader, there is corruption
Forget about a leader, wanting a leader or looking to a leader.

But what to do?
Take your clues from what and where the ptb’s are pushing us towards
cashless society= use cash
food dependence = food independence
grow some food

barter/trade

– I hate the smart phone technology which I equate with slavery

smart phones = stupid people

plus all that wifi radiation horrific for people

yes technology has a place
but what place?
isn’t it time for humanity to think about that?
before we lose that opportunity

live mindfully
be cognizant of your choices

etc.,

” It is time to turn our backs on said people and be our own leaders.”

It is long past the time.. but no time is better to start then right now.

And forget about movements, identifying with one and here I am thinking of the truth movement

we don’t need a ‘movement’ we need ourselves ( to change) and to cooperate with our neighbours

from their everything will move outward

I cannot understand why people as individuals, cooperating, do not understand or grasp the scale of power they really have

It is this belief that we are ‘powerless’ and in need of leaders that keeps us down and enslaved

It is time to stop now

@Penny…

It would be great if you would let yourself be stunned by the Heavenly Wisdom preserved in the Orthodox Church. “Amazement is the beginning of philosophy” said Socrates/Plato. Then there is a long and arduous way ahead to Salvation, which would require a great personal effort and perseverance.
All the best,
WizOz

One comment on an Italian blog on the Google header says it reproduces the rainbow coloured banner widely used by the lgbt/gay movement (call it what you will)

@Penny:

Dear friend, allow me to begin with the very words you used: Please don’t take what i say as an insult in any way… It’s not intended as such. Having said this:

You are making a series of logical mistakes.

1) You are assuming that your experience in the Latin Church (I have decided to stop using the word “Papacy” as this offends some people) gave you an insight into “organized religion”. It did not. It only gave you an insight into the Latin Church

2) By using the term organized religion you assume that this category makes sense. However, since organized religion could include everything from Tibetan Buddhism to the Inca worship of Pachamama, to Shinto to Ubanda to Satanism this is just not a term which allows you to operate a useful discrimination between various phenomena. In other words – it is highly misleading.

3) By speaking of “organized religion” you imply the logical possibility of UN-organized religion and that can only mean one thing: each person makes up his/her religion. Which is fine, except for one major problem: if all contradictions are accepted as equally valid then there can be no truth. So UN-organized religion is by definition false.

4) When you write “When I think of the person I was then, I am much more happier, interested, intelligent and inquisitive now. you are implying that the purpose of religion is to make you happy. That is a mistaken view, especially when applied to happiness in this world.

5) you are overlooking the possibility that amongst the hundreds of religions out there one, just ONE, might be true. Think of it this way. There are 10 people in a room. They are asked how much 2+2 equals to: the first person says 1, the second says 2, the third says 3 and so on. Clearly, for one question there are 10 different answers. Is it right to conclude from that that there is no answer or that all of these answers work as long as they make those who proposed them happy? Does that misleading approach not obfuscate the fact that one person in the group (#4) actually gives the RIGHT answer?

Again, I can only commend you for rejecting the Latin Church and all its clearly false teachings. But I urge you not to throw away the baby with the bathwater.

Though, for the record, I will say that this is one of the reasons I loathe the Latin Church so much: most of what is does is turn away good people from ALL of Christianity. So, in a way, dear Penny, by rejecting ALL of Christianity and even all of “organized religion” you are allowing the Latin Church to further victimize you. Don’t let them do that. You succeeded in freeing yourself from a lot of the Latin Church’s evil – don’t let them “win” in the end by completely turning you off any kind of religion!

Kind regards,

The Saker

@Penny: it should certainly not make one feel oppressed?

Yes, it can give you joy and even blissful, in the sense of Blissful are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blissful are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted. Blissful are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. Blissful are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled. Blissful are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy. Blissful are the pure in heart: for they shall see God. Blissful are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God. Blissful are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blissful are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.” (“blessed” is a bad translation of the original Greek μακαριος). Also, a true religion should give you real freedom, in the sense of “and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free”. I think that unlike the perverted and distorted message of the Latin Church, true Christianity is all about truth, bliss and freedom :-)

I see the creation in nature

Of course. And since nature is creation as are we, it should not be worshiped because this would be “horizontal” worship, from creature to creature rather than from creature to Creator.

I appreciate that honesty.

Awesome! Thanks. I just feel like the lucky owner of a fountain of cool and fresh water in the middle of an arid desert trying to share my water with others and convince them that my water does not come from a poisoned well. But since all the wells my fellow desert-dwellers have see in their lives have been poisoned, toxic and disgusting, they are afraid to approach and drink…

[ok, getting off my soapbox now, going to grap a good coffee]

Take care, my friend, and thanks for being here,

The Saker

From my understanding I see the biggest problem in the world that people are not able to:

See what is Truth and what is Lie. ( they even feel is is lie, but they embrace it, because it has advantage, short term)

Can not differentiate between Good and Bad. ( for the very bad cosequences from this failure)

This world helps to relativize the choices and postpones the result fro these choices for some time.
But not for ever.
People will face the consequences personally, sooner or later.

Mart

Saker:

” By speaking of “organized religion” you imply the logical possibility of UN-organized religion and that can only mean one thing: each person makes up his/her religion.”

When you speak of a UN organized religion? What do you mean?
I have heard/read this talk before, a OWO religion.
But, I am of the mind that the OWO religion is here
And it is the love of money and all that is material. Also something I notice that is very prevelent -immediate gratification

What do you mean when you speak of a UN organized religion?

When every you have time to answer I will check back
thank you in advance :)

Hi wizoz

thanks for replying.
I just didn’t want to offend you in any way….(hence the apologetic tone)

” I was speaking of the experience of the Orthodox Church which is infinitely more profound than that of the Roman-Catholic one, which in fact cut herself from the source of the Spirit, following to closely the ways of the World.”

I have been listening to the series on Youtube that saker linked and I get the concept from the discussion

and your comment
“9 Now the works of the flesh are evident, which are: adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lewdness, 20 idolatry, sorcery, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies, 21 envy, murders, drunkenness, revelries, and the like; of which I tell you beforehand, just as I also told you in time past, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.”

I see this in terms of the Triune brain- my experience colours my understanding

sigh…
promise me you will keep on commenting
and I promise you I will keep on reading
deal?

@Penny:When you speak of a UN organized religion? What do you mean?

I did not mean “UN” as in United Nations. I meant “UN” as in unorganized. Disorganized. Non-organized.

What I meant also is that religion has to be organized by definition unless it is a complete farce. Think of it, religion is about true/false and that means that it has to put conceptual and behavioral boundaries amongst people. You cannot take the law of karma seriously and at the same time think that doing harm to others does not harm you. Religions cannot accept the kind of “free for all” which modern society seeks to promote and any religion which would have more than one participant would have to organize itself to avoid complete chaos. So in reality all religion is organized religion. Does that make more sense now?

Cheers,

The Saker

Hi Saker

yes that makes more sense now
I thought you meant some kind of UN united nations religions
so I was scratching my head a bit
but thank you that is much clearer
:)

@Penny…

You are right. The main target is Orthodoxy, viz. the Right Faith. A Church is Orthodox as long as it preserves and transmits (this is the meaning of Traditio) the Faith as it was given by the Christ. People can have “right”, correct beliefs, or wrong beliefs. When it started to innovate, to replace the Tradition with their own subjective beliefs it became a heresy (the mening of “hairesis” is school, like in “the school of such and such teacher). The Roman Church started to innovate long ago, under a strong Judaizing inspiration. In fact, today the doctrines it peddles are far remote from the teachings of the Christ. In actual fact it betrayed the Christ and became the spearhead of the attack on Orthodoxy, precisely because its military organization and militant spirit.

Platon…

The tripartition of the soul is integral to the Christian doctrine. It is integral to all Traditions.
Cheers,WizOz