Russian Media (Ukraine/Russia)
- Китайцы сняли мультфильм о саммитах ШОС и БРИКС в Уфе (Source) (Video Source)
- Командующий ВМС Украины подтвердил превращение Одессы в базу НАТО (Source)
- Американский генерал: Украинцы передают военным инструкторам США опыт борьбы с русскими (Source)
- Украина превратится в большой радиоактивный могильник (Source)
- Украина легализуют рынок торговли человеческими органами (Source)
- Саакашвили играет роль «великого комбинатора (Source)
- Генсек Совета Европы: Особый статус Донбасса нужно закрепить в Конституции Украины (Source)
- США не могут справиться с «трансплантологами» из Косово (Source)
- В ближайшем к Мариуполю украинском городе местный лидер «Блока Порошено» погорел на взятке (Source)
- Паника в США. Коллапс доллара (Source)
- Плоды национального Майдана: на Украине тиражи украиноязычных изданий упали ещё больше (Source)
- История Украины за 2 минуты :: Показывайте по украинским группам, особенно молодежи (Video) (Source)
- Американский журналист Майкл Бом прямо и цинично унизил украинцев! (Video) (Source)
- Источник: группировка войск России на Новой Земле удвоится к 2020 году (Source)
- Украина и Коломойский в одной яме: дефолт ПриватБанка и Ощадбанка неизбежен (Source)
- В 17-й танковой бригаде ВСУ назревает бунт (Video) (Source)
- СМИ: Наливайченко оформил статус участника АТО (Source)
World Weekly SITREP
- Can Missile Defense Counter Russia’s Nuclear Saber Rattling? (Source)
- MP Gavrilyuk: Ukrainian government is being subverted by a gay conspiracy [ENG Subs] (Source)
- БРИКС освобождается от ЛЖЕ доллара Читайте далее (Source)
- Переданные Киеву пленные: «Очень поменялось мнение и взгляды» (Source)
- Appeal of a Ukrainian priest to people of Armenia | Eng Subs (Source)
- The End of the European Dream | Eng Subs (Source)
- US-Saudi War on Yemen: Abdel-Malik al-Houthi’s Message to the Yemeni Resistance (English Subtitles) (Video)
- Julian Assange’s The World Tomorrow: Hassan Nasrallah (E1) (Source)
- Chinese cartoon about the BRICS/SCO summit (Funny) (Source)
- Sensational confession of Ibran Mustafic, Bosnian Muslim war veteran and politician: We were killing our own people in Srebrenica(Source)
- The Srebrenica Precedent (Source)Viewed from a humanitarian standpoint, the US response to the Srebrenica massacre was a lethal fiasco. But despite the ugly facts of the episode, a mythology emerged from Srebrenica that emphasized the supposedly benign character of US intervention. In this telling, US policy was the savior of the Bosnian people and the defender of human rights more generally.
Twenty years later, Srebrenica is still shaping US foreign policy. NATO interventions in the Balkans served to legitimate both the Atlantic Alliance and US hegemony, and the new language of human rights and genocide prevention has helped justify later interventions, including the ongoing strikes against ISIS. A truly pivotal event in the post–Cold War era, Srebrenica helped forge a pro-interventionist alliance of both militarist liberals and conservatives. This alliance remains a potent lobby for war to the present day.
- Why Did Russia Veto British Resolution on Srebrenica? (Source)Most Western media reacted in a propagandistic manner and bashing Russia by implying that it is supporting “the genocidal policies of their traditional allies Serbs”.
But what were the British motives?
Genuine concern for human rights and peace and stability in the Balkans?
Or a cynical chess move in a cunning geopolitical game currently unfolding in the Balkans between the west and Russia?
- Russia Vetoes UN Srebrenica Genocide Resolution (Source)
- How the US military plans to neutralize Russia (Source)The new military strategy of the United States, which now includes Russia in the list of top threats, indicates that Washington is trying to maintain its global influence that was established after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
- Someone Pull The Plug Or This Will End In War (Source)
- Grandmaster Putin’s Golden Trap. Part 3.2 The battle for Eurasia (Source)Has Links to
Grandmaster Putin’s Golden Trap. Part 1,
Grandmaster Putin’s Golden Trap. Part 2.1 The dollar and the world economy
Grandmaster Putin’s Golden Trap. Part 2.2 Why Keynes was wrong about gold
Grandmaster Putin’s Golden Trap. Part 2.3 The Sino-Russian Golden Alliance
Grandmaster Putin’s Golden Trap. Part 3.1 Sticks and no carrots
- Confessions of a combatant: Joining the LPR militia, surviving an airstrike, battlefield psychotherapy (Source)
- Russian Army to re-activate the 10th Guards Tank Division close to Ukraine’s border (Source)
- Russian Army forms 9 CBR Regiments (Source)Translated from Russian by J.Hawk
The Russian MOD Press Service Directorate announced on June 29, 2015, that its Chemical, Biological, Radiological Troops formed nine new regiments.
“The current development of CBR defense forces is aimed at ensuring they are capable of reacting to all possible threats–radiological, chemical, and biological,” said Major General Igor Klimov, CBR Troops deputy chief.
In his words, currently the Armed Forces have a well-prepared CBR forces grouping capable of fulfilling missions in pursuit of national interests.
“One should note that only in 2014 combined arms armies received nine new CBR regiments,” Klimov underscored.
In addition, the four separate CBR brigades assigned to military districts had their structure optimized.
All military units and organizations established information security subunits.
“Between 2016 and 2020, the organization and structure of units and organizations belonging to CBR Troops will be perfected in order to carry out the CBR mission to protect Armed Forces groupings engaged in armed conflicts and local wars, and to counteract emergencies and conduct applied science research (chemistry, biology, biochemistry, genetics, biotechnology),” Klimov noted.As CBR Forces receive new types of equipment, its formations will adopt new organizational structures.
J.Hawk’s Comment: There are lots of stories which go viral that probably shouldn’t. “Sound and fury signifying nothing.” Then there are stories like this one which are of genuine import. Standing up new military formations is not done on a whim or as part of a fad, given the expenditure of resources such initiatives entail. Talk is cheap; military restructuring and expansion is not.The fact that we are seeing more than doubling of Russia’s CBR forces in a very short time indicates that the military and national leadership is anticipating a distinct possibility its armed forces might find themselves, at some point in foreseeable future, operating in a WMD-contaminated environment. That’s the only possible explanation of a move on such a scale. Of course, the big question is whether Russian forces are expected to operate under conditions of radiological contamination caused by their own or NATO tactical nukes, but that’s a question we can’t really answer without finding out what kinds of wargames the Russian General Staff is playing these days.
This is not the first such report in recent weeks. Earlier ones included the formation of the 1st Guards Tank Army and the establishment of Assault Sapper units, both of which point toward a certain offensive-mindedness of the Russian Ground Forces. As does the above news report.
- The United States Air Force and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) successfully tested the latest version of a nuclear bomb that was originally developed in the early 1960s. (Source)
- Pentagon Concludes America Not Safe Unless It Conquers the World by Paul Craig Roberts (Source)
- US military tests dummy nuclear bomb in Nevada (Video) (Source)
- Who Whom? By Rostislav Ischenko (Source)
- Russia, Ukraine and U.S. Hegemony (Source)A great deal about the nuclear threat is known and is accessible. In his song, ‘Talking World War III Blues’, Bob Dylan attributed to Abraham Lincoln, “You can’t fool all the people all the time.” Simply demonizing Russian leader Vladimir Putin shuts out dire facts about the actions and intentions of the U.S. and its allies.
- The Financial Attack on Greece: Where Do We Go From Here? By Michael Hudson (Source)Once an economy is fiscally crippled by (1) not having a central bank to finance government spending, and (2) by limiting government budget deficits to just 3% of GDP, the economy must shrink. A shrinking economy will mean fewer tax revenues, and hence deeper government budget deficits and rising government debt.
The ultimate killer is for the ECB, IMF and EC to demand that governments pay their debts by privatizing public infrastructure, natural resources, land and other assets in the public domain. To compound this demand, the Troika have blocked Greece from selling to the highest bidder, if that turns out to be Gazprom or another Russian company. Financial politics thus has become militarized as part of NATO’s New Cold War politics. Debtor economies are directed to sell to euro-kleptocrats – on terms financed by banks, so that interest charges on the deal absorb all the profits, leaving governments without much income tax.
- Political Sellout in Athens. Prime Minister Tsipras Surrenders, Ignores the “OXI” Vote (Source)
Popular Greek sentiment on Troika imposed austerity is clear and unequivocal. Last Sunday’s referendum left no doubt. Voters overwhelmingly said “OXI” – “NO.”
Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras ignored them – despite pledging no more austerity, calling the referendum, publicly urging Greeks to vote “no,” and by implication indicating he’d support the will of the people. It’s up to millions of long-suffering Greeks to decide what’s next – accept more austerity harshness or refuse by committed, sustained mass activism for new governance serving all citizens equitably and fairly, not just its privileged few.
Tsipras agreed to over $13 billion more in budget cuts harming ordinary Greeks most, especially those least advantaged. His proposal is very close to what Troika officials demand – popularly rejected overwhelmingly last Sunday to no avail.
He agreed to higher VAT taxes on most goods and services hitting ordinary Greeks hardest – including processed foods assessed at 23%. He held out for a lower rate for “the most remote” Greek islands – what Troika officials oppose. Whether they’ll bend remains to be seen.
They demand a uniform rate throughout the country – unjustifiably claiming a separate administrative system anywhere raises expenses.
Pension concessions were made, but not entirely – 2012 legislation mandating more cuts than already won’t be implemented until October 2015. Creditors want it in force immediately.
Tsipras caved entirely on raising the retirement age to 67 by 2022 as well as phasing out a “solidarity grant” to poor pensioners by December 2019. They’ll be less able to survive on their own than currently.
Greece seeks $59 billion in new bailout funds – the third request since crisis conditions erupted. Tsipras proposed European Stability Mechanism (ESM) loans – the Eurozone’s bailout fund.
Greece’s parliament will vote on the new proposal later on Friday – not yet as this article is written. Passage appears rubber-stamp.
New Democracy party member/former foreign affairs minister Dora Bakoyannis said enough parliamentary support exists to approve any bailout deal – despite Energy Minister Panagiotis Lafazanis telling a Thursday business conference:
“The choices we have are tough…but the worst, the most humiliating and unbearable is an agreement that will surrender, loot and subjugate our people and this country.”
What’s at stake doesn’t get any clearer than that. On Saturday, Eurozone finance ministers will meet to discuss Tsipras’ proposal. An emergency Sunday summit of European leaders will decide up or down on what’s submitted.
So far, Troika officials have been unbending. Tsipras promised immediate implementation of proposed “reforms.” Hardline German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said possible debt relief will be discussed.
At the same time, he sees little room for maneuver – saying they’ll be no outright cut in Greece’s obligations, no matter how odious. On Thursday, Angela Merkel said “a classic haircut is out of the question for me. That hasn’t changed between the day before yesterday and today.”
German ECB member Jens Weidmann expects no further emergency credit extended to Greek banks without an agreed on bailout deal.
The central bank “has no mandate to safeguard the solvency of banks and and governments,” he said. The ECB “is no longer being used to finance capital flight caused by the Greek government.”
Greece wants a new three-year bailout deal – whether forthcoming remains to be seen.
Given Tsipras’ near unconditional surrender, he’ll likely at least get enough to save off immediate economic collapse at a big price: his soul along with unconscionable harm to millions of long-suffering Greeks deserving much better.
- Prime Minister Tsipras’ Bailout Reform Package: An Act of Treason against the Greek People by Prof Michel Chossudovsky (Source)
- Greece – Black Friday – Blackmailed into Capitulation? Tsipras’ Austerity Plan by Peter Koenig (Source)
- Putin: Where was EU when Greek crisis was evolving? (Source)
- The neocon angel of death is winding towards the Balkans (Source) (Source)
- Greece – Black Friday – Blackmailed into Capitulation? Tsipras’ Austerity Plan (Source)
Dear friends and comrades of the Delphi Initiative,
Today’s dawning divulged a horror scenario – The Syriza government practically capitulated on the demands of the troika, of the murderous tyrannical Brussels Parliament, EC and ECB. Against the will of the people, Mr. Tsipras and his new Finance Minister proposed an austerity Plan that is almost impossible to be rejected by the Brussels self-denominated emperors of Europe.
- US Fears Euro Crisis Unravelling Anti-Russia Project (Source)
If Greece were to exit the eurozone, there will be recriminations across the EU, from countries such as France, Italy and Spain, which have also been urging Berlin to take a more accommodating line on Athens. Even Britain has been cajoling Berlin to make a deal with Greece, no doubt for the same unspoken ulterior geopolitical reasons as Washington.
The contradiction in Europe over the financial crisis is thus putting Washington on a head-on confrontation with Berlin. Washington needs Berlin to take a severe creditor hit in order to keep the EU coherent for its geopolitical objective of isolating Russia. But Berlin’s subservience to Washington is going to be severely strained if it is eventually forced to take such a hit to its economy. Berlin has talked itself into a political corner with its hardline creditor rhetoric towards Athens. How will Merkel explain a capitulation to her people?
One thing is sure, however. The American NSA phone-tappers at the German Chancellery are working overtime these days.
- List of Things Discussed at the BRICs Summit Is Impressive (Source)
Cooperation with Mongolia looks set to increase. Putin remarked on the great potential of Chinese-Mongolian-Russian cooperation.
Mongolian President has requested that China and Russia rethink the Siberian-2 pipeline, and consider instead running the pipeline through Mongolia, which would be cheaper and faster than build the current plan which would take the pipeline over the mountainous Altai region.
BRICS start a reserve currency fund with $100 billion pool.
India looks set to officially join the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO).
Some manager agreements have been made on the group’s development. This involves nailing out some of the infrastructure and innovation projects planned. These are the projects that fall under the ‘new silk roads’ mostly. More details likely to come.
BRICS are going to be looking at some joint approach to combating terrorism.
Are working on strategies for food provisions for most vulnerable communities.
Bullet-proofing joint economies against severe fluctuations in oil prices.
Agreed to multilateral approach (cooperation) to global challenges (read US hegemony, and NATO).
There’s hints that the BRICS could be welcoming Iran aboard, or at least looking at increasing cooperation with the nation.Turkey, Indonesia, Mexico, Egypt, Argentina, Nigeria, and Greece are also expressed interested in joining BRICS officially. For Greece, this would be impossible while it remains within the EU.
Possibly most important, BRICS set to expand use of national currencies in mutual trade. BRICS nations are involved in 75% of all world trade (either between, or involving a BRICS nation), with a growing percentage of that trade happening between BRICS nations. Trade between Russia and China is set to increase by around $100 billion in 2015. Use of national currencies to settle trade between the two nations has increased by more than 800%.
BRICS nations agree to cooperate on preventing ‘revision’ of history.
BRICS Development bank will start launching projects as early as 2016.
- BRICS Bankers Confirm They will Undergird – Not Undermine – Western Financial Decadence (Source)
A genuine alternative to imperialist finance would be based upon
* the sort of default on unpayable, unjustifiable debt that Argentina managed to accomplish in 2002;
* exchange controls that countries like Malaysia (in 1998) and Venezuela (in 2003) imposed on their elites (as did Greece last week);
* new regional currency arrangements such Ecuador’s proposed sucre; and
*socially- and ecologically-conscious financing strategies tied to compatible trade (like ALBA) such as were once proposed and seed-funded by the late Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez in the stillborn Bank of the South.
Given NDB and CRA positioning and personnel, it is foolish and perhaps dangerous to invest hope in the BRICS’ fake alternative.
- Putin Leads BRICS Uprising by Mike Whitney (Source)The dollar is toast. The IMF is toast. The US debt market (US Treasuries) is toast. The institutions that support US power are crumbling before our very eyes. The BRICS have had enough; enough war, enough Wall Street, enough meddling and hypocrisy and austerity and lecturing. This is farewell. Sure, it will take time, but Ufa marks a fundamental change in thinking, a fundamental change in approach, and a fundamental change in strategic orientation.
The BRICS are not coming back, they’re gone for good, just as Washington’s “pivot to Asia” is gone for good. There’s just too much resistance. Washington has simply overplayed its hand, worn out its welcome. People are sick of us.
Can you blame them?
- Emergence of Great Eurasia Looming Against the Background of Declining West (Source)
The one superpower dominated world is becoming a thing of the past right in front of our eyes. Old international institutions are in decline, take the World Trade Organization (WTO), the European Union (EU) mired in crisis, or the degrading Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). So far, intense discussions of United Nations Organization reform have been nothing but shooting the breeze.
- New Silk Road”: Pros and Cons for Russia (Source)
- The BRICS/SCO Summit(s) in Ufa Marks the Start of a Silk World Order By Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya (Source)
Gone are the days of unchallenged US domination. The architecture of the post-Second World War or post-1945 global order is now in its death bed and finished. With or without Washington, a Silk World is emerging and its coming is being trumpeted from Ufa as the SCO strengthens and the BRICS institutionalizes itself as the cornerstone of a new multi-polar world order.
- China and Russia: the world’s new superpower axis? The Guardian (Source)
- The Iran nuke stalemate in one tweet: Escobar (Source)The by now legendary tweet from Iran’s Foreign Minister Zarif in which he quoted Abraham Lincoln is the Rosebud deciphering the current stalemate between the US and Iran in Vienna.
Zarif tweeted, “Mark my words; you can’t change horses in the middle of a stream.” Well, a privileged Iranian source told Asia Times “changing horses” is exactly what US President Barack Obama abruptly did – in regard to conciliating positions he had agreed upon two days earlier.
This happened this past Wednesday night, Vienna time – at the negotiating table.
- Saudi Arabia puts big money in Russian economy (Source)An interesting feature of the deal is that the Saudi investment vehicle will combine with other Asian sovereign wealth funds, especially the Russia-China investment Fund (which is backed by the China Investment Corporation.)
Meanwhile, the RDIF disclosed that it also signed an agreement with another Saudi Arabian sovereign-wealth fund, the Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority, to undertake projects in Saudi Arabia and other Middle East countries.
The Saudis are notorious for the glacial pace of their decision-making, but in this case, Mohammed bin Salman’s direct interest speeded up things. The deal committing the Saudi sovereign funds to invest such big amounts in Russia has been signed just as the Iran nuclear deal could be sailing into view in a couple of days.
Again, there are indications that Moscow and Riyadh are working on an early visit by King Salman to Russia.
It is tempting to interpret the trends as constituting a strategic defiance of the US by the Saudis. After all, the Saudis are making up to a large extent for the western banking sanctions against Russia. But a more constructive interpretation is warranted: the Saudis probably hope to make the Russians “stakeholders” in a broader “win-win” relationship that also buttresses their core interests in Syria, Yemen and elsewhere in the region.
To be sure, the Saudi-Russian investment deals cannot but be seen as a powerful signal that the Saudi-Russian rapprochement is rapidly acquiring a momentum that has the potential to reset the power dynamic in the Middle East.
One key area to be watched is Syria where Moscow and Riyadh come under pressure to harmonize their respective approaches.
- Another Attempt to Organize «Orange Revolution» in Ecuador (Source)Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa is blowing the whistle. The country may face another coup attempt. There is solid ground to support this allegation. In his March weekly address to the people the President said the protests in Ecuador were staged by enemies of «citizens’ revolution»as the opposition was implementing the strategy of attrition.
According to him, the parties and organizations funded by international structures are subject to the influence of the US Central Intelligence Agency which does its best to create hotbeds of chaos and violence and hinder the creative activities of government. Talking to people, Correa often gives details on the policy of «soft regime change» practiced by Washington in Latin America. According to President, there is a five-phased plan to destabilize Ecuador.
First: public brainwashing (ablandamiento) will be launched by media outlets acting as informal opposition political parties’ mouthpieces. Their mission will be to incite public discontent and then point a finger at the government as the main culprit.
Second: the opposition will try to discredit the government as illegal and acting against the interests of people. To convince people they will launch an intensive propaganda campaign accompanied by thousands of biased publications, dissemination of fake analytical documents and spreading information allegedly received from «reliable» sources. They will also use social networks.
Third: the anti-government forces will heat up street protests by staging manifestations. It does not matter how many protesters will hit the streets. The puppet media outlets will highlight the events as instructed to convince the world that Ecuador is a conflict-torn country.
Fourth: the opposition will use different non-violent methods recommended by Gene Sharp to bring the government down. That is something they are trying to do in Venezuela and Argentina.
Fifth: the opposition will strike at the pillars of power. It will seize government buildings, provoke street unrests, incite discontent among the military etc. The CIA knows how to do it.
It will all be done to make the President go.
- In Ecuador, Fight for Mankind; In Greece, Fight for Greece! By Andre Vltchek (Source)Greece is white, it is European, and therefore eyes of entire Western “progressive” world are now directed towards Athens: will its government dare to default, would Greece leave euro-zone and eventually the European Union? As if the answer to this question could change the world; as if Athens is where the fate of humanity will be decided.
Some 10 thousand kilometers away, Ecuador is predominantly indigenous, and therefore, inhabited by ‘un-people’, to borrow from George Orwell’s colorful terminology. Battered by its own, mainly Euro-centric and pale-skinned ‘elites’ who are enjoying extremely close links with both EU and the United States, Ecuador and its determinedly left-wing government can count very little on international solidarity, especially on the camaraderie from ‘so-called progressive’ movements in the West.
After all, non-white, non-Western people are expected to suffer. Even the left in the West is ‘accustomed to’ their agony.
Frankly, almost nobody in Europe or in the United States wants those left wing governments in Latin America, in Asia or in Africa, to succeed. That is ‘well hidden secret’, or at least ‘an uncomfortable truth’!
China, South Africa, Venezuela, Ecuador and other countries all over the world have been addressed and treated in the most despicable, patronizing, and even racist way by so-called left wing individuals and groups in the West.
The Left got thoroughly defunct in both Europe and in North America. But it continues to be distressingly self-righteous, self-indulged, bossy and arrogant. It does not govern and does not inspire almost anybody, anymore. It became shamefully cowardly and lazy. But it behaves as if it would be holding some God-given right to judge and advice others: those who do fight, those who do inspire and those who do govern! It is evident that it wants non-Western socialist and communist governments and movements, those that are proudly governing all over the world, to go straight to hell!
“If we collapsed, let others collapse as well!” Is unpronounced motto.
It is because even the Left in Europe and US is constructed on Christian and Euro-centric mind frame, with exceptionalism and supremacist sentiments at its core.
Of course such things are never pronounced in Paris, London, Rome, or New York, but there is a perfect consensus there, that only the Western thinkers and leaders are qualified and should be trusted with ‘saving the world’. And only they ought to be allowed to decide, which country qualifies to be called socialist or communist, democratic or tyrannical, progressive or regressive.
Unable to lead, and most likely unwilling to govern, too lethargic and intellectually spent, most of Western ‘progressive’ thinkers are constantly regurgitating lunatic economic and political theories that no one in other parts of the world, especially the poor world, would ever take seriously, let alone want to implement. Those Western ‘progressive leaders’ are also demanding grotesque levels of purity from the Latin American and Asian left-wing leaders. Simultaneously, they demand great sacrifice from non-Western people: “Let us consume and live high-life, as poor us, we cannot help it. But let them care about environment and live in austerity.”
***
And so, while Greece votes on its financial future, Ecuador is facing one of the most vicious subversions in its history. It is facing it alone. It appears that everyone from non-Latin American left who matters is now in Athens. As far as I know, there are no solidarity ‘delegates’ descending on Quito!
Ecuador has now been abandoned, not unlike Venezuela was, for already quite some time.
I was recently invited to speak on an important television channel based in Iran, to talk about Palestine and Greece. I refused. My argument was clear: both Palestine and Greece already received enough solidarity from ‘us’, in Latin America. Now our revolutions are facing great threats. They are being attacked. We are human, too! We also need help; we need solidarity.
To give credit where credit is due, Iranian editor put me on hold, after expressing her concern about the situation in Latin America. Few minutes later she came back to me, via Skype: “I talked to our director and he told me to interview you on Ecuador. He said: they are our brothers. We fall together, or we will survive together!”
Naturally, such statements and gestures are remembered for the rest of the life!
But that’s Teheran, not London or Paris or Chicago!
***
My priority now is Ecuador. My priority is Latin America. This is where I see great battle for the future of humanity taking place. Here and in Asia. Definitely not in Europe!
Latin American governments here are not perfect. Chinese government is not perfect either. But they are doing all they can, after decades and centuries of plunder, after Europe, the United States, in unison with local elites and multinational companies, were pillaging and raping everything “south of the border”.
Corruption could not be eradicated in one year, or in one decade. Imported religious and moral corruptions were shaping entire “Latin America” (which is, thankfully, becoming less and less ‘Latin’ these days) by murderous and greedy Westerners, for generations. Things can improve, greatly, in one decade or even in one year, but horror structures built during long centuries could not be fully reversed. ‘The Process’ has to be in place for many years, uninterrupted.
Yes, we are not perfect, but we are trying to get better as we go. We are moving forward! We are trying to, going and falling, passing through fire, filth, conspiracies and intrigues. We are moving forward, damn it!
***
Ecuadorian elites are protesting and they are sabotaging everything great that was done by Correa and his administration. Many think that the coup is in the air.
Not one word about progress; new highways and airports, modern hospitals and schools, medical posts, countless playgrounds for children, free culture, libraries… Right wing in Ecuador owns most of the media. Not much positive is written about Ecuador by Western ‘progressive’ media outlets, either. We at Counterpunch being a great exception!
Not much good is written about China, Vietnam, Eritrea, South Africa, Zimbabwe or Iran. To Western purists, all these countries are not good enough, not socialist enough, not as they define socialism or communism, not as they define democracy! 6 or 7 thousand years of Chinese culture mean nothing. Everything has to be measured and defined only by Western standards.
Russia is different: it is not socialist at all (although it adopted great internationalist Soviet foreign policy), but it is predominantly white, and so it gets plenty of emotional support, fiery speeches and declarations of love and support.
Many Chinese comrades I spoke to in Beijing fully gave up on the Western left; they see it, mainly, as the most reactionary force (ideologically), when it comes to non-white left wing countries and governments. And I couldn’t agree more!
***
Greece should default. That fortress, fascist European Union, should not bully it.
But Greece should fight for internationalist, global ideals.
While we all know, that what it is fighting for is just its own gain… or for survival of its high standards of living.
When things were going well, when money was flowing in, when Greek farmers began driving latest models of German cars on smooth motorways, Greek people were not protesting. And they were not asking where the money came from. It mainly came from plundering on non-Western world, of ‘non-people’. That was fine, wasn’t it?
I was in Greece, recently. I spoke to many people, including those from their left, mainly from the left. Almost nobody had any clue about what is going on in Latin America. No one cared. Even in Turkey they are monitoring what goes on in Caracas or La Paz.
But not in Athens – in Athens nobody gives a flying f…!
Many were still complaining bitterly about illegal immigration from Africa! Don’t those writers who are now writing flattering essays, glorifying Greek people, know that? Or they pretend not to see and hear?
Greece is fighting for its own goals. Its incomes dropped, from 1.400 to 800 euros a month, per capita, in many cases. Terrible, but in many African nations where money to support Greek farmers often came from (by EU finishing African agriculture), incomes are sitting at around 30 euros per month. I tried to address these issues in Athens, but encountered stone faces and total bewilderment, even hostility. I was told: “But we are used to different standards!”
And therefore I repeat: what is happening in Greece is not some left wing, internationalist revolution.
Greeks are fighting for Greece.
Latin America is fighting for humanity! It never exploited anybody. It sent doctors, teachers, all over the world. It sent oil to the poor, even in the United States. It supplied unfortunate countries like East Timor with trainers. It offered solidarity to Palestine, Iran, so many others!
***
If Ecuador will get under direct fire, I will go back, and I will stand by it, doing all I could to support it. And if the Western Left will do nothing to help, I will break, fully and categorically, all my ties with it!
As many wrote: Greece will survive. “It is, after all, in Europe”. Even when it is down, it is, somehow, up.
We, “down here”, will not have another chance. And if we fall, entire non-Western world will fall with us!
- SS Khaplang and the Naga insurgency in India and Myanmar (Source)
- Japan keen on joining NATO anti-ship missile consortium: sources (Source)
- Don’t go by media briefing, there was positive content in Modi-Xi at Ufa (Source)
- Modi kickstarts dialogue with Iran (Source)
- 10 Very Strange Things That Have Happened In Just The Past Few Weeks (Source)
- Now Even Kudrin Says It – Russia’s Economy Will Resume Growth in Final Quarter (Source)
Emerging consensus of a return to growth in final quarter points to short and shallow recession and an economy that has adjusted well to falling oil prices
- US beating drums of war against Russia to increase European defense spending’ (Source)
- 75% of Russians ready to vote for Putin at presidential elections – poll (Source)
- Mackinder Reincarnates–Now Hungary Joins Silk Road (Source)
- Does the volatility of Chinese stock markets pose a threat to Russia? (Source)China’s stock market collapse in the last couple of weeks affected markets across Asia. RBTH spoke to analysts about the reasons for the free fall and whether this volatility in Chinese financial markets would affect Russia.
- 70 percent of Russians opposed to compromise on sanctions – report (Source)
According to a new Levada Center opinion poll, 70 percent of Russian citizens believe that Russia should not make any sanctions-related concessions, even though a third of the population has admitted that sanctions are a problem. However, despite these difficulties, Russians continue to back President Vladimir Putin, whose popularity rating has never been higher. Experts have several theories for why Putin’s rating remains buoyant in spite of citizens’ growing dissatisfaction.
- Navalny Is a Crook and a Racist – and a Loser Not a Winner (Source)
Navalny’s criminal record and opportunistic racism means he cannot win – something obvious to everyone except the few liberals who continue to support him.
- OSCE Parliamentary Assembly recognizes presence of Russian forces in Ukraine (Source)
The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly has adopted a resolution recognizing the presence of Russian military forces in eastern Ukraine. The vote on the resolution took place in the absence of the Russian delegation, which opted to boycott the session on July 8. Russian experts say the change in rhetoric was to be expected, but do not anticipate that the resolution will have any serious consequences.
- Between a Self-Questioning Europe, a Self-Assured Russia, and a Hapless Ukraine: How American Armed Forces Became NATO’s Foreign Legion (Source)
- Songs of Victory (Video) ( Source)
- Letter from Norman Finkelstein to the supporters of his Byline Project for Gaza (Source)
- Special Report. Transnistrian Front | Eng Subs (Video) (Source)
- John Batchelor Podcast Ft Stephen F. Cohen (Audio) (Source)
Ukraine Sitrep
- Chechen Islamists Flock to Ukraine to Back Govt Against Rebels (Source)
‘We Always Fight the Russians’
- Here’s How to Save the Minsk II Agreement (Source)
In its current form, Minsk II can’t solve the Ukraine conflict. Here’s how to fix it.
- Ukraine’s Poroshenko discusses Minsk agreements with Merkel, Hollande (Source)
- U.S. ambassador to Russia John Tefft: Donbass killing their own children, Maidan was not a coup (Source)
- Kiev Request For SCO Partner Status Still in Force (Source)
- Is Kiev Trying to Starve Donbass? (Source)
- These two infographs show the devastating effects Western/EU policies have had on Ukraine’s economy (Source)
- The growth of fascism in Ukraine before and after Euromaidan :Report for the International Anti-EU Forum, Athens, 26-28 June 2015 (Source)
- Roger Annis – War in Ukraine & NATO Offensive in Eastern Europe (Video) (Source)
- Ukraine Wants 1,000 Javelin Systems in Exchange for Nuclear Warheads (Source)
- Ukraine Fully equipped to fight fire in Chernobyl radiation exclusion zone. No worries everything’s under control (Video) (Source)
- Ukraine – a ’Banana Republic’ without bananas (Source)
During the initial Euromaidan protests and subsequent coup, many Ukrainians changed their social media profile pictures to an English language graphic, titled “Pray for Ukraine.” While things were far from perfect then, the real suffering had yet to start.
The time to “Pray for Ukraine” is now.
The EU in total collapse…
24 hours to save the euro: Germany prepares for a ‘temporary’ Greek exit as euro project on the brink of collapse
Berlin readies five-year expulsion plan for Greece, after Athens is accused of destroying the trust of its partners
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/11734202/24-hours-to-save-the-euro-Germany-prepares-for-a-temporary-Greek-exit-as-euro-project-on-the-brink-of-collapse.html
~Political Sellout in Athens. Prime Minister Tsipras Surrenders, Ignores the “OXI” Vote~
The Greek people and military should overthrow him and the government, else they will no longer control their own country.
The EU was HITLER’S idea and it proves Germany WON the Second World War
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/470967/The-EU-was-HITLER-S-idea-and-it-proves-Germany-WON-the-Second-World-War-claims-new-book
(I saw other very detailed sources years ago, it seems to be the truth, however: “Germany” != TheGermans, the normal Germans do not benefit from the EU, the EU is hated here)
yes, Martin, Hitler was the west’s idea so the west won
Hi Ann,
Yes, over the years I personally developed the same theory that Hitler was a toy like Obomber, brought to power by the intl. banking “elite”, in fact to achieve the exact opposite of what folks elected him for.
What I always wondered is, did he know it or not.
E.g. was he a traitor or a useful idiot.
Without answerig the former question it is fair to say that Hitler was created, financed, built up, brought to power and supported all along the way by the same AngloZionists that still rule the world today (now even magnitudes as much as back then).
He was created by the West to achieve – among other things – the following goals, in my (humble) personal opinion:
* weaken and enslave germany for decades if not centuries
* robb off all german patens, economic and military secrets
* make Russian-German axis impossible for decades if not centuries
* make Zionists untouchable for the saame time, if not milennia
* create a precedence for the build-up of a Rothschild state in Palestine
(once promised by Britain, but no way to reach this under normal circumstances. I’m absolutely not cetain how this relates to Stalin’s idea of creating Israel in Crimea etc)
* have germany and CCCP fight one another to enable the West to take-over and enslave both of them
If you think about the places which the West never bombed in germany (IG Farben, for example, while innocent civilians got murdered in Millions by allied bombers) and then think about Churchill’s “Operation UNTHINKABLE”, then it all suddenly makes sense, what otherwise would be doomed to stay eternal unresolvable contradictions.
I’m not a historian, but I have the gut feeling that those who call themselves “historians” in the West will never come up with anything digging in the area of Truth and reality, that seems to be the only thing they have learned in years of their studies. Just my 5 Kopeken.
Martin – about Crimea and Stalin. As I (poorly) understand things, Stalin in later years changed course on letting the zionists into Crimea. At the end, he defeated their plan. He came to distrust the Americans, and when the yanks pushed for the Crimea foothold, he saw through the whole plan.
Fort Russ had a deep study on all this several months back …… yes, found it. This is excellent information I think it addresses your point:
How Stalin played the Americans with the “Crimean California” project
Alas, Martin, the BRICS financial structures support the same forces:
“BRICS $100 B Contingency Reserve Arrangement (CRA) is dollar-denominated and structurally hard-wired to support the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
To illustrate, according to CRA rules agreed at last year’s BRICS Fortaleza summit, after 30% of a country’s quota is borrowed – based on double the amount of its own contributions (China at $41 billion, and Brazil, Russia and India at $18 billion each, and South Africa at $5 billion) – then the borrower must next sign a neoliberal IMF agreement.”
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/07/10/brics-bankers-confirm-they-will-undergird-not-undermine-western-financial-decadence/
“Collapse” a word over-used that has become a euphemism.
The US economy is not going to collapse.
The US dollar is not going to collapse.
The EU is not going to collapse.
The Euro Zone is not going to collapse.
Minsk 2 is not going to collapse.
These are all changing, devolving, stressing, and may be mutating.
But none are subject to sudden crumbling.
There are two many stakeholders in any and all of these. Even great empires don’t suddenly end. What is interesting is all of them are going under enormous pressures simultaneously.
That makes me euphoric, except over Minsk 2, because no substitute is possible but a victorious war, which is not really in Russia’s game plan. So, Minsk 2 will be around until the junta and its successor is overthrown by Ukies who then sue for peace. That could be next year or later.
Collapse may be gradual or sudden, and it’s difficult to predict. The French, American, and Russian revolutions went fairly quick, while Rome took a few centuries — but this is a different time, different system, with different communications and awareness, and black swans can suddenly appear. The empire is already largely hollowed out propped up by lies and outrageous manipulations, with more appearance than substance in many areas. Financial crash can occur over weeks or days. It was pretty close in 2008, and it happened in 1929. The thing is metastable.
Here it is 47 minutes in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1tl6ijsjso
Star Trek Season 2 Episode 19 The Immunity Syndrome
————
http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/48.htm
[…]
KIRK: With the eddies and currents in that protoplasm, the probe could drift thousands of kilometres. We must be exactly on target, because we won’t have a second chance. Bones, time for another stimulant.
MCCOY: How long do you think you can keep taking that stuff? It’ll blow you apart.
KIRK: Keep me together for another seven minutes. That’s all I need.
[…]
—————-
Interesting script — protoplasmic blob with self defense mechanisms. Like the world or investor community? The market runs on computer now, and how long does it take for computers to crash? Plunge protection? OK — used before, but it take much longer than 7 minutes to probe the center of the problem and repair the system, and the next time just shutting down the market may not work because what will happen to change anything when it reopens? Yet another $trillion bailout and stimulant? ‘How long do you think you can keep taking that stuff? It’ll blow you apart.’ And we don’t have any Capt. Kirk in command — we have an Obama….
Oh yeah — another nice resonant fragment from that script:
KIRK: We are committed.
SCOTT: Aye, we are, but we’re committed to what? We have no power for the phasers.
MCCOY: We couldn’t use it. We’d cook ourselves along with that mess of protoplasm out there
KIRK: That thing would probably like phasers. It eats power.
SCOTT: Then what the devil, begging your pardon sir, are we doing?
KIRK: Mister Spock was trying to tell us what to do when we lost voice contact.
SCOTT: We can’t use the power to destroy it.
KIRK: Anti-power.
MCCOY: What?
KIRK: This thing has a negative energy charge. Everything seems to work in reverse. We’ll use anti-matter.
SCOTT: Aye, it couldn’t swallow that.
Blue, this is an amazing dialogue….what happened then ?
They finally end up destroying the giant amoeba (trying to eat the universe, sort of like the Blob which ate NY, if I recall I haven’t seen the whole episode for years) — sort of like the empire too.
You can see the whole script and the video at those links I gave.
Science fiction is like cartoons and fantasies — you can get truth from them that isn’t allowed anywhere else. In retrospect they sometimes call it satire, like Swift’s Gullivers Travels. It also let writers who ‘know things’ on some level access the collective unconscious to inform and stimulate people’s thinking — a major function of the arts, after all (and why totalitarian regimes often ban it). Roddenberry made some very good stuff (I think the original Star Trek is still the best).
it was on one of the freeview channels on uk tv just the other day………..!!!!!!!
Finally somebody discovered the Strategic Culture Foundation. Great.
Slightly off topic but I thought this from the Hegemon’s Brit vassal propaganda bullhorn too good to pass:
“Expert panel set up for review of BBC……
It will also suggest that the BBC website should be scaled back, question whether the corporation’s news fulfils its obligation to be impartial, examine whether more of the broadcaster’s output should be independently produced and consider the future of BBC Worldwide, the paper reported”.
Impartial? Oh! That’s rich!
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-33496925
My impression from seeing that article is that it’s about, in the end, moving towards privatization instead of all ‘socialist’ TV from the government. As for impartial, I would expect a determination that BBC is too pro-Russian, pro-socialist, and such — better that corporations should control the telescreen, after all…
I’m not really sure how this mess in Greece will turn out.But I am sure of one thing there.If Tsipras does betray the Greek people and show that his party can’t or won’t be their salvation.It will be the biggest recruitment possible for the ultra-right Golden Dawn party.The millions of disillusioned Greeks that trusted Tsipras will turn to the only other anti-EU major party.And sady enough that is Golden Dawn.If for no other reason than that ,I’m hoping Tsipras doesn’t end up betraying the Greek people.
I’m sure that would make the fascist banksters and their puppets just SO disappointed….
(Not to mention the US neoliberals).
The international bankers are not “fascist”, they are international capitalists who hate national borders and sovereign peoples (like Yugoslavia). And they hate Golden Dawn, who are socialists and nationalists.
You know this from where? List your sources.
Fascism is just a late stage of capitalism.
Nazis, like Golden Dawn, although calling themselves national socialists, are not socialist, and quickly eliminate real socialists as they can.
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007392
Martin Niemöller: “First they came for the Socialists…”
[…]
Sorry but – of course they are socialist. Fascism is one of the two possible versions of socialism, the other being the communist dictatorship (the state-capitalism kind) like the USSR.
You don’t think that Hitler’s party just so happened to be called “national socialist” party? Socialism is socialism, be it red, brown or whatever else. It is always the denial of an individual, propping up some mythical “race”, “nation”, “people’s Party” or whatever the given collectivist scam is being called.
socialism is theoretically in denial of human greed imposed as value. imposing human greed as value is VERY important for architects of today’s civilization. making differences (starting early from childhood) among people is cornerstone of making bussiness. if everybody has everything they need, even more they need for living and are equal… then, who is rich and who is poor? how “rich” people could know they are rich? there are no reference point. and majority of people want to be rich. for them, only purpose of living is to be rich. so, obviously, there must be many poor people around, in socialism or capitalism, no mater how. artificial differences among people are set every day, minutes, to distinguish those who can pay much more for the same glass of water so they can feel they are rich and “above”. in that settings of human behaviour any ideology no mater how is fair can very easy degenerate in dictatorship or something worse.
T2015..
Sorry, but you have little to no understanding of what socialism is. The point of it, as inherent in the word itself, is for the people and the society, not for despotism. One needs to look at what a party actually does, not what they say or call themselves for propaganda purposes.
Socialism and communism is much older that 20th century politics and their distortion by word doctors and spin masters, or the 19th and 20th century theorists who grabbed the words and concepts, and is diametrically opposed to dictatorship and fascism.
Don’t fall for the propaganda, but investigate the actual political science, concepts, and long history of these.
Even wikipedia gives an decent overview and definition:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
“Socialism is a social and economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy,[1][2] as well as a political theory and movement that aims at the establishment of such a system.[3][4] “Social ownership” may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these.[5] There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them.[6] They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.[7]”
[…]
i understand you but believe me i don’t need wiki or any other book to explain me what is socialism because i was born in socialism, lived 26 year in socialism and i recall laughing at americans how they are backward when they have to pay for medical treatment and similar. we had it for free. and that was normal. once there were one summer few americans with my cousin from USA here and they could not understand how is that we have everything like in USA? and we were not capitalist ruled country. why we have now what we have is that because of people who want more than other to feel better than other and richer than other. StarTrek is theoretical socialism which is functioning in deep space where none went before… and maybe Sweden society has reached nearest to socialism. of course, socialism is good, i know it from first hand, but here on Earth good ideas are definitely allways abused by psychopats. Libya is good example of socialism in wrong hands. what they did from good idea. slaughterhouse.
wrong reply. i apologize.
Mistakenly directed but a good post nonetheless.
Communism may be opposed to fascism, but it is still totalitarian. The power is in the hands of a group of people who dictate to all others, treating adults as if they were kindergarten children and ruthlessly destroying everybody who opposes them. Communists claim that they are doing everything for the people, while in reality they walk all over ‘the people’.
It’s sad that in 2015 some people need to resurrect dead ideologies to replace other dead ideologies.
It would be nice if people learned what these words really mean as opposed to what people who grab them do, and the propaganda they put out. .
By your logic democracy is a horrific system run by the richest people, stealing from the working class, and making constant wars on other countries because that’s what the US, calling itslef a democracy, does.
The people you are talking about are not communists!
Blue, I grew up in a socialist country, so I think I’m quite competent. [Redacted – keep it civil, T2015]
Again – any form of collectivism is bad, however you label it. Socialism did have some good sides like free healthcare and free education, but that’s about where it ends. In pretty much all other aspects it was pure evil, always ending in “comply or perish” of some sort. The very opposite of freedom, more like an ant colony.
You are not talking about real socialism then, but a cheap fraudulent imitation. It;s like being in some weird religious cult and saying then how you know all religion is evil, or being with a nazi lab run by mad scientists and then saying science is evil. .
If you hate collectivism then go live in the wilderness all by yourself and see how well you do.
Simple introduction:
http://www.worldsocialism.org/english/what-socialism
What is Socialism?
Central to the meaning of socialism is common ownership. This means the resources of the world being owned in common by the entire global population.
But does it really make sense for everybody to own everything in common? Of course, some goods tend to be for personal consumption, rather than to share—clothes, for example. People ‘owning’ certain personal possessions does not contradict the principle of a society based upon common ownership.
In practice, common ownership will mean everybody having the right to participate in decisions on how global resources will be used. It means nobody being able to take personal control of resources, beyond their own personal possessions.
Democratic control is therefore also essential to the meaning of socialism. Socialism will be a society in which everybody will have the right to participate in the social decisions that affect them. These decisions could be on a wide range of issues—one of the most important kinds of decision, for example, would be how to organise the production of goods and services.
[…]
So you prefer to have a few rich people own it all and make all the decisions? We can see how well that works!
[Redacted. Let’s keep this civil, please.] And even when it briefly did appear in its infancy, it got corrupted blazingly fast and turned into one of the usual fascist/socialist dictatorship flavours. Rinse, re-label, repeat. No workie.
What was suposedly not “civil” in those posts, prey tell? Why this constant bullying here for no reason?
T2015
You used the sort of language that belittled those you were responding to. The comment section of this site is for people to have discussions based upon friendliness and mutual respect. Starting off insulting the intelligence of someone may satisfy your own ego, but it hardly creates an atmosphere conducive to useful dialog.
” communist dictatorship (the state-capitalism kind) like the USSR.”
See, hear you turn this into word salad. State capitalism is, obviously from the words, not communism at all, but capitalism. Regardless of what social programs the USSR had it was not communism because the workers were not in control. An oligarchy was in control, and early on often the very same people who owned and controlled everything before the revolution. Communism in inherently democratic, not dictatorial.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism
In political and social sciences, communism (from Latin communis – common, universal)[1][2] is a social, political, and economic ideology and movement whose ultimate goal is the establishment of the communist society, which is a socioeconomic order structured upon the common ownership of the means of production, absence of social classes, money,[3][4] and the state.
[…]
How can you have state capitalism if there is no state?
Now, you can have a ‘state’ of sorts, not one as defined by anarchists, if it is really democratic and run by the people — the ‘collective’ of workers — and in other times of history various societies came very close to that, and small groups and tribes often did, for most of human history.
But you have to use the terms correctly and adhere to valid concepts, not pick up any propaganda or nonsense that comes along (such as calling the US or EU democratic). You can’t allow the tyrants and oligarchs to steal all the words and change their meanings, or rewrite political science or economics — or dictionaries — to suit their agendas. Now they want to call dissenters to the government ‘supporters of terrorism’. The meaning of anarchism has long been twisted from reality. The term ‘national security’ is just a bad joke now. This stuff has to be stopped.
I have to agree with T2015 here (although we disagreed at many other times and we probably will again).
It’s one thing to read beautiful words in a book, and another to live their interpretation in practice. And something is definitely wrong with the theory itself if it can be implemented in ways which are the opposite of what was meant. All the countries which put socialism and communism into practice have done it in a way which turned out to be totalitarian at some point. So if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck..
@blue
I’m sorry, but you have no idea what it means in practice, how intrusive these type of regimes can be, and downright deadly. How they want to tell people not just how to live, but what to think, what to love, what to hate, what to do with their bodies and their souls and their minds.. THEY are the models that will be employed by the West, with the same hypocrisy with which they have been used by the East – meaning they will say that all is for the good of the people, but in reality it is the opposite. There are all kinds of side-effects for the societies which follow that road: some of the most damaging are an entitlement to thieving due to the mess up of the distinction between state property and personal property; and the continuous desire of the people to betray each other due to the distorted morality inherent in these regimes.
There are all kinds of nice terms which can be used by theoreticians who hate the word ‘capitalism’ (although I don’t think this was real capitalism, but oligarchic monopoly). Why not choose ‘liberalism’ or ‘social democracy’ ? These were not as misrepresented as some think socialism and communism were. Or simply invent new associations of words to represent the new reality which is desired. If nobody can do that, and we are back to the old order of things both in practice and in theory, it means that the human evolution is finished.
There have been many times and places where socialism has worked quite well, and there is not political or religious system which has not been twisted to what it is supposed to oppose, including republics and democracies.
There is always both a ‘good side’ and a ‘bad side’ with humans, but those can’t be used to blame a description and theory of how societies work well. Yet there are some theoretical systems which are inherently destructive, such as capitalism which embodied greed and reduces all things ot commodities and profits, rewarding the predators by systematically giving them more and more wealth and power, and monopolies.
The problem with the countries you don’t like is that they did not implement socialism of communism, but something else while calling them socialism or communism. A country can call itself whatever it chooses, correctly or not, just as the US calls itself democratic while it is very far removed from actual democracy.
I don’t know of any country where socialism or communism worked well. Even if it had been like you said, that they implemented something else and called it socialism or communism, the original doctrine is not good. To call something ‘the dictatorship of the proletariat’ is just as sinister as any other dictatorship. But people who haven’t lived through that cannot understand. For the French intellectuals of the 50’s and 60’s it was just a cool game, whereas for the people living in the countries where the game was played it was a matter of life and death.
This is a video of a Russian guy, made with images from old Soviet films, and I think it expresses very well what I mean:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vu6OgmtsYAY
The new alliance of the BRICS countries seems something totally different from the past. It shows that there can be true cooperation between countries with different political regimes and different faiths. Why not find something like that, new and vibrant, to describe the new and vibrant world that could be ?
You ignore history — which stretches back thousands of years, over all the continents, including pre-Columbian ‘America’, when you say you don’t know of any country where socialism or communism worked well, as well as smaller groups than countries. Socialism and communism are much older than the 19th or 20th century.
One should realize, however that during the recent centuries when capitalism and capitalist empires came into being and became a dominant force in much of the world one of the things they did was work very hard to destroy socialist and communist areas anywhere it took root, even those communitarian areas, towns, and organizations (generally rural) which were working well in the US, if they became large enough to pose the danger of a ‘good example’. Cuba, for instance, accomplished a great deal despite it being under constant attack from the US, and there are other recent examples to the south of the US which tried to rule everyone with it’s Monroe Doctrine. Libya had the highest standard of living in Africa until the US destroyed it. Kerala functioned well as a democratic communist state for a long time. So did Native American ‘Indian’ nations.
You don’t like the phrase ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ (which certainly does not define all of socialism or communism, but is a specific slogan used in a limited area for a short time period), but would you support dictatorship of the oligarchy, monarchy, or corporations?
Do you understand the context by which it was used and what it meams?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship_of_the_proletariat
In Marxist theory, the dictatorship of the proletariat refers to a state in which the proletariat (the workers) has control of political power,[1][2] which must be understood within the context of historical materialism. The term, coined by Joseph Weydemeyer, was adopted by the founders of Marxism, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, in the 19th century. In Marxist theory, the dictatorship of the proletariat is what exists between capitalism and communism.[3] It is a democratic state where the whole of the public authority is elected and recallable under the basis of universal suffrage;[4] it is the defeat of the bourgeois state, but not yet of the capitalist mode of production, and at the same time the only element which places into the realm of possibility moving on from this mode of production.
[…]
And you think this is sinister?? That it’s like any other dictatorship? Well, that shows you know next to nothing about communism, socialism, or Marxism. I suggest you study these things and learn about them before you write more such nonsense.
FLOR solitaria
I don’t know of any country where socialism or communism worked well.
Never heard of Cuba, eh? This sounds like one of those “operator errors”. ;D Obviously, the operative phrase behind this willful ignorance is “I don’t know”. And the operative principle is “I don’t want to know”.
Yes, Cuba is a great example of communism. Starving, but successful. Driving old American cars from the 40s and 50s, but a great communist success.
Blue, I was born in a communist country and I know what it’s like for real. It’s starvation, humiliation and mockery. There isn’t a generation in my family that hasn’t suffered since communism appeared in that sorry land. My father was imprisoned and beaten to a pulp by the Romanian Securitate (the not-so-secret Gestapo-like police which still rules the country) when he was just an 18 year old kid. One of my uncles died from the beatings of the same goons and his neighbour went mad from the same cause. Another old uncle who was in the ‘bourgeois’ government was imprisoned and tortured and died in prison. Another one was sent to the ‘Canal’ (the Romanian equivalent of the gulag) for 14 years, he died soon after he was released. My parents were constantly thrown out of their university courses and jobs, and frequently interrogated. I was interrogated by the same criminals when I was a 20 year old pregnant newly-wed for daring to criticize the communist state (only among my friends, one of whom betrayed me), although they knew the said communist state was going to fall shortly due to their own actions. My baby nearly died from the cold and lack of medication (many did) and from the heartlessness of the doctors. Which is the same by the way, they won’t treat anybody if they are not bribed.
And after communism fell, there was the experience of raw capitalism. Suddenly everybody wanted to be a capitalist and tried hard to exploit their fellow men in every possible way. And the country was being run by the same worms who were fighting for power amongst them, destroying the country and the people. Also a lot of ‘brave’ men appeared, who hadn’t dared to open their mouth during communism but who liked to spit on the graves of those who died fighting against it.
As an immigrant to a new country I endured a lot of hardships and humiliation, like most immigrants. I had to do all kinds of work and lost my health prematurely because of that. It’s a brutal system, but communism is no better.
Read Solzhenytsin, who was disappointed by both.
Cuba has had some rought times because it was constantly attacked by the US for 50 years, including economic sanctions, numerous assassination attempts, and other dirty tricks — even an invasion, by the US — a huge and powerful country just to its north and it STILL survived, if not always with high living standards, but with good health care and care for it’s people and with most people living decent lives.
You say you suffered in Romania under both communism and capitalism — so the problem wasn’t communism, or maybe even capitalism that much, but Romania — and that’s expected in any country corrupted and filled with gangsters.
I can find a lot of hardships I suffered, and which many people still suffer, in the US, due to poverty and lack of caring for the people and society, and corruption and gangsterism. The problem with capitalism is that it does not thwart that stuff but supports it as part of the system. The good stuff in America is largely due to long struggle of the socialists and ‘progressives’ such as Wobblies, and to communists — without which Social Security, free primary schools, unemployment insurance, and other necessary programs, as well as abolition, unions, civil rights, and women voting, would never had happened. (When my mother was born her mother couldn’t vote, and when she bought house she had to have her former husband co-sign the loan because she was a woman — and never got paid what she would have if a man.)
There is a long history of social activism in the US, with much of the changes in the late 19th and early 20th century, and still work continues, and struggles against the capitalists which fight it not just in practice but in what they say even — and now they are working to dismantle all the progress made over all those years and subjugate and exploit the working people again. in the US as well as the rest of the world. That’s what capitalism does, inherently, and in theory. When capitalism exploits and subjugate the people that not a corruption of the system; that’s what it was designed to do — social Darwinism and greed (the dark side of Locke and liberalism).
For starters, go to R.D. Wolff’s sites, rdwolff.com and democracyatwork.info — you can hear talks and take online courses in Marxism, etc., and get other information about what this is really about. If you want I (or others here) can provide a list of other useful sites to learn from, and references to these and speakers and professors have been given on this blog before — for those who want to learn.
We were FORCED to study marxism in high-schools and universities, the real thing: Marx, Lenin, Engels.. Everybody hated it and considered it the biggest nonsense. Indoctrination started in kindergarten, you have no idea what it means to a child to be forced to go to all those endless stupid parades and participate in endless stupid official meetings where the communist party and the communist leaders were praised as if they were gods. It’s not a thing specific to Romania, it happened in all the communist countries. As for social Darwinism, it was applied in real life: whoever was able to survive – did, nobody helped anybody. Religion was almost completely forbidden, private property was confiscated by the state (all the communist party officials moved into the villas of the ‘bourgeoisie’ and sent their kids to expensive schools in the West). One of my grand-fathers was sent to prison for being the owner of 20 acres of land and they took his land, as they took everybody’s land. It was the same in the Soviet Union. There are so many books about this, you just need to read them.
I remember we used to envy the Yugoslavs because they were allowed to travel and work in the West, they used to bring all kinds of stuff from there and sell it when I was a kid. And still some of them said even on this site that it wasn’t very good for them either. There were some differences in enforcing communism in different countries, but basically it was bad everywhere. Whoever says it wasn’t, either was never there or belonged to the elite.
Vote for the women is fine, but you need to have whom to vote for, which didn’t and doesn’t exist in communism because there is only one party allowed. There was, indeed equal pay for women and men, however women had to do the same work as men and people were forced to take any kind of bad jobs available (the good ones were kept for the people with connections and bribes) because it was mandatory to work.
I could write a book about all this, and at one time I actually started one, but I realized that people were not interested. I wrote a couple of scripts, which disappeared in the drawers of some obscure film company and then I gave up. The selfish West couldn’t care less about the suffering of some poor sods under communism.
My point is that communism is just as bad as capitalism: it is the ultimate exploitation of man under the guise of benevolence. And you will see that the West will become like what Eastern Europe was under communism. Then you will understand what I mean, because I see that you still don’t. Both these ideologies were exploited in practice by ruthless people,( sometimes belonging to a certain tribe who likes to work both sides), however, having lived under both regimes (I’ve been living in North America for over 20 years) I can say that I prefer capitalism. It was pretty bad a lot of the time, but not as bad as communism was, because it still allowed freedom of speech and of religion, which communism doesn’t allow. I won’t deny that it’s getting worse here too, in fact all those freedoms I appreciate so much seem to disappear day by day.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/11671547/Camerons-extremism-orders-could-criminalise-traditional-Christian-teaching.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfKP_cEBt1U
But most of us who are in the West and lived under communism at one time see these signs as belonging to communism, they are familiar to us because we lived with their results. If I’m not mistaken VVP said a few years ago in his discourse at Davos that the West was going the route of the former USSR (I read the speech at the time and I remember that it was more diplomatically put but pretty clear), so I think we should believe him and find something else.
I’m not going to argue with a brick wall who doesn’t even know what real communism is and refuses to learn. Think whatever you like.
From FLOR solitaria on July 16, 2015 · at 10:29 pm UTC
“Everybody hated it and considered it the biggest nonsense.”
“There were some differences in enforcing communism in different countries, but basically it was bad everywhere. Whoever says it wasn’t, either was never there or belonged to the elite.”
Sweeping statements such as these are not serious discussion, but simply a manipulative way to apply one’s own prejudices and make them sound like this is a universal feeling. Especially the second quote which besides being untrue, is patently rank, and right up there with the sort of smears one sees from zionists against anti-zionists.
I don’t recall to have read anywhere on this site that Saker or his family have been great supporters of communism. In fact I believe it was the contrary.
Whoever wants to support it is free to do so, but to tell others who lived through it that they don’t know what communism is, is at best naive. Of course, whoever thinks communism was, and is, great, could also move to China, or Vietnam, or Cuba, etc and live there and not in the Capitalist West – so as to put his money where his mouth is.
fake ISIS executions,MC Cain involved
via cyber berkut
Des vidéos d’exécutions par l’EI dévoilées, McCain éclaboussé
Lire la suite: http://fr.sputniknews.com/international/20150711/1016963919.html#ixzz3femZfMtp
http://fr.sputniknews.com/international/20150711/1016963919.html
What I wanted to say:
Hitler == artificial pseudo-enemy according to Hegelian dialectic, just as ISIS, ISIL, Al-Quaeda,, MujaHedin(or how they are written), Saddam Hussein and all the others, doesn’t it get boring at some point?? The West always continues playing the same games ……….
Will this ever stop??
In case anyone forgot, the original “I am a Ukrainian” video was made by a Western team with connections to US gov’t.
See for yourself :https://youtu.be/63arp4ZuJyo (only 5 minutes)
I recommend using extreme caution in believing anything written by Dmitry Kalinichenko (The Golden Trap). For example, his premise that Putin is cleverly exchanging oil/gas income only for gold & has therefore “trapped” the US into selling its gold is the silliest of fiction. If Russia were using all her oil/gas income to buy gold, the budget would be in serious trouble. Russia doesn’t buy gold except from her own mines. Russia SELLS both gold & oil/gas.
Kalinichenko falsely overstates a tremendous gold purchase during one quarter, when in fact Russia is merely slow to sell her gold production during that quarter because the West had unofficially temporarily expanded sanctions into that area. Five minutes w a calculator shows a ludicrous mismatch in numbers even if the premise were correct.
We who recognize in Russia the hope of overcoming the diabolical NWO wish to believe whatever is optimistic or triumphal, so it takes a little effort of will sometimes to engage brain. We have some real good news; we don’t need fiction.
Some sections of his writing may be ok; I have scanned only two other sections, which also contained errors of fact.
I posted a couple of comments in response to his series.
One was countering his statement that ‘gold is money’ — a common fallacy in fact. Gold is a commodity unless a government designates it as money because money is a legal instrument of a government — ‘legal tender’ — not just something with value.
I also posted a comment saying that gold is like nuclear weapons whose real benefit is not in employing them but stop others from using it as club, if you have a lot of it, so fiat money can be used (as the US and many other nations do).
He does not understand some basic economics, and should read things from people like Michael Hudson or Randy Wray. So should most people — ‘economics 101’ doesn’t carry one too far and much of it is just wrong.
Thank you Baaz for so much information. Really a nice wide selection.
Baaz, the SITREP that you have put together here is simply magnificent; it really surpasses everything I’ve digested on the blog thus far!
I truly have the feeling of the SITREP’s included contributors writing right after my own heart. The Counterpunch piece especially was hard-hitting and perceptive to the utmost. Connected all the dots superbly. The Western Left’s deluded arrogance with not one single progressive merit of its own to back up anything; Greece and its peoples’ First Worldist sense of imperial entitlement underpinning the entire farce of Syriza. Not only did these middle class ultra-super-duper revolutionaries not ask the Eurocrats to go bugger themselves — they have also been totally silent about NATO and its base in Crete from where the bombers took off to Libya. Bottom line as per Counterpunch and myself in unison: The Western Left has never liberated anybody; nor will it ever. The struggle for emancipation from Western pathocracy has always been led by the “lesser peoples” outside North America and Western Europe, period.
Among the comments above, I would like to address broadly the issues brought up by Martin from East-Berlin. Hitler, in my view, was just another braindead Westerner, gladly plagiarizing the well-established practices of Anglo-American imperialism — land-grabbing, lawlessness, enslavement, war, and racist genocide — including elevating them to your God-given national ethos.
Lastly: Golden Dawn will make very angry noises, sure, but in all likelihood they’ll be quite happy to settle for beating up Third World immigrants and refugees while the Master Race coteries in Brussels and Berlin destroy their beloved Fatherland. Another manifestation of that good ol’ discreet charm of the bourgeoisie, methinks.
@ Baaz.
Thank you for this in-depth sitrep. Very much appreciated.
:[]:
Seems as if Greece has continued to be a weapon wielded by the US to weaken the EU. US REALLY doesn’t want the euro as a rival to the dollar. I guess a weakened EU will be a dependent EU, even less able to resist.
The growth of the European Union was 1,2 % in 2014, which places it in 173rd place – which is to say one of the world’s worst results (the world average is 2,2 %).
Tsipras reversed the nearly-final sale of the electric grid to Azerbaijan, and prevented a Chinese arrangement with the Port of Piraeus– money which could’ve kept the banks open, or provided a cushion to restart the drachma. Now the horrid banksters or oligarchs will get both to pay off never-ending debts.
Now Hollande is against ‘temporary Grexit’:
http://sputniknews.com/europe/20150712/1024527627.html
Quote from Telegraph article on what Schnauble/Merkel’s austerity deal would include (asset stripping, basically):
First, they must simply hand over “ valuable
Greek assets of €50 billion ” to be privatised –
flogged off to decrease the debt. Who will do
the privatising? Schäuble proposes that these
Greek state assets – airports, electricity
companies, whatever – should be surrendered
to a body called the “Institution for Growth in
Luxembourg”. And who is in charge of this
institution, eh? Jawohl, meine Freunde! It turns
out to be a front for the German KfW, the
Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau, the state
development bank that was set up, ironically, as
part of the postwar Marshall plan to rescue the
bombed-out German economy.
Yep, that’s irony.
Clearly Tsipras is at best, not very smart.
Greece, in their heart, want captivity. The human race is that way for some societies.
Some fight and die rather than be enslaved.
Some run and abandon their posts.
Some just kneel and hope their heads don’t roll. They are prepared to beg for water and bread.
Tragically, the thieves are at the gates and Greece will be robbed naked.
Everything we think of as Greece, greatness, magnificence, noble is being stripped from their willing bodies.
They would line up to be flagellated if they were “guaranteed” another day as part of Europe.
Only a few have the heart and head to resistance. I salute those few.
Another domino falls…
Russian national payment system and Japan’s JCB to issue co-badged cards >>
http://rt.com/business/272173-russia-japan-banking-jcb/
and here some good analysis by Joseph P. Farrell on the same topic >>
http://gizadeathstar.com/2015/07/behind-the-scenes-a-huge-development-russia-and-japan-to-issue-co-badged-cards/
Amazing sitrep Baaz ! You’ve covered the globe..:)
News just in: Murky and Mr Orange (Hollande) have issued a joint statement demanding Porks must recognise Donbass and Lugansk as per Minsk.
Not sure, but I think there was a reference to the repeated violations by the UAF.
http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/merkel-hollande-urge-poroshenko-give-donbass-self-rule/ri8677
People still have to deal with international banksters, facists, corporations, finaciers, speculators, etc., but this is not, as Jon Perkins pointed out, the US, but international. That means some of the craziness of the US must fall to the wayside as the situations develop.
Blue
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/07/10/brics-bankers-confirm-they-will-undergird-not-undermine-western-financial-decadence/
What is needed is a caped crusader superhero team: Bill Black, Michael Hudson, Steve Keen, Stephanie Kelton, Randy Wray, Bill Mitchell, and Max Keiser and John Perkins for a bit of spiciness. They should to go around to these different nations to enlighten them, vanquishing the fascists, neoliberals, neoclassical economists, oligarchs, and crooks, and explain to the people just how these rip-offs go down. Maybe bring along Fedor Emelianenko to handle hecklers. As a grand finale, give them 3 days at the UN.
(In the meantime, invite all the corporate media people to their local gin mills and keep them drunk as a skunk — that should be the easy part. Let the independent media cover it all.)
This is not that complicated — not rocket science (which the US can’t do right either), but some basic information and common sense. If we are going to have a world war with finance and economics at least people should understand the weapons and which side is which.
@ Blue:
“What is needed is a caped crusader superhero team: Bill Black, Michael Hudson, Steve Keen, Stephanie Kelton, Randy Wray, Bill Mitchell, and Max Keiser and John Perkins for a bit of spiciness.”
Can you imagine? A Dream Team of sorts. I vote to add two fine ladies in there too; Ellen Brown and Catherine Austin Fitts, and why not, a bit of Dr Paul Craig Roberts and Gerald Celente cannot hurt.
“[..] oligarchs, and crooks, and explain to the people just how these rip-offs go down.”
Yup. Somehow we have to slay the misguided notion most people have of banksters as some nebulous white collar crooks, and in many ways they are, but more importantly they are a mafia: they behave like mobsters and will whack people like mobsters do. Just because they outsource their ‘hits’ to third parties, it doesn’t mean they’re not the ones making the call, assigning the targets and bankrolling the hitmen – these being; ‘economic hitmen’ or actual ones.
And I think I identified the right people to investigate this bankster mafia: it’s the Italian special investigation team, created precisely to investigate and prosecute the Italian Mob; they have the skills and experience to do this type of job.
And as far as I’m aware, they are the only ones trying to pin down the network of human traffickers operating from Libya.
Here’s a long but essential article on the subject:
Mastermind: The evil genius behind the migrant crisis
http://europe.newsweek.com/mastermind-evil-genius-behind-migrant-crisis-328471
^They would make a fine addition to our Dream Team.
.
-TL2Q
The Problem of Greece Is Not Only a Tragedy. It Is a Lie – By: John Pilger
“[..] These reportedly include a 50 per cent increase in the cost of healthcare for pensioners, almost 40 per cent of whom live in poverty; deep cuts in public sector wages; the complete privatization of public facilities such as airports and ports; a rise in value added tax to 23 per cent, now applied to the Greek islands where people struggle to eke out a living. There is more to come.”
“Anti-austerity party sweeps to stunning victory”, declared a Guardian headline on January 25. “Radical leftists” the paper called Tsipras and his impressively-educated comrades.”
“[..] Instead of social justice for Greece, they achieved a new indebtedness, a deeper impoverishment that would merely replace a systemic rottenness based on the theft of tax revenue by the Greek super-wealthy – in accordance with European “neo-liberal” values — and cheap, highly profitable loans from those now seeking Greece’s scalp.”
“[..] The day after the January election a truly democratic and, yes, radical government would have stopped every euro leaving the country, repudiated the “illegal and odious” debt – as Argentina did successfully — and expedited a plan to leave the crippling Eurozone. But there was no plan.”
“[..] The leaders of Syriza are revolutionaries of a kind – but their revolution is the perverse, familiar appropriation of social democratic and parliamentary movements by liberals groomed to comply with neo-liberal drivel and a social engineering whose authentic face is that of Wolfgang Schauble, Germany’s finance minister, an imperial thug.”
Mr Pilger closes his piece with: “This is not inevitable, a done deal, if we wake up from the long, postmodern coma and reject the myths and deceptions of those who claim to represent us, and fight.”
Link to full text> http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-problem-of-greece-is-not-only-a-tragedy-it-is-a-lie/5462175