Moveable Feast Cafe 2016/06/28 … Open Thread

The Cafe is open, a young lady is there, maybe she has red hair and waits for Flash Gordon from London. He arrives soon and tells us his adventure :

Flash Gordon in the Cafe

One day, sitting in the old Cafe, sipping careful my hot tee
Reading in my newspaper, through my glasses, I saw her…
Sitting lonely in the corner, at the table of the owner.
With high heels and mini skirts, with breasts, which mind flirts.
Lovely green hat on her head, Oh, I swear, her hair was red.
Her pullover, all in green and her legs, of a Queen.
She was sitting in my front, as a dream, just I want…
I don’t know, I had the feeling that her gesture has a meaning.
Looking through binoculars, not believing to my eyes,
Saw her legs under the desk, moving slowly, pitoresque…
Sexy move and crossing legs, me on watch, sitting on eggs.
What ? she’s flashing now for me ? who’s this woman, who is she ?
But my eyes are stuck in there, under desk and on her hair…
Where I am ? Paris or London ? had the feeling I’m Flash Gordon.
This is going to be hot, with my eyes fixing that spot…
At the flashing of that flesh, my mind’s plane is gonna crash.
But that woman, clever mind, knew much better what she find.
Suddenly, like a cat in her house, who is playing with the mouse,
In her green and in her red, she approached me and said :
– Are you looking for a friend ? cause I know your real intend…
– Really ? what a big surprise, I just wonder, what’s your price…
We have talked, have a drink and I payed without a blink.
Looking through my glasses, all was green, her assets,
Her pullover, skirts and hat, and the wonder beyond that
Was the purple of her head, what a color, what a red !
When she disappeared in toilet I was searching for my wallet…
Green and red, intriguing mixture, now, I understand the picture
I thought, she will strip for me, for sympathy and for free…
Being very sweet like honey, red head took away my money.
As for me, as Flash Gordon, left no reason for a pardon.

Waitress,
The café has now opened, and there are vacant chairs. A cup of cappuccino please. Need a strong one for some serious deliberations.

Being absent for a month, I got delayed in going through two ‘electrifying’ articles “A Russian warning” and “How Russia is preparing for WWIII” that appeared in this website couple of weeks back, and are high in popularity rating. It appeared to me that the ‘Bear’ has woken up from slumber, now that the ‘Fox’ has started to munch its tail !

Suffice it to say that, the human civilization, in its known existence of past six millennium, has never come to such an extreme level of hostility: on the one hand, the AngloZionist (AZ) plutocracy finds a way to achieve final ‘victory’ i.e. absolute global control, if they can decimate Russian-Chinese-Iranian people and leadership, while on the other hand, the Eurasian people and leadership started preparation to hand over the final ‘defeat’ to the AZ cabal, so that political-economic independence can be maintained and the eternal ideals of truth-justice-equality can be established.

Background:
We know the long-term objectives of the AZ cabal during its centuries-old existence:
1) Control ‘political process and power’ in every society/country on the earth
2) Control ‘economic process and wealth’ in every landmass/country/ocean on the earth
3) Control ‘socio-cultural process and population’ in every region/country on the earth

To achieve all the three objectives, the AZ clique, essentially needs to subjugate all the civilizations across the world. Apart from brute force of invasion, the following tools, and methods are among the durable and effective initiatives undertaken/established by AZ cabal during the past century to achieve their objectives of hegemonic world order (through ‘one world government’):
1) UNO, and its hundreds of sister organizations
2) Global banking and financial Institutions like BIS, WB, IMF, ADB
3) Trade pacts like GATT, WTO, and similar other pacts driven by USA-West Europe-Japan
4) Arms control treaties/regimes like CTBT, NPT, NSG, MTCR
5) Fiat Dollar as the foreign currency exchange basis across the globe
6) ‘English’ promoted as the primary language replacing vernacular languages across world
7) System of ‘Electoral politics’ promoted as ‘Democracy’ across globe
8) System of ‘Monopoly Capitalist’ economy in the garb of ‘Market Economy’ across globe
9) World-Wide-Web/Internet as ‘information’ and as ‘cultural’ platform across globe
10) Mainstream media broadcasting/publishing nonstop propaganda across globe
11) Genetically modified crops and foods
12) Genetically engineered humanoids

Since 1985 the AZ elite-aristocrats went berserk to think that finally the golden moment has arrived – centuries old dream about ‘end of history’ with the establishment of AZ liberal capitalist world order is nearing realization, with significant strategic maneuvers that can be phased as below:

(a) Preparatory phase from 1985 to 2000: the AZ clique coordinated in 1985 (Mikhail Gorbachev seizing power in ruling party of USSR), 1991 (Dissolution of USSR, and Yugoslavia), 1999 (NATO attack Greater Serbia without UNO authorization to support Kosovo region to secede), and 2000 (USSR’s mighty nuclear submarine Kursk destroyed through sabotage); 1981 onwards drive towards industrial capitalism in China, and 1992 onwards (drive towards industrial capitalism in India through globalized finance owned by the AZ bankers and industrialists

(b) Passive war phase from 2001 to 2016: AZ cabal coordinated in 2001 (false flag attack on WTC in New York using Arab Salafist terrorists that paved way to USA, UK first attack in 2001 the forces of Afghanistan government to remove Taliban government from power, and then attack in 2003 the forces of Iraq government to remove Baath Party government and kill President Saddam Hussein), 2008 (Georgian attack against South Ossetia which was repulsed by Russian military), 2011 (ISIL and other Salafists started attacking Syrian government forces in all regions but couldn’t seize power, however NATO attack on Libya to support Salafists resulted in defeat of the Libyan government forces and killing of President Muammar Gaddafi), 2014 (Ukraine’s President Yanukovich was removed through ‘Euromaidan’ militancy plus constitutional coup and large scale repression of Russian people, but USA failed to establish naval base in Crimea).

What are the ongoing strategic actions undertaken by AZ clique? When are they planning to plunge into ‘Active war phase’ against Russia and China? In order to defeat the AZ cabal in the eastern hemisphere, the strategic actions and preparedness of the ruling governments of USA-Rest of 5 EYES-Israel-Key NATO Countries during last ten years need to be assessed without bias. I am sharing my observations in this transparent and rational discussion forum, thanks to the tireless efforts of The Saker and his team …

Assessment of ‘AZ camp’ ongoing strategic plan:
To achieve the long-term objectives, AZ camp has been using manipulation and coercion with equal ease during past centuries.
Current overarching geo-political and political strategic actions common across all the countries of the eastern hemisphere are:

a. Manipulating the policy of government and bureaucracy as well as coopting the key political parties across all countries of the eastern hemisphere so that they can deploy pro-USA pro-Rest of 5 Eyes pro-Israel as well as anti-China anti-Russia policy actions. Simultaneously, oligarch-aristocrat families and elite individuals with servility towards AZ ideology (i.e. capitalist enterprises, private ownership, European ‘liberal imperialism’) are promoted in the political leadership-bureaucracy-business enterprises who can advance the interests of AZ clique

b. Developing conventional, nuclear, biological, chemical, and other special weapons and building a military force based on land, marine, air, and space that will be able to dominate every other country in every region, and if necessary, the military force can take punitive actions against any country including carrying out ‘first strike’ against other nuclear powers like Russia and China without any possibility of retaliatory strike

c. Pushing the military machinery manufactured by AZ cabal (in USA-Rest of 5 Eyes-Israel-France) into as many countries of the eastern hemisphere as possible and for all three departments (army, navy, air force) through coopting the ruling party, military, and bureaucracy; undertaking regular military exercises with military of industrialized and/or populous countries (except Russia-China-Iran) to enhance the level of interoperability with USA/NATO military personnel and machinery – as ‘groundwork’ for future regional military alliance

d. Deploying mainstream media, academic institutions, NGOs, pressure groups for carrying out grass-root level activism and propaganda across all countries of the eastern hemisphere addressing two sections of people: educated and elite sections of society are imbibed ideas on ‘Liberal Democracy’, ‘Human Rights’, and ‘Capitalist Market Economy’, application of which can increase private ownership of industry, while vulnerable sections of Sunni Islamic societies are brainwashed with ideas of ‘Wahabi Salafist’ militant ideas that can permanently keep the home country and its neighbourhood disturbed

e. Engaging global mainstream media and academic institutions to continuously vilify Chinese investments in infrastructure, mining, and manufacturing sectors in other countries that would help the country to register economic growth along with Chinese economic growth

f. Engaging global mainstream media and academic institutions to continuously denigrate effectiveness of Russian military machinery sold to other countries, and to resist and vilify Russian diplomatic involvement in multilateral institutions for dispute resolution among countries in other regions of the world

Geo-political and political strategies and resultant ongoing action plans in different regions of the eastern hemisphere can be summarized as below:

1) In East Asia, South-East Asia, Pacific Ocean zone, the key strategic action point is ‘Containment of China’ and ‘Create Asia-Pacific NATO’ through the following programmes:

a. Fomenting secessionist and anti-merger movements in Hong Kong, Xinjiang (Turkestan), Xizang (Tibet) regions of Chinese mainland. AZ cabal utilizes fault-lines of multi-ethnic and multi-religion society in China to create strong secessionist movements to torn apart the country into multiple vassal states attached to AZ Hegemon
b. Installing AZ camp followers as the ruling elites of Taiwan island who will not make peace with mainland, and can declare formal independence from Chinese mainland
c. Provoking trouble in South China Sea, East China Sea through coopting the ruling party leadership and bureaucracy of littoral states like Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines, Japan and nudging them towards confrontational behaviour with China
d. Keeping the land boundary dispute between India and China alive through coopting the Indian ruling party leadership and bureaucracy and nudging them towards illogical and confrontational behaviour
e. Keeping the ‘Korean problem’ alive by coopting successive South Korean governments towards taking an aggressive stance towards North Korean government so that peace agreement (as logical settlement of Korean War armistice) never happens
f. Keeping the ‘Kuril Islands problem’ alive by coopting successive Japanese governments towards taking an illogical aggressive stance towards Soviet/Russian government so that peace agreement (as logical end of WW II) never happens
g. Spreading propaganda in global media identifying Chinese ruling party’s internal debates as ‘factional fight’ to create factionalism within the ruling party, and vilifying Chinese manufacturing prowess as ‘sweatshop’ to create a negative image of China

2) In South Asia, Indian Ocean zone, the key strategic action points are ‘Pull India into AZ Orbit’ and ‘Keep Afghanistan a Troubled State’ through the following programmes:

a. Fomenting Salafist terrorism in India through Pakistan border, and then cozying up to the ruling party leadership and bureaucracy with ‘offer’ that joining the USA and NATO’s anti-terrorist campaign would resolve the terrorist problems in India
b. Coopting Pakistani leadership and military to mobilize various shades of Salafist Islamic groups into Afghanistan to keep it a ‘troubled zone’, that reinforces the ‘necessity’ of maintaining USA and NATO military bases in Afghanistan permanently
c. Finalizing two-way cooperation between USA and India so that USA can utilize Indian defense logistics facilities (India with limited zone of conflict, has very less requirement of reciprocal measure) and security intelligence network in case of large scale war
d. Manipulating Indian diplomacy in the neighbourhood to foment trouble in Sri Lanka, Nepal, Maldives as and when the leadership in those countries chose to steer through independent path as their people chosen
e. Keeping the India-China border dispute alive, by coopting successive Indian governments towards non-settlement of border agreement with China

3) In West Asia, North-East Africa, North Africa zone, the key strategic action points are ‘Turn the Region into Sphere of Israel’, ‘Establish Salafist power-base’, and ‘Reorganize State boundaries’ through the following programmes:

a. Creating multiple groups of Salafist terrorists by drawing unemployed/underemployed youth from Sunni Islam communities in the entire east-west corridor from Morocco North Atlantic shore to Afghanistan, and indoctrinating them with Wahabi Salafist ideas. (http://www.globalresearch.ca/america-created-al-qaeda-and-the-isis-terror-group/5402881). These are groups created with funding by Saudi, GCC, Israel using remnants of Saddam’s Iraqi Army officers and Egyptian/Algerian/Libyan Army deserters, trained by Pentagon/Mossad/M16, armaments and logistics provided by Turkey-Saudi-GCC countries as well as USA-Israel-NATO countries. For expansion of terrorist operation the funding is being arranged through illegal business of extraction and sale of Petroleum from North/Central Iraq, North/East Syria, Libya, Nigeria oil fields
b. Portraying the army of Arab Salafist terrorists as army of ‘pan-Islamic World’ through recruitment of non-Arab mercenary forces from West Europe, Caucasus, Central Asia, South Asia to create a ‘legitimacy’ among huge Asian and African Muslim population who would imagine that one ‘Caliphate’ can provide them a life with ‘dignity’ in a society free from all vices. Turkey is busy recruiting volunteer terrorists from south and south-east Asian countries where poverty and illiteracy is widespread
c. Destabilizing ‘State apparatus’ by coopting the popular revolts against the autocratic rulers in Egypt, and Tunisia, and by mobilizing Salafist terrorists to bring down rulers in Libya, and Syria who were looked upon by their people as ‘legitimate’; simultaneously ‘State boundaries’ are being obliterated with different Salafist groups turning large swathes of land into their fiefdom across countries like Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Egypt, Somalia, Libya, Mali, Nigeria, Chad – simultaneous occurrence of destruction of state apparatus as well as state boundaries in a region will throw up reorganization of states
d. Pushing Pentagon/CIA/M16 to background and creating a dependency on Israel for all governments in West Asia and North-East Africa who seek logistics-training-intelligence required, strangely, for both – helping the Salafist army (in Yemen, Libya, Syria, Iraq) as well as resisting the Salafist army (in Egypt, Somalia, Mali), thereby shaping up a two-tier architecture in the region with Israel as coordinator state providing logistics and intelligence supports to tier-2 satellite states
e. Manipulating the Kurdish liberation forces (separately in Turkey, Iraq, Syria) to act such that, the Iraqi and Syrian Kurds (leaders of which are hand-in-glove with AZ cabal) break away from their countries and create new state, while Turkey based Kurds (tradition of Marxist ideology based struggle against Turkish state repression) are expelled from their land of south-east Turkey to the new ‘Kurdistan’ state
f. Keeping Iran as a ‘pariah’ state in global affairs through imposing strict sanctions that will cripple economy and defense, and weaken the society beyond recovery; coopting the government and bureaucracy in all countries neighbouring Iran to create such a geopolitical situation so that, Iranian military forces are under tremendous working stress continuously for decades

4) In Central Africa, Western Africa, Southern Africa zone, the key strategic action points are ‘Containment of China’, and ‘Keep sub-Saharan Africa a Troubled Region’ through the following programmes:

a. Creating chaos and destabilizing ‘State apparatus’ by arming various tribes in the central and western regions of Africa who will indulge in internecine warfare through decades, thus Ruanda, Burundi, DR of Congo, Republic of Congo, Sudan, Nigeria etc. will remain hotbeds of tribal clashes
b. Creating chaos by arming various Salafist terrorist groups in sub-Saharan countries and in parallel creating fissures between Muslim and Christian population, thus making way for deployment of military forces from USA and NATO with usual rhetoric of ‘maintaining democratic and lawful government’
c. Influencing the political leaders in Africa’s south region where anti-imperialist struggle against European powers brought independence (Angola, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Zambia) towards cooperation with different institutions of AZ cabal and indulge in corruption, which ultimately bring them under the wings of AZ Hegemon (http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/06/04/%5EMozambique%20Corruption.pdf )
d. Building ‘client state’ in all regions of Africa where the entire spectrum of political leadership follows the AZ ideology, like Malawi (historic AZ anchor in southern Africa), Liberia (historic AZ anchor in western Africa), South Sudan (recently created after dismembering Sudan); possibility of dismembering DR of Congo is high where Katanga can be created as a new state under leadership beholden to AZ clique

5) In West Europe, South Europe, North Europe zone, the key strategic action point is ‘Containment of Russia’ and ‘Chipping Away Sovereignty of European Nation-States’, ‘Turn the Region into Multiracial Colony like USA’ through the following programmes:

a. Infiltrating the leadership of political parties which profess ‘socialist’ ideologies (hence, ‘anti-imperialist’) so that even if in any country the AZ loyalist elitist party loses election to any of the so-called socialist party, the pro-AZ capitalist and imperialist policies of government will continue in economy and defense
b. Bringing almost all countries under ‘EU’ and ‘NATO’ banner either as a direct member or as associate, and installing AZ camp followers as the ruling elites of all political parties in all countries in the region; diminishing the state sovereignty through shifting all governance and policy matters to EU headquarters – it ensures almost total acceptance of any policy of the AZ cabal in Europe
c. Staging false flag terrorist attacks in key countries like France, Germany in case the leadership in those countries are seen deviating from the policies of AZ clique, implementing policy that can bring peace in Europe and independence from USA
d. Coopting Turkey and Saudi political and bureaucratic leadership to mobilize and settle millions of Arab Sunni Muslim people into different countries of Europe – one of the purpose is to create a multi-racial society in Europe (something similar to USA where Negro and Hispanic peoples form a large part of population apart from the people of European descent), second purpose is to deploy large number of Salafist militants in Europe which will form part of future army that may be used to destabilize and invade the south-eastern borders of Russia
e. Spreading false propaganda in European media and academic institutions identifying fascist Germany’s territorial expansion and genocides as equivalent to communist Soviet Union’s defensive maneuvers and administrative overbearingness, and vilifying present Russian defense preparedness as military ‘muscle-flexing’

6) In Central and East Europe (Baltic Sea to Black Sea) and ex-USSR zone the key strategic action point is ‘Ruining the Slavic Civilization’, ‘Creating East European NATO’, and ‘Contain Russia’ through the following programmes:

a. Fomenting secessionist movements in Caucasus and Siberian region of Russian land, so that Russian state and socio-political structure is demolished beyond repair. AZ cabal utilizes fault-lines of multi-ethnic and multi-religion society in Russia to create strong secessionist movements to dismember Russia into multiple vassal states of AZ cabal
b. Instigating separatism in the countries of Balkan region either through Sunni Salafist terrorists or through Slavic ethnic fascists or through Christian religious extremist factions to break the entire region into small state-lets which can will become AZ vassals
c. Manipulating the leadership and bureaucracy in all European countries that were part of USSR previously, towards taking government policy decisions/actions which will anchor them towards west Europe and USA and simultaneously harm Russian interests; coordinating ‘colour revolutions’ through planned mass demonstration and planned chaos, in case governments don’t follow AZ diktats, and then bringing in AZ lackeys who will draw Russian government into military confrontation (Ukraine, Georgia)
d. Expanding EU and NATO to the borders of current Russia through creation of new military installations in east Europe, Black Sea, Baltic Sea, and nudging AZ loyalist governments of ex-Soviet bloc countries like Poland, Latvia, Estonia, Romania, Bulgaria and ex-USSR state Azerbaijan towards confrontational behaviour with Russia; counter move by Russian government is portrayed in mainstream media as ‘Russian aggression’
e. Reopening the ‘Kaliningrad issue’ through occasional media reporting, even if WW II settlement was clear about Konigsberg handed over to USSR – the final action plan of AZ cabal is to deny Russia access to Baltic sea; similarly denying the validity of ‘Crimean referendum’ for reunification with Russia through continuous false propaganda in media, even if it was an integral part of Russian empire – the final action plan of AZ cabal is to deny Russia access to the Sevastopol naval base in Black sea
f. Coordinating ‘colour revolutions’ through mass demonstration and armed insurrection against central Asian governments that were part of USSR previously, and who have staunchly anti-AZ (like Kazakhstan, Kirgizstan, Tajikistan) sentiments. At the same time, reinforcing corrupt autocratic governments in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan (both with sizeable Sunni Islamic population) to develop them as lynchpin for AZ clique

Predominant economic strategies and resultant ongoing actions across the eastern hemisphere can be summarized as below:

1) Owning and controlling the natural resources like petroleum, natural gas, minerals-metals, exotic materials like Gold, Cobalt, Uranium etc. in all countries of the eastern hemisphere through influencing the country’s oligarchy, political leadership, and bureaucracy – the AZ cabal always targets for owning the resources

2) Funding and controlling the research-development of technical know-how in every sphere of human life: from refining of ore and power generation up to designing of consumer goods, industrial goods and military machinery – the technological advancement ensures the AZ cabal to retain edge in economy over any competing society

3) Bringing more and more spheres of human society and human life under capitalistic mode of economy – starting with agriculture (in 17th century) and industry (in 18th century), capitalist mode of economy already engulfed services sectors (part of government activities till 1980s) like education, healthcare, and communication. There is every possibility that in near future, even activities of ‘governance’ by the government will be run by the private capitalists of AZ cabal

4) Manipulating the leadership in all countries towards taking decisions/actions pertaining to economic activities like mining-infrastructure-manufacturing where (mostly) Chinese and Russian investments and technologies are involved, that can that can jeopardize the Chinese and Russian interests; in central Asian region the AZ clique works overtime to create such environment that can bring Russian and Chinese investment policies at loggerheads

Assessment of ‘AZ camp’ preparedness:
There can be no doubt that AZ plutocracy-aristocracy believes in ceaseless preparation for world domination. Since 1990s the strategic actions have been carried out with amazing consistency and in most cases with desired results. The key aspects of preparedness can be listed below:

1) USA Defense forces through its regional commands across the world, as well as the forces of UK, Australia, Israel, and France have very high degree of military preparedness aimed at fighting multiple wars simultaneously at multiple theatres. They have developed and deployed a ubiquitous comprehensive C4ISTAR procedure that will support ‘first strike’ to decapitate the adversary. Advanced military technology and machinery deployed around the world that can provide AZ cabal superiority to bully other countries are:
a. Very strong naval force with 11 Carrier Strike Groups (CSG), and huge number of sea and coast battle ships, submarines, under water drones
b. Unique Missile Defense System (MDS) that can defend a region by striking down incoming projectile progressing through initial firing or midcourse or terminal stage
c. Vast stockpile of Nuclear bombs and missiles that can be delivered from land, air, sea using supersonic aircraft, hypersonic glide vehicles, submarine, land silo, mobile launcher targeting object on land, air, sea, space
d. Sophisticated space based weapons like kinetic kill vehicle, directed energy weapon, hypersonic missiles delivered from space using artificial satellites in orbit, robotic orbital vehicle (X 37B, reusable space plane which is highly maneuverable in orbit) targeting objects on land, air sea, space; unique monitoring of the high earth orbit (HEO) and coordination with other satellites using four satellites of Geosynchronous Space Situational Awareness Program (GSSAP)
e. Special armaments researched by DARPA like robotic combat force, microsatellites as drones, microbiological weapons, undersea mobile unmanned sensors, weather control techniques (HAARP project)

2) AZ clique and its camp followers are amazingly connected across broadest possible spectrum in both sides of Atlantic: in North America, South America, Europe continents political leaders of all major parties (irrespective of professed ideology), bureaucrats, military officials, industrialists, business managers, financers, legal and media professionals, academicians, NGO managers maintain their cobweb through rotating key members from one role to another. Thus a retired Director of intelligence department of USA can occupy the role of Chairman of financial investment firm as well as the role of a university Professor! AZ cabal attaches high importance to bring in select elites of Indian, Chinese, Korean diaspora into key positions in USA and UK

The AZ cabal have few known secret associations like Bilderberg group, Trilateral commission, Club of Rome, Council on Foreign Relations etc. where representatives of the top (may be, hundred) plutocrat families coordinate economic-military-social affairs of the world in order to achieve hegemonic world order. (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-10/does-bilderberg-really-run-world-one-chart-help-you-decide)

3) Military encirclement of Russia and China around their geographical regions by USA (along with forces from Rest of 5Eyes, NATO, Japan) has been progressing at a feverish pace. With components of missile defense system installed at Poland, Romania, Japan, and planned for South Korea, carrier strike groups present in all the oceans, hundreds of military bases in Europe-Asia-Pacific Ocean-Indian Ocean, military logistics facility sharing agreements with dozens of countries, the AZ cabal is keeping no stone unturned.

During 18th to 20th century AZ elites got their foot soldiers from among the peoples of Europe through propagation of ideologies like ‘nationalism’, ‘fascism’, ‘ethno-religious supremacism’ – hence, every time European army marched to Russian border, military forces were drawn from different European countries. Considering Europeans as ‘spent force’, now in the 21st century, AZ elites are busy mobilizing their foot soldiers from Sunni population (mainly Arabs, and Chechen, Uzbek, Uyghur) through ‘Wahabi Salafi’ ideology to march to Russian border. (http://katehon.com/1227-cia-and-turks-created-caliphate-to-launch-attacks-on-russia-and-china.html)

4) The governments in UK, France, Turkey, Israel which are the strongest outposts of AZ cabal have been trying to infiltrate into globally well-known multilateral institutions where China, Russia, Kazakhstan and other ex-USSR countries play the central role (like SCO, EEU, AIIB etc.). If the endeavour succeeds, there can be sound opportunities for these countries to play the role of a ‘Trojan Horse’ to weaken and defeat the ‘Eurasian Resistance’

5) The AZ cabal’s final preparedness is creation of AZ-run economic-military supranational blocks that will actively impair all-round security of the ‘Eurasian Resistance’ countries: physical security, energy security, food and water security. To squeeze key Eurasian countries like Russia, China, Iran, ex-USSR countries, south Asian countries from economic relationship with other regions, exclusive trade blocks like TPP, TTIP, and TISA are being created, where AZ corporate interests will trounce ‘state’ sovereignty. This will ensure ‘captive market’ for goods and services produced by AZ plutocracy, keep US fiat Dollar as global exchange currency, and ‘contain’ the ambitions of German-French-Italian oligarchy. (http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-transatlantic-trade-and-investment-partnership-ttip-would-abolish-europes-sovereignty-the-eu-would-become-a-us-colony/5417382)

Recent Setbacks of ‘AZ camp’:
In spite of meticulous preparation, AZ camp is having serious setbacks:

1) Free and fair public referendum in Crimea on the question of unification of with Russia, and Crimean administration becoming part of Russia legally without Russian military directly getting involved to use ‘force’
2) Appearance of Donbas as separate political entities in East Europe which have been successfully resisting the Ukraine’s fascist government’s illegal war against its own Russian population, without direct interference from Russian government
3) Syrian government resisted the savage onslaught by the AZ cabal (through Salafists mobilized by Turkey, Saudi, Jordon, Israel) on the Syrian population with help from governments of Iran and Russia, and Hezbollah movement of Lebanon
4) Kurdish factor in Iraq-Syria-Turkey becoming more of a ‘jigsaw puzzle’ by every passing day, with the Turkey-based Kurds really threatening to cut a slice of south-east Turkey that has been Kurdish land even before Seljuk and Ottomans Turks settled in Anatolia
5) Japanese government’s ambivalence towards more militarism or peace with Russia and China (now that Japanese aristocrats-oligarchs got cold-shouldered by AZ cabal through denial of around $50 billion submarine deal of Australia)
6) German government expressing disgust over NATO’s recent warmongering about Russia (due to unrestricted migration from west Asia and north Africa as well as loss in trade with Russia due to EU sanctions, popularity of ruling party is at historic low)
7) Bulgarian government’s unwillingness about being part of NATO Black Sea fleet stems from the fact that with so much of social disturbances, Bulgarian government is not willing to take decisions that will be overtly anti-Russian
8) In UK (lynchpin of AZ cabal in Europe) the common people in a recent referendum decided to exit EU due to unrestricted migration from east Europe/west Asia, lack of employment in middle class society, unprecedented social inequality as a result of neoliberal capitalism
9) In spite of two decades of setbacks in the social, economic, and political sphere of life, Russian government developed some war machinery like extremely agile hypersonic missiles and highly effective electronic warfare systems that, as means of ‘asymmetric warfare’, can effectively counter USA/NATO military prowess
10) Chinese government utilized the two decades of bonhomie (1990 to 2010) with USA-based oligarchs and captains of industry to build massive technological capability and capacity in mainland China which is now spinning its own sphere across Asia and Africa independent of the AZ cabal’s world-wide sphere

As an act of desperation to reverse the recent setbacks and to regain the momentum towards ‘one world government’, the AZ clique can launch a significant false-flag operation in near future which will get transformed quickly into a military and economic campaign across Europe-Asia-Pacific as the ‘Active war phase’ to challenge the ‘Eurasian Resistance’ block. For the sake of humanity, the ‘Eurasian Resistance’ block especially Russia-Kazakhstan-China-Iran must remain vigilant for any eventuality anytime soon.

Straight-Bat

The ‘Progress’ of the End of Tsarism

By Jørn K. Baltzersen

November 7, 2005

Once in our lives we wanted to make the people happy and this is something for which we will never forgive ourselves.

~ an old Russian leftist to Nadejda Mandelstam, Leftism Revisited

This year we mark the centenary of the revolution that gave birth to the Russian Duma Monarchy. Today is the 88th anniversary of the dreadful event that goes by the name of the Russian Revolution, in which the Kerenski provisional government was overthrown.

A book from 2003 is on this occasion very relevant indeed. The Third Rome: Holy Russia, Tsarism and Orthodoxy is a book by Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson and published by the Foundation for Economic Liberty. An excerpt is available online.

The book starts out in the preface with what one could call a sort of Hoppean challenge of the Whig theory of history:

The purpose of The Third Rome is to alter the political universe of those who read it. In other words, it was to challenge the assumptions that underlie the liberal/conservative consensus in western countries. Such assumptions include the superstitious belief in progress, the linear (i.e. evolutionary) development of history and, importantly, the continued dominance of the idea that western democracies are morally superior to not merely the rest of the globe, but also superior to all systems of rule that have ever existed.

Further down in the preface Dr. Johnson goes on:

For the exoteria of western politics, one is routinely treated to myths about the linear development of European history from the “darkness” of the middle ages to the “light” of the Enlightenment, science and its progeny, postmodernism. The “tyranny” of medieval and early modern kings is contrasted to the benevolence of modern republics. The evils of feudalism are contrasted to the capital/state alliance. This makes up every introduction to political science in universities, and it is at the very nature of “civic discourse” as it is contrived in the west. The only difficulty is that it is nonsense.

At no time in global history have ruling classes amassed such centralized power: surveillance techniques, media power, armies, advanced weapons, computers and a disciplined bureaucracy that can track each and every citizen with pinpoint accuracy throughout his life form the vulnerable underbelly of the tripe concerning “democracy” and “republicanism” in the west. Tyranny previous to modernity was largely impossible: the technological apparatus needed to create “totalitarianism” simply did not exist. Only modernity can create tyranny.

Johnson is right on the money when he tells us:

[T]he day to day functioning of royal government, is not contrasted with the actual functioning of republican systems, but rather with idealistic theory of republicanism.

The book is not only a defense of the Russian monarchy. It is also a defense of the Orthodox branch of Christianity. Johnson is an Orthodox Christian. In his book he puts himself in conflict with the Catholic Church. The third Rome is Moscow, the second Byzantium, and, of course, the first is Rome. An important part of the book is the theme that the Orthodox Church, Russian culture, and the Russian monarchy are tightly linked.

I cannot say I agree with everything Dr. Johnson says. Nor have I double-checked all the facts. Most LRC readers will probably react negatively to Johnson’s anti-globalization and anti-capitalist rhetoric.

We know so very well how many Western intellectuals have wanted to see the Russian Revolution and the more than 7 decades of Communist rule through rose-colored glasses. We should probably read Johnson’s book with critical eyes, but the history we have been taught by said Western intellectuals should probably viewed at least as critically — if not more. Johnson is probably not very far from the truth when he claims:

[T]he English language historical literature on Russia merely rehashes 90-year-old Bolshevik propaganda and calls it history.

We are taught that what gave the West its success is small political units, as opposed to China and Russia. However, what works for the West does not necessarily work for Russia. As Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn told us in his Leftism Revisited:

[T]he brilliant, scintillating, amiable intelligentsiya were the guiltiest of all. For generations they had undermined the fabric of Holy Mother Russia, either by siding with the Social Revolutionaries, the Narodnaya Volya, the Social Democrats, or by being “open-minded,” by deriding the national heritage, by spreading polite doubt, by stupidly imitating Western patterns, ideas, and institutions that would never do for Russia.

One can disagree with Raphael Johnson’s anti-Western rhetoric, but he undoubtedly has a point in that Russian culture is quite different from Western culture. Besides, given all the anti-Russian rhetoric that has been in circulation, anti-Western rhetoric the other way is perhaps the least one could expect.

Johnson echoes Bertrand de Jouvenel when he tells us that absolutism in the Russian monarchy was absolutism in the political sphere only. Today the political sphere includes everything, and the modern man hardly understands how limited royal “absolutism” actually was. Johnson tells us that the monarchy was invisible to roughly 90 % of the Russian population until the revolution. Johnson describes a decentralized system:

The peasant commune controlled the social life of the peasant, and was completely independent of the tsar.

Dr. Johnson attacks the modern regime in which the workers stand alone in an environment where the employers have no responsibility for the workers’ well-being. Johnson’s attack on the “Robber Barons” would probably find many disagreements among many of the readers of LRC. However, Johnson does have a point when making us aware of the responsibility masters of old had for the well-being of those who worked for them. In a sense he echoes Bertrand de Jouvenel’s reflections on the same issue in his On Power. One can easily — to some extent at least — agree that one of the major problems of our times is freedom from responsibility.

Johnson describes a high level of social legislation, especially legislation protecting workers from poor working conditions. Now, it is at least questionable that such legislation is desirable. However, the legislation at the time was probably nothing compared to what we have nowadays. There is little doubt that if such legislation were in place in pre-1917 Russia, the claims that old Russia was a “reactionary” system exploiting the lower classes do not have very much basis.

Johnson also seems sympathetic to the idea that the modern centralized state, which more or less has crushed the institutions that would protect the individual from power, does not give any real individualism:

An “individual,” isolated from his commune or region, would, as in all “democracies,” be a meaningless legal fiction, easily exploited. This is the esoteria of “individualism” in political theory; it is easier for the oligarchy to dominate isolated individuals than to deal with larger and more powerful communal and municipal structures.

On Nicholas I Johnson tells us:

In liberal democracies, those who have the most ambition to rule are those who run for office. Nicholas showed the opposite that, even when the crown was handed to him, he rejected it in favor of the (formal) heir apparent. Only under pressure did he accept the crown. In democratic thinking, only the ambitious and obnoxious are capable of doing what is necessary to get elected. American politicians are whores. They are forced to alter their views depending on the group with which the politician is meeting with or speaking. He is constantly asking for money with far less grace than a common prostitute.

On taxes The Third Rome tells us the Russians were the least taxed in all of Europe at the time:

St. Nicholas II was brought to the throne in 1894. He found a Russia far from being “backward,” but, in a few years — by the start of World War I — was the envy of the world. She had the lowest taxes in all Europe. Direct taxation per capita amounted to 3.1 rubles per year, versus 13 for Germany, 10 for Austria, 12 in France and 27 in progressive, democratic and capitalist Britain. Indirect taxation was also the lowest in Europe, amounting to 6 rubles per capita for Russia, but 10 for Germany, 11 for Austria, 16 for France and 14 for Britain.

This level of taxation should absolutely give cause to consider the old Russian order in a favorable light. Moreover, the old Russian regime’s attitude towards central banking is quite interesting indeed:

Russia was just beginning her economic expansion into world markets. There can be no question that the refusal of the Romanovs to set up a central bank under the rule of the global financial elite marked them for extinction. Imperial Russia was the only major European power who refused to set up a Central Bank, though the Bolsheviks, as always, willingly obliged.

It seems here that Johnson has nothing against world trade and making money. So what is the anti-capitalist rhetoric for? Is it merely an attack on the alliance between state and capital? Or is it an attack on a lack of worker protection? Both concepts are attacked by Johnson. I am not in this essay defending Johnson’s pro-welfare perspective. By no means. The pro-welfare perspective is very little relevant to the book’s key point, namely that the emperor was far more a friend of liberty than the brutal barbarism that was soon to come.

When reading Leftism Revisited, we are told:

[Serfdom] did exist until 1861, but it was no more and no less characteristic of Russia than slavery was of the United States. It was, moreover, incomparably milder than slavery and did not exist at all in the majority of the empire. Some serfs were rich — with fortunes amounting to from 30 to 60 million dollars (present purchasing power) — and they paid only a microscopic head tax.

The Third Rome tells us of serfdom that:

It is, regardless, far from clear that the liberation of the serfs was an unmitigated gain for the peasantry. Nevertheless, in 1861, what took the American republic years and hundreds of thousands of American lives to accomplish (in the case of slavery), the Russian Tsar accomplished in one fell swoop, the elimination of serfdom and the liberation of the peasant.

One of the things I recall having been taught in school about Russia is something like that 10 % of the Russian population owned 90 % of the land. Raphael Johnson counters such teachings in Western schools when saying, e.g.:

By 1917, the peasantry controlled the overwhelming majority of farmland — more than three times what was controlled by the nobility.

Another thing we are generally taught is that Russia was a police state and the most absolute state in all of Europe. Such teachings are again countered by Johnson:

De Goulevitch claims there were 3,500 members of the St. Petersburg police force. However, Kochan and Keep (1997) claim that there were 5,000 full time policemen in the entire empire of 180 million souls, which would make Russia one very poor example of a police state. In fact, the total number of government workers, including the zemstvo employees, policemen and employees at all levels never exceeded 330,000. By contrast, much smaller France, in 1906, had budgeted for 500,000 employees.

Moreover, Johnson tells us that the royal government did not dare step into the domain of the peasant communes, and that:

The peasant rebellions of the Russian countryside were on the scale of large civil wars.

Moreover, in one of his many well-placed rants against democracy, Dr. Johnson tells us:

“Free elections” are the easiest way for an oligarchy to enslave a population without them knowing it.

Johnson covers many topics such as the question whether Ivan the Terrible is a correct translation from Russian and whether he was a butcher. Johnson believes Ivan the Awesome is a more correct translation. Johnson claims to be clearing up some misunderstandings, and he should be credited for this. However, his antipathy — when describing the fight over power between the Tsar and the aristocracy — against the aristocracy, which serves as a check on power, I do not have much sympathy for.

The fact that Russia had to fight the Mongols has probably had more influence on the development of the geographically largest nation on this planet than we generally think of. Johnson also gives us a bit of his thoughts on this.

Johnson claims that Peter I was an un-Russian emperor, in the sense that he was bringing about “enlightened absolutism.” This is according to Johnson a European concept and not a Russian one. Johnson has consequently little sympathy for Peter the Great. According to what we are taught in Western schools Russia is the example of absolutism in Europe. Again, Raphael Johnson offers here a perspective which is well worth looking into. Among the checks on the Emperor’s power were — according to Johnson — the Orthodox Church and the peasant commune.

Johnson gives us a pretty good overview of Russian history until 1917. He has left post-1917 out because he believes this is not particularly Russian. He does quite well in explaining a system prior to democratic absolutism and the totalitarianism and atrocities of the 20th century. This was by no means a perfect system, but it seemed to work quite well for Russia, and it was unfortunately brutally brought to an end.

It is commonly believed that the first revolution in 1917 was progress, whilst the October revolution was the great tragedy. This is similar to the conception that the end of Habsburg and Hohenzollern rule was progress, whilst the rise of the Hitlerite monster was the great tragedy. Of course, it is true that the rises of Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler were great tragedies. However, to think that the end of Romanov, Habsburg, and Hohenzollern rule was progress is a grave error. As for Russia, Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn sums it all up in one brilliant sentence in Leftism Revisited:

In Russia, the fall of the monarchy in March 1917 destroyed the center and object of all loyalty.

As — amongst others — Bertrand de Jouvenel has noted, revolutions never bring about better leaders in the end. This is also true for Russia, and one of Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn’s 1188 notes in Leftism Revisited tells us no different when describing Alexander Kerenski:

I met the man twice in the United States. He was “nice” but, listening to his views, I could only pity him. George Katkov was absolutely right when he said that the Russian “liberals” who destroyed the old regime had no idea of the crime perpetrated, nor the least capacity to steer the ship of state on an even keel.

Although I am generally satisfied with Dr. Johnson’s communicating the end of Tsarism as decline, and with his attempt to refute survived propaganda about Tsarism, I feel that the myth about the two independent steps of revolution in 1917 is not sufficiently countered. The Kerenski error should have been countered more thoroughly.

Johnson has an extensive bibliography to be used for further studies. However, there seems to be something missing in this bibliography. Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn wrote in Leftism Revisited:

The misconceptions, moreover, about the Russian class structure that prevail in the Western world are so manifold and so deeply rooted that they seem ineradicable. The three brilliant volumes by Anatole Leroy-Beaulieu on late nineteenth-century Russia, L’Empire des tsars et les Russes, give a glimpse of a totally mixed society based neither on birth nor on money. Needless to say, the same impression is conveyed by the great Russian novelists of that period. Actually, before Red October Russia was Europe’s “Eastern America,” a country where social mobility was greater than elsewhere, where titles had none of the nimbus they had in the West, where fortunes could be made overnight by intelligent and thrifty people regardless of their social background. Skilled European workers and specialists in many fields emigrated to Russia rather than to the United States. And, even before 1905, knowing how to speak and to write gave total liberty.

Anatole Leroy-Beaulieu’s work is available in English as Empire of the Tsars and the Russians. Considering this tribute in Leftism Revisited and considering that anyone seriously involved with disputing the transition from monarchy to democracy being progress should be familiar with Leftism Revisited, I find it peculiar that one cannot find any reference to Anatole Leroy-Beaulieu in Johnson’s book. Specifically, anyone involved in disputing the development from monarchy as progress paradigm when it comes to Russia should be familiar with the 10 pages — and the associated notes — in Leftism Revisited on Russia, i.e., the chapter by the name of From Socialism to Communism. Again, why Leroy-Beaulieu is not referred to is puzzling. Moreover, the above quote from Anatole Leroy-Beaulieu gives a perspective which is not clearly communicated — or perhaps even lacking — in Johnson’s book.

The Third Rome is highly recommended. Many LRC readers will find the rhetoric disagreeable. The book should — despite its shortcomings and disagreeable rhetoric — be read by anyone seriously interested in the transition from monarchy to democracy. It is high time we start viewing the Russian Revolution as Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn did:

Imagine a very popular, intelligent, conscientious, good-looking and responsible young man, obviously destined for a highly successful life. One day, having had a few drinks too many, he runs his car into a tree and ends up a paraplegic. Accidents happen not only in the lives of persons, but also in the lives of nations.

There is no meaning behind the course of history.

Ignore an anti-modernist book on the geographically largest nation on this planet if you so wish, but that would probably be for the good of your own ignorance.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2005/11/jrn-k-baltzersen/was-overthrowing-the-tsar-progress/

I want to remind people of our mortality. We are here for a short time and then in eternity like all our ancestors.

I lost about 20 kilos after I got my cancer diagnosis and I have refused treatment.

A jesuit once said that we have to learn one thing. How to die. I am learning. When I look back at my life I have to constantly beg for forgiveness. If the Lord answers my prayers, it is because He is everything and I am nothing.

Today I think of my daughters great grandfather, a Russian who never came back from the war. In his village there were no men left and the women had to work hard. The children had no masculine examples. The women baptized them in the forest at night.

Condolences to all the families of victims of the attack in Istanbul. Shame on the Erdogans who have nurutured the beast of Daesh.

But, there are other victims whom never appear in the media and so never have our compassion. Just this Monday, an attack in the Lebanese village of Al Qaa ( North Bekaa valley ) left 10 deads and 15 injuried….

“Terrorist attacks and victims in the Lebanese village of Al Qaa”

http://spanish.almanar.com.lb/adetails.php?eid=131811&frid=23&cid=23&fromval=1&seccatid=31

“Terrorism has managed to strike Lebanon again, this time in the far northeast of the country.

Several suicide attacks carried out by suicide bombers have killed at least ten people in a village predominantly Christian on eastern Lebanon, Al Qaa, an area close to Syria.

On Monday night, the village was hit by four suicide bombings, he said a military source told AFP. Thirteen people were injured, according to hospital sources quoted by the National Information Agency. They were taken to hospitals in the region.

Two kamizakes were exploded near an armored vehicle and a military unit of information and forth in front of a church, according to a military source. Two explosions took place near the town hall.

The direction of the Army advised the people of Al Qaa, in a statement, not meet in public places and to respect the security measures.

Fighting has erupted outside the town between the Lebanese army and armed groups. Army artillery bombed the positions of the latter in the province.

Early Monday morning another four suicide bombings claimed the lives of another five people.

Reactions

For the Lebanese Prime Minister Tammam Salam, this operation shows “the baleful plans directed against Lebanon and the risks that threaten the country.”

The army chief, General Jean Kahwayi, meanwhile, paid tribute to Al Qaa and other border towns which “represent the first line of defense against terrorism.”

The UN special coordinator for Lebanon, Sigrid Kaag, “condemned” the attacks and called on the international community to “improve the capabilities of the Lebanese army so that it does meet the security challenges, including terrorist threats.”

<b<Terrorist presence

Lebanon currently collects 1.1 million Syrian refugees throughout its territory, especially in Aarsal, northeast of the country.

Reports of Lebanese and international security confirms that among the refugees include a number of terrorist militants willing to carry out attacks against civilians and the Lebanese Army.

It was thanks to the attacks carried out jointly by the Lebanese Army and Hezbollah that most of the Lebanese-Syrian border in the east of the country is assured.

The infiltration of terrorists has become almost impossible and attempts to commit several car bombings have been aborted.

But when the Army and Hezbollah came to the border village of Arsal to continue cleaning the rest of the border, an entire political and media campaign of the political field “March 14″ was launched brandishing the threat of Sunni-Shiite discord.

This prevented the continuation of the operations of cleaning the northeastern border of Lebanon, facilitating the continuation of terrorist attacks such as those that took place on Monday in Al Qaa.”

That is the way, all united against Daesh/Al Qaeda, international terrorism and its funders/supporters:

“Goodbye to the victims of attacks in Lebanon”

“Christians and Muslims attend the funeral of victims of suicide bombings in the Lebanese village of Christian majority of al-Qaa, June 29, 2016.”

http://www.hispantv.com/noticias/fotos/280268/libano-victimas-atentados-pueblo-cristino

US is cranking up the propaganda on south China Sea.

China risks ‘outlaw’ status if it rejects South China Sea ruling: lawyer
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-philippines-court-lawyer-idUSKCN0ZF2YS