I’ve said before (and will say again) that once you have monopolies controlling something very important to society (in this case Social Media). Then they “must cease” being permitted as “private companies”.They need to be nationalized under a state directing agency. Some might say a state company might enforce censorship too. But the way I see that is,I’d rather be censored by a state operation.If I would be, in which theoretically I can change that policy by law or through elections.Than by a private company of rich people that I have zero chance to influence. And that their view is controlled by their personal politics,their pursuit of money,or both.
Just as with the banks ,another group,that if they are “too big to fail”. Means they are “too big to be private companies”. When you have private companies able to control the well being of all society. Then you have a big problem in our society.In the case of social media and internet services,as with banks.They require the use of government services to exist and make profits. Which means they “depend” on our common government for their ability for profits in society. That should never be permitted.
I agree regarding monopolies and private vs state owned.
But banks: there is no such thing as “too big to fail”.!! This is an invention by Goldman and other investment banks who gave this as a pretext in order to extract tax payers money to cover their losses. How the system should have worked is : The government covers small depositors up to, say 100k USD, and the rest eat their losses. The banks fail, the banksters go to jail for fraud. A new clean bank is created.That’s it. It doesn’t need to be government-owned.
I think your idea is a good one, within the system, to correct the problem temporarily. The problem for me goes deeper than that though. Banks and the owners of banks always end up with way too much power in a society. And then no matter what “fix” is made on a particular issue. They find ways to get around it and regain, or keep, their power. They serve their own interests and those of others of the elite. And not those of the nation and common people of the nation. So it is better to eliminate that problem totally. And not have to constantly deal with it, over and over again, under different circumstances. Banks, and the financial power they give, shouldn’t be in the hands of private individuals.
Yes, the problem lies in the system. The capitalist system which is running the world is based on the banks monopoly, hence the power of the bankers on the political elite. Having this power, they choose the people who run the politics. The election system is organized and monitored closely by the same banking elite in order to remain in power. The so called liberalism is playing directly into their hands having the role of carrot supplied to the masses and is called democracy.
This is a symptom of what has always been the fatal flaw in right-libertarianism — the failure to account for the fact that corporations are chartered by the state and are therefore statist entities. They are part of>/b> the state. That is, corporatism is by definition fascism, just as Mussolini said.
Therefor, censorship by a corporation is censorship by government and a violation of the 1st Amendment. The whole, “They’re a private entity so they have the right…” argument is bogus. There is no such thing as a private corporation, whether it’s a “monopoly” or not.
Ha,ha,ha,ha,ha. OK I got that out of my system now.
He is not Islamophobic. Unless you believe that anyone trying to stop their country being overrun by people of a different religion and culture are all Islamophobic. I don’t see him advocating Europeans go to Muslim countries and take them over and convert them from Islam. Now that would be called Islamophobic. Not wanting your own country to be invaded by people with a different religion and culture. And with terrorism becoming an almost daily occurrence because of that,is not Islamophobic. There is another name for that,its called “being smart”.
@Anonymous: Do you exist ? Is there anything ? I can answer them for you 1. probably 2. certain.
Now what is that not nothing ? You don’t know, nobody does.
If there is now something, what happend between nothingness which is the most simple given and that which is, which is very defnitly not nothing and much, much more difficult to grasp ?
Answer: we cannot know. So there we are with a miracle and an entity – and it is an entity no matter in what multitudes it can be differentiated. And that entity is God , the First and the Last. Your crap Math follows after the fact. The very fact the equation can be postulated already is another proof for the existence of God but in no way it’s result, which is false, because if it were true, it could impossibly be stated and therefore again it’s result false.
You fool, who can see, and yet sees nothing !
PS: There is an introductory step to clear the fog – just bang your head 20 – 50 times hard against a wall, and then try to think about what exactly happend…..
(Edited,do not use caps your sentences.It violates the blog rules. I’ve edited it for you this time. But if you continue. I’ll to sent all your posts to Saker for review.MOD)
The countries who are taking in refugees and migrants are being overrun, no argument from me. But where I differ is I actually know why they are coming. The West has either oppressed their countries and kept them from developing by flooding them with our cheap, excess products to ensure no domestic industry would develop, tricked them into accepting ridiculous IMF loans which they can’t pay back and all the so called “aid” we pump in, we get twice as much back in interest, goods and labour. Or we bombed their homes to the point where they can’t feel safe on the speck of land where their childhood home once stood, which is now a pile of worthless rubble thanks to “good” Christian bombs, not “bad” terrorist bombs.
The migrant waves, however artificial they have been (The US was “advertising” Europe to migrant countries, promising them free housing, cars, government hand outs etc.), are a form of karmic retribution because we let our corrupt and criminal governments do this to their countries without lifting a finger to stop them. Now we bitch and moan about them coming here after all the crimes we committed against them, their families and loved ones.
And what Paul Joseph Watson along with the entirety of Infowars and their affiliates have been doing is playing into the same globalist narrative, knowingly or unknowingly, they are oh so determined to fight. The clash of civilisations, in this case, Christians vs. Muslims, is a globalist depopulation plan and they are playing into it. The majority of Muslims don’t give a rats ass about you, me or our “way of life.” The few who hate your guts do it from the couch and for good reason, the handful who actually try and kill you are so small in number they are dwarfed by our own criminals. And it is the fact that their terrorists that makes them terrorists, not Islam.
I am an atheist, I don’t give a damn about anyones religion, to me they are all tools of oppression and crowd control, nothing more. But saying Islam is a terrorist religion is just utterly ridiculous.
If we all were actually smart, we wouldn’t waste a breath cursing Muslims and migrants, we would fight our own corrupt governments to prevent this from happening in the first place, because they are the root cause of the migrant waves. These people didn’t just fall from the sky one day and decided to come here.
People perpetuating the “Islamization” narrative of the migration crisis have got the cart far before the horse. These people didn’t wake up one day in Afghanistan, or Iraq, or Libya, or Syria and say “Gee, I’d sure like to spend all of my scant resources to undertake a perilous journey to overburden Germany’s health care system and plant a demographic plot to become a ‘minority majority’ in 30 years.” No, they left their homes, friends, and relatives because us in the ‘West’ bombed their homes, shot their friends and scattered their relatives to the wind. That’s how ‘we’ ended up with them. Not because Islam ‘told’ them to come. We broke it, we bought it, simple as that.
My country was occupied by Ottomans for 500 years. And now we are still being overrun by wahabi mercenaries and local muslims funded by Saudi, Qatar and other arabic countries. So how do you justify that?
“My country was occupied by Ottomans for 500 years. And now we are still being overrun by wahabi mercenaries and local muslims funded by Saudi, Qatar and other arabic countries.”
There a re quite a few Native Americans who could express a similar view about you and yours occupying the usa, as you do about Muslims moving into Serbia.
I am 100% Serbian. For generations my ancestors were pious orthodox christian peasants who lived off the land in the Balkans. We did not sail on the Mayflower.
I just read a post on paulcraigroberts.org about radical left wingers who hate white, conservative culture in America. So is this who you are? I think all your comments now make sense in that light.
I didn’t justify anything, I merely said actions have consequences, inaction on the part of the people, too. And I would count Serbia among the victims of the West, I don’t know why you would assume Serbia to be in the perpetrator category like a Germany, Britain, France and especially US. NATO bombed Serbia in a gross violation of international law, why would you think I would throw Serbia in with this band of merry terrorist states?
Hi Serg, thanks for that. “Christians” is a very broad definition as is “Muslims”. I have to say I do not wish the people of the West ill for what their criminal politicians have done. I do not wish for any people to be confronted by Wahabism, regardless of their religion.
Perhaps people who get banned from YouTube or have their videos otherwise hidden could upload their content to Russian servers. Would Yandex be a good alternative?
I can’t say I’m going to miss him. LOL Actually, I think he is such a dork that I don’t watch his stuff. If he kindly disappeared until he grows up, he would be doing the world a favor.
Switch to a peer to peer, decentralized blockchain based technology, where no one will be able to shut it down, and get paid in crypto currencies for posting content.
“Google IS the internet” – no, it isn’t. Altavista is the internet, at least, there was a time when there wasn’t a Google, and there will be again. Instead of whining about Google, you should be telling people how bad they are and how you can CHANGE services.
ALWAYS keep a copy of your videos before uploading.
Windows to Linux (Ubuntu)
YouTube to Vimeo
search with Duckduckgo
Chromium to Firefox
Gmail to riseup.net
WhatsApp to GPG4USB and Copy-Paste
VPN to stop IP-profiling
uBlock stop Facebook/Twitter/Google buttons tracking you and stop all ads
run your own mail server using Linux and iRedMail
I’ve said before (and will say again) that once you have monopolies controlling something very important to society (in this case Social Media). Then they “must cease” being permitted as “private companies”.They need to be nationalized under a state directing agency. Some might say a state company might enforce censorship too. But the way I see that is,I’d rather be censored by a state operation.If I would be, in which theoretically I can change that policy by law or through elections.Than by a private company of rich people that I have zero chance to influence. And that their view is controlled by their personal politics,their pursuit of money,or both.
Just as with the banks ,another group,that if they are “too big to fail”. Means they are “too big to be private companies”. When you have private companies able to control the well being of all society. Then you have a big problem in our society.In the case of social media and internet services,as with banks.They require the use of government services to exist and make profits. Which means they “depend” on our common government for their ability for profits in society. That should never be permitted.
I agree regarding monopolies and private vs state owned.
But banks: there is no such thing as “too big to fail”.!! This is an invention by Goldman and other investment banks who gave this as a pretext in order to extract tax payers money to cover their losses. How the system should have worked is : The government covers small depositors up to, say 100k USD, and the rest eat their losses. The banks fail, the banksters go to jail for fraud. A new clean bank is created.That’s it. It doesn’t need to be government-owned.
I think your idea is a good one, within the system, to correct the problem temporarily. The problem for me goes deeper than that though. Banks and the owners of banks always end up with way too much power in a society. And then no matter what “fix” is made on a particular issue. They find ways to get around it and regain, or keep, their power. They serve their own interests and those of others of the elite. And not those of the nation and common people of the nation. So it is better to eliminate that problem totally. And not have to constantly deal with it, over and over again, under different circumstances. Banks, and the financial power they give, shouldn’t be in the hands of private individuals.
Yes, the problem lies in the system. The capitalist system which is running the world is based on the banks monopoly, hence the power of the bankers on the political elite. Having this power, they choose the people who run the politics. The election system is organized and monitored closely by the same banking elite in order to remain in power. The so called liberalism is playing directly into their hands having the role of carrot supplied to the masses and is called democracy.
The problem are not the banks. The problem is the central bank and the way credit is issued.
This is a symptom of what has always been the fatal flaw in right-libertarianism — the failure to account for the fact that corporations are chartered by the state and are therefore statist entities. They are part of>/b> the state. That is, corporatism is by definition fascism, just as Mussolini said.
Therefor, censorship by a corporation is censorship by government and a violation of the 1st Amendment. The whole, “They’re a private entity so they have the right…” argument is bogus. There is no such thing as a private corporation, whether it’s a “monopoly” or not.
Google, FB, Amazon, Twitter are as evil as MSM. But they are 1000x more powerful.
They represent the evil of Cult Liberalism, Globalist Feudalism, and Transhumanist deviance.
Boycott them all.
He’s illuminati. why do you think he’s always pushing islamophobia???
“He’s illuminati.”
Ha,ha,ha,ha,ha. OK I got that out of my system now.
He is not Islamophobic. Unless you believe that anyone trying to stop their country being overrun by people of a different religion and culture are all Islamophobic. I don’t see him advocating Europeans go to Muslim countries and take them over and convert them from Islam. Now that would be called Islamophobic. Not wanting your own country to be invaded by people with a different religion and culture. And with terrorism becoming an almost daily occurrence because of that,is not Islamophobic. There is another name for that,its called “being smart”.
Having your country invaded by people with no religion would probably be the best of all possible outcomes if you consider:
“The probability of God is now basically zero (10–36 if you’re keeping score at home).”
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/crossexamined/2014/04/computing-the-probability-of-god/
@Anonymous: Do you exist ? Is there anything ? I can answer them for you 1. probably 2. certain.
Now what is that not nothing ? You don’t know, nobody does.
If there is now something, what happend between nothingness which is the most simple given and that which is, which is very defnitly not nothing and much, much more difficult to grasp ?
Answer: we cannot know. So there we are with a miracle and an entity – and it is an entity no matter in what multitudes it can be differentiated. And that entity is God , the First and the Last. Your crap Math follows after the fact. The very fact the equation can be postulated already is another proof for the existence of God but in no way it’s result, which is false, because if it were true, it could impossibly be stated and therefore again it’s result false.
You fool, who can see, and yet sees nothing !
PS: There is an introductory step to clear the fog – just bang your head 20 – 50 times hard against a wall, and then try to think about what exactly happend…..
(Edited,do not use caps your sentences.It violates the blog rules. I’ve edited it for you this time. But if you continue. I’ll to sent all your posts to Saker for review.MOD)
The countries who are taking in refugees and migrants are being overrun, no argument from me. But where I differ is I actually know why they are coming. The West has either oppressed their countries and kept them from developing by flooding them with our cheap, excess products to ensure no domestic industry would develop, tricked them into accepting ridiculous IMF loans which they can’t pay back and all the so called “aid” we pump in, we get twice as much back in interest, goods and labour. Or we bombed their homes to the point where they can’t feel safe on the speck of land where their childhood home once stood, which is now a pile of worthless rubble thanks to “good” Christian bombs, not “bad” terrorist bombs.
The migrant waves, however artificial they have been (The US was “advertising” Europe to migrant countries, promising them free housing, cars, government hand outs etc.), are a form of karmic retribution because we let our corrupt and criminal governments do this to their countries without lifting a finger to stop them. Now we bitch and moan about them coming here after all the crimes we committed against them, their families and loved ones.
And what Paul Joseph Watson along with the entirety of Infowars and their affiliates have been doing is playing into the same globalist narrative, knowingly or unknowingly, they are oh so determined to fight. The clash of civilisations, in this case, Christians vs. Muslims, is a globalist depopulation plan and they are playing into it. The majority of Muslims don’t give a rats ass about you, me or our “way of life.” The few who hate your guts do it from the couch and for good reason, the handful who actually try and kill you are so small in number they are dwarfed by our own criminals. And it is the fact that their terrorists that makes them terrorists, not Islam.
I am an atheist, I don’t give a damn about anyones religion, to me they are all tools of oppression and crowd control, nothing more. But saying Islam is a terrorist religion is just utterly ridiculous.
If we all were actually smart, we wouldn’t waste a breath cursing Muslims and migrants, we would fight our own corrupt governments to prevent this from happening in the first place, because they are the root cause of the migrant waves. These people didn’t just fall from the sky one day and decided to come here.
Well said Serg.
People perpetuating the “Islamization” narrative of the migration crisis have got the cart far before the horse. These people didn’t wake up one day in Afghanistan, or Iraq, or Libya, or Syria and say “Gee, I’d sure like to spend all of my scant resources to undertake a perilous journey to overburden Germany’s health care system and plant a demographic plot to become a ‘minority majority’ in 30 years.” No, they left their homes, friends, and relatives because us in the ‘West’ bombed their homes, shot their friends and scattered their relatives to the wind. That’s how ‘we’ ended up with them. Not because Islam ‘told’ them to come. We broke it, we bought it, simple as that.
My country was occupied by Ottomans for 500 years. And now we are still being overrun by wahabi mercenaries and local muslims funded by Saudi, Qatar and other arabic countries. So how do you justify that?
SG
“My country was occupied by Ottomans for 500 years. And now we are still being overrun by wahabi mercenaries and local muslims funded by Saudi, Qatar and other arabic countries.”
There a re quite a few Native Americans who could express a similar view about you and yours occupying the usa, as you do about Muslims moving into Serbia.
“Me and mine”…?? “Occupying the USA” ???
I am 100% Serbian. For generations my ancestors were pious orthodox christian peasants who lived off the land in the Balkans. We did not sail on the Mayflower.
I just read a post on paulcraigroberts.org about radical left wingers who hate white, conservative culture in America. So is this who you are? I think all your comments now make sense in that light.
sg
You live in the usa.
I have never lived in the USA. Sorry to blow your conspiracy theory.
@Serbian Girl
I didn’t justify anything, I merely said actions have consequences, inaction on the part of the people, too. And I would count Serbia among the victims of the West, I don’t know why you would assume Serbia to be in the perpetrator category like a Germany, Britain, France and especially US. NATO bombed Serbia in a gross violation of international law, why would you think I would throw Serbia in with this band of merry terrorist states?
Hi Serg, thanks for that. “Christians” is a very broad definition as is “Muslims”. I have to say I do not wish the people of the West ill for what their criminal politicians have done. I do not wish for any people to be confronted by Wahabism, regardless of their religion.
Samo tako Seko
when they are finally on there door step, the all will be to late
Everyone needs to remember that Google was financed and supported by the CIA from Day One.
‘Nuff said…
Perhaps people who get banned from YouTube or have their videos otherwise hidden could upload their content to Russian servers. Would Yandex be a good alternative?
“I won’t be around much longer”
Oh, well…
I hear netanyahoo is getting resistance in israel, as well. Time to circle the fascist wagons again and bring in a new mccarthyism.
Oh, wait, the zio-sods are already doing this.
The ‘Platform’ is the Message…!
Welcome to Corprolandia!
Access Denied!
Maybe, just maybe we need another …. platform?
Cheers – hope you come back.
Glad to see that disgusting fellow will be gone.hes a shill
I can’t say I’m going to miss him. LOL Actually, I think he is such a dork that I don’t watch his stuff. If he kindly disappeared until he grows up, he would be doing the world a favor.
Switch to a peer to peer, decentralized blockchain based technology, where no one will be able to shut it down, and get paid in crypto currencies for posting content.
https://steemit.com
Disclaimer,
I have no linkage with them whatsoever. Just like the tech. BLOCKCHAIN is the future!
“Google IS the internet” – no, it isn’t. Altavista is the internet, at least, there was a time when there wasn’t a Google, and there will be again. Instead of whining about Google, you should be telling people how bad they are and how you can CHANGE services.
ALWAYS keep a copy of your videos before uploading.
Windows to Linux (Ubuntu)
YouTube to Vimeo
search with Duckduckgo
Chromium to Firefox
Gmail to riseup.net
WhatsApp to GPG4USB and Copy-Paste
VPN to stop IP-profiling
uBlock stop Facebook/Twitter/Google buttons tracking you and stop all ads
run your own mail server using Linux and iRedMail
Fight back with FREE software.