Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin on Monday likened the UN Security Council resolution on Libya to a Medieval crusade call.
Russia abstained from a UN Security Council resolution adopted on Thursday imposing a no-fly zone over Libya and measures to protect civilians from leader Muammar Gaddafi’s forces.
“The Security Council resolution is deficient and flawed; it allows everything and is reminiscent of a medieval call for a crusade,” Putin told workers at a ballistic missile factory in the Urals region. “It effectively allows intervention in a sovereign state.”
Ten of the Security Council’s 15 members voted in favor of the resolution, with Russia, China, Germany, India and Brazil abstaining. The resolution was co-sponsored by France, Britain, Lebanon and the United States.
“This U.S. policy is becoming a stable trend,” Putin said, recalling the U.S. air strikes on Belgrade under Bill Clinton and Afghanistan and Iraq under the two Bush administrations.
“Now it’s Libya’s turn – under the pretext of protecting civilians,” the premier said. “Where is the logic and conscience? There is neither.“
“The ongoing events in Libya confirm that Russia is right to strengthen her defense capabilities,” he added.
Western-led military strikes against Libya’s strongman Muammar Gaddafi, who has been ruthlessly fighting rebels in the North African country since mid-February, began on Saturday.
Libyan television has reported that at least 50 civilians have been killed and over 150 wounded in the strikes and that many health and education facilities have been destroyed.
——-
Comment: First, thanks for C for sending me a link to this article. Second, I cannot decide whether Putin and Medvedev are playing “good cop, bad cop” with the West, or whether they each represent a different constituency. There are also presidential elections in the near future, so that might explain this rather bizarre situation. Either way, the fact that Putin used the term “crusade” (which is not a frequent idiom in Russian) tells me that he is trying to get brownie points with the Arab audiences. Damage control?
Well, the reply didn’t take long:
“Medvedev rebuts Putin over Libya”
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20110321/163130143.html
It seems that the hypothesis that the president and the prime-minister represent different interests get stronger with this. And with the presidential elections approaching, this will probable get more common.
I don’t know what Putin’s agenda is, but he is 100 percent right here, though the word “crusade’ implies a higher motive than gang rape.
I wish many on the Left would get their heads out of their asses and see what’s going on. There are still leftists who are convinced all it takes to fix situations like this is the careful application of a massive amount of bombing. Reason be damned. This is the political equivalent of voodoo.