by Straight-Bat for the Saker blog
Foreword
A personal journey for nearly 15 years is coming to an end – it was 2008 winter when I stumbled upon ‘The Vineyard of the Saker’, slowly but surely I became, first, a regular reader, then a commenter (first as ‘Anon Indian’ and thereafter, ‘Straight-Bat’), and finally, for past 3 years a guest-author. Like most of the regular readers, I got attracted by the most significant traits of The Saker blog-site – quest for truth and loathe for injustice. My profound thanks to The Saker for providing me such a platform which has already cemented its position as a torch-bearer of the anti-hegemonic struggle! This is also an opportunity to extend my thanks to the moderators and IT staff who maintained the blog-site free from useless (garbage) comments which made this blog-site as the home for most intelligent comment section among all alternate media. As the curtain is falling down on this wonderful platform of international exchange of views, I would like to pen down my last piece for The Saker on what I feel as the keystone for the future of the Resistance Camp, and indeed, for the future of humanity!
1. Background
The Anglo-Jewish oligarchy armed with the ideology of Zionist-Capitalist political economy, has been building a world-wide empire during the past five centuries through wanton destruction of the environment [link🡪 https://www.globalresearch.ca/historical-analysis-of-the-global-elite-ransacking-the-world-economy-until-youll-own-nothing/5805779]. As a result of it, the socio-economic condition of our planet has become frightening ever since the era of industrial capitalism commenced – richest 10% of the global population own 75% to 80% of all wealth and take 50% to 55% of all income, remaining 90% of the population has become wage-slave and debt-serf, but they have been thoroughly indoctrinated for generations so that during their lifecycle cradle-to-grave they live under an artificial impression of being ‘the responsible citizens of democratic nation’. [link🡪 https://wir2022.wid.world/www-site/uploads/2022/03/0098-21_WIL_RIM_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.pdf]
However, there are very clear signs that the edifice of the current world order is now crumbling. And, this is the most crucial period when any wrong move on the geopolitical and geo-economic chessboard would be detrimental to the Resistance Camp. Earlier, I have detailed my views on the importance of the role of Eurasia and the four sentinels – Iran, Russia, China, (North) Korea – for the future of our civilization. I have also detailed the significant actions for the key players in the Eurasia in the same article [refer🡪 https://10.16.86.131/super-states-in-core-eurasian-geopolitics-utopian-proposition/]. The current leadership of Russia, China, Iran are wise, hence inappropriate move(s) is not expected. However, I would like to take this opportunity to, once again remind the leaders and the people of China and Russia about the importance of the bond of friendship and cooperation between them – RUSSIA & CHINA MUST MAINTAIN AN UNBREAKABLE ALL-WEATHER PARTNERSHIP UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES.
2. An Outline of the China-Russia Partnership
Let me dwell over the key points like, the necessity to create the “strategic comprehensive partnership”, how the partnership can be forged, and what are the headwinds for such partnership.
2.1 Who needs the “strategic comprehensive partnership”?
The common people, the 90% of the population who earn their livelihood in exchange of their physical labour and mental efforts in the primary, secondary, and tertiary sectors of economy in not only China and Russia, but across the Eurasian landmass, need this partnership that will ensure a healthy standard of life and a moral and just social environment.
There are hundreds of learned academicians and intelligent analysts in Alt-Media who invariably point out towards the political-social-business elites (the 1% wealth owning class plus 9% business managers-technocrats-bureaucrats-media etc.) while talking about the partnership between China and Russia – yes, they also need it, but they will support such partnership as long as their primary business relationship with the global oligarchy remain unobstructed. As soon as the ‘wealth accumulation’ process of the elite and oligarch families of China and Russia gets impacted (due to various internal reasons) they will certainly try to pull the levers that will impede the onward march of China-Russia partnership. This scenario was appropriate until December’2020 in China (when the Chinese government launched an antitrust investigation into Alibaba Group for its monopolistic practices) and until February’2022 in Russia (when the Russian government launched the special military operation for demilitarization and denazification of the Ukraine since February 2022. Since then, it became clear that, even if every 9 out of 10 industrialist-banker-trader would like to to expand economic ties with their countertparts in North America, West Europe, and West Asia where the entire economy is owned and controlled by the Zionist-Capitalist cabal (after all, that system ensured wealth accumulation for them for past five centuries), the peoples’ government of their respective countries will maintain such relationships with the global oligarchy ONLY to the extent that fulfils the minimum necessity.
In unfortunate scenarios like natural disaster, famine, armed conflict, and economic decline when the entire society is under flux, most of the country’s 10% elites will prefer to shift to the countries of North America, West Europe, Australia continents where the western philosophy of Zionist-Capitalist political economy has taken roots. But 90% of common people will prefer to take such unfortunate downturns of lifestyle in their own stride because they belong to their land with which they haven’t severed bond! How could they part with their mother that supports them? And, during any such socio-economic devastation, it is the community members who will come forward with practical solutions, extend helping hand, wipe the tears from their grieving neighbours! The common people of entire landmass that is known as Eurasia will look forward to the Russia-China partnership as their protector during any unforeseen doomsday.
2.2 Why such “strategic comprehensive partnership” is a necessity?
Let me address this matter from a negative perspective – let’s explore why “strategic comprehensive partnership” between China and USA, or Russia and USA, or Russia and EU, or China and EU will not serve the purpose for 90% of the common people of China and Russia? Any strong partnership between two countries/blocks where USA or EU represents one side, essentially would be planned, and shaped by the Zionist-Capitalist cabal consisting of Jewish, Anglo-American, Anglo-Saxon elite oligarchy families with roots in both sides of Atlantic. Since the cabal represents 1% elite-aristocrat oligarchy class of North American and West European countries, the “strategic comprehensive partnership” shaped by that cabal can only serve the purpose of 10% of both the partnering countries/ blocks. Other than paying lip service to the so-called ‘democracy and human rights’ the 10% population will do nothing for the 90% – the life of 90% would become more difficult, investment in domestic economy would become sparse, earning package would become thinner, healthcare and education would become costlier, (and, as a result of which) depopulation would become the norm! At the same time, the 1% elite-aristocrat oligarchy class of both the sides of partnering countries/blocks would amass wealth at a ferocious pace by all means – legal and illegal, while the 9% managers-technocrats-bureaucrats-media persons also build fortunes within a short period of time! One need not scratch head to find examples of this – look at the socio-economic conditions of 90% common population of the country where the elites entered in cosy partnership with USA recently – Russia during 1990s, Ukraine during 2010s, east Europe *except Hungary, Poland) during 1990s and 2000s. Thus the partnerships preferred by the country’s elites and oligarchs (Russia or China on one side while USA or EU on the other side) would be detrimental to the interests of the common people of both Russia and China.
Now someone may ask a valid question – why should there be a “strategic comprehensive partnership” at all? Aren’t China and Russia too big a society/country to stand on its own feet, aren’t Russia and China too resourceful to withstand any invasion? Doesn’t Russia and China possess enough talent to grow and sustain their economy? Well, ever since the first post-Ice Age Neolithic civilisation appeared around 10,000 BC in north Africa and west Asia, societies (and all forms of political entities that grew within different societies at different points of time) interacted among themselves – trading interaction, socio-cultural interaction, intellectual interaction – in order to fulfill the requirements that could not be arranged with own resources. Without interactions and exchange of ideas and materials, no society (with any form of political entity – city, republic, kingdom, empire, nation) could prosper commercially and/or intellectually. Inquisitiveness about what another society is doing is as old as the civilisation – sending ’emissary’ to the neighbouring empires/kingdoms used to be a normal regular feature of the ancient and medieval world. Between the neighbouring societies/countries there was/is one added reason for a continuous and consistent interaction – both the sides need to have clear understanding of socio-political environment prevailing in its neighbourhood. So, even if it is assumed that Russia and China are great countries and great powers, there are strong practical reasons for a partnership. In reality, China is deficient in energy resources (which is abundant in Russia) and China has shortage of arable land (while Russia has vast landmass that remains under-utilised), while Russia is deficient in ‘human resources’ (that is abundant in China), Russia has limited ‘market’ (which is large in China) – hence, it is a win-win scenario for both the countries to forge a strong and stable relationship covering economiy, culture, and security.
If we bring in the current geopolitical tensions and overall global environment into consideration (which partly arised because of the refusal by the leadership and the citizens of Russia and China to comply with the ‘diktats’ of the Zionist-Capitalist oligarchy) the necessity of such a partnership dramatically increases. Since 1770 AD, the Zionist-Capitalist oligarchy has been controlling the entire economic base (covering banking and finance, industry, agriculture, and service sectors) of West Europe and the Anglo countries which, after 1990 have been mostly churning out military machinery as their only industry. By 2001, NATO became the owner of the largest military machinery the world has ever seen. It is beyond doubt that, NATO can inflict stupendous destruction/damage on any society it chooses to attack with full force (nuclear, biological, and conventional) – more importantly, the 1% Zionist-Capitalist oligarchy possess a psychopathic and sociopathic bent of mind which allow them to accept any type of damage/destruction to their own countrymen, the 90% common people (they would like to call it as ‘collateral damage’) caused by the armaments of the opposing forces, as long as they get enough young people (from the 90% commoners) to serve the managers (who manage the military affairs; since WW II, the global oligarchy believes every activity including war must be profit-oriented, and hence the managers need to manage the war and relentlessly suck the taxpayers money).
To guard against such adversary, China will need material and technical support from Russia, and Russia will need manpower, material, and technical support from China. A “strategic comprehensive partnership” needs to be formally put in place with utmost urgency – it will serve both the countries!
2.3 How the “strategic comprehensive partnership” can be forged?
In absence of detail reports we can guess from news articles, speeches etc. that the Russia-China partnership is growing stronger by the day. Let’s explore what should be the essential components of the so-called “strategic comprehensive partnership”:
(i) Contrary to many bloggers and commenters, I will put ‘Economy’ as the first and foremost component of any partnership – essentially any partnership starts with participation of both the sides in economic activities. Bilateral trade between these two giants have been steadily growing (except during global financial crisis of 2008 and economic sanctions against Russia during 2015 – 2017). China-Russia bilateral trade jumped 34.3% to $190 billion in 2022, a new record. However, the depth and breadth of trade and commerce could be much more than existing data suggests. While China can rely on its partner for, may be half of its energy imports (oil, gas), Russia can depend on its partner for a mix of industrial (electronic products, electrical machinery) and consumer products (garments, footwear) thereby ensuring a balanced trade (as much as possible). We notice a growing trend of Chinese financial participation in Russian energy ventures (from Yamal to Arctic) – this is a matured way of dealing the overall economic relationship. Apart from energy and mining, Chinese government should come forward with large-scale investments as part of the Belt and Road Initiative – not only Chinese and Russian interests will be addressed, but economic rejuvenation of entire Eurasia (covered by SCO, EEU, and APEC blocks) will get a boost.
There were/are knowledgeable sceptics who pointed out that Russian industry should, probably at any cost to its nation and sovereignty, establish close business relationship with USA and West Europe, since those were the leading industrialised countries who have technology and capital to infuse new life in Russian economy and to generate employment in Russia. Since 2022, when the USA acted like the sea pirates in the medieval era, and seized Russian assets in Europe and American territories and sanctioned almost every possible economic interaction between Russia and the West, the Russian elites stopped dreaming about the ‘European way’, however, there is little evidence that they are looking towards a new dawn of close economic interactions with their eastern neighbours!
(ii) ‘Security’ certainly merits to be listed as the second most important component of a partnership. The necessity of safeguarding national boundary and maintaining internal peace have always been the prime mover for security cooperation between neighbouring countries. China and Russia are no exception. The consistent threat of ISIS/Salafist terrorism (Islamic societies in Asia have traditionally high rate of population growth but many such societies lack affordable standard education and employment, all of which result in easy recruitment of unemployed youth as ‘terrorists’ by the agents of the Zionist-Capitalist cabal) and resultant violence and disturbances in China, Russia, and other core Eurasian countries resulted in institutionalization of the anti-terrorist procedures of SCO and CSTO. Apart from that, if we step back and review the military policy and deployment by the Anglo-Jewish oligarchy (based in the USA, the UK, Australia, France, Germany and other NATO countries) during past 25 years, it becomes very clear that the technological research, development of military hardware and software, deployment of military machinery everywhere around the globe (USA has 800+ bases) thousands of kilometres away from their own country are aimed at firstly, to contain Russian and Chinese military within the current boundary, secondly, to carry out a lightning strike to destroy Russian and Chinese nuclear missile stock, thirdly, to install Zionist-Capitalist stooges in place of the ruling leaders, finally to break the countries (Russia into 5 – 10 parts, and China into 3 – 5 parts) in order to permanently subjugate and break the spirit of the Russian and Chinese people and state. (I don’t have sufficient expertise in military theory and operation, however, in my opinion) it is imperative that China and Russia join hands for five-fold defensive cooperation:
(a) Development and deployment of appropriate underground-based, submarine-based, space-based machineries and systems that can track, trace, inactivate, and destroy the key components of enemy’s C4ISTAR system as much as possible within a few hours;
(b) Development and deployment of appropriate land surface-based, underground-based, ocean surface-based, submarine-based, air-based, space-based machineries and systems that can track, trace, inactivate, and/or destroy the enemy’s machineries and systems that will be used by the enemy for first strike using conventional, nuclear, biological, weather warfare against the Resistance camp; and development and deployment of machineries and systems to destroy the enemy’s key system machineries like ballistic missile defence systems, satellite network, orbital strike vehicles etc. of the USA and NATO;
(c) Manufacturing and deployment of conventional military machinery and systems that are decidedly technically superior compard to the enemy machinery and systems, training and deployment of military forces that have categorically superior skills and moral compard to the enemy forces; manufacturing of nuclear-powered orbital vehicles, manufacturing of AI and digitally connected main battle tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, manufacturing of ultra-quiet nuclear-powered submarines, and manufacturing of land-, air-, submarine-, sea-, based hypersonic missiles with Mach 10 and more average speed.
(d) Construction and commissioning of hundreds of very large impenetrable shelters 100-metre deep under mountains, deserts, forests, and barren unfertile landmass which can act as ‘alternate townships’ for providing emergency accommodation, food, and healthcare to a hundred thousand citizens of the country for at least two years – considering that only the large/medium cities will be targeted by the enemy, China will need 10 times more such underground townships compared to Russia. Undoubtedly, such massive investment in creating ‘unproductive’ infrastructure may not be explainable with the economic theories that are practiced today, but what purpose such theoretical Economics would serve to the societies in Eurasia if the Zionist-Capitalist cabal is able to strike with nuclear and conventional ammunition to wipe out around half of the population who reside in Chinese and Russian cities (as well as Iranian and North Korean)?
(e) Instead of waiting for the situation when push comes to shove, the Russian and Chinese military forces should construct may be around 10 military bases each to guard the major trade-routes thereby safeguarding the socio-economic interests of the Resistance camp (both sea and land) that would support rapid mobilization of air, naval, and land forces. In this regard, bloggers and commenters would point out to the fact that till 2015, the Chinese leadership never felt that their economic interests would get seriously threatened by the USA or the UK and/or NATO (China could afford to look the other way when Libyan infrastructure was destroyed and Libyan leaders were killed, because only about 5 billion US Dollars of investments went down the drain), but after the BRI was accepted by the global south, huge projects valued at about one and half trillion US Dollars have compelled them to construct military bases. Russian government has been very clear about such military bases – the Russian bases in Syria played a stellar role to keep the ISIS and Salafist forces and their masters at bay till date, and that proves how visionary the Russian leadership was!
(iii) ‘Socio-cultural’ bonding between the societies of neighbouring countries go a long way to reduce historical frictions and animosities (if any) resulting in enhanced understanding between the societies, which in turn enhance trade and commerce. It a matter of history that both the countries – China and Russia – share some of their socio-cultural traditions ever since the Mongol empire brought both these giant landmasses under one umbrella during the 13th and 14th centuries. Even if for obvious reasons, none of the regions – China, Russia, Iran – liked the idea of Genghis Khan’s forceful integration, the empire-building being a historical phenomenon, each of those societies adopted quickly. Though the Mongolian empire soon dissolved into the history, some traces of common culture lived on in society and governance of those three landmasses. It will be worthwhile if Chinese and Russian governments draw out specific plans targeting three segments of their population: (a) youth from age group 17 to 30, (b) working people from age group 30 to 60, (c) females from age group 20 to 50. There should be exchanges of such teams through out the year for various objectives – study and research in language and literature, social studies, physical science, economics, engineering and technology, research and product development etc.
Apart from that, cultural groups should maintain a periodic presence in partner country, which should be promoted by government and tourism industry in both the countries. The study of history, culture, and religious philosophies have deep roots in both Chinese and Russian societies – these should be encouraged by both the governments. This will increase religious tolerance and cohesiveness among people belonging to different religions.
(iv) If in any sphere Russia and China has been cooperating like true partners since the beginning of the 21st century, that is the ‘Strategic aspects’. I already detailed those strategically significant aspects for Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea in my article published in The Saker in November’2022. [Link 🡪 https://10.16.86.131/super-states-in-core-eurasian-geopolitics-utopian-proposition/ ]
2.4 What were the headwinds against the “strategic comprehensive partnership”?
Even during 2019 – 2020, the mind-set of the elites among the Russian bureaucracy-mainstream liberal politicians-industrialists-bankers-professional managers-technocrats was that, since the Russian religion, culture, and economic tradition etc. mostly belong to European civilisation, the Russian people and government should effectively move towards ‘Europeanisation’ (and ‘atlanticisation’ so to speak, considering the fact that a part of the Anglo-Jewish aristocracy moved to the USA and Canada) of their society. It’s true that, after the 15th century, the Russian empire was, most of the time engaged in political tussle and military campaigns vis-a-vis European kingdoms/empires, but primary reason for such things were that most of the times the Russian throne was occupied by aristocrat families from Europe – to be more specific, Germany. (It is another subject that there was never anything called ‘European culture’ and/or ethos – if ever there was a concept of “European-ness” the same got worldly expression through the joint military campaigns by the warlords/kings of different west European societies against the Byzantine, Russian, and Syriac/Lebanese societies!) Time and again the European powers marched against Russia, and every time such campaign ended when Russian forces stormed their capitals! If Russian elites were hell-bent on proving “European culture” then, sadly, they would have to keep Russia out of that concept in order to make it exist!!! However, the geopolitical and geo-economic landscape rapidly changed after 2021. With Russian government launching an assault against the fascist Ukrainian government and the USA and the EU declaring everything-under-sanction against Russia, the Russian elites are finding it extremely tough to pull Russia along the so-called ‘European’ route.
It is true that President Xi Jinping initiated the BRI programs that was breathtaking in its vision and mission around 2013 – 2014. But long after that, before the covid-19 could hit China at the end of 2019, the elites among the Chinese industrialists-bankers-professional managers were still of the opinion that the continuously growing economy of China should and would be seamlessly tied to the global economy linking through the system run by the Zionist-Capitalists. Very interestingly, the Chinese elites wanted to move as closer as possible to the Zionist-Capitalist global oligarchy for a very different reason than the Russian elites root for. What they couldn’t have imagined that the Zionist-Capitalist global oligarchy would take total control of the wealth and power (of any country) once they get an opportunity to spread its wings. One need not move further than Russia to see how the Russian society and social capital were mercilessly exploited and looted during 1990s. Fortunately, Communist Party of China is aware of the pitfalls of close interaction with the Zionist-Capitalist clique, and since 2020 China has raised the guards.
3. Why the Global Oligarchy Hate Multi-polarity?
We know the reason – the Zionist-Capitalist global oligarchy hates the concept of multipolarity because that is the second most significant challenge to its untrammeled hold on WEALTH and POWER across the world wide (informal) empire. The first time they encountered such challenge was between 1941 to 1990 when the USSR, East Europe and China emboldened by their socialist philosophy became a thorn in the flesh of the global oligarchy. Now, since 2020 the global oligarchy has been facing its recent disaster – unlike the first instance, this time the Zionist-Capitalist global oligarchy is on a very difficult arena. Multipolarity will significantly and adversely affect its wealth, power, and prestige. Let us explore a few scenarios in which some economic / scientific achievements by China / Russia will result in an awkward situation for the countries being controlled by the Anglo-Jewish oligarchy:
(i) What if the Chinese-owned or Russian-owned companies develop new consumer products and pharmaceutical products using self-developed technology that gets wide acceptance in the global south? What if those companies start providing technology know-how/ intellectual rights to other Asian, African, and South American countries? What will happen to the world-wide industrial empire of Zionist-Capitalist oligarchy based on their continuous technological lead forged since industrial revolution 1750 CE? Won’t the Chinese and Russian state-owned companies eat away the MNC revenues (most of which were/are owned by the Zionist-Capitalists) – MNCs earn revenues decade-after-decade that surpass GDP of most of the countries in the world (in 2017, revenue-wise 157 of top 200 economic entities were MNC companies and only 43 were sovereign States)?
(ii) What if the Russian and Chinese governments successfully develop an eco-system in which banking & finance gets closely linked to gold and commodities like rare earth minerals, petroleum, and natural gas? What will happen to the world-wide rentier empire of the Zionist-Capitalist kleptocracy based on ‘magical’ concepts of endogenous credit money (a special type of fractional reserve banking) and ‘fiat’ money? How Federal Reserve, Bank of England, World Bank, International Monetary Fund will continue to rule over the supply of printed fiat money as global exchange currency?
(iii) What if the Chinese government establish beyond any doubt that, controlled economy can be market-oriented but effective, that Asia can lead innovative technology-oriented industry, that Marxist philosophy can build a political platform that ensures 90% (of 1.4 billion population) is leading a middle-class standard of life? Wouldn’t there be a seachange in the existing extreme inequality across the globe, if the ‘Chinese model’ finds acceptance across the global south?
(iv) What if the Russian state with patriotic, energetic, and inquisitive communities continue to make breakthrough in modern warfare by infusing technological innovation with reverse engineering of old Soviet military machinery? What will happen if Russia continues to assist its partner countries in core Eurasia and indeed, across the world with military gear necessary to resist gunboat diplomacy of the Deep State owned by the Zionist-Capitalists (to maintain and perpetuate imperialism under the garb of freedom-democracy-human rights)?
(v) What if the Russian and Chinese governments successfully develop an education system that would deal with realities of life, society, and nature, and the students in those countries develop scientific and spiritual temperament with understanding of morality, justice, ethics, and truth in social life? What would happen to the institutions of academia across the world where ‘intellectuals’ continue to spin new ‘theories’, ‘thoughts’, ‘concepts’ (most of which are meaningless mix of jargons and complex vocabulary) base for which have been ‘created’ by the Anglo-Jewish intelligentsia (apologists for Zionist-Capitalist swindle) during past three centuries? The educated people in the anglophile and francophile countries still feel elated if they get opportunity to ‘study’ and earn degree in non-sense streams of post-modern/pre-modern/structural/pre-truth/post-truth/ etc. etc. theories – and, that ensure billions of US Dollar business of ‘education’ in the USA, the UK, and Europe!!! What would happen to that education business?
The Zionist-Capitalist elites weren’t bothered about China till it acted as a “good follower” during the two decades of extensive industrial growth from 1990 to 2010, neither they were much bothered till Russian resources were sucked out from its economy from 1991 to 2007. In fact, the Zionist-Capitalist oligarchy continue to expect and wait for the day when Russian oligarchs and Chinese oligarchs would be able to seize the state power (albeit as the sponsors of ‘democratic’ political party). But the events during 2020 to 2022 period, transformed the socio-political landscapes of Russia and China away from such possibilities of bandwagoning with the Anglo-Jewish oligarchy promoting the Zionist-Capitalist ideology.
4. Conclusion
Some of the probable points of divergence between Russia and China may be:
- China with its humongous human capital might be tempted to go alone in industrial and defense projects that were initially proposed as joint ventures
- Russia with its massive hydrocarbon reserves might be tempted to go alone in exploration and distribution projects that were initially proposed as joint ventures
- Russia with its very large hydrocarbon extraction facilities might start thinking why should China at all try for petroleum extraction instead of sourcing all the oil and gas from Russia
- China with its very large industrial base might start thinking why should Russia at all build consumer industries instead of sourcing all the consumer goods from China
However, any astute observer would note that, each of the above points relates to the old economic concept relentlessly propagated by the Zionist-capitalists – counting the economic gain (or loss) by a particular country (or business owners and bankers). Resisting the satanic forces politically while succumbing to satanic commercial principles at the same time does not augur well for the Resistance camp. Will it not be a resounding moral defeat for the Resistance Camp if they imbibe the same Zionist-capitalist philosophy of economics and commerce as their adversary which may create a stalemate in the process of development of allround cooperation? I refuse to believe that Russia and China (or for that matter, Iran and North Korea) will ever come to such a crossroads, for each of them could peep into their history of the 20th century to find how their selfless egalitarian supreme leaders – Stalin and Mao – sacrificed even their sons for the cause of struggle against the Zionist-Capitalists and Fascists! Could any sacrifice be more than that?
It is entirely conceivable that the ongoing struggles of Resistance Camp will usher a new era in a new multipolar world order by the end of this decade. However, at the end, my appeal remains, whether Russia and China register immaculate wins in their respective geopolitical struggles and economic reorientation, OR they get partial success in their respective objectives, OR they encounter failure (most unlikely), Almighty showers blessings, OR Almighty punishes (most unlikely), for the sake of humankind, IN NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHOULD THE LEADERSHIP AND THE PEOPLE OF RUSSIA AND CHINA ALLOW THEIR BOND OF FRIENDSHIP AND MUTUAL TRUST TO WEAKEN NEITHER THEY SHOULD LET THEIR ATTACHMENT WITH IRAN AND NORTH KOREA TO WANE!
To Straight – Bat
Excellent article and very important plans for both Russia and China to consider and implement ,many of the things you have pointed out i have thought about myself.
What Russia and China does now and the future will determine how the population of this planet will
survive and prosper.
It would be great if both Putin and Xi could read your article and may have you as an adviser !
This war EAST v’s WEST is going to be for the LONG GAME !
Thank you for this wonderful article
TOM123
@TOM123,
Thank you so much for the kind words.
“What Russia and China does now and the future will determine how the population of this planet will
survive and prosper ….
This war EAST vs WEST is going to be for the LONG GAME!”
This is a very very significant point – I would like to put my thought process on record here as below:
(a) You have absolutely hit the bull’s eye – the future of humanity, and indeed, the future of the planet is being decided by what China and Russia are doing now in every facet of life and society – political, economic, cultural, environmental realms. Whether truth-justice-morality-ethics will continue in the society, whether environment will continue to support many forms of ‘life’, whether 8 billion people will continue to live and experience a decent life on the face of earth, everything depends on the combined might and wisdom of the two super-states of Russia and China and also to a great extent on Iran-North Korea joining those two super-states as capable social and military warriors!
(b) I differ with your concept of EAST vs WEST – no, EAST is not fighting the 80% common people of WEST. In fact, those plebeians have been zombified by the Zionist-Capitalist media & academia during past three centuries. In lieu of a few hundred dollars and a bare minimum standard of life, those 80% plebs became debt-serfs of the banking-cum-monetary ponzi scheme run by the Anglo-Jewish oligarchy – they are not understanding that those oligarchs will continue to rob every asset and all efforts from them, and Russian, Chinese, Iranian, Indian landmass will be portrayed as the standard bogeyman for them! Most of those plebs are not being blamed by me. EAST is fighting the 1% Anglo-Jewish oligarchy & 9% people (which include many non-anglo and non-jewish ethnicity like migrated south Asians, migrated Koreans, migrated Arabs etc. besides the usual bandits) who manage their ‘show’ – armed with the Zionist-Capitalist ideology, these scumbags will surely ruin the planet and the people within another 5 decades, if not stopped on their track.
“It would be great if both Putin and Xi could read your article and may have you as an adviser!”
I have no idea if the top leadership of the Resistance camp read incisive analyses and articles on the current events apart from the classic literatures on politics, economics, and history. However, if I ever get an opportunity to serve them, to me it will be a privilege to the highest order; I will always be available for the service to the people of Eurasia, and to the humanity as a whole.
@ Straight-Bat
A wise leader should always have information and ideas out side his circle which can
influence him ,and he should know his weakliness and his strength ,
Since this Blog will be taken down ,I was wondering how can i get in contact with you ? or if you desire to keep
that information private i can put my e-mail address on this article.
Warm regards
TOM123
@TOM123,
Please put your email address here, so that I can get in touch with you.
Best Regards,
Straight-Bat
@ Straight-Bat
Your details have been given to the Saker/team to pass on to Straight-bat. Mod.
TOM123
@ Straight-Bat
My e-mail is freedomthomas@proton.me
TOM123
@TOM123,
Received your email id from The Saker team as well as here, in the comments section. Thanks, I communicated to your email id.
Sorry for being off-topic but where or how do I write a question to Andrei for his upcoming Q&A? Thank you.
Interesting summary. Some additions.
1. My preferred name for the current global governance systemis the “East India Company” modelof global governance. Others prefer to give it the “N” name made popular by Mr. A.
2.The Mongols were one of the precursors of the system. The other was the Arab/Muslim conquest of various parts of the world. Both being totalitarian systems. The Chinese are not very fond of the Mongols. They caused immense damage in China. They never fully recovered. You could argue that the ability of the Europeans to easily subdue China via Opium Wars has its roots in the Mongol conquest.
3. At its core the alliance between Russia and China is spiritual. Some would prefer to say ideological but that is just semantics.
4. People with the “East India Company” mindset exist in every country. In some countries they are a large part of the population, some countries have less. In Russia I guess (from reading The Saker) they are called “liberals”. They form a large chunk of India’s elite, which is one of the reasons India has made hardly any significant economic development in the last 70 years since the British left. Evidence of this is the fact that the global share of India’s economy in 1947 was around 5%. Today it is still around 5 %. You can easily tell people who have this mindset. They say things like- “there has to be one powerful country that rules the world”, “it is survival of the fittest”, “there is no alternative to (liberal) democracy”, “if it wasn’t for capitalism most of the world would be in poverty”, etc.etc.
5. The banking system, current trade relationships, intellectual property systems, legal system, are some of the instruments of the East India Company” system. By allowing China to be a big part of the system it was hoped that China could be co-opted. But China instead used the system to overthrow it. It looks like it will succeed. It’s not over yet. They have the nuclear weapons and are not averse to using it if it suits them to do so.
6. The proposed new system canbe described in short as a “non predatory system”. It shouldbe self explanatory.
Indian here, living in India, not too fond of the self-styled elites.
1. The global share of Indian economy declined until about the mid-1990s, and has gradually been rising since then. The 5% figure for 1947 and 2022 are appropriate.
2. Underlining the attitude of the self-styled elites here is nothing other than love of wealth, status, power … et cetera. What they may say are simply “cover stories”, since the truth cannot be admitted openly, and cannot even be faced.
3. I am not an expert, but it seems to me that — compared to most others around the world — Russians do not fear those in power. They must therefore lead the struggle in spirit.
Russia and China is a gimme. The Belt & Road remodelled world is spread far and wide and requires protection from ‘nasty pants US inc.) at its many choke points.
‘If there’s something strange in your neighbourhood
Who ya gonna call ?
Vlad Putin
If it’s something weird
And it don’t look good
Who ya gonna call?
Vlad Putin
I ain’t afraid of no (US CIA Stooge Boogyman) Ghost.’
My concerns are China-India and Saudi-Iran relations scuppering Shut-Out USA.
Russia needs to spell out certain realities, like the friend of my enemy better pull their heads out their ass.
@ WTFUD
I have the same concern ,hopefully they see the big picture and work together against the die-ing
empire now and work out their differences later.
Looks like Pakistan is wavering to the west also Turkey received a notice by HARP to get in line or their
may be more Earth quakes .
TOM123
Yes Comrade TOM123
There’s no way of morally shaming the vermin that make up the American political and corporate/finance class or their pet mongrel Israel and Euro/Canadian pet poodles.
A natural disaster in Syria and yet the US refuse to ease sanctions that will allow in aid to the affected parts, even threatening Iran’s humanitarian aid to its ally.
Russia especially but China also must deal/get serious with the US/Israeli threat/belligerency in the region in order to ease any apprehension of the Saudis & Emirates, who will certainly come under considerable pressure to remain under the satanic empire’s wing.
@ WTFUD
We arm chair generals do not known what is going on behind the curtains, and how many curtains
there are I assume that all the EASTERN players are working in unison, there biggest challenge Is how to take down
the empire with out having a all out Nuclear WAR ,They are hoping that the fake PONZE world wide financial
system will collapse before the NUKES start flying
TOM123
@TOM123,
biggest challenge Is how to take down the empire with out having a all out Nuclear WAR
Yes. The challenge before the Eurasian powers is how to pull down the existing world order architecture without ever resorting to nukes! But Russia-China-Iran-N Korea governments must get prepared for a protracted war (in case of exchange of nuclear missiles, they need to avoid too much destruction).
You may request The Saker for my email id, and get in touch with me.
Straight-Bat
Excellent article — “To guard against such adversary, China will need material and technical support from Russia, and Russia will need manpower, material, and technical support from China. A “strategic comprehensive partnership” needs to be formally put in place with utmost urgency – it will serve both the countries! ”
Together, Russia & China with help from others can exist & beat the uS + NATO. I’d like to see Chinese troops getting battle experience fighting Ukraine and its mercenaries with Russia. If the uS threatens sanctions China can withold goods & materia necessay for the uS to survive. In fact if China stopped immediatly ALL trade with the uS they would collapse within months ! After all China supplies most of the uS imports.
TO all commentators
Where does North Korea fit in this axis ???? ( Russia ,China ,Iran ) ?
Thank You
TOM123
@james1,
Thank you for the kind words of appreciation.
Together, Russia & China with help from others can exist & beat the US + NATO. I’d like to see Chinese troops getting battle experience fighting Ukraine and its mercenaries with Russia.
I don’t have any doubt about the appropriateness of your statement. In fact, the Chinese government should be more vigilant – the USA and the UK have been campaigning hard to convert ASEAN into Asian NATO. Currently they have been redesigning and strengthening the entire south-east + east Asian theatre for war in the near future, Apart from Japan, South Korea, Singapore, now Phillipines has also become a zone for rapid militarisation for fighting back in case of any Chinese armed expedition towards Taiwan. China & Russia MUST overtly and covertly coordinate their plan of actions (probably, bringing in the North Koreans, and Persians into such plans will add more strength).
Fantastic article which explains very well how it all works. The best way I can describe it to my friends and colleagues is it’s like Age of Empires on the pc. Build and destroy other civilizations. I am new to this way of thinking but since school politics was only taught really at country level. Geopolitics is where all the action happens. Thanks for the great analysis.
@RobMc,
“The best way I can describe it to my friends and colleagues is it’s like Age of Empires on the pc.”
I would like to say “… it’s like the Age of Empires on the reverse direction”. Indeed, for past 500 years the elites and aristocrats from Anglo-Jewish tribes converted the plant into hell – killing all people in one-third of the earth surface (the USA, Canada, Australia, NZ etc. etc.), looting whatever they got in front of them (Asia, Africa, America), building colonial empires in every nook and corner of the globe …. The Eurasian super-states need to stop these marauding gangsters – this article is all about that!
I agree 100% with the premise of the geopolitical unity of Russia and China against the common threat of NATO, the USA and the new “rules based international order”.
Retired Rear Admiral John Kirby wishes the battle should end, without negotiation, under the sponsorship of Lula and others, negotiations which are also inclusive of Russia and China.
Then he says, on CNN, that the war must be settled on the battlefield.
“Essentally combat is an expression of hostile feelings. But in the large-scale combat that we call war hostile feelings often have become merely hostile intentions. At any rate, there are usually no hostile feelings between individuals. Yet such emotions can never be completely absent from war. Modern wars are seldom fought without hatred between nations; this serves as a more or less substitute for the hatred between individuals. Even when there is no natural hatred and no animosity to start with, the fighting itself will stir up hostile feelings: violence committed on superior orders will stir up the desire for revenge and retaliation against the perpetrator rather than against the powers that ordered the action. It is only human (or animal, if you like), but it is a fact.”
― Carl von Clausewitz
“The aggressor is always peace-loving (as Bonaparte always claimed to be); he would prefer to take over our country unopposed.”
― Carl von Clausewitz, On War
Economic theories alone cannot solve the problems of war unless we take account of the manipulation of the human heart.
“We are living through a National Socialist revolution. We emphasize the term “socialist” because many speak only of a “national” revolution. Dubious, but also wrong. It was not only nationalism that led to the breakthrough. We are proud that German socialism also triumphed. Unfortunately, there are still people among us today who emphasize the word “national” too strongly and who do not want to know anything about the second part of our worldview, which shows that they have also failed to understand the first part. Those who do not want to recognize a German socialism do not have the right to call themselves national.”
Hermann Göring – wikiquote
Nationalism and Socialism (1933)
Göring: “Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.”
Out of the abundance of his heart, Göring speaks.
Fascism is a policy of deception, whether it comes under the guise of nationalism or socialism. We imagine democracy to be better, but it is only slightly better, as Churchill suggests.
‘Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.…’
Winston S Churchill, 11 November 1947
Government is only as good as the people that comprise it, and often they are more errant and human than divine.
Despite his failures and faults, Colin Powell was essential on China. There’s probably unsung heroes on China in the Pentagon and in State Department, but all we are allowed to hear is the Devil’s choir.
CHAKRABARTI: Particularly during that time when he was secretary of state, and he said that he had enemies all over the administration. Can you describe to me how Colin Powell handled those toughest moments? I mean, in other words, when things got tough, what was he like? What did he do? What did he say?
WILKERSON: That’s a good question. It was so bad by the third year that the deputy secretary of state, Rich Armitage, was calling the vice president’s office the Gestapo, the Nazis, regularly. And everyone seemed to be aligned against us, the president, the vice president, the national security adviser and the secretary of defense, who was joined at the hip with the vice president. Powell was constantly confronted with a situation where not only was he losing the bureaucratic struggle — he was, and he knew it — losing the bigger struggle for the issue at hand.
The only place where this did not occur, which was really fascinating to watch, and no one’s really covered this very well in the literature, was China. And he won the battles on China. As Rumsfeld and Cheney were ardently trying to create a new Cold War with China, Powell was keeping them from doing it. They were using, fundamentally, Taipei and Taiwan in general to do that. But Powell was very adroitly, bureaucratically and otherwise maneuvering behind them. In order to keep at that time, Chen Shui-bian in Taipei, from effecting a referendum for independence. Which was a red line with Beijing. He would [thwart] them, again and again and again.
https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2021/10/22/life-legacy-colin-powell-iraq-foreign-policy
I don’t think it is good or wise to paint all Americans with the same brush, certainly, but overall there’s a very great painting, and we might have to take the good with the bad, of those who kept us away from nuclear war, or other wars that could never be won.
Dear Straight-Bat
This is a fine piece of writing. Sane and cautiously optimistic in a time when all is irrationality and pessimism. The relationship between China and Russia is intriguing for the apparently deep warmth and respect between the two leaderships. Why is it not characterised instead simply by a pragmatic attitude of “it’s just good business” between two almost perfectly complementary economies? I wonder if it has something to do with the fact that, in both China and Russia, the model of governance that is embraced is characterised by a very strong, centralised state that is active and sincere in exercising its responsibilities to its people. Those who aspire to and achieve positions of leadership in such polities are usually highly intelligent and serious people. Serious because of the weight of responsibility they bear towards their people. I believe that the two leaderships recognise this in each other. And by contrast, in a country such as the USA where libertarian values are dominant there is no requirement for intelligence or responsible seriousness on the part of the leadership. All that is needed is a willingness to follow the instructions of those with the serious money and a talent for following a teleprompter when a public statement is needed.
It is also intriguing to read all of the commentary on the newly emerging multipolar world. As if this is something novel. In my view, the period since the end of World War II is an aberration in having been, for its roughly first half, bipolar and, for its roughly second half, unipolar. This is highly unusual in the long run of world history in which, for the most part, things have been multipolar. Even at the height of the Cold War there was the formation of the Non-Aligned Movement in Serbia (then part of Yugoslavia) following the Bandung Conference in Indonesia. (Incidentally, this Movement is still in existence and meets this year in Uganda.) But of course multipolarity, in and of itself, is no guarantee of peace. After all, there were 109 parties to the treaty of Westphalia all those centuries ago. For me, what is new and profoundly important about the present moment is not the emerging multipolarity but the growing aspiration and commitment to consign imperialism and colonialism to the dustbin of history.
You say nothing about India. Surprising to say the least. Its relationship with China is something of a conundrum. Economically, they appear to have little that they need from each other so what will be the basis of future cooperative conversations between the two?
I want to conclude by thanking you for the thought-provoking words of yours that have been published over the years here among the vines. They have been thirst-quenching wine indeed.
Best wishes.
Dear Sarcophilus,
Thank you so much for the kind words. Yes, i’m trying to find sanity in this insane world, i’m searching for morality in this immoral world.
“This is highly unusual in the long run of world history in which, for the most part, things have been multipolar.”
Absolutely true! If you look back into the history of humankind, it was multipolarity always until 1500 CE. Thereafter the Anglo-Jewish aristocrats/oligarchs continuously undertook geopolitical tasks that finally ended when unipolar world order was established in 1991. There may be debate over the 1750 to 1914 period as if British power built unipolar world order – facts and figures clearly show 1750 to 1914 was a period when British – French were major poles of world order, and the Netherlands and Russia also became minor poles of world order, the USA joined after 1870 as a minor pole …. So, unipolar world order where the Hegemon maintains 800+ military bases around the world is a very recent phenomenon.
About Non-Aligned Movement, I can only mention that it started with a bang, but lost its wherewithal by mid 1980s. It should again be revamped with all seriousness.
“You say nothing about India. Surprising to say the least.”
About India, The Saker published a long article that provides like a primer on modern India… Please go through this article – a long one
[link >> /the-reality-of-modern-india-recurrence-of-corporate-state/ ]
After you read this article, you will conclude yourself that India will be hardly able to contribute in any way in near future for the Resistance camp – the opposite is also true, India can hardly support the Hegemony.
One thing is very special about The Saker blog-site – most of the regular commenters felt the warmth of discussing within a large family! May be because Saker himself is very much ‘a people’s man’!
Best Wishes,
Vielen Dank für diesen wunderbaren Artikel.
Als ehemaliger Stabsoffizier (es sind schon viele Jahre her) war und bin ich bestrebt meine Familie und mein Umfeld mit den Zielen eines gleichberechtigten Lebens und für Frieden auf der Welt einzutreten.
1990 gab es für mich eine Illusion, die da lautete: Abschaffung der Militärblöcke und eine friedliche Zusammenarbeit zwischen Ost und West. Diese wurde jedoch schnell zerstört. 1999 nahm Deutschland wieder im Rahmen der NATO an Kampfhandlungen teil. Dies war für mich ein Tabubruch. War alles vergessen?
Mit den Jahren beschämten mich immer mehr dieses unwürdige, vasallenhafte Auftreten “unserer” Regierung. In diesen Zeitraum las ich mehrmals Schriften von Bismarck und stellte mir die Frage, ob unsere Politiker nicht lesen können,
Zu meiner Schulzeit war Heinrich Mann Pflichtlektüre. In seinem Buch “Der Untertan” beschrieb er ausführlich dieses Duckmäusertum was heute bei unseren Politikern üblich ist gegenüber den USA. Sie überbieten sich gegenseitig mit ihren Aussagen zu Waffenlieferungen in die Ukraine.
und da sind wir bei des Pudels Kern.
Krieg der Anglo- Zionisten gegen Russland und letztendlich auch gegen China und den Rest der Welt.
Meiner Meinung nach wird dieser Krieg sehr schmerzhaft und langwierig für den sogenannten Wertewesten werden.
Eine Frage noch. In vielen Artikeln wird über das Wirken der Anglo- Zionisten gesprochen. Habe och es versäumt, oder wurde noch keine Analyse über die Entstehung und Ausbreitung dieses Systems aus Banken und anderen “Institutionen” geschrieben?
Thank you for this wonderful article.
As a former staff officer (it was many years ago), I was and still am striving to support my family and my environment with the goals of an equal life and for peace in the world.
In 1990 there was an illusion for me that read: abolition of the military blocs and peaceful cooperation between East and West. However, this was quickly destroyed. In 1999, Germany again took part in combat operations within the framework of NATO. This was a taboo break for me. Was everything forgotten?
Over the years, I was more and more ashamed of this unworthy, vassal-like behavior of “our” government. During this period I read Bismarck’s writings several times and asked myself whether our politicians could not read,
Heinrich Mann was required reading when I was at school. In his book “Der Untertan” he described in detail this cowardice that is common today among our politicians towards the USA. They outbid each other with their statements about arms deliveries to Ukraine.
and here we are at the heart of the matter.
Anglo-Zionist war against Russia and ultimately also against China and the rest of the world.
In my opinion, this war will be very painful and protracted for the so-called value west.
One more question. Many articles talk about the work of the Anglo-Zionists. Did I miss it, or hasn’t an analysis been written about the emergence and spread of this system of banks and other “institutions”?
@Hagen,
Thank you for the kind words.
In Asian continent, Germany is looked upon as kind of ‘great nation’ (irrespective of its extreme political ideology and similar things), and hence we always thought Germans are very intelligent, knowledgeable, and practical people in the matters of economy. But the way Germany is behaving since 2014, I think, our impression about Germany has become completely opposite. Forget about political ideology, couldn’t the German leaders see that USA is simply killing the German industrial base by forcing it to procure energy at 3 times the price available to them (for getting Russian gas/oil)? Using the facades of human rights/LGBTQ bla bla, the USA government is shutting down the German industry one after another – by 2025, Germany GDP would have much less industrial components than earlier! Germany is hurting the Germans mostly – Russia and China are giants who won’t be too much bothered if Germany wants to finish off itself economically.
There were a number of articles on this blog-site about the rise of ‘Anglo-Zionists’. If you search in the home page under “search article”, you can retrieve the same.
Danke für den Hinweis, werde ihn nutzen.
Ein paar Gedanken zu den von Ihnen verfassten Kommentar:
Deutschland war das Land der Dichter und Denker. So sah uns die Welt. Dieses Ansehen wurde durch die Nazis in den Schmutz getreten.
Nach Kriegsende wurde Deutschland besetzt, durch die vier Besatzungsmächte. Schon damals gab es willfährige Politiker, welche sich den Besatzungsmächten unterwürfig zeigten.
Adenauer: “Lieber ein halbes Deutschland ganz als ein ganzes Deutschland halb”.
Nach der Wende 1989 hielten nur die Russen (Sowjetunion) ihr Wort und verließen Deutschland. Der Rest der Geschichte ist bekannt.
Im Osten Deutschland wurde sehr viel Wert auf Bildung gelegt, wenn auch natürlich im Sinne der Sowjetunion. Wenn ich das Abitur von 1975 und das meiner Kinder von 1992 und 1997 vergleiche, besteht ein großer Unterschied im negativen Sinne. Uns wurden noch Goethe, Schiller, Kant usw. vermittelt, was bei den Kindern nicht mehr der Fall war. Wie kann ich im Abitur naturwissenschaftliche Fächer abschaffen?
Das ALLES nannte man Bildungsreform (laut Duden =Reform- Änderung zum Besseren). In Wahrheit wird das Bildungsniveau kontinuierlich gesenkt. Habe für meine Arbeit als Projektingenieur einen Nachfolger zu finden; keine Chance, bis sich ein junger Mann aus Indien gemeldet hat. Unsere zukünftigen Facharbeiter sind teilweise nicht in der Lage Flächen zu berechnen. Wenige wollen auf Montage und in Schichten arbeiten, geschweige auf Montage gehen. Der Einfluss 70 Jahre Besatzungsmacht haben das geschafft. Der überwiegende Teil Politiker nach Helmut Schmidt sind nur noch willfährige Marionetten der USA. Sie überbieten sich im Geschrei nach mehr Waffen für die Ukraine und wollen den Abgrund nicht sehen.
Kleines Aber zum Schluß; bereits Heinrich Heine in Nachtgedanken: “Denk ich an Deutschland in der Nacht, dann bin ich um den Schlaf gebracht, ich kann nicht mehr die Augen schließen, weil meine heißen Tränen fließen”. Bekanntlich stirbt die Hoffnung zum Schluß.
Machine Translation:
Thanks for the hint, I will use it.
A few thoughts on the comment you wrote:
Germany was the land of poets and thinkers. That’s how the world saw us. This reputation was trodden in the dirt by the Nazis.
After the end of the war, Germany was occupied by the four occupying powers. Even then there were compliant politicians who showed themselves submissive to the occupying powers.
Adenauer: “It’s better to have half of Germany as a whole than a whole Germany as a whole”.
After the fall of Communism in 1989, only the Russians (Soviet Union) kept their word and left Germany. The rest of the story is known.
In eastern Germany, a lot of emphasis was placed on education, albeit, of course, in the spirit of the Soviet Union. If I compare the Abitur from 1975 and that of my children from 1992 and 1997, there is a big difference in a negative sense. We were also taught Goethe, Schiller, Kant, etc., which was no longer the case with the children. How can I abolish natural science subjects in the Abitur?
All this was called educational reform (according to Duden = reform- change for the better). In truth, the level of education is continuously being lowered. Have to find a successor for my work as a project engineer; no chance until a young man from India has contacted me. Our future skilled workers are sometimes unable to calculate areas. Few want to work on assembly and in shifts, let alone go on assembly. The influence of 70 years of occupying power has managed to do this. The vast majority of politicians after Helmut Schmidt are just compliant puppets of the USA. They outdo each other in shouting for more weapons for Ukraine and do not want to see the abyss.
But one small thing in the end; already Heinrich Heine in Nachtgedanken: “If I think about Germany at night, then I am deprived of sleep, I can no longer close my eyes, because my hot tears are flowing”. As you know, hope dies at the end.
@Hagen,
I wonder, if Germans are not taught Goethe, Schiller, Immanuel Kant, and Heinrich Heine how would they learn about the German civilization and traditions? Literature, music, poetry, philosophy … at every field Germany had immense contribution to the human civilization!
I can understand your agony. But, let me tell you – this is the same story everywhere. The Anglo-Jewish elites not only introduced the Zionist-Capitalist political economy across the world, in order to maintain their stranglehold, they have been introducing nonsense academic curriculum and at the same time pushing the classic philosophy-art-literature into oblivion in every society across the world. Unless a country escape from the Zionist-Capitalist clutch, its future is doomed.
Unfortunately, China is not a true friend of Russia, or for that matter of any other country either. There is no difference between the West and China.
China bullies all its neighbors and claims their land and seas as its own.
China has its dirty eyes on the territory of Philippines, Vietnam, India, Malaysia, Japan, Brunei, Indonesia etc.
China illegally occupies Tibet and abuses its people.
It is committing cultural genocide of Tibetans by settling Han Chinese in Tibet to dilute the Tibetan culture.
How can such a country be a friend of anyone?
@TJ,
Let me respond point-by-point to your statements.
“China is not a true friend of Russia, or for that matter of any other country either. There is no difference between the West and China”
Your statement falls under one category of Zionist-Capitalist campaign happening during last 300 years – ‘Chinese state and society is a danger to its Asian neighbours’. The other category of Zionist-Capitalist campaign had been ‘Russian state and society is a danger to Europe’. This is the same Anglo-Jewish elites who imbibed Zionist-Capitalist ideology, but who never say something like ‘Indian state and society is a danger to its Asian neighbours’. So, why the same western gangsters identify Russia and China as dangerous but not India? It is because, the elites-aristocrats of Indian subcontinent happily handed over the land and people to a few thousands of Anglo-Jewish warlords and traders, but CHINA and RUSSIA put up very strong resistance to the looting gangs of Anglo-Jewish warlords and traders.
Now, let me ask you a few simple questions:
(1) During past 500 years, Western elites-aristocrats murdered 99% of the original inhabitants of North American, Australian continents. Murdered at least two-thirds of the original inhabitants of South American continent. Both the regions were thousands of kilometres away from west Europe. How many non-Chinese people were murdered by the Chinese elites-aristocrats 1000s of kilometres away from Chinese mainland?
(2) During past 500 years, Western traders-bankers-industrialists looted natural resources in the form of mining and plantation North American, Australian, South American, African, Asian continents. Except north Africa all the regions were thousands of kilometres away from west Europe. Where from the Chinese traders-bankers-industrialists looted such resources away from Chinese mainland?
(3) During past 300 years Western kings/emperors setup colonial empires in Africa and Asia that changed their societies beyond recognition by introducing foreign language, foreign religion, and foreign customs. Where did the Chinese emperor set up such colony and changed the local society?
“China bullies all its neighbors and claims their land and seas as its own. China has its dirty eyes on the territory of Philippines, Vietnam, India, Malaysia, Japan, Brunei, Indonesia.”
Kingdoms and empires that were built in a era always contested their common border regions – hence Qing China had similar issues with all its neighbours (just similar to Tsarist Russia, Habsburg AstroHungary, Bourbon France, Mughal India, …. every empire/kingdom). After 1911 when Qing empire got abolished, these border issues went into hibernation, but after 1949 it came into the limelight when communist party captured power. But except India, China don’t have ongoing territorial contest with others. The islands spread over the entire South China Sea as well as Taiwan were part of Chinese empire for probably more than a millenium. Even if the littoral countries would not like to accept that historical reality, finally they would accept the fait accompli.
“China illegally occupies Tibet and abuses its people. It is committing cultural genocide of Tibetans by settling Han Chinese in Tibet to dilute the Tibetan culture”
After Mongols started to win wars with Chinese emperor mid-13th century onwards, Tibet’s status of independent state became history. After that, Tibet became a tributary paying entity where Chinese emperor stationed military garrisons always, during the period 1250 to 1911. The Tibetan ruling aristocrats (Dalai Lama and Panchen Lama) won’t be happy when Chinese communists re-established their authority. ‘Chinese government systematically destroying Tibetan and Uighur society and culture’ is yet another campaign of the Zionist-Capitalists for past 70 years or so, and they utilise the elites-oligarchs-bureaucrats of the neighbouring countries to spread this campaign. During past 40 years when the Han chinese were allowed to have one-child in the family, the minorities had the freedom of more kids! The standard of living for the minorities in China is much better than the minorities of many other Asian countries!
Nonsense, if presented with seriousness, will never become truth; however nonsense, if presented with humour, at least it could still be enjoyed by the listeners/readers.
TJ, you have never been to China (Tibet) or any of the other countries you mention otherwise you would know everything you write are lies (propaganda). I know because I have been to every country you listed except Brunnei. How can you even begin to talk about diluting culture seriously when Chinese is not even spoken in the countries you listed. Every place you mentioned, there are more English speakers than Chinese.
Every country in the World needs to be Sovereign (Multi-Polar World). When you are Sovereign, you can create “Sovereign Credit” which is free from “Private” International Finance (City of London, Bank of International Settlements (BIS) etc…). Sovereign countries “trade” using government created “Sovereign Credit” which is “debt free”. The Anglo-Zionists have controlled the World for the past 5 centuries using military power and then “International Finance”; reserve “fiat” currency. Sovereignty and Sovereign Credit is key to breaking Anglo-Zionist domination over the World.