Something fantastically interesting has happened in Novorussia: two senior Novorussian commanders, Igor Bezler and Alexei Mozgovoi have attempted to communicate with those Ukrainians who are on the other side.
Though I am not sure about the exact dates of the events (all I have is the dates of the posting on YouTube), this apparently began when Igor Bezler agreed to be interviewed by three TV crews at the same time: a Russian one, a Novorussian one, and a Ukrainian one. The big news here was, of course, that a Ukrainian journalist was given access to the city of Gorlovka, currently surrounded by Ukrainian forces, and that she got to speak with the local people, including combatants and then that she was given access to Bezler himself. Since all the journalists were more or less openly accusing each other of “filtering the truth” all parties agreed that the full recording, unedited, would be made available on YouTube. Now please keep in mind that in Banderastan, Russian journalists are blacklisted, Russian TV stations banned, and that the people in the junta controlled Ukraine are told that the other side are terrorists and Russian soldiers. Oh, and the Ukrainian media is the most disgusting, sold out, subservient, propagandistic you can imagine. And then suddenly, at least one Ukrainian TV crew agrees to show the face of one of the most feared Novorussian commanders and he get’s to speak his mind.
But the next event was even more amazing. Alexei Mozgovoi agreed to a videoconference with not only Ukrainian journalists, but with actual field commanders of the Ukrainian military. To see Mozgovoi and the Ukrainians speak directly to each other was absolutely amazing. And here I have to apologize. I will not ask our translators to translate and subtitle the full thing. First, there were not one, but two such videoconferences. Then, we are talking about three long videos, see for yourself:
Bezler interview: Published on Oct 21, 2014
http://youtu.be/uVN2wkuL88w (length: 2 hours 17 min)
First videoconference of Mozgovoi: Published on Oct 22, 2014
http://youtu.be/WYy5Y9MQozA (length: 1 hour 20 mins)
Second videoconference of Mozgovoi: Published Oct 28, 2014
http://youtu.be/tC7YGe0SmqQ (length:1 hour 51 mins)
I do hope that somebody somewhere will translate it all, but this is way too big a load for me to ask any of our volunteers.
Also, these are very complex videos. There are discussions, some short moments of yelling and interrupting, there is cross-talk and there are even two songs. This is complex, very emotional stuff, very hard to convey in a translated text. Besides, who will have the time to sit through it all?
No, what I propose is to share with you the elements which struck me so much.
But first I need to clarify an important point: while the original idea apparently had been to have combatants talking to combatants, the Ukrainian side only had a few commanders and a few activists. The Novorussian side was composed of actual soldiers. Apparently, the Ukrainian side did not feel comfortable putting their foot-soldiers on the spot.
First and foremost, it was amazing to see how much both sides fully agreed upon. Both sides agreed that this war was useless and only benefited the enemies of the Ukraine. Both sides expressed contempt, disgust and even hatred for the politicians in power and the oligarchs who rule over Banderastan today. Both sides also agree that Yanukovich was a scumbag and that the Maidan protests were absolutely legitimate but that the original protests had been hijacked by enemies of the Ukraine. Both sides also agreed that this war had to be stopped. Now, please keep in mind that Ukrainian Nazis were, of course, not invited. These were mainly regular Ukrainian military speaking to Novorussian military and Ukrainian activists speaking to Mozgovoi. There were also some real disagreements.
The Ukrainian position was this (paraphrase – not real quote): “the Maidan was legitimate and correct but you – the Novorussians – took up arms and you thereby created a crisis which the illegitimate junta used and which prevented us from defending our political goals. We don’t want our country to further break up and what you are doing is exactly that. Also, we know that the Russian “Polite Armed Men in Green” are fighting on your side and many of you are not representing true Ukrainian interests, but Russian interests. Stop fighting and join the political process to clean our country from the crazies“.
To which Mozgovoi replied (paraphrase – not real quote): “we did not choose to fight, you came to our land and you are killing our people. If you really want to clean Kiev from the Nazi scum, then don’t stand between us and Kiev and let us pass – we will take care of them no problem. You are taking orders from Nazis and oligarchs and you are doing nothing to stop them from killing our people. If we were to lay down our arms, we would all be massacred.
One interesting thing was that when the Ukrainians accused the Novorussians of doing Russia’s bidding, Mozgovoi replied that the Ukrainians were pawns of the CIA and, amazingly, the Ukrainians pretty much agreed that the CIA was running the show. As for Mozgovoi, he did not deny that Russia was helping.
Both sides were expressing frustration that they could not unite their forces and jointly get rid of the oligarchs and Nazis.
During the Bezler interview, there was one amazing moment was when the Ukrainian crew asked Bezler if he spoke Ukrainian, to which he replied that ‘yes’. Unconvinced, the Ukrainian crew asked him if he could recite a poem by the famous poet Taras Shevchenko. Then, to everybody’s surprise, Bezler recited the poem “to the Poles” in which Sevchenko describes how happy the Cossaks were,
Until in the name of Christ
The ксьондзи (Latin Priests) came and set afire
To our quiet paradise. And spilled
A huge sea of tears and blood,
And killed and crucified orphans
In the Name of Christ
The heads of Cossacks then dropped
Like trampled grass,
The Ukraine cried, and moaned!
And the head after head
Fell to the ground. As if enraged,
A priest furious tongue
Screamed: «Te Deum! Hallelujah! .. “
And this is how my Polish friend and brother!
Evil priests and rich men
Separated us from each other
When we could have lived together happy
[nb: this is my own translation, I could not find this poem in English anywhere; as any Russian, I mostly understand Ukrainian, but I can easily misunderstand a word or expression so, caveat emptor, and don’t take this translation to the bank! The Saker]
It was quite amazing to see how well Bezler spoke Ukrainian and how he used this opportunity to remind his Ukrainian counterparts how already in the past they were used and manipulated by Russia and Orthodoxy -hating westerners, and he did so using verses of their own national hero!
In another rather surreal moment, a Novorussian solider took out a guitar and sang a song about the war. The Ukrainians were clearly moved, although they were also disturbed by the fact that the song repeatedly said that these were “Russians fighting Russians”. This issue came up several again later in the conversation. From the Novorussian point of view, the Ukrainians were also part of the “Russian cultural realm” (as opposed to state or nationality) albeit with a different accent and a different history. The Ukrainians insisted that they were a different nationality, albeit one with strong ties to the “Russian cultural realm”.
During both the Bezler and Mozgovoi interviews the issue of prisoners was raised. Both sides reported that their men were mistreated and even tortured while in captivity. Interestingly, during the Bezler interview there were two Ukrainian officials present, one human right activist and another who was representing the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense for the topic of POWs. They both readily admitted that Bezler treated the Ukrainian prisoners not as prisoners at all, but as guests: they were free to walk around, they ate and slept with Bezler’s men, they were treated with kindness and hospitality. In once instance he even fed them red caviar! But the very same Bezler openly admitted that “we take no prisoners from the Nazi death squads” confirming what I have said many times: the Russian kindness and generosity towards Ukrainian POWs only extends to regular army units – captured death squad members are immediately executed.
There are hundred of small moments and exchanges which I wish I could convey to you, but that would take too much space and time. What I will say is that it was quite amazing to see enemies talking to each other in a very friendly manner. I was also amazed at how readily the Ukrainians agreed that the Ukraine must rid herself from the Nazis and the oligarchs. In various occasions people on both sides said “let’s do that together!”. Others were more dubious. Frankly, I am extremely impressed by the courage and decency of many of the Ukrainians in these interviews who, while standing their ground on the issue of the territorial integrity of the Ukraine, quite openly said how much they hated the Nazis and the oligarchs. I sure hope that God will protect these men for their courage.
Both Bezler and Mozgovoi looked very, very good. The latter especially surprised me by explicitly stating that his goal was regime change in Kiev and not just the separation of Novorussia which he clearly sees as a only temporary solution and as a necessary self-defense measure. Clearly, both Bezler and Mozgovoi are first and foremost anti-Nazis and both of them see that there is not “Novorussian solution”. Mozgovoi explicitly stated that he think that both sides could live together if the Ukrainians got rid of their Nazis and oligarchs.
While I have always said that the only possible stable solution of the crisis is a de-nazification of the Ukraine and a conversion of the current Banderastan into a “mentally sane” Ukraine, I am not naive and I also see that this might take a decade or more. However, seeing how Mozgovoi and his Ukrainian counterparts agreed on the need to de-nazify and de-oligarchise (is that English?) I see that there is hope because the bottom line is this: both sides have much more in common than what separates them!
Again, these were regular Ukrainians, not crazed Nazi death-squad members, I understand that. And the two sides do disagree on fundamental issues. I see that too. But I also see that there is a basis, a minimum in common, to negotiate. This does not have to be a war of extermination.
The Ukraine as we knew her is dead. Now we have Crimea and Novorussia which are gone forever, and a rump-Ukraine I call “Banderastan” which is occupied by the US CIA, Ukie Nazis and oligarchs. My hope is that the just as the Ukrainian civil war turned into a war for the self-determination and liberation of Novorussia, so will the war for self-determination and liberation of Novorussia turn into a war for the liberation of Banderastan from its US/Nazi/oligarchic occupiers. If that happens and if a new Ukraine eventually emerges, then I have no doubt that the people of the Ukraine will agree that each region should have the right of self-determination ranging from cultural right to full separation. Only then will we really find out which regions want to stay and which ones want to leave forever.
In the meantime, I am very positively impressed by the Novorussian field commanders. Bezler and Mozgovoi of course, but also Givi, Motorola, Zakharchenko, Kononov and the others are all strong figures capable of both fighting and talking. Strelkov, alas, is still more or less in political no man’s land and I am very concerned about his proximity with the blogger el-Murid who is clearly a “gateway” to the “hurray-patriots” and “Putin bashers” which are being used by the Empire to try to discredit Putin. Still, the political infighting amongst Novorussian leaders continues and there is still no clear leader. Hopefully, the upcoming elections will help to solve this issue.
The Saker
very interesting I must watch videos-perhaps the counter revolution is more interesting-but I cannot see west ukraine agreeing with ukrainian army, they are very anti-russian and would not want to lose face by admitting the current “solution ” is not working, especially as I believe Poland is absolutely determined to use multiple means(including continuation of banderastan type events/politics/ etc) to rebuild a greater Poland. Not even if the Ukraine falls into chaos because of the economy etc, Rus will still be blamed. Amilitary take over also is not possible to be successful , I don’t think every day folk will accept that either let alone the west, nor might the military themselves want to get into a political nightmare even if or when the current one fails completely.Only perhaps complete bankruptcy is declared and UN/EU steps in to provide humanitarian relief from anywheres, and Rus “insist” on certainly assisting the east(presuming anyone is left to support), so the failures of USA/ NATO /EU policies will become more evident, and some sort of stabilising protectorate be formed. the situation is symptomatic of western economies anyway-so close to economic collapse, Ukr serves only as an example of the failure of economics in the hands of over rated, incompetent and irresponsible politicians. whether people in EU will wake up more to threat of far right politics is also part of the equation too. Saker, thank you for your website, all you do, and permitting comments. Yours sincerely.
the new head guy of NATO is still insisting that there has been territorial violation by Russia over Crimea and that this is not acceptable to NATO-any chance of an assessment by Saker that this viewpoint could/will persist until the end of time, preventing any mutual agreement , prevent any NATO and UKr action by retaking Crimea or even blockading it(Ukr must be relying on this perspective to support its NATO “application”), also considering Ukr is actually not part of NATO-how far will both push this to continue confrontation and continue providing provocation for confrontation, will neither admit this is futile and lose face at any time?
Could you at least identify the participants for us? Say, “at opening of tape from left to right front row . . .”
I am dubious about the description. It looked like a press conference to me. The Ukrs doing all the talking don’t look like field commanders.
Did Mozgovoi raise his real goal of an all-military government? Any interesting responses?
I’m reminded of the child’s line in Carl Sandberg’s poem: “Some day they’ll give a war and nobody will come.”
Mozgovoi kept calling War Councils with the field commanders to set up a military dictatorship and nobody would come.
It was probably true that he would find more appetite for that among Ukr commanders.
I’d suggest the man be shot at dawn, except that I think this will work brilliantly as a provocation, expanding the purges of the military. Don’t I recall Stalin trying that? How did that work out, anyway?
Cass
Mozgovoi is right, east Ukrainians only took up arms to defend themselves. When the people started protesting in the Spring over what was happening in Kiev armed men were sent in to shoot them. There are many videos of this. Plus you had the right sector terrorising people in the streets. The regular Ukrainian army should side with their brothers in the East and wipe out the Right Sector and the Nazi battalions together. They are murdering innocent civvies.
I read one comment on twitter by one of these people (no I would say rabid animals) that the people of the UK support them. NO I DO NOT. I DO NOT SUPPORT NAZIS, RIGHT SECTOR IN UKRAINE. As a UK citizen I support the people and brave fighters of Novorussia and if the BBC, ITV and Sky news would show the war crimes committed by Kiev and their volunteer battalions so would the rest of the UK.
Shame on David Cameron for supporting such an evil regime especially when his great uncle fought against them in WW2.
Paul II said…@ 30 October, 2014 05:03
”
At the end of the day, soldiers follow orders.”
Not always.
@ Anonymous from 29 October, 2014 20:09
Nothing important happened. The Ukrainians are totally unrepentant. Not even once do they seem to agree or understand that it is Ukraine that is the aggressor. Novorussia has two options 1. fight and survive or 2. give up and die.
All these foolish discussions can only weaken the resolve of the opressed to fight back.
I agree. The ukies kept claiming that their fight against junta was “interrupted” by Novorossia’s uprising, blah-blah… I don’t trust anything they have been saying. They have completely dismissed Novorossian side’s right to defend themselves, constantly tried to sidetrack the conversation by bringing up personal stories of some hostages’ mistreatments from the hands of novorossian military. This is a show for the gullible. The ukies wants Russian gas for the winter hence all this “sudden” bridge building. Comes spring, they’ll support more junta’s offensives against civilians of Novorossia if not outright annihilation. See it as you like, but I would take any “peace” initiative from the ukies with a truckload of salt. This nation has been living for decades on Russian subsidies. True, they are living in poverty and under the constant abuse by their oligarchs. However, they have a blind hate towards Russia while claiming Russia’s subsidies as their birthright. This is a very typical ukies’ attitude of entitlement and spitefulness simultaniously. Schizophrenia of sort…
Yes, I am for ending this war as soon as we can, but those words about brotherhood, love… C’mon… If someone killed my mother or my child, I wouldn’t rest till my last breath until the justice is served. Never again in my wildest dreams I would call them brothers.
“Mozgovoi explicitly stated that he think that both sides could live together if the Ukrainians got rid of their Nazis and oligarchs.”
Russia and the US could live together if both sides got rid of their oligarchs and Nazis/fascists/power-hungry lunatics.
Re: Reply to “Olivegreen” on 10-29-2014:—
You are once again comparing events that took place over a decade with events that happened over a few months. Yes, the second war was harsh, nobody is denying that. Many innocent people suffered. But this was at least partly understandable because of all the events that preceded it. There was a feeling that this had to be stopped no matter what. When the Donbass people have a rap sheet anywhere even close to that of the Chechens by 1999, then these two wars can be regarded as in any way comparable.
Re: Grieved recommended the videos of Margarita Montyan.
I watched them and found them very worth while. She has lots of interesting insights.
It’s amazing that there are still decent thoughtful people like her in the Ukraine.
Paul II said…@ 30 October, 2014 13:46
“Russia and the US could live together if both sides got rid of their oligarchs and Nazis/fascists/power-hungry lunatics.”
Complexity is difficult and so many crave simplicity.
One of the factors in the complex is the socio-economic system including its ideology – perceptual framing if you prefer.
Some may seek to test your hypothesis though which will likely encourage different hypotheses.
Anonymous said…@ 30 October, 2014 13:45
” Yes, I am for ending this war as soon as we can,”
Perhaps you can define the “we” as well as “this war” and “ending”.
pm Thursday Lugansk and Donetsk ask OSCE and Rus to assist, as Ukraine has broken Minsk agreement due to shelling etc-sounds getting more serious still-fromrt.com
I didn´t see the videos but I wouldn´t trust a single word from the Ukie military. These people are being assesed by the USA. They are just trying to untie themselves from the deathsquads when everybody knows they work together for the same master. From my point of view, as an inhabitant of Southamerica I have seen these maneuver many times.
Beware Saker. Don´t fall for these stunts.
David
I like your movie script KatKan – it’s plausible, fingers crossed!
I wanted to post this translation from Kristina Rus at her new Fort Russ blog – and thanks to various people who have linked over there, it’s one of my daily bookmarks now.
It’s from Viktor Zubritsky’s Facebook page, and I don’t know who he is except he lives in Kiev so presumably with the Ukraine side. Also she doesn’t link to the post itself, just his page.
Here’s her story – which I think has already been posted here, but one loses track a little:
Revolt in territorial battalions, panic in Kiev
Let me quote the whole thing, and maybe if anyone wants to they can go to Zubrisky’s page and find the post and verify the meaning.
I take all this to mean that soldiers returning from the killing fields have realized they were set up, that the oligarchs simply stole the money and never intended to fight a real war, knew it couldn’t be won anyway, and didn’t care. If so, this meme is combinuing withthe concept of NAF forming alliance with Ukraine to clean up the country, and is spreading in Kiev and could amount to something. More fingers crossed!
“According to verified information, from Police HQ on Bogomolets street #10 – Ministry of Internal Affairs is in real panic. Operational information was received that some territorial battalions are planning to unite and negotiate with the forces of the so-called DPR-LPR for joint armed march on Kiev. As a minimum, expect inaction of the forces from DPR-LPR during the campaign of the battalions.
Representatives from combat battalions believe that the government was hijacked by the oligarchs who robbed the people and the country, under the guise of conducting ATO, creating an armed confrontation within the country.
The Minister is clearly furious, subordinates are in a panic. The entire Security Service is on its feet with all the ‘capabilities’. Operational detachments were dispatched to identify and behead the “protest movement”. The mood is resolute, the goal is liquidation. But it is not clear who will execute the order…
So Avakov’s experience with Muzychko will have a sequence.
Now Arsen Avakov and his Deputy Sergei Yarovoi have a new subject for concern, negotiations and meetings, as it is today.
P.S. It should be noted that in the Ministry of Internal Affairs along with panic there are other moods: “Finally!” “
Kristina adds this:
“KR: In the comments the author said, the staff of the Ministry of Internal Affairs has a lot of friends and relatives, you cannot hide things like this from the general public in Kiev”
Well, the junta is not pleased:
http://fortruss.blogspot.com.ar/2014/10/revolt-in-territorial-battalions-panic.html#more
“According to verified information, from Police HQ on Bogomolets street #10 – Ministry of Internal Affairs is in real panic. Operational information was received that some territorial battalions are planning to unite and negotiate with the forces of the so-called DPR-LPR for joint armed march on Kiev. As a minimum, expect inaction of the forces from DPR-LPR during the campaign of the battalions.
“Representatives from combat battalions believe that the government was hijacked by the oligarchs who robbed the people and the country, under the guise of conducting ATO, creating an armed confrontation within the country.
“The Minister is clearly furious, subordinates are in a panic. The entire Security Service is on its feet with all the ‘capabilities’. Operational detachments were dispatched to identify and behead the “protest movement”. The mood is resolute, the goal is liquidation. But it is not clear who will execute the order…”
So the oligarchs and fascists want to “identify and behead” (literally?) soldiers who are not just seeing the light but turning their guns around? If they don’t watch out they might just end up forcing the soldiers to act in self-defense, precipitating the very rebellion they fear. And much sooner than I’d thought it might be possible…
Thank you Saker, and all comments here, especially Anonymous at 19:00, olivegreen, and yes, the person who posted the wikipedia on Chechnya, Grieved for links I have yet to go to but will – a rich store of opinions and information on this thread. I have learned much.
I followed the early incursions by Kiev sponsored belligerents into peaceful communities, heart stopping events in Muriopol and Odessa, so my hope is that the two sets of forces will be able to confront their common adversary – it is huge that both recognize this already. This common recognition must eventually override the horrors of war.
An anonymous near the top said,
“If the Ukrainians need to be “denazified” meaning to get rid of extreme warlike tribalism”
Um, no. The Ukrainians need to be “denazified” meaning to get rid of actual Nazis. Not even Neonazis, let alone generically pugnacious tribalists. Lest we forget there are major, powerful elements in the current government whose lineage goes back to genuine Nazis and whose ideology specifically embraces that Nazism in all its racialist, fascist, genocidal horror.
Another anonymous much lower down, arguing about Chechen wars, says, “—unless someone will claim that the Wikipedia source is mere “Western propaganda” when it comes to Russia, Ukraine and any related topics.”
Well, I don’t know about the specifics here either of that particular entry or those wars. But in general, I don’t know why anyone wouldn’t claim that. As a rule, I find that Wikipedia is very sound and useful when it comes to relatively uncontentious issues which are not political. If I want to know who invented Cornflakes or what a Wankel engine is, Wikipedia is excellent. But for more political, contentious matters I find Wikipedia on average decidedly unreliable. I wouldn’t say it has an overall slant in any top-down sense, but for any given topic area, there will be editorial contests for dominance and one political tribe or another will prevail, at least for a time. So you end up with things like articles that whitewash Pinochet because some bunch of Chicago school economics fans and/or wealthy Chilean elites who benefited from the dictatorship and don’t care about a few proles getting erased were all over the page dumping the more incriminating stuff any time someone tried to reintroduce it. Overall, I think in English-language Wikipedia there is a tendency for right wing imperialism to dominate because, well, Anglo-zionism. So you wouldn’t expect a pro-Russian point of view to dominate English-language Wikipedia.
@ Vintage Red
“According to verified information, from Police HQ on Bogomolets street #10 – Ministry of Internal Affairs is in real panic. Operational information was received that some territorial battalions are planning to unite and negotiate with the forces of the so-called DPR-LPR for joint armed march on Kiev.”
I smell a false-flag ops coming very soon. All this sudden “good” ukies appearing out of nowhere and trying to negotiate a peace. “Panics” about supposed “good” ukies/DPR-LPR joined march on Kiev. Is CIA/Kiev building up a justification of the upcoming attack on Novorossia?
Dear Saker,
Thanks very much this utterly fascinating piece, which says so much.
I have nothing else to say except that I also agree with your assessment of El Murid. I think he is altogether bad news and a very bad influence and not just on Strelkov.
Best Wishes,
Alexander Mercouris
Dear Saker,
these are truly amazing videos. I’ve only seen the 2nd one so far and it’s really an impressive open and civilized dialogue.
A couple of comments re the 2nd vid:
1) The Ukrainian side is even more critical of the political верхушка than Mozgovoi. They agree Ukraine needs to be de-oligarchized and neutral regarding the EU/US-Russia divide and openly state that 99% of the non-Pravy Sektor soldiers would rather see this happen joining forces with the NAF then continue bombing the southeast.
2) The biggest disagreements are over geopolitics and Russia. When they humorously ask Mozgovoi will he vote for them if they engage these goals on a political platform, he answers that he just doesn’t see this happening because western foreign influence won’t allow it. A chaotic, destabilized Ukraine is a policy goal they actively work on. But this thought seems to just fly over their heads and they seem honest in their optimism that the people of Ukraine can bring about the necessary changes unhindered.
3) The biggest problem is Russia of course. They see Russia as an outside force vying for Ukrainian territory trying to break up the country and their logic is that this is a bigger problem and should be addressed first before moving into a de-oligarchizing mode. And here I think Mozgovoi didn’t insist and emphasize enough that this is not what’s happening. This is the message they really need to hear, since all they have at their disposal is Ukie-media propaganda all day long.
All in all a fascinating conversation. A moment of light.
This is wonderful and impressive Saker. One hopes that after they get rid of the oligarchs in Kiev, they also do away with the gangsters and bandits in Donbass and Lugansk?
Republicans are allegedly a majority in Australia. However, Queen Elizabeth is still the Head of State. The Republicans can’t agree on a replacement. Yes, oligarchs are bad (the Nazis lasted about a month before they were removed and their electoral support has blown away. They aren’t there to remove). The Russians obviously did not respect the identity of the Ukranians. Therein lies the whole story since August 2013. No one threatened the Donbass (Odessa and Mariupol were conflicts between locals. Girkin arrived with an even higher level of provocation than the Maidan. There are clearly gronds for a negotiated unity. Indeed the rebels have nowhere else to go. Conquering more territory will bring in more discontented civilians.
Good news this evening about a Ukraine-Russia gas deal.
At the same time, military tensions between NATO and Russia are real and can lead to extremely unpleasant developments.
Something to be watched.
Until then in the name of Christ
The ѕнітвіґDѕ (priests) did come
And set a fire to Paradise
And burned, and blood spilled some.
They, orphan children, crucified
And in Christ’s Name, t’is told
Their little bodies burned and fried
And heads of Cossacks rolled.
Ukrainians did cry and moan
As head rolled after head
They heard the Bishops then intone
“Te Deum! Now, you’re dead!”
And this is how my Polish friend
Described the evil priests
A-butchering until the end
Like Satan’s maddened beasts.
Oh! Rue the day they came to call
And stilled our cheerful laughter!
Our rural bliss, when we could all
Live happily ever after!
The moral, friends, is plain to see
Keep firm in your tradition
And cassocked rogues from o’er the sea
Send straightly to Perdition.
Hi saker !
I liked your piece very much, but I also saw in Global Research Strelkov’s piece written to Kodokovsky…so I read it more carefully…its so well written…I don’t know if everyone saw how beautiful it was, because the piece by Kordovsky was first in your article and by the time I got to Strelkov I was “done”…
Its too long for me to post here, but I wonder if people might go to Global Research and here is the link;;;
http://www.globalresearch.ca/russias-hope-for-rebirth-social-justice-and-national-mobilization/5409244
Oct 31 -DPR prime minister says they are preparing for war-Kiev is not signing demarcation borders as at Sept 15th as agreed, Ukr still violating ceasefire daily.
could there be arguements between Poroshenko and Yatsenuk? It seems that they nearly have equal numbers of votes(Y has slightly more %age) but Y’s party proportionally very much less seats. If Ukr and NFA troops/leaders marched to Kiev to remove oligarchs etc etc this would be seen as “treasonable” surely by Kiev, then the private forces would be “permitted” to use all force to stop them , surely leaders from the east would not put themselves in such a vulnerable position.The elections , as declared recognised by Rus and everyone else, legitimise the new rada, so any “opposition’ by Ukr army NFA to remove or adjust new parliament would be treasonable, and be further used as an excuse by USA NATO etc etc to pump in funds/NGO’s excuse for NATO occupation, NATO “spearhead force” go into Ukraine to stabilise , to stabilise their new “democracy”?
http://www.eurasianet.org/node/70661
article re local manufacturers in Kharkiv copying other countries bullet proof vests etc to support Kiev, helping the economy
Jonathan J.
Good instincts. Yatseniuk and Poroshenko were in negotiations before the election to form a unified bloc, and couldn’t do it. Tensions may arise, alas. I’m sure Yatseniuk has his nose out of joint that every single headline throughout the vote count was about Poroshenko claiming victory for pro-EU forces, without mentioning that Yatseniuk was leading.
The demarcation line had to be decided before coming into force of the Minsk provision that heavy artillery had to be drawn back from it. Ukraine did sign it but then “withdrew” their signature. This is one of the clearest indications that the massing of forces is done with the intention of driving forward.
I’m better than this but I just can’t resist.
Which two party leaders who just made it into the Rada could be known as “Arsenic and Old Lace”?
I just posted the three NAF-UKr conference urls to the Ukraine Today comments section.
Doesn’t seem fair. Now the Ukrainians can watch them and I still don’t know what was in them!
At one point I was fluent in six languages, but none of them used Cyrillic alphabet, alas. My brother was an exchange student in Russia, but he’s no help. Captive of the 5th column, him.
Is not Kumbaya yet, Comrades.
Mozgovoi is a traitor. He and Strelkov have been campaigning for a military dictatorship. Read his stuff carefully. He adamantly believes no one should be in government except people who have fought in the front lines. Slowly but surely he and Strelkov have lost the support of the rest of the NAF, until Strelkov himself admits in the article linked below that Mozgovoi is the only field commander he trusts.
Mozgovoi does not take prisoners. So what does he do to soldiers who surrender? I do not know why his battalion was disbanded, but I doubt very much it was “for nothing.”
There is a point at which “persistence” ceases to be admirable. I think that point is reached when you’ve lost all support from your peers, so you try to find some in the enemy.
Does anyone else find admirable the picture of a joint right wing military command in power in Kiev “purifying” the country? Apparently starting with “the traitor Zakharchenko” and anyone who supported him, (which is almost everyone)? BTW, Mozgovoi has also been talking to the Nazi volunteer battalions.
Saker, get a grip!
http://slavyangrad.org/2014/10/22/the-line-of-demarcation/
Cassandra
@ Jonathan Jarvis
Kharkhiv is the would-be third Republic. They got badly trashed by Right Sector, early on. There is an underground that is staying underground until it is safe to come out, ie when they are “rescued”.
I guess they are happy to have work, and they don’t want conscripts killed, so making vests looks like a fair thing. They also have a major tank revival factory, fixing current tanks and also bringing ancient stored ones out of mothballs. Those, I hope, they don’t fix very well.
Go look on the newest thread hows I think the final battle will go; they won’t go to Kiev until the Sectors go first.
BTW, does anyone else recall the sainted Strelkov, on his return from his fruitless trip to Moscow, saying bitterly “Well, at least I can still control who gets humanitarian aid. That is one bit of power I have left.”
When hearing that Strelkov means “Shooter” did you ever wonder “Shooter at whom, exactly?” Strelkov’s ideas of discipline are reputed to be as Czarist as all his other ideas.
Cass
ps @ Jonathan,
that bullet proof vest maker is the kind of guy the country needs. Smart, thinking, hands on and can-do. If he can resist becoming an oligarch he’d do well in Government modernizing their outlook. I wish him well even tho he’s on the other side now.
This was really informative.
For me (disclosure: I am half Russian half German) a lot of things in this highly complex conflict are difficult to understand.
One thing is the use of “Russian”. From my pov, “Russian” can interchangably mean “part of the Russian cultural realm”, “citizen of Russia” or “ethnic Russian”. All of these definitions can be overlapping, and all of these definitions also arent the same.
Likewise “Novorussija” could also imply a “New Russia”, simultaneously meaning the old historic term, as well as a “new Russia” preferably without the “old Oligarchs”.
My perespective of the Russian settlement of this region seems to imply that people settling in those areas were fed up with the Russian nobility and moved to a place where the Boyars had few rights.
I recently had a discussion with a pretty “nationalist but not Nazi” Kiev side girl, she explained her “Russophobia” with the fact that Moscow is close, and that Moscow has, historically speaking, repeatedly proved its ability to rule over Ukraine, while Washington is far away, generally distracted by some other shenangians, and broadly speaking doesnt now shit, especially about Eastern Europe. This makes Washington a distant and inept overlord, compared to the close, and more competent, overlord that is Moscow (or Brussels). I can see the appeal in the western choice for a nationalist Ukrainian.
What does “Russian” mean for you?
And how would you refute the last point?
Concerning second Chechenya:
In my opinion, Russian victory had the following prime reasons:
1: Casus Belli for Russia in the second round was “stop terrorists”, not “keep a random republic we dont give a fuck about in the federation, after letting republics we care very much about out”.
The latter Casus Belli makes for some pretty bad morale.
2: Non Chechen Caucasus tribes generally took the Russian side in the second war, which wasnt the case in the first war. The Chechens didnt exactly made much friends during their “independence”, and having access to the non Chechen locals often proved a considerable force multiplier.
3: Russia had a pretty good intel on the various Chehcen groupings, and the faultlines between f.e. the Chechen Nationalists and the Saudi backed Wahabis. They exploited these faultlines, and actually brought back some minor nationalist leaders back from the cold. This was also important because it raised the spectre of betrayal over the Chechens, which further amplified their internal contradictions.
4: Russia got its shit together, and was in a much better state overall.
for what i know, they communicated with officers of “Dnepr-1” batallion.
The one stationed in Kransoarmeysk town.
The one stationed where 400 women allegedly are missed since Slavyansk fallen.
400 women missed, and 286 female corpses allegedly found, being raped and killed with headshots.
http://ria.ru/world/20141031/1031105901.html
http://lb.ua/news/2014/10/31/284534_snbo_otreagirovali_zayavlenie.html
If true, then how can the militia even for a while side with them?
Arioch, the one consistent feature of US-aligned and approved death-squads is their exceptional brutality. The Banderista butchers are of an ilk with the US-created IS vermin, they of scarcely believable cruelty, the Contra scum sent into Nicaragua to kill teachers, health-workers and peasant leaders (‘…the moral equivalent of our Founding Fathers’ as that daemon Reagan said)and numerous other such utterly evil groups. International terrorism is an Atlanticist creation, from the days of the transmutation of mujahideen atavist thugs in Afghanistan into al-Qaeda to the present, designed to terrify the moronic and ignorant Western publics into acquiescence with Imperial plans to throw the entire world into chaos and confusion, to consolidate Atlanticist dominance while ecological collapse and ferocious genocidal wars liquidate billions of ‘useless eaters’.
“The Ukrainians need to be “denazified” meaning to get rid of actual Nazis.”
Absolutely correct, Purple library! The word has been slung around too loosely. Now, like the boy who cried wolf, too many of us are muzzled by political correctness when the real thing rears its serpent head.
Judging by the past few elections, the Ukrainians don’t want the name; they disavow people flaunting Nazi regalia. But the ideology has sunk its roots into the population, especially its worst element, genocide.
Did any of you ever see a WWII Nazi short film depicting a swarm of hook-nosed rats pouring over a map of Europe? Goebbel’s playbook, chapter one, dehumanize your victims.
The Colorado Potato Beetle, a voracious destroyer of crops, was introduced into Europe from the U.S. at the end of WWII, either sneaking into Iowa GI’s letters from their Moms or as state-sponsored bioterrorism. It remains a major pest in Europe. It’s striped black and orange, reminiscent of the gold and black stripes of St. George.
The Ukrs have started calling rebel Novorussians “Koloradi.”
Poroshenko’s TV Channel 5 ran a cartoon showing a man in a haz mat suit carrying a gas canister decorated with a yellow and blue flag, gassing a swarm of Colorado beetles.
Yatseniuk has repeatedly, publicly, in writing and verbally, made it clear that he wants to see the Donbass ethnically cleansed of the ‘untermenschen.’ The vacated land has been promised to the berserkers to reward them for their “voluntary” service. They would like to see much of this accomplished by driving another couple of million more people to Russia by their terror campaign against civilians. It saves on the cost of gas.
Neo-Nazis have won seats here and there around Europe but nobody anywhere has ever appointed one of them to a cabinet post. Who but a closet Nazi would give them control of Interior, State Security, and the Prosecutor General’s office: all the instruments of oppression and suppression, and impunity as the cherry on top?
If it quacks like a duck, waddles like a duck, swims with ducks and mates with ducks, it’s a duck.
Anybody who tries to say this is about language rights is terminally naive, or thinks their audience is. It’s about ethnic cleansing.
But while I’m on language rights, Putin’s recommendation for Crimea was three national languages.
Zakharchenko has just announced language policy for DPR: all classes will be in English. Every child will begin school in a second language, no discrimination, and the graduates will have their access to the outside world magnified. An exception will be made on demand (90% by petition) in an overwhelmingly homogeneous school district.
I have a nagging worry about slanting your teaching staff by this requirement, but I think the decision is in the best possible hands. Zakharchenko checks all Mozgovoy’s boxes as a warrior, but loathes war. He won me in his first press conference with his plea to the northwest “Don’t unleash the beast. Just . . . don’t.”
This is a superb blog — lukcily it’s linked through Asiatimes that I read regularly!! since I hate Google — I’ll just “sign in” directly , if this works — as ‘anyomous’ – but my name is teddy.
Most Transparent Administration (in the US) Ever? Ferguson No-Fly Zone Was “To Keep The Media Out”
Further reply to Olivegreen on 10-30-2014:—
You mention that Novorussia has no “rap sheet” to match the so-called 10 year “rap sheet” of the Chechens. Please bear in mind, the Chechens never seized any part of Russian territory and never thereupon petitioned to bring themselves and the territory they seized to be annexed by the USA. They destroyed no Russian industries or infrastructure as far as I know. But within just several months the Novorussians seized significant parts of Ukrainian territory, ousted the Ukrainian authorities from there, and then insisted they wanted to transfer all that territory, its industries, infrastructure, also shale oil and gas and other valuable resources to Russian administration and control and thus “join Russia”. That is drastic. No country can possibly allow such a dismemberment and just surrender. As I understand, the Novorussians right from the start did not want to talk about anything except in effect unconditional Ukrainian surrender, just how fast all Ukrainian authority could withdraw and how fast the transfer of Novorussia meaning all of southeastern Ukraine could be facilitated to become part of Russia. I would say that the agenda of the Novorussian elite has always been to dismember and obliterate the Ukrainian sovereign state which they think is a big mistake and that Ukrainians simply do not deserve to have any space of their own or country of their own but must always be someone else’s flunkeys, preferrably to the Moscow government, but even to Washington, or Brussels, or Berlin, or even Warsaw,—but must be someone else’s flunkeys, nothing better. Therefore, all in all, your reasoning is poorly taken. Also, I have read a transcript of Putin’s account of Yanukovich’s final hours as president of Ukraine, the one he gave at the Valdai conference. Being somewhat conspiratorially inclined, I noted lots of questionable things about that accounting, just why Yanukovich abandoned his post the way he did and thus in effect brought down his own so-called legitimate government. He supposedly left Kyiv against Putin’s own advice, the law enforcement in Kyiv was “withdrawn”, Yanukovich went to Kharkiv where he was allegedly held by somebody “at gunpoint” and prevented from going to Rostov, and then the next thing, he turned up in the Crimea, already occupied by Russian forces, and the distance between Kharkiv and Crimea is quite lengthy…over 400 kilometers, over 250 miles. In many ways the story does not make sense. I suspect that Yanukovich was simply instructed to run away [if not by Putin then by whom one would wonder], his job was done, and the projects as to Crimea and Novorussia would kick in.
> Please bear in mind, the Chechens never seized any part of Russian territory
Chechnya is Russian territory for few centuries now.
Novorossiya only became Ukrainian when commies did it around 1920.
So either none of them seized land, or both did.
The rest of the anwer went http://the-arioch.livejournal.com/71174.html for it was too long and detailed for Blogger to accept it.