The Saker: You are a very well known public figure in the United States. Still I would like you to tell us three things about you which in your opinion is the most important things about you.
Cynthia McKinney: I am always in a state of questioning and learning and I love to research questions and an array of solutions of interest to me. I think curiosity is a good thing and broadens ones knowledge. But, it was exactly this questioning nature of mine that got me into political trouble because the institutions that I joined are steeped in “propriety” and “etiquette” and “place”; the culture is set by those who are there the longest and have accrued the most power. That is not Black women–and it’s certainly not Black women who ask too many questions and don’t know their “place.”
I’m told that Rahm Emanuel, who recruited my opponent to run against me in the Democratic Primary, said that I was not a “team player” because I did not accept Democratic Party leadership nostrums on the 2000 Presidential Election that sent George Bush to the White House, September 11th, Hurricane Katrina, and George Bush’s wars that became Barack Obama’s wars. In fact, the first Iraq War funding bill brought to a vote in Congress after I left, passed with only the required number of votes, 218; had I been returned to Congress, that bill would have failed and quite possibly, we’d be having a completely different conversation right now. That’s the importance of every vote on every issue; the importance of every vote on every candidate, in every election. Instead, I was turned out of Congress, the war funding bill passed with the vote of my replacement, and as is said, “the rest is history.” The documentary American Blackout tells this story very well.
I conducted my own investigation of the 2000 election and found that the State of Florida whose governor was Jeb Bush, had actually ordered–paid a Georgia company to provide inaccurate voter lists after convicted felons were scrubbed. In fact, when Floridians showed up at the polls to vote for Bush or Gore, many Blacks found that their names had been scrubbed as convicted felons and they were turned away from the polls. I was livid. The Bush Administration had been sworn into office with no legitimacy.
Then, September 11th happened. The Bush Administration’s response to September 11th was that the United States was hit by terrorists who hated its freedoms. The way it was put was, “We were hit because we are free.” All of the Members of Congress were passed talking points and we were supposed to mindlessly go out and repeat what was on the talking points. I was supposed to go back to my constituents and tell them that September 11th happened because they are free–which first and foremost was a lie that I refused to repeat. Then, when I learned that both Bush and Vice President Cheney were lobbying Congressional leaders not to have an investigation, I smelled a rat and began to do my own research on the tragedy. In real time, I scoured the international press for information on what really happened and learned that there had been warnings passed on to the Administration from many countries. At that point, I asked the one question that hasn’t to date been adequately answered by those in authority: “How can a trillion-dollar military and intelligence infrastructure fail four times on one day?”
The Democratic Party leadership directed its minions not to cooperate with Republicans who had formed a Select Committee to investigate Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The world saw the true conditions of poverty and neglect that residents of mostly-Black New Orleans experience, but that was really a window into poverty in the United States. Let the U.S. tell the story, there is little poverty or racism left in the U.S. Hurricane Katrina showed that the Emperor really has no clothes. I just punctuated the point!
The punishment meted out to me by AIPAC and both the Democratic and Republican Parties taught me a host of lessons about the limitations of U.S. democracy. My eyes have been opened to how totally and thoroughly the U.S. state has been penetrated by operatives who have no interest in protecting or perfecting the United States of America. Yet, the perpetrators of this disregard at best, treason at worst, would have the average U.S. resident believe that his or her problem is really the Blacks, Latinos, or Muslims. I have learned that The Cabal (as I call this group) are very good at committing crimes and yet pointing the finger at everyone else while leaving a trail of tragedy and hurt behind them. For more information on how I was personally affected by this treatment, please see my book, Ain’t Nothing Like Freedom. For an example of how another Congressional election was subverted by The Cabal, please read Gus Savage’s Congressional Record remarks about his experiences at the hands of the Israel Lobby.
Despite all of the negative things that have happened to me, I still believe that the people in the U.S. can create positive transformational change for themselves that will also be good for the rest of the world. What I don’t know is if they will seize the opportunity to do so, while it is still possible. Sharpening the technologies of death and applying them at home as well as abroad shapes the tenor of the times. I fear that the democratic space for such positive change is drastically and rapidly closing. The 2016 Presidential campaign could ring in the deathknell of freedom if either Hillary Clinton or Jeb Bush are elected and begin their tenures in the White House in 2017.
The Saker: My second question will be about race relations in the United States since the election of Barack Obama. Do you believe that the fact that a black president was elected somehow changed race relationships in the United States and is that a sign that race is not as important as it used to be or is race still a crucial factor in US politics?
Cynthia McKinney: Sadly, what President Barack Obama proved during his tenure was that Black men can kill for The Cabal just as easily as White males can. Hillary Clinton has already demonstrated an extreme propensity to do as she is told by those who control the U.S. Deep State; another war criminal is not an acceptable choice for me for President of the United States. Therefore, race relations in the U.S. have experienced an extreme setback. However, my hope is that people now will understand that the transformational change (or as Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. put it–the revolution of values) will not come because the people elect “the first,” but will only come when the people elect someone whose values represent their values of liberty, peace, truth, justice, and dignity. Until the U.S. seeks professional help for its psychosis, slick Deep State operatives will continue to be able to have the more uninformed U.S. people salivating at the prospect of beating up someone because of their religion, race, language, accent, or intergenderedness.
The Saker: When I think of Colin Powell, Susan Rice, Condoleezza Rice or Barack Obama, I am always amazed at the fact that they appear to be just as faithful servants of the AngloZionist Empire than their White counterparts. Could that indicate that the race of a politician is really irrelevant and that class interest is far better predictor of political orientation than ethnicity?
Cynthia McKinney: I reject that it’s even class interest. I agree with Wesley Clark who says that the U.S. has been taken over in a “policy coup” and either you’re willing to serve the new masters of the U.S. plantation or your are not. As far as I am concerned, the four mentioned by you are not role models at all of Black aspiration. Blacks in the U.S. are worse off with them at the helm and so are Africans, Asians, and peace-loving Europeans around the globe. That these individuals could rise to such levels inside the U.S. only reveals that they were willing to put a dagger in the heart of the Black body politic for their own (and the interests that they represent) gain. Of course, I was criticized when I said it, originally about Colin Powell but I think hindsight gives some who need glasses a bit more clarity of vision and I would generalize now to them all: they chose to get a blood transfusion that sucked out their souls; they traded the chance to buy Ferragamo shoes for the tremendous opportunity that they had to do good in the world. I know lots of people in the U.S. like that. Some even call them “leaders.” Here’s an interview that I recently did on the political situation inside the U.S.: http://cprnews.podbean.
The Saker: What kind of future do you wish for Black Americans in the United States. Do you hope that they will integrate into a society in which race will not matter, or do you believe that blacks in the United States will create their own African American culture? Are you a supporter of a “melting pot” in which all races ethnicities and nationalities mix into one but lose their unique identity, or do you prefer a “toss salad” in which different ingredients are mixed but retain their unique individuality.
Cynthia McKinney: How boring the world would be if we all were exactly the same. I LOVE diversity! I celebrate diversity! I learn from diversity! That is political diversity, ideological diversity, as well as human and ecological diversity. Therefore, I care as much about the impoverished child in the Mississippi Delta as I do about the malnourished child in Palestine as I do about children who have never tasted chocolate but work on Ivory Coast plantations so we can enjoy Mars Bars. I care about the values that can make all people free to live their lives in a productive and responsible way–not dictated to by the IMF or World Bank or Washington Consensus. I believe in Afro-Asian unity; I believe in the promise of the Non-Aligned Movement; I believe in the civil rights movement of the United States. I believe that we can have justice if we first base it on truth; that we can have peace thereafter; and that the highest of these values is dignity for all.
The Saker: You have first hand experience with the “official” regime in power in Washington DC as well as the so-called “deep state” – those forces who hold the real reins of power and have the final authority to take crucial decision. How would you describe these forces? Who are they? Are they bankers, or the corporate world in general, or are we talking about a few families? The Israel Lobby or the oil Lobby? Maybe the Military Industrial complex? Or the police-prison complex? The intelligence and security agencies?
Cynthia McKinney: Yes, I have engaged directly with the apparatchiks of The Deep State. I know their names, faces, and organizations. Every two years when they think I will run for office to regain my Congressional seat, they also send stalkers to me. I understand them more than they understand me.
My Dissertation Committee member, Dr. Peter Dale Scott, has written several books about The Deep State and its politics and events. While I lost elections because of them, I won the hearts of many. I’ve seen people who thought I was loony (as I’ve been publicly called) now become my supporters, followers, and admirers. People seek me out now to apologize to me for believing all the negative media hype about me. That negative media hype began in earnest when I turned The Deep State apparatchiks down each time they tried to enlist me in their schemes against the people.
What I have learned is that they are fallible; it is possible for the people who represent good in the world to win. And win, we must.
The Saker: Ever since I read The Autobiography of Malcolm X man years ago I have been wondering why it is that there are monuments and road named after Martin Luther King everywhere but not a single monument or road named after Malcolm X. I personally consider Malcolm X the greatest person to have been born in the USA and I have an infinite respect for him. But it seems to me that the Black people in this country have turned away from him. Is that so and, if yes, why?
Cynthia McKinney: I think it is important to understand the nature of the rise of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the demise of both Malcolm X and Dr. King. The U.S. government hated them both and is responsible for the murder of them both. In 1963, when Malcolm X was murdered, both he and Dr. King had agreed to work together. Yes, they had vastly differing styles, but their unmanipulated objectives were the same. Malcolm’s strengths were King’s weaknesses and vice versa. Therefore, together, they would have packed a mighty powerful punch. That was cut short by assassins’ bullets. After the murder of Malcolm X, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Counter-Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) leaders cackled in glee. Next target, MLK. Operation Lantern Spike was the military intelligence name given to the program to surveil/kill Dr. King. Dr. King was the kinder, gentler Malcolm. Dr. King was preferred by U.S. Whites to Malcolm, but White Resistance rejected them both. And that’s why they both ended up dead by assassins’ bullets. They both knew that the U.S. government wanted them dead and they both refused to stop. They both are profiles in courage. Please don’t get me started on the culture of manipulation that has overtaken the traditional Black culture that saw us through slavery, Jim Crow, and more. Cultural invasion has taken place and the strength of Black culture has been decimated–like a cancer that takes over the body. Without excision, the body will die.
The Saker: You have been a member of Congress and you have been a Green Party candidate for the Presidency. What would you say to somebody like myself who believes that the US “democracy” is, indeed, the “best democracy money can buy”? That instead of a “one person one vote” we live in a “one dollar one vote” system in which money, not popular opinion, decides of the future. I personally believe that this system is rotten to the core and unreformable and that what the US needs is not “government change”, but “regime change”. Do you believe that this oligarchic plutocracy can still reform itself and ever become a government of the “people, by the people, for the people” rather than the government of the “one percenters, by the one percenters and for the one percenters”?
Cynthia McKinney: The United States has never been a democracy. It was founded on genocide and human trafficking and slavery. Women were denied the right to vote. What’s so democratic about that? That’s why what’s needed is sobriety and a real understanding of what these people say with their palaver. The world needs a translator for what these people in charge of the U.S. now mean when they say certain things and utter certain words.
The Saker: The capitalist economy is based on growth and yet we live in a finite environment: our world. In your opinion, can there be such a thing as a “sustainable capitalism” and, if yes, how is capitalism different from a malignant tumor since the latter is also based on an infinite growth in a finite environment? And if capitalism is inherently unsustainable, then what could replace it?
Cynthia McKinney: I recently wrote a four-part series on Capitalism for RT.com. The first of the series appears here: https://www.rt.com/op-edge/
The Saker: We all know the key role the Israel Lobby played in opposing you. How would you access the power of that Lobby nowadays? Do you believe that the tensions between Obama and Netanyahu are real and that Israel and the USA are drifting apart or is that just a veil hiding the reality of the power of the Zionist forces in the USA? Is the grip of the Israel Lobby on Congress and the media getting weaker or is it still as strong as ever?
Cynthia McKinney: The Zionists are fully in control of the U.S. state. One only need look at the Democratic and Republican Party Presidential “debates” to understand that. What they increasingly do not control are the people of the U.S. and that is where people who think like me come in. It is imperative that we make a stand at this moment with the people and for the people. The more the Zionists hit us the more obvious their beatings for nothing but expressing an opinion become to the masses. Sort of like demanding an investigation of 9/11 and being hit over the head for it; eventually everyone will say, well, we do need an investigation of 9/11. Now, the need for a 9/11 investigation is the new commonsense of the U.S. In Europe, if you say that, you are called “anti-semitic” and subject to prosecution! Can you believe it? Why would Zionists not want anyone to even mention the need for a 9/11 investigation?
The Saker: How do you see the future of the USA – do you believe that this country will be able to transition from Empire to “normal country” (like so many other countries had to do in the past, including Spain, Portugal, Russia, the UK, Japan, Germany and many others) or will it take a major war, possibly with Russia and/or China to finally achieve regime change in the USA?
Cynthia McKinney: Not as long as the people who came up with The Samson Option have their fingers on the controls in the U.S., France, the U.K., and other states. However, if they can be jettisoned, and a new kind of U.S. leadership can be exercised, I do believe that the U.S. will be able to live in peace with the rest of the world. That is my hope. Until then, I reiterate my words in my favorite speech:
“In 1957, Dr. King observed that both political parties had betrayed the cause of justice. And so it must be repeated today. Our beloved America is dividing again in two Americas. Our struggle is for nothing less than the soul of our country. We want an America that is respected in the commonwealth of man; we want our values to shine like a beacon around the world. As an American of conscience, I hereby declare my independence from every bomb dropped; every threat leveled, every civil liberties rollback, every child killed every veteran maimed every man tortured. And I sadly declare my independence from the leaders who let it happen.”
The Saker: thank you!
My apologies to Ms McKinney. She isn’t the crazy I thought (told) she was, although I doubt we agree on much.
Free markets are the answer to any economy. Supply and demand is freeing. Every ‘ism is a control scam and a corruption maker.
As for the USA, its done as a country. Being relatively ethnically, spiritually, and historically united is the key to surviving any collapse. We’re so past that here. Divide and conquer and manipulation has been the mantra of the Tribe, the politicians, and the corporations. However division politics is kinda been a poetic justice one at that. Because despite the wealth and power accrued, divisiveness will be the source of their downfall, which has already started. Unfortunately the slow collapse currently makes the U.S. the greatest threat the world has ever seen. Pity there aren’t some capable, sane adults in DC to dismantle the nukes and turn off the lights.
She isn’t the crazy I thought (told) she was
Just ask yourself *who* told you that any *why* you were told that.
Free markets are the answer to any economy
If disagreeing with this qualifies anybody as being “crazy” then please count me in as an incurable, raving, lunatic and the craziest of all.
?
Am I allowed to ask what would be better than a market economy and why it would be better?
“Market economy” is different from capitalist free market economy as defined today by the neocons and free marketeers. Even socialist economies have markets. So its not a question of markets. Just like trade is good but “free trade” as defined by neocons today is not good. A well regulated mixed economy where the state controls the “commanding heights” of the economy and places the welfare of the people (not business) at the top of the priority list is, in my opinion, the best form.
So the objection is to the version of free market economics exploited by the 1% to further their interests? Fair enough.
It should be said that even it (and even the 1% in their travesty of it) accept a role for government and regulation. So it is not enough just to say, as some do, that there is no such thing as free markets. So, Ngoyo, 8.30pm is so much more persuasive than 2.48pm, making a constructive debate easier.
I really dont understand that convoluted sentance “It should be said that even it (and even the 1% in their travesty of it) accept a role for government and regulation.” It doesn’t mean anything. What does that sentance that supposedytly proves there is a “free market” means? Again a very simple question: where and when have you sween this so alled “free market economy” yuou keep on insisting speaking of.
The truth is that government IS ruled by the 1%; therefiore the 1% ARE rthe government and since they control, the government they also control the economy via many ways. One example is the Federal reseve board whch controls credit in USA. There is NO “free market economy” anywhere therefore your thesys abotu “free market economy” is just an empty word, soemthing you keep on saying voer and over untill it becomes meaningless noise.
Again, answer the simple question: where and when have you seen this so called “free market economy” in action?
Petkovich,
It is indeed convoluted to the point of incomprehensibility. Apologies.
There is an extreme version of free market economics. It ignores the fact that many of the theoretical results it depends on require unrealistic assumptions. The theoretical economists were quite clear on that. It also ignores the results of the theory that don’t suit. But even it assumes government and regulation.
Similarly, this extreme version of free market economics is only of practical interest because it is exploited for political purposes by certain interest groups (essentially, large corporations). They have been very successful in using it as a propaganda tool against anyone who opposes them. But even they rely on government and regulation.
The upshot is that it is pointless simply shouting Boo ever time someone mentions free markets and announcing that they don’t exist. There is only a point in this exercise if like Ngoyo here (and others like Vasco da Gama and Purple Library Guy elsewhere) you are willing to discuss what form of balanced economy (from free market through to social democrat and beyond) you propose and how you propose we get from here to there.
am I allowed to ask when was the last time you have seen this so called “free market” economy in action anywhere on Earth?
One difference between a market economy and a “free market” is that the former exists whereas the latter does not and indeed cannot.
Mixed economies with a sizable market component can be made to work reasonably well. I might prefer something different, but such an alternative would need to be carefully built with a lot of work and thought, to handle all the devils in the details, not merely assumed into existence with a sweep of theory. But markets are the same–they have to be built carefully by social institutions such as states, with legal frameworks, infrastructures, counterbalances to keep them from running amok, and supplementary economic mechanisms to do things they are not good at. Things markets are not good at include handling externalities, supplying public goods (roads, scientific research etc), supplying the products of “natural monopolies”, and supplying at reasonable prices goods for which demand is very strong and inelastic such as medical care, generators during emergencies and so on. “What the market will bear” when it’s something you’ve really gotta have can readily become a price huge enough to drag on the rest of the economy (not to mention create a lot of human misery). For all these reasons and more, trying to run an economy on “free markets” with a sweep of an invisible, theoretical hand works very badly, and works worse the more seriously you try to take it. Compounding this difficulty is that the main reason uncompromising “free markets” are championed is not because the theory makes any sense but because it makes a good smokescreen for policies which give advantages to wealthy elites. They want those policies independently of any academic economic theories, so they arrange for theories that give them something like those policies to get backing; what fit and got backed was some neoclassical, a sprinkling of Austrian and some bad novels by a bitter twisted woman named Rand. But if something different had given them a policy mix that gave them even more advantages, it would be out with the “free markets” and in with “creative indebtedness theory” or whatever.
And that, Petkovich, is how it is done. Thanks to Purple Library Guy for a thoughtful contribution (again).
Of course, the trouble with what Purple Library Guy says, and what I would say if I tried to describe how I would like our society reformed, is that it assumes a person or persons, some institution, that knows best. If we take a hint from Mohamed and his reference to John Nash, picture our political economy as a game with multiple players, It isn’t obvious that anyone can determine the set of optimal or feasible solutions, or how to get from here to there. We have to go about it piecemeal by bargaining and bickering.
If free markets are free, why couldn’t Saddam sell oil in Euros?
Cynthia McKinney’s wild eyes and funkadelic hair-doo fed the ‘she’s crazy’ propaganda. She often found herself flustered for words during discussions (frustration?), I watched her often, she was very brave, but too easy to cast aside as irrelevant by the image makers. She was not establishment enough to even begin to challenge the establishment.
Market economies and infinite resources: The necessary balance requires a retooling of the measurement metrics. GDP as it is used is an imperfect indicator, it does require constant growth (just as a tree is always growing unless it’s dying), but the way it measures growth needs to be refined. Things that are not given value now, should be given value, like the improvement of the environment.
Increasingly, with more efficient recycling, and new methods of fabrication, materials recycling lessens the needs for base metal extraction. Also with an ever greater volume of wealth being completely digital, GDP effects are no longer as tied to material resources. Music, video, reading material, document production, education, etc. are increasingly digitized, paper will become a thing of the past.
Also with innovation in battery technology, energy distribution should decentralize, lessen dependence on polluting extractive fuels, and generally improve the shelf life of machines which deteriorate with combustive technologies.
I’m a flag waver for the future, I think humanity can achieve equilibrium given the proper moral leadership, and implementation of the best available technologies. If markets are to work for the greater good, they will require transparency. What we see now with the TPP is an attempt to create an opaque structure for ‘free markets’, this is an anachronism of how business must be carried out in the 21st century.
Those that react adversely to the word ‘markets’ in whatever sense are just reactionaries, often times Luddites in a hypocritical disguise, for so much of what we have come to enjoy – hot water, our favorite music in the car, the plane we use to visit loved ones, all became ubiquitous because of ‘markets’.
Angleo, I can’t believe you can dismiss Cynthia McKinney with your “wild eyes” comment…and then talk about the right kind of future…how do you think we (humanity) is going to get to this future without Cynthia McKinney ? It blows my mind that you are such a theorist that you think Cynthia McKinney is not a pivot point.
I admire Cynthia McKinney, and one of my closest friends has the wildest eyes ever….I was speaking in the context of how she is/was portrayed by the media, and how the image makers will use these variations in human appearance to smear people.
Look at Trump, he’s always demeaning peoples looks, yet he’s first in the polls (proving my point). In order to appeal to the masses of America, you almost have to be bred for it these days (see Trudeau)
This is more a condemnation of America, not me. I simply view things through various prisms, which proves difficult for most who like things black and white – such as yourself. I analyze media, I study the media ecology, I let it inform me, not the other way around.
Okay, well its good to hear that you like Cynthia in spite of insulting her wild and beautiful and wonderful and clear seeing and sparkly eyes…but Angelo, I don’t actually see things in black and white..I see them in colour – full living colour and you are a theorist.
Many of the things you have said over the threads, I agree with, but there’s no doubt at all that today, its just black and white.
I just read your comment Ann, and I think it quite funny actually. I was called frog eyes when I was younger because my eyes were so big. As I got older I actually got the comment, because of the size and color of my eyes that I had ‘wild eyes’. Me and Cynthia have a lot in common….if I insulted her I insulted myself :)
My friend, of which i mentioned, has super wild eyes, they are like golf balls. His face makes the perfect comedians face (think Rodney Dangerfield), which he knows, and plays on well. You work with what you have.
As far as black and white, yes, I’m very familiar with your views based on your comments, you have a very concrete way of seeing things. Your delineations are quite narrow. I suggest you read some more of Steiner’s materials to glimpse how non dogmatic he was. It was for that reason that he was considered a Jewish sympathizer by the National Socialists, and an anti-semite by the Jews.
Steiner’s materials are the philosophy of freedom
To add to the above, and to provide an example, if we were to place the appearance of someone into their proper ‘image fit’ (in today’s media ecology) Cynthia McKinney would do well in the art, poetry or fashion world. I know it may seem absurd to some, but understand that the choosing of faces for the media world is a full time job, and there are some that are paid handsomely to do so. Those that get paid to do this are called talent scouts, and the first thing they look for is the ‘right face’ for the field they are recruiting for.
The admirer of philanthrophy says…throw in a dose of innovation…mix it with some “transparency”…and all is in “equilibrium” (wtf is that).
***
Ladies and Gentleman, welcome to the divine comedy.
Maybe you can tell the children at the school I sponsor in Cambodia, where we teach children real skills like reading, writing, raising crops, animal husbandry, cloth making, etc that you don’t believe in philanthropy?
In other words, GET A LIFE.
One might ask, what about free marketism?
The thing with free markets is that they don’t exist. None of the participants in the market has any interest in them being free. So no internal process in the market place can create freedom there. You need an outside force like the government to create and maintain the “free market” In which case its not free, its regulated.
There’s an inconsistency. Free labour markets are not consistent with a country united ethnically or historically.
I think I got that wrong in part: I’m not sure what makes a country “historically united”. I do still think it difficult to sustain “ethnic” unity if labour markets are free. So you can’t have both free markets and the “unity” you seek.
Question: where in the world is there a true free market economy? Please name a few such countries. Similarly can you give a few countries that truly follow or practice say, Christ teachings?
he won’t answer you. He just keeps on saying “free arket economy” over and over because that is what he has been taught to say and he cannot say anythign else. It’s like a magic manta to him.
That’s because Ewan is a troll and trying to divert the thread away from any important things we might touch upon between ourselves about Cynthia McKinney and her work
Thee are no free markets — that’s clear — but even if there were it’s a bad idea, and based on wrong assumptions.
To start with, markets of any kind assume that the people who end up with the goods should be the ones with the most money who can afford them, not those who need, or even deserve them the most: rich guy gets to take a bath in milk while poor children go hungry.
Markets assume that the value of goods can be adequately measure in money, which is an abstract fiction designed and controlled by those who can manipulate the economy through undemocratic power.
There are a number of ways to fairly and justly distribute goods, and markets is hardly the best of them. If some crop happens to come in in abundance one year then the price falls, even while the cost does not because it takes more labor to harvest it, and it is generally sold cheaply, or wasted, while farmers can go out of business, instead of properly stored (for those times when crops fail). There is no planning, order, or sense to it. Overproduction and excessive competition, and price gouging from monopoly, from market forces results in economic failure and chaos. The faithful worship the nonexistent ‘invisible hand’ which is nothing more than some mix of manipulation and chaos, in about the most inefficient economic system there is.
The point was quite simple and addressed to Marian. Marian said that free markets are the solution for any economy. She also said that ethnic unity is essential for the survival of any country. I simply pointed out that a free labour market A labour market less constrained by government regulation than now) would make ethnic unity impossible to enforce. So her two statements are inconsistent. They can’t both be right..
Ethnic unity is not needed; simple tolerance, or even celebration, of other groups is sufficient, as shown by the many places which survive with much diversity. In fact, without diversity a city or a nation tends to be non-creative and stagnate, while different cultures bring a variety of ideas and innovations.
One needs to identify the basic, often hidden, assumptions and see if there is really any truth in them.
Salam Mariam,
Wasn’t the paranoid, schizophrenia and delusional John Nash, a Nobel Laureate in Economics, who debunked Adam Smith. It just took him a blond girl in the bar to debunk Adam Smith.
Best regards,
Mohamed.
That John Nash suffered from schizophrenia has nothing to do with the work which won him the Nobel prize. Why mention it? Or, if you mention it, why not with sympathy and perhaps awe that despite his illness and decades of suffering he still made such a huge contribution?
And I doubt he would think he “debunked” Adam Smith.
Salam Ewan,
I am in awe of John Nash, without an iota of doubt in my mind. Yes, he debunked Adam Smith and he knew it. He wrote his dissertation on it.
I don’t know if you saw the movie called, “Beautiful Mind”. If you did, then you will remember the scene in the bar about the blonde girl, and the rest is history.
For this reason his Nobel Laureate is in Economics. Mr Nash is a great mathematician and a genius.
Best regards,
Mohamed.
We should distinguish between Adam Smith the 18th century Scottish philosopher and “Adam Smith” the mascot of “free market” fundamentalists (who haven’t bothered to read “Moral Sentiments” or even the bits of “The Wealth of Nations” where he says, for example, the rich follow the “vile maxim of the masters of the world” – “all for ourselves and nothing for other people”).
Also best to distinguish between John Nash, the man who suffered horribly from mental illness and yet achieved great things, and Russell Crowe…
Yup, the same Adam Smith who told to sell all the Nation’s Wealth to the rich, such as Utilities Companies (Electricity, Water and Gas), Telephone, Internet, Transportation to the rich for pittance.
And, did John Nash really suffered from mental illness, or was he made to suffer from mental illness, since he debunked the Scottish Philosopher.
“The Wealth of Nations” is not based on any science and/or mathematics, it is supposedly based on “common sense”. In real life there is not ever going to be equilibrium. It is an not an achievable dream. The pendulum is always going to swing, one way
or another, and never remains in center.
Mohamed.
Except,those utilities didn’t exist in the 18th Century.I think its important to remember that historical personages were people of “their time”.They understood (or didn’t) their era,not our era.There are some ideas that have stood the test of time.But those are one’s that are based on “human” traits (such as “Commandments”),and universal ideas.But to assign permanence to ideas that someone considered good for the 18th Century.Or the reverse,to think that in the 21 Century “proving” those ideas wrong,really “proves” anything is useless.Personally,I believe (as I think you do) that industries that are needed (not optional) by the public in a society should be controlled by “the state”.Whether through direct ownership.Or through a public corporation,separate to only a degree from state ownership.But then,I’m a man living (and who has lived) in the 20th-21th Centuries.That a man from the 18th Century had another idea is no surprise.If humanity survives.A man in the 25th Century may think our ideas today were wrong,who knows.
Salam Uncle Bob 1,
Please do a Google on Natural Monopolies.
Best regards,
Mohamed.
Do you know that the Utilities Companies, such as water, electricity, gas, telephone, internet and so forth are massive monopolies, which were owned by the people (the government) in all countries beside USA. These were made to sell off by Maggie Thatcher, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton to the 1% for pittance.
Yes, it was Adam Smith and no one else. Yes, he recognized these massive monopolies, but said instead the State owning it, they should be privatized and to be overseen by Public Commissions.
Hell, even the minerals rights are owned by Sam Walton and his descends, and not owned by the people (government of USA). So, the Oil of USA, which is a public wealth is owned by Walton.
Go figure,
Mohamed.
…It would be the greatest feat of economic forecasting by anyone, ever, in the universe, or anywhere anywhen in the multiverse (I suspect) if Adam Smith did indeed tell us to sell off monopolies in gas, electricity, oil, telephone, or the internet…
I can only suggest, if you are interested, that you dip into the extensive secondary literature on Adam Smith, that is, on the 18th century Scottish philosopher.
Also, perhaps, on John Nash’s thesis on non-cooperative games.
again can you jusr answer our simple question here:
When and where have you seen this so called “free market economy” in action? Stop inventing new subjects such as Adam Smith and so on. Adam Smiyh lived in time when slaves were used a free labor. Adam Smith was full of smelly old shit.
Just answer how USA was EVER a “free market economy” when it used free labro as slaves and it used land and land resources that it stole from the Indians.
Slow deep breaths. You’ll find it helps.
Mohamed raised the subject of Adam Smith and John Nash. As it happens, he is not quite right about either. I pointed out as much. If he is interested in the subject, I can point him to very good books that would let him take it further (and further than I have taken it – I don’t claim any expertise).
I honestly believe that both John Nash and his wife were recently murdered. Remember, he debunked the Father of Capitalism.
Mohamed.
So, Marian, how come your second paragraph hasn’t solved your third paragraph?
Dear The Saker,
Wow – thanks the Saker for this interview. A truly courageous lady. Dr King’s observation in 1957 is so clear today as it was then – wake up people!
I don’t know why but when I read that section of the interview about Malcolm X and Dr King – it made me feel overcome with emotion & deeply, deeply sad :(
We are the many – they are the few – they are scared of us and that’s why they divide and conquer.
Rgds,
Veritas
Yes, agree with you
WOW, I haven’t the time to read know but will be back. I always liked CM.
I had the honor of working on Cynthia McKinney’s Green Party campaign for President as her Oregon coordinator. She came to Oregon and I arranged a series of fundraisers for her. At one point I asked what she would most like to see in Oregon, and she said “an old growth forest” – she had never been in one! So we outfitted her with suitable boots and took her on a hike deep into the forest. Very little conversation, and eventually we stopped, just listening and observing. Cynthia turned to me and said “I understand now why you love the forest so much”.
I have the deepest respect for Cynthia McKinney as she has always told truth to power.
VV
Cool. Thanks for sharing that.
I’m proud to have voted for her. She didn’t mention smacking a Capitol Policeman upside the head with her cell phone when he tried to manhandle her. “Get your hands off me!”
Thanks for this interview Saker. Most white Americans have never heard people like Cynthia Mckinney, Farrakhan, Al Sharpton and other black leaders speak for themselves. Their opinion of them is formed solely from what others (the media) tell them about those leaders. Hence the surprise when they hear them speak for themselves and realize that they are not crazy and in fact make a lot of sense.
For the record, Ngoyo, do not class Sharpton with the others. He is the type of character placed by the cabal where he is, so as to pretend he is doing something for his community. He belongs to the herd of the useless and very well paid for being such. If you wish check this link,
Words and Nothingness”, http://wp.me/p2e0kb-1LI
Thank you. Al is a snitch, a tax evader and a sycophant to all the wrong people. He makes a mint with his operation.
A great moral leader like this lady makes me look at the US like I did when I lived there (illegally!) for 8 years… It really is a good country, if only they could get rid of the exceptionalist cancer.
“I personally consider Malcolm X the greatest person to have been born in the USA…”
Wow Saker. Out of the 100’s of millions of Americans past and present, he’s your top choice?! You’re entitled to your own views, but that’s messed up.
Yes, I totally do and I stand by that statement.
Read about his life.
At the very least, read his autobiography!
The autobiography is a classic. Awakened a lot of American minds in a way that not many books ever can. I shudder to think how many Americans could attempt to name the greatest Russian, of any era, out of total ignorance!
Black supremacy and racial supremacy is so inspiring!
“he promoted black supremacy, advocated the separation of black and white Americans, and rejected the civil rights movement for their emphasis on integration.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_X
SO?!
He also spoke of “blue eyed white devils” about all Whites.
SO WHAT?
As soon as he found real Islam he abandoned his racist rhetoric completely!
HE HAD THE COURAGE TO ADMIT HE WAS WRONG (yes, I get to use caps if I want).
For bleep’s sake, READ ABOUT HIS LIFE before spewing that kind of stupid nonsense!
And I don’t mean Wikipiedia – READ HIS AUTOBIOGRAPHY!!
The Saker
Right on, Saker. One of X’s greatest strengths is most Americans’ greatest weakness — the capacity for self-criticism.
Manning Marable’s book (cited elsewhere in the comments), however, was justly taken apart by Jared Ball over at Black Agenda Report: http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/marable’s-malcolm-x-eulogy-revolution-idea. Marable’s book would have people believe that a mass-murdering Wall Street stooge like Obama has something in common with Malcolm X.
Thanks for the great interview, Saker. I proudly voted for McKinney in 2008!
While the Alex Haley bio remains great, the work Manning Marable did on the last couple years of Malcolm’s life (the OAAU years) requires a look, too.
Haley played all sorts of games with the record once Malcolm was neutralized in 1965. Here’s a clip to Marable talking about this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfGdlfrOugg
Well, Malcom X, oppose multiculturalism and multiracialism and supported black separatism he wanted blacks and whites to live separately, and for blacks to have their own racially pure areas where they dominated totally, owned their own business, elected their own leaders, taught their own children and generally controlled their own communities… Well, what is to be said about that? Some find it inspiring and admire him.
Here he points out that one of the main enemy of blacks are jews in their communitites. Selling blacks alcohol.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNPuXcN9QhY
RE: dsa
The comment section of this site is filling up with websayanim. Tolerance of these things, while it may seem like the right thing to do in principle, invariably results in unreadable and useless comment sections.
vot tak, you are obviously from Israel, just as myself, you know Hebrew I see. So, why would you be against sayanim helping us? I’m very puzzled by your comment. Please explain.
Shalom
I can’t believe a troll like this got through…the trolls are bad tonight…
I feel sorry to real nature trolls for calling this kind of websayim a troll, but that’s the name these people are called when they disrupt a thread like this…
These guys (up directly above challenging vot tak) are not even pretending to be anything but…trolls..Israeli trolls…
They hate Cynthia McKinney for calling them their real name…
“paid operatives in the service of Zionists”.
Even the word ‘separatism’ has a negative tinge especially if you are a “good American.” Americans– or should I say white liberals– say they value diversity, but shrink at separatism: It’s all fine for guys like us to live together (unspoken assumption), “but what are those people up to?”
Shifting topics a bit, listening to the Malcolm X clip one gets the idea that white liberals supported the civil rights movement, in part, so that they could direct it.
Malcolm X was really pro-family. Or is that moniker the exclusive domain of “conservative” neo-Christains?
Deep State needs to be Deep Sixed: This is the latest of their floundering around. I think those in charge are hoping everyone will forget about Kunduz as other news takes its place ( maybe a really big mall shooting in the USA). Maybe they need more time to get their (lame and sitting) ducks in a row or collecting the cockpit recorders of the attacking planes and joining them in the vault with those of the MH17 “incident” has been a problem.
http://news.antiwar.com/2015/10/23/pentagon-to-delay-report-on-afghan-msf-hospital-attack/
Thank you Saker both for giving voice to Ms. McKinney’s views and your own as well.
Cheers,
RR
Great interview. I agree with McKinney that the zionists do control the USA. Thanks, Saker.
Her comments here seem vastly different from many of her public statements, locally, as a US Rep.
Gun control freak. Strange ideas about economics. She never seemed to realize that LBJ’s unGreat Society BS has wrecked the black family structure.
Sure, easy to agree about the Deep State and its evil. But to call free markets and capitalism bad because of the way the DS and governments have wrongfully meddled is silly.
Diversity can be good, but in the US the idea of diversity as practiced here has led to inter-group warfare in the name of victimization and acquisition of government benefits. Thus we have such things as the knock-out game, which is 180 degrees away from MLK’s idea about character.
“Her comments here seem vastly different from many of her public statements, locally, as a US Rep.”
They are the same. Perhaps you have been misled by the standard US media propaganda?
“Gun control freak.”
Her ideas on gun control are fine. Those who won’t tolerate any gun control are the real freaks.
“Strange ideas about economics”
Again false claim. You can see what she stands for here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynthia_McKinney_presidential_campaign,_2008 Its perfectly sane and rational to be opposed to capitalism as practiced today. In fact its the free marketeers of today who have strange ideas about economics.
Capitalism as practiced is bad. Perhaps there is a better form of capitalism, just like there is a better form of communism.
“Diversity can be good”
Diversity is good. Period. The opposite leads to groupthink and supremacist ideas. The Nazis the Boers, the KKK you get the idea.
“… but in the US the idea of diversity as practiced here has led to inter-group warfare in the name of victimization and acquisition of government benefits.”
Actually intergroup warfare is being carried out by the racially homogenous 1% against the rest of Americans and the world. It is the owners of big business who claim to be constantly victimized by taxation, government regulations and the ability of their victims to sue them. This same people are also the ones who appropriate the bulk of government benefits. Poor people black or white get a tiny proportion of government benefits compared to the rich white upper class “victim”. Never mind that the ordinary Americans have seen their wages decline for 40 years while the Fed spend 5 trillion bailing out the rich just since 2008. Now thats what I call victimization and acquisition of government benefits.
“Thus we have such things as the knock-out game”
The knock out game may be new to you but American blacks have known it by various names over the last 300 years. Lynching is one, police executions is another. Its a knock out when some cops put 40 bullets into some black guy because he had his wallet in his hand. Thats really the opposite of MLKs message.
Look America, Black and White, is messed up. But Whites certainly can’t claim to be victimized by Blacks.
That is the irony,many of “us” do feel that way.We take isolated incidents and build them in our minds to be the norm.It helps to “balance” the hundreds of years of oppression against black people in the US in our minds.I don’t know the answer to that.As long as the elite’s can turn the “people” against each other we can never change things.But knowing that,and being able to do anything about it,are two different things.
If “hundreds of years oppression of black people” means beating, killing, raping innocent white people today is okay, what sort of violence towards black people by whites does a thousand year of black moor occupation, murder and slavery entitle whites too according to you?
Today 90% of all interracial violence in USA is black on white, black people sure have a dark future if your type of logic has any merit.
“Today 90% of all interracial violence in USA is black on white, black people sure have a dark future if your type of logic has any merit.”
Your %’s are correct. Without referring to social status & opportunity as possible reason, this alone could explain most of the reason http://www.amren.com/news/2015/07/new-doj-statistics-on-race-and-violent-crime/
“Some observers argue that what causes the overwhelming preponderance of black-on-white over white-on-black violence is “chance of encounter,” due to the fact that there are five times as many whites as blacks in the American population.”
however, the item carries on:
“However, there are only about 30 percent more Hispanics than blacks, yet black-on-Hispanic violence is almost as lopsided as black-on-white violence. This suggests blacks may be deliberately targeting both whites and Hispanics.”
Past oppression is not a good reason for current preponderence of black on white attack so we are back to social status & (lack of) opportunity as the most likely reason.
Simple hate – based on past oppresion – would be an extremely poor reason (but understandable).
In any case your bigoted logic (i.e. “black people sure have a dark future”) stinks.
That was not my bigoted logic, that was “Uncle Bob 1”
“Simple hate – based on past oppresion – would be an extremely poor reason (but understandable).”
-Then according to your logic, you will understand when whites starts to retaliate in kind towards innocent blacks.
The reason has nothing to do with the past, it has to do with the elites encouraging racial hatred and violence towards in order to cause distraction and internal conflict so the people wont unite against them.
edited slightly. Mod TR
Apologies dsa, I see I had mistakenly assigned that to you.
In answer to your more recent comment – i’m never quite sure where the bulk of the blame should be apportioned – the elite or the gullible.
In any case:
“Then according to your logic, you will understand when whites starts to retaliate in kind towards innocent blacks.”
Absolutely.
It’s the reason why mankind in general should regress to the pond scum from which we came.
DSA…if you didn’t have some somewhat intellgent comments on the more Russian oriented threads on Saker’s … none of your comments would be allowed through…on this thread you are a total troll and don’t deserve to be here.
actually DSA I’ve re-read other threads and you’re a troll there too…byebye
“Diversity is good. Period.”
-Diversity is bad. Period. “Diversity” is almost always a consequence of oppression and racism, most people do not want diversity and wants to live mainly surrounded by people of their own ethnic group. Throught history diversity has exclusively been a tool of the elite to fracture, distract, subdue and destroy unruly populations, by transferring foreign populations into the newly conquered populations to keep them busy fighting among themselves instead of uniting like an ethnically homogeneous population would have. It is being used the same way today towards the European populations.
“The Nazis the Boers, the KKK you get the idea.”
-Boers are an ethnic group, that is currently being exterminated by the black supremacists that rules South Africa. And actually diversity leads to nazists, KKK and such, that is a typical consquence of interethnic conflict. When people are forced to compete with other ethnic group, they band togheter and form such organistions.
“The knock out game may be new to you but American blacks have known it by various names over the last 300 years. ”
-Antiwhite sure likes to justify violence and racism towards whites today with history, pretty ignorant given all the violence none-whites, and blacks in particular are inflict on innocent whites, not only today but through history, ever heard of the moor occupation of Europe?
“Look America, Black and White, is messed up. But Whites certainly can’t claim to be victimized by Blacks.”
-Given that 90% of all interracial violence is by blacks on whites in America, that black rappers in mainstream media sing about killing whites, that mainstream movies promote black racists as heros, and blacks get jobs and education over whites simply due to their skin color, I’d say it is pretty hard not to see whites as being victimized by blacks, and impossible to see whites as victimized blacks.. Of course that is a simplistic view, the truth is that black are used as tool against the still-majority white population to keep them distracted from uniting in their interests against the elites, blacks are told it is good and just to rape and murder and kill innocent white people, and white people are told they are racist if they defend themselves from black bigots.
“Her ideas on gun control are fine. Those who won’t tolerate any gun control are the real freaks.”
-Guns are liberty.
“most people do not want diversity and wants to live mainly surrounded by people of their own ethnic group”
Nonsense! how do you explain Asians, Blacks and a host other non white immigrants moving into white communities? Are all those people looking to live with others of their own kind? Its by no means certain that most whites do not want diversity. After all in America whites make the rules and they are the ones legislating and enforcing diversity.
“And actually diversity leads to nazists, KKK and such, that is a typical consquence of interethnic conflict. “
Again nonsense! Its ideologies of racial, ethnic, religious exclusivity and supremacy and the consquent fight against diversity that leads to Nazis, KKK etc The enforcement of diversity leads to the decline of such groups and ideologies as has occurred in the US. White supremacists ruled the roost right here in the US, lynching Blacks left and right, until the fight for diversity dethroned them.
“Boers are an ethnic group, that is currently being exterminated by the black supremacists that rules South Africa.”
Complete nonsense!! What evidence do you have of the extermination of the Boers?. Thats a vile lie! How many have been lynched? how many have been killed? Black supremacists rule South Africa? What a lie. The South African blacks forgave the boers the crimes they commited against them. The SA blacks created the Rainbow nation. The Sa blacks refused to enact the ANC Freedom Charter which called for economic dispossession of the white oppressors. If you want to see racial supremacy in action have the courage to bone up on South African history. Then perhaps you won’t think whats happening in SA today is Black supremacy.
“Antiwhite sure likes to justify violence and racism towards whites today with history”
Actually I’m not anti white and there is no anti white racism in America today. Whites are fully in charge and screwing everybody else. By the way history matters. deal with it. Otherwise you are wallowing in ignorance.
“ever heard of the moor occupation of Europe?”
Blacks have never occupied Europe. what you presumably refer to is an Arab occupation. No doubt there were some black there but it was an Arab/semitic occupation. Again learn history its important.
Please cite a single historical case of large scale oppression of Whites by Blacks.
Have you ever heard of white enslavement of blacks? it went on for 300 years and involved millions. Have you heard of Jim Crow? Segragation? Apartheid? European Colonization of Africa? Neocolonialism? Imperialism? European genocide against Blacks? Probably not given your comments. But its a long list. Please provide your list for the contrary case of Black oppressing whites.
Hope you have the courage to watch this documentary http://www.maafa21.com/watch/ its free. Or watch the trailer on youtube if you dare:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLnNi_qb7nY
“Given that 90% of all interracial violence is by blacks on whites in America,”
Says who? Are you counting official violence i.e police and justice dept violence against blacks? How about mass violent arrent and incarceration of Blacks for made up nonviolent crimes? This too is a form of violence against blacks.
“mainstream movies promote black racists as heros”
Welcome to the club. White racists have consistently been promoted as heroes by Hollywood. For decades. And not only Hollywood the entire education system promotes white racists from the founding fathers on down as heroes. So Black kids in school have to learn that their heroes are people who owned slaves and were outrageously racist!
“blacks get jobs and education over whites simply due to their skin
Now thats a pretty racist statement! wheres your proof or are you just watching too much Fox news?
“white people are told they are racist if they defend themselves from black bigots.”
who ever told you that? or told white people that? Don’t blame your problems on black people. Blacks don’t control anything in America. In fact they are controlled.
The problem is that the 1% have managed to convince, frankly, stupid whites that blacks and immigrants are the problem. This distracts these whites from see that its the lily white 1% that getting ever richer at their expense. One can clearly see how well that con job has been done!
“Nonsense! how do you explain Asians, Blacks and a host other non white immigrants moving into white”
-Money, of course, the anti white regimes in west trick immigrants that if they come to white countries they will become rich, mostly of course, they find that the white countries were saturated with immigrants a long time ago, and they become unemployed and resentful towards the native white majority population.. They also do not move into white areas but into their own areas, forming huge enclaves, whites of course will flee once the none-white population become too large.
“White flight is a term that originated in the United States, starting in the mid-20th century, and applied to the large-scale migration of whites of various European ancestries from racially mixed urban regions to more racially homogeneous suburban or exurban regions. ”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_flight
“fight against diversity that leads to Nazis, KKK etc The enforcement of diversity leads to the decline of such ”
Today there are many La Raza, black panther, new black panthers, lynching white people left to right. Of course in a racially homogeneous area there would be no such groups. I like the term “enforcement of diversity” you understand that people only live under diversity if they are forced.
” Thats a vile lie! How many have been lynched? how many have been killed?”
-Google “Farm murders” on google, bewared, black supremacist are probably the most violence racist on this earth, around 4000 has been lynched, raped, torture, murdered. Of course, that is according to statistics kept by the black supremacist regime so..
“What evidence do you have of the extermination of the Boers?.”
-Again, beware, black supremacists are the most violence racist on this earth, this report is from the genocide watch.
http://www.genocidewatch.org/images/White_Genocide_TVA.pdf
“Welcome to the club. White racists have consistently been promoted as heroes by Hollywood. ”
-Yeah, in the minds of fanatic anti-whites. Find me mainstrema white with rapper that sings about killing niggers or a 100million dollar hollywood movie where the white hero says killing black folks, what is not to like.
“Now thats a pretty racist statement! ”
-Every statement you have made so far shows extreme racism, it find it very amusing that you hysterical anti whites think it’s racist to point out racism towards white, it is called affirmative action. Got white skin color? Sorry, then you cant have the job, we only hire those with black skin color.
“The problem is ”
-Frankly the problem is racists like you that promote racial hatred towards whites and gives whites no other choice but the organize themselvs into pro-white groups to protect their children from people like you.
Some of what you say might be true, as it is true of any place there is a clash of diversity.. But after watching the interactions from the outside, with no bone to pick and actually wanting to understand things, I would say blacks have a lot of things going for them, but for everything going for them 2 other things have been put in place so they are stopped. So they got the right to vote but are arrested for using the sidewalk… Now if blacks were rich, then they wont have such a hard time, but in most cases to make money you need education and connections and opportunity and those are denied. Asians found out that they had the education so they find the country heaven, a land of opportunity…. See Asians especially from those under british rule found out that to be the masta’s bitch, you needed an edudadition.. So many countries have massive edudation programs.. Some learnt early on and England is a great example of where they are used in administrative tasks.. they are also used in Africa to administer their colonies. Seeing that blacks were the exploited ones, they just did not have that opportunity being commodities and such and they still are.. I think education goes a long way towards creating opportunity. But being capitalistic, the poorer you are the more advantage they take off you.. so you always stay poor. If Obama wanted to fix things, he would have done a massive education program for blacks and other minorities. Made it harder for them to be taken advantage off.. In a generation this huge gap in black/white would have disappeared. But it is worse now with blacks being used for target practice.. Many places have arrest warrants on almost all blacks who live there.
For what was done to them, I am grateful they don’t hold a racial grudge against whites. A few seeing the inequality of things might break and lose it, others just lose hope and turn to crime. But it is all because of the white system that was setup to exploit blacks. And about reservations and affirmative actions and such, it is only a small percentage, where they have to have like 20% other races, blacks being just one of them, it really does not affect employment opportunities as much.. You know in india and china, minorities have first preference? considering they are less than 10% of the population, they take a huge chunk of everything from education, jobs, housing and benefits. It is a lot more balanced in the US and I don’t think it is mandatory anymore to comply with it in the private sector. In the US money defines your status.. white trailer trash have just as much problems as the blacks. But they at least can dress up and get out of their predicament.. Blacks on the other hand are not even offered the chance.
Like I said, not black or white, was quite surprised and curious to see how things are and never understood a lot of things I saw. Explanations did not make any sense.. In the end I realized it is the very system itself and that system was created by whites.
Thank you for that excellent reply Ngoyo. Sometimes I get the feeling that people in the West relate to capitalism with some sort of Divine reverence. Like the hand of God. To quote John Ralston Saul; “Capitalism can be a useful social tool or a weapon of unabashed human exploation. Capitalism itself contains no ethical values. Those who use it decide by their actions whether it is a force of good or evil.”
Thank you for that great interview Saker. People like Cynthia McKinney make me believe that there is hope for America after all. And thank you Saker for sharing more of your own vies as well. God bless you.
Unfortunately the elites in America have managed to convince many whites that the problem is blacks and immigrants. As a result the white working class in America is pretty racist and anti immigrants. This white working class has served as the political platform for the elite’s destruction of the labor unions and the consequent forty year decline in real wages amongst other depradations.
Its truly astonishing to see.
Unfortunately the elites in America have managed to convince many blacks and immigrants that the problem is whites. As a result the blacks and immigrant lower class in America is violently racist(see knock out games). This black and immigrant lower class has served as the political platform for the elite’s destruction of the labor unions and the consequent forty year decline in real wages amongst other depradations.
Its truly astonishing to see.
Is this guy for real or is this some grade school kid pranking the site!? Can’t come up with an argument but play 3rd grade tricks!
Ngoyo, in my previous comment I was referring to your reply to Desertrat at 6:12 pm.
Tried to enter my comment under yours, but didn’t work.
Naturally anyone that wants to disarm the population is dangerous. Guns ensure and protect the liberty of the people, without them the people are helpless.
I see nothing good in diversity, diversity in itself is just a racist term that means “less people of European descent.” You never see PC fascists demanding that a black neighborhood needs more diversity or that a mexican or asian majority towns or blocks needs more diversity or that a company with majority blacks or asians need more diversity, diversity exclusivily means that there are too many white people in neighberhood or in a town, or in a company and the less white people, the more “diversity.”
In diverse areas everything is always white people fault, black people got no jobs? That is because white in the area discriminate against them, too few mexicans in education? That is because white teachers discriminate against them.. Too many black criminal killing white people? That is because white people discriminate black people and force them into a life of poverty which causes them to rob white people.. Everything is white people fault.. But white people cant move away and live in only white areas either.. Whites are oppressive supremacists in diverse areas, but whites are not allowed to leave those areas and let blacks and none-whites live by themselves.. No.. white majority areas are bad and must be “diversified” until whites are a minority everywhere.
Diversity can be good, but …
Don’t believe the lies about diversity being a strength.
Diversity is always a weakness. It leads to diminished social cohesion, distrust, and a reluctance to engage in civic minded behavior. It produces a community of atomised individuals who lack meaningful ties to each other and are easily manipulated by those who own the mass media and who control the major institutions like the school system and the higher education system.
If you don’t believe me take a look:
The Downside of Diversity
it has become no capitals please – it is considered shouting. Mod TR increasingly popular to speak of racial and ethnic diversity as a civic strength. From multicultural festivals to pronouncements from political leaders, the message is the same: our differences make us stronger.
But a massive new study, based on detailed interviews of nearly 30,000 people across America, has concluded just the opposite. Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam — famous for “Bowling Alone,” his 2000 book on declining civic engagement — has found that the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects. In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogenous settings. The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings.
“The extent of the effect is shocking,” says Scott Page, a University of Michigan political scientist.
Shlomo,
When you say “new” study, do you mean since 2012 when Prof. Putnam said that his research on diversity had been “twisted” to support the conclusion you reach?
…and is that Scott E. Page, author of “Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, firms, Schools, Societies” ? Shome mishtake shurely (Ed.)
Ewen, you’re the other troll
You think Shlomo a troll? I don’t. I also know I’m not. Calling someone a troll seems too easy a way of avoiding engaging with what they say.
Ewan is not a troll. His comments tend to focus on areas of disagreement or things he considers errors. People extrapolate that, getting the impression that his disagreement is total, but it’s a false impression. He strikes me as a nuanced thinker. He is not parroting anybody’s party line as near as I can figure.
I probably disagree with him on a fair number of things, but he’s clearly a person one can have a respectable argument with.
well, CIA paid ops aren’t dummies..they just divert threads. think of this…we’ve never seen Ewan and DSA before Cynthia McKinney thread…and they both are diverting the thread from important topics like how to get to Plan A…
Oh, dear I’m not even an operative, I’m a dupe – they don’t pay me! (I just get my instructions in an unmarked envelope at the drop-off every month.)
Some more dead “moderate” Al Qaida types in retaliation no doubt for their actions.
http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/three-al-qaeda-warlords-assassinated-in-northern-syria/
Congratulations to both of you for the excellent interview, Saker! The scope of your site/blog/information hub gets wider by the day.
I agree with “Anonymous”
I totally adore this exceptionally brave woman!
And if RT knows what it’s good for them *nudge-nudge*… they’d be lobbying her (as we speak), offering her to have her own show.
Imagine that ;-)
–
PS: Did you guys know this about Miss Cynthia? (She – and others – were trying to bring aid help/supplies to blockaded Palestine/Gaza and this is what happened to them…)
Cynthia McKinney Remains Imprisoned in Israel After Gaza-Bound Boat Is Seized
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/02/cynthia-mckinney-remains-imprisoned-israel-gaza-bound-boat-seized/
Cynthia McKinney – Palestine, Israel, Boat getting rammed Pt1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Psk5rjjsvy4
McKinney to Obama: “Say Something” About Gaza Humanitarian Crisis”
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21593.htm
.
(And there’s plenty more, if you “google” her) :)
-TL2Q
Thanks to Cynthia for the links to the documentary about her. What an astonishing, brave, brilliant woman who retains her curiosity and fire. She has charisma and guts and thinks for herself, the kind of person we need to have in Congress, a visionary; that rare politician who makes me proud of America.
This is a wonderful interview of a women for whom I have an enormous amount of respect. Miss Mckinney is one of the few lawmakers who dared to challenge the powerful Cabal in the heydays of the war on terror. Keep up with the great work Saker from an avid american reader.
Darling Darling Cynthia…I love you and so do all people who are real people. I’m watching your documentary now, and I’ve just got to the place about ‘closed blinds’. I love you so much girl. You are so brave and so real. Thank you for your sacrifices for us.
Hi Saker and Cynthia, thank you both so much for all the work you both do for all of us.
Love you both.
Ann
Excellent!
However, the podbean link doesn’t work and a search of podbean doesn’t turn up anything for Cynthia McKinney. Can you correct the link?
Thanks!
It took me 4 times to read her interview with you I got so upset. Cynthia is a brave voice I go to read again. I am again shocked at our country. We live a lie.
I wish mention had been made of her trip to Libya with journalists.
Cynthia is always after the truth.
A great orator and a fantastic human being.
More and more Americans are waking-up to the reality that country’s political establishment (Republicans, Democratic, Tea Party or Green Party) lacks true leaders who are dignified, moral, uncorruptable and dedicated to the national interests of the United States and its citizens of all color, ethnic and religious backgrounds.
The American electrode system gives Americans the choice between evil and slightly less evil. And anyone decides not to choose among the two evils by boycotting the election – he still plays the part of collaborator with the evil system.
With a exception of a few US lawmakers, such as, Paul Findley, Cynthia McKinney, Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul – all US lawmakers are affraid to stand-up to the powerful pro-Israel lobby groups. The secret code in US politics is: “If you want to get ahead; you don’t criticized Israel, you defend Israel“.
Paul Craig Roberts, is a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Zioconservative Wall Street Journal. On October 2, 2012, he posted his views on Cynthia McKinney and American leadership, saying: “America needs a president like Cynthia McKinney.”
Thank you for this interview. It’s always good to hear from Ms. McKinney. By the way, there is Malcom X Boulevard both in Boston and in New York City.
Thank you Saker for another profi job. No, Cynthia is NOT crazy she is just talking the truth for everyone of us on this earth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4xMHVSZLyU
The world will become a multi-polar world, no problem, and it will, therefore, survive. No problem. As long as Russia and China are as one.
The ONLY change for the better now possible in the USA is total people-revolution.
It will require a full-blown peoples’ revolution to kill the monster that posesses the USA.
Interesting issue raised at
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article43244.htm
This Is Not A Democracy: Behind The Deep State That Obama, Hillary Or Trump Couldn’t Control
Foreign policy never really changes regardless of who holds the White House. This is why exceptionalism always wins
By Patrick L. Smith
October 25, 2015 “Information Clearing House” – “Salon” – There are two ways to consider the White House’s announcement last week that, no, American troops will no longer withdraw from Afghanistan as previously planned. You can look back over President Obama’s record in such matters or you can face forward and think about what this decision means, or implies, or suggests —or maybe all three—about the next president’s conduct of foreign policy.
I do not like what I see in either direction. What anyone who looks carefully and consciously can discern in Obama’s seven years in office are limits. These are imposed in part by inherited circumstances, but let us set these aside for now, appalling as they are. My concern is with the limits imposed by the entrenched power of our permanent government, otherwise known as the “deep state.”
[…]
“Women were denied the right to vote.” – And that was obviously the correct course given the fact that since women began voting the US has slid a morass of idiocy unrivaled in history. #BringBackThePatriarchy We need women to be carers and nurturers, not political activists. As long as we are going to pursue the worst form of government in a multicultural society – democracy – it shouldn’t be “one man, one vote” – it should be “one FAMILY, one vote” – if mama wants to pull the lever, fine, just as long as she is representing the interests of her family. Single adult individuals should be given perhaps one-quarter of one vote.
Gosh,I thought I was a bit “old fashioned”.But you definitely leave me in the dust there.That idea wouldn’t even be considered “modern” in the 19th Century.Hmmm,one quarter of a vote.I think free blacks in the US were given that in slavery times.Or maybe it was a half a vote I don’t remember.If it was,then you are advocating less than a freed slave got,interesting.I’m not sure how “popular” that idea would be.But I do think I have an idea of its popularity among women and single adults.
Sweet mother of god…. what did I just read?!?!?!
You never know, Uncle B, he [because he’s so obviously a HE!] might be an ISIS sympathizer, you know… the kind of single digit IQ males who are interested in nothing else but rape little girls [even toddlers]… same kind of knuckle-draggers who think; buying and selling human beings [women] is the ‘new’ in-thing.
Please, do remind me…. what century are we on?
-TL2Q
Haha,I know.
I figured it was just trolling to get a rise from people. Of course the problem is actually that ghosts (including the brain-dead) have to be stopped from voting (just consider the prime example in Chicago and gravestone registrations).
Cynthia McKinney used to be my favorite member of Congress. Its too bad the Democratic party was able to force her from office.
I think the most likely scenario for the end of the U.S. empire is that the money runs out. A symptom of America’s imperial malaise is its venal, incompetent deep state. They will bankrupt this country in every way.
What is really needed for the world is a containment strategy for the U.S. empire,
There are two women in America who can truly bring democracy to America that never was, as Cynthia said above, and they are Cynthia McKinney and Dr. Jill Stein. Two people of intelligence, understanding, are abound with true human spirit, are fighters with great courage, and are perhaps the only hope of America to sustain.
Ehehehe, the interview was good for laughs. Does the woman think Bill Clinton and Al Gore were not in oligarch’s pocket? It appears not. And why doesn’t she go on and rant about her fellow African, the current president, gaining 100% in his reelection cycle in some districts with plenty of Republican political orientation represented?Odds of that happening are close to that of Jewish (~2% or less of total US population) chairman of FED being appointed over and over again, or an asteroid hitting Earth if you prefer astronomical metaphor.
Incidentally, does she not know that votes nowadays in Murica are counted by software and administered by a company located in Spain, hm? Doesn’t the woman understand implications and consequences of it? Does she not know how easy is to rig Murican elections?
Apparently not.
So she was “shocked” to find out that African men and women can follow oligarch’s directives just as easily as European do? Either the woman is very stupid or very insincere, or both.
She said she care as much for the malnourished children in Palestine as for children in Ivory Coast “plantations,” so what I would like to know is has she ever done anything for those children or is she just making mental farts there? Those who care for someone or something always show that by their deeds. Did she ever donated something for those children? I don’t think so.
And the woman is also showing some ignorance about the foundation and the form of government of US. US was founded not as democracy but as republic. Democracy is a sham that can only work reasonably well for the states with the population of a several thousand souls’ city at most. It has only ever worked for Greek city-states called polises. Like many a smart man have stated, if the population is too big nobody have the sense of affiliation and nobody cares, and if it’s too small, then it’s easy to bribe everyone. And while Murica was republic, Murica did not go on rampage throughout the world killing tens of millions of people and destroying countless countries, that only came after Murica was transformed into democracy.
And you, do you consider MalcolmoX the greatest African person to be born in USA? If so, then fair enough, but you should have clearly stated as so. You do understand that many scientists have been born in Murica, and many good people, politicians included, that have advanced the life of their average citizens there, hm? I am sure MalcolmoX or dr. voodu King have done nothing of the sort, probably not even for their fellow Africans in Murica, unless we count his intent for Europeans in Murica to do that for his fellow Africans.
It an interview which is good for digestion purposes I guess — it makes a person want to visit toilet asap, so I guess a thank you” is in order here, hm? EHehehe
Oh, I forgot to ask. Why the woman cannot or won’t give a direct answer to any of your question, hm? I noticed she didn’t answer on a single question, she just went on through her talking points.
And also, do people in Murica really believe in that crap about the “values of liberty, peace and justice,” hm? Ehehe, if so, then they really have to be exceptionally dumb populace, that’s for sure. :)
Oh, I forgot to ask. Why the woman cannot or won’t give a direct answer to any of your question, hm? I noticed she didn’t answer on a single question, she just went on through her talking points and political narrative. It’s a crap article in short. Only good for health digesting purposes like I said. :)
Cynthia McKinney represented the GA district I have lived in for the past 20 years. She is one of less than a handful of politicians in my 27 years of residence in this country I ever respected for their authenticity, courage, passion and love of all peoples of the planet. I would vote for her to replace the US bootlicker par excellance, Ms. Merkel, as the Chancellor of Germany. After coming to this country in 1988 I quickly learned what the US is all about, a country I cannot pledge allegiance to in the sorry condition it is, morally and spiritually, in other words, I will probably never apply for US citizenship.