By Cynthia Chung for the Saker Blog
“Neither the sure prevention of war, nor the continuous rise of world organisation will be gained without … a special relationship between the British Commonwealth and Empire and the United States…not only the growing friendship and mutual understanding between our two vast but kindred systems of society, but the continuance of the intimate relationship between our military advisers”.
– Winston Churchill, ‘Iron Curtain Speech’, 1946
This will sound like an outrageous statement to many. How could the British have reconquered the United States?! They never won any war against her and by the 20th century had always fought alongside the United States as a trusted ally. And isn’t it rather the opposite, doesn’t the United States dictate British foreign policy at this point?
It is true, Britain never won a war against the United States, and it was understood by the mid-19th century that the British would never succeed in conquering the United States externally. Rather, if they were to be successful, she would need to be conquered from within, to which this paper is dedicated to telling the story of.
Two Opposing Systems
During the American Civil War, British support for the Confederate army had reached a point where Britain would have certainly militarily intervened on their behalf if it had not been for Tsar Alexander II deploying the Russian navy on both eastern and western coasts of America for seven months in support of Lincoln’s Union. Russia was prepared to go to war with Britain in order to keep the United States whole.
Tsar Alexander II explained in an interview with pro-industry American banker Wharton Barker on Aug. 17, 1879 why he thought it important that Russia should take such a strong stance in America’s Civil War (published in The Independent March 24, 1904):
“…All this I did because of love for my own dear Russia, rather than for love of the American Republic. I acted thus because I understood that Russia would have a more serious task to perform if the American Republic, with advanced industrial development were broken up and Great Britain should be left in control of most branches of modern industrial development.”
In other words, Tsar Alexander II understood that the United States had created the only economic system (known as “The American System”) that was capable of competing and defeating Britain’s slave-based economic policy of free trade. (For an overview of what is The American System refer here and here.)
In stark contrast to this sentiment, Lord Robert Cecil, who later became Marquess of Salisbury, a very prominent position in British peerage and who served three times as Prime Minister of Britain, had this to say in Parliament during the American Civil War:
“The Northern States of America never can be sure friends because we are rivals, rivals politically, rivals commercially…With the Southern States, the case is entirely reversed. The population are an agricultural people. They furnish the raw material of our industry, and they consume the products which we manufacture from it. With them, every interest must lead us to cultivate friendly relations, and when the war began they at once recurred to England as their natural ally.”
In other words, the cotton plantations that ran on slave labour in the American South, were in service of the British Empire’s global cotton trade which also ran on slave labour from India and conducted terrible exploitation of its British cotton workers.
The American Civil War was about two different economic systems in opposition to each other, and it was the South that was the “natural ally” to the British Empire.
However, the Union won the Civil War and the United States managed to keep itself whole. The South had to end its slave labour and the United States managed to push back on Britain’s slave-based economic policy (for more on this story refer here).
In fact, many leaders throughout the world, during this period were pushing back on Britain’s slave-based economic policy of free trade enforced by the British East-India Company. With leading opposition coming out of Germany, Russia, Japan and China, in addition to the United States.
In 1879, Otto von Bismarck broke Germany’s free trade system implementing an American style tariff policy for his nation. The kinship between Germany and the United States became so strong at this time that Otto von Bismarck’s speech in the parliament (1879) was quoted by McKinley on the floor in US Congress:
“A success of the United States in material development is the most illustrious of modern time. The American nation has not only successfully born and suppressed the most gigantic and expensive war of all history, but immediately afterward disbanded its army, found employment for all its soldiers and marines, paid off most of its debt, given labour and homes to all the unemployed in Europe as fast as they could arrive within its territory and still by a system of taxation so indirect as not to be perceived, much less felt… Because it is my deliberate judgement that the prosperity of America is mainly due to its protective laws, I urge that Germany has now reached that point, where it is necessary to imitate the tariff system of the United States.”
Otto von Bismarck was heavily organising for the building of the Berlin to Baghdad railway, which after much resistance and delay would only be completed in 1940. If this has been accomplished during Otto von Bismarck’s life, the Middle East could have avoided the Sykes Picot carving up.
In 1869, Japanese modernizers working directly with the Lincoln-Carey strategists ran the Meiji Restoration which industrialized Japan.
In the 1880s and 90s, Lincoln-Carey Philadelphia industrialists were contracted for huge infrastructure and nation-building projects in China. Hawaiian Christian missionary Frank Damon, having participated in the Carey group’s strategies at a very high level, helped instigate, shape, and build the Sun Yat-sen organization that gave birth to modern China.
Sun Yat-sen referred to his admiration of Lincoln’s USA as the basis for a new multipolar system saying:
“The world has been greatly benefited by the development of America as an industrial and a commercial Nation. So a developed China with her four hundred millions of population, will be another New World in the economic sense. The nations which will take part in this development will reap immense advantages. Furthermore, international cooperation of this kind cannot but help to strengthen the Brotherhood of Man.”
The Three Principles of the People by Sun Yat-sen and The National System of Political Economy by Friedrich List were both modelled off of American System economics.
It was crystal clear that the leadership of the world had embarked upon a common path and was desirous to enter a new age where slavery might truly become a thing of the past; that the individual was from henceforth to be seen as sacrosanct, that after centuries of brutal war the world was finally ready for peace and was willing to uphold liberty and freedom for all.
Was it just a dream?
No, it was not just a dream, although it was just as fleeting. The reason for this is found in the list of names below.
This list is by no means complete, there are many more names that were assassinated or ousted from their positions in this purge of “American System” supporters.
Yet, not even this ongoing purge was seen as enough to guarantee that nothing again would rise in opposition to the system of empire. It was for this reason that the world was dragged into two world wars…
Liberty for All?
“Two systems are before the world; the one looks to increasing the proportion of persons and of capital engaged in trade and transportation, and therefore to diminishing the proportion engaged in producing commodities with which to trade, with necessarily diminished return to the labor of all; while the other looks to increasing the proportion engaged in the work of production, and diminishing that engaged in trade and transportation, with increased return to all, giving to the laborer good wages, and to the owner of capital good profits… One looks to pauperism, ignorance, depopulation, and barbarism; the other in increasing wealth, comfort, intelligence, combination of action, and civilization. One looks towards universal war; the other towards universal peace. One is the English system; the other we may be proud to call the American system, for it is the only one ever devised the tendency of which was that of elevating while equalizing the condition of man throughout the world.”
– Henry C. Carey, Harmony of Interests, 1851
These words written by Henry C. Carey at one time were understood by many to be the inherent difference between the English vs American economic system. However, today, we have forgotten much about what constitutes the American system.
Romans too, were once faced with a similar existential circumstance.
Junius Brutus, known as the man who saved Rome, ended the tyranny of King Superbus’ rule during Rome’s Age of Kingdoms. It was Junius Brutus’ actions that brought about the formation of the Roman Republic, and it was he who had the Roman people vow that never again would they accept the arbitrary rule of a king.
However, over the course of nearly five hundred years, the Roman people increasingly forgot this important lesson and what it meant to be a Roman citizen. In 49 BCE, Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon leading to civil war and the Roman people offered him a crown for it.
The Roman people had forgotten what it meant to be a Roman citizen. They had forgotten that a free people who upheld dignity and liberty above all else would never accept to serve under the arbitrary rule of a king, an emperor. And upon forgetting such a thing, they had stripped themselves of any valour they once held. They had become mere subjects, at the mercy of whoever found themselves for that brief moment sitting on the throne (for more on this story refer here).
If we are not careful, such a moment will also visit us…
***
The world wars were fought to divide the partnerships that were forming against the system of empire. Germany and the United States were to be pitted against one another in both world wars. Japan was also to be pitted against the United States in the second world war. As a result, the economies of Germany and Japan were greatly set back, and their sovereignty was null and void. From post-WWII on, Germany and Japan had no choice but to enforce the will of the newly established Anglo-American Empire (for the story of how Britain created both world wars refer to Carroll Quigley’s book “The Anglo-American Establishment” and my paper).
Russia and China were all that was left. Hence, 76 years of Cold War going strong…
But how did the United States get drawn in by Britain as a consequence of the world wars?
Under the Surrounding Sea of Dictatorship
“Western Europe has only 20 to 30 more years of democracy left in it; after that it will slide, engineless and rudderless, under the surrounding sea of dictatorship, and whether the dictation comes from a politburo or a junta will not make that much difference.”
– Willy Brandt (German Federal Chancellor, right before he stepped down in 1974)
What Willy Brandt, who Samuel P. Huntington so fondly quotes in both his “The Crisis of Democracy” and “Disaffected Democracies” leaves out was that this was not only envisioned as an inevitability for Western Europe, but for the United States as well.
Churchill had announced the Iron Curtain on March 5th, 1946, declaring the Soviet Union and China as the next targets in sight. If the United States were to commit to this long-term cold war stand-off, it was understood that it was only a matter of time before they increasingly saw the necessity of empire, of a global dictatorship and abandon their constitutional ideals.
In August 1946, after nuclear bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Bertrand Russell (member of the Fabian Society and British grand strategist) wrote The Bomb and Civilization, calling for a one world government:
“Either war or civilization must end and if it is to be war that ends, there must be an international authority, with the sole power to make the new bombs…But I fear that all of this is utopian…If America were more imperialistic, there would be another possibility, less utopian and less desirable, but still preferable to obliteration of civilized life. It would be possible for Americans to use their position of superiority to insist upon disarmament not only in Germany and Japan, but everywhere except the United States, or at any rate, in every country not prepared to enter into a close military alliance with the United States…During the next few years, this policy should be enforced. If one or two wars were necessary, they would be brief and would soon end in decisive American victory. In this way, a new League of Nations could be formed under American leadership, and the peace of the world could be securely established. But I fear that respect for international justice would stop Washington from adopting this ‘policy’.”
Just a few months later, in October 1946, Russell writes On the End of Nation-States published in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists:
“There is only one way in which great wars can be permanently prevented, and that is the establishment of an international government…There is one other method by which in theory the peace of the world could be secured, and that is the supremacy of one nation or one closely allied group of nations. By this method, Rome secured the peace of the Mediterranean area for several centuries. America at this moment, if it were bellicose and imperialistic could compel the rest of the world to disarm, and establish a worldwide monopoly of American armed forces. But the country has no wish for such enterprises. And in a few years, the opportunity will be gone. In the near future a world war, however terrible, would probably end in American victory without the destruction of civilization in the Western Hemisphere. An American victory would no doubt lead to a world government under the hegemony of the United States, a result which for my part I should welcome with enthusiasm.”
Incredibly, in the year 1946, a little over a year after the end of WWII, Russell was calling for yet another world war, a war that would finish off the last two countries who threatened Anglo-American global hegemony, Russia and China.
The reason why Russell was stating that in a few years the opportunity would be gone was in reference to the Soviet Union and China getting the bomb, to which at that point, the great strategic advantage of the United States with seemingly next to nil consequence, this window of “opportunity” for unilateral colossal destruction would be lost.
It was for this reason that in November 1948, Russell while addressing a gathering at Westminster School, shocked his listeners when he advocated a pre-emptive nuclear strike against the Soviet Union. He argued that a war between the United States and the Soviet Union was inevitable. It would, therefore, be a humanitarian gesture to get a nuclear war over with quickly and unilaterally.
On the 29th of August, the Soviet Union conducted its first successful weapon test. The so-called window of “opportunity” was lost for the formation of a quick American led global domination.
The Soviets had discovered how to create an atomic bomb several years before the 1953 date forecast by the CIA. This advent was a discouraging one for those who had had similar hopes to that of Russell, however, they understood it not as all hope was lost, but that a much longer game would now have to be played.
The Soviets acquisition of the atomic bomb was used as a justification to form a military industrial complex within the United States.
The Joint Intelligence Committee submitted an estimate of the nature of the nuclear threat from the Soviets. JIC-502, titled “Implications of Soviet Possession of Atomic Weapons” and drafted January 20th 1950 claimed that once the Soviets had 200 atomic bombs, they could launch a surprise attack and defeat the United States.
It was JIC-502 which would be the first to put forward a justification for the preventive first strike concept, supported by a massive military buildup under the pretence of pre-emptive war.
NSC-68 would be drafted the same year, declaring that the U.S. was in the moral equivalent of war with the Soviet Union and called for a massive military buildup to be completed by 1954 dubbed the “year of maximum danger”, the year JIC-502 claimed the Soviets would achieve military superiority and be able to launch war against the U.S. This proposed military buildup would increase the defense budget from $10 billion to $40 billion from 1950-53. (As we now know this decision was not based on any actual observations of Soviet capability or intention, for more on this refer here.)
During this same period another security doctrine was drafted, titled “NSC-75: A Report to the NSC by the Executive Secretary on British Military Commitments”. The report concluded that if the British Empire collapsed, and Britain could no longer carry out these deployments, in defending the “free world” against the Soviets, the U.S. would not be able to carry out its current foreign policy, including NSC-68.
It was thus concluded in the report that it would be more cost-effective to aid Britain in saving its Empire!
If you were ever wondering why the CIA was constantly found paired with British Intelligence, starting from its very inception, in a series of coups in countries they had no reason to be in, now you know why (for more on this refer here).
The U.S. had gone from an explicit mission to end imperialism worldwide under Roosevelt, to actively supporting and upholding British colonies and vassal states under Truman.
Caesar had been handed his crown and the American people had no idea.
A Century of War
As a consequence of this very foolish decision, the United States found itself doing the bidding of the British Empire, and there was a great deal to do after WWII in re-securing British interests.
You see, much of the world had understood WWII to be about the sovereignty of nation-states against the tyranny of fascism and empire. After all, the imperialists and the fascists were often found linked hand in hand, as seen with Edward VIII (though he was not alone in the British Royal family in his views), the Vichy government in France, King of Italy Victor Emmanuel III who appointed Benito Mussolini as Prime Minister in 1922 (who only deposed Mussolini in 1943 when it was clear they were going to lose the war) and Imperial Japan under Emperor Hirohito.
It is for this reason that we saw, before WWII was even over, the imperialists and the fascists in discussion with each other as to what would form the post-war world. It is for this reason that the countries chosen to oversee this post-WWII Grand Strategy would be the U.S., Britain, France, Germany and Japan, rather than Roosevelt’s choice of the U.S., Russia, Britain and China.
However, countries from all throughout the world started to rise up against their colonial oppressors once WWII was “won.” For they understood that if freedom and sovereignty for all had indeed won, there was no further place for the brutal rule of colonialism. Finally, all countries would have the right for self-determination.
Ho Chi Minh, a Roosevelt ally who had fought against the Japanese fascist imperialists during WWII, signed the Declaration of Independence for a new nation, the Democratic Republic of Vietnam on September 2nd, 1945, stating the following:
“A people who have courageously opposed French domination for more than eighty years, a people who have fought side by side with the Allies against the Fascists during these last years—such a people must be free and independent.”
After a long and horrific battle against the ruthless Japanese fascists, with support during the war from the United States and China, it was the hope of Ho Chi Minh that Vietnam could return to its former days of peace with its new-found independence from colonial rule.
Instead, the French would re-enter into Vietnam to re-secure their colonial asset. When sparks of revolution also started to form in Algeria, the United States agreed to enter Vietnam in support of France’s colonial interests (for more on this refer here).
There was also another reason.
In the November 3rd, 1965 Draft Memorandum from Secretary of Defense McNamara to President Johnson, it is written under “Courses of Action in Vietnam”:
“The February decision to bomb North Vietnam and the July approval of Phase I deployments make sense only if they are in support of a long-run United States policy to contain Communist China. China – like Germany in 1917, like Germany in the West and Japan in the East in the late 30’s, and like the USSR in 1947 – looms as a major power threatening to undercut our importance and effectiveness in the world and, more remotely but more menacingly, to organize all of Asia against us…This understanding of a straightforward security threat is interwoven with another perception – namely, that we have our view of the way the US should be moving and of the need for the majority of the rest of the world to be moving in the same direction if we are to achieve our national objective…the role we have inherited and have chosen for ourselves for the future is to extend our influence and power to thwart ideologies that are hostile to these aims and to move the world, as best we can, in the direction we prefer. Our ends cannot be achieved and our leadership role cannot be played if some powerful and virulent nation -whether Germany, Japan, Russia or China – is allowed to organize their part of the world according to a philosophy contrary to ours.”
A philosophy that counters Anglo-American supremacy that is.
Bandung: The Voice of the People
Despite the Americans launching the Korean War from 1950 to 1953, and partaking in a coup alongside British MI6 of Iran’s Prime Minister Mosaddegh and derailing Iran’s century and a half fight for sovereignty, much of the world still remained hopeful that the United States had not yet fully succumbed to the siren’s call towards empire.
It was for this reason that the Bandung Conference was held, a conference you have likely never heard of, and where more than half of the world’s population was represented in their call for the right to self-determination. It was these countries’ hope that the United States would be in support of this, for they understood that they were unlikely to succeed in their defiance against systems of empire without American support.
They also understood that the United States’ founding principles were for this very thing and it was their hope that Americans would remember their original cause against empire.
The Bandung Conference held in April 1955 was the first large-scale Asian–African Conference in history, its five organisers were Indonesia, India, Sri Lanka (formerly the British colony Ceylon), Myanmar (formerly the British colony Burma), and Pakistan (all fresh out of British and Dutch colonialism). The conference took place over six days and was held in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. 29 countries participated, representing a total population of 1.5 billion people, 54% of the world’s population at the time.
The conference’s stated aims were to promote Afro-Asian economic and cultural cooperation and to oppose colonialism or neocolonialism by any nation. The conference was an important step towards the eventual creation of the Non-Aligned Movement, which was as an effort to avoid the polarized world of the Cold War between Communist and Capitalist states. Drawing on the principles agreed at the Bandung Conference in 1955, the Non-Aligned Movement was established in 1961 in Belgrade, Yugoslavia through an initiative of the Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, Ghanaian President Kwame Nkrumah, Indonesian President Sukarno, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser and Yugoslav President Josip Broz Tito.
All of these men in the above picture were elected leaders of their respective countries who were adherents to The American System, and still had great hope for the United States to return to its roots as an anti-imperialist force in the world (for more on this refer here.)
This was very much what made up the spirit of the Bandung Conference as seen by this statement by Sun Yat-sen, China’s first President of the Republic of China, in his book A True Solution for the Chinese Question (1904):
“To work out the salvation of China is exclusively the duty of our own but as the problem has recently found a worldwide interest, we, in order to make sure of our success…must appeal to the people of the United States in particular for your sympathy and support, either moral or material, because you are the pioneers of western civilization in Japan: Because we intend to model our government after yours; Above all, because you are the champion of liberty and democracy. We hope to find many Lafayette’s among you.”
And in his 1919 treatise:
Within the opening speech at the Bandung Conference (April 1955), President Sukarno (one of its leading organisers) spoke:
“Today is a famous anniversary in that battle –against colonialism. On the 18th of April, 1775, just 180 years ago, Paul Revere rode at midnight through the New England countryside, warning of the approach of the British troops and of the opening of the American War of Independence, the first successful anti-colonialist war in history. About this midnight ride the poet Longfellow wrote:
“A cry of defiance and not of fear,
“A voice in the darkness, a knock at the door,
“And a word that shall echo for evermore…”
Yes, it shall echo forevermore. That battle which began 180 years ago is not yet completely won.
…Colonialism has also its modern dress, in the form of economic control, intellectual control, actual physical control by a small but alien community within a nation…It behooves us to take particular care to ensure that the principle which is usually called the ‘live and let live principle’ – mark, I do not say the principle of laisser-faire, laisser-passer, of Liberalism, which is obsolete – is first of all applied by us most completely within our own Asian and African frontiers.”
In April 1954 just before the Geneva Conference on Vietnam, Zhou Enlai, Premier of the People’s Republic of China, initiated bilateral agreements with India (under the leadership of Nehru) and with Myanmar (under the leadership of U Nu) which established the Five Principles of Peaceful Co-Existence. This initiative by Zhou, Nehru and U Nu would become a central concept motivating the Spirit of Bandung.
Bandung Conference 1955.
Panchsheel or Five Principles of Coexistence was a new set of principles for the conduct of international relations that would reflect the aspirations of all nations to co-exist and prosper together in peace and harmony. It was a peaceful offering as an alternative to the war mongering Cold War Doctrine.
In 2005 the Ministry of External Affairs Government of India released a pamphlet for the 50th anniversary of Panchsheel:
“The timeless relevance of Panchsheel is based on its firm roots in the cultural traditions of its originators, two of the world’s most ancient civilisations. The linkage that was established by the spread of Buddhism in China laid the historical basis for the formulation of the principles of Panchsheel by India and China.
On the 50th anniversary of Panchsheel, we can without hesitation say that its relevance, as embodied in the Joint Statement of 1954, shines as brightly today as when it was first conceived. Panchsheel was developed in the context of a post-colonial world where many were seeking an alternative ideology dedicated to peace and development of all.
Fifty years later, the world is now searching for an alternative to the adversarial constructs that dominated the Cold War era. Countries all over the world are focusing on creating extended and mutually supportive arrangements, and attempting to define a new economic, social and political world order in the context of globalisation, non-traditional security threats and the quest for multi-polarisation.
Today, Panchsheel can help the world move away from the traditional concepts of balance of power and competitive security, the consequent searching for an enemy, and the predicating of activities on conflicts rather than cooperation.
…What should be stressed today is that the principles of Panchsheel are not just empowering principles, they are also guiding principles that enshrine a certain code of behaviour. Their essence is the non-use of power, the approach of tolerance, ‘of living one’s life, learning from others but neither interfering nor being interfered with’, and the obligation to do unto others as you would have them do unto you. It may not be out of place in a world searching for moral certainties to emphasise this message of Panchsheel.”
British Southeast Asia Command (SEAC) – aka Save England’s Asian Colonies!
Before WWII was even over, Churchill in 1943 at the Quebec conference established a British Southeast Asia Command (SEAC) headquartered in Kandy British Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) with Adm. Louis Mountbatten in command.
What this did was divide the Southeast Asia between General MacArthur’s Pacific Command and Mountbatten’s SEAC. The British got Burma (now Myanmar) and Malaya (now Malaysia) their previous colonies, as well as Thailand, Singapore and Sumatra. But they were not satisfied and continued to pressure the United States to allow British priority in “liberating” the entire region.
The U.S. intention in agreeing to the establishment of SEAC was that the British would take a larger role in defeating the Japanese fascists in Burma, thus opening up a southern route for the resupply to China to aid in their fight against the Japanese fascists.
By 1944, however, Mountbatten had successfully sabotaged this effort, such that General Stilwell, Commander of the US forces in China-Burma-India concluded:
“Limey” is an American derogatory nickname for a British person. Some of the American military personnel joked that SEAC in truth stood for Save England’s Asian Colonies.
This was not a far stretch of the imagination considering the head of British intelligence operations in China was John Keswick the chairman of Jardine Matheson, a major player in the opium trade that was enforced on China against its will, culminating in China’s loss of the two Opium Wars against Britain. Keswick and his special operations were ordered out of China in 1942.
General Wedemeyer, who was a United States Army commander who served in Asia during World War II from October 1943 to the end of the war, recognised one of the major reasons why the CCP and the Kuomintang were unable to form an alliance against the Japanese was due to British sabotage and instigation. The British were playing the same old same old imperial game of flaring up the bad blood that had already developed between the two groups, the age old game of divide and conquer. The CCP did recognise that this would ultimately lead to the balkanisation of China, if the union of China against the Japanese imperialists was not put forward as the number one priority before all else.
General Wedemeyer stated:
The actual target of this British policy was revealed in an article in the London Daily Mail, October 1945:
“anti-British psychology has not been discouraged by our American ally. US propagandists have been working from Lanchow, gateway to Tibet, to the Gobi Desert of Mongolia…A Great plan to dam the Yangtze, known as the ‘Yangtze Valley Authority’ will be one of the greatest engineering contracts of modern times…Their geologists have plodded the old caravan trails to the fringes of Tibet and the wild western tribal countries.”
In other words, the British had already identified the “threat” over fifty years ago of an independent China who had already had her sights on great industrial projects such as the Yangtze dam (now completed as the Three Gorges Dam) and the reconstruction of the old Silk Road (now the center of China’s development policy under the name of the Eurasian Land-Bridge). And, as today, there is much pressure for the U.S. not to collaborate with China on such great projects. And, as today, Britain and the U.S. regard the Belt and Road as a threat to western hegemony and have even gone so far as to call the BRI a threat to national security.
Projects like the Mekong River Basin Survey modeled after the Tennessee Valley Authority were set back for decades or were never built to this day, such as the Kra Canal or Thai Canal, which would connect the Gulf of Thailand with the Andaman Sea across the Kra Isthmus in southern Thailand. It is envisaged that such a canal would improve transportation in the region, similar to the Panama Canal and Suez Canal and thus greatly increase the standard of living and development in the surrounding areas.
This exposes the true intention of the Cold War doctrine which continues to this day, that the threat was never really considered communism, but rather the cause of nationalism (to which the communists more often than not supported), since under nationalism, industrialisation is considered fundamental to the liberation of the people. It is the liberation of a people and the creation of sovereign nation states which is considered the real enemy to a system of imperialism, which is the reality of the western framework today.
Such remarks by General Stilwell and General Wedemeyer further showcase how American foreign policy was hijacked by Britain’s foreign policy upon the death of President Roosevelt.
Roosevelt died April 12th, 1945. Two week later the first United Nations conference was held (April 25 to June 26, 1945).
At the first United Nations Conference, Lord Cranborne spoke:
With Roosevelt’s death the British were able to convince the rather naïve President Truman to transfer post-war responsibility for all of Southeast Asia to the British SEAC, under Mountbatten.
The British (and to a lesser extent the French and the Dutch) at re-conquest of their former colonies, made promises of good intentions to eventually de-colonize, however, once they had established their power militarily, they reneged on their promises. The justification being that these colonies were too weak to defend themselves against the spread of Russian dictated communism.
People such as Sukarno, overnight, went from being criticised as an abider to Japanese fascism to instead being a communist sympathiser. And thus, much of Asia and Africa found themselves in a similarly debased fashion, they were not allowed to be individuals, to be free to create their own fate from something new. They were not free to have their own ideas, their own schools of thought, instead they were treated as children, with no choice but to choose the ideology of one parent or the other. However, this was largely western hypocrisy, as was so clearly seen by the very domineering presence of western imperialism and increasingly clandestine warfare.
The reason why so many nationalist leaders were open to working with the communists within their country was because the communists were also for nationalism and against imperialism, and nothing came remotely close to the level of destruction that was occurring on a military and economic level from western imperialism, which curbed industrial progress in favour of backwardness. To side with western imperialism was equivalent to agreeing to perpetual tyranny through poverty and enslavement.
This is why so many countries continued a strong pro-American sentiment, even after the disaster of the Korean War, because they recognized a choice between western imperialism and Soviet communism was an artificial construct, and that there existed a very clear third option that of the American System of economics which was opposed to systems of imperialism. However, as we have seen, this pro-American System, pro-Roosevelt sentiment was entirely ignored.
At the Crossroad
Are we committed in handing Caesar the crown? I am not so sure for there remains a great deal of love for liberty and the pursuit of happiness, however, we must remind ourselves that this was never in the cause of liberty for a few but rather liberty for all.
If we delude ourselves into believing in such a thing as liberty for a few, and you make think you are included in such a privileged few, take heed, for tomorrow who is to say what your station shall be?
Liberty for a few, is in reality, Liberty for none. It is the acceptance to be ruled by a Caesar, and be satisfied with the crumbs of freedom and thus to have no freedom at all. If we side with the world’s oppressor, we too will be consumed in the process.
And thus, I will leave off with President Sukarno’s further comments in his opening speech at Bandung. Take heed, for the world is still awaiting, will the United States finally wake from its century of madness and return to its founding principles?
“Great chasms yawn between nations and groups of nations. Our unhappy world is torn and tortured, and the peoples of all countries walk in fear lest, through no fault of their own, the dogs of war are unchained once again…The nations of Asia and Africa cannot, even if they wish to, avoid their part in finding solutions to these problems…We have heavy responsibilities to ourselves, and to the world, and to the yet unborn generations.
‘We are living in a world of fear…Perhaps this fear is a greater danger than the danger itself.’ [quoting President Roosevelt]
… Bear in mind the words of one of Asia’s greatest sons [Sun Yat-sen]: ‘To speak is easy. To act is hard. To understand is hardest. Once one understands, action is easy.’
…The highest purpose of man is the liberation of man from his bonds of fear, his bonds of human degradation, his bonds of poverty – the liberation of man from the physical, spiritual and intellectual bonds which have for too long stunted the development of humanity’s majority. And let us remember, Sisters and Brothers, that for the sake of all that, we Asians and Africans must be united.”
– excerpt of President Sukarno’s opening speech at the Bandung Conference
[ Part 2 will discuss Asian-African orientation today and how this is interfacing with Anglo-America. The author can be reached at cynthiachung.substack.com ]
One can and usually does agree in principle, the problem is their cultural codes are too close due to being Anglo-Saxon. So it is difficult to change that.
The current system of global governance has its basis on the ideology of the East India Company. A few key features of which are:
– control of finance and technology development. i.e. keep the leading edge technologies under your control and decide who gets to develop which technology.
– maintain financial control globally via the banking system- who gets capital and for what purpose. This decides which countries get to develop by how much.
– by means of boom and bust, predatory lending and other means extract as mush wealth globally, the better for you to maintain control
Even after nominal freedom of the colonies the control has been maintained. It is notable that India’s share of the global economy in 1947 was around 5% and it is still at 5% 70 years later. Fortunately China managed to escape this fate because they decided to beat the West at its own game. It could easily have been otherwise. So did Russia for a different set of reasons.
Hitler also tried to emulate the same principles. So, in that sense the British Empire and Nazism are the same ideology but expressed differently. The Germans were more upfront about, the British more cunning and devious.
So, denazification has to be a worldwide process and cannot just be confined to Ukraine or Europe. The East India Company mentality (aka Nazi ideology) is prevalent throughout the world and in every country to a greater or lessor extent.
It won’t be easy. They know it is their last chance and they will do anything to keep their power and privelege- including nuclear weapons. It does not matter to them that the world is destroyed as long as they are in control.
From their point of view better a stone age world with them in power rather than a rich and thriving world with them not in power.
They don’t have any kind of faith so I don’t think they want to die.
They were born and bred in the bosom of Russia (the Ashkenazi) and we must have faith that Mother knows how do deal with them.
They have suffered many exiles in their time although never while in possession of nukes.
We may have a few milliseconds in the near future to ponder the truth.
My homeland is getting hard to love for all kinds of different reasons. It’s just a little island, it seems so modest as homelands go. We were Christians, once.
God will not be mocked!
Grazie, ottima lezione di storia.
The “British” are certainly not in charge of this “Anglo-American Empire”. The ones who control the global financial system and the banks since the 19th century are the ones to whom every Anglo and Euro leaders (the “Collective West”) bows and obeys and these individuals are the ones who will continue to rule the world and enslave most of humanity… until the advent of the Apocalypse described in the Bible.
This elite group that you mention, are they the vehicle for bringing in the last days, and then are disposed of by that individual? Or are they the group from which that individual arises from? This article has many good points but misses the main one, the parasite that controlled the Empire simply jumped onto the new Empire, and controlled them both! The take that the US was against Imperialism doesn’t pass the truth test of History!
Got any particular ‘ones’ in mind, or are these ‘ones’ amorphous? Certain groups do hide behind the collective colour of others. Eager to assign blame for all manner of evil, based solely on ‘colour’. Perhaps the ‘ones’ that can’t be named…..yet are able to leverage vast sums of money to finance all levels of evil, from famine, war, terror, enslavement (read as; human trafficking) and forced migration.
Cheers M
I’ll take a stab…”The Big Three”:
1-The Royal Family
2-The Vatican
3-The ‘Red Shield’…aka The Rothchilds
‘Trillionaires’ all?
That’s a damn good roll, mate.
They are the children of Satan. They hide behind the name Zionist because it gives them cover with Christians that don’t read the Bible. Jesuits are the flip side of the same coin. Seek truth and shun lies and liars.
I wonder who these people could be.
Maybe some tightly knit religious minority, something like the Moonies or the Seventh Day Adventists.
Such people would control enormous wealth and dominate politics, finance and the media.
And you would certainly not be able to criticise them in any way without exposing yourself to great risks.
I wonder who might fit the bill.
Can’t think of anyone off hand.
“British” Anglo saxon” etc. are merely convenient terms to give a name to the ideology. People with this mindset sexist in every country. It is a mindset that believes in these,among others.
– the globe is over populated. They have been saying this since the world population was 1 billion.
– It is only natural for the world to have one hegemon. Therefore it is best that this is us and not them.
– poverty is a natural condition for a fairly large portion of the population.
– it is natural that some humans exploit (and hence some have to be exploited). All the better that we are not the ones being exploited.
– Our ideology and methods are the only valid human values and these are universal values- this is axiomatic.
and so on.I am sure you can identify more.
Excellent article. Looking forward to the next instalment.
The US has only had one enemy, that is, England.
Some points:
– The City of London, the 1 mile² of bankers HO’s was behind the 1913 establishment of the US Federal Reserve (which is not federal nor a reserve) after the 1912 sinking of The Titanic in which the 3 richest & most vocal opponents of a US central bank drowned – Astor, Guggenhiem & Schwarz (in spite of 700+ other survivors)
– recall the control of the US money supply, the lifeblood of an economy changed hands 4 times in US history?
“Give me control of a nation’s credit and I care not who makes its laws” – Rothschild
– the USSR didn’t develop the bomb themselves. She was given the plans by the Cambridge Five, i.e. British Intelligence. Viktor Rothschild was rumored to be the 6th man. In this way England could keep the US & USSR at each others’ throats, hence the Cold War.
– Up to Obama (#44), 43 of US Presidents have been related to British royalty
– the US ‘stars & stripes’ is the same as the British East India Co. flag, save the canton of the Union Jack is replaced with the 50 stars
– How Wallace was defeated in favor of Truman to become President is an article in itself. England’s final defeat of the US was bringing Truman to power. Now the US is just a global bogeyman, so the City of London remains in the obscured.
– “The United States is the first country in the world to be established as an empire” – Noam Chomsky
– “It is no coincidence that the century of total war coincided with the century of central banking” – fmr US Senator Ron Paul
“War is A Racket – it always has been” – US 5-star Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler
https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/warisaracket.pdf
They don’t call England “perfidious Albion” for nuttin’
> he US ‘stars & stripes’ is the same as the British East India Co. flag, save the canton of the Union Jack is replaced with the 50 stars
in fact the first US flag and East India Company flags are the same. replacing the canton came in the 3rd iteration. Hawaii flag is still the union jack
Chomsky babbled there – the British Empire was the British East Indie Company with its very own army. Today the City of London Corporation.
As for Ron Paul et al, Austrian School notables, they follow precisely the London School of Economics Prof. von Hayek and Milton Friedman of the Mont Pelerin Society – virulent anti-American System British assets – this is infiltration.
As for the Flag – if the US does not get a grip, that Star-Spangled-Banner will be a Star-Mangled-Spanner (as a well known writer put it).
As for the USSR thermonuclear program – check Sakharov – Russia was and is extremely capable. The UK triple agents were simply that, tripe.
As someone who hates the Americans, the American state. I am totally with you here. England must work with Russia/China/Iran/India/Turkey the great civilizations to overthrow the evil Empire who’s center in the city of London and New York and so on. However the USA needs to be smashed apart and Britain must break from it and remove the American empire from Britain.
In reality the British and the Americans, and in fact the rest of the “combined west” or current ZioAnglo empire, was conquered by the Khazars, posing in their robes as middle eastern Jews. Everything else is a sideshow, not that the white westerners would have been angels without Khazarian imput, but I don’t think they would ever have achieved this level of coordinated and integrated evil. Zionism is elitist supremacy, just like Nazism, and other supremist philosophies, that’s why they can team up in Ukraine, even though they are natural enemies they understand one another.
They are not enemies, they are two faces on same coin, by design. One would never exist without the other.
Cheers M
I would like to see the topic of the British vs the Zionists, or Khazars.
Most of material central to LaRouche has the Zionists spin off from the British Rhodes round table crowd or thereabouts, to find someone to keep tough-guy influence via Israel around the Suez Canal, whereas much of the material around the Saker refers to the “Anglo-Zionist” empire with many commenters referring to Khazars.
I have read the website that keeps popping up on this Khazars topic but it seems kind of not as deeply footnoted as the British or Anglo-Zionist framework.
I realize part of the problem with being able to say one or the other is the root of western empire, is that all three seem blended as you trace back the ideas, as is the history of empires and oligarchy and the “cattle” view of man as one example.
It would be great to see someone familiar with all three groups to explain the relationship between these boogeymen and their real status in relation to one another in terms of real power and influence over time. I understand the British, East India Co, and the Zionists, but the Khazars argument sounds a little “fringe, like something someone on the internet would embellish to mask the core British financial power and the ties back to Venice maritime empire. The Venetians moved to UK and set up new empire shop there essentially expressed through the Royals. How does this agree with the Khazars history model?
There is always something missing to this kind of research. Where is the f……g money and who owns what through what crimes. That would be the end game.
@cynthiachung
The World Landbridge map by the first Governor of Colorado, is the best example of a picture explaining a thousand words. Have you a date for its publication – I only guess 1850’s?
And I suspect Brandt was referring to the surrounding sea of dictatorship, that map exposes!
It’s only truthful if there’s first an understanding that Money rules the world.
And the family that has ruled over money for centuries is the Jewish Rothschild family which is headquartered in England. That family practically funded every major war in the Western World and created the state of Israel and funded it.
Only powerful money can do that.
In turn, they’ve assassinated every leader (whether in Russia, the US, or anywhere else) who stood in their plan of world monetary conquest via the establishment of their own central banks with the US$ as World Reserve Currency (aka the unipolar world or the Anglo-Zionist Empire).
Thus, they’ve become the Deep State (or the Money god or Mammon) that wags the US which in turn wags the world.
https://tinyurl.com/meet-the-deep-state
That pretty much sums it up. That satanic clique that have been doing pretty much the same thing for centuries.
The satanic scum cannot survive when the world is at peace.
To do so might they might turn themselves into targets?
That Deep State wags all those nations that comprize the AngloZionist Empire. It does so directly and indirectly. The following book is a very useful, almost seminal, introduction to the subject area: Once read, it colours every geopolitical observation forever more.
https://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/reeedcontrov.pdf
Cynthia Chung has done a superb job of laying out the history in a way that brings to light the nature of US changes over time and the way this has driven its changing relationships with other nations. Addition of that final layer of outside manipulation would elevate this work beyond superb to that of a classic imho.
yeah indeed, what a super-brain Cynthia Chung is, I suspect she must have a lot of books about international politics in her head. I wish i was super infomed like she is but you know the every day life of regular people is a life of buying food, cooking it, cleaning, doing laundry, working and then waking up the next day to spend a lot of energies doing all those basic things which at the end of day leaves people too tired to get into deep studying and reading of international politics books and politics news and information websites like this one, World Socialist Website, Information Clearinghouse of Tom Feeley, Paul Craig Roberts website, Dissidentvoice, RT etc,
So Jewish Rothschild is financial advisor and whipping boy for the British Queen, as nobody dare to say directly that Britain is rules by an absolute Monarchy.
The Queen is Chairman of NATO and the Board of the 300, the Jew was/is wandering scapegoat for European Royal families.
Cynthia, I have watched your video and Matt’s videos quite a few times. But the Anglo American system is here to stay.
The very fact that you are writing about this in English , instead of Chinese or Korean which your ancestors were speaking and writing with, tells all.
English has achieved a Singularity which no other language in the history of mankind did, and I think Churchill said that “USA speaks English”.
And the English language as we know has all these traditions from Shakespeare, the Victorian authors , and all that.
To get rid of the things you are talking about, we have to eliminate the English language and it won’t be possible. So the Anglo American establishment is here to stay.
Who cares? The world of interest to Europe once spoke Greek ,then Latin and now English. The world will soon speak Chinese and Russian and Hindi as distant second and thirds. All literature, culture etc of pop variety will likely be Chinese . Look at what K pop has achieved with youth everywhere , and then think what Chinese will achieve if they win a war too.
English is over within a generation or even less.
About 50% of the world’s webpage is written in English. Most of the rest are in Chinese, Japanese and Korean.
Other than CJK, the rest of the world kind of use English as the lingua franca.
The Romans borrowed heavily from Greek Civilization. Whatever coming after the Anglo-American civ will have to use a lot of aspects of the AA empire.
“Cynthia, I have watched your video and Matt’s videos quite a few times. But the Anglo American system is here to stay.”
No, like other systems this too will go away.
At best, the Anglo American system will be confined to Five Eyes, Europe, Japan, South Korea,Taiwan.
Even this will be eroded starting from the last country mentioned in the previous sentence. Finally ending with just the five eyes.
As for the English language its omnipresence will start to erode as soon as it becomes obvious to most people that the Anglo American Empire is over. People learn English not because of Shakespeare, Victorian authors and all that but because it is the language of the powerful. China, Russia have managed quite well without most of their population being proficient in English. As countries develop they will start teaching/learning mostly in their own languages. Within a generation English will be as popular as perhaps French or Spanish is today.
The zones you mentioned control all of finance, insurance, legal and logistics system.
If there are any disputes, they will go to USA for a final judgment, which is not always fair but at least that keeps things going.
Russian literature has not been too prominent since the death of Boris Pasternak. Ditto to that of most of the rest. Only Japanese and Chinese seem to produce things which are still worthwhile to read.
The KPop boom was possible because a lot of the lyrics were in English. BTS even let Ed Sheeran to write one of their songs.
The Romans continued to use Koine Greek (like what American English is to the English used by the Victorians) for everyday use until the Lombard arrived.
“If there are any disputes, they will go to USA for a final judgment, which is not always fair but at least that keeps things going.”
I might have escaped your notice but for the last two years “things” have not been kept going all that well, and we are in the midst of a roiling cluster funk of broken supply chains, production failures, material shortages, empty shelves and the like. Our western political leadershit is incapable of producing a single coherent thought or credible personality, and politicians are regularly rated in surveys below car salesmen and prostitutes.
Things are not being “kept going” and the US justice system could not find its arse with both hands and a searchlight of the brightest of sunny days. Hubris, meet Nemisis.
I’m not sure that English will still be popular. And if its popularity wanes after all, good riddance, then.
Seriously, ‘I before E except after C’, who came up with that bullshit? How does anyone who learned English as a second language put up with the inconsistent spelling rules this Eldritch abomination is riddled with, such as the ‘ea’ in ‘hear’ and ‘bear’ being so different? It has even developed such that there’s two regional pronunciations for words like ‘tomato’ and two regional spellings for words like ‘colo(u)r’ and ‘neighbo(u)r’.
NASSER was never elected, he came to power with the help of Kermit Roosevelt and his group in a military takeover. So much for the article….
What Tsar Alexander II failed to understand is that Yankees never say thank you. They thanked him by finding the Bolsheviks who murdered his grandson and great grandchildren in cold blood.
Lincoln was the beginning of the Federal Behemoth stage of American history. Alexander unknowingly helped to create the monster.
Excellent article where the argumentative thread is broken in no time.
Mrs. Chung is a master at telling a gripping story full of main characters without losing the tension of reading her from top to bottom is gripping.
BRAVO
Fabulous, thanks Cynthia.
You & Matt are pouring out lost truths non-stop.
Amazing paper, I’ll be the whole month of August digesting this and the references.
Post World War 2, America dominated Britain, dethroning the £ as world currency,humiliating Brutain during Suez and encouraging the multi-cultural mess that they themselves represented.
The 1947 common wealth immigration act was the beginning of the British naqbar.
I would say that the British establishments encouragement of American arrogance & over extension is a policy of revenge designed to destroy the American empire. In this at least, they are proving successful and I for one eagerly anticipate the collapse of the US empire & the disintegration of that psychotic nation.
Quite an impressive paper Cynthia Chung presents, I can only concur and wish that I had written it.
Bravo.
Britain never won a war against the United States? What happened when the USA tried to annexe Canada? After Britain armed the Native Americans to assist them in confronting US genocide. British troops burned down the White House. The ensuing peace ensured Canada’s continuance as a separate state.
This would make a wonderful film -Perhaps the Chinese will finance such a movie American humiliation is always enjoyable to witness.
The Yanks try to forget the British burned down the White House in 1812. Due to Yanks trying to annexe Canada. They prefer their victory in the same war at New Orleans. For Canadians who fought with the British, this is part of their founding story.
There is a film The War of 1812, Directors Garey & Scott released 2011. I have not seen it though.
The Saker referenced this a while back, in reference to Yanks massacring Native Americans
/revisionism/
Years ago there was a book by Bevin Alexander that I read: “Korea: the first war we lost.”
Well Excuuuuuuse ME! Didn’t we lose the War of 1812?
The US should annex the western provinces; and Canada should annex the Eastern and Great Lakes States. Two brand new countries! WE can give the Canadians a true second amendment; and they can give us health insurance.
Current history reflects the past, where through the ages one problem has cropped up incessantly: Jewish lust for power to rule the world as masters, with all others either slaves or culled from the living. This proclivity engenders chaos, division, and war.
First Thing First : Eliminate Jew Influence
The day of reckoning is nigh. In their hubris and stupidity, they cannot see it yet.
WOW — this is free??
Beautiful job, Ms. Chung!
The English gentry and Jewish banking cartel worked to overthrow the Norman Aristocracy in Britain and the Empire. So if you want to call it the Jewish-English empire, I have no issue with that. However the Normans built the entire British imperial/globalized and banking structure. Which the English gentry/Jewish banking cartel took over in the mid 1800’s and it was done politically in 1910 in Britain. Since then the Liberal-Socialist or Puritan ideology has been dominant. Churchill was an American agent, sent to weaken Britain so it could be dominated by the USA.
Churchill was blackmailed by Zionist money as a result of his gambling debts. If he was anyones agent he was the Zionists.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-YgFDZNXPyg&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR2az2mbq4oGQkEnPFfyZNN1xFFsggyTjhNPJ6OABJYETsdiULGmJ5jwCOw
The link is to “How British Elites Created Indestructible Offshore Tax Havens | Britain’s Second Empire | Timeline”
I found the documentary.quite informative and its information correlates with the author’s thesis here…
Very well done, Ms. Chung. — If I may comment: Actually, it is the finance-controlled City of London (which has its own laws and jurisdiction) that is behind the whole imperial-slave system that was known as the British Empire, which in turn was the outer shell of this ultimate inner circle. In between these two was British Intelligence. So it was a sort of triad system, very hard to penetrate.
The US Declaration of Independence was against these powers, as the Czars of Russia recognized, for both had a common foe. The US was infiltrated 1) through the Tory held secret society Skull and Bones at Yale University, and 2) through secret societies in the South and through the New York-Van Buren (financial) creation of the Democratic party. This party, the party of slavery, then and now, controlled by Rothschild agent August Belmont, made sure the South became an ally of Britain.
It’s a long story of course, but British Intelligence stationed in Montreal during the American Civil War, first instigated the war, and then assassinated Lincoln, who not only opposed the City of London, but dared to print greenbacks to bypass financial control.
After the war, Belmont arranged it so that the Democrats threw the election to Grant, a northern general who was naive. By 1875, the financial elite gained control through hard money and the Specie Resumption Act. This year also witnessed the coming out of Skull and Bones at Yale — now in control of the University.
From these two seeds came the takeover of the US government through the 20th and into the 21st century.
The British Empire, as formally understood, no longer exists. Michael Hudson points out the Lend-Lease Act was used to take over by the new Anglo-American Empire.
And the US rewarded the aspiring Bandung conference, with the CIA backed Suharto coup, with millions killed.
Does it never end??
https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/books/article/3090523/sukarno-suharto-and-us-backed-mass-murder-communists
Welcome to the Rules-based international order!
The book covers the appearance and rise of military strongman General Suharto, who was considered friendly to US interests and would go on to rule the country until 1998.
“Everything Suharto did in October [1965] suggests that he was executing an anti-communist counter-attack plan that had been developed in advance, not simply reacting to events,” writes Bevins, who adds that Washington quickly began to supply communication equipment to the army and made it clear that direct assistance could resume if the local communist party was destroyed, the president removed, and attacks on US investments stopped.
Most disturbing, the US embassy prepared lists of the names of thousands of communists and suspected communists, “and handed them over to the army, so that these people could be murdered and ‘checked off’ the list”. One embassy worker reportedly said that he “probably has a lot of blood on my hands, but that’s not all bad”. Managers of US-owned plantations also furnished the names of “troublesome” communists and union organisers, who were subsequently killed.
Meanwhile, American publications and journalists parroted the official line, even as rumours of widespread violence circulated and a further million citizens were herded into concentration camps.
Perhaps not surprisingly, it worked. “Almost overnight the Indonesian government went from being a fierce voice for Cold War neutrality and anti-imperialism to a quiet, compliant partner of the US world order,” historian John Roosa
Right off the bat, an egregious error! We beat the Yanks in the War of 1812. Ask Al Murray, if you don’t believe me. History is mostly interpretation of artifacts (just in case you didn’t know), and I reject the absurdity of the premise of the article based on observation. I will state the actual answer one more time – I have done it before but it was ignored: these evils of which you speak emanate from the City of London (q.v.) and those who work through it. Understand this. Note too, nobody identifies the Vatican with Rome, so it is equally daft to identify the City with the Disunited Queendom. The credibility of this site suffers when it hosts such editorialising as if it were actuality. Consider this a friendly advisory.
I quote: “We beat the Yanks in the War of 1812”
So you were there Seamus? I’m gobsmacked.
Allow people to tell how they see things. That is the credibility of this site – we allow people with different views to state their case. If you cannot stand it, it is your problem dude.
Sorry Amarynth, Seamus is right and made his point in a polite manner.
As for “we allow people with different views to state their case”, I have politely corrected factual errors by both authors and commenters here which have been blocked by moderators.
I wouldn’t say that the British reconquered America. That argument is basically an American alibi.
Instead, America chose to rejoin their British motherland as part of the Anglo-American Empire of today.
The Americans cannot play the Victim Card and insist that they are the innocent virtuous victims.
The USA is not a victim. The USA is a victimizer of other nations.
The Americans allied with the British because they share a common cultural DNA and civilizational values.
And that is an insult.
What are these common Anglo-American “values” in reality?
Free Market exploitation fronting as Freedom.
Imperialist Domination disguised as Democracy.
In short, the Anglo Americans are the world’s leader in terms of lies.
And Vladimir Putin coined the phrase of the century when he called America the Empire of Lies.
Not bad, Author:
Unfortunately, propping up the “American” System doesn’t work out to Well.
USA and GBR are Factions amongst the Zionist-Mason pwnd and run Countries.
Granted USA’s Founders were a bit more Altruistic on Paper; but they were Landed Masonic Gentlemen. They “Wanted” to keep an Arm’s Length from the GBR Oligarchy; but eventually the Murican Robber Barons and Rentier-Bankers joined hands with those Across the Atlantic.
The TakeOver was completed around 1913 when the FEDRSV came into being.
The Zionist-Mason Plutarchy “pwned” the Core Powers for decades; and eventually staged Wars that Destroyed Empires and Democracies.
I call the Modern Rendition as the H8_Hegemony – with the Zionist-Mason Plutarchy and Vassal Rentier-Banker/Corporate-Oligarchy/SocioPolitical-Ochlarchy running “Greater_ISR” and the G7.
A couple of points:
1.I remember during the Vietnam War saying, that unlike what the US portrayed as a war against Communism. Was instead a war against Vietnamese nationalism . And that the US could never win a war against nationalism there. The US should have known that since they themselves used nationalism against the English during their revolution.
2.Many years ago I studied how the different nations developed their economies. And except for the British (to some extent they did also,but it’s complicated),those powers that succeeded in rising to great economic power build those economies by protecting their own internal markets. The most spectacular examples on that were the US,Germany,and Japan. Later the USSR picked up on that,and South Korea,and lastly today China.
I find it ironic that one of the icons of American Exceptionalism is the continued use of non-decimal measurements based on the body parts of dead English kings/queens. Especially for a republic that adopted decimal currency ($1 = 10 dimes = 100 cents = 1000 mills) after having supposedly declared independence from said monarchs in ’76.
If I remember correctly, Thomas Jefferson wanted to convert the US to the metric system, and ordered a meter and kilogram to be shipped from France, but British pirates captured the sailor and the project was abandoned.
Even after this, the US became a member of the Meter Convention of 1875 together with Russia (the British Empire was absent).
Is it any coincidence that dissing metric has become part of the USAian identity since the creation of the special relationship?
I stopped reading after the first sentence. The author asserts that Britain never won a war against America. It has only fought one and won it. I refer to the war of 1812.
There were two,the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. The British clearly lost the first. And the second ended as “a draw”,both sides won and lost battles.With the last the Battle of New Orleans being a rout of British forces. But the war was ended without a clear winner by the Treaty of Ghent.Leaving both sides able to claim a “victory”.
A couple of points.
1. “America” did not exist until after the Revolutionary War. A great many colonists fought to remain with Britain and they (Empire Loyalists) moved to Upper Canada (now Ontario) after the war.
2. The War of 1812 was initiated by the US invasion of Canada. In the sense that the US invasion was defeated and the White House burned down, they lost.
Your argument is akin to calling the Vietnam War a “tie”.
There are several interesting stories in the article, but the idea that the UK oligarchs have stolen from the USA oligarchs control of the USA state and empire is ridiculous: first in WW1, and then nearly completely in WW2, with the job finished in 1956 Suez, the USA oligarchs have shafted the UK oligarchs pretty hard. Here is JM Keynes as to WW1 and WW2:
«The financial history of the six months from the end of the summer of 1916 up to the entry of the United States into the war in April, 1917, remains to be written. Very few persons, outside the half-dozen officials of the British Treasury who lived in daily contact with the immense anxieties and impossible financial requirements of those days, can fully realize what stead-fastness and courage were needed, and how entirely hopeless the task would soon have become without the assistance of the United States Treasury.»
«The core of the trouble was that the Americans did not quite believe how broke the British Empire really was. Nor did they much care. Powerful players in Washington may have been sentimental about the common struggle that had just ended but were unsentimental about empires and the new world that must now be built. This was not a game of equal players. Every time the British turned down an American offer, the next offer was worse.
An angry Keynes wrote back to his mother: ‘They mean us no harm but their minds are so small, their prospects so restricted, their knowledge so inadequate, their obstinacy so boundless and their legal pedantries so infuriating. May it never fall to me to persuade anyone to do what I want, with so few cards in my hand … I am beginning to use up my physical reserves.’»
Then even before the start of WW2 the Council on Foreign Relations started for the government a vast programme of preparation for grabbing the UK empire:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_and_Peace_Studies
The UK even welcomed USA military occupation:
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1986/jun/18/foreign-affairs-2#S6CV0099P0_19860618_HOC_479
«When NATO was set up in 1948, the commander of the United States air force who arrived in Britain with the advance guard of the American forces to be stationed here said: “Never before in history has one first-class power gone into another first-class power’s country without any agreement. We were just told to come over and ‘We shall be pleased to have you’.”»
While George Washington and others, perhaps including Woodrow Wilson, had idealistic/isolationist aims, the USA government had been taking over the colonies of other powers in an ever expanding area, first by buying the middle west from Napoleon, then Alaska from the Tsar, then destroying the spanish empire and grabbing the Philippines and Cuba, etc. etc. etc.
The current relationship between USA and UK is one of the UK’s abject vassalage, also because since after WW1 the wealth of the UK elites has been largely moved to the USA.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4964236/Special-relationship-seen-joke-diplomats.html
«Barack Obama and his aides regarded the idea of a special relationship between Britain and the US as a joke, it was claimed last night. Jeremy Shapiro, a former presidential adviser, said the special relationship was ‘unrequited’ and he revealed he would insert references to ‘the Malvinas’ – Argentina’s name for the Falklands – into Press conferences. Mr Shapiro said that although US officials stressed the importance of the relationship to British visitors, they would make jokes about the Falklands away from the cameras. He added that the so-called special relationship with Britain ‘was never really something that was very important to the United States’. […] Referring to a 2009 survey that revealed 14 out of 25 EU countries believed they had a special relationship with America, he said the relationship with Britain ‘didn’t differ dramatically from other countries’.»
Andrew Marr, “A history of modern Britain”, 2007
«Against these new empires, the moth-eaten pretensions of a mild-mannered king-emperor, a few battleships and a modest number of colonial governors in baggy shorts barely seemed relevant. Britain’s dilemma from 1945 until today has been easy to state, impossible to resolve. How do you maintain independence and dignity when you are a junior partner, locked into defence systems, intelligence gathering and treaties with the world’s great military giant? […] At other times her dependence has been embarrassing, in big ways such as the Suez fiasco; and small ways, such as the American refusal to share intelligence assessments in Iraq, even when the raw intelligence was gathered originally by British agents and passed on. […] Periodic bouts of anti-Americanism inside the Foreign Office and in Whitehall generally have been the result. Anti-American feeling has been the Establishment’s secret vice. In public, successive foreign secretaries and mandarins spoke reassuringly of the British ‘punching above our weight’ and the vital importance of the Churchill-hallowed ‘special relationship’. In practice this meant sharing intelligence with the Pentagon and CIA, the intertwining of nuclear strategy, large US bases on British soil, the leasing of British bases to America, and a posture towards American presidents that is nearer that of salaried adviser than independent ally.»
The fantasies of Churchill and MacMillan of leading the USA, and of using the USA military to garrison the UK empire, remained fantasies, because the UK corporate oligarchs, directly or via the Business Roundtable, the Chambers of Commerce, RIAA/Phrma/…, K-Street have a hard grip on USA political and state apparatuses.
I think you’ll find that the British won the war of 1812.
TRUE…..This exposes the true intention of the Cold War doctrine which continues to this day, that the threat was never really considered communism, but rather the cause of nationalism (to which the communists more often than not supported), since under nationalism, industrialisation is considered fundamental to the liberation of the people. It is the liberation of a people and the creation of sovereign nation states which is considered the real enemy to a system of imperialism, which is the reality of the western framework today.
Partly true………. reason why so many nationalist leaders were open to working with the communists within their country was because the communists were also for nationalism and against imperialism, and nothing came remotely close to the level of destruction that was occurring on a military and economic level from western imperialism.
There were very few true communists and nationalists in the Europe. One negates the other. Most of them are dilettantes, INTERNATIONALISTS (angloamerican planted eggs) crying for attention, unaware of statehood, weakening historic nation and national institutions for the sake of the FAKE general good (Anglo-American interest).Tito is perfect example. Weak Serbia, strong Yugoslavia-fictitious nation. In the meantime, he strengthened Croatia-nation created from catholic Serbs in the middle of the 19th century which allways follow western imperialistic goals. To this day, his children rule Serbia in the interests of Western imperialism as liberal socialists. Nationally – socially are forbidden words. That immediately qualifies you as Hitler Nazi supporter.
This is a mistaken interpretation.
Colonialism is economic, as is everything. The US was not founded for ‘freedom’, it was founded to escape taxation.
WWII was the result of the west (US+UK) aiming Germany at the USSR. As a communist state it was anti-capitalist and this could not be tolerated (current examples include Cuba, Venezuela, and China – also reference the brutal suppression of rising socialist and communist movements in Europe after WWII).
The other goal, equally important, was to capture the vast resources of the USSR. Thus Germany in the late 1930’s was the equivalent of Ukraine in the late 20-teens, a proxy army for empire.
Make no mistake, this empire includes the UK, but only as a satrapy of the US. The current face off for PM between two rabid pro-war stooges of a country with literally no military capability proves it.
I find that quote by Henry C. Carey, Harmony of Interests, 1851 to be quite humorous. Move forward to today and ask yourself what Henry would have thought about our present predicament? I give you only Admirals Rickover’s final paragraph on the subject from a 1957 speech. The entire speech is far too long but believe me it is worth a read:
“One final thought I should like to leave with you. High-energy consumption has always been a prerequisite of political power. The tendency is for political power to be concentrated in an ever-smaller number of countries. Ultimately, the nation which control – the largest energy resources will become dominant. If we give thought to the problem of energy resources, if we act wisely and in time to conserve what we have and prepare well for necessary future changes, we shall insure this dominant position for our own country.”
https://ourfiniteworld.com/2007/07/02/speech-from-1957-predicting-peak-oil/
The problem with leadership of any kind is they have no long, long range views taking into consideration all the issues and fundamentals and how could they knowing nothing of the internet and cell phones as just two examples! Whatever great plans they had in store for either themselves or others it has mostly ended up in the refuse bin of history and will continue to be so.
Carroll Quigley though is the name for sure. His book Tragedy and Hope spells it all out but even he failed to understand what the end game actually is as even those he studied didn’t have the ultimate answers and weapons until that is computer tech arrived and with it the QR Code.
Today I’d imagine they surely salivate like rabid dogs they do for a system that will indeed give them what they so desire full worldwide control of the entire planet both financially and behaviorally. Behaviorally, that is the real fruit of such a system for them as isn’t that the real fundamental problem of mankind “SIN”
We really are nothing but serfs for the international bankers and they have the ultimate weapon technology!
Just imagine microchips as small as dust being placed in the halls of power during the years preceding WW1 and being able to listen in on every conceivable conversation.
Just imagine?
Well, the British were truly pushed off the pedestal, Britain ended up as ‘Junior Partner’ in a new empire that closely resembled the old, in fact a structural copy. But global dominance passed to a different conglomerate of banking interests: Rockefeller Corp and associated banks. Within the US power passed from JP Morgan to Chase Manhattan Bank.
An evolved version of the British Empire emerged.
Weren’t the British who created israel?
Seems so but it became very much a US project later.
No. It was the Zionist who created Israel. They used all manner of nefarious means to do it.
this explains it in forensic detail:
https://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/reeedcontrov.pdf
By the way here is an oldy but goody on the oil industry from T. Boone Pickens:
Financial Post dated 2008
Washington – – World crude oil production has topped out at 85 million barrels per day even as demand keeps climbing, helping to drive a stunning surge in prices, billionaire oil investor T. Boone Pickens said on Tuesday.
“I do believe you have peaked out at 85 million barrels a day globally,” Mr. Pickens, who heads BP Capital hedge fund with more than US $4 billion under management, said during testimony to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
The United States alone has been using “21 million barrels of the 85 million and producing about 7 of the 21, so if I could take a minute on this point, the demand is about 86.4 million barrels a day, and when the demand is greater than the supply, the price has to go up until it kills demand,: Mr. Pickens told lawmakers.
U. S. Crude futures have risen by a third since the start of the year and more than sixfold since 2002 as surging demand from China and other developing nations outpaces production.
Oil slipped on Tuesday, a day after touching a record high near US 140 a barrel, but remained above US 133 a barrel.
Mr. Pickens, who announced a US 2 billion investment in wind energy earlier this year, told lawmakers during a hearing on renewable electricity that he expected” the price of oil will go up further.” Without alternatives. the cost of foreign oil will drain the United Sates of more resources, he said.
Yikes, eh?
And then here is an added juicy morsel from Martin Armstrong on Germany’s crisis in energy!
Germany and Finnish parent company Fortum signed a $15.24 billion deal to save energy company Uniper. In return, Germany will take a 30% stake in the company. Uniper reported only receiving a fraction on contracted gas from Russia’s Gazprom since mid-June, and it seems shipments may continue to slow or cease entirely. Uniper has been purchasing gas elsewhere at a premium, dampening their profits.
“We are living through an unprecedented energy crisis that requires robust measures. After intensive but constructive negotiations, we found a solution that in an acceptable way met the interest of all parties involved,” said Fortum’s President and CEO Markus Rauramo.
Chancellor Olaf Scholz said saving Uniper is of “paramount importance” for the German economy. Sholz said the “government plans to introduce mechanism to pass through 90% of replacement costs for missing Russian gas to consumers as of October 1.” The costs will be passed on to the consumers, of course.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/energy/germany-to-bail-out-uniper/
Interesting. Perhaps in the main true, a decent “theory of the case.” But what all such articles don’t touch upon is the far deeper strata of human sociobiology and genetics.
Chung and her husband Ehret present a Manichean vision of the Bad Brits and their Anglo-American empire pitted against the freedom-loving rest of humanity in their blogs, articles and videos. The problem of empire however is NOT confined to the British or even the last 500 years of European colonialism.
Empire is coded into the human political genetics, into the deep sociobiology of our species. It’s easy to see this. Empires have always existed, coming and going in waves as one nation-race-ethnicity rises, conquers and eventually collapses replaced by another. Name one period in history where there were no empires.
Likewise, egalitarianism, love of liberty and the hope for individual and group sovereignty exists in perpetual antipathy to imperial ambitions. Both are coded into the human political genome. So how to transcend the dilemma?
I think through much broader study and a cross cultural, ongoing, multi-disciplinary study of human beings to develop a far deeper “theory of the case” that doesn’t focus on the current Anglo-American Empire.
Otherwise, we’ll just trade the current chaotic, brutal empire in decline for a new Chinese, Russian or some other empire to replace the one we know and all despise.
Hi Charles
How about William Gilpin’s global cooperative vision and an endeavour to set ourselves free from rampant Russia/sinophobia… should we perhaps give that a whirl?
That and of course changing to money creation that is not based on debt and fiat, but to tangibly backed currencies this time by multiple commodities.
Also to new international trading methods that don’t help feed the old gravy train giving the parasitic Zone A collective a way to thieve from the productive countries of the world… now there’s a novel idea.
In 1852, Gilpin stated:
“Salvation must come to America from China, and this consists in the introduction of the “Chinese constitution” viz. the “patriarchal democracy of the Celestial Empire”. The political life of the United States is through European influences, in a state of complete demoralization, and the Chinese Constitution alone contains elements of regeneration.
For this reason, a railroad to the Pacific is of such vast importance, since by its means the Chinese trade will be conducted straight across the North American continent. This trade must bring in its train Chinese civilization. All that is usually alleged against China is mere calumny spread purposefully, just like those calumnies which are circulated in Europe about the United States”.
A man ahead of his time perhaps.
And Mathew Ehret’s excellent expose where this is all laid out.
https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/how-the-usa-lost-its-anti-imperial
Cheers
Col
I swim in understanding that world of the Big, Bad Brits but I do like your angle. Is a stable alternative possible, as the ending line of the Gettysburg address asks?
Is it possible to exit the loop of empires, given human nature? Seems we escape momentarily, only to regress. I suppose that’s better than permanent empire. We know the ingredients for a cultural and scientific renaissance, but the problem is, it’s a game of participation, and it has to reach critical mass to be able to break out.
So the Russians are currently the olde Americans and the Americans the old still rotten British?
I like the reference to missing the window of opportunity to Nagasaki Russia. All downhill more or less for the US since.
The Federal Reserve were the sponsors of both world wars and almost every other external conflict since
Ms Chung is clear and straight to the point in her writing, even when the topic is covered by multiple layers of disinformation, misinformation, gaslighting. May God the All-Merciful and All-Compassionate continue to protect and guide your soul in this world trough the way of the truthfulness and compassion. Your work is noble and extremely important for this and the yet unborn generations.
Chung omits a great mass of history, roughly from 1880-1945, which was the period when what we now call Neoliberalism was busy ousting the reforms of the Classical Economists and attempting to overturn the American System, all of which was accomplished by 1920. How that was done is one part of Dr. Michael Hudson’s major historical inquiries, and one which I also picked up on back in the 1980s. The general outline of what occurred and when is known but not the specific actors, although some are easily identifiable. The important point is the coalescing of the Anglo-American elites’s political-economic philosophy prior to WW1, most likely in the 1890s, which was aimed at overturning the idea that their income was mostly unearned, and that they were thus parasites feeding on society instead of being major contributors. The Classical Economists’s goal was to end that last vestige of Feudalism through heavy taxation of rentier income while legislating away their sources, monopolies and trusts being the most important and powerful. The American Populists of that Era called their primary foe the Money Power/Trust and the Age was properly named the Gilded Age, all for excellent reasons. To ignore the collusion between Anglo and American elites during that timeframe raises its own set of questions given the proposed area of Ms. Chung’s enquiry. She suggests a conspiracy during that timeframe but doesn’t investigate it–why?
The time period I note at top lacks an in-depth enquiry focusing on Neoliberalism’s rise whose roots are in Victorian England and New England. There are also disturbing questions about Frankin Roosevelt’s genuine allegiances during his Presidency, especially his unwillingness to prosecute the elites involved in the Businessmen’s Plot–the only attempted coup in US History–many of whom qualified as American Fascists.
Do recall the maxim: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
The “Anglo-American elites’s political-economic philosophy…was aimed at overturning the idea that their income [rents. interest, fiat loans] was mostly unearned, and that they were thus parasites feeding on society instead of being major contributors.”
Bingo, you hit it. (I added the brackets)
That’s the basis of the financial elites whole takeover of classical political economy, i.e. the real economy and of the original USA. Instead of prosperity, freedom, development; bring about austerity, debt slavery and financial control. Make all of this robbery legal, and yes through the media appear virtuous.
Such is the case, and as long as people from all countries, from all walks of life, do not see this, and work together to expose it and oust it, then the future is in danger.
Thanks for your reply. Simon Patten, a teacher and practitioner of the American System, formulated what he called the Economics of Abundance, which was erased by the elites when they eradicated the teaching of political-economy in major US universities prior to 1920. Upton Sinclair researched that happening and self-published his findings in a book that I happen to own. My research problem is 1890-1920 where it’s very difficult to locate evidence of this counter-revolution. And very few historians have worked on the overall problem because their indoctrination tells them there isn’t any problem–the whole transformation was natural, just don’t study Marx or his contemporaries.
For Russia, China and the Global South, this historical problem isn’t their problem. Rather, freeing themselves from the Neoliberal global system and forming a new democratic structured system is their chore. Sure, it would help them to know how that structure was born and matured, but it’s not required for them to do their work. The people needing the Truth are those living in the Collective West. IMO, Ms. Chung isn’t helping those people to discover how they were swindled, and that it’s escalating as I write.
I did a lot of research in all areas, there are parts of the 1890-1920 in records.
Off the top of my head:
They used Skull and Bones alumni to start up the higher education system during this period at the start during the late 1800s. See Anthony Sutton book Skull and Bones. Rockefeller Foundation then created the university grant system around 1920 whereby they weeded out classical theorists in university faculty and put their stamp on ideology.
Strict laws against corporations (fake entities) was thrown out by a coup d’etat in the legal system without any precedent. This maneuver gave corporations undue legal privileges they did not have before.
Rockefeller in particular set up all the accrediting agencies in the various professions to control what was and what was not accredited, ie. permitted.
Of course the Federal Reserve was created at Jekyll Island as a reform to financial panics the elites themselves perpetrated.
The British Roundtable group from Rhodes circle started the Council on Foreign Relations around 1920. This led to the takeover of the State Department.
The material is there, it just needs to be focused.
In general the robber barons set up philanthropies to cover their takeover scheme.
Thanks again. You touch on some elements I know about. For me, time to do additional research is short. My relationship with Dr. Hudson is proving useful as he knows things he hasn’t published. IMO, his curiosity is satisfied, and he just wants to finish publishing his works–4-5 more books if not more.
«the time period I note at top lacks an in-depth enquiry focusing on Neoliberalism’s rise whose roots are in Victorian England and New England.»
A georgist/marginalist political economist, prof. Mason Gaffney, thinks he has a good answer: John Bates Clark, a hack Economist who removed “economic rent” from even marginalist models.
https://masongaffney.org/publications.html
https://masongaffney.org/publications/K1Neo-classical_Stratagem.CV.pdf
https://masongaffney.org/publications/K2008_Keeping_Land_in_Capital_Theory.pdf
https://masongaffney.org/publications/K9-StabileHGInfluenceonJBClarkMGComments.CV.pdf
Even one of his contemporaries saw through J.B, Clark’s prevarication:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1884976
Reviewed Work: The Distribution of Wealth: A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits by John Bates Clark
Review by: T. N. Carver
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Vol. 15, No. 4 (Aug., 1901), pp. 578-602 (25 pages)
Yes, Clark was the front man, and the current Neoliberal economic prize is named after him. But as implied, there were/are much more powerful forces behind him then and now. Hudson’s published research skewers Clark but doesn’t unveil those who paid him. Clark must be exposed as the paid shill he was along with those who financed him while re-elevating classical political-economy back into the position it had reached @ 1870 as an analytical tool.
As to who was behind J.B. Clark: M. Gaffney did a bit of investigation on that, and reports the results in his works.
In any case it is not complicated, consider the board of trustees of the University of Chicago, nearly all hedge funders or “investors”: https://trustees.uchicago.edu/
Thanks very much for introducing me to the late Mason Gaffney. He has an excellently kept website with most of his papers accessible. Yet more grease for my wheel!
Wow! What a contribution to our understanding of what is going on.
Sun Yat Sun’s “To speak is easy. To act is hard. To understand is hardest. Once one understands, action is easy” . It’s all there. This certainly helps me understand what’s going on and guide my actions from here on.
Will certainly circulate this fondamental article.
A lot of the countries mentioned including Singapore were post-Colonial countries that are still running to this day on a British Civil Service model.
People complain about Singapore’s strict laws (with capital punishment of death by hanging), they are all British era laws that when the current crop of WEF sponsored animals took over they saw it was good to follow so that they could have their brand of control.
Not realizing these and the typical top-down work management style were put in place because British system saw non-British locals as sub-human. Those who eagerly supported such a system were typically shallow characters without a sense of soul or awareness of one’s own actions impacting others and the result is a toxic work environment.
The common trope pushed by the British that ‘Malays were lazy’ was in fact Malays passively resisting the colonial work system that they detested as it was top down (do as I say, not as I do) and treated them only slightly better than wage slaves, compared to what they were used to in the days of indigenous Malay empire.
I agree with the comments referencing the cultural codes close connection to the Anglo Saxon. After a couple centuries a major upheaval that completely rewrites the fabric of society is the only way positive change away from empire is going to take place.
Comments above mention the East India Company, which was a major part of this problem. The irony is the red and white horizontal stripes found on both the US and Malaysia flags come from the EIC.
EIC, like the Dutch VOC, was one of the earliest megacorporation with paid death squad and ‘clean up crew’ types who were sent to clear out natives who didn’t agree with their takeover.
Its unbelievable how long this has been ongoing and people of the Non-Aligned Movement tried to move things in a better direction. We are now seeing the same attempt being made by Russia, a country that since ~900 C.E> is no stranger to dealing with the Dark Forces that morphed into every poisonous form of globalism described above.
Will the degenerate western ideologies, common core retarding the brains of the west weaken the effectiveness of the western banking cabal to hire saboteur agents enough that this time Non Aligned Movement 2 be a success? We can only hope.
I know I am sick of the endless failures at building a proper world that’s not being directed and controlled by some hidden hand. The kind of hidden hand that believes their purpose in life is to control and micromanage everyone else (which sums up the mess of the past five thousand years of global history, probably longer).
The last 2 years was just the latest move by them to seize even the last few remaining rights we have, made more dangerous by technology and the fact majority have found themselves in the digital trap because of ‘convenience’. I wouldn’t be surprise if all this to put apps in a phone for everything from banking, social media to managing internet of things, improved bandwidth and more insidiously open-air microwaving with cellphone towers was all connected to this overall plan started by the same British Empire to control and manage.
After reading this article its also clear why LaRouche PAC practically uses the term ‘British Empire’ where those who follow other alt-media sources would use ‘NWO’.
Thanks. Great Read. Loved the quote by Sun Yat-sen :
‘To speak is easy. To act is hard. To understand is hardest. Once one understands, action is easy.’
Another problem lies with the masses choosing to blow like a kite in the storm of MSM lies. I say ‘choose’ because the burden of responsibility and blame also lies in the ordinary citizen wallowing in modern conveniences and being therefore oblivious to the creeping police state around them.
The empire has gotten this far only because enough average joe normie don’t self reflect on their impact or if there’s a bigger things out there in the spiritual realm beyond their 9-5 job, the house and the picket fence (which is now all being taken away).
Its all very well to have leaders doing the work but a general overall population’s level of awareness and sentience is key. This is why the Empire targets the education system so the public education churns out unthinking robots that passively sit back and let the takeover proceed.
Russia is aligned in both thought and spirit at both government and citizen level because of the hardships of the 1990s, and children who grew up in that time are now the working members of society. So it remains to be seen if apathy sets in with successive generations. The kind of apathy that also contributed to the destruction of the west.
Really well written and with several events of history that I am reading about for the first time. Thanks Ms. Chung
Gracias por tu trabajo
Thank you for your work
TAKE A LOOK AT THIS CHRISTIAN-SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT PLAN THAT I WOULD DO IF I WAS USA A CHRISTIAN-SOCIALIST PRESIDENT
1- I would reduce the military spending, slowly close all the US Armed Forces bases around the world.
2- Halt temporarily the NASA space program.
3- Lower the amount of US government workers, and lower the salary of high income US government workers. 4- Close many government departments that are not necessary.
5- Stop all the money donated to Israel, Colombia, Saudi Arabia and many other capitalist imperialist states. 6- With all the money not being used in wars and in NASA, to wage a war for free against covid, leukemia, cancer, heart disease, diabetes, weight gain, dental problems, eye problems and mental disorders and many other physical problems that millions of people in USA have.
7- Wage a war using all the special forces of the FBI, CIA and NSA against the problem of abduction of children and young girls (1 million children and girls are abducted every year).
8- Wage a war against rapists.
9- wage a war against crime, against mass shooters.
10- Wage a war against all forms of verbal, and physical bullying.
11-Ban all alcoholic beverages, ban fattening foods, ice creams, cakes, pancakes, donuts, chocolates, cigarettes, drugs, discos, dancing clubs, prostitution centers, provocative anti-christian clothes and any thing that is against Christian socialist morality. 1
12- Ban sports cars and luxury cars (they are not necessary for progress) and lower the speed limits of highways to 50 miles per hour (it is better to die of boredom driving for longer periods, than to die in acar accidet (like Paul Walker).
13- Wage a war against racism and all types of discriminations like discrimination against people with weight gain problems.
14- A strict system of control in the traffic, specially against truck drivers and big vehicles who use their vehicle to harass people in smaller cars.
15-Special treatments for american natives, blacks, gays, latinos and other sectors of the country that have been suffering under Democrats and Republicans
16- Death Penalty for Bush and neocons Republicans who are guilty of the 9-11 inside job terrorism and the mass murder 1 million iraquis, death penalty for the people behind the assasination of John F. Kennedy, death penalty for the people behind the attack against USS Liberty.
17- Increase the minimum wage to 20 per hour.
18- Nationalize under workers-control, all important sectors of the country like grocery stores, electricity, airlines, transportation, internet and phone companies etc
19- US citizenship for the 12 million undocumented people of the country with special treatment for them like a monthly paycheck, free houses etc.
20- The creation of a specialy army to protect the new marxist-christian state against Republicans, right-wing churches and FOX news, and right-wing terrorists who will try to overthrow the new communist workers state. 21- Nationalize important universities in order to provide free university professions.
22- Nationalize Disney World, all theme parks, many entertainment and pleasure sectors like gyms, book corporations, nintendo, playstation company, theme parks, movie theaters etc. restaurants, cruice ship companies etc in order to provide pleasure and entertaintment for free and-or low prices.
23- A program in order to pay for the external debt, lower and destroy the fiscal deficit, reduce the external debt to zero.
24- Declaration of war against Israel, the state of Israel, in order to stop Israel from killing Palestinians, special treatment for the Palestinians, and closing all the diplomatic relations with Israel and all oligarchic abusive governments.
25- Special immigration treatment and special rights for the immigrants of all oppressed and poor countries of the world, specially haitians, africans and the oppressed in general.
26-Medical care will be free, college professions (not just cooking and lower professions, medical science, law, etc will be 100% free,all colleges will be owned by the state.
26-B. Since I love humans so much, I would create a life-extension department in the US government in order to invest scientific research so that people would live to 150 years old
27 – After the economy gets better and the poor economically oppressed people of USA live in a good house, drive good cars, eat well and get out of poverty (thanks to communism ideology) and live a self-realized life (thanks to marxism, communism). I would open NASA, and create a department to communicate with extrterrestrials (With Luis Elizondo, Steven Greer, Jaime Maussan, Blake Cousins, Jeff Rense, SETI, David Wilcock, Tyler from Secureteam, Chris from Mars Anomaly, Bruce Se beces All, and other extraterrestrial ufologist scientists
28- Create a life after death scientific deparment with Robert Lanza and Anthony Peake as head of that department
29- A disclosure about big foot and in combination with the Scotlandgovernment, a disclosure about the Loch Ness monster
30- Invest in the creation of a time machine
31- A philosophy, science book-reading revolution. The creation of a book corporation owned by the state in order to give people books of Nietzsche, Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemburg, Goethe, Plato and other important thinkers, (this is necessary in order for people mentally and emotionally evolve toward better humans
32- Donation of resources, money and music equipment to communist heavy metal, rap and other marxist music bands
33- Creation-invention of a system of professional sports in which both teams win the game at the same time because the system of one winner and one loser is oppressive and not democratic party
34- Create a low-carb ketogenic deparment with Eric Berg and other low-carb doctors as head of that department
PS: And many many other things that are needed in order to convert USA into a class-less society of self-realized people, loving each other and helping each other
I am glad to discover Cynthia’s work thanks to the Saker website. I think it is worth to watch the video,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0tFlawT9vo
I now realize that the British and to a lesser extent, the Dutch and the French helped shape the current US foreign policy doctrine which is based on World dominance. That doctrine is as many leaders of the East have realized decades ago based on fear. The chronic Western warmongering is in some way a consequence of endemic fear in Western countries.
The next step is to find out who in our institutions is most subject to fear and to engage a dialogue with those guys to help them go over their feelings and open their minds. MaybeI shoudl test that theory with Pelosi first :-). If the fear is that the Asian/African/South-American countries are so backward as to need guidance from the West in the form of undercover operations to stage coups, then there is much work to do to open the minds of the Western elites.
There is so much at play in this takeover of the Western governance by a few groups of idealists (neocons, neoliberals, the scientists promoting world governance, etc). What those idealists are doing actually is just rationalizing the behavior of the colonist countries of the last centuries (The North-Atlantic countries). The Western people have benefited from that colonial world order; the elites got prosperity out of it. So the people of the West still want to believe the narrative; it has been good for them in the past. The reality is that the colonial past is gone and the political elites in Europe, America and Australia don’t see it yet.
This is a very important topic. America was the role model for industrial capitalism after civil war. The key event that changed the path of history was the takeover of private owned central bank, federal reserve in 1913+16th amendment, income tax. Red Shields, Morgan’s, Rockefellers and Warburgs took over US banking system, took US to WWI and from that point on things went down hill. Financial capitalism slowly took over the industrial capitalism.
There can be no multipolar world, true independent nations, if privately owned central banks, federal reserve, IMF, World Bank, ECU, etc. are allowed to exist.
Watch “money masters,” and “from jfk to 9-11 everything is a rich man’s trick”
The greatest trick the devil ever played was letting the English convince the world that everything is the fault of the Jews. It’s mostly been their pirate-slave empire.
Thank You,Cynthia, for a fine piece of investigation, bringingup manyof the lost gems of the 20th century.
The death, from cancer, of SunYat-sen at a young age, fromstomach cancer, threw china into a contest between his acolytes, Mao and Chiang Kai-shek. Deng Xiaaoping finally got on the track of unification after a long, hard, unhealthy time.
The attention to Russian help for the nationalist cause in the American Civil War is also worthyof praise. This is forgotten in American history.
And this: In an article in Parade magazine, Elliott Roosevelt also said that Stalin told him in a post-war interview that he believed the president had been poisoned by members of the British prime minister’s ″gang″. https://apnews.com/article/8c6e28a9f752338340b79e00a8903381
Truman was foist upon Roosevelt, in preparation for FDR’s assassination at the opportune moment. FDR never trusted Truman at all. The atomic bomb was a surprise to truman, who became the facile tool of fascist imperialism right away and embraced it thoroughly, which was easy for an un-curious narcissist, being heavily pandered to by advisors and consultants.
Spectacular piece. Bravo.
“Paul Revere rode at midnight through the New England countryside, warning of the approach of the British troops and of the opening of the American War of Independence, the first successful anti-colonialist war in history. ”
I have to disagree with this statement by the author. The American revolution was not “the first successful anti-colonialist war in history”, but rather the formal establishment of the American empire. The Americans were imperialists from the beginning. They quickly spread throughout the continent’s eastern coast and then headed west, conquering and slaughtering the Native American nations and either purchasing or taking lands controlled by European powers.
As they did this, they developed the Monroe Doctrine of Manifest Destiny which proclaimed the Western Hemisphere as theirs and not to be touched by Europe.
The idea that America was born in “freedom and democracy” was an image projected from the earliest days that caught the imagination of Americans and that of the world at large. It is one of the greatest con games in history. When Hollywood came to be, that imagery took off almost beyond reason – yet people all over the world gobbled it up, not so much because it held a degree of reality in their minds, but because they desperately wanted it to be true.
As for the British, it can be said with authority that their old cognomen, “Perfidious Albion”, can not be denied even to this day as you nearly always find the British working in the background of chaos and intrigue in the world.
‘“Either war or civilization must end and if it is to be war that ends, there must be an international authority, with the sole power to make the new bombs…But I fear that all of this is utopian…If America were more imperialistic, there would be another possibility, less utopian and less desirable, but still preferable to obliteration of civilized life. It would be possible for Americans to use their position of superiority to insist upon disarmament not only in Germany and Japan, but everywhere except the United States, or at any rate, in every country not prepared to enter into a close military alliance with the United States…During the next few years, this policy should be enforced. If one or two wars were necessary, they would be brief and would soon end in decisive American victory. In this way, a new League of Nations could be formed under American leadership, and the peace of the world could be securely established. But I fear that respect for international justice would stop Washington from adopting this ‘policy’.”’
This is precisely the sort of nonsensical rubbish which proves to all that Bertrand Russell was anything but an intellectual, anything but an academic, just a deluded half-wit with influence.
There is zero evidence that Americans imposing unilateral disarmament on all but Americans have the humanity to rule justly, nor is there any evidence that there ever was.
The single biggest winner of WW II was the USA and the idiot who writes this anti-UK rubbish is unfit to converse if he will not acknowledge that. The UK ended WW II bankrupt and in hock to the USA, who imposed Lend-Lease on the UK which took 50 years to pay off, when the psychopathic USA then deliberately ensured that further mass indebtedness would be imposed upon the UK through economic terrorism.
The UK has not been a Great Power since 1918 and, far from framing the Versailles Treaty, J M Keynes, who attended the discussions, stated presciently at the time that the agreement had already framed the conditions for another Great War. We were right, the parties controlling the negotiations were wrong. And it was we, the British, who suffered.
Let us also be clear: it was the psychopathic USA who hated the genuinely socialist post-war government of Clement Attlee, elected by all the men and women who fought courageously in WWII in an existential fight fro survival against Hitler (something the USA never did, has never done, nor likely ever will do) that set about rebuilding a bombed-out nation using centralised control. It’s not saying we should always have centralised control, it’s saying that when mass mobilisation is required to return a nation to a stable situation, you can never rely on greedy capitalists, solely in it for what they can get out of it, to carry it out responsibly, appropriately, on a sensible timescale. The only thing they care about is money, they don’t care if that means 15 years of three generations’ lives are wasted to make them that money.
The USA did everything it could to ensure that socialism would never again exist in the UK and did everything it could to try and oust democratically elected leaders like Harold Wilson who refused to warmonger on the USA’s behalf. If the author wishes to challenge that, it can hang itself as a sexual deviant. The term man or woman would never again be appropriate to describe them.
It is obvious why this lying propaganda is being printed here: THE SAKER lives in the USA and cannot print the truth about the USA without being expelled. So he takes the cowardly option of trying to make out that the UK is a dominant partner in a BDSM relationship where the USA is a psychopathic enforcer and the UK is forced to submit or else.
The role of the Jewish state of Israel is also key to the evil imposed on the British people and the Saker, as a Jew, is equally responsible for the never-ending silence about the absolute evil of Zionist-power-structures which impose absolute nonsense on 400 million people when the combined Jewish population of the US + UK combined is well less than 10 million.
I don’t expect the Saker to print such truths either, because he is not prepared to relocate to a jurisdiction where he won’t be ostracised or expelled for doing so.
But it doesn’t change the truth: the UK ceased being a great power when it ceded the right to a Jewish state in Palestine, half bankrupted itself in the First World War and completely bankrupted itself in the Second.
There have been 80 years which have passed since the UK was a significant global player and it won’t be again any time soon either.
All this evil propaganda here trying to make out that events since 1980 have anything to do with the UK and are not absolutely everything to do with the USA and only the USA just shows that this site doesn’t have principles, it just has petty scores to settle.
The world won’t be saved by the journalists at this site, it will just impose the same sick power structures with new rulers.
That is nothing worth fighting for unless you are an unprincipled, avaricious money-grabbing bunch of psychos who have learned your lessons from John Bolton, Dick Cheney, Larry Fink, Bill Gates and George Soros.
I am strongly coming to the conclusion that a subset of those allowed to author articles here are precisely that.
Unless this author submits to the truth that the USA imposes slavery via allowing corporations to use prisoners to undercut the competition of honest businesses, he should be banned from writing her forevermore.
The USA believes in slavery, has slavery hard-wired into its nation and has done throughout the entirety of its history.
It has racism hard wired into its nation; it has dynastic families hard-wired into its economics, its banking, its politics; it has freemasonry and the occult hard-wired into its monuments, institutions and buildings; and it has monopolistic super-profits gained via murdering all opponents hard-wired into its fortune-making.
The USA Constitution is no longer worth the paper it is written on, the Bill of Rights is an anachronism and a joke and the term ‘Land of the Free’ has not referred to the USA for decades.
But of course the whole world is controlled by 60 million people in a land occupied by US air bases, with its industry constantly bought out and milked by US conquistadors and its media forever being controlled by US issues that 95% of UK citizens could not give one flying fart about.
We, the British, globalised Formula I and EPL football. Not you, the USA. We, the British. You couldn’t globalise NFL, baseball or basketball if your lives depended on it. So you have to conquer our sports to try and claim how dominant you are. Far more people watch the Champions League Final, a European invention, than watch the Superbowl, a US invention. Not opinion, fact.
You come over here with your spying ‘Fellows and Scholars’ tasked with stealing our intellectual property and expecting our two top Universities to treat you as special cases whilst treating the British as third class.
You come over here and tell us we have to be in the EU or you will terrorise our economy.
You come over here and tell us we have to go to war with you in Ukraine or else. You order us to invite the puppet Zelensky to our Parliament and demand that everyone kiss his ass.
Well let me tell you this: if we were in control, the IMF, the World Bank and the UN would be moved out of the USA before 2022 was out.
The Special Relationship would be dead and all US forces bases in the UK would be ordered emptied of US personnel, equipment and spying technology Fylingdales would be used to spy on the USA. GCHQ, MI6 would be stripped of organised criminals taking orders from the USA.
Diplomatic relations with Israel would be terminated.
Warmongering with Russia and China would cease and we would be promoting peace talks for Ukraine
involving Russia, China, Ukraine, the EU, and the nations which depend on grain exports from Odessa.
All future ownership of UK football clubs by US buccaneers would be banned until such time as the US ownership models are opened up to embrace 75% foreign ownership of all major US sports.
And much, much more.
Don’t tell me the UK is in any control whatsoever.
At least, don’t tell me that if you don’t want to be called a prostitute and/or a mentally subnormal cretin who needs to go back not to secondary school but to infant school.
That is the price United Kingdom paid, and will have to pay for a very long time, for hindering European unity and bringing Asians to Europe.
The people of United Kingdom, who continue to honor people like Nelson, Wellington and Arthur Harris, will continue to suffer as long as they do not repent their long sins of killing Europeans to defend ‘national honor’.
Rather surprising for this website – Count Rumiantzev (Roumanzoff) of Russia working with US Ambassador to Russia, John Quincy Adams ensured the 1812 war outcome.
Russia again as in 1863 later with Lincoln.
When Pres. Trump negotiated with Russia’s Putin, he gave the British Empire,Anglo Establishment a real bad case of heartburn!
Some additonal information
https://aim4truth.org/2018/04/17/exposed-all-the-queens-agents-and-corporations-that-control-the-world/
Message to the moderators and administrators of this site, that I found a few days ago: Thanks a lot for publishing my last comment, other progressive anti-war news sites are not so democratic and in favor of freedom of speech like this site.
“…All this I did because of love for my own dear Russia, rather than for love of the American Republic. I acted thus because I understood that Russia would have a more serious task to perform if the American Republic, with advanced industrial development were broken up and Great Britain should be left in control of most branches of modern industrial development.” -Tsar Alexander II
Good point from the author that Britain might not have intervened more to help the South because of the Russian fleet anchored close by to support the North. That Russian fleet action and this Tsar quote, however, are good examples of why a country should not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. He couldn’t know that by 1927 this country he was supporting would replace the other and how so, although he could have suspected it would given the size of its territory (as the economist Adam Smith did a century earlier when he wondered in his “Wealth of Nations” about what great future awaited such a large and rich territory). The Tsar may have contributed decisively to the making of what some say is the biggest empire that ever existed. I think the Roman Empire is the greatest empire that has ever existed. I think the Roman Empire is the greatest empire ever.
I think the Hebrew prophet Daniel was right on that too. You may recall that he said that the legs of the statue in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream represented the Roman Empire without naming it. He named, though, the parts (empires) above so we know it’s the Roman Empire. Daniel said the splintered feet represented the divisions into which this empire would be split, which would become the new power but not as powerful as the former. Well, one could argue that the view of this author is in harmony with this Hebrew prophet in that one of those same parts of the Roman Empire would now be manifest in America.
Pardon the repetition about the Roman empire being the greatest. Forgot to erase the last sentence of that middle paragraph… I think there are trolls who catch the messages as they’re going and mess them up. Indeed.
Wow, this article is not even an article, it is a thesis, a book, I will share this bomb of knowledge with my friends and families, lots of people do not a lot of things that happen in their reality, this will contribute to give people more power, because knowledge is power. Thanks for this educational text
Very good article however I think there is a great omission:_
No mention of Cecil Rhodes and his covert round table organisation ?.
This is a vital piece of the jigsaw. Many of the current organisations (eg the council of foreign relations) trace their existences back to this covert group, as do most of the pro-colonial machinations that took place in Canada and the US mentioned at the turn of the 20th Century.
«No mention of Cecil Rhodes and his covert round table organisation ?»
Sure they tried, and before him there were other plotters of the english imperial domination, some people think that there were even more influential others. So in other states.
The problem with most is that plotting and spying can only achieve so much, it cannot turn a weak power into a strong power in the long term. This is the age of continental powers, like the USA or China (or on a smaller scale Brazil, the Russian Federation, the EU, India).
Modern dominance and war is industrial war with mass armies, and can only be sustained by huge states whose core resources (including population) are far from potential conflict areas and that have the budget to win wars of attrition.
And that’s pretty much the whole USA strategy: start wars of attrition by proxy and then join the fight later when the existing contenders are already exhausted and then overwhelm them with people and supplies. Some military authors have written quite plausibly that the american military confuse strategy with logistics, but after all logistics have brought them many victories.
Churchill in a discussion with another english politician (Violet Bonham-Carter) reported having become well aware of all that:
David Cannadine, Roland Quinault “Winston Churchill in the Twenty First Century”:
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ZSIdHeug6g4C&pg=PA24
«The irony was, of course, that one of the war aims of the Roosevelt administration was the liquidation of the British Empire, and the expansion of American power and influence at the expense of Britain.
By the end of 1943 it was clear to Churchill that he could no longer rely on American co-operation. As he explained to Violet Bonham Carter: “When I was at Teheran I realized for the first time what a very small country this is. On the one hand the big Russian bear with its paws outstretched — on the other the great American Elephant — and between them the poor little British Donkey — who is the the only one that knows the right way home”.»
To Little Black Duck.
I too had heard that the current control of the world was through the Ashkenazi. From http://www.stopworldcontrol/cabal/ well worth the watch. The Ashkenazi were descendents of Noah. (Found old map showing how the land was divided among them around Mesopotamia) Kicked out of Russia by Kiev ruler because they were ruthless, immoral people, devil worshiping group. Settled in Germany, France, Spain, throughout Europe. Mayer Rothschild (a descendent) in Germany got together with 12 financial businessmen (established the Illuminati) and established the banking systems in Europe. His five sons were sent to 5 different big EU cities and became bankers. Nathan Rothschild was sent to London. They became very powerful and controlled the money of kings and queens, hence they could dictate policy. The story of control and infiltration of US politics goes from there. I recommended Matthew Ekhert’s (friend of Cynthia’s) book series on the US. Yes. There is a group defining policy and controlling all. Russia and China are independent from this control. We can only hope Russia will prevail. Interestingly, Our Lady of Fatima communicated to Lucia(not sure if exact name) around the 1930s that Russia would be necessary to save the world.
The history we were taught in UK schools is extremely at odds with the facts.
Our rulers were not great. They were, and remain, total bastards.
Thank you, Cynthia Chung! What an eye opener! I have never had such a great historical revelation! Keep up the excellent work!
Referring to your notes on Bertrand Russell here. The journal of atomic scientists is nothing more than middlebrow CIA desk jockeys trying to appear as intelligent scientists. Make no mistake it is a US government propaganda mouthpiece. It is easy to see in more recent times as they pitch the magic vax and lockdowns, they are all in on global warming ending the world soon, and they are even starting to preach about racial and gender issues now! LOL! Sad but true.
Keeping in mind the fact that it has always been CIA, I would add that the messages delivered by Russell were exactly meant to scare Russia and China and at the same time convince Americans and the world that they had invented the “magic god bomb” first. Like the man on the moon, Russell’s entire collective works may have been all for show and the Americans may not have been so well positioned except to execute their giant bluff, which they did very successfully if this is the case.
@ the special relationship
There is an important essay by a Walt Garlington here
/distorted-american-aristocracy/ to which i commented:
I will never forget the biography of the American industrialist family the Vanderbilts whose Matriarch of the family forced their poor daughter into a loveless marriage to a British Lord who was so broke his castles and land were returning to dust. Consuela’s mother wanted a British peerage and she got it by marrying her daughter accordingly. Don’t you find that odd that after the War of Independence and all that transpired a generation or 2 later an American family went and did this?
and here to a reply by Bernard Davis please read:
/distorted-american-aristocracy/#comment-994590
The impression I got from my learning was their daughter Counseula didn’t get what she wanted at all. Her loveless marriage left her miserable her entire life. She had only her children and little else. Her mother was the only one going around with a big a smile on her face. I believe that’s called Vicarious living? Counseula i believe longed for America where her childhood was and a great point about things going the other way – not! Interesting. Regardless we are talking about American Royalty {most or many of whom were Christian} and that brooches another subject of some interest about how much of American Royalty went down with the Titanic? Some conspiracy websites like this one raises many questions:
https://www.henrymakow.com/questionssurround.html
You know there is a saying “Guilty by Association” and I fear that in many cases to get what we want we end doing exactly that.
Wow, if it weren’t for the Atomic Bomb i dare say we would have long seen been into more world wars. If that atomic knowledge had been hanging over the heads of those at the Versailles Treaty the outcome would have been very different. Thats the thing about international bankers not even they are safe anymore from their actions. The threat of annihilation has come even to their front door hence their talk and need for a one world government. The problem and real problem however, is authority and what they need above all is someone with the ability of a god almost to bring it about hence the quotes:
“It is necessary to discover a head capable of directing it, endowed with an intelligence surpassing the most elevated human level.”
—H.G. Wells
“Let that man be a military man or a layman, it matters not.”
—Paul Henry Spaak, first president of the Council of Europe, planner of the European Common Market, president of the United Nations General Assembly, and one-time Secretary-General of NATO
“Strong, one-man civilian control of America’s giant military establishment is vital to the nation’s wellbeing. The concentration of authority is inevitable.”
—Roswell Gilpatrick, Deputy Secretary of Defence
Aren’t those words amazing? Profound!!!! I mean really what they are saying is that all the leaders that have come before were useless and failures? The Popes, the Monarchies, heck even our own parents failures?
Alas though what we haven’t seen is what these international bankers who started out as Rabbi’s are desirous of which their scriptures prophesy a Messiah!?!?!?!?!?! And so Messianism and I guess with it the Noahide laws?
May God in Christ Jesus help us all!!!!
“The only escape from total destruction of civilization will be a world government, or we will perish in a war of the atom.”
—Harold Urey
“In the field of atomic energy, there must be set up a world power.”
—Robert J. Oppenheimer
“World government has become inevitable.”
—Arthur Compton Cantelon
“One world Government is in the making. whether we like it or not, we are moving toward a one-world government.”
—Dr. Ralph Barton Perry of Harvard
“Either we will find a way to establish world government, or we will perish in a war of the atom.”
—Raymond Swing to Albert Einstein
“The secret of the bomb should be committed to a world government, and the USA should immediately announce its readiness to give it to a world government.”
—Albert Einstein
“Sovereignty must go, that means also the interests which sovereignty protects must be recognized as outmoded in character and dangerous in operation.”
—Professor Laski of Oxford
“We shall have a world government whether or not we like it. The only question is, whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”
—James Warburg, February 17, 1950 before the U.S. Senate
Lastly, Cantelon sums up what the ultimate goal has been from page 144 of The Day the Dollar Dies Logos International 1973
The objective? Yes, the objective of those gaining control of the world’s wealth was to have total authority over all mankind.
My thoughts turned one more time to the writings of the Russian Dostoevsky who said,
We shall triumph-we shall plan the universal happiness of man.
This, said Dostoevsky, would be accomplished by the one who would hold control of man’s conscience and his bread.
The only happiness sought by Lucifer, however, was not man’s good but his own Satanic desire to have men worship him. If he controlled man’s bread he could force men to bow to him.
The prophet John tells how this world leader who will have power over “all kindreds and tongues and nations”
(Rev. l3:7) will cause that as many as will not worship shall be killed. (Rev. 13:15).
And again I recalled the fantastic passage of scripture that I had repeated so many times before,
He causeth all small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand or in their
foreheads: and that no man might buy or sell save he that had the mark-or the number. (Rev. 13:16-17)
This would seem to be Lucifer’s hour of triumph. He has struggled many long centuries to reach this goal. He has deceived the nations in leading them to battle. He has imparted his cunning and power to the money changers of the world who have stripped the masses of their wealth and have brought all mankind under a number system.
Now, he cries, men must worship me or be put to death.
No man can buy or sell or live in my one-world society, unless he takes the number of our universe. End quote.
and so is it about to begin? Is this Social Credit system it? Is Mathew 25 at the door? Where does your “special relationship” lay or with whom rather? That i guess is the real eternal question!
Cheers
Gerry, you have nailed something so important to human beings as to why all this madness. The objective is the triumph of the TOTAL man to bring paradise to earth, only by man and for man; God does not exist, where are God your peace, your happiness and your prosperity for men?
A new religion arises, its catechism are all the impious ideologies.
Lord the World (R.H. Benson, London, 1907) is, in all probability, the first great negative utopia or dystopia in the history of literature.
“The hymn of the New Fraternity contained verses with a skilful combination of feeling and emotions: Lord who inhabits land and seas… to exalt the humanitarian idea.
It gave off a certain religious air. In reality, if its content was not meditated upon, even a Christian could have intoned it without scruples of conscience. However, on reflection, its meaning was quite clear, because there God was being replaced by man as the recipient of worship… The text stated that the kingdom of God was found in the heart of man and charity was the greatest virtues.”
This is a war for souls, it is a totally supernatural battle.
For the fortunes of the Dukes of Marlborough it was a godsend.
Without that marriage, it would have been likely that Winston Churchill’s descendants would have inherited it, given he had nothing to do with the dukedom (his ‘father’ played around a lot and was infertile before he was married).
good grief really?
Thanks
Michael Hudson in his ‘Super Imperialism’ goes into great detail how financial interests in America, perhaps just following the logic of capitalism, suborned the Brits, the Europeans and then the global South under the control of US finance capitalism. Institutions like the World Bank, the IMF, and trade organizations reinforced this dominance. Thus, the Americans cut the legs out of the pound and directed trade from the Sterling Area to themselves and developed the global South to be exporters of commodities and importers of manufactures.
I have a question, how about Israel? because according to James Petras, Paul Craig Roberts, David Duke and other political writers, they claim that Israel exercises a lot of power within the US capitalist class.
PS: By the way USA and England are beautiful countries, but they would be better places to live in if they had humanists workers states, along of course with other european and countries of the world having also workers-states, because Ireally don’t believe in the socialism in one country theory. For workers states to work other countries would have to have humanists workers states
Saving countries from the oligarchic corrupt class is not that hard, it is simple. What exists in USA, UK and many other countries is dictatorship of the capitalist class, and the solution is dictatorships of the working class (an opposite dictatorship), but the majority of humans have too many mental viruses, too confused, too divided, and if humans were more rational and open minded, most people would support political parties that are in favor of dictatorships of the working class and poor peasants
My blog: It has all the basic works of marxists in PDF http://communist-books.blogspot.com