For all these years, I have read Dmitry, and generally do not disagree with him, but there was a piece of the pie, that distraced fom his credibility.
Now that piece fell into place.
Wanna guess which one it is?
The scary shit about all of this is not the crazies in the basement, but the crazies in the Fed & Wall Street, that made the financial reset(debt jubilee, look it up) by the way of war pretty much inevidable.
Might want to check out the endgame chapter in the learned elders of zion for quick reference.
The protocols of the elders of zion is an interesting case. If a forgery, it was written by people who had the zionists well figured out.
If genuine? Well …
Like many I’d once believed the official line that to treat the Protocols as anything other than a forgery was to align myself with anti-semitism, but events since 9/11 has disbursed me of any such illusion.
Are the protocols of the elders of zion on the net? A quick search and I did not see it. Wikipedia had a page saying it was a forgery but what wikipedia were saying it was about has happened.
they are all over the net in a dozen formats.
if you don’t see them easily (at least a couple top results by http://bfy.tw/6NDr ) that is because you are being censored (and that is scarier isn’t it? )
re:protocols, if they are fake, somehow they are suffering from the same effect as 1984 and brave new world, and someone is taking their pages as instruction manual, instead of fiction.
Peter Meyers’ “Protocols toolkit” is a must read for anyone interested in the Protocols. As far as the Protocols themselves, the financial plan is brilliant and deserves careful reading, especially for those looking to escape the choke-hold of the international bankers.
I see the Saker among the signatories, thanx for that.
Since I think the statement is correct, I must assume, it carries certain risks.
Ballsy move.
I have an idea.
Why not try to push this document viral and in addition to the authors, make an allowance for anyone around the world concerned to sign it online. I promise to do my best to bring it to the attention of my peers either way…
The US is without doubt the dumbest nation in human history. Yes, they are exceptional, exceptionally stupid. There will be NO limited exchange as the Russians will go all out. I don’t think the degenerates in Washington understand the Russian psychology.
What Obama is doing on Russia’s border looks ill advised, and we are shocked and surprised because we have not seen this before. At least we have not seen it in Europe.
There is a precedent however for what Obama is doing. The empire has been doing it for years on North Korea’s border.
Every year the Empire launches a mock invasion of the North and every year the North complains bitterly that the Empire is creating a dangerous situation.
It works well for the empire. They can use the response of the North, in the form of news broadcasts from the North, as evidence of the North’s belligerence.
By creating a state of constant tension the Empire can keep its Japanese and South Korean colonies on the reservation, keep troops based there, and sell them expensive weapons.
There is never a question of the colonies regaining their soverignty. The Empire is there to protect them.
If you go through old news reports, you will notice a pattern. Every time there is talk between the North and the South, every time there is a move to reproroachment there is an incident that derails reconciliation and puts everyone back on square one. Invariably it’s the fault of the North we are told.
The North Koreans are crazy you see. You just don’t know what they will do next.
In fact, the North is 100% predictable. They will always respond by taking things to the point of war.
Slap banking sanctions on them after concluding a nuclear deal. Fine, the North built and tested a bomb. Shell disputed waters against our protestations. Fine, we’ll shell your artillery base. The Empire knows how the North will react, and the North knows the Empire will not attack. The cost would be too high.
So they are locked, in this bizzare dance, and it works just fine for the Empire.
Why not use this model in Europe? I mean, the plan is to demonize and isolate Russia. By putting troops on the border and conducting highly aggressive war games the tension is raised to DMZ levels right?
It will work well for the Empire. The European colonies will stay on the reservation. They will buy loads of expensive weapons, and the threat from their crazy unpredictable neighbour can be used to terrify the local population in to never asking the question; What are the Americans doing here?
This is the future of Europe. There will be no war, just endless tension. A new Cold War forever.
C’mon man, our Nobel Lauriate wouldn’t do sucha thang.
You mean you really think the man has got anything to do with US foreign policy?
Day after the inaguration they sit him down in dark room and roll him a highdef version of the Zapruder video shot from multiple angles and give him the script he needs to memorize.
To me it’s clear there is a plan, though I also have my doubts about Obama being anything other than a prompter reader. But his mentor is Brezinski, and this is more like a Brezinski plan.
The Azion Empire’s geopolitical posture has been predictably consistent since the end of WWII, if not since the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, extended to the whole world when the conditions prevailing in 1945 permitted it.
Military alliances have traditionally been entered into for mutually protection against a perceived more powerful enemy. For instance, Carthage joined forces with Berbers, Iberians and Gaulish against the rising Roman Republic; the Grand Alliance stitched up by the Holy Roman Emperor Leopold I contained the German States, Austria, England, Spain, Portugal and Holland against Louis XIV of France; the Quadruple Alliance of Russia, Prussia, England and Austria was set up against Napoleon Bonaparte; and the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria and Italy was once again formed to counter France’s threat.
At the conclusion of WWII, the USA became the uncontested world power and the holder of the the atomic trump card, hence no other country or even group of countries were in a position to assail that dominance considering the destruction inflicted by the war on most of Europe, Soviet Union, Japan and China. Yet, it build a series of alliances, starting with Nato in 1948, Seato in 1954, etc. clearly for purposes other than its defence. No proof of this statement is required since its behaviour since then, and especially since the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, is irrefutable proof that the “alliances” were no more than fig leaves for occupation.
However, the fig leaves would easily drop off if there were no threats and, in their absence, they had to be invented: “the communist threat”, “the yellow peril”, “the domino effect” and so on. And to give more credence that the threat was real, countries had to be divided between opposing regimes to cement a permanent state of conflict requiring the “protection” of the US. Occasionally the populace in the occupied Europe and elsewhere had to be reminded too that the threat was real and Gladio made many demonstrations of Nato’s capacity to terrorize people to justify its existence – the same trick the mafia gangsters of New York or Chicago use to extort protection money from their victims.
The newest threat is “terrorism”, but because there was no terrorism to speak of, (apart from Gladio, but that was compromised when Andreotti went public about its activities) it had to be created from scratch by the CIA and maintained by a permanent state of war in the Middle East, a fertile ground for new recruits with a grudge against their creators and masters but unleashed on innocent people, thus justifying more war and bloodshed in a endless vicious circle of hate and violence.
The “opportunity window” is brief – and between the anointing of Ms H and the target date (may 2017) for attacks through Ukie and Estonia does not provide enough time to do the build-up. The attack therefore will be defeated on Russian terms and soil.
Then what? Double-down on violence or…be swept away…
At some point the US will have to change… This cannot be avoided.
1.No Patsies left alive: Oswald was able to blurt out, ” I’ve been set up”. Luckily for his his wife, she did not speak English and he told her nothing. Mateen’s current wife is under grand jury indictment and is being held incommunicado somewhere. No Life magazine interviews for her!
2. No loose ends. Seize all “inconvenient” videos or films as crucial to “national security”. Arrange for accidents for any credible eyewitnesses not killed at the scene.
3. Make sure your agents in local law enforcement later unobtrusively take jobs far, far away within a two year period in case of independent boards of inquiry being established. This, should happen only after defensive closing of the ranks in solidarity has occurred on a local level.
4. Accuse anyone questioning to key elements of the operation of being a “conspiracy theorist.” or a “sensationalist” trying to make a buck or sell newspapers”
Been a nbit tonight on rt watching the hawks all about ne book completely explaining re Martin Luther King assasination…….any one who challenges the state will be asassinated.
Please watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pe5vHV7Skpo This is how the Empire treats the Lakota. This is how the Empire deals with all who stand in its way. It has been going on for centuries.
“Today, June 21, in an interview with Sueddeutsche Zeitung NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has accused Russia of violating the provisions of the Founding Act on Cooperation and Security. In addition, he said that Russia is violating certain restrictions on the presence of the Russian military contingent provided for the act.
Stoltenberg said that the excessive strengthening of Russian weapons of NATO states recorded in Crimea, Kaliningrad, in the Baltic, Barents and Black Seas, as well as on the territory of the Eastern Mediterranean . Although, to report more detailed information secretary general of the Alliance but usually become.
He also said that Russia had violated the “fundamental principle of the act,” which is “respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries.”
Stoltenberg stressed that the strengthening of the military presence of the Alliance in the eastern borders is planned to prevent potential conflicts. NATO Secretary General said that the placement of the four thousand troops in Poland and the Baltic States will be implemented against the background of other events, but not isolated.
Recall that the “Founding Act Russia-NATO Council on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security” was signed in May 1997 in Paris . Based on the document, the Alliance confirmed not to deploy troops on a permanent basis along the Russian borders.”
guess what could be used to escalate cold war and claim false flags and false prpvocations
“A US Congress-proposed bill seeks to re-establish a Cold War-era body aimed at countering Russian espionage, amid tense relations between the two major world powers, BuzzFeed reported, citing a source in the US intelligence services.
MOSCOW (Sputnik) — In a press release last month, Senator Richard Burr’s press office said that the 2017 Intelligence Authorization Bill, which was passed by the Senate Intelligence Committee in May, “requires the President to establish an interagency committee to counter Russian active measures,” however no details on the requirements have been listed.
Since 2014, relations between Russia and the United States deteriorated. Washington and its allies have introduced several rounds of anti-Russia sanctions over the reunification of Crimea with Russia and Moscow’s alleged interference in the Ukrainian conflict.
MOSCOW, June 21. /TASS/. Russia’s State Duma will urge the parliamentary assemblies of NATO, OSCE and some national parliaments to intensify dialog over the US missile shield deployment in Eastern and Southeastern Europe, according to a draft resolution posted on the Duma’s electronic database on Tuesday.
“State Duma deputies are turning to their colleagues – parliamentarians of the member states of the OSCE, NATO, the people’s skupstina of the Republic of Serbia, the skupstina of Montenegro, the parliamentary assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the assembly of the Republic of Macedonia with a proposal to step up direct dialog as part of bilateral parliamentary contacts, and also in the Parliamentary Assembly of the OSCE over the deployment of US missile shield systems on the territories of East European countries and the policy of NATO expansion in Eastern and Southeastern Europe,” the draft document says.
According to the authors of the document – deputies of the State Duma Committee for International Affairs, this is “a dangerous line actually aimed at unleashing a new cold war rather than at defense.”
READ ALSO
US ambassador says missile defense in EU won’t undermine Russia’s strategic capabilities
Russia to take countermeasures against US missile defense in Romania – Putin
US facilities capable of intercepting Russian strategic missiles — envoy
Russia continues monitoring development of US missile defense system — diplomat
Kremlin considers “Russian threat” rhetoric NATO propaganda
According to the Russian lawmakers, such dialogue is geared to jointly assess possible impacts of such steps and elaborate proposals aimed at creating favorable conditions for relaxation of international tension. The lawmakers express “profound concern over the deployment in Europe, in particular in Poland and Romania, of U.S. missile defense systems which, as double use systems, can be used as offensive tools against Russia in a prompt global strike.”
“Despite the assertions of commitment to European security, these actions are turning entire regions in Europe’s east and southeast into hostages to such policy, exposing their territories to a retaliatory strike in case of an armed conflict,” the Russian lawmakers warn.
The Russian State Duma is seriously alarmed by “irresponsible actions and aggressive rhetoric of the leadership of the number of NATO countries and open attempts at dragging certain European states into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.” NATO’s recent decision to deploy its battalions in Poland and the Baltics States runs counter to the provisions of the Russian-NATO Founding Act of May 27, 1997, which has it that “in the current and foreseeable security environment, the Alliance will carry out its collective defense and other missions by ensuring the necessary interoperability, integration, and capability for reinforcement rather than by additional permanent stationing of substantial combat forces,” the document underscores.
Well one I read a while ago that our current civilisation or epoch is the seventh, as previous technological epochs were ended -exterminated by “powers”……..this might explain relics that we would understand now being found entombed in rocks up to several hundreds of milions years old……….for example
More like the best option for Americans is total annihilation of themselves.
That way, America’s mass murdering wars of aggression will be confined within the USA instead of plaguing the rest of the world with Americans’ bloodthirsty Crusades.
Tass anounced much closer co_operation as they both have a very similar understanding of international issues including Syria……..chinese army looking for some military experience perhaps should Assad invite them one wonders……?????
Rus foreign minisirty stresses it is looking for “consolidation of the broadest international support” in resisting international terrorism….and fighting against it..wherever it is………would this be dependant on UN definitions of international terrorist groups or a “broader” definition maybe of their own as UN seems incapable of following any other definition than that supplied or enforced onto UN by exceptionalist powers and tag along supporters??????
One day will Nato and Usa be capable of being designated as suporting international terrorism……Turkey certainly seems to be trying its hardest to include itself in this definition but not much if anything seems to be acknowleged about this except by Rus doing its bit in Syria. And recent action by rus airforce “upsetting” usa in southern Syria, a warning of what usa can face?
MOSCOW, June 23. / TASS /. Northern Europe does not need division lines or artificial fanning of tensions, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in a message of greeting to the international conference Historical Past and Outlook for the Future in Russia and the Nordic Countries. The text of the message is available on the Foreign Ministry’s website.
“Russia systematically works for preserving Northern Europe as a space of neighborliness, partnership and mutually beneficial cooperation,” Lavrov said. “We are certain that it is in our common interests to step up cooperation in overcoming various challenges with reliance on international law and the principle of equitable and indivisible security.”
“The region does not need division lines or artificial fanning of tensions,” he said.
“I expect that the conference will make a useful contribution to maintaining trust and mutual understanding between Russia and the Nordic countries and help enhance international humanitarian cooperation,” Lavrov said.
an attempt to cool down an increasingly ‘hot situation”??
MOSCOW, June 23. /TASS/. The Russian and Chinese foreign ministers will sign a declaration on increasing the role of international law, Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Thursday.
“As you know, the Russian president will pay a visit to China and the presidential administration has announced about this,” the diplomat said.
READ ALSO
Putin considers Russia-China interaction important factor of global stability
“During the forthcoming visit, the foreign ministers of both counties are planning to sign a declaration on increasing the role of international law,” she noted.
According to the diplomat, this document for the first time sets forth a common approach by both countries to a number of contemporary international problems.
“The declaration is aimed at stressing the significance attached by Russia and China to the most important principles and norms of international law amid increasing instability in many regions of the world,” Zakharova said.
“In our view, it is important that it sets forth the understanding shared by the two permanent members of the UN Security Council with regard to such topical components of international law as the principles of the sovereign equality of states, the non-use and the non-interference into internal affairs and the peaceful resolution of disputes,” the Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said.
On the invitation of China’s President Xi Jinping, Russian President Putin will pay an official visit to China on June 25.
———————————————–
Russian President Vladimir Putin urged all countries to unite for the struggle against international terrorism, having drawn a parallel with the rise of Nazis before World War II.
“What other lesson do we still need to learn (besides World War II) to cast aside outdated ideological differences and geopolitical games to unite in the fight against international terrorism?” Putin said speaking before State Duma deputies.
“The risk for this common threat to disseminate has been growing before our very eyes,” Putin said.
“We need to build a modern, non-aligned, equal for all states system of collective security,” he added.
“Russia is open to discuss this important issue and has repeatedly declared its readiness to engage in dialogue, but again, as it was on the eve of the Second World War, we do not see a positive response,” the president said.
On June 22, Russia marks the Day of Memory and Grief. The President of Russia and State Duma deputies honored the memory of those killed in the Great Patriotic War by having a moment of silence.
Russia prepares for defensive war
Print version
+ – Font Size
Meanwhile, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) has recently published a voluminous, 100-page report “Security Outlook 2018. Potential Risks and Threats.” About a third of the report is dedicated to Russia.
According to estimates of the Canadian intelligence, the Kremlin has not been modernizing its army for “hybrid warfare.” Russia prepares for a real (defensive) war, the report said.
The second conclusion says that the hopes for the pressure of sanctions have not justified themselves, as Putin’s team remains united and steadfast in its intentions.
Also read: Will there be war with Russia in 2016?
To which extent is the report objective? Why does the Canadian intelligence deviate from the official propaganda line of the West? Pravda.Ru asked these questions to former adviser to the UN Secretary General, member of the UN Committee on the Biological Weapons, military expert Igor Nikulin.
“The West has been trying to drive Russia into a corner, but we can not retreat farther. Russia is already staying in the corner, from which we want to get out. Our so-called Western partners leave us no other choice. They, of course, expect Russia’s complete capitulation as it was in 1991, but such a shame will not repeat in our history, I hope. We as a country and as a nation will cease to exist if we surrender to the “fifth column” and other lovers of Western values,” Igor Nikulin said in an interview with Pravda.Ru.
The fact that the CSIS did not base its report on statements from the “non-system opposition,” but preferred to expose more objective information that came contrary to the official line of the West, seems somewhat alarming. According to Igor Nikulin, the CSIS most likely “coordinates its conclusions with senior departments.”
“The government of Canada does not play any significant role in the Western alliance. Ottawa is a US and UK satellite that acts on orders from the curators,” the expert said in an interview with Pravda.Ru. Therefore, such a step taken by the Canadian intelligence most likely pursues some hidden agenda.
Russia has learned many lessons from the 1990s, when the country fully trusted its Western well-wishers, and would not make another mistake like that again.
Agreements with the West do not worth the paper
“Agreements with the West are not worth the paper on which they are written,” Igor Nikulin told Pravda.Ru. In conclusion, he quoted a phrase from Russian diplomat A.M. Gorchakov: “Russia is concentrating.”
Meanwhile, German Chancellor Merkel has recently publicly admitted that she regrets her mistakes. An increasing number of European politicians say that it is time to start establishing normal relations with Russia. Does this mean that the Old World may change its politics in relation to Russia? Pravda.Ru Inna Novikova talked about it to military expert and former head of Israeli intelligence service Nativ, Yakov Kedmi.
“If Merkel is the maximum of what today’s Germany can put on the political arena, then I feel sorry for Germany. It means that Germany deserves Mrs. Merkel, who will take the country to new failures and setbacks.
“Yet, the German economy is still strong enough to withstand even Frau Merkel, unlike the Russian economy that could not cope with Mr. Yeltsin. Russia was on the brink of extinction when Yeltsin ended his cadence.
Western sanctions against Russia to continue as long as Washinbton wants to
“Even a stronger and more developed state – the Soviet Union – had not been able to stand its president, Nobel Prize winner Mikhail Gorbachev. The Russian Empire could not stand its last emperor and his generals. Today’s Russia is a lot stronger, but I would not recommend testing the strength of power.”
“The French Senate has recently demanded anti-Russian sanctions should be abolished. Do you think it will have any consequences?”
“The presence, imposition or lifting of sanctions and their shape is not determined in Paris, Berlin or Rome – it is determined in Washington. It depends on what kind of power there will be in Washington and what policies it chooses to pursue. Europe has a very limited degree of independence at this point. European leaders, especially MPs, take certain decisions based on their personal political interests.
In a presidential republic, such as France, it is only the president who can change the French policy. In the United States, Senate or Congress may take any political decisions, but it is up to the US president to determine the policy of the country. One should not build illusions about a possible change in the political course of European countries.
“The reasons that made the Americans impose sanctions on Russia have not disappeared. The purpose of sanctions is to slow down the development of the Russian economy, so that Russia could not afford to maintain a reasonable standard of living of the population, the army. Remember when in the Soviet times the United States passed the Jackson-Vanik amendment that restricted economic relations with the state that prohibited free migration.
Interestingly, the Jackson-Vanik law was never used in relation to China. When the Americans raised the subject in the 1980s, the Chinese asked them how many millions of Chinese migrants the USA would be willing to welcome, and that was the end of the discussion.
The law was never applied to post-Soviet states either, but it was used against Russia, even though there were no restrictions for migration in Russia. This is a simple example of how sanctions serve one particular goal. The sanctions will remain in effect as long as the US policy aims to restrain the economic development of Russia or China. The USA will keep on looking for reasons and technologies to make its European allies support them.”
Pravda.Ru
– See more at: http://www.pravdareport.com/russia/politics/22-06-2016/134797-west_russia-0/#sthash.bWPartDO.dpuf
———————————————————————–
note the other day Rus was blamed/accused for breaking the founding agreement of I have forgotten what sorry…..NATO Russia Council????
———————————————————
extract from
“For Russia, the West is now a hypocrite by nature. It provoked the current debacle by its Kiev coup, and therefore its eternal preaching will inevitably fall on deft ears. Russia does not care what the West thinks about it, or whether a law was bended here or there, because the US broke the most sacred law, which is not to place fascists in power, especially considering the great sacrifice made by Russians during World War II. The massive bombardment of ethnic Russians is seen as a genocidal act, in the spirit of World War II fascists who waged a war against ethnic Russians.
Which side will win?
For the West, the war against Russia is a war in which it sees itself as superior and seeks to discipline the barbarian. It now does not need to deal with its own shortcomings, failures and neuroses, but has the role of the enlightened educator who will teach Russia to obey the law.
For Russia, this is a war to restore its basic dignity, and a war of survival, as its very heart was attacked due to the close proximity to its borders, and the symbolic role Kievan Rus plays in Russian memory. It will therefore stop at nothing in what it sees as self-defense.
Both sides will inflict heavy damage on each other, and to an intensifying degree each time.
However, in the long run, Russia will be the one who wins.
That is not only because historically, in every war where Russia fought for its survival (from Genghis Khan, to Napoleon, to Hitler), Russia won, but also since the pristine need to survive is more deeply rooted than the need to belittle and mock others in order to feel superior about oneself.
The West can find another target to attack after Russia proves that it is an undefeatable enemy. Or it can raise its hands in despair and mumble something about Russia being a barbarian who cannot be controlled and it therefore gives up (France and Germany have recently come to this conclusion, for the US and UK it may take longer).
But for Russia, basic decency is a value worth dying for, and some norms of human behavior must never be crossed in any circumstances. Therefore it will fight until the end and will do anything in its power to win.
For the West this is not a war on its survival. It is a war to teach Russia a lesson and to point to its own superiority.
For Russia, this is a war about protecting basic dignity and decency, a war on basic decency which must not be touched, since if one compromises on one’s honor, one has no right to continue to live.
Therefore Russia must win, and, if to judge by history, will win. But the price can be high.
Joshua Tartakovsky is an independent researcher and a graduate of Brown University and LSE. He is currently in Athens”
For all these years, I have read Dmitry, and generally do not disagree with him, but there was a piece of the pie, that distraced fom his credibility.
Now that piece fell into place.
Wanna guess which one it is?
The scary shit about all of this is not the crazies in the basement, but the crazies in the Fed & Wall Street, that made the financial reset(debt jubilee, look it up) by the way of war pretty much inevidable.
Might want to check out the endgame chapter in the learned elders of zion for quick reference.
The protocols of the elders of zion is an interesting case. If a forgery, it was written by people who had the zionists well figured out.
If genuine? Well …
Like many I’d once believed the official line that to treat the Protocols as anything other than a forgery was to align myself with anti-semitism, but events since 9/11 has disbursed me of any such illusion.
Are the protocols of the elders of zion on the net? A quick search and I did not see it. Wikipedia had a page saying it was a forgery but what wikipedia were saying it was about has happened.
At your service:
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-references-protocols-full-text-folder.html
they are all over the net in a dozen formats.
if you don’t see them easily (at least a couple top results by http://bfy.tw/6NDr ) that is because you are being censored (and that is scarier isn’t it? )
re:protocols, if they are fake, somehow they are suffering from the same effect as 1984 and brave new world, and someone is taking their pages as instruction manual, instead of fiction.
Peter Meyers’ “Protocols toolkit” is a must read for anyone interested in the Protocols. As far as the Protocols themselves, the financial plan is brilliant and deserves careful reading, especially for those looking to escape the choke-hold of the international bankers.
I see the Saker among the signatories, thanx for that.
Since I think the statement is correct, I must assume, it carries certain risks.
Ballsy move.
I have an idea.
Why not try to push this document viral and in addition to the authors, make an allowance for anyone around the world concerned to sign it online. I promise to do my best to bring it to the attention of my peers either way…
Thanx
The letter at ClubOrlov (I prefer to read as I cannot hear too well)
http://cluborlov.blogspot.com.au/2016/05/a-russian-warning.html
The US is without doubt the dumbest nation in human history. Yes, they are exceptional, exceptionally stupid. There will be NO limited exchange as the Russians will go all out. I don’t think the degenerates in Washington understand the Russian psychology.
What Obama is doing on Russia’s border looks ill advised, and we are shocked and surprised because we have not seen this before. At least we have not seen it in Europe.
There is a precedent however for what Obama is doing. The empire has been doing it for years on North Korea’s border.
Every year the Empire launches a mock invasion of the North and every year the North complains bitterly that the Empire is creating a dangerous situation.
It works well for the empire. They can use the response of the North, in the form of news broadcasts from the North, as evidence of the North’s belligerence.
By creating a state of constant tension the Empire can keep its Japanese and South Korean colonies on the reservation, keep troops based there, and sell them expensive weapons.
There is never a question of the colonies regaining their soverignty. The Empire is there to protect them.
If you go through old news reports, you will notice a pattern. Every time there is talk between the North and the South, every time there is a move to reproroachment there is an incident that derails reconciliation and puts everyone back on square one. Invariably it’s the fault of the North we are told.
The North Koreans are crazy you see. You just don’t know what they will do next.
In fact, the North is 100% predictable. They will always respond by taking things to the point of war.
Slap banking sanctions on them after concluding a nuclear deal. Fine, the North built and tested a bomb. Shell disputed waters against our protestations. Fine, we’ll shell your artillery base. The Empire knows how the North will react, and the North knows the Empire will not attack. The cost would be too high.
So they are locked, in this bizzare dance, and it works just fine for the Empire.
Why not use this model in Europe? I mean, the plan is to demonize and isolate Russia. By putting troops on the border and conducting highly aggressive war games the tension is raised to DMZ levels right?
It will work well for the Empire. The European colonies will stay on the reservation. They will buy loads of expensive weapons, and the threat from their crazy unpredictable neighbour can be used to terrify the local population in to never asking the question; What are the Americans doing here?
This is the future of Europe. There will be no war, just endless tension. A new Cold War forever.
Here is the strategy in detail:
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-quiet-grand-strategy-of-barack-obama/
C’mon man, our Nobel Lauriate wouldn’t do sucha thang.
You mean you really think the man has got anything to do with US foreign policy?
Day after the inaguration they sit him down in dark room and roll him a highdef version of the Zapruder video shot from multiple angles and give him the script he needs to memorize.
That simple.
To me it’s clear there is a plan, though I also have my doubts about Obama being anything other than a prompter reader. But his mentor is Brezinski, and this is more like a Brezinski plan.
@ Secret Agent
My question is: What’s new?
The Azion Empire’s geopolitical posture has been predictably consistent since the end of WWII, if not since the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, extended to the whole world when the conditions prevailing in 1945 permitted it.
Military alliances have traditionally been entered into for mutually protection against a perceived more powerful enemy. For instance, Carthage joined forces with Berbers, Iberians and Gaulish against the rising Roman Republic; the Grand Alliance stitched up by the Holy Roman Emperor Leopold I contained the German States, Austria, England, Spain, Portugal and Holland against Louis XIV of France; the Quadruple Alliance of Russia, Prussia, England and Austria was set up against Napoleon Bonaparte; and the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria and Italy was once again formed to counter France’s threat.
At the conclusion of WWII, the USA became the uncontested world power and the holder of the the atomic trump card, hence no other country or even group of countries were in a position to assail that dominance considering the destruction inflicted by the war on most of Europe, Soviet Union, Japan and China. Yet, it build a series of alliances, starting with Nato in 1948, Seato in 1954, etc. clearly for purposes other than its defence. No proof of this statement is required since its behaviour since then, and especially since the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, is irrefutable proof that the “alliances” were no more than fig leaves for occupation.
However, the fig leaves would easily drop off if there were no threats and, in their absence, they had to be invented: “the communist threat”, “the yellow peril”, “the domino effect” and so on. And to give more credence that the threat was real, countries had to be divided between opposing regimes to cement a permanent state of conflict requiring the “protection” of the US. Occasionally the populace in the occupied Europe and elsewhere had to be reminded too that the threat was real and Gladio made many demonstrations of Nato’s capacity to terrorize people to justify its existence – the same trick the mafia gangsters of New York or Chicago use to extort protection money from their victims.
The newest threat is “terrorism”, but because there was no terrorism to speak of, (apart from Gladio, but that was compromised when Andreotti went public about its activities) it had to be created from scratch by the CIA and maintained by a permanent state of war in the Middle East, a fertile ground for new recruits with a grudge against their creators and masters but unleashed on innocent people, thus justifying more war and bloodshed in a endless vicious circle of hate and violence.
This is US foreign policy.
Kim
The “opportunity window” is brief – and between the anointing of Ms H and the target date (may 2017) for attacks through Ukie and Estonia does not provide enough time to do the build-up. The attack therefore will be defeated on Russian terms and soil.
Then what? Double-down on violence or…be swept away…
At some point the US will have to change… This cannot be avoided.
May 2017? why May 2017?
Another hack from Operation Gaslight
Staged events: Cardinal Rules
1.No Patsies left alive: Oswald was able to blurt out, ” I’ve been set up”. Luckily for his his wife, she did not speak English and he told her nothing. Mateen’s current wife is under grand jury indictment and is being held incommunicado somewhere. No Life magazine interviews for her!
2. No loose ends. Seize all “inconvenient” videos or films as crucial to “national security”. Arrange for accidents for any credible eyewitnesses not killed at the scene.
3. Make sure your agents in local law enforcement later unobtrusively take jobs far, far away within a two year period in case of independent boards of inquiry being established. This, should happen only after defensive closing of the ranks in solidarity has occurred on a local level.
4. Accuse anyone questioning to key elements of the operation of being a “conspiracy theorist.” or a “sensationalist” trying to make a buck or sell newspapers”
Speaking of loose end tidying up, Check this out:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-21/loretta-lynch-admits-federal-authorities-have-lost-orlando-shooters-wife
Been a nbit tonight on rt watching the hawks all about ne book completely explaining re Martin Luther King assasination…….any one who challenges the state will be asassinated.
Maybe, just maybe, the debate will begin in the US over the foggy heads residing at foggy bottom.
http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/trolling-war-russia/ri15093
Please watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pe5vHV7Skpo This is how the Empire treats the Lakota. This is how the Empire deals with all who stand in its way. It has been going on for centuries.
“Israel needs a new friend, and that friend is Russia” (approx.. 20 minute mark)
My thoughts, Oh NOoooooooo!
Israel needs a new friend as the tapeworm needs a new host…
“Today, June 21, in an interview with Sueddeutsche Zeitung NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has accused Russia of violating the provisions of the Founding Act on Cooperation and Security. In addition, he said that Russia is violating certain restrictions on the presence of the Russian military contingent provided for the act.
Stoltenberg said that the excessive strengthening of Russian weapons of NATO states recorded in Crimea, Kaliningrad, in the Baltic, Barents and Black Seas, as well as on the territory of the Eastern Mediterranean . Although, to report more detailed information secretary general of the Alliance but usually become.
He also said that Russia had violated the “fundamental principle of the act,” which is “respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries.”
Stoltenberg stressed that the strengthening of the military presence of the Alliance in the eastern borders is planned to prevent potential conflicts. NATO Secretary General said that the placement of the four thousand troops in Poland and the Baltic States will be implemented against the background of other events, but not isolated.
Recall that the “Founding Act Russia-NATO Council on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security” was signed in May 1997 in Paris . Based on the document, the Alliance confirmed not to deploy troops on a permanent basis along the Russian borders.”
http://www.anna-news.info/node/59635
guess what could be used to escalate cold war and claim false flags and false prpvocations
“A US Congress-proposed bill seeks to re-establish a Cold War-era body aimed at countering Russian espionage, amid tense relations between the two major world powers, BuzzFeed reported, citing a source in the US intelligence services.
MOSCOW (Sputnik) — In a press release last month, Senator Richard Burr’s press office said that the 2017 Intelligence Authorization Bill, which was passed by the Senate Intelligence Committee in May, “requires the President to establish an interagency committee to counter Russian active measures,” however no details on the requirements have been listed.
US Air Force shows an RC-135 surveillance aircraft
© AFP 2016/ USAF/GREG DAVIS
US Intelligence at Russia’s Northern Doorstep: Surveillance Intensifies on All of Russia’s Borders
According to the BuzzFeed news outlet, the intelligence bill calls to revive the Cold War-era presidentially-appointed group to counter “Russian spies and Russian-sponsored assassinations” in the United States. The group would have to also investigate the funding of Russian “covert broadcasting, media manipulation” and secret funding.
The bill, among other measures, calls to tighten how Russian diplomats can travel within the United States without official notifications to US authorities, limiting it to a 50-mile perimeter around the embassy. All movement outside that perimeter would have to be investigated by the security services, the media outlet reported.
The bill now must be passed by the Senate.
Since 2014, relations between Russia and the United States deteriorated. Washington and its allies have introduced several rounds of anti-Russia sanctions over the reunification of Crimea with Russia and Moscow’s alleged interference in the Ukrainian conflict.
Russia has repeatedly refuted the allegations, warning that the Western sanctions are counterproductive and undermine global stability.”
http://sputniknews.com/military/20160622/1041719177/congress-russia-spy-committee.html
—————————————————————————-
MOSCOW, June 21. /TASS/. Russia’s State Duma will urge the parliamentary assemblies of NATO, OSCE and some national parliaments to intensify dialog over the US missile shield deployment in Eastern and Southeastern Europe, according to a draft resolution posted on the Duma’s electronic database on Tuesday.
“State Duma deputies are turning to their colleagues – parliamentarians of the member states of the OSCE, NATO, the people’s skupstina of the Republic of Serbia, the skupstina of Montenegro, the parliamentary assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the assembly of the Republic of Macedonia with a proposal to step up direct dialog as part of bilateral parliamentary contacts, and also in the Parliamentary Assembly of the OSCE over the deployment of US missile shield systems on the territories of East European countries and the policy of NATO expansion in Eastern and Southeastern Europe,” the draft document says.
According to the authors of the document – deputies of the State Duma Committee for International Affairs, this is “a dangerous line actually aimed at unleashing a new cold war rather than at defense.”
READ ALSO
US ambassador says missile defense in EU won’t undermine Russia’s strategic capabilities
Russia to take countermeasures against US missile defense in Romania – Putin
US facilities capable of intercepting Russian strategic missiles — envoy
Russia continues monitoring development of US missile defense system — diplomat
Kremlin considers “Russian threat” rhetoric NATO propaganda
According to the Russian lawmakers, such dialogue is geared to jointly assess possible impacts of such steps and elaborate proposals aimed at creating favorable conditions for relaxation of international tension. The lawmakers express “profound concern over the deployment in Europe, in particular in Poland and Romania, of U.S. missile defense systems which, as double use systems, can be used as offensive tools against Russia in a prompt global strike.”
“Despite the assertions of commitment to European security, these actions are turning entire regions in Europe’s east and southeast into hostages to such policy, exposing their territories to a retaliatory strike in case of an armed conflict,” the Russian lawmakers warn.
The Russian State Duma is seriously alarmed by “irresponsible actions and aggressive rhetoric of the leadership of the number of NATO countries and open attempts at dragging certain European states into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.” NATO’s recent decision to deploy its battalions in Poland and the Baltics States runs counter to the provisions of the Russian-NATO Founding Act of May 27, 1997, which has it that “in the current and foreseeable security environment, the Alliance will carry out its collective defense and other missions by ensuring the necessary interoperability, integration, and capability for reinforcement rather than by additional permanent stationing of substantial combat forces,” the document underscores.
More:
http://tass.ru/en/politics/883791
—————————————————–
The best option for mankind is total annihilation of themselves.
One should ask why Atlantis got submerged ?
Well one I read a while ago that our current civilisation or epoch is the seventh, as previous technological epochs were ended -exterminated by “powers”……..this might explain relics that we would understand now being found entombed in rocks up to several hundreds of milions years old……….for example
More like the best option for Americans is total annihilation of themselves.
That way, America’s mass murdering wars of aggression will be confined within the USA instead of plaguing the rest of the world with Americans’ bloodthirsty Crusades.
game changer anybody? Putin is fed up…so am I
https://www.rt.com/news/347709-putin-nato-russia-security/
Wel I would look forward to a sitrep from Martin as to what Rus options could possibly be……..and what may be…………
!!!!!!!!!!
Tass anounced much closer co_operation as they both have a very similar understanding of international issues including Syria……..chinese army looking for some military experience perhaps should Assad invite them one wonders……?????
Especially as usa suporting uighurs for example……
Rus foreign minisirty stresses it is looking for “consolidation of the broadest international support” in resisting international terrorism….and fighting against it..wherever it is………would this be dependant on UN definitions of international terrorist groups or a “broader” definition maybe of their own as UN seems incapable of following any other definition than that supplied or enforced onto UN by exceptionalist powers and tag along supporters??????
One day will Nato and Usa be capable of being designated as suporting international terrorism……Turkey certainly seems to be trying its hardest to include itself in this definition but not much if anything seems to be acknowleged about this except by Rus doing its bit in Syria. And recent action by rus airforce “upsetting” usa in southern Syria, a warning of what usa can face?
MOSCOW, June 23. / TASS /. Northern Europe does not need division lines or artificial fanning of tensions, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in a message of greeting to the international conference Historical Past and Outlook for the Future in Russia and the Nordic Countries. The text of the message is available on the Foreign Ministry’s website.
“Russia systematically works for preserving Northern Europe as a space of neighborliness, partnership and mutually beneficial cooperation,” Lavrov said. “We are certain that it is in our common interests to step up cooperation in overcoming various challenges with reliance on international law and the principle of equitable and indivisible security.”
“The region does not need division lines or artificial fanning of tensions,” he said.
“I expect that the conference will make a useful contribution to maintaining trust and mutual understanding between Russia and the Nordic countries and help enhance international humanitarian cooperation,” Lavrov said.
More:
http://tass.ru/en/politics/884143
bit over optimistic?
Sleepwalking? More like a rocket sled.
Ironically it’s red diaper babies of USSR residing in Washing DC that are leading the warmongering against Capitalist Russia.
Have you followed the career and family history Jamie Gorelick?
I wonder how many blood relatives she had/has on the Central Committee?
an attempt to cool down an increasingly ‘hot situation”??
MOSCOW, June 23. /TASS/. The Russian and Chinese foreign ministers will sign a declaration on increasing the role of international law, Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Thursday.
“As you know, the Russian president will pay a visit to China and the presidential administration has announced about this,” the diplomat said.
READ ALSO
Putin considers Russia-China interaction important factor of global stability
“During the forthcoming visit, the foreign ministers of both counties are planning to sign a declaration on increasing the role of international law,” she noted.
According to the diplomat, this document for the first time sets forth a common approach by both countries to a number of contemporary international problems.
“The declaration is aimed at stressing the significance attached by Russia and China to the most important principles and norms of international law amid increasing instability in many regions of the world,” Zakharova said.
“In our view, it is important that it sets forth the understanding shared by the two permanent members of the UN Security Council with regard to such topical components of international law as the principles of the sovereign equality of states, the non-use and the non-interference into internal affairs and the peaceful resolution of disputes,” the Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said.
On the invitation of China’s President Xi Jinping, Russian President Putin will pay an official visit to China on June 25.
More:
http://tass.ru/en/politics/884227
—————————————
eg
If Washington really decides to break the existing agreements, Moscow will “respond in a similar manner”
Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova
Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova© Sergey Savostyanov/TASS
READ ALSO
US Capitol building
US Senate suggests reinstating committee to catch Russian spies — media
MOSCOW, June 23. /TASS/. Russian diplomats working in the United States constantly become objects of provocations by the American secret services, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Thursday.
“We have taken note of the media reports suggesting that the US Congress is working out a bill for stepping up surveillance over Russian diplomats and restricting their movement in the US territory,” she said. “We have recently felt a significant increase in pressure on the Russian embassy and consulates general of our country in the United States.”
According to Zakharova, staff members of Russia’s consulate missions abroad “regularly become the objects of provocations by the American secret services, face obstacles in making official contacts and other restrictions.” “There have been very many such cases,” the official added. “We don’t speak of them publicly, but regularly notify the American side of our concerns.”
“The US authorities have taken a course towards tightening of the notification regime that has existed for decades for the trips of Russian junior and medium-level diplomatic staff 25 miles (40 km) away from the center of the city, in which the relevant representative office is located,” the spokeswoman said.
“If Washington really decides to break the existing agreements, we will, of course, respond in a similar manner and introduce analogous restrictions for American diplomats in Russia,” she said. “It’s not our choice.”
More:
http://tass.ru/en/politics/884219
———————————————–
Russian President Vladimir Putin urged all countries to unite for the struggle against international terrorism, having drawn a parallel with the rise of Nazis before World War II.
“What other lesson do we still need to learn (besides World War II) to cast aside outdated ideological differences and geopolitical games to unite in the fight against international terrorism?” Putin said speaking before State Duma deputies.
“The risk for this common threat to disseminate has been growing before our very eyes,” Putin said.
“We need to build a modern, non-aligned, equal for all states system of collective security,” he added.
“Russia is open to discuss this important issue and has repeatedly declared its readiness to engage in dialogue, but again, as it was on the eve of the Second World War, we do not see a positive response,” the president said.
On June 22, Russia marks the Day of Memory and Grief. The President of Russia and State Duma deputies honored the memory of those killed in the Great Patriotic War by having a moment of silence.
Russia prepares for defensive war
Print version
+ – Font Size
Meanwhile, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) has recently published a voluminous, 100-page report “Security Outlook 2018. Potential Risks and Threats.” About a third of the report is dedicated to Russia.
According to estimates of the Canadian intelligence, the Kremlin has not been modernizing its army for “hybrid warfare.” Russia prepares for a real (defensive) war, the report said.
The second conclusion says that the hopes for the pressure of sanctions have not justified themselves, as Putin’s team remains united and steadfast in its intentions.
Also read: Will there be war with Russia in 2016?
To which extent is the report objective? Why does the Canadian intelligence deviate from the official propaganda line of the West? Pravda.Ru asked these questions to former adviser to the UN Secretary General, member of the UN Committee on the Biological Weapons, military expert Igor Nikulin.
“The West has been trying to drive Russia into a corner, but we can not retreat farther. Russia is already staying in the corner, from which we want to get out. Our so-called Western partners leave us no other choice. They, of course, expect Russia’s complete capitulation as it was in 1991, but such a shame will not repeat in our history, I hope. We as a country and as a nation will cease to exist if we surrender to the “fifth column” and other lovers of Western values,” Igor Nikulin said in an interview with Pravda.Ru.
The fact that the CSIS did not base its report on statements from the “non-system opposition,” but preferred to expose more objective information that came contrary to the official line of the West, seems somewhat alarming. According to Igor Nikulin, the CSIS most likely “coordinates its conclusions with senior departments.”
“The government of Canada does not play any significant role in the Western alliance. Ottawa is a US and UK satellite that acts on orders from the curators,” the expert said in an interview with Pravda.Ru. Therefore, such a step taken by the Canadian intelligence most likely pursues some hidden agenda.
Russia has learned many lessons from the 1990s, when the country fully trusted its Western well-wishers, and would not make another mistake like that again.
Agreements with the West do not worth the paper
“Agreements with the West are not worth the paper on which they are written,” Igor Nikulin told Pravda.Ru. In conclusion, he quoted a phrase from Russian diplomat A.M. Gorchakov: “Russia is concentrating.”
Meanwhile, German Chancellor Merkel has recently publicly admitted that she regrets her mistakes. An increasing number of European politicians say that it is time to start establishing normal relations with Russia. Does this mean that the Old World may change its politics in relation to Russia? Pravda.Ru Inna Novikova talked about it to military expert and former head of Israeli intelligence service Nativ, Yakov Kedmi.
“If Merkel is the maximum of what today’s Germany can put on the political arena, then I feel sorry for Germany. It means that Germany deserves Mrs. Merkel, who will take the country to new failures and setbacks.
“Yet, the German economy is still strong enough to withstand even Frau Merkel, unlike the Russian economy that could not cope with Mr. Yeltsin. Russia was on the brink of extinction when Yeltsin ended his cadence.
Western sanctions against Russia to continue as long as Washinbton wants to
“Even a stronger and more developed state – the Soviet Union – had not been able to stand its president, Nobel Prize winner Mikhail Gorbachev. The Russian Empire could not stand its last emperor and his generals. Today’s Russia is a lot stronger, but I would not recommend testing the strength of power.”
“The French Senate has recently demanded anti-Russian sanctions should be abolished. Do you think it will have any consequences?”
“The presence, imposition or lifting of sanctions and their shape is not determined in Paris, Berlin or Rome – it is determined in Washington. It depends on what kind of power there will be in Washington and what policies it chooses to pursue. Europe has a very limited degree of independence at this point. European leaders, especially MPs, take certain decisions based on their personal political interests.
In a presidential republic, such as France, it is only the president who can change the French policy. In the United States, Senate or Congress may take any political decisions, but it is up to the US president to determine the policy of the country. One should not build illusions about a possible change in the political course of European countries.
“The reasons that made the Americans impose sanctions on Russia have not disappeared. The purpose of sanctions is to slow down the development of the Russian economy, so that Russia could not afford to maintain a reasonable standard of living of the population, the army. Remember when in the Soviet times the United States passed the Jackson-Vanik amendment that restricted economic relations with the state that prohibited free migration.
Interestingly, the Jackson-Vanik law was never used in relation to China. When the Americans raised the subject in the 1980s, the Chinese asked them how many millions of Chinese migrants the USA would be willing to welcome, and that was the end of the discussion.
The law was never applied to post-Soviet states either, but it was used against Russia, even though there were no restrictions for migration in Russia. This is a simple example of how sanctions serve one particular goal. The sanctions will remain in effect as long as the US policy aims to restrain the economic development of Russia or China. The USA will keep on looking for reasons and technologies to make its European allies support them.”
Pravda.Ru
– See more at: http://www.pravdareport.com/russia/politics/22-06-2016/134797-west_russia-0/#sthash.bWPartDO.dpuf
———————————————————————–
note the other day Rus was blamed/accused for breaking the founding agreement of I have forgotten what sorry…..NATO Russia Council????
———————————————————
extract from
“For Russia, the West is now a hypocrite by nature. It provoked the current debacle by its Kiev coup, and therefore its eternal preaching will inevitably fall on deft ears. Russia does not care what the West thinks about it, or whether a law was bended here or there, because the US broke the most sacred law, which is not to place fascists in power, especially considering the great sacrifice made by Russians during World War II. The massive bombardment of ethnic Russians is seen as a genocidal act, in the spirit of World War II fascists who waged a war against ethnic Russians.
Which side will win?
For the West, the war against Russia is a war in which it sees itself as superior and seeks to discipline the barbarian. It now does not need to deal with its own shortcomings, failures and neuroses, but has the role of the enlightened educator who will teach Russia to obey the law.
For Russia, this is a war to restore its basic dignity, and a war of survival, as its very heart was attacked due to the close proximity to its borders, and the symbolic role Kievan Rus plays in Russian memory. It will therefore stop at nothing in what it sees as self-defense.
Both sides will inflict heavy damage on each other, and to an intensifying degree each time.
However, in the long run, Russia will be the one who wins.
That is not only because historically, in every war where Russia fought for its survival (from Genghis Khan, to Napoleon, to Hitler), Russia won, but also since the pristine need to survive is more deeply rooted than the need to belittle and mock others in order to feel superior about oneself.
The West can find another target to attack after Russia proves that it is an undefeatable enemy. Or it can raise its hands in despair and mumble something about Russia being a barbarian who cannot be controlled and it therefore gives up (France and Germany have recently come to this conclusion, for the US and UK it may take longer).
But for Russia, basic decency is a value worth dying for, and some norms of human behavior must never be crossed in any circumstances. Therefore it will fight until the end and will do anything in its power to win.
For the West this is not a war on its survival. It is a war to teach Russia a lesson and to point to its own superiority.
For Russia, this is a war about protecting basic dignity and decency, a war on basic decency which must not be touched, since if one compromises on one’s honor, one has no right to continue to live.
Therefore Russia must win, and, if to judge by history, will win. But the price can be high.
Joshua Tartakovsky is an independent researcher and a graduate of Brown University and LSE. He is currently in Athens”
http://www.fort-russ.com/2015/02/by-joshua-tartakovsky-battle-of-wills.html
old article but relevant
———————————————————–