This article was written for the Unz Review: http://www.unz.com/tsaker/trumps-inaugural-speech-promises-hopes-and-opportunities/
Just hours ago Donald Trump was finally sworn in as the President of the United States. Considering all the threats hanging over this event, this is good news because at least for the time being, the Neocons have lost their control over the Executive Branch and Trump is now finally in a position to take action. The other good news is Trump’s inauguration speech which included this historical promise “We do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone, but rather to let it shine as an example for everyone to follow”. Could that really mean that the USA has given up its role of World Hegemon? The mere fact of asking the question is already an immensely positive development as nobody would have asked it had Hillary Clinton been elected.
The other interesting feature of Trump’s speech is that it centered heavily on people power and on social justice. Again, the contrast with the ideological garbage from Clinton could not be greater. Still, this begs a much more puzzling question: how much can a multi-millionaire capitalist be trusted when he speaks of people power and social justice – not exactly what capitalists are known for, at least not amongst educated people. Furthermore, a Marxist reader would also remind us that “imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism” and that it makes no sense to expect a capitalist to suddenly renounce imperialism.
But what was generally true in 1916 is not necessarily true in 2017.
For one thing, let’s begin by stressing that the Trump Presidency was only made possible by the immense financial, economic, political, military and social crisis facing the USA today. Eight years of Clinton, followed by eight years of Bush Jr and eight years of Obama have seen a massive and full-spectrum decline in the strength of the United States which were sacrificed for the sake of the AngloZionist Empire. This crisis is as much internal as it is external and the election of Trump is a direct consequence of this crisis. In fact, Trump is the first one to admit that it is the terrible situation in which the USA find themselves today which brought him to power with a mandate of the regular American people (Hillary’s “deplorables”) to “drain the DC swamp” and “make America”, as opposed to the American plutocracy, “great again”. This might be somethhing crucial: I cannot imagine Trump trying to simply do “more of the same” like his predecessors did or trying to blindly double-down like the Neocons always try to.
I am willing to bet that Trump really and sincerely believes that the USA is in a deep crisis and that a new, different, sets of policies must be urgently implemented. If that assumption of mine proves to be correct, then this is by definition very good news for the entire planet because whatever Trump ends up doing (or not doing), he will at least not push his country into a nuclear confrontation with Russia. And yes, I think that it is possible that Trump has come to the conclusion that imperialism has stopped working for the USA, that far from being the solution to the contradictions of capitalism, imperialism might well have become its most self-defeating feature.
Is it possible for an ideological system to dump one of its core component after learning from past mistakes? I think it is, and a good example of that is 21st Century Socialism, which has completely dumped the kind of militant atheism which was so central to the 20th century Socialist movement. In fact, modern 21st Century Socialism is very pro-Christian. Could 21st century capitalism dump imperialism? Maybe.
Furthermore, Trump inaugurational speech did, according to RT commentators, sound in many aspects like the kind of speech Bernie Sanders could have made. And I think that they are right. Trump did sound like a paleo-liberal, something which we did not hear from him during the campaign. You could also say that Trump sounded very much like Putin. The question is will he now also act like Putin too?
There will be a great deal of expectations in Russia about how Trump will go about fulfilling his campaign promises to deal with other countries. Today, when Trump pronounced the followings words “We will seek friendship and goodwill with the nations of the world – but we do so with the understanding that it is the right of all nations to put their own interests first” he told the Russians exactly what they wanted to hear: Trump does not pretend to be a “friend” of Russia and Trump openly and unapologetically promises to care about his own people first, and that is exactly what Putin has been saying and doing since he came to power in Russia: caring for the Russian people first. After all, caring for your own first hardly implies being hostile or even indifferent to others. All it means is that your loyalty and your service is first and foremost to those who elected you to office. This refreshing patriotic honesty, combined with the prospect of friendship and goodwill will sound like music to the Russian ears.
Then there are Trump’s words about “forming new alliances” and uniting “the civilized world against Radical Islamic Terrorism, which we will eradicate completely from the face of the Earth”. They will also be received with a great deal of hope by the Russian people. If the USA is finally serious about fighting terrorism and if they really wants to eradicate the likes of Daesh, then Russia will offer her full support to this effort, including her military, intelligence, police and diplomatic resources. After all, Russia has been advocating for “completely eradicating Radical Islamic Terrorism from the face of the Earth” for decades.
There is no doubt in my mind at all that an alliance between Russia and the USA, even if limited only to specific areas of converging or mutual interests, would be immensely beneficial for the entire planet, and not for just these two countries: right now all the worst international crises are a direct result from the “tepid war” the USA and Russia have been waging against each other. And just like any other war, this war has been a fantastic waste of resources. Of course, this war was started by the USA and it was maintained and fed by the Neocon’s messianic ideology. Now that a realist like Trump has come to power, we can finally hope for this dangerous and wasteful dynamic to be stopped.
The good news is that neither Trump nor Putin can afford to fail. Trump, because he has made an alliance with Russia the cornerstone of his foreign policy during his campaign, and Putin because he realizes that it is in the objective interests of Russia for Trump to succeed, lest the Neocon crazies crawl back out from their basement. So both sides will enter into negotiations with a strong desire to get things done and a willingness to make compromises as long as they do not affect crucial national security objectives. I think that the number of issues on which the USA and Russia can agree upon is much, much longer than the number of issues where irreconcilable differences remain.
So yes, today I am hopeful. More than anything else, I want to hope that Trump is “for real”, and that he will have the wisdom and courage to take strong action against his internal enemies. Because from now on, this is one other thing which Putin and Trump will have in common: their internal enemies are far more dangerous than any external foe. When I see rabid maniacs like David Horowitz declaring himself a supporter of Donald Trump, I get very, very concerned and I ask myself “what does Horowitz know which I am missing?”. What is certain is that in the near future one of us will soon become very disappointed. I just hope that this shall not be me.
The Saker
With americans as friends…
CIA planned to hand Falklands to Argentina & airlift islanders to Scotland
https://www.rt.com/uk/374399-cia-argentina-falklands-war/
“Secret CIA documents show the US had plans to either give the Falkland Islands to Argentina and repatriate the islanders to Scotland or allow them become Argentine citizens because the spy agency thought the UK would lose the 1982 war.”
That was one of those wars where both sides stoked it to reinvigorate failing criminal regimes. The pindos, meanwhile, played both sides, since both were essentially their colonies.
Your comment about educated people knowing that social justice and capitalism does not go hand in hand certainly is correct, everyone educated in USA hate Trump and all the uneducated loves Trump.. Could it be that educated it just another word for brainwashed globalist moron? And uneducated is just another word for average worker?
I guess a human needs a lot of “education” to be able to grasp the glories of your Marxist system.
Supposedly the only “education” required to grasp it is to live the capitalist system. Some people do enjoy, for a sufficient amount of time, the privilege to objectify their experience and validate/falsify some theories setting aside prevailing prejudice. Nevermind proposed solutions and, depending on how much they want to stake it, convince others of its perceived merits.
The irony is: the more you objectify the capitalist experiment handier become the means to reinforce it, and most importantly, at its own expense.
Fighting terrorism would be easy for the US: stop supporting it and stop supporting the other countries who support it (including Saudi, Qatar, and Israel). And stop trying to take over and control other countries. Then nations which are bothered by it could deal with it effectively. The US itself can stop being the biggest terrorist nation in the world, with virtually all major terrorism able to be traced back to the US.
@ blue:
Can’t agree more, well… with everything you’ve said :)
Let’s hope Trump look at the numbers and he says: “why are we paying this much money to arm ISIS and other various terrorists groups?!?!!” – answer: “hmm… errrr… errr”
Trouble is… that a lot of that funding is done via the infamous CIA “black budgets,” which, according to insiders tend to top anything the US Military spends (can you believe it?), and I’m not even sure if the executive has access to those “black-budget” records, to be perfectly honest with you. So hence; even the smartest of people – to quote Uncle Bob “on our side,” don’t really realize what an up-hill battle Trump has ahead of himself.
But! He could cut through the thick ‘secretive’ curd by just placing punitive sanctions on States that are well known for funding and supporting terrorism, like, hmmm, I donno… the Gulf States?
That kind of info should be easily available to Trump, unlike the murky US/CIA black budget.
-TL2Q
The “black budget” is mainly derived from illegal drug dealing (from Afganistan, Central & South America) organized by the Deep State & associated intel agencies. Since it is not a part of the official government budget it is not subject to auditing, control or abolishment. If the published figures on the quantities of drugs thus turned over are even close to reality, the attempt to control or abolish it will probably result in the the parts of intel agencies responsible for its creation, maintenance and utilization going “independent”. The temptation will be too great, the money thus derived being greater than the official budget. And they will turn all their wrath upon those trying to control or abolish them.
This in extenso gives a broader understanding to “Putins” proposal to form a joint front against “drug trade and international terrorism”.
Also, in historical context of the the opium wars and Chinese strugle for independence, it explains the drastic measures by Iranians, Far East governments, and currently Duarte against any form of drug trade.
Жељко из Крајине
Basically, a transnational crime operation: the top layer is operating exactly as the Mob used to.
This requires a major purging, including cooperation with Russia.
I’ve long suspected the move to legalize most narcotics – notably by Soros – is an attempt to preempt such a purging, (if that’s what Trump intends, along with Michael Flynn.)
Legalization would sanitize what is an international criminal operation, the proceeds of which are used to sponsor terrorism and ‘regime-change.’
Well see how serious the new admin is about this.
@ Eimar:
“[..] Legalization would sanitize what is an international criminal operation, the proceeds of which are used to sponsor terrorism and ‘regime-change.’”
Yeah, I hear you, but I’m two-minded about the legalization solution, on the one hand I feel is the way to go, for the reasons you mentioned, on the other… legalization of something doesn’t necessarily stop exploitation. iPhones are very much legal, yet it doesn’t really help the situation for the Chinese workers who manufacture them. Mining is not illegal either, yet the conditions some miners are toiling under around the world, particularly in the developing world, are atrocious.
^That’s just one aspect of it, the other is the drug-gangs and/or drug cartels.
By legalizing their ‘trade’ you’re just making the most violent, sociopathic members of the human race… well… legal! Do you think they’re just gonna disappear in the horizon? Hell, no! They’ll jump right into the business – that’s now made legal – and they’ve known how to run all their lives. Essentially you’d be turning into billionaires the worst elements of society – with all the power that brings, like, buying politicians, or worse; running for office themselves.
If you wanna legalize drugs – which I’m not entirely against on principle, btw – you need to clean house first, and be rather ruthless about it. Death penalty for Drug-Lords, anybody under them all the way down to petty drug-dealers on the street, while de-criminalizing the user, of course.
Trouble with that is… and this bring us to a full circle… Drug-gangs are protected by you know who: their main suppliers: the intelligence agencies. Because, duh! The drug-gangs are their distributors. How can you put your product out there unless you have a network of distributors? Why on earth would you go after them?
It’s the same MO all over the place where there are drug-gang never ending troubles. Like, the police doesn’t know who or where these drug-gangs are. Of course they do, it’s just that orders keep coming from high-up to leave them alone and to turn the blind eye to their activities.
Paradoxically… there’s still a “war on drugs” policy goin’ on in the US, so they [the police] must be seen as doing something about it… hence, that’s why you end-up with so many people locked-up in jail just for pitiful amounts of pot or whatever.
See? It’s not as simple as just making drugs legal and taxed to the hilt [like alcohol or tobacco are] and this hideous drug underworld that is financing/arming terroism will miraculously go away. If anything, you might be overcharging them by doing that.
-TL2Q
@TL2Q
Excellent.
I hesitate to recommend a lengthy “read,” but, even if you live in the US and assume you have some grasp of how deeply, pervasively corrupt the octopus that Trump is going up against, I guarantee that you will admit, after reading it, that you had no adequate idea. This, in her own words, is the story of Catherine Austin Fitts, who rocketed into financial “superstar” status with a major NY financial firm, accepted the position of Undersecretary of HUD (Housing and Urban Development), refused to “play ball” with the corruption she encountered, and ended up railroaded into prison.
Even the role of the illegal drug trade is not as one would have expected — everything is woven into one corrupt organism. As you will see . . .
http://www.dunwalke.com/contents.htm
@ Talks-to-Cats:
Thanks for the link. That’s a keeper, I’m bookmarking it to read at a later date.
I’m familiar with Catherine Austin Fitts and her story, perhaps not with as many details as I’m sure your link provides, but she does have a lots of fans around here in the Vineyard other than myself ;-)
–
Catherine Austin Fitts – The Red Button
“In this video Catherine discusses the disturbing truth about the role dirty money plays in our economy and her vision for transforming the economy”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTm3Jbr6ePQ
-TL2Q
@ Anon / Željko Krajina:
You’re spot on. Mind you, they engage in all kinds of illegal/criminal activities not just drug dealing/drug trafficking. The worse of them all is human trafficking, a nice euphemism for slave-trading consisting basically of; kidnapping and selling women and children for prostitution + the most depraved porn and snuff films to the underground market. That’s just to name one other one besides drug trafficking, I’m sure they’re up to their eye-balls into the illegal arms trade too, and it wouldn’t surprise me; the black market of human organs.
Let’s not forget we had reports of those same things happening in Ukraine after the nazis took over. It seems they’re just following the example set by their masters :/
-TL2Q
Soros is in a snit:
“NEW YORK — Billionaire investor George Soros said Thursday he views President-elect Donald Trump as an “impostor and con man and a would-be dictator” who will rattle financial markets”
Are these attributes all not necessary prerequisites today for an America President?
It is understandable that most people if they lost a biilion dollars might also be slightly upset and he also has to pay all those demonstrators $50/hr so there’s another drain on his funds.
http://www.ctvnews.ca/business/george-soros-says-trump-a-would-be-dictator-who-will-rattle-markets-1.3248870
http://www.businessinsider.com/george-soros-lost-1-billion-after-trump-election-2017-1
Meanwhile President Trump’s first job will be on the White House lawn picking up all the toys Obama threw out of his perambulator (pram).
I’m afraid, that Soros, by saying “Trump is a dictator who will rattle the markets…” is simply projecting his own strategy, his next move into the market shock, (by the way, this is how he became famous) then putting the blame on Trump. However, it is pretty sure that Trump is well informed in that sector.
George Soros has openly declared war on Trump.
Churchill’s Bust Back in Oval Office as Donald Trump Starts His Presidency
https://sputniknews.com/us/201701211049848571-churchill-bust-oval-office/
Well, churchill being the preeminent pindo quisling, it is a natural thing. Like a hunting trophy mounted on the wall.
Something not many americans know is that churchill has far less respect in the UK than in the usa.
Trump’s Declaration of War
Paul Craig Roberts
President Trump’s brief inaugural speech was a declaration of war against the entirety of the American Ruling Establishment. All of it.
Trump made it abundantly clear that Americans’ enemies are right here at home: globalists, neoliberal economists, neoconservatives and other unilateralists accustomed to imposing the US on the world and involving us in endless and expensive wars, politicians who serve the Ruling Establishment rather than the American people, indeed, the entire canopy of private interests that have run America into the ground while getting rich in the process.
If truth can be said, President Trump has declared a war far more dangerous to himself than if he had declared war against Russia or China.
The interest groups designated by Trump as The Enemy are well entrenched and accustomed to being in charge. Their powerful networks are still in place. Although there are Republican majorities in the House and Senate, most of those in Congress are answerable to the ruling interest groups that provide their campaign funds and not to the American people or to the President. The military/security complex, offshoring corporations, Wall Street and the banks are not going to roll over for Trump. And neither is the presstitute media, which is owned by the interest groups whose power Trump challenges.
Trump made it clear that he stands for every American, black, brown, and white. Little doubt his declaration of inclusiveness will be ignored by the haters on the left who will continue to call him a racist just as the $50 per hour paid protesters are doing as I write.
Indeed, black leadership, for example, is enculturated into the victimization role from which it would be hard for them to escape. How do you pull together people who all their lives have been taught that whites are racists and that they are the victims of racists?
Can it be done? I was just on a program briefly with Press TV in which we were supposed to provide analysis of Trump’s inaugural speech. The other commentator was a black American in Washington, DC. Trump’s inclusiveness speech made no impression on him, and the show host was only interested in showing the hired protesters as a way of discrediting America. So many people have an economic interest in speaking in behalf of victims that inclusiveness puts them out of jobs and causes.
So along with the globalists, the CIA, the offshoring corporations, the armaments industries, the NATO establishment in Europe, and foreign politicians accustomed to being well paid for supporting Washington’s interventionist foreign policy, Trump will have arrayed against him the leaders of the victimized peoples, the blacks, the hispanics, the feminists, the illegals, the homosexuals and transgendered. This long list, of course, includes the white liberals as well, as they are convinced that flyover America is the habitat of white racists, misogynists, homophobes, and gun nuts. As far as they are concerned, this 84% of geographical US should be quarantined or interred.
In other words, does enough good will remain in the population to enable a President to unite the 16% America haters with the 84% America lovers? http://brilliantmaps.com/2016-county-election-map/ [1]
Consider the forces that Trump has against him:
Black and hispanic leaders need victimization, because it is what elevates them to power and income. They will turn a jaundiced eye toward Trump’s inclusiveness. Inclusiveness is good for blacks and hispanics, but not for their leaders.
The executives and shareholders of global corporations are enriched by the offshored jobs that Trump says he will bring home. If the jobs come home, their profits, performance bonuses, and capital gains will go away. But the economic security of the American population will return.
The military/security complex has a 1,000 billion annual budget dependent on “the Russian threat” that Trump says he is going to replace with normalized relations. Trump’s assassination cannot be ruled out.
Many Europeans owe their prestige, power, and incomes to the NATO that Trump has called into question.
The financial sector’s profits almost entirely flow from putting Americans into debt bondage and from looting their private and public pensions. The financial sector with their agent, the Federal Reserve, can overwhelm Trump with financial crisis. The New York Federal Reserve Bank has a complete trading desk. It can send any market into turmoil. Or support any market, because there is no limit on its ability to create US dollars.
The entire political ediface in the US has insulated itself from the will, desires, and needs of the people. Now Trump says the politicians will be accountable to the people. This, of course, would mean a big drop in their security in office and in their income and wealth.
There are a large number of groups, funded by we-know-not-who. For example, RootsAction has responded today to Trump’s forceful commitment to stand for all of the people against the Ruling Establishment with a request to “ask Congress to direct the House Judiciary Committee to open an impeachment investigation” and to send money for Trump’s impeachment.
Another hate group, human rights first, attacks Trump’s defense of our borders as closing “a refuge of hope for those fleeing persecution.” Think about this for a minute. According to the liberal-progressive-left and the racial interest group organizations, the US is a racist society and President Trump is a racist. Yet, people subject to American racism are fleeing from persecution to America where they will be racially persecuted? It doesn’t make sense. The illegals come here for work. Ask the construction companies. Ask the chicken and animal slaughter houses. Ask the vacation area cleaning services.
This list of those on whom Trump has declared war is long enough, although there are more that can be added.
We should ask ourselves why a 70 year old billionaire with flourishing businesses, a beautiful wife, and intelligent children is willing to give his final years to the extraordinary stress of being President with the stressful agenda of putting the government back in the hands of the American people. There is no doubt that Trump has made himself a target of assassination. The CIA is not going to give up and go away. Why would a person take on the grand restoration of America that Trump has declared when he could instead spend his remaining years enjoying himself immensely?
Whatever the reason, we should be grateful for it, and if he is sincere we must support him. If he is assassinated, we need to take up our weapons, burn Langley to the ground and kill every one of them.
If he succeeds, he deserves the designation: Trump the Great!
Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, and any other country on the CIA’s hit list should undersand that Trump’s rise is insufficient protection. The CIA is a worldwide organization. Its profitable businesses provide income independent of the US budget. The organization is capable of undertaking operations independently of the President or even of its own Director.
The CIA has had about 70 years to entrench itself. It has not gone away.
Beautifully said by Paul Craig Roberts, James, huh? . . . “If he is assassinated, we need to take up our weapons, burn Langley to the ground and kill every one of them.” . . . Paul Craig Roberts is the best.
PCR is a fool. Saying stuff like
“If he [Trump] is assassinated, we need to take up our weapons, burn Langley to the ground and kill every one of them.”
is juvenile impressing-the-girls-talk. Nothing like that is ever going to happen, and if it would happen, PCR would watch it from the safety of his basement on CNN, penning his next article: “Historical chance for Putin: Nuke Florida Now!”
By the way, attacking the CIA on Twitter and such is totally PC, the ZWO actually encourages it.
I read the PCR comment and then I went to check William Engdahl, whom I like a lot also. Totally opposite take on things. Apparently, it will be more of the same with Trump as many suspected. Except that there is a pivot to asia going on, that was going on before Trump.
http://journal-neo.org/2017/01/09/is-trump-the-back-door-man-for-henry-a-kissinger-co/
Obama defined the modern day slave bowing to his masters every order.
A little weak on the analysis of being black in a dangerously racist society. Sure, they are being misdirected, but don´t tell me they don´t have a case! Also, the central americans and mexicans are fleeing the violence and poverty that has been engineered by US for their multinational companies.
Not too many leftists get that they are being manipulated to support the CIA approved option. I try to interject some facts to discussions I engage in. Its very hard, because when you´ve believed a narrative for decades, and the media has told you so thousands of times, people are vulnerable that way; they tend to believe it.
Why did Trump run for president?
My take is that he saw that the pond is getting smaller and the alligators grew in number and that culling is being prepared in the US (mainly because Ukraine and Syria plunder did not go as planned). Not being too close to a fire made him a likely candidate for a sacrifice. But will he try to better the life for all or just himself and those around him?
But for now we should be thankful that Hillary lost. Cautious also because the Empire try to present her loss as something they calculated to create the impression that they are still in full control and that Trump was their choice from the start. Creating the image that they won and that every fight against them is futile.
Their control is an illusion in our case and self delusion in theirs. Empire does have it’s apparathciks positioned well to cultivate the chaos but that does not mean that they can control it. Just nudge it in one direction and then try to minimize the damage done to them. But minimizing damage is done primarily in the media sphere and the real damage leaks out. They try to convince us in their invincibility,omniscience and omnipotence.
Time itself is the best indicator of their loss of control. Ask yourselves did some of the things happening now were possible 2,5,10 or 15 years ago? Possible? Yes. Probable??? And yet they happened.
Empire grows weaker by the day and those opposing it are rising in numbers and strength. Course of it’s demise is unknown but certain. We should spare some time to look what will replace the old system. For when the boat sinks the rats flee. We should look where are they fleeing too. For new day pharisees are probably prepared or are in a process of preparing (probably latter,for majority of them is afflicted with self delusion and they have huge inertia and it is questionable if those seeing what awaits them have the power to move them or strength to survive if they cut them off) for a worst case scenario-loss of empire and are hard trying to prepare a new nest(s).
I was on the fence about how much Trump meant any of the stuff he said that I like (or for that matter any of the lots of stuff he said that I don’t like), until news about who he’s appointing to what started trickling in. Some of them are Breitbart types, which does not fill me personally with confidence, but which is at least sort of consistent with how he’s been talking. But a bunch of them are either the usual Goldman-Sachs-type suspects only even more so or the kind of people who are scandalous appointments because they’re usually one step back, holding the leashes of the people who actually get appointed. Big oil guys and such.
So frankly, when it comes to the people power and draining the swamp stuff, I don’t think he means a word of it. Time will tell, but the rogues’ gallery he’s got working for him–and I’m not talking about the ones seen, rightly or wrongly, as dangerous nutbars by the liberal press; I’m talking about the ones from the financialist plutocratic establishment–makes me really doubt it.
Basically, we got two main gangs fighting it out — realists vs neocons — so whoever wins we end up with a rich gang in charge. The realists in charge is better, but they are still terrible if a little less crazy. We still need a revolution of some sort to straighten things out, but as it’s going, divide and conquer is working against the people. I still expect everything to go to hell, and we won’t even have a nice hand basket to ride in.
Could Trump surprise me and do good stuff? I can’t predict the future but I’m sure not holding my breath. Maybe we will avoid nuclear war, however.
My Liberal friends are furious with me for not adamantly opposing Trump, and for my adamantly opposing Clinton. Had Clinton been inaugurated, the wheels would be in motion for a No Fly Zone over Syria, and undoubtedly more heinous accusations about Russia.
For her not becoming president, we should all be grateful, though I won’t torture my liberal friends by saying that to them.
Nonetheless, Trump as president does not by any stretch mean we are out of the woods.
Here is a recent article from The Irish Times, which is not a US site, of course could be CIA controlled, however, I think the article is free of the histrionics and innuendo of US MSM.
http://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/fintan-o-toole-president-donald-trump-is-an-authoritarian-and-anarchist-1.2944986
The new Secretary of State has been the Chairman of a company with a long record of environmental crimes and disasters. The article points out many of Trump’s problems.
Not the least is Trump’s “Make America Great Again” US exceptionalism redux. These people just can’t give up and mind their own business, and make a living the honest way, without resorting to gun boat diplomacy backed free printing of dollars.
Trump’s devotion to coal and fracking will result in North America’s water being degraded.
See the article for the other consequences of his cabinet appointments.
True enough, there is a ‘chance’ we’ll all get some breathing room from immediate WWIII.
However, having Henry Kissinger as a close advisor, seriously compromises the future. As Pepe Escobar says, this rapprochement with Russia is just triangulation to isolate China. When Russia sees the deal and says, ‘Thanks but no thanks, we’ll stick with China and Iran’,
the likelihood of US knives being drawn will be high.
Fortunately, Russia’s strong defenses may succeed in deterring the crazies from initiating a war. If they do, we readers of this site, pretty much know what USA fate will be. Washington DC may well be literally ‘washed away’, along with the East and West Coasts.
The other issue is that as Americans, we can expect the education and health care and social safety net to all deteriorate, given Trump’s cabinet appointments. That will further hollow out the US.
Empires in serious decline, when unable to loot other countries’ resources, cannibalize their own populations in favor of the elites who run them. Every American needs to have a plan B, for when either slow decline or rapid collapse kick in.
We call it the NATO Times here.
It notoriously ran a puff piece on a CIA operative (Turkish/Libyan, Irish passport) who was one of the instigators, along with his brother, of the destruction of Libya (see Thierry Meyssan at Voltairenet for details).
Plenty to criticize re Trump’s admin – and to worry about – but the IT is not a credible source.
Here’s the link:
http://www.voltairenet.org/article190363.html
Authoritarian anarchist is an oxymoron. Anarchism is the opposite of authoritarian. Leads me to think O’Toole is a non-oxy moron who just picks words he thinks are insults out of the air to call Trump.
It’s a rare thing to find criticism of Trump based on any facts, knowledge, and sound thinking. These so-called analysts and pundits are like the trolls who, when presented with a fact-based, logical, developed argument, respond with ‘You’re a poopy head’ (or like Horowitz calling Lavelle a communist and the Iranians Nazis). The article is just picking up various common memes and bits of narratives floating around and trying, mix and match, to make something, as if assembling legos into something real or meaningful.
” multi-millionaire capitalist be trusted when he speaks of people power and social justice – not exactly what capitalists are known for, at least not amongst educated people. ”
-Educated people in the west tend to be liberals, are those the ones you are referring too? The uneducated people AKA working class people were the ones that voted Trump into power.
“modern 21st Century Socialism is very pro-Christian. Could 21st century capitalism dump imperialism? ”
-Not culturalmarxism that is dominant in the west. It remains very anti-christian.
I certainly agree with Saker about his analysis up to a point. The whole ‘anti Russia’ sentiment in the US has no factual basis. And it is a matter of historical fact that throughout the 19th and early 20th Century, the US and Russia were allies. Both Tchaikovsky as a Russian, and Mark Twain as an American saw Russia and the USA as friends, as quoted in Tchaikovsky’s book about his visit to the US. Anyone who visits Sevastopol, I recommend going to the Leo Tolstoy library, where I visited in May 2015, and the very kind librarian showed me the book about Tchaikovsky’s visit to the US, and the remarks of the US ambassador, who toasted the Russian sailors and hope for eternal friendship between the two countries—as long as neither one interfered in the internal affairs of the other. (oops!)
There is no reason for anyone to seek enemies, unless their hearts are sullied by greed, hatred and delusion.
Likewise, Socialism and Christianity are natural allies. One of my most memorable moments was Christmas dinner at my Mormon colleague’s house. He as a politically conservative Christian and me a left wing, socialist sympathizer Buddhist. He showed me the story of Jesus’ life, which nearly brought me to tears. When asked my opinion, I said,
“Jesus treated the sick–for free. He fed the hungry–for free. But the final straw was when he threw the Pharisee bankers out of the temple for skimming profits for no good reason but their greed. So the powers that be killed him. Jesus looked to me to be a Communist or Socialist, and throughout history, saintly people like Jesus, Gandhi, Martin Luther King are despised by rulers and killed”.
My colleague, was speechless. My understanding of Jesus is totally different from what he expected.
As for Socialism vs Atheism, it is important to note that Buddhism and Confucianism, which both sidestep the issue of the existence of God, were both seriously persecuted by the Chinese communists. So in my view, this conflict is not about whether God exists or not.
The problem that Communists had with the religious institutions whether in Russia or in China, was the mental prison and social control that they had, using the particular framework in the respective countries. As mentioned above, and Saker certainly agrees, there is absolutely no contradiction between the teachings of Jesus, and the principles of Socialism.
When I was in China, a Communist party official asked me about Marx and my views as an American and a Buddhist. Since Communism and Socialism are based on the idea of fairness in the–literally–Common Wealth– of a society, and given Buddhism’s idea of ‘saving all beings,’ which is in accord with Christian principles of social justice, charity, sharing, and shared understanding of leading a moral life, there is no contradiction between any of these systems. The problem only arises in turf battles by institutions and their leaders, who want to use their particular idea as a means of social control.
Yes, maybe that’s why Fidel Castro said about Jesus ” Jesus was the biggest revolutionary man ” this was during a visit in Cuba by the Pope. I don’t know what the Pope has responded but surely the Russian Patriarch agrees with that.
Trump is a conman who just saw the opening and started saying right words to make him look different. The only reservation I have is about his Russian policy which does not bring him any point but still insists on at least rhetorically. That was, perhaps, just to make sure he is perceived as different by the public.
My take is that once in the office, he would go on to make himself and his cronies richer while enjoying being the president of the US. All the signs so far indicates so.
Why have you locked Putin and Trump together?
Putin needs to keep this Administration at arms length
Is putin supposed to betray China and Iran both countries are being antagonised by Trump?
LOL, all educated people know that capitalism and social justice does not go together? That is why living standards for workers are sky high in capitalist countries and rock bottom in communist countries?
Hey, where do you live? Do you live in the glorious worker paradise of North Korea or Cuba or do you live like a fat little piggy suckling on the teeth of capitalist America?
Hey, did worker living standards improve in Vietnam, China when they dropped communism and turned to capitalism or did they fall?
Has worker’s live actually improved with creation of union, and social benefit in US? The mistreatment of workers, (the environment), riots of early 1900s was all fiction?
No one win with fundamentalism, let it be religion, communism, or capitalism. The truth is always in the middle.
Well, actually, eventually they did.
Did you read that recent article here about Cuba?
In the years since 1949 China has lifted almost the entire rural population out of poverty, everyone receives an education, and I visit China a lot, and believe me, there are not many complaints.
Vietnam is heading in the same direction now.
In the years since 1989 the middle and working class in the ‘west’ have suffered a steady decline in living standard. Recently, I was reading about the lot of serfs in the middle ages. The article noted that they paid 50% of what they produced (their income) to the lord and master. I thought, “you Lucky Bastards …. only 50%”
If you add up all the taxes, direct and indirect, ‘we’ pay, and add the interest we pay to buy a house or the rent we pay (which all relates back to the banking system we slave under), and the bloated profits we pay to some corporations, and the taxes we forego to international corporations that leads to higher taxes, etc etc, it will come to at least 50% of the average wage, probably more. So, just what has this neo-capitalism bought ‘us’? … fking serfdom!
I do not pretend to be giving a history of the world, so it will be easy to pick holes in what I have said. However, the general theme is credible.
Vietnam’s political leadership is thoroughly corrupt Elites.
Like Ho never existed or the wars against imperialism, colonialism, hegemony were for the Communists to get rich and rip off the masses.
The West’s and China’s investment capital is flowing in to build industrial capacity for cheap goods and massive profits on those investments.
The leadership is raking in billions for themselves.
Talk to Vietnamese. Real estate along the shoreline is some of the most expensive in the world. And plots are tiny.
The globalists have control.
Anonymous on January 21, 2017 · at 12:24 pm UTC
“LOL, all educated people know that capitalism and social justice does not go together? That is why living standards for workers are sky high in capitalist countries and rock bottom in communist countries?”
Then please explain us about the living (working your ass off until death follows) standards for American workers! Why don’t you begin with total yearly vacation/leisure time of the American worker compared to that of the workers in historically VERY socialist countries like France, Belgium, Spain, Netherlands, Denmark, etc.? Let me tell you, no compare. Period. (Think of about average 25 days plus bank holidays). Healthcare, compared to most (socialist) EU countries, Cuba, or even the former USSR? Uncomparable. Healthcare in the US is a sick, overly expensive joke. Freedom? Well, you guys can’t even spell the word “freedom”. I’ve lived in CA for about three years during better years, before 9-11, DHS, etc. and I was time and again shocked how many freedom had already been taken away from Americans compared to that in Europe. Jaywalking or loitering for a couple of minutes have gotten me in trouble in the US on several occasions, in Europe that’s almost impossible and I can make this list about a mile long.
About social justice I won’t even get started. Although degraded in Europe with our salon socialists turning their coats and becoming more and more capitalist, you seriously can’t compare social justice between the US and most EU countries. By the way, check out the numbers: The more socialist the governments in Europe were, the higher the percentage of low income workers owning at least one house. In fact, even many (White) Russians and Ukrainians own more than one dwelling (example: 2 or 3 room apartment and a dacha).
The reason that countries all over the world keep doing bad economically and socially is that their governments are or in bed with or sanctioned by the exceptional nation of democracy at gunpoint…
Now you enjoy and keep lolling but please check your facts.
An astonishing inauguration speech by Donald Trump.
Unlike his hundreds of shock-wave generating tweets during the Presidential elections campaign, that can be electronically tweaked and/or deleted by CIA-Twitter-Facebook-Google anytime, the words spoken here are henceforth part of the official record of the of the United States.
With this speech alone Donald Trump has already made history and outclassed most of the 44 previous Presidents of the United States by orders of magnitude – and Trump’s presidency has not even begun.
When Putin entered the stage, the Geo-political poles started immediately shifting, and now with Trump joining the scene, we are in for some truly historic times.
Why is Horowitz a “rabid maniac”? Because he criticized Hamas? Didn’t you just say you were against radical Islam?
Hamas is not radical Islam. Palestine is an issue of human rights and international law, not religion (except for the Zionists who thing god gave them all the land millennia ago, when it was actually instead of old British imperialists last century).
Where some in Hamas are radical is that because of the atrocities committed by Israel, they do not believe that Israel should exist. This is not radical, indeed it is the reason that Palestine was not formed as a state in 1947, because the occupants, on principle refused to accept their land to be taken to creat a Jew supremacist state. With “some sort of Israel” now establsihed, this view is deemed radical, but is increasingly less so. Because unless the Israeli regime retreats its borders to the legitimate 2 state solution, the “Jewish state of Israel” will cease to exist because there will be only one binational state.
I agree with the Saker, Trump’s speech is an historical speech and is raising a lot of hope.
But in doing so, he is acting like Don Quichotte fighting the Anglo-Zionist Empire which still controls the finance and a 5th column probably even more dangerous than the one in Russia.
Another concern is Israel. I am not so sure that when Israel is concerned, America will have priority. Israel still could drag the US in the M.E. cauldron by willing to include in the terrorists list the Hezbollah and Iran.
In the same area Saudi Arabia and Qatar need to be tamed to stop the sponsoring of the Jihadists.
Turkey also is still causing concerns as both Russia and the US are realizing the importance of that country controlling the access to the Black sea.
Finally his u-turn concerning globalization will requires negotiations even more complex than the Brexit one and the outcome will impact most of the world : China, Japan, South Korea, India and the EU. I am not so sure that Tillerson will have the skill to conduct those negotiations harmoniously
I will add that if D.Trump wants to return the power to the people, he will have to give them a real money and not just a credit line on a bank account. Futhermore people should have the right to own their money and not to be obliged to depose it to a bank, they should also be able to use that money without limitation for down payment. Without a real money, people have no means to protect themselves against the central power. Of course, real money is gold and it means the end of central banks like the FED.
If Trump is not doing this , it means that his talk concerning returning the power to the people is an empty talk.
I want you to notice that while all the wild speculation was going on about a coup or other action to take place preventing OUR President Donald John Trump from being inaugurated as the 45th President of these United States, I have remained silent. I don’t like jumping onto band wagons such as that. I know our words have power, and it’s sort of like the Miranda statement where it says, “…anything you say can, and will be used against you in a court of law.” The things we say can and will manifest themselves as reality; is the reality of a government under coup what we want? If not, then don’t even talk about it. Instead, I chose to pray for protection of Donald Trump, and his family, and for the people of OUR country too, that they would not loose hope and submit to a descent into the dark side. I know, I was joined by millions of hopeful Americans, that the power of the “deep state” tyranny would not prevail. Yesterday, we saw its poster child fly away in a helicopter. That was good.
I also saw the video footage from the Inaugural Ball, President Trump’s opening address, right before he danced with Melania. It’s great, isn’t it, that after all we’ve been through, we have a “First Lady” who is classy, beautiful, well dressed, and truly in love with her husband…not the scam, childless “marriage” we’ve had the embarrassment before the whole world to deal with. I heard a good one: a man, don’t know who, wrote in a comment about Melania, “Oh, she’s so beautiful and I am jealous he has a wife who looks like she does because my own wife looks like Trump.” I also hear they are dancing in the streets in Slovenia, where Melania was born. They are proud their “home girl” is now First Lady in what will be once again, the great country of United States.
As President Trump begins the work of this Freedom movement from the White House to get America back on track, there isn’t going to be a world apology tour right out of the hat, instead, tomorrow (Sunday, Jan 22) he will sign the executive order that stops sending billions of USD to those horrific, Satanist baby-killers, “Planned Parenthood.” How long have we been trying to get that stopped? At least since 1973. While I’m here, I want to tell all you fellow Americans, there has never been any “law” that “legalized” abortion. And Roe v. Wade was not a “decision,” it was an opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Court. That’s ALL it ever was…our bad for letting the Lying Leftstream Media and the enemies of God tell us they could kill any child from conception, up to and including the moment of birth because Roe v. Wade was made the “law of the land.” What NONSENSE! and What sane society can continue to exist when this abomination takes place in their midst? That’s nonsense too! So, my grateful thanks…We’ve been speaking to this sin of funding these murderers preying upon our precious and helpless babies in their Satanic ritual blood sacrifices to their dark lord for a long, long time and then comes Donald J. Trump: I’ll take care of that! and BOOM…it’s done. Nancy Pelosi eat your black heart out, you disgusting witch.
So, what else is coming? Let’s not sit back and watch, all you people and expect one man to do all the work. Like the Donald has said, it’s our country now, we got it back and it’s going to be up to us what direction it goes, because we have the right to expect him to honor his words when he says our voices will be heard. I bring it back to words now, and the critical, vital importance of them. We should choose them wisely, respecting their power, and use only those words that will serve to build up our nation, and ourselves, so that it can be said that America is that shining city and inspiration to the whole world to be better than we have ever been, to reach for the stars, and go with God where no man has dared to go before.
Trump: notice who he entrusted his entire week of inauguration to—Tom Barrack.
A businessman, billionaire. A man from his world who he knows can deliver what Trump wanted. The man had done it with a Superpac that ran very precise and effective ads for Trump, devastating attacks on Hillary.
Everything for the inauguaration went well, on time, under budget.
Tom Barrack is a Roman Catholic of Lebanonese background. He will play a very interesting role as outside conduit with ME interests. This is how Trump works.
Trump then delivered a speech that surprised everyone except his speech writer (more editor and polisher, Stephen Miller) and his touchstone co-philosopher (Steve Bannon).
Trump went straight at all the former living Presidents, all the current politicians, all the crony capitalists (who put up $90 million for the week’s events). He hit them in their stone-cold hearts with sharp spears. He whacked them atop their lizard skulls with rejection of all their ideologies’ dogmas.
Trump delivered what his Movement secretly hoped for. The return fire of the Deep State and MSM assault on him and them that we have witnessed for 10 weeks since his election.
Trump shocked everyone. He struck hard, deep and wide.
He will continue this in actions. He is not a man of words.
He is a man of vision and action.
He intends to rebuild America.
He intends to change Washington.
And remember this also.
He is a 9-11 doubter. He isn’t in the Truther group who think they know the causes and the conspirators.
But he harbors doubts about the event.
Most importantly, Trump is highly tuned to the senselessness of war. And he is laser-focused on WMDs as the greatest threat to the US and the world.
He is a man of the world, his properties and brands are everywhere. He’s not a globalist, he’s a tourist-investor. He values Peace as fundamental to commerce, trade, tourism and investment.
So, Trump will focus on solving North Korea and Iran. I think Iran is very easy if they remain transparent about their nuclear energy program. North Korea is a psychotic leadership challenge.
In all foreign issues, Trump will want others to do the heavy lifting.
Thus, China and Russia for North Korea, and Russia for Iran will be his choice for dealing closely with the issue of WMDs and missile threats.
Again, Trump does not value war as an instrument of policy. He values strength of military to prevent war.
What that means, though, he will strike if he senses a verifiable threat from either source. Thus, Russia will be very important as agent of resolution.
If Trump and Putin get along, these two WMD threats will be dealt with via Putin. Trump likes to use experts as his agents.
I really see Trump’s foreign policy intrinsically linked to Putin.
Safeguarding the planet, fighting ISIS and AQ, backing NATO out of Russian spheres, cooperating on migrant flows and developing science and technology safeguards for security, disease control, fresh water, food supplies and other matters that the superpowers need to do for planet stability and sustainability—all rely on these two men getting together and finding commonality.
Trump cannot succeed without Russia and Putin.
And he intends to succeed.
The alternative is more of the same. He will refuse that from any and all “advisers” or co-opters.
Trump is here to change things, not to tweak or put a glossy paint job on the existing structure.
He will strip to the skeletal beams and columns and redesign what is worthy of a new use. He will tear down what is useless and rotted. He will design and build new structures. This is what he has always done as a builder-developer.
In a few months, we will see the signs.
In a few years, change will have occurred.
He intends to be a great leader, not an occupant of power.
Very well said, Larchmonter, very well indeed. Succinct and to the point, especially this:
“In a few months, we will see the signs.
In a few years, change will have occurred.
He intends to be a great leader, not an occupant of power.”
Changing the direction of The United States of America is like steering a battleship. It takes a while for the turned wheel to show up in the action of the battleship. Change will not happen overnight and the massive change needed to make USA what it was when I and some of the other older folks commenting here were growing up will take some years.
There will be immediate changes but nothing earth shattering. In a year we will see improvement, in two even more. In four we might see enough change to understand the direction the country is moving in. For those expecting change overnight, ain’t gonna happen.
Viewed from the other side of the fence as I do, in this AO Mr. Trump’s election and ascendancy to the presidency is regarded with cautious optimism. We will believe in change when we see it, not before, and trust me, there will be indications of change readily visible here before almost anywhere else.
On the other hand, the very fact that Mr. Trump won the election over Hillary Diane Rodham was cause for quiet celebration. Why, you might ask. Because the general consensus of opinion in this AO was if she had won in less than a month we would have been visited by some cruise missiles the the day after she tried to enforce a ‘no fly’ zone over Syria which would have led to almost instant war with Russia.
It is a fact that he who owns Sevastopol and Krimea owns the Black Sea, pure and simple. The entire tragedy in Ukraine had one goal and one goal only, to wrest control of this city and this peninsula and therefor control of Black Sea from Russia. The tragedy and tens of thousands of deaths in Ukraine since maidan mean nothing to her, Sevastopol was the prize, and the citizens of Sevastopol and Krimu denied this prize to her. She will neither forgive nor forget this affront to her plans, ergo we will live some years longer as will all the rest of you with her not in power for the second time. Never forget Mr. Putin’s words when he was speaking of growing up on the streets of St. Pete: “I learned early that if I thought it would be a fight I would get in the first hit.” Do you think he has forgotten that lesson? I don’t, ergo it’s a very good thing that Rodham lost the election, this loss for the good of Humanity.
It’s going to be an interesting ride over the next few years. I’ve got about another 20 to go if genetics hold true and I hope I live to see USA return to what it was back when I was young. The change there was incremental but obvious to anyone who looked. I was gone from US a great deal in the decades from the mid ’60’s and if you truly want to see change go away for five or ten years. It’s an eye opener when you return. I hope, and we pray, that things will change and America will be as great as she was at the pinnacle of her greatness some six decades ago. Such a change, especially in partnership with Russia, will bring peace and prosperity to the world. A welcome change for all in my opinion.
Auslander
Author
Never The Last One http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ZGCY8KK
An Incident On Simonka https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01ERKH3IU
I agree with most of what you said but this stood out for me –
“So, Trump will focus on solving North Korea and Iran. I think Iran is very easy if they remain transparent about their nuclear energy program. North Korea is a psychotic leadership challenge”
Solving? The problem is and always has been US aggression not Iran or N Korea.
It is not up to the US to interfere. Why does the US have to “solve” Iran?
What does that even mean?
Have the Iranians asked the US to solve them?
It seems far more likely that the US will breach the terms of the nuclear deal, rather than Iran.
Regarding the term “psychotic” being used against the. N. Korean leader let’s just look at a few facts.
The term “psychotic” is a psychiatric term which means “completely dissociated from reality”
I would argue very strongly that the North Koreans are only too well aware of reality, the reality of the ever present threat of annihilation by the USA.
Had it not been for the PRC the entirety of NK would have been destroyed in the 50’s during the
Korean war in which a third of the population was massacred by American bombing. Indeed I read that the USAF mission was to level every single structure standing more than a meter high. Think about it.
NK had no air force to speak of and American jets had free reign over the country to massacre and destroy at will until Chinese were able to get new MIGs down to NK whereupon facing equal opposition the US fled the airspace.
The US has never signed a peace treaty with NK despite NK endlessly seeking this and even today the NK gov are saying they will denuclearize if they get a peace deal.
The US demands regime change, nothing less as indeed it wants with Russia, China and Iran, Trump or no Trump.
In the 1990s things had cooled between the two Koreas to a point where rapprochement was happening and NK adopted what was called the “Sunshine Policy” which produced a number of benefits to N and S Korea.
This outbreak of peace was too much for the US and Bush, upon taking office, declared NK part of his “axis of evil” along with the other countries including Iraq and Iran amounting to seven altogether which the US stated it would destroy within five years.
Prior to Bush of course North Korea had no nuclear weapons nor sought them.
But the Bush regime instructed the South Koreans to tear up the Sunshine Policy and along
with the US participate in the biggest military build up ever in that region. Drills have taken place rehearsing full scale invasion of North Korea.
That’s right, the North Korean people and their government live with the most powerful military on Earth right outside their front door practising invasion and massacre on a more or less continuous basis not to mention sanctions aimed at starving them to death which would have happened were it not for China supplying basic foodstuffs and medicines.
After the US had invaded and murdered tens of thousands of Iraqis in 2003 on the basis of a pack of lies about the country having WMD the N. Korean government, looking at this, were obviously terrified and realising they were on the hit list accurately determined that the only way to survive this was to acquire nuclear weapons for defensive and deterrent purposes.
What choice did they have?
If NK did not have nuclear weapons it would not exist today and by the way if Russia did not have nuclear weapons it would not be around today either. Nor China.
We should extend the same respect for the sovereign rights of small countries as we do for large ones whether or not we agree with their type of political system.
Whether it is China quite justifiably seeking to build defences on islets in the S China sea to push back US missile warships to a distance where they can’t wipe out Chinese cities or poor beleaguered NK threatening to retaliate with nuclear weapons if attacked it is the same problem – US aggression.
In fact I think it is safe to say that 99% of all wars and strife on our planet derives from the USA and it’s puppets seeking global control.
The top priority of any government is to protect the country. That is number one.
Iran is arming up, not to attack anyone but to defend itself from US aggression.
Mr Putin states regularly that Russia wants peace but is preparing for war. China too.
Leave North Korea alone and North Korea will leave you alone.
My solution to this problem would be twofold – bring NK under a protective umbrella of Russia/China, force the US to the negotiating table with a peace deal to include the US military
going home and getting out of the region completely.
I read here in 2014 an observation of the Saker’s regarding Ukraine that there will be no peace
in Ukraine until it is denazified (hope my memory is accurate).
Well, I’d say there will be no peace on Earth until it is de-Americanised, de-dollarized and de-Zionised.
Yes, N. Korea rattles it’s nuclear weapons to show it’s commitment to defend itself – with it’s back to the wall and no other effective means of deterring a US attack.
Russia and China showed off their nuclear capabilities 50 years ago so don’t need to now as it is fully accepted that attacking them means vaporised US cities. NK is merely doing the same thing.
And it has worked so far and they are still standing.
It is called deterrence.
If we are going to borrow terms from psychiatry I would use the term psychopathic and apply it to the mentality of the USA and it’s satraps. Things though look hopeful. The US cannot prevail in it’s ridiculous posture in the S. China and I do think they will be gone from that region militarily in a few years and thank God the people of North Korea will be able to breathe again.
Shooting your uncle with field artillery, as reportedly, Kim has done, and some of his other executions, in the most barbaric fashion, fit my terminology for him.
I agree that the Hegemon, as I often write, is the cause of most of the ills and imbalances of the planetary order of human life.
As for Iran, the Trump administration has to conclude that Iran is not an existential threat to Israel and the US. It’s that simple. And some means of transparency and guidance from Putin should accomplish this.
Never forget that Iran has waged proxy war against Americans in the region. Using Hezbollah as proxy to blow up the Marines is a bit hard to forget. So there is some issues of adjusting to the present leadership in Tehran.
Whether Trump can come to a deal with them, time will tell. He looks at all countries as markets for trade. He sees peace as a condition of business stability and investing opportunity. He wants a nuclear threat level as low as it ever was in modern decades. So, Iran can do business with Trump. He wants to do business with them.
Should that not develop, they should understand that, like Russia with anyone, the US will protect its human and military assets anywhere.
Go back to Eisenhower and the Chinese over Matsu island area. They were menacing and Ike ended the menace. Soviet bombers were overflying Alaska in the JFK years. He sent a secret flight of AF attack planes to deliver a message to a Far East air base (Operation Red Oak, my friend, Paul Johnson, Jr. led the flight of four that delivered that kinetic message).
Americans right now are ready to go pre-WWII status. The “enemies” of the US ought to take the opportunity to let the Hegemon go back in his cave at home.
Trump wants business deals. The only military action he seeks is in coordination with others like Russia who want to liquidate all of the radical Islamic terrorists everywhere.
This moment in history is upon us. Iran should grab hold, develop its economy and do great things in Eurasian development. Russia is the regional power. Israel is in a box. With India wobbling, Iran can influence much in South Asian neighborhood and the Caspian sea region. It has a huge future, played smart.
Trump needs to see that is the direction of Tehran. It’s actually a no-brainer.
As for North Korea, only Russia and China can solve that. The US will never just deal to back out of the Western Pacific and Asian Pacific markets. They will lose too much “face” to do that. The US Navy would never allow that.
But if Pyongyang would de-nuke itself, as Russia and China want, then the troop levels in the region would be drawn down as development of the Peninsula increased. Russia has been working on this for two intense years.
China may re-engage. Pyongyang has stiff-armed everyone who has tried to integrate them into regional cooperation.
Trump has no ideology about any of these two nations. He merely wants no nukes for both and business opportunities, especially with the Iranians.
So, Hegemony is going out of fashion, if not out of the Deep State think tanks and globalist pressure groups.
“Shooting your uncle with field artillery, as reportedly, Kim has done, and some of his other executions….”
What are your sources of that information? I have read a lot about that in MSM, but from where did they get their info? Anybody who knows?
Well, let’s say it is true. It is not Trump’s business to bring him to justice. find a lawyer, take him to court. Mister Larchmonter obvious think we the nation should play role of either north korea police, or take justice in our own hand. Maybe he has found the WMD he can take out. Too bad Chinese is right there, and will make the old korea war like cake walk.
My position is the US should be out of the region as soon as Russia and China and Japan can control the stability of the Peninsula.
I also think the US Navy is always looking for a gigantic oceanic battle in the Seas of East Asia or Southeast Asia. That was the goal after WWII. They played a huge role in the Vietnam disaster and want to be the Hegemon forever.
Police action was the Korean War. A disaster that had to be ended in a truce not a treaty. So, I’m definitely for no police actions.
The only solution for the US is to give up strategies of containment. I see no hint of those strategies with Trump. Though his move with Taiwan may have unintended consequences. Treating Taiwan as a sovereign would ignite a very bad and critical situation.
So, North Korea is a regional problem that has to be solved. There are ways to do that without a peninsula war which would destroy much of South Korea.
The THAAD missiles being set up in South Korea complicate everything.
It could lead to an arms race for the Asia Pacific.
The peninsula will be stable as soon as US get out of region. North Korea is not a problem, US is.
“Trump has no ideology about any of these two nations. He merely wants no nukes for both and business opportunities, especially with the Iranians.”
That is a very rich statement. Who is Trump to dictate who can have nuke or not? Good luck with him if he try.
Who is Putin and Xi to say no nuclear proliferation?
The eight nations that have nukes are fairly agreed upon this (though Pakistan is still a question mark).
Generally, all actions, Russia and China joining the sanctions regime against Iran, indicate they did not want Iran to have nukes.
So, Trump merely is same as others.
Russia and China was stupid on the Iran position if that was true. It does not make my statement less true. Trump needs a lot of luck if he try.
Never forget that Iran has waged proxy war against Americans in the region. Using Hezbollah as proxy to blow up the Marines is a bit hard to forget. So there is some issues of adjusting to the present leadership in Tehran.
Seems the US has been the agressor in the region. How many ‘regime changes’ is Iran responsible for on US soil?
And why was it not ‘hard to forget’ the Israeli attack on the US Liberty? The navy crew survivors spent years trying to get a real investigation going. Yet no problem giving the country responsible 40 billion in aid, including military.
What’s more, that same country does have nukes, unlike the Iran it continually smears (while murdering their nuclear scientists). And it not only has refused international inspection, it has also threatened to use them.
Yet it’s Iran that is painted as a ‘threat’?
Iran is treated by some folks hereabouts as if it was a saint.
It runs proxy wars in three nations torn to hell. Yemen, Syria and Iraq.
It proliferated IEDs which have killed as recklessly as drone missiles and cluster munitions.
If Iran had nukes, the Arab world would have nukes swiftly. They’d buy them from Pakistan.
Think about that chain of events.
Russia, actually, has been the most assiduous nation working to keep Iran from getting nukes.
I guess they understand the implications.
Think about that.
What do you expect her to do with hostile forces marching toward her borders from those state? Surrender? Chinese marched right across YaLu river and beat the enemy back when similar happened in 1950.
Trump’s plan is full of holes. Your hope of Putin and Trump teaming together to accomplish these goals is far from being reality.
There are a lot of people who have positioned themselves against that, and aligned with the commercial interests of the military-industrial complex of their country. I am thinking about the Europeans who might be willing to pursue this strategy in the near future (France, Germany among them)
Trump will have serious problems with the Chinese on the commercial front and any rapprochement with Russia will be impossible if Trump is building its Navy and position its submarines near the China Sea.
The war against the terrorists will probably be the only thing USA and Russia might be able to accomplish in the next 4 years, which will not be enough for Trump to help him get reelected in 4 four years and finish the job.
Maybe, maybe not.
I think that this program of rebuilding the US infrastructure is a winner.
Also, I believe that he will succeed in getting a lot of jobs back after ditching bad trade deals.
Stopping wars will make A LOT of money available. some to rebuild the crumbling US military, but some can go to much more beneficial goals.
If he can fight corruption inside the USA, that will also save billions of dollars.
finally, who knows, maybe he, being a Republican and millionaire businessman is the only person who can deliver a single-payer healthcare system to the American people.
So there is a lot he can do inside.
Outside Russia can help him in Europe, the Middle-East and Asia.
So I would not be too pessimistic about his prospects.
Neither, however, would I recommend putting on rosy glasses.
If he does not crush the Neocons inside the USA then he is dead, dead, dead. If he continues to try to appease them, they will feel emboldened and they will massively sabotage him.
He needs to make an example. I say that he should begin with Soros and his corporate Empire the same way Putin dealt with Berezovsky. He might not be able to stick Soros in jail, the latter will run just like Berezovsky did, but he can probably break his corporate Empire if he uses all the resources of the US government. Breaking Soros will send a powerful message to the rest of them. Or he could go after the Clintons/Bushes. Doesn’t really matter who he goes after, as long as it it some kind of top level SOB.
My 2cts.
The Saker
Thanks, Saker, for replying to my earlier comments.
I am a Canadian. We have the single-payer system, and as long as I can remember, the USA have always refused to follow this road. The level of poverty in the USA and the lack of access to the healthcare system for a majority of Americans will be a big challenge for Trump. He will have to score at this level early in his presidency for him to survive politically.
What I foresee is that the USA will face a boycott of its dollar before Trump is able to put its big plan in place. He will try to cut its budget deficit in social programs to finance the rebuilding of its military force. Therefore, he will attack the majority of Americans. He will be a very divisive President and the Democrats will use this to rebuild their voter base for the next US election. The political elite will try to impeach Trump in the meantime, because of conflicts of interests.
I hope everything will work out between Putin and Trump. However, the odds of that happening are not high in the short term, imho.
BigBen
The Saker,
Here is the reality of your points:
Trump’s 10-year infrastructure for 1 trillion. That is 100 billion a year.
Military, Trump plan largest fleet expansion since cold war, that maybe a trillion spent a lot faster than the one above.
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2017/01/09/navy-trump-planning-biggest-fleet-expansion-cold-war.html
He will repatriate some jobs at beginning, but I do not see he can do too much more. He has to compete with the rest of world, or people will feel the pitch in their wallet. More people will do what Germany was doing, challenge him to compete.
Saker, I do not agree that socialism has evolved. The ideology that your refer to as “21st century socialism” only exists in Latin America.
Paul Craig Roberts nails the US and European socialists:
“The left-wing’s causes have shrunk down to little more than transgender rights, homosexual rights, lesbian rights, female rights, illegal alien rights, and the persecution of white heterosexual males for opposing these rights. As Jeffrey St. Clair asked the other day, what about the working class?”
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/01/19/left-wing-country-needs-one/
Add to this ideology a rabid hatred of anything Russian, and political correctness that stifles any dissent ..
I am puzzled, Saker, that you omitted the most important influence on D. Trump: two Slavic wives, or should I pun wi-fe-s. Both of them originated within a communist system that they mildly disliked but realized belatedly how much they benefited from it in terms of free education, free health care, somewhat restricted cultural expression (but not education) guaranteed jobs, retirement, maternity leaves, child care, and so on. Both spoke many languages, and had artistic predisposition.
It is extremely hard to guess how much influence the spiritual and cultural backgrounds of these two women had on Don’s current views, but I am certain it is > 0.
And I am certain this topic will become subject of many speculations/articles.
This influence might be even reflected in Trump’s determination to get rid of Obama-care.
Best regards, Spiral
Spiral, the best way to describe Russian, read Slavic, women is thusly:
“Lace and perfume wrapped around spring steel.”
How true. Another way is a few lines from my short story, An Incident On Simonka:
“Your choice, sir. For your information one of the translators is my wife, the other is her mother.”
There was a brief silence then USS Klakring communicated again. “You are one brave bastard to send your wife to my ship. Not sure about the mother in law.”
“Not brave, sir. You do not want to tangle with Russian women, you will have a very sad day.”
I would be willing to bet that both ladies have had somewhat more than minor affect on Mr. Trump, if nothing else I’m sure he is acutely aware of what life was under the Soviets and is today in East Europe. My wife of well over a decade is very clear in her assessment of life in SSSR as opposed to life for most citizens today, IOW much better for the majority under the old system. I don’t argue the point with her. While I may be foolish sometimes I’m not that foolish and I have yet to kiss a cooking pot after all these years, try as I might according to VCO.
Auslander
Author
Never The Last One http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ZGCY8KK
An Incident On Simonka https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01ERKH3IU
good one Aussie
“D. Trump: two Slavic wives,”
Glad to see someone else raise this point, which I raised months ago but have not yet seen addressed.
Melania speaks five languages and could easily be to Slavic countries what Jackie was to France: That is, JFK was “the man who brought Jackie to Paris.” Trump could be “the man who brought Melania to Moscow/Minsk/Warsaw/Berlin” etc.
She is no dumbie.
The light-blue outfit she wore for the Inauguration ceremony was stunning–and in perfect taste. Ditto the upswept but not too formal hairdo.
Katherine
What happened to the separation of church and state? Trump’s inauguration was just another bigoted, religious ceremony for and by Christian zealots, who always want to impose their Jewish god on everybody. I managed to continue to watch this religious circus until Trump said that “we will be protected by God.” That was unbearable. And disgraceful. America has never lived up to the promise of the First Amendment.”
The Bushes did it. Even Clinton did it. Is the first time you were upset?
And besides, if you do not object to Israel being the Jewish state, why would you object to a symmetry such as the US being called the Christian state? Christians are after all the majority here.
What do you think the Puritans were?
The putative separation of Church and State does not mean repressing or ignoring the Church, Islam or Judaism. But the Church ought to be at least the ‘first among equals’.
If you want a religion-free zone, go back in time to Ceaucescu’s Romania.
It is necessary to go only as far as modern China, where the State will tolerate no organised superstition.
China may be as mistaken in their policy as the US is, though not necessarily for the same reasons.
Yes, it is a mistake to think that the propensity to superstition can be suppressed, but the dangers of superstitious behaviour , particularly en masse, are well known cf The Devils of Loudun.
A rather extreme example, don’t you think? Especially in the Vanessa Redgrave version.
Rather than the particular circumstances , it was Huxley’s conclusions in that case that I should have referenced.
From memory, he cited the aphorism . . . “where two or more are gatheredtogether in My Name etc. . . .”, and suggested that , on the contrary, the larger the ensemble, the less chance there was of anything remotely enlightening or “holy” occurring.
I really can not find any reason to argue Robert’s point. Separation of Church and state is something need to be guarded with one’s live.
The kind superstition in China is nothing more than a culture nuance, it has no religious significance. Culturally, it is more in line with “respect elders, or lightning will strike you”. A little more, a little less depend on your age or education level…
No religion has ever gotten hold of Chinese government throughout history…
“If you want a religion-free zone, go back in time to Ceaucescu’s Romania.”
Ceausescu, you mean? (You better double-check what else you don’t know about him.)
Yes, I do want a religion-free zone because that is what the American Constitution says the US government should be. It does not matter whether I am a theist or not. But it does matter to me (and to many outstanding, thinking Americans) that politics should be free of religious dogma.
You who doesn’t understand what Jefferson said when asked about the meaning of the First Amendment. In trying to explain it to Jefferson eventually had to settle on an easy metaphor: he said that the First Amendment builds a “wall of separation” between State and Church.
Now, do you think you might be able to understand what Jefferson and I have said?
Another reason (whether American or not) is that you confuse secularism with communistic atheism. They don’t have much, if anything, in common. Adios.
Pedantry.
El fin de Ceaucescu 1989 – YouTube
A nation is not a dead thing, preserved in formaldehyde.
Your fanatical position requires that you begin positing a group of “deplorables and irredeemables’.
I am honored to be numbered among them by such as you.
FYI you are posting in a public forum, which you do not control in the slightest, unless by the strength of your arguments.
What are you gonna do now? Burn down some mailboxes (as I saw some of your confederate brainiacs try to do last night in Washington), throw rocks or your toys out of your pram?
“You who doesn’t understand what Jefferson said when asked about the meaning of the First Amendment. In trying to explain it to Jefferson eventually had to settle on an easy metaphor: he said that the First Amendment builds a “wall of separation” between State and Church.”
I didn’t obviously write this–as it is. It contains mangled syntax. It looks like my paragraph has been tampered with. Originally it was not, though. I wonder what might be happening.
I can tell you Franz, from first hand, that at that time, Romania wasn’t a religion-free zone. The regime tolerated the religion even though the Church had no power in the state. The regime realized the potential of religion (majority of Romanians were religious, including many members of the state apparatus) but not supported it openly. Though the priesthood stood under severe supervision. That supervision wasn’t felt by the ordinary people by the way. They used to make religious marriages and burials. They could participate in religious festivities and so on.
I so totally know that. I have a friend who was a Presbyterian minister and converted to Orthodoxy. He went on to tour the Orthodox world and helped to build a log church in a Romanian village on money raised within the USA. Those are the fondest memories of his long life.
I was just presenting a stock image of an avowedly ‘totally atheist state’, as such a monstrosity was being championed by the poster, who demanded separation of Church and State within the USA.
You and I know where such monstrous, and anti-human, tyrannical ideology leads.
Trotskyites are immune to such understanding.
“who demanded separation of Church and State within the USA”
No, he specified “USA government.”
No establishment of religion does not ban religion but only the state’s support of one religion over others.
Katherine
Trump is play to base on religion. The Jewish state treat none Jews as second class citizen. I do not see the logic of since there is a Jewish state, we can call ourself Christian State. If that were to happen, I predict there will be more the mail box burning in the street.
All those religious talk by presidents are playing to base, Trump is no exception. I do not understand why people think he is any different. He is striking more towards the right than center, but what else is new.
I hear what you say , but it seems to me to be unrealistic to expect that Trump, in his endeavour to bring ” we the people” back together and once more forge a nation, will not speak to the people in a language with which they are familiar.
This is what the ” bard ” has traditionally done.
I managed to continue to watch this religious circus until Trump said that “we will be protected by God.” That was unbearable. And disgraceful. America has never lived up to the promise of the First Amendment.”
The first amendment guarantees the freedom to practice religion — to put it into practical effect in daily, civic life.
Liberal Judaism is essentially atheistic; the dialogue it has shaped and written is so widely and habitually echoed from all quarters by now that it is mistaken for the mindset of the founders. It is not so.
Even Jefferson was agnostic — i.e., he neither believed nor disbelieved, leaving the question open.
It does guarantee freedom of religion, but it also guarantees freedom from religion. (As do other passages in the Constitution, about no religious tests, for example.) So what if Jefferson was an agnostic. Or a Deist. Or a flying-spaghetti believer?
O LORD our God, arise
Scatter our enemies
And make them fall !
Confound their politics
Frustrate their knavish tricks
On Thee our hopes we fix
God save us all!
I did by mistake post this on Pepe’s analysis.
It belongs here.
Sorry for the repeat.
Kent on January 21, 2017 · at 7:36 pm UTC
I read the PCR article yesterday, and thought wow, many good points, and then the finish.
“Whatever the reason, we should be grateful for it, and if he is sincere we must support him. If he is assassinated, we need to take up our weapons, burn Langley to the ground and kill every one of them”
First thought. Have he lost his marbles, or has he finally decided to grow some balls, and let it all hang out.
However, having noticed his increasingly obvious harsh language developing through the last year or so, I’m a little bewildered.
Important observations and points in the article nevertheless.
Adam Garrie’s take on the inauguration speech is IMO as, or better to some of the points.
“Donald Trump is a realist. His speech was all about problem solving”
See for yourself: http://theduran.com/donald-trump-realist-speech-problem-solving/
Beeing who he is, Mr. Trump would not spend more than a few minutes on this blog, as a reader, and/or participant. Waste of time.
He does have a very simplistic view of “how to win” – “get things done”
Part of this is his many years of study and experience of “the noble art of self-defence”. Boxing!!
He has attended numerous high (and not so high) profiled Boxing events for many years, and apart from the “shaky” business experiences in this very corrupt “sport”, the game plans and tactics in a boxing matches (where the goal is to WIN), should not be dismissed as maybe a fairly big part of his effective (so far) strategy, and as is often the case in life, keep it simple and effective is better.
As for one aspect of his attractiveness to “the basket of deplorable s” , I would argue, that his total lack of taste in “stuff”, interior decorating his private sorroundings etc., might have contributed to his success in a somewhat major way.
It is truly staggering for me, the shear amount of uneducated and deliberately dumbed down people there are in the US, and THEY, I’m certain would have chosen similar decorations etc. if they had the means.
Finally, Saker, as always, sobering, realistic (albeit somewhat naive analysis as always, which is a good thing IMO), and hoping, as we all do for some sort of positive development/outcome.
You are truly a Gemstone in this Universe.
Salute.
Take Care
Kent
P.S for the “Free-Grazers” in here. Please consider donating whatever you can, to keep the boat afloat .
PS – PS. “plaster of Paris for my mistake.
Who knows, where the time goes!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2xODjbfYw8
Kent
Massive demonstrations against Trump…well, I am a skeptical man, because of my age and because of my background, but let me tell you something : I’ve never witnessed such a behavior in my life when a US president had been invested. I find this very unpleasant (at least) how such many people can do this so early, without waiting to see what kind of president Trump will be. They judge him in advance, closing their eyes and ears but opening their mouths. It is amazing to see so many people being led astray by so few. The deep state “liberal” control has made the job, during so many years of brainwash. As I said, I am skeptical. I am skeptical about Trump’s foreign policy because I live in Europe and that could affect me too, but such behavior from his countryman at and after his inauguration raises big questions. And those questions are serious for the whole american people.
Sadly, the past 50 years have conditioned many people to be habitually pessimistic and negative, and this equivalent to being realistic.
In the case of others — hopefully a minority — pessimism is an accurate reflection of their inner being (soul / group mind).
For the time being, these two can be indistinguishable. But their responses to events unfolding even as we speak will make differentiating them increasingly easy.
………..
Does it strike anyone else as odd that, while the contemptuous dismissal of a race of people is not tolerated, contemptuous dismissal of faith in God is OK ?
I attribute this to the effect the conditioning the “culture distorters” (Yockey’s term for them) has had on us : we have come to take things for granted that should provoke principled, angry rejection because these have been so often imposed without meaningful resistance.
Case-in-point: replacing Easter with Martin Luther King Day.
Those of us who can still remember who (and how) we are must (IMO) do so, and vociferously so that the young have a sense of what was and yet may be again. Otherwise, those who (in MSM and academia) control the past (dialogue/history) will control the future, as they intend.
Without knowing what you mean by “faith in God ” it is difficult to know how to respond to your question, other than to say that contempt is rarely appropriate.
@ ioan:
“Massive demonstrations against Trump…well, I am a skeptical man, because of my age and because of my background, but let me tell you something : I’ve never witnessed such a behavior in my life when a US president had been invested [..]”
Here’s your answer, it comes from the NYT!!!! Can you believe that? No? Me neither, but there you go…
–
Billionaire George Soros has ties to more than 50 ‘partners’ of the Women’s March on Washington
“What is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the Women’s March? [Against Trump] Turns out, it’s quite significant [..]”
http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2017/01/20/billionaire-george-soros-has-ties-to-more-than-50-partners-of-the-womens-march-on-washington/
-TL2Q
The article forgot to also mention that Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and the Tooth Fairy are real! LOL.
It’s likely that Trump Kool Aid drinkers will become just as pathetic as Obama Kool Aid drinkers were during the past 8 years.
In both cases, people that postured as anti-establishment, anti-war, anti-Zionists, or even anti-Imperialists in the past will change their political tune and downplay their “anti-establishment” criticism or even (implicitly) support the American Empire and its aggressive imperialism once their favored political ruler/party is in power.
The more things change, the more things stay the same.
America is fundamentally an imperial predator nation.
That is essential to Americans’ political and cultural DNA since even before the days of Manifest Destiny.
Trumpism is merely the latest mask that the Americans (and Zionists) use to disguise themselves.
Trump is clearly a Zionist puppet
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/05/30/trump-is-clearly-a-zionist-puppet/
(warning about ‘VT’ in case you don’t know, just my opinion:)
‘VT’ is (they’re anything but veterans, by the way) as far as I can tell the most miserable vulgar lousy contemptible psychopathic disinfo site imaginable. Really, I followed them for quite some time. Their main job is to discredit (discredit e.g. what the JM$M calls ‘anti-Semitism’). They’re Roth-child disinfo agents, comparable to Hitler/Goebbels’ Nazis, Soros, Pussy Riot, ISIS, whatever. It’s totally depraved disinfo crap. (they e.g. really showed that beyond a shadow of a doubt during the Oregon stand-off – Robert LaVoy Finicum assassination)
Standard modus operandus of trolls everywhere : any time something you hate is mentioned, immediately express outright contemptuous mockery of it. Every time. Like a biting fly that will not go away.
Fortunately, simple awareness of the pattern is enough to recognize what is going on when it appears.
And gives people, from long past experience, a good idea of the troll’s cultural/ethnic identity.
The political system, especially in the US…
You can get a new dog. He might be an ordinray dog, a bad dog, or a great dog, but it’s still just a dog and he might hunt or guard well, but he wont talk, or play the piano or chess with you. We have no saints or messiahs or philosopher-kings here — and the place is still a loony bin.
Soros is 86 — maybe he’ll croak soon. Maybe the US economy will will crash soon — the fundamentals are rotten. If the plane is spinning down changing the pilot doesn’t give much hope. Trump doesn’t understand economics nearly well enough to reverse the momentum, and isn’t nearly smart, powerful, or competent enough to ease the empire down with a soft landing.
So right off, don’t have any great expectations for him — only an amazing congealing of popular forces and intelligence has an chance of averting disaster at some point because that’s the only repository of sufficient power, and most people don’t have a clue what would need to happen or how. It might get better or hold off a bit, but no cure — like how an aggressive cancer is called ‘cured’ if survival is extended for 5 or 10 years. The major problem — cancer — is capitalism and it’s end stage, imperialism. How long will it take before that’s discarded? We still have active remnants of slavery and feudalism, as well as monarchy and authoritarianism, and widespread deception and tribalism, and war. We have to think about this in terms of centuries of world sociology and systems, and we have echos here of the long depression, the great depression, previous world wars, boom and bust, gay 90s, gilded age, roaring 20s, and all that.
How could anyone younger than about 1,000 years old get on top of all this — learn enough and have a long enough perspective? What is necessary is a cultural repository of knowledge and history, and and way that has been oppressed and tossed down the memory hole is a major cause for why we have gone astray. There is some awareness of this problem, which is why we now read so much commentary comparing this man and this time to past situations, but it’s spotty and often distorted or disinformation. The ‘left’ has gone astray largely because the institutional memory of what it had been was repressed and mostly destroyed with propaganda and false history (look at the narratives from Israel and the zionists as a glaring example of this).
Did you ever wonder why we have ministers or secretaries of defense, state, agriculture, so forth, but none for history, sociology, philosophy, theology, ethics, cybernetics, literature, or art? The things which help people take a longer and broader view?
One thing lacking in Trump’s speech — most any political speech, is a view longer than at most 2 or 3 centuries (only very vaguely and in platitudes) and pretty much over the last decade or two. What of the relevance of the forces of authoritarian feudalism, and kings, involved in keeping down the workers and the maintenance of hierarchical structures of wealth and power, aristocracy and peasants, and war lords, from which these are rooted? It goes way back, but we need to look only a few centuries ago — or currently in other countries — to see it.
Trump touched on this, referring to returning power to the people — but without good historical and political science context. Who is alive who can remember power in the hands of the people? When has that ever existed in the US? Trump must have been talking about something else, of course.
“Did you ever wonder why we have ministers or secretaries of defense, state, agriculture, so forth, but none for history, sociology, philosophy, theology, ethics, cybernetics, literature, or art? The things which help people take a longer and broader view?”
I have. But then again, I’m originally from Alflolol, Doesn’t carry much weight around here apparently (as of now that is).
(actually, we do have something covering the above (a minister of sorts, and a very extensive department in all Scandinavian countries). No visible power though, but still it is mandatory, and considered important.
http://telemarksporten.no/Tegneserier/AlflololSt01Reduced.pdf
Take Care
Kent
we have ministers or secretaries of defense, state, agriculture, so forth, but none for history . . .
Average people today have access to more and better information than a PhD professor, relying on a library, had not too many years ago. So long as they are free to research, write and converse, there is no problem.
Already, how many psy-ops that used to be imagined were settled history key laughter today when invoked ? Truth is undermining MSM “history” faster than it can propagate itself. Like “Russia hacked the election.”
The sweet part is that, the more the chronic liars are identified as liars, the more their claims trigger automatic scepticism.
Trump is not “polarizing” society — it was polarized years ago. He is galvanizing the healthy part of it into long-overdue action.
This sort of thing is worrying — the best he could find? Where will Chelsey Manning relieve herself?
https://www.rt.com/news/line/ jan 21 2017
Yesterday 23:10 GMT
Trump taps NC bathroom bill defense lawyer to head up DOJ’s Civil Rights Division
President Donald Trump has nominated attorney John Gore, a lawyer at the high-powered Jones Day law firm, to head up the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, David Lat at Above the Law reported. Gore helped defend North Carolina in a court case about HB2, better known as the bathroom bill, which requires transgender people to use the bathroom that matches their birth gender, rather than the gender they identify with. Jones has also been “actively involved in legislative redistricting litigation,” according to his Jones Day biography.
I had same concern regarding him. His acceptance speech at RNC convention, was perfect, and inspiring, but his behavior since has been not following his speech.
I would not give much weight on what he is saying, but what he is doing.
I think Blue’s ‘concern’ for Chelsea Manning’s bathroom choices is said more in jest, than trepidation.
Of course I could be wrong.
LOL. You maybe right, but I stand by my comment that he did not follow through, or did opposite (specially in this case if become true) of what he said in RNC convention.
Said lightly, but in earnest. That law is ridiculous. Not only was there not a problem with transgender using bathrooms, but passage of the law cost NC oodles as various groups and businesses boycotted the state. The law was passed as nutty right wing rabble rousing and ignorance.
Appointing John Gore raises reactions and problems, which could easily have been avoided with naming some other competent person — as with other Trump appointments. It’s like Trump is going out of his way to create and exacerbate division. Not smart! It does not bode well at all for his following through with his stated policies, and harkens back to Obama appointing corrupt banksters and war mongers to his cabinet.
I agree blue. I had same observation about Putin’s gay comments 2 years ago. Trump is all talk right now. I am not sure what he is trying to accomplish when take out extreme positions. This is not a business negotiation. Not everyone involved are inferior. Instead of kicking but, he will get his butt kicked, already started with BMW…
@Chelsea Manning’s bathroom choices
But it says much about where Western ‘values’ should go.
I was in a western college in china in the beginning of 1980s, we had a young man wear dress high heels all the time. There was no influence of the West at the time.
It just naturally happened. I would not put it as simple as western illness.
As long as they obey the law, why should anyone judge if someone physically feel they are the same sex they born with or out.
“It just naturally happened”.
Gay, transgender, and such, has always been a part of the human species as well as others, and among humans there have always been a range of reactions to it. Biological systems, including sex, chemicals, and neural systems, are filled with variations, ‘errors’, and randomness, both with genetics and conditions met along the way in maturing.
There is no master design, but evolutionary and environmental (including pollution) probabilities, and there is also the randomness which is the basis of evolutionary change. Humans like to find order, patterns, meaning, and purpose in things, on levels they can understand and hold as stable or culturally fix, but that’s not how things primarily work: the actual order and ‘rules’ of the universe are quite different than humans suppose, and we are just beginning to understand the math, physics, relationships, and forces involved, and even the true nature of what we call reality, and what is ‘physical’, ‘spiritual’, and ‘natural’.
It’s been overblown now into another political weapon, and another way to do identity politics and tribalism as part of grabbing power. There always was and always will be a range in the probabilities of biological configurations, development, behavior, and ‘normalcy’. Deviations from what someone likes, is accustomed to, or what they themselves are like is natural and inevitable: they should get over it — that’s just the way things are.
Blue, You and I have a lot in agreement. You are right about environment/pollution element of it. You also right about how politicalized it is.
I can not imagine how those people felt, but the least I can do is not to judge them.
Yeah…
One example:
http://news.berkeley.edu/2010/03/01/frogs/
Pesticide atrazine can turn male frogs into females
also
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endocrine_disruptor
”
ny system in the body controlled by hormones can be derailed by hormone disruptors. Specifically, endocrine disruptors may be associated with the development of learning disabilities, severe attention deficit disorder, cognitive and brain development problems; deformations of the body (including limbs); breast cancer, prostate cancer, thyroid and other cancers; sexual development problems such as feminizing of males or masculinizing effects on females, etc.[citation needed]
”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1281309/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prenatal_hormones_and_sexual_orientation
Health care?
One of the issues for Trump et al is Obama-Care.
Let me explain how “health Care” works here, and why, the Country i live in is knee-jerking to all things American.
First. ANY, person living here, pays absolutely nothing for immediate help, whatever the circumstances.’
‘
Example Car accident, heart failure etc.
Even though I live in a non rural environment, if I have a heart failure, or any other serious condition, or anybody are involved in a serious car accident here, there wiil be an ambulance present, within 15 minutes, and if determined to be serious, a helicopter with qualified medic’s within 20 minutes. (fire department always first responders here). Medics will examine injuries/conditions, and if very serious, the Heli will transport you to the very best facilities in this country to treat your condition, (600+ kilometers)
And, here is the clue. it will cost you exactly nothing, nothing!! period. Think about that for a moment.
This is applicable for all citizens, tourists, immigrants etc.
The stupidity for people living here (Norwegians) is, that they do actually believe that The “health reform) “Obama Care is something similar, and therefore, he is a good man.
It is not. We all know that.
Furthermore. As a citizen, you pay a symblic amount of money for drugs, and a symbolic amount for visiting your Doctor.
If, you do have a condition that requires treatment for a prolonged time (after three visits), you pay nothing at all, even included Taxi for 100 miles or more, for YOU, 5 times a year or more, to the nearest hospital. Free, cost you absolutely nothing.
Now, I might, or not make a post later on on this forum explaining why I do not consider this to be a good thing (necessarily)..
Thoughts, anyone??
Take Care
Kent
Hvordan har du det. Hallo, Kent.
I once spent a year in Norway on a Fulbright grant, so I happen to know enough to appreciate your post. I met quite a few Britons and Americans in Norway who either had a Norwegian spouse or decided not to return to the “best democracies on the planet” for some good reasons, even though the best democracies in the world are Scandinavian democracies. The US is now way down on the list, not even in the top 20 any more, I believe, and probably falling all the time.
I have always thought the Norwegian government is among the most sensible in the world, but I have doubts now after some recent developments. (What, for example, were Norwegian F-16s doing in Libya? And why F-16s in the first place? Don’t the Swedes offer equally lethal Saab Gripens?)
I don’t know if this is the right forum, but, sure, if you could offer some thoughts on why you think the “utopian” Norwegian health care system is not so perfect after all, I am sure, you would find a wide enough audience.
Ha det.
My daughter wants to go to norway.:-) so it would be interesting.
You know we spend 5000 on preme, and 2500 on deductible, after that 30% on every visit on company subsidized medical insurance for 4, I am not sure if you want to pay that amount. If you do not work for a big company, you could pay a lot more if you have money.
I know many old people spend down their savings to get on medicaid, which will give all the options you stated. They pay full price at elderly apartment home first, until they have no money left, then the government pick up tab.
It is very hard to drive and pay for the care by yourselves. Imaging you are 78 and on dialysis 3 times a day. Your children has a life themselves, if government does not provide care, how much productivity her children will have, and what will quality of life she and her family will have.
Thoughts, anyone??
What you are describing is, with some variations, what every single developed and civilized country on the planet has. This is similar to what we had in Switzerland. In the USA most people have a mental block when they read about that and that block forces them to either dismiss is all as “communist propaganda” or dismiss it all under the pretext that (rich) Canadians often chose the be treated, for top dollar, in the USA. The latter is a rather primitive cop out, but it is preferable to admitting that the USA is the only country on the planet not civilized enough to understand that healthcare is fundamentally a civil right. Even those who favor a “single payer” system (meaning that the government ought to pay healthcare costs) never mean a full array of medical and medical-related services as in western Europe.
Frankly, as long as most Americans are clueless about the options out there and can only imagine either private healthcare or some variant of Obamacare (which is an obscene joke), I don’t have much hope for meaningful, civilized, health care in the USA.
To make things worse, ALL insurances screw Americans in a way which no European could even imagine. They can dump them anytime, they refuse to pay, even when they have to, they force you to take them to court, they have an advanced system to deny you your benefits, they have huge “co-pays”, etc. American pay pay pay and pay and then the get screwed over and over and over and over again. But since they don’t know that it is better elsewhere they literally cannot imagine a better situation. As for the word “socialism” it evokes images of Gulags and bread queues, don’t even mention “communism”. A lot of them will tell you that Obama was a socialist. And they say that with total sincerity. That tells you how much they know about socialism….
And the sames goes for collective bargaining, worker’s rights, union, etc. all of which are successfully presented by the indoctrination machine as either “communist” or “mobsters” or, at best, “wholly ineffective”.
Or disability. It is horrible to see what is going on here. I have an autistic friend who could not get disability. I know another friend with terminal hepatitis who would not even walk who could not get disability. It simply blows your mind. To get disability you need to have lawyer involved, then your chances are better.
This is why on a social level I don’t consider the USA civilized (I won’t even mention their penal system and their jails). It is a developed society – yes. But civilized? No.
This is changing, very very slowly, but as long as Americans don’t travel and live abroad and have a means to compare, they remain stuck in a fundamentally uncivilized social system.
This is very sad for me to see. When I see my friends here, some who have 4 jobs per family (2 jobs for the husband, 2 for the wife) who cannot get health care or when I see all those who get no holidays at all (the minimum in Europe is 4 weeks) or when I see how two friends of mine who got severely hurt in car accidents (of which they were not guilty for) cannot get medical treatment I want to weep.
In truth, what we have here, especially in the South, is a *plantation mentality* in which the bosses screw the labor force and keep it docile by a combination of violence and promises to become bosses themselves one day.
That is the logical outcome of turbocapitalism mixed in with fascism. And it ain’t gonna change for as long as the locals are convinced that their system is better than any other one.
Cheers,
The Saker
The hit from this, eduction costs, homelessness, lack of child care, etc., on efficiency and productivity is immense — in the many trillions. Just so a few can be much wealthier than the rest of us.
Sometimes when waiting in a long line at a store, with employees buzzing around posting or changing prices, checkers needing to send people to check on a prices, using machines to tally up totals and dedeuct credit card amounts, and so forth, I say “Imagine how much we could save if things were free’. About all that would be required is an inventory system for restocking — which could be easily automated anyway. Capitalism is horribly inefficient, as well as cruel.
One of Trump’s points about making America great again is improving the state of the nation’s human capital, which is deplorable. Currently, American citizens are at a great competitive disadvantage versus their peers in other nations, and for America to improve, that situation must improve. Nor is that the only area needing massive upgrading. As Mercouris notes at his piece, Trump faces a daunting challenge differing from but similar to those faced by Lincoln and FDR, http://theduran.com/donald-trump-president-united-states/
Saker
I agree totally. Well said.
I was pleasantly surprised by Trump’s speech, but have seen many parts of it before spoken by other presidents–TR, FDR, and JFK sprang to mind immediately. The biggest challenge Trump faces to get his program off the ground is the Republican controlled Congress, much as PCR relates. If Trump truly wants to reinvigorate the citizenry, they cannot abide for-profit education or healthcare any longer or a $trillion spent on the Outlaw US Empire annually. Once upon a time, it was the Liberties enjoyed by the citizenry that was touted as one of America’s Great Assets, but most of those now lie in tatters or on the hard drives at the NSA. But on one point Trump’s already failed in his position as Chief Magistrate–none of the outstanding criminals–the Clintons and Obamas for starters–was arrested for their heinous crimes, which makes him an abettor of them. Yes, I’m very cynical, yet remain somewhat optimistic. As I said, however, Congress is already busy tearing down what he announced he wants to build, so I hope he’s plenty of ink for his Veto Pen.
I think this sober and positive analysis of the Trump phenomena is to date the Saker’s best take on political reality.
Gandhi once said that “to be an internationalist one first has to be a nationalist”.
I pin my hopes on the premise that indeed Trump is a nationalist capitalist (for all it’s faults) if nothing else and America will now start to mind it’s own dam business and butt out of bossing the rest of the world around, to put it simply.
For all those naysayers and rabid anti Trump detractors that see him as a dictator and part of a vast globalist conspiracy, I say that given political reality, what other choices do you think there was between voting Hillary out and Trump in anyway? I’d say Zero, Nada, None!
So get real and live with the consequences of the best of what a dying imperialist empire has to offer in terms of hope for the future. Seems to me that most Americans of all political strips are unconsciously infected with a deep sense of exceptional entitlement, born out of decades of personal consumerism which gives them the illusion that they have any real choices and can just go out shopping for their ideal political candidate.
Sorry but political reality dictates taking your chances with a Trump presidency, or suffering the consequences of a Wall Street and Globalist financed and endorsed psychopathic Clinton presidency that has promised and practically guaranteed you a world war three scenario, not to mention the continued gutting of the American economy.
As for the Zionist rantings of David Horowitz, just like some white supremacist KKK members are trying to hitch a free ride on the Trump band wagon, I wouldn’t pay any attention to their insane ravings as they don’t remotely represent any of what Trump has said about his “inclusive” policy of all Americans and not imposing “regime change and American values” on the rest of the world.
Just as in a used car add says, “take as is” buyer beware, you got exactly what you paid for, after having twice elected Obama, a hollowed out shell of a man, the Globalist puppet who’s only Noble Peace Prize legacy is having left the world on the brink of a thermonuclear Holocaust disaster and the Wall Street gutting of the American and all the western worlds economies.
But by all means have fun casting premature evil conspiratorial aspirations on an imperfect Trump all while in reality the fact is that you have absolutely no alternative choices in the matter. So make the best of it and do your part, or just keep whining that the world of endless consumerism has totally failed you and not offered you the perfect product choice of an ideal political candidate to suit all your desires and needs for the next US President.
So join the rest of the world, thanks to your American CIA interference in our own internal governance and accept that Trump is the only possible viable alternative left to an all out universal disaster that was about to take place if your “popular” choice of Hillary had been inaugurated as POUTS and Commander in Chief of the most powerful nation on earth yesterday.
A not happening that as a Canadian I can only rejoice in and breath a sigh of relief for, as I’m sure the rest of the world does. Thank God and bless the wisdom and fortitude of the (extraordinary) ordinary “middle” working class American voter for saving all of humanity from an immanent Hillary disaster, come what may. No thanks to all those “leftist” activist that didn’t bother to vote or mindlessly voted for a totally impotent alternative, knowing the dire circumstances at hand.
Meanwhile to all those cynical Trump detractors here, we’ll just have to wait and see exactly what Trump does and who’s on the right side of history. I just shake my head at all the myopic self-centered egocentrics of the “alternative” left, while the world burns down to the ground in perpetual wars and they “fiddle in Rome” endlessly debating the merits of Trump’s win over a known genocidal maniac Hillary that has as much as promised you a genocidal Armageddon that could potentially end all life on earth.
Have fun disparaging Trump all you want along with the establishments mainstream media while he takes action and makes an unpredictable reality out of the (thin) whole cloth you have spun about him.
Only time will tell if all you naysayers are right or dead wrong, so be patient and await the inevitable outcome, being as how we have absolutely no other choice in the matter anyway.
That said, I’m encouraged by the fact that the Saker’s lattest political analysis here is at long last finally beginning to catch up to his history of unsurpassed, astute in depth military information and analyses.
And thank God for saving us all from a Hillary Clinton presidency.
A little more insightful than the inauguration.
“President Donald Trump Delivers Remarks at CIA Headquarters (1/21/2017)”
https://youtu.be/xagAlOXT9Wk
Click into around 9:00 but the real ‘orders’ come in around 10:00.
Several subtle messages as the new (proposed) CIA boss is introduced.
The key one, in the very belly of the beast, relates to the support he got from the military (in votes).
Considering the alleged tensions between the Pentagon and CIA in Iraq/Syria this is the key signal. And apparently they (the new CIA) are going to do a phenomenal job. Hint.
They have a new boss and a new programme: Obama’s ISIS is dead.
The other ‘weak signals’ from the broader futures/foresight environment suggests Saudi Arabia and other gas stations in the ME are going to experience some HUGE challenges.
Trump’s oblique references to ‘shoulda’ kept control of Iraqi oil (as winners reward) suggests where the new CIA ‘black budget’ funding is likely to come from — the Clinton donating Saudi Wahhabist regime can now likely expect some offers they can’t refuse to ‘assist’ Trump’s new CIA programme.
Silence so far on Afghan drug running — so opium supplies may still be 2nd order budget items.
I watched your video. Firstly notice that Trump spent most of his time bashing the media, secondly his high praise of the CIA, which has the capacity of momentarily assassinating him out right was nuanced so as to give them favor and work with him. What else was he to do, declare war on them?, even while he knows full well that they are his very worst enemy. No, the mans astute enough to know the best policy is try and win them over on his side while he decimates their leaders. It’s a question of personal survival and a political strategy to neutralize and get them working on his side, nothing else to be read into this game but that Trumps playing them.
I mostly agree with this analysis. It is the most reasonable one I have read of his speech. I am worried, however, about Trump’s policy plans which sound pretty bad. Like Obama, he seems to be making appointments based on a political calculus rather then on competence. During his campaign he kept firing his staff. I hope he shows a similar ability to change direction as president. I am also worried that Trump will be impeached and the genuinely scary Mike Pence becomes president. I think if Trump is going to successfully challenge the neocon/neoliberal deep state he will need political allies. This might mean a mobilized section of the U.S. public. However, his policy proposals are going to poison his relations with the Sanders/leftist segment.
Forget the Sanders/leftist Hillary voting idiots, they have already proven themselves to be a totally lost cause. Look to ordinary common sense Americans that have saved the day and elected Trump as their next President. The entire PC SJW GLBTQ left liberal crowd has already proven themselves to be totally brain washed and dead, corrupted to the core by American elitist political gender driven imperialism.
The left is not this monolithic. My guess is the media present a distorted view of public opinion. If Trump can go to the left of the Democrats it will discredit their anti-Trump propaganda and put them on the defensive. The opposition to Trump will be reduced.
Trump will have a much harder time changing the US system than Putin din in Russia. When Putin was first elected he had the support of the Russian military and intelligence ‘establishment’ that never wanted to be US puppets in the first place (like Russia had become under Yeltsin). By comparison, Trump has very few powerful allies and very many powerful enemies. Defeating an entire corrupt system is a very hard, if not impossible, feat for one man (even a very wealthy man) to accomplish on their own. Consequently, the safe bet, for those of us that enjoy prognosticating, is that the Trump years will not be radically different than the Obama years. And, of course, if the Neocons succeed in orchestrating a coup d’etat against Trump the world would once again be facing the prospect of nuclear war.
Look at the milieu in which he succeeded as a businessman and developer.
NYC, Manhattan, unionized, Jewish to the teeth environment.
Corrupt officials in the boroughs, corrupt union, mafia families, competitors, Jewish money, Jewish tort lawyers, the court system, Liberals running most other levels of government, State and Federal.
Trump never had a friend or associate strong enough to help. His close friend is out in Vegas, Phil Ruffin. They partner in the Trump Hotel in LV.
Trump is a fearless visionary. He’s a celebrity buffoon, if you will, but he is very smart, very strong, very clever, very skilled and knows his enemies very well. He also has networks of cohorts who supply him with the Intel he needs to defend himself from flank attacks.
The guy is very accomplished at winning.
Now he has tools of power and knows how to use them.
His base is half the nation, un-ideological. All tuned to his vision.
He just rolled over the UniParty, the Dems, the Republicans, the MSM, the Wall Street wise guys, the Deep State saboteurs, the atheists, the Satanists, the pedophiles, the crony capitalists, K Street lobbyists, the Chamber of Commerce, the Club for Growth, Soros, Zbigniew Brezinski, Fox, Msnbc, NBC, CNN, CBS, ABC, the telecoms, the hedge fund guys, the wealth management vultures and the phony pollsters and ballot box stuffers.
He made history.
He is more than people think. Check the buildings and resorts he built or rebuilt. He managed 500 companies around the world in his latest filing of holdings. He failed 4 times with strategic bankruptcies. The success rate is 99.2% for 40+ years of business.
He just won the Presidency of the United States. Spent the least money by a factor of 4x. The man knows how to win.
Zero edge carrying article ….continuing the metaphor re buildings…..at end of speech to cia saying, v he offers to build a room without columns as a builder he knows this….meaning no more fifth columns and the like which will be used to dermine…and do they understand that……interesting.
Your sentiments and fears ring true enough, given all of what Trump is up against in terms of taking on the “establishment”. However don’t underestimate the degree of support he may indeed have from deep within the underbelly of that same establishment, from all those whom are true to upholding their sworn allegiance to the American constitution. If he survives an assassination, and follows thru with his plans, he may well go down in history as having started Americas second revolution.
Agree, but Trump has at least some support and protection from within the military establishment. Question is, how much in order for him to survive as president?
Saker – spot on.
Interesting article discussing what the author thinks will be the direction taken by the trump regime.
The Pessimist’s guide to Donald Trump
http://theduran.com/pessimists-guide-donald-trump/
I quote “We do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone, but rather to let it shine as an example for everyone to follow”. Whoopee, Roger Williams and Rhode Is are back in business.
I quote again, “We do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone, but rather to let it shine as an example for everyone to follow”. Only if Roger Williams and Rhode Is experiment if-you-will is re-engaged will ‘light’ shine from America. However, we may be sure that if, as suggested, Pope Francis is in a battle with Trump as a neocon(?)/globalist/nwo at war with Freemason forces then Mr Trump is no friend of ‘light’ or Roger Williams as these very Freemason forces opposed Rhode Is’ model of religious freedom, etc.
It is a very dark and frightening vision. Anyone who follows a nation that speaks evil of Mr Putin is destined to go the fastest route to Gehenna.
Trump’s approach is purely negative, as ever. So the starting point of his future actions must be found in the picture of his enemies (“Feindbild” in German). Who are they? Politically, economically and socially. All the rest follows automatically.
It is disconcerting that a critic of the “AngloZionist Empire” should hope for the best from a Trump administration which could hardly be more Anglo or Zionist, and (whatever the fine words about regime change) remains imperialist (simply “realist” rather than “neocon”, possibly) in its assumptions about how it pursues its interests. It appears to see China and Iran as enemies to be held in check by means economic or military, and rapprochement with Russia simply as further means to this end.
To you all that bought in to the Trump ‘charade’. Trump will not drain the swamp, he IS the swamp.
Trump being anti-establishment, anti-media, and that the media is ant-Trump and etc. etc. , Its all a horse and pony show. The media is fully behind Trump. So is the establishment. Please, please watch this ground-breaking video. The real fun stuff is elaborately explained for you. Watch the whole video. I rest my case to what I have been saying for months. :-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vcd-yvudYSg
I saw only the first few seconds so far, and I have found his relation with Israel very disturbing. Will watch the rest a bit later.
I voted for Trump only because Clinton would have started a war with Russia, and still mostly expect he will ruin the US. One huge indication is that he goes along with this ‘business’ thing, and people think because he made money he will make a good political leader.
It must be understood that the purpose of the US is not to make money and profits, and government is not a business! I saw this ‘we will run this like a business’ take over a Boy Scout council, and it pretty much destroyed it, introducing a lot of corruption along the way.
Someone once asked GW Bush what he though history would think of him. He said he didn’t care — he’d be dead then. So let’s just kill all the children because they are not profitable, and by the time they grow up we all have died anyway — live for the moment and forget about humanity and the future. That’s Wall Street and how the US is run.
YOU ARE WRONG…WATCH & LEARN ABOUT DJT.
Who is wrong about what, and watch what? You comment isn’t specific enough (with the indentation being ambiguous) so I understand it.
BTW, fr some interesting comment about how Trump will be privatizing things listen to
https://sputniknews.com/radio_loud_and_clear/201701201049790986-inauguration-day-disunited-states/
Inauguration Day: Disunited States of America
Loud & Clear
10:00 20.01.2017(updated 10:23 20.01.2017)
Brian Becker
On today’s episode of Loud & Clear, Brian Becker is joined by Estevan Hernandez, a writer for Liberation News, Kevin Akin, State Chair of the California Peace and Freedom Party, and Walter Smolarek, producer of Loud & Clear.
Today is the Inauguration — a day of celebration for some, but anger and protest for many others. Since the November election, Donald Trump has rolled out a far right cabinet filled with generals and oligarchs. What is on the Trump agenda? And how will poor and working people and the many, many communities he has targeted fight back?
Analysis of role of street rioters from Stefan Molyneux :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1Y7V2fQKTU
TRUMP CLEANS HOUSE WITH UN BILL from the website jimstonefreelance
Before Trump was inaugurated, he already took steps to find out who his enemies were by having congressman Mike Rogers of Alabama submit the following, so it could be ready on day one of his presidency. Here is the abstract:
American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017
This bill repeals the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 and other specified related laws.
The bill requires: (1) the President to terminate U.S. membership in the United Nations (U.N.), including any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body; and (2) closure of the U.S. Mission to the United Nations.
The bill prohibits: (1) the authorization of funds for the U.S. assessed or voluntary contribution to the U.N., (2) the authorization of funds for any U.S. contribution to any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, (3) the expenditure of funds to support the participation of U.S. Armed Forces as part of any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, (4) U.S. Armed Forces from serving under U.N. command, and (5) diplomatic immunity for U.N. officers or employees.
_____________________________
Obviously Trump does not expect this to pass. But by having this submitted he will, in one easy step, know who will work with him or against him. BRILLIANT.
The full text is HERE: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/193/text
RT has an article on this today:
https://www.rt.com/usa/374754-us-leave-united-nations-bill/
However, it looks like this bill has been floating around for sometime – so it is debateable how much Trump was involved in this.
Just read an account of Soros’s efforts to sideline Trump and generally make trouble:
http://journal-neo.org/2017/01/17/has-soros-declared-a-full-out-war-on-trump/
How can trouble be made for Soros?
Katherine
Why did those soldiers stand behind Trump during his speech, then leave shortly afterwards?
The supply side economic policies of Reaganomics and Thatcherism brought us the recession of 1980-81, 1998-00 and 2007-09. The Trump election should alarm us, since he admires both Reagan and Thatcher. The American working class was taken in by Trump’s slogan “Make America Great Again”.
Ever since Reagan and Thatcher came to power white working class “has been experiencing social and economic destabilization, downward mobility, heightened insecurity, an uncertain future, and ever more precarious work and life conditions.”
To make America great again resonated with the voter, Trump used the working class sector discontent, to appeal to many Americans to vote for him. The discontent caused by globalization in which Trump participates, divided Americans into friends and enemies of his vision. Trump exploited this division and presented his vision to the people who understood their condition through scapegoat politics.
In unregulated economies, economies without unions and resource economies trade agreements are a race to the bottom. Globalists are taking advantage of low wages in developing countries and outsourcing industries from America to Mexico, China, Vietnam and elsewhere leaving shuttered factories across America, and at the same time leaving workers to depend on food stamps as the elite grow their offshore accounts.
Economies that depend on resources remain “hewers of wood and drawers of water” which subjects them to boom and bust cycles. Developed economies like that of Germany and other Northern European nations where workers plan and negotiate with management trade specialization is beneficial.
Trade agreements do not take into consideration comparative advantage garnered by climate, existing infrastructure, educational and health standards so when a nation has a comparative advantage in some product like lumber due to these factors challenges are made that the product is unfairly subsidized. However, low wages in countries like China and Mexico are not considered as subsidies. Trump, I feel has an argument that these factors need to be considered and the trade deals need to be reevaluated. Taxing incoming goods would eliminate outsourcing, lead to self reliance, and elavate wages in low income countries.
Yes, “21st Century capitalism” can and must “dump imperialism” – and it must simultaneously dump the prehistoric pattern of tribal conquest – of which International Jewish supremacy – Zionism – has been the last gasp.
Since prehistory, the world has been trapped in a struggle for survival between competing empires. “Even” the communist Soviet Union was an empire, struggling for survival against an essentially American capitalist empire. All that ever changed, over the millennia, has been the size of the empires and the reach of the weapons. The inevitable and imminent end of that old way was signaled at Hiroshima, when a single bomb from one empire, on one side of the world, obliterated an entire city and its population, in an empire on the other side.
The need to end that old way, and proceed beyond the old tribally-defined or racially-defined struggles for supremacy, has been sinking into human consciousness ever since Hiroshima – albeit gradually and fitfully. Historic momentums don’t change overnight.
Besides the nuclear danger, the awkwardness of administering empire has indeed become – has always been – the most self-defeating feature of any economic system or system of government. All war is now to be seen as glorified slash-and-burn, contrasting to the much greater profits offered by sensible international businessmen-presidents working together. Protecting the interests of various nations and populations no longer depends on obliterating each other. Diversity and prosperity are anything but throwing diverse cultures into a blender.
Of course Trump knows all this, as does Putin and all top-level international military intelligence. Hiroshima made it a no-brainer.
That law is ridiculous. Not only was there not a problem with transgender using bathrooms, but passage of the law cost NC oodles as various groups and businesses boycotted the state. The law was passed as nutty right wing rabble rousing and ignorance.
@Blue : I am so often delighted to read what you say that this opinion comes as a disappointing surprise.
The people that Yockey called the culture distorters always preach that the range of possible right ways and choices is limitless. Experience shows that this is a lie. For one example, Germany in the early 1930s found that its real-world choice was between the value system of Western Civilization and that of Marxist Dialectical Materialism. Similarly the USA in 2016 : traditional American social values (Trump) or Bolshevist anarchy (Killery — Same people and same program 100 years later. Failure or refusal to recognise this is no small part of the reform problem).
A great many consequences follow from having made this choice — one of which is that since traditional (Populist) sexual mores are restored, then policies which reflect and implement these in practice (like the NC Bathroom Law) are valid expressions of the popular will — the collective wisdom — of the American people put (back) into effect. Same with the RF outlawing mass media promoting “alternate lifestyles/sexuality” as something glamorous.
Once consequences that follow from this choice are enforced, the majority of suggestible people (who are only following what they think is right because people they look up to tell them it is) “get the message” and life can return to something like normalcy.
I cannot be the only one here who sees the passage of (and refusal to back down from) the NC Bathroom Law as analogous to the crossing of (the cultural) Rubicon. Or, more recently, “the shot heard ’round the world” at Lexington in 1775. Add the widespread popularity of the “Molon Labe” firearms mantra of the American heartland.
Part and parcel of taking our country back again involves making exactly such intransigent, “confrontational” choices, and “making them stick.” Trying to reason and make nice with the pussy hat Bolsheviks who don’t like them is worse than stupidity. The only thing they will agree to is them getting their own way, in everything.
With Great Respect,
T-t-C
I don’t know who Yokey is.
There is a bunch of political and cultural stuff in your post, and that’s part of the problem of politicizing this issue, and trying to impose ‘normative values’ on it — and so are the activities of ‘homosexual propaganda’ that Putin and company reacted to. Note that in Russia there is no law against being homosexual — just ‘promoting it as a lifestyle’.
The reality is as I described it — a natural part of biological processes as well as a likely result of distortions of the environment, such as chemical pollutants. This bathroom thing is an area the lawmakers should just leave alone. There are transgender people (which is not the same as homosexuality), and they do need to relieve themselves, as anyone else does. This is an issue for medical science, not politics. It’s rather similar, actually, to separate bathrooms and lunch counters for Blacks — except that being Black is obvious and this generally isn’t.
Now — you someone who is in fundamental ways a man, who dresses as a man (or the reverse), and may be even surgically altered and under hormone therapy, and the person is supposed to use a restroom designed for the (apparent) opposite sex — some lady has to go into the men’s restroom because that was the original designation by surface appearances? What kind of sense does that, leading to some brouhaha, make? It’s just asking for trouble, and giving people a hard time for no good reason — where was no problem to start with. It was never a big deal until the politicians made it into a big deal — as if they didn’t already have enough to do, and enough ways that they interfere with peoples’ personal lives.
Perception??
If one makes analysis based on preconceived perceptions (generally speaking), one might get to some fundamentally wrong conclusions.
So, is the Lion cub laughing or not??
http://telemarksporten.no/Tegneserier/Laughing_Lion.jpg
And what should one deduct from the expression of this creature:
http://telemarksporten.no/Tegneserier/LJSCat02.jpg
Take Care
Kent
The law was originally proposed by a convicted pederast – also a leading member of the Human Rights Campaign ( which actually devotes itself to weaponizing homosexuality in pursuit of global eugenicist and Malthusian agendas, mainly through NGOS and the UN.)
The revised law required those claiming to be ‘women trapped in men’s bodies’ to be officially undergoing treatment and to have a birth certificate stating that they had legally ‘transitioned.’
So real transsexuals, intersex individuals did not have any discrimination to face.
It was the perverts and predators – men with no interventions and in possession of all their tackle – who demanded inclusion in the ‘transgender’ cult – and it is a cult, manufactured in Harvard.
The aim is to replace naturally-occurring sex differences – which unambiguously places motherhood in the female domain -with legal fictions, so that a culture of acceptance is created to normalize A.R.T. – particularly surrogacy.
Gay ‘marriage’ was the first step to redefining a global institution whose function – as distinct from civil union – is to legitimize the offspring of men and women, whether monogamous or polygamous.
I am surprised too at your lack of insight Blue, not least your blind spot with regard to ‘transgenderism’ which is a recent ideological invention, not a historically-recurrent bio-anomaly (hermaphroditism).
I also wonder why you don’t recognize that the recruitment of children – and the appalling experimentation conducted on them through the pathologizing of sex non-conformity – by these ‘transgender activists’, in collusion with a corrupt medical establishment is actually a moral evil.
McCrory was right to challenge this abuse of power.
That corporate America came down on him like a ton of bricks should make you seriously question your assumptions – unless you think the plutocracy (especially Big Pharma) should have the right to control language, and decide what ‘female’ and ‘male’ mean?
I don’t know who Yokey is.
@blue : https://archive.org/details/Imperium_352
Ignore the hysterical slander of him @wiki on grounds of his having been politically incorrect. His chapters on Darwin, Marx and Freud are illuminative.
There is a bunch of political and cultural stuff in your post, and that’s part of the problem of politicizing this issue, and trying to impose ‘normative values’ on it
There are normative values in every social grouping. Even if there were none when a group coalesced, they evolve. They are perceptible expressions of what makes us “us” and not “them,” and range from trivial to vital in importance.
I am not trying to impose these on a picture which has none, because no such picture exists, or can, because group norms are intrinsic to human social life. I am pointing out that it is the right of people to define their own culture by these and live them. The people trying to impose normative values are the Bolsheviks with their social engineering and cultural agitprop, the Sharia law barbarians, et al. When in Rome, do as Romans do. Or at least do not attack their values, imagining that you are enlightening them with your “superior” ones.
It’s just asking for trouble, and giving people a hard time for no good reason — where was no problem to start with. It was never a big deal until the politicians made it into a big deal — as if they didn’t already have enough to do, and enough ways that they interfere with peoples’ personal lives.
Exactly opposite when you view it from a real life perspective (vs. a theoretical one in which everything is an abstraction, nothing is real, and “victims” abound).
Why was it never a big deal before ? Because transvestite “women” used bathrooms with 100% individual stalls, and transvestite “men” could use men’s rooms’ walled stalls also — privacy. Don’t ask, don’t tell.
Only if there are gestapo genital inspector gatekeepers at public restroom doors (obviously never) does anything really change. Otherwise, business as usual.
What does change is modern gender-benders being denied a license to invade the traditional, sexually segregated public safe space and flaunt their deviancy, upsetting the people around them — to derive some sick sense of personal importance from being <avant garde “agents of change.”
The only people with a real life problem from this law are those who create their own problems and then complain that they are victims because they cannot live their fantasy without consequences.
This is like the sophistry of murder and cannibalism being OK on a lifeboat adrift at sea — a situation so incredibly rare that it might not even happen once in a year — used to supposedly “invalidate” the universal norm that cannibalism is not OK. Both suppositions (the purported victimhood of the flaming transgenders and the moral rectitude of the murdering cannibals) are almost entirely in the abstract — imaginary.
Bottom line : it is no more unjust to expect gender-benders to conform to traditional US norms in the US than it is for RF to expect immigrants there to live congruently with Russian normative values. I notice that when VP articulated this, he received a standing ovation in the Duma while when conservatives here (US) do this there is only opprobrium from those conditioned to regard Brave New World “values” as expressions of personal righteousness.
IMO.
PS: I do not intend this as an ad hominem attack on you, personally.
I got a minute and read this much of Yockey, picked almost at random as a first selection, page 79, chapter on Marxism.
“Socialism is also an ethical-social principle, and not an economic
program of some kind. It is antithetical to the Individualism which
produced Capitalism. Its self-evident, instinctive idea is: each man for all.
To Individualism as a Life-principle, it was obvious that each man in
pursuing his own interests, was working for the good of all. To Socialism as
a Life-principle, it is equally obvious that a man working for himself alone is
ipso facto working against the good of all. ”
I’d say he doesn’t understand either, and neither what the Chinese are calling ‘win-win’ now. His thinking is binary and simplistic. Both of them are part of political economics, comprised of both, and some other elements, and are not exclusive but, in balance, complimentary, and can be synergistic. It should be now obvious that individualism need not work for the good of all, and socialism need not exclude the individual or his development (and in social cooperation is crucially necessary for the highest individual development. Frankly, to me, this reads like a high school level essay.
When he says “a man working for himself alone is ipso facto working against the good of all” he directly contradicts ideas of classical economics, and the ‘invisible hand’, which are only partly true and can be easily discredited are also applicable in various situations, especially in a ‘free market’ environment. None of this self evident at all, but is, in fact a central issue in a great many essays and theories about politics, economics, and other such fields of humanity studies.
In terms of cybernetics, consciousness, and intelligence studies — collective intelligence and swarm intelligence — how individual actions and rules, even simple ones, can emerge into complex systems and ‘apparent intelligence’ within ‘societies and cultures’ (ant colonies, slime molds, robotics, A.I., genetic algorithms) is a hot topic these days. Much of this he could know nothing of, of course, since so much of it was developed since Yockey’s death.
Capitalism itself, however, is shown to be inimical to individualism as the working class becomes alienated and zombified in the industrial workplace and monopolistic economy, and education as well as living standards are stratified — now to extreme degrees.
In short, he has got so much wrong in just those two sentences I must wonder how much time I want to spend exploring his work further. I’ve found it is better to do some reading to get a rough inventory of various ideas and terms, but to then observe and think for oneself. Most of what I’ve read and the ideas I have at my disposal I have no idea who to attribute to or how they related them, and make no particular effort to keep them straight: they are like a junk yard where I can pick bits and pieces to use in whatever I am inventing or constructing at the time. Often, when people say something is like Aristotle, Kant, or some school of thought I have to, with few exceptions, stop to try to remember, or look them up, to see what is they said — and then it starts to fade again back into the undifferentiated junkyard, crowded out by whatever I’m thinking or learning about at the time. It is the content and concepts I hold in my mind, not academic ordering of sources or people, unless it just happens to stick there for some some reason.
So I asked myself, ‘what would it be like to be intersex in some way, and wanting to legally use a rest room, without creating any commotions, and there is a law that says I can’t go to one for the sex I identify with and am dressed as?’ It would not be good situation at all! That was the basis of my thinking.
PS:
On the whole modern gender phenomenon, an amazingly good (and hysterically funny) (both at the same time) essay by Israel Shamir :
http://www.unz.com/ishamir/from-yin-to-yang/
Most highly recommended.
I read it. Most highly approved!
In response to the transgender thing, this will be short.
I looked up Yockey and downloaded the book to read when I can, and also the Spengler book, ditto.
I briefly read a few sites about transgender, the various syndromes, and various opinions.
My impression of it all, in my current state of more or less drifting through the day and centered on my immediate surroundings, is that this has gotten way to overcomplicated and with far too much luggage to haul around — it will/would take days and weeks to wade through even a part of it (with already two books from two right wing ‘philosophers’, the youngest of whom died 57 years ago. What does this boring, marginal, big-endian vs small-endian, and complex stuff have to do with anything? I haven’t even carefully read through the last posts on it yet — my mind keeps drifting off, but they seem to me to be filled with political and cultural stuff, which is what I think should be avoided from all sides, in favor of people minding their own business without trying to impose their ideas and values on others.
I feel like I’ve stepped outdoors to check for the letter carrier and was suddenly enveloped in a whirling storm of melting ice pellets, leaves, and flying monkeys squirrels. As I said, it will take some time for to go through all this, if I can spare that time, but for now I see nothing in my original posts to retract — it’s a dumb and unnecessary law concerning a very small fraction of people, and doing nothing but increasing the noise and chaos levels. The best way to deal with those who want to make a big political movement out of this is to ignore them and simply live and let live. That law just further empowers them, lets them think they are important, and further divide people. If someone dressed as one sex enters a bathroom for the opposite sex we already have laws against creating a public disturbance. It’s covered.
To make a law against someone — intersex person — using a bathroom dependent on their birth certificate (must people carry that around with them? Must people find a way to and bear the cost of having it altered? Are people to be forced to undergo surgery?) is not calming trouble but asking for more. Over what?? We need to calm things down, not stir them up more.
If the princess wants to marry the frog or the dish run away with the spoon or the owl and pussycat go to sea, what’s that to me or anyone else? We have much bigger fish to fry.
That’s all I can say right now.
I also liked Israel Shamir’s article. I never caught up with Peter AU’s objection to the man, because Peter never gave a concrete example from Shamir’s work that could be analyzed for either error or truth.
It ok that Shamir did not empathize the fact that the deepest imperial purpose behind the sexual nonsense promoted by the Empire is the human herd culling itself. The goal of his article didn’t go that far. But that reality needs to be faced by those taken in by the whole scam, in terms of their ridiculous “identity” as well as by those trying to ignore it.
To take a wholly individualistic approach to such things ignoring the overarching social engineering agenda behind that which one would prefer not to deal with, in favor of other areas of that same Empire agenda which one does want to deal with is to cede too much territory and maneuvering room to the Empire, and to willfully remain in incomprehension of the full dimensions of the assault on civilization.
By the way, the Empire goes out of their way to promote such a relationship of the individual to the big wide world, especially through the New Age nonsense. It’s called solipsism. And it leads to ceding far, far too much territory to the Empire’s mind control.
If you don’t want to deal with it, or can’t deal with it for whatever reason, then don’t.
But encouraging others not to deal with it either?? I second Talks to Cats and Franz, but not that. Just to be clear.
While the lame-stream-media has been busy reporting on those phony, anti-Trump, Soros-protests…
President Trump was busy at work. Just minutes after leaving his inauguration, he went on to sign the Executive Order to start dismantling Obamacare. Now, you may agree or disagree with that move, but the truth is that was one of his key pledges during his campaign and as a result; he’s shown he’s a man of his word.
Just some hours ago, he signed the Executive Order to withdraw the US from the TTP agreement. Another promise fulfilled. Nothing to sign on TTIP since he already said he wouldn’t even consider to approve it.
He already met with [workers] Union Leaders, and car manufactures to get the jobs going.
Another important move – which, admitedly, I’ll believe when I see it – he plans to move the WH press conference room to a bigger one, because he wants to include members of the alternative-media, Info Wars was reported by the Russian Insider as an example, but apparently Trump also wants to include popular blogers too.
Who knows, folks? Maybe one day we might even get to see Saker sitting along side to RT’s Gayane Chichakyan at one of the WH press conferences :-) (Hey! One can dream, can’t we?)
Lastly, Sputnik reports that…
Russia Receives Daesh Coordinates in Al-Bab From US
“Russia has received coordinates of Daesh targets in Al-Bab, Aleppo Province, from the US via the ‘direct line,’ the Russian Defense Minsitry said Monday [..]”
https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201701231049927674-russia-us-daesh-coordinates/
–
I’ve never seen a President getting to work this quickly, let alone actually delivering on some his/hers promises this early.
Like most; I still remain ‘cautiously optimistic’ about Trump. But, it can’t be denied that so far… so good. Wouldn’t you guys agree?
-TL2Q
This one informs my previous post…
–
Trump Wins The Unions: Teamsters Praise TPP Withdrawal, Labor Chiefs Describe “Incredible” Meeting With Trump:
“[..] The remarks came at the start of a meeting at the White House with leaders of construction, carpenters, plumbers and sheet metal unions, during which Trump pledged to stop trade deals that harmed American workers [..]”
“This is a group that I know well,” Trump said referring to the union bosses, adding “we’re going to put a lot of people back to work” and “stop the ridiculous trade deals.”
When Trump said the administration “just officially terminated TPP,” it prompted applause from the labor chiefs (and this time it certainly wasn’t by paid members of the studio audience), who later described their meeting with Trump as “incredible.” [..]”
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-23/labor-unions-pivot-praise-trumps-tpp-withdrawal-describe-meeting-president-incredibl
–
-TL2Q
And yet, a few posts back, someone claimed adamantly that ‘Russia pursues nothing but her own interests.’
How to square this circle?
Just finished to watch Trump’s signing of a new executive order – regarding the Mexican border. The man is fast, he is fulfilling his promises made during his campaign at large speed. Like a boxer : punch fast and hard. His opponents are amazed, as well as his skeptics, as myself. Well, is not boring at all…
@ ioan:
“The man is fast, he is fulfilling his promises made during his campaign at large speed. Like a boxer : punch fast and hard. His opponents are amazed, as well as his skeptics, as myself. Well, is not boring at all…”
You ain’t kidding, ioan. Never seen anything like it before [granted; I’m not as old nor as young as some may think I am ;-) ] As I’ve implied before; that alone deserves praise, and as a natural-born contrarian myself, that’s no cheer-leader blank check I’m extending to Trump. It’s just that I believe in giving praise to those who earn it.
But! But! If I have to hold to him account… you better believe I will, like I’m sure others will do too, including yourself.
For better or worse, he’s got everybody’s attention at the moment. All eyes are on him. We’re all watching him like a hawk. Neither side will let him slip. Best course of action for him to follow is the honest path… to do what he promised he’d do. Nothing less, nothing more.
At the end of the day that’s why people vote for a particular candidate; their choice is based on his/her policies and on his/her promises. The people, rightfully so, expect the winning candidate to deliver, at the bear minimum, on the specifics they mentioned during the campaign, like, for example: I expect Trump to build the darn wall, but I wouldn’t expect him to re-open a 9/11 investigation – it would be great if he does, but he didn’t promise that. Even though… he’s a known skeptic of the official “conspiracy theory” that was the 911 Commission Report, so you never know… He did call for an investigation on voting fraud [either yesterday or day before] and he didn’t promise that one [not to my knowledge at least] and I think that’s underway already!
-TL2Q
Interesting comment from ‘The Trumpening’ at Nakedcapitalism.com:
In order to better understand Donald Trump, one must be familiar with the ideological origins of Trumpism: the theories of Alain de Benoist and Alexander Dugin. Some ot their main themes a battle of the periphery (good) versus the center (evil); abandoning traditional left / right orthodoxies; a cultural turn towards tradition; and internationally a call for multipolarity and an end to the US global hegemony.
On top of this Trump is utilizing two of Steve Sailer’s strategic ideas. First, that the Republican Party should concentrate on maximizing the white vote. And secondly, the concept of “citizenism” should the globalist censures about showing partiality towards a nation’s own citizens.. In citizenism, the citizens of a nation are like common stock holders in a company and the government serves the role of corporate managers whose first duty is to increase the wellbeing of its citizens and to not hand out US citizenship willy-nilly to foreigners.
So the Trump battles with the media serve a couple purposes. First Trump realizes that no matter what, the media is going to attack him with everything they have. And so his strategic interest is to canalize their attacks towards safe directions he prefers. Trump was quite promiscuous with his campaign promises on what he would accomplish on his first days. For example a whole lot of “bad hombres” should already be deported. So these dumb discussions about crowd size are a better debate for Trump to have than discussing why no bad hombres have been deported yet. Also fighting the insider media helps associate Trump with the periphery and highlights him battling the center.
And given that reporters are not much more than corporate lobbyists; Trump may soon have them reregister as such. After all, Mexican oligarch Carlos Slim is a major owner of the NYT and Amazon oligarch Jeff Bezos is the owner of the WaPo. Their reporters are making damn sure they serve the economic interests of these oligarchic masters.
And while Trump was getting predominantly white union leaders to sing his praises yesterday, at the same time candidates for the DNC were taking turns trying to outdo each other in bashing whites. That’s no way to retake the northern industrial states!
On China, Trump is looking for a conflict that will allow him to justify imposing trade sanctions against China. And it will be so much more fun when cuck GOP leaders demure and Trump has to point out that China is actually still Communist and still has a Politburo! But of course ending the War Party’s jihad on Russia will lead to a multi-polar world. The US, the EU, Russia, Iran, India, China, Japan, etc, should all take on the role of regional powers as the US pulls back its forces towards its own shores.
Politically the Democrats have no role to play for at least the next two years. The war will be Trump against the establishment GOP. The GOP leadership are born losers and so Trump will go over their heads and speak directly to the oligarchs who control them. Trump’s main tool will be to threaten to do damage to these oligarchs through executive action but he just might be persuaded to lessen the impact if the GOP cucks vote as they are instructed.
And it is pretty rich for the Democrats to whine about not having a seat at the NAFTA renegotiation table. Obama in fact promised to renegotiate NAFTA and he controlled both houses of Congress for his first two years. But he did nada and now that the baller in chief is getting things done now suddenly Democrats are interested in NAFTA??
The next couple years is going to be loads of fun!
Like most; I still remain ‘cautiously optimistic’ about Trump. But, it can’t be denied that so far… so good. Wouldn’t you guys agree?
Yes. But he will have to be Hercules — the Augean Stable is that full !
An excellent essay by Thierry Meyssan on one crux of his task :
http://www.voltairenet.org/article195017.html
@Eimar —
Outstanding piece !!
Here is a companion piece by the same author:
http://www.voltairenet.org/article193284.html
I posted it on as many social media sites as I could think of.