This article was written for the Unz Review: http://www.unz.com/tsaker/russian-american-agreement-on-syria/
The recent agreement between the USA and Russia really solves nothing, it does not even end the war, and both sides are expressing a great deal of caution about its future implementation. And yet, this is a huge victory for Russia. While it is too early to say that “the Russian won in Syria”, I think that it is now fair to say that the Russian position on Syria has won. Here is why:
First: nobody is suggesting anymore that Assad will be ousted or Damascus taken. That, in turn, means that everybody has now recognized that Syrian Arab Republic, backed by Russia, has successfully repelled the aggression of the huge coalition the AngloZionists built to overthrow Assad.
Second: Russia has forced the UNSC and the USA to admit that the vast majority of those who fight Assad today are terrorist. Of course, this is not how this was declared, but if you look at the organizations which the UNSC has already declared as ‘terrorists’ then you already have an absolute majority of the anti-Assad forces. This means that the moral and legal legitimacy of the anti-Assad forces is lies in tatters.
Third: regardless of what Erdogan does actually try to do next, there are now clear signs that neither NATO, nor the EU nor even the Turkish high military command want a war with Russia. And that means that Erdogan’s gamble has not paid off and that his entire Syria policy is now comprehensively dead. Keep in mind that following the treacherous attack on the Russian Su-24 the Kremlin made it a policy goal to “Saakashvilize” Erdogan. This goal is now almost reached and Erdogan’s future looks very, very bleak: everybody ( except maybe the Saudis) is sick and tired of this maniac. The best thing which could happen to Turkey now would for the military to get rid of Erdogan and to replace him with somebody willing to repair all the damage he did.
Fourth: all the threats to impose a no-fly zone or to occupy Syria have now been invalidated by an agreement which basically declares that anybody not respecting the cease-fire is a legitimate target for engagement and destruction.
Fifth: the USA had to accept the humiliation of having to agree to all of the Russian terms for the current ceasefire. Yes, of course, the USA can, and probably will, try renege on part, or all, of this agreement, but the precedent has been set and it will be very hard, if not impossible, for the USA to openly return to the pre-2016 policies.
Sixth: does anybody still remember the rhetoric of Hillary Clinton about Syria and Russia? Her position was crystal clear: Assad must go and those who support him “punished”. Even after the Russian military offensive began, the US refused to tell the Russians where the “good terrorists” were and where the “bad terrorists” were. No exchange of information with Russians was acceptable. Now the Americans had to agree to work with the Russians on a map of Syria designating where the participants of the ceasefire and were those who were not included in the ceasefire were deployed. In other words, the US will now have to share with Russia all the info it previously refused to share and work with the Russians on a daily basis.
Seventh: Russia has basically co-opted the so-called “Free Syrian Army”. How? By basically forcing every single faction in Syria to chose between one of two possible statuses: being a ‘terrorist’ (and a fair target for destruction) or being a participant in a political process entirely designed by Russia. The Russians are now even opening a “Truce Center” at the Khmeimin airbase near Latakia which will now “render assistance” to all the parties to the ceasefire.
This, for the time being, mainly a diplomatic victory, of course, but a Russian diplomatic victory made possible by a Russian military victory. A tiny Russian military contingent has basically completely neutralized the plans of an entire worldwide Empire. That, in itself, is an amazing achievement.
The other big winner here are, in my opinion, the Kurds who, according to British officials, appear to be coordinating their military operations with the Syrian army and the Russian Aerospace Forces and who now might well even achieve their dreams of joining the Iraqi and Syria regions of Kurdistan. Which is just about the worst nightmare for the Turks come true, hence the still remaining risk of a Turkish military operation ostensibly to create a ‘buffer zone’ but really to save face. That kind of intervention will remain a possibility for as long as the Turks can continue to hope to commit aggression against their neighbors under the protection of NATO and the USA. And that ain’t gonna change anytime in the future.
And then there are the Saudis. They are very, very angry. They are angry to the point of making not so subtle threats about using nuclear weapons to deal with their adversaries. See for yourself:
Actually, since Pakistan got The Bomb, I would not dismiss any Saudi claims of having a number of nuclear devices. But what does that really mean?
Absolutely nothing.
It is quite possible that the Saudis have the know how for a nuclear device. And it is quite possible that they even got their hands on enough nuclear materials for a few bombs. They might even have succeeded in purchasing a few nuclear devices from the Pakistanis or Israelis. But even if that is true, the reality is that the Saudis don’t even have the military capability to deal with the poorest Arab country on the planet (Yemen) and that they most definitely don’t have the military capability to engage their nuclear devices in a way which would allow them to achieve any kind of military advantage. After all, what are we talking about here? Using nuclear weapons against the Syrian military? Against Iran? Against Russia? This is absolutely ridiculous. The reality is that whatever nuclear capabilities the Saudis might or might not have, the fact that they would make nuclear threats is just a sign of weakness and fear, not a sign of strength. This is why nobody is impressed by these statement, least of all the intended targets of such threats.
While it is quite true that the latest agreement between the USA and Russia does not mark the end of the war in Syria, it is a turning point, a kind of a Minsk-2 Agreement which nobody really wants to comply with, but which seals the defeat of the AngloZionist plans in Syria as much as Minsk-2 meant the defeat of the Ukronazi dream.
Time is now on the Russian/Syrian side. With each passing day the Russian task force in Syria will become more powerful, as will the Syrian Armed Forces. That, by itself, will not be enough to defeat Daesh, and we can expect a stiff resistance from the Takfiri crazies, but the writing is on the wall for all to see: the more the Russians and the Americans become directly and jointly involved, the less Turkey and Saudi Arabia will be able to determine the outcome of the war. In other words, while this is far from being the end of Daesh, it is the beginning of the end for Daesh in Syria.
Yet again the nay-sayers and Putin-haters have been proven wrong. To be honest, so have I: I would never have guessed that the Russians could have achieved so much with so little and yet they did pull off this extremely dangerous gamble and they won. Only an extremely skillful combination of military, economic, diplomatic and political means could have yielded such a remarkable result but Putin, apparently, found this perfect mix. The path ahead remains extremely dangerous, for sure, but the outcome of the 20 week long Russian military intervention in Syria is nothing short of remarkable.
The Saker
“To be honest, so have I: I would never have guessed that the Russians could have achieved so much with so little and yet they did pull off this extremely dangerous gamble and they won.”
Putins end goals are known, but when it comes to tactics, the only thing predictable is the unexpected. His thinking is his own, not simply the gurgitation of accumulated knowledge. Original.
Torah Jews: Extend their morality to non Jews
Talmudic Jews: Follow a form of psycopathy where they exert zero morality to non Jews. (With the Chutzpah and thin skinned nature to demand it for themselves)
There are two ethical sects to Jews. Khazarians/Askenazi Jews. Converted in twelve century to an abrahamic faith for political convenience. Sephardi Jews. Likely decendents from biblical Jews.
Ashkenazi elite who are Talmudic Jews control the US, Israel, France and Germany, Australia, New Zealand and Canada. They do this via controlling money supply and then buying mass media (demonising enemies and lauding allies) and corporations. Unfortunately their management is terrible so only by extending their icy touch can they expect success.
I think it likely that Ashkenazi/Khazarian Talmudic profile is very common in the AngloZionist empire.
Please post Off-Topic comments in the Moveable Feast Café thread. (KL)
read up on narcissism, it neatly encapsulates the khazar hordes mode of behavior. At least that way you know what to expect. narcissistic rage in response to a narcissistic insult is a very interesting subject on its own.
I agree wholeheartedly and have suspected as much for quite a while, it’s nice to hear someone else come to the same conclusion. Much of the Jewish community does indeed seem to suffer from some mass version of narcissistic personality disorder. Deep-seated feelings of self-loathing, insecurity, and guilt are covered up with grandiose illusions of self. Egomania, psychological projection, lying, manipulation, sense of victimhood, paranoia, need to control others, not perceiving anything wrong with oneself, sense of entitlement, sense of specialness(choseness, moral superiority), and fragile emotions are all symptoms of this disorder.
Please check out the following links, they’re very informative:
http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/narcissistic-personality-disorder/basics/definition/con-20025568
http://waking-you-up.com/Narcissistic-Sociopath.html
http://samvak.tripod.com/npdglance.html
also these two on “victim playing” are very pertinent:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victim_playing
http://outofthefog.net/CommonBehaviors/SelfVictimization.html
Sounds remarkably similar to the Land of the Free with its grandiose delusions in American Exceptionalism.
We have asked for OT posts to be made to the Moveable Feast Cafe thread. Please do not make OT posts here. Otherwise we will be forced to not approve them. Thank you for your cooperation in the future. Mod.ZZ
you are absolutely correct….and the Zionists are winning the campaign for global dominance. Russia and china stand in their way. ty
” Putins end goals are known, but when it comes to tactics, the only thing predictable is the unexpected. His thinking is his own, not simply the gurgitation of accumulated knowledge. Original.”
Very well, said, Peter.
It’s called intelligence. And it is what the psychopathic Western control-grid lacks by definition.
The Saker,
Sputnik has published your article:
http://sputniknews.com/politics/20160225/1035354086/syria-ceasefire-russia-victory.html
But, why on Earth they call him “anonymous US military analyst” at this stage?
However, The Saker, an anonymous US military analyst, does not share such a stance. He believes that the agreement is a huge victory for Russia.
Because they don’t know his info is available now..
Not only now but also before was publicly known that he is a US based military analyst, but of Russian origins.
Is it that Sputnik does not know it yet?
It was not precisely the part Anonymous which surprised me so much, but his consideration as US military analyst by nothing less than Sputnik!
War party not interested in peace,not at all.
Pentagon, CIA heads demand to increase pressure on Moscow over Syria.
NEW YORK, February 23. /TASS/. Top military and intelligence officials in U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration want to increase pressure on Moscow by expanding support to militants fighting in Syria after the agreement was reached with Russia on the ceasefire in Syria on February 27, the Wall Street Journal online newspaper said on Tuesday.
The publication called Defense Secretary Ash Carter, Marine General Joseph Dunford and CIA Director John Brennan an “alliance of Russia hawks in the cabinet.”
According to the daily, at the last meeting in the White House Obama’s top advisers expressed extremely bellicose views towards Moscow.
More:
http://tass.ru/en/world/858470
Just released,possibility of more sanctions against Russia and more lethal help for the ”rebels”.
”Une autre version, soutenue par la majorité des conseillers d’Obama, sous-entend de nouvelles sanctions économiques contre la Russie.”
Lire la suite: http://fr.sputniknews.com/international/20160224/1022021421/plan-b-pour-syrie.html#ixzz414T1vfHy
english version will follow soon
MOSCOW, February 24. /TASS/. Those who cast doubt on the Russian-US agreements on Syria are in fact calling for war, not for peace, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Wednesday at a meeting with Co-Chairman of the Initiative to Reduce Nuclear Threat and member of the Supervisory Board of the International Luxembourg Forum on Preventing Nuclear Catastrophe Sam Nunn.
READ ALSO
Putin discusses initiatives of Russia-US Syria statement with Iran’s president — Kremlin
Putin explains essence of Russia-US statement on Syria in phone talks with Saudi King
Russian lawmaker warns Russia-US deal on Syria ceasefire may face resistance inside US
Putin discussed Syrian settlement with Bashar Assad — Kremlin
Syrian Foreign Ministry: Groups violating ceasefire to be regarded as terrorist
“Today there are many people who want to prevent the normal development of cooperation between Russia and the United States. There are even those who are trying to undermine the opportunities to promote the Russian-U.S. agreements and boost our cooperation on the most pressing issues of our time,” the minister said.
“Literally on the day when Russia and the United States approved the joint initiative on the ceasefire in Syria, voices could be heard from the capitals of the US allies and from Washington which questioned the viability of this agreement,” Lavrov said. “We want to say frankly that these voices are a call for war rather than for peace.”
“I very much hope that politicians of your level with a responsible approach to developments will counter these negative trends and promote fair, equitable and mutually advantageous cooperation between our countries,” the minister added.
More:
http://tass.ru/en/politics/858573
UNITED NATIONS, February 24. /TASS/. Russia and the US have drafted two blueprints of a UN Security Council resolution in support of the agreement on ceasefire in Syria, reached earlier this week, a source at the UN headquarters told TASS.
In the coming days, a united resolution will be drafted on the basis of these blueprints.
“There are two texts, the American and the Russian, and the task now is to converge them into one,” the source said, calling coordination of the future resolution a tedious process, especially considering the fact the case in hand was Syria.
Another source told TASS Russia and the US were holding discussions of the document in a bilateral format and no versions of the text had been circulated among other members of the Security Council.
More:
http://tass.ru/en/world/858479
MOSCOW, February 24. /TASS/. Russian-US agreements on ceasefire in Syria may face resistance in the United States, Federation Council’s International Affairs Committee chairman Konstantin Kosachev said on Wednesday.
READ ALSO
Putin discussed Syrian settlement with Bashar Assad — Kremlin
“This agreement started to face resistance inside the United States. In any case, yesterday I noticed statements by military leadership of the country, the Pentagon, from special services, in particular CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) that say that Russia cannot be trusted, (Syrian) President Assad cannot be trusted. These agreements (on ceasefire in Syria) will not be implemented by these sides by default, and it is necessary to develop a ‘plan B’,” Kosachev said at the meeting with Executive Director of the Center for the National Interest Paul Sanders.
The Russian lawmaker expressed concern that “US military are not working in unison with US diplomats and the US president.” “I will be glad to be mistaken but it is very important now for the pressure on conflicting parties in Syria to be as consolidated as possible, for us to separate terrorist groups from the internal conflict in Syria by joint efforts as they deserve a joint response and joint strike, both political and military,” he noted.
Kosachev added that another obstacle for implementation of Russia-US agreements on ceasefire in Syria may be the presence or lack of support of these agreements inside Syria. He reminded that the Syrian government already supported the agreement. However, he added, there are doubts on whether the armed opposition will support the deal.
More:
http://tass.ru/en/politics/858541
Did you expect the Anglo-Zionists to tamely go down without putting up a fight?
What we are seeing here is the expected behaviour.
This is just the dawn of a multipolar world, it will take several years for people to stop behaving like animals.
”Did you expect the Anglo-Zionists to tamely go down without putting up a fight”? Emphatically no. But I do expect the US deep state, suffused as it is with neo-cons, liberal hawks and humanitarian interventionists, to be undergoing a collective apoplectic seizure right now. After their collapse in the Syrian adventure expect them to turn up the heat in Ukraine.
John Smith said: “After their collapse in the Syrian adventure expect them to turn up the heat in Ukraine.”
Actually, I’d expect the counter-attack in a different theater of operations.
Like South Africa, where the ANC is speaking out against a color revolution, Brazil with the oil-related economic turmoil and impeachment move afoot, or Venezuela suffering from the oil collapse and economic warfare, all of which the resistance to AZ hegemony cannot readily reach to counteract as they could in Ukraine and Syria.
Not to say that the Banderite storm-troopers won’t enjoy orders to turn up the heat, but getting their butts whipped twice may have put a damper on the vitriolic warhawks going full kamikaze for a while.
True. The war and “cull the human herd” party are not pleased with peace and (God forbid!) any economic development threatening to arrive anywhere in the region.. The rebuilding must take off very soon.
US website draws a parallel between what happened economically after Oslo Accords 23 years ago (nothing!) and what must actually happen this time:
“When Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization signed an agreement in 1993 to end the killing and establish self-government for the Palestinians, Lyndon LaRouche immediately said that the tractors must roll, today, if the plan was to succeed. The common benefit to both sides, based on Israeli industrial capacity and Palestinian skilled labor, must be launched without delay, he insisted. That did not happen, as the IMF and World Bank were put in charge to oversee the process.
Twenty-three years later — The dramatic ceasefire in Syria agreed to by Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Secretary of State John Kerry on Feb. 22 in Munich, and confirmed in a phone call from President Vladimir Putin to President Barack Obama, has the immediate potential of transforming not only Syria, not only the Mideast, but the entire world. The brilliant strategic intervention by Putin into Syria last year demonstrated that terrorists could be defeated, but also that the US under President Obama had in fact sided with the terrorists to achieve “regime change” against uncooperative governments. That era of U.S. subservience to British imperial tyranny can be finished — if the ceasefire holds.
As with Oslo, the ceasefire will only hold if the the reconstruction and development of Syria (and the region) begins immediately. Helga Zepp-LaRouche said on Feb. 23 that the Silk Road process launched by Xi Jinping can and must be brought into the region now – not next month or next year. The development program for Southwest Asia presented in the EIR report The New Silk Road Becomes the World Land-Bridge provides the foundation. Xi Jinping initiated the project during his visit to Saudi Arabia, Iran and Egypt in January. There is no time to lose.”
In other words, ultimately ,”It’s the economy, stupid!”
the link https://larouchepac.com/20160224/silk-road-can-make-syrian-ceasefire-succeed ends: with:
The CIA, and the White House, are not pleased. The Wall Street Journal issued a report from unnamed sources that CIA Director John Brennan, Secretary of Defense Ash Carter, and Obama’s new Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Joseph Dunford are doing what they can to sabotage the deal, claiming Putin will not comply, and demanding new and increased pressure on him, to cause “real pain.” The Economist Magazine, the voice of the City of London, went berserk, writing:
“The only puzzle is what John Kerry, America’s secretary of state, thought he could achieve through his agreement with Mr Lavrov–except, perhaps, to expose Russian cynicism.”
(Clearest case of “projection” I have seen in days!)…………Anonymous…….
Clearly, leading figures within the US institutions realized that if Obama were allowed to proceed, the world was rapidly heading for thermonuclear extinction. Now, there are those who want to dump him, as well we must. What is required to consolidate these moves is to end the power of the problem at the source — Wall Street and the British Empire. Unleashing the global development process required must begin by shutting down Wall Street and restoring a sane economic order.”
First step here, to compliment the needed rebuilding in Syria (by China?) : Restoration of Glass Steagall absolute separation of reckless derivatives gambling investment banking from legitimately productive commercial banking….no more “too big to fail” excuses by Congress and plans to prop up banks by seizing customer deposits for “bail-ins” ala Cyprus a couple of years ago.
Excellent analysis as usual saker u r a godsend compared to the rest of the rubbish that is written about russia. The Anglo-Zionist are still playing a dasterdly game for Kerry stated via the state department that their is a plan B which is really their plan A but publicly saying plan b for the balkanization of Syria. Hence the pinzer effect that the Syrians are mounting on Raqqa will have to go on turbo drive. These Cabalist /ashkanazi-khazarian mafia will never let up they will go 4 broke balkanize the whole area weaken them and bolster their Zionist dream. Barzani his deeply inbeded with these mobsters if the Iraqi Kurds dont get rid of him I can still c problems in the north eastern corridor of Syria. Erdoghan ,Barzani and the mobsters all made a deal in 2012 and that was balkanization of the area. Divide and conquer. Yestrerdays news gets wrapped in todays fish.
NATO Hiding in Norway — Syria and Ukraine Nowhere to Hide. Stephen F. Cohen, NYU, Princeton
According to S Cohen,Washington wants the ‘head’ of Putin and at any price.
No peace only more wars in sight even if the US must sacrifice the EU vassals and the stability of Europe with even more refugees.Face saving is not enough,they want to be back to full domination(unipolar world).
https://audioboom.com/boos/4221124-nato-hiding-in-norway-syria-and-ukraine-nowhere-to-hide-stephen-f-cohen-nyu-princeton-eastwestacoord-com
Excellent analysis Saker… thank you for pulling all the pieces together.
The Aussie media has not yet mentioned the Peace deal… very odd.
But then all the news we get about Russia is about 3 days late, no doubt it has to go the long way round (via the US censors) before it reaches down under.
And as in New Zealand the only news we get is anti-Russian sourced from the BBC or Reuters. I know what is really going on from coming to sites like this. Unfortunately the rest of the country is non the wiser and think Russia is bombing civilians, hospitals and causing the refugee crisis. Well done Russia. You are our only hope for a better, peaceful world.
I logged onto the NZ Herald to see if they reported the NZ vote at the recent UN Security council meeting… and there was nothing (NZ voted against Syria’s right to keep it current borders). As for the rest of NZ they are too busy congratulating themselves on their inflated house prices to notice that their wages have been reduced to insignificance, and their cost of living will probably soon be amongst the highest on the planet.
It used to be a nice place… last century.
Run by a millionaire business parasite, New Zealand has witnessed growing poverty and inequality. A typical Anglosphere dystopia. That vote in the UN is remarkably filthy, however.
You are so right Babushka, I have given away completely the local stuff.
Confirming what we just said…. and already know.
News on developments around the world are generated by the Pentagon, the State Department, the White House and by think tank “experts”, who deliver the official point of view.
The American public is being constantly misinformed regarding global affairs, Stephen Kinzer, a senior fellow at the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University, writes in his article for The Boston Globe.
“Under intense financial pressure, most American newspapers, magazines, and broadcast networks have drastically reduced their corps of foreign correspondents,” he says, stressing that a lot of important news about the world now comes from reporters based in Washington.
http://sputniknews.com/us/20160221/1035117709/us-media-coverage.html#ixzz419O7baBq
Who gets their info from old school networks anymore ? Regular media and their satellite operations are obsolete and will not survive. After all that is why we come to sites like The Saker for alternative views of the world
Never was so much owed by so many to so few. Winston is spinning in his grave tonight.
I’m not so sure. They’re talking about breaking up Syria now.
American final goal is still to wipe Russia off the map.
Thanks, Saker. This is a glorious moment, for the same reason, as you suggest, that Minsk 2.0 is a glorious moment – because it has held the whole world to its terms ever since. And so will this agreement. It is a model for the future world, as Putin says, and it extends far beyond Syria in its achievement.
I’ve written the following in a couple of other places, about this agreement:
It’s the result of continual effort. It’s a masterful agreement. It is changing the world back to UN-sanctified agreements within international law, and Putin specifically stated the countries where the US action had produced devastation by breaking out of that previous norm.
Russia and the US are now co-chairs on peace in the world. One by one, countries will come under this umbrella, and Russia has earned its place as principal guarantor of the good behavior of the US through the strength of its arms, and the force of its diplomacy.
This forces US to share information with Russia or risk losing any undisclosed assets in the field to Syrian and Russian firepower. All the bad guys will be destroyed over time. Syria will liberate its land militarily where it can, and through diplomacy and negotiation, over a longer time frame, where it can’t (e.g. Golan Heights). Russia will keep the US in check, and the UN will be the benchmark for all disputes of sovereignty.
Very good prediction of the future. The whole world will win if it really happens.
With it’s army of Terrorists on the run, how is Washington going to partition Syria? Turkey and the Saudis’s are isolated and every one else in the Middle East is kissing up to Russia…….including the Israelis. The American public is waking up to the reality that Russia actually has competent leaders. Usually when that happens, they will switch their support to the winning team. Americans hate losers…..it’s just a matter of time.
I think this will yield military advantage, too, due to Saker’s seventh point. The Syrian army’s enemies have now been divided into those who are currently still fighting them and those who are, for the moment at least, not. They get to concentrate their full strength on the first group and just keep tabs on the second unless or until it, or bits of it, violate the cease fire.
If it holds for any length of time, by the time the supposedly “non-terrorist”, ceasefire observing opposition return to the fight, the opposition in general’s position will have eroded significantly. If it holds until Isis et al. have been effectively defeated, Syria and allies will be left with a much smaller enemy stripped of its craziest elements; at a minimum they will be far easier to defeat, at a maximum the remainder will see which way the wind is blowing and throw in the towel.
Simply put, this agreement allows the pro-Syrian forces to divide their enemies up and defeat them in detail. Sweet!
The GWBush mode of control (re-worded): if you are not with us (the reconciled future), you are with our enemies….
Thinking about it further, I can see downsides. The US will no doubt seek to define territory held by ceasefire participants as broadly as possible, restricting where Syria and its allies can attack. Further, it will do its best to ignore their violations of the ceasefire or blame them on other groups “mixed in” with the innocent ceasefire participants, while arguing that Syria, Russia et al. can’t attack back because it would hit the “innocent” ceasefire participants along with the al-Nusra or whoever hiding among them. And if they do strike back against ceasefire violators, it will be used massively for propaganda. Basically, the US is likely to seek to let the active terrorists use the currently-inactive terrorists as human shields. Tough Russian negotiators will probably have fair success in limiting these two factors, largely by threatening to take their marbles and go back to the battlefield.
Further, of course, the US will seek to arm and supply the ceasefire observing groups, and generally strengthen them while they are not fighting. Also, Isis will use ceasefire territories as safe zones to retreat into and regroup.
Despite all this, though, I think overall the net benefit from the brute fact of the enemy having shrunk, with the pro-Syrian forces able to concentrate on fewer foes on fewer fronts, will outweigh these difficulties.
It may be that the US has a cynical longer-term ploy in mind: Maybe they’ve decided that Isis is too far off the reservation, too much under the control of Saudis, Turks etc. and maybe even (shudder) themselves, to be a good proxy force for the US. Maybe their plan is to build and take stronger control over those forces that go for the cease fire, and simply let pro-Syrian forces take out Isis and al-Nusra, encouraging individuals in those groups to defect to the US-controlled “moderates” that they’ve been unable all this time to turn into a significant faction. Then they start over with more controllable proxy insurgents.
If that’s their plan, though, I think they’re dreaming, throwing good money after bad. The forces those insurgents would be up against are just too tough now, and I suspect the people of Syria have had enough. They’d be starting from too weak a position and fighting uphill, and anyway I seriously doubt the US will be able to corral themselves such a force in the first place. Bottom line, there are plenty of angry Arabs willing to do violent things, but hardly any willing to do them for the United States. Arab proxies for the US cannot hold together if they know they’re proxies for the US. So the more controllable the proxy insurgent, the weaker it will be.
One of the largest US military bases in the world including enough fire power to defeat every single country except Russia is 50km from IS’s main logistics line..
That’s like saying my 15 year old party hearty daughter who stays upstairs is not under my control and I have no idea when she’s home or not..
Your point looks superficially as if it were relevant, but it isn’t. Tell me: If you polled a bunch of IS members on their opinions of the United States, what would they say?
After the loss of Kosovo, the Russians won successive victories in Abkhazia, South Ossethia, Crimea and NovoRossia, and now Syria. Quite a streak to win against The Empire.
After Syria, without catching a second of break, the battle will move back the the main field – surpassing your enemy economically. Russia has been slowly growing and USA slowly decaying, but the gap is still too big for this tempo to be meaningful. I hope Russia accelerates economic growth similar to China, Hong Kong, and … actually like Estonia.
Whether Russia won in Eastern Europe is debatable. The Baltics, Montenegro, Kiev, Moldova, and more are not so clear – winning might be a lot clearer, such as NATO not moving east at all. And one could argue that Russia lost in Libya and Iraq. And losing huge business partners in the Ukraine and Turkey is a serious blow to Russia.
Industrially and financially, Russia is a mixed bag. Can you name a couple of successful Russian brands in the West? Pick any field – electronics, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, robotics, microprocessors, high-tech materials, cars, etc.
Russia will be hard pressed to be like China or Estonia. Estonia is a small country that keeps getting smaller in terms of population that has a big brother in Finland and China had massive Western investment and a system where the oligarchs were under control. Russia still has to deal with its oligarch problem, which is a big cause of the disasters, such as the Ukraine. Moscow can find billions of euros for bargains and enticements for their partners, such as people like Kholomoisky, but can’t find a few million euros to promote Russian culture, language, and even just a political point of view. The NGO Gap has been killing Russia.
This is also my point of view,agree with you here,therefore I am not so optimistic,the hard work is yet to come
In Iraq Russia is coming back, with a force.
It is amazing, as Iraq has been military controlled by the US, the current State, army and government of Iraq had been built by the US.
Yet, Iraq is slowly but surely moving towards Russia and away of the US.
Pavlo,
I can’t comment on that, but I have noticed a trend among online Zionist to create a perception of Shia extremists – a counter-‘ISIS’ so to speak, but just as bad.
The Saudi ‘Operation North Thunder’ claimed (before they shut him up) that Iran (Shia) was extending its ‘demographic footprint’ in Iraq by supporting and arming Shia ‘extremists.’
The Iraqi Popular Militias have said on no uncertain terms that Saudi will face consequences if it attempts an invasion of Iraq.
I have also read several reports – going back a few months – of KRG peshmerga forces ‘defecting’ to join the Popular Militias, and the head of one of the Popular Militias announcing that they ‘didn’t trust’ the US.
The Zionist trend to generating a perception of Shia ‘terrorism’ may be because this orientation away from the US is becoming stronger.
The Soviet economy was not built on Consumer brands which is why its GDP was understated. It was a Producer Goods society because that was the focus of Socialist Economics and the quality of optical goods, heavy presses, aircraft, jet engines, hydrofoils, MilSpec production was high.
Western societies hollowed out core manufacturing to focus on brand labels made by OEM contractors in cheap labour centres – every major Western brand is essentially like “Virgin” a label applied to another producer’s product with the economic rent accruing to the label not the product.
The USSR did this in 1947 when it produced “Kiev” cameras using equipment looted from Carl Zeiss in Jena but did it so badly it had to return the equipment to Jena and send the “Zeiss Ikon” cameras to Kiev to have a “Kiev” label stuck over the Zeiss Ikon badge.
Russia has not focused on consumer goods. Even under the USSR the electronic calculators used by Beriozka Stores were all “Brother” of Japan
USA for example was forced to close the NASA developmental space program because of the Russian equipments needs for this program. This for now only one, but I can name many more.Even every country around the world will collapse , but for sure Russia will still alive, because of the hardship what they went through the centuries.None of the nations are so strong like Russians and I’not Russian
That is why Soviet Union collapsed ?
If you want an off-road vehicle there is only one brand you will want to consider, KAMAZ. They have won the Paris-Dakar Rally 13 out of the last 15 years.
Truly incredible engineering, logistics and driving talent. Nobody else comes close.
Hi Saker & everyone else,
I have few questions in connection to the article above:
a) What do you make of the latest development that so-called moderate opposition has joined forces with ISIS and cut off the supply route along the Khanasser-highway?
What does this mean for the truce and what does this say about the SAAs ability to finish the job on their own? It’s been over 24h and IS seems to be holding ground and even advancing further in some places.
b) What do you think about the rumors that Saudi & friends have been secretly amassing weapons, equipment and personell in Lebanon for a surprise “decapitation” strike/invasion on Damascus in co-ordination with Turks in Azaz? (Perhaps even from Jordan). Sounds like a doable plan and something Russia would have a hard time countering.
But, how plausible is this considering Hezbollah’s position in Lebanon? Jordan seems easier to get them to go along.
Really curious to see what you guys think!
Regards,
Alex
Here’s what Zaid Fadel has to say:
“”ALEPPO: Terrorist supporting websites were clamoring for attention after hearing of a substantial reinforcement of ISIS forces (in unison with Nusra/Alqaeda) at the Atharyaa-Khanaassir Axis which was supposed to block the highway between Aleppo-Hama and Aleppo-Al-Raqqa. We, at SyrPer humbly respond with a big Bronx Cheer (raspberry) to their idiotic vituperations. The ISIS/Alqaeda plan was a big flopperoo. As I write, the Syrian Army with the help of the PDC is now hunting down each and every one of those estimated 2,000 rodents who, through sheer stupidity, managed to link their fate to the already doomed ISIS rats trapped like, well, rats, east of Aleppo.”
@Eimar
Thanks for the info, seems to be the case, not much info coming out, not even through local Twitter accounts, but yeah, seems the attack was a bit of a flop… nothing more but a distraction.
All in all, good news! Let’s hope the positive trend continues…
None of that matters much outside of a general NATO backed attack on Syria. First the road link to Aleppo has been cut several times before on the Khanasser highway. Thats a fluid fight that goes back and forth. But IS is losing it overall. These attacks by IS will soon be nothing more than harassment as the strategic situation goes against them in Aleppo and Raqqa.
Second, a Saudi decapitation strike against Damascus is not very doable and certainly will not be a surprise. The Syrians have plenty of intel in Lebanon which they used to control not long ago. Plus the Russians have formidable surveillance over the entire region. There is no chance of a surprise here and the Syrian/Iranian/Hezbollah backed by Russia would, IMHO, rip the Saudis apart.
@Ngoyo
Good point, haven’t thought about it in that way – but you’re right, they would never be able to pull a “decapitation strike” off without NATO help so they can come in from several axes simultaneously. And yeah, hardly a surprise anymore if this conspiracy rumor is true – if it ever was true to begin with.
While I don’t wish for war, I would like to “see” into the possible future where the Saudis do something stupid like this and get totally “rekt” by Russia and others that have a score to settle with the Saudis. If there ever was a nation on earth deserving annihilation, it’s Saudi Arabia.
One reason Russia and its leading team under president Wladimir Wladimirowitsch Putin achieved such brilliant results is that they have the most powerful partner on its side: the truth. Western people used on lies in politics like used on flies in a dirty place are always underestimating the power of truth.
People nowadays have antennas to feel very properly who is telling the truth and who is telling lies.
Hmmm . . . A noble sentiment, but to paraphrase Stalin,
How many battalions does the truth have?
Putin seems to have learned well something that us righteous folks need to internalize: You will not triumph because your cause is just, so you better damn well figure out a way to make your just cause triumph.
Lies and deceit are universal qualities. So is naivety
For those that didn’t know,Feb. 23rd ,is a big holiday in Russia (used to be in Ukraine as well).Its Defender of the Fatherland Day. It celebrates the Russian Military’s ceaseless defense of Russia.Here is a video of how Putin spent a small part of the day:
https://www.facebook.com/eurasiadaily.nz/videos/1576029119354741/
to “Saakashvilize” Erdogan! LOL execellent
Let’s just hope Porkie will not appoint him gouvernor of Kherson oblast in the not too distant future :(
Rgds
Fabien
breaking
“John Kerry is an incredible motivator! He has just told Syrian jihadi-controlled rebellion that all it has to do is sabotage the upcoming ceasefire he has agreed to with Moscow and he will reward them with a mini-state carved out from Syria. What better incentive to abide by the deal and cease hostilities could he possibly give them?
John Kerry, the US secretary of state, has said he will move towards a plan B that could involve a partition of Syria if a planned ceasefire due to start in the next few days does not materialize, or if a genuine shift to a transitional government does not take place in the coming months.”
http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/kerry-says-if-ceasefire-fails-he-may-partition-syria/ri13017
yup, the two faced absolute liar of ************************* is carrying on as usual..yes but no……..
MOSCOW, February 24. /TASS/. Russia is not aware of any “plan B” on Syria, a source in the Foreign Ministry told TASS on Wednesday.
“The Russian side is not aware of any ‘plan B’ that US is talking about. Intensive work on the statement was carried out, and it is necessary to hurl all effort into its practical implementation,” the source said.
More:
http://tass.ru/en/politics/858494
john kerry kohn is a cohen firster a bones man second.
you can trust his plan a or b take it to the goldman sack of bank.
goy you can trust this cohen.
balkanise syriana no no
just trust them aske nazi
@TheSaker
“The other big winner here are, in my opinion, the Kurds who, according to British officials, appear to be coordinating their military operations with the Syrian army and the Russian Aerospace Forces and who now might well even achieve their dreams of joining the Iraqi and Syria regions of Kurdistan”
How does the partitioning of Syria represent a defeat for the AZE? The breakup of Syria is central to the zionist Oded Yinon Plan.
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/333343-ceasefire-turkey-agreement-syria/
link to the RT interview with Ray Macgovern they had when the news broke of “cessation of hostilities” as Mercouris clearly discusses. it is not a ceasefire-his article on russ insider today…………..
http://russia-insider.com/en/military/russia-did-not-agree-ceasefire-syria/ri13012
Time will tell. Putin may be hoping to replicate his Ukraine containment, which the Obama administration has no doubt been studying closely.
Obama’s Thanksgiving Turkey surprise burned two nagging birds – Erdogan and Putin – with one well-timed stone; his ‘long game’ is not to be underestimated.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/12/18/president-obamas-year-end-message-i-played-the-long-game-and-i-won/
The DAESH are far from finished, and although the Islamic State has been left out of the ceasefire, it can be used to draw forces away from the so-called moderates until they can recover sufficiently to strike anew themselves. And that’s just the most obvious interpretation.
Assad’s first instinct is correct; crush the DAESH completely then talk peace. The Saudis have talked cease fire in Yemen only to advantage ‘surprise’ attacks.
Obama’s long game appears to be based on giving the opponents he can’t thwart openly, all the rope they need to hang themselves, then leave them dangling to America’s favour.
Republicans, Petreus, Hillary, Nuland, Erdogan, even Putin, all thought they were getting their way with Obama, but a commensurate toll was always exacted.
Ukraine containment?
Minsk has failed and now as of the 23rd aka Protector of the Fatherland Day, the whole contact line in the DLR is seeing action on the behalf of the Uki’s.
The Kiev Government is falling apart, Right Sector members are now starting to realise that their problem seems to be more the Dual Citizens in power and so we get WAR.
http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/02/a-restless-night-in-donbass.html
http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/02/kherson-self-defense-openly-calls-for.html
If it is to be, may strength and perseverance be for the NAF and this time, all the way to Kiev and beyond. Time to clean house.
Right Sector, only now beginning to realise the root – or one of them – of Ukraine’s problems?
Two years later?
Says a lot about RS IQ, doesn’t it?
Hostilities always continued after any Ukranian ‘ceasefire’. Putin let them stand anyway till the next version was signed. His objective was to win economically.
Kiev bled so much heavy equipment and personnel in various cauldrons, particularly grandstanding at Donestsk airport, that low intensity warfare is really all they can manage. The only outlet for their aggressive leaders seems to be political infighting and there is no way to put down the warlordism. Save for the power grid, which is nuclear, the national economic infrastructure is a total loss to war and corruption.
For Russia (not so much Novorussia), NATO/Kiev is contained; militarily weak, domestically politically stymied, and whether NATO/EU care to admit it or not, they have to buy what they broke and its all on Ukraine’s side of the fence.
Mariupol was potentially within Novorussian grasp; a risky potentially costly prize that Putin strongly advised the rebels to let go to conserve resources. Subsequent harsh rebel experience at Donestk airport made the wisdom of the move obvious in hindsight.
Ukraine was one bit tabletop wargame. It would be a mistake to forget Syria-Iraq (Turkey?) are also one tabletop.
Putin’s willingness to let imperfect cease fires stand may be a weakness; there were no third parties in the Ukraine duel.
IS is not party to the ceasefire – but neither is Turkey. Assad is not incorrect in desiring to completely defeat DAESH; while like the Novorussians at Marioupol, the cost of a pyrrhic victory would be the war, the cost of not winning now, might also be the war.
Turkey can now move to rearm its proxies the same way the Anglo-Zionists will move to rearm theirs and that’s cheap compared to Ukraine. Turkey also now has a ceasefire to abuse, which may lure them from posturing lunacy to commission of lunacy.
Kerry is clumsily trying to misdirect, saying that partition is Plan B, but partition was always Plan A.
Iraq was well on the road to partition. The Kurds, then IS, are reduced to fighting only for their core areas. Ambitions to take the entire country are realistically harboured only by Baghdad, backed by Iran, quietly by Russia, and dishonestly by the U.S..
In contrast, all of Syria’s factions have ambitions for the whole pie. IS in Iraq strongly appears dependent on IS in Syria. For the U.S./ NATO, Syrian unitary state ambitions must be ended.
From this perspective, Syria must partition first, not just geographically but as a national polity. If Iraq partitions first, it sets an example the Assad government can use to unite Syrians. If Syria partitions first, it sets an example for partition Baghdad can no longer easily ignore.
However, Washington is also on a timer. Moderate, secular Sunni Iraq, the West’s only true natural ally pool, is well on its way to extinction. More seriously, Iraqi Kurdistan is imploding on its own, the shining example of partition devoured within and without by festering corruption.
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/332408-iraqi-kurdistan-collapse-turkey-oil/
This wouldn’t be so bad if partition into failed states were set in stone, but its not, yet. At some point, the realization that partition into unrealistic mini-states, will be recognized as unrealistic to the locals.
Unless something like a prolonged ceasefire without true peace, allows local warlords to get used to being the largest fish in smaller ponds, dependent on outside handouts. Syria is no good to Russia if they only have a rump Assadistan dependency under constant terrorist attack.
Putin moved the war in the Ukraine from the battlefield to straight economics and politics. Ukraine is NATOs festering corrupt violent money hole. A little tat for that tit may be on order; balkanization is the likely vector and remains Plan A.
re: “Mariupol was potentially within Novorussian grasp; a risky potentially costly prize that Putin strongly advised the rebels to let go to conserve resources. Subsequent harsh rebel experience at Donestk airport made the wisdom of the move obvious in hindsight.”
Is this really true? Many, including Borodai, say that they could easily have taken Mariupol but were ordered not to so as to make Akhmetov happy. He is a partner. The Kremlin wanted to use him as part of holding the Ukraine together and paying many of the bills in the Donbass. In other words, the actual issues were saving money and trying to have Akhmetov to work with. The trade-off is it is quite demoralizing for your troops. The reality is that the Kremlin has significantly different goals in the Ukraine than the people in the Donbass likely have. The Saker has mentioned this several times, and the situation in Mariupol would just be a minor example of it.
The Novorussians thought they could easily take Donetsk airport and found the cauldron constantly burning their hands. That should warrant a major reality check on part of the rebels.
Donetsk Airport was possibly one of the single most costly battles of the war for both sides, particularly in terms of quality of personnel and equipment spent, if not quantity. Strategically important for Donetsk to win but pointless save for propaganda for Kiev to hold. Front-line soldiers, sometimes only see the front lines and what they can take, as opposed to what they can actually hold and what is wise to hold.
Mariupol wouldn’t need networks of Soviet-era reinforced bunkers like Donetsk Airport to become a problem for the rebels. Urban warfare is naturally personnel-intensive. The thinning of forces to secure Donetsk and Mariupol would be potentially fatal to the overall Novorussian war effort, and Donetsk no more needs Mariupol than Kiev needed Donetsk Airport. The overland connection to Russia is far more vital.
What the Nonvorussians seem to want is reunification with Russia; the Russians want a large Russian minority in Ukraine democratically keeping Kiev/NATO in check. The Novorussians would fare far better in the latter deal, obviously well-placed to profit from Ukraine-Russia trade when a lasting peace ever resumes.
The compromise, an independent Novorussian buffer state, isn’t wanted by Donetsk/Luhansk, Kiev, Moscow or Washington, despite Washington’s willingness to partition everywhere else. Ukraine is too vital a prize.
Ukraine is a vast, rich, vital component of the East European Plain. Control of all of this plain would leverage Europe (more accurately, those who control Europe) against the Eurasian central plain, from an adversarial MacKinderan perspective. Partition is not attractive for those formenting from the North American heartland, because partition still tilts the geography of Europe towards Eurasia.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/ukraine-geopolitics-and-the-us-nato-military-agenda-tectonic-shift-in-heartland-power/18128
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_European_Plain
Securing their portion of this ‘outer island’ plain and not being ethnically cleansed from it, is the Russian strategic priority. Land power is where Russia’s strength lies. America/NATO’s (fading) strength lies in sea power. Mariupol, for now, belongs to sea power.
Mariupol is a coastal city; in times of peace, valuable for trade. In times of war, a potential liability since a coastal city is vulnerable to attack (or reinforcement) from the sea.
Gadaffi’s Tripoli, his main power base, fell to Mermaid Dawn because Gaddafi didn’t have a navy and substantial loyal forces to protect it.
The best Libyan units were necessarily drawn inland by fighting for nearby oilfields and encroachment from Benghazi, all while under NATO airstrikes. Then the hammer fell from the sea. Gaddafi thought the Mediterranean secured his back, neglecting to consider that while al Qaeda didn’t have a navy for an amphibious landing, its NATO sponsors could arrange one.
The Novorussians in Mariupol would also face similar challenges. If held by Novorussia, the port would be blockaded and bombarded to ruins by Ukraine. Kiev could reinvade at their convenience, so a large Novorussian force would be tied down, hedging against threats that could come by sea or land. Mariupol to Novorussia would be a useless military and economic liability not only in war, but in the peace to follow if extensive reconstruction was needed.
Yet, Mariupol is naturally and legally part of Donetsk Oblast. Mariupol would naturally be returned to Donetsk as part of a genuine peace. Therefore, reducing it to ruins by fighting and occupation serves no domestic interest in the long or near-term.
On the other hand, a port city shorn of its hinterland – a hinterland which can survive without the port – is of less value to Kiev. They have to spend resources on Mariupol’s feeding and maintenance, not the natural local economy. Mariupol is no doubt become a lucrative smuggling hub, but that’s not useful to the ‘white market’ economy Kiev needs.
Mariupol’s full value can only be realized in peacetime where all Ukraine, including Novorussia, receive fair benefit. In wartime, its value lies from neutral (Kiev occupation) to liability (Novorussian occupation). Again, the city already naturally belongs to Donetsk in any fair peace.
So why take by force, what would be Novorussian in peace? In that sense, Mariupol is already fallen without a shot need being fired.
Regardless of political deals going on behind closed doors, relevant strategic and tactical considerations from geopolitical to local, weigh against Novorussia spending limited resources – including the lives of its motivated but numerically limited soldiers – on Mariupol.
When we talk about dash, are we talking about nato special forces or some idiots in black going around raping goats and pillaging the women?
There is a HUGE difference in capabilities between the two, if you seen them fight you would know. Most of the videos I seen, these guys behave exactly like the gangs of new York.. Even with the sideways shooting and high fiving Allah..
Dozens of air America flights took a whole bunch of them to Yemen a few months back to help out against some more cave men without shoes because they were just too much for regular blackwater mercs to handle.. It hallowed out the dash shock army just like the imperial Japanese army.. They cant even defend against militias as we saw in Iraq. The professionals are having trouble with the Yemini cavemen though. Just like the dash offensive to block attacks against them resulted in hundreds of moderate terrorist pals getting the snout fried out of them in 2 days flat. I bet that was a British tactic.. Lawrence the destroyer of Arabia did the same thing to get them killed off to buy his whitey fiends a few days..
The entire thing seems to be, the shock troops will take a location and then disappear. Since no one had the overwhelming firepower it was easy to hold onto locations with just gangsters. They mined and placed IED’s in all positions which would be used by any attacker.. It has been a while since I seen a professionally planned op.. Maybe because a lot of them were sent to Libya as well. From all I can see, off the 50,000 das mercenaries now only the 30,000 or so gang members are left, most are locals in it for the good times.. Might be a few thousand pros around to make sure no one runs off.. Heck they kill more deserters than are killed by the SAA and the Iraq military combined.. Even the Kurds killed like 300 of them taking that slave market.. In like 3 days.. In a city.. On the other hand the SAA kills a dozen in a major operation.. So the pros are only present in important logistical centers in blocking positions.
The US has supposedly killed what 35000 of them by now? leaving just 15,000 left…ya right.. By now 35,000 wanna be terrorists would have fled the county for turkey and Europe for sure where the women are far easier than getting a bomb in your bed..
Your gangster reference is exactly what the great historian Toynbee called “Warbands”. I expect the West and their radical Islamic friends in the gulf will try to relabel Al Qaeda and ISIS fighters to a new “brand” that is acceptable to the Masters of the Universe.
The new warband will have the same ideology as ISIS and will be used to continue the destruction of Syria in a slower violence way to the same ends. I suspect that Al Raqqah will be turned over to Sunni Salifi who are the same as ISIS , but will have a trademark name:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salafi_jihadism
I fear that the ceasefire is just a chance for the warband corporate sponsors to restock their shelves and advertise their new product line. This will not end well…
@A.T.
“Assad’s first instinct is correct; crush the DAESH completely then talk peace. The Saudis have talked cease fire in Yemen only to advantage ‘surprise’ attacks.”
Assad was forces by the Russians to accept this temporary ceasefire, but unfortunately the first instinct is the answer to a problematic situation. There must be some hidden agenda. It is not easy to fight an Empire, they just do not give up easy. Remember the Vietnam war, went on year after year until the United States was utterly defeated.
After all, Assad asked Russia for help, and he is the leader of Syria. So he and his governnent should decide whether it would be a temporary ceasefire, at least according to what Putin earlier said about sovereignty of the independant Syrian state.
It is easy to understand that the AZ/US imperialism has political error, but that does not mean that everything Russia is doing is right.
Well, time will tell us, but do we have the time?l
Recall that a somewhat pessimistic, we are always more realistic.
Who has the time indeed.
Obama’s presidency is almost over; his only concern is not being remembered as the ‘man who lost Syria’. Even though he shouldn’t have been there in the first place.
Putin may or may not stick around past 2018. He won’t want to be remembered as the man who lost Syria either.
The DAESH; how much time do they have before they run out of blood to match Western treasure.
Western treasure is mostly a pile of IOUs; that’s on a timer too. Although a surprisingly flexible one, and the one timer that may matter most.
Sounds all rosy. So let’s hope there’s nothing to this story:
https://www.superstation95.com/index.php/world/930
Saudis, UAE Staging Troops in Lebanon for Damascus Attack; Turk Navy Deployed to Med to destroy Russian air defenses of Syria! Citizens told GET OUT of LEBANON IMMEDIATELY!
My personal suspicion is, the only time the War Party ever agree to a cease fire, is when they need a pause in order to carry out some new evil plan.
One part of that story is right – Russian forces couldn’t use nukes to stop that invasion path. So it would come down to numbers on the ground. With Syrian army forces no doubt concentrated in the North, and not much around Damascus.
Sigh… or is this another case of trying to set up a scenario where nukes will be used (by the War Party, on the Saudi, UAE etc troops), and _blamed_ on Russia? End result – Damascus area radioactive, no more Assad, and Russia looking really bad. Meanwhile, the Saudis got to ‘test’ one or more of their recently announced nukes. So this was the reason for the false flag bombing in Ankara? To convince the Turkish military to go along with this? Since they’d think this way they won’t get nuked. But they _will_, by their own side.
On the other hand, is it reasonable to expect Hisballah to sit around doing nothing while Turkey infiltrates troops and weaponry into Lebanon?
TerraHertz
Yes, I read that with interest but it would be strange if Russia did not have SSNs on patrol in the neighbourhood tracking Turkish submarines which are German-designed HDW vessels U-214 diesel-electric similar to the ones Greece operates.
I should think any attack on a Russian vessel would result in destruction of all Saudi and Turkish and Israeli vessels in the region and Iran moving on Riyadh and India neutralising Pakistan
This story is patent nonsense. Staging in Lebanon? For a surprise attack??? Isn’t that where Hizballah hangs out? And aren’t those the guys who are fighting in Syria along with the SAA, the Iranians and Russian Fed forces? The Saudi and their gulf partners are interbred buffoons, but even they are not that stupid.
As for Turkey attacking Russian air defences from the Med? Don’t the Russian forces have considerable naval assets in the eastern Med themselves, including air defence and tactical nuke capability alongside their submarine forces? So Turkey and the Gulf inbreeds would attack Russia and expect to survive? I don’t think so. Such speculation can be brushed away scornfully without further thought.
Agreed. Remember the ‘Red line’ crisis of 2013; the U.S. had a large fleet of cruise missile destroyers, aircraft carriers with SEAD-capable fighters, and a serious Russian intervention wasn’t even thought possible beyond a few warships.
Yet, America/NATO decided to back down in exchange for Assad destroying his chemical weapons, because the A2AD Assad possessed, with Russian naval help, was more than enough to wipe NATO out of the Mediterranean.
Turkey and the GCC have not SEAD (Supression of Enemy Air Defenses) capabilities, which means, no breaching Syrian/Russian A2AD (Access to Areal Denial).
The Americans no longer have confidence in their present A2AD capabilities; Turkey and the GCC have none. Which means, no hot war for the Arab or Turks in Syria, and certainly no American involvement.
Only Erdogan’s Turkey might have the motivation of losing a war, to weaken its secular Kemalist army, because its ideologically opposed to the Islamic AKP.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppression_of_Enemy_Air_Defenses
http://thediplomat.com/2016/02/new-us-defense-budget-18-billion-for-third-offset-strategy/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil%E2%80%93military_relations_during_the_Recep_Tayyip_Erdo%C4%9Fan_government
The only way Russia/Syria could lose, is to give up winning conditions such as they enjoy now. This ceasefire is not to be trusted. Once the IS DAESH start losing really badly, they will just defect to the so-called moderate DAESH protected by the ceasefire.
Military action and diplomacy go hand in hand. Russia is a master of both domains.
Assad’s and Putin’s objectives haven’t changed a single inch since last September, while in Western media zillions of plans, accusations, white papers, suggestions, demands, lectures, grand chessboard moves, premature conclusion and assorted crap has been published.
“By media hoaxes and wishful thinking we shall win”, still seems to be the motto of the controllers and parasites. Good luck with that!
And so the restoring of the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Syria moves on. At an ever increasing pace.
Does Zion has the guts and the will to realize that it is running all its mission-critical programs on faulty software? This seems to be the only open issue that could hinder Assad and Putin from achieving a sensational, against-all-odds, historical victory.
Long live Syria!
Long live Syria!
Long live the heroic resistance of the Syrian people!!
Long live the heroic resistance of the Syrian people!
Russia is scoring goals with lightning speed. The ceasefire will most probably intensify the Russian bombing raids but concentrated towards ISIS and Nusra. This is the fast track to the comprehensive defeat of jihadists. I guess, this means Syria will be cleaned up in full by the summer.
The AZs will shift their attention to Ukraine and the South China Sea. They will not relent. This is the endgame for the NWO, and ‘losing’ is not an option for the unhinged AZs.
US and nato will never begin a direct war against Russia. They know exactly that they will lose it and will be pulverized within 48 hours. Neither a first strike nuclear war neither a conventional. Russia’s geography and population structure gives it an utmost strategical advantage none can deny. Just take a map and look at it!
What means this now? It means that a peace structure without Russia will not happen.
NATO is only the US. Germany is unstable and entering one of its turbulent phases. People forget that stability is very rare in German history and the 1949-2007 period very unusual. It is going more in the direction of 1923 when the country began breaking up internally.
France has no wish to unravel any further. It has Britain acting as a magnet for Invaders in Calais and Germany sucking them in through Spain and Austria. Greece has been totally destroyed by Germany dismantling its border guards and Turkey setting out to destroy its former colonies like Greece and destabilise Europe
“Fifth: the USA had to accept the humiliation of having to agree to all of the Russian terms for the current ceasefire. Yes, of course, the USA can, and probably will, try renege on part, or all, of this agreement, but the precedent has been set and it will be very hard, if not impossible, for the USA to openly return to the pre-2016 policies.”
How unexceptional!
Russia is now working peer-to-peer with US which is a massive shift from the narrative 6 months ago.
The EU poodles have gone quiet and Iran is fast tracking commerce and SCO strategies.
The only thing looking suspicious is the Saudi regime’s recall on Lebanon etc. Staff and citizens out. Are they aware of something immanent — e.g. a Israeli provocation? The global bully ‘pay back’ will be at the weakest point and that would have to be at the Hezbollah “+1” in the Team 4+1.
Why is everyone ignoring the Kurdish elephant in the room? Thesaker himself has alluded to the partition of Syria in favour of the Syrian Kurds.
That is Oded Yinon 101. Good grief! The AZE are loving this ceasefire.
The emergence of a Kurdistan (from corners of Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran) is not a partition. And if it does emerge then its viability is largely dependent on Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran. There is high probability on a regional reconfiguration but ‘partition’ is a US PR word to disguise their folly.
Symbolically, this is a Vietnam re-mix with all but the Huey copters on the embassy roof.
Assad will stay for the transition and those that vote for him will remain in a viable Syria (minus some lost oil revenues — which were lost in any case). Assad gave concessions for a Kurd autonomous region some years ago as the strife escalated. It’s the other governance structures in the equation that need to adjust their policies.
In any case, a rebuilt Syria will likely reclaim the Golan Heights (and its alleged oil) via war or UN diplomacy (which is now the ‘in’ thing once Yankee-Moon is trumped out on his Korean butt).
Too early to see what will provoke the issue but recent Saudi warnings on Lebanon likely signal something is up — either that, or the meth pill supply has run out for the prancing princes.
So bits of Syria being given to an “emergent” Kurdistan is not partition? That is contradictory. Have you seen the Oded Yinon map and its inheritors? Kurdistan is central to the Zionist plans.
The Iranians and Hezbollah went into this conflict stating that Syria’s integrity was not up for negotiation. The Russians have sometimes echoed this statement. They better stick to it or their conniving in the destruction of Libya will be seen as just that.
“… Kurdistan is not partition? That is contradictory. ” — suggest you think a loosely Federated Minsk II. The Australian Federation of Colonial States came together in a similar model for their ‘common wealth’. It is a workable model.
Why don’t you think current “Kurdistan” in Iraq — it is obviously designed to break away from Iraq, which is a key part of Oded Yinon. The AZE will be hoping to setup something similar in Syria — the key question is whether Russia will connive at this outcome aswell.
If Syria is partitioned then Russia is exposed as engaging in international Kabuki.
We aren’t ignoring it; we just don’t know what is going on. Syria is presumably going to have a Kurdish canton. It seems like the Syrian Kurds are becoming more on Russia’s side, whatever exactly that means. And we have no idea what the US is actually hoping to do with Turkey and the AKP. They seem to be playing their usual double game.
The Yinon plan was based on the West calling the shots, with no input from Russia and Iran. Things may go the other way now, with the West significantly withdrawing from that region. Maybe they will try to blow everything up before leaving, in which case Turkey may be a sacrificial lamb. Who knows? For that matter, who knows what is going to happen in Iraq? Will Barzani finally be thrown in the ditch he so deserves?
The West had plenty of plans for carving up Russia, just like the Yinon plan. Doesn’t mean it is happening. Might makes right, and the West has been unable to win on the ground.
The merest whisper of partitioning Syria is a ZIONIST concept — and if they manipulate Russia into championing that notion, then shame on Russia.
There’s too much hopium sloshing about this thread. For example, Medvedev and the 5th columnists are still undermining Russia; and the Russian Central Bank continues to leech for the Western banksters.
Now we have a ceasefire just as the Western proxy armies are beginning to fold…
I don’t like any of it.
PS and the “we don’t know what’s going on” argument works both ways, i.e. you don’t know what Russia is up to either. IMO, we’re as ripe for a betrayal as a victory
Autonomy for Kurds in Northern Syria is practically de facto – as agreed with Assad in exchange for the defence of the Syrian State.
The original Zionist plan only wants a ‘Kurdistan’ that is controlled (currently via the Barzani clan in Iraq) by them.
The Syrian Kurds – and increasingly the Turkish – are pivoting away from a Zionist/US-controlled partition.
If the Zionists/Anglo- US oil cartel want control, they are more likely to get it through the HDP in Turkey, and it’s Turkey that faces the threat of civil war/partition now, rather than Syria.
In fact Assad would probably be relatively happy with a Syria-friendly ‘buffer’ autonomous Kurd canton between Syria and Turkey.
Particularly if governed by a Kurd/Syrian alliance hip to attempts to weaken the state overall: it is an open secret that Netanyahoo wants another ‘Israel’ carved out of Syria/Iraq.
I don’t think the Syrian Kurds are going to oblige him – or the oil cartels – with that.
Eimar on February 24, 2016 · at 9:37 pm UTC
“Autonomy for Kurds in Northern Syria is practically de facto – as agreed with Assad in exchange for the defence of the Syrian State”
There’s the claim of that illusory agreement- Can you provide additional information from external sources regarding this agreement?
Why would an autonomous Kurdish state defend the “Syrian state”??
– Would Abkhazia defend Georgia? NO.
Would South Ossetia defend Georgia? No.
Would Transdniestria defend Moldova? No.
Why on earth would we believe an autonomous Kurdish state would defend the Syrian state?!!
That seems a very non credible claim.
Also, looking at reality, the fact that the YPG never once defended the Syrian state! Instead fighting “ISIS” all the while annexing Syrian territory, claiming it as their own, indicates non defence of the Syrian state. In fact it could clearly be seen as an attack on the sovereignty of the Syrian state- Hardly a defence strategy for the Syrian state.
“The original Zionist plan only wants a ‘Kurdistan’ that is controlled (currently via the Barzani clan in Iraq) by them.
That is not true at all. In fact I would call that intentionally misleading. Israel wants a Kurdistan, they’ve made that very plain. Very clear. They want a cojoined Kurdistan. A 2nd Israel as some zionists have called it themselves
The Syrian Kurds you reference?- Don’t you mean the PKK? Because it’s not clear how many real Syrian Kurds exist in Syria any more- And it’s long documented the PKK has been involved in Syria- So more misinformation? Intentional? Or otherwise?
Lots of reports regarding PKK involvement with so called “syrian kurds”
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/who-are-the-kurds-a-complicated-network-of-alliances-explained/article28831812/
“With the assistance of its PKK allies and some help from Iraqi Kurds, the Syrian Kurds’ YPG has beaten back the IS forces.”
http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/the-kurds-and-the-future-of-assad
“Many PKK fighters returned to Syria during the civil war. Jordi Tejel, an expert on Syrian Kurds says, “already in April 2011 the PKK sent one thousand armed fighters to establish the YPG in Syria”
Syrian Kurds is a misleading label, intentionally so, in my opinion.
Would Quebec defend Toronto or British Columbia? You are using bad analogies; you were using enemies, whereas Syrians and Kurds have the same enemy: Turks. You are adding “state” to his “autonomy”. Most of us are discussing a Syrian canton for the Kurds as part of a deal with Damascus, Moscow, and Tehran. Are we sure that there is such a deal? No, though it seems logical. With current borders, that canton would be severely restricted in terms of options for trade and business. If Turkey were to break up, could it try to join a Turkish Kurdish zone? Sure, that is possible and may be a future threat to Damascus, one which Tel Aviv would like to see. In the real world, though, what do you suggest Moscow or Damascus do? Is there an alternative to cutting a deal with Syrian Kurds?
Anyway, your discussion is somewhat missing the big elephant in the room. Syria was deeply involved in the earlier war between the Turkish Kurds and Ankara. Damascus (and the Kurds) lost that war, and had to agree to some humiliating terms. So the PKK and Turkish Kurds became a part of modern Syria, with lots of refugees for one thing. You can’t easily separate them now, and this is another reason for the extreme hostility from Ankara towards Damascus. The PKK Kurds are like Mexican-Americans in Arizona or something; love them or hate them, they are part of the American fabric now. On the bright side, the Kurds are good fighters, and can help defeat the Turkish unofficial brigades that Davutoglu discussed and recommended in his book Strategic Depth as a methodology to emulate from the Ottoman Empire and to expand Turkey’s influence. And the price to Turkey for such a big mistake is likely to be severe – just as the price to Damascus for being on the losing side of the Kurdish-Turkish war in the past was pretty significant.
This is more of a simulacrum of a ceasefire than a real one. It is a political maneuver, and goes along with calling for elections, Russia’s UN report on all the terrible actions by the Turkish authorities, and more. Big-league politics.
As for a betrayal, well, this partly depends upon what you think Russia (and Iran) are trying to achieve, and what they may have promised the Damascus authorities. Creating a Syrian Kurdish canton that keeps, say, 50% of its money and resources may have been part of the deal. You may not like it, but it may have been necessary, and will be helpful in controlling Turkey. Perhaps the future of Turkey will be the big game going forward. Whether the Anglo-Zionists will get their way there and in Barzanistan is going to be a fight.
If you want to judge the Kremlin and Putin by what we have seen over the last 15 years, it has been a mix of liberal/neoliberal economics and a gradually stronger and independent foreign policy. The economics side has definitely looked ugly, but it is not so simple to say they are betraying people in foreign affairs. They are, after all, facing what is probably the strongest empire in world history.
This so called ceasefire has nothing to do with internally to Syria but to stop external factions from supplying logistics to the terrorists inside Syria. Right now everyone blames everyone else and because moderate factions get logistics openly, with a ceasefire they wont have the excuse of supplying moderate terrorists.. That’s it.. Nothing more or less..
If they keep doing it, then Russia can come out openly and say it is external factions that’s the cause of the problems inside Syria because wont abide by the ceasefire. If turkey sends another 1000 fighters to azaz right now they have done it on 3 occasions to stop the YPG and Russian bombings etc… How will turkey explain their actions?
For the Kurds I think it best to look at how Putin handled the situation in Chechnya.
I would guess Russia will be acting as the peacemaker between Kurds and the Syrian government.
Syria and Kurds both have a common enemy in Turkey. I think some sort of deal where the Kurds have a good deal of domestic/regional autonomy but stays loyal to Syria – part of the sovereign state of Syria is what Russia will be aiming for. Russia is also in a position now to act as guarantor of an agreement for both parties.
Russia has never deviated from the position that Syria will not be partitioned.
Now all that is needed is the billions of euros that were available for Chechnya. And that may be the problem in the case of Syria: everybody will desperately need whatever money is available and not want to share. Let’s hope that gas pipelines or gas offshore can enter into the equation before too long.
“…the moral and legal legitimacy of the anti-Assad forces…” was there ever such a thing in Syria?
I don’t know… sure, all signs confirm Saker’s analysis, but I don’t have good feelings about the moment…
Soo, that UNSC resolution put forth by Russia, the one that Samantha Powers called “a distraction,” which was summarily dismissed, was that a face saving measure?
I don’t think anyone’s posted this link on Engdahl’s view on Syria, which draws on the Saker but is focused on the geopolitics of oil: http://journal-neo.org/2016/02/23/i-refuse-to-believe-in-a-nuclear-war-over-syria-and-oil/
Engdahl often offers thoughtful analysis, but in this case, I think he oversimplifies to the point of absurdity. At the same time, let’s hope he’s right about the war on Syria not leading to nuclear war.
Dear Saker,
Excelent, fantástic text!! Congratulations!
» Actually, since Pakistan got The Bomb, I would not dismiss any Saudi claims of having a number of nuclear devices. «
Haha, that Saudi analyst doesn’t know how to spin the nuke wheel. Such blunt and clumsy random remarks discredit the whole nuclear prop. They need to produce a video showing “nuke action” in the desert and then make a solemn official royal statement about it. Nuke’s Gospel requires skilled preachers, not such loose “analytical” canons.
The Saudi’s funded the Pakistani nuclear program with backing from the US. So this is not a joke. The design is Chinese which was based on soviet designs. hence we cant even be sure if they might have western micro and mini nukes available which neither India or china has or maybe not even Israel.. So the west helped Muslim’s get the nuke. Including China in there too.. When this thing blows up everyone can blame everyone else for it. The Saudi’s have a lot of pull with Pakistan. Just as much as the US does.. I don’t think any other pissboy throughout history has milked their masters as much as this terrorist nation. I would believe the Saudi’s if they say they have nukes, Pakistan wont have the option to refuse no matter what they say in public..
Well, you’ll remember I am 100 % convinced that it’s all one freakin’ hilarious joke. But last time I checked (end of December), heresies of Nuke’s Gospel were not welcome on this blog. So we’ll have to make do with reading the discussions and articles and watching the videos transitively accessible via the Google page I linked to, instead of adding to them or starting new ones.
Just people should know that doomsday scenarios – as in the 1983 Hollywood movie »The Day After« (Nuke fanboys will love it! => uloz) – are just fearmongering, which is an essential ingredient of democracy:
Rainer Mausfeld – Warum schweigen die Lämmer?
Dear Saker
With geat admiration I want to thank you.
This is a crack of light in a very dark world.
The Russians seem to be the only people capable
Of learning from their mistakes.
Onward
Matto5
The more we see of Putin the more we wonder what his real goals are. His speeches are wonderful. He speaks of international law in terms that are far more inspiring than the global Big Brother concept that Nato has been pushing. But the reality, beyond the rhetoric, seems to be a partnership between the US and Russia where Russia really just wants a bigger piece of the pie. For example. it looks to me like Putin refused to give Syria meaningful help until too late, even though Russia knew all along that Syria was fighting a proxy war against Nato and Nato’s regional allies. When Putin finally stepped in, like he meant it, it was just in time to fail to prevent dismemberment of Syria and probably too late to save Assad’s behind. the truce, such as it is, appears to be basically an agreement to cut Syria into two or three parts. The US will be more than happy with that outcome, I believe. It looks like Assad will be left with a rump state, if he manages to avoid the fate of Saddam and Quadaffi.
I swear, this blog reads sometimes like it comes straight from the Kremlin PR dept..
well I think there were very many months of intelligence gathering and setting up embedded networks , establishing logistics, assessments-otherwise how could Rus be so quickly effective in its actions, setting up networks with SAA etc, probably Iran, Hezbollah to just find out what on earth was happening, and quite a bit of strategic planning too when all the ukraine stuff is happening-all possibilities to the endgame, remembering VP’s stated aim is to go after terrorists that threaten rus. and also timing re his presentations to UN and other forums etc, and in balance how effective Rus could be when clarity emerged how absolutely dire the situation was becoming…………..
» The more we see of Putin the more we wonder what his real goals are. «
The more we see of Putin the more we realize his real goals are the restauration of Russia and the establishment, together with China, of a peaceful and prosperous Eurasian order where there can be no place for Uncle Sam – until the USA undergoes an American Revolution, leading to the removal, in one form or another, of those who have, for decades, hoaxed and robbed and raped and murdered the nations of the world, including, to a lesser degree, their own nation.
And the more we, in Europe, watch Uncle Sam, the more we come to the conclusion that he is about to ignite another war in Europe. As if Europe hadn’t had enough of them. And more and more Europeans understand that Uncle Sam, in addition to being the Plight of the Planet, is their common enemy and the greatest threat to their future.
Unfortunately, America has no intention of removing its grubby hands from its European colonies … I mean… “sovereign democracies.”
America is a like abusive husband, who routinely beats his wife but is still insanely possessive of her.
To put it bluntly, Europe is America’s bitch. And the Europeans, for the most part, are happy to go along with this pathological relationship.
Seventy years of harassing political establishment and people of Europe
http://orientalreview.org/2016/02/04/seventy-years-of-harassing-political-establishment-and-people-of-europe/
European Political Influence Operations Are «Made in USA»
http://www.voltairenet.org/article190319.html
Who is hunting Angela Merkel?
http://orientalreview.org/2016/01/18/who-is-hunting-angela-merkel/
‘German politicians are US puppets’
http://orientalreview.org/2014/11/07/german-politicians-are-us-puppets/
Another link about America’s deadly embrace of Europe, as part of its plans for war against Russia.
Operation Barbarossa 2: American Occupation of Europe Intensifies
http://journal-neo.org/2016/02/17/operation-barbarossa-2-american-occupation-of-europe-intensifies/
It’s true, Russia and the Europeans are innocent when it comes to subterfuge and aggression on the world stage. They never have and they never will commit lies, deceit or acts of aggression against their neighbors. !!!!!!!!!!!
Want to buy a bridge ?
Anything is possible. ” The is surrounded by a bodyguard of lies”. WC
Remember Russia had a large intelligence community in Syria, over 200 families.. Dozens of sig and intel gathering facilities, most were destroyed and taken over by terrorists. But the core group was always present in Damascus. They were protected by Syrian special forces and they deployed a large number of people for the protection of the Russians. We know hezbolla was there since 2011 but only started fighting since 2013 or so when they realized most terrorists were foreigners and who were supporting them.. same with iran.. Also remember sanctions and other political events in Europe as well..
Russia was supplying weapons all the time, like 2-3 supply ships a week.. BUT Syria had to pay for it.. With Iran being under sanctions there was that too.. Of the 65 pantzirs ordered by Iran, 45 were for Syria and I think only a couple ended up in Syria and some of that were immediately sold to NAF by crooked SAA officers.. Now this was a very big deal.. Any equipment sold to Syria might end up with the US.. So they had to put in place ways to prevent such things happening..
Remember Russia provided 650mil in aid to Syria.. And the US supplied TOW missiles to terrorists and they started destroying hundreds of Syrian vehicles with it.. Only at that point did Assad realize there was no way to stop the terrorists who could destroy anything Syria had to stop them.. Which is when Assad sold the mining rights to Russia.. At which point Putin authorized to supply Syria with what ever they needed..
Did you read what I just wrote? Assad sold sovereignty to Russia for their help.. The Russian base in Syria is Russian property.. Syria’s oil and gas are now Russia’s oil and gas.. And this only happened after the Iranians realized the danger and they had nothing themselves to stop this.. Iran was the one funding Syria with food and oil the last 4 years. But Iran don’t have the weapons.. We can blame Russia.. But Russia had the upper hand.. If Syria was not willing to Submit then why should Russia help.. Once Syria signed everything over, Russia moved in fast.. Remember Russia lost in Iraq and Libya.. Neither of them were willing to do what it took to save themselves. They thought they could play each other and get by. If not for Iran I think Syria would not have realized the danger either.. Iran would be one of a handful of countries with north. Korea that had decades to plan and practice for special forces and close combat situations involving huge fronts and only they would recognize and see what was happening before it was too late.
When turkey send in 10,000 terrorists to attack Aleppo, also bribed many Syrian intelligence officers there to not see this before the terrorists were already inside the city well hidden, Syria moved a large number of troops from idlib to deal with this and expel them, at that point turkey intervened directly to supply another 2 sorties of 10,000 terrorists each to take ildib, providing them fire support, intelligence, ecm jamming and logistics and it was this that convinced everyone who was behind it all. Such a large offensive could be seen from space.. Since the US also supplied these terrorists with TOW and other weapons. This scared the Iranians enough to push Putin to make a deal. And I suppose Putin asked Assad for payment and worked out a deal..
This is not a simple matter for anyone involved… And loss of sovereignty is not to be taken lightly.. Its like living under house arrest.
Excellent summary.
The US announced a Peace and claimed victory.
You have summed up the reality well.
except 8. The US is now a junior partner in the Russia/Iran/Syria/Hezbollah coalition.
Whisper it very quietly
Very quietly I whisper a ‘thank you’ to Robert Kennedy – he it was who counseled his brother to take the more positive approach with the Kremlin in the standoff over missiles in Cuba when conflicting responses were coming forth from the Russian side and a nuclear catastrophe seemed imminent. His reasoning was that there are within each of the governments pressures at play which neither on its own has an accurate read to diagnose – and that is just as true today as it was then. Some things have to be taken on faith; it is better to think well of the leadership and act accordingly when so much is at stake.
These are the kinds of acts of statesmanship that history remembers; this is legacy.
I like your comment. I’m sure, you are right with “Some things have to be taken on faith; it is better to think well of the leadership and act accordingly when so much is at stake.” To me only this opens the balance with the bone-hard facts on the military ground.
I’m convinced, that the task of the leaders is to manage the awkward descend of the “exceptional nation” to normality without too much of unnecessary wreckage.
Only good examples like Putin’s “we do not want to be a superpower” changes the spirit (= 75%)
Who likes in a short deviation to contemplate this historic week from an even more distant, cosmic aspect finds it in the astromundane analysis of “A Whole Week in Six Mirrors”
http://astromundanediary.blogspot.de/2016/02/2_22.html
Welcome to the flag waving part:-),team chaos is in frantic form as the ‘moderate’ head choper narrative and ‘syrian civil war’ propaganda is unraveling fast.The kind machine gun hands of Kerry is shaking Hollywood perception managers to come up with a better ‘them vs us’ kool aid to feed the American shepels.Why the about face now? Well why not as the court has ruled that all ‘we came we saw he died’ fame mails are to be made public from 2009 to 2013!.Must itbe ememphasized that she initiated ‘assad must go’ policy and the transfer of head choppersfrom lLibya to Damascus!All the dirty laundry is soon to be dished out hence the run to quick fix….what will Hollywood come out with?..john wayne halfbred with Freddie kugar?
Putin the saviour of free world. God us with him.
To commenter … We value comments that provide insight and further the discussion of the topic at hand. One line ‘snarky’ comments will not be allowed. mod-hs
Yes, Saker, it was close, very close and Putin pulled it off. The setting up of a “Truce Center” was a brilliant move out of which those who cooperate can be rewarded and those who do not do so can be dealt with. I hope we can see televised reports from this center so that the whole world can see Syria being put together again for and by the Syrians.
Sorry Kerry no need for Plan B.
To quote a famous line, this is not even the end of the begining. It is a calculated strategic pause.
All sides are tired and need time to regroup, including the Russian contingent and SAA. At best this is consolidation.
There are years left to travel on this road and Israel has not abandoned their plan.
Nor have they been forced to do so.
Btw, if Israel has a bomb, then so too do the Saudis. A nuclear false flag, to salt the earth and make Syria inhospitable, is still on the table. So far ten million Syrians are displaced. Israel will make sure they can never return.
Russian victories are great but what of Syrian losses? Does anyone believe Syria in 20 years will look like Dubai?
I sure don’t.
» Btw, if Israel has a bomb, then so too do the Saudis. «
But they don’t. And don’t. And don’t. None of them does.
» A nuclear false flag, to salt the earth and make Syria inhospitable, is still on the table. «
Not on the table. Only in the perverse parallel universe of apocalyptic propaganda.
» Does anyone believe Syria in 20 years will look like Dubai? «
Dubai doesn’t produce anything. What is it built on? Drug money? Fiscal evasion? What will Dubai look like once the criminal money flow is cut?
Yes. My universe is perverse.
It has nuke weapons and unfortunately, they work just fine.
Tell us again Loom, how do the physics work in your diment-ion?
This conversation is getting persoanl. Please shut it down. Mod TR.
Of course Israel has the bomb- They invented it.
Saker wrote:
You forget an important factor.
That the warmongers in the U.S. still think of Russia as conquered territory so they can’t wrap their heads around the fact that Russia does not behave as they demand that a conquered territory should do. Since it was (and after Yeltsin is) not a conquered territory even if the dissolution of the USSR means they lost the cold war.
The result of that is that every time Russia shows it has its own goals in the world they go nuts and reach for the nearest stick to punish the uppity that dares to interfere with their plans.
That short sighted reaction tends to backfire. As seen in the Ukraine where that, combined with the need to have direct control instead of through the EU, resulted in them not just losing control of part of the Ukraine but also of the chance to evict Russia from Crimea.
The same thing is happening in Syria. The short term effects of lashing out might provide the satisfaction of being able to show the world who is the boss but it is coming at the cost of their medium and long term goals.
And then there is luck. I think you can think up at least half a dozen (deniable) provocations, on top of Turkey shooting down that SU-24, which would have required a greater commitment then Russia should/can give and Putin (and advisers) would want to commit to in Syria but haven’t occurred.
When Russia first started bombing I said “give it a year and Daesh will be forced out of Syria”. Still a long way to go but the eastern desert will fall a lot quicker than the large cities. Once they break the northern supply route and either connect the Kurdish areas or have SAA take over the area in between Turkey will be unable to supply the quantities of munitions required to Daesh. Then the route is on bigtime.
“Russian Defense Ministry asks human rights agencies to assess Turkey’s shelling of Syria”:
http://tass.ru/en/defense/858652
I can not wait for the video with translation of this last briefing…..
Why is it that nobody’s prefacing the word ceasefire with the important word partial? Not even Lavrov or Putin who certainly ought to know better. Is there something politically incorrect with the word partial, or did no party want the statement to reflect the truth of the situation and nature of the agreement? Am I the only person on the planet who sees this glaring oversight? Or is it that nobody gives a damn s*** about it?
I see it this way:
Since the beginning, the main problem of this war in Syria was the covert support of the US to the terrorists – and so, the threat this represented to Russia. Now, the US has recognised that the enemy is not Russia, but the terrorists! This is what this ceasefire is all about, and this is why it is so important. There are many other factors to consider, of course; the terrorists will still be bombed to death – but, by both sides! Between Russia and the US, however, this is a total ceasefire, not a partial ceasefire, and this is a major event at this time in history, meaning that, at least for now, the war in Syria will not escalate to a world war, as this depends on them.
The US really don’t have the power to destroy all enemies. Or even many enemies one by one. The only thing that keeps that fear is their exceptional superiority. If put to the test and they fail, the entire charade fails. What we know has nothing to do with the realities on the ground, we just don’t have the information yet. We know the Syrians need more time to train and maybe Russia needs more time to move equipment. Nato needs more time to come up with plan b.. But WE don’t know about the real reasons. The US has recognized nothing.. psychopaths never understand, nor do they realize their own mortality. Even in death they still can not believe they are dead. The US does recognize the wrong they do, just just don’t care. So do you really think they will change in any way?
I noticed the dog barking and automatically Kerry the tail starts wagging on plan b..
Russia is still the enemy; Kerry’s mention of ‘partition’ is a subtle reference to MacKinderism and the need to keep Eurasia balkanized, and also to Russia’s hope for a peaceful, united Syria. No-one doubts ‘Plan B’ was always Plan A, its just that after five years of failed proxy warring, Plan A needs a Plan B.
For America/NATO/GCC there was always the danger of ‘genuine’ indigenous Jihadis retaking their own movements and reasserting their own agendas. The neocons wouldn’t care as long as Syria bleeds, but Obama’s brain trust might consider this a problem.
Obama may realize that IS DAESH isn’t going after Assad, its been going after the other DAESH militarily successfully for too long. If their pet Jihadis have become too independent, the rogue dogs are in need of culling.
They can’t do this easily themselves anymore, but Russia and the SAA can. The DAESH might be forced to choose between going back under the America/NATO leash or death by Russian airstrike. However, Russia has suspended all airstrikes for now.
The EU and assorted other parties may not want to escalate the situation in Syria, but I can guarantee you that the IMPORTANT parties – the US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia – certainly do.
And they can. There are all sorts of options open to them, including Turkey invading Syria. Israel might even decide to invade Lebanon via Syrian territory, although the plan was to degrade Syria’s military badly first, then invade Lebanon to get rid of Hizballah.
The idea that no one can invade Syria or escalate the situation because a UNSC Resolution says you can’t is a joke.
It ain’t over until it’s over.
What is starting to concern me is that in relation to Syria the nuclear option is being openly discussed.
The Chinese are also worried about a nuclear conflict on the Korean peninsular. They clearly state that they will respond in kind if they believe they are being attacked or at a high risk of being attacked.
Not to mention America’s provocations in the Sth China sea. The response from China is firm and clear, they have a red line and will use a military option if pushed too far.
This is the first time in my life, since Cuba and I was too young then, that the nuclear option is being so openly discussed.
It is worrying because it is almost as though we accept that it will happen, resigned …….
There just needs to be a flash point, a miscalculation
I expect just before WWI & II people were either asleep, lulled by the press, or thinking, “nobody would be that stupid”
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/02/25/452201/US-Navy-sails-South-China-Sea
The United States Navy plans to ramp up what it calls “freedom of navigation” operations in the South China Sea, in the face of harsh criticisms from China that views the move as provocation.
The sailings involve a US warship coming within 12 nautical miles of islets claimed by China as a way of rebutting Beijing’s assertions of sovereignty.
South Korea dismisses China warning about US missile system
Wed Feb 24, 2016 8:46AM
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/02/24/452032/South-Korea-China-US-THAAD
South Korea has rejected China’s warning that a US missile system planned to be set up on Korean soil would harm relations between Seoul and Beijing.
“The deployment of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system is a measure of self-defense against growing nuclear and missile threats from North Korea,” presidential spokesman Jeong Yeon-guk said on Wednesday.
I don’t know where you are from but from what I have read, Yuropeans were very eager to show their manhood in WW1 and WW2.. actually for the last few thousand years.. and to be a better man than grandpa.. Remember the long lines of people waiting to sign up.. The smiles while walking to the front.. Al the girls throwing flowers and such.. You would think the thousand years before that would have taught people something’s…. I think it was only after the first couple of batches of eagar beavers were buried at least on paper if their body could not be found or identified that others started getting worried about things.
Oh wait, I saw the saw thing this centaury as well in the US. A man got to do what a man got to do and these days that’s blowing up some hajis. maybe tying them up and beating them to a pulp and water boarding them and pushing them into a 3×3 box and leaving them in the middle of the desert. It is what being exceptional means.. So the moral of the story is find someone a lot weaker than you to beat up on to become a man. Most likely someone who cant even touch you. So americans were much smarter than the yuropeans. Except now it has really gone to their heads. They actually started to believe in all their own revisionist history and stolen technological superiority. The mass psychosis is now at such a level that they might actually believe that to be a man they might actually have to beat up someone more equal even though there is no one close but it has to look like an even fight and since Russia and china don’t make anything anyway it will have to do.. The high is just not there any longer..
An excellent analysis. An amazing turn of events. Erdogan is toast and a fool. The Americans know the Kurds are ready to defect to Russia’s side if Turkey is let loose on them. And the Turks will lose anyways. The opticks of this are stunning. Europe will be looking at Russia with more respect.
And of course the fighting will go on further demonstrating the proficiency of the Russian military.
Putin for President!
Under cover of truce with Russia, US prepares military escalation in Syria
One day after Monday’s announcement by the United States and Russia of agreement on a partial “cessation of hostilities” in Syria, there are mounting indications that Washington is preparing a major military escalation of its drive to topple the Russian-backed government of Bashar al-Assad and install a puppet regime.
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/02/24/syri-f24.html
USrael made clear their intention to continue their implementation of Oded Yinon plan for total dominance of Israel in the ME:
“John Kerry, the US secretary of state, has said he will move towards a plan B that could involve a partition of Syria if a planned ceasefire due to start in the next few days does not materialize, or if a genuine shift to a transitional government does not take place in the coming months.”
@http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/kerry-says-if-ceasefire-fails-he-may-partition-syria/ri13017
They made it even clearer that in fact they expect this outcome:
“Pentagon, CIA Prepare for Russia to Break Ceasefire in Syria, by Mary Chastain24 Feb 201678:
The Pentagon and CIA do not believe Russia will honor the ceasefire agreement in Syria arrived at this week, according to sources speaking to The Wall Street Journal.
Officials want to apply more “pressure on Moscow” to make sure they keep their end of the bargain. The Wall Street Journal reports that Defense Secretary Ash Carter, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford, and CIA Director John Brennan all have indicated they want to “inflict real pain on the Russians” should they break the ceasefire.”
@www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/02/24/pentagon-cia-prepare-for-russia-to-break-ceasefire-in-syria/
“Israel Is Changing Its Approach to Syria War Amid Assad’s Battleground Advances.
Russian intervention has tilted the scales, and Jerusalem is concerned of a regime victory, which would be victory for Iran as well. To prevent that, Israeli officials believe West must intervene in favor of moderate rebels”, by Amos Harel Feb 21, 2016:
…“the war in Syria has largely served Israel’s interests. The ongoing fighting has worn down the Syrian army to a shadow of its former capabilities. And Hezbollah, Israel’s main adversary in the north, is losing dozens of fighters every month in battle. Israel has been quietly wishing success to both sides and would not have been against the bloodletting continuing for a few more years without a clear victor” Now, after successful Russian intervention, Israel states openly that “an Assad victory would be bad for Israel” and it calls upon the West “to send real military aid to the less extreme Sunni rebels”.
@http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.704437
It looks that it was already decided that Russia will not keep its part of the bargain.
I hope the Saker’s optimism is correct. However, all I remember is that in the case of Donbass, ceasefire seems not to help much, at least for many months. Thus people in Donbass get killed, but not reported, or even reported as killed by the Donbass resident “terrorists” themselves. So I could easily believe somethign similar could happen here. If Syria+Russia bombs someone they say they are bombing non-terrorists or civilians, and when terrorists shelled SAA, they say it’s just defense by the “moderate opposition”. It depends on who has the bigger microphone, it seems.
Just remember to catch yourselves on if you find yourselves justifying a “free Kurdistan” for the Syrian Kurds — that is part of the Oded Yinon Plan.
You might think that such an outcome is different from the Zionist plan, but it is not. It is the same outcome only they’ve got you thinking it was your idea all along.
Don’t be played.
@“free Kurdistan” for the Syrian Kurds — that is part of the Oded Yinon Plan.
This is the reason why US is backing the Kurds. The Mosul-Haifa pipe-line is still on the drawing boards. How else could you turn Haifa into “the Rotterdam of the Middle East”, the real objective of the “Operation Iraqi Freedom”?
Remember…
Balkanizing the Middle East: The REAL Goal of America and Israel: Shatter Syria and Iraq Into “Many Small Pieces”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/balkanizing-the-middle-east-the-real-goal-of-america-and-israel-shatter-syria-and-iraq-into-many-small-pieces/5510096
So if you find yourself ruminating on the advantages of breaking up Syria — remember that it is probably not your idea ;) Welcome to the way the AZE works.
The way MacKinderism works. Today’s spoiled Anglo-Zionists could never have developed a coherent theory of imperialism on their own and can barely carry out their interpretation of the Heartland theory.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-great-game-eurasia-and-the-history-of-war/7064
Preventing a Eurasian heartland from coalescing will always be the goal of the North American heartland. The ones with win-win conditions are those that are laughing all the way to the bank playing both sides and while setting up to rule the eventual winner.
MacKinderism=Anglo American Empire
The Anglo-Zionists today are merely the degenerate spawn of the Anglo Americans mating with the Zionist Jews.
Excellent points! I agree Putin (appears to have) got what he clearly stated as goals in October, which is why Western elites are worried. (See
https://ludwitt.wordpress.com/2016/02/23/syrian-ceasefire-agreement-how-putin-got-what-he-clearly-articulated-from-october-2015-and-why-western-elites-are-worried/ )
Yet, already the US Government is showing signs of reneging or at the least not fully engaging with signs of increasing impatience from Moscow. (See https://ludwitt.wordpress.com/2016/02/24/seems-that-the-us-government-is-backtracking-on-trying-to-make-ceasefire-stick/)
Syria and Russia are winning the war, good. in regard to the M.E.M.R.I.. tv video , doesn’t the saker know that it is a Israeli run agency. set up by a former Israeli agent. M.E.M.R.I. tv tries to diminish the Arab nations. tries to make all Arab people look like radical jihadists. middle east media research institute is a phony set up.
Quote: “A ceasefire and yet another huge victory for Russia”?
Humph… A huge victory would be the total elimination of all terrorists, whichever ?? FSA, ISIS , Daesh ect..ect…. This ceasefire will leave time for the psycho-scums to regroup & resupply ??
Sorry, this is how I see it ??
sorry to rain on your parade but the exact opposite is true: The truce is bad for Russia and it will help the ISIS regroup.
Putin is doing the exact same thing he did in Ukraine: the Donbass rebels were ready for a victory and he stopped them by signing the Minks II agreement. Same in Syria: the Syria government was ready for victory yet Putin stopped them in the last minute yet again.
Now the West/USA media will start screaming how Putin is not keeping his word right on schedule next week, while supplying the ISIS with weapons and solders via Turkey. The truce does nothing to help Russia, in fact it hurts Syria and im beginning to wonder who Putin works for.
Of course, Im just wasting my time here typing all this cuz you will censor me once again and not publish this.
Look, you’ll be censored here because of breaching any of the very minimal and reasonable house rules (e.g. not attacking others). Not for having an opinion. Whether you are read or not by others depends on the qualitative content of your post comment.
It becomes somewhat tiresome on this progressive blog to keep having to refer armchair generals to the larger framework. What Putin (and his supporters) are doing is winning the bigger war against the ’empire’ — that dark empire which has, since the demise of the Soviet experiment, completely taken over the USSofA and installed, for all intents and purposes, a soviet ‘communism’ globalized poodle system across Europe and run out of Brussels known as the EU and Nato.
The Syrian experiment is succeeding from the learning derived from the Ukraine experiment. And, again, once it proves effective (against the ’empire’) then the learning from it will be used to then implement Minsk II (or III) once the neo-nazi regime their falls early 2017 (or earlier if the IMF fails) with the democratic overthrow of the Obama-Biden regime in DC/USA.
Russia, China, Iran (the SCO et al) are implementing the ‘pivot out’ of the O-bomba criminal Wall St gang and therefore a small psychological war ‘win’ here or there is of less consequence than the progress of the overall long game. Your ‘win-lose’ paradigm is so dated — and that is the Achilles heal of the empire’s strategists and why they are losing big time where it matters. This is generational, civilizational, … and the end of capitalism as we have known it. Get it?
While I agree that the SAA had the momentum, and it is a shame to lose it, there is no comparison with the Novorussians in terms of who could win. The Novorussians’ best options was to consolidate their gains, which they did when Donestsk Airport finally fell.
That victory was so messy, it suggests Mariupol, let alone Kiev, were simply not achievable, especially if Kiev/NATO decide to spend Ukrainian conscript blood like water in response, spearheaded by ‘cyborg’ right wing fanatics.
IS cut the road from Damascus to Aleppo yet again; imagine if the SAA were committed to a messy Aleppo-as-Stalingrad and this happens.
SAA/Hezbollah/Iranian performance on the ground has been impressive, but anyone can check out the map of the Syrian Civil War and see how much the Assad government needs to do. It might have been better to resolve those cauldrons in green, between Homs and Hama, and the one just west of Khalkhal Airbase south of Damascus, before a truce.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Syrian_Civil_War_detailed_map
What matters in these wars is being able to hold what is taken. While the truce isn’t a great victory, it may be a necessary one and we don’t know all the real numbers.
Time will tell who’s strategic calculus had more merit, and Putin does have a good record.
I’ll believe the cease-fire when it happens. Hopefully the following linked article is wrong, but my hunch is that it’s not…
http://themillenniumreport.com/2016/02/what-is-really-going-on-in-syria-is-the-cease-fire-a-coalition-deception-to-attack-damascus/
I believe we are seeing a historic turning point through the successful Russian action in Syria. Thank you Saker for being here to document it so clearly. The Empire has finally been stopped dead in its tracks. The fuming going on in the White House comes from the self-serving Darth Vaders trying to figure out how to salvage their careers; indeed, their whole privileged lives that have depended until now on the endless expansion of the Empire’s control over helpless humanity. These cannibals are done for, and they know it. They are about to shuffle Obama out the door and replace him with the next political whore, whether Clinton or Trump,but it doesn’t matter. They will teeter and fall with the rest of the bunch. Then the Khazarian Mafia won’t need the U.S. any more. They will likely just let it collapse into the heap that awaits those who defy conscience. But there isn’t anyone to replace it with, so they are on the way out too. The people of the world are quietly cheering, including us in the U.S. who have lived with this monster for so long.
You are correct, imo. Americans should just relax and let this corrupted system fail. Only their illusions will be destroyed. Then real capitalism will return — only it will be 21st century capitalism with the same general desirable human-scale outcomes (different mechanisms) as Chavez’s 21st century socialism. Only the parasitic class need contemplate extinction.
It seems to come down to this:
Russia is winning battles, but can/will it win the war.
And, which war?
Katherine
The chance of Earth is like 1 in 9 quintillion.. Guess the continued survival of planet earth..
Was mich an dieser Vereinbarung stört sind die unkalkulierbaren Folgen für den weiteren Kampf gegen ALLE militanten Gegner Syriens.
Translates:
What bothers me to this agreement, the incalculable consequences for the continued fight against All militant opponents of Syria.
This is the English Saker site – please in future could you translate what you have written for other commenters. I have translated it.
I think although I agree with the Saker that this is a great victory, the true and most dangerous front in the war against Russia is financial and Putin and his team must get his house in order. As Glaziev said on your site, “They went on the warpath, because the war allows them to maintain their control over the periphery. The today’s war is hybrid in nature: the most important front is the currency and finances. The main goal is to enhance the control over the periphery but, if that fails, to create chaos in the periphery.”
The book, The Creature from Jekyll Island, recommended by Ron Paul, has noted that the Bolshevik revolution was financed by U.S. banksters, see here:
http://www.wildboar.net/multilingual/easterneuropean/russian/literature/articles/whofinanced/whofinancedleninandtrotsky.html
“One of the greatest myths of contemporary history is that the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was a popular uprising of the downtrodden masses against the hated ruling class of the Tsars. As we shall see, however, the planning, the leadership and especially the financing came entirely from outside Russia, mostly from financiers in Germany, Britain and the United States. Furthermore we shall see, that the Rothschild Formula played a major role in shaping these events.”
I hope Saker you and your team comment on this dangerous trend; if Soros or his allies can attack the ruble, the effect is a nuclear on the Russian economy, as Glaziev notes:
“For that, we need control of the use of money specifically for the intended purpose; we need selective currency regulation including restrictions on speculations, prevention of manipulations of the financial market, suppression of the attempts to destabilize our financial market as a result of uncontrolled cross-border operations. When we will have achieved these basic necessary conditions for the macroeconomic stability, we could achieve the economic growth, the potential of which is no less than 10% a year.”
/sergei-glaziev-the-full-extend-of-economic-manipulations-in-russia/
Tend to agree with one caveat: just look at pompous mediocrities leading the USA. OTOH, if there were real wise people at the helm here there will be no Ukraine, no Libya, no attempts to install MB in Egypt, and no Syria probs. And there would be no need to all recent activities.
Analysis of the truce / ceasefire by Pablo Jofré Leal for HispanTV ( very interesting!):
“Stop or impulse to war of aggression against Syria? Part I”:
http://hispantv.com/newsdetail/opinion/216365/acuerdo-tregua-siria-estado-islamico
(….) However, and as is customary in American foreign policy, threats came quickly. This time, through the Secretary of State John Kerry who before the Foreign Relations Committee of the US Senate, said that if the ceasefire fails and political transition in Syria does not have the required steps to ensure seriousness and making of real decisions on the formation of a transitional government, Washington retains the option of a Plan B.
This plan is none other than the military option that was being mulled in recent weeks through statements of high warmonger content of the governments of Turkey and Saudi Arabia, who called concrete ground operations with shipping, in the case of the House to Saud, of an estimated 150,000 soldiers contingent. Turkish, Saudi and US statements perfectly complement and this truce can serve to finalize details of an invasion in the light of a unilateral decision by Washington and its allies arguing that “Syria has not fulfilled its part of the commitments and so they will advance in the so-called plan B “and for this, the story is rich in false flag operations that are usually very favorable elements to realize the hegemonic aspirations of the most warmongering sectors of Washington, its European partners and the Middle East. Moving towards peace with a sword hanging over your head has never been an easy way to achieve objectives.(…)
(…) The Iranian government, which has consistently advocated a ceasefire in the Levantine country, has been cautious against the signing of the Interim Agreement in what he says regarding compliance by the forces raised in arms. Hussein Amir Abdolahian, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister for Arab and African Affairs said the Iranian government has had an unalterable position on the solution to the conflict in Syria to a political solution thus boost national dialogue between the government and the opposition under the supervision of the United Nations
“Since the beginning of the Syrian crisis, Iran has insisted on establishing a ceasefire in the Arab country. The Syrian government will respect the measure, however we doubt the commitment of the counterparty, as terrorists and armed groups take advantage of the chaotic situation to pursue their nefarious objectives “Abdolahian said. Meanwhile, both President Putin and President Rohani have held talks regarding this firm of ceasefire agreeing to continue working to find a peaceful solution to the Syrian crisis and reiterating its commitment to continue with determination the fight against EIIL terrorist group – Daesh in Arabic – the Al-Nusra Front – associated with Al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations included in the sanctions list of the United Nations Security Council.(…)
(….) Ar Raqqah, at this stage of the conflict has become a vital objective both from a political point of view, as military and symbolic to the extent that tries to prevent that location – made the capital of the false takfiri caliphate – is in the plans Americans to realize there – in the plan of disintegration of Syria – a transborder sunni political entity between Syria and Iraq and also territorially adjacent to Saudi Arabia. All under the umbrella of the Qatar-Turkey Gas Pipeline paralyzed, which is opposite plan to the projected pipeline between Iran-Iraq and Syria to the output of Iranian gas to the Mediterranean Sea. Recall that the Qatari monarchy is one of the main financiers of the Takfiri groups operating in both Iraq and Syria.
This leads us to consider that part of the conflict in Syria – and the action of enemies such as Turkey and the Gulf monarchies – not so much in the hydrocarbon wealth of the Levantine country as in the strategic fact of being Syria a transit zone of oil and gas pipelines, in the global strategic map designed by the West, to not depend on Russian oil and gas and possibly from Iran. Syria and its energy strategy came to light in the beginning of the aggression in March 2011 under the framework of what is known as “Syria and the four seas” understanding thereby that the Levantine country energetically connects the Persian Gulf, Caspian Sea , the Black and the Mediterranean Sea, all surrounded by the biggest oil and gas producers in the world.
In May 2009 the international media announced that Qatar and Turkey would build a pipeline to carry Qatari gas – the third largest reserve of natural gas in the world and first world producer of gas liquefaction GNL- to Turkish lands through Syria. This involved have the blessing of the government of Damascus, which has opted for a pipeline project coming from the Caspian Sea which would pass through Iran, Iraq, Syria and would go to European markets via ports in the Mediterranean Levant. The table was served for Turkey, Qatar and the house Saud to began to develop plans to destabilize Syria, a scenario that began to take shape from what the West called the Arab Spring – known in the Muslim world as Islamic awakening – and financial and military support to takfiri gangs to do the dirty work.
Washington and its European allies. Turkey, Jordan, the Zionist entity, Saudi Arabia and the feudal monarchies of the Persian Gulf, which are the major supporters of the groups fighting the Syrian people as well as regional powers like Russia and Iran know that the result of what happens in Syria you will determine the balance of power necessary, either in terms of energy, as politic. It is not the same thing a balkanized Syria than a country territorially intact. Some play for the divide and conquer, others for maintain an entire country under penalty of not only disintegrate a part of the Middle East, but generate regional instability with serious global repercussions.”
I agree with the conslusion of Saker, but it was just another secular analysis that does not include the “confirmed intent” (as a prosecutor would call it) of the Book of Revelation and its Koranic equivalent.
The Saudi elites are Talmudic occultists and don’t care how their future nukings will look in the eyes of x and y.
Their Foucauldian Regementality is different than that of the Saker.
The other day I was reading Mr. President Putin´s site, as I usually do almost in a daily basis ( especially I like very much and pay attention to the photos there ), and could notice that in his last visit to Belarus he was quite serious and circumstances faced, compared with previous visits. For example, I can remember the liveliest faces on ocassion of the Minsk-2 Agreement encounters, where both Mr.Lukashenko and Mr. Putin smiled and seemed good and reliable friends…..
Well, now the only one who continue smiling here is Lukashenko, I was wondering why?
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51390
And then they say that comrade Vladímir Vladímirovich is inscrutable….. This will be when he wants….Not here.
Today I was reading the newly discovered and interesting site Katehon.com and just find, amongst some other equally interesting, this analysis:
http://katehon.com/agenda/friendly-visit-why-putin-visiting-belarus
Forgot to add these other photos. See for yourself, Mr. Putin looks really ill-at ease….
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51389/photos/43340
World War III videos: TOWs and T90 russian tanks: extreme psy-op techniques exposed
Syrian Rebels blow-up russian rescue helicopter after rebels shot russian MIG near the turkish border:
Video Psy-op illustates primitive fake war videos
The only “advanced” aspect: a fake video (blown-up chopper) is used to have an audience reduced to human cattle swallow yet another fake video (downed MIG).
Now for fake war videos illustrating real advanced psy-op techiques:
World War III videos: TOWs and T90 russian tanks: extreme psy-op techniques exposed
While real videos of the Syria war have a few hundred views, this psy-op passed the one million mark within 3 days:
Short range (~800m) TOW strike hit T90 with “Shtora” in Sheikh Aqil
youtube. fYOJSz1WOEg
The TRUTH, immediately confirmed by the fact that any of the following is censored by the video publisher:
The same video psy-op is used for two different goals, by simply renaming the title:
1.- “West, Saudi and Turkey helping rebels” with the title “Short range (~800m) TOW strike hit T90 with “Shtora””
2. “rebels have no chances against russian weaponry” as “TOW is useless against T-90 even with switched off “Shtora”, the new dynamic defense rule!”
The immediate diversion agenda:
The russian T-90 tanks turret can’t be penetrated by TOW, you need Javelins, which the freedom fighters don’t have.
General diversion agenda:
BIG LIE – “US, Turkey nd Saudi support syrian rebels”
Grotesque hoax immediately exposed by this simple fact:
After yers of being air bombed by Assad’s, US (since Sep 2014) and Russia (since Sep 2015) with all kinds of bombs, mostly barrel bombs targeting only civilians:
rebels still have no anti-aircraft weapons whatsoever.
An agenda diverting from this:
Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Jordan “Governments”
ALL FAKE sunnis taking part in the genocide of sunnis across the border, in Syria and Iraq, officially part of the “US led coalition” bombing the real rebels under the cover of “bombing ISIS”,
Contrast with Egypt’s Sisi, also an illuminati agent whose role requires him to so far passively stand as innocent bystander during the sunni genocide.
BASICS – start here
great-tribulation.blogspot — /2016/02/
I have to agree with Saker. Christian Russia has shown itself to be a leader of true humanity. Putin’s planning and the execution of the Russian military is nothing short of remarkable. Putin has gained Russia immense international respect. The USA is a ruined nation and the American people know that the country is on the wrong path. As an American I can only thank Mr. Putin for this accomplishment. Perhaps someday America will realize that Russia is a natural ally in the elevation of humanity. Let’s hope.