Yes, thank you Saker you have made my day again not just with your professional analytical reports, but also here is the example how the media brainwash the population around the world. In this case of the moderator I would invite more opposition just to let the public know how they would react to this topic. Regarding to the petition I have signed and it is on his way around the world from my side. I have approached mostly the academic community / starting in Australia /and it is going to be interesting to read their point of view even it is very dangerous for them because as we know they can loose their job. Let see who is going to stand up against the war around the world. We just have to hope that this Easter 2014 is going to be a winner for everyone and every single nation around the globe.
Unfortunately I cant view the vid at this time but I thought I’d venture a comment.
Stepping back and taking a historical view, it seems that current events are a repetition of the ‘Great Game’ that was waged between Russia and England for centuries, perhaps having its beginning with Napoleon’s defeat and the Congress of Vienna. What was once a guiding policy of England is now obfuscated by the notion that States act in their national interest when in reality the real Western global powers are not bound by geography.
Bottom line is the ‘western powers’ are in a struggle to subdue and control Russia. The Soviet Union could not survived without continual economic and industrial support of the West.
Russia’s revival under Putin is a loss of resources for the Western banking system and must be dismembered, As for the US, how many folks remember that Russia came to the aid of Lincoln during the Civil War?
One thing is that (which one of the commentators pointed out) that ever since 1989 , the West lives in the 1991 moment and somehow can not seem to come out of it.
It cannot accept things as it is and is deeply hateful of Russia following her centuries-old traditions.
So this brings us to the cold war 2 as you explain well.
But can Russia win this one ?
You Russian people have defeated the Papal Tutonic knights (St. Alexander Navalny) , the hordes of Napeoleon (Czar Alexander) and the Third Reich (Stalin) but can you win this one ? Remember the enemy at this time is the greatest mightiest empire that mankind has ever known and this enemy is willing to use any tools at it’s disposal.
How Russia will survive this ? I would love yours views on this one.
I don’t know if you have addressed this in one of the comments in your other posts, but I am curious to know what you make of Mike Whitney’s argument that it was a mistake of Putin to speak with Kerry & BO because it advertises his weakness:
Well, I might be a little too optimistic, as I live in Russia myself, but I do believe that we can win the cold war II.
There are two reasons.
First is the spirit, or moral. In contrast to the USSR, where after 60-s people started to lose faith in communism, today the majourity feels that we are on the truth side. For russian mentality it is very important. I have a Ph.D. in physics that I obtainde in France, but if I have to grow potatoes it would be okay if I feel that the truth is on my side. I mean for true russians the spirit is more important than body.
The second reason is more materialistic and called the peak of natural resources. Google peak oil? for an explanation why the price of oil is so high and why it can’t became lower. The post carbon institute has some very nica materials on the resource limitation. In short, humanity is entering the age of resource constarints in contrast to the capital constraint. So in the nest century resources and especially energy will cost more, and the capital less. In thsi situation Russia cannot lose longterm, and we have a capable military, good rockets and nice nukes to defend ourselves in the short term.
I am not sure if Russia would be able to find a good solution for the resource limitation (especially energy) itself. But this problem we will face after western civilization witha lag of about 20 – 30 years.
Any despotic nation that is under the wing of the US is protected. Any nation that is independent of the british controlled US is subverted and destroyed, no matter where it is on the path to democracy.
The west successfully subverts the spread of democracy by this tactic. An actual democratic nation wouldn’t be a puppet of the british controlled US, it would be a puppet of the people of the nation. But the england and her agent US won’t stand for this. So, any evolution towards real democracy is killed and English controlled US servility substituted .
the modus operandi of Britain is to make country and regions unstable and install british stooge with explicit instruction to bring the money -looted ones -to Britain from where it is not going to go anywhere else. Some oligarch jews were the stooge of British in Russia and they brought so many ill gotten money to uk. So did the Kuwaitis-who brought 400 billions of pounds within a week of first Iraq war problem in august 1990(now kuwait soverenign fund is nto in kuwait but in londoan and under british occuptation) -so has continued the massive loot of the rest of the world by the English race through this money protection racket . it is money protection racket in the sense that those elite’s money is protected only when it is made to be lodged in British London banks.
This is how the british and Americans now conduct their battle for “hearts and minds” – by making local satraps so widely and deeply despised that they are totally dependent on their Washington overlords for their sheer physical survival. The real “benchmark” the Iraqis have to display to the Americans’ satisfaction is an infinite capacity for obedience.”
“In the aftermath of President Abraham Lincoln’s defeat of the London-backed slave-holders’ Confederate insurrection, the London-linked New York faction of U.S. finance unleashed a predatory looting of the physical assets of the territory formerly ruled by the defeated Confederacy. That operation, which was described then as “carpet bagging,” is a term that pointed to the style of the personal baggage, in which the travelling, locust-like predators carried their personal effects.”
A very famous news mogul-Mr. William Randolph Hearst (Jewish proprietor of he the Hearst newspaper chain ))- had been stopped from running for American presidency in 1916 because he was suspected by the English that might not have been inclined to rescue england in the 1st world war. Anyway, the southern so called Baptist and confederacy (= racists) constituency was pressing hard for america to come to rescue england who was staring defeat and thus loosing the prospect of enslaved nations who would have been feed from defeat of england. America did come to aid of england and it was called end of isolationalism. But this end of isolationalism would be tolerated only when it suits english interest against others and not in case of others like freedom for Irish people in northern Ireland (an occupied part of Ireland).and that British agent Wilson intervened on side of Britain in name of spreading democracy at point of gun! Woodrow Wilson was re-elected in 1916 on a promise to stay out of the Great War.
Woodrow Wilson, who secured re-election on a war avoidance platform in 1916, but then demanded a declaration of war against Germany in the following year in response to a demand from the Morgan interests that he prevent a looming British collapse.
“The First World War was by far the bloodiest conflict in human history up to that time. Schwartz and Skinner noted, “Woodrow Wilson proclaimed a war for democracy against ‘Prussian dictatorship,’ but that was propaganda. Germany had civil rights, an elected parliament, competing parties, universal male suffrage, and an unparalleled system of social democracy.” Germany was far more democratic than either the British or French empire.”
Think of that-Britain was looting two third of the world at the time and killing starving millions of people-and this Wilson comes to Britain rescue in name of protecting democracy! And that is exactly what these bastards mean when they utter democracy-that is a code word for them to attack other countries for furtherance of british interest.
Britain’s “Bomber” Harris, who led the RAF Bomber Command during its mass raids on Germany in the Second World War, cut his teeth devastating Kurdish villages in Iraq in the 1920s.
Heinz Guderian – master of the Blitzkrieg and father of modern tank warfare – commanded the German XIX Army Corps as it rampaged across Poland in 1939.
Personally leading the devastating attack which traversed the Ardennes Forest and broke through French lines, he was at the forefront of the race to the Channel coast. Only Hitler’s personal command to halt prevented Guderian’s tanks and troops turning Dunkirk into an English bloodbath. All because vily coaward liar Churchill promised something to hitler only token resistance to his ultimate aim-to destroy russia and (thus from brutish point of view germans too.)
4th June, 2007.
President putin is wrong when he says that russia should or will target the missile on europe if america goes with anti missile defence plan in Europe.in fact it was not America but england which asked for ABM againstt Russia. BBc spy journalists were harassing presidential candidate Gore not to go ahead with Florida recount on ground” ally like britian want to conclude AMB deployment in Yorkshire as soon as possible so there should be no delay in govt. formation.in other word accept fraudulent win of bush for sake of england ! “ Russia must target (rather than should) the nuclear missiles with multiple war heads against all the cities, towns and big villages( including military instalations) of england because this cold war -like the one before- is being started by england for the benefit of english race only-.it is race war between the english parasite race versus the rest of the world-the sooner the rest of the world realizes that better it is for the world. look how germany wes villified soon after fall of soviet union-look how russia is being vilified immediately after Putin made russia strong.
-such is the evil propaganda of britihs spies inside america. . poland is nothing but a proxy for the british bastards. itis no use targetting poland -target the main villain which is england and the english race which m ust be aniihilated fromt the face of the world.
Russophobia is the result of centuries of religious hatred. First against Christianity as such by the Jews, secondly against the Christian Empire as the alliance of what the Jews perceived as their greatest enemies (the Amalekits!), the Church and the Roman Empire. Their destruction was perceived as a religious duty. The “West” hated Byzance, the Second Rome, the Christian Empire and fought mercilessly to destroy it. Their hatred grew when they realized that the hated Second Rome made a come back as the Third Rome, Russia. And it reached feverish pitch when they realized that the destruction they unleashed upon it through revolution, terror, starvation, war still did not succed to break it. And it is so irrational and erratic because, probably, deep down their dark souls they know that they won’t ever be able to prevail. That’s what Pascha reminds us every year: the Gates of Hell have been smashed and the power of Satan trampled on.
Amalek is a useful device for continually renewing the threatening external enemies that Judaism requires to keep the Chosen Flock united. I’ve seen Amalek nominated as the Palestinians, Moslems, Arabs, even the ‘United States of Amalek’, due to the ‘loss of precious Jewish souls’ through inter-marriage. This ‘religion’ basically refuses to admit that there might ever be a time or place where Jews and non-Jews live in peace. Although, of course, there have been such times, but only, it seems to me, when a strong central, non-Judaic power keeps Judaic anti-goyism under check, and protects the Jews from real antisemitism in return.
Unfortunately many liberals do have this Russophobic attitude.
Not all though: One can be very liberal and an atheist/ agnost, and still appreciate another culture, even if it is more religious and more conservative: it is all about respect and authenticity.
One can have different views about life: no problem at all, as long one is honest, compassionate and reasonable, and striving for truth.
just a link
http://novorossy.ru/
Yes, thank you Saker you have made my day again not just with your professional analytical reports, but also here is the example how the media brainwash the population around the world. In this case of the moderator I would invite more opposition just to let the public know how they would react to this topic.
Regarding to the petition I have signed and it is on his way around the world from my side. I have approached mostly the academic community / starting in Australia /and it is going to be interesting to read their point of view even it is very dangerous for them because as we know they can loose their job. Let see who is going to stand up against the war around the world.
We just have to hope that this Easter 2014 is going to be a winner for everyone and every single nation around the globe.
Unfortunately I cant view the vid at this time but I thought I’d venture a comment.
Stepping back and taking a historical view, it seems that current events are a repetition of the ‘Great Game’ that was waged between Russia and England for centuries, perhaps having its beginning with Napoleon’s defeat and the Congress of Vienna. What was once a guiding policy of England is now obfuscated by the notion that States act in their national interest when in reality the real Western global powers are not bound by geography.
Bottom line is the ‘western powers’ are in a struggle to subdue and control Russia. The Soviet Union could not survived without continual economic and industrial support of the West.
Russia’s revival under Putin is a loss of resources for the Western banking system and must be dismembered, As for the US, how many folks remember that Russia came to the aid of Lincoln during the Civil War?
T1
Dear Saker,
Thanks for sharing this wonderful video.
I can find some interesting patterns here.
One thing is that (which one of the commentators pointed out) that ever since 1989 , the West lives in the 1991 moment and somehow can not seem to come out of it.
It cannot accept things as it is and is deeply hateful of Russia following her centuries-old traditions.
So this brings us to the cold war 2 as you explain well.
But can Russia win this one ?
You Russian people have defeated the Papal Tutonic knights (St. Alexander Navalny) , the hordes of Napeoleon (Czar Alexander) and the Third Reich (Stalin) but can you win this one ? Remember the enemy at this time is the greatest mightiest empire that mankind has ever known and this enemy is willing to use any tools at it’s disposal.
How Russia will survive this ? I would love yours views on this one.
I don’t know if you have addressed this in one of the comments in your other posts, but I am curious to know what you make of Mike Whitney’s argument that it was a mistake of Putin to speak with Kerry & BO because it advertises his weakness:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article38242.htm
@Debanjan
Well, I might be a little too optimistic, as I live in Russia myself, but I do believe that we can win the cold war II.
There are two reasons.
First is the spirit, or moral. In contrast to the USSR, where after 60-s people started to lose faith in communism, today the majourity feels that we are on the truth side.
For russian mentality it is very important. I have a Ph.D. in physics that I obtainde in France, but if I have to grow potatoes it would be okay if I feel that the truth is on my side. I mean for true russians the spirit is more important than body.
The second reason is more materialistic and called the peak of natural resources. Google peak oil? for an explanation why the price of oil is so high and why it can’t became lower. The post carbon institute has some very nica materials on the resource limitation.
In short, humanity is entering the age of resource constarints in contrast to the capital constraint. So in the nest century resources and especially energy will cost more, and the capital less. In thsi situation Russia cannot lose longterm, and we have a capable military, good rockets and nice nukes to defend ourselves in the short term.
I am not sure if Russia would be able to find a good solution for the resource limitation (especially energy) itself. But this problem we will face after western civilization witha lag of about 20 – 30 years.
Best regards
Alexey
Any despotic nation that is under the wing of the US is protected. Any nation that is independent of the british controlled US is subverted and destroyed, no matter where it is on the path to democracy.
The west successfully subverts the spread of democracy by this tactic. An actual democratic nation wouldn’t be a puppet of the british controlled US, it would be a puppet of the people of the nation. But the england and her agent US won’t stand for this. So, any evolution towards real democracy is killed and English controlled US servility substituted .
the modus operandi of Britain is to make country and regions unstable and install british stooge with explicit instruction to bring the money -looted ones -to Britain from where it is not going to go anywhere else.
Some oligarch jews were the stooge of British in Russia and they brought so many ill gotten money to uk. So did the Kuwaitis-who brought 400 billions of pounds within a week of first Iraq war problem in august 1990(now kuwait soverenign fund is nto in kuwait but in londoan and under british occuptation) -so has continued the massive loot of the rest of the world by the English race through this money protection racket . it is money protection racket in the sense that those elite’s money is protected only when it is made to be lodged in British London banks.
This is how the british and Americans now conduct their battle for “hearts and minds” – by making local satraps so widely and deeply despised that they are totally dependent on their Washington overlords for their sheer physical survival. The real “benchmark” the Iraqis have to display to the Americans’ satisfaction is an infinite capacity for obedience.”
“In the aftermath of President Abraham Lincoln’s defeat of the London-backed slave-holders’ Confederate insurrection, the London-linked New York faction of U.S. finance unleashed a predatory looting of the physical assets of the territory formerly ruled by the defeated Confederacy. That operation, which was described then as “carpet bagging,” is a term that pointed to the style of the personal baggage, in which the travelling, locust-like predators carried their personal effects.”
A very famous news mogul-Mr. William Randolph Hearst (Jewish proprietor of he the Hearst newspaper chain ))- had been stopped from running for American presidency in 1916 because he was suspected by the English that
might not have been inclined to rescue england in the 1st world war. Anyway, the southern so called Baptist and confederacy (= racists) constituency was pressing hard for america to come to rescue england who was staring defeat and thus loosing the prospect of enslaved nations who would have been feed from defeat of england. America did come to aid of england and it was called end of isolationalism.
But this end of isolationalism would be tolerated only when it suits english interest against others and not in case of others like freedom for Irish people in northern Ireland (an occupied part of Ireland).and that British agent Wilson intervened on side of Britain in name of spreading democracy at point of gun! Woodrow Wilson was re-elected in 1916 on a promise to stay out of the Great War.
Woodrow Wilson, who secured re-election on a war avoidance platform in 1916, but then demanded a declaration of war against Germany in the following year in response to a demand from the Morgan interests that he prevent a looming British collapse.
“The First World War was by far the bloodiest conflict in human history up to that time. Schwartz and Skinner noted, “Woodrow Wilson proclaimed a war for democracy against ‘Prussian dictatorship,’ but that was propaganda. Germany had civil rights, an elected parliament, competing parties, universal male suffrage, and an unparalleled system of social democracy.” Germany was far more democratic than either the British or French empire.”
Think of that-Britain was looting two third of the world at the time and killing starving millions of people-and this Wilson comes to Britain rescue in name of protecting democracy! And that is exactly what these bastards mean when they utter democracy-that is a code word for them to attack other countries for furtherance of british interest.
Britain’s “Bomber” Harris, who led the RAF Bomber Command during its mass raids on Germany in the Second World War, cut his teeth devastating Kurdish villages in Iraq in the 1920s.
Heinz Guderian – master of the Blitzkrieg and father of modern tank warfare – commanded the German XIX Army Corps as it rampaged across Poland in 1939.
Personally leading the devastating attack which traversed the Ardennes Forest and broke through French lines, he was at the forefront of the race to the Channel coast. Only Hitler’s personal command to halt prevented Guderian’s tanks and troops turning Dunkirk into an English bloodbath. All because vily coaward liar Churchill promised something to hitler only token resistance to his ultimate aim-to destroy russia and (thus from brutish point of view germans too.)
4th June, 2007.
President putin is wrong when he says that russia should or will target the missile on europe if america goes with anti missile defence plan in Europe.in fact it was not America but england which asked for ABM againstt Russia. BBc spy journalists were harassing presidential candidate Gore not to go ahead with Florida recount on ground” ally like britian want to conclude AMB deployment in Yorkshire as soon as possible so there should be no delay in govt. formation.in other word accept fraudulent win of bush for sake of england ! “
Russia must target (rather than should) the nuclear missiles with multiple war heads against all the cities, towns and big villages( including military instalations) of england because this cold war -like the one before- is being started by england for the benefit of english race only-.it is race war between the english parasite race versus the rest of the world-the sooner the rest of the world realizes that better it is for the world.
look how germany wes villified soon after fall of soviet union-look how russia is being vilified immediately after Putin made russia strong.
-such is the evil propaganda of britihs spies inside america. .
poland is nothing but a proxy for the british bastards.
itis no use targetting poland -target the main villain which is england and the english race which m ust be aniihilated fromt the face of the world.
@Debanjan
A very funny? – and quite telling – slip of the tongue:
… defeated the Papal Tutonic knights (St. Alexander Navalny)
It was Nevsky, and not – Navalny – one of the laughable “opponents” of Putin
shed
Русофил и русофоб:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw4OT-kXr10
@Debanjan
“the enemy at this time is the greatest mightiest empire that mankind has ever known and this enemy is willing to use any tools at it’s disposal”.
This is a bit of hyperbole. It is in fact “the colossus with feet of clay”.
WizOz
This is a very good interview with Paul Craig Roberts on the US agenda of world hegemony.
Perhaps good to share with less informed friends, family and colleagues.
Dr Paul Craig Roberts 2014 : Ukraine, Neocons & Armageddon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k11v8WOVT2U
Wiz Oz The Empire is a mindless, hollow shell, but its weapons are real, as is its willingness to unleash them.
Russophobia is the result of centuries of religious hatred. First against Christianity as such by the Jews, secondly against the Christian Empire as the alliance of what the Jews perceived as their greatest enemies (the Amalekits!), the Church and the Roman Empire. Their destruction was perceived as a religious duty.
The “West” hated Byzance, the Second Rome, the Christian Empire and fought mercilessly to destroy it. Their hatred grew when they realized that the hated Second Rome made a come back as the Third Rome, Russia. And it reached feverish pitch when they realized that the destruction they unleashed upon it through revolution, terror, starvation, war still did not succed to break it. And it is so irrational and erratic because, probably, deep down their dark souls they know that they won’t ever be able to prevail. That’s what Pascha reminds us every year: the Gates of Hell have been smashed and the power of Satan trampled on.
WizOz
@shed
Yes you are correct.
I made this mistake.
It should be Nevsky and not Nevalny.
Thanks for pointing it out.
Amalek is a useful device for continually renewing the threatening external enemies that Judaism requires to keep the Chosen Flock united. I’ve seen Amalek nominated as the Palestinians, Moslems, Arabs, even the ‘United States of Amalek’, due to the ‘loss of precious Jewish souls’ through inter-marriage. This ‘religion’ basically refuses to admit that there might ever be a time or place where Jews and non-Jews live in peace. Although, of course, there have been such times, but only, it seems to me, when a strong central, non-Judaic power keeps Judaic anti-goyism under check, and protects the Jews from real antisemitism in return.
German people increasingly react negatively against the russophobia in the media. This has made it even into the media themself:
http://www.ardmediathek.de/ndr-fernsehen/zapp/immer-auf-putin-breite-kritik-an-medien?documentId=20845808
Unfortunately many liberals do have this Russophobic attitude.
Not all though: One can be very liberal and an atheist/ agnost, and still appreciate another culture, even if it is more religious and more conservative: it is all about respect and authenticity.
One can have different views about life: no problem at all, as long one is honest, compassionate and reasonable, and striving for truth.
I do not comment here much but his is absolutely stunning.
http://www.voltairenet.org/article183373.html
Poland helped plan this whole thing.
Regards
Graham
http://www.voltairenet.org/article183373.html
Is seems Poland helped NATO plan this months ahead of the coup. Is this not an act if war ?