Today’s Victory Day celebrations in Moscow mark a turning point in Russian history

Today is truly a historical day. For the first time ever, the West has boycotted the Victory Day Parade in Moscow and, also for the first time ever, Chinese forces have marched on the Beautiful Square, (“Red” square is a mistranslation – the “Red Square” ought be called the “Beautiful Square”) with the Russians. I believe that this is a profoundly symbolic shift and one which makes perfectly good sense.

The past

For one thing, Russia and China suffered more from WWII than any other country. See for yourself:

Now take a look at the casualties suffered by the “boycotting countries” and everything becomes clear (the only exception to this rule is Poland, which lost a huge proportion of its population). The fact is, that for all the Hollywood movies produced about WWII, the Anglo countries suffered very little, compared to the huge losses of Russia (25+ million) and China (15+ million). For details, see here and here. As for continental Europe, it’s resistance to the Nazis, while very real and heroic, was a feat of the few, not a true national resistance (like in the Soviet Union, Poland or Yugoslavia). But there is much more to this than just numbers.

The real reason why the US/NATO/EU countries have boycotted the celebrations in Moscow is, of course, not their very modest contribution to the defeat of Nazi Germany, but their unconditional support for Nazi Ukraine: the “country” which considers Stepan Bandera a national hero, the OUN-UPA death squads as a “heroic liberation movement” and the liberation of the Ukraine as a “Soviet occupation”. It is also a fact that the Anglos have always shared these feelings and that had developed several plans for total war against the USSR were considered right at the end of the war which I have already mentioned them in the past:

Plan Totality (1945): earmarked 20 Soviet cities for obliteration in a first strike: Moscow, Gorki, Kuybyshev, Sverdlovsk, Novosibirsk, Omsk, Saratov, Kazan, Leningrad, Baku, Tashkent, Chelyabinsk, Nizhny Tagil, Magnitogorsk, Molotov, Tbilisi, Stalinsk, Grozny, Irkutsk, and Yaroslavl.

Operation Unthinkable (1945) assumed a surprise attack by up to 47 British and American divisions in the area of Dresden, in the middle of Soviet lines. This represented almost half of the roughly 100 divisions (ca. 2.5 million men) available to the British, American and Canadian headquarters at that time. (…) The majority of any offensive operation would have been undertaken by American and British forces, as well as Polish forces and up to 100,000 German Wehrmacht soldiers.

Operation Dropshot (1949): included mission profiles that would have used 300 nuclear bombs and 29,000 high-explosive bombs on 200 targets in 100 cities and towns to wipe out 85% of the Soviet Union’s industrial potential at a single stroke. Between 75 and 100 of the 300 nuclear weapons, were targeted to destroy Soviet combat aircraft on the ground.

Ask yourself a simple question: why were these plans never actually implemented? The answer is both simple and obvious: because the West feared the Red Army. And since the West was terrified of the Red Army, what do you think the western guests felt each time they watched the Victory Day parade in Moscow? Were they thinking about how the Soviet Army defeated the Nazis, or about how the Russian Army kept them in check? Again, the answer is obvious.

The reality is that while western people very much belong on the Beautiful Square for the Victory Day parade, the western leaders do not: not only did the Anglos carefully nurture and promote Hitler, they always saw him as “their SOB” whom they hoped to unleash against the Soviet Union. Their plan failed, of course, but that only increased their russophobia (“phobia” in the double sense of “fear” and “hate”). To see the western leaders “missing” today is, therefore, a very good thing and I personally hope that they never get invited again (I know, they will, but I wish they weren’t).

The present

The AngloZionist Empire and Russia are at war. Of course, the presence of nuclear weapons on both sides makes this a special kind of war. It is roughly 80% informational, 15% economic and 5% military. But it is a very real war nonetheless, if only because the outcome of this war will decide the future of the planet. The Donbass or the Ukraine are, of course, of exactly zero interest to the West. What is really at stake here is the survival of one of two different models:

AngloZionist Unipolar Imperial Model	Russian Multipolar Model
One world Hegemon	Collaborative development
Might makes right (national and international)	Rule of law (national and international)
Single societal model	Each country has its own societal model
Ad hoc “coalitions of the willing”	Respect for international law
Secularism and relativism	Central role for religions and traditions
Military violence as preferred solution	Military violence as option of last resort
Rule of the 1%	Rule of the 99%
Ideological monism	Ideological pluralism
White supremacism	Multi-culturalism

Both Russians and Americans are quite aware of what is at stake and neither side can back down. On one hand, if the US/NATO/EU prevail, they will have succeeded in breaking the Russian “back” and Russia will rapidly be submitted. Should that happen, all the BRICS countries will soon follow, including China. On the other hand, if Russia prevails in the Ukraine, then the US grip on the EU will soon be weakened and, possibly, lost altogether and the entire world will see that the Empire is crumbling. Should that happen, the entire international financial system will escape from the AngloZionst control and liquidate the petrodollar. The consequences of such a collapse will be felt worldwide.

Xi , Putin and Nazarbaev together on Vday

The presence of Xi Jinpin next to Putin on this historic day, the participation of the Chinese military in the parade and the presence of PLA Navy ships alongside the Russian Black Sea Fleet, is a direct and powerful message to the world: in this titanic struggle, China is fully throwing her weight behind Russia.

[Sidebar: Notice on the photo of Xi and Putin that there is one more absolutely crucial figure sitting next to the war veteran: Nursultan Nazarbaev, the President of Kazakhstan. The crucial role this man has played to shape today’s world has not been recognized, but with time I am sure it will. Long before Putin, it was Nazarbaev who did everything in his power to prevent the breakup of the Soviet Union, the creation and strengthening of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the creation of the Eurasian Economic Union. I would note that Putin has, on several occasions, expressed his deep admiration for, and gratitude to, Nazarbaev whom he has explicitly described as the “father” of the new Eurasian union.]

This is the “new Russia” – one literally flanked by her two allies, China and Kazakhstan. It is hard to over-estimate the importance of this event: for the first time in 400 years Russia has finally fully turned her face to her natural ecosphere – the East.

Many languages and culture have an expression which basically says that you recognize your true friends in times of hardship. I believe that this is true. This is even truer in international politics. And if you apply this criterion to the history of Russia, you come to a simple, but inevitable conclusion: the West has never been Russia’s friend (of course, I am talking about the ruling class, not the common people!). By turning towards Asia, Russia is finally “coming home”.

Chinese units have never marched on the Beautiful Square before, and to see them there today also sends a clear message to the West: we are standing with Russia!

Chinese forces on the Beautiful Square

Chinese Navy in Novorossiik

The future

Today’s Victory Day parade in Moscow marks a turning point in Russian history: now, for the first time ever, there is a consensus in Russia that instead of looking West, Russia must look North (Siberia, the Arctic), East (Asia) and South (Latin America, Africa). There will be no “big break” with the West, however, as Russia will continue to hope for the decolonization of Europe. In part, this process has already begun in Greece and Hungary, and it is simmering in Serbia, France, Italy and even Germany. The potential for a European decolonization is definitely there and Russia should not, and will not, give up on Europe.

Another major priority of Russia will be to try to facilitate a rapprochement between the two other BRICS “heavyweights”: China and India. Tensions between these two giants are an inherent risk for all the BRICS members and cannot be allowed to remain.

Russia will also try to strengthen her informal but still very real alliance with Iran, Syria and Hezbollah. These three are natural allies for Russia and while it is too early to include Iran or Syria in the BRICS or the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, where Iran already has an observer status, eventually this should happen. Iran could also become the first non-ex-Soviet country to join the Collective Security Treaty Organization.

Still, the single most important development in the future will be the deepening of the symbiotic relationship between China and Russia, the one I call the “China-Russia Strategic Alliance” which Larchmonter445 has so brilliantly analyzed in his “Vineyard of the Saker White Paper: the China-Russia Double Helix“: while remaining externally two separate countries, Russia and China will form a single economic, political and military entity, fully integrated and fully dependent on each other (Xi and Putin have again signed a list of mega-contracts between the two countries).

Unless of course, a full-scale war breaks out between the Empire and Russia.

I personally have no hope for a peaceful solution for the Ukrainian civil war. There is nothing which could be meaningfully negotiated between Russia and the Nazi regime in Kiev. Besides, all the indicators and warnings seem to agree on the fact that an Ukronazi attack on Novorussia is all but inevitable. At that point, there are only two possible outcomes: either the Novorussians are defeated and Russia has to openly intervene, or the Ukronazis are defeated and the Novorussians go on the offensive and liberate most, or even all, of Novorussia and the Donetsk region. I am cautiously optimistic and my sense is that the Urkonazis will be defeated for a third time. When that happens, the regime in Kiev will most likely rapidly collapse.

Conclusion

I am under no illusion that the end of World War II brought happiness and freedom to all of mankind, even less so in Eastern Europe. In reality, it brought an untold number of horrors and suffering to many nations, especially Germany. I don’t see Victory Day as a celebration of Communism or of the Soviet regime, but as a victory over one of the most abhorrent regimes in history. It was the victory of all the people who fought against the Nazis and not of one specific political ideology or order. But, by the same token, I don’t think that it makes sense to deny that Stalin and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union played a key role in this victory. The notion that the Russian people prevailed “in spite of Stalin” really makes no sense as he, and his commanders, played a key role in every single major battle of this war, just as Hitler and his commanders did on the other side. As I said before, this victory belongs to all those who helped defeating the Nazis and that very much includes Stalin, his commanders and the CPSU. Hence the Red banners do belong to this parade.

Finally, this day is also a day of celebration for all those who, today, are still resisting the true “heir” of the Nazi regime – the AngloZionist Empire, with its global hegemonic ambitions and never ending colonial wars. Thus today is a day of celebration for all of us in the Saker community, our brothers (and sisters!) in arms and all our friends and allies in this global resistance to global Empire.

I congratulate you and wish you a joy-filled and peaceful Victory Day!

The Saker

PS: we all probably have our own favorite iconic photo for World War 2. Mine is this one:

Sergei Makarovich Korolkov minutes before his execution by the Germans

It shows a Russian solider, Sergei Makarovich Korolkov, who has just been captured by a German unit and is about to be executed. I love his look of self-confident defiance, which, to me, symbolizes the real “ultimate weapon” of the Russian people: an unbreakable willpower, even in the face of defeat or death.

PPS: check out the excellent article “To be Russian” by Andre Vltchek.

Luca K on May 11, 2015 · at 5:17 pm EST/EDT

I disagree with a lot in this piece.
For example, unless the author expressed himself very poorly and meant
something else, the notion that the ‘Russian model’ represents the rule
of the 99% is quite bizarre and totally unsupported by any evidence.

But the idea that Russia supports multiculturalism – as if that is
something great, it is not – and Zusas ‘model’ supports ‘White supremacism’ is even more absurd.
What I see Russia do is what L stated ‘ Russia represents pride in your culture and heritage, as oppose to the politically correct self-hate that is being taught to whites in western Europe”

To the degree that Russia tries to integrate non russians, that is borne out of necessity. The RF inherited most of the 2dn largest land empire ever, after the mongols at their height.
The russians conquered a lot of non russians to achieve that.
Insensitivity to the many ethnicities conquered by Russia(some of which have a history of fighting Russian domination) only creates instabilityand opportunities which can then be exploited by ZUSA to splinter the Russian Federation.
But the Russians are the recognized dominant culture and people of the Russian Federation.

This is in total contrast to the loony model of multiculturalism in
Western countries, both in the old indigenous European homelands as
well as in those countries which were created in the ‘new world’ and
still hold white-euro majorities.

The current ‘zamerican model'(also implemented to varying degrees in
many euro client states and in the ‘anglo’ world in general) does not
care about white people at all, quite the opposite.

Mass non european immigration into the these countries play against
the interests of the vast majority of the people, who, btw, have no
say in the process. More on the costs of multiculturalism later.
Who promotes it and what are their interests?

Two major groups can be identified;

One group is made up by a tiny elite in these countries(so called 1%)
who do not give a damn about their co-ethnics bc theirs are class
interests. They want cheap labor. They understand that fragmented societies make it easier for them to pray on labor.

French philosopher Alain de Benoist explains in “L’immigration; armée
de réserve du capital” (April-June 2011, Nr. 139):

“This was a handy way for a large number of big employers to exert downward pressure on wages. …From then on capitalism entered the competition of the workforce by reaching out to the reserve armies of wage earners.”

In the aftermath of World War II, immigrants began to arrive more and more
frequently from Maghreb countries; first from Algeria, then from Morocco.
Trucks chartered by large companies (especially in the automobile and
construction industry) came by the hundreds to recruit immigrants on the
spot. From 1962 to 1974, nearly two million additional immigrants arrived
to France of whom 550,000 were recruited by the National Immigration Service (ONI), a state-run agency, yet controlled under the table by big business.
Since then, the wave has continued to grow. François-Laurent Balssa notes that when a workforce shortage in one sector occurs, out of the two
possible choices one must either raise the salary, or one must reach out
to foreign labor. Usually it was the latter option that was favored by the
National Council of French Employers (CNPF) and as of 1998 by its successor, the Movement of Enterprises (MEDEF).
That choice, which bears witness of the desire for short-term benefits,
delayed advancement of production tools and industrial innovation.
During the same period, however, as the example of Japan demonstrates,
the rejection of foreign immigration and favoring of the domestic workforce
enabled Japan to achieve its technological revolution, well ahead of most
of its Western competitors.

Big Business and the Left; A Holy Alliance

At the beginning, immigration was a phenomenon linked to big business.
It still continues to be that way. Those who clamor for always more
immigration are big companies. This immigration is in accordance with
the very spirit of capitalism, which aims at the erasure of borders
(« laissez faire, laissez passer »). “While obeying the logic of social
dumping, Balssa continues, a “low cost” labor market has thus been created with the “undocumented” and the “low-skilled,” functioning as stopgap “jack of all trades.” Thus, big business has reached its hand to the far-left, the former aiming at dismantling of the welfare state, considered to be too costly, the latter killing off the nation-state considered to be too archaic.[…]”

The other main group is organized Jewry.
In the following vid, Ann Schaffer, director of the American Jewish
Committee’s Belfer Center for American Pluralism, states the basic
philosophy of Jews in Zamerica, which is much the same in other Western
nations as well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43eC1rZNJvg

“The Jewish community has always worked on the premise that as a minority,our security, our strength, our well being in America is interdependent with those of other minorities. This is a Jewish issue.
It’s very much a Jewish issue.”

Jewish academic activist Earl Raab:

“The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American
population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all
be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a
Nazi-Aryan party[ I roll my eyes] will be able to prevail in this country.

We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to
bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected,
but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it
irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry
more practical than ever.”

Charles Silberman notes:

American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief—one firmly rooted in history—that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors,
as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups.
It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality,
that leads an overwhelming majority of U.S. Jews to endorse
‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called
‘social’ issues.

Barbara Lerner Spectre is a Zionist and head of Paideia – The European
Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden, an organisation funded by the
Swedish government and the Wallenberg Foundation to promote Jewish ideology.
Through an organisation called One Sweden, which she heads, she promotes multiculturalism.
Although born in the United States, Spectre moved to Palestine (“Israel”)
in 1967 where she worked at the Shalom Hartman Institute in Jerusalem,
though she decided to move to Sweden in 1999.
Spectre is married to rabbi Philip Spectre, who was the official rabbi
at the Great Synagogue in Stockholm and the Chief Rabbi in Sweden
during the early 2000s.

During an interview she made the following remarkable statement —
remarkable because she does not attribute anti-Jewish attitudes
to irrational prejudices.
Instead she says that it’s because of the “leading role” played by
Jews in the movement toward multiculturalism:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ

“I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation,
Europe will not survive.” — Barbara Lerner Spectre, IBA-News, 2010

She has also stated that

“We need a Jewish community in Europe. Israel needs a Jewish community in Europe. Israel cannot exist, both economically and politically, without Europe. They are necessary advocates for Jewish issues.”
—Barbara Lerner Spectre, Jewish Peoplehood and Identity, 2007

The double standarts could not be more obvious. Organized Jewry, people such as Spectre, is all Zionist and supports Israel whole-heartedly.
They use their great control of the media to impose an info black-out
over the very racist nature of the Jewish state, an artificial entity
which strives to be as homogenous as possible, having ethnically cleansed 80% of the indigenous people and radically refusing refugees from Africa and elsewhere.
Video done by jews showing this, the refugees are often called ‘infiltrators’.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA

Now, if Barbara Spectre loves multiculturalism so much, why doesn’t
she return to Israel and promote it THERE? Including the basic right
of the palestinian refugees expelled by the jews to return to their
homeland?
Bc in the West multicult benefits the Jews while in Israel it does not.

213 Comments

L on May 09, 2015 · at 3:30 pm EST/EDT

“White supremacism”

-Um lol? W.Europe is white supremacists? Whites are already a minority in most capital cities in the west and are expected to become a minority in most large western countries by 2050.

The american model is : Multiculturalism(Anti-whiteism, anti-chrisianity, queer theory, feminism, massimmigration).

The Russian model is : Sovereignism(A multipolar worlds of multiple political systems and ideologis)

“US set for dramatic change as white America becomes minority by 2042 ”
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/aug/15/population.race

“‘British whites’ are the minority in London for the first time as census shows number of UK immigrants has jumped by 3million in 10 years”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2246288/Census-2011-UK-immigrant-population-jumps-THREE-MILLION-10-years.html
- Roelf Turksema on May 09, 2015 · at 4:01 pm EST/EDT
  
  ”W.Europe is white supremacists?” Yes, you don’t need to be the majority to suppress the majority.
  Never heard of the 1% I guess? Immigrants come and go, do not let yourself be frightened by them or groups that oppose them, they have the same needs, the same greeds and the same wish: Live a long and prosperous live in peace and freedom, a good future for their offspring.
  All differences like religion, colour, race, jihad and all that is noise from nationalism, and we all know where nationalism and white supremacy leads to don’t we? Do not be afraid, enjoy it, integration makes beautiful and strong kids :-)
  - Roelf on May 09, 2015 · at 5:21 pm EST/EDT
    
    Seems like a rubbish comment of a common liberal rassist. If russia would get outnumbered by orientals and africans in there home, there would be a bloodsheet on the streets. Be sure about it. Multikulturalism in western sense means holocaust on national cultural heritage of the nations which are blessed with it. And I see your wet pants about mixed racial relationsships and destroying our people. I can see how woundefull it works in every country where it is. So, because of that, you are nothing less and more as a ordinary multicultural racist. Be aware that we all pay a price for what we say.
    - Roelf Turksema on May 09, 2015 · at 6:42 pm EST/EDT
      
      ”And I see your wet pants about mixed racial relationsships and destroying our people. I can see how woundefull it works in every country where it is. So, because of that, you are nothing less and more as a ordinary multicultural racist.”
      
      Sigh….so you did not understood a word from what I wrote, sorry for that: On the contrary, I love our multi culti society ( Netherlands ), the only problem we have with it that it helps nationalists (Nice word for ignorant dumb asses that never travel further then the local football canteen) complaining how bad a live they have because of all the refugees and so on.
      
      Calling me an ordinary multicltural racist…..what does that say about you, you writing as L, me under my own name. You could improve your due diligence to start with……
      
      And yes, if Russians would become outnumbered, there would be bloodshed on the streets, Russians do not differ from us. We should all behave like grown ups.
      - L on May 09, 2015 · at 7:35 pm EST/EDT
        
        Sorry to ruin your racist fantasies, but the majority of Europeans, just like the majority of all people in the world – do not want to become marginalised minorities in their own countries.
        
        So ignorant backyard racist like you are in for a rough time, in every European countries resistance to fascist genocidal political correctness is rising. UKIP/SNP in UK, FN in France, SD in Sweden, Afd in Germany and so forth.
        
        But don’t worry, after your racist multicultural society has been erased you can always move to South africa and zimbabwe and experience you dreams of a society free of white people, you can even move into an enclave of those geneticallly superior racemix humans you admire so.
        
        Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 9:21 pm EST/EDT
        
        The real problem and tragedy is that so many millions are forced to leave their own countries because life has been made intolerable—economically, politically, environmentally, socially—for so many and survival requires leaving home and becoming an emigrant or refugee. Who is responsible for that? The constant meddling and warmaking of the USA and allies and retrogressive “development” policies that favor international corporations, financial institutions, etc. and do not provide a basis for the citizens to thrive in their home countries.
        
        Katherine
        
        Penelope on May 09, 2015 · at 10:22 pm EST/EDT
        
        Yes, you’re right, Katherine.
        
        All of my Mexican immigrant friends would love to be able to live at home in their own country, but the US is forever messing up their economy in one way or another. Several times the gangsters who run the US govt have interfered when Mexico was about to embark on a land-use reform to redistribute some land to the have-nots.
        
        It seems so insane to me that we keep interpreting our problems as occurring between nations– The difficulty is of course between the 1% international oligarchs and the rest of us. Seems so counter-intuitive for everybody to be suffering at the hands of so few.
        
        The guy who wrote “Superclass” and fawns over them says there are about 6,000 men who control the whole shooting match. Sees shameful to be beaten by so few.
        
        Regards,
        Penelope
        
        Teuton on May 10, 2015 · at 9:32 pm EST/EDT
        
        BS. The people who leave are the ones with a little more money than the rest, so they can make a living. They are just greedy and want more, and lazy, and don’t want to fix their own country but go to a country where other people have already done the work and organized a livable society.
        
        Anonymous on May 10, 2015 · at 11:22 pm EST/EDT
        
        That is grossly unfair. It is also an ignorant statement. NATO destroyed beautiful Libya because it was not only flourishing, but just too independent for the Rothschilds to allow. Please God Russia defeats them firmly and permanently – and that George Soros goes to Hell quite soon.
        
        Anonymous on May 10, 2015 · at 11:17 pm EST/EDT
        
        I am white and I want to live among White people – and only White people. White people have just begun to realise that they are being threatened with extinction and we do not like that idea one bit.
      - EK on May 09, 2015 · at 9:11 pm EST/EDT
        
        You may like the “multicultural” society, but not everybody does, that’s the problem. If you want to spend time with Africans or Arabs, you can always pack a bag and move to Africa for a month or three. On the other hand, if I want to spend time *without* Africans or Arabs, where do I go? Damn buggers are all over the Europe by now, thanks to you multiculturalists.
        
        I’ve been to Dublin last month, wanted to absorb some authentic Irish culture. Instead, I got to absorb Pakistani, Arabic, Indian, Nigerian, Somali, Polish and many others I was not interested in. Which left me annoyed and disappointed. If I was interested in any of them, I wouldn’t go to Ireland, I’d go to Pakistan, Emirates, India, Nigeria, Somalia or Poland, you see?
        Someone like you probably thought it would be funny to have a ton of foreigners around. And it even may be fun, I can’t really judge that. But is it still Ireland?
        
        By the way of migration and cultural mixing, all the Europe becomes the same. Strange people everywhere, hauling around their obsolete cultural baggage, diminishing the original cultures and turning Europe into second Africa. Last islands of positive deviation (= uncontaminated original culture) can be found in the post-Soviet Europe, in countries so poor that even Africans mostly avoid them; and those are about to be ruined forever once the EU starts forcing their criminal “immigrant quota” on them.
        
        Meanwhile, Russians must be doing something right, because they seem to be able to absorb the foreigners without having to give up their own original culture. I would love to know how are they doing it.
        
        Jacob on May 10, 2015 · at 3:36 am EST/EDT
        
        “..Damn buggers are all over the Europe by now, thanks to you multiculturalists..” May be they are after the wealth that was looted from them by the old colonists. I wish my country ask for compensation for the atrocities the Brits committed in my country, India. And also for all the exploitation, genocides (Bengal famine etc) ..
        
        Get used to the idea that the times are changing.
        
        cernogoraz on May 10, 2015 · at 9:13 am EST/EDT
        
        “Get used to the idea that the times are changing.”
        
        This is a very sociopathic and perhaps borderline evil sentiment. GET USED TO IT EUROPEANS, WE’RE TAKING OVER NOW LOL. That is not the world I want and not the world that the brave guys in east Ukraine are fighting for. We are fighting for a new, multi-polar world in which each civilization/world (e.g. Russian world, Latin European world, Germanic world, Sino world, Persian world) develops according to its own cultural-historical model. No enforcement of Western values on the global ‘South’ and this naturally goes the other way round. If Indians want to talk about what a small number of British elites did to them in the past (by the way, also a time when 95% of British lived and worked in worse conditions – according to Marx at least – than the African slaves), then why should the British not take revenge against the Normans or the Saxons or even the descendants of the Roman Empire? Why should the Balkanic peoples not subjugate the Turks? Why should the Berbers not decimate the Arabs?
        in the USA
        
        Anonymous on May 10, 2015 · at 2:51 pm EST/EDT
        
        To EK
        I feel no pity for “poor Irish” because there are more Irish outside of Ireland than inside. They also contributed to erosion of other peoples cultures with their pubs etc. When it was really bad in Ireland they all emigrated to where it was good. Now people immigrate to Ireland from places where it is worse. It is simply human survival. If you were in Africa, raped by the West of all livelihood, you would do the same.
        
        SSAX on May 15, 2015 · at 2:35 pm EST/EDT
        
        The Irish immigrated because of the “irish famine” that was caused by the British administration. They wanted to exterminate the Irish. Also, many Irish were sent as slaves (indentured servants) during the earl colonial period. The first slaves in the New World were Irish. Also, many convicts in Australia were Irish.
        
        Anonymous on August 11, 2015 · at 2:49 am EST/EDT
        
        Anyone is perfectly welcome to immigrate especially to empty lands like in America. Who would have stopped them? It’s a huge place.
  - L on May 09, 2015 · at 5:25 pm EST/EDT
    
    I hope not it will be pretty hard for us evil whites to oppress anyone as our apparent “white supremacist” government makes us a minority in our countries, in our towns and in our streets discriminates us in the labour and academia and teaches our children how inheritly evil we are.
    - Jack on May 12, 2015 · at 7:49 am EST/EDT
      
      They (the 0.01% ruling-class) don’t encourage immigration because they care about skin color, though they do have utter-disdain for “culture.” The immigration is to drive wages into the dirt. Culture unites people against an enemy, so is an impediment to the Elites.
      
      Globalists have destroyed our formerly high-wage economy. They hold the levers of power. Do not blame the pawn-immigrants, herded here like cattle, for the planned and executed scheme to destroy the Western Middle-Class.
      
      Illegal immigration would end in the USA the day that American Traitors offering jobs to illegal-immigrants faced a decade in a prison-cell for doing so. Absent the job-offers from Traitors, the Mexicans would return home. I hope the word “traitors” doesn’t offend anyone, but what else do you call someone who hires foreigners, illegally, as his own neighbors are unemployed in record-numbers?
      
      The Mexicans who return might just forment a revolution against the colonialists which have abused them for centuries. It would certaintly take a revolution to throw out the Globalist-colonizers who are running and runing the USA, setting policies of Outsourcing, Immigration, and Wars that do not benefit Americans in the least, but only Corporate, Overseas Investors
  - L on May 09, 2015 · at 5:26 pm EST/EDT
    
    Well, actually. Russia represents pride in your culture and heritage, as oppose to the politically correct self-hate that is being taught to whites in western Europe, that is why most nationalist parties in W.Europe are pro-Russian. Because Russia is the last bastion of European culture and civilization free from political correctness. While the current pro-USA multicultural/politically correct fascism regimes in W.Europe is anti-traditiona, anti-white, anti-European.
  - L on May 09, 2015 · at 5:31 pm EST/EDT
    
    ” Do not be afraid, enjoy it, integration makes beautiful and strong kids :-)”
    
    -Are you suggesting that racially mix children are genetically superior to normal children? Yes, native americans are so much better off now that they have been integration with European settlers.
    - Roelf Turksema on May 09, 2015 · at 6:44 pm EST/EDT
      
      I can only add that the ”settlers” were not Europe’s finest ;-).
      - L on May 09, 2015 · at 7:35 pm EST/EDT
        
        Multiculturalism is the nazism of our time and needs to be dealt with as such, and it will.
    - Leo on May 10, 2015 · at 7:20 am EST/EDT
      
      Just to give you an idea of how backwards these Multiculturist Liberals’ brains work;
      
      – An interbred person is considered beautiful and “unique”, “exotic”
      – Pure bred animals (pets) are valued and considered beautiful. Others end up in pounds and/or euthinized.
      
      – Neither Animals nor humans are capable of interntional harm or evil, everything is the result of how they were brought up and someone else is to blame. BTW – Pitbulls are resposible for 64% of dog bite fatalities. Killer Whales amoung many other species kill and sometimes torture other animals for fun. Others kill for retribution i.e. Lion > Hyena.
      – Humans are punished by getting locked up for lifetimes.
      
      In summary Liberals hate people and thus hate themselves.
      - Roelf Turksema on May 10, 2015 · at 9:36 am EST/EDT
        
        ”An interbred person is considered beautiful and “unique”, “exotic””
        
        Nothing to do with unique or exotic, pure science. Thanks for letting me know how my brains work, I always wondered….
        
        ”Pure bred animals are considered beautiful”
        
        By whom? The people that trade in them? I’m happy with my Romanian street dog, who would euthanize my dog and why?
        
        We differ. Respect that.
    - Alec on May 11, 2015 · at 4:10 pm EST/EDT
      
      Russia must be very careful to accept multicultural ethnicities. Look what happened to the west for selling their soul to the highest bidder! People who only hold the hand out to receive but who is not willing to work for a living and /or expect more than what they are willing to contribute must be forced to leave the country. The author stated that in Dublin no more Irish, in London, no more English, in Paris no more French, in Rome no more Italians etc etc. All that these dark coloureds or covered faces have in common is to come and squat in their adopted country and scream and shout against the goodwill and social order of their host country. BEWARE they come as thieves in the night to steal, murder and plunder and change the social order eg, Obama. However, this “job” of destroying a country’s morals and traditions can also be meted out to some of the whites and white leaders. My prayer for Russia is to sleep with eyes wide open!
    - Alec on May 11, 2015 · at 4:35 pm EST/EDT
      
      I also would prefer to live in a country void of other country’s squatters. And if a fat-cat government
      allow the dirt from “overseas” to come and increase crime by 1000% then it is time a nation takes action against these parasites. I just hope that Russia won’t go the same route as the West with their infatuation of sponsoring a mixture of races. That is why most of the 3rd world countries are in Africa
      or close to Africa, and the 1st World countries are in Europe, Eastern Europe, Asia and in Australia and in North America. These countries up to now could go forward and develop but generally speaking 3rd world countries stagnate eg, Ukraine (which became a 3rd world country recently)
    - Poppadop on May 12, 2015 · at 11:39 pm EST/EDT
      
      Military strategy beats genetics any day. Keep sticking to that racial pseudoscience, and the banksters will beat you with pure numbers like they did Germany.
  - SxyxS on May 09, 2015 · at 5:38 pm EST/EDT
    
    Dude,please stop smoking too much weed,than you’d talk less primitive good-doer-sh!t.
    There is no integration with muslims(only a tiny minority of them are willing and most of these tiny minority come from yugoslavia and turkey where islam was reduced to a minimum)
    Muslim integrate you and they ethnically cleanse systematically regions as sion as they reach the majority)
    Islam is a religion that occupies and rules with a system to subjugate all others.
    I know this as i am from muslim origin.
    
    Integration and multiculturalism only work without them-sadly the tribe has decided to flood europe with muslims(watch the jewess barbara spectre on youtube even admitzing it)
    And how the hell do you want to make strong children with people who’s average iq is below 80.
    + your thesis is wrong.
    If integration would make what you say than yugoslavia and swiss would have the most beautifull women(and the turks who systematically enslaved and raped people from any culture they dominated)-instead the tchech and swedes have the most beautifull and they were pretty well monoculturell and isolated.
    (saying this as a guy from ex yugoslavia with turkish roots)
    your theorie only work until a certain point in small doses ,but not on a large scale.
    But-keep on dreaming,as guys like you rather die with a romantic dream than acceppt reality that contradicts your point of view.
    
    @)saker
    your last point ist wrong:
    There is no “monoculturalism” in western society.
    The officially called multiculturalism is in fact zero-culturalism as the tribe destroys any culture they can:just like they did with communism in russia and china(calling cultural destruction “culture revolution)
    +white supremacist would never allow dark skinned boys to shag their daughters or rape their children(like in rotherham)
    they would install riduculous marriage laws just like the zionist do in israel.
    laws that even discrimate dark skinned jews.
    This is not about white supremacy-this is about thalmud supremacy and fascism.
    All these “white” colonialism started in britain after cromwell killed the king in britain and immediatelly called the jews to enter britain and since than britain become the bully of this world and increased their war activities by 400%.
    - the master on May 09, 2015 · at 6:14 pm EST/EDT
      
      Imagine this – a small town in Ural
      and the Victory parade there. Fantastic – watch the historical tanks!
      
      https://youtu.be/Dxd7dzmz644?t=1336
      
      Really worth seeing.
    - Roelf Turksema on May 09, 2015 · at 6:58 pm EST/EDT
      
      ”Muslim integrate you and they ethnically cleanse systematically regions as sion as they reach the majority)
      Islam is a religion that occupies and rules with a system to subjugate all others.
      I know this as i am from muslim origin.”
      
      Congratulations then, your almost as bad as Jews and Cristians! But we were first: look what is going on in Jerusalem, al not so religious people move to Tell Aviv or Haiva, look what happened to the native Aussies and real Americans, even if we are not a minority we tend to kill who ever is in our way and bring our Coalition Provisional Authority Order Number 1 or other ”laws” upon them.
      
      Do not worry, I don’t do weed, I do not drink mor then 1 glass wine or beer per week on average, I work, with all colors and tastes, there’s good and there’s bad guys every where, in all religions, in all sorts, hey, even in your beautiful country.
      
      Tell us honestly, what if Nato would not have thrown oil on the fire, what if there had not been any weapon deliveries, what if the media would have been honest, would their have been a war in Yugoslavia? Was religion the problem or was it NATO’s usual divide and conquer?
  - Rootman on May 09, 2015 · at 8:49 pm EST/EDT
    
    Greetings, ´fellow traveler´ from joop.nl! Good to be able to communicate outside of their censorship. Do you experience the same difficulty posting comments lately? The moderation team obviously works in shifts; some shifts are completely hopeless, some quite reasonable. Is Marcus blocked?
    
    They keep placing articles from Aldershoff *(very Russophobe neocon ´Ukraine analist´ based in Brussels). Do you think he represents the view of the ´owners´?
    
    * example of his most recent article for people interested in the sort of discussion on this Dutch site:
    https://translate.google.nl/translate?sl=nl&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=nl&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joop.nl%2Fopinies%2Fdetail%2Fartikel%2F31880_oost_oekraine_stilte_voor_de_volgende_storm%2F&edit-text=
  - pc on May 10, 2015 · at 7:01 pm EST/EDT
    
    MY CAPSLOCK WILL NOT TURN OFF TODAY, SO FORGIVE THE CAPS. I JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT I BELIEVE WHAT HE MEANS IS IN THEIR EFFORT TO DOMINATE THE ENTIRE WORLD THE WESTERN ELITE ARE WILLING TO ELIMINATE THEIR OWN. IT IS PART OF THEIR AGENDA. OF BLURRING ALL CULTURAL AND ETHNIC DISTINCTIONS TOWARD THE END GOAL OF OWNING AND RULING THEM ALL.
- Saibot on May 09, 2015 · at 4:38 pm EST/EDT
  
  I think the term “white supremacism” used by the OP refers to the fact that those to have the money and power are predominantly white, while a disproportionate amount of black and Hispanic people in the US are lower working class. See the recent protests and riots in Ferguson, Baltimore, etc… This has to do with the racial composition of the population only insofar as social unrest will increase as the composition of the population changes further and the social divide widens.
  - Wolf on May 09, 2015 · at 5:26 pm EST/EDT
    
    @ saibot
    
    Than we should clear that out. We do not talk about white supremacism. We speak about anglozionistic supremacism. If you look to the who is who of financial elites, mass media owner and so on, its hard not to realise there is a kind of …other ethnics involved. The reality is, since the 1% has created there empire, the white worker class and middle class is falling with every year more into poverty. We are bleeding out by taxes, suffering under imported criminals and in all western- and middle european countrys we face a rape wave on our woman. And everybody knows who is responsible for it. Nope, if russia thinks they can make advertisment with a kind of multicultural agenda, they will lose the war over the hearts of people in west- and middle europe. I can just warn about it.
  - L on May 09, 2015 · at 5:28 pm EST/EDT
    
    If that is true then it would be “asian supremacism” as asians are the richest ethnic group in USA.
    
    There are many types of supremacism in W.Europe. But none of them are white, and if there was white-supremacism, then that is the only supremacism that would exist as it would not tolerate other races supremacism or indeed have massimmigration at all.
    - Red Ryder on May 09, 2015 · at 6:06 pm EST/EDT
      
      Asians are not the richest ethnic group. We all know who the richest are. The banksters and the Wall Street Gangsters are overwhelmingly not Asian. And the new billionaires of Silicon Valley are overwhelmingly not Asian.
      
      The Elites of America are overwhelmingly not Asian.
      - Outlaw Historian on May 09, 2015 · at 7:17 pm EST/EDT
        
        Thanks for your correcting comment.
      - Luca K on May 10, 2015 · at 4:56 pm EST/EDT
        
        I think that what L was referring to was comparing 98% of whites in the US(excluding Jews) with East Asians(in the US).
        In that case, the reality is that, on average, east asians earn more than whites(jews excluded).
- Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 5:28 pm EST/EDT
  
  I participated in the 2010 Census. All Hispanics, who are of mixed origin, were counted as “white”. So that 2042 date is wildly optimistic. I’d say more like NOW.
  - Outlaw Historian on May 09, 2015 · at 7:14 pm EST/EDT
    
    I always check the “Other” box, since in reality we are all mutts–internally, males and females are all the same, whereas the only differences are external. Although, I doubt most on this thread would consider themselves mutts.
- blue on May 09, 2015 · at 5:37 pm EST/EDT
  
  Not everyone in the US is racist or classist, of course, but it is embedded int the culture and institutions, as well as being embedded in and practiced by a great many people. Is it not remarkable that for the first time in hundtreds of years a black man was elected president, and that there was such a huge roar that it happened, as a remarkable thing instead of an ordinary occurrence? It was never celebrated that a white male was elected!
  And the other thing celebrated is when someone who is not filthy rich but someone from middle or lower classes is elected (although rare so not wealthy as depicted).
  
  So these are indeed exceptional elections, and such tokenism is found everywhere in the US.
- James C. on May 09, 2015 · at 6:46 pm EST/EDT
  
  Yes, the idea of White Supremacy in the west is a faded idea from the 1950’s. How do I know? Well, I live in the USA and spend much time in Western Europe. Not only does the liberal western culture not feature a drive for white supremacy, the prevailing direction is to create multi ethnic societies in which whites become the minority, Europe is fast becoming the land of a new ethnic ideal. Governments and Educational institutions drive hard for open borders immigration and to give priority to Middle Eastern, African and SW Asians. Last time I was at New York’s JFK airport, I was in a crowd where I was the only white among hundreds of people clearing passport control. In London, I was standing in line for entry, and I counted maybe 5 whites among a thousand people in lines for entry. In Stockholm, I have walked streets in neighborhoods crowded with all ethnic groups except whites. Visit Denmark! It is in an open drive to make whites a minority and Christians a minority. I will not drone on! You need to see the west of 2015, not that old west of 60 years ago! To even suggest the west is about white supremacy is a mistake I can see happening, IF ONE IS LOOKING BACK, BUT not today! Whites are fast becoming a minority, In California, on of the world’s greatest states economically, whites are now the minority population, and are fast becoming smaller all the time. YES, white dominate politics and business, because they are OLD, left overs from the 60-70’s! Give it 25 years, and the west will be mostly non white, and ethnics will move into positions according to their abilities.
  I mostly agree with the list. BUT this issue shows a lack of modern understanding.
  - blue on May 09, 2015 · at 9:04 pm EST/EDT
    
    You probably live in a different USA than I do.
  - Penelope on May 10, 2015 · at 5:00 am EST/EDT
    
    If you are building a compulsory global govt, probably you want to force the mixing of citizens of different countries. That way life experiences and cultural expectations are so different that people can’t come together to resist your global govt.
    
    Ford Foundation and other foundations were the first to expand immigration in the US with a coordinated legislative program.
    
    For an extended period there was no inhibition of illegal immigration at the Mexican-California border. Instead there was a checkpoint on the highway 50 miles from the border! I’d like to see them implement that policy for the robbers of banks: Come in and help yourselves, but we’ll catch you at a checkpoint 50 miles away.
    
    For YEARS the border was such a cinch to cross that all my illegal neighbors would go home to Mexico twice a year for fiestas, knowing there’d be no problem re-crossing.
    - Ann on May 10, 2015 · at 6:03 am EST/EDT
      
      I like multi-ethnic living…but I guess its easy to divide and conquer…even in the States…if there’s alot of immigrants.
      - Penelope on May 10, 2015 · at 3:22 pm EST/EDT
        
        Ann, I also like multi-ethnic living. I ALWAYS choose to live in the Mexican neighborhoods. But the majority of Americans don’t want this degree of immigration & it violates our laws. Plus, there’s no question that it lowers wages. It’s a great tragedy that the US govt gangsters continue to ruin the Mexican economy so that there’s little choice for many Mexicans except to emigrate.
        
        Regards,
        Penelope
    - blue on May 11, 2015 · at 2:34 am EST/EDT
      
      Do we understand outsourcing and moving production to cheap labor countries? Sure.
      
      But what of labor which can’t be moved, like processing chickens or maintenance? Then you import cheap labor. So this is a big contributing factor, from business sector, to keep illegal immigrants flowing in — and illegal means they have little recourse when exploited.
- Penelope on May 09, 2015 · at 10:05 pm EST/EDT
  
  Excessive immigration is being used by the oligarchs to fracture nations and cultures.
  And to make a consensus against the oligarchs unattainable.
- WizOz on May 10, 2015 · at 7:25 am EST/EDT
  
  Would “multiculturalism”, Coudenhove-Kalergi plans and “hatred for Whites” be the only causes of the flooding of the “West” with the low life of other continents?
  
  “Immigrants are flooding into Europe, but they can’t solve the demographic crisis.”
  Nov 20, 2014
  
  “Many Europeans view immigration the way that people with a headache view Tylenol. The immigrants flooding into Europe mask the pain of the aging native population with its huge baby deficit. It disguises the ugly core demographic numbers, and gives politicians and the public an excuse to avoid taking the real steps necessary to avoid committing demographic suicide.
  Europe and Japan are the frontrunners in this race to oblivion. Both have populations that are dramatically shrinking and aging. Low birth rates and increased life expectancy are both responsible, but what the demographers call “lowest low fertility” accounts for the bulk of the problem.
  In the official published statistics, foreign immigrants and their locally born children partially cover up a very inconvenient truth: native European populations are ageing at historically unprecedented speeds. They are shrinking, or on the verge of shrinking, because two generations of Europeans have failed to have enough children to replace themselves. Foreign migrants partially mask this pain, making European (and US) demographic statistics look better than they otherwise would.”
  https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/will-they-cure-europes-demographic-sickness-or-just-temporarily-alleviate-the-pain
  - Uncle Bob 1 on May 11, 2015 · at 12:10 pm EST/EDT
    
    You have hit the nail on the head there.That immigration alone, is not the real cause of the “multi-culturism that Europeans and white Americans don’t like. Europeans and white Americans refuse to think about that.Its far easier to blame immigrants than yourself for the problem.My grandparents on one side had nine children.And the other side had five.I was an only child,I had two children.Who only had four cousins in the whole family.Our nations are dying and we refuse to see the problem,let alone fix it.In Eastern Europe,their populations in most countries,are 10-15% less than in 1990,and shrinking.Without immigration it would show even more.In 1990 Ukraine was around 56 million people.Now (including Crimea and Donbass) its around 46 million.An that,while a particularly bad case,is not alone at all.The Baltic States,Russia,the Balkan States,also are (except Russia) still shrinking.Russia seems to be the only country in Europe trying to do something,anything,to reverse that.
- Luca K on May 11, 2015 · at 5:17 pm EST/EDT
  
  I disagree with a lot in this piece.
  For example, unless the author expressed himself very poorly and meant
  something else, the notion that the ‘Russian model’ represents the rule
  of the 99% is quite bizarre and totally unsupported by any evidence.
  
  But the idea that Russia supports multiculturalism – as if that is
  something great, it is not – and Zusas ‘model’ supports ‘White supremacism’ is even more absurd.
  What I see Russia do is what L stated ‘ Russia represents pride in your culture and heritage, as oppose to the politically correct self-hate that is being taught to whites in western Europe”
  
  To the degree that Russia tries to integrate non russians, that is borne out of necessity. The RF inherited most of the 2dn largest land empire ever, after the mongols at their height.
  The russians conquered a lot of non russians to achieve that.
  Insensitivity to the many ethnicities conquered by Russia(some of which have a history of fighting Russian domination) only creates instabilityand opportunities which can then be exploited by ZUSA to splinter the Russian Federation.
  But the Russians are the recognized dominant culture and people of the Russian Federation.
  
  This is in total contrast to the loony model of multiculturalism in
  Western countries, both in the old indigenous European homelands as
  well as in those countries which were created in the ‘new world’ and
  still hold white-euro majorities.
  
  The current ‘zamerican model'(also implemented to varying degrees in
  many euro client states and in the ‘anglo’ world in general) does not
  care about white people at all, quite the opposite.
  
  Mass non european immigration into the these countries play against
  the interests of the vast majority of the people, who, btw, have no
  say in the process. More on the costs of multiculturalism later.
  Who promotes it and what are their interests?
  
  Two major groups can be identified;
  
  One group is made up by a tiny elite in these countries(so called 1%)
  who do not give a damn about their co-ethnics bc theirs are class
  interests. They want cheap labor. They understand that fragmented societies make it easier for them to pray on labor.
  
  French philosopher Alain de Benoist explains in “L’immigration; armée
  de réserve du capital” (April-June 2011, Nr. 139):
  
  “This was a handy way for a large number of big employers to exert downward pressure on wages. …From then on capitalism entered the competition of the workforce by reaching out to the reserve armies of wage earners.”
  
  In the aftermath of World War II, immigrants began to arrive more and more
  frequently from Maghreb countries; first from Algeria, then from Morocco.
  Trucks chartered by large companies (especially in the automobile and
  construction industry) came by the hundreds to recruit immigrants on the
  spot. From 1962 to 1974, nearly two million additional immigrants arrived
  to France of whom 550,000 were recruited by the National Immigration Service (ONI), a state-run agency, yet controlled under the table by big business.
  Since then, the wave has continued to grow. François-Laurent Balssa notes that when a workforce shortage in one sector occurs, out of the two
  possible choices one must either raise the salary, or one must reach out
  to foreign labor. Usually it was the latter option that was favored by the
  National Council of French Employers (CNPF) and as of 1998 by its successor, the Movement of Enterprises (MEDEF).
  That choice, which bears witness of the desire for short-term benefits,
  delayed advancement of production tools and industrial innovation.
  During the same period, however, as the example of Japan demonstrates,
  the rejection of foreign immigration and favoring of the domestic workforce
  enabled Japan to achieve its technological revolution, well ahead of most
  of its Western competitors.
  
  Big Business and the Left; A Holy Alliance
  
  At the beginning, immigration was a phenomenon linked to big business.
  It still continues to be that way. Those who clamor for always more
  immigration are big companies. This immigration is in accordance with
  the very spirit of capitalism, which aims at the erasure of borders
  (« laissez faire, laissez passer »). “While obeying the logic of social
  dumping, Balssa continues, a “low cost” labor market has thus been created with the “undocumented” and the “low-skilled,” functioning as stopgap “jack of all trades.” Thus, big business has reached its hand to the far-left, the former aiming at dismantling of the welfare state, considered to be too costly, the latter killing off the nation-state considered to be too archaic.[…]”
  
  The other main group is organized Jewry.
  In the following vid, Ann Schaffer, director of the American Jewish
  Committee’s Belfer Center for American Pluralism, states the basic
  philosophy of Jews in Zamerica, which is much the same in other Western
  nations as well:
  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43eC1rZNJvg
  
  “The Jewish community has always worked on the premise that as a minority,our security, our strength, our well being in America is interdependent with those of other minorities. This is a Jewish issue.
  It’s very much a Jewish issue.”
  
  Jewish academic activist Earl Raab:
  
  “The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American
  population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all
  be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a
  Nazi-Aryan party[ I roll my eyes] will be able to prevail in this country.
  
  We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to
  bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected,
  but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it
  irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry
  more practical than ever.”
  
  Charles Silberman notes:
  
  American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief—one firmly rooted in history—that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors,
  as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups.
  It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality,
  that leads an overwhelming majority of U.S. Jews to endorse
  ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called
  ‘social’ issues.
  
  Barbara Lerner Spectre is a Zionist and head of Paideia – The European
  Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden, an organisation funded by the
  Swedish government and the Wallenberg Foundation to promote Jewish ideology.
  Through an organisation called One Sweden, which she heads, she promotes multiculturalism.
  Although born in the United States, Spectre moved to Palestine (“Israel”)
  in 1967 where she worked at the Shalom Hartman Institute in Jerusalem,
  though she decided to move to Sweden in 1999.
  Spectre is married to rabbi Philip Spectre, who was the official rabbi
  at the Great Synagogue in Stockholm and the Chief Rabbi in Sweden
  during the early 2000s.
  
  During an interview she made the following remarkable statement —
  remarkable because she does not attribute anti-Jewish attitudes
  to irrational prejudices.
  Instead she says that it’s because of the “leading role” played by
  Jews in the movement toward multiculturalism:
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ
  
  “I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation,
  Europe will not survive.” — Barbara Lerner Spectre, IBA-News, 2010
  
  She has also stated that
  
  “We need a Jewish community in Europe. Israel needs a Jewish community in Europe. Israel cannot exist, both economically and politically, without Europe. They are necessary advocates for Jewish issues.”
  —Barbara Lerner Spectre, Jewish Peoplehood and Identity, 2007
  
  The double standarts could not be more obvious. Organized Jewry, people such as Spectre, is all Zionist and supports Israel whole-heartedly.
  They use their great control of the media to impose an info black-out
  over the very racist nature of the Jewish state, an artificial entity
  which strives to be as homogenous as possible, having ethnically cleansed 80% of the indigenous people and radically refusing refugees from Africa and elsewhere.
  Video done by jews showing this, the refugees are often called ‘infiltrators’.
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPxv4Aff3IA
  
  Now, if Barbara Spectre loves multiculturalism so much, why doesn’t
  she return to Israel and promote it THERE? Including the basic right
  of the palestinian refugees expelled by the jews to return to their
  homeland?
  Bc in the West multicult benefits the Jews while in Israel it does not.
- Anonymous on May 12, 2015 · at 1:52 pm EST/EDT
  
  Thankyou for saying the obvious so I don’t have to.
  
  Saker – it sounds like you are in favor of unlimited immigration – i.e. the Islamization of Europe, including Russia
- Luca K on May 12, 2015 · at 4:26 pm EST/EDT
  
  I posted a comment and it is not showing.
  Hoping it is a glitch instead of censorship, I’m posting it again.
  
  On The Costs of Multiculturalism:
  
  Harvard sociologist Robert Putnam, a leftist and supporter of multiculturalism, conducted extensive research in the US and it showed that increasing ethnic diversity lowers the willingness to contribute to charity or to public goods.
  
  It also increases social isolation and it lowers trust both within and
  between races; lowers political participation and lessens confidence
  in political leaders.
  
  Dr.Frank Salter, an Australian academic and researcher at the former
  Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Physiology, Germany, best known for
  his writings on ethnicity and ethnic interests, wrote in an article:
  https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2010/6/the-misguided-advocates-of-open-borders/
  
  “Unrestricted migration would harm Australia’s national interests in ways
  documented by scholars in economics, sociology and related disciplines.
  Much of the harm is predictable from what is known about the dysfunctions
  of diversity.
  They include growing inequality in the especially invidious form of ethnic stratification. No one likes to be ruled over by a different ethnic group or to see his own people worse off than others. The result is resentment or contempt, depending on the perspective taken.
  
  Diversity has also been associated with reduced democracy, slowed economic growth, falling social cohesion and foreign aid, as well as rising corruption and risk of civil conflict.[iii]
  
  The loss of social cohesion bears emphasis. Disapproving of birds flocking together is beside the point; it is a biological fact that needs to be taken into account.[iv] Rising diversity within human societies tends to drive people apart, causing them to take sanctuary in individual pursuits and ethnic communities. The practical consequences are reduced public altruism or social capital, evident in falling volunteerism, government welfare for the aged and sick, public health care[v]and a general loss of trust.[vi] Ethnic diversity is second only to lack of democracy in predicting civil war.[vii] Globally it correlates negatively with governmental efficiency and prosperity.[viii]”
- Hans Wust on March 17, 2016 · at 11:56 pm EST/EDT
  
  I agree with all you said but that the model authorship which is actually Zionist.
  Should you read the ‘Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion’, you would realize that this book written in the early 19th c. is a prophetic one with such a clear fulfillment that makes appear the very Bible like a dubious pamphlet.
Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 3:30 pm EST/EDT

Without US support Hitler would not have been able to invade Poland, let alone the USSR.

“Hitler’s American Business Partners”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMKnH2BlkBA

“The following is excerpted from a report printed by the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary in 1974:
…
Ford was also active in Nazi Germany’s prewar preparations. In 1938, for instance, it opened a truck assembly plant in Berlin whose “real purpose,” according to U.S. Army Intelligence, was producing “troop transport-type” vehicles for the Wehrmacht. That year Ford’s chief executive received the Nazi German Eagle (first class)….

The outbreak of war in September 1939 resulted inevitably in the full conversion by GM and Ford of their Axis plants to the production of military aircraft and trucks…. On the ground, GM and Ford subsidiaries built nearly 90 percent of the armored “mule” 3-ton half-trucks and more than 70 percent of the Reich’s medium and heavy-duty trucks. These vehicles, according to American intelligence reports, served as “the backbone of the German Army transportation system.”
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=4368

“Author Snell says that Nazi armaments chief Albert Speer told him in 1977 that Hitler “would never have considered invading Poland” without synthetic fuel technology provided by General Motors.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/nov98/nazicars30.htm

“They send oil to Spain, Vichy France which was reshipped to the nazis. They even refueled German tankers and U-boats supplying tetra-ethyl lead which was necessary for aviation gasoline”(48:00)
http://www.archive.org/details/AV_517-AMERICAN_POWER_STRUCTURE_UPDATE-PART_II

The US empire was the main profiteer of Hitler’s war. No wonder why they treated the nazis so favourably after the war. For the US empire Hitler was a useful tool to become a superpower and destroy Europe. With ISIS they pursue a similar strategy.

“How Was The CIA Formed?
By absorbing the Nazi war criminal infrastructure”
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/gehlen.htm

“Hitler’s Shadow: Nazi War Criminals, U.S. Intelligence, and the Cold
War”
http://www.archives.gov/iwg/reports/hitlers-shadow.pdf
- no mercy on May 09, 2015 · at 5:48 pm EST/EDT
  
  My respect to the fallen,
  but the USSR 25+ millions is not verified,
  it is a figure based on two censuses and by both the metod and time span itself the number hides also victims of Stalin´s NKVD terror.
  If we would just rely on Soviet sources than anyway the number is not relevant as the number was raised year by year. It was Gorbachov who first came up with over 25 mil., for preceeding general secretaries also some 16 mil. were enough….
  - Roelf Turksema on May 09, 2015 · at 7:00 pm EST/EDT
    
    Would you settle for less and could you explain what difference that would make? Don’t hesitate, there is not such a thing as Sovjetwarvictim denier………and it is not illegal to doubt the amount.
  - alan on May 09, 2015 · at 11:22 pm EST/EDT
    
    If you think you have a better, more accurate count of the casualties, by all means, show it to us. Of course, we would expect that you provide some evidence as well….
    - Roelf Turksema on May 10, 2015 · at 9:40 am EST/EDT
      
      I never investigated it and could not give any evidence, for me the numbers do not matter, it’s a lot, far to much to comprehend, the Russian people suffered the most during and after WW2, that is a fact and that should never be denied nor forgotten.
  - Kat Kan on May 10, 2015 · at 2:44 am EST/EDT
    
    Just as a rough guide, read Wikipedia’s notes on where they got their casualty figures, country by country. It’s a lot more complicated than just census figures.
    
    Also, for USSR the figures are “1946 borders” which includes Ukraine, Belarus and the 3 Baltic states. These have since 1991 all re-calculated their own losses, but they were never subtracted from official Russian figures. The opening up of official archives in the 1990s hasn’t helped much either — a lot of the deaths were never recorded in the first place.
    
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties#endnote_USSR
    
    But we do know numbers tend to get rounded up, so I think it’s better to write “around” or “almost”, rather than 25+ .
- Outlaw Historian on May 09, 2015 · at 7:21 pm EST/EDT
  
  Both Ford and GM got compensation from USG for their bombed factories!!!
- Poppadop on May 09, 2015 · at 11:56 pm EST/EDT
  
  Ford was also active in Nazi Germany’s prewar preparations. In 1938, for instance, it opened a truck assembly plant in Berlin whose “real purpose,” according to U.S. Army Intelligence, was producing “troop transport-type” vehicles for the Wehrmacht.
  
  “It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system; for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”
  ~ Henry Ford
  
  Ford was anti-Empire, so helping Germany made sense in that regard.
  http://www.therealistreport.com/2013/03/was-hitler-zionist-stooge.html
  
  With ISIS they pursue a similar strategy.
  
  ISIS commits nonsensical atrocities to build up “boogyman” status as a matter of course. The banksters needed to fabricate the Holocaust after the fact. Could this be because the Nazis were not truly being run by the Empire? I swear, so much logic gets thrown out the window for WW2…
  http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/26/the-holocaust-narrative-politics-trumps-science/
juliania on May 09, 2015 · at 3:34 pm EST/EDT

I haven’t yet commented on all the articles justifiably condemning the outrageous misread of history with respect to WWII, but here is my comment, for what little it is worth. I am sick and tired of all the war propaganda, whether east or west, north or south, whilst killing proceeds apace! I can no longer read articles about war, suffer through memorials, countless, of war, see parades of war machines, listen to leaders proclaim how much stronger they are and how formidable their weapons.

I realize all this is because of the West’s belligerency and criminal attacks on defenseless nations, and I abhor these events and plead to God constantly to aid suffering peoples everywhere, from Vietnam to Iraq to Libya to Ukraine, to now poor victimized Yemen – and I don’t know what is the answer but a parade of weapons of destruction IS NOT IT.

God have mercy, everyone will suffer in this descent into madness. I am sorry – I will no longer read about war; I recognize the sufferings of millions of my fellow human beings and I cry for them. The only answer I can give is peace, and prayer.

It is of no use to say ‘we suffered more.’ When one person suffers, we all do.

Forgive us, Lord.
- Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 4:20 pm EST/EDT
  
  “You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.” ― Leon Trotsky
- Saibot on May 09, 2015 · at 4:50 pm EST/EDT
  
  Very well said, juliania! I’m happy to see that I’m not the only person here concerned about all this.
  
  However, I’m afraid that not reading about war will not make it go away. It’s better to try to prevent it, and at the same time be prepared for the worst case. In being prepared, I’m not talking about going to arms or being prepared as a ‘nation’ or a ‘people’. I’m talking about being prepared as an individual or as a family/group. Learn how to survive, how to make tools and how to repair them.
  
  I believe that we may have challenging times ahead. But in the right social environment, they may as well be happy times of community and sharing, of building things together, and of remembering the things that are really important to us. So, don’t be scared!
  - elsi on May 09, 2015 · at 6:26 pm EST/EDT
    
    I’m not interested in war and in fact have never liked military parades, especially in my country, whose army, with few honorable exceptions, have always been linked, in the popular imagination, to the fascist dictatorship of Franco.
    But this parade I like it, well more than like, I love it, I’m moving and I hope someday to participate in this event commemorating the anti-fascist struggle of the Soviet/ Russian people to liberate us all from the dark beast of fascism.
    
    Many here, Juliania, most guess, we have pacifist sentiments, and do not want anything but to live quietly in peace and prosperity, such as the wishes of the Russian people and their representatives, Comrade V.V.Putin and his associates.
    But when the dark forces pounce you, is useless resign and pray, no choice but to take a gun and fight, as the comrades of The Donbass. Me, at least I will fight, I will not let them leave me in misery, rape me, burn me alive or crucify me without resistance.
    We should prepare all, learning to defend ourselves, not to be cannon fodder.
Steve Brown on May 09, 2015 · at 4:03 pm EST/EDT

Excellent article
- the master on May 09, 2015 · at 6:04 pm EST/EDT
  
  …and useful indeed.
  Yeah, the world media proclaiming Putin will stand there alone must be ashamed when seeing India and China presidents greeting their own troops on Redsquare.
  This is the point of Saker´s article: “unconditional support for Nazi Ukraine”, it explains all what happened, all the coming and all the stupidity of European policy.
  When watching the Serbian unit marching on parade I was really sorry how the country was let down by weak Russia at that time.
  And it is the reason why I do not think Russia will ever have real allies. Watch how behaves Turkey, Iran, Belarus…I have no doubt that when the time comes both China and India will watch only own interest and no principles or moral.
  P.S.: Stalin built a mess when (pretended commanding) the army, equally as Hitler.
Gearóid O hAghmail on May 09, 2015 · at 4:20 pm EST/EDT

That is some photo!

Thank you Saker for your work.
Greetings from Ireland.
Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 4:23 pm EST/EDT

All humanity is indebted to the Soviet people for this great sacrifice!

One single house in Stalingrad (Pavlov’s House) stood longer (60 days) than whole France (45 days) and Netherlands (7 days). As Vasily Chuikov (general commanding Soviet forces in Stalingrad) said later, Germans lost more men trying to take Pavlov’s house than they did taking Paris.

Eternal glory to the Red Army and Soviet people who defeated Nazi Germany and liberated Europe from Nazism!
Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 4:28 pm EST/EDT

Brilliant.
Thank you, Saker.

“Today’s Victory Day parade in Moscow marks a turning point in Russian history: now, for the first time ever, there is a consensus in Russia that instead of looking West, Russia must look North (Siberia the Arctic), East (Asia) and South (Latin America, Africa). ”

My modest dream has started coming true. Today is a great day to celebrate. Cheers, comrades!

One of my most favored WWII photos is this one:

http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/lone-man-refusing-nazi-salute-1936/
A lone man refusing to do the “Sieg Heil” salute at the launching of the Horst Wessel in Nazi Germany, 1936
Patient Observer on May 09, 2015 · at 4:39 pm EST/EDT

Again, the Saker shows clarity and credibility. Well done.
Stepping Razor on May 09, 2015 · at 4:42 pm EST/EDT

The pictures of the generations out walking in the streets with their framed pictures of their ancestors really warmed my heart and gave me a lot of hope. It is great to see the young children out with their parents, grandparents and great grandparents. I loved the pictures I have seen from Odessa, Saur Mogila and a big crowd in Berlin.

I was proudly wearing my t-shirt with a representation of the Order of Victory medal printed on the chest and have messaged my old friend in Moscow. I hope one year I can bring my family and we can pay our respects and be out in the springtime sunshine together with the Russian people.

Warmest regards, from Canada with much love.
XbNB on May 09, 2015 · at 4:50 pm EST/EDT

With great respect to our eastern friends and to the ‘leaders’ of the west,damn your souls to hell.My own father fought the nazis and thankfully,survived. He would be disgusted at these sham quislings who never fought a battle in their lives. ”piss ‘n wind” he would say.
- Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 5:19 pm EST/EDT
  
  Who are the quislings you speak of? on which side? please clarify.
LAH on May 09, 2015 · at 5:20 pm EST/EDT

“I don’t see Victory Day as a celebration of Communism or of the Soviet regime but as a victory over one of the most abhorrent regime in history”.

German Nazism or Soviet Communism, both poisons of equal malevolence. More Russians died at the hand of Soviet Bolsheviks than at the hands of German Nazi’s. Both regimes were equally abhorrent and Russia will only be free from its Soviet past when it has a parade on Beautiful Square to celebrate the end of the Soviet communist regime as well.
- Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 10:53 pm EST/EDT
  
  http://www.cercec.fr/materiaux/doc_membres/Gabor%20RITTERSPORN/Victims%20of%20the%20Gulag.pdf
- alan on May 09, 2015 · at 11:19 pm EST/EDT
  
  Ohhh, you are so so tormented by all the dead Russians… gimme a break.
  
  Facts are that it is very simple: Most people treat their own civil war differently than naked aggression.
  Fact: the US Civil War kill more US people than any other war the US is involved in, do they bring it up every time ? no.
  Fact: most people couldn’t care less if the Germans, Italians, US, or Japanese, or Chinese, or Russsians were to kill a quarter of their own citizens in a civil war so long as they DONT INVADE any other country.
  The West then turn this around and go invade other countries using civil war as pretext, and would even go make up a civil war (like in Ukraine), just so they can have the excuses to show off their hegemony.
Vasily on May 09, 2015 · at 5:24 pm EST/EDT

I don’t agree that the western bloc (USA, EU, UK etc) promote white supremacism. The western zionist elites hate the native people of Europe. What they promote is mass immigration and multiculturalism. The reason is mainly economic because multinational corporations want to have access to very cheap labor. Any native people of any European country that is against mass immigration, is labeled as a “Nazi” by the media and political propaganda.

I will give you an example from Greece. It is widely known that Greece is now economically destroyed because of it’s “integration” into the globalised economic system (EU, Eurozone etc). Unemployment is over 30% and all the major public and state assets in the economy (e.g mines, airports, ports, state corporations, energy etc) will be sold to multinational corporations and foreign funds.

Furthermore, Greece is the main entry point for illegal immigration into Europe because it borders Turkey. EU has forced Greece to accept all illegal immigrants that enter Greece during the last 10 years with an agreement called Dublin Treaty.

Every year about 100,000 to 200,000 illegals arrive in a country that cannot even feed and provide to it’s native citizens.

The situation has become explosive as now more than 1.5 million of the 11 million population are foreigners (albanians, Georgians, Chechens, Bulgarians, Egyptians,etc) and another 1.5 million are recent illegal immigrants of Pakistani/Muslim/African origin. Many Syrians have also arrived this year but they are not allowed to move to other countries as they wish to do.
Crime has skyrocketed and in prisons there is a war between Albanian and Muslim gangs. Large sections of Greek cities are ghettos with gangs commiting crimes and fighting for control of drug market.

At the same time, thousands of young educated Greek people have emigrated. The demographics are now similar to Yeltsin era Russia with very low birthrate, high death rate, with 30,000 more deaths than births.
This is a genocide inflicted on greek people.

What is the reaction of the “greek” governments ?

They blame the greek people as “racists” !

Almost a million Greeks perished during the Nazi occupation but the elites who are responsible for the illegal immigration problem and the economic destruction are using the media to blame and portray greek people as Nazis !!!

Of course it’s all a plan to divide and conquer. Greece is a debt colony of the west now and in order to keep it that way, they need to genocide Greek people

Do greek people have a right to have a homeland ?

I think the NWO plans to destroy Greece and the greek people.

And the reasons are partly related to geopolitics.

Greece has a very important geopolical position and needs to be controlled by the west by all means necessary.

And a semi-islamized Banana Republic Greek colony will have no spiritual connection to orthodox Russia and the danger of a potential future Russo greek alliance will be avoided
- Joe K on May 09, 2015 · at 7:37 pm EST/EDT
  
  So…
  
  1. You recognise that TPTB seek to exploit the marginal status of
  immigrants, as part of a winning, time-tested strategy of class
  warfare. Namely, in the labor struggle, immigrants are invariably on
  the front lines, where the battle is most intense.
  
  2. You oppose tptb’s plans for Greece.
  
  3. You then demonstrate your principled opposition by *exacerbating*
  the marginality of those same immigrants, calling them “illegals”,
  maligning their religions, declaiming how these refugees are being
  used to perpetrate a genocide of the true Greek people, and so on.
  (And by the way, who in hell are these “native inhabitants” of Europe
  you speak of? Are they somewhere on this page?)
  
  Considering these three positions of yours, I find myself torn
  between two alternative interpretations.
  
  But either way, FYI, you sound suspiciously like a Nazi to me, and you
  are being played like a fiddle.
  
  Divide and conquer, as they say.
  - Joe K on May 09, 2015 · at 8:47 pm EST/EDT
    
    BTW…
    
    (And by the way, who in hell are these “native
    inhabitants” of Europe you speak of? Are they somewhere on this
    page?)
    
    …missing link is here.
    - JOHN on May 10, 2015 · at 5:17 am EST/EDT
      
      If you deny the existence of native people, then you are the racist. Europe has native ethnic groups and the same exists for other countries around the world. A native ethnic swede does not look as a chinese or african person. A korean does not look like an african or a german. Illegal immigration is a new form of colonialism and genocide. Mass settlement of illegal immigrants and foreigners will cause the extinction of native people.
      
      Article 2 of the convention defines genocide as
      
      …any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
      (a) Killing members of the group;
      (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
      (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
      (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
      (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
      — Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2
      
      With the massive illegal immigration and forced economic destruction, we have (a), (c) and (d)
  - Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 11:14 pm EST/EDT
    
    “you sound suspiciously like a Nazi to me”
    
    Vasily’s post was full of facts & 1st hand experience. Your response? Namecalling.
    
    How typical of those who seek to force illegal – yes, illegal, sorry if that word disturbs you – immigration into settled cultures, thereby destroying them.
  - Lumi on May 10, 2015 · at 9:16 am EST/EDT
    
    Let’s face it: There has been, for decades, an immigration policy in all so-called “democratic” countries in Europe that is intended to destroy the national culture and ethnic composition of European peoples. Nowhere would mass immigration of both ethnically and culturally very different populations have found the consent of the native people. It was simply decided for them by their “leaders”, who despise them, obeying only their anglozionist masters.
    
    As SxyxS above writes, the objective of so-called “multiculturalism” is really “zero-culturalism”. (Thanks for that expression.)
    
    I’m not sure the core of the issue is about “muslims”. That’s what the debate is focused on in Germany, islamization of the Occident. These muslims often stay true to their identity, which is a strength, and a positive quality.
    
    If immigrant people were all law-abiding and respectful of the host nation … but many aren’t. Quite the contrary, even though the media doesn’t talk about that.
    
    As for today’s Germany, it is such a ridiculous outfit of lies and falsehood, so disrespectful of its own history, so horriby bent down in obsequiosity, that it cannot reasonably expect to be respected by others. If you behave like a doggy, expect to be treated like one.
    
    Native European people (and I’ve heard that in many European countries) feel insecure about their own culture. Because they’re constantly, albeit subliminally, told and shown on big screens that their own culture is bad, intolerant, exclusive, excluding others … and they should be more open, tolerant, welcoming … because if not, they’d essentially be egoists, xenophobes, homophobes, bigots, racists, antisemites, nazis … like those who protest against immigration … lots of isms and phobias that sound like psycho problems … I mean, what the f***? These insults are impertinent. Most people, despite the brainwashing, still love their homeland, and they don’t want it to change, at least not to the worse. What’s wrong with that?
    
    And that is one of the reasons why many European patriots look to Russia, where they sense there is a patriotic vision that gives their soul a home … whereas in “democratic” Europe the native soul is uprooted and told to adapt, to streamline, to modernize, to genderize, to globalize.
    
    Russia is the only free country left in Europe.
    
    The (non-criminal) immigrants, most of whom are just people looking for a better life, are not the main problem. Developed nations should help others develop (which is possible), for the common good of humanity, and regulate immigration according to self-interest (yes, why not?), then this immigration problem would cease to be.
    
    But I absolutely and truely hate the arrogant proponents of this psycho warfare against Europe, these enemies of the European peoples and our continental cultural heritage, and I want to see them rounded up and concentrated into a suitable camp to be built in Brussels where they can cherish their multi-culti you-are-guilty gay lesbian bureaucratic euromatic pedophile nonsense to the end of their lives.
    - Penelope on May 10, 2015 · at 3:15 pm EST/EDT
      
      Great comment, Lumi.
      
      The citizens of a country shd be allowed to choose their immigration policy. What a concept, huh? I mean it wd be almost like we believe in democracy. Of course it wd be necessary that we stop permitting our govts to attack other nations so that people don’t have to emigrate to survive.
- Penelope on May 10, 2015 · at 3:30 pm EST/EDT
  
  Vasily, Thank you for an informed comment. You make many good points. I too am sick of the propaganda lies.
Tom Mysiewicz on May 09, 2015 · at 5:26 pm EST/EDT

Another great Russian victory was the defeat of the brutal Khazar Empire in the 10th century. I always have mixed feelings about WWII, which my late dad got a back full of shrapnel participating in. (Back then, only a “good conduct” medal for that!) Because I believe the conflict was specifically engineered after the First War to produce that exact result. Keeping Russia and Germany fighting seems to have long been a priority of the AngloZionists. They continue with this monomaniacal strategy today. Impediments–mass depopulation, war production and communism–kept Russia from becoming the great industrial power it should have been. This is true for China also, although one has to wonder long and hard why the U.S. allowed its industrial capacity to be transferred there? Well, I won’t go into that here. I, for one, felt betrayed by the outcome of the “Cold War”. Because I and most Americans believed the propaganda and simply wanted Russia to be free, like we were. I never met Americans who simply hated Russia or Russians. (Except for my Polish grandma!) So be proud of your victory–Russia had every right to defend itself–but also remember Hitler was a product of German desperation. The Germans never really had a chance and Hitler was no great general, although his economic programs of the 1930s should not be entirely discounted. While Russia, Britain and America starved Germany prospered. Germany was rearmed by the AngloZionists specifically to take on the USSR, but Hitler apparently got cold feet on advice of his generals and the Molotov-Von Ribbentrop nonaggression pact was born. Both Europe and Russia should learn from the tragedy of this war that mutual destruction is not the solution to any problem!
- T on May 10, 2015 · at 9:48 am EST/EDT
  
  In the interests of full disclosure I am a non European Muslim.
  
  “Another great Russian victory was the defeat of the brutal Khazar Empire in the 10th century.”
  
  The defeat of the Khazars was indeed a great Victory for the Rus. HOWEVER WW II was a gigantic victory for Gog & Magog (who have origins from the Khazar Empire). Gog & Magog got their revenge with the Bolshevik revolution and the establishment of the USSR. Gog & Magog got their revenge upon N.S Germany in 1945 for daring to free themselves from economic oppression, and the Gog & Magog World Order is now trying to destroy Russia as she is undergoing a spiritual renaissance post USSR. What does the Gog & Magog World Order want? She wants to make the Imposter State of Israel the ruling state in the World. And any people(s) who stand up for themselves are in the firing line.
SuomiMies on May 09, 2015 · at 5:26 pm EST/EDT

greetings here from Finland

Here are crazy NATO military alliance represented unleashed. 900,000 Finnish reservists have been sent a letter from their investment during the war. This is already pretty scary! Crazy Finnish NATO representatives prepare the invasion of Russia. European NATO Force Commander Breedlove says Finnish NATO agents what they must do. In my view, here in Finland is already NATO weapon systems, secretly brought to the course.

it is noteworthy that Finland was signed in September 2014, NATO host nation agreement. NATO host country agreement is contrary to the Constitution of Finland, and it can be classified as treason. Presidents of Finland and the Finnish army commander signed this Agreement, even if the Finnish population 75% are against NATO.

In my view, NATO is preparing invasion of Russia through the Finnish soil. I am a Finnish citizen and I’m not going to go to fight against the Russian people, just for the sake of some of Washington’s mad warmongers. Rather, I choose death or prison
- Anonymous on May 10, 2015 · at 3:43 pm EST/EDT
  
  SuomiMies,
  
  Thank you for the informative & principled comment. So much deception by our “leaders”.
  
  Regards,
  Penelope (in the belly of the beast)
mikeH on May 09, 2015 · at 5:33 pm EST/EDT

Your picture of Sergei Korolkov reminds me of the Italian contractor killed in Iraq, Fabrizio Quattrocchi. It is the same spirit and one that is not to be taken lightly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabrizio_Quattrocchi
Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 5:41 pm EST/EDT

Western leaders boycott the unknown war. That is….so surprising.
nick on May 09, 2015 · at 5:44 pm EST/EDT

What white supremacism ? The western media promote miscegenation and multiculturalism on a daily basis.

The west is controlled by Zionist Jews, not by “white” people (there are hundreds of white European ethnic groups including Slavic Russians).

Jews are the most powerful elitist group in USA and they control banking, finance, Hollywood, academia and key government positions while powerful lobbies like AIPAC push US foreign policy into a pro Israel Line.

Just check the ethnoreligious background of most CEOs of Hollywood producers, investment bankers, and central bankers. Almost all of them are Jewish. For a minority of 2% they hold disproportionate power.

Even in Russia, the 95% of oligarchs are Russian Jewish. The same for Ukraine.

As for Ukraine, it is not run by “Nazis” but by western puppets. Of course the western intelligence used some Ukrainian ultra nationalists as useful idiots and these thugs commited horrendous atrocities. But Ukraine is not going to become a “Nazi”, nationalist or ultraconservative state (such as Nazi Germany, Francoist Spain or Fascist Italy etc).

Ukraine will become a puppet
of NWO and will be integrated into globalization. That means it’s economy will get plundered by multinational corporations and it’s people will emigrate in droves to work as low wage labourers in Europe. And Ukrainian people will get brainwashed to accept transsexualism and homosexuality
- Luca K on May 10, 2015 · at 5:20 pm EST/EDT
  
  You r correct, sir.
Philoctetes on May 09, 2015 · at 6:03 pm EST/EDT

I am a great admirer of Putin’s and consider him a Great Man, as in the Great Man theory of history, to which I do not subscribe. Nonetheless Putin is indeed making, or at least attempting to make, a monumental shift in history as few others could. I suggest, however, that the Saker’s romanticism has led him to misunderstand the nature of the conflict between the Anglo-Zionists and the Russians, and that his list of opposing features is mistaken in two major respects.

First, Russia is not fighting for “Rule of the 99%.” I recall feeling chills of disgust during one of Putin’s speeches to the Russian Federation – I believe it was the one where he woos the billionaires to repatriate their stolen assets – in which he drops a line that I paraphrase “we all made our fortunes in different ways.” There was no doubt what he meant: he was condoning the theft of state resources into private pockets and assuring the thieves of the safety of their assets under his authority. This promise dovetails with the Arkadi Rotenberg Law that expresses the sort of “nationalism” on which Putin depends for his support: wealthy Russians whose assets are confiscated abroad as part of the West’s sanctions shall have them reimbursed from the Russian purse at the expense of the 99% who are told to suffer heroically for Mother Russia.

Although there is still a profound difference between the honesty and integrity of Putin and Russia on the one hand and the inveterate lies and deceit of the USA on the other, this is a contingent difference that will dissolve as the mores of the thieving oligarchs play an ever deeper role in Russian affairs. In a generation or two, I anticipate Russia having degenerated to the level of ruling class mores described in John DeCamp’s “The Franklin Cover-up” and Henry Walter Vinson’s “Confessions of a D. C. Madam,’ both of which involve sexual blackmail, pedophilia and child-murder to satisfy appetites of rulings elites that are protected and covered-up by the state apparatus of the intelligence agencies, the justice system, and the media. In brief, although Putin is moral, the high ideals that he wields also reflect his operating from a posture of weakness rather than strength – forgive me, but Stalin availed himself of similar ideals in reaching out to Great Britain and France before WWII to join them in upholding treaties and enforcing international law against an increasingly ominous Germany – and given the Rotenberg Law and what it implies about power in Russia, these ideals will be abandoned and corrupted if he succeeds.

The Saker often speaks of the West’s support for Hitler, so I refer him to the best and clearest exposition of the details of this support by quoting from an email I wrote in response to someone equating fascism with communism:

[BEGIN QUOTE] Fascism and communism are diametrically opposite forms of government. America is not and cannot be heading toward both of them. For starters, fascism has historically been viewed by the ruling classes as its bulwark and savior against communism because of its supporting the twin pillars of God and private property. Such was Neville Chamberlain and cronies understanding of their pact with Hitler – take Russia and Eastern Europe but leave the British Empire and its allies alone — which Hitler discarded because he distrusted democracy and believed that if he first attacked USSR and Chamberlain were replaced by a vote, then Germany would suffer attack from two fronts at once, hence better to subdue Western Europe first. (See “In Our Time: The Chamberlain-Hitler Collusion” by Clement Leibovitz & Alvin Finkel.) [END QUOTE]

“In Our Time” is one of the rare books of honest history because it was written by Liebovitz (with the help of historian Finkel), a Egyptian Jewish socialist physicist and computer engineer who spent 8 years poring through the state papers of Great Britain and private diaries of its ruling class.

One of the great liars leading the pack against Putin is Yale historian Timothy Snyder whose March 20, 1014 article in the New York Review of Books, “Fascism, Russia, and Ukraine” gives the low-down for the blinded intelligentsia of the United States, “World War II began with an alliance between Hitler and Stalin in 1939. It ended with the Soviet Union expelling surviving Jews across its own border into Poland.” Snyder is also a member of and mouthpiece for, the Council on Foreign Relations. I heard him speak a few months ago at the ALOUD series of public disinformation held at the downtown Los Angeles Library and his lies were so thick and furious that I had to force myself to stay seated and to keep quiet, but he said one true thing. This rebellion in Russia depends on Putin and Putin will not be around in 15 years.

Putin remains a Great Man, but he has no successor, and he has not been able to establish a government with authority and autonomy in Russia. Listen to the annual 4-hour Q&As: all the little people come to him directly for help with their wages and their housing and their health-care because they have no other effective recourse at the local level. Putin routinely promises to look into these matters, and perhaps he will, but this is no substitute for reliable local government that he has been unable to establish. With no Great Man to succeed him, and with the specter of the oligarchs he willingly accommodates at his back, there is no reason to believe that Russia will not come to the same sorry pass as the USA, especially with a totalitarian capitalist partner like China as its main ally.
- Red Ryder on May 09, 2015 · at 6:32 pm EST/EDT
  
  When Putin is finished in 2024, take another look.
  
  He inherited a weak, destroyed, dying nation.
  
  What do we see today? Strength, facts that signal growth, pride, accomplishment, independence, world leadership.
  
  The internal development is in the PM’s hands. What the hell is that midget doing?
  
  Also, there isn’t even a political party like the Chinese have to deal with discipline internally in the massive government.
  
  It’s not all on Putin. He’s working on the survival and growth elements and will take care of perfecting things later.
  
  As for a successor, I think there are several men who have the capacity. The question is who will the people choose to grant authority to?
  
  And the oligarchs? That is long from over. Putin definitely is not done with that issue.
  
  First things first.
- blue on May 09, 2015 · at 6:55 pm EST/EDT
  
  “on which Putin depends for his support: wealthy Russians whose assets are confiscated abroad”
  
  Exactly — he depends on them, as well as the mass of working people. He is in a difficult position trying to make progress (which he has done) while holding the country together. And it is a huge country, which does not change direction easily or quickly.
  
  Yet, because it us a huge and complex country, while Putin is a great man, he is not the only great man in Russia and is largely present and effective because of the various forces at work, which he has been able to blend together into a coherent policy. When Putin retires someone else will take his place, and perhaps be about as effective because those same forces will come into play — if the new president can manage them properly. If he can’t manage them well, then he will likely not last too long as one sector gains strength from lack of being contained.
  
  At this time one could argue that ‘Putin is Russia’, but that is because he understands, reflects, and represents Russia, not vice versa. That is his remarkable talent.
  Would that all politicians be as gifted.
- Amen on May 09, 2015 · at 7:28 pm EST/EDT
  
  I enjoyed your writing.
  
  The Silovoki produced Putin,it is no secret!
  
  Cometh the moment!….cometh the man! it has always been so!
  
  There is a truism….”you can take as much authority as you can wield”
  
  When that moment arrives….be it Joan-de Arc, Georgy Zukhov or Subodai…. the followers recognize a leader.
  
  Be patient for death…our turn will come!
  - Philoctetes on May 10, 2015 · at 12:19 am EST/EDT
    
    Would that you were right that cometh the moment cometh man. America’s descent into totalitarianism calls for such a man but perhaps provides no moment for him to enter the political arena.
    - blue on May 10, 2015 · at 1:09 am EST/EDT
      
      There have been several who could have filled the bill, but people did not sufficiently support or vote for them. You can lead horses to water but you can’t make them drink. Many people I’ve tried to explain things to just don’t want to hear it — and that includes the so-called ‘peace people’.
- Grieved on May 09, 2015 · at 8:04 pm EST/EDT
  
  In all these parades we forgot to mention the inevitable contingent supplied by the enemy, which is the parade of straw men.
  
  To my ear, there is a very pronounced clamor of discord in the latest threads here. I’m seeing this on other sites also, namely Russia Insider and Fort Russ.
  
  Anyway, great article, Saker, a beautiful observation of history exactly as it changes. Thank you!
  
  And oh look, while the dogs have been barking, the caravan has moved on ;)
  - Mopoke on May 10, 2015 · at 2:55 am EST/EDT
    
    ‘Russia Insider’ seems to be giving a lot of coverage to anti-Russian articles these days.
    
    Has anyone else this opinion?
  - Penelope on May 10, 2015 · at 5:16 am EST/EDT
    
    You’re right, Grieved. It’s kind of silly to have allowed the whole conversation to have been hijacked by racism argumentation when the subject was Russia’s celebration of the victory over Nazism via a military parade.
- Andrew on May 09, 2015 · at 11:26 pm EST/EDT
  
  Philoctetes:
  
  For starters, fascism has historically been viewed by the ruling classes as its bulwark and savior against communism because of its supporting the twin pillars of God and private property. Such was Neville Chamberlain and cronies understanding of their pact with Hitler – take Russia and Eastern Europe but leave the British Empire and its allies alone — which Hitler discarded because he distrusted democracy and believed that if he first attacked USSR and Chamberlain were replaced by a vote, then Germany would suffer attack from two fronts at once, hence better to subdue Western Europe first.
  
  Sorry, this is completely backwards.
  
  World War II started because Britain and France declared war on Germany after Germany invaded Poland. Were it not for that event, Poland would have had to surrender to Germany probably within the first week of war and agree to terms (probably a restoration of the 1914 border, or perhaps with the additional loss of the Lodz district as with the border imposed between the General Government and Germany or even the 1795 border. Rump Poland would have had to become a German client state like Slovakia or Romania.
  
  Hitler tried repeatedly to make an alliance with Britain because he respected Britain’s imperial accomplishments and wanted to emulate them on the continent to the east in the Soviet Union. Britain repeatedly refused anything of the sort. In the end, Britain sacrificed her empire to destroy Nazi Germany and thus maintain the balance of power on the continent. Until you can understand this decision by Britain, you won’t be able to understand her foreign policy strategy.
  
  Fascism itself is hardly hisotrical as it was a brief interlude in European history where Corporations and the moneyed elite and military establishments decided to rule the state directly without regard for the views of the people. The results of WWII and the success of the Anglo-American power model have made it clear to all concerned that corporate and elite money power is better expressed through the manipulation of public opinion and meaningless contests between two or more nearly identical parties who distract the masses from real concern with the common direction of government set by the ruling class with a handful of pot-sitrring differences and bogeyman enemies abroad to hate and bomb.
  - Philoctetes on May 10, 2015 · at 12:17 am EST/EDT
    
    You should read “In Our Time” and address its facts.
  - Poppadop on May 10, 2015 · at 1:48 am EST/EDT
    
    World War II started because Britain and France declared war on Germany after Germany invaded Poland.
    
    Precisely. And even the invasion of Poland never would have happened if it weren’t for the Danzig Massacres, something that’s eerily similar to the “anti-terrorist operation” in Novorussia. Poland was carrying out the Empire’s proxy warfare even back then.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qY2jHoOGQ8#t=6m35s
    
    Hitler tried repeatedly to make an alliance with Britain because he respected Britain’s imperial accomplishments…
    
    I call shenanigans.
    
    “One might think, perhaps, that at least in England itself every person must have this share of these riches. By no means! In that country, the class distinctions are the crassest imaginable. There is poverty – incredible poverty – on the one side, and equally incredible wealth on the other. They have not solved a single problem.”
    ~ Adolf Hitler, 1940
    http://www.therealistreport.com/2015/01/adolf-hitler-man-who-fought-bank.html
- Penelope on May 10, 2015 · at 4:04 pm EST/EDT
  
  Philoctetes, My main reservation is that I see no resistance from either Russia or China to the IMF system. This system prevents monetary control at the national level– thus preventing sovereign credit creation. By this means nations are kept subservient, since they must borrow worthless US or EU credits & get trapped in the interest-paying trap. China wants to have greater voting rights in the IMF, but its basic mechanism continues to inhibit normal national self-investment.
  
  Starikov’s online book is illuminating in this regard.
  - Poppadop on May 13, 2015 · at 8:40 pm EST/EDT
    
    Philoctetes, My main reservation is that I see no resistance from either Russia or China to the IMF system. This system prevents monetary control at the national level– thus preventing sovereign credit creation.
    
    “I have no hesitation to say if they can re-charter the bank with this hydra of corruption, they will rule the nation, and its charter will be perpetual, and its corrupting influence [will] destroy the liberty of our country. When I came into this administration… I had a majority of 75. Since then it is now believed it (the bank) has bought over by loans, discounts, etc. until… there were 2/3 for re-chartering it.”
    ~ President Andrew Jackson, 1833; first US president with an assassination attempt
    
    The Empire’s gloves come off when nations challenge the bank; the bank is the Empire. Neither Russia nor China seem to want to initiate direct confrontations right now.
elsi on May 09, 2015 · at 6:04 pm EST/EDT

Saker, I also wish you a Happy V-Day to you, your family and friends.

Well. The West was absent but not The East, Asia was there …
The West was absent but not its people, which was present in heart.
This is a day of celebration for me since I live in this blog and joined the fight.
And as for me, I’m sure it is for many people, at least here in South Europe.
Like you, Saker, I think that the leaders of the West do not paint anything there, especially after the events in The Ukraine. At least today, it is more consistent not go.
Maybe next year we can be there represented the peoples of Europe who remember, who do not forget and who will always be in the trenches of the anti-fascist front.
A Soldier's Duty on May 09, 2015 · at 6:07 pm EST/EDT

Probably the most amazing story of tragedy and triumph to come out of the Gulag system was the story of Rokossovsky. In spite of his horrendous sufferings in prison for supposed “treason,” he swallowed his bitterness and pain and with great humility and devotion to country, he loyally served Stalin to defeat Hitler. This exemplifies the Russian spirit.
Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 6:10 pm EST/EDT

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-09/us-tells-greece-reject-putin-pipeline-marking-return-cold-war-politics

That visit proved more than Europe could bear, and so the European Commission promptly filed antitrust charges against the Russian gas giant in an absurdly transparent attempt to punish the Kremlin for interfering in negotiations between the EU and its Aegean debt serf.

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user92183/imageroot/2015/04/TurkishStream_0.jpg
Ugo Z. on May 09, 2015 · at 6:12 pm EST/EDT

To all Russian and Eastern peoples, on this great day of celebration of heroes and memories of suffering and sacrifice—may God bless your families and nations.

Thank you.

I hope we can contain Fascism without another great conflict.

Let the militia kill it in its Kievan crib.
Veritas on May 09, 2015 · at 6:14 pm EST/EDT

Dear The Saker,

Thanks for your piece. Russia has turned and the West will be the losers. There is no going back for the US and its vassals – you can never take back the snub today. It is a rememberence day for Russia and their friends to remember. I don’t think Russia should bother to invite these countries in the future – they now know where they stand.

It was interesting that the Ex President of Croatia said he would have attended and Silvio Berlusconi also said it was wrong to skip the celebrations – sadly the “leaders” we have now don’t represent us:

http://sputniknews.com/europe/20150509/1021927998.html

http://sputniknews.com/world/20150509/1021932032.html

I enjoyed the “To be Russian” article – very good. I don’t have any Russian heritage (as far as I know) but feel more Russian these days becuase she stands for the beliefs I hold dear. The friendliness and kindness I experienced today at the Victory Day memorial really came through.

Ukraine is a lost cause – until those fascist are kicked out – there will be no peace. After Chocie boys ridiculous and insulting comment today – we see just how low things have sunk.

A picture speaks a thousand words…..surrounded by Nazi Germans he’s like “so what – not scared of you”

Rgds,

Veritas
Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 6:21 pm EST/EDT

http://tass.ru/ekonomika/1958134

USING https://translate.yandex.com/:

Greece does not intend to abandon the “Turkish stream”
Economics and business
May 8, 20:15 UTC+3
The authorities believe this project is beneficial for the Greek people

ATHENS, may 8. /Corr. TASS Denis Kabanov/. Greece does not intend to abandon the construction branch of the “Turkish stream” on the territory of the country. About this Greek Minister of productive reform, environment and energy Panagiotis Lafazanis said on Friday after meeting with the special envoy and coordinator of the U.S. state Department on international energy relations AMACOM Hochstein. Quoted him as saying on its website the newspaper “Proto theme”.
- NICK on May 10, 2015 · at 5:31 am EST/EDT
  
  The Syriza government is a puppet of USA. It is a neoliberal globalised party masqueraded as a “leftist” party. Syriza hugely supports EU and they consider themselves as “cosmopolitans”, “Europeanists” and not greeks. They are committed members of EU-EUROZONE-NATO and they consider a greek withdraw from these power blocs as a suicide and a disaster.
  
  They plan to sell all greek public assets to german and american multinational corporations. All 15 greek airports will be sold to German company Fraport for just $1 billion. All these money will be used to repay part of the IMF loan. They have put on sale many public buildings and land, hundred of beaches will get privatised as well mines, energy and natural gas corporations.
  
  As for Lafazanis, he is a crook that has never worked in his whole life. He was a professional member of the communist party in the 1970-1980s and now he pretends to be a “leftist” even though he has voted for all the neoliberal measures that the syriza government implements.
Mara on May 09, 2015 · at 6:22 pm EST/EDT

Great article, sums the situation well.
One more thing got my attention when I was watching the parade: minister Shoigu crossed himself as he rode on the Square:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AulYHLB2M3Y&feature=youtu.be
I thought he was Buddhist?
- Kat Kan on May 10, 2015 · at 11:23 pm EST/EDT
  
  We are not sure about being Buddhist. Apparently the Russian Wikipedia reckons he is Orthodox; the English one doesn’t say either way.
  
  But it was a powerful image, so much so Saker wrote a whole article about it.
  
  /something-truly-amazing-happened-today
  
  Shoigu looks like one of the main contenders to replace Putin, when the time comes. He is worth watching.
The Devil His Due on May 09, 2015 · at 6:30 pm EST/EDT

Stalin’s Five Year Plans saved Russia as well. He also gave the Russian people the gift of literacy and pride in themselves and what they could accomplish.
- Teuton on May 09, 2015 · at 7:47 pm EST/EDT
  
  but at what price? he was more murderous than Hitler.
greencrow on May 09, 2015 · at 6:32 pm EST/EDT

Thanks for putting this momentous occasion into context, Saker. As a Canadian I am emotionally with the Russians on this day and regretful that my country is such a spineless vassal of the Zioglobalists. Here is my blog’s tribute to Putin and Russia on this day. You will note I have added the link to this page.

http://greencrowasthecrowflies.blogspot.ca/2015/05/all-wars-of-past-century-were-actually.html
- Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 7:51 pm EST/EDT
  
  I, we, should have created a national delegation of the actual people of Canada and gone to represent Canada in Moscow at the parade, instead of letting our neo-con ruling class insult the sacrifices of the peoples of the USSR in WWII. There must be some way to do this instead of letting these creeps speak for us.
  - Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 8:54 pm EST/EDT
    
    Amen to that. We should not let such an occasion pass again without standing up for true Canadian “values”…i.e., not the ones our Army is ostensibly fighting for as per the Cdn Min of Def recruitment ads.
    
    gc
  - Anonymous on May 10, 2015 · at 7:34 am EST/EDT
    
    This would have been a great idea. Next time we should do it.
Teuton on May 09, 2015 · at 7:35 pm EST/EDT

Sadly, Saker, I have to say that I find your analysis and take on all of this very idealistic and naïve.

Firstly, WWII was nothing but a bunch of people trying to overthrow the yoke which had enslaved their countries through an international system, only to find that one system replaced another and true freedom has never been achieved. To celebrate this is kind of ridiculous.

To say that Russians believe in multiculturalism makes me laugh. There is no place on earth where your name and your family’s origins from centuries ago causes more discrimination than in Russia.

Of course the Russians are being threatened by the American system, but that just means majority of Russians still have to make the best life they can, despite the corruption of the Russian government and Russian oligarchs in their land. Americans are just trying to replace those two categories.
- alan on May 09, 2015 · at 10:24 pm EST/EDT
  
  “but that just means majority of Russians still have to make the best life they can”
  
  Er, sounds like you would recommend Putin and Russians simply surrender to the US hegemon.
  - Teuton on May 09, 2015 · at 10:54 pm EST/EDT
    
    no, I don’t believe they should surrender. I just find the Saker’s idealism about V Day a little too much
    - Skeptic on May 10, 2015 · at 8:32 am EST/EDT
      
      Are you a descendant of Teutonic Knights who thinks that Hitler was not such a bad guy? Too bad your family didn’t live under German occupation in the East.
      - Teuton on May 10, 2015 · at 7:35 pm EST/EDT
        
        Yes, I am a descendant of the Teutonic Knights. My father fought at Kursk and my ancestors against Alexander Nevsky. I don’t think there’s much to be proud of in either Hitler or Stalin’s legacy. Both murderous madmen.
Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 7:44 pm EST/EDT

Lol. You’re propaganda these days gets more and more surreal. Good luck with your continuing whitewash of Stalin and the Bolshevik army.
Raven on May 09, 2015 · at 8:03 pm EST/EDT

Just my 2¢:

1.

the Anglos have always shared these feelings and that had developed several plans for total war against the USSR were considered right at the end of the war

The AngloSaxons planed to conquer Russia since the early days of russian-british rivalries in the Mediterranean Sea and central and eastern Asia, e.g. Crimean War (1853-1856). Rivaleries boosted simultaneously with petroleum era (~1870th, e.g. Baku, Caspian Sea). Please listen to speeches of Churchill (even before (what you call) WW1).

At the end of 1937 (yep, two years before the so-called beginning of (what you call) WW2) Germany has been down and out, bankrupt (remember Autobahnen/Highways, Kraft durch Freude (Strength Through Joy), artificial reduction of mass unemployment (6-8mln people) along with a huge amount of reparations and, most expensive, rearmament of the Wehrmacht). The Nazis wouldn’t have managed to hang on without financial aid – from the US, of course. What is nowadys IMF/Lagarde in Kiev then has been BIS (Bank for International Settlements) in Basel/Switzerland. Credits for the designated aggressor (against Russia) then have been brokered by … Prescott Bush (grandfather of G.W.Bush). Brokerage lasted during the whole war.

Please refere to what happend on May 7 in 1915 with RMS Lusitania – W. Wilson took over and began operation let the germans do the job (against russia). Of course it is beyond all question, Germany (1933-1945) committed crime against humanity. But nevertheless, it (they, the germans) have been made to do so – not that complicated after “Treaty of Versailles” and “Treaty of Trianon”, both: (c) Copyright 1920 by W. Wilson.

2.

because the West feared the Red Army. And since the West was terrified of the Red Army, what do you think the western guests felt each time they watched the Victory Day parade in Moscow?

According to your statistics there have been about 11mln military death of the USSR and about 5.5mln german military death, let’s say 5mln of them in the Great Patriotic war. So, how do these numbers match with your statement, cited above?

Thanks for reading
- Poppadop on May 10, 2015 · at 12:23 am EST/EDT
  
  The AngloSaxons planed to conquer Russia since the early days of russian-british rivalries in the Mediterranean Sea and central and eastern Asia, e.g. Crimean War (1853-1856).
  
  And the Empire’s plan to conquer Tsarist Russia was accomplished with the success of the Bolshevik Revolution.
  http://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_the_bolshevik_revolution-5.pdf
  
  As George Orwell told us, “War was a sure safeguard of sanity.” Using the Germans to fight the Soviets, when they were still effectively controlling Russia for the banksters, makes no sense. Therefore, it’s probably not true.
  http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/09/13/hitler-and-the-banksters-the-abolition-of-interest-servitude/
  - Raven on May 10, 2015 · at 9:27 am EST/EDT
    
    Using the Germans to fight the Soviets, when they were still effectively controlling Russia for the banksters, makes no sense. Therefore, it’s probably not true.
    
    The empire is threefold: big money, big oil and military-industrial complex. According to your own words (above) two out of three folds were – much to their very regret – not controlling Russia. And, please remember 1990th. Along with criminals like Khodorkovsky big oil already has been in control of Russia.
    And of course, big money is not in control of Russia, too, at least no longer. Haven’t you heard about $350bln flewing so-called City-of-London, most of it russian money coming back home.
    
    For the (from now on ancient) empire there’s nothing left than war against Russia. I would be glad when it will be – according to The Saker – an 80% informational war. Another Thirty-Years-War (3rd one), counting from the (military) beginning in 2001/09/11 (i.e. another Pearl Harbor / Tonkin).
    
    In regard to Germany as a tool, as a weapon of the ancient empire: since 1945 (western) Germany has been (mis-) used by the AngloSaxons. They even re-armed Germany in 1955 (after only 10 years, remember Blitzkrieg-Guderian!) to be a full member of NATO and of course to be (mis-) used against Russia. And, in regard of current NSA-BND-scandal in Germany: in 1946(!) the AngloSaxons re-installed most of the so-called “Fremde Heere Ost” (Foreign Armies East, Nazi millitary intelligence), then being named “Organisation Gehlen” and nowdays called BND, to be used … against Russia. [BTW: The AngloSaxons (Atlantik-Brücke/Atlantic bridge, American Council on Germany, Council on Foreign Relations …) these days (BND-scandal) are sacrificing (at least politically killing) Merkel – because she refused a (full-scale) military war in Novorossia, i.e. in Russia.]
    
    Last but not least: there’s no military drone-war (all over the world) without … Germany (Ramstein).
    
    All in all: Germany is the ancient empire’s weapon of mass destruction (WMD).
    
    The only solution to this: turn Germany into a russian central point of defence (against WMD and all sorts of other military shit), but only defensiv, i.e. no infantry. For this Crimea 2.0 ++ is needed.
    Between 25% and 33% of german people right now would welcome russian army to defend Russia (and thus Germany) from german soil. Almost all german people would very much appreciate to annually pay … let’s say 4 or 5 bln for russian defense services and to completly cut down the annual military budget, 33bln.
    
    Footnote: According to still valid articles §53 and §106 of United Nations Charter, Russia (member of allied forces of WW2) is allowed to occupy Germany – any time, without any reason.
    
    May be little Georgian has been right?
    - Johan on May 10, 2015 · at 2:29 pm EST/EDT
      
      That Stalin note, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalin_Note, is something indeed well worth remembering today.
    - Yes this needs sorting out on May 10, 2015 · at 3:00 pm EST/EDT
      
      “Footnote: According to still valid articles §53 and §106 of United Nations Charter, Russia (member of allied forces of WW2) is allowed to occupy Germany – any time, without any reason”
      
      I have heard this before,and apparently it is the same for Japan.
      
      Raven,how can this be explained?
      
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Final_Settlement_with_Respect_to_Germany
      
      If by the treaty Germany became sovereign,why does the UN charter not reflect this?,just US opposition?
      
      I also read about something referred to as ‘the Chancellor act’?
      requiring US control of Germany.
      
      Do you have any clues?
      - Anonymous on May 10, 2015 · at 8:47 pm EST/EDT
        
        The existence of the Kanzlerakte was confirmed by the “architect of the Ostpolitik” Egon Bahr, a close confidant of Chancellor Willy Brandt.
        Bahr himself describes what happened in 1969, when Brandt became Chancellor:
        http://www.zeit.de/2009/21/D-Souveraenitaet
      - Raven on May 10, 2015 · at 9:33 pm EST/EDT
        
        You will have to read the (whole) treaty (on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany) yourself. Really hard stuff. At a first glance (first 30 articles) Germany regained it’s sovereignty and allied reserved rights (“regarding Germany as whole”) have been explicitly derelicted. But only if you stop reading before article 100. Later articles declare previous articles in regard of allied reserved rights as invalid.
        
        This pattern you will find in all previous treaties regarding Germany’s sovereignty:
        – at first Germany is declared as a souvereign country [BTW: why to declare a country souvereign? Simply stop occupying it. No declarations by foreigners needed!],
        – later all allied reserved right’s derived from occupation law will be exempted, i.e. Germany will continue to be occupied and thus will not be souvereign.
        You will find this pattern in all treaties from the very first one in early 1950 till the treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany, mentioned above.
        
        But, most important, Germany may sign many more treaties, the articles in the UN charta are still existing – and still valid.
        Of course, it is said, they won’t be executed – right now. Unfortunately there is no article telling us under which condition these articles would/could be reactivated or, the other way round, which are the conditions the execution of these articles is strictly forbidden.
        
        And furthermore, according to these articles every country in the world does have the right to occupy Germany and to apply any military measure on it – but only four other countries (USSR/RU, UK, FR and USA) signed the treaty (above).
        
        If these articles really are no longer used / of no more use – very simple: delete them, completely and officially.
        
        BTW, if you want to know what a real peace treaty looks like – read the treaties of Peace of Westphalia. This is real (european invented) public international law. The UN charta is american bullshit.
        
        Another footnote: France and Russia renounced their allied reserved rights (“regarding Germany as whole”) in 1990. The AngloSaxons don’t – why?
        
        Useful info on May 11, 2015 · at 9:07 am EST/EDT
        
        Thank you for your 2 responses and also to Anonymous.
        
        “The AngloSaxons don’t – why?”
        
        I think the US/UK post WW2 plan, was always to be world hegemony.
        
        Money creation backed up by muscle,with the UK as junior partner.
        
        Keeping Germany subservient is part of the Halford Mckinder/Alfred Milner ‘Heartland’ plan,
        
        “He who controls the heartland controls the world island,he who controls the world island controls the world”
        
        The US has achieved domination of all Nato countries and now seeks Ukraine,Novorossya has spoilt their takeover plan.
        
        There will never be any peace while America is allowed Dollar hegemony,it is clear that Russia and China intend to fully break clear of the 1944 Bretton Woods system.
        
        That system gave the US economic keys to the world, and now the 21st century world wants the keys back.
        
        Perhaps instead of Frau Merkel,Germany needs someone with spirit,like Dr Sarah Wagenecht?.
        
        Thanks again.
      - Raven on May 10, 2015 · at 10:05 pm EST/EDT
        
        Sorry for 2nd reply:
        
        What is nowadays called the Chancellor Act never has been a secret. Every chancellor, even Kohl, except Brandt, has been proud to tell (after every election) they have been at Petersberg at Allied High Commission before they started service. You could read about it in many newspapers.
        
        But, but, what do the US need any (Chancellor) act for? The US never (learned) to declare war. They don’t need any (written) act. They just want subjection/subjugation – it is that simple. US is an oppressor. Fullstop. No written acts needed. Just forget about this not at all mysterious Chancellor Act.
        
        The trick with this act is: as soon as any designated chancellor has signed the act, he/she was guilty of high treason and thus – susceptible to blackmail. The US will have him (and Germany) on toast.
    - Poppadop on May 13, 2015 · at 1:23 am EST/EDT
      
      The empire is threefold: big money, big oil and military-industrial complex. According to your own words (above) two out of three folds were – much to their very regret – not controlling Russia. And, please remember 1990th.
      
      For the record, I was talking about conditions before the Cold War. Yes, Russians rejected the Empire’s Orwellian scams over time, yet for a long while, the Soviets were definitely playing Eurasia to the US’s Oceania. Helping construct the Holocaust helped no one but the Empire, plenty of labor went into the arms race instead of bettering the people, and the Soviets were supposed to stay in Afghanistan forever [like America is doing now].
      
      All in all: Germany is the ancient empire’s weapon of mass destruction (WMD).
      
      Of course Germany flipped from fighting the Empire to serving the Empire; they were pummeled back into submission, something the Soviets had a large role in. All nations that do the banksters’ bidding get abused first. Even the US was hit with two wars, one proxy civil war, three assassinated presidents, etc. before passing the Federal Reserve.
      
      The only solution to this: turn Germany into a russian central point of defence (against WMD and all sorts of other military shit), but only defensiv, i.e. no infantry. For this Crimea 2.0 ++ is needed.
      
      Infantry can be used defensively, too. You know, Russia will win more points if Germany stands on more even ground [multi-polar world, remember?] and stops getting prosecuted for the banksters’ racket war. Still, I definitely agree there are Germans that would take another shot at toppling the Empire. Now if only someone would stop beating around the bush and name names…
      
      “These individuals hide in the shadows. They’re constantly inventing new enemies; ensuring war is always raging somewhere. The merchants of death, the military-industrial complex: They’re known as Logos. They are the true enemies of anyone who loves peace!
      
      “From the bottom of my heart, I wish for a world that never again knows the scourge of war. Since Logos continues to block our efforts, I am taking this opportunity to announce a military campaign with the specific goal of eliminating it and its members!”
      ~ Chairman Gilbert Durandal, Mobile Suit Gundam SEED Destiny, Episode 33
      http://www.veoh.com/watch/v86098241HpzmZG3W
alan on May 09, 2015 · at 8:44 pm EST/EDT

Instead of “White Supremacism” I would just call it “US Exceptionalism”.
Meaning of “Exceptional” : special, outstanding, superior.
This ridiculous concept is widely accepted by US leaders and perhaps many US citizens. If you think you are “superior”, then it must follow that others are “inferior” when compared to you; then you are basically following the footsteps of Hitler, this needs no more explanation!
Sanjin on May 09, 2015 · at 9:09 pm EST/EDT

i would like to add something to those who like mathematics when comparing war casualities. Russia lost double compared to Germany, but stil, with 50% less men, entered Berlin.Defeated nazi Germany.That is victory. US lost on Normandy, D-day, about 18 thousand men from ridiculous number of german troops. That is also victory. US+allies lost about 52? thousand on Mt. Cassino where germans lost 20 ? thousand. It is also victory. Ardens?
So, people today, when they don’t have job they are desperate and they cannot enjoy sunny day, life. They take pills. When they get job and work whole daylight for some unknown man, owner, they recall freedom they had not knowing then what to do with that freedom. When is war, people dream peace. When is peace, people are angry for some reason and want confrontation/war. People allways need and search for some reference point, otherwise they have problem with life. I think this parade is very good reference point to remind and warn people what to wish. West has lost own reference point. Ukraine lost reference point. Croatia lost reference point. I would not dare to ridicule russians and Great patriotic war. They have NATO on doorstep. That is very serious situation and recalling memories of past centuries. Russians today live in different reality than Conchita Wurst live.
Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 9:26 pm EST/EDT

Sorry, 3¢:

3.

if only because the outcome of this war will decide the future of the planet. The Donbass or the Ukraine are, of course, of exactly zero interest to the West. What is really at stake here is the survival of one of two different models:

I don’t agreee with your (only) two models. The outcome of this war? Well, after this (what you call an) informational war …

If you want to know what is coming up, have a look backwards: the decline of the Roman Empire lasted ~ 3 centuries. The decline of the AngloSaxon Empire (ASE) will last ~ 3 decades (if not a 3-years-collapse). The decline started 2001/09/11.

Thereafter the map of Europe will change back to what it looked like before … the summit of the ASE – may be like in the 1870th, maybe 1815 (e.g. no Belgium, no “Ukraine”, something like former Austria, …), may be 1803 (before Napoleon). Of course, there will be a re-united Ireland, a Republic of Scotland, Republic of Wales and so on. Historical Basque Country along with “Kingdom” of Aragon (including Catalanioa) and so on. (I told you already in another comment, Europe’s strength is not to be united but it’s diversity! I strongly advise to read the documents of the Peace of Westphalia, 1648)

The same will happen in the (Far) East. May be there will be a tremendous (political) earthquake and Japan will be part of China (again). No Taiwan anymore. Corea will be re-united, of course (thanks to Russia). Cashmir will be part of Pakistan, which will be devided into Belutshistan (BTW: who has drawn all these borders into the desert? Right, ASE! All these ASE drawn borders will be revoked.)

Pacific? See Sputnik (no english translation available). And of course (Atlantic) Malvinas will be Malvinas (again).

After the decline of the ASE at least New Mexico, Arizona and Texas will be re-integrated with Mexico, may be even Florida and California. Thus, Canada and rest of the US will be united, Alaska see Sputnik article.

UN, UNO? Will reside in Switzerland and Austria. The French will get back Miss Liberty (from NY) in exchange with two rusty Mistral carriers.

Enjoy!
Endangered Species on May 09, 2015 · at 9:30 pm EST/EDT

Where to begin?
There is nothing to celebrate about either of the Zio manipulated mass genocides of gentiles in WWI or WWII – which was made inevitable by the terms on which WWI was ended. Nobody won these civil wars between white christian european peoples other than the Zios who were manipulating both sides.

The Ukrainian orcs who stupidly serve Zios; Poroshenko, Yats and Kolomoisky in attacking other white christian slavs do not deserve to be called nazis. The real german nazis were racists, operated slave labour camps, waged aggressive warfare, and raped and pillaged the nations which they overran. In this, they were no better or worse than Genghis Kahn, Julius Caesar, Napoleon, or Alexander. But, to give credit where credit is due, homicidal maniacs or not, the German nazi leaders were actual germans and dreamed of a better future for the german people – at least the white christian majority.

Looking at the cultural devastation of the USA and Europe in 2015 (not to mention the death toll from Mao’s communism in China), I see nothing to celebrate about the outcome of WWII. Suppose the axis had won, how much worse could it have been? With the white middle classes of the west now destroyed, the productive capacity of the west gutted, the jobs outsourced to China, and all wealth and institutions firmly in the grip of Zios – this is a good outcome? Non-Hispanic whites are in the minority in American maternity wards – this is a good thing? Faith had been obliterated by Zio pop culture, which has also promoted race mixing for the past 50 years. Seriously, if that is a victory, maybe defeat would have ended up better.
- Poppadop on May 14, 2015 · at 4:48 am EST/EDT
  
  The real german nazis were racists…
  
  Why would White racists declare war on the predominately White US in defense of the Japanese?
  
  The Banking Empire usually exaggerates or fabricates negative information about their opponents. Take Thomas Jefferson, for instance. He was against the bank, as well. After learning this, I was not surprised to learn that widespread claims he fathered illegitimate Black children might not be true.
  
  Looking at the cultural devastation of the USA and Europe in 2015 (not to mention the death toll from Mao’s communism in China), I see nothing to celebrate about the outcome of WWII.
  
  You have a point there; defeating fascism only made the Empire stronger. It’s not much of a victory unless one disregards the banksters [bad idea]. At least Russia and China seem to standing up to them now. This is happening decades after WW2, but hey, it’s something…
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4W85OnL4xtY
Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 9:48 pm EST/EDT

Interesting suggested translation, in the very first paragraph, that “Red Square” [“Krasnaya Ploshchad” in Russian, I think] actually should be rendered “Beautiful Square”. I think the Russian has no other word for “red” than “krasnoye” or like “red star”—“krasnaya zorya”.
My knowledge of Russian is limited, but in the Ukrainian language [that language is around and in everybody’s face, like it or not!] the word “krasne” does mean “wonderful” or “beautiful”, whereas “red” in Ukrainian is rendered “chervone”.—In Ukrainian it would be “chervona zorya” or “chervona zvizda”,—or “Red Square” being “Chervona Ploshcha”.

The “white supremacism [sic]” aspect of the so-called AngloZionist model is really propagandistic,
because what should be stated is “English-speaking global cultural supremacy” which is already pretty much achieved. English being the primary language of science, technology, aviation, medicine, as well as worldwide entertainment, English is the truly international language, without that much objection by anyone. But English should be kept to its own parameters, and should not invade other languages and make other languages “Spanglish” or Ukrenglish” or “Russenglish”
or in the way English penetrates and overwhelms all other forms of tongue and speech.
Penelope on May 09, 2015 · at 10:10 pm EST/EDT

And we mustn’t forget who financed Hitler’s rise to power: no one less than George Bush’s Daddy & friends: http://www.georgewalkerbush.net/bushfamilyfundedhitler.htm

The above article is by Webster Tarpley. Prof Anthony Sutton has written on the topic, too.
Anonymous on May 09, 2015 · at 10:26 pm EST/EDT

“… For the first time ever the West has boycotted the Victory Day Parade in Moscow and, also for the first time ever, Chinese forces have marched on the Beautiful Square (“Red” square is a mistranslation – the “Red Square” ought be called the “Beautiful Square”) with the Russians. …”

Yes, both of these aspects are reasons to rejoice.

In fact, presence of the conniving western “allies” would have been totally incongruous with this solemn occasion. Those same “allies” that were actually preparing to attack Russia till the very day of Hitler’s invasion on 22-VI-1941 (recall: http://www.nofollow.ru/video.php?c=YC7ezpt4SrM ). Who, after a temporary and belated role of convenience during WWII, resumed such plans as soon as this one ended (Plan Totality, Operation Unthinkable, Operation Dropshot, all mentioned by Saker above) – and are right now working actively more than ever on vanquishing Russia.

It was extremely heartwarming and reassuring seeing President of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jinpin sitting in the seat of honor to the very right of President Putin during the parade. Two leaders, one of the most populous and the other of the largest country on the planet, representing the hope of our future.
Yaskaleh on May 09, 2015 · at 10:32 pm EST/EDT

When I read the White supremacism part I almost choked on my coffee. There is barely anything even remotely like white supremacism in the West, it’s a multi-cultural destructive society. I do not consider Russia as a multi-culture because your leaders aren’t actively working to eradicate all unique cultures and peoples like TPTB does in the west.

I think the main problem is in how you define “multi-culturalism”.
In the west multi-culturalism means the end of native cultures and peoples, to create a “one nation, one people” society that’s easier to control. It is quite similar to national socialism yet the opposite.
- alan on May 09, 2015 · at 11:11 pm EST/EDT
  
  It’s not really White Supremacism but US Exceptionalism.
  As I commented earlier:
  Meaning of “Exceptional” : special, outstanding, superior.
  This ridiculous concept is widely accepted by US leaders and perhaps many US citizens. If you think you are “superior”, then it must follow that others are “inferior” when compared to you; then you are basically following the footsteps of Hitler, this needs no more explanation!
  - Yaskaleh on May 10, 2015 · at 10:52 pm EST/EDT
    
    I agree with you. Instead of the “White supremacism vs multi-culturalism”, which doesn’t have anything to do with reality, I would instead propose this:
    US Exceptionalism versus Multi-polar world.
    The primitve jingoism of the Banderites are just a tool, an easy tool to sacrifice for the goals if US Exceptionalism. Jingoism is based upon hatred and superiority complex. It share the same type of relationship to nationalism as rape has with sex.
    The native peoples and cultures all over the world wants to live and exist according to their own will. A Multi-polar world allows for people to decide their own fates.
    Live and let live, it’s a rule I live by. It is why I firmly support Novorussia against Kiev. Kiev does not believe in such, to them there is only subjugation or death. The only way we can move forwards is if we can learn to respect each others and work together for mutual benefits.
Penelope on May 09, 2015 · at 10:35 pm EST/EDT

Thank you, Saker. I loved your two articles today.

For the most light-hearted, least martial parade w plenty of smiles, see the Tyumen parade. On RT’s mixture it starts at 1:10 w floats depicting wartime activities, then has motley horses beginning at 1:20 w a dancing white horse. There is even a tableau vivante with a couple who have been spray-painted bronze to resemble statues about 1:30 or a little later.

It must be a small town & they’ve used imagination where they didn’t have things like tanks– they’ve even made a combination tank/biplane from cardboard. This is the people’s parade. While the troops march there are even a couple little kids holding Dad’s hand.
Richard Cley on May 09, 2015 · at 11:09 pm EST/EDT

Much as I admire your writing and your website it is clear you do not understand the modus operandi of the Neo Conservative Zionist west.

The intention is for the Jews to run the New World Order, not the whites.

The enforced immigration to the west is to exterminate the white Christians of western Europe and replace them with a brown Islamic state run by Jews.

Please study Richard Coudenhove Kalergi’s plan for Pan Europa adopted by Wilson at Versailles through Col House.

Right from the very start of Zionism it was the Jew’s intention to destroy the west through war, guilt and cross breeding with Arabs and Blacks.

By the way the House of Windsor (the British Royal family) are all Jews and Zionists. Their men folk are all circumsized by the Chief Rabbi thus for you to say AngloZionists is a bit like calling a Coala a Coala bear (bear bear since Coala is Aboriginal for bear). The British Royal family are all Jews and Zionists.

And just incase you did not know the ruling bank of the Western Zionist monster is the Bank of England. It has just two shareholders: the Rothschild family and the House of Windsor.

But you are not supposed to know this…no one is. And you are not supposed to know the following: Hitler took control of a broken 15 year old Weimar Republic with no oil and no money and turned it in to a world power in just six years.

Either Hitler was a magician or Mr Warburg of the US Federal Reserve acting on behalf of his boss Mr Rothschild funded the rebuilding of Germany. Magician or recipient of Mr Warburg’s largesse? I know which choice you will make.

All wars are Mr Rothschild’s wars and the Queen of the House of Windsor shares his profits. Royalty has always been the Rothschild’s weakness: hob knobbing with Royals.

PS Multiculturalism is favoured by Marxists. It is the living hell of today in London where 70% of London’s ethnic population has been eradicated in favour of African and Islamic ***********. Ethnic cleansing of indigenous Londoners is the order of the day (multiculturalism).

Putin stands for homogenous nationalism not multiculturalism Saker…or perhaps your knowledge of English is not good enough to understand the full horror of ethnic cleansing by the forced imposition of multiculturalism?
- blue on May 10, 2015 · at 1:17 am EST/EDT
  
  Begging your pardon, but if you think the zionists want anything positive for the Jews then you don’t understand zionism, which is destroying the Jews. Zionists are fascist nationalists — nation optional, although convenient at the moment. It’s like you don’t need Germany to be a Nazi (about the same thing as a zionist). This is about sociopaths.
- Poppadop on May 10, 2015 · at 3:35 am EST/EDT
  
  The enforced immigration to the west is to exterminate the white Christians of western Europe and replace them with a brown Islamic state run by Jews.
  
  You mean the same Islam that condemns the Zio-banksters’ usury in arguably stronger terms than Christianity?
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riba#Scripture_on_Riba
  
  The forced immigration is simply a way to keep the serfs at each others’ throats while the cultural milieu is molded to the Empire’s liking. As the saying goes: It’s nothing personal – it’s just business.
  
  “We must keep the people busy with political antagonisms… By dividing the electorate this way, we’ll be able to have them spend their energies at struggling amongst themselves on questions that, for us, have no importance whatsoever.”
  ~ U.S. Bankers magazine, 1892
  
  Magician or recipient of Mr Warburg’s largesse? I know which choice you will make.
  
  That’s the banksters’ false dichotomy of money creation. There is a third choice: Have the government create the money debt-free without the Banking Empire’s permission or, as Hitler put it, “the thralldom of interest.” I should not need to explain what the Empire does to people that pick this choice.
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfEBupAeo4
- Rootman on May 10, 2015 · at 5:58 am EST/EDT
  
  Really don´t like the racist conspiracy undertones of your post, The biggest contribution to multiculturism in Europe are modern means of transportation and a colonial past. Plus short term interest for cheap labor. At the time of the massive migration of Turkish and north African guest workers, we still had an iron curtain. Otherwise, our multi- etnic element would mainly consist of Poles, Rumanians, Ukrainians etc.
  
  In all empires, even the Roman, Greek, Mongol, Ottoman etc. mass migration has always occurred. With modern technology and large world population it is just slightly upscaled.This phenomenon is not special at all. Some ethnical and cultural mixing is very healthy, and of all times.
Gina on May 09, 2015 · at 11:52 pm EST/EDT

I love his look of self-confident defiance which, to me, symbolizes the real “ultimate weapon” of the Russian people: an unbreakable willpower, even in the face of defeat or death.

The peoples of the US & the EU have lost this completely because of the fear- & warmongering by the mighty ones. We are now in the following situation:

15. Our power in the present tottering condition of all forms of power will be more invincible than any other, because it will remain invisible until the moment when it has gained such strength that NO cunning can any longer undermine it. (p.11)

Here’s an insightful article about the text containing the above quote :
The Protocols – a Neocon Manifesto
Gina on May 09, 2015 · at 11:59 pm EST/EDT

Putin Holds his Father’s Picture: The Immortal’s March (photos + video)
craig on May 10, 2015 · at 5:48 am EST/EDT

It seems a lot of posters are bothered by the term `white supremacism’ as a western ideal, when in fact, they say, the west lets in a wide variety of ethnicities into their countries to the point that the white ethnic majority will soon become the minority. The point Saker is making is ‘white supremacy’ as an ideal amongst all the ethnicities within a nation corresponds with `one western hegemon’ as an ideal among all the nations of the world. Its not about numbers; according to this ideal: most nations are not western, but are subservient to the west just as most people living in the west may not be white but are subservient within the white social framework.
Rootman on May 10, 2015 · at 6:18 am EST/EDT

Racist!

[At some point people will rise up and begin cleaning, and those who illegally and uninvited came here are going to be left with 2 choices (or perhaps only one): leave or be killed.]

This statement is as close to inciting violence as still being legal, and could be coming out of the filthy mouth of a pravy sector thug.

What is totally missing from your rant is that 2nd and later generations of migrants are just as European as you, since they are born here. One of them might become your granddaughter/-son in law, you will become very proud of your great-grandkids, and be happy they ´breed like rodents´.

You are being played: native workers against migrant workers. Played by big corp: divide and conquer, both into servitude.
WizOz on May 10, 2015 · at 7:31 am EST/EDT

The boycott of the Victory Parade by the “West” is the open admission that it was always at war with Russia, a war that it still hopes to win despite all the setbacks.
old_bill on May 10, 2015 · at 7:37 am EST/EDT

Enjoyed that analysis.

Yes it did get a little carried away toward the end, but the world model comparison started well.

Also identifying yesterday as a point of inflection was insightful.
Anonymous on May 10, 2015 · at 7:55 am EST/EDT

Excellent summary, overview and comparative framework!

You have outdone yourself, Saker.

I’ll donate on this piece alone.

1. “It is also a fact that the Anglos have always shared these feelings…” — indeed, and in fact the British ‘German’ Monarchy (now renamed ‘Windsor’) were falling over themselves to align with fascist Germany — e.g., Edward VIII (Edward Albert Christian George Andrew Patrick David). As for the US — just consider Prescott Bush and Hitler (not to mention bootlegging alcohol during the prohibition).

The Buddhists have a saying “Turtles all the way down” — well might we say, in respect to this tardy British (& European) Empire: “Criminals all the way up!”

2. India, Egypt and others were also represented — the vast proportion of humanity alive today. Just because the G7 club snubbed the event does not mean any great significance — basically a sign of fear of the Hegemony (‘du jour’) — the French cannot even sell/deliver 2 useless boats unless ‘King’ Obama gives the green light.

3. As for Frau Merkel skulking into Moscow the day after — how very fitting! I think the German and Japanese heads should be required to crawl in through the back door a day late for the next 100 years to atone for their nations’ 20th century infamy.

4. Surely if Putin, Xi and others (BRICS etc) can keep a steady hand on the tiller then this festering house of cards known as the US Hollywood ’empire’ will implode. There are recent political shocks in Alberta (home of Harper); the UK is a complete mess with the Scots going National and the English hunkering down with the Tories around the financial cesspool casino known as London (the only economic thing they have left); and a ‘Brexit’ is looking very possible.

5. Once Iran is locked into into the SCO and BRIICS then we’ll see some change of pace (of change), imo.

6. Of course, one of the biggest psychological blocks to this natural change process was pointed out during the recent CrossTalk (“Remembering victory”) — i.e., that the US/West thinks they won the Cold War against the USSR (& perhaps even China) and therefore consider Russia to be a defeated nation similar to Germany and Japan after WW2. They have no right to self-determination etc. Therefore, in part, the present struggle with Russia can be seen as the forerunner of a new emergent national Germany and Japan from under the control of the US post WW2. This is why it is a leading edge geopolitical issue. The US is not just fighting Russia (as the ex-USSR) but also (in their own minds) a possible break out of Germany and Japan into independent identity and geopolitical policy. And this all started with the shifts in Latin America towards independent economic and indigenous development (e.g., post-Chavez Venezuela as one example where the pressure is still overt).

In addition, interesting comment on RT’s CrossTalk by Dmitry Babich (just before 1/2 time — cue in around 11:00 – 12:34) on the similarities between Ukraine and Spanish civil war (1936-39) — basically a clash between ideologies. This seems perceptive in respect to developments in the Ukraine. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyKQ4XDUoz4

7. In respect to understanding the dynamics of economic wars and “men of affairs” — I suggest reviewing this little book from 1911 which predicted the WW1 three years later. Especially pages 5-10 in the following link which covers such themes as “The Servile Press” (p.7) and “The Commercial Wars” (pp. 9-10) in respect to infrastructure control — “But their railroads, their loans, their import duties are all the booty of the victors”. This is the rub at the moment — it’s not about nationalism per se. ‘THEY’ cannot get their hands on the new emerging infrastructure (railroads, loans, import duties and booty) being implemented under BRICS and spearheaded by Russia and China! ‘THEY’ have sold the rope to hang themselves with (from Wall St garrets) … and THEY know it (and when their domestic populations wake up and realize, then it is really going to get messy at home).
Ref: https://archive.org/stream/prophecyfulfille00dela#page/n0/mode/2up
(click on the pages to progress thru the book).
Andre beriault on May 10, 2015 · at 8:05 am EST/EDT

Bravo Saker… Well said
mjm on May 10, 2015 · at 9:40 am EST/EDT

Just finished watching the parade. Wonderful.
One of the things I liked best was the song of the band at the very end. Does anyone know what song it was?
Michael
Uncle Bob 1 on May 10, 2015 · at 1:26 pm EST/EDT

This posting was about the Victory Day events.And it degenerated into a “food-fight” on immigrants and racism,or not racism.I don’t know if it is deliberate,or accidental.But its ridiculous either way.
Christoph on May 10, 2015 · at 3:04 pm EST/EDT

Had the Russian and German emperors struck a peace deal in 1917 the men could have been best friends.

Korolkov has character.
The Germans appear tired and upset.
Does anyone know what happened before his execution?
mikael on May 10, 2015 · at 3:05 pm EST/EDT

He knew is was dead, probably survived with an hears with countless of time, and then to be hawled infront of an firings squad, I belived he knew is would die anyway, sheer desteny have broght him where his life was to end and he knew it, thats what I see.

And to the never ending squicing about white supremacy, an PC narrative invented by the Tribe and howled as something of high importance and if not wanted, regade as a sin.
I dont belive their babbeling, anyway, not for a second, this “multiculturalism” is nothing but the side effects of imperialism, and the victims of it.
Anything else is divertion, as multiculturalism is, to hide the inflow of poor people, with litle or no laws by their side, used to undermine european workers and their inherent and hard erned right.
It happend land after land, and we are blamed for been lazy, when imigrants take all the jobbs.

The rightwinged freak gov. of Norway havent stopped the flow of “refugies” at all, and this influx will simply rise, and makes housing as one ex. more and more expencie and the state covers everything they point on, of frea of been labeled as “racists” by the PCs.
This is an intended policy, and the naivitee and the moronic narrative of invasion is the effect of western wars.
Western interventions in to Africa, corporate takeovers, BokoHarams everywhere, and Americans have the solution, more weponds and more wars, creating the enemy They need.
The game is stone age old.
I am fullblown white, but is dark, and the difference is that I am Black/reddish, not with a shade of blue.

I will never lower my self to blame the victims of pure impreialism, because thats the cowards way, to blame the victim, instead of whom is making all this refugies, the insane UssA and Israel.
I dont fear Islam, at all, no more than Christians, orthodox or not, nor a thrue Jew like the Etiopians.
What I do fear is people rotten anouf to refuse to acknowledge the f… facts.

So a litle link. to what I am talking about and have hinted about it before, The Frankfurt School, from the Bolshewiks Intelligencias persptions of what we are supousedly wurthy to be.
This is whats happening this days in the western MSM.
http://www.schillerinstitute.org/fid_91-96/921_frankfurt.html

peace
Christoph on May 10, 2015 · at 3:09 pm EST/EDT

Caption contest entry for the WWII Deaths chart:

“Mission Accomplished” – Averell Harriman, Prescott Bush, Clarence Dillon, John Pierpont Morgan, William Saunders (financial backers of the Bolshevik and Nazi coups).
Rootman on May 10, 2015 · at 4:48 pm EST/EDT

I was very impressed by the parade, the singing of the anthem, the high spirit of the soldiers, radiating from their faces.

But this thread seems to be hacked by fascistoïd racists…
Bente Petersen on May 10, 2015 · at 5:32 pm EST/EDT

Larchmonter445 “Vineyard of the Saker White Paper: the China-Russia Double Helix“
Just read it…. great evaluation of what going on… Yes Russia and China are brilliant,
in every way.
The Saker on May 10, 2015 · at 7:40 pm EST/EDT

Muslims and Negroids obviously think they can barge in someone elses’ home whenever they want, and obviously expect to be welcomed and accepted after that

This is a racist comments the mods should not have allowed. I am zapping it.

The Saker
дулебг on May 10, 2015 · at 10:21 pm EST/EDT

How can it be shown in graph – that Yugoslavia has had les than half a million deaths, when UN-Commision confirms there was 1,7 million? And 90% of them were Serbs.
- Kat Kan on May 11, 2015 · at 12:04 am EST/EDT
  
  Good question. That is too low isn’t it?
  
  Odd thing is, the chart is from Wikipedia, and this is their own notes on the sources:
  
  The official Yugoslav figure for total war dead is 1.7 million (300,000 military and 1,400,000 civilians). This figure is cited in reference works dealing with World War II[467][468][469] However, the official Yugoslav figure has been disputed by academic studies that put actual losses at about 1.0 million persons.[470][471][472][473]
  The U.S. Bureau of the Census published a report in 1954 that concluded that Yugoslav war-related deaths were 1,067,000. The U.S. Bureau of the Census noted that the official Yugoslav government figure of 1.7 million war dead was overstated because it “was released soon after the war and was estimated without the benefit of a postwar census”.[471] A recent study by Vladimir Žerjavić estimates total war related deaths at 1,027,000 which included military losses of 237,000 Yugoslav partisans, Chetniks, and 209,000 Ustaše. Civilian dead of 581,000, including 57,000 Jews. Losses of the Yugoslav Republics were: Bosnia 316,000; Serbia 273,000; Croatia 271,000; Slovenia 33,000; Montenegro 27,000; Macedonia 17,000; and killed abroad 80,000.[472]
  
  Bogoljub Kočović a Yugoslav statistician,calculated that the actual war losses were 1,014,000.[473] The late Jozo Tomasevich, Professor Emeritus of Economics at San Francisco State University, believes that the calculations of Kočović and Žerjavić “seem to be free of bias, we can accept them as reliable”.[474]
  
  It is possible the more recent counts that I have bolded are closer to reality than the original 1.7 million estimate.
  
  If they have taken these numbers for their chart, then it is correct.
  
  The chart is very deceptive as each division on it is TWO million; the Yugoslavia line comes to a bit over halfway in one division, so that is okay for the revised numbers.
  
  On the Wikipedia page you can click the small code numbers beside each country name, to get to section that explains where they got the numbers from. Or just scroll down to “footnotes” (just above the source links section) to see all the countries. It is quite interesting to see what an inexact “science” this is.
Joilson on May 11, 2015 · at 3:38 am EST/EDT

Western leaders in mass demonstrations

http://21stcenturywire.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/JE-SUIS-CHARLIE-PARIS-RALLY.jpg

Putin headed the procession “Immortal Regiment” in Moscow

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71UROJ8NzQU
gaga on May 11, 2015 · at 11:12 am EST/EDT

dear mr saker

I dont know who you guys are working for

but guessing after your posts i would say for the same satanists as almost everybody

how many dead Germans in WWIII

at least 10 Million germans werde murdered after the war..an honest person told me

at least 3,5 millions murdered by the polish
at least 400000 by the czechs
at least 2 million died in russian prisoncamps
1 milliion were killed in the rheinwiesenlager by the good guys from the US
over 1 million kiled in raids by the royal n d US airforce on german civilians hambur dresden

and how many soldiers from germany died in WWII

and you only mentin china russia and teh poor polish
do your reseach write the truth that war was forced on Germany
by albion… with poland as the big assistant

your BS we already get from so called german politicians

help god
- Sometimes the truth escapes censorship on May 11, 2015 · at 4:48 pm EST/EDT
  
  ‘Other Losses’ – by James Bacque
  
  .An Invesatigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the hands of the French and Americans After World War II, (Little, Brown and Company Ltd., c/o Fenn Publishing Company, Ontario, Canada. 1989, 1999, 2004)
  
  The Morganthau plan……
  
  Freda Utley – ‘The High cost of vengeance’ published 1949.
  
  Some of us know.
- T on May 11, 2015 · at 7:12 pm EST/EDT
  
  In the interests of full disclosure I am non European Muslim.
  
  Yes more German people suffered deprivation and dishonor and death after the war than during the war. I am also one of those who has read about this oppression during “peace”.
  
  You should read Hellstorm by Goodrich and watch the documentary by the same name.
  
  Yes N.S Germany was forced into war however they also did things that helped the Zionist movement, willingly or unwillingly. If only they knew eschatology!
  It seems to me that Ukraine is playing the role of Poland. I pray Putin has learned from history.
  
  And God knows best.
Marlene on May 11, 2015 · at 4:50 pm EST/EDT

Dear Saker, I enjoy all your essays, but this one is outstanding… maybe because it lies so close to your heart, maybe because you spelled it out with such clarity, whatever it is, you brought to these writings, these words cannot leave any decent human being untouched. Reading it, brought spontaneous and very charged emotions– It is so unbelievable that these Anglo leaders viewed the terrible tragedy and destruction wreaked by WW2 with such stone hearted detachment, simply a strategy to achieve their ungodly world domination agenda they had from the beginning, especially as with Russia overrun, they’d have all her rich resources and the rest of the planet would be a breeze — or so they thought! I had always wondered why the US joined the war so late? What shocked me the most though, is how they’d planned Russia’s demise all along! — This brave and indomitable country which for all intents and purposes, won the war for the Allies and at such terrible cost! Back stabbers to this day, same organization, different faces! I agree with you, these evil ones should never be invited to Victory Day — and others that follow them after they are locked up, should show first that they deserve to be true partners of Russia and China, before such a great honour is conferred on them. Long live Putin and the Russian people — May God be ever with them. I too, salute you dear Saker.
ZZZ on May 11, 2015 · at 5:17 pm EST/EDT

Superb article.I enjoyed each line.God bless the Saker.
Aziz from Tunis.
henry on May 11, 2015 · at 11:57 pm EST/EDT

please put me on the sakers email list
gordon on May 12, 2015 · at 1:14 am EST/EDT

An excellent summary of events.
Michael on May 12, 2015 · at 2:11 am EST/EDT

What a BS. This writer has never been to Russia and does not understand its culture at all. Comparison of Anglozionist world and Russian is just laughable….
BT on May 12, 2015 · at 3:16 am EST/EDT

Beautiful parade. I loved it. One has to be a psychopath not to get goosebumps, especially when the band walks up to the dais sings. I dont know Russian, but i got goosebumps just feeling the energy and emotions and watching those eager faces.

One thing i could not help but notice though. Pretty much all the commanders of the Platoons that marched through were fat, pot bellied and out of shape. I am not sure how war ready they are. The younger soldiers were of course in great shape and looked eager (in spite of many days and hours of drilling for this parade).
One can see this especially at the end of the parade, when Putin goes and shakes hands with the platoon commanders. Almost every one – except may be the Indian platoon commander (commanded by a Captain, so young officer) and the Chinese platoon commander, were quite out of shape. Putin even placed his hands on one of the officer’s ginormous belly as he spoke to him at length. I am not sure what he said!