Iran joined militias in battle for Basra
Sarah Baxter and Marie Colvin, Times Online
IRANIAN forces were involved in the recent battle for Basra, General David Petraeus, the US commander in Iraq, is expected to tell Congress this week.
Military and intelligence sources believe Iranians were operating at a tactical command level with the Shi’ite militias fighting Iraqi security forces; some were directing operations on the ground, they think.
Petraeus intends to use the evidence of Iranian involvement to argue against any reductions in US forces.
Dr Daniel Goure, a defence analyst at the Lexington Institute in Virginia, said: “There is no question that Petraeus will be tough on Iran. It is one thing to withdraw troops when there is purely sectarian fighting but it is another thing if it leaves the Iranians to move in.”
US defence chiefs are concerned that the troop surge has overstretched the military. Admiral Mike McMullen, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, warned that the army and marines were at risk of crossing an “invisible red line” if the burden on forces remained. He said deployments of 15 months had to be reduced to a year “as fast as possible”.
Petraeus is likely to announce that combat tours will be reduced from 15 months to 12 months.
The number of US troops in Iraq is set to fall from 160,000 to 140,000 by July, but Petraeus is expected to recommend an indefinite pause in further troop cuts.
Moqtada al-Sadr, the radical Shi’ite cleric, has called for 1m people to march on Baghdad on Wednesday – the fifth anniversary of the fall of the capital – when Petraeus and Ryan Crocker, the US ambassador to Iraq, will be briefing Congress.
A senior Iraqi official who met Petraeus last week said, “It will be difficult to show that the situation is improving.” Another Iraqi source described the US general as “furious” that al-Maliki moved against the militias into Basra without consultation and had to rely on US forces to bail him out.
Abu Ahmed, a senior military commander with the Awakening, the Sunni tribal movement cooperating with US forces, said progress was largely the result of al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army ceasefire.
“When the Mahdi Army decides to resume its activities, neither the American troops nor the Iraqi government will be able to stop it,” he said.
Additional reporting: Hala Jaber
——-
British fear US commander is beating the drum for Iran strikes
By Damien McElroy, Foreign Affairs Correspondent, The Telegraph
British officials gave warning yesterday that America’s commander in Iraq will declare that Iran is waging war against the US-backed Baghdad government.
A strong statement from General David Petraeus about Iran’s intervention in Iraq could set the stage for a US attack on Iranian military facilities, according to a Whitehall assessment. In closely watched testimony in Washington next week, Gen Petraeus will state that the Iranian threat has risen as Tehran has supplied and directed attacks by militia fighters against the Iraqi state and its US allies.
The outbreak of Iraq’s worst violence in 18 months last week with fighting in Basra and the daily bombardment of the Green Zone diplomatic enclave, demonstrated that although the Sunni Muslim insurgency is dramatically diminished, Shia forces remain in a strong position to destabilise the country.
“Petraeus is going to go very hard on Iran as the source of attacks on the American effort in Iraq,” a British official said. “Iran is waging a war in Iraq. The idea that America can’t fight a war on two fronts is wrong, there can be airstrikes and other moves,” he said.
“Petraeus has put emphasis on America having to fight the battle on behalf of Iraq. In his report he can frame it in terms of our soldiers killed and diplomats dead in attacks on the Green Zone.”
Tension between Washington and Tehran is already high over Iran’s covert nuclear programme. The Bush administration has not ruled out military strikes.
In remarks interpreted as signalling a change in his approach to Iran, Gen Petraeus last week hit out at the Iranian leadership. “The rockets that were launched at the Green Zone were Iranian-provided, Iranian-made rockets,” he said. “All of this in complete violation of promises made by President Ahmadinejad and the other most senior Iranian leaders to their Iraqi counterparts.”
advertisement
The humiliation of the Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki by the Iranian-backed cleric Moqtada al-Sadr in fighting in Basra last week triggered top-level warnings over Iran’s strength in Iraq.
Gen Petraeus and Ryan Crocker, the US ambassador to Baghdad, will answer questions from American political leaders at the US Congress on Tuesday and Wednesday before travelling to London to brief Gordon Brown.
The Wall Street Journal said last week that the US war effort in Iraq must have a double goal.
“The US must recognise that Iran is engaged in a full-up proxy war against it in Iraq,” wrote the military analyst Kimberly Kagan.
There are signs that targeting Iran would unite American politicians across the bitter divide on Iraq. “Iran is the bull in the china shop,” said Ike Skelton, the Democrat chairman of the Armed Services Committee. “In all of this, they seem to have links to all of the Shi’ite groups, whether they be political or military.”
——-
Al-Sadr militia prep for U.S., Iraqi fighting
By Sharon Behn, Washington Times
Militiamen loyal to anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr are positioning explosives to defend the major routes into Baghdad’s Sadr City neighborhood in anticipation of a major battle with U.S. and Iraqi government forces, residents said yesterday.
Iraqis also said families in Sadr City and other Shi’ite areas of Baghdad are stocking up on food, fearing new fighting that will leave them unable to get to the markets.
While food prices in most of Baghdad are stable, they have increased in Sadr City and surrounding neighborhoods as people brace for a resumption of fighting that rocked the neighborhood late last month, said Sajad, an Iraqi translator who spoke with several residents in the Shi’ite stronghold on behalf of The Washington Times.
Tomatoes that were 30 cents to 40 cents a kilogram (2.2 pounds) are now $2.50 a kilo, and the price of eggs and cheese have gone up three to five times their normal price, said Sajad.
In a southwest neighborhood of Baghdad, where Shi’ite militiamen have recently been pushed out, neighbors warned Ahmed, the father of three young children in the area, that there could be another rebel Shi’ite uprising as soon as tomorrow — two days before Gen. David H. Petreaus and U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker are to report to Congress on progress in the U.S. troop surge.
The warning, Ahmed said, appeared to come from Sadr City, so it would only affect Baghdad. Orders to Shi’ite militia across the country normally are issued from Najaf, a holy city in southern Iraq where Sheik al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army is headquartered.
In Washington, U.S. intelligence officials said they had no way of confirming Mahdi Army preparations for the Sadr City battle, but added that it is “entirely possible.”
One official said the Mahdi Army is likely to try to reignite violence. “It’s obviously a fluid situation.”
In the U.S.-protected International Zone in central Baghdad, private contractors were “hardening” their rooms to avoid getting killed or injured in the event of another rocket and mortar barrage, similar to the one that followed the government push against Sheik al-Sadr’s militia last week in southern Iraq.
“I’ve moved my desk so that I won’t be in the line of shrapnel,” said Jack, a 32-year-old American working for a U.S. company who has spent 16 months in Iraq.
“I’m wearing my Kevlar a lot,” he added, referring to his body armor. Jack, like others quoted in this story, asked that family names not be used.
The unease in Baghdad comes amid calls by Sheik al-Sadr for a massive anti-American rally Wednesday to mark the fifth anniversary of the fall of Baghdad.
“The time has come to express your rejections and raise your voices loud against the unjust occupier and enemy of nations and humanity, and against the horrible massacres committed by the occupier against our honorable people,” said a statement released by Sheik-al Sadr’s office.
The statement called on all Iraqis to head toward Najaf, the site of large Shi’ite pilgrimages.
Shi’ite areas have been told to close their stores to commemorate the day, said Ahmed. The last time stores were ordered closed was when the battles between Iraqi troops and Shi’ite militias erupted last week in the southern city of Basra.
“All Shi’ite neighbors, they tell me — maybe Sunday — we have second attacks … they will come back and attack the government,” said Ahmed.
It was not possible to confirm the threats, but the reports were fueling unease in the capital, which only recently had begun to feel a modicum of security after months of concentrated military operations by U.S. and Iraqi forces.
On Thursday, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki — a Shi’ite once allied with Sheikh al-Sadr — had warned the crackdown against the Shi’ite militias would continue despite the truce ordered by the anti-American cleric.
Yesterday, however, Mr. al-Maliki backed off the threat, saying the arrests of Shi’ite suspects would be suspended.
But Sadr City residents are nervous, said Ahmed, and the militias are preparing for another showdown with U.S. and coalition forces.
“When they see American convoys, they quickly put IEDs in the street and everywhere they will attack Americans,” he said, referring to bombs planted in roads.
Hassan, a Shi’ite doctor who lives in a different neighborhood and does not support the Mahdi Army militia, said he also expects the fighting to flare up again and that the streets of Sadr City are booby-trapped.
“This is the quiet before the storm,” he said. “But I am sure that if anyone, government or coalition attack Sadr City it will be a big loss, because all the roads of Sadr City are filled with explosives.”
Iraqi reactions to the fighting in Basra and Baghdad varied. Some praised the prime minister for taking on the Mahdi militia, others said Muqtada’s ability to turn the violence on and off only strengthened his hand, and that of his backer, Iran.
While Iraqi government forces struck hard, they ended up by having to call on U.S. air support after being overwhelmed by the Shi’ite militia response.
Hundreds of police — many of whom were Sheik al-Sadr supporters — reportedly laid down their weapons and joined the militia in both Basra and Sadr City.
“In some areas around Sadr City, the militia are part of the police,” said Ahmed.
In other areas, police responded differently he said. Some “left their post to return to their unit, some continued to attack militia.”
• Sara A. Carter contributed to this article.
Many of the best quality ISF units have redeployed from Baghdad to Ninevah (half of 2nd IAD, much of 3rd IAD, 37th Wheeled Mechanized Armored Cavalry Brigade {9th IAD}, part of 35th T 72 Tank Brigade {9th IAD}, Basrah (INP ERU, 36th T55 Tank Brigade {9th IAD}, or Northern Babil (25th Brigade{6th IAD.}). Much of the INP have also redeployed from Baghdad to around Iraq.
As a result, the ISF will have to conduct operations in Baghdad in an economy of force manner, including with respect to Sadr City/Thawra. They will be partnered with MND-B.
3rd Brigade, 1st IAD, from Diyala has also redeployed to Basrah.
In Basrah, the IA has more than enough forces do what it needs to do (it is augmented by the INP national ERU, plus Babil SWAT and Karbala’s QRF.) As a result, there is unlikely to be substantial sustained violence in Basrah.
Violence to the degree it happens will be by Iranian backed groups in Baghdad and Diyala. I hope that core JAM does not involve itself in the violence.
The main sunni arab and Kurdish political parties are pushing for aggressive operations against JAM. I am surprised by the extent to which the UIA leaders are supporting this operation. Dawa has significant tension with ISCI/Badr (including on regional autonomy), Fadheela Sadrists and others. Yet for the moment, Dawa is taking a very hard line. It is one thing to support operations against rogue JAM, organized crime, and Iranian backed special groups. Muqtada publicly supports ISF attacks against these forces. Yet to my surprise, PM Maliki is insisting that core JAM not only be frozen, but disarmed, and before the provincial elections. The Iraqi parliament is about to pass legislation by an overwhelming majority with this purpose. Muqtada seems to be saying that he will disarm JAM if the Najaf Marja and top Quom clerics ask him to. Could Muqtada believe that the ISF is strong enough to defend Iraqi Shias? Many IA soldiers are politically Muqtada supporters—including a lot of very high quality soldiers who get along very well with their MNF-I colleagues. Most of them stayed loyal to the IA in the recent tiff with Shia militias. Perhaps Muqtada trusts the IA sufficiently, or regards the IA as too popular among the Shia masses to confront.
PM Maliki is taking a big political risk. The sunni arab and Kurdish leaders are supporting him against JAM (which is reviled by non-Shia Iraqis.) But they still don’t like or trust PM Maliki, who they continue to see as Shia sectarian. ISCI/Badr are also supporting Dawa for now; but how long will this support last? Fadheela Sadrists don’t like Muqtada, that is why they partitioned the Sadrist movement. But why will they support Dawa on other matters? There is a reason Dawa has chosen to ally with Muqtada. How will Maliki’s actions influence Dawa’s electoral prospects on 10.1.08?
The ideal outcome is for Muqtada to voluntarily disarm JAM and fully lever his fate to the Iraqi political process. That way, even if he wins Iraqi elections, he will have to govern responsibly and legally to be able to win reelection.
Vineyard, if you have little curiosity about the ISF. Why? Why don’t you ask any questions you might have regarding the ISF in the comments here: http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2008/04/iraqi_security_force_12.php
Most of the IA performed well in the last few weeks. Most of Muqtada’s supporters remained loyal to the IA.
To the degree there were problems, they were with the 52nd Brigade (that completed its training on February 18, 2008), and possibly the 51st Brigade (former IA 5-10, former SIB from FPS before that, the Brits botched up rushed and inadequate training for the unit . . . it has had major criminal, and political problems from the start. To be clear there is no independent confirmation that 51st Brigade performed poorly.)
I haven’t seen any reporting on any problems with the IA excluding these two units.
The people who write the ISF OOB are friends of mine. They know their stuff. The IA has more sprit de cour than you give them credit for. Most of the units are pretty ethnically diverse. You have argued that the sons of Al Anbar, former ISCI, Kurds, Dawa, Sadrists and other soldiers in the IA are not really loyal to the IA as an institution or the Iraqi State. Yet, when have the sons of Al Anbar failed to follow their orders. Or Kurdish soldiers for that matter. Or the many Ninevah sunni arabs in the IA (many of whom fought in Al Anbar in 2005 and 2006?
You cannot claim that the soldiers of the IA are disloyal without providing evidence of actual recent disloyalty. (Note that I do not mention the IP.)
It is important to study what is happening, regardless of where that study leads.
I noticed on Tony Sayegh’s site that current cabinet minister and former Israeli DM said Israel woud destroy Iran in retaliation for any attack on Israel.
Putting it all together, perhaps Israel expects an American attack on Iran and is warning Iran not to retaliate against Israel.
I hope I’m wrong.