Results from the new Russian-Chinese strategic partnership are coming in fast.
First, Russia has agreed to sell China 4 advanced diesel-electric submarines of the “Lada” class (aka Project 677):
Project 677 |
This type of submarine is one of the most advanced in its class, even superior to its formidable predecessor the “Kilo” class Project 636 which was already so silent that it was nicknamed the “Black Hole” because for its ability to avoid detection. Lada class submarines excel in many roles including anti-submarine and anti-surface warfare and reconnaissance, and it has an advanced automated combat system.
Second, Russia will also sell China 24 of its advanced SU-35 multi-role combat aircraft:
SU-35 |
The Sukhoi SU-35 is considered a 4++ generation aircraft meaning that while the airframe is still of the 4th generation, the systems installed on-board are already of the 5th generation. Though these are very different aircraft, it is widely admitted that the only aircraft which could match or even exceed the formidable capabilities of the SU-35 in air-to-air combat would be the American F-22 (in the ground attack role the SU-35 is far more capable than the F-22).
In other words, China is now acquiring the kind of military hardware which no other Asian country possesses and which will present the United States with a very serious challenge.
Third, Russia and China also signed a huge energy deal. The WSJ reports:
After more than a decade of talks, Russia has agreed to supply China with natural gas, a deal that could see China surpass Germany as the largest importer of Russian gas. Officials Friday signed a raft of other energy agreements, including one to double Russian oil supplies and hand China’s state oil company a stake in Russian oil fields, tightening the nexus between Russia, the world’s largest energy producer, and China, the hungriest consumer. Chinese President Xi Jinping, in Moscow on his first foreign trip as leader, called the accords a “breakthrough” at a signing ceremony in the Kremlin Friday. Russian President Vladimir Putin said the visit would have “long-term, historic results.” Russian state gas giant OAO Gazprom said it would conclude a 30-year supply deal with the Chinese by the end of the year, just as the company is struggling with declining demand and regulatory pressure in its core market of Europe. Under the terms of the memorandum, annual deliveries of 38 billion cubic meters of gas will start in 2018. Supplies could eventually reach 60 billion cubic meters a year, Gazprom Chief Executive Alexei Miller told reporters after the signing ceremony. Germany, long the largest consumer of Russian gas, imported 33 billion cubic meters last year.
One particularly interesting aspect of all this are the comments made by the state-run China Daily which described this strategic partnerships as “a well-deserved riposte to Washington for America’s military ‘pivot’ to Asia. Xi is executing China’s own ‘pivot’ – the visit to Moscow to cement ties with Mr Putin. Xi’s decision to make Moscow the destination of his first official visit as China’s president will give the US a sharp reminder that it is not the only power able to flex its muscles” the report, translated by BBC Monitoring, went on.
No kidding!
The Saker
Defense Ministers Chang Wanquan and Sergei Shoigu |
Berezovsky?
Really good news that they are starting to get their act together, & I’m even more encouraged that they both seem to have agreed on a major push on the BRICS bank.
Shall be following with great interest.
KenM:they both seem to have agreed on a major push on the BRICS bank.
Yes, I heard that this morning, they want to create a development bank, I think. If I heard this right, then it looks to me like they are following the example Chavez and the creation of the “Banco del Sur” except that this new bank would cover the entire planet.
Sweet, sweet, very sweet :-)
Saker
Could this be the retaliation for the Cyprus russian money ?
http://www.businessinsider.com/spamhaus-cyberbunker-ddos-attack-2013-3
interesting times..
@Anonymous:Could this be the retaliation for the Cyprus russian money?
I very much doubt it. First, it does not punish the culprits and, second, I happen to believe Putin & Co. when they say that they want to promote the respect for international law, if only because that is very much in the Russian national interest.
Some rumors now speak of losses up to 80% for Russian investors along with capital outflow prevention measures. If so, this means that the Western banks are basically robbing the Russians. I am confident that there will be a retaliation, but it will be an economic one and a legal one, not some DDoSing.
The single most effective retaliation for all this will be the one Putin has been using for *years* now – every time the West treats Russians like shit, he makes darn sure the Russian public opinion knows about it. This kind of “jiu jitsu move” turns every anti-Russian policy implemented by the West into something which strenghens Putin and, thereby, Russia.
SAKER
I hope you are having a good friday!! now this is personal…the text misses all the point and changes the whole theater, it does not matter Iran, the missile-defense system in Alaska is a direct threat to Russia, it is just next door..wonder why Russia deployed some 24000 troops and emergency responders to Chelyabinsk and all the army drills that we are seeing now..Saker are we getting close to a cero point?
http://www.thereporteronline.com/article/20130324/OPINION03/130329763/does-missile-defense-system-expansion-have-obama-146-s-support#1
Best regards
@Anonymous:I hope you are having a good friday!!
Well, that depends on how you mean it :-) I am having a good Friday, but I am not having a “Good Friday” yet since, being an Orthodox Christian, I celebrate “Great and Holy Friday” (aka Good Friday in Western parlance) according to the Church Calendar (aka “Julian Calendar” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_calendar) and, this year, this day falls on May 3rd.
the missile-defense system in Alaska is a direct threat to Russia
More to China actually since Russian missile bases are mostly far away from Alaska.
wonder why Russia deployed some 24000 troops and emergency responders to Chelyabinsk
Just to collect meteor fragments before too many end up on Ebay
the army drills that we are seeing now.
These drills are well needed to establish what works and what does not, and to have the armed forces finally concentrate on what is important.
Saker are we getting close to a cero point?
If by “cero point” you mean some kind of conflict, no, I don’t think that at all. At least not with Russia and not in the foreseeable future.
HTH and cheers!
The Saker
Saker, I have a technical question. Regarding that “missile shield” how useful would it be against Russia if it’s in Europe? I always assumed Russian ICBMs would fly over the North Pole and Canada (looks like a shorter distance on the map) and not over Europe and the Atlantic. Am I wrong?
Thanks
@Lysander : well, the threat would be during the so called “boost phase” when the missile is gaining altitude and is relatively slow. During this phase the missile flies mostly vertically and its subsequent course makes no difference. Does that answer your question?
Cheers,
The Saker
hi Saker, i hope you are well…i was wondering if i can ask you to write about (or point me to previous articles by yourself on this topic) the zionist influence in the former soviet union. i know it existed but to what extent is the question i find myself pondering about. For example i have seen articles refer to stalins inner zionist circle..but was this exclusive only to stalin or every soviet premier? thanks, Tarek
thanks,
Tarek
@Tarek: hi Tarek, by the Grace of God I am well, thank you. I hope that all is well with you too. Regarding the topic you are interested in, can I point you to this article of mine:
http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2008/04/acting-as-one-which-of-course-they-are.html
Take a look at it and let’s take it from there. If you want me to clarify or go into more details, just let me know and I will do my best. Also, do you read French by any chance? If yes, this is a good book on his topic:
http://www.amazon.fr/Deux-si%C3%A8cles-ensemble-1917-1972-sovi%C3%A9tique/dp/2213615187/
It has never been translated into English due to the power of the Zionist lobby in the UK and USA.
Let me know if either suggestion is useful or how I can better reply to your query, ok?
Kind regards,
The Saker
Hi Saker, thanks very much. I am well thanks. Just finished reading the article. Great read. No, unfortunately i dont read french. Just need to read further as this has got me wondering more about the topic. If these zionist elites were part of the soviet establishment until the end of the soviet empire (with diminishing influence) then if we consider for example, ussr’s support for arab countries, like my own, egypt in the days of nasser for example, what
was the internal reaction of those zionist elite to
these policies – was there internal attempts to subvert this foreign policy? when nikita kruschov gave the trio of england, france and the zionist entity an ultimatum to pull back from their aggression against egypt in 56, was that also inspite of the zionist elite in the party? or did they (the zionists) go along with these
policies? i know the zionists are always playing both sides of the fence but to what extent did the soviet zionists willingly or unwillingly play a role in the ussr’s support of arab states against the west and the zionist entity?
Saker, thanks for the info on ballistic missiles.
Off topic but do you remember Ayatollah Khamenei’s threat to level Tel Aviv in Haifa in retaliation for an Israeli attack on Iran?
I came accross this USA today article via a commenter by the handle of Kooshy over at the “going to Tehran” blog.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/02/27/iran-north-korea-nuclear-bomb/1952273/
“Does Iran already have the bomb?”
“The question is whether the weapon North Korea tested this month was its own, Iran’s, or a joint project.”
“During Secretary of State John Kerry’s listening tour of the Middle East, one troubling regional issue might go unspoken: the possibility that Iran already has nuclear weapons capability.”
Now all that seems unlikely. But assuming Iran was engaged in pure deception, how hard would it be to secretly build a bomb while under NPT monitoring? It seems like it would be awfully hard to do.
@Anonymous:when nikita kruschov gave the trio of england, france and the zionist entity an ultimatum to pull back from their aggression against egypt in 56, was that also inspite of the zionist elite in the party? or did they (the zionists) go along with these policies?
You are touching on a very complex and interesting question: where were the loyalties of Soviet Jews? Was, say, Trotsky acting as a materialist communist and internationalist, or was he acting as a Jew? What about Genrikh Iagoda? What about Grigorii Arbatov?
This is a very complex question which, I think, requires a nuanced answer. My personal take is that the first generation of revolutionary Jews did very much see themselves as Jews and they acted as such. There can be no doubt at all that Leon Trotsky was the agent of US Jewish bankers for example. But by the time Stalin had fully submitted the party most Jews left alive where very loyal to the Soviet system. This changed again with Krushchev and then with Brezhnev. Early “Revolutionary” Jews were very much a product of the pre-1917 Jewish society, then Jews became a product of the Soviet system, by the time of Brezhnev they “re-discovered” their Jewishness and that rapidly turned them towards Zionism. This is why Berezovsky and Natan Sharansky can be polar opposites in their life inside Russia, but as soon as they left Russia they ended up objectively serving Zionist interests.
As for supporting Arab states, it was mostly out of a desire to support anti-American forces, not some kind of truly heartfelt sympathy for Arabs or Palestinians. While much has changed since, I believe that most Russians still see the Arabs and Palestinians as a part of a bigger picture and not as a problem to be looked out separately
To consider the role of Jews in the USSR requires looking at their CHANGING role inside the Soviet Union and, hence, their changing of loyalties.
Does that make sense?
The Saker
Hi Saker, yes, that makes sense..thanks again..cetainly wets the apetite for a deeper dive into the topic for me..really appreciate your thorough and prompt response and your insightful articles…Tarek