by Leon Tressell
The vote to exit the EU has shocked the financial and political elites and led to massive turmoil on global stock markets. The corporate media is full of shocked pundits lamenting the democratic decision of British people for Brexit. Brexit voters are being blamed for everything from the rise in racism against immigrant families to the increased dangers of terrorist attacks.
The corporate media both in Britain and internationally are furious with the British electorate for voting for Brexit. They never saw it coming and still don’t understand why ordinary people voted for Brexit. More than this, they still don’t understand how the Brexit vote reveals how completely out of touch the corporate media and the political/financial elites are with the millions of working class people who voted for Brexit.
Let’s be very clear about this: the vote for Brexit was a working class rebellion against the financial and political elites of Britain who have presided over a massive redistribution of wealth in favour of the super rich leaving a fifth of the population in poverty. Analysis of the referendum vote shows how the poorer an area was the higher the vote was for Brexit.
The working class stood up to massive pressure from the Bremain camp that included: all of the mainstream political parties, the Bank of England, CBI, IMF, ECB, Obama, the World Bank and the trade union bureaucrats.
The vote for Brexit shows how out of touch the establishment advocates of the EU are with working class people. Millions of working class people are struggling to get by with declining wages, incessant benefit cuts, zero hour contracts, mass unemployment, food banks and poor housing that are putting their families and communities under intense strain. On top of this, working class people suffer the most from the cuts to the welfare state and the incessant cuts to local council services.
Working class people are not stupid they can how the EU is a fundamentally undemocratic organisation that is completely unaccountable to them. The secret negotiations between the EU and the Obama administration over TTIP, which members of the European Parliament have no say over, proves conclusively how this is an organisation run for the benefit of the too big to fail banks and the multi-national corporations.
They can see how the undemocratic EU has bludgeoned the people of Greece into living in permanent austerity and mass poverty despite a referendum last year that decisively rejected austerity measures. Obama’s favourite economist Paul Krugman called the EU’s intervention into Greece last year a ‘coup d’etat’.
The advocates of Bremain such as Mark Carney (ex-Goldman Sachs), Prime Minister Cameron (from a tax avoiding banker family) George Osborne (son of a Baronet) warned working class people that Brexit would lower their living standards more than any other group in UK society.
However, millions of working class people were not taken in by the crocodile tears coming from those responsible for creating a massively unequal society. Quantitative easing and ZIRP have made the super rich fabulously richer as they have benefited from the massive bubbles on the stock market and in property. The top 10% of society own 45% of all wealth totalling over £5 trillion while the bottom 50% of society own a pathetic 9% of the wealth.
Prime Minister Cameron’s government has presided over a savage attack upon welfare benefits which have led to one and half million benefit sanctions leaving people totally destitute and leading to hundreds of people committing suicide. The attack on welfare benefits for disabled people have been so severe that it has prompted the UN to launch an investigation into the human rights violations of disabled people.
The political and financial elites who advocated that Britain should stay in the EU are puzzled as to why so many working class people stubbornly support Brexit. They are incapable of comprehending the anger, pain and suffering of millions of working class people who feel increasing contempt towards a political and financial elite that has no understanding of their daily lives. Over 13 million live in poverty (1 in 5 of the population) while 15 million live in inadequate housing conditions.
This inchoate anger at the daily reality that confronts them has few outlets in life. The EU referendum provided working class people with a means of sticking two fingers up at the political and financial establishment which now presides over a very divided country along lines of class and geography.
The Brexit vote has led to unprecedented turmoil in both of the main political parties in Britain.
A weak, divided Conservative government now faces a further period of infighting as it selects a replacement for David Cameron. The raw wounds within the Conservative Party will not be able to heal as Brexiteers such as Justice Secretary Michael Gove and former Defence Secretary Liam Fox go head to head with those who backed staying in the EU such as Home Secretary Theresa May and Pensions Secretary Stephen Crabb.
The financial and political elites have suffered a major defeat. The Conservative Party is one of the oldest and most successful political parties in history and has served the British ruling class well for over two hundred years. Now it faces an unprecedented crisis and is unable to effectively govern. It will face huge challenges as the world economy slides into another recession.
This situation presents the opposition Labour Party with a golden opportunity to deal a knock out blow to the Conservative government’s programme of endless austerity and huge public spending cuts. However, the right wing of the Labour Party known as the Blairites, after former Prime Minster Tony Blair, have seen fit to launch their long awaited coup against its socialist leader Jeremy Corbyn.
The ‘Red Tories’ within the Parliamentary Labour Party have let the Conservative government off the hook and are going to launch a leadership challenge to Corbyn. They have remorselessly attacked Corbyn in the corporate media and effectively acted as agents of the ruling class in the Labour movement.
This has provoked a furious backlash from thousands of trade unionists and socialists all over Britain who see Corbyn as offering an opportunity to defeat the austerity agenda of the Conservatives that has inflicted hardship and suffering upon millions of people. If Corbyn can harness the huge mood of discontent revealed by the Brexit vote he has the opportunity to not only defeat the right wing of the Labour Party, but to go on to defeat the Conservatives in the next general election. An election that may be months away.
So if Corbyn has the support of the rank and file in the Party.Why is he not able to just purge the Blairites out of the Party.It seems to me that either he gets rid of them or his section of the Labor Party needs to reform themselves into a “New Labor Party”.
Well, they call it democracy so he can’t purge them. Only money can do change. If elections could change anything, would be forbidden immediately.
@ Uncle Bob
There is already a ‘New’ Labour Party, the Blairite faction, which has very little in common with traditional Labour.
But they could bring back the old Independent Labor Party, a truly working class party which became famous during WWI for its opposition to the war.
Kim
We’ve already had New Labour, that was Blair’s Tory-lite abomination, we don’t want it again.
Once the challenge to Corbyn has been seen off, as it will be (30,000 new members signed up last week to do just that) the traitorous Blairite MPs will be deselected by the constituencies (the people power behind the MPs) if they don’t split to form a party of their own or move to join the Tories.
The chosen challenger to Corbyn, Anna Eagle, was overwhelmingly told by her constituency to support Corbyn but ignored them in the secret no confidence meeting which anyway has no legitimacy as a means to oust the leader. She has no viable future (voted for the Iraq war and against the Chilcot investigation) nor do most of the rest of them.
Interesting times.
I like Corbyn, I think his heart is in the right place. But he is no leader. He shows little if any passion and no discernible charisma. Without these traits, he will not stir the desire of enough voters to follow a different vision to the status quo.
We’ve had the appearance of passion, conviction and charisma acted out in in bucket-loads from Thatcher, Blair and Cameron to hoodwink the unwary.
We know that game by now.
Corbyn is supported precisely because of his lack of reliance on charisma and his insistence on a low-key, realistic way of doing politics, not despite them.
Time for some changes.
Your comments re Bliar (sic) and Thatcher are of course correct. Nevertheless, they had the charisma and leadership quality to be elected in the first place. The first prerequisite to wielding power is to be elected to leadership. The fact that those two megalomaniacs acted as they did was actually a consequence of their winning their positions in elections. Without that, they could not have acted as they did. The same applies to those with a less egotistical and more altruistic mindset.If they don’t have the fire to inspire followers, then it’s all just empty words with no chance of carrying the day. That’s just how it is, like it or not.
Exactly, and corbyn even was elected to lead the Labour Party.
Excellent comments, Helen. Thanks!
People dismissed another guy as a nonentity too.
Hs name is Vladimir Putin.
?? Didn’t most of the Blairite wing of the party just resign? And many will struggle to get re-selected for the next election given the way the grass roots has changed. I know the papers can’t write it, and I am not 100% convinced yet, but the facts right now are clear – Corbyn is in total control of the party.
Also note that what has really happened is not new support for Corbyn but a return of the militant (and Militant) left which was unable to continue supporting a Labour party that was run by Brown/Blair.
It is largely a return of the militant left who couldn’t support Blair/Brown (me, for one example) but he has also captured the imaginations of a lot of new young supporters.
The party membership has increased by 60,000 new members this last week, its highest ever, far more members even than when Blair was at his most popular.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-party-gains-60000-new-members-following-attempted-coup-against-corbyn-a7112336.html
Helen – I well remember Blair’s first actions as Prime Minister – a meeting with his “mentor”, one Margaret Thatcher.
At that time I was an active member of the Labour Party, and, like many others, I resigned my membership. The sense of deception was substantial, and we all know how “Thatcherite” the following years were, don’t we.
It will take a LONG time for the damaged caused to be fully mitigated, but whether you like him or not, Jeremy Corbyn is a move in the right direction, and those new Labour Members are an early indication that the “rank and File” recognise this.
Yes. Start a Justice Party. He’d have a million members in a New Labour minute.
What the wrighter fails to note is that this is not between working class and the elite. This is between transnational elite and national elite. The working class by itself has no will. That’s the way it has always been, that’s the way it will always be. The national British elite may be less powerful than transnational in Britain, but without it there would be no brexit.
Where’s the evidence to support your assertion? It’s a very interesting comment and I’m genuinely curious. I thought Snowden’s observations about the massive voting disparities across different political entities was equally interesting (e.g. Gibraltar and Northern Ireland versus England). One imagines a scenario wherein the UK falls before the EU.
From what I’ve seen or read and from what I’ve seen confirmed reading and listening to my friends and family in England is that the people who voted to remain were more than likely were middle or lower middle class but were university educated and had aspirations of being upper middle class.
The proudly and militantly aetheist ones on FB were very likely to support remain in the EU. (lol but seriously).
Outside of London and its suburbs and other big cities the working classes supported leave. Older people too regardless of background often supported leave.
Not quite sure what Snowden said on this but you should be aware that the EU blurs the lines over Catholic/Protestant domination issues in N Ireland. If the EU is in charge everyone is happier than if there is a UK vs Eire fight. Many think that both UK & Eire being in the EU has helped NI enormously.
The same of course would apply for Gibraltar. If the EU is in charge, who cares if UK or Spain is the owner. That is why those two areas (and Scotland but not Wales) were pro Stay. And still not very much – a 10 or 15% swing from the UK average is not big deal for relatively small regions.
Good point. Excellent article but I too felt that the “working class” wasn’t really a good enough descriptor.
There is an awareness that press and politicians are lieing to us, but I suspect many people couldn’t tell you what the lies are – and nor should they, just a 6th sense that something is wrong is enough – and the 6th sense is quire right. For example TTIP, I doubt anyone knows what is wrong with TTIP, and few even know what it is. But everyone knows it stinks. Everyone knows that an honest government would be explaining what it means, and that an honest press would be forcing the question.
There’s is a concerted fightback by the neo liberal parts of both the Conservative party and the Labour Party. Non of whom want Brexit.
Corbyn was the only politician to call for the invoking of article 50 – all the other politicians in the mainstream started to back track.
Now we will get delay, delay, delay, then we will see what we have seen when other votes on the EU have taken place – they will ignore it.
A year from now I bet that the UK will be no nearer leaving the EU.
And Farage is totally silent over invoking Article 50?
This is a vote in the UK, not the EU. It will be ignored by the UK government with the complicity of Farage.
Farage is an MEP, not an MP, and as such has no voice or influence in the UK government. He has stood for election several times as an MP and has never managed to come close to winning. Once he loses his MEP status with Brexit what little standing he had is finished.
Worth a read, for a take on what is actually happening that is neither mainstream or the view as posted above.
http://www.voltairenet.org/article192607.html
“While the world Press is searching for ways to re-start the reconstruction of Europe, still without Russia and now without the United Kingdom, Thierry Meyssan considers that nothing can now prevent the collapse of the system. However, he points out, what is at stake is not the European Union itself, but the institutions which enable the domination of the world by the United States, and the integrity of the United States themselves”
Only by considering all perspectives can the real nature of something be understood.
I fully agree, in particular to your observation on the GDR:
“The Berlin Wall was not destroyed by anti-communists, but by a coalition of the Communist Youth and the Lutheran Churches. Their intention was to refound the Communist ideal, but liberated from the Soviet yoke, the political police and the bureaucracy. They were betrayed by their elites, who, after having long served the interests of the Soviets, did an eager about-face and rushed to serve the interests of the United States.”
This is Merkel in a nutshell: As propaganda officer in the GDR students’ association, she had a good training in understanding how the “Klassenfeind” works. Plus some old fellow guidance from Helmut Kohl. Once outmaneuvering the stunned CDU leaders in the illegal donations scandal, she used this knowledge very effectively to maintain her grip on the power, both by internal politbureau power tactics as well as by running a professional media propaganda. Switching the big brother from East to Washington was only a miniscule step for her. Thus, no problem to support Washington’s approach to install TTIP as a kind of economic NATO to cement US domination of Europe, to collaborate in assessinations by drones controlled from Ramstein, to support the war against Syria, to engage in the Ukraine coup.
She knows that her control is still better guaranteed by acting as governor of a vasall state than by the risky endeavour to represent the interests of the German and European people. Well, it becomes a bit bumpy now.
Re EU: There are two sides of the coin: The EU of the people who deal easily with its huge internal diversity – a compentence nurtured by generations of students living for a while abroad in the Erasmus programme – and the EU of the corporations and their feudal lords without any nobility. Later is best expressed by the pramble of the Constitution of Europe drafted by Giscard d’Estaing:
The following quoted block of text has all been converted to lower case per Saker moderation policy — mod-hs
“his majesty the king of the belgians, her majesty the queen of denmark, the president of the federal republic of germany, the president of the hellenic republic, his majesty the king of spain, the president of the french republic, the president of ireland, the president of the italian republic, his royal highness the grand duke of luxembourg, her majesty the queen of the netherlands, the president of the portuguese republic, her majesty the queen of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland
resolved to mark a new stage in the process of european integration undertaken with the establishment of the european communities, […]
have decided to establish a european union and to this end have designated as their plenipotentiaries:
his majesty the king of the belgians:
mark eyskens, minister for foreign affairs; philippe maystadt, minister for finance;
her majesty the queen of denmark:
uffe ellemann-jensen, minister for foreign affairs; anders fogh rasmussen, minister for economic affairs;
the president of the federal republic of germany:
hans-dietrich genscher, federal minister for foreign affairs; theodor waigel, federal minister for finance;
the president of the hellenic republic:
antonios samaras, minister for foreign affairs; efthymios christodoulou, minister for economic affairs;
his majesty the king of spain:
francisco fernández ordóñez, minister for foreign affairs; carlos solchaga catalán, minister for economic affairs and finance;
the president of the french republic:
roland dumas, minister for foreign affairs; pierre beregovoy, minister for economic and financial affairs and the budget;
the president of ireland:
gerard collins, minister for foreign affairs; bertie ahern, minister for finance;
the president of the italian republic:
gianni de michelis, minister for foreign affairs; guido carli, minister for the treasury;
his royal highness the grand duke of luxembourg:
jacques f. poos, deputy prime minister, minister for foreign affairs; jean-claude juncker, minister for finance;
her majesty the queen of the netherlands:
hans van den broek, minister for foreign affairs; willem kok, minister for finance;
the president of the portuguese republic:
joão de deus pinheiro, minister for foreign affairs; jorge braga de macedo, minister for finance;
her majesty the queen of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland:
the rt. hon. douglas hurd, secretary of state for foreign and commonwealth affairs; the hon. francis maude, financial secretary to the treasury;
who, having exchanged their full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed as follows:”
end of text than has been lowercased … mod-hs
The European people had been a quantité négligeable in this constitution To a degree that it did not fly in several member states who did dare to ask their people, was never ratified, and even in the resulting Lisbon Treay as substitute, the preamble had to be amended by a clause paying some lip service:
“DRAWING INSPIRATION from the cultural, religious and humanist inheritance of Europe, from which have developed the universal values of the inviolable and inalienable rights of the human person, freedom, democracy, equality and the rule of law…”
The British voters rendered a big service for the European people. We the people really have to take care not to be betrayed irrevocabely. The intention of the socalled “elite” is clear: Pushing through the Glyphosate decision against all well founded objections by member states who could not be coerced enough into servicing the interests of the chemical industry. Breaking European Law in bypassing the parliaments for ratifying CETA, the backdoor for TTIP should it fail, and breaking various constitutions and EU law by the secret negotiation on TTIP.
Wow – this explains *everything* !
Thanks so much!!!
@ eagle eye,
“what is at stake is not the European Union itself, but the institutions which enable the domination of the world by the United States……”
This for me is the real meat of the matter. The Brexit vote is the first intimation of cracks appearing in the conglomeration of alphabet organisations that have had such a stranglehold on the globalisation project: NATO, WTO, IMF etc, and have done so much deceitful damage to so many ordinary people who nevertheless have to fund these horrors through their taxes and needlessly imposed austerity.
Let them all fall.
Absolutely fasciating! The noise-to-signal ratio is reducing dramatically.
The key factor for me isthat German foreign policy (and by extension, a major part of EU policy) is being dictated by the US State Dept.
Now more: Clinton-son-in-law hedge-fund managed by Goldman Sachs veteran acted on insider knowledge:
http://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/05/goldman-sachs-financed-hillary-clintons-son-in-law-to-make-bullish-greek-bets-after-it-structured-unseemly-greek-debt-deals-that-hobbled-that-country/
The Clinton Global Iniative is aptly named.
Add that to the Lagarde/Tapi scandal., and its becoming clearer that these ‘institutions’ are nothing but fronts for international scams.
Over 1 million got off their arses and marched around London to try to stop the Iraq War.
#StillNoBrExit
I forgot to mention a good friend of mine, his whole family seemed to be pro leave but they are also atheist Scots. Scotland and my theory about atheists suggest they should have voted remain but didn’t. There were a lot of “splits” within groups.
People who felt they were informed and educated but relied on the BBC for their information supported remain and thought that anybody who wanted to leave was a dangerous racist xenophobe.
My observations as a Canadian born in England and most of my family in England.
Not just a protest vote by the working class.
Many professionals voted Leave to stem the haemorrhage of our key industries. The city of London is now Europe’s money laundry instead of servicing the needs of British business. Not only is the EU undemocratic, it is staggeringly inefficient. We are very concerned about the proposed imposition of TTIP without debate, discussion or consultation.
The EU has grown into a malignant, totalitarian bureaucracy that is unfit for purpose.
@ jungle:
“Not just a protest vote by the working class.
Many professionals voted Leave to stem the hemorrhage of our key industries [..]”
^ I agree. Why would white-collar professionals, and skilled or semi-skilled workers would want to get undercut by hordes of workers (skilled or not) from overseas?
It’s about darn time they realized we’re all on this sinking boat together, it’s just that the working-class (the great unwashed masses) are considered to be a sort of a canary on the coal mine. An early warning system, treated with the same kind of contempt they would treat their own home smoke-alarms when they go off and there’s smoke but no fire: “Take the batteries off! Smash it with a stick!”
Well… things are gonna get real fun when blue-collar jobs get replaced by robotization (estimated in 5 to 7 years time), and white-collar jobs go the same robotization time of the Dodo, in the next 10 to 15 years.
Who’s gonna be left with a paying job in order to buy the stuff the robots make?
You’re not supposed to ask such ‘silly’ questions…
The Swiss already tried to fend themselves off from this robo-madness ahead of time, by holding a referendum on a universal ‘basic income’ for all citizens – but they voted against it :/
I suppose the “elites” will have to build robots that exist only to buy what other robots sell or make.
Don’t you love the pure unadulterated bliss Globalization, Free-Markets, unbridled Capitalism, Monopolization, Privatization, crony Capitalism, bring to us all?
Can’t you just feel the trickling down effect? The rising tide that lifts all boats? The prosperity coming our way?
No? Well! That’s because you’re a racist (!?) :/
And that’s that, the ivory-towers dwellers have spoken!
–
Anyhoo… the working-class [blue-collar or otherwise] was indeed instrumental to secure this Brexit voting result. Our OP here, Leon Tressell, is absolutely correct. And I endorse his article, 200%.
-TL2Q
Thats hit the nail on the head
The above commentary is precicely accurate and I commend and thank the writer.
Mr Corbyn now needs all the help he can get as the Blairites are virtrully a 5th column whose objective is to take away any democratic choice or control from British people who inhabit the real world. We British are waking up and are made of the right stuff.
Thank you.
This is what happens when austerity doesn’t kill off the poor fast enough. They survive and bite back. Sovereignty won’t make life easier when all the money is safely parked offshore. You need their money more than heads on pikes.
Life is not all about money.
Why do you need their money? What is it? Can you eat it?
What you need is the repatriation of the power and property that they have stolen.
Corbyn? England does not need an equivocating fri-gin social democrat…. It needs at least a De Gaulle and at most a Lenin. Some one who can anticipate and stand up to the armed forces when they attack the social change as they have promised. And someone who can stay alive long enough to do so. sigh.
But we are still British, not French or Russian. The British will never go for an openly authoritarian leader. The last one who would qualify as such was Churchill who was tolerated for his aggression during the war and voted out of office immediately the war was over.
BTW, every combat veteran squaddie that I speak to voted out, despite the nonsense spouted in the media by retired generals with books to sell. I wouldn’t bet on the armed forces or the police defying the will of the people if it ever came down to it—they have been on the receiving end of this massive scam also.
@ Helen ” not go for an openly authoritarian leader”.. Cromwell, anyone? OK this is a centuries old stretch granted. It depends on the historical circumstances and I do not think this crew of elitists are going to go quietly into “that dark night” of historical oblivion. So Once the historical need is past so is the idiosyncratic/authoritarian leader depending on circumstances.
What is needed is a thesis ( nail it on the cathedral door if necessary) for the next stage of humanity or these sly 1 percent types are going to slip it to us big time. They are gearing up in the USA for sure for a power grab and it will not be pretty.
These Britons are all in mental hospitals or pushing up daisies after unexpected accidents.
It will be some ordinary bloke with the gift of the gab that will lead a few million to storm Westminster and the City.
Anyone wearing a suit or owning anything posher than a BMW will get strung up.
There will be anarchy…and then what?
American troops on the street, suicide bombers and drones killing OAPs going shopping.
After they have looted us…and they almost have…we will become just another third world hell hole.
This is why we need a coalition government today and immediate withdrawal…no negotiations…just straight finger them and go!
Well, I agree with you on one point, “It will be some ordinary bloke with the gift of the gab …..”
…or better yet, a succession of ordinary blokes (male and female) with the gift of the gab and a sound grasp of the political realities.
We have no shortage of those if we look beyond the current crop of media whores who believe they, and only they, are born to rule.
How ridiculous to label the entire referendum working class v the elite! The laziest of analysis I’ve read on the subject.
The demographics, the split of ages, and geography and political parties/nationalities all have a bearing. To simply say that are no working classes in Scotland when the turnout was both high and favourable in terms of Remain is bordering on hilarious.
That said, the working classes in general are at the coal face in terms of cuts and austerity and yes they voted anti government, not necessarily anti EU. One working class town in Wales, known to be the highest recipient of EU investment in the UK mostly voted out which was very funny indeed.
As for the infighting in political parties, Cameron, the worst PM ever. And Corbyn, possibly the worst opposition leader the UK has ever seen. For me his cards were marked during the Doctor strike and given the chance to question the PM over the despatch at PMQs failed to even mention it. It’s OK to be vocal of Palestinian rights and refugees, but to ignore the topic of the day… ridiculous.
EU investment in the UK? I thought it was the other way around. Silly me.
From the Duran: The State Dept is letting Mark Toner be their spokesperson … Finally there is someone who just does not make you want to cringe most of the time. He can’t agree with Gayane C. but he does not let her fluster him either. Watch his eyes and slight head nod as he emphasizes the points he believes are valid. I remember when he refused to blast the Russians for the concert at Palmyra saying something along the lines of “those poor people deserve a break” and “I am not going to slam that” and, as if to himself,…”I just won’t do it”.
What is cringe worthy is that his bosses are so much more heartlessly and arrogantly ,well, clueless. It is a fine state of affairs when the flunky deserves the top job?
http://theduran.com/u-s-state-department-condescends-pro-brexit-voters-video/
“The political and financial elites who advocated that Britain should stay in the EU are puzzled as to why so many working class people stubbornly support Brexit. They are incapable of comprehending the anger, pain and suffering of millions of working class people who feel increasing contempt towards a political and financial elite that has no understanding of their daily lives.”
In “defense” of said elites, their current state of confusion and paralysis is to a certain extent understandable. After all, their monopoly capitalist rule has been able to buy them a rock-solid consent lasting for generations among their subjects at home, duly accompanied by all but complete social peace and tranquility. Whenever there has been mounting tensions, the masses have been very ready to support violence and reaction at home or abroad with the US taking this to its ultimate conclusion: Never-ending war on the rest of the planet and an extremely violent, thuggish police force.
It’s plain to see that these elites had become so self-confident that they didn’t even bother to conceal their — highly genuine — contempt and arrogance. The result of the Brexit referendum was correctly perceived as a most unwelcome reminder of the “practical” limits of hubris. If anything, they’re seriously terrified at the prospect of being held responsible for far worse defeats possibly in the making.
Blair, Brown and Cameron tried as war criminals as defined at Nuremberg and then summarily executed at Wandsworth for greater crimes than that of Amery.
Might help a bit.
Soros hung, drawn and quartered!
Rothschild family stripped of everything and confined to a 1930s council house with rising damp, inadequate central heating and a sewage treatment works at the end of the garden? Would be fun!
Nah…the City of London raised to the ground and Westminster blown up and turned in to a pleasure park. Buck house becomes a doss house…
Not enough…
A very good basic analysis of the trauma of being British today, but it lacks foresight and understanding.
Foresight is that conventional politics as we have known it is finished. The established political parties think that by changing their leaders at this crucial time rather than forming a coalition, as is the tradition at a time of crisis, all will be well. It will not.
Understanding has told the Establishment that their game is up. If they wish to carry on they will have to create a police state every bit as oppressive as Stalin’s Russia or suffer repeated protests if they and their financial friends continue as they have.
The national debt has to be swept aside, usuary and its cousin halal banking outlawed and the government must issue debt free currency straight in to the economy for major infrastructure projects rebuilding roads, airports, harbours, hospitals and community centres.
Austerity must be abandoned, foreign ownership of property outlawed, and a massive building programme of affordable home contruction began aimed at the poor and low paid.
Will this happen with any of the parties currently in the House of Commons? Not one chance in a million. The scum that rule us will try to continue as before with is stuck in the EU for ever and a day negotiating.
So what will happen? I know, but do you or does the Establishment? Only in the last decade has the British police been armed to the teeth, ostensibly for fighting terrorism but in reality to shoot to kill starving homeless Britons demonstrating for freedom and bread.
Freedom and bread was what Germans wanted in the 1920s…or are the words of the Hitler Youth Vorwarts Vorwarts incorrect? They were marching for freedom and bread in their song and that’s what the British will be doing before long.
Just an after thought, with no national debt, there would be no need for income tax because almost all income tax goes to service the artificial national debt.
“Austerity must be abandoned, foreign ownership of property outlawed, and a massive building programme of affordable home construction begun aimed at the poor and low paid.”
Terribly sorry, but that’s exactly what the bourgeoisie (correctly, mind you) abhors as monstrous, totalitarian, oppressive, full-fledged Stalinism. Corollary questions: What’s your problem with Stalin — and with the imperialist British bourgeoisie, respectively?
What you quoted Anon was National Socialist policy.
My problem with Soviet Russia is that it was run by Jews and financed by usury (Jewish banks)…it had nothing to do with the common people…thus is was worthless…just like the EU it was a fascist State.
Fascism is the supremacy of the State over the people (read Mussolini’s definition) and National Socialism is the supremacy of the people over the State.
The ‘B’ in the UK are in the hands of Rothschild and the House of Windsor. The former owns 98% of the share capital of the privately owned Bank of England and the latter 2%. The people are debt slaves to the Jews via Rothschild and Windsor and the State is on the verge of becoming fascist.
Either power is given back to the people immediately or there will be revolution. How many dictatorial States voluntarily give power back from whence it was stolen? Thus it will surely be revolution. QED. (My apologies for use of Latin but in this fascist ‘free world’ it is most appropriate).
“Freedom and bread” is always the cry of the exploited and oppressed. “Freedom and bread”!
“My problem with Soviet Russia is that it was run by Jews and financed by usury (Jewish banks)…it had nothing to do with the common people…thus is was worthless…just like the EU it was a fascist State.”
Haha, you tell the Russian people that. Amazing this infallible pull towards Western imperialist narratives and conclusions among all the various stripes of Western ultra-super-duper-revolutionaries. As long as their Earth-shattering über-revolution isn’t materialising, they’ll settle for Western imperialism.
The bloody stupid British daily fail newspaper is pushing that stupid, incompetent, useless, mediocre, great failure may (the home secretary) for prime minister, and has even tried to compare her to thatcher. If you need any more reason to despise this sick newspaper, then you are either ignorant or too stupid to be allowed to vote (this is, of course directed at mainly Brits, because people outside Britain can’t be expected to know enough about the newspapers here).
And as for that delusional, evil mass MURDERER bliar wanting to be part of the British negotiation team regarding the exit from the eu, it just shows you how sick the British Establishment is that he is even free to voice his satanic opinion.
If I were British I’d vote for the UKIP. They’re the only party that can be trusted to protect and fully implement the results of the referendum.
Many are thinking along these lines here a comment post up on syrianperspective.com june 30 under article.
I never doubted for a moment that Brexit was a done deal. David Cameron was ordered to hold the referendum by the Old Money clique within the Conservative Party, opponents of overconfident Mercantile-Trotskyite upstarts, signalling the long planned break up of the EU was imminent.
It’s the ‘never let a good crisis go to waste’ theme (especially if they themselves started it rolling)!
What big bash anniversary celebration date is coming soon, anywhere, to tell what will be in the longer-term scheme of this—it could be some bigwig’s birthday, maybe even one of the jetsetting war criminals we see out & about every day.
Turns out it’s a far rarer thing than that. What turns 322 years old on July 27/2016?:
https://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/george_walker_bush-johnkerry-skull-n-bones.jpg
Good article as far as it goes, but it ignores completely the inconvenient fact that THE overwhelming factor in the huge working class Brexit vote was working class opposition to the capitalist ramp immigration.
From 2001 to 2014 I knocked thousands of doors in the English and Welsh areas that just gave the globalists a bloody nose. I can assure your readers that, although most of these people rightly oppose privatisation, de-industrialisation and warmongering, the root of their alienation from bourgeois politics (including that of the student/civil service left) is anger at their way their communities have been smashed up, jobs and housed given away, and identity is denied, ridiculed or subverted by mass immigration.
And on top of that there’s widespread suspicion and fear of Islamisation in Sunni communities increasingly dominated by reactionary Wahhabism.
Post-Brexit – if it goes through – all this will only get worse as the Tories replace cheap labour Christian East Europeans with Africans and Asians.
If the left ever want to be relevant outside of a dangerous and doomed alliance with Islamism (epitomised by George Galloway, who doesn’t command an ounce of support among the English or Welsh working class) then they would have to accept that mass immigration is the ‘highest form of capitalism’, stealing human capital from poor countries and using it to suppress wages and popular resistance to globalisation in the old industrial ones.
Then turn their back on the ethno-masochistic fetishisation of the ‘Other’ and take up the old mantel of patriotic and ethno-centric socialists such as Bob Blatchford and Jack London.
They won’t do it of course, so the European working class will shift more and more to pro-capitalist, pro-Zionist populists such as Marine Le Pen and H C Strache. At least they tend quite strongly to oppose Nato sabre rattling against Russia.
One quick point, I bring this up because I keep reading this from naysayers about Brexit (a couple in this blog but there are lots and lots of them out there on the interwebs).
The point they make is that once the UK is out of the EU, the UK is free to sign on the TTIP dotted line. While they’re technically correct about their hypothesis, this is what this crowd tend to forget: the EU member states hierarchy of power.
([*] as a side note: they keep going on and on about how France and Germany keep vetoing TTIP. Yes, sunshines… that was BEFORE Brexit, can you lot promise us all they’ll be carrying on vetoing it even after Article 50 is initiated? No? *crickets-crickets*)
EU citizens are allowed to vote representatives to the EU Parliament, trouble is… they have no power to write legislation, the unelected EU Commission does that, and then the Parliament can vote it in or out.
Second problem with that is that the majority of MEPs are Europhiles. The Euroskeptics gained huge traction in the last election but they’re still not the majority. This results in the obvious effect that however hideously totalitarian the legislation drafted by the Commission may be, the Europhile MEPs tend to approve it. It’s in their self-interest to do so; the more EU grabs power for itself the more they can secure the easy cushy-job they have.
The other problem is local and general elections on EU nations, which as the EU power grows, they’re becoming largely ceremonial as times goes by, since EU legislation often trumps national legislation.
So! If the UK becomes independent from the EU, and a government signs the country into TTIP against the whishes of the majority of the population, at the very least that same population has the option of getting the rid of that government and vote one in that can nullify TTIP (I don’t believe for a second TTIP is undoable, btw). If on the other hand, the EU MEPs, the very ones with their snouts in the trough agree and sign for TTIP, the populations of the EU members states have zero hope of overturning it.
First they have to coordinate themselves (amongst nations, can you imagine the nightmare that is?) to kick out the treasonous MEPs, and then do it all over again on their local elections, just to make double sure.
Yet! They still can’t vote the EU Commission in [or out] anyways, and the Commission will still be free to keep-on pushing for TTIP regardless of how the people vote.
What about any of the above is so hard to grasp?!?!!!!
Centralization of power + bigger and bigger bureaucratic untouchable governments = bad.
This is what Ron Paul has been desperately telling us for years, if not decades.
And lastly; even if the UK sign themselves into TTIP (I firmly oppose it, btw. And I’m sick and tired or reading unfounded comments that UKIP supports TTIP – they don’t!), that on itself shouldn’t affect the rest of Europe of the rest of the world (particularly the emerging markets) for that matter.
So, what is it to them?
-TL2Q
Mr Ed says No Dice! to BrExit.
Asked how Brexit could be “walked back,” Kerry said “I think there are a number of ways.” He declined to enumerate, stopping short of explaining the popular vote was non-binding.
Parliament alone has final say up or down. Most MPs will support what powerful interests want. Clearly they oppose Brexit, making it highly unlikely.
Did Kerry inadvertently explain what’s ahead, despite leaders like Germany’s Angela Merkel saying “(t)he referendum is a reality…I can see no way that this can be reversed…”
She along with other EU leaders met in Brussels, Cameron included in day one discussions, not day two, creating the impression (or perhaps illusion) of a new 27-nation bloc without Britain.
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article55759.html
Dead Brexit Walking – by: Pepe Escobar
http://en.ria.ru/columnists/20160630/1042224982/dead-brezit-walking.html
^ I utterly hate to go against my beloved Pepe on this, but this type of nonsense (which I heard time and time again on the rigged Brexit debates) it does my head in! (Because it adds-on to the confusion the bewildered masses out there are already experiencing mostly thanks to the MSM):
.
“[..] In fact this is the current status quo; the UK is not part of the euro or part of Schengen.”
It goes like this… in a number of polls, UK citizens voted: 70% plus are in favor of drastically cutting immigration down to the bare minimum, and close to 50% polled in favor of ZERO immigration. Hence; when that info came out at the time… finally! The “so-called” toxic issue of immigration made the centre stage at the Brexit debate with only before a couple of weeks to go for people going the polling stations (mind you).
Before that, it was all… we love the enrichment multiculturalism brings, we love immigration, we love Europe (and Europeans) but we hate the EU (etc)
This is the thing… about Schengen and Schengen member nations; it does not stop EU citizens moving-in, settling-in, claiming benefits and/or working in non-Schengen EU nations!
The only difference is that they have to produce an EU passport at passport-control on the way in. THAT’S IT!
Legally, it makes precisely NO difference on those EU citizens who want to emigrate to non-Schengen EU member nations (and have a EU passport), ergo; it makes ZERO difference on immigration from the EU to the UK.
And another thing!
“[..] the UK is not part of the euro [zone]”
…and you know why? Largely thanks to UKIP at the time (and this was pre-Farage, if my memory serves me right) and the hell they raised back then.
That’s why their logo is a sterling sign. From their inception the UK Independence Party was all about going against the EU and everything they stood for, including their rotten fiat currency. This is one of those trivia most people either don’t know about, or conveniently forget about (mainly the establishment “forgets” and in turn; the sheep follow…).
“The core issue, for Britain, is access to the single market. And that, as far as Brussels is concerned, will never be a case of “you can get your tea and scones and eat them too.” You’ll only do it if you accept EU immigration [..]”
Yeah… it depends on what you mean by “Britain.” If by Britain you mean the globalist corporatists, I agree with you 100%. If by Britain you mean regular brit people… well, I have to disagree on that too.
This is what is incomprehensible to a lot of people outside the EU, or outside Europe for that matter… a hell of a lot of Brits are ready to cut off their ‘noses’ [euphemistically called: access to the single market] in order to spite their ‘faces’ [hey, they might be putting their jobs on the line, but so long their bosses lose theirs… they’re kind of alright with that]
As Gerald Celente says: “’When The People Lose Everything & Have Nothing Left To Lose.. They Lose It …”
-TL2Q
This is interesting regards Farage (not a fan, me) especially as his main funder, Arron Banks is reportedly moving his money behind Andrea Leadsom (hard right,Thatcher Redux) as prospective leader of the Tories.
Nige looking for a new job, maybe?
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/jul/03/farage-murdoch-lebedev-and-fox-break-bread-as-told-by-lily-allen
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/29/leave-donor-plans-new-party-to-replace-ukip-without-farage
@ Helen
Alright then.
I’d put zero credence on anything coming-out The Guardian.
First of all; they’re all ultra-neo-liberals against anything and everything they don’t agree with – yeah… that’s really ‘democratic.’ /end arc
Boris is out, so is Gove (not that I ever really trusted either of them to begin with), so… the only two viable choices are: Teresa May (Remaninac – pro-EU, already in charge of a governmental position to curb immigration but she’s done freak-all about ever since she got appointed as Home Secretary)
^ This is the Tories’ ‘anointed one.’ Ladies and gents
On the other hand: we have Andrea Leadsom. She was part of the official ‘Vote Leave’ campaign, btw.
I personally saw her performance on the last Brexit ‘debate.’ She did great and came through to many viewers as a breath of fresh air. Honest, yet humble at the same time.
While all the others came through as: the Remainac-side of the debate were hostile loud-mouths, all three of them but particularly the Labour new Londonistan Mayor: Khan. Every time they lost an argument they shouted! LIAR! That was the best “point” they had to make *eye-roll*
On the Brexit side, things weren’t that much better… we had a Labor lady (can’t remember her name now) but she was stalling under pressure, not to mention she didn’t look too convinced about the stuff she was trying to peddle.
And finally Boris Johnson [a career politician with secret aspirations for showmanship rather than politics]. He was pretty much a waste of space that day :/
Anyway, the point I’m trying to make is that the day-after the debate a lot of peeps were rooting for Andrea Leadsom.
.
If we go back to what you posted:
“This is interesting regards Farage (not a fan, me) especially as his main funder, Arron Banks is reportedly moving his money behind Andrea Leadsom (hard right,Thatcher Redux) as prospective leader of the Tories”
The guy you cite, A. Banks, is indeed a UKIP supporter (as far as I know)
In fact, once again, if my memory is not faulting on me, he’s the one who wanted to contest the Electoral Commission choosing ‘Vote Leave’ over the ‘GO’ campaign. He got advised not to do that because it would have resulted in delaying the referendum.
Now, please do keep up: Cameron under pressure from losing conservative votes to UKIP, he promised a Brexit referendum, in order to gain those lost voters back….
….BACK in 2010!
It took this two-faced, ass-hat to actually deliver on his promise; six years down the road!
But back to Banks… (btw, I’ve said all what I’ve said because what is happening right now is not coming out the blue, it has its history!) …I’m not in the least surprised he’s backing Leadsom.
I’m backing this motherly-sounding, ex-grammar teacher Leadsom myself.
After this faux-Brexiter Gove is out of picture… she’s one of the few left that argued in favor of UK leaving the EU.
Let me give you a news-flash: 17 plus mullion people voted to get out of the EU for a reason!
If it’s not Leadsom… it’s May. *shudders*
-TL2Q
PS: oh and btw, a correction is in order here: [Helen Quote: “hard right, Thatcher Redux” (only she meant “Leadsom” as the new Thatcher in her sentence)] while the MSM is busy-busy promoting this hideous witch, Theresa May, as the next Thatcher alright…
Remind you of anyone? As Theresa May is compared to the Iron Lady, we reveal the leadership hopeful’s Tory values in her own words
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3670758/Remind-Theresa-compared-Iron-Lady-reveal-leadership-hopeful-s-Tory-values-words.html
Actually, I think both May and ‘motherly sounding’ Leadsom are vying for the Thatcher Redux title, and neither will tolerate Farage–they want his followers votes but not him.
@ Helen:
“[..] and neither will tolerate Farage–they want his followers votes but not him”
To be fair, you might be onto something in there.
I just that can’t get myself to be enthusiastic about a woman who said:
“Theresa May says many Britons ‘BENEFIT GREATLY’ from Sharia Law”
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/674489/Home-Secretary-Theresa-May-says-Britain-benefits-Sharia-Law
…and she’s someone I never-ever liked from day one. Her track record since she’s been in office is beyond the pale.To me, she always looked like an even uglier version of Clinton. And not that looks matter to me (when it’s down to politicians), but ideologically speaking these two are two peas on the same pod.
Back to Leadsom (in relation to Farage) she said:
Andrea Leadsom refuses to rule out prospect of Nigel Farage joining Brexit negotiations
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-andrea-leadsom-nigel-farage-eu-negotiations-a7117341.html
(^ And that went down rather well with UKIP and Brexit supporters)
–
So, I agree with you there, she may be pandering to the UKIP swing voter.
Never the less – given the choices – I rather her, than May.
If May gets chosen undercover of the confusion the release of the Chilcot Report will unleash (due next Wednesday) + the internal Tory voting for a new Party Leader (PM), also due around next mid-week… and that ghastly May woman gets in, brexiters can kiss their ‘out-of-the-EU’ vote goodbye.
It’s just as simple as that, I’m afraid.
-TL2Q
its early days and as someone once remarked ‘every revolution eats its own’. This particular political bloodletting has a long way to go yet.
Essentially accurate article. Two fingers to Cameron’s “We’re all in it together” from from the industrial heartland that had its heart cut out by Thatcher and the much hated Blair. Hands off Jezza! hands off our democratic decisions!. Lets hope Blair gets his comeuppence with Chillcot. The urgent attempt to get rid of Jezza is not least because they are terrified of the world wide publicity he will get when he denounces the creep as leader of the party.There is no easy way Corbyns supporters can get rid of the Old New Labour party machine which is entrenced but its our party and the Blairites can piss off.Talk of lack of charisma is a Blairite meme. We will win but it will not be easy. This is just the start of a steep learning process which will require guts and determination.
“Get out of the way if you can’t lend a hand for the times they are a changing”